HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 139-88RESOLUTION NO. 139-88
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD SPECIFYING THAT, UNLESS EXCLUDED
BY COUNCIL, ALL PORTIONS OF THE PROPOSED
BERKSHIRE NO. 3 ANNEXATION SHALL UPON ANNEX-
ATION TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, BE INCLUDED
WITHIN THE GREATER BAKERSFIELD SEPARATION OF
GRADE DISTRICT, AND SETTING HEARING FOR
OBJECTIONS THERETO.
WHEREAS, proceedings have been commenced for the annexa-
tion of certain unincorporated territory, designated as BERKSHIRE
NO. 3 to the City of Bakersfield; and
WHEREAS, said territory lies outside the Greater Bakers-
field Separation of Grade District; and
WHEREAS, Section 8290 of the Streets and Highway Code of
the State of California provides that the unincorporated territory
of a county which was not included within a separation of grade
district at the time of formation of such district, and which sub-
sequent to formation of such district is annexed to or otherwise
included within a city which is a part of such district, shall
immediately upon such annexation to such city be included within
the district and shall thereafter become a part of the district to
the same extent as such city; except such portion or portions
thereof which the City Council has determined will not be benefited
by inclusion in the district.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the
City of Bakersfield as follows:
1. That a description of the unincorporated territory
described in the annexation proceedings, is attached hereto and
marked Exhibit "A", and shown on the map attached hereto, marked
Exhibit "B".
2. That unless any portion shall be excluded by the City
Council, all portions of said unincorporated territory shall, upon
annexation to the City of Bakersfield, be included within the
Greater Bakersfield Separation of Grade District.
3. That WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 17, 1988, at the hour of 7 P.M.
(or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard) in the Council
Chambers of City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield,
California, is the time when and the place where objections to
inclusion within the district will be heard.
.......... o0o ..........
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was
passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a
regular meeting thereof held on July 6, 1988 , by
the following vote:
~¥ES: COUNC, ILMCMr;ERS CHIL~$, DeMOND ,~M TH BATTY, ~EI~,~ON McDER~O~ ~ALVAd;(~fO
NOES C0 .... u, ~ NONE
A~;~r CO~:'j'.[[)?:?.[~S NONE
Deputy CITY CLERK and Ex OfficrC'Clerk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED July 6, 1988
MAYOR of the City of/B~akersfield
APPROVED as to form:
CITY ATTORNEY o[ the ~C_~ty of
Bakersfield
AJS/meg
Attachments
Exhibit "A"
Exhibit "B"
A ANEX 5
GS.BERK3.1
6/27/88
EXHIBIT "A"
BERKSIIIRI~ No. 3
ANNEXATION No. 3]8
A parcel of laed situated in the County of Keg:n, State of California, being
those pol'tb~n$ of Lots 3, 4, 13, ]4, ]6, 17, 18, ].9, 20, 29 an~ 30 as sh~n on
map o[ the Ik}~kshire Farm Tract as filed Jn the offi~ of the Kern C~nty
Recor~r o. Au(~ust 27~ 190], in Section 30 and an addiLional ~rtJon Jn Section
31, T~nship 30 S~th, ~nge 28 East, M.i).B. & M., mo~e parti~larly descried as
follows:
13eginnii]g at Ihe point of intersecLJon of the South line oE the North 30 feet
and the East line of the West 30 feet of Lot 3, of the "Berkshire Farin Tract".
'File said South line also being the South right-of-way line of Pallama Lane. The
said point also being on the Corporate Boundary of the City of Bakersfield;
'i]IENCE (1) departing fr~n the existing Corpornate Boundary Southerly along last
na~d East l~ne and Southerly prolongation thereof, of Lots 3 and 14, a distance
of ]456.02 feet more or less to a point on tile South right-of-way line of the
Arvin-Edison Intake Canal as described in Parcel 1C-3 of that certain Or-der of
Condemnation recorded in Book 3972, Page 201 of Official Records in the Office
of the Kek~n County Recorder;
'111ENCE (2) Easterly along the said South right-of-way line of the Arvin-Edison
Intake Canal, a distance of 660 feet more or less to a point on the East lille of
said Lot 14;
'illENCE (3) Southerly along the said East line, a distance of 1125.96 feet more
or less to a point on tile North right-of-way line of Berkshire Road, also being the
North line of the South 30 feet of said Lot 14;
~11{ENCE (4) Easterly along the said North lille and Easterly p~olongation thet-eof,
a distance of 660 feet more or less to a point on the East line of the West half
of said Lot ]6;
'I~IENCE (5) Southerly along said East line and Southerly prolongation thereof, a
distance of ]350.90 feet more or less to a point oll the South line of said Lot
18;
1111~NCE (6) Westerly along said South line and Westerly prolongation thereof, a
distance of 990 feet more or less to a point on the East line of the West half
of said Lot 30;
'111ENCE (7) Southerly along said East line, a distance of 1351.00 feet more or
].ess to a point or] the South line o~ tile North 30 feet of Section 31, said South
line also being tile South right-of-way line of Hosking Avenue (fo~nmrly
Hosking ' s Road);
4: BERKSHIRE
'111BNCB (8) WesLerly alons ~a.[d South ].[ne, a dist:ance of- J feet more or less
to Lhe SouLher]y prolongation of the West line of said LoL 29
'I]IENCE (9) NorLherly along khe West lJ. ne oE said Lots 4, 13, 20, 29 aud said
$ouLherly proloagation of 29, a distance of 4]50.97 feet more or: less to the
point on Lhe NoL'Lh right-oE-way l~ne oF_' Lhe said Arvin-F, dJ. son ZnLake Canal said
poi. nl: aisc b~in9 on the existing CorporaLe Boundary of Lhe City of Bakcr:s~ield.
IllbNCI:, (10) C)ntlnutng Norther:]y and I!;asLer]y along the various courses oE the
said CorporaLe Boundary to the point of Beginning.
Containin9 149.22 acres of land, ~rare or less.
4: BEI~.KSI I I.I~,1';2
ARVIN ISON .~ '
BEFIF,,SH IH g FAFIM
INTAKE CANAL
E
J9