HomeMy WebLinkAboutMITIGATION 5/22/1996
,1/ í
x
I
I
I
1/
"
ól
(I
"
1-
~vl
I'
'1\'
/',J
\1
IJ~
1\=-
I, \
1'-,.
---/
I "
~ ,
,I
/
I, "
I
'\
---:
/
/,
\
t
,
/ ,-.-
, -
",'
I
~
--'
,
,--.J
1..,
,I
,\.
\
"
, '
/ /'
-1'
,
--........;
-/\
-.
\ '.
y c'
'^ '-
",
~ ~ .~
I
\ /",~
'-
-..c-
-'-
'\
'/ /
-;
,-.-,
1
~.
/
\ /
,-'
, },
/'
'\..
,./
,/ .
'--~
J
,.
./'
í
'./
\'
/
",
" \,
-,¿
/.
-
,
"
/
>
OJ,
\
J
,,1.
~
"" ----;..
j -.
"- /'
"/
/ ''\ , /
'- .,
/./
,,'
) /1., (
r, ~
'-::"
./ ~
'-..
\~ " -c--
, \ I
~
'y
1: '.
'\ '.1 r
/
-
-(
".
\.
',..-:
-.
'-
/\./ \
1
//
"
\.
, "-
\
/1
~ \
~ì _
,
/
r
L
; /
II
~
'-
/
'/'
-(
,./'.....;..
'~
i---
'''-'
'-
~ I)
// .,-/-
"
,
\
~V
r
./(
."
"
'-' \" '1
, ~,
;,.-< -;- À'..
..
í -L I
-,
/, /' -7\ ;-
'-
-- ,
\ /
/
.-
--:
':'\
;.- /' "
/}
) '- ~
.-
l' :\ '- .
/'
/ ,¿
,'"
'/
\
;---~
.(
(
"
''y Ì'
,\ / /,
~
:J
';
J./
./
;
,r
r
"
./' /
/
\
./
\
,\ \
/
'-
'--'
'1·
;
I·
(
/'
,--'
l
./
>-., --
.........: -
>-
í
v--
, (
/
/"
./. .
\
,c'
,è- .
,
'-' '
'-
^j' ).
-.- / \.
í
/ <¿
,/
-=-J '
,
'-
/ ./
\
, /' '.\; J
~
r
j
\
è-\
'-
I
/
~/ '--
"
í
. )
-:-\
/,
\
,
'-
/
,'-,.
~ ,(
,"
'-,.
I ~ '-
, I,
--": \.
I /
.\ ."
/,
'¡'-
r
- ;.:,-
./
r
,
/-
-,
"
-'
I
;''.~-
'-
/'
.,
I /
\ '-,-'
\ , I.
I --: "-
,
..... )
/ ) " 'I ,
"
/-
11/
/
\ ,
/
--..., .......,." \~.
./
I
\'
.....
(,
" ,:
1 " /'
í' "
/ Ì' \
1/
'\
r\
f
"
.,J I
. ,
I·
, ')
"'" ;-<.
"-
/'''
. 'I /
./'
./'
II
.'\
-'
-;~~
-.:.
"
/
./"
~
\.,-
.7 ,\
'\
"
"
'-
':':>
"
. è-
.....,/<
.-^'
;
:r
¿
/
(/
I
/-
'. r
)
(' \
<___' J "
./
..J
,I
/',
I / .
(-........
/ / /
'- (I
..
ì /
../ '/ , / '-
,
\ -::.
,/
\ ' I .\"
)
~'
./' "
/:., \ 0-
J , \ .
"",
J - .,
" : ;.-
,.- ^-- /
~r j
./
" " / -;:
J....? //
J \
F
/
-,
\
¡.L
'(
.~ -r
./'
(
'- I
y,
(
'i'
"
\ .',
-
\ /.....
,k
,-' '\
'-,. .
r'
,,-
"
"
/-
J
'>-
. "-
,.
-'(
'-
/
\.> ,,"V~
/r
'/
"' '--~-
::..
"J
.(
.L
'-- '\..'..-
-/ ,"
'- "
!
,
-"--
'-,
./
. II.
\...,
\.
/
\
'-:(,
-\ 1-- "'--
, . : ,\" ,,;/ I,
)Kenn~~y!Je~~s ~ Ç9nª~ltants~\
\. ~ .. . . ,1--' /'
'-
\,,\,
[.
T
.1/
\
r
"
"
'-
'-
"
.' r-.J
"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Kennedy/Jenks Consultants
RECENED
M~'{ 2. ß, 1996
HAZ. MAT. OW.
SITE CHARACTERIZATION WORKPLAN
FUEL DISPENSER UNITS
CORPORATION YARD - TRUXTUN AVENUE
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
22 MAY 1996
K/J 962301.00
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
22 May 1996
Kennedy/Jenks Consultants
Engineers and Scientists
200 New Stine Road, Suite 115
Bakersfield, California 93309
805-835-9785
FAX 805-831-5196
ML Arnold Ramming
City of Bakersfield
Public Works Department
Engineering Services Division
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, California 93301
Subject:
Site Characterization Workplan
Fuel Dispenser Units
Corporation Yard - Truxtun Avenue
KIJ 962301.00
Dear Mr. Ramming:
As requested by the City of Bakersfield - Public Works Department (City), Kennedy/Jenks
Consultants is pleased to submit the site characterization workplan for the above-referenced
site. The workplan was requested by the City of Bakersfield Fire Department - Fire Safety
Services and Office of Environmental Services (Fire Department) to further assess
hydrocarbon-impacted soil that was identified beneath the fuel dispensers during an
underground storage tank replacement project conducted in May 1995. The Fire Department
requires (in accordance with Chapter 6.7 of the California Health and Safety Code and Chapter
16, Title 23 of the California Code of Regulations) that a subsurface investigation be performed
to define the vertical and horizontal extent of fuel released from the dispensers.
A copy of the workplan has been forwarded to the Fire Department for their review of the
proposed investigation methods. Up~n Fire Department approval of the workplan,
Kennedy/Jenks Consultants will prepare and submit a cost estimate to the City for
implementation of site characterization activities.
If you have any questions regarding the workplan or require additional information, please call
me at 835-9785.
Very truly yours,
KENNEDY/JENKS CONSULTANTS
Ke/~ ~,t--
Ken Knight, R.G.
Project Manager
Attachment
cc: Howard Wines, Bakersfield Fire Department
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Kennedy/Jenks Consultants
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
SITE CHARACTERIZATION WORKPLAN
FUEL DISPENSER UNITS
CORPORATION YARD - TRUXTUN AVENUE
K/J 962301.00
MA Y 1"996
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PROJ ECT SUMMARy.............................................................................. .......... ..... ....... 1
1.0 FACILITY INFORMATION............ ............................................................... .... ..........2
1 . 1 Tan k Own e r. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. .. . . .. . . .. .. .. . . .. . .. .. . . . . . .. . . .. .. . . . . . . . . .. . . .. .. .. .. 2
1.2 Site Location............. ........................................................................ .......... ..........2
1.3 Site History and Tank Use..................................................................................... 2
1.4 Previous Investigations......................................................................................... 2
1.5 Area Land Use...................................................................................................... 3
1.6 Depth to Groundwater....... ............... ............ ........... ....,............... ...................... ....3
2.0 FIELD INVESTIGATION METHODS....... ...... ................ ....... ....... ....... .......................3
2.1 Field Preparation................................................................................................... 3
2.2 Sampling Locations.. ........................................ ..... ................................... ............. 3
2.3 Field Investigation Methods............................. .......................................... ............ 3
2.3.1 Drilling Method .................................................. ......................... ......... .... ..... ...3
2.3.2 Soil Sampling Method.................................. ...................................... .............4
2.3.3 Field Screening Methods.......................................................... .......... ............4
2.3.4 Reconnaissance Groundwater Sampling Method........................................... 4
2.3.5 Borehole Abandonment............................... ...................................... .............4
2.3.6 Equipment Decontamination............. ...... ................................. ....................... 5
2.3.7 Investigation Derived Residuals.............................................. ;....'. .~'.... ...:.......... 5
3.0 ANALYTICAL TEST METHODS ............................................................................... 5
4.0 SOIL CHARACTERIZATION REPORT .............................................. .......................5
5.0 PROJECT SCHEDULE....................... ........... ........ .............. ........... ..................... .....6
P:\962301.OQ
WORKPLAN.DOC
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Kennedy/Jenks Consultants
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
SITE CHARACTERIZATION WORKPLAN
FUEL DISPENSER UNITS
CORPORATION YARD - TRUXTUN AVENUE
K/J 962301.00
MAY 1996
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF FIGURES
FiQure Title
1 Site Location Map
2 Tank and Piping Diagram with Proposed Borehole Locations
LIST OF TABLES
Table Title
1 Summary of Analytical Data
2 Project Schedule
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix Title
A Laboratory Analytical Reports
ii
P:\962301.00
WORKPLAN.DOC
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Kennedy/Jenks Consultants
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
SITE CHARACTERIZATION WORKPLAN
FUEL DISPENSER UNITS
CORPORATION YARD - TRUXTUN AVENUE
K/J 962301.00
MAY 1996
PROJECT SUMMARY
The City of Bakersfield (City) operates a vehicle fueling facility at their Corporation Yard
located on Truxtun Avenue approximately 1/4 mile west of Hwy. 99 (Site). During an
underground storage tank removal and replacement project performed in May 1995,
hydrocarbon-impacted soils were observed beneath the fuel dispenser units and soil
samples were collected for laboratory analysis. A representative from the City of
Bakersfield Fire Department - Fire Safety Services and Office of Environmental
Services (Fire Department), the local enforcement agency for underground fuel tanks,
witnessed the tank replacements and collection of soil samples.
Laboratory analyses identified unleaded gasoline and diesel fuel constituents in soil
samples collected from beneath the dispenser units. Soil samples collected beneath
the former storage tanks did not contain any fuel constituents. Based on the laboratory
results, the Fire Department notified the City that a site characterization workplan must
be submitted to further assess the vertical and lateral extent of fuel released beneath
the dispenser units.
As requested by the Fire Department, the site characterization workplan described
herein has been prepared in accordance with the guidelines found in Appendix A -
Reporting Requirements, Part A - Soil Contamination Workplan: Tri-Regional Board
Staff Recommendations for Initial Evaluation and Investigation of Underground Tanks,
January 22, 1991. The workplan' describes the investigation methods the City will
employ to delineate the extent of the fuel released beneath the Site al1ëtthepotential
threat to human health and the environment.
In general, the site characterization will include drilling four boreholes to a minimum
depth of 40 feet below ground surface (bgs) or when encountering 10 feet of native
sediments that are not impacted with hydrocarbons, whichever is shallowest, based on
field screening techniques. Soil samples will be collected every five feet for potential
laboratory testing of fuel constituents. If hydrocarbons-impacted soil is suspected
below 40 feet, the City will be contacted for immediate approval to extend the
borehole(s) until 10 feet of clean soil is encountered or a maximum depth of 80 feet
bgs. Should shallow groundwater be encountered before defining the vertical extent of
hydrocarbon-impacted soil, a reconnaissance groundwater sample will be collected
using a Hydropunch™ sampler prior to the abandonment of the borehole. No
groundwater monitoring wells will be installed during this investigation.
1
P:1962301.00
WORKPLAN.DOC
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
Kennedy/Jenks Consultants
Following the receipt of analytical data collected during the field investigation, a site
characterization report will be submitted to the City and Fire Department that defines
the extent of fuel released beneath the dispensers units, the concentration of
hydrocarbon constituents in the subsurface, and recommendations for future
management of the release site.
1.0 FACILITY INFORMATION
1.1 Tank Owner
The vehicle fueling facility is owned by the City of Bakersfield. It is operated and
maintained by the Department of Public Works, Engineering Services Division. The
City contact person for the site characterization is Mr. Arnold Ramming, Civil Engineer
III; telephone (805) 326-3724.
1.2 Site Location
The fueling facility is located at the City Corporation Yard on Truxtun Avenue,
approximately 1/4 mile west of the Hwy. 99 overpass. The entrance into the property is
on the south side of Truxtun Avenue, across the canal bridge at the stoplight for Empire
Drive. The underground storage tanks (USTs) and fuel dispensers are located in the
southeastern portion of the property immediately north of the railroad corridor. Figure 1
shows the location of the Site and general vicinity. Figure 2 is a tank and piping
diagram that shows the locations of the USTs, fuel dispensers, and the proposed
investigation boreholes.
1.3 Site History and Tank Use
The Corporation Yard is operated as a vehicle service, maintenance, and storage yard
for City sanitation trucks and service vehicles. City vehicles are fueled from the service
island dispensers on a daily basis. Currently, the fueling facility consists of two USTs
located on the south side of the service island with six dispensing units; three each for
unleaded gasoline and diesel fue). Previously, the fueling facility had three USTs
located on the north side of the service island; one each for unleaded gas, diesel fuel,
and low-leaded gas. The former tanks were replaced with the currentUST sysfem in
May 1995.
1.4 Previous Investigations
During the UST removal and replacement job performed by Lutrel Services Inc. in May
1995, hydrocarbon-impacted soils were encountered beneath the fuel dispenser units.
Soil samples were collected from 2 and 6 feet beneath each dispenser. Laboratory
analyses of the soil samples confirmed the presence of benzene, toluene, ethyl-
benzene, and xylenes (BTEX), as well as elevated concentrations of total petroleum
hydrocarbons (TPH) as gasoline and diesel fuel. Soil samples collected from 2 and 6
feet below the former USTs did not detect any BTEX or TPH constituents. Table 1
provides a summary of the analytical data for the fuel dispenser samples. Appendix A
contains copies of the laboratory analytical reports.
2
P:1962301.00
WORKPLAN.DOC
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Kennedy/Jenks Consultants
1.5 Area Land Use
The land use within 1/4 mile of the Site includes industrial facilities, office buildings, and
undeveloped property along-the south side of the Kern River. Immediately south of the
Corporation Yard is a wide railroad corridor. The Kern River is located approximately
1/3 mile north of the Site (Figures 1).
1.6 Depth to Groundwater
According to data collected by the Kern County Water Agency (KCWA) in September
1994, the depth to groundwater in the vicinity of the Site ranged between 150 to 180
bgs. Since that time, the Kern River has had an almost continuous flow of water, as
well as the unlined irrigation canal located between the Site and Truxtun Avenue.
These sources of groundwater recharge have most likely raised the water table since
September 1994, but the current depth to water beneath the Site is unknown. Due to
the proximity of the river and canal, perched groundwater conditions could exist in this
area.
2.0 FIELD INVESTIGATION METHODS
2.1 Field Preparation
Prior to implementing field activities, a site-specific health and safety plan will be
prepared for the project and submitted to the City and Fire Department. A copy of the
health and safety plan will be kept on-site during field activities.
In preparation for the field program, Kennedy/Jenks will obtain necessary drilling
permits, prepare subcontractor agreements, and schedule all field activities to facilitate
an efficient investigation. Pre-sampling activities will be initiated with a reconnaissance
of the Site to mark the borehole locations for an underground public utility clearance
(i.e. "Dig Alert"). All sampling locations will be approved by the City before beginning
field work.
2.2 Sampling Locations
Four boreholes will be drilled along the northern edge of the fuel service island, each
located in proximity to the fuel dispenser units and former piping conduits. During
fieldwork, only the south side of the service island will be accessible for fueling. The
approximate locations of the boreholes are depicted on Figure 2.
2.3 Field Investigation Methods
2.3.1 DrillinQ Method
The boreholes will be advanced using a hollow-stem auger rig. A low-clearance rig
(approximately 12-ft. mast height) will be used to work beneath the 14-f1. clearance of
the service island awning. Prior to drilling, concrete cores will be cut through the
driveway to expose the soil beneath the structure.
3
P:I962301.00
WORKPLAN.DOC
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Kennedy/Jenks Consultants
The boreholes will be advanced to a minimum depth of 40 feet bgs, or when 10 feet of
clean native soil is encountered, whichever is shallowest, based on field screening
methods. If hydrocarbon-impacted soil is suspected below 40 feet, the City will be
contacted for immediate approval to extend the borehole until 10 feet of clean soil is
encountered or a maximum of 80 feet bgs. Should shallow groundwater be
encountered before defining the vertical extent of hydrocarbon-impacted soil, a
reconnaissance groundwater sample will be collected using a Hydropunch™ sampler
prior to the abandonment of the borehole. No groundwater monitoring wells will be
installed during this investigation.
2.3.2 Soil Samplinq Method
During drilling, soil samples will be collected with a split-spoon sampler at five-foot
intervals beginning at five feet bgs. Soil samples will be collected in pre-cleaned brass
sleeves, sealed with end caps, and retained in chilled ice chests. After all samples
have been collected, field screening data will be reviewed to select the laboratory
samples. Soil cutting descriptions will be logged onsite by a Kennedy/Jenks geologist
using the Unified Soil Classification System.
2.3.3 Field Screeninq Methods
Soil from each sampling interval will be screened for the presence of volatile organic
compounds (VaCs) using a photo-ionization device (PID). vac monitoring will be
conducted by immediately placing soil samples in sealed plastic zipper baggies for
approximately 15 minutes and then inserting the PI D probe into the headspace. Field
vac readings will be recorded on the borehole log forms and used to select laboratory
samples.
2.3.4 Reconnaissance Groundwater Samplinq Method
If shallow or perched groundwat~r is encountered during drilling, a reconnaissance
groundwater sample will be collected for laboratory analysis using a Hydropunch™
drivepoint sampler. The direct push sampling system uses a non-retrievable metal
point with a PVC well screen attached. The well point/screen unit is secured inside a
hollow metal sleeve approximately 5 feet in length. The metal sleeve isthreadéd onto
the bottom of steel drill rods that are lowered through the inside of the augers. The drill
rods are driven approximately 5 feet into undisturbed sediments and pulled back
approximately 3 feet to expose the well screen. Grab samples are collected by
lowering a disposable bailer through the drill rods into the well screen. After the
samples are collected, the drill rods and augers are removed from the borehole, leaving
the well point and screen intact in the sediments. Groundwater samples are collected
by slowly pouring the water from the bailer into three 40-ml glass vials with Teflon septa
and hydrochloric acid preservative.
2.3.5 Borehole Abandonment
Following the completion of all sample collection, each borehole will be abandoned by
placing a sanitary seal consisting of a cement/bentonite slurry from the bottom of the
4
P:1962301.00
WORKPLAN.DOC
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Kennedy/Jenks Consultants
borehole to ground surface using a tremie pipe. New surface concrete will be placed to
grade where the concrete cores were cut.
2.3.6' Equipment Decontamination
To reduce the possibility of cross-contamination of samples, all drilling and sampling
equipment will be cleaned prior to initial use and between use at each location. Drilling
equipment will be cleaned using high-pressure steam. Sampling equipment will be
cleaned with a non-phosphate detergent solution and triple rinse.
2.3.7 Investiqation Derived Residuals
Investigation derived residuals include all soil cuttings, decontamination water'
generated from equipment cleaning, and any groundwater generated during drilling and
sampling. The residuals will be place immediately upon generation into DOT-approved
55-gallon capacity steel drums, labeled as to contents, and stored onsite pending
proper disposal. Appropriate disposal will be assessed from analytical results of site
samples and samples of bulked residuals, as necessary.
3.0 ANALYTICAL TEST METHODS
Approximately 4 to 5 samples will be analyzed for hydrocarbon constituents from each
borehole, depending on VOC screening data and total depth. In all boreholes, samples
from the bottom 10 feet will be analyzed to verify that native conditions exist. All soil
samples and groundwater samples, if collected, will be analyzed by the following
methods:
· BTEX by EPA Method 8020
· TPH-gasoline by EPA Method 8015-M
· TPH-diesel by EPA Method 8015-M
To assure the quality of the samples results, the following quality assurance samples
will be collected:
· One field duplicate sample per twenty soil samples (submitted blindlo""thé lab)
· One equipment rinsate field blank (blind)
· One water travel blank (only tested if groundwater analyzed and hydrocarbons
detected)
4.0 SOIL CHARACTERIZATION REPORT
Following the receipt of all analytical reports from the laboratory, Kennedy/Jenks will
prepare a draft site characterization report for submittal to the City and Fire
Department. The report will include an executive summary, descriptions of drilling and
sampling activities, a summary table of analytical results, a discussion of investigation
findings, and recommendations for future management of the Site. All comments from
the City and Fire Department will be incorporated into the final report submittal.
5
P:1962301,00
WORKPLAN.DOC
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Kennedy/Jenks Consultants
5.0 PROJECT SCHEDULE
Table 2 shows the anticipated schedule for workplan approval by the City and Fire
Department, cost development and contracting, implementation of field activities,
laboratory testing, and report preparation. The schedule also highlights the
approximate periods when City or Fire Department reviews and approvals are
anticipated.
6
P:\962301.00
WORKPLAN.DOC
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FIGURES
. ~.~. ,.- ... .
I ROS HIGHWAY
I BLM, CAUENTEJI !' !
- RES. A REA \J.. <
~ FF Commercial Orlvt'
....J 2J
-
, - ~
I OJ
...LI .x c
5! ~ CL
-:! CL
21'
I 201
19:
W 18,
I w
a:: -, ("'\'1
I- " Jastrol17th
>
CI) :J Park' :
I V:d .:
16th I
II GOLC~ V EMP
I I .
SITE
I '" CALlFOJ
r, -
'-
-.
::;! .nse;
I ,- San Er
,-
, " - Ches
-
-
~ Che
I 2
u:J :n
0
I (/)
..r::
u
~.
> ~
-:ú
I 3rc
-
.J.' Bani
I u;
- 3
;.
~ ~
I :.
I
I N Kennedy/Jenks Consultants
I .. City Corporation Yard - Truxtun Ave.
Bakersfield, California
I 0 .It. Loc.tlon ..p
I
FEET K/J 962301.00
I January 1996
Flgur. 1
13 - i
. Proposed Borehole
Location
N
.
0
I
FEET
- Kennedy/Jenks Consultants
City Corporation Yard - Truxtun Ave.
Bakersfield, California
T.nk and Piping DI.....m with
PropoaH Borellole Locallone
--._- -- -.- - -~- ._. ----- -- ~. - -- -- -
K/J 962301.00
January 1996
figure 2
,
,
¡!
,
\
1
\
I,
I
)
,I
I
I
I
I
!
i
¡
I
~
\
\
ì
!
\
,
,
,
\I
j
)
¡
\
-4
¡
i
I.S%!"
? ,? / \
"
\ r~<:)~c::..·./ /' ?
- - ,
e.lC...ra.t...O ~~ c~. ;lJ~r '- to-. c. rA..." f_~ c::::;... -........ "- \
~~.-:O ~_~~=....... ~-"'"?"C~L / --,
\ (
~,l..'~ ~.~~ f "-
'-
,E U E:.. L E- I S A.. '..J
- -----'\~ - -
'-
/ \
I (ç(q 5) ( l
I lJE~1.:, lA. 'S \ I ¡\1 t::V\.J 'vlsí ( 6li G)
;
\ I \
(,(1"; I.-EAÞ ¡:=D \ D I [SU-- I
'" / \ /
"------ - - - - - - - ./ "- ./
-- - --
...:c¡ -
...",. A...G. ~A." 1
/--"
/ "-
(:ç¡;;'Iv\c,\I¿D \
oS /e( ç
\
,
!
I
!
,,_ I
,,! I
!.D\o.J - Ls:...,.....O CA..~..,..:::J. I
(LILy I
I
I
I
I
,
~
I
I
i
I
I
,
"'"
~.,,~ ~A2..E: =
--~-;;:-" - '-. -~-;:,,--,=
'- /I..._%,.~--
I
\
\
I
I
I
I
I
. -t"'.o_ß
\
'SiD t..ACS
,
"1 T"AUt.L.. VCu; ,joZlLC
:~I v....~OC- 2.£,ïu:..aJ UOl~~
: AU. 1¥'TtJG o:£loú 6 ZJ.DÞ ,,0
-"- ~ ~ !"ROn;-ZnvE-
IJ :t.-A. ß_'::'r'("C'
I: " r-AP-r.o "-
t,':.. C_oJ_ "-
, -·~o,.
A,12.... c..- ""-
5. c:::=' CJ. L
~.I. .c.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLES
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 1
Kennedy/Jenks Consultants
SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL DATA
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
SITE CHARACTERIZATION WORKPLAN
FUEL DISPENSER UNITS
CORPORATION YARD - TRUXTUN AVENUE
MAY 1996
K/J 962301.00
DISPENSER #, DEPTH
AND (pRODUCT)
ETHYL
BENZENE TOLUENE BENZENE
(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg)
NO 8.3 4.8
NO 27 25
NO NO NO
NO 18 26
NO NO NO
NO NO NO
26 170 31
NO 0.5 1
#1-2 @ 2' (gas)
#1-2 @ 6' (gas)
#6 @ 2' (diesel)
#6 @ 6' (diesel)
#7-8 @ 2' (diesel)
#7-8 @ 6' (diesel)
#11 @ 2' (gas)
#11 @ 6' (gas)
TOTAL
XYLENES
(mg/kg)
180
230
NO
510
NO
NO
780
12
TPH-Diesel
(mg/kg)
6,900
3,000
12,000
1,600
TPH-Gas COMMENTS
(mg/kg)
3,200 no Benzene
1,800 no Benzene
--...........,..........
::::~:~:~:~:~:::::~:~:::~:~:::~:::::::::::::::: no B TEX
:rrrrrrlIImri no Benzene
.......................
........................
r@IIII:rrrr@I no BTEX
¡IIill¡il¡I¡:::i¡i}:i:::::. no BTEX
8,500 highest concentrations
91 lowest concentrations
NOTE: Soil samples collected by Lutrel Services Inc. during th'e tank and piping replacement in May 1995
mg/kg = milligrams per kilograms
NO = not detected
TPH = total petroleum hydrocarbons
BTEX = benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and xylenes
I:;:::::::::::::::;::;;:::::::::::;:::::::;:;:::::::::1 - Not analyzed for the gl'ven constl'tuent
:;:::::;:;:::::::;:::::::::::::::;:;::::::::::::::::: -
-
-
-
-
-
TABLE 2: PROJECT SCHEDULE
ID Task Name
1 Prepare Workplan
2 City and Fire Dept. Approvals
3 Develop Implementation Costs
4 City Approval & Contact
5 Conduct Field Investigation
6 Permits / Health & Safety Plan
7 Drill and Collect Samples
8 Laboratory Analyses
9 Prepare & Submit Draft Report
10 City and Fire Dept. Review
11 Prepare & Submit Final Report
5/22/96
-
- -
-
-
,
I
~
-
-
- -
-
-
-
-
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
SITE CHARACTERIZATION WORKPLAN
CORPORATION YARD FUEL DISPENSERS - TRUXTUN AVENUE
I
KIJ 962301.00
1
Start Finish
5/13/96 5/28/96
5/29/96 6/14/96
6/17/96 6/25/96
6/26/96 7/12/96
7/15/96 8/7/96
7/15/96 7/19/96
7/22/96 7/23/96
7/24/96 8/7/96
7/24/96 8/14/96
8/1 5/96 9/4/96
9/5/96 9/18/96
Task
Task Summary
.....
..... City & Fire Dept. Review ITTIIIIIIIJJIIJ '
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX A
LAB ORA TORY ANAL YTICAL REPORTS
Page 1
I
Purgeable Aromatics
and
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
I
LUTREL SERVICES
2212 S UNION AVE
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93307
Attn: BILL ROSICA 834-5986
Date Reported: 05/12/95
Date Received: 05/11/95
Laboratory No.: 95-05695-5
I
Sample Description: CITY OF BAKERSFIELD CORP. YARD: DISPOSAL #1-2 @ 2' SAMPLED BY BILL
ROSICA
I
Sample Matrix:
Soil
Date Collected:
Date Extracted-B020:
Date Analyzed-8020:
Extracted-8015M(g) :
Analyzed-8015M(g) :
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
@ 04:22PM
I
Date
Date
I
Constituents
Analysis
Results
Reporting
Units
Practical
Quantitation
Limit
I
3200.
mg/kg
mgjkg
mgjkg
mg/kg
mg/kg
3.
3.
3.
6.
I
Benzene
Toluene
Ethyl Benzene
Total Xylenes
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (gas)
None Detected
8.3
4.8
180.
600.
I
TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015
Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020.
I
I
I
I
Note: PQL's were raised due to high concentration of target analytes requiring
sample dilution.
I
California D.O.H.S. Cert. #1186
I
I
,~9:J~ ~
Stuart G. Buttram ()
Department Supervisor
I AU results lisled in this report are lor the exclusive use olllle submittlnq Plrty. BC Laboratories. Inc. assumes no res~ibilify 10< reDOrt alteration. !U!Oaratioll. d@tachment n, "'"'" ..- ¡............¡....
I
Purgeable Aromatics
and
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Page 1
I
LtJTREL SERVICES
2212 S UNION AVE
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93307
Attn: BILL ROSICA 834-5986
Date Reported: 05/12/95
Date Received: 05/11/95
Laboratory No.: 95-05695-6
II Sample Description:
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD CORP. YARD: DISPOSAL #1-2 @ 6' SAMPLED BY BILL
ROSICA
I
Sample Matrix:
Soil
Date Collected:
Date Extracted-8020:
Date Analyzed-8020:
Date Extracted-8015M(g} :
Date Analyzed-8015M(g):
05/11/95 @ 04:37PM
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
I
Practical
I Analysis Reporting Quantitation
Constituents Results Units Limit
Benzene None Detected mg/kg 5.
I Toluene 27. mg/kg 5.
Ethyl Benzene 25. mg/kg 5.
Total Xylenes 230. mg/kg 10.
Total Petroleum
I Hydrocarbons (gas) 1800. mg/kg 1000.
I
TEST METHOD:
TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015
Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020.
I
I
I
I
Note:
PQL's were raised due to high concentration of target analytes requiring
sample dilution.
I
I
California D.O.H.S. Cert. #1186
I
&~~ R9:=
Stuart G. Buttram
Department Supervisor
10 results listed in this report are lor the exclusive use of the sUbmlttlnq par1v. BC Labon1or1es. Inc. assumes no resoonsibilitv lor reoort alteration. seOlration. detlcllment or third -'" Interuretatlon.
I-
I LABORATORIES
Page
1.
I
purgeable Aromatics
and
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
I
LtJ'l'REL SERVICES
221.2 S UNION AVE
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93307
Attn: BILL ROSICA 834-5986
Date Reported: 05/12/95
Date Received: 05/11./95
Laboratory No.: 95-05695-7
I
Sample Description: CITY OF BAKERSFIELD CORP. YARD: DISPOSAL #6 @ 2' SAMPLED BY BILL
ROSICA
I
Sample Matrix:
Soil
Date Collected:
Date Extracted-8020:
Date Analyzed-8020:
Date Extracted-8015MCd):
Date Analyzed-8015MCd):
05/11/95 @ 02:38PM
05/12/95
05/12/95
05/11/95
05/12/95
I
Reporting
Units
Practical
Quantitation
Limit
I
Constituents
Analysis
Results
I
6900.
No Recovery
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
%-
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.9
I
Benzene
Toluene
Ethyl Benzene
Total Xylenes
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (diesel)
Surrogate \ Recovery
None Detected
None Detected
None Detected
None Detected
400.
I
TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA BOIS
Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/B020.
I
I
I
I
I
Note: PQL's were raised due to high concentration of target analytes requiring
sample dilution.
I
California D.O.H.S. Cert. #11B6
£/¿
I
Stuart G. Buttram
Department Supervisor
I An mults listed in this ~ Ire tor the exclusive use 01 the submittino oartv. BC La""""_. Inc. ..sum" "" ...........¡kU.... ,_ _" ,"._>4.... ._......... ~...__...... ...,-, .--. ,..._..h"_'
¿.
'-
I LABORATORIES
I
Purgeable Aromatics
and
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Page
1
I
LUTREL SERVICES
2212 S UNION AVE
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93307
Attn: BILL ROSICA 834-5986
Date Reported: 05/12/95
Date Received: 05/11/95
Laboratory No.: 95-05695-8
I
Sample Description: CITY OF BAKERSFIELD CORP. YARD: DISPOSAL #6 @ 6' SAMPLED BY BILL
ROSICA
I
Sample Matrix:
Soil
Date Collected:
Date Extracted-8020:
Date Analyzed-8020:
Date Extracted-8015M(d) :
Date Analyzed-8015M(d):
05/11/95 @ 03:05PM
05/12/95
05/12/95
05/11/95
05/12/95
I
I
Constituents
Analysis
Results
Reporting
Units
Practical
Quantitation
Limit
I
3000.
86.
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
%-
5.
5.
5.
9.
I
Benzene
Toluene
Ethyl Benzene
Total Xylenes
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (diesel)
Surrogate %- Recovery
None Detected
18.
26.
510.
200.
I
TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015
Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020.
I
I
I
I Note:
PQL's were raised due to high concentration of target analytes requiring
sample dilution.
Sample chromatogram not typical of diesel.
I
California D.O.H.S. Cert. #1186
I
I
~~
Stuart G. Buttram
Department Supervisor
11/ results lilted in this reool1lre tor the erclusiv.. us.. nf Ih.. .,,""'1ttINI ft'_ R~ I .h"..'"n.. ,"_ .......... M _...-.,~".... ... ..--~ ....-...- ........-- "--'~---' -. .~,... .._. .,............
I
Purgeable Aromatics
and
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Page 1
I
LUTREL SERVICES
2212 S UNION AVE
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93307
Attn: BILL ROSICA 834-5986
Date Reported: 05/12/95
Date Received: 05/11/95
Laboratory No.: 95-05695-3
I Sample Description:
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD CORP. YARD: DISPOSAL #7-8 @ 2' SAMPLED BY BILL
ROSICA
I
Sample Matrix:
Soil
Date Collected:
Date Extracted-8020:
Date Analyzed-8020:
Extracted-8015M(d) :
Analyzed-8015M(d) :
05/11/95
05/12/95
05/12/95
05/11/95
05/12/95
@ 03:20PM
I
Date
Date
Practical
I Analysis Reporting Quantitation
Constituents Results Units Limit
Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.3
I Toluene None Detected mg/kg 0.3
Ethyl Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.3
Total Xylenes None Detected mg/kg 0.6
Total Petroleum
I Hydrocarbons (diesel) 12000. mg/kg 1000.
Surrogate ~ Recovery No Recovery ~
I
TEST METHOD:
TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015
Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020.
I
I
I
I
Note:
PQL's were raised due to high concentration of target analytes requiring
sample dilution.
I
I
California D.O.H.S. Cert. #1186
L¿¿
I
Stuart G. Buttram
Department Supervisor
III ~,ullt Ii,,@(! in "';,. _ .,~ In, 'h" ~..hl';y. "0 "I ''''' ."hmiHIM "..tv III" ......,.t",l_ I,," ...,,"'.. M _,...,;";00... ... '.M" ...._.;.. .......i.. ~......_.....",;..I .._. 1...__....-.
Page 1
I
Purgeable Aromatics
and
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
I
LOTREL SERVICES
2212 S UNION AVE
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93307
Attn: BILL ROSICA 834-5986
Date Reported: 05/12/95
Date Received: 05/11/95
Laboratory No.: 95-05695-4
I
Sample Description: CITY OF BAKERSFIELD CORP. YARD: DISPOSAL #7-8 @ 6' SAMPLED BY BILL
ROSICA
I
Sample Matrix:
Soil
Date Collected:
Date Extracted-8020:
Date Analyzed-8020:
Extracted-8015M(d) :
Analyzed-8015M(d) :
05/11/95
05/12/95
05/12/95
05/11/95
05/12/95
@ 03:42PM
I
Date
Date
Practical
I Analysis Reporting Quantitation
Constituents Results Units Limit
Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.2
I Toluene None Detected mg/kg 0.2
Ethyl Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.2
Total Xylenes None Detected mg/kg 0.5
Total Petroleum
I Hydrocarbons (diesel) 1600. mg/kg 100.
Surrogate \ Recovery 10l. \
I
I
TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015
Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020.
I
I
I
Note:
PQL's were raised due to high concentration of target analytes requiring
sample dilution.
I
I
California D.O.H.S. Cert. #1186
.~~/
Stuart G. Buttram
Department Supervisor
I
IAII results listed in this reoort are for the elclusive use at the submiltlll<l carty. BC laboratories. Inc. assumes no resDOMibiIiIv fOf "'00" alteration. seoaratlon. detaehment or third ...m ,"'",,",totion.
Page 1
I
Purgeable Aromatics
and
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
I
LUTREL SERVICES
2212 S ONION AVE
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93307
Attn: BILL ROSICA 834-5986
Date Reported: 05/12/95
Date Received: 05/11/95
Laboratory No.: 95-05695-1
I
Sample Description: CITY OF BAKERSFIELD CORP. YARD: DISPOSAL #11 @ 2' SAMPLED BY BILL
ROSICA
I
Sample Matrix:
Soil
Date Collected:
Date Extracted-8020:
Date Analyzed-8020:
Date Extracted-8015M(g) :
Date Analyzed-8015M(g):
05/11/95 @ 03:52PM
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
I
I Analysis
Constituents Results
Benzene 26.
I Toluene 170.
Ethyl Benzene 3l.
Total Xylenes 780.
I Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (gas) 8500.
Reporting
Units
, Practical
Quantitation
Limit
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
S.
S.
5.
10.
mg/kg
1000.
I
TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015
Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020.
I
I
I
I
I
Note: PQL's were raised due to high concentration of target analytes requiring
sample dilution.
I
California D.O.H.S. Cert. #1186
I
~~~
Stuart G. Buttram
Department Supervisor
I all ,..,,11. II.,owt ;" .~¡. ......... or. .",... ..~,...;y. ....~. .h. ...~_....M .0_ Of' '.h......I.. I.. ....._.. __ _.___.,.""..... _.__~ .k._"__ .......... ........._._.. _I~ ___. '_00.._.0."..
L
I
Purgeable Aromatics
and
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Page 1
I
LUTREL SERVICES
2212 S UNION AVE
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93307
Attn: BILL ROSICA 834-5986
Date Reported: 05/12/95
Date Received: 05/11/95
Laboratory No.: 95-05695-2
I
Sample Description: CITY OF BAKERSFIELD CORP. YARD: DISPOSAL #11 @ 6' SAMPLED BY BILL
ROSICA
I
Sample Matrix:
Soil
Date Collected:
Date Extracted-8020:
Date Analyzed-8020:
Date Extracted-8015M(g) :
Date Analyzed-8015M(g):
05/11/95 @ 04:14PM
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
I
I
Practical
Analysis Reporting Quantitation
Constituents Results Units Limit
Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.3
Toluene 0.5 mg/kg 0.3
Ethyl Benzene 1.0 mg/kg 0.3
Total Xylenes 12. mg/kg 0.6
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (gas) 91. mg/kg 60.
I
I
I
TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015
Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020.
I
I
I
I
Note: PQL's were raised due to high concentration of target ana1ytes requiring
sample dilution.
I
I
California D.O.H.S. Cert. #1186
I
ð~~ Sb--
Stuart G. Buttram
Department Supervisor
IAlI ~sults listed in this ~DOtt are for the e.clusiw uw of the subml"lno Da"" BC lobor"o,les. Inc. ..sum_..... __.ihm." .^' _M" ."......... ..n..""",, ....__ - "',... _.....1_..__....--
00
000
('I)T'"
('1)0)
O)T'"
I
!'-
N
('I)
"Ó-
-10
OJo
:¡::oo
If)-
...
OJX
~<{
ct1u.
CD .
.
tT'"
:JT'"
00)
ü"'f
If)!'-
ct1'"
-('I)
<........:
Oll)
og
T'" _
V
>
C
o
t-
en
::::J
o
LL
o
Z
c¡:
:J:
o
_U___m" --- -----+-~--
Report To: ~_ __ _______
------------------ -------- - -- "0
Name: t....vi~1 Se~\t, <..J 'vt Project: C~y af Ì>1\tv iL ~~
Address: l Z '_0, Uþl,-~~ Project II: L()~ .JL::::ì'vJ-J_____ ~ð
CitY:hL'~lf I'~.IJ .. Sampler Name: K'O.5¡'l,_ ß -~
State: C'-' I,~ Zip: 9.3Jc) Other: ~ ~
Attn: 6,'1/ 12~ '( A ~~
"'"
~
-
'J ,~
-"e ~
\9 '-
~
. -~
:z: J- I
"::l.. IU :::z:
~
I- ~ I-
d
Z
.
)
LU
a:
o
~
a:
o
.m
'~
Phone: {3 J 4· ')9"Ç{,
Lab#
Date & Time Sampled
3 .' ~ (' f-'"'
x
-I::
~
2
.5
S
.s
:>1
C.
&'
~ 2'
@ b'
~')
Ç~/I'9)'
_ ~; 'II ~ 9~
~- ,,,... 9 }~ 3 " 0 y"- 1'\ .J
-----~---- ----.. ----- -----
--~,-_." -
------ -'--' _.- ---
---
- -- --- -'-- --.
--.--
- --~-_.'----'--"----'
---.-. ----
------------_..--- .. --------- - --- ---- ---- ~-
Analysis Requested
-..- ",--- .--.- -- _..H u___"-- ._~- "--. ..- --.- ..--. .."--'-
~
I:: >.
-- ê
è -- .D . OJ
:Q è ~ OJ '0 a.
E I:: >.
0 If) I-
() ñ; "C ~ ct1
OJ L. L.
cj OJ OJ Oð OJ OJ
OJ CI) Z .D I::
L. >. OJ E ëü
If) "C ~ ~ :J ë
OJ 0 "5 CD Z 0
a. iñ If) ü
E :J OJ
ct1 Ü a:
CI)
- --- - --- f--- - - f----- --- - - f--
- --- -- - I-- -- -- ---. -- ---
_n__. ".---- -'-" -- -- -- --- --_."-- -- ----~ -.-- -- .--.
-" .n....." -.--.- -- .......-, .-..--. ---- ..... ..._--. "- ..- ".'--'> -.------. ----
I
--- -- -- --- -- ,-- -- --- -- .----- f----- - - --
-- - -- e-- -- --- -- -- ..- -- - - --
-- ---- --- -- -- --- - - - -
.-." --- - .._-- I--- -- --
-.. __v_. -- --- -- -- -.-- .-.- ,-- -- -- --- -
--- ~._- .---. ~--- -- - -- .--. - ~-- --- ---
- --- --- -- -- - -'--' .---- --- ~- -- - --
,
I-- - -
.,.. "--- 0_'_ --'- .-....- -- -- . . P"'- ...- -.--- -.-- ..--. .>-- ---- -.---..- ------
.--.- - -'-' -
I
i
--- ~~bJ(~~q~t5/ I ï'CisTi~
(Signature)
~ --
by: (Signature) - 'Received b#(Signature) I Date: Tim
---------- ------- ---
by: (Signature) Received by: (Signature) Date: Tim
by: (Signature) Received by: (Signature) Date: Tim
....-. . -- ...----- ----- --- ------- --- ..._--~_.. _.- --- -..- -- - - -.". --- -- - -.--
by: (Signature) Received by: (Signature) Date: Tifl1
.- ."~---------_._.- -------.. -. ----.---- -. -----..--.. ..- n_._.__ .......--------
by: (Signature) Received by: (Signature) Date: Tim
- - - - - -
B~~ Info: _________________ R~~U~
Name: 5 -;- ,
Addres;--~~------------------ Rell ulshed
Comment:
NCZQl\ ç\J~ ~ ON
T. P. H.
24 HL..J tv~4
~
.-----
-----_.-- -.--.-----.--- ------
Relinquished
City
Attention:
Time:
State
"-------.--.--.
-_._.........
Miles:
-_._------~-~--_._---,_.
. Sample Disposal
n c Di~ @"5.Q.Q.a
R~ clie_
P.O.#
~---
---.--....--
-
- -
- -
Relinquished
Relinquished
____n_______."'_
Relinquished
-
-