HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 45-88RESOLUTION NO. 45-88
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION OF THE COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSING PROCEEDINGS
FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD IDENTIFIED AS ANNEXATION NO. 324
(OSWELL NO. 7 ANNEXATION).
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a
change of organization, to wit, the annexation to the City of
Bakersfield of the hereinafter-described territory, pursuant to
Section 56800 of the Government Code of the State of California.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the
City of Bakersfield that it hereby finds and determines as
follows:
1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the
annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the territory described
in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part of this resolu-
tion as though fully set forth herein.
2. That a map of the territory proposed to be so
annexed, marked Exhibit "B", is attached hereto and made a part
of this Resolution as though fully set forth herein.
3. That a Plan for providing services within the
affected territory of the proposed annexation, in accordance with
the provisions of Section 56653 of the Government Code, is marked
as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as though
fully set forth herein.
4. That this proposal for change of organization, to
wit, annexation, is made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local
Government Reorganization Act of 1985, and it is requested that
proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith.
5. That the reasons for the proposed change of organi-
zation are that the owners and residents of the affected terri-
tory desire to receive municipal services from the City of
Bakersfield, and the City desires to receive tax revenues for
benefits given and to be given to the territory proposed to be
annexed.
6. That for this proposed annexation and the zoning
upon annexation, therefor, the ordinance for which was adopted
February 24, 1988, an Initial Study was conducted and it was
determined that the proposed project would not have a significant
effect on the environment, and a Negative Declaration was pre-
pared.
7. That the laws and regulations relating to the prepa-
ration and adoption of Negative Declarations as set forth in the
California Environmental Quality Act and City of Bakersfield
Resolution No. 107-86 have been duly followed and the Negative
Declaration for this proposed annexation is hereby approved and
adopted.
8. That the territory proposed for annexation as
described herein has been determined to be uninhabited pursuant
to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985,
Section 56046 of the Government Code.
9. That the names of the officers of the City of
Bakersfield who are to be furnished with copies of the Executive
Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed Notice of
Hearing, if any, are:
City Clerk
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
J. Dale Hawley
Interim City Manager
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Arthur J. Saalfield
Interim City Attorney
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
10. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten
(10) copies of this resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive
Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern County
at 1430 Truxtun Avenue, Suite 802, Bakersfield, California.
.......... o0o .........
- 2 -
EXHIBIT "A"
ANNEXATION NO. 324
OSWELL NO. 7
A parcel of land situated in the County of Kern, State of California, being a
portion of Sections 34 and 35, Township 29 South, Rang~ 28 East, M.D.B. & M.,
more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at a point of intersection of the West line of the East 55 feet
of the Southeast l~4of said Section 34 and the South line of the North ]~of
the Southeast ]~ of Section 34, said point being on the existing corporate
boundary of the City of Bakersfield;
51{ENCE (1) Northerly along said West line, 629.21 feet more or less, to the
South right-of-way line of Alloway [Jane (Co. Rd. No. 1495);
THENCE (2) Easterly along said South right-of-way line and Easterly prolonga-
tion thereof, a distance of 55 feet to tile centerline of Oswell Street (Co.
Rd. No. 1372), said point also being the East line of said Section 34;
~{ENCE (3) North 0o30'25" East along said centerline, 0.71 feet to the
Westerly prolongation of the South right-of-way line of A1].oway Lane as shown
on Tract 2172 filed April 14, 1959 per Map Book 10, Page 13[ it] tile Office
of the Recorder of the County of Kern;
THENCE (4) North 89°51'05" East along said prolongation and South right-of-way
line, 331.13 feet to the Southeast corner of the afore-mentioned Tract 2172.
THENCE (5) North 0~30'20" East along the East line of said Tract, 30.002 feet
to ~le centerli~ of Alloway Lane,~ said point also being the Southwest corner
of Virginia Avenue School Progetty;
~ENCE (6) Easterly along the Sou~h line of the North~of the Northwest ~
of the Southwest ~ of Section 35, said line also being the South line of
Virginia Avenue Sd~ool Property, 662.17 feet more or less, to tile
Southeast corner of said property;
'UdENCE (7) Northerly a].on~ the East line of said school prof3erty also being
~le West line of tile East ]j of the Northeast~of the Northwest ~of the
Southwest ~of Section 35, a distance of 649.44 feet more oc less, to a
point on the Souhi] right-of-way line of Virginia Avenue (Co. Rd. No. 1249),
said point also being the South line of the North 10 feet of the Southwest
~of Section 35;
R]{ENCE (8) Easterly along said South line, 1634.74 feet more or less, to the
West line of the East 20 feet of the Southwest ~ of Section 35;
THENCE (9) Southerly along said West line, said line also being the West
right-of-way line of Sterling Road (Co. Rd. No. 254), 1,308.94 feet more or
less, to the Sou~1 line of the North ~of the Southwest ]~of Section 35;
~{ENCE (10) Westerly along said South line, 1,263.98 feet more or less, to the
East line of the West 40 feet of the Southeast ]~of the S~]thwest ~of Section
35 and a point on the existing corporate boundary of the City of Bakersfield;
~ENCE (11) West along said existing corporate boundary to the Point of
Beginning.
CONTAINING 64.57 ACRES OF LAND; MORE OR LESS.
4:OS.NO.7 PC:wrn
PO.B.
VIRGINIA AVE.
SCHOOL
II
36
L
$~C. 2 t -310 -S. FI,2~Jc.~ ~ ~
I~--~ .-o-~ I ,~,.,
ANNEXATION OF
OSWELL NO. 7
200 0 ~00 4OO 6~0
EXHIBIT "B" i
PLAN FOR PROVIDING SERVICES
"OS~T.T, NO. 7"
A~E~ATION NO. 324
SERVICES
Planning
Parks and Recreation
Library
Police Protection
Fire Protection
Streets
Construction
Maintenance
Sweeping
Lighting
Flood Control
Sewerage
Water
Other
Acjency Which Presently
Provides Service
COLCqTY
Check Services Which
City/District Will Provide
Upon
Annexation
X
Future Date
(specify)
DEVELOPMEHT
Indicate How Services Provided
by City/District will be Financed
(i.e., general tax rate or special
assessment.)
COUNTY X G~ERAL TJLX REVK~UE
COL~Y~Y NO ~ ~ ~ ~
~ & ~A~
~ PA~L X ~ T~ ~
~/CO~ JO~ NO ~I~ ~ ~ ~
C~ X ~ & ~ T~ ~
~ N~ D~P~ P~ D~P~
C~ X ~ & ~ T~ ~
NO S~ X ~ & ~ T~ ~
UPON
CITY/E.?LC.S.D. JOINT X DEVMrnPMENT USER FEES/SPECIAL
~. ~'k~ ~ N/A N/A
PP~,~Y C~ X ~R
EXHIBIT "C"
Please provide the following information, when applicable, only for services which will be provided by the applicant
city/district.
Location
Indicate location from which service will be
provided (i.e. nearest fire station, library,
etc. )
Police -All police services in the City of Bakersfield are administere~
through the City Police Deparh~ent located at the s/w corner
of Truxtun Avenue and Eye Street about 5 miles northwest of
the annexation.
Fire- Station 41 (County) is 1 miles west at Mt. Vernon Avenue and
Virginia Avenue.
Parks and Recreation-Potomac Park (County) is located within ½ mile.
5~on development of residential areas, neighborhood parks will
be provided in accordance with City policy.
Library-N/A
Streets
Construction/Maintenance-The City Corporation Yard on Tr~xtun
Avenue west of Fwy. 99 will provide necessary facili-
Sweeping ties, personnel and servioes to accomodate Public
Works efforts. Maintenance and personnel will be
Lighting dispatched from the City Yard on a regular basis for
prev~ntivema~_ntenance as needed. Repair includes
streets, constructed/maintenance, sweeping & lighting.
Sewer-An existing sewer trunkline in Oswell Street is available per
~er~-~ ~as .... les ~ ..... t~ Se~,ices Dist.
Effluent would then be treated by City Wastewater Treatment
Plant #2.
Water-This area is served by the California Water Service C~k3ny.
Other-(Refuse) City will provide service either by City for~es dis-
patched from main corporation yard or by contracted franchise
service.
Service Level Capacity
Indicate frequency and availability of service
(i.e. street sweeping, response time for
emer~lency services, rec. pro, rams, etc.)
24-hour patrol is provided in the inm~diate
vicinity of this annexation. FJ_rst priority
response is approximately 7.00 minutes or less.
Fire protection is provided on a 24-hour basis
with reslconse time of 4 minutes or less. The
anne~ation will not affect the joint powers fire
service capability.
All City parks are open to the public at reasonable
hours.
There will be no reduction in the range capacity
of the City to provide the necessary public works
services to this area. Services will be on a
regular basis and "as needed".
Adequate capacity exists.
Collection is twice-w~ekly.
ill.
What effects, if any, would annexation of this territory have on the existing level
of city/district services (i.e., need for additional emergency service personnel or
construction of new facilities, etc.)? The annexatic~ of this territory will not
affect near term level or capability of the City to provide needed services. Upon
time o£ gull build out o~ t~ls territory, approximately 1.55 new police officers will
be required to maLn%ann ~]~e City Standard of 1.5 officers per 1000 population.
Street improvements resulting frc~n proposed develol~ent will increase the maintenance
responsibility of the City but will not effect the existinq level of service.
IV.
Would city/district require any upgrading or change in facilities to serve affected
territory (roads, fire hydrants, mains, etc.)? If so, would city/district or' residents
be responsible for financing? The City will not require any upqradinq or chanqes
in existing facilities. As development occurs, developers shall provide and Day
~or major improvements and facilities and dedicate th~n to the city. DeveloDers
shall also deposit f~ads for a share of the cost of future traffic siqnals on
Brundage Lane at the Oswell Street intersection.
Indicate and explain existing zoning in affected territory. Subject property is
Zoned A-1 (Light Agricultural) and R-1 (Low Density Residential) in the County.
See attached County Zoning Map, 103-35 as reference.
VI.
Indicate and explain proposed prezoning in area. (List effects on present land
use that would occur as a result of annexation such as maintenance of livestock
on property, etc.) The territory is prezoned City R-1 (One Family Dwel]ing) Zone.
Proposed zoning uuon annexation is consistent with existinq county zoning and ]and
use designations under the Bakersfield Matro~olitan Area General Plan.
VII.
List city/district services that area will directly or indirectly benefit from, such as
decrease in fire insurance rate, shorter emergency response time, use of community
facilities, etc. city police should be able to respond in a more timely manner than
the present County Sheriff and State Highway Patrol. Current City Police standard
is 1.5 sworn officer per 1,000 population cc~pared to the County standard of 1.15.
Re~use service will be provided by the City and will result in savings to the owners
within this annexation. Np special assessments or charges for street s~eping, leaf
collection, school crossing guards, street lighting energy costs and fire hydrants
upon development of subject area.
VIII, Please provide the following information relative to city/district and county taxes:
List existing tax rate(s) in area. Existing tax rate in area equal 1.076576% of
A. assessed market value. TYiis represents the total property tax rate. When annexed
approximately 30% of the total tax of the area will accrue to the City.
(Rate as shown on 1987-88 County Auditor-Controller Tax Rate List).
Would effected area be subject to any bonded indebtedness of the city/district: If
so, explain. Yes, the tax rate for City bonds equals 0.004970% of assessed market
value. When annexed, the total tax rate will be 1.081546%.
(Rates as slyown on 1987-88 County Auditor-Controller Tax Rate List)
How will the difference in tax rates affect a house with a market value of $50,000,007
The yearly tax would increase by the amount of $2.14 on a house of $50,000 this
market value due to inclusion of the City Bond Rate. (Fiqure includes deducticn
for home owners exer~3tion) .
ZONING MAP 103:3,5
..
LEGEND