HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 58-86RESOLUTION NO. 58-86
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION OF THE COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSING PROCEEDINGS
FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD IDENTIFIED AS ANNEXATION NO. 309
(MT. VERNON NO. 3).
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a
change of organization, to wit, the annexation to the City of
Bakersfield of the hereinafter-described territory, pursuant to
Section 56800 of the Government Code of the State of California.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the
City of Bakersfield that it hereby finds and determines as
follows:
1.
annexation
in Exhibit
That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the
to the City of Bakersfield of the territory described
"A", attached hereto and made a part of this resolu-
tion as though fully set forth herein.
2. That a map of the territory proposed to be so
annexed, marked Exhibit "B", is attached hereto and made a part
of this Resolution as though fully set forth herein.
3. That a Plan for providing services within the
affected territory of the proposed annexation, in accordance with
the provisions of Section 56653 of the Government Code, is marked
as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as though
fully set forth herein.
4. That this proposal for change of organization, to
wit, annexation, is made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local
Government Reorganization Act of 1985, and it is requested that
proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith.
5. That the reasons for the proposed change of organi-
zation are that the owners and residents of the affected terri-
tory desire to receive municipal services from the City of
Bakersfield, and the City desires to receive tax revenues for
benefits given and to be given to the territory proposed to be
annexed.
6. That for this proposed annexation and the zoning
upon annexation therefor, the ordinance for which was adopted
this date, an Initial Study was conducted and it was determined
that the proposed projects would not have a significant effect on
the environment, and a Negative Declaration was prepared.
7. That the laws and regulations relating to the prepa-
ration and adoption of Negative Declarations as set forth in the
California Environmental Quality Act and city of Bakersfield
Resolution No. 83-132 have been duly rolowed and the Negative
Declaration for this proposed annexation is hereby approved and
adopted.
8. That the territory proposed for annexation as
described herein has been determined to be uninhabited pursuant
to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985,
Section 56046 of the Government Code.
9. That the names of the officers of the City of
Bakersfield who are to be furnished with copies of the Executive
officer's Report and who are to be given mailed Notice of
Hearing, if any, are:
City Clerk
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
George A. Caravalho
City Manager
city of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Richard J. Oberholzer
City Attorney
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
(Legal Counsel for
Applicant)
10. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten
(10) copies of this resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive
officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern County
at 1430 Truxtun Avenue, Suite 802, Bakersfield, California.
.......... o0o ..........
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was
passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at
regular meeting thereof held on the 4th day of June ,
1986, by the following vote:
CITY CLERK and Ex officio Clerk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED this 4th day of June ,
B~AYOR of the City of Bakersfield
1986
APPROVED as to form:
CITY~TTORNEY of the C' y of Bakersfield
bl
5 R. MT3-AP 3
MT. VERNON NO. 3
ANNE.X~T!ON NOs 309
A parcel of land situated in the Northeast quarter of Section 4, Township 30
South, Range 28 East, M.D.B.&M., County of Kern, State of California, more
particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the East quarter corner of said Section 4 also being a point on the
existing Corporate Boundary of the City of Bakersfield;
Thence (1) Departing said existing Corporate Boundary, West along the South line
of the Northeast quarter of said Section 4 to the center of said Section;
Thence (2) North 01°02'59" East along the West line of said Northeast quarter a
distance of 1,203.53 feet to a point on the South right-of-way line of Washington
Street (Co. Rd.No. 2927);
Thence (3) South 88°52'01" East, along said right-of-way line, a distance of
12.00 feet;
Thence (4) North 03°41'15" East continuing along said right-of-way line a dis-
tance of 706.69 feet to a point on the South right-of-way line of State Freeway
58;
Thence following said South freeway right-of-way line for the next (9) courses;
Thence (5) North 89°18'45TM East 402.39 feet;
Thence (6) North 86°36'03" East 441.52 feet;
Thence (7) North 88°48'31" East 616.52 feet;
Thence (8) North 83°14'20" East 100.50 feet;
Thence (9) North 88°56'56" East 602.85 feet;
Thence (10) South 88°44'33TM East 372.72 feet;
Thence (11) South 20°52'48" East. 56.29 feet;
Thence (12) South 11°40'22" East. 125.12 feet;
Thence (13) South 88°58'35" East. 22.50 feet to a point on the existing
Corporate Boundary of the City of Bakersfield;
Thence (14) Southerly along the last named Corporate Boundary to the Point of
Beginning.
Containing 116.85 Acres (~)
EXHIBIT "A"
PLAN FOR PROVIDING SERVICE MT. VERNON NO. 3
bERVICI~S
J';~l'ks and Recreation
library
P,~licc Ihotcctloa
lite Ih'erection
I.i gh 1: ing
Flood Coetro[
lit!tel' _ Water
Agency Which Presently Check Services WMch Indicate Ilow Services Pro-
Provides Service City Will Provide: vided by City wil} be
Financed (i.e., general tax
Upon Future rate or special assessment.]
Annexation Date
(specify)
County X General Tax Revenue
County X General Tax Revenue/Fees
County N/A General Tax Revenue
County X Genera/ Tax Revenue
County
County X General & Gas Tax Revenue
County Existing N/A
County X General & Gas Tax Revenue
No Service X General & Gas Tax Revenue
County X After
Installation General Tax ReycBue
County X General Tax Revenue
After
N/A(Sentic Tanks) X Installation User Fees/Special Assessment
Calif. Water Service
EXHIBIT "C"
J ,M,'CKC #t~
Flease provide tho following in£ormation, when applicable, only for services ~llich ~ill be provided I)y the
applicant cit7. I,ocatlon Service I,evel Capacil)'~
Indicate location from ~lch service
will I)e provided (i.e. eearest fire
station, librarj_~ etc.)
Police- All police services in the City of Bakersfield are administered
through the City Police Department located at the s/w corner of
Truxtun Avenue and Eye Street about 5 miles north of the annexa-
tion.
[:ire - Station 41 (County) is within 4 miles at Mt. Vernon Avenue and
Virginia Avenue.
Parks dod Recreation - Wayside Park is located 3 miles to the southwest
blartin Luther King Jr. Park is located 2 miles to the northwest.
I.ihrary-N/A
Streets
Construction/Maintenance _The City Corporation Yard on Tru~tun Avenue
west of Freeway 99 will provide necessary
facilites, personnel and services to
Sweeping accomodate Public Works efforts. Mainten-
ance and personnel will be ~ispatcbed from
the City Yard on a regular basis for pre-
ventative maintenance as needed. Repair
I,ighting includes streets, constructed/maintenance,
sweeping and lighting.
Sewer- An existing City trunk sewer in Mt. Vernon Avenue xs available
for connections. Effluent would then be treated by City Waste-
water Treatment Plant #2.
Other- (Water) - This area is served by the California Water Service Co.
Imllcate £requcDcy and ;w~ilabJli. ty of
Service (i.e.,street s~cepinE, response
for emer?~e~lcy services rcc ju'~lrams
24-hour patrol is provided in the immediate
vicinity of this annexation. First priority
response is approximately 7.00 minutes or
less.
Fire protection .is provided on a 24-hour
basis with response time of 5 minutes less.
The annexation will not affect City fire
service capability.
Ail City parks are open to the public at
reasonable hours.
There will be no reduction in the range
capacity of the City to provide the
necessary public works services to this
area. Services will be on a regular basis
and "as needed".
Adequate capacity exists i~ Plant #2 for
proposed area.
Adequate capacity exists.
ii!.
~nat effects, if any, would annexation of this territory have oA existing level'.
of city services (i.e., need for additional emergency ser,~ice personnel or con-~'-
struction of new facilities,'etc.)? The annexation of this territory will not
affect near term level or capability of the City to provide needed services.
IV.
Would city require any upgrading or change in fa¢ili{ies to serve affected terri-
tory (roads, fire hydrants, mains, etc.)? If so, would city o__r residents be
responsible for financing? The City will not require any upgrading or changes
in existing facilities. Should the residents of Mr. Vernon NO. S want area wide
street lights and sewers, the City would assist them in establishinl a public
improvement district to finance installation of these improvements.
' V. Indicate and exp'lain existing zoning in affected territory.
is Zomed M-2 (Light Manufacturin~ Zone) in-the County.
Subject property
VI.
Indicate and explain proposed prezoning in area. (List effects on present land
use that would occur as a result of annexation such as maintenance of livestock
on property, etc.) The City's M-1 (Light Manufacturing) pre-zoning is compatible
and consistant with the existing zoning and with the adopted metropolitan area
general plan. This land is now vacant and undeveloped. This area is within the
Casa Loma Specific Pla~ Project Boundary.
VII.
List city services tha' rca will directly or indirect' benefit from such as
decrease in fire insura..~e rate, shorter emergency response time, use of com-
mur. i~y facilities, etc. City police should be able to respond in a more timely
manner than the present County Sherrif and State Highway Patrol. C]irr~nt City
Police standard is 1.6S sworn officers per 1,000 population co~pared to the
County standard of 1.15. The City will provide street maintenance which inc].de~
street sweeping. Refuse service will be provided by the City and will result in
savings to the owners within this annexation.
VIII.
Please provide the' following information relative to city and county taxes:
List existing tax rate(s) in a~ea. Existing tax rate in area equal 0.924859%
. of assessed market value. 'This reDresents the total property t~w rata
When annexed, appro.ximately 30% of the total tax of the area will accrne to
the City.
~ould effected area be subject to any bonded indebtedness of the City?
if an" explain Yes, the tax rate for'City bonds equals 0.006~68% of assessed
mar[~t va[~e. ~hen annexed, the total tax rate will be 0.931227% of assessed
market value.
How will the difference in tax rates affect a house with a market value of
The effect of the difference in tax r~tes will neE]i£ib]'~
$50,O00 .__