Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 164-87RESOLUTION NO. 164-87 A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSING PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD IDENTIFIED AS ANNEXATION NO. 315 (BERKSHIRE NO. 2 ANNEXATION). WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a change of organization, to wit, the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the hereinafter-described territory, pursuant to Section 56800 of the Government Code of the State of California. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield that it hereby finds and determines as follows: 1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the territory described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part of this resolu- tion as though fully set forth herein. 2. That a map of the territory proposed to be so annexed, marked Exhibit "B", is attached hereto and made a part of this Resolution as though fully set forth herein. 3. That a Plan for providing services within the affected territory of the proposed annexation, in accordance with the provisions of Section 56653 of the Government Code, is marked as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as though fully set forth herein. 4. That this proposal for change of organization, to wit, annexation, is made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, and it is requested that proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith. 5. That the reasons for the proposed change of organi- zation are that the owners and residents of the affected terri- tory desire to receive municipal services from the City of Bakersfield, and the City desires to receive taK revenues for benefits given and to be given to the territory proposed to be annexed. 6. That for this proposed annexation and the zoning upon annexation therefor, the ordinance for which was adopted this date, an Initial Study was conducted and it was determined that the proposed project would not have a significant effect on the environment, and a Negative Declaration was prepared. 7. That the laws and regulations relating to the prepa- ration and adoption of Negative Declarations as set forth in the California Environmental Quality Act and City of Bakersfield Resolution No. 107-86 have been duly followed and the Negative Declaration for this proposed annexation is hereby approved and adopted. 8. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein has been determined to be uninhabited pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, Section 56046 of the Government Code. 9. That the names of the officers of the City of Bakersfield who are to be furnished with copies of the Executive Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed Notice of Hearing~ if any, are: City Clerk City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 George A. Caravalho City Manager City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 Richard J. Oberholzer City Attorney City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 (Legal Counsel for Applicant) 10. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten (10) copies of this resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern County at 1430 Truxtun Avenue, Suite 801, Bakersfield, California. .......... o0o ......... -2- A R.BERK2AP1 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on AUGUST 26, 1987 , by the following vote: CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of the Council of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED AUGUST 26, 1987 MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED as to form:~ C~TY AT~OR~q~Y of the~-City of Bakersfield AJS/EA/meg Attachments A ANEX 5 R.BERK2AP1 - 3 - EXHIBIT "A" BERKSHIRE NO. 2 ANNEXATION NO. 315 A parcel of land situated in the County of Kern, State of California, being a portion of Sections 30 and 31, Township 30 South, Range 28 East, M.D.B.&M., more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection of the North right of way line of the Arvin-Edison Intake Canal as described in Parcel 1C-3 of that certain Order of Condemnation recorded in Book 3972, Page 201 of Official Records in the Office of the Kern County Recorder and the East line of Lot 5, of the "Berkshire Farm Tract" as filed in the Office of the Kern County Recorder on August 27, 1901. The said point being on the Corporate Boundary of the City of Bakersfield, said point being the True Point of Beginning; THENCE (1) departing from the existing Corporate Boundary Southerly along the East line of Lots 5, 12, 21, and 28 of said "Berkshire Farm Tract" and Southerly prolongation thereof, a distance of 4150.97 + feet to the South line of the North 30 feet of Section 31. The said South line also being the South right of way line of Hosking Avenue. THENCE (2) Westerly along the said South right of way line of Hosking Avenue, a distance of 654.77 + feet to the Southerly prolongation of the West line of Lot 128 of sa~d "Berkshire Farm Tract." T~ENCE (3) Northerly .along the West line of Lots 5, 12, 21, 28, and the Southerly prolongation of Lot 28, a distance of 4159.84 ~ feet to a point on the North line of the South 165 feet of Lot 5. Said point being a point on the existing Corporate Boundary and also being on the North right of way line of the Arvin-Edison Intake Canal. THENCE (4) Easterly along the various courses of the said Corporate Boundary to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 63.00 acres of land, more or less. lt:mro Page 1 of 1 Dll Berkshire2 ~-',-1 ! ~ ~ ! ' i ~ i I / ~ i I ~ I ] I ANNEXAD EXHIBIT "B" "BERKSHIRE NO. 2" .&NNEXATION NO. 315 PLAN FOR PROVIDING SERVICES SE" 2ES A.gency Which Presently Check Services Which Indicate How Services Provided Provides Service ,City/District Will Provide by City/District will be Financed I (i.e., .general tax rate or special Upon I Future Date assessment.) Annexation , (specify) COUNTY X GENERAL TAX REVENUE UPON COUNTY X DEVELOPHENT GENERAL TAX REVENUE COUNTY N/A GENERAL TAX REVENUE COUNTY X I GENERAL TAX REVENUE COUNTY/CITY JOINT AGREEMENT N/A GENERAL TAX REVENUE COUNTY X GENERAL TAX REVENUE COUNTY N/A PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT CClII~qTY X ~mmn^T ~v ~,E~Nu~ NONE X GENERAL TAX KEVENUE UPON N/A X DEVELOPMENT GENERAL TAX REVENUE COUNTY X GENERAL TAX REVENUE UPON N/A X DEVELOPMENT USER FEE/SPECIAL ASSESSMENT GREENFIELD CO. UPON PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PAYS CAPITAL CO~c N/A WATER DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT USER FEES FOR INDIVIDUAL SERVICE UPON N/S X DEVE LOPHENT USER FEE Planning Parks and Recreation Library Police Protection Fire Protection Streets Construction Sweeping Lighting Flood Control Sewerage Water Other (REFUSE) EXItI BIT "C" Please provide the following information, when applicable, only for services which will be provided by the applicant city/district, Location Indicate location from which service will be provided (i.e. nearest fire station, library, etc. ) Police - Ail police services in the City of Bakersfield are admini- stered through the City Police Department located at the S/W corner of Truxtun Avenue and Eye Street about 5-1/2 miles north of the annexation. Fire- Station 52 (County) is within t-1/2 miles at South Union and Barton Street. Parks and Recreation - P!anz Park is within 3 miles northerly of the area. Upon development of residential areas, neighborhood parks will be provided in accordance with City policy. Library - N/A Streets - Construction/Maintenance Sweeping Lighting Sewer The City Corporation Yard on Truxtun Avenue west of Freeway 99 will provide necessary facilities, personnel and services to accommodate Public Works efforts. Maintenance and personnel will be dispatched from the City Yard on a regular basis for preventative maintenance as needed. Repair includes streets, constructed/main- tenance, sweeping & lighting. - Sewer services will become available in Hosking Avenue upon completion of the Hosking Avenue Trunk Sewer Project which will tie into Treatment Plant No. 3. Water - This area to be served by Greenfield County Water District. Other (REFUSE) - Upon development, service will be provided by the City, possibly by contracts with a franchise collector. Service Level Capacity Indicate frequency and availability of service (i.e. street sweeping, response time for .emer.gency services, rec. pro.grams, etc.) 24 hour patrol is provided in the immediate vicinity 'approximately 7.00 minutes or less. Fire protection is provided on a 24-hour basis with response time of 5 minutes or less. The annexation will not affect City Fire service capability. Ail City parks are open to the public at reasonable ]]ours. N/A There will be no reduction in the rance capacity of tile City to provide the necessary public works services to this area. Services will be on a regular basis and "as needed". Adequate capacity exists. Adequate capacity exists. City refuse pickup is twice a week. 111. What effects, if any, would annexation of this territory have on the existing level of city/district services (i.e., need for additional emergency service personnel or construction of new facilities, etc.)? The annexation o£ this territory will not affect the near term level or capability of the City to provide needed services. Upon time of full buildout of this territory, additional police officers will be added to maintain the City Standard of 1.5 officers per 1000 population. Street improvements resulting from proposed development will increase the maintenance responsibility for the City but will not effect existing level of service. IV. Would city/district require any upgrading or change in facilities to serve affected territory (roads, fire hydrants, mains, etc.)? If so, would city/district or residents be responsible for financing.~ As development occurs, the developer provi~-~s and pays for major facilities and dedicates them tO the City. The proposed Hosking Road trunk sewer system through the area will possibly be financed by an assessment d~strzct which will encompass the entire annexation area. Developers in the area wzll also share in the cost of a proposed crossing of the Arvin-Edison Canal. Indicate and explain existing zoning in affected territory. Subiect oroperty is zoned A {Exclusive AEriculture) in the County for that portion ]yin~ north of Berkshire Road. The remainins portion of subject pronertv south of Berkshire Road is zoned E (1/4), PD (Estate - 1/4 acre, precise development combining) in the county, Vl. Indicate and explain proposed prezoning in area. (List effects on present land use that would occur as a result of annexation such as maintenance of livestock on property, etc.) Proposed prezoning and amendment to the Bakersfield ~,letropolitan Area General Plan will consist of City R-1 (Single Family Dwelling) Zone over the entire subject property. The impact in general will be a change from existing agriculture land use to city low density residential use as subject area is now primarily used for agricultural production. VII. List city/district services that area will directly or indirectly benefit from, such as decrease in fire insurance rate, shorter emergency response time, use of community facilities, etc. City Police should be able to respond in a more timely matter than present County Sheriff and State Highway Patrol Services. The present City single family dwelling refuse collection rate of $75.00 per year is lower than fees County residents now pay to independent companies. No special assessment or charges for street sweeping, leaf collection, school crossing guards, street lighting energy costs and fire hydrants upon development of subject area. -- VIII. Please provide the following information relative to city/district and county taxes: List existing tax rate(s) in area. The existing tax rate (as shown on Kern County A. 1986-1987 tax rate schedule~ in the area equals 1.075609% of assessed market value. This represents the total property tax rate. When annexed approxzmately 30~ o~ the total property tax of the area will accrue to the City and the remaining to the County for providing health care and social services. Would effected area be subject to any bonded indebtedness of the city/district: If so, explain. Yes, when annexed, the rate will be increased to 1.0811t~% of assessed market value which equals the City bond rate of 0.005505% and the total property tax rate of 1.075609% as shown on Kern County 1986-1987 tax rate schedule. How will the difference in tax rates affect a house with a market value of $50,000.00? If the house is used as the principal residence, the $7000.00 home owners exemption leaves $43,000.00 for taxin~ purposes. The City Bond rate of 0.005505% amounts to a difference of $2.37 more per year on a house of this value.