HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 58-87RESOLUTION NO. 58-87
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION OF THE COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSING PROCEEDINGS
FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD IDENTIFIED AS ANNEXATION NO. 312
(MT. VERNON NO. 4 ANNEXATION).
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a
change of organization, to wit, the annexation to the City of
Bakersfield of the hereinafter-described territory, pursuant to
Section 56800 of the Government Code of the State of California.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the
City of Bakersfield that it hereby finds and determines as
follows:
~. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the
annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the territory described
in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part of this resolu-
tion as though fully set forth herein.
2. That a map of the territory proposed to be so
annexed, marked Exhibit "B", is attached hereto and m@de a part
of this Resolution as though fully set forth herein.
3- That a Plan for providing services within the
affected territory of the proposed annexation, in accordance with
the provisions of Section 56653 of the Government Code, is marked
as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as though
fully set forth herein.
4. That this proposal for change of organization, to
wit, annexation, is made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local
Government Reorganization Act of 1985, and it is requested that
proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith.
5. That the reasons for the proposed change of organi-
zation are that the owners and residents of the affected terri-
tory desire to receive municipal services from the City of
Bakersfield, and the City desires to receive tax revenues for
benefits given and to be given to the territory proposed to be
annexed.
6. That for this proposed annexation and the zoning
upon annexation, therefor, the ordinance for which was adopted
this date, an Initial Study was conducted and it was determined
that the proposed projects would not have a significant effect on
the environment, an~ a Negative Declaration was prepared.
7. That the laws and regulations relating to the prepa-
ration and adoption of Negative Declarations as set forth in the
California Environmental Quality Act and City of Bakersfield
Resolution No. 107-86 have been duly followed and the Negative
Declaration for this proposed annexation is hereby approved and
adopted.
8. That the territory proposed for annexation as
described herein has been determined to be uninhabited pursuant
to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Aot of 1985,
Section 56046 of the Government Code.
9. That the names of the officers of the City of
Bakersfield who are to be furnished with copies of the Executive
Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed Notice of
Hearing, if any, are:
City Clerk
City of Bakersfield
1501Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
George A. Caravalho
City Manager
City of Bakersfield
1501Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Richard J. Oberholzer
City Attorney
City of Bakersfield
1501Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
10. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten
(10) copies of this resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive
Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern County
at 1430 Truxtun Avenue, Suite 801, Bakersfield, California.
.......... 000 .........
-2-
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was
passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a
regular meeting thereof held on April 8, 1987 , by
the following vote:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS' CHILDS. CHRiStENSEN, SMITH, RACY, M~fff~-DtCKERSON, SAI.¥AGGIO
NOES. COUNCILMEMBERS: ~
ABSENT; COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSTAINING: COUhCILMEMBERS.: ~
CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED as to form:
CtT% AT/~RNEY of the City of Bakersfield
CA/meg
R RES 4
MT.VER4
EXHIBIT "A"
MT. VERNON NO. 4
ANNEXATION NO. 312
A parcel of land situated in the northeast quarter of Section 4 of Township 30
South, Range 28 East, M.D.B.&M., County of Kern, State of California, more
particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the point of intersection of the East right of way line of
Washington Street (Co. Rd. No. 2927) and the South right of way line of
State Freeway 58 also being an angle point on the existing corporate
boundary of the City of Bakersfield;
THENCE (1) North 00"06'16" West, 265.08 feet to the point of
intersection of the North right of way line State Freeway 58 and the
East right of way line of Washington Street (Co. Rd. No. 2927);
THENCE (2) North 01°34'59" West, along said East right of way line of
Washington Street, 4]6.46 feet to an angle point thereon;
THENCE (3) North 44°16'38" East, along said East right of way line,
27.86 feet to a point: on the South line of the North 30.00 feet of said
northeast quarter of Section 4 also being a point on the existing
corporate boundary of the City of Bakersfield;
THENCE (4) easterly, southerly and westerly along last named corporate
boundary to the point: of beginning.
Containing 40.32 acres (~) gross
RY:mro
MT.VERNON4 .....
PLAN FOR PROVIDING SERVICES
/,iT. VERNON NO. 4
f
SERVICES
Agency Which Presently Check Services Which Indicate How Services Provided
Provides Service City/District Will Provide by City/District will be Financed
(i.e., 9eneral tax rate or special
Upon Future Date assessment.)
Annexation (specify)
County X General Tax Revenue
o .... .,. ¥ Ganara] Ta~ Revenue/Fees
County N/A General Tax Revenue
County X General Tax Revenue
County X General Tax Revenue
County N/A General Tax Revenue
County X General & gax Tax Revenue
County N/A N/A
County X General & Gas Tax Revenue
No Service X General & Gas Tax .Revenue
After
County X installation General Tax Revenue
County X General Tax Revenue
After
N/A X Installation User Fees/Special Assessment
California Wtr. Serv. N/A
N/A X User Fee
Planning
Parks and Recreation
Library
Police Protection
Fire Protection
Streets
Construction
Maintenance
Sweeping
Lighting
Flood Control
Sewerage
Water
Other - Refuse
EXHIBIT "C"
Please provide the following information, when applicable, only for services which will be provided by the applicant
city/district.
Location
Indicate location from which service will be
provided (i.e. nearest fire station, library,
etc. )
Police - All police services in the City of Bakersfield are adminis-
tered through the City Police Department located at the s/w corner
of Truxtun Avenue and Eye Street about 4 miles northwesterly
of the annexation.
Fire - Station 41 (County) is within 1/2 mile at Ht. Vernon Avenue
Virginia Avenue and will service the subject area per City/
County Joint Powers Agreement.
Parks and Recreation - Martin Luther King Jr. Park is located 2
miles to the northwest.
Wayside Park is located 3 miles to the south-
west.
Library - N/A
Streets
Construction/Maintenance - ~e City Corporation Yard on Truxtun
Avenue west of Freeway 99 will provide necessary
Sweeping facilities, personnel and services to accommodate
Public Works efforts. Maintenance and personnel
Lighting will be dispatched from the City Yard on a regular
basis for preventative maintenance as needed.
Repair includes streets, constructed/maintenance,
sweeping and lighting.
Sewer - An existing City trunk sewer line in Brundage Lane is avail-
ablu to this area for connections, Effluent would then be
treated by City Wastewater Treatment Plant #2.
Water - This area is serviced by the California Water Service Co,
Other - (Refuse) - Service will be provided by the City either by
City forces or by contract with a Franchise Refuse Collector,
Service Level CapaCity
Indicate frequency and availability of service
(I.e. street sweeping, response time for
emerc~ency services, rec. pro~lrams, etc.)
24-hour patrol is provided in the immediate
vicinity of this annexation. First priority
response is approximately 7.00 minutes or less.
Fire protection is provided on a 24 hour basis
with response time of 5 minutes less. The annexa-
tion will not affect City fire service capability
All City parks are open to the public at reasonab,~
hours.
N/A
There will be no reduction in the range capacity
of the City to provide the necessary public works
services to this area. Services will be on a
regular basis and "as needed".
Adequate capacity exists in Plant #2 for proposed
area,
Adequate capacity exists.
City Refuse pick up is twice a week,
Ill.
What effects, if any, would annexation of this territory have on the existing level
of city/district services (i.e., need for additional emergency service personnel or
construction of new facilities, etc.)? The annexation of this territory will not
a££ect near term level or capability of the City to provide needed services.
IV.
Would city/district require any upgrading or change in ~cilities to serve affected
territory (roads, fire hydrants, mains, etc.)? If so, would city/district or residents
be responsible for financing? The City will not require any upfradin~ or chan~es
in existing facilities, Any upEradinE of this type ¢Roads~ Fire Hydrants. Mains,
etc.) will be required by the City'at the time of develooment and financing is
the responsibility of individual developers.
Indicate and explain existing zoning in affected territory. Subject p~ropert¥ ~oc~d Witt~in
the Casa Loma specific Pla~ bo~Ddarv, adoptedAu~ust 2S~ 1~86 which desifnates
land use for this area as 7.2 [Service Industrial].
Vl.
Indicate and explain proposed prezoning in area. (List effects on present land
use that would occur as a result of annexation such as maintenance of livestock
on property, etc.) The City proposes to prezone the subject property with 7.2
[Service Industrial), or more restrictive zonin~ of the C~ lnm~ ~p~ ~ ~ P~ ~n.
Zoning will be the same whether the area is in the City of
Vii.
List city/district services that area will directly or indirectly benefit from, such as
decrease in fire insurance rate, shorter emergency response time, use of community
~cilities, etc. City Police should be able to respond in a more timely manner
than the present County Sheriff and State Highway Patrol. Current City Police
standard is 1.65 sworn officers per 1,000 population comDared to the County
standard of 1.15. The City will provide street maintenance which includes street
sweepinK. Refuse service will be provided by the City and will result in savinKs
to the property owners within this annexation.
Please provide the following information relative to city/district and county taxes:
List existing tax rate(s) in area. £xist±nK tax rate in area equal 1.015701% of
assessed market value. This represents the total property tax rate. When
annexed aporoximately 30% of the total tax of the area will accrue to the City.
Would effected area be subject to any bonded indebtedness of the city/district:
so, explain. Yes, the tax rate for City bonds equals 0.00S505% of assessed
market value. When annexed, the total tax rate will be 1.021206% of assessed
market value.
If
structure
How will the difference in tax rates affect a:t~:~with a market value of $50,000.007
The yearly tax would increase by the amount of $2.75 due to inclusion of the
City bond rate.