HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 51-86RESOLUTION NO. 51-86
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION OF THE COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSING PROCEEDINGS
FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD IDENTIFIED AS ANNEXATION NO. 310
(CALIFORNIA STATE COLLEGE).
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a
change of organization, to wit, the annexation to the City of
Bakersfield of the hereinafter-described territory, pursuant to
Section 56800 of the Government Code of the State of California.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the
City of Bakersfield that it hereby finds and determines as
follows:
1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the
annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the territory described
in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part of this resolu-
tion as though fully set forth herein.
2. That a map of the territory proposed to be so
annexed, marked Exhibit "B", is attached hereto and made a part
of this Resolution as though fully set forth herein.
3. That a Plan for providing services within the
affected territory of the proposed annexation, in accordance with
the provisions of Section 56653 of the Government Code, is marked
as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as though
fully set forth herein.
4. That this proposal for change of organization, to
wit, annexation, is made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local
Government Reorganization Act of 1985, and it is requested that
proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith.
5. That the reasons for the proposed change of organi-
zation are that the owners and residents of the affected terri-
tory desire to receive municipal services from the City of
Bakersfield, and the City desires to receive tax revenues for
benefits given and to be given to the territory proposed to be
annexed.
6. That for this proposed annexation and the zoning
upon annexation therefor, the ordinance for which was adopted
this date, an Initial Study was conducted and it was determined
that the proposed projects would not have a significant effect on
the environment, and a Negative Declaration was prepared.
7. That the laws and regulations relating to the prepa-
ration and adoption of Negative Declarations as set forth in the
California Environmental Quality Act and City of Bakersfield
Resolution No. 83-132 have been duly folowed and the Negative
Declaration for this proposed annexation is hereby approved and
adopted.
8. That the territory proposed for annexation as
described herein has been determined to be inhabited pursuant
to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985,
Section 56046 of the Government Code.
9. That the names of the officers of the City of
Bakersfield who are to be furnished with copies of the Executive
Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed Notice of
Hearing, if any, are:
City Clerk
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
George A. Caravalho
City Manager
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Richard J. Oberholzer
City Attorney
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
(Legal Counsel for
Applicant)
10. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten
(10) copies of this resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive
Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern County
at 1430 Truxtun Avenue, Suite 802, Bakersfield, California.
.......... o0o ..........
2
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was
passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a
regular meeting thereof held on the 21st day of May ,
1986, by the following vote:
CITY CLERK and Ex officio Clerk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED this 21st day of May , 1986
MAYOR of the City (~f Bakersfield
APPROVED as to form:
~ITY AT~0RNEY of the City of Bakersfield
bl
5 R.CSC-AP 3
CALIFORNIA STATE COLLEGE
ANNEXATION NO. 310
A parcel of land situated in the County of Kern, State of California, being a
portion of Section 32, Township 29 South, Range 27 East, and Section 5, Township
30 South, Range 27 East, M.D.M., more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the intersection of the North line of the South 80.00 feet of the
Southeast quarter of said Section 32, also being the North right of way line of
Stockdale Highway, with the East right of way line of the Arvin-Edison Water
Storage District Canal, as said canal right of way is defined in Parcel 1C-1 of
that certain order of condemnation recorded in Book 3840, at Page 291 in the
Office of the Kern County Recorder. Said point of intersection being a point on
the existing Corporate Boundary of the City of Bakersfield, and the point of
beginning for this description;
Thence (1) Southerly, Westerly, Northerly and Easterly along the last named
Corporate Boundary to the point of beginning.
Containing 402.63 Acres (+)
EXHIBIT "A"
KERH
6
(i)
T .30 $ IR 27 E
I
CALIFORN IA STATE
COLLEGE BAKERSFIELD
F.O.B.
(1:
(I)
Ij ...... 1 I,
ANNEXATION OF
CALIFORNIA STATE COLLEGE
EXHIBIT
Ualltornla btate COllege
PEAN FOR PROVIDING SF.R¥ICE'
5F. IlVI CES
I'huming
Parks iHld Recreation
I.ibrary
Police Protection
Fire Protection
5 tree t s (*St ockdale
}lighway)
S~eel)imq~ *
I,i llh t lng *
I:lood Centre[
Sea, era ge
Other fWater)
[Refu~e)
Agency Which Presently Check Services Which Indicate IIow Services Pro-
Provides Service City Will Provide: vided b¥ City will be
Financed (i.e., general tax
Upon Future rate or special assessment.
~mexation Date
(specify)
STATE N/A General Tax Revenue
COU~FY X General Tax Revenue
COUNTY N/A General Tax Revenue
STATE N/A General Tax Revenue
CITY X
COUNTY X General & Gas:Tax Revenue
COUNTY Existing N/A
COUNTY X General & Gas Tax Revenue
NO SERVICE X General & Gas Tax Revenue
COUNTY X After General Tax Revenue
Installation
STATE N/A General Tax Revenue
CITY X User Fees/Special Assessment
CITY (ASHE WATER DIV.) X User Fees
(see note)
PRIVATE CONTRACTED SERVICE X User Fees
NOTE: City will contract with same
provider for refuse service.
LAFCKC #4 EXHIBIT "C"
~Fleasc provide the following [n£ormation, ~hcn appljcal~ie,
applicant city. I,ocat Ion
Indicate location [rom ~dch service
wil! be provided (i.e. nearest [ire
statJon~ iibraryj etc.)
Pollce- Police protection' is provided by the State of California.. No
Change in ibis service is foreseeable
only for services which will be provided hy the
Service l,evel (:ap~ciiy~
hnlicale [reqnepcy ami ;wailnb~lit)' of
service ([.e.~street sweeping, response tim
for emerp~enc/ services ~ rec_~.~CoDli3~L~_,_e I c.
Fire - Station 11 (City) is within 1 mile at Stockdale [twy and E1 Rio
Drive
Station 9 (City) is within 1!1/2 mile at Gosford Road and
Westwold Drive.
Parks and Recreation - Kroll Park is located I miles to the west.
I.ibrary - N/A
Streets- (*STOCKDALE HWY)
The City Corporation Yard on Truxtun Avenue
west of Freeway 99 will provide necessary
facilities, personnel and services to
accomodate Public Works efforts. Mainten-
ance and persognel will be dispatched from
the City Yard on a regular basis for prevent
alive maintenance as needed. Repair includei
streets, constructed/maintenance, sweeping
and lighting.
Cons truction/Hah~tenance *-
Sweeping*
I,tghting*
Sewer _ This area is served by tile city sewer system. Effluant is treated
by the City Wastewater Treatment Plant #3.
Other _ (Water) - This area is served by the City of Bakersfield (Ashe
Water Division).
N/A
Fire protection is provided on a 24-hour
basis with response time of 3 minutes less.
The annexation will not affect City Fire
service capability.
All City parks are open to the public at
reasonable hours.
N/A
There will be no reduction in the range
capacity of the City to provide the
necessary public works services to
this area. Services will be on a regular
basis and "as needed".
~ith tile present expansion of Plant #3,
adequate capacity exists.
Adequate capacity exists.
ii!.
W~at effects, if an>', would annexation of this territory have cn existing level'
of city service~ [i.e., need for additional emergency sea(ice personnel or con
s~ruction of new facilities, etc.)? The annexation of this territory will
not affect near term level or capacity of the City to provide needed services.
IV.
Would city require any upgrading or change in facilities to serve affected terri-
tory [roads, fire hydrants, mains, etc.)? If so, would city or residents be
resoonsible for ~lnanclng. The City will not require any upgradin~ or chan~es in
e~isting facilities.
V. Indicate and e~xp'%aiRexisting zoning in affected territory. A-1 (Light Agri-
cultural Zonej ~n tRe County.
VI.
Indicate and explain proposed prozoning in area. (List effects on present land
use that would occur as a result of annexation such as maintenance of livestock
on property, etc.) The Cities proposed prezonin~ consists of R-I f0ne Family
Dwelling) over a majority of the area and R-$ (Limited Multiple-~ami]y Dwelling)
over the remainder. ~]]is pro-zoning is compatible and consistant with th~
adopted metropolitan area general plan.
VII.
Lis~ city services that area will directly or indirectly benella from such as
decrease in fire insurance rate, shorter emergency response time, u~e of com-
m.unizy facilities, etc. Refuse service will be provided by the City and will
result in savings to this area. The cost of domestic water will be substantially
reduced oncg this area is annexed. Fire insurance rates are hess expensive in
the c~ty Oeecuse ot a Oetter txre rate classification.
VIII. Please provide the following information relative to city and county taxes:
List existing ~x rate(s) in area. N/A (Tax Exempt Status]
~ould. effected area be subject to any bonded indebtedness of the city?
If so, explain. N/A
How will the difference in tax rates affect a house with a market value of
~ 50,000 N/A