HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 147-85RESOLUTION NO. 147-85
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD REFERRING SEGMENT II OF PROPOSED
AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE
BAKERSFIELD METROPOLITAN AREA GENERAL PLAN
(LAND USE AMENDMENT 3-85) AND THE RELATED
ZONING APPEAL BACK TO PLANNING COMMISSION.
WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Bakersfield referred
Segment II of a proposed amendment to the Lane Use Element of the
Bakersfield Metropolitan Area General Plan to the Planning
Commission; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of
Bakersfield, in accordance with the provisions of Section 65351
of the Government Code, held a public hearing on September 19,
1985, on Segment II of a proposed amendment to the Land Use
Element of the General Plan, notice of the time and place of
hearing having been given at least ten (10) calendar days before
said hearing by publication in the Bakersfield Californian, a
local newspaper of general circulation; and
WHEREAS, such Segment II of the proposed amendment to the
Land Use Element of the Bakersfield Metropolitan Area General
Plan is as follows:
Segment II:
LEROY JACKSON has applied to amend the General
Plan Land Use Element designation from Office
to Commercial on 6.84 + acres located at the
southeast corner of 24~h and Oak Streets.
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 121-85 on September 19, 1985,
the Planning Commission recommended denial of Segment II by this
Council and this Council has fully considered the findings made
by the Planning Commission as set forth in that Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Council of the city of Bakersfield, in
accordance with the provisions of Section 65355 of the Government
Code, conducted and held a public hearing on October 16, 1985, on
the above-described Segment II of the proposed amendment to the
Land Use Element of the Bakersfield Metropolitan Area General
Plan, notice of time and place of the hearing having been given
an least ten (10) calendar days before the hearing by publication
in the Bakersfield Californian, a local newspaper of general cir-
culation.
WHEREAS, upon conclusion of the hearing, the Council
determined that it could not approve the project without further
analysis of the environmental impact of the project, and that,
unless such analysis is to be based upon a "worst case scenario"
likely necessitating an environmental impact report, a specific
plan for the project site is necessary.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED and found by the Council
of the City of Bakersfield as follows:
1. The above recitals and findings, incorporated
herein, are true and correct.
2. The report of the Planning Commission, including
maps and all reports and papers relevant thereto, transmitted by
the Secretary of the Planning Commission to the City Council, is
hereby received, accepted and approved.
3. The City Council hereby refers Segment II of the
proposed amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan
and the related zoning appeal to the Planning Commission for a
recommendation upon a specific plan to be submitted by the appli-
cant and additional environmental review based upon such specific
plan.
.......... o0o ..........
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was
passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at
regular meeting thereof held on the 16th day of October ,
1985, by the following vote:
CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Cler~ or
Council of the City of Bakersfield
the
APPROVED this 16tn day of October ,
MAYOR of the City ~ Bakersfield
1985
APPROVED as to form:
CITY ATTORNEY of the/~Tty of Bakersfield
AJS/bl 3
R.SEGII-1