HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 212-88RESOLUTION NO. 212-88
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION OF THE COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSING PROCEEDINGS
FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD IDENTIFIED AS ANNEXATION NO. 329
(CASA LOMA NO. 5 ANNEXATION) GENERALLY LOCATED
EAST OF THE CITY LIMITS, NORTH OF WHITE LANE
AND EASTERLY OF THE KERN ISLAND CANAL (WARD 1).
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a
change of organization, to wit, the annexation to the City of
Bakersfield of the hereinafter-described territory, pursuant to
Section 56800 of the Government Code of the State of California.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the
City of Bakersfield that it hereby finds and determines as
follows:
1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the
annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the territory described
in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part of this resolu-
tion as though fully set forth herein.
2. That a map of the territory proposed to be so
annexed, marked Exhibit "B", is attached hereto and made a
of this Resolution as though fully set forth herein.
part
3. That a Plan for providing services within the
affected territory of the proposed annexation, in accordance with
the provisions of Section 56653 of the Government Code, is marked
as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as though
fully set forth herein.
4. That this proposal for change of organization, to
wit, annexation, is made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local
Government Reorganization Act of 1985, and it is requested that
proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith.
5. That the reasons for the proposed change of organi-
zation are that the owners of a portion of the affected territory
desire to receive municipal services from the City of Bakersfield,
and the City desires to receive tax revenues for benefits given
and to be given to a portion of the territory proposed to be
annexed, and that the City of Bakersfield, as owner of the bal-
ance of the affected territory, desires to have such City-owned
property converted to tax exempt status.
6. That for this proposed annexation, the Casa Loma
Specific Plan was adopted by the City Council on August 6, 1986
and the Board of Supervisors on August 25, 1986, and an Environ-
mental Impact Report for the Bakersfield Airpark was certified by
the City Council on September 14, 1988, and it was determined that
the proposed project would not have a significant effect on the
environment.
7. That the territory proposed for annexation as
described herein has been determined to be uninhabited pursuant
to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985,
Section 56046 of the Government Code.
8. That the names of the officers of the City of
Bakersfield who are to be furnished with copies of the Executive
Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed Notice of
Hearing, if any, are:
City Clerk
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
J. Dale Hawley
City Manager
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Arthur J. Saalfield
City Attorney
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
9. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten
(10) copies of this resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive
Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern County
at 2700 "M" Street., Suite 302, Bakersfield, California 93301.
.......... 000 .........
- 2 -
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was
passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a
regular meeting thereof held on October 12, 1988 , by
the following vote:
CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED October 12, 1988
MAYOR of the City of Ba~'ersfield
APPROVED as to form:
the C/j,t~
aJS/EA/meg /
Attachments
Exhibit "A"
Exhibit "B"
Exhibit "C"
A ANEX 5
AP.CASA5.1
10/3/88
of Bakersfield
- 3 -
CASA Lf~A NO. 5
ANNEXATION NO. 329
A parcel of land situate in the County of Kern, State of California, being a
portion of Lots 8 and 9 of Kern County Sales Map No. 1, Land of J.B. Haggin
as filed March 16, 1889, in Section 17, Township 30 South, Range 28 East,
M.D. B. & M., more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at a point on the Northwest corner of said Lot 9, said point also
being on the existing corporate boundary of the City of Bakersfield;
Thence (1) departing existing boundary, Easterly along the north line of said
Lot 9, to the East line of the West 198 feet of said Lot 9, said East line also
being the East boundary line of Grant Deed 2816 to the City of Bakersfield as
recorded in Book 5994, Page 2351 on April 21, 1987;
Thence (2) Southerly along said East boundary line a distance of 1290.85 feet
to the North line of the South 30 feet of said Lot 9, said line being the
Northerly right-of-way line of White Lane (County Road #782);
Thence (3) Westerly along said North line and the North line of the South 30
feet of said Lot 8; a distance of 1370.41 feet, to a point on the centerline
of the Kern Island Canal, such point also being on the said existing corporate
boundary;
Thence (4) continuing Westerly, Northerly, and Easterly along said existing
corporate boundary as described in the Airpark No. 1 Annexation No. 178 of
September 29, 1971, to the point of beginning.
Containing 44.71 acres, more or less.
4: CASALOMA5
i,J
II
PM No 4106
b_]
7
(4)
(4)
T, 30 $,
(3)
PROPOSED CASA LOMA No.
ANNEXATION
I
R. 26 E,
I
I
ANNEXATION NO. ~
RESOLUTION NO,
ANNEXATION OF
CASA LOMA No. 5
TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
~?1 -+ ACRES
SCALE:
2~00
...... ,~ EXISTING C~A~ BOUNOARY
~ PROPOSE0 ~IEXATIOff BOUNOARY
EXHIBIT "B"
PLAN FOR PROVIDING SERVICE
ANNEXATION NO. 329
(Casa Lc~a No. 5)
SERVICES
Planning
Parks and Recreation
Library
~ency Which Presently Check Services Which Indicate How Services Provided
Provides Service City/District Will Provide by City/District will be Financed
(i.e., General Tax Rate or Special
Upon Future Date Assess~nt.)
Annexation (Specify)
County X General Tax Revenue/
County X General Tax Revenue
County General Tax Revenue
Sheriff & Highway Patrol X General Tax Revenue
City/County Joint
A~ree~nt General Tax Revenue
County X General and Gas Tax Revenue
County Upon
Develo~nt Private Develo~nt
County X General and Gas Tax Revenue
NONE X General and Gas Tax Revenue
County X General Tax Revenue
County X General Tax Revenue
N/A X User Fees/Special Assessment
California Water Service User Fee
Privately Contacted X User Fee
A
Police Protection
Fire Protection
Streets
Construction
Maintenance
Sweeping
Lighting
Flood Control
Sewerage
Water
Other: (REFUSE)
EXHIBIT "C"
ANNEX329.1 RTY: wrn
Please provide the following information, when applicable, only for services which will be provided by the Applicant
City/District.
Location
Indicate location frcm which service
will be provided (i.e., nearest fire
station, library, etc.)
Police: Ail police services in the City of Bakersfield are
administered through the City Police Department located at the
southwest corner of Truxtun Avenue and Eye Street about 5~miles
northwesterly of the annexation.
Fire: Station No. 5 (City) is within 1 mile at the corner of
South Chester Avenue and Planz Road.
Parks and Recreation: Planz Park the nearest City park, is
located within 2 miles westerly. Park and Recreation areas will
be provided in accordance with the Casa Lc~a Specific Plan.
Library: Not applicable.
Streets:
Construction/Maintenance; Sweeping; Lighting: The City
Corporation Yard on Truxtun Avenue, West of Freeway 99 will
provide necessary facilities, personnel and services to
accommodate Public Works efforts. Maintenance and personnel
will be dispatched from the City Yard on a regular basis for
preventative maintenance as needed. Repair includes streets
construction/maintenance, sweeping and lighting.
Sewer: A City truck sewer line exists in Planz Road 1/4 mile
northerly of the area connecting directly to City Wastewater
Treatr~nt Plant No. 2.
Water: The territory is in the service area of the California
Water Service Cogpany.
Other: REFUSE - Present refuse service is by franchise
collector. Upon anr~xation, the Ctiy will provide collection
either by City forces or by contract witht he present collector
if possible.
Service Level Capacity
Indicate frequency and availability of service
(i.e., street sweeping, response tim~ for
emar~enc7 services, rec. programs, etc. )
24-hour patrol is provided in the immediate vicinity
of this annexation. First priority response is
approximately 7.00 minutes or less.
Fire protection is provided on a 24-hour basis with
response ti,,-e of 3 mi£f~tes or less.
not affect City/County joint fire service capability.
Ail City parks are open to the public at reasonable
hours.
Not applicable.
There will be no reduction in the range capacity of the
City to provide the necessary public works services to
this area. Services will be on a regular basis and
"as needed."
Adequate capacity exists.
Adequate capacity exists[
City refuse pick up is twice a week.
III. What effects, if any, would annexation of this territory have on t~he existing
level of City/District services (i.e., need for additional emergency service
personnel or construction of new facilities, etc. )? The annexation of this
territory will not affect near term level or capability of the City to Drovide
needed services. Street imDrovements resulting frc~ any future development will
increase the maintenance resDonsibility of t~he City but will not affect the
existing level of service.
IV. Would City/District require any upgrading or change in facilities to serve
affected territory (roads, fire hydrants, mains, etc.)? If so, would
City/District o~r residents be responsible for financing? The City will not
_require any upgrading or changes in existin(~ facilities. As future additional
develoDment occurs, Developers shall provide and DaY for necessary major
improvements and facilities and dedicate them to the City.
V. Indicate and explain existing zoning in affected territory. This area is located
within the Casa Loma Specific Plan Area adoDted by the City Council on August 6,
1986 and by Kern County Board of Supervisors on August 25, 1986. The s~ecific
...... plan desiqnates the land use for this territory as 7.3 (Heavy Industrial).
VI. Indicate and explain proposed prezoning in area. (List effects on present land
use that would Occur as a result of annexation, such as maintenance of livestock
on property, etc. ) This annexation does not propose any Land Use or Zoning
change from that already adopted by the Case Loma S~ecific Plan. The adopted
7.3 alesic]nation will not change whether the territory is in the City or the
County.
ANNEX329.3 3 RTY :wrn
VII. List City/District services that area will directly or indirect.l~v benefit from
such as decrease in fire insurance rate, shorter emergency respo, tlse time, use of
community facilities, etc. City police should be able to respond in a more
timely manner than the present County Sheriff and State Hi(thway Patrol. Current
City police standard is a higher sworn officer per 1,000 population percenta(~e
compared to the County standard. Refuse service will be provided by the City
and will result in savin(~s to the owners within this annexationJ No special
assessments or charqes for street sweeping, street liqhting enerc/y costs and
.... fire hydrants upon any future development of subject area.
VIII. Please provide the following information relative to City/District and County
taxes:
List existing tax rate(s) in area. Existing tax rate in area equals 1.076576%
of assessed market value.' This re~resents the total property tax rate. Widen
annexed, a designated percentage of the total tax of the area will accrue to the
City.
(Rate as shown on 1987-88 County Auditor-Controller Tax Rate List).
Would affected areas be subject to any bonded indebtedness of the' City/District:
If so, explain. Yes, the tax rate for City bonds equals 0.004970% of assessed
market value. When annexed, the total tax rate will be 1.081546%. (Rates as
shown on 1987-88 County Auditor-Controller Tax Rate List).
How will the difference in tax rates affect a building with a market value of
$50,000. The yearly tax rate would increase by the amount of $2.49 on a buildinq
of $50,000 market value due to inclusion of the City Bond Rate.
ANNEX329.4 4 RTY :wrn