Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 92-00RESOLUTION NO. 9 2 "' 0 0 A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION PROPOSING PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD IDENTIFIED AS ANNEXATION NO. 415, LOCATED ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF JEWETTA AVENUE TO OLD FARM ROAD, SOUTH OF HAGEMAN ROAD. (WARD 4) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Bakersfield, in accordance with the provisions of Section 65353 of the Government Code, held a public hearing on MONDAY, DECEMBER 15, 1997, and THURSDAY, DECEMBER 18, 1997, on the prezoning for the territory, notice of the time and place of hearing having been given at least twenty (20) calendar days before said hearing by publication in the Bakersfield Californian, a local newspaper of general circulation; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 110-97 on December 18, 1997, the Planning Commission recommended approval and adoption of the prezoning by this Council and this Council has fully considered the findings made by the Planning Commission as set forth in that Resolution; and WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a change of organization, to wit, the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the hereinafter-described territory, pursuant to Section 56800 of the Government Code of the State of California; and WHEREAS, the proposed annexation territory is within and consistent with the City of Bakersfield Sphere of Influence boundary; and WHEREAS, the property owner has agreed to annex to the City; and WHEREAS, the City has agreed to serve the property upon annexation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield that it hereby finds and determines as follows: 1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the territory described in Exhibit "A" and shown on map marked Exhibit "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution as though fully set forth herein. 2. That a plan for providing services within the affected territory of the proposed annexation, in accordance with the previsions of Section 56653 of the Government Code, is marked as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as though fully set forth herein. 3. That this proposal for change of organization, to wit, annexation, is made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, and it is requested that proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith. 4. That the reasons for the proposed change of organization are that the owners of the affected territory desire to receive municipal services from the City of Bakersfield, and the City desires to receive tax revenues for benefits given and to be given to the territory prop(~.~l~,, to be annexed. O~ "' "'""/~..~ ORIGINAl. 5. That for this proposed annexation and the prezoning therefor, Ordinance No. 3819, which was adopted January 28, 1998, an Initial Study was conducted and it was determined that the proposed project would not have a significant effect on the environment. A Negative Declaration was prepared and posted on November 7, 1997. 6. That the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and adoption of the environmental document as set forth in the California Environmental Quality Act and City of Bakersfield Resolution No. 107-86 have been duly followed 7. That the territory proposed for annexation as described heroin has been determined to be uninhabited pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, Section 56046 of the Government Code. 8. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein has been determined to have one hundred percent (100%) consent to annexation. 9. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein is within the City of Bakersfield Sphere of Influence Boundary. 10. That the names of the officers of the City of Bakersfield who are to be furnished with copies of the Executive Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed Notice of Hearing, if any, are: Pamela A. McCarthy City Clerk City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 Alan Tandy City Manager City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 Bart Thiltgen City Attorney City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 11. That the appropriatE; City officials shall file ten (10) copies of this Resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern County at 2700 "M" Street, Suite 302, Bakersfield, California 93301. ......... o0o ......... 2 ......... o0o I HEREBY CEIRTIFY th;~t the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bak~~rsfield at a regular meeting thereof held on AUG 16 ZO00 , by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER CARSON, DEMOND, MAGGARD, COUCH, SULLIVAN, SALVAGGIO COUNCILMEMBER t.J 0 N ~_ COUNCILMEMBER e,..,1 c;, ,,,4 COUNCILMEMBER I'~ CITY CLERK and Ex ~k of the Council of the City of Bakersfield AUG 16 Z00O APPROVED BOB ~ ~!'/Z/"~""' MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED AS TO FORM: BART J. THILTGEN City Attorney By: CARL HERNANDEZ Ill Assistant City Attorney MO:pah August 1,2000 S:V~lnexation',ANN415.ROA.wpd EXHIBIT "A" "Hageman No. 4" Annexation No. 415 That parcel of land being a portion of Section 24, T. 29 S., R. 26 E., M.D.M., County of Kern, State of California, more partic, ularly described as follows: All of Lots 3, 4, 5, 9 and I 0 of Parcel Map No. 2731 filed for record in Book 15 of Parcel Maps, Page 16, in the Office of the Kern County Recorder. Also all of that portion of Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 of Paxcel Map No. 5812 filed for record in Book 25 of Parcel Maps, Page 69 in The Office of the Kern County Recorder, lying northerly of Tract No. 4570-A filed for record in Book 32 of Maps, Page 139, in the Office of the Kern County Recorder. Also, all of the public road right-of-way :for Jewetta Avenue bounded northe~y by the south boundary line (and prolongation thereof) of Tract No. 4718 fi!ed for record in Book 34 of Maps, Page 163, and bounded southerly by the north right-of-way line of Meacham Road (Co. Rd. No. 862). Also all of that portion of the public road right-of-way for Old Farm Road adjoining the west line of Lot 10 of said Parcel Map No. 2731. Total Annexation Area contain ing 124.52 acres. G:\GROUpDATXROnMEXAHageman4 ~J _J _J '] ROSE:DALE "HAGEMAN N0. 4" %7) TRACT 3012 ANNEXATION NO. 415 CON'r'AINING 124.52 ACRES EXHIBIT "B" CITY OF BAKERSFIELD CALIFORNIA o, xw, R.T. Yr.~I ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PLAN FOR PROVIDING SERVICES ANNEXATION NO. 415 (HAGEMAN NO. 4) SERVICES A~tencv Which Presently Provides Service Planning Parks and Recreation Library Police Protection Fire Protection COUNTY NORTH BAKERSFIELD RECREATION & PARK DIST. COUNTY SHERIFF & HIGIIWAY PATROL COUNTY Street COUNTY Construction Maintenance CDUNIY Sweeping NONE Lighting Flood Control Sewerage Water Other (REFUSE) COUNTY CITY (SEE PAGE 2) VAUGHN WATER SERVICE CO, PRIVATE G;\GROUPDATXlegaI\I997XANNX415.wpd Check Services Which CiW/Dist~ct Will Provide Upon Future Date Annexation (specify) CITY CITY (SEE PAGE 2) CITY CITY CITY CITY CITY CITY CITY Indicate How Services Provided By City/District will be Financed (i.e., ~eneral tax rate or special assessment.) GENERAL TAXREVENUES GENERAL TAXREVENUES N/A GENERAL TAX REVENUES GENERAL TAX REVENUES, FIRE FUND GENERAL AND GAS TAX REVENUES BY PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT GENEIL~L AND GAS TAX REVENUES GENERAL AND GAS TAX REVENUES GENERAL TAX REVENUES GENERAL TAX REVENUES USER FEE & PRVT. DVMT. USER FEE USER FEE EXHIBIT "C" 1. Please provide the fbllowing infunnation, when applicable, only fur service which will be provided by the applicant city. Location Indicate location from which service will be provided (i.e. nearest fire station, library, etc.) POLICE-All police services in the City of Bakers field are administered through the City Police Department located at the s/w comer of Truxtun Avenue and Eye Street approximately 8 miles east of the annexation. Service Level Capacity Indicate frequency and availability of service (i.e., street sweeping, response time for emergency setWices, rec. programs, etc. 24 hour patrol is provided in the i~mnediate vicinity of this annexation. First priority response is approximately 7.00 tninutes or less. FIRE-Service will be provided by County Station No. 65 located at the Northeast comer of Calloway Drive and Rosedate Highway pursuant to exchange wherein County protects certain property within the City's jurisdiction. Thus, the City does incur tlm cost of providing fire protection and the fnce fund collected from the City's taxpayers must be transfarred to the City. Fire protection is provided on a 24-hour basis. The annexation will not affect City or County Fire service capability or response time, PARKS AND RECREATION - Tbe annexation project is within the jurisdiction of the North Bakersfield Recreation and Park District and is subject to all adopted requirements and stm~dards of the district. Existing neighborhood Parks (City and County) are open to the public at masonable hours. LIBRARY-N/A N/A STREETS-The City Corporation yard on Truxtun Avenue west Fwy. 99 will provide necessary facilities, personnel and services to accommodate Public Works efforts. CONSTRUCTION/MAINTENANCE/SWEEPING/LIGHTING-Maintenance and personnel will be dispatched from the City Yard on a regular basis for preventative maintenance as needed. Repair includes streets, constructed/maintenance, sweeping and lighting when located within the City's right of way. There will be no reduction in the range capacity of the City to provide the necessary public work services to this area. Services will be on a regular basis and "as needed". SEWER-The territory has access to the existing City trunk sewer line iu Jewetta Avenue which was constructed as part of the City's northerly extension of the "Judkins" trunk sewer system m~d is directed to City Wastewater Treatment Plant No. 3. Adequate capacity exists. WATER-The territory is being served by the Vaughn Water Service Company aud no change will occur upon annexation. Adequate capacity exists. OTltER-(Refuse)-When annexed, service will be provided by the City either by City forces or by contracts with a franchise refuse collector. City refuse pickup is twice a week. III. What effects, if any, would annexation of this territory have on the existing level of city/district services (i.e., need for additional emergency service persormel or consh-uction of new facilities, etc)? The annexation of this territorvwi~n~taffectthenearterm~eve~rcapabi~i~v~ftheCitvt~pr~videneededservices. Atthetime of development, additional police officers very Iikelv will be recmired to maintain the current level of city service. The planned future development of ;roblie streets and municipal facilities within the territory will increase the future mainten,ante responsibility of the City but should not affect the existin2 level of service. IV. Would city/district require any upgrading or change in fiicilities to serve affected territory (roads, fire hydrants, mains, etc.): If so, would cil~z/district or residents be responsible for financing? Private development provides and l~avs for major facilities and dedicates them to the City. No up~radin~ or chan~e in facilities will be recmired in the ter~terv for annexation. The territory is now totaliv vacant and the proposed use is for single family residential development. The proposed develooment is to be phased over a ~eriod of time. Indicate and explain existing zoning in affected territory. A maior portion of the subject terdtotw is mresentlv zoned County E (I/4) (Estate, 1/4 acre or lar~er lot size) Zone which allows suburban sinale family residential occupancy on estate-size lots. The North Rosedale School and Park Area is zoned County E (10) (Estate, 10 Acre Minimum Lot Size). V1. indicate and explain proposed prezoning in area. (List effects on present land use that would occur as a result of annexation such as maintenance of livestock on property, efc.) The City l~roposes to orezone the correspondin~ County estate lots to Citv E (Estate One Family Dwelling) Zone which allows sin2Ie-familv residential occuuancv on ll,000 sq. ft. minimum size lots. The North Rosedale School and Park Area is Prozoned City E (I0) (10 Acre Minimum Lot Size). The proposed l~rezoinn~ is consistent with the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan designation and is consistent with the current SR (Suburban Residential) designation. The orezonin~ designations are also consistent with the existin~ County zonin~ as per City Ordinance No. 3819. List city/district services that area will directly or indirectly benefit from such as decrease in fire insurance rate, shorter emergency response time, use of community facilities, etc. CiW Police should be able to respond in a more timely manner than present County Sheriff services. The present City refuse collection rote is substantially lower than feas county residents now pay to independent companies. No special assessments or chames for street sweeping, leaf collection, street li~htin~ energy costs and fire hydrants when located within the City's incomorated area City l,overament also pro,Ades increased political representation for the residents within the corporate limits. Please provide the following information relative to city/district imd county taxes: List existing tax rate(s) in axea. The existin~ tax rote in the area ecluals 1. 147638% of assessed market value. This represents the total property tax rate. When annexed a designated percentage of the total OroDertv tax of the area will accrue to the City and remainder to the County for ~rovidin~ health care and social services. (Rate as shown on 1999-2000 County Auditor-Controller Tax Rate List). Would affected area be subject to any bonded indebtedness of the city/district: If so, explain. No, the last listed (1992-93) City bounded indebtedness has been paid off and the current (1999-2000) tax rate list shows no city bonded indebtedness. How will the difference in tax rates affect a property with a market value of $50,000.00? The property rate will not increase due to annexation and re-assessment will not occur due to annexation.