The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutBUSINESS PLAN 11/12/2004 ~- ," ~~ ..., ..... - Tait Environmental Systems UST Construction· Design· Maintenance· Compliance November 12, 2004 Certified Mail - Return Receipt Requested (' E-Certified 91 7108 2133 3930 8586 133~ City of Bakersfield Fire Department 2101 "H" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 Re: SB98 Test Results 3221 "H" Street, Bakersfield Geo Par: SA-098 CLLC: BKFDCA14 To Whom It May Concern: Enclosed are the S8989 Test results for the above-referenced location. Feel free to call if you have any questions. Very Truly Yours, TAIT ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS ~~ ALAN THROCKMORTON Compliance Manager AT:clb : \tes\pacbell\sb989\letters\bkfdca 14 cc: Andy Taylor Linda Porter (Post At Site) CA Lie #588098 . AZ Lie #095984 . NV Lie #0049666 1863 North Neville Street. Orange, California 92865 . 714.560.8222 . 714.685.0006 Fax 3283 Luyung Drive· Rancho Cordova, California 95742 . 916.858.1090 . 916.858.1011 Fax www.SB989.com ¡ , SWRCB, January 2002 Page_of_ Secondary Containment Testing Report Form This form is intended for use by contractors performing periodic testing of UST secondary containment systems. Use the appropriate pages of this form to report results for all components tested. The completed form, written test procedures, and printouts from tests (if applicable), should be provided to the facility owner/operator for submittal to the local regulatory agency. 1. FACILITY INFORMATION Facility Name: SBC I Date of Testing: 11/9/04 Facility Address: 3221 "H" STREET BAKERSFIELD, CA Facility Contact: I Phone: Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing : 48 HOURS PRIOR - AT LEAST Name of Local Agency Inspector (ifpresent during testing): NONE Company Name: T AIT ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS Technician Conducting Test: ROBERT ALLEN Credentials: ~ CSLB Licensed Contractor SWRCB Licensed Tank Tester License Type: A B ASB C-10 HAZ I License Number: 588098 Manufacturer Trainine Manufacturer Component( s) Date Training Expires SUPPLIED UPON REQUEST 2. TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION 3. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS Component Pass Fail Not Repairs Component Pass Fail Not Repairs Tested Made Tested Made ANNULAR ~ 0 FILL SUMP ~ 0 PIPING SUMP ~ 0 SUPPLY SECONDARY ~ 0 RETURN SECONDARY ~ 0 VENT SECONDARY ~ 0 0 -J If hydrostatic testing was performed, describe what was done with the water after completion of tests: CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING To the best of my knowledge, the facts stated in this document are accurate and in full compliance with legal requirements ~ ~ Date: 11/9/04 Technician's Signature: , ).\ . SWRCB, January 2002 Page_of_ Test Method Developed By: 4. TANK ANNULAR TESTING o Tank Manufacturer t81 Industry Standard Other (Specify) o Pressure t81 Vacuum Professional Engineer Test Method Used: Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: 4" GLYCERIN FILLED DIAL GAUGE Equipment Resolution: nk# 1 Tank # Tank # Tank # Is Tank Exempt From Testing?' DYes o No Yes o No Yes No Yes No Tank Capacity: 6,000 Tank Material: STEEL / GLASS Tank Manufacturer: MODERN Product Stored: DIESEL Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and I HOUR starting test: Test Start Time: 10:00 Initial Reading (R1): -7 Test End Time: 11 :00 Final Reading (RF): -7 Test Duration: 1 HOUR Change in Reading (RF-R¡): 0 Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0 Test Result: t81 Pass o Fail o Pass o Fail o Pass o Fai o Pass o Fail Was sensor removed for testing? t81 Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Was sensor properly replaced and t81 Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA verified functional after testing? Comments - (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) , Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary containment, such as systems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum, are exempt !Tom periodic containment testing. {California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Section 2637(a)(6)} j . ~ SWRCB, January 2002 Page_of_ Test Method Developed By: 5. SECONDARY PIPE TESTING o Piping Manufacturer 12] Industry Standard Other (Specify) 12] Pressure Vacuum Professional Engineer Test Method Used: Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: 4" GLYCERIN FILLED DIAL GAUGE Equipment Resolution: Piping Material: Piping Manufacturer: Piping Diameter: Length of Piping Run: Product Stored: Method and location of i in -run isolation: Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: Test Start Time: Initial Reading (R¡): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): Test Duration: Change in Reading (RF-R¡): Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: Piping Run # SUPPLY PLASTIC WESTERN Piping Run # RETURN PLASTIC WESTERN Piping Run # VENT FIBERGLASS SMITH Piping Run # 314" I" 3" 30' DIESEL 30' DIESEL 25' DIESEL 15 MINUTES 15 MINUTES 15 MINUTES 9:05 9:05 I I: I 5 5 PSI 5 PSI 5 PSI 10:05 10:05 12: 15 5 PSI 5 PSI 5 PSI I HOUR I HOUR I HOUR 0 0 0 0 0 0 12] Pass o Fail 12] Pass o Fail 12] Pass o Fail o Pass o Fail Comments - (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) :¡.- SWRCB, January 2002 Page_of_ 6. PIPING SUMP TESTING Test Method Developed By: Sump Manufacturer ~ Industry Standard o Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum ~ Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: TEMPSONIC TEST UNIT Equipment Resolution: Sump # Sump # Sump # Sump # Sump Diameter: 31" Sump Depth: 49" Sump Material: FIBERGLASS Height from Tank Top to Top of 16" Highest Piping Penetration: Height from Tank Top to Lowest 12" Electrical Penetration: Condition of sump prior to testing: GOOD Portion of Sump Tested' ABOVE PIPING Does turbine shut down when sump sensor detects liquid (both Yes No ~NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA product and water)?- Turbine shutdown response time N/A Is system programmed for fail-safe Yes No ~NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA shutdown?- Was fail-safe verified to be Yes No ~NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA operational?- Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting 15 MINUTES test: Test Start Time: 10:10 / 10:25 Initial Reading (R,): 0 / 0 Test End Time: 10:25 / 10:40 Final Reading (RF): .0005 / .0005 Test Duration: 15 MINUTES Change in Reading (RF-R1): .0005 / .0005 Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: .0020 / .0020 Test Result: ~ Pass o Fail o Pass o Fail o Pass o Fail o Pass o Fail Was sensor removed for testing? ~Yes No NA DYes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Was sensor properly replaced and ~Yes No NA DYes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA verified functional after testing? Comments - (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) , Ifthe entire depth of the sump is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to ªºy of the questions indicated with an asterisk (*) is "NO" or "NA", the entire sump must be tested. (See SWRCB LG-160) :~'." SWRCB, January 2002 Page_of_ 8. FILL RISER CONTAINMENT SUMP TESTING Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sumps Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present, but were Not Tested Test Method Developed By: Sump Manufacturer ¡g¡ Industry Standard D Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum ¡g¡ Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: TEMPSONIC TEST UNIT Equipment Resolution: Fill Sump # Fill Sump # Fill Sump # Fill Sump # Sump Diameter: 31" Sump Depth: 49" Height from Tank Top to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: NA Height from Tank Top to Lowest Electrical Penetration: 12" Condition of sump prior to testing: GOOD Portion of Sump Tested ABOVE COLLAR Sump Material: FIBERGLASS Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and 15 MINUTES starting test: Test Start Time: 9:02 / 9:17 Initial Reading (R,): 0 / 0 Test End Time: 9:17 / 9:32 Final Reading (RF): 0 / 0 Test Duration: 15 MINUTES Change in Reading (RF-R¡): 0 / 0 Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: .0020 / .0020 Test Result: ¡g¡ Pass D Fail D Pass o Fail D Pass o Fail D Pass o Fai.1 Is there a sensor in the sump? t8J Yes No DYes No DYes No DYes No Does the sensor alarm when either product or water is ¡g¡ Yes No NA DYes No NA DYes No NA DYes No NA detected? Was sensor removed for testing? t8:1Yes No NA DYes No NA DYes No NA DYes No NA Was sensor properly replaced and t8:I Yes No NA DYes No NA DYes No NA DYes No NA verified functional after testing? Comments - (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow-up for failed tests)