HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 175-88RESOLUTION NO. 175-88
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD SPECIFYING THAT ALL PORTIONS OF
THE PROPOSED CALLOWAY NO. 1 ANNEXATION SHALL
UPON ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD,
BE INCLUDED WITHIN THE GREATER BAKERSFIELD
SEPARATION OF GRADE DISTRICT WHEN CONTIGUOUS
THERETO (WARD 4).
WHEREAS, proceedings have been commenced for the annexa-
tion of certain unincorporated territory, designated as CALLOWAY
NO. 1 to the City cf Bakersfield; and
WHEREAS, said territory lies outside the Greater Bakers-
field Separation of Grade District; and
WHEREAS, Section 8290 of the Streets and Highway Code of
the State of California provides that the unincorporated territory
of a county which was not included within a separation of grade
district at the time of formation of such district, and which sub-
sequent to formation of such district is annexed to or otherwise
included within a city which is a part of such district, shall
immediately upon such annexation to such city be included within
the district and shall thereafter become a part of the district to
the same extent as such city; except such portion or portions
thereof which the City Council has determined will not be benefited
by inclusion in the district.
WHEREAS, on July 6, 1988, the Council of the City of
Bakersfield adopted its Resolution No. 136-88 specifying that
unless excluded by the City Council, all portions of proposed
Calloway No. 1 Annexation shall, upon annexation to the City of
Bakersfield, be included within the Greater Bakersfield Separation
of Grade District, when contiguous thereto, and setting WEDNESDAY,
AUGUST 17, 1988, at. the hour of 7:00 P.M. (or soon thereafter as
the matter could be heard) in the Council Chambers of City Hall,
1501 Truxtun Avenue, ~akersfield, California, as the time, date
and place to hear any objections to proposed annexation and inclu-
sion within said district and said notice was published as
required by law; and
WHEREAS, the public hearing was duly and regularly con-
ducted by and before the City Council at its meeting of AUGUST 17,
1988, in all respects in accordance with Resolution No. 136-88.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the
City of Bakersfield as follows:
1. In accordance with Section 8294 cf the Streets and
Highways Code, the City Council has heard all relevant and perti-
nent objections, if any, to inclusion within the Greater Bakers-
field Separation of Grade District of any portion or portions of
the territory described as Calloway No. 1, as described in
Exhibit "A."
2. In accordance with Section 8295 of the Streets and
Highways Code, at its discretion, the City Council determined that
all portions of the territory should be included in the Greater
Bakersfield Separation of Grade District, as all such territory is
benefited by such inclusion.
3. All pc. rtions of said unincorporated territory shall,
upon annexation to the City of Bakersfield, be included within the
Greater Bakersfield[ Separation of Grade District, at the time said
territory becomes contiguous to said district.
4. In accordance with Section 8296 of the Streets and
Highways Code, the Clerk shall notify the Secretary of the
District and shall furnish such Secretary with a certified copy of
this resolution.
.......... o0o ..........
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was
passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a
regular meeting thereof held on __August 17, 1988 , by
the following vote:
AgS£NT COUN,;I~ ME¥: I: g!; DEMOND
ABSTAINING: COUNCILM; MBERS NONE
~ITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED August 17, 1988
MAYOR of the City of B~kersfield
APPROVED as to form:
Exhibit "A"
A ANEX 5
GS.HNGCi.1
8/10/88
~iy~sfield
- 3 -
ANNEXATION [40. 322
EXHIBIT "A"
CALLOWAY NO. 1
A parcel of .[and situated i~] the County of Keri], State of California, being a
portion of Section 19, 20, 29 and 30, Township 29 South, Range 27 East, M.D.B. &
' 1
M., more pa]-~tlcular Y described as follows'.
Beginning at a point of lntersectlo on the South line of the North 30 feet of
the Northwest 1/4 of Section 29 and the East line of tJ~e %,~st 840.77 feet of the
Northwest 1/4 of Sec~ion 29, said South line also being the South right of way
line of Rosedale Highway (State Route Vl-KER-58), said point of intersection on
the Corporate Boundary of the City of Bakersfield.
'iIIENCE (l) departing from said corporate boundary along the said South line N.
89° 08'14" W., a distance of 810.77 feet to the East llne of the West 30 feet of
~J]e Northwest 1/4 of Section 29, said East line also being the East right of way
line of Calloway Dfive (Co. Rd. No. 360 & 522);
RI{ENCE (2) S.81o22'60" W., a distance of 61.03 feet to ~ point of lntersectlo
of the West line of the East 30 feet of the Northeast 1/ of Section 30 and the
South lille of the North 40 feet of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 30, said West
llne also being the West right of way line of said Calloway Drive, said South
line also being the South right of way line of said Rosedale Highway;
/]~ENCE (3) N. 00051'16" E., a distance of 40.05 feet to a point of intersection
of ~J~e North line of Section 30 and ~J~e West li~%e of the East 30 feet of the
Northeast 1/4 of Section 30;
R]{ENCE (4) coatinui~]g N. 00°29'05"E., along the West line of the East 30 feet
of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 19, a distance of 1364.35 feet to a point on
Corporate 13ou~ldary of the City of B~ersfield, ~J]e said west line also being the
West right of way line of Calloway Drive (Co. Rd. No. 522);
I~IENCE (5) Easterly and Southerly along the various courses of the said
Corporate Boundary to the true point of beginning.
Containing 19.68 acres of land, more or less.
4: CALL. NO. 1
LT:wrn