HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 95-88RESOLUTION NO. 95-88
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION OF THE COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSING PROCEEDINGS
FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD IDENTIFIED AS ANNEXATION NO. 325,
CALLOWAY NO. 2 ANNEXATION, GENERALLY LOCATED
AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CALLOWAY DRIVE AND
HAGEMAN ROAD, CONTIGUOUS TO THE CITY LIMITS.
(WARD NO. 4)
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a
change of organization, to wit, the annexation to the City of
Bakersfield of the hereinafter-described territory, pursuant to
Section 56800 of the Government Code of the State of California.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the
City of Bakersfield that it hereby finds and determines as
follows:
1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the
annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the territory described
in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part of this resolu-
tion as though fully set forth herein.
2. That a map of the territory proposed to be so
annexed, marked Exhibit "B", is attached hereto and made a part
of this Resolution as though fully set forth herein.
3. That a Plan for providing services within the
affected territory of the proposed annexation, in accordance with
the provisions of Section 56653 of the Government Code, is marked
as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as though
fully set forth herein.
4. That this proposal for change of organization, to
wit, annexation, is made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local
Government Reorganization Act of 1985, and it is requested that
proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith.
5. That the reasons for the proposed change of organi-
zation are that the owners and residents of the affected terri-
tory desire to receive municipal services from the City of
Bakersfield, and the City desires to receive tax revenues for
benefits given and to be given to the territory proposed to be
annexed.
6. That for this proposed annexation and the zoning
upon annexation, therefor, the ordinance for which was adopted
May 25, 1988, an Initial Study was conducted and it was deter-
mined that the proposed project would not have a significant
effect on the environment, and a Negative Declaration was
prepared.
7. That the laws and regulations relating to the prepa-
ration and adoption of Negative Declarations as set forth in the
California Environmental Quality Act and City of Bakersfield
Resolution No. 107-86 have been duly followed and the Negative
Declaration for this proposed annexation is hereby approved and
adopted.
8. That the territory proposed for annexation as
described herein has been determined to be uninhabited pursuant
to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985,
Section 56046 of the Government Code.
9. That the names of the officers of the City of
Bakersfield who are to be furnished with copies of thE? Executive
Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed NoticE? of
Hearing, if any, are:
City Clerk
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
J. Dale Hawley
City Manager
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Arthur J. Saalfield
City Attorney
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
10. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten
(10) copies of this resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive
Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern County
at 1430 Truxtun Avenue, Suite 802, Bakersfield, California.
.......... o0o .........
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was
passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a
regular meeting thereof held on June 8, 1988 , by
the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMOEI~;: CHILOS, OeMOND, SMI'flt, RAT'Pf. Iq~l'T%'ON, MCDERMOTT S;4.VAGGIO
NOES: COUNCILMEMBEBB: None
ABSENT* COUNCILMEMBERS; None
ABSTAINING: COUNCILME MBERS; None
DEPUTY CITY CLERK and Ex Of~io Clerk of the
Council of the City 6f Bakersfield
APPROVED June 8, 1988
MAYOR of the City o~ Bakersfield
APPROVED as to form:
/ /t'./
AJS/me~ /
Attachment~ ~ '
A ANEX 5
AP.CALL2.1
5/28/88
Bakersfield
F~IBIT "A"
~NNF~XATION NO. 325
(CALLOWAY NO. 2)
A parcel of land situated in Sections 18 and 19, Township 29 South,
Range 27 East, M.D.B.&M., County of Kern, State of California, more
particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Section 19; thence South
00°28'15" West, along the East line of said Section, 2003.57 feet to
a point on the east line of Lot 16 as lots are shown on "Sales Map of
Lands of J.B. Haggin" filed August 20, 1890 in the Office of the Ke~n
County Recorder; Thence North 89039'37" West, 30.00 feet to a point on
the West line of the East 30.00 feet of said Section 19, also being a
point on the West line of Calloway Drive (Co. Rd. No. 522) and also
being a point on the existing corporate boundary of the City of
Bakersfield and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
Thence (1) Continuing North 89039'37" West, 1307.87 feet to a point on
the West line of Lot 15 of said "J.B. Haggin Sales Map";
Thence (2) North 00°34'41" East along the %~st lines of Lots ][5 and 2
of said J.B. Haggin Sales Map" to the Northwest corne~ of said Lot 2,
also ~ing a point oR the North line of said Section 19;
Thence (3) North 00°95'01" East, 30.00 Feet to a point on the North
line of the South 30.00 feet of said Section 18, also being a point on
the North line of Hageman Road (Co. Rd. No. 522);
Thence (4) South 89°54'59" East along said North line, 1304.53 feet to
a point on the West line of the East 30.00 feet of said Section 18,
also being a point oR the West line of Ca!lo~ay Drive (Co. Rd.~o.745)
and also being a point on the ~xisting corporate boundary of the City
of Bakersfield;
Thence (5) Southerly along saig existing corporate boundary
TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 60.89 ACRES (MORE OR LESS)
4:~NNEX. 325 RTY:ag
~SEC~ 16 T, 2S S~ R, 27E~
P&UL
'oi
SEC, ~P
(2)
ANNEXATION NO. ~2§ RESOLUTION NO.
ANNEXATION OF
CALLOW,~Y NO 2
TO THE CITY OF' ~AKERSFIELO
EXHIBIT "B"
PLAN FOR PROVIDING SERVICES
Check Services Which
City/District Will Provide
ANNEXATION NO. 325
(CALLOWAY NO. 2)
SERVICES
Planning
Parks and Recreation
Library
Police Protection
Fire Protection
Streets
Construction
Maintenance
Sweeping
Lighting
Flood Control
Sewerage
Water
Other: (REFUSE)
Agency Which Presently
Provides Service
County
North Bakersfield
Recreation & Park Distr.
County
County and Highway Patrol
City/County Joint
Agreement
County
County
County
N/A
N/A
County
N/A
Vaughn Water Company
N/A
Upon
Annexation
X
No Change
No Change
X
No Change
X
N/A
X
No Change
(Specify)
Indicate How Services Provided
Upon
Development
Upon
Development
Upon
Development
Upon
Development
by City/District Will Be Financed
(i.e.~ General Tax Rate or Special
Assessment.)
General Tax Revenue
General Tax Revenue
General Tax Revenue
General Tax Revenue
General Tax Revenue
General and Gas Tax Revenue
Private Development
General and Gas Tax Revenue
General and Gas Tax Revenue
General Tax Revenue
General Tax Revenue
Special Assessment/User Fee
User Fee
User Fee
D30 ANNEX325.1 EXHIBIT "C" RTY:mro
Please provide the following information, when applicable, only for services which will be provided by the Applicant
City/District.
Location
Indicate location from which service
will be provided (i.e., nearest fire
station~ library~ etc.)
Police: Ail police services in the City of Bakersfield are
administered through the City Police Department located at the
southwest corner of Truxtun Avenue and Eye Street about 6-1/2
miles southeasterly of the annexation.
Fire: Fire protection service will continue to be administered
from County Station No. 65 located on the north side of
Rosedale Highway easterly of Calloway Drive.
Parks and Recreation: Development will require dedication of a
park site or in lieu fees in accordance with adopted standards
of the North Bakersfield Recreation and Park District.
Library: Not applicable.
Streets:
Construction/Maintenance; Sweeping; Lighting: The City
Corporation Yard on Truxtun Avenue, West of Freeway 99 will
provide necessary facilities, personnel and services to
accommodate Public Works efforts. Maintenance and personnel
will be dispatched from the City Yard on a regular basis
preventative maintenance as needed. Repair includes streets
construction/maintenance, sweeping and lighting.
Sewer: This territory is within the boundary of the Buena Vist
Planned Sewer Area whereby sewerage is sent to Wastewater
Treatment Plant No. 3 by extending a pipeline from Rancho
Laborde Drive.
Water: This area will be served by the Vaughn Water Company.
Service Level Capacity
Indicate frequency and availability of service
(i.e., street sweeping, response time for
emergency services~ rec. pro~rams~ etc.)
24-hour patrol is provided in the imanediate vicinity
of this annexation. First priority response is
approximately 7.00 minutes or less.
Fire protection is provided on a 24-hour basis with
response time of 3 minutes or less. /he annexation will
not affect City/County joint fire service capability.
District parks are open to the public at reasonable
hours.
Not applicable.
There will be no reduction in the range capacity of the
City to provide the necessary public works services to
this area. Services will be on a regular basis and
"as needed."
Adequate capacity exists.
Adequate capacity exists.
Other: REFUSE - Present refuse service is by franchise
collector. Upon annexation, the City will provide collection
collection either by City forces or by contract with the
present collector if possible.
~0 ANNE×325.2
City refuse pick up is twice a week.
RTY:mro
IfI. What effects, if any, would annexation of this territory have on the existing
level of City/District services (i.e., need for additional emergency service
personnel or construction of new facilities, etc.)? The annexation of this
territory will not affect near term level or capability of the City to provide
needed services. Upon time of full build out of this territory, additional City
police officers will be required to maintain the current level of service.
Street improvements resulting from proposed development will increase the
maintenance responsibility of the City but will not affect the existing level
of service.
IV.
Would City/District require any upgrading ,or change in facilities to serve
affected territory (roads, fire hydrants, mains, etc.)? If so, would City/District
or residents be responsible for financing? The City will, at time of development,
re§uire upgrading or changes in existing facilities. As development occurs,
Developers shall provide and pay for major improvements and facilities and
dedicate them to the City. Future residents of the project will possibly be
assessed for a landscape maintenance district and a sewer assessment district if
established.
Vo
Indicate and explain existing zoning in affected territory. The Kern County
Rosedale General Plan designates 42.98 acres as Estate Residential (10,000
square feet net-l.76 to 3.00 Dwelling Units per gross acre); 12.06 acres as
Multi-Family Residential (6,000 square feet net-5.01 to 14.00 Dwelling Units
per gross acre); and 6.32 acres as Commercial.
VI.
Indicate and explain praposed prezoning in area. (List effects on present land
use that would occur as a result of annexation, such as maintenance of livestock
on property, etc.) The South 42.98 acres (gross) are prezoned City R-1 (One-Family
Dwelling). The Northeast (6.50 acre) corner of the territory is prezoned City
C-2 (Commercial Zone) and the remaining 11.88 acre portion is prezoned City R-2
(Limit Multiple-Family Dwelling Zone).
City prezoning will be consistent with County Planned Land Use.
D30 ANNEX325.3 3
VII. List City/District services that area will directly or indirectly benefit from
such as decrease in fire insurance rate, shorter emergency response time, use of
community facilities:, etc. City police should be able to respond in a more
timely manner than the present County Sheriff and State Highway Patrol. Current
City police standard is a higher sworn officer per 1,000 population percentage
compared to the County standard. Refuse service will be provlded by the City
and will result in savings to the owners within this annexation. No special
assessments or charges for street sweeping, leaf collection, school crossing
guards, street lighting energy costs and fire hydrants upon any future
development of subject area.
VIII. Please provide the following information relative to City/District and County
taxes:
Ao
List existing tax rate(s) in area. Existing tax rate in area equals 1.199076% of
assessed market value. This represents the total property tax rate. When
annexed, a designated percentage of the total tax of the area will accrue to the
City. (Rate as shown on 1987-88 County Auditor-Controller Tax Rate List).
Would affected areas be subject to any bonded indebtedness of the City/District:
If so, explain. Yes, the tax rate for City bonds equals 0.004970% of assessed
market value. When annexed, the total tax rate will be 1.204046%. (Rates as
shown on 1987-88 County Auditor-Controller 'Fax Rate List).
How will the difference in tax rates affect a house with a market value of
$50,000. The yearly tax rate would increase by the amount of $2.14 on a house of
$50,000 market value due to inclusion of the City Bond Rate. (Figure includes
deduction for home ow~ers exemption).
D30 ANNEX325.4 4