HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 171-88RESOLUTION NO. 171-88
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION OF THE COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSING PROCEEDINGS
FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD IDENTIFIED AS ANNEXATION NO. 328
(CASA LOMA NO. 4 ANNEXATION) GENERALLY LOCATED
BETWEEN BRUNDAGE LANE AND STATE HIGHWAY 58
AND RUNNING WESTERLY FROM SOUTH UNION AVENUE
APPROXIMATELY 1/4 MILE (WARD 1).
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a
change of organization, to wit, the annexation to the City of
Bakersfield of the hereinafter-described territory, pursuant to
Section 56800 of the Government Code of the State of California.
City of
follows:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the
Bakersfield that it hereby finds and determines as
1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the
annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the territory described
in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part of this resolu-
tion as though fully set forth herein.
annexed,
of this
2. That a map of the territory proposed to be so
marked Exhibit "B", is attached hereto and made a part
Resolution as though fully set forth herein.
3. That a Plan for providing services within the
affected territory of the proposed annexation, in accordance with
the provisions of Section 56653 of the Government Code, is marked
as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as though
fully set forth herein.
4. That this proposal for change of organization, to
wit, annexation, is made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local
Government Reorganization Act of 1985, and it is requested that
proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith.
5. That the reasons for the proposed change of organi-
zation are that the owners of a portion of the affected territory
desire to receive municipal services from the City of Bakersfield,
and the City desires to receive tax revenues for benefits given
and to be given to a portion of the territory proposed to be
annexed, and that the City of Bakersfield, as owner of the bal-
ance of the affected territory, desires to have such City-owned
property converted to tax exempt status.
6. That for this proposed annexation, an Initial Study
was conducted on June 6, 1988, and it was determined that the
proposed project would not have a significant effect on the
environment, and a Negative Declaration was prepared.
7. That the laws and regulations relating to the prepa-
ration and adoption of Negative Declarations as set forth in the
California Environmental Quality Act and City of Bakersfield
Resolution No. 107--86 have been duly followed and the Negative
Declaration for this proposed annexation is hereby approved and
adopted.
8. That the territory proposed for annexation as
described herein has been determined to be uninhabited pursuant
to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985,
Section 56046 of the Government Code.
9. That the names of the officers of the City of
Bakersfield who are to be furnished with copies of the Executive
Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed Notice of
Hearing, if any, are:
City Clerk
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
J. Dale Hawley
City Manager
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Arthur J. Saalfield
City Attorney
City of BaKersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
10. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten
(10) copies of this resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive
Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern County
at 1430 Truxtun Avenue, Suite 802, Bakersfield, California.
.......... o0o .........
- 2 -
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was
passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a
regular meeting thereof held on August 10, 1988 , by
the following vote::
AVES: COUNCILMEMF~E~?F: CHILDS,:~i~),SMITH R~,~;~ PET~oSON.~DE~M[~ 5;,L~AOGIO
ABS~NI C0~NCILM~EHS DEMOMD
ABSIAINiNG C0U*,C~ UBe~S NONE
CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED AUGUST 10, 1988
?
MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED as to form:
C:T~Y//A~ t/h~C/ity of Bakersfield
Exhibit "A"
Exhibit "B"
Exhibit "C"
A ANEX 5
AP.CASA4.1
8/02/88
- 3 -
EXHIBIT "A"
ANNEXATION NO. 328
CASA LOMA NO. 4
A parcel of land situated in the County of Kern, State of California, being
a portion of Section 31, Township 29 South, Range 28 East and Section 6,
Township 30 South, Range 28 East, M.D.B. & M., more particularly described
as follows:
Beginning at a point of intersection of the West line of the East 57.75
feet and the North line of the South 30 feet of the Southeast 1/4 of said
Section 31, said point being on the West right of way line of Union Avenue
(State Route V1-KER-204), said point also being on the existing corporate
boundary of the City of Bakersfield;
Thence (1) S.0°46'20"W. along the said West line a distance of 30 feet to
the North line of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 6;
Thence (2) S.0°39'32"W. along the West line of the East 57.75 feet of said
Northeast 1/4 a distance of 203.51 feet to a point on the North right of
way line of State Freeway 58 (V1-Kern-58).
Thence following said North right of way line for the next (5) courses:
Thence (3) Southwesterly along a 115 foot radius tangent curve concave
to the Northwest, through a central angle of 27°09'46", an arc length
of 54.52 feet;
Thence (4) Southwesterly along an 80 foot radius tangent curve concave to
the Northwest, through a central angle 57047'57", an arc length of 80.70
feet;
Thence (5) S.85°37'14"W., a distance of 774.10 feet;
Thence (6) S.89°53'15"W., a distance of 402.44 feet;
Thence (7) N.89°31'14"W., a distance of 12.33 feet;
Thence (8) N 0°39'46"E., along the East line of the Berneta Park subdivision
boundary and Northerly prolongation thereof, a distance of 379.88 feet more
or less to the North line of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 6;
Thence (9) N.0°59'46"E., a distance of 30 feet to a point on the existing
corporate boundary of the City of Bakerfield;
Thence (10) Easterly along last named corporate boundary to the point of
beginning.
Containing 11.21 acres of land, more or less.
KERN ............... '
....... ............
_
PlAN FOR PROVIDING SERVICES
(CASA LOMA NO. 4)
ANNEXATION NO. 328
SERVICES
Planning
Parks and Recreation
A~enc¥ %faich Presently Check Services Which Indicate Hc~ Services Provided
Provides Service City/District Will Provide By City/District will be Financed
(i.e., 9eneral tax rate or special
Upon Future Date assessment.)
Annexation (specify)
COUNTY X GENERAL TAX REVENUES
COUNTY X GENERAL TAX REVENUES
COUNTY / GENERAL TAX REVENUES
SHERIFF & HIG~AY PATROL X GENERAL TAX REVENUES
CITY/COUNTY
JOINT AGREEMENT GENERAL TAX REVENUES
COUNTY X GENERAL & GAS TAX REVENUE
UPON FUTURE
COUNTY DEVELO~4ENT PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT
COUNTY X GENERAL & GAS TAX REVENUE
N/A X GENERAL & GAS TAX REVENUE
N/A X GENERAL TAX REVENUE
COUNTY X GENERAL TAX REVENUE
COUNTY (UNIfIN AVENUE
SANITATION DIST.) SPECIAL ASSESSMENT/USER FEE
CALIFORNIA NATER SERVICE USER FEE
MOSTLY
PRIVATELY CONTRACTED X USER FEE
Library
Police Protection
Fire Protection
Streets
Construction
Maintenance
Sweeping
Lighting
Flood Control
Sewerage
Water
Other (REFUSE)
E X H I B I T "C" RTY:wrn
4:ANNEX328.1
Please provide the following information, when applicable, only for services which will be provided by the Applicant
City/District.
Location
Indicate location from which service
will be provided (i.e., nearest fire
station, library, etc.)
Police: All police services in the City of Bakersfield are
administered through the City Police Department located at the
southwest corner of Truxtun Avenue and Eye Street about 2 miles
northwesterly of the annexation.
Fire: Station 6 (City) is centered within the territory and
w--~--i service the subject area per City/County Joint Powers
Agreement.
Parks and Recreation: Lowell Park is located ~mile to the
north. Wayside Park is located 1 mile to the southwest.
Library: Not applicable.
Streets:
Construction~4aintenance; Sweeping; Lighting: The City
Corporation Yard on Truxtun Avenue, ~st of Freeway 99 will
provide necessary facilities, personnel and services to
accommodate Public Works efforts. Maintenance and personnel
will be dispatched from the City Yard on a regular basis for
preventative maintenance as needed. Repair includes streets
construction/maintenance, sweeping and lighting.
Sewer: Existing County Union Avenue Sanitation District sewer
lines in Brundage Lane and Union Avenue are available to this
area for connections. Effluent would then be treated by City
Wastewater Treatment Plant No. 2 per City/County Agreement.
Water: This area is serviced by the California Water Service
Company.
Other: REFUSE - Service will be provided by the City either
by City forces or by contract with a Franchise Refuse Collector
4 :ANNEX328.2
Service Level Capacity
Indicate frequency and availability of service
(i.e., street sweeping, response time for
emergenc7 services, rec. pro~rams, etc.)
24-hour patrol is provided in the immediate vicinity
of this annexation. First priority response is
approximately 7.00 minutes or less.
Fire protection is provided on a 24-honr basis with
response time of 2 minutes or less. The annexation w
not affect City/County joint fire service capability.
All City parks are open to the public at reasonable
hours.
Not applicable.
There will be no reduction in the range capacity of the
City to provide the necessary public works services to
this area. Services will be on a regular basis and
"as needed."
Adequate capacity exists for proposed area.
Adequate capacity exists.
City refuse pick up is twice a week.
RTY :m~o
III. ~,~hat effects, if any, would annexation of this territory have on the existing
level of City/District services (i.e., need for additional emergency service
personnel or construction of new facilities, etc. )? The annexation of this
territory will not affect near term level or capability of the City to provide
needed services.
Street improvements resultinq frc~n Drooosed any future development will increase
the mainterence responsibility of the City but will not affect the existinq
level of service. It is not anticipated that an increase in number of Police
Office would be required due to this annexation.
Would City/District require any upgrading or change in facilities to serve
affected territory. (roads, fire hydrants, mains, etc.)? If so, would
City/District o__r residents be responsible for financing? The City will not
require uD(~radin~ or chanqes in existin~ facilities. As future development
occurs, Developers shall provide and DaY for major imorovemants and facilities
and dedicate them to the City.
Indicate and explain existing zoning in affected territory. Subject Dro~erty is
located within the Casa Loma Specific Plan boundary adopted August 25, 1986
which designates land use for this area as 6.2 (General C~ercial) for the
majority of the area and 3.3. (Public Facilities)for the approximately 0.7 acre
fire station site.
Indicate and explain proposed prezoning in area. (List effects on present land
use that would occur as a result of annexation, such as maintenance of livestock
or~ property, etc.) The City proposes no chanqe to the adopted 6.2 and 3.3
land uses as desic~nated by the Casa Loma Specific Plan. Zonin~ will remain the
same whether the area is in the City or the County.
4:2kNNEX328.3 3 RTY: mro
VII.
List City/District services that area will directly or indirectly benefit from
such as decrease in fire insurance rate, shorter emergency response time, use of
community facilities, etc. City police should be able to respond in a more
timely manner than the present County Sheriff and State Hi(]hwav Patrol. Current
City police standard is a hi(]her sworn officer per 1,000 population percentage
compared to the County standard. Refuse service ~;ill be provided by the City
and will result in savings to the owners within this annexation. No special
assessments or charges for street sweepin(I, leaf collection, street lightinq
ener~ costs and fire hydrants upon any future
development of subject area.
VIII. Please provide the follc~ing information relative to City/District and County
taxes:
List existing tax rate(s) in area. Existin(] tax rate in area e~uals 1.076576%
of assessed market value. This represents the total property tax rate. When
annexed, a dasiqnatedpercentage of the total tax of the area will accrue to the
city.
(Rate as shown on 1987-88 CountyAuditor-Controller Tax Rate List).
Would affected areas be subject to any bonded indebtedness of the City/District:
If so, explain. Yes, the tax rate for City bonds e~uals 0.004970% of assessed
market value. When annexed, the total tax rate will be 1.081546%. (Rates as
shown on 1987-88 CountyAuditor-Controller Tax Rate List).
How will the difference in tax rates affect a building with a market value of
$50,000. The yearly tax rate would increase by the amount of $2.49 on a building
of $50,000~arket value due to inclusion of the City Bond Rate.
4:ANNEX328.4 4 RTY:wrn