HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 46-86RESOLUTION NO. 46-86
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION OF THE COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSING PROCEEDINGS
FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD IDENTIFIED AS ANNEXATION NO. 308
(PANAMA NO. 6).
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a
change of organization, to wit, the annexation to the City of
Bakersfield of the hereinafter-described territory, pursuant to
Section 35140 of the Government Code of the State of California.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the
city of Bakersfield that it hereby finds and determines as
follows:
1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the
annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the territory described
in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part of this resolu-
tion as though fully set forth herein.
2. That a map of the territory proposed to be so
annexed, marked Exhibit "B", is attached hereto and made a part
of this Resolution as though fully set forth herein.
3. That a Plan for providing services within the
affected territory of the proposed annexation, in accordance with
the provisions of Section 56653 of the Government Code, is marked
as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as though
fully set forth herein.
4. That this proposal for change of organization, to
wit, annexation, is made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local
Government Reorganization Act of 1985, and it is requested that
proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith.
5. That the reasons for the proposed change of organi-
zation are that the owners and residents of the affected terri-
tory desire to receive municipal services from the City of
Bakersfield, and the City desires to receive tax revenues for
benefits given and to be given to the territory proposed to be
annexed.
6. That for this proposed annexation and the zoning
upon annexation therefor, the ordinance for which was adopted
this date, an Initial Study was conducted and it was determined
that the proposed projects would not have a significant effect on
the environment, and a Negative Declaration was prepared.
7. That the laws and regulations relating to the prepa-
ration and adoption of Negative Declarations as set forth in the
California Environmental Quality Act and City of Bakersfield
Resolution No. 83-132 have been duly folowed and the Negative
Declaration for this proposed annexation is hereby approved and
adopted.
8. That the territory proposed for annexation as
described herein has been determined to be uninhabited pursuant
to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985,
Section 56046 of the Government Code.
9. That the names of the officers of the City of
Bakersfield who are to be furnished with copies of the Executive
and who are to be given mailed Notice of
Officer's Report
Hearing, if any, are:
City Clerk
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
(10)
officer
at 1430
George A. Caravalho
City Manager
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Richard J. Oberholzer
City Attorney
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
(Legal Counsel for
Applicant)
10. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten
copies of this resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive
of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern County
Truxtun Avenue, Suite 802, Bakersfield, california.
.......... o0o ..........
2
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was
passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a
regular meeting thereof held on the 7th day of May ,
1986, by the following vote:
CITY CLERK and Ex officio Clerk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED this 7th day of May , 1986
MAYOR of the city of Bakc~sfield
APPROVED as to form:
I/TY~~TTO~EY of~the~ity of Bakersfield
bl
5 R. PA6-AP 3
PANAMA NO. 6
ANNEXATION NO. 308
A parcel of land situated in the County of Kern, State of California, being a
portion of Sections 19 and 30, Township 30 South, Range 28 East, M.D.M., more
particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the northeast corner of Lot 8 of Sales Map No. 1 of lands of J. B.
Haggin, Section 19, Township 30 South, Range 28 East, M.D.B.&M., Kern County,
California, filed May 3, 1889, in Book M of Maps at Page 5 in the Office of the
Kern County Recorder. Said corner also being a point on the existing corporate
boundary of the City of Bakersfield, and the point of beginning for this
description:
Thence (1) South along the East line of said Lot 8, also being the East line of
the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 19, a distance of 1321.42
feet to a point on the center line of Fairvlew Road;
Thence (2) South along the East lines of Lots 13 and 18 of said J. B. Haggin
Sales Map, also being the East line of the West 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of said
Section 19, a distance of 2641.72 feet to a point on the center line of Panama
Lane;
Thence (3) along a Southerly projection of said Lot 18 East line, a distance of
30.00 feet to a point on the South right of way line of Panama Lane;
Thence (4) West along said South right of way line a distance of 1320.00 feet to
a point on the existing Corporate Boundary of the City of Bakersfield;
Thence (5) Northerly and Easterly along the last named Corporate Boundary to the
Point of Beginning.
Containing 121.03 Acres (~)
EXHIBIT "A"
SALE S (5)
$£C Jg
(~)~
PM NO 4992
RO.B.
9
[~ 2C
SEC
- I
:
ANNEXATI~ OF PANAMA NO.6
121.0~ ~ ACRES
EXHIBIT 'B'
' I'LAN FOR PROVIDING SERVICE PANAMA NO. 6
5I!RVI CliS
I~l;tlmiltg
t';,l'k5 and Recreation
! ibrary
Police Protection
I:ire Protection
Cons!rtmtion
I.i i,,l~ t
Flood Control
5~we~'nge
Agency Which Presently Check Services Which Indicate Ilow Services Pro-
Pro~idcs Service City Will Provide: vialed by City wiil be
Financed (i.e., general tax
Upon Future rate or special assessment..
~nexation Date
(specify)
County X General Tax Revenue
County X General Tax Revenue
County N/A General Tax Revenue
County X General Tax Revenue
County .
County X General & Gas Tax Revenue
County Existing N/A
County X General & Gas Tax Revenue
No Service X General & Gas Tax Revenue
County X After
Igstallation General Tax Revenue
Cnnnty X General Tax Revenue
After
N/A (Septic Tanks) _ X Tn~tallntion User Fees/Special Assessment
CaliF. Water Service
EXHIBIT "C"
I.APCKC #&
'Flease provide tho following information, when applicable, only for services which will he provided by the
applicant city. Location Service l,evel
Indicate locatto~gh-~dch service
will be provhled (t.e. nearest fire
statIon~ librMr_rJ etc.)
Police - All police servi'ces in the City of Bakersfield are administered
through.t'he City Police Department located at the s/w corner of
Truxtun Avenue and Eye Street about S½ miles north of the
annexation.
P~re - Station 52 (County) is within 2¼ miles at South Union and Barton
Street.
Station S (City) is within 2 miles at the corner of South Chester
Avenue and Planz Road·
Parks and Recreatioe - Planz Park is located 2 miles to the north.
Lthrary- N/A
Streets
Construction/MaIntenance
Sweeping
Llghting
- The City Corporation Yard on Truxtun Avenue
west of Preeway 99 will provide necessary
facilities, personnel and services to
accomodate Public Works efforts. ~ainten-
ance and personnel will b~ dispatched from
· the City Yard on a regular ~asis for prevent.
ative maintenance as ne6ded. Repair include~
streets, constructed/maintenance, sweeping
and lighting.
Sewer - Connection to City sewer may be made to Monitor Street and Panama
Lane Trunk lines. Effluant would then be treated by the City
Wastewater Treatment Plant #3.
Other - (Wa'ter) - this area is served by the California Water Service Co.
Indlcnto freque!tcy and aw~ttnbility of
Service (i.e.,street s~veeping, response
for ente~ency servicers,
24 hour patiol is provided in the immediate
vicinity of this annexation. First priority
rpsponse is approximately 7.00 minutes or
less.
Fire protection ~s provided on a 24-hour
basis with response time of S minutes less.
The annexation will not affect City Fire
service capability.
All City parks are open to the public at
reasonable hours.
N/A
There will be no reduction in the range
capacity of the City to provide the
necessary publi~ works services to
this area. Services will be on a regular
basis and "as needed".
With the present expansion of Plant #3,
adequate capacity exists.
Adequatecapacity exists.
II!.
Wheat effec%s, if an>', uld annexation of this terri have on existing level'.
of city services (i.e., need for additional emergency service personnel or con-~
struction cf new facilities, etc.)? The annexation of this territory will
not. affect near term level or capacity of the City to provide needed services.
IV.
Would city require any upgrading or change in facili{ies to serve affected terri-
tory (roads, fire hydrants, mains, etc.)? If so, would city or residents be
responsible for financing? The City will not require any up~ading or changes
in existing facilities. Should the residents of Panama NO. 6 want area wide
street lights and ~wers, the City would assist them in establishinR a publi~
improvement district to finance installation of these improvements.
V. Indicate and exp'lain existing zoning in affected territory.
cultural Zone) in the County.
A-1 (Light Agri-
VI.
Indicate and explain proposed prezoning in area. (List effects on present land
use ~hat would occur as a result of annexation such as maintenance of livestock
on property, etc.) he City's R-1 pre-zoning is compatible and consistent with
the adopted Metropolitan Area General Plan. The proposed Single Family Residential
Use o± Land will preclude commercial farming use.
VII.
List city services tha -ca will directly or indirect' benefit from such as
decrease in fire insuraJ,_e rate, shorter emergency res, ..se time, use of com-
munit7 facilities, etc. City police should be able to respond in a more timely
manner than the present County Sherrif and State Highway Patrol. Current City
Police standard is 1.65 sworn officers per 1,000 population compared to the
street sweeping. Refuse service will be provided bv the City and will rmqn]r
zn sawngs to tBe homeowners within this annexation.
VIII.
Please provide the' following information relative to city and county ra~es:
List existing t~x rate(s) in area. Existing tax rate in area equal 0.958496%
of assessed market value. This represents the total property tn~ rnr~ When
annexed, approXimataly 30% of the total tax of the area will accrue to the City.
.Would. effected area be subject to aqy bonded indebtedness of the city?
If so, explain, Yes, the tax rate for City bonds equals 0.006368% of assessed
market value. When annexed, the total tax rate wi'11 be 0.964864 of assessed
market value.
How will y_he difference in tax .rates affect a house with a marker value of
$50,000