HomeMy WebLinkAboutORD NO 3977ORDINANCE NO. ~ 9 ? ~7
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE SEVENTEEN OF THE
BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL CODE AND ZONING MAP NO.
102-15 AND 102-22 BY CHANGING THE ZONING FROM M-1
(LIGHT MANUFACTURING), M-2 (GENERAL MANUFACTURING)
AND M-3 (HEAVY INDUSTRIAL) TO R-I (ONE FAMILY
DWELLING), R-2 (LIMITED MULTIPLE FAMILY DWELLING)
AND C-2 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) ZONES ON 170.90
ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF OLIVE DRIVE TO
GILMORE AVENUE, BETWEEN FRUITVALE AVENUE AND
STATE ROUTE 99. (GPA # P99-0482),
WHEREAS, in accordance with the prccedure set forth in the provisions of Title 17
of the Municipal Code of the City of Bakersfield, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on
a petition to change the land use zoning of those certain properties in the City of Bakersfield
generally located south of Olive Drive to Gilmore Avenue, between Fruitvale Avenue and State
Route 99.
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 58-00 en June 15, 2000, the Planning Commission
recommended approval and adoption of an ordinance amending Title 17 of the Municipal Code to
approve R-l, R-2 and C-2 zones as delineated on attached Zoning Maps No. 102-15 and 102-22
marked Exhibit "B" and Exhibit "C", by this Council and this Council has fully considered the
recommendations made by the Planning Commission as set forth in that Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, as a result of said hearing, did make several
general and specific findings of fact which warranted an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and
changes in zoning of the subject property from M-l, M-2 and M-3 to R-l, R-2 and C-2 and the
Council has considered said findings and all appear to be true and correct; and
WHEREAS, for the above-described project, an initial Study was conducted and it
was determined that the proposed project would have a significant effect on the environment,
therefore, a Notice of Preparation (NOP) and an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared
for the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and
WHEREAS, the applicant entered into an agreement with the City of Bakersfield to
implement all mitigation measures identified in the environmental analysis contained within the
Program EIR; and
WHEREAS, the law and regulations relating to the preparation and adoption of
Environmental Impact Repots, as set forth in CEQA and City of Bakersfield's CEQA Implementation
Procedures, have been duly followed by city staff, Planning Commission and this Council; and
WHEREAS, a Program Environmental Impact Report for the project was advertised
and posted in accordance with CEQA; and
WHEREAS, the general plan designations for this area allows residential and
commercial development; and
WHEREAS, Mcintosh and Associates representing Olive-Landco Associates has
submitted an appeal for the project; and
WHEREAS, the appeal for the project is for conditions of approval recommended
by the Planning Commission for the project; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the project proposal and the appeal and
hereby makes the following findings:
1. All above recitals are true and correct.
2. All required notices have been given.
The provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) have been
followed.
Based on the initial study and comments received, staff has determined that the
proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment. A Notice of
Preparation (NOP) was prepared and sent to responsible agencies and property
owners within 300 feet of the project site, A Program Environmental Impact Report
(EIR) was prepared for this project in accordance with CEQA.
That this project was the subject of a Program EIR and the entire environmental
record is incorporated herein by reference as set forth in the resolution certifying the
Final Program Environmental Impact Report.
That infrastructure exists or can easily be provided to accommodate the types and
intensities of the proposed developmerit.
That the project site is a portion of an i~'regular shaped parcel consisting of 504.33
acres that was annexed to the City of Bakersfield on April 24, 2000.
The public necessity, general welfare and good zoning practice justify the
recommended change of zone to R-1 (One Family Dwelling), R-2 (Limited Multiple
Family Dwelling) and C-2 (Regional Commercial) zones on 170.90 acres located
generally south of Olive Drive, between Fruitvale Avenue and State Route 99, north
of Gilmore Avenue.
The project site, with prior approval of General Plan Amendment No. P99-0482, is
designated LR (Low Density Residential), LMR (Low Medium Density Residential)
and GC (General Commercial) on the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan
Land Use Plan.
10.
The recommended Zone Change No. IP99-0482 will reflect the previously adopted
General Plan Amendment No. P99-0482.
11. The recommended zone change is compatible with the surrounding uses.
12.
The recommended zone change is consistentwith the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010
General Plan, subject to prior approval of General Plan Amendment P99-0482.
13.
That the applicant by prior agreement agreed to comply with all adopted mitigation
measures contained within the Final P~'ogram EIR for this project.
14.
15.
16.
follows:
1.
That Zone Change P99-0482 is hereby recommended for approval by staff and the
Planning Commission with mitigation measures adopted in the GPA/ZC P99-0482
Final Program EIR,
That Section 17.06.020 (Zoning Map) of the Municipal Code of the City of
Bakersfield is recommended for amendment by changing the land use zoning from
M-1 (Light Manufacturing), M-2 (General Manufacturing) and M-3 (Heavy Industriall)
to R-1 (One Family Dwelling), R-2 (Umited Multiple Family Dwelling) and C-2
(Regional Commercial) zones on 170.90 acres on Map Nos. 102-15 and 102-22
attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and Exhibit "C", respectively, of that certain property
in said City of Bakersfield as described in Exhibit "D" attached hereto.
That Zone Change No. P99-0482, as outlined above, has been recommended by
the Planning Commission for apprevali with mitigation and conditions of approval
shown on Exhibit "A", subject to prior approval of General Plan Amendment No.
P99-0482.
SECTION 1,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAI NED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield as
The above recitals and findings are true and correct and constitute the findings of
the City Council in this matter.
All required notices have been given.
The provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) have been
followed.
Based on the initial study and comments received, staff has determined that the
proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment. A Notice of
Preparation (NOP) was prepared and sent to responsible agencies and property
owners within 300 feet of the project site. A Program Environmental Impact Report
(EIR) was prepared for this project in accordance with CEQA.
That this project was the subject of a Program Environmental Impact Report and the
entire environmental record is incorporated herein by reference as set forth in the
resolution certifying the Final Program Environmental Impact Report.
That infrastructure exists or can easily be provided to accommodate the types and
intensities of the proposed development.
That the project site is a portion of an irregular shaped parcel consisting of 504.33
acres that was annexed to the City of IBakersfield on April 24, 2000.
The public necessity, general welfare and good zoning practice justify the
recommended change of zone to R-1 (One Family Dwelling), R-2 (Limited Multiple
Family Dwelling) and C-2 (Regional Commercial) zones on 170.90 acres located
generally south of Olive Drive, between Fru tva e Avenue and State Rout~ ,.,,9~,.north
of Downing Road. ,.~..~,~ ~
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
The project site, with prior approval of General Plan Amendment No. P99-0482, is
designated LR (Low Density Residential), LMR (Low Medium Density Residential)
and GC (General Commercial) on the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan
Land Use Plan.
The recommended Zone Change No. P99-0482 will reflect the previously adopted
General Plan Amendment No. P99-0482.
The recommended zone change is compatible with the surrounding uses.
The recommended zone change is consistent with the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010
General Plan, subject to prior approval of General Plan Amendment P99-0482.
That the applicant by prior agreement agreed to comply with all adopted mitigation
measures contained within the Final Program EIR for this project.
That Zone Change P99-0482 is hereby approved as recommended by staff and the
Planning Commission with mitigation measures adopted in the GPA/ZC P99-0482
Final Program EIR.
That Section 17.06.020 (Zoning Map) of the Municipal Code of the City of
Bakersfield be amended by changing the land use zoning from M-1 (Light
Manufacturing), M-2 (General Manufacturing) and M-3 (Heavy Industrial) to R-1
(One Family Dwelling), R-2 (Limited IVlultiple Family Dwelling) and C-2 (Regional
Commercial) zones on 170.90 acres on Map Nos. 102-15 and 102-22 attached
hereto as Exhibit "B" and Exhibit "C", respectively, of that certain property in said
City of Bakersfield as described in Exhibit "D" attached hereto.
That Zone Change No. P99-0482, as outlined above, is hereby approved with
mitigation and conditions of approval shown on Exhibit "A", subject to prior approval
of General Plan Amendment No. P99-.0482,
SECTION ,%
This ordinance shall be posted in accordance with the Bakersfield Municipal Code
and shall become effective not less than thirty (30) days from and after the date of its passage.
4
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance was passed and adopted by
the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held
on AUG 5' 0 2000 , by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBER CARSON, DEMOND, GREEN, MAGGARD, COUCH, SULLIVAN, SALVAGGIO
COUNCILMEMBER ~ ~
COUNCILMEMBER n~_~,~ ~o .
COUNCILMEMBER rT~ ~
APPROVED AUG 3 0 2000
BOB II~'l(f/
MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED as to form:
BART THILTGEN
City Attorney
By:~(/~~
Exhibits:
A. Conditions.
B. Zone Maps.
C, Legal Description
S:\Gpa-June\P990482 Kyle Canter EIR\RES\Ord ZC ccl .WPD
August 17, 2000
5
EXHIBIT "A'
General Plan Amendment/Zone Change No. P99-0482
Mitigation Measures/Conditions of Approval
AESTHETICS/LIGHT AND GLARE
Construction equipment staging areas shall be located away from existing residential
uses and appropriate screening (i.e., temporary fencing with opaque material), shall be
used to buffer views of construction equipment and material, when feasible. Staging
location shall be indicated on project Final Development Plans and Grading Plans.
(Mitigation measure-EIR June 2000).
Hours for construction shall be consistent with the City of Bakersfield Construction
Noise Standards. (Mitigation measure-EIR June 2000).
AIR QUALITY
Prior to the approval of a grading plan for any residential tract, multiple family project,
and commercial project, the project applicant shall submit a letter to the City of
Bakersfield Planning Department from the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution
Control District (SJVUAPCD) stating the dust suppression measures that shall be
completed during construction activities in order to comply with SJVUAPCD Regulation
VIII. At a minimum, these measures shall include: the replacement of ground cover in
disturbed areas quickly; proper maintenance of construction equipment; watering of haul
roads two times per day; reduced speeds on unpaved roads of 15 miles per hour or
less; and the use of low volatile organic compound asphalt. (Mitigation measure-EIR
June 2000).
Prior to the approval of a grading plan for any residential tract, multiple family project,
and commercial project, the project applicant shall submit a letter to the City of
Bakersfield Planning Department from the SJVUAPCD stating the measures that shall
be completed during asphalt paving in order to comply with SJVUAPCD Rule 4641.
(Mitigation measure-EIR June 2000).
The construction grading plans shall inc, lude a statement that all construction equipment
shall be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacture's specifications.
(Mitigation measure-BR June 2000).
The construction grading plans shall include a statement that work crews shall shut off
construc{ion equipment when not in use. (Mitigation measure-EIR June 2000).
7, The project applicant shall incorporate the following in building plans:
Solar or low-emission water heater shall be used;
Central water heating systems shall be used;
Double-paned glass shall be used in all windows; and
Energy efficient low-sodium lighting in parking areas shall be used.
(Mitigation measure-EIR June :2000).
Exhibit "A"
GPA/ZC P99-0482
Page 2
BIOLOGICAL
9.
10.
11.
12.
Mitigation measures beyond those contained in applicable plans and policies would be
implemented on a project-by-preject basis. (Mitigation measure-EIR June 2000).
RESOURCES
The project applicant shall pay a one-time mitigation fee due and payable to the City of
Bakersfield at the time grading plans are approved or building permits are issued. The
mitigation fee is currently $1,240 per acre (Phil Burns pers. com. 2000) and may be
increased to keep pace with inflation (City of Bakersfield 1994). The mitigation fee shall
apply to the project sites in their entirety. (Mitigation measure-EIR June 2000).
Prior to construction activities, focused surveys for the San Joaquin kit fox shall be
conducted by a qualified biologist to determine if any known kit fox dens are located on
the project sites. If an active den is not found, no further mitigation would be necessary.
However, if an active den is present, kit foxes shall be relocated by a qualified biologist
using California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) and the United State Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS) approved methods. If the biologist determines that relocation
is not practicable, he/she shall destroy the den according to CDFG~approved methods
and USFWS-appreved methods to allow the foxes to relocate on their own. Results of
the surveys shall be provided to CDFG. (Mitigation measure-EIR June 2000).
Thirty days prior to construction activitiE;s, a qualified biologist shall conduct a survey to
determine if the burrowing owl is present on the project sites and the nesting status of
any individuals present. If nesting is not occurring, construction work shall proceed after
any owls have been evacuated from the project sites using CDFG-approved burrow
closure procedures. If an active nest is present, to protect any active burrow site, the
following restriction on construction shall be required between February 1 and June 30
or until nests are no longer active as dstermined by the project biologist: clearing limits
shall be established by the biologist in any direction from raptor nests/burrews
depending on the species and existing c, onditions. Resultsofthesurveysand relocation
efforts shall be provided to CDFG. (Mitigation measure-EIR June 2000).
Thirty days prior to construction activities, a qualified biologist shall conduct a survey to
determine if any raptors are nesting in trees on the project sites. If nesting is not
occurring, construction work shall proceed. If an active nest is present, to protect any
active nest/burrow sites, the following restriction on construction shall be required
between February 1 and June 30 or until nests are no longer active as determined by
the project biologist: clearing limits shall be established by the biologist in any direction
from raptor nests/burrows depending on the species and existing conditions. Results
of the surveys shall be provided to CDFG. (Mitigation measure-EIR June 2000).
Exhibit "A"
GPNZC P99-0482
Page
CULTURAL RESOURCES
13.
Prior to construction, the project applicant shall implement the following measures as
outlined in the February, 1991 Archaeological Assessment for the project area:
Recorded sites CA-KER-2873 and CA-KER-2874 shall be mapped and surface
collected.
Two backhoe trenches (minimum depth: 1.5m. [5 ft.]) and two test units (1 x 2
m.) shall be placed at each recorded site to determine the presence and contant
of any intact subsurface deposiL Further recommendations, if any, will depend
on the results of these tests.
Efforts shall be made to locate, borrow, and record artifacts previously removed
from the project area.
(Mitigation measure-EIR June 2000).
14.
In the event that a material of potential I;ultural significance is uncovered during grading
activities on the project sites, all grading shall cease and the project applicant shall
retain a professional archaeologist to evaluate the quality and significance of the
material. Grading shall not continue until resources have been completely removed by
the archaeologist and recorded as appropriate. Compliance with this measure is subject
to periodic field inspection by the project applicant. (Mitigation measure-EiR June
2000).
GEOLOGY AND SOILS
15.
The proposed project structures and improvements shall be designed in accordance
with all applicable requirements of the Uniform Building Code and the City of Bakersfield
Municipal Code. (Mitigation measure-EIR June 2000).
16.
Engineering design for all structures shall consider the probability that the project area
will be subjected to strong ground motion during the lifetime of the proposed
developments. Construction plans shall be subject to the City of Bakersfield Municipal
Code and shall call for standards which address horizontal bedrock accelerations of at
least 0.24 gravity. (Mitigation measurs-EIR June 2000).
17.
Pursuant to City of Bakersfield Municipal Code Section 16.16.100, prior to site grading
or excavation, the project applicant shall submit to the Engineering Division for review
and approval, an Erosion Control Plan. (Mitigation measure-EIR June 2000).
18.
in compliance with the Kern County California Soil Survey, a community sewerage
system shall be designed and implemented in association with the proposed
low-medium density residential housing (LMR Site), to the satisfaction of the City of
Bakersfield Engineering Department. (Mitigation measure-EIR June 20,0A)~ ~
~-"-
Exhibit "A"
GPNZC P99-0482
Page 4.
HUMAN HEALTH/RISK OF UPSET
19.
Prior to issuance of any grading permit:, the project applicant shall perform soil tests to
determine concentrations of pesticide and fungicide residues which may be present
within the project site, Should contaminant levels be in excess of acceptable Federal,
State and/or County levels, the project applicant shall identify and implement remedial
action, subject to approval by the City of Bakersfield and responsible regulatory
agencies to reduce contaminants to acceptable levels. (Mitigation measure-EIR June
2000).
20.
Pursuant to the Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources (Division), active wells
which would remain upon project cornpletion and associated equipment within the
project area shall be enclosed by an eight-foot block wall. Appropriate gates shall be
installed and climbable landscaping around the perimeter of the facility shall be avoided.
The inside grade of the facility shall be constructed so that potential spillage will be
confined to the enclosure. Improw.=ments are the responsibility of the project
applicant/devebper. (Mitigation measure-EIR June 2000).
21.
Sufficient access to the existing and abandoned wells shall be maintained in order for
the Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources (Division) to investigate the
conditions of the wellheads and check for leakage. If any re-abandonments are
required, the Division shall furnish necessary specifications to the property owner.
(Mitigation measure-EIR June 2000).
22.
If any abandoned or unrecorded wells are uncovered, or damaged during excavation
or grading activities, remedial plugging operations pursuant to Division of Oil, Gas, and
Geothermal Resources requirements would be required. (Mitigation measure-EIR June
2000).
23.
Prior to issuance of building permits, any discovered oil contaminated soil shall be
remediated to the satisfaction of the Local Unified Program Agency (the Office of
Environmental Services-Bakersfield City Fire Department) in conjunction with the State
Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) and/or California Department of 't'oxic
Substances Control (DTSC). (Mitigation measure-EIR June 2000).
24.
Prior to issuance of grading permitsl the project applicant shall provide sufficient
evidence that the existing groundwater wall has been properly closed pursuant to the
RWQCB requirements. (Mitigation measure-EtR June 2000).
25.
Prior to issuance of demolition permits, the project applicant shall remove all above
ground storage tanks and oil storage drums from the sewage treatment plant facility.
Areas beneath the storage drums and storage tanks shall be re-inspected to verify if
additional staining has occurred. All reported stained soils as well as newly identified
staining shall be tested, removed, and properly disposed of off-site in accordance with
Exhibit "A"
GPNZC P99-048;!
Page 5
26,
27.
28.
local, state, and federal regulations. (Ivlitigation measure-EIR June 2000).
Prior to demolition work, the applicant shall sample structures within the sewage
treatment area (i.e., equipment shed, truck shed, maintenance shop, engine room, and
office building) to determine the presence or absence of Asbestos Containing Materials
(ACMs). Any demolition of the existing buildings shall comply with State law, which
requires a contractor, where there is asbestos-related work involving 100 square feet
or more of ACMs, to be certified and that certain procedures regarding the removal of
asbestos be followed. (Mitigation measure-EIR June 2000).
If during demolition of the structure, paint is separated from the building material (e.g.,
chemically or physically), the paint waste shall be evaluated independently from the
building material to determine its proper management. Should the Lead Based Paint
(LBP) materials require disposal, the applicant shall contact the landfill operator in
advance to determine any specific requirements they may have regarding the disposal
of LBP materials. (Mitigation measure-EIR June 2000).
Prior to approval of final development plans, the City shall confirm that appropriate
setback distances for future residential units from the existing heavy industrial area to
the southeast am applied pursuant to the criteria established by the City of Bakersfield
and County of Kern Fire Departments. The greatest buffer distance calculated in
accordance with these criteria shall be the minimum set back distance approved without
consideration of other potential safety programs. The requirements include the
following:
330 feet; or
The endpoint distance shall be based upon the chemical specific, Emergency
Response Planning Guide 2 (ERPG 2) concentration, using the alternate release
scenario (i.e., the most crediblle accidental release scenario) for an airborne
Acutely Hazardous Material (AHM) toxic gas release from any facilities in the
adjacent zone; or
The endpoint distance of a one pound per square inch (1 psi) over pressure,
based on the alternate release scenario (i.e., the most credible release) of a
flammable substance vapor cloud explosion from any facilities with more than
10,000 pounds (2,500 gallons) of a fiammable gas in a process in the adjacent
Zone; or
The endpoint distance shall be based on the radiant heat exposure that
potentially could cause second degree burns, to a person for the duration of the
fireball resulting from a Boiling Liquid Expansion Vapor Explosion (BLEVE) from
any facility with more than 10,000 pounds (2,500 gallons) of a flammable gas
stored in multiple containers; or
Exhibit "A"
GPNZC P99-0482
Page 6
29.
30.
NOISE
31.
32.
Health and Safety Code. This criiteria would only apply to construction adjacent
to existing facilities that have reported continuous re~eases subject to the (Air
Toxics Hot Spots Act of 1987).
(Mitigation measure-EIR June 2000).
Prior to project approvals for future industrial uses located between the future
residential development and the existing heavy industries, the City shall utilize the
distance criteria developed by the City of Bakersfield and County of Kern fire
departments and provide sufficient setbacks for the industrial uses. Refer to criteria
outlined above. (Mitigation measure-EIR June 2000).
All areas with bare soil exposed as a result of grading activities shall be landscaped
at the earliest time possible or stabilized by watering when winds exceed 25 miles per
hour in order to reduce the potential inhalation of spores causing Valley Fever,
(Mitigation measure-EIR June 2000).
To reduce significant traffic noise impacts to below 65 dBA CNEL at proposed low
density and low-medium density residential locations situated adjacent to collector and
arterial roadways, the project applicant shall incorporate sound barriers, along cited
roadways (Knudsen Drive, Hageman Road, Mohawk Street, and Krebs Road). Since
lot design and grading plans are not yet available, the exact height and location of
barriers cannot be accurately determined at this time. Therefore, prior to Final
Development Plan approval, the project applicant shall prepare an acoustical anaBysis
to the satisfaction of the City Building Director, which provides location and heights of
future sound barriers. (Mitigation measure-EaR June 2000).
Prior to Final Development Plan approval, a subsequent noise analysis shall be
prepared, to the satisfaction of the City Building Director, which demonstrates that site
placement of stationary noise sources associated with future commercial uses would
not exceed criteria established in Chapter 9.22 of the City of Bakersfield Municipal
Code, for adjacent residences. To demonstrate commercial and industrial noise source
impacts are below the City's standards, the project applicant may need to include
project design features such as setbacks, barriers, building location/orientation,
acoustical design of buildings, etc. (Mitigation measure-EIR June 2000).
TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION
Exhibit "A"
GPNZC P99-0482
Page 7
TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION
33.
The following improvements shall be implemented off-site in conjunction with the
proposed development:
Krebs Road shall be constructed adjacent to the project site at its ultimate half-
section width as a Collector (2 lanes undivided) in conjunction with development.
Mohawk Street shall be constructed adjacent to the project site (south of
Hugeman Road) at its ultimate half-section width as an Arterial (4 lanes divided)
in conjunction with development.
Landco Road shall be constructad adjacent to the proiect site (north of Hugeman
Road) at its ultimate cross-section width as a Arterial (4 lanes divided) in
conjunction with development.
Hugeman Road shall be constructed adjacent to the project site (west of
Mohawk Street) at its ultimate half-section width as an Arterial (6 lanes divided)
and as an Arterial (4 lanes divided) east of Mohawk Street in conjunction with
development.
(Mitigation measure-EIR June 2000).
34.
Traffic signing/striping within the project boundaries shall be implemented in conjunction
with detailed construction plans for the project. (Mitigation measure-EIR June 2000).
35.
Sight distance at each intersection shall be reviewed with respect to Cultruns/City of
Bakersfield sight distance standards at the time of preparation of final grading,
landscape and street improvement plans. (Mitigation measure-EIR June 2000).
36.
Opening day mitigation measures found in the above 33. - 35. shall be required to be
implemented with the first phase of the development.
37.
The project shall participate through payment of fees in the phased construction of off-
site roadway improvements and traffic signals for the Year 2020 follows:
Olive Drive
Knudsen Drive to Roberts Lane
Six lanes divided
Hugeman Road
West of Patton Way to Mohawk Street
Six lanes divided
Mohawk Street to SR-204 Freeway
Four lanes divided
Exhibit "A"
GPNZC P99-048;!
Page 8
38.
39.
Rosedale Highway (SR-58)
West of Patton Way to Mohawk Street
Six lanes divided
Mohawk Street east to Oak Street
Eight lanes divided
Fruitvale Avenue
Hageman Road to Rosedale Highway (SR-58)
Four lanes divided
Mohawk Street
Hageman Road to Rosedale Highway (SR-58)
Four lanes divided
South of Rosedale Highway (SR-58)
Six lanes divided
Landco Road
Olive Drive to Hageman Road
Four lanes divided
Hageman Road to Rosedale Highway (SR-58)
Four lanes undivided
Gibson Street
Gilmore Avenue to Rosedale Highway (SR-58)
Two lanes divided
Buck Owens Boulevard
SR-204 Freeway to Rio Mirada Drive
Six lanes divided
(Mitigation measum-EIR June 2000).
The traffic signals required within the study area at buildout shall specifically include an
interconnect of the signals to function in a coordinated system. (Mitigation measure-EIR
June 2000).
The project shall contribute on a pro-rata basis to the construction of ultimate
intersection lane requirements for Year 2020 as follows:
Patton Way (NS) at:
Olive Drive (EVil)
Traffic signal
i
Exhibit "A"
GPNZC P99-0482
Page 9
Hugeman Road (EW) Traffic signal
Eastbound left turn lane
Eastbound through lane
Westbound through lane
Rosedale Highway- SR-58 (EW)
Traffic Signal
Fruitvale Avenue (NS) at:
O~ve Drive (EW)
Northbound right turn overlap
Hugeman Road (EW)
Northbound left turn lane
Northbound through lane
Northbound right turn overlap
Southbound left turn lane
Southbound right turn overlap
Eastbound dual through lane
Westbound through lane
Krebs Road (EW)
Traffic signal
Northbound through lane
Southbound through lane
Downing Avenue (EW)
Traffic signal
Northbound through lane
Southbound through lane
Rosedale Highway- SR-58 (EVV)
Southbound left turn lane
Eastbound through lane
Westbound through lane
Mohawk Street (NS) at:
Rosedale Highway- SR-58 (E1A/)
Traffic signal
Northbound dual left turn lane
Northbound dual through lanes
Northbound right turn lane with overlap
Southbound dual left turn lanes
Southbound dual through lanes
Southbound right turn lanes with overlap
Eastbound left turn lane,
Eastbound dual through lanes
Eastbound right turn overlap
Westbound left turn lanes
Exhibit "A"
GPA/ZC P99-0482
Page 10
Westbound dual through lanes
Westbound right turn ovarlap
Landco Road (NS) at:
Rosedale Highway- SR-58 (EW)
Southbound left turn lane
Eastbound left turn lane
Eastbound dual through lanes
Westbound dual through lanes
Knudsen Drive (NS) at:
Norris Road (El/V)
Traffic signal
· Northbound shared left turn lane
Olive Drive (ETA/)
Northbound left turn lane
Northbound right turn overlap
Southbound left turn lane
Eastbound through lane
Westbound left turn ~ane
Westbound through lanE;
Gibson Street (NS) at:
Rosedale Highway- SR-58 (E~
Northbound left turn lana
Southbound left turn lane
Eastbound left turn lane
Eastbound dual through lanes
Westbound dual through lanes
SR-99 Freeway SB Ramps (NS) at:
O~ve Drive (EVIl)
Traffic signal
Eastbound through lane
Westbound through lane
State Road (NS) at:
Olive Drive (EVIO
Eastbound through lane
Westbound through lane
Exhibit "A"'
GPNZC P99-0482
Page 11
40.
41.
42.
Roberrs Lane (NS) at:
O~ve Drive (EW)
Northbound left turn lane
Southbound right turn lane with right turn overlap
Eastbound left turn lane
Eastbound right turn overlap
Buck Owens Boulevard (NS) at:
Rio Mirada Drive (EW)
Traffic signal
SR-99 Freeway NB Ramps (E~)
Northbound right turn lane
Southbound right turn lane
Eastbound left turn lane
Eastbound right turn large
Westbound left turn lane
Rosedale Highway- SR-58 (El/V)
Southbound free right turn lane
Eastbound through lane!
Westbound through lane
Westbound free right turn lane
(Mitigation measure-EIR June 2000),
The project shall contribute to off-site improvements in accordance with the Capital
Improvement Plan and establishment of transportation impact fees for the Metropolitan
Bakersfield 2010 General Plan Area (Kern County Resolution 92-196 and 92-195) and
(City of Bakersfield Municipal Code 15.84). (Mitigation measure-EIR 6/2000),
The off-site roadway system shall be improved to roadway classifications as shown on
the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan Circulation Element. The
implementation of off-site improvements shall be determined as future entitlements are
granted for development in and around the project area. (Mitigation measure-EIR June
2000).
The developer shall be required to pay his proportionate share of all the year 2020
mitigation measures as specified in sections 5.9-2a through 5.9-2c of the DEIR. A fee
schedule shall be prepared by the developer with a requirement for approval prior to
recordation of a subdivision map or final occupancyofanycommercial developmentwith
fees being paid at time of building permit on a per unit basis. (Mitigation measure-EIR
June 2000).
Exhibit I'A"
GPA/ZC P99-0482
Page 12
43.
44.
45.
46.
The traffic impact fee schedule shall also include computation of fees for those facilities
on the Phase 2 RTIF list which are not included in the improvements specifically listed
for Year 2020. These additional facilities shall include all facilities on the RTIF list within
the influence area of the project which is generally the area bounded by Coffee Road,
Norris Road, Roberts Lane, Freeway 99 and Rosedale Highway. The additional facilities
include, but are not limited to, the following:
Olive Drive from Knudsen DrivE; to Coffee Road
Mohawk Street from California Avenue to Rosedale Highway
Mohawk Street Bridge over the Kern River
Various other signals, bridges, I;ulverts and improvements within the study area
which are on the RTIF list.
(Mitigation measure-EIR June 2000).
Within 60 days of the action of the City Council, submit easement documents for
Mohawk Street, Hageman Road and Knudsen Drive for recordation. (Mitigation
measure-EIR June 2000).
Prior to the approval of the first development within GPA/ZC P99-0482:
1. Submit a sewer study for the area for approval.
2. Submit a conceptual drainage study for the area for approval.
(Mitigation measure-EIR June 2000).
The project shall comply with all mitigation measures as specified in the DEIR, as well
as the additional mitigation measures as follows:
Opening Day Mitigation Measures Opening day mitigation measures in
sections 5,9-1a through 5.9-1c of the DEIR should be required to be
implemented with the first phase of development. The traffic analysis based
these upon full development of the project with a study year of 2002. No partial
build out was addressed.
Cumulative: Year2020 Mitigation Measures The developershall be required
to pay his proportionate share. of all the year 2020 mitigation measures as
specified in sections 5.9-2a through 5.9-2c of the DEIR. A fee schedule shall be
prepared by the developer with a requirement for approval prior to recordation
of a subdivision map or final occupancy of any commercial development with
fees being paid at the time of building permit on a per unit basis.
Exhibit "A"'
GPA/ZC P99-0482:
Page 13
Regional Transportation Impact Fee (RTIF) Mitigation In order to comply
with the last paragraph of mitigation measure 5.9-2c, the aforementioned fee
schedule shall also include computation of fees for those facilities on the Phase
2 RTt F list which are not included in the improvements specifically listed for Item
2 above. These additional facilities shall include al8 facilities on the RTIF list
within the influence area of the project which is generally the area bounded by
Coffee Rd, Norris Rd, Roberrs Ln, Fwy. 99 and Rosedale Hwy. The additional
facilities include, but are not limited to, the following:
2.
3.
4.
Olive Drive from Kundsen Drive to Coffee Road.
Mohawk Street from California Avenue to Rosedale Highway.
Mohawk Street Bridge ever the Kern River.
Various other signals, bridges, culverts and improvements within the
study area which are on the RTIF list.
(Mitigation measure-EIR June 2000).
47.
At the time of development or division, traffic signal interconnect conduit may be
required to be installed in collector or arterial streets. (Mitigation measure-EIR June
2000).
48.
The recommendations of the traffic study contained in the Draft EIR on pages 1-6
through 1-8 concerning the need for supplemental traffic analysis shall apply to each
new phase of project development. Items (a) through (d) recommend more detailed
analysis which couldn't be performed at the time of the study. These would include, but
not be limited to, (1) assessing the mitigation needs for major intersections such as
Hageman Rd. at Mohawk St., Hageman Rd. at Landco Dr. and Mohawk St. at Krebs Rd,
(2) assessing needs for various road improvements, and (3) assessing the phasing and
timing of various mitigation improvements. (Mitigation measure-EIR June 2000).
SERVICES AND UTILITIES
49.
An approved water supply system capable of supplying required fire flow for fire
protection purposes shall be provided to all premises upon which buildings or porlions
of buildings are constructed. The establishment of gallons-per-minute requirements for
fire flow shale be based on the "Guide for Determination of Required Fire Flow" published
by the Insurance Service Office. (Mitigation measure-EIR June 2000).
50.
Fire hydrants shall be located and installed per Fire Department standards and
approved by the Fire Chief. On-site fire! hydrants shall be provided when any portion of
the building protected is in excess of 150 feet from a water supply on a public street, or
as required by the Fire Chief. (Mitigation measure-EIR June 2000).
51.
in accordance with A.B. 2926, the developer shall pay development fees levied in
accordance with Education Code Section 17620 and Government Code Sections 65995,
65995.5 and 65995.7. (Mitigation measure-EIR June 2000).
Exhibit "A"
GPA/ZC P99-0482
Page 14
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
In compliance with the Quimby Act, the developer shall either dedicate land and develop
a park(s), or pay in lieu fees pursuant to Bakersfield Municipal Code 15.80 which
requires developers of new residential uses to provide 2.5 acres of land per population
projections of 1000, based on fair market value. Accordingly, project implementation
would create a demand for approximately five acres of neighborhood park land.
(Mitigation measure-EIR June 2000).
Development of park land off site, if necessary, shall be subject to further environmental
review to ensure that significant environmental effects, if any, are mitigated on a site
specific basis. (Mitigation measure-EIR June 2000).
The project developer shall pay the appropriate connection fee to the North of River
Sanitary District No. 1. All new wastewater facilities shall be located within public
rights-of-way or utility easements. (Mitigation measure-EIR June 2000).
Wastewater system design and all public mains, meters, and appurtenances shall be
installed and constructed in compliance with the applicable standards, specifications,
policies, and regulations of the North of River Sanitary District No. 1. (Mitigation
measure~EIR June 2000).
Development of wastewater facilities off site, if necessary, shall be subject to further
environmental review to ensure that significant environmental effects, if any, are
mitigated on a site specific basis. (Mitigation measure-EIR June 2000).
The developer shall pay the appropriate connection fee to the California Water Service
Company. All new water facilities shall be installed within public rights-of-way or utility
easements. (Mitigation measure-EIR .June 2000).
Water system design and all public water mains, meters, and appuflenances shall be
installed and constructed in compliance with the applicable standards, specifications,
policies, and regulations of the California Water Service Company. (Mitigation measure-
EIR June 2000).
Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits, the developer shall install low water use
fixtures, plumbing fixtures and appliances, to the satisfaction of the California Water
Service Company. These fixtures/appliances may include the following:
Interior:
SuppLy line pressure: Reduce; water pressure greater than 50 pounds per
square inch (psi) to 50 psi or less by means of a pressure-reducing valve;
Drinkincl fountains: Equip drinking fountains with self-closing valves; and
Ultra-low flush toilets: Install 1.6 gallon per flush toilets in all new construction.
Exhibit "A"
GPNZC P99-0482
Page 15
60.
61.
62.
Exterior:
Landscape with low water-consuming plants wherever feasible;
Minimize use of lawn by limiting it to lawn-dependant uses;
Group plants of similar water use to reduce over irrigation of low-water-using
plants;
Use mulch extensively in all landscaped areas (mulch applied on top of soil will
improve the water-holding capacity of the soil by reducing evaporation and soil
compaction);
Preserve and protect existing trees and shrubs (established plants are often
adapted to low-water-using conditions and their use saves water needed to
establish replacement vegetation);
Install efficient irrigation systems which minimize runoff and evaporation and
maximize the water which will reach the plant roots (drip irrigation, soil moisture
sensors, and automatic irrigation systems are a few methods to consider in
increasing irrigation efficiency and may be feasible for individual development
projects; and
Use pervious paving material whenever feasible to reduce surface water runoff.
(Mitigation measure-EIR June 2000).
Development of water facilities off site, if necessary, shall be subject to further
environmental review to ensure that significant environmental effects, if any, are
mitigated on a site specific basis. (Mitigation measure-EIR June 2000).
The proposed project shall incorporate design features for the storage and collection
of recyclables pursuant to federal, state, and local statutes (i.e., Bakersfield Muniicipal
Code, Chapter 8.32) and regulations related to solid waste. (Mitigation measure-EIR
June 2000).
Backqround
Section 15.8 of the DEIR contains the traffic study for the project. County staff has
pointed out that detailed level of service analysis was performed for the major
intersections external to the project but not for internal (e.g. - Hageman Rd. at
Mohawk St., Hageman Rd. at Landco Dr., etc). The traffic study does address this
issue in the recommendations on pages 1-6 through 1-8. The specific improvement
recommendations were carried through as Mitigation Measures in the body of the
DEIR, but not the recommendations concerning followup monitoring and study.
These recommendations include the statement that, "Each new phase of project
development will require new traffic analysis because of the need to (1) monitor
actual traffic conditions on the roadway system to determine existing levels of service
prior to each phase, and (2) address the impacts of specific land uses and quantities
at a level of detail which is not known at this time."
It is for these reasons, we believe, the detailed analysis the County con .si.~'~9
missing was not performed. The following condition is recommended.
Exhibit "A"
GPA/ZC P99-0482
Page 16
63.
64.
65.
66,
Condition of Approval
The recommendations of the traffic study contained in the Draft EIR on pages 1-6
through 1-8 concerning the need for supplemental traffic analysis shall apply to each
new phase of project development. Items (a) through (d) recommend more detailed
analysis which couldn't be performed at the time of the study. These would include,
but not be limited to, (1) assessing the mitigation needs for major intersections such
as Hageman Rd. at Mohawk St., Hageman Rd. at Landco Dr. and Mohawk St. at
Krebs Rd, (2) assessing needs for various road improvements, and (3) assessing the
phasing and timing of various mitigation improvements.
(Public Works Condition).
The applicant shall record an overflighl easement prior to recordation of any tract or
approval of any site plan. The overflight easement shall read substantially, like
Exhibit D2 of the Kern County Airporf Land Use Compatibility Plan. (Planning
Condition).
Require that the developer make a fifty-five (55) foot wide offer of dedication for road
right-of-way purposes along the east line of the GC (General Commercial)/C-2
(Regional Commercial) area prior to the issuance of any building permit for the site,
(Planning Commission Condition), to the extend necessary as determined by the
Public Works Director to comply with the city's general plan and traffic study.
The developer shall provide, between the LMR (Low Medium Density Residential)/R-
2 (Limited Multiple Family Dwelling) and the existing HI (Heavy Industrial) area, a
forty (40) foot wide buffer or more depending on a noise study which will determine
that the noise level is consistent with the 2010 General Plan Policy.
The Noise Study shall be completed and approved by the Planning Director prior to
the approval of any site plan or tentative tract on that area proposed for LMR/R-2.
(Planning Commission Condition).
The developer shall install, at the discretion of the Planning Director, trees along
Hageman Road between the LR (Low Density Residential)/R-1 (One Family
Dwelling) area and the existing SI (Sen4ce Industrial)/M-2 (General Manufacturing)
area. (Planning Commission Condition).
S:\Gpa*June\P990482 Kyle Cader EIR\ln[tialStudy~Exhibit A1 .wpd
R-)
E
E
R'S
~moxD
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
ZONING MAP I02-15
SEC 15 T. 29S R 27E
E ~~ LEGEND
I
TO R- ~Z
N
M+2
aL~
County
M-2
HWy
ROSEDALE
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
ZONING MAP 102-22
SEC. 22 T, 29 $ R. 27 E,
LEGEND
EXHIBIT "D"
ZONE CHANGE P99-0482
ZONE CHANGE LEGAL DF, SCRIPTION
GENERAl, COMMERCIAl, ZONE NORTH OF PROPOSED IIAGEMAN ROAD
ALL THOSE PORTION OF LOTS 3 AND b OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO 3-93 AS PER
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE RECORDED FEBRUARY 8, 1995 AS DOCUMENT NO. 0195015706
OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, ALSO LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 29
SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, MDM. IN THE COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 3 OF SAID LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO.
3-93, BEING ALSO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 15;
THENCE(l)
THENCE(2)
THENCE(3)
THENCE(4)
THENCE(5)
THENCE(6)
THENCE(7)
SOUTH 00°16'02'' WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 1024.90 FEET;
NORTH 89°05'45" WEST, 43.20 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE
SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1500,00 FEET;
SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
19°43'30'', AN ARC LENGTH OF 516.40 FEET;
NORTH 10o57'04'' WEST, 76.04 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE
EASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2000.00 FEET;
NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10°50'47'',
AN ARC LENGTH OF 37861 FEET;
NORTH 00o06, 17" WEST, 662 87 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 3 OF SAID
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO, 3-93;
SOUTH 89°05'45" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, 607.71 FEET TO THE POINT
OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINS 1448 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
Page 1 of :3
EXHIBIT "'D"
ZONE CHANGE P99-0482
ZONE CHANGE LEGAL DESCRIPTION
R-2 IN SECTION 22
ALL THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 7 AND 10 OF LOT LINE AD.I'USTMENT NO. 3-93 AS PER
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE RECORDED FEBRUARY 8, 1995 AS DOCUMENT NO. 0195015706
OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, ALSO LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF SECTION 22 TOWNSHIP
29 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, M.D.M. IN THE COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 7 OF SA/D LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 3-93;
THENCE(l) SOUTH00°38'34"WESTALONGTHEEASTL1NEOFSA1DLOT7,506.67FEETTOTHE
BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,500.00 FEET;
THENCE (2) SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14°21 '59", AN ARC
LENGTH OF 376.11 FEET;
THENCE (3) SOUTH 15o00'39" WEST, 263.48 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE
EASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2, 180.00 FEET;
THENCE (4)
SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 23°41'16'', AN ARC
LENGTH OF 90I .28 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 10 OF SAID LOT LINE
ADJUSTMENT NO. 3~93;
THENCE (5) SOUTH 68018'03'' WEST, 183.94 FEET;
q[~IENCE (6) SOUTH 49o36'38'' WEST, 195.44 FEET;
THENCE (7)
THENCE (8)
THENCE (9)
THENCE (10)
THENCE ( 11 )
SOUTH 34°18, 14" WES'I
NORTH 89o14'34'' WEST
NORTH 00037'20" EAST
NORTH 89o07'49" WEST
NORTH 00046, 10" EAST
500.15 FEET;
577.74 FEET;
1649.94 FEET;
992.36 FEET;
997.62 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 22;
THENCE(12) SOUTH 89°06'40" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, 2315.01 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
CONTAINS 91.84 ACRES MORE OR LESS
Page 2 of 3
EXHIBIT "D"
ZONE CHANGE P99-0482
ZONE CHANGE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS
R-I NORTH OF PROPOSED HAGEMAN ROAD
ALL THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 2 AND 3 OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 3-93 AS PER CERTIFICATE OF
COMPLIANCE RECORDED FEBRUARY 8, 1995 AS DOCUMENT NO. 0195015706 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS,
ALSO LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, M.D.M. IN
THE COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 2 OF SAID LOT LINE ADJUSTqMENT;
THENCE(I) ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT2, SOUTH 89°05'45" EAST, 1009.48 FEET;
THENCE (2)
DEPARTING FROM SAID NORTH LINE, SOUTH 00o06, 1T' EAST, 662.87 FEET TO THE
BEG/NNFIqG OF A CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2000.00
THENCE (3)
SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10°50'47'', AN ARC
LENGTH OF 378.61 FEET;
'IEENCE (4)
SOUTH 10o57'04" EAST, 76.04 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE
CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1500.00 FEET AND TO WHICH A
RADIAL LINE BEARS NORTH 18°49'15'' WEST;
']:HENCE (5)
SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE TItROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 29024'09",
AN ARC LENGTH OF 769.76 FEET;
THENCE (6)
SOUTH 41°46'36'' WEST, 692.59 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO
THE NORTIIWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1500.00 FEET;
THENCE (7)
SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 42"52'25",
AN ARC LENGTH OF 1,122.43 FEET;
THENCE (8)
NORTH 01 o 12 '02" EAST, 365.60 FEET TO THli BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE
SOUTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1400.00 FEET;
THENCE (9)
NORTHEASTERLY ALONG S/kID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39°21'52'', AN
ARC LENGTH OF 961.85 FEET;
'THENCE (10) NORTH 40°33 '54" EAST, 512.28 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE
NORTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1400.00 FEET;
THENCE (11 ) NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 40°23 '20", AN
ARC LENGTH OF 986.89 FEET;
THENCE (12) NORTH 00° 10'34 EAST, 18.90 FEET TO THE. POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINS 64.26 ACRES MORE OR LESS
Page 3 of 3
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING DOCUMENTS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
County of Kern )
PAMELA A. MCCARTHY, being duly sworn, deposes and says:
That she is the duly appointed, acting and qualified City Clerk of the City of Bakersfield;
and that on the 31 th day of August , 2000 she posted on the Bulletin Board at City
Hall, a full, true and correct copy of the following:: Ordinance No. 3977 , passed by the
30th day of August 2000 and
Bakersfield City Council at a meeting held on the
entitled:
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLIE SEVENTEEN OF THE BAKERSFI ELD
MUNICIPAL CODE AND ZONING MAP NO. 102-15 AND 102-22 BY
CHANGING THE ZONING FROM M-1 (LIGHT MANUFACTURING), M-;.>
(GENERAL MANUFACTURING) AND m-3 (HEAVY INDUSTRIAL) TO R-I~
(ONE FAMILY DWELUNG), R-2 (LIMITED MULTIPLE FAMILY DWELLING)
AND C-2 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) ZONES ON 170.90 ACRES
GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF OLIVE DRIVE TO GILMORE
AVENUE, BETWEEN FRUITVALE AVENUE AND STATE ROUTE 99.
/s/PAMELA A. MCCARTHY
City Clerk of the City of Bakersfield
S:~Document%FORMS~AOP.ORD.wpd
August 31, 2000