HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 171-85RESOLUTION NO. 17~-85
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BAKERSFIELO MAKING FINDINGS THAT FOUR WRITTEN
PROTEST HAVE BEEN FILED AND ORDERING THE
TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS PROCEEDING NO. 880,
ANNEXATION NO. 302 (HUGHES NO. 2), ANNEXED
TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD.
WHEREAS, Resolution of Application No. 79-85, dated
June 12, 1985, was submitted to the Local Agency Formation
Commission of Kern County ("Commission") for the annexation of
territory to the city of Bakersfield designated as Proceeding
No. 880, Annexation No. 302 (HUGHES NO. 2); and
WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing upon
posal was held before the Commission on the 24th day
1985, and continued to the 8th day of October, 1985;
WHEREAS, following said public hearing, the Commission,
on October 8, 1985, adopted
being Resolution No. 85-41,
Commission; and
said pro-
of September,
and
its Resolution Making Determination,
recorded in Minute Book 32 of said
WHEREAS, on October 16, 1985, the Council of the City
of Bakersfield adopted its Resolution No. 155-85 initiating pro-
ceedings for annexation of the said territory to the City of
Bakersfield and setting Wednesday, the 20th day of November,
1985, at the hour of 7 p.m. (or as soon thereafter as the matter
could be heard) in the Council Chambers of the city Hall,
1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California, as the time, date
and place of hearing on the proposed annexation and the owners of
land within the said territory were duly informed of their right
to file written protests against the annexation with the City
Clerk at any time prior to the conclusion of the hearing on the
proposed annexation; and
WHEREAS, the public hearing was duly and regularly con-
ducted by and before the city Council at its meeting of
November 20, 1985, in all respects in accordance with Resolution
No. 155-85.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED by the
Council of the City of Bakersfield as follows:
1. In accordance with Section 35229 of the Government
Code, it is hereby found regarding the value of written protests
filed and not withdrawn by owners of land and improvements at
the conclusion of the public hearing, as follows:
Four written protests against the said annexation were
filed with the Clerk of the city of Bakersfield prior to the con-
clusion of the public hearing on the proposed annexation, but did
not constitute sufficient protests to require an election or to
terminate proceedings.
2. The description of the exterior boundaries of the
territory annexed is contained in Exhibit "A", attached hereto
and incorporated in this Resolution as though fully set forth
herein.
3. That the said territory designated as Proceeding
No. 880, Annexation No. 302 (HUGHES NO. 2), and described
herein, and every part thereof, is hereby ordered annexed to the
city of Bakersfield.
4. That the Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified
copy of this resolution ordering a change of organization, along
with any required remittance to cover the fees required by
Section 54902.5 of the Government Code, to the executive officer
of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern County.
5. That the executive officer of the Commission is
hereby requested to prepare and execute a certificate of comple-
tion and make the filings required by Chapter 4 of the Municipal
Organization Act of 1977 and record a certified copy of the cer-
tification of completion with the recorder of Kern County, with
the surveyor of Kern County and with the Clerk of the city of
Bakersfield.
.......... o0o ..........
2
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was
passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a
regular meeting thereof held on the ~Oth day of November'
1985, by the following vote:
CITY CLERK an~ Ex officio Clerk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED this 20th day of November , 1985
--MAYOR of the City 6f Bakersfield
APPROVED as to form:
Q ~~ ' sfleld
CITY ATTORN~o~ the City of BaKer, '
bl
R.HU2-OD 3
ANNI!XA'I'I()N NO. 302
IIIl(;111iS NO. 2
A parcel ol- land situated in the Cmmty oE Kern, State of California,
I)eJn[,~ a imrtion o£ Section 2,1, 'l'om~shil) 30 South, Rallge 27 East,
H.I).11. t; H., more particularly described as foilmrs:
Ilegimiing at the intersection of the south line of tile north ,15 feet
of said Section 24 with the west .line o1: the east 45 feet of tile
nortiniest quarter of said Section 2,1, said intersection being a
point m~ the existing Corporate IIomidary of the City of Bakersfield,
anti the Point of Beginning for this description;
Thence (1) southerly, westerly, m~rtherly and easterl'y along the
last named existing Corporate Ilmmdary to the Point of Beginning.
CONTAININt; ,18.6 ACRES +
I!XII I II IT