The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutBUSINESS PLAN HAZARtaJuS·· MATERIALS· .D.SION TIME· CHARGED BUSlNESSIDEAPRTMEm__N~: .AsS·('5~e;£ ~ ADDRESS: 1't'2..4- Q ~-'l .. - . .-'-- .0_ .n._ -. --- - --- --- PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ~~. ~<ïG þ.:Sße=,-ros. ~~v PROJECT NUMBER: 2- <3 be¡ DATE: /~ J~/zplolr .J7/z-11 D " .Jet (2- 7/olr . "- - '. '-'~ .,-" - - -- - ~- ---- NAME: dlLJ ~ &.J ¿;£V . -. .'...- - -'">-,. ~ -- --,- ..- ... ---.- -.--="-' ""~" _.~- ... . -- --- . --,. -- .. - - - .- n.u.. .~_-". __ . - - - . - - . -_.. --- - - ---- - .---.-.----. . -.-_.- . - . .-. -.-. PROJECT COMPLETION: TIME CHGD: 4\,w-<; 4~ 4 ~'" 41r--~ . - .',~- - -. - -. -. .-"... . - .-- COMMENTS:' ?l..t:..~.:c 'e../'e....J 4J ~ C,1&r.-1..I\f> P<V(.bs.J ~,Ae.W .f .r~~p~ &. $'+e..- ",sl·b w w~ ('e.V"ð;J <Re...",e.J J(5~ \~s .{ c..lch{' c~se.. -" . ~ "---'~ - - "- .'" --.-. . _ .," _ -._. ~,'" "_"""u 0: _. ---. -. . . .. . . .. . - ~'--- ---_. ..~_._----~. --- DATE: II e Es~~ -------------- - --- -------------------- ---- ----- --------.----- ------------------ ---- ----- - "S>'Ll',J(;. ~ <fO 0^ ~l) - ----------- --------~---- --~~«- ---------- II If UNijt:{2.. 11-t-0-(Q. Ac.còJJ" LUZ.ð-l2 .---------- --------------- -.--.----------. '------------------ ----------- ~ f\.c.G..u-- AA;,;- 1<> ~ """1 --.----------- ------------ --~---~--~--~~-(~ -- íD S'Ee i-iDuJ ~ NGL~ '<r ,,,¡ Æ'<-<5D. ------------------------. ---- --------------- ---------- ------ ----------------- 'g )?, ~e-__l___..__.___._____ 8' (04 ---------6 - f f,,<. g ------;- --------.---- --.-------- ~. --._~---- -- ------- .~ ..----------.------ ------------ ----- ------------.--- -- - --------------- ---. --------- -- -- - ----------.. ---. -------- -- ----------------- --.--.--- e 'Õ6\ f-S\e.\}) 'f..\r4\"~ ESCROW is dosiNG WE'RE GETTiNG TItE kEYs LET TItE REMOdEl bEGiN e ~~ ~~, (ùJ7; "- - ~--------- - - - -- - - ---- JOiN ASSISTANCE LEAGUE® of BAKERSFIELD .iN IIRiNGiNG A NEW BEll" ~, ~ NEWS CoNFERENCE ANd CElEbRATioN FRidAY, JUNE 1 8, 2004 11 :00 A.M. 1924 ··0" STREET BAkERSfiEld, CA 9»01 RSVP: BEVERLy 66~..87}6 -- --- --- -- - assistance leaguefl Bakersfield e LHoward Wines - Re: Fwd: EPA Environm ~ I Oversight Project Number pag.E!1J From: To: Date: Subject: Howard Wines Webb, Charles 6/21/20042:37:27 PM Re: Fwd: EPA Environmental Oversight Project Number I got 4 hrs into the Asbestos Analysis review I'm responding to. I anticipate about another 4 hrs of on-site overview of the asbestos removal. After that, another 4 hrs of disposal document review & case closure. Figure another 4 hrs of anything that comes up in between. Total estimate = 16 hrs@ $87/hr = 1,392.00 »> Charles Webb 6/21/2004 1 :50:54 PM >>> Letter looks fine. Just need memo/email on your time estimate for the Assistance League project >>> Charles Webb 6/3/0410:46:12 AM >>> Howard, This is the project number you will be assigned for charging your time on the project. >>> Manar Haddad 6/2/04 9:29:46 AM >>> The project number assigned for the above is: LUZ412 Thanks . r ~,.m ~ Enviro~mental ~ 1iIIii;;~ í).~NY .t- Solutions Made Easy - . $' Richard D. Leon '"i- Office..........(559) 233-7156 General Foreman Toll Free ....1-800-882-5362 Fax..............(559) 233-2356 ~ ~ ~ 2706 South Railroad Avenue Fresno, California 93725 Asbestos & Lead Removal Hazardo'us Materials & Waste Disposal Emergency Spill Response Soil & Water Remediation Indoor Air QuaE ty PARC EnVIronmental Has Your SolutIons DOSH REG #19 www.parc-ics.com UC #501913 . ¡, <.~ (] ~..ÇC¡~ ~qq q -5) 'f <ji' .. . . . , ...... , . . -, ,. , ;... - - -- -- - . - . . - FIRE CHIEF .~CI' ,:I;?AZE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 2101 "H" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661) 852-2170 SUPPRESSION SERVICES 2101 "H" Street Bakersfield. CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661) 852-2170 PREVENTION SERVICES FIRE SAFETY SERVICES' ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 900 Truxtun Ave.. Suite 210 Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3979 FAX (661) 852-2171 FIRE INVESTIGATION 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3951 FAX (661) 852-2172 TRAINING DIVISION 5642 Victor Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93308 VOICE (661) 399-4697 FAX (661) 399-5763 - e September 27, 2004 Ms. Barbara Sandrini Assistance League Bakersfield 12160 Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 RE: 1924 Q Street Asbestos Hazardous Waste Remediation Activities Dear Ms. Sandrini, This is to inform you that this department has reviewed the results of the disposal documentation and laboratory confirmation sampling, dated 07/20/04, associated with the waste asbestos removal from the Assistance League building located at 1924 Q Street. Based upòn the information provided, this department has determined that appropriate response actions have been completed, that acceptable remediation practices were implemented, and that, at this time, no further investigation, remedial or removal action or monitoring is required at the above stated address. Nothing in this determination shall constitute or be construed as a satisfaction or release from liability for any conditions or claims arising as a result of past, current, or future operations at this location. Nothing in this determination is intended or shall be construed to limit the rights of any parties with respect to claims arising out of or relating to deposit or disposal at any other location of substances removed from the site. This letter does not relieve the property owner of any responsibilities mandated under the California Health and Safety Code if existing, additional, or previously unidentified contamination at the site causes or threatens to cause pollution or nuisance or is found to pose a threat to public health or environmental quality. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (661) 326-3979. Sincerely, RALPH E. HUEY, Director of Prevention Services ~~~~ -r-- c:-- By: Howard H. Wines, III Hazardous Materials Specialist Registered Geologist No. 7239 Office of Environmental Services "ri/¡;/j/'1/I;11t7 lite Yf~)'IINII{¡lIt~y c;lí(}j( 011(11w r~/wlI nç( y¡:,:w,!¡.¡ Y;I/ ./ Au~ 31 04 09:41a e e assistance league" Bakersfield Fax Cover Page To: (}~ ~ - Fax: 3),;- )61.1;; From: ;Ø1 da/M¿U:~l' 9' '3 :J.. - 7 t;,.;;!..j , þý-3C¡&-7b~ Date: ?- i}-ð'! ~ #'01 Pages: Ll,l/J~ ð¿~~. Subject: 17~1LY ¿;~dZid h!~ Notes: ~/ ~0~~dlY'" - I Æ ..1. /. r r&vi1 ~ t/f.f þð'M. , ~ 1216 "0" Street. Bakersfield. CA 93301 Telephone: (661) 323-0838 Fax:(661)3~2753 .... p. 1 ¡ .....,., ....".' .J Au~ 31 04 OS:41a e e p.2 .' Line Enterprises 10001 Pheasant Run, Fresno, Ca 93720 (559) 434-1039 Fax (559) 434-3148 August 16, 2004 Contact. Mark Re: SDD BuRdlng Bakersfield, Ca . Dear Sir, Attached are the air sample resuPts for the above referenced faallty. We saw no visible evidence of asbestos containing material. All samples were Well within the Prescribed limits. ff you have any questions or need additional Information. please do not hesitate to call. Yours truly,· ,7~ ~~ Tom line Certified Asbestos Consultant #92-00183 Rug 31 04 08:41a e e -. WESTERN ANAL YTlCAll..AØORAroRY TEST REPORT NIOSH 7400 ANALY8J8 RepORT: 27889 CUBrr: Une En1erpr1se.;¡ 10001 Pheasant Run DATE RECeIVED; July 21 2004 FteSlJo, CA 93120 DATE REQUIRED: JYly 22, 2004 ATTN: Tom üne REF: ECD Bldg. e.lœrsfield, CA SUBJeCT; Phase Contrast M~ Analy$i$ of AIr Semples for FIber ContiIn MET'HQCOlOGY: MOSH FIber Count (Method 7400 Revision 3, A Aulee) FILTER TYPE; MCe AlTeR AAEA: 385 rnmA2 FILTER OIAMEreR: 25 mm MAGNIFICATION: 40QX AELD AREA: 0.00755 mIW'2 p.3 page 1 of 2 Sample location I Sample Frølds Fibtn F/mnr'2 FibeIs Volume PfheN ID ~ DInII Caunted Counted þftr Filler Ucæ... crafAlr 1 East Mech. Room 100 3.5 4.46 1717 1~ D..DD'I2 2 &uernent Mech. 07120104 100 5 8.37 2462 1440 . 0.0017 3 Staff Room U7I20104 100 4.5 6.73 2207 1440 O.QØ15 4 NE Center 0712W04 100 8 7.64 2943 1440 O.0Q2g 5 Ea&t Center 07I20I04 100 4 5.10 1962' 1440 O.G014 6 Office Board Room 0712C1D4 100 5.5 7.01 2SQ7 1440 ø.øoll . 7 Kitchen 07120104 100 7 8.92 3433 1440 11.0024 8 SE COmer CllI20104 100 5.5 7.01 2697 1440 0.001' 9 SOuth ~ C712MJ4 100 6 8.37 2462 1440 1.0017 10 I....." 'oAKr 07 T¿uQ4 100 3 3-82 1471 1440 0.0010 ~}JJ\ ~ - OpUCAI Mike n ~~-- .' 127;U Branfcrd 9tn:d. ~ 19 I M_. CA 91331/(818) 8_094& £d W~~~:6Ø ~øøe £1 '6n~ . ON ><t;.: :~ e _ --." .--_. -- --------- ...-_-._-- '- --- - -- ----.~_.~ <;'1 ./:\ i \..,~ . :'1 "'. 1 e Environmental Fees Newsletter · january 2003 New Hazardous Substances Fee Rates ( The He;:¡lth ;:¡nel Safety Code provides for an annual ~1djustment of the [;:ltes for the elispos;:¡l fee. i"acility fee, generalùr fee, tiered permit fee, environmenwl fee. ~mel occupational lead poisoning preVenLlOn ["ce, based on changes in the cost of living as measured by the California Consumer Price Index. The following tables show the adjusted hazardous subst;:¡nces fee r;:¡tes for calendar year 2003 and the 2002 rate for the occupational lead poisoning prevention fee. 2003 DISPOSAL FEE (Base rate $101.20) CATEGORY NonRCRA Hazardous Waste -generated in a cleanup action RCRA Waste -treated to be nonRCRA or nonhazardous -generated in a cleanup action and treated to be nonRCRA or nonhazardous Other Waste Mining waste Extremely hazardous waste Restricted hazardous waste Solid waste residues resulting from incineration or dechlorination 2003 GENERATOR FEE (Base Rate $3,262.00) WASTE GENERATED 5 - 24.9 tons 25 - 49.9 tons 50 - 249.9 tons 250 - 499.9 tons 500 - 999.9 tons 1,000 - 1,999.9 tons 2,000 or more tons 2003 ENVIRONMENTAL FEE NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES FEE RATE (PER TON) $ 16.51 5.72 40.88 16.51 5.72 13.16 202.40 202.40 5.06 FEE RATE ~G , . 0 3,262.00 16.310.00 32,620.00 48,930.00 65,240.00 FEE 1 - 49 50 - 74 75 - 99 100-249 250 - 499 500 - 999 1,000 or more $ 0 231.00 407.00 813.00 1,742.00 3,252.00 11,037.00 2003 FACILITY FEE (Base Rate $23.458.00) CATEGORY Disposal Large Onsite Treatment Large Offsite Treatment Small Treatment Mini Treatment Large Storage Small Storage Mini Storage Postclosure-Iess than 5 years Small Medium Large Postclosure-more than 5 years Small Medium Large Standardized Series A Series B Series C Series Small Quantity C RATE (PER FACILITY) $ 234,580.00 70,374.00 70,374.00 46,916.00 11,729.00 46,916.00 23,458.00 5,865.00 5,725.00 * 11.450.00 * 17,175.00 * 3,050.00 * 6,100.00 * 10,300.00 * (~. 11,730.00 5,497.00 4,617.00 2,308.00 * Postclosure fees due are 50% of those shown if lead agency is not DTSC. PERMIT TYPE FEE Permit-by-Rule (Facility and TTU) Conditional Authorization Conditional Exemption Commercial Laundry 2002 OCCUPATIONAL LEAD POISONING PREVENTION FEE NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES CATEGORY A CATEGORY B 10 - 99 100 - 499 500 or more $ 235.00 471.00 1,175.00 2003 TIERED PERMIT FEES $ 1,138.00 1,138.00 38.00 38.00 $ 337.00 941.00 2,691.00 ~ (~! asp 02 70161 4 ~ _._{ýð I \W~d/ ~ c}~ . ~ ~l " -.-- ASSISTANCE LEAAIIÞ ::C·0S./~/(i21~~pm . _-":"':..~.:~'_"""';.'-'~':';~::':~J _.....J SS182S2758 assi~nce league" Bakeisfield íPOOR ORIGIN£tb . ~~--="~~0:::~~._~'.~." ..~. Fax Cover Page To: '. :. ._ t .,. .', /! I _ ..... /7 r..' .[ .' /~..,¡, I . l /:1("../ .,,__, l .oJ·". ... ;.-.~-.....,.' '.¡ .... .L...... ~. ~~ 'i .' Fax #:. :5 .;J R~-15 ~:f From: ... /1 if 11/ !~) . ~Wct ·1V~{.¿'1L-{ - Date: (' 'J -, . ' / ¡-dtf'Ú,)L ....1 . # of Pages: ,.:A Subject: ;i!¡;t£ £'<0;' é~!<"'å r;..iT.?; ß,zll;'~<C : l. l . . Notes: 1216·0" Street, Bakersfield, CA 93301 Telephone: (661) 32~838 Fax: (661) 323-2753 P. ØØ1 / /' / ASSISTANCE LE~ 6618282783 121.8/1214 12: 47pm P. I2II2IZ _,,#.1 ~ ' .~. /' ST A TF. OF CALln )RN'A ./ STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION I"'ROPER'Y AND Sf>EGIN. lAXf'SOEPAH1MENT '150 N S TH:El. SACllAMENTO. CALIFORNIA f><.J flOX !)42879. SACRAMFNTO. GALlH)/1NIA D47lÐ.()()!J1 [)1()-3~?3-a5ix; . FAX ~1(ì·3~7-on"9 www.boe.ca.gov CAnOl E "'laDEN Fil'$l Oistl'l."j. Sa, rrð1CÎ!:iQ'.) September 18, 2004 Bill. LEO/IIAf![) Stxmril OI......J. Onl..·ìo GlAUDE PARnISH Thi d Di"'rict. Long B~M1 .IOHN C.HIANG Fourfh I Jistrict. Lns An90kIt~ ~nEVEWESTLY StDlH i.~ø. Saac1met1tll EDD 1216 0 ST BAKERSF I ElD CA 93301 EPANo.: CAC002579316 1924 Q ST BAKERSFIELD CA 93301 RAMON J. HJRS'r. b"tClllliA Direr:irr INFORMATIONAL NOTICE The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) has advised the Board of Equalization that you are a recent recipient of an EPA identification number. The State Board of Equalization administers six hazardous waste tee progrM"lS in cooperation with the DTSC. As a holder of a state or federal EPA 10 number you may also be required to register with the Board to report your generator activities. If you generate or produce five (5) or more tons of hazardous waste per calendar year, regardless of the final disposition of the waste, you should contact the State Board of Equalization to obtain a hazardous waste generator fee account number. Utilization of a waste hauler or a hazardous waste contractor to remove your hazardous waste does not relieve you of the liability for the fees that result from the generation, recycling and/or disposal of your hazardous waste. Additional information regarding generator fees is available in Regulation 3000, "Generator of Hazardous Waste." The regulation is available on our website or request a copy from the Board's Infolnlation Center by calling 800-400-7115. If you qualify as a generator based on the above criteria and need to register, please contact us at 916-323-9555, or write: ExCISC Taxes and Fees Dh:Îslon. MIC:S7 State Board of Equalization PO Box 942879 Sacramento, CA 94279-0057 It Is not necessary for you to register as a generator wl1h the Board of Equalization if the amount of hazardous waste generated or produced does not exceed five tons during a calendar year. For questions specific to the EPA number or site referenced above contact DTSC at 8D0-618-6942. For additional Information regarding the Generator Fee program or any other t~x programs administered by the Board of Equalization please visit our website at www.boe.ca.gov.This site will provide you with general information about the programs administered by the Boa-d, forms, publications. newsletters, proposed legislation, and linkstc> other government sites. EXCISE TAXES AND FEES DIVISION BOt':· t 58"J ÆV :t (5-04) 7, ~ ASSISTANCE LE~ 8818282758 ~ . '-\':: ~-'-=-' . r1)?)\~R OR'G'N~L assistance league" 'salœtsfield Fax Cover Page To: i""'!. ./1 .;~ ; .I:;~ . ) t f7¡::(.I~··J.. .'.::. ;/~:.)~~, "<.';.. I,.....~,.I;.,.... .." -- ,.'. } . .L· ~"C /.;'2·i¿~·(:-'. Fax #: ,::f.-.~) (5::~· ~ ;'J:"". ¿ ,./ (,I)' l·...'·,.,.~· /{ ! 1.../ ( <!..." From: '. 7::-/ '\,J::<~, "'Y::(" /'" ..~ ro' -~\ .~ ,,0.. .'~ ,,,. ._ ,k., .._ /,. '_ _. , 1:,.._.........- (" ~-,.. ......{;., .. _" .. t.., ,.-.. " Date: . z ~.. ,0' -- c7' ~ ¿, 1~7' # of Pages: Subject: 1'/ . c ;If,. ì~f('t. - ;'~i (i;,t ;': .<t }:(~t.t ¿ì . (' ! L· /,' " .r, "/; I :.,! U(¡.'i ß _'~';J ,(Ä..(" j 1_ .... "-,' / (/ /0 ") tI /) ! çr.., ( l.:l( Notes: (i}l{./,~, l ¡ \../ /'1... ,~r". ,..J, ,. .... ~ .;'; 'II"~.' ~': :-11 (;:,....:.... , . "" ) -C'_. ¡ / / I,' / / ~.., .../.././ I;'.~;:' .(,¡t -~r. .'~ :,Ii~'t. .' J ~f JII; /IÕ t~h.' ..".,' cur'··" 'v .' ~ ;I/:;\;~~':~¿ .-to. ..... ,: .. \~/¡' , -........). I· . ,/'/1 ~,.<.~..,~~. C' ,..'. ..:.~.i..).(, .- 1216 "(J' Street, Bakersfield. CA 93301 Telephone: (661) 323-0838 Fax: {661} 323-2753 ØØ1 ;f '7'. .::¡: ASSISTANCE LEtIIb Ø.4/04 11181am P. øøz 6618282758 Stote of Cali.iornia-Envirantne;'t~1 Protection Agency Fa"" Appro~d OMB No. 2050-0039 (bpi",. 9·30-99J plf:o~ print:or type. Form c:Jesf'gitecJ for use on eUhJ (J 2-pifchJ fypewrUer. I. Generator'. US EPA 10 No. o "" "" "- c:.. I() CO 6 o <XI (.!'')~ cr)~ ~U u.::: «' C'i}& C'W')O "- tv)::::; Nð ~ J: I- ~ N o CO 00 ..:r N "'<t 6 o "? "" LU .... Z w U ~{ 'Z 2 In LU "" il ~I jl .....- å!' U') "" o t z w Ö "" LU ~ LU "- o See Instructions on back of page 6. Departmenl of Toxic Substances Control So.çrarnen1o, California Il1fQnTlôtlon in the shaded creos i, not required by Federal law. UNIFORM HAZARDOUS VVASTE ~~FEST . 23396496 3. Go""rator'. Name and Miiiling Address AssJ!itanœ league of Baf¡en;fiefd I ,'}!(f fOO 1216 () Sfroot.8af<ersfll3kJ. CA. 93301 B. Sta'" G.,ner<¡1or'. IP G IE N IË R A T o R .4. G.neraIDr'. Phone ( 66H83.2-7623 AU.,: Barbara Sandrirlf 6. us EPA ID Numb.r S. iran'podet 1 Company Name PAP-I':; F-I'\\lifonmeutat D. Tran.parter'. phon. (~59) 233.71',j6· 7. Transporlœr 2 Company Name 9. De.ignated Facilily Name and Site Addr... Forward Inc. 9999 S. Austin Road Manteca ,CA 95336 a. R,f..\. Waste Ashflstos, 9. NA2212. PGW (ERQt17t) I. Wa.te Number Slate 1~1 y EPA/Other nIr State EPA/OIher Stote EPA/Olher Stale EPA/Other b, c. d. '.1. J. Addiliono! Deocriptionllor Matefial, Li.led AbaYe 11..A$b~~i41-G10 . "''f~-'- h c'-', -ì U( ..J, c. 15. Sp.cial Handling I..truclians and Additianallnlarmatian Caution: Wellf ~A ~oW!d p~ dolf1lrag 11M rooØlttory protINIí<l\ IiÑ!M handlmg. EMERGENCY CONTACT: Chern -Tel. ~nc. at 1..soo-255-3924 $ite pick up a~: 1924 Q Stredt Bakeorlíeld ('.A 93..101 Jot, , 64700 16. GENERATOR'S CERTifiCATION: I ....reby declare that iii" content. of this co>nli!¡nmont are fully and occurately de.cribed oboyc by proper .hlPring nam" and ore da,,¡fied, pocked, marked, and labeled, Clnd ore in 011 respects in proper condition for trat"sport by highway Qccord¡.,g to applicable international and naliona governmèllt regulations. II I am a large quanlity generator, I certify that I have a program in place ID reduce tho volume and toxicity of west<> genera"'d to the dog",e I haye determined Ia b. econDfl\ically practicable and that 1 hoVe .elected the practicable IOethod of treatment, 'tarage, or disposal cur",ntly aya;labl. to me which minimi%Ø' the present and fuþ"" threat 10 human heoilh and Ihe environment; OR, jl I am a Imall quantily goneralar, I have made a gOod laith effcrt to minimixe my waste generation and ",lecl the be.1 woste manag....enl methad that ¡s available to me and thot can aflard. w V) <:( U ~ T R [¡ I! ~ I' o R T ;; R S.iQQO.'H.œ. -~ .~ ..-~ .... Signature F ) ) t.L-':'(:'CI.L.9...I.-, Signature ,M~. '. ..... 19. Di .cropancy Ind ication Space F J\ C ~ l this manifest exeo t 0$ noted in Item 1 9. '( '( , . ., \. -:~(~M~' /... DO NOT"WRITE BELOW TH.IS·ÛNE. Yellow: TSDF SENDS THIS COpy TO GENERATOR WITHIN 30 DAYS. (Gcnerator$ who $.lJbm;t l1ozordous waste for transport out·of"sta.e, produce completed copy of ~hi, copy and .end 10 D15C within 30 doy.,J .. ; t : f, :' ~ I .~ ;. ........ ~. \ .. "~" msc 8022A \1/99) EPA >3700-22 !FJ@OR OR'Ø'MiiJlb FIRE CHIEF ç:t::i' ¡ ;':C;.\,~ E ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 2101 "H" Street Bakersfield. CA 9330i VOICE (661) 326-3941 FA.X.(eS61) 852-2170 ./\J SUPPRESSION SERVICES 2101 "H" Street ,; Bakersfield. CA 93301 ",' VOICE (661) 326-3941 rl' FAX (661) 852-2170 5 PREVENTION SERVICES fiRE SAfETY SERVICES' ENVIRONMENTAl SERVICES 900 Truxtun Ave.. Suite 210 Bakersfield. CA 93301 VOICE (661 326-3979 FAX (661) 852-2171 FIRE INVESTIGATION 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield. CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3951 FAX (661) 852-2172 TRAINING DIVISION 5642 Victor Ave. Bakersfield. CA 93308 VOICE (661) 399-4697 FAX (661) 399-5763 e June 30, 2004 Assistance League of Bakersfield c/o Olson Design Studio 2130 F Street, Suite A Bakersfield, CA 93301 e RE: Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study (RIfFS) Results For the Property Located at 1924 Q Street in Bakersfield, CA Messrs: , ".., . , ", ..-/ This office has reviewed the Analysis of Asbestos Cleanup Alternatives report, dated May 3, 2004, submitted by you for the property located at the above statèd,address. Laboratory results reveal asbestos containing materials are present oh,.the subject property. ? I This office accepts option "A," listed in the RIfFS results, removal of the asbestos cohtaining material, as the most practical method for accomplishing:~ reduction in the asbestos levels detected at the site. However, if you or your c;onsultant has an alternate method you wish to employ, you may submit a reque~t to this office for review and approval. \ .s Please ~espond within twenty (20) working days from receipt of this letter as to your it;ttentions regarding this matter and a time table for carrying , them out. .J If you have any questions, please call me at (661) 326-3649. í~~ " I \. f t , \ cc: ,) C. Webb,ÆD/CD " Sincerely, ~ttlU___ £;-A Howard H. Wines, III Hazardous Materials Specialist Registered Geologist No. 7239 Office of Environmental Services S:\CORRESPONDENCE\2004-06\A~istance League ACM removal approval. DOC \ .J \., (((JJ;;/}t.'UÙ~v lite Yf,;¡'iIIlmNtt!;y ¿~(lF ') /Io.¡t(' Q~/I.(~NI rf'¡ '11;'#(,11'// I' i ". e e MEMO May 3, 2004 TO: Howard Wines, Office of Environmental Services FROM: Assistance League of Bakersfield SUBJECT: Analysis of Asbestos Cleanup Alternatives -1924 Q Street Recommended Cleanup Action Pursuant to the requirements of the EPA RLF funding the asbestos cleanup within the building at 1924 Q Street, the Assistance League will be acquiring for the relocation of their facilities, following is a draft of the potential cleanup alternatives for the asbestos removal, including the recommended cleanup action. BACKGROUND The Assistance League of Bakersfield is a nonprofit organization that has operated for 48 years. Their services to the community include: Operation School Bell which provides clothing and uniforms annually to 1,500 - 2,000 needy school children; Operation Opportunity which provides clothing annually to 200 adults who have been on public assistance, but have received training and are entering the job force; and operation of the "Bargain Box," a thrift store that generates funds to help pay for these community services as well as providing a work site for job trainees. . The League is currently located in three separate and adjacent buildings, which are located in the path of a current redevelopment project that will eliminate substantial economic and physical blight. The Assistance League's focus has been to remain in the same general area to provide needed service to the community. The proposed building at 1924 Q Street, is only about eight blocks away from their existing facilities. SITE BACKGROUND The building at 1924 Q Street is the site of the former State Employment Development Department office. Environmental studies and testing have been completed on the office site. The Phase 1 study reviewed the historical environmental issues associated with the office and land parcel. Building materials were tested (see attached testing results) to determine the presence and levels of asbestos fibers within the various building materials. The floor tile, mastic and boiler room insulation were found to have asbestos fibers. Use of asbestos within building materials was eliminated by regulations in the 1970's, the EDD building was built prior to these regulations. Due to the floor tiles and mastic's age and deteriorating condition many have been cracked, damaged and dislodged creating asbestos in a friable condition. Insulation around the piping in the boiler room has also been damaged and deteriorated, causing the asbestos to take a friable condition. Mr. Howard Wines May 3, 2004 Page 2 e e ASBESTOS CLEANUP ALTERNATIVES There are four basic approaches to the problem: · Removal: The asbestos-containing material is removed from the building by qualified professional and, if applicable, state certified and trained personnel and disposed of by burial in a site specifically approved for asbestos. · Encapsulation: The asbestos-containing material is coated with a penetrating or bridging sealant to prevent release of asbestos fibers into the air. · Enclosure: The asbestos-containing material is physically separated from the building environment by means of erecting permanent airtight barriers. · Deferred Action: In conjunction with a well defined Operations and Maintenance Plan, the actual removal, encapsulation or enclosure is postponed to a later date. Each of the four alternatives has advantages as well as disadvantages to the future operations of the Assistance League of Bakersfield. A. Removal 1. Advantages: Eliminates the source of the asbestos. Ends the exposure and precludes the development of future problems. 2. Disadvantages: Costly, complicated, and time consuming method. Replacement of the removed material with a substitute material is usually necessary. Greater potential for exposure of workers to asbestos hazards. 3. When appropriate: When there is a high exposure potential. When the material is deteriorating, highly accessible, or subject to severe water damage. When exposed material surfaces exist. 4. When inappropriate: Removal may not be feasible because of the location of the material and the kind of surface to which the material has been applied, or because of lack of funds. This is the preferred cleanup alternative. The Assistance League will be doing extensive remodeling of the facility to accommodate their numerous programs. Most interior non-bearing walls will be removed or reconfigured which would further damage the floor tiles and mastic. Because their programs cater to children coming to their facility, any level of potential friable asbestos contamination would be unacceptable to the Assistance League organization. To remove the potential of asbestos exposure to children or the general public coming to the Assistance League facility, the complete removal of asbestos materials is the preferred option. The asbestos cleanup of the building, as to federal and state standards, was originally estimated to be approximately $50,000.00. The project was put out to bid by the Assistance League (see attached RFP). Three bids were received and summarized in the attached memo. Also attached is the low bid for the project by PARC Environmental at $51,050.00, plus $830.00 for a Post Abatement Air Clearance Survey. In conjunction with the above analysis, the contract serves as the recommended corrective action. Mr. Howard Wines May 3, 2004 Page 3 e e This cleanup approach is the most effective and can be implemented immediately, in keeping with the League's relocation time schedule. B. Encapsulation 1. Advantages: Controls fiber release. Rapid and reasonably economical method. 2. Disadvantages: Source of the asbestos exposure remains in the building. If the material is damaged or deteriorating, the additional weight of the sealant may cause layers of the material to break away from the underlying surfaces. A management system is required. Continuing inspection and maintenance for damage or deterioration to the encapsulated surface is required, Le. future potential for fiber release is possible. . Most encapsulants deteriorate over time. Encapsulated material is very difficult to remove if asbestos removal becomes necessary in the future (for instance, when the building is eventually remodeled or demolished). 3. When appropriate: When removal is not feasible. When the material is of low friability. If the material will still retain bonding integrity after encapsulation. When damage to the material is not probable. When accessibility to the material is limited. If the surface in question is complex, making removal difficult. When there are economic or time constraints. When used as a temporary measure until funding for removal is made available. 4. When inappropriate: When removal is feasible. When the material is highly friable. When the material does not adhere well to the substrate. If the material ;s deteriorating or damaged. When damage to the material is probable. When water damage or the potential for water damage exists. When there is high accessibility. When continuing inspection and maintenance of encapsulated material is not planned. This approach is not feasible when additional remodeling will be taking place and the relocation of their operations must adhere to a short time schedule. Encapsulating the asbestos in the floor tiles when removing and rebuilding of various walls must occur would not leave the asbestos encapsulated. With thousands of children, residents and volunteers accessing the future facility, encapsulating would not guarantee a potential future release is not possible. C. Enclosure 1. Advantages: Controls fiber release. Rapid, economical, and uncomplicated method. 2. Disadvantages: The source of the asbestos remains in the building. Fiber fallout continues behind the enclosure. Costly if enclosure disturbs functions of other systems (e.g., enclosure may require lighting changes, mechanical changes, etc.). A management system for maintenance or renovation is required. Continuing inspection and maintenance of damage to enclosure system is required. Construction of the enclosure will normally result in disturbance of the asbestos - containing material. Mr. Howard Wines May 3, 2004 Page 4 e e 3. When appropriate: When removal is not feasible. When disturbance or entry into the enclosed area is not likely. 4. When inappropriate: If removal is feasible. When damaged or deteriorated material causes a high level of fiber fallout. If water damage to the enclosure is likely. When entry into the enclosure is likely for repairs and maintenance. The floor tiles and mastic are essentially throughout the flooring in the building. It is not feasible to enclose those areas of the building, to do so would essentially make the building useless for any type of occupancy with the asbestos remaining in the building. D. Deferred Action with an Operations and Maintenance Plan 1. Advantages: Utilizes a specific plan for action. Monitors material condition over time. Controls exposure potentials. Economical. 2. Disadvantages: Source of the asbestos remains in the building. The exposure potential remains. 3. When appropriate: When removal is not feasible. When disturbance of material is likely. When a well-defined plan is followed. When the propensity for fiber release is low. 4. When inappropriate: When removal is feasible. If material is heavily damaged. The option would again leave the asbestos within the building, making it useless for occupancy and not available for the Assistance League's relocation plan. If you have any questions, comments or additions to the analysis or information, please contact the Assistance League through our legal representative, James Parker, Jr. at (661 )322-4004. Attachments Asbestos Testing Results Request for Proposals - Asbestos Removal Memo summarizing Asbestos Removal bids Asbestos Removal Contract - PARC Environmental e e u I REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS 1. Introduction. The Assistance League of Bakersfield (the "League ") is in escrow to acquire the former State Employment Development Department office building located at 1924 "Q" Street, Bakersfield, California (the "building"). The anticipated escrow closing date is June 1, 2004. Prior environmental assessments conducted by the State of California identified asbestos within (a) all the thermal insulation in the building's boiler room, (b) all the vinyl tile and mastic floor covering, (c) all the wall base and mastic along the base of the building's interior walls and (d) a Transite Type B gas vent pipe from the boiler room to the roof (all hereafter the "asbestos containing materials"). On condition that the League closes escrow and secures an asbestos removal grant from the City of Bakersfield Redevelopment Agency (the "RDA"), the League intends to hire an experienced, licensed asbestos removal contractor (the "contractor") to expeditiously remove the asbestos containing materials from the building inunediately close of escrow so that the League may proceed with remodeling the building. 2. Scope of Work. The contractor will locate, uncover, remove and dispose of all asbestos containing materials from the interior of the building in strict conformance with all applicable federal, state and local governmental statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations. including, but not limited to: (a) The Comprehensive Environmental Responses, Compensation and Liability Act ("CERCLA"); (b) Uniform Administrative Requirements For Grants and Cooperative Agreements To States and Local Governments (40 CFR Part 31); (c) The Davis-Bacon Act of 1931 (40U.S.C. §§ 1541 et sea., formerly 276(a)-276(a)-5; 42 U.S.C. § 3222) and California's counterpart prevailing wage laws (Labor Code, §§ 1770 et sea.) The contractor must pay applicable prevailing wage rates for the locality, as determined by the United States Department of Labor and the State Department of Industrial Relations; (d) Executive Order 11246, Equal Employment Opportunity and implementing regulations at 41 CFR 60-4 relating to federally assisted construction contracts; e e (e) The City of Bakersfield's Business License Ordinance; (f) Asbestos removal regulations of the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District. 3. Time for Completion: Anticipated Start Date. The work must be completed in 15 working days after receipt of a notice to proceed from the League. The antiCipated start date is within the first three weeks of June, 2004. 4. Buildina Inspection Prior to Submittina Proposals. The Contractor shall be responsible for removing and disposing of any carpet covering asbestos tile and othexwise locating the asbestos containing materials within the building's interior. The building may be entered for inspection by prospective bidders by making arrangements with the City of Bakersfield's Real Property Manager, Don Anderson, at 326-3061. 5. Deadline for Submittina Proposals. Proposals shall be in the form of the attached contract which must be completed and signed by the contractor and submitted with a copy of the contractor's State Contractor's License on or before 12:00 noon, April 30, 2004, to the League in care of: Olson Design Studio 2130 F Street, Suite A Bakersfield, CA 93301 Dated: March _, 2004 ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF BAKERSFIELD By Barbara Sandrini, President C:\WPDA TA \JRP\LeagueReqforProposals.wpd 2 05/11/04 09:42 FA! 661 322~06 ~ __ _0_-0- - - KUHS, PARKER &: HUGHES :I MEMORANDUM Via Facsimile Only TO: ABATECO (Fax 661/391-0181) DATE: May 11, 2004 AS.!., Inc. (Fax 661/327-2977) P ARC Environmental (Fax 559/233-2356) FROM: James R. Pa<ker, Jr~ FILE NO., 1317.00 SUBJECT: Assistance League of Bakersfield; Asbestos Removal Oontract Bid Results ALB received the following bids on the above-referenced project: ABATE CO A.S.I., Inc. P ARC Environmental $63.050 $75,000 $61.880 ALB intends to award the contract to P ARC Enviromnental. Thank you fo! bidding the project. JRP/vjh cc: Barbara Sandrini Gary Olson Charles Webb (via fax 328-1548) Don Anderson (via fax 852-2100) 0:\01d. HP Dm1!\WPDOCS\ASs!nll¡Ç<! l..eIoqUB\Ab.....cc.mm.01.wpd. ~ 002/002 e 04/2r/O~ 10:3i F.~~ 661 3~2 2906 e ~OO2;006 ADDENDUM NO.1 TO REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS 1924 "a" Street. Bakersfield. California DATE: April 21. 2004 TO: Abateco A.S.I., L"lc. Dresser PARC fax fax fax fax 661.391.0181 661.327.2977 661.589.8658 559.233.2356 SUBJECT: Modifications to Request for Proposal dated March 26, 2004 Attached hereto are revised pages 1, 2 and 6 of the Asbestos Removal Contract. Replace the prior version of pages 1, 2 and 6 with the revised pages 1, 2 and 6. The follov'ling modifica.:1ons. have been made to the scope of work: 1. A "Pest Abatement Air Clearance" survey and certificate will be required. It is OUI understanding that trois work will be performed by a separate independent consultant as a subcontractor. The cost should be included as a separate line item in pe:Iagraph 4 oÏ the Asbestos Removal Contract and as part of the Contract Price in paragTaph 3. 2. It has come to OUI atter-tioD that there are two (2) Transi~e vent pipes f:om the western basement equipment ream to the roof that need to be abated. The second pipe is the vent pipe for the het water heater, which also will need to be discon..."'leCted and removed as part of the work. 3. D.1ring the March 26"õ1l prebid wallt thr..l it was detennined that additional assessment testiIlg should be performed on the white tape on the duct joints for the HV AC system in the east groll.."'ld floor eCrwpmen-: room. A copy of the tests results are attached that indicate it is negative for asbestos. .4J80, a sa.>nple was collected from the tan tape on the irlsulated duct joints in the west basement eqœpment room which indicated it is negative for asbestos. However, a fourth sample was collected of the white putty from the first duct out of the boiler in the western baseme!1t equipment room which did indicate the presence of asbestos Ì1: S"ùÍficie!lt quaIltities reC1Uiring removal. 4. The ÌIlsurance requirements have been amended (~ 6 of the Asbestos Removal Contract) to requiIe Contrac:or's Pollution Liability Insurance to cover releases of or exposme tc asbestos. .As before, you must complete, sign and submit the Asbestos Removal Contract on or before 12:00 nOOD, April 30, 2001. to the League in care of: Olson Design Studio 2130 F Street. Suite A Bakersfield, CA 93301 Ifyeu need to view the project sitè again, please do not hesitate to call Don Anderson at 326-3061. Attachments: Revised pages 1. 2 and 6 of the Asbestos Removal Contract; ATL test resl.ùts of additional samples da.ted March 28,2004 C:\014 HP D..:<\WFDOCS'V.=ri=t1UlOe Lellaue\ad.de"dum No. l.w;><: 10:37 F.{! 661 3~2906 e . 04/21104 (4]003;006 ASBESTOS REMOVAL CONTRACT THIS AGREEMEN! is executed on this u.tilday of April , 2004 by L1e ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF BAKERSFIELD. a California corporation (the "League'') D.lÌd PARC Environmental , a California corporation (the "Contractor"); WITNESSETH' WHEREAS. the League is in escrow to acquire the former Employment Development Department office building ¡ocated at 1924 "Q" Street, BakersfieJd, California (the "buiJd:ng"); a:J.d WHEREAS, prior environmental assessments of the building cOInmissioned by the State identified asbestos within Ca) the thermal insulation in the building's boiler room. (b) the vinyl tile and mastic floor covering, (c) the wall base and mastic along the base of the building's interior walls, Cd) a Transite Type B gas vent pipe from the boiler room to the Toof, (c) a Transite Type B Vent Pipe ÎÌ'om the water heater to the roof and (f) white putty in the first ¿ uct out of the boil er room (all hereafter the "asbestos containing materials"); and WHEREAS, the Contractor has inspected the interior ofllie building and has satisfied itself as to the ext~t and location of the asbestos containing materials and is fully apprised of the cost, expense and scope of the work necessary to remove same from the building; az:.d WHEREAS, the League has applied for a grant from the City of Bakersfield Redevelopment Agency ("RDA") of Environmental Protection Agency funds 10 remove the asbestos containing materials from the buiJding (the "grant"); and WHEREAS, the Contractor warrants and represents that it is an experienced, fully licensed, weU qualified specialist in the field of asbestos survey and abatement; and WHEREAS, provided the escrow closes and the grant is fully fundd, the League desires to hire the Contractor and the Contractor desires to bind itself to tbe League to locate and remove the asbestos containing materials from the Buildjng, all as provided hereafte:. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed as fonows: 1. Scope of Work. The CODtractor wil1locate, uncover, remove and dispose of all asbestos containing materials from the interior of the building in 5!.rict cODÍonnance wi!.1" all applicable federal, state and Jocal gove..'1lIl'lental statutes, ordinanc.es, rules and regulations, including, but not limited to: (a) The Compret:.ensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act ("CERCLA"); (b) The Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants anè Cooperative Agreements to States and Local Governments (40 CFR Part 31); (c) The Davis-Bacon Act of 1931 (40 V.S.C., §§ 3141 et~. and 42 (R~vìsc:d 4-21-04) e J4/H/lq 10::\ï F.U 661 :\~~ ~906 e @00'<;006 U.S.C. 3222) and California's counterpart prevaiiing wage laws (Labor Code> §§ 1770, et gg.); Cd) Executive Order 11246, Equal Employment Opportunity, and Implementing Regulations at 41 CFR 60-4 relating to federal1y assisted construction contracts; (e) The City of Bakersfie1d's BLlSiness License Ordinance; and (t) Asbestos Removal Regulations of the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution CO:ltro1 District. The Contractor acknowledges receipt of copies of Howar¿ Wine's memo dated March 8, 2004, Clayton Environmental Consultants, Inc.'s Asbestos Assessment dated July 17, 1989 and A TL's Asbestos Analysis dated March 14, 2004. League makes no warranties or representations as to the accuracy or completeness of such report5 and analyses. For purposes of this agreement, the Contractor shall presume that all of the vinyl tile and mastic, all of the thermal insulation in the boiler room and all of the wall ba.se and mastic wiiliin the building are asbestos containing materials to be removed hereunde-:. 2. Time for Completion: Anticipated Start Date. Tne work must be comple"ted in 15 working days a.:.~er receipt oÏthe notice to proceed from the Leag-;.le. Time is of the essence. The anticipated start date is vvithin the first th...-ee weeks of June, 200.1, however, the Contractor ad.'I1owledges that th~ League has no control over when the escrow will clost: and the grant will be funded. If the work is not finished or completed within the time provided herein, damage will be sustained by the League, the actual amount ofwh~ch will be impractible and extremely difficult to ascertain and determine as a result of such delay. The Contractor shall pay to the League damages Îor such delay in an amount eqœl to $500 per day multiplied by the number of days the Contractor dclays in finishing the. work in excess of the lime pro....ided herein. Th:: League may deduct the 2Inount of such damages from any monies due or may become due the Cont:'actor under this agreement. 3. Contract Price. Compensation for completion of ill: work, inckding all labor, materials, equipment, permits, fees, taxes, surveys, certificates and all other costs of completing 6e work, shall be the sum of Fifty-One Thousand Eight-Hundred and Eightv dollars ($ 51.880.00) which shall be paid by the League to the Cont-actor 35' days after compleùon of:he work provided that the Contractor pro'VÌdes the Owner an Unconditional Waiver and Release Upon Final Payment duly executed by the Contractor and by al] subcontractors and material suppliers to the Contractor who furnished labor, services, equipment or material to ù:.t Contractor in the cours~ of completing the work.. 4. Warranty and Certificate. Upon completion of the work, t.~e Conb'actor shall warrant that all asbestos containing materials have be.en removed from the bLÚldin¡;, in accordance v.ith all appHcable federal, state and local laws and shall provide the O\v:1er with a Post Abatement Air Clea."'aIlce Certiñcate. The Owner may elect to delete the Post Abatement Air Clearance Survey and Certificate, in which case the èontract Price shall be reduced by S 830.00 . 5. Davis-Bacon Act and Labor Code Requirements. The Contractor's attenÜon is directed to the following requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act and the Labor Code: (R:v:scd 4-21-04) 2 e e (a) Hours of Labor. Eight hours labor constitutes a legal day's work. The Contractor shaH forfeit. as a penalty to the League, $25 for each workman employed in the execution of the Work by the Contractor or any subcontractor under it for each Day during which such workman is required or peffi1itted to work more than eight hours in anyone Day and 40 hours in any one calendar week in violation of the provisions of the Labor Code, and, in particuJar, sections 18 J 0 to 1815 thereof, inclusive, except that work performed in excess of eight hours per Day and 40 hours during anyone week sha] be permitted upon compensation for all hours worked in excess of eight hours per day at not less than one and a half times the basie ratc of pay, as providcd in Labor Code section 18] 5. (b) PrevaiIinQ Waí.!Cs. Pursuant to the pro'visions ofth~ Davis-Bacon Act and Labor Code section] 773, the League has obtained from the Secretary of Labor and the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations the general prevailing rate or per ùiem wages and thc general prevailing rate of holiday and overtime work in the locality in which the vvork is to be performed for each craft, classification or type o[worker needed to execute the work. Copies of the prevailing rate of per diem wages are attached hereto Exhibit A. The Contractor shaIJ cause a copy of the Secretary's and Director's determination of the prevailing rate of per diem wages to be posted at a prominent and easily accessible place at the site of the work. The Contractor shall pay a!! mechanics and laborers employed directly on the site of the work unconditiona11y and at least once a \\:eek, and without subsequent deduction or rebate on any accounts, the fuJl amounts accrued at time of payment, computed at wage rates not less than those determined by the Secretary and Director to be prevailing wages, regardless of any contractual relationship which may be alleged to exist between the Contractor and the Jaborers and mechanics. The League will nOl recognize any claim for additional compensation because of the payment by the Contractor of any wage rate in excess of the prevailing wage rate. The possibility of wage increases is one of the elements to be considered by the Contractor in determining his bid and will not under any circumsêances be considered as the basis of a claim against the League. The Contractor shal1 comply with Labor Code sections 1774 and 1775. In accordance with Labor Code section] 775, the Contractor shall forfeit [IS a penalty to the League not more than $50 for each Day or portion thereof for each worker paid Jess than the prevailing rates as determined by the Director for the Work or craft in which the worker is employed for any Work or by any subcontractor under the Contractor. The amount ofthjs penalty shaH be determined by the Director based on the factors set forth in section 1775. In addition to such penalty, the difference between such prevailing wage rates and the amount paid to each workman for each Day or portion thereof for which each workman was paid less than the prevailing \o'iage rate shall be paid to each worker by the Contractor and maybe withheld by the League and deducted from amounts otherwise earned by the Contractor hereunder. (c) Pavrol] Records. The Contractor's attention JS directed to the provisions of Labor Code section] 776, a portion of which reads as follows: "(a) Each contractor and subcontractor shall keep an accurate payroll record, showing the name, address, social security number, work classification, straight time and overtime hours worked each day and week, and the actual per diem wages paid to each journeyman, apprentice, worker, or other empJoyee employed by him or her in connection with the public work. Each payroll recurd shall contain ..., ;) e e or be verified by written declaration that is made under penalty of perjury, stating both of the following: (1) The information contained in the payroll record is true and correct. (2) The employer has complied with the requirements of Sections 1771, 1811, and 1815 of the Labor Code for any work performed by his or her employees on the pub] ic works project. "(b) The payroll records enumerated under subdivision (a) shall be certified ar.d shall be available for inspection at aJ] n~asonabJc hours at the principai office of the contractor on the following basis: (1) A certified copy of an empJoyee's payroll record shaH be made available for inspection or furnished to the employee or his or her authorized representative on request. (2) A certified copy of all payrolJ records enumerated in subdivision (a) shalJ be made available fo;- inspection or furnished upon request to 3 representative of the body 3\varding the contract, the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, and the Division of Apprenticeship Standards of the Department of Industrial Re!ations. (3) A certified copy of all payroJ] records enumerated in subdivision (a) shall be made available upon request by the public for inspection or for copies thereof. However, a request by the pubJic shall be made through either the body a\varding the contract, the Division of Apprenticeship Standards, or the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement. lfthe requested payro!l records have not been provided pursuant to paragraph (2), the requesting party shall, prior to being provided the records, reimburse the costs of preparation by the contractor, subcontractors. and the entity through which the request was made. The public sha!l not be given access to thc records at thc principal office of the contractor. "(c) The certified payroll records shall be on forms provided by the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement or shall contain the same information as the forms provided by the division. "(d) A contractor or subcontractor shall fi]e a certified copy of the records enumerated in subdivision (a) with the entity that requested the records within 10 days after receipt of a written request. "( e) Any copy of records made available for inspection as copies and furnished upon request to the public or any public agency by the 4 e e awarding body, the Division of Apprenticeship Standards, or the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement shall be marked or obliterated in a manner so as to prevent disclosure of an individual's name, address, and social security number. The name and address of the contractor awarded the contract or the subcontractor performing the contract shall not be marked or obliterated. "( f) The contractor or subcontractor shall inforÏ11 the body awarding the contract of the location of the records enumerated under subdivi- sion (a), including the street address, city and county, and shaIJ, within five working days, provide a notice ora change of location and address. "(g) The contractor or subcontractor shall have 10 days in which to comply subsequent to receipt of written notice requesting the records enumerated in subdivision (a). In the event that the contractor or subcontractor fails to comp!y within the 10-day period, he or she shall, as a penalty to the state or political subdivision on whose behalf the contract is made or awarded, forfeit twenty-five dollars ($25) for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each worker, until strict compliance is effectuated. Upon the request of the Division of Apprenticeship Standards or the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, these penalties shall be withheld from progress payments then due. A contractor is not subject to a penalty assess- ment pursuant to this section due to the failure of a subcontractor to comply with this section." The Contractor shaH be responsible for seeing that his subcontractors comply with these provisions. The penalties specified in Labor Code section] 776 for noncompli- ance therewith may be deducted by the League from any monies due or which may become due to the Contractor. The payroll shall be accompanied by a "Statement of Compliance" signed by the employer or his agent under penalty of perjury indicating that the payrolls are correct and complete and that the wage rates contained therein are not !ess than those required by this agreement. The Contractor sha]! be responsible for the submission of copies of payroJls of all subcontractors. The Contractor and each subcontractor shall preserve their payroJI records for a period of three years from the date of completion of this Agreement. 6. Insurance. (a) Automobile Liability Insurance. The ConLractor shall provide automobile liability insurance on an occurrence basis for bodily injury, including death, of one or more persons, property damage and personal injury with limits of not less than $1 million per occurrence. The policy shall provide coverage for owned, non-owned and hired autos. The policy shall contain an additional insured endorsement in favor of the League, its agent, employees, officers and volunteers. 5 -o·V:!1/1)4 10::¡S FAX 661 322 .6 e [4} 005 ..006 (b) Broad F onn Commercial General LiabiJitv Insurance. The Contractor sh21l provide broad form com:nercial general liability insurance on an occum~n~e basi~ fo~ b~diJy injury, including death of one or more persons, property damage and personallIlJ1.1IY, mID lUDlts of not less than $1 million per occurrence and the policy shall provide contractual liability coverage for the terms of this agreement, and contain an additional ID.5'".lI"ed endorsement L'1 favor of the League, its agents, employees, officers and volunteers. . (c) Workers' Compensation Insurance. The Contractor shall provide workers' compensation insurance with statutory limits and e:nployer's liability insurance with limits of not l~ss than $1 mitiion per occurrence and the policy shall contain a wa.iver of subrogation in favor of the League, its officers, agents, employees and vo1unteers. (d) Contractor's Pollution Liability Insurance. The Conlractor shall carry Contractor's Pollution Liability insurance with combined single limits of at. least S 1 million covering claims for personal injury and property damage from release of or exposure to asbestos. (e) All polici~s r~quired ofth<: Contractor shall be primary insurarJc~ as to the League, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers, a...'1d any L"1.SUTanCe or self-i!1surance maintained by the League shall be in excess of the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with it. Except for workers' compensatioJ:1, all insurance shall be placed with insurers with a Bests' rating no less th.an A: V. All policies shall contain an endorsement providing the League with 30 day's prior vmtten notice of cancellation or material change in policy language or terms. All po Ii ties shall provide that there shall be continuirlg liabi1ìty thereon, notv.rithstanding any recovery on any policy. Copies of policies shall be delivered to the League on d~mand. The insurance required hereunder shall be maintained until all work required to be performed u.nder tÞis agreement is satisfactorily completed as evidenced by vvritten acceptan~ by the League. The Contractor shall furnish the League with certificates of insurance an¿ required endorsementS evidencin.g t1:2.t Ù1e League is an additional named insl,¡I'ed unde: the insurance policies required hereu."1der within ten days after execution of this agreement. 7. . Payment of Taxes. PeIT!1.i!s and Licenses. The contract price set forth iL paragraph 2 above includes full compensation to the Contractor for all ta.xes, permits, licenses and other fees which the Contractor is required to pay in o:Ù: to perform Ll1e worK. 8. Responsibilitv for Damage. The Le~Je, its offic~rs, employees, agentS and volunteers shall not be answerable, responsible or aCCOu:ltable in any man...,er for any loss or damage that may happen to the work or any part thereof, for any loss or damage to any 0 f the materials or other things or empJoyed in performing the work, for irJury to or death of any person, either workmen or the public, or·for damage to propæy from any cause which might have been prevented by the Contractor, its workmcn or anyone empJoyed by the Contractor. The Contractor shan be responsible for any liability imposed by law and for injuries to or death of any person, including but not limited to workmen and t.>"e public, or damage to property resulting from defects or obstructions or from any cause whatsoever during the progress of the work or at anVLilne before its comDle~iorl and final acceptance. The Contractor shall indemnify, defend :.n¿ hold the League harmless, '3.n¿ all its officers, employees, agents and yolunteers, from aU clÚms, suits or actions oÎ every nam~, kind and description, brought for.h, or on account of, injuries to or death of any person, induCing bt¡t not limited to workmen and the public, Or damage to property resulting from the performance of L">-ùS agreement, accept as otherwise provided by law. Tnc Contractor's duty to indemnify and hold the League harmless applies regaJ"dless of the existence or degree of fault or negllgence on the part of the League, its officers, employees, agents and volunteers. (Rc:"i~t:Ò 4·2: -(4) 6 e e 9. Contractor's Responsibility for the Work. Until finaJ acceptance of the work by the League, the Contractor shall have full charge and care of the work and all materials and equipment to be used therein, and shall bear the risk of injury, Joss or damage to any part thereof by action of the elements or from any other cause, whether arising from execution of or from 110n- execution of the work. 10. Conditions Precedent. AI! of the League ',s obligations hereunder are expressly subject to the following two conditions precedent: (a) First, the League shall have no obligation hereunder unless and t:ntil the League's escrow closes and the League becomes the legal owner of the building; and (b) Secondly, the League shall have no o~ligation hercunàer unless and until the League's application for the Grant is approved and the Grant is funded by the United States Environmental Protection Agency and the RDA in an amount sufficient to cover the contract price hereunder. 11. Incorporations Bv Reference. The telms and provisions of that certain written agreement between the League as "Subgrantee" and the RDA pertaining to the grant anè completion of the work, a draft copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B, are hereby incorporated by reference. The Contractor hereby promises to comply with and perform an provisions of such agreement relating to (1) performance of the work, (2) compliance with laws, (3) record keeping and (4) indemnity. 12. Notices. Any notice, request, tender, demand, de]jvery, approvaJ or other communication provided for, required or arising under this agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed if delivered in person to an individual or to an officer of a corporate party or if mailed, three business days following deposit in the United States mail, and Registered 0:- Certified, Return Receipt Requested, postage prepaid, addressed to the League at ] 216 "0" Street, 13akersljckL California 93301 with copy to James R. Parker, Jr., Esq., Kuhs, Parker & Hughes, P.O. Box 2:205, Bakersfield, California 93303, or addressed to Contractor at 13. Assignment. The Contractor shall not assign this agreement in \vhoIe Oï in part and any such assignment shall be null and void and shall constitute at the Leagues' election a material breach by the Contractor as of this agreement. 14. Attorneys Fees. The prevailing party in any litigation concerning this agreement shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys fees. IS. Entire Agreement. This agreement supercedes any and aU other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the League and the Contractor with respect to the subject maner hereof and contains all of the covenants and agreements between the parties with respect to such matter. The League and the Contractor hereby acknowledge that no representation, inducement, promise or agreement, oral or otherwise, has been made by any party or anyone acting on beha!f of 7 e e any party. which are not embodied herein and that no other agreement, statement or promise not contained in this agreement shall be valid or binding. IN WI1NESS WHEREOF, the League and the Contractor have caused this agreement to be executed as of the date and year first hereinabove written. ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF BAKERSFIELD By Barbara Sandrini, President ~ , President By Janet DeWitt, Secretary ByJ~R2 t Paul A. Lane ------ , Secretary "League" "C ontractor" CICld HP D,SkIWPDOCS·AsSlSI:U'« Lea!-",e\Asbe>1DS Remov.1 COl1lrae\.wpd 8 e 322_6 4/20/2004 11'~ 13 0412.1 ,'0 ~ 10: 35 F.Ü 66i ¡'J l'C,ò· OCS fò.x Server PAGE 002/ 002 fUghtFax ---~._. - (661)952-2172 ~, 1 BKSFLD FIRE PREYENTION ~RR 29 200~ lS~47 ~A~-2,-a~ MeN ~1.a? ASBESTOS TESTING LABORATORV 67'23 Meany Avenue. Suite D, Bak~n'sfi~td, CA 93308 {6(1) 588-1116 Bulk A~ Analysis RnIIl RaøOtt ,tR~ /LIpJrJ ]V"'.- 1~,3U })øllr~~ f)wIM ~-' ~'t).\ ~~:~ C1lC/Þ onY OF ðNŒRSFIEl.D 171$CHeS~AW BAKERSFlEL.O. QÅ D33e1 .(ør.: HQWJt,RO H. WIPES UI ~Jl)/~; 11s:z.4QQI..d..-I .v..... NtM..., 1 tM N___,-"~,'~ : ~~. ...~~ .l'<:I·~V . I~' ) FÞOUO OIN«, IIIC~ ) ocr-: { ~ {i r""'~1 ç_" SAST~ICAI.. ~OM. DUCT ')oINTe.- WHIT!' TAPE; IÓ"-'- ru ~ ..4_ Turo! I'd '~&r 1CnIo ~ ~'9Þ' otI, W><I1"fI TWIrl c-pc... ~:I t1f nlH... ~.""~..,..,..,,, II ( NÞ'Io ) ~ ( tIC/II, .~ l'ÓnftIMtr: 2 Q... leAL. ROOM- WHI'n! -r,t.P E La.o~ -AEr.t-....¡,.ø... ~Il~ T.., ~ ha.... nsw l¥f ~ A~ T'ra.t f:)rJI ~ - Ir__~"';~~...:ø."II"Y__~~': .. C HD'I ) Q-t ~ ~~: S l.--IWlæT_~~ROOM-OUCT ''''N..-.,1 IN8U\.ATlON - TAN TAPe ~ ~ :-:- .......-- r... ~ ..,-. rw. /XI lIP<U ,ul'HNJ -non" ~'\Mim;. Now. eltOWN ND'I, ,......-(;OO......... "__.,f'J.¡...._~.k . -~ ~ ) ~(... ) ~~( ~ ) ~( ~ l'*ttIItJN1r: .. ~. WE58T MecHAI'IICÄLROOM . 18't' DUCT OI.Jf oF ao\1.ER.. WHITE. PUTTY . ÚI_Dq~ .-.s.""'(,!?"..7:Imo ~ "~'\flll(~ Pr:Ll..tI.,.~ -..n: ..........:DIII L~.z ....~..... ...,... <if~' c-..-~ ~ (:I0Il 1A.~-:~:~~, . "¡ ~.t J"l M ru- . . ) ~_ (_ )"__"""" ( W~ oa..:- ( 4J. ~¿f ~ ~~: W:@.~ (1(P.... ~~s.... )trl~'.tIIN ----= ·..-~.'I....~QoI WJI'~ ØßQIAI~ .n.u"'~._..,--.J......_J.OO 'M>--~~ e e State of California Department of Industrial Relation! DIVISION OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH Certificate No. Certificate of Registration for Asbestos-related Work 019 PROFESSIONAL ASBESTOS REMOVAL CORP. dba --..eARCJrn)llR.O_11ME.NIALC_O~Lo.liS_ (No..... of'Emphyer) is duly re~is¡ered by the DivisJor. cfOccupatior.al SaÎt:ty and Hu.ith in accorðar.ct: ....ith the C.alifornia Ad:l1inimttve Cede. Title 8, Aniclc 2.5 for ôlSbcsto:l-n:I:lted worle. ~xpiralion Date 20-Dee-04 19-Dec:-03 Date ()f Is.sulI!1cc fø./Jí J/J F.fft:ctlve Dac 2 t - Dec-03 This registrar:ion is valid only when the foHowing rcq~ir~enrs and conditions are met: I. The regiStered employer sha] safdy perform asbestos-related work in compliance with relevant occupational safety and health regulaJ:ions. 2. The registered employer shall notify the Division of changes in work location s or conditions as ~ ecified by Seaion 341 ,9 ofTitJe 8 of the CaJiforr:ia Adr:1 inistrative Cede. 3. The registered employer shall post a sign readable at 20 feet at the location of any asbestoNe!;¡ted work stating: Contrnctor's Lit:ensc No. 501913 Danger-Asbestos C;¡ncer and Lung Haz:ard Authorized Person nel Only 4. A COpy of the registration sha1l be posted at the jobsite beside the Cal-OSHA pester. 5. The regisn:red employer :i1all provide a copy of this registration eertificate to the prime COntr.J.ctor aI1d any oth er employerS;lt the site before the COm rnenc c::,ent of any asbestos-related work. 6. The reg istered employer shall conduct a safety confe:-ence prior to the commencement of any . 3."bestos-rela~d ......ork as specified by Section 341. J j of Title 8 of the C4¡ifornia Ad!ninstrativc' Code. 7. The registered employeracknow ledges 1h e DiviSion's right to revoke or SUSpend ¡his regjstrario n <IS provided by Section 34l.J 4 oftit!e 8 ofrhe C¡¡Jifomia Admirlistrstive Code. ~11"1II'1IJl/Jl/II/I"/lIII"'I/!lI/I/I/I/III//llI'III/IIIf"I"/lIIn/III!ln"I/IJ/111"""IIIII""""""llllIIil"IIII/I/I/II"",,,IIIIIIIIIII""IIIU""lfJlllliI1/I"I"IiIIlIlIllIlIlI"IIII~I"""II"IIIIIIIIIII/I"'I/IlUlnlll/l'/I""lfll"'II""IIII""""r""'''~ E I = '"ª S'^'f or C^I/ronu,^ I g :_=_~_: "^" M ::.:" '''M'' """" AG" Ie, CO NT II ,\ CT 0 II S STAT ,.; Li C I,; N ~ lë II 0 A I II) ~::-¡_ 9\:";,,...::._,.. ]Juildi?ìg Quality _ =:_-_~_~_~__ °,ïIi1:I:::" ASJ3ESTOS CIIìHTIFICATION _~_:=_~_:=: =- <"f·'·~l/l f¡~1J1l '(-1,-1 ~ In ~_ I'IIISII:li(, In flIP. p/(~visioIlS of S/J~·-([jF"; 1l" ¡,~;.' f ~II/~ llslllcs~ :lOci Pofr.ssiolls ~;(ld/~. =_ª :'= IIw /1/'1(1511:11' of C{)lIllndur~] (111!~) III)fcl)~t¡l¡llc:rllfY II At IIC (ol/owillg qllahryillg :=: E IH'15011 ,as slleœssflllly C<1f1IIIWIr.c iUI}~flS"d J~ ('c/tiflc: t)I ·.Jx:1iIlÎllalioll: a I 1 é~·,:";I"!I· "'(iU;·:, lij,~¡ f,\l~' ~~iff~Þ'h J ~ .~ ~'1fr.r ,.. r.,,' I';r-:~ h, ., ~ ;ji¡~f1iI.~r,i~ryÌ)~ ~ ~";lí·!r~~'''':>f"l''r''t\·l'''-¡;nl·,-II,,_,}_. -, I ¡"'I ~_. ~I . ""',,- _ § '1";(.' ~r"t ::(1' I· vm l'lf ,. . ""j I .~ 9J "~'11 ::; ! "':::<_:'~'~~::;'>" ./·~,!af~';I!:n,',':I.:,·I/'_·i;·:··;i JI.!IY'I,I,II'1'j ::! \.. :¡!«fC .Y. \ . I¡ ~f¡fr;¡~mfr.nrr~~~i1':H~).'·, J ;' '.' .' .,'. '1/ l r :'~~~~Hl;¡'T¡í!N!!:-,:?F,ril~fry'f¡il ;:;:r, Í":;:':¡1;:;¡r~.·~~'1mf~Jmr$J"~n~r~:i~mm~íTorm~l.rmr:l~ :>' ¡" "'.' 1',.'1- III ': '" ~ , Qlla lif ir.r: N i c: /1[1 rd /J P. /I /I i:-; K J " rI f,';: :; : """':', ,,,'" : ~ : !:; ,,('jl r. . .. '. ;'1 .,., ~.\ .....:~.~~~:.~:<.:/ I.I'I! I.~(~ No.: _')[) I /) 11 . t11", I" . .'\" ...__" '.'".... H~ill(~.5.5 Nall1(~: P..r·c E/lV i 'Olllllelll:nJ II /' , - 0 f (! S s i () II;¡ I. ^ s " psi: () f1 II f! III 0 V fl I Cor I) 0 r 0 I: 1 0 1\ \\" I tI':~<j ""110".." .....1 "//",'nl...·..1 11,(r 'I I =ª ~ /I II ""1/ "/ ,[ /III f1 I' y, I <) n 7 ., .i.. cr.III""oll.... Is 'lor, '''"Wlly" I IC ê_- = . II "r."1I0' III C""II,rI...., I. ''''' .s E 1'\ I! t? r I;: Irnusf(',nl,lr. tHllf ...I.:.III.r: If:lllrncd Ir) 111e' _ ëEf .. h.._~' -;..,.. 11",:1.,"0, "I"'" ,'r,..",,1 W'I"II ""1""",...1. ª ê II..,:",.", "/ C"""....,,,... I :1I_-:'1!1 I 0/01' rc,."~,,,I, <II IIIvoll,!'''''' I..rolll" I CO.,,,,,. E ·;¡,IIIIIIIIII/III"III"'IIIIII""III/,"IIIIIIIIIIIIII/IIIIIII/JIIIIIIIIIIIII'"1/1111111"111"11111""""11""1111111111111111111111111111I/IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII/IIIIIIIII/IIIIIIII/"'II11/1I11II11I/IIIIIIIIIIIlII,,,'IIII,,,,iII,",,//III/I/I/IIII/II/''''''''tll¥\ AGG09 e e e e Slate Of California ~~:.. CONTRACTORS STATE LICENSE BOARD ~... ""::~'(. C¥\:_.. ACTIVE LICENSE : ,,: OI1"'Umcr ~ .\crai~ ~. ......... l"m....,"_ 501913 E~.,- CORP e",m...><>_ PROFESSIONAL ASBESTOS REMOVAL CORPORATION DBA PARC ENVIRONMENTAL C.I.....~..~(. C33 C-2 ASB B HAZ C21 A HIC ............... ~ Im~ i]~ E·""'oftO... 11/30/2004 I Any ch¡¡nçe of business ¡¡ddresslname must ~ reported to the R"Çls:;¡¡r '.""thin 90 days i ! ThIS license is nollransterrable. and shall be returned to the Registrar upon demand when suspended. revoked. or invalidated lor any reason. This pocket card IS valid through the expiration date only. It found. drop ,n ùny m¡¡,ltxn. Pos:¡¡ge gu¡¡ranleed bv ÇOnlr~:ors St;¡te License SoolTd POBox 26000 ~;7~ Licensee Sçn¡¡bJre - ~ - . - BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: Don Anderson, Real Property Manager Finance DepL - Property Management Division March 8, 2004 . TO: FROM: Ralph E. Huey, Director BY: SUBJECT: Phase I Site Assessment for 1924 Q Street SUMMARY A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment has been performed in accordance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E 1527 for the subject property. There are no indications of any recognized environmental conditions in connection with the subject property with the exception of known and/or suspected asbestos containing materials. RECOMMENDA TION Asbestos containing materials should be properly removed and disposed of from areas of the building prior to remodeling or retro-fitting, such as floor tile, wall base mastic and thermal insulation materials within the boiler room. Roof flashing mastic is not required to be removed and disposed of until such time as re-roofing may need to occur. SITE DESCRIPTION The site consists cUITently of a vacant State of California Employment Development Department office building. RECORDS REVIEW Standard environmental record sources did not indicate the property as being listed under any environmental regulatory oversight program. An assessment of asbestos containing materials was conducted at the subject property on two separate occasions. Environmental Management, Inc. (EMI) prepared an assessment dated September 13,1988, and Clayton Environmental Consultants, Inc. issued a July 11, 1989 asbestos assessment which also referenced the previous EMI results. Although the EMI assessment records could not be located, the Clayton assessment did indicate that, 'Y~~w~~p~OPe~ A W~" e e Mr. Don Anderson March 8, 2004 Page 2 "Samples were not collected of materials that tested positive for asbestos during a previous building assessment conducted by EMI" (Clayton, p. 5). The only omitted area likely to contain asbestos materials, which was not subsequently assessed by Clayton, is the boiler room of the subject property. In addition to the boiler room omission (which indicates that thermal insulation therein likely tested positive for asbestos in the previous EM! assessment), the Clayton assessment indicated the presence of asbestos in vinyl floor tile mastic, wall base mastic, roof flashing and mastic, and a TransiteT>4 Type B gas vent pipe. There are two petroleum product pipelines within one mile of the subject property: a 10" PG&E natural gas transmission line which follows the south side of Golden State Highway, approximately !12 mile to the north, and a 4" diesel fuel pipeline operated by Kinder Morgan Energy Partners that runs along the north side of the Union Pacific railroad tracks approximately !12 mile eastward and terminates at the rail yard on Sumner St. There are no abandoned oil wells within one mile of the property. There are no listed federal or state hazardous waste sites within one mile of the property. The closest known site where a release of petroleum products has occulTed is the former Pacific Southern Foundry site at 60021 SI Street, approximately 1¡4 mile northeast of the subject prop~rty. Underground storage tanks (USTs) removed from that site in 1989. Minor amounts of diesel impacted soil was over excavated and aerated on site. The remedial actions were completed in 1991. The closest known groundwater contamination site is under McKinney's Air Conditioning located at 2323 R Street, approximately 114 mile north of the subject property. A 500 gallon gasoline UST was removed from that site in 1988. Gasoline was determined to have leaked into the groundwater and the groundwater continues to be monitored at this time, after soil vapor extraction has already been performed on the site. The closest Underground Storage Tank (UST) is located at the Downtown Chevron Station, 2317 L Street, approximately Y2 mile northwest of the subject property. This site, like McKinney's (above), is known to have gasoline impacted groundwater beneath their respective sites. The on-going groundwater investigations and clean-ups at these sites will not affect the use of the subject property. SITE RECONNAISSANCE A physical inspection of the property was conducted on March 5, 2004. There were no indications of any haiardous waste disposal. e e Mr. Don Anderson March 8, 2004 Page 3 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY City of Bakersfield aerial photographs for the subject property were reviewed. The property was multi-family residential prior to becoming governmental office space. FINDINGS There are no indications of any recognized environmental conditions in connection with the subject property with the exception of known and/or suspected asbestos containing materials. RECOMMENDATION Asbestos containing materials should be properly removed and disposed of from areas of the building prior to remodeling or retro-fitting, such as floor tile, wall base mastic and thermal insulation materials within the boiler room. Roof flashing mastic is not required to be removed and disposed of until such time as re-roofing may need to occur. Attachment· e e .. ..,-- .......- . ...---'- / / / / ./ -...... 1252 Quarry lane · Pleasanton. California 94566 . (415) 426-2600 Assessment of Suspect Asbestos-Containing Materials EmploYment Development Department Bakersfield, California or Office of the State Architect Clayton Project No. 24089.00 July 11, 1989 Gi.J~;N~:)S SëRVICëS Ci\i5jCN crNTRA L OFFIce 'JUt t ß 1989 REC'D S\\1i:.O ~ e. c 3 ,~'ò~ ~~\.. , ,...trÞ~c;\ L ~. ~'~r'fO CiftVÞ 0' '::_...~". ~þt. OU"". - e':·:·:::;.:·;r.~;l!al COnSUllolnlS,lnc. e CONTENTS Pa~e 1.0 INTROD UCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2.0 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS .......................... 2 2.1 SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT.... .. . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. ... . . . . . 2 2.2 RECOMMENDATIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3.0 NOTIFICA TIONS ............................................ 3 4.0 STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES ............................... 3 5.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 5.1 SOURCES OF INFORMATION .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 5.2 DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING /BUILDING USE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 5.3 DESCRIPTION OF ASSESSMENT ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 5.4 RESULTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Appendices A BULK SAMPLING ANALYTICAL RESULTS B SAMPLING LOCATIONS C ANALYTICAL METHOD D PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES FOR ROUTINE MAINTENANCE AND REMODELING OPERATIONS E TOXICOLOGICAL INFORMATION F ESTIMATED COST FOR ABATEMENT OF ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIAL - i - . - "'- · - e e Assessment of Suspect Asbestos-Containing Materials at the Employment Development Department Bakersfield, California for Office of the State Architect Clayton Project No. 24089.00 July 11 , 1989 .' . Clayton Environmental Consultants, Inc. 1252 Quarry Lane . Pleasanton, California 94566 . (415) 426·2600 1.0 INTRODUCTION Mr. Robert Siu. Project Architect for the Office of the State Architect, authorized Clayton Environmental ConsultaDtS. Inc. to conduct an assessment of suspect asbestos-containing materials in tbe Employment Development Department. 1924 Q Street. Bakersfield, California. The scope of the services provided by Clayton is described in our proposal dated May 2. 1989. wbich includes an explanation of the terms and conditions under which the work was provided. A description of the assessment conducted is provided in Section 4.3 of this repon. On June 15, 1989, Mr. Joel Leong, Senior Engineer at Clayton, conducted a walkthrough assessment of the building. Mr. Leong recorded the areas of tbe building inspected. as well as areas where materials suspected oC containing asbestos were located. This walkthrough assessment provided a visual record of the readily accessible portions of the building. When materials suspeçtcd of containing asbestos were found, a bulk sample was collected from each homogeneous material. Areas with similar-appearing materials were identified and recorded. The Clayton laboratory analyzed the samples for asbestos content using the technique of polarized light microscopy (PLM) and following the EP A PLM protocol for determining asbestos fibers in bulk insulation materials. NOTE: Materials which tested positive for asbestos during a previous assessment by Environmental Management, Inc. (EMI) were not sampled during this survey. Appendix A presents bulk sample analytical results. Appendix B provides a floor plan of tbe sampling locations. ~ppendix C briefly describes the analytical method used. Appendix D summarizes precautionary measures for routine maintenance activities and remodeling operations. Appendix E describes the health hazards associated with asbestos exposure. - 1 - ~401""R2I' .. .~".""Ivf.mel)(al Consultants, Inc. _ 2.0 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS The following summary and recommendations are based on the results of analyses of samples collected and on Mr. Leong's subjective observations. 2.1 SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Samples of suspect asbestos-containing materials were collected in the building. Analysis indicated the presence of asbestos in vinyl asbestos floor tile mastic, wall base mastic, roof flashing and mastic, and a transiteTW Type B gas vent. 2.2 RECOMMENDATIONS 2.2.1 Asbestos Control and Manuement The asbestos-containing materials identified during this assessment, in their present condition, are not friable. The potential for fibers becoming airborne is limited except during renovation or remodeling operations involving removal, scraping, cutting, grinding, sawing, drilling, sanding, or otherwise disturbing these materials. We understand that remodelling activities planned for this building may disturb some of these materials. Cenain precautions should be taken to minimize exposure to personnel performing this work and prevent contamination of adjacent building areas. These precautions are summarized in Appendix D. We recommend that affected asbestos-containing materials be removed by a qualified asbestos abatement contractor using appropriate precautions prior to remodelling activities that may disturb the materials. We will be available to work with you to specify the most appropriate asbestos removal work practices and procedures. In the interim, steps should be taken to prevent the potential release of fibers by maintaining these materials in good repair. These materials should be examined and repaired regularly to prevent the release of fibers. In addition, an effective asbestos management program should be implemented that would include taking precautions to protect employees during routine maintenance. 2.2.2 Renovation/Demolition The U.S. EPA requires that asbestos-containing materials (1% or greater asbestos content) be removed prior to demolition of a building. During (enovation and demolition operations, it is possible that materials may be uncovered which are different from those sampled during this assessment. Personnel in charge of renovation or demolition should be alerted to note materials uncovered during these operations which differ substantially from those included in this assessment. Additional sampling should be performed to determine the composition of" the materials. - 2 - 14C1Ø-01.1l1U' _..: .'.":."I'-":;·':'~':;·'I.¡f Consullanls. Inc. e 3.0 NOTIFICA TIONS On January I, 1989, Assembly Bill 3713 mandated a significant addition to the California Health and Safety Code that affects owners of buildings constructed prior to 1979. The bill details notifications requirements for owners of buildings that contain aSbestos-containing construction materials (ACCM). The bill requires that owners provide written notices to employees, contractors, and lessees concerning specific matters related to ACCM. The notice must include (1) existence of, conclusion from, and contenLS of asbestos building surveys; (2) specific locations of ACCM; (3) general procedures and handling restrictions to m~nimize asbestos disturbance¡ (4) results of any bulk analysis or air monitoring conducted; and (5) potential health risks associated with asbestos exposure. For nonfriable materials (Le., material is limited to bonded asbestos in the material where the asbestos fibers are completely encapsulated), such as asbestos-containing vinyl floor covering, notice must include (1) information described in items 1 and 2 in the preceding paragraph and (2) information to convey that the activities described in Section 2.2.3 relating to removing, sanding, scraping, etc. are restricted and should not be performed by unqualified employees. The bill also requires the posting of warning notices in building areas where construction, maintenance, or remodeling may create a release or disturbance of ACCM. The warning notice must contain the information specified below: CQU/;Oll. Asbestos. CQIICeT QIUI LUllg DiseQse HaZQTd. Do NOl Disturb Without Proper TTGilling aNi Equipmelll. Because ACCM was identified during this assessment, we recommend that you inform persons affected in accordance with the provisions of this regulation. 4.0 STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standards and guidelines apply to employees. The OSHA asbestos standard mandates a permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 0.2 fibers (longer than S micrometers per cubic centimeter of air (f Icc) determined as an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) and an excursion limit of 1 flcc as a 30-minute 1WA. The OSHA action level is 0.1 flee, the level at which medical monitoring and other activities are req uired. Under its AHERA regulations for schools, the EPA recommends performing clearance air sampling after a response action involving asbestos-containing materials. The EPA's clearance criteria are based on statistical comparison of airborne asbestos concentrations inside a work area against those outside the work area. Where phase-contrast microscopy (PCM) is an acceptable analytical method, the EPA has recommended 0.01 flee as a limit for airborne fiber concentrations. In addition to these exposure criteria, the U.S. EPA National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS) (40 CFR 61, Subpans A and M) must also be followed during any maintenance or renovat!on activities which might disturb the asbestos-containing materials. - 3 - 2401t-OO.RU . -.. ' -.-..,. ~e' ¡¡or.menlal ConSull.1nIS. Inc. e The state of California also has specific regulations regarding asbestos, California standards for tbe workplace are issued primarily by the Division of Occupational Safety and Health (DOSH). Specific asbestos requirements are contained in Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR) and in the California Health and Safety Code, Effective January 1, 1989, an addition to the California Health and Safety Code mandated by AB 3713 requires building owners to provide written notice to employees and other persons concerning specific matters related to asbestos. The EPA has limited the asbestos content of some materials to I percent, however, asbestos has not been eliminated from all manufactured building materials. Tberefore, tbe age of a building or remodeling project cannot be Ihe basis for assuming that a material does not contain asbestos. 5.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 5.1" SOURCES OF INFORMATION We reviewed the following documents in connection with this project: · Previous assessment by Environmental Management, Inc. (EMI) dated September 13, 1988 · Blueprints T-l, A-I to A-4, M-l and M-2, E-l and E-2, OSA, Project Manager: Bob Siu; Project Title: Building Modifications During the course of the assessment, the following individuals provided information or assistance to the Clayton investigator: ~ Affiliation Roben Siu Jim Wallace Office of the State Architect Employment Development Depanment The information and documents supplied to Clayton during the course of this project were assumed to be complete, true, and correct and were relied upon by the Clayton investigator. The findings presented herein must be reviewed giving due regard that tbe assessment, inspection, and sampling procedures contain inherent limitations, as is tbe case with any sampling procedure, and were conducted based on observations that were visually apparent at the timc of the inspection of the site. 5.2 DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING/BUILDING USE The single Story building is of a combinatiOD wood frame and structural steel construction witb an addition of approximately 6,500 square feet. The entire building is approximately 12,325 square feet. There is a boiler room in the basement and a mechanical room in the addition which provides roof access. . - 4 - l.......au .... ".. ":'':'·i'_~'..¡rùnment.J1 Consultants, Inc. e 5.3 DESCRIPTION OF ASSESSMENT The Clayton investigator inspected the building for suspect asbestos-containing materials, such as those listed below: Thermal Insulation · Pipe wrap · Fittings, elbows, joints · Duct insulation · Heat shields · Insulation on chillers, heaters, boilers, and air conditioning units Surfacing Materials · Fireproofing · Acoustical plaster · Decorative plaster, wall and above ceiling · Spray-applied insulation MJscellaneoUJ Materials · Floor. tiles wall base mastic · Ceiling tiles and mastic · Wallboard/dry wall/sheetrock · Transite TW, board/pipe · Vibration dampering material in ducts · Wall covering mastic · Roofing materials II must be noted that our assessment was limited as follows: Samples were not collected of materials that tested positive for asbestos during a previous building assessment c9nducted by EMI. 5.4 RESULTS Our assessment resulted in the collection of samples of materials for testing. As detailed in Appendix A. asbestos was identified in the material we tested. Analysis of the 9-by 9-inch vinyl asbestos floor tile mastic samples detected 10 percent chrysotite asbestos. Analysis of the wall base mastic samples detected 2 percent chrysotile asbestos. Both materials were sampled in the building addition and are assumed to be homogeneous throughout the building. Asbestos was not detected (less than 1 percent) in a sample collected of the ceiling tile mastic above the grid ceiling in the addition offices and a sample collected of the wall covering mastic. . Analysis of the roof flashing and mastic materials on the building addition and the gap between the original building and the addition detected chrysotile asbestos in concentrations ranging from 1 to 3 percent. Analysis of the Type B gas vent through the roof of the original building - 5 - 2401UO.IlEl' . .. ~ - c,:;·(~úe·...¡ro,'mental Consultants, Inc. e detected 2S percent cbrysotile asbestos. This was the only transiteTU gas vent observed on the roof. Additional sample analysis of dry wall joint compound, sheetwork wall core, plaster and lath wall, and ductwork joint màterial, did not detect the presence of asbestos (less than 1 percent). It is not unusual to find variation in results for the same material, since the asbestos may be unevenly distributed in the matrix. For this reason, if one sample of a material indicates tbe presence of asbestos, the material should be treated as asbestos-containing, even if· other samples are negative. This repon prepared bY:~~ I Leong, P.E. Senior Engineer Thi~ report approved by: July 11, 1989 ~ 6 - 2401t-OO.U" ... -- ~··:·":.;~e·i:()nmenlal Consultants. Inc. e APPENDIX A BULK SAMPLING ANALYTICAL RESULTS ..--. ø_ "::..;., ,e,,,¡,onmental Consultants. Inc. e The tables in Appendix A include the foUowing information.: A. Material Sampled A pbysical description of the material sampled in tbe assessed building or structure. B. Location of Material ill BuildiDg Tbe location of the material (e.g., pipe wrap or joint insulation) in the assessed building or structure). C. Amount Asbestos Present The approJ:Ìmate amount of aSbestos-containing materials present in the building based on observations, drawings, or other sources of information. D. Condition The condition of the material present, whicb was subjectively evaluated by the investigator (e.g., good, fair, or poor). E. Accessibl11t)' The accessibility to the material is evaluated as follows: · S (Staff-Only) -- materials behind locked doors (e.g., boiler rooms) and materials above dropped ceilings (e.g., pipe joint wrap) · M (Moderate) --materials that can be seen but not reached without some eUon (e.g., high ceilings) · E (Easy) -- materials within the employees' reach (e.g., low or stairwell ceilings, wrap on pipes) F. FrlablUty The ability of a material, when dry, to be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced [0 powder by hand pressure. Friability was subjectively evaluated by the investigator as low. moderate. or high. G. Field IdentlllcatloD The first letters in the column are an abbreviation for the client. The number is the material identification number assigned by the Clayton investigator. At least three representative samples were collected for each type of friable or suspect material sampled as material content is not always uniform. H. Sample Location The physical location where the sample was collected in the assessed building or structure. I. Estimated Percent and Type The numbers indicate the percent of each type of asbestos present in the sample. Percentages are not reported for materials not containing asbestos. ..... .- TABLE 1 BUUC SAMPLING ANALYTICAL RESULTS DcpanmCUI: BuUdJar- EmploymeDI Developmenl Depanmenl Clicnl: OfTicc 011 he Slale ArchÍlecl DcsIp d VcotUallOD: Date: June 20. 1989 IDvc:atl.alcr. Jod Leong Project No.: 24089.00 Esllmaled AmOUDt Present PerceDt Asbe$tOlS (+/- SCJt)- L A B S C C " N 0 C C A H C G D 0 E F M R R Localioo of Materill T I F N S R 0 y 0 N Mataûl Slmpled 10 BulldlDI H A T D S 1 Fidd I.D. Simple Locallon S S C D Millie. '-by '-Inch Throulhoul ßoor 12,325 G S L B-OI Vlealed Iplce, 10 ßoor lile, black addilion Maslic, will blse, brown Throughout wills unJcoowD G S L 8-02 Vacated 'pace, 2 addillon lola. compouod. dry Win, Sheet rock wills unknowD G S L 0-03 Vlclled dficc, above X ·cIf-white cellini addltioD Mlltle, I-by I-foot Througboul ceillnp uDJcnowD 0 S L 11·04 Above &rid ceiling. X c:dllnl tllc, brown vaealed oIfice, addition PIIster, oIl-wbile Plallu wal\. abovc ccllinl unknown G S L O-OS Above ceiling. storagc X room aCUII halch Joinl malerill, dUClwork, Throughout ductwork unknown G S L 0-06 Above ccilinl, Iloralle X oIl-wblle room aceas halch Flasblo., ori,lllll Roof, 'orilinal building unknown F S L 8-07 Southeasl corner roof, X bulldinl, blaclt original building MIstle, lip, bllck Gap belween oripnll building 100 p S M 8-08 South side lap and Iddilion roofs ( . i. -< 0 e < ::;' 0 ::I Toul 3 Percenl " :) AsbcstOl !!. n 0 10 :) \II c: " 2 : \II ::J ~ e · ADlly.1I pc:dormed in accordance wllh EPA Prolocol for asbcstOlS ullng pollrized IIlht mleroaeopy (PLM). " G - Good S - Staa Ooly H - Higb - ChrysOlile a Crocidolile .. NODe Detected F - Fair M - Moderale . L - Low p - Poor E - Ea.y Dil Sq FI Cond Diameter Square Feel .. Condllion Access Fri Amos - Accesslbilily Friabilily Amosite Cbryl Croc ND TABLB 1 (CONTINUED) BULK SAMPLING ANAl. YTICAl. RESULTS DepartmcDt: BuDclJD¡: DcaJp tl VcøUI.tloll: IDvatJptor: Employmeø' Devdopment Depulmenl Clienl: D.le: Project No.: Joel Leong Office of Ibe SIBle Archilccl June 20, 1989 24089.00 Estimated AmOUDI Preseot L A E S C N Q c C G D 0 B F Location tl Malerial T I F N S R M.tedal Sampled I 10 BulldJD, H A T D S I field I.D. 0.. veDl, Type B, ".y One Ibroull! rod, orilinal unknown F S 1. 0-09 buildinl Aashlø&. .dditioD, black Root, .ddilioD unknown F S L D-IO Tar rod, bl.ct Root, addi'ioD 6,SOO F S L D-II Millie, 11'.11 covcrlnl, Conference room untnowø G S L D- 12 browø original bulldiDI Sheel rock wall core:, Throulhoul buildin¡ unknown G E L B-B while Pllller 11'.11 core, wblle Throughoul buildlnl unknown F E L 0-14 Pcn:enl Asbalœ (+/- S,,)" e S.mple Loca'ion A M o S C H R Y S N D ( : TOlal ~ Percent r; .A&bcslœ ~ Î. o :J '" C C R o C Root, orillnal 25 buildinlloulh ,ide Root, addilion, 3 lOulh side Root, addÌlion X loulh aide Conferenc:c room X original buildin¡ Vacated spIce X addillon V',cIled 'pace X addllion 2j ::: t¡ :J 3 .- '" :J " e · Analysis performed In accordance wilb EPA Pro,oco/ Cor .sba'os using polarized lilhl microscopy (PLM). o - Good S - 51aa Only H - Hi,b F - F.ir M - Moderale L-LOw P - Poor E - EIlY Dia Sq FI Cond Diame'er Square Feel Coodition Access Fri Amos .. Accosibilily Fria bili , y Amosi'e · · · Chrys Croc ND .. Cbryso'ie Crocidoli'e None De'ec'ed ..:.,: ec¡:..:r..Jnmental Consultants, Inc. e APPENDIX B SAMPLING LOCATIONS . a.. -_ " r Iglllol BUIlding B-IZ 18-08 8-09 $ 8-07 -I AdditIon II. 04 -OJ -- (),H-O,-' thll-Ol IbB-I;! ,J'II H ---- - ._~ .vII o~ II -U(, AIIE'!oS Hotch ___U_[____ tJ of,¡'/u 11'11 e NOTE:. Drawing not to scal. aa IOD £D,iroDmfDlal rOD.ull.iiïì~lñr~------- --r;g.n flocr Plln Ind Sl~t lOCltilllls £rpOfntnl Drvrloprotnl Ik..r tnrnt II.I-N' (...f,1 r.I·',.... . I 'I !I ..: .~·¡¡_.vi(onmenta Consultants. Inc. e APPENDIX C ANAL YTICAL METHOD . '"., ~... - . ·e·;~;,ùnmental Consultants. Inc. tit METHOD OF ANALYSIS FOR BULK ASBESTOS USING POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY (PLM) When a bulk asbestos sample is received, several representative ponions of the sample are removed and put into a labeled petri dish. The sample pans are examined through a stereobiDocuIar microscope and fibers are extracted using forceps. These extracted fibers are then placed on a microscope slide and mounted using a refractive index solution [high dispersion (HD) CargiUe liquid}. After being mOunted, the fibers are identified using PLM, supplemented by dispersion staining1. After fiber identificatioD by PLM, an estimation is made as to the percentage (area) composition of asbestos. The estimated percentages are ba~d on size, number, shape, and density of each of the components, and comparison to a standard set of samples previously quantitated by the interim Research Triangle Institute (RTI) methodz. 1 McCrone, Walter C., The Asbestos Panicles Atlas. Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Inc., 1980. 2 Research Triangle Institute, -Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestifonn Minerals in Bulk Insulation Samoles: Page 8 to 12, 1982. -- -- ~..:ï.y"ú.jronment.11 Consult.1nrs, Inc. e APPENDIX D PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES FOR ROUTINE MAINTENANCE AND REMODELING OPERATIONS ..... ~-- :e . _~.-n-:n;.1: Consulrants. Inc. e PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES FOR ROUTINE ~INTENANCE AND REMODELING OPERATIONS A. MaIDtenaDce Activities The following precautions should be taken whenever maintenance activities may potentially disturb or release asbestos fibers. Many of these precautions are required by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA) new asbestos standard contained in the Code of Federal Regulations (29 CFR 1926.58). Maintenance activities should be performed when the affected area is unoccupied. If any asbestos-containing materials have been dislodged during maintenance work, the affected area should be cleaned with a vacuum system equipped with high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters. Accumulations of asbestos dust should be cleaned up with a HEPA vacuum or by wet mopping. Dry sweeping causes fibers to become airborne.. Persons performing maintenance work sbould be monitored to determine their exposures to asbestos fibers. Maintenance personnel should be provided with and required to wear respirators approved by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Each maintenance employee should be trained in the correct use and maintenance of these respirators, evaluated by a physician to determine his or her ability to use a respirator and be fit-tested to determine that the respirator selected will provide adequate protection for that individual. Maintenance workers should receive instruction in the potential health effects of asbestos and in safe work practices, including what precautions to take to minimize disturbance of the asbestos-containing materials. B. Renovation Activities Any plans for building renovation should be carefully evaluated to determine if such activities will involve disturbance of asbestos-containing material; if so, the following precautions should be taken. A11y work involving 100 square feet or more of aSbestos-containing materials must be performed by a contractor certified by the Contractors' State License Board and registered by the Calüornia Division of Occupational Safety and Health to perform asbestos-related work. The renovatioD area should be isolated from the remainder of the facility. Typically, this involves the construction of a temporary plastic barrier with an "air lock" for worker entry. Ventilation in the zone should be temporarily isolated (the aif movement system between the renovation area and neighboring areas should be shut off) and an exhaust fan should be used to place the renovation area under a slight negative air pressure in relation to the rest of the facility. The fan should exhaust out-of-doors and be equipped with a HEPA filter. All persons entering the renovation area should be provided with and required to use NIOSH- approved respirators and disposable coveralls and caps. Requirements for fit-testing and medical evaluation as described above for maintenance workers also apply to renovation workers. Air monitoring should be performed routinely around the perimeter of the renovation area to ensure tbat asbestos fibers are not released into other areas of the building. Personal sampling should also be conducted to evaluate potential exposures of renovation workers to asbestos and to determine the type of respiratory protection required. . - "- CJ.y:on_ronmental Consultants, Inc. e Construction debris that may contain asbestos must be sealed in impermeable containers, labeled. and disposed in accordance with U.S. EPA and OSHA requirements. Warning signs must be posted around the renovation area. These signs must meet current OSHA requirements. Whenever possible, the aSbestos-containing materials should be welted prior to any disturbance to reduce asbestos fiber emission. Prior to dismantling the barriers at the completion oC work. the area should be cleaned thoroughly using wet mops or vacuums with HEPA CUters. Clearance air sampling sbould be conducted at tbis time to ensure that asbestos concentrations are at or below 0.01 fibers (longer than 5 micrometers) per cubic centimeter oC air (C Ice). The 0.01 flee limit is the EPA recommended clearance criterion Cor reoccupaney after construction activities involving asbestos-containing materials. ,:···e:··ironmental Consultanrs, Inc. e APPENDIX E TOXICOLOGICAL INFORMATION .~... '- - '. e..Wiionmental Consultants. Inc. tit ASBESTOS Asbestos is a generic term referring to various fibrous mineral silicates, including chrysotile (hydrated magnesium silicate), amosite (iron-magnesium silicate), crocidolite (sodium-iron silicate), tremolite (calcium-magnesium silicate), anthophyllite (another iron-magnesium silicate), and actinolite (ca1cium-magnesium-iron silicate). The potential health hazards associated with exposure to asbestos result from inhaling the airborne fibers. Small asbestos fibers can pass readily through the upper respiratory tract and be deposited in the terminal bronchioles of the lung. Once there, they can produce a local irritation, which the body attempts to overcome by initiating a tissue response. This response includes encapsulation of the fibers and consequent formation of "asbestos bodies." Asbestos fibers are the causative agents in cases of asbestosis, a progressive disease characterized .by diffuse interstitial fibrosis. and. at Umes, pleural changes of fibrosis and calcification. Clinical signs of asbestosis include rales and dyspnea. In its severe form, asbestosis can contribute to, and result in, death by inhibhing the body's ability to obtain oxygen, and the hean's ability to pump blood through the asbestos-scarred lungs. Exposure to airborne asbestos fibers has also been associated with bronchogenic carcinoma (a malignancy of the interior of the lung), mesothelioma (a diffuse malignancy of the lining of the chest cavity or abdomen). and cancer of the stomach, colon. and rectum. Cigarette smoking can enhance the incidence of bronchogenic carcinoma. In order to protect workers from such occupational hazards. the Occupational Satety and Health Administration (OSHA) has established a permissible exposure limit of 0.2 fibers (longer than 5 micrometers) per cubic centimeter of air (flee) as an 8-hour, time-weighted average (TWA) concentration limit. This OSHA standard also specifies an action level of 0.1 flee of air averaged over an 8-hour workday and an excursion limit of I flee over a 30 minute period. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) has recommended an 8-bour, TWA exposure limit of 0.1 flcc, with a peak concentration limit of O.S flee based on a IS-minute sampling period. The American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) has adopted 8- hour, TWA threshold limit values (TL Vs), which vary according to the type of asbestos. They are listed as follows: Amosite: Chrysotile: Crocidolite: Other forms: 0.5 flee 2.0 flee 0.2 flcc 2.0 flee ACGlli lists all forms of asbestos under the category of human carci~ogens. RightFax e 3/24/2004 11:50 e PAGE 001/003 Fax Server MAR-L~-e4 MON e~:16 P.0} ASBESTOS TESTING LABORATORY 6723 Meany Avenue, Suite D, Bakersfield, CA 93308 (661) 588-1116 Bulk Asbestos Analysis Final Report Client: c;ny OF BAKERSFIELD 1715 CHESTER AVE QAKERSFIELD. CA 933C)1 ÂIt.: HOWARD H. WlNES III Analpl. Report NrJ: 1 ~.30i4 ! DtU~ B.a:nvœ: 3/12104" DBk Ex.m";lltlrJ: 3/1-4J0.4. Rl'!f'Ø't D~ 3/.,.cJ04 " J.oIt ID I llll.: I ORIGINAL 81-DG 1$24 Q STREET ~I _ ~ . .~_ l S~ NIRIIb,,.: 1 Cøm"'ØI: TAN I(IOK PIA TE MASTIC IN ORIGINAL Bt,.OG TAN KiCK PI..A"Æ MASTIC IN ORIGIAt. BLDG ~V Dffn'~rJ. ,DIn". J'rn Per L,."r A.!wJw J\lþ( I'd lAY.' ~b...rœ 1'IIDtI GRAY KICK NO'Io IftOWNNASnC ND'16 ·I;..., CtNHIMJ;¡t# VØIIu..- "l~íbr')fU (iør.l,pø...:MØ....6beeIIø&:« N[)4, ) C:eII~ (;. ) '"~v.. GiIa~5; ( No<!' ) OtMi; l· M)~ . f .\~ NM""';;2---¿'~'I" CORÂL CÓLOR 9X9 FL.ÒORTILE IN ORIGINAL '.alI N~: 1š~tii '..~¡~ 8L.OG " ,:" Lin~,,-nC!cYjrrt..iim_ AI!~flœ? trR rfll Lll.ur Asbaros r- /'c'f '.4r4t AJ~.uðt 7\:ø# VINYl TILE NO'!' TAN W'lGTIC NO'll> f",. C~ik J.'1&t#'H'lJoíbrØ118 0Itnpr1tt~ ( ND'" ) CeIII.IIQM: (NO'III ) FImMt a....: ( N[)1¡) oc".: ( ~ s-.ptll M""bIt,: 3 Cømnfl"nJ: PUïTY COLORED GXÐ FLOOR TilE IN ORIGINAL Bl..DG I......' Ðð<:rint;!2!l .-~ nfi! Pt:t I...,n Ad_I,.. n,,.. Pn lAJY_' T1L.E CtwytotIe '"' BLACK hlAtrrtc ~,~ . .J;: ~~ (~~~~ of ".hrmu '-'utlf1Ø~"""'=--: ( . .... ) ~: ( NO'" ) f'1btOUS GIns: (NO'" I ~~r+ ;~: S4MtpltI NrurdI.,: 4 CcJ~ aWE KICK PLATE MASTIC iN ORIGINAL BLDG lAJ> NIIIfI6N: 1!+ .:!~ ÿ.,({ ~tsaiÐt¡QII AsMr.. ~' I'd lAYe, hbntM T._ Pet LaM, ÑJund" 7WM ~I ~. ,;:i 8UJ(. N~ ' '. ':' ~H N~ k....~ CfNllpWii_ v~;... ~-;;;,~~ ~~oe' ( N(N, ) CduIoM: ( TRC'Ib) F~'" GIIiI$S: ( NO" ) ONI:"( ~ -E-- ---------~~ SUp~l': JY. .((í,~ SIt.llon (EP.414__6Mf<IR-'$IUS. ..&...orAl".. ~J ,Y_.· u...«'¡t.~~--- (I.O(!J"'" "TP-" ~fINW:M""""'".tllm.lbtf!l¡;wtJuF.op" WND"-N_ÞIúrud fA/JN"mhr; 1~1M" ......1tn," T"t>e ?J. RightFax e 3/24/2004 11: 50 PAGE 002/00341ÞFax Server M~~-1~-e4 MOH e~:le ASBESTOS TESTING' LABORATORY 6723 Méany Avenue, Suite D, Bakersfield, CA 93308 (661) 588-1116 Bulk Asbestos Analysis . Fin.. Report ~ NII_~n 5 lAb ¡V"",w:1M-,7W ;.....;. çømmml: BROWN KICK PLATe. MASTIC IN ORIGINAL BtDG Ltn~/' DqqjØ!a .1.~.t't1lf :r.4! Pet '.-In,,, ~rm 1m, kl Lrø~ ~_T.tRf. BROWN HD'Io SROWN MA.8T1G ~ T~NMA&'jIC ND'IL FøtÆf c."øtJflt(RÎJø V4Ift".'if ,.íJrøK, C;""""f"'III~butoa: ( HO<J. ) Celulou: (. ND~ ) ~ 0.-.: ( NO'!' )~; ( ~;. '.~ s-,pl;-¡y;¡;,~: e èO_lIt: åUU< STORAGE RM FLOOR Tile ORIGINÄI.' lAb NII';'IHw: 1*7M:: BLOB , l..du., JM"ÍJt(;_ . A"-tm T.1l I'ð fAy". .4~ 7'10_ I'd L~Ð .úbfMP h_ TILE ~ .,.., øu.C.KÞU.8T1C c~. 10% F., ~P<"" I '.t.n -/" J<"ibNHu (.·"'Mf'lØllII.III',""'MllrOA' (n. ) c.øLbol: (NDII(, ) 'JbIg15 saa.: { ND1I. ¡ 0W1III'; 0( fMnp16 N.".,,: 7 GÒItUIf4!lft: FLOOR TILE IN WOMENS RIR IN OFFtCE OF tat NMmbwr 1 Moo". .. " ORIGINAL BLDQ LøoÞM""inti_ A.~ 1M. I'rtl_r hbftt-:IM,., PrlL...,.,. AI"'-"" n~ n~ c~ ß &LA.C~ ctrytoa. n f~~~/t". J'øhlø of¡'~ Cø~~ (:w. ) CeIUo-= (NO" )"~ G!QB: ( NO'll. I 0ItIW: { ~ . .. ... / \ ¿/' - ~ -' çjJ--- __ f...¿/. ~ ~.~·l~ .'J1upgW.,ot": "'- Kirk .'iltd/on (fl.:p,i M....".¡ ~~/14 J'tIIN1..c... ENJM.aiø.u ,\-.. i.iMW ~O-.,.,_ (L0{9 -,... "rr-. __ ...",_~._ _... _ LOll "/VD" -1'1_. »n~uW M Q) t> M Q) U') >:: c\! I.t. e~ 0 0 ..... ~ iQ 0 0 ¡¡. ~ P- O If) .. .-I .-I o;< 0 0 N ..... o;< . I· I, g=== --'·~-U=--rw----t'--~ ni]¡=¡mr=-=i\f\F @ @) ~(j) @® :II rJ°'¡"h , : ···..r -.;' 1;.0,..;' ., ':; . ;;' !1t ~ ~".a á) ·D'· .. r . ® ~d~;=:~ ~~I DEMOLmON PLAN x c\! tL. .+oJ ~ ~ "1'1 0:: CD tø./I!jfRj Kid<p/..fe ({ (i) Cøl'ø-I '''~9' P/øor f;/~ r;.. ~j @ pfA./-I-~ "n f\ I' ® b/fAe KicK pIA+~ ~ b rDWf\" " (i) buJk s~rø-,4I!. rooØ'\ (,' x," f lOtiI' +; I~ á) R f( ht:l( ~~"CJ 1\ r, rt " I o i P 'I I -1I -¡- I I I I ¡II I I . D---~' . I . I I I II I = (~~ c..=':"~ -,-1 ___ __ ... ...___-.-1 x o m z « CJ a: ( III UJ (/) Ja: ~ ~i ~ a:t¡ w (D Z 0 J~ ~ ~ °oi~ a: ~ Iii 8 ~¡a~~~~ ii a~h~ a~ - or t== _ 1\Y1,1/D111 K tlfr'l1/m1 ... Ine·N' - (JIO - 2ZIlOO -"!=;K -., 3-/:1. -~o1 /9;' I{ 0 Sfre.e..:r .;:' - , e e May 3, 2004 ~~ ~ ~ - TO: Howard Wines, Office of Environmental Services FROM: Assistance League of Bakersfield - SUBJECT: Analysis of Asbestos Cleanup Alternatives -1924 Q Street Engineering Evaluation/Cleanup Activities (EElCA) Pursuant to the requirements of the EPA RLF funding the asbestos cleanup within the building at 1924 Q Street, the Assistance League will be acquiring for the relocation of their facilities, following is a draft of the potential cleanup alternatives for the asbestos removal. In addition, the Engineering Evaluation/Cleanup Activities (EE/CA) is also attached in the form of a copy of the Request for Proposals for asbestos removal along with the Asbestos Removal Contract. BACKGROUND The Assistance League of Bakersfield is a nonprofit organization that has operated for 48 years. Their services to the community include: Operation School Bell which provides clothing and uniforms annually to 1,500 - 2,000 needy school children; Operation Opportunity which provides clothing annually to 200 adults who have been on public assistance, but have received training and are entering the job force; and operation of the "Bargain Box," a thrift store that generates funds to help pay for these community services as well as providing a work site for job trainees. The League is currently located in three separate and adjacent buildings, which are located in the path of a current redevelopment project that will eliminate substantial economic and physical blight. The Assistance League's focus has been to remain in the same general area to provide needed service to the community. The proposed building at 1924 Q Street, is only about eight blocks away from their existing facilities. SITE BACKGROUND The building at 1924 Q Street is the site of the former State Employment Development Department office. Environmental studies and testing have been completed on the office site. The Phase 1 study reviewed the historical environmental issues associated with the office and land parcel. Building materials were tested (see attached testing results) to determine the presence and levels of asbestos fibers within the various building materials. The floor tile, mastic and boiler room insulation were found to have asbestos fibers. Use of asbestos within building materials was eliminated by regulations in the 1970's, the EDD building was built prior to these regulations. Due to the floor tiles and mastic's age and deteriorating condition many have been cracked, damaged and dislodged creating asbestos in a friable condition. Insulation around the piping in the boiler room has also been damaged and deteriorated, causing the asbestos to take a friable condition. '^, " . t e e Mr. Howard Wines May 3, 2004 Page 2 ASBESTOS CLEANUP ALTERNATIVES There are four basic approaches to the problem: · Removal: The asbestos-containing material is removed from the building by qualified professional and, if applicable, state certified and trained personnel and disposed of by burial in a site specifically approve-d for asbestos. · Encapsulation: The asbestos-containing material is coated with a penetrating or bridging sealant to prevent release of asbestos fibers into the air. · Enclosure: The asbestos-containing material is physically separated from the building environment by means of erecting permanent airtight barriers. . Deferred Action: In conjunction with a well defined Operations and Maintenance Plan, the actual removal, encapsulation or enclosure is postponed to a later date. Each of the four alternatives has advantages as well as disadvantages to the future operations of the Assistance League of Bakersfield. A. Removal 1. Advantages: Eliminates the source of the asbestos. Ends the exposure and precludes the development of future problems. 2. Disadvantages: Costly, complicated, and time consuming method. Replacement of the removed material with a substitute material is usually necessary. Greater potential for exposure of workers to asbestos hazards. 3. When appropriate: When there is a high exposure potential. When the material is deteriorating, highly accessible, or subject to severe water damage. When exposed material surfaces exist. 4. When inappropriate: Removal may not be feasible because of the location of the material and the kind of surface to which the material has been applied, or because of lack of funds. This is the preferred cleanup alternative. The Assistance League will be doing extensive remodeling of the facility to accommodate their numerous programs. Most interior non-bearing walls will be removed or reconfigured which would further damage the floor tiles and mastic. Because their programs cater to children coming to their facility, any level of potential friable asbestos contamination would be unacceptable to the Assistance League organization, with the complete removal of asbestos materials the preferred option. The asbestos cleanup of the building, as to federal and state standards, was originally estimated to be approximately $50,000.00. The project was put out to bid by the Assistance League (see attached RFP). Three bids were received and summarized in the attached memo. Also attached is the low bid for the project by PARC Environmental at $51,050.00, plus $830.00 for a Post Abatement Air Clearance Survey. In conjunction with the above analysis, the contract serves as the (EE/CA). This cleanup approach is the most effective and can be implemented immediately, in keeping with the League's relocation time schedule. ;:} ;: e e Mr. Howard Wines May 3, 2004 Page 3 B. Encapsulation 1. Advantages: Controls fiber release. Rapid and reasonably economical method. 2. Disadvantages: Source of the asbestos exposure remains in the building. If the material is damaged or deteriorating, the additional weight of the sealant may cause layers of the material to break away from the underlying surfaces. A management system is required. Continuing inspection and maintenance for damage or deterioration to the encapsulated surface is required, i.e. future potential for fiber release is possible. Most encapsulants deteriorate over time. Encapsulated material is very difficult to remove if asbestos removal becomes necessary in the future (for instance, when the building is eventually remodeled or demolished). 3. When appropriate: When removal is not feasible. When the material is of low friability. If the material will still retain bonding integrity after encapsulation. When damage to the material is not probable. When accessibility to the material is limited. If the surface in question is complex, making removal difficult. When there are economic or time constraints. When used as a temporary measure until funding for removal is made available. 4. When inappropriate: When removal is feasible. When the material is highly friable. When the material does not adhere well to the substrate. If the material is deteriorating or damaged. When damage to the material is probable. When water damage or the potential for water damage exists. When there is high accessibility. When continuing inspection and maintenance of encapsulated material is not planned. This approach is not feasible when additional remodeling will be taking place and the relocation of their operations must adhere to a short time schedule. Encapsulating the asbestos in the floor tiles when removing and rebuilding of various walls must occur would not leave the asbestos encapsulated. With thousands of children, residents and volunteers accessing the future facility, encapsulating would not guarantee a potential future release is not possible. c. Enclosure 1. Advantages: Controls fiber release. Rapid, economical, and uncomplicated method. 2. Disadvantages: The source of the asbestos remains in the building. Fiber fallout continues behind the enclosure. Costly if enclosure disturbs functions of other systems (e.g., enclosure may require lighting changes, mechanical changes, etc.). A management system for maintenance or renovation is required. Continuing inspection and maintenance of damage to enclosure system is required. Construction of the enclosure will normally result in disturbance of the asbestos - containing material. 3. When appropriate: When removal is not feasible. When disturbance or entry into the enclosed area is not likely. "{".. . , î e e Mr. Howard Wines May 3, 2004 Page 4 4. When inappropriate: If removal is feasible. When damaged or deteriorated material causes a high level of fiber fallout. If water damage to the enclosure is likely. When entry into the enclosure is likely for repairs and maintenance. The floor tiles and mastic are essentially throughout the flooring in the building. It is not feasible to enclose those areas of the building, to do- so would essentially make the building useless for any type of occupancy with the asbestos remaining in the building. D. Deferred Action with an Operations and Maintenance Plan 1. Advantages: Utilizes a specific plan for action. Monitors material condition over time. Controls exposure potentials. Economical. 2. Disadvantages: Source of the asbestos remains in the building. The exposure potential remains. 3. When appropriate: When removal is not feasible. When disturbance of material is likely. When a well-defined plan is followed. When the propensity for fiber release is low. 4. When inappropriate: When removal is feasible. If material is heavily damaged. The option would again leave the asbestos within the building, making it useless for occupancy and not available for the Assistance League's relocation plan. If you have any questions, comments or additions to the analysis or information, please contact the Assistance League through our legal representative, James Parker, Jr. at (661 )322-4004. Attachments Asbestos Testing Results Request for Proposals - Asbestos Removal Memo summarizing Asbestos Removal bids Asbestos Removal Contract - PARC Environmental ìì {~' e e AGREEMENT NO. h R D A 0 4 - 0 0 4 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING REGARDING CLEAN-UP OVERSIGHT OF FUNDED SITES UNDER THE BROWNFIELDS REVOLVING LOAN FUND (RLF) This Memorandum of Understanding is made and entered into on ~~Ai( 3 Q 2004 by and between the Bakersfield Redevelopment Agency, as Lead Agency and Fund Manager, and the Bakersfield Fire Department Prevention Services Division, Office of Environmental Services, as the Certified Unified Program Agency for hazardous materials and hazardous waste management oversight in the City of Bakersfield, as Site Manager. RECITALS WHEREAS, the Bakersfield Redevelopment Agency has been awarded grant funds through the United States Environmental Protection Agency to capitalize a Brownfields Revolving Loan Fund (RLF) so that landowners/developers can borrow funds from the Agency to remediate brownfields sites in Bakersfield's redevelopment areas; and WHEREAS, the Bakersfield Fire Department's Office of Environmental Services (OES) has been certified by the California Secretary for Environmental Protection as the Certified Unified Program Agency for the administration of hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulations in the City of Bakersfield. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. OES shall ensure that a Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study (RI/FS) using a Risk Based Corrective Action approach is conducted for each project; 2. OES shall coordinate a review of each project with any other applicable regulatory agency; 3. OES shall ensure that RLF cleanup meets applicable and appropriate requirements under Federal and State environmental laws, including CERCLA and NCP; - Page 1 of 3 Pages - .;¡ ,'" e e 4. OES shall monitor all contractors performing RLF cleanup work; 5. OES shall maintain site-specific records and draft necessary reports for each site in accordance with 40 CFR Part 35 Subpart 0, and transmitting these to the appropriate regulatory agency and the E~A; 6. OES shall ensure the adequacy of RLF cleanup as it is implemented, including ensuring that Federal and State requirements for worker health and safety are met; 7. OES shall notify the appropriate regulatory agency when there are potential damages to natural resources so that they can ensure that the Natural Resource Trustees are properly notified and coordinated with; 8. OES shall ensure notification of out-of-state transfer of CERCLA wastes as required by 40 CFR 35.6120; 9. OES shall ensure that a site is secure and that it poses no immediate threat to human health or the environment if the borrower is unable or unwilling to complete RLF cleanup; 10. OES shall determine whether the proposed RLF activities are authorized by CERCLA and the NCP based on site evaluation and current site conditions; 11. OES shall conduct a review any site-specific engineering evaluation and cost analysis of any cleanup alternatives, as proposed by the RLF applicant; 12. OES will incur no costs to be charged to the RLF without prior notification and approval of the RLF project manager; 13. OES shall charge its oversight costs for the above referenced items to the RLF project at the current billing rate of $87 per hour, or at the rate in effect at the time under the City of Bakersfield's Master Fee Schedule for oversight costs. OES shall notify the RLF project manager whenever the billing rate changes; and 14. OES shall submit its charges consistent with procedures agreed to by OES and the RLF project manager. - Page 2 of 3 Pages - ¡ ^ . . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Memorandum of Understanding to be effective as of the date first set forth above. BAKERSFIELD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES By ~~~{'b Deputy Executive Director By RALP Director of Preventio APPROVED AS TO FORM: VIRGINIA GENNARO General Counsel By A~~)..,.,~ ~ALA IE~~ Deputy City Attorney COUNTERSIGNED: - Page 3 of 3 Pages -