HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 142-88RESOLUTION NO. 142-~8
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION OF THE COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSING PROCEEDINGS
FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD IDENTIFIED AS ANNEXATION NO. 326
(CASA LOMA NO. 2 ANNEXATION) GENERALLY LOCATED
BETWEEN E. BRUNDAGE LANE AND STATE HIGHWAY 58
AND S. WASHINGTON STREET AND COTTONWOOD ROAD.
(WARD 1)
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a
change of organization, to wit, the annexation to the City of
Bakersfield of the hereinafter-described territory, pursuant to
Section 56800 of the Government Code of the State of California.
NOW, THEREFORE,
City of Bakersfield that
follows:
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the
it hereby finds and determines as
1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the
annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the territory described
in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part of this resolu-
tion as though fully set forth herein.
2. That a map of the territory proposed to be so
annexed, marked Exhibit "B", is attached hereto and made a part
of this Resolution as though fully set forth herein.
3. That a Plan for providing services within the
affected territory of the proposed annexation, in accordance with
the provisions of Section 56653 of the Government Code, is marked
as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as though
fully set forth herein.
4. That this proposal for change of organization, to
wit, annexation, is made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local
Government Reorganization Act of 1985, and it is requested that
proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith.
5. That the reasons for the proposed change of organi-
zation are that the owners and residents of the affected terri-
tory desire to receive municipal services from the City of
Bakersfield, and the City desires to receive tax revenues for
benefits given and to be given to the territory proposed to be
annexed.
6. That for this proposed annexation, an Initial Study
was conducted and it was determined that the proposed project
would not have a significant effect on the environment, and a
Negative Declaration was prepared.
7. That the laws and regulations relating to the prepa-
ration and adoption of Negative Declarations as set forth in the
California Environmental Quality Act and City of Bakersfield
Resolution No. 107-86 have been duly followed and the Negative
Declaration for this proposed annexation is hereby approved and
adopted.
8. That the territory proposed for annexation as
described herein has been determined to be uninhabited pursuant
to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985,
Section 56046 of the Government Code.
9. That the names of the officers of the City of
Bakersfield who are to be furnished with copies of the Executive
Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed Notice of
Hearing, if any, are:
City Clerk
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
J. Dale Hawley
City Manager
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Arthur J. Saalfield
City Attorney
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
10. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten
(10) copies of this resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive
Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern County
at 1430 Truxtun Avenue, Suite 802, Bakersfield, California.
.......... o0o .........
- 2 -
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was
passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a
regular meeting thereof held on __ July 6, 1988 , by
the following vote:
~o~ 5 ,%, _, ": f:': NONE
"' NONE
ABSEN[ "-2 ' '
Deputy CITY CLERK and Ex (Y~f'~c~O: Clerk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED July 6, 1988
--MAYOR of the City rs'~eld
APPROVED as to form:
CITY ATtORNeY ~[:the C~ty of Bakersfield
AJS/meg
Attachments
Exhibit "A"
Exhibit "B"
Exhibit "C"
A ANEX 5
AP.CASA2.1
6/25/88
E~qlBIT "A"
ANNE>QITION NO. 326
CASA LCMA NO. 2
A parcel of land situated in the County of Kern, State of California, being a
portion of Sections 32 and 33, Township 29 South, Range 28 East, and Sections 4
and 5, Township 30 South, Range 28 East, M.D.B.&M., more particularly described
as follows:
Beginning at a point of intersection of the East right of way line of Washington
Street (Co. Rd. No. 2927), and the North right of way line of State Route
VI-KER-58 as recorded in the State Highway Maps in Book 4, Pages 80-89 in the
office of the County Recorder of the County of Kern, said point of intersection
also being on the Corporate Boundary of the City of Bakersfield;
THENCE Westerly along the said North line of State Route V1-KER-58,
the following (7) courses:
THENCE (1) N.74°20'59" W., a distance of 38.03 feet more or less; THENCE
(2) N.88°52'01"W., a distance of 1.00 foot m~e or less; THENCE
(3) Continuing N.88°52'40"W., a distance of 40.00 feet more or less; THENCE
(4) S.75°08'08"W., a distance of 39.54 feet more or less; THENCE
(5) S.89°12'52"W., a distance of 226.43 feet more or less; thence
(6) N.89°28'00"W., a distance of 980.27 feet mo~e or less; '~{ENCE
(7) N.84°35'31"W., a distance of 779.60 feet moue or less;
THENCE (8) S.85°06'52"W., a distance of 387.79 feet more or less;
THENCE (9) N.89°28'00"W., along the said North right of way line of State Route
V1-KER-58, a distance of 153.59 feet more or less, to a point of intersection of
the said North line and the East right of way line of Cottonwood Road (Co. Rd.
No. 2927), said point of intersection also being on the East line of the ~st 55
feet of Section 4;
4:CASALOMA 1 of 2 LT:wn
THENCE (10) N.79°14'32"W., a distance of 111.54 feet more or )ess, to a point of
intersection of the said North right of way line of State Route V1-KER-58 and
the West right of way line of said Cottonwood Road, said point of intersection
also being on the West line of the East 55 feet of Section 5;
THENCE (11) N.l°14"E, along said West line, a distance of 390.20 feet more or
less, to the North line of Section 5;
THENCE (12) continuing Northerly along the West line of the East 55 feet of
Section 32, a distance of 30 feet more or less, to a point on the North right of
way line of said Brundage Lane, said point also being on the existing Corporate
Boundary of the City of Bakersfield;
THENCE (13) Easterly and Southerly along the various courses of the said
Corporate Boundary to the point of beginning.
containing 27.13 acres of land, mor~ or less.
4:CASArOMA1
2of 2
- ,~ MT. VERNON NO.
ANNEXATION NO, ~ RESOLUTION NO,~
j ANNEXATION OF
~ ~r ~ 27.13 ~ ACRES
L, _ ~ .... 200 O 200 400 ~O
~'~-- J """'"'"""" PROPOSED ANNEXATION B~NDA~
~il EXHIBIT "B"
PLAN FOR PROVIDING SERVICES
ANNEXATION NO. 326
(CASA LOMA NO. 2)
SERVICES
Agency Which Presently Check Services Which Indicate How Services Provided
Provides Service City/District Will Provide by City/District Will Be Financed
(i.e.~ General Tax Rate or Special
Upon Future Date Assessment.)
Annexation (Specify)
County X General Tax Revenue/Fees
County General Tax Revenue
County N/A General Tax Revenue
Sheriff & Highway Patrol X General Tax Revenue
City/County Joint
Agreement N/A General Tax Revenue
County X General and Gas Tax Revenue
Upon
County X Development Private Development
County X General and Gas Tax Revenue
N/A X General and Gas Tax Revenue
Upon
County X Development General Tax Revenue
County X General Tax Revenue
Upon
N/A X Development User Fees/Special Assessment
California Water Service N/A
N/A X User Fee
Planning
Parks and Recreation
Library
Police Protection
Fire Protection
Streets
Construction
Maintenance
Sweeping
Lighting
Flood Control
Sewerage
Water
Other: (REFUSE)
D31 ANNEX326.1 EXHIBIT "C" RTY:mro
Please provide the following information, when applicable, only for services which will be provided by the Applicant
C~y/District.
Location
Indicate location from which service
will be provided (i.e., nearest fire
station~ library~ etc.)
Police: Ail police services in the City of Bakersfield are
administered through the City Police Department located at the
southwest corner of Truxtun Avenue and Eye Street about 4 miles
northwesterly of the annexation.
Fire: Station 41 (County) is within t mile at Mt. Vernon
Avenue/Virginia Avenue and will service the subject area per
City/County Joint Powers Agreement.
Parks and Recreation: Martin Luther King, Jr. Park is located
1 mile to the northwest. Wayside Park is located 1-1/2 miles
to the southwest.
Library: Not applicable.
Streets:
Construction/Maintenance; Sweeping; Lighting: The City
Corporation Yard on Truxtun Avenue, West of Freeway 99 will
provide necessary facilities, personnel and services to
accommodate Public Works efforts. Maintenance and personnel
will be dispatched from the City Yard on a regular basis for
preventative maintenance as needed. Repair includes streets
construction/maintenance, sweeping and lighting.
Sewer: An existing City trunk sewer line in Brundage Lane is
available to this area for connections. Effluent would then be
treated by City Wastewater Treatment Plant No. 2.
Water: This area is serviced by the California Water Service
Company.
Other: REFUSE - Service will be provided by the City either
by City forces or by contract with a Franchise Refuse Collector.
D31 ANNEX326.2
Service Level Capacity
Indicate frequency and availability of service
(i.e., street sweeping, response time for
emergency services~ rec. pro§rams~ etc.)
24-hour patrol is provided id the immediate vicinity
of this annexation. First priority response is
approximately 7.00 minutes or less.
Fire protection is provided on a 24-hour basis with
response time of 3 minutes or less. The annexation w~
not affect City/County joint fire service capability.
All City parks are open to the public at reasonable
hours.
Not applicable.
There will be no reduction in the range capacity of the
City to provide the necessary public works services to
this area. Services will be on a regular basis and
"as needed."
Adequate capacity exists in Plant #2 for proposed
area.
Adequate capacity exists.
City refuse pick up is twice a week.
RTY:mro
III. What effects, if any, would annexation of this territory have on the existing
level of City/District services (i.e., need for additional emergency service
personnel or construction of new facilities, etc.)? The annexation of this
territory will not affect near term level or capability of the City to provide
needed services.
Street improvements resulting from proposed development will increase the
maintenance responsibility of the City but will not affect the existing level of
service. The demand for police protection in the area should not affect the
City's officer per 1000 population standard because no residential development
is proposed.
IV.
Would City/District require any upgrading or change in facilities to serve
affected territory (roads, fire hydrants, mains, etc.)? If so, would
City/District o__r residents be responsible for financing? The City will~ at time
of development, require upgrading or changes in existing facilities. As
development occurs, Developers shall provide and pay for major improvements and
facilities and dedicate them to the City.
Indicate and explain existing zoning in affected territory. Subject property
located within the Casa Loma Specific Plan boundary adopted August 25, 1986
which designates land use for this area as 7.2 (Service Industrial).
VI.
Indicate and explain proposed prezoning in area. (List effects on present land
use that would occur as a result of annexation, such as maintenance of livestock
on property, etc.) The City proposes no change to the adopted 7.2
(Service Industrial), or more restrictive zoning of the Casa Loma Specific Plan.
Zoning will be the same whether the area is in the City or the County.
D31 ANNEX326.3 RTY:mro
VII. List City/District services that area will directly or indirectly benefit from
such as decrease in fire insurance rate, shorter emergency response time, use of
community facilities, etc. City police should be able to respond in a more
timely manner than the present County Sheriff and State Highway Patrol. Current
City police standard is a higher sworn officer per 1~000 population percentage
compared to the County standard. Refuse service will be provided by the City
and will result in savings to the owners within this annexation. No special
assessments or charges for street sweeping, leaf collection, school crossing
guards, street lighting energy costs and fire hydrants upon any future
development of subject area.
VIII. Please provide the following information relative to City/District and County
List existing tax rate(s) in area. Existing tax rate in area equals 1.076576%
of assessed market value. This represents the total property tax rate. When
annexed, a designated percentage of the total tax of the area will accrue to the
City.
(Rate as shown on 1987-88 County Auditor-Controller Tax Rate List).
Would affected areas be subject to any bonded indebtedness of the City/District:
If so, explain. Yes, the tax rate for City bonds equals 0.004970% of assessed
market value. When annexed, the total tax rate will be 1.081546%. (Rates as
shown on 1987-88 County Auditor-Controller Tax Rate List).
How will the difference in tax rates affect a building with a market value of
$50,000. The yearly tax rate would increase by the amount of $2.49 on a building
of $50,000 market value due to inclusion of the City Bond Rate.
D31 ANNEX326.4 RTY:mro