The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRES NO 104-85RESOLUTION NO. 104-85 A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSING PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD IDENTIFIED AS ANNEXATION NO. 304 (PACHECO NO. 10). WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a change of organization, to wit, the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the hereinafter-described territory, pursuant to Section 35140 of the Government Code of the State of California. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield that it hereby finds and determines as follows: 1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made tion as though fully set forth herein. 2. That a map of the territory proposed to be so annexed, marked Exhibit "B", of this Resolution as though 3. That a Plan for the territory described a part of this resolu- is attached hereto and made a fully set forth herein. providing services within the part affected territory of the proposed annexation, in accordance with the provisions of Section 35102 of the Government Code, is marked as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as though fully set forth herein. 4. That this proposal for change of organization, to wit, annexation, is made pursuant to the Municipal Organization Act of 1977 (Part 2 of Division 2 of Title 4 of the Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 35000 thereof), and it is requested that proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith. 5. That the reasons for the proposed change of organi- zation are that the owners and residents of the affected terri- tory desire to receive municipal services from the City of Bakersfield, and the City desires to receive tax revenues for benefits given and to be given to the territory proposed to be annexed. 6. That for this proposed annexation and the zoning upon annexation therefor, the ordinance for which was adopted this date, an Initial Study was conducted and it was determined that the proposed projects would not have a significant effect on the environment, and a Negative Declaration was prepared. 7. That the laws and regulations relating to the prepa- ration and adoption of Negative Declarations as set forth in the California Environmental Quality Act and City of Bakersfield Resolution No. 83-132 have been duly followed and the Negative Declaration for this proposed annexation is hereby approved and adopted. 8. That the names of the officers of the City of Bakersfield who are to be furnished with copies of the Executive officer's Report and who are to be given mailed Notice of Hearing, if any, are: city Clerk City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 George A. Caravalho city Manager City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 Richard J. Oberholzer City Attorney City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 (Legal Counsel for Applicant) 9. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten (10) copies of this resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern County at 1110 Twenty-Sixth Street, Bakersfield, California. .......... o0o .......... I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on the 10th day of July , 1985, by the following vote: Council of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED this 10th day of July , MAYOR of the City of f~eld Bak~ 1985 APPROVED as to form: CITY ATT~EY of the,~ity of Bakersfield bl R.PA10-AP ANNL:XATION NO. ,504 PACIIIiCO NO. 10 A parcel of land situated in the Comity of Kern, State of C;llifoYnia, being a portion of the northeast quarter of Section 24, To~vnship South, Range 27 East, M.I).B. ~i M., more particularly described fol lo~qs: Beginning at the intersection of the, south line of the north dS feet with tim west line hi' ~he e~st 186.06 feet of said northe;~s~ quarter, said intersection being a point on the south right of' line of I'acheco Road, a point on lhe existing Corporate Boundary of the City of Bakersfield, aad the Point of Beginning for this description; Thence (l) Southerly, westerly, northerly and easterly along the last named Corporate BoundaYy to the Point of Beginning. CONTAININ(; 32.67 ACRES liXlll BVI' ~~ 24 .~C FAITH AVENUE FAIRVIEW ROAD .SEC. t9 .30-26 KERN ISLANO CANAL POPULATION: 461 ~ICXI CT, HOUSING UNITS ~ J40 ANNEXATION OF PACHECO NO.;O ~oG---% 2o0 ~oo r~o EXHIBIT 'B' PLAN FOR PROVIDING SERVICE SEI[VI CE$ Parks and Recreation ' 'brary I'eli ce ProtectSon Fire Protection "~ ood Control S~wera ge Other _ Water _Agency Which Presently, Check Services Which County Count)' County County City County County Count), No Serv County County N/A (Se] Califor i'rovides Service City Will Provide' vided by City will be ]:inanced (i.e., general tax Upon Future l"ate or special assessme,t.] ~mexation Date (specify) _ X General Tax Revenue X General Tax Revenue/Fees ........ n/a General Tax Revenue X General Tax Revenue X General Tax Revenue X General 8 Gas Tax Pevom,o Existing N/A X I General & Gas Tax Revenue ice X After Insta]lat2on General & Gas Tax Revenue General Tax Revenue X otic Tanks) X After ' Installation User Fe~s/Sp~eSal A~o~monv ~ia ~ater Serv_ige EXHIBIT "C" i. AFCKC #4 -[. 'l']ease provide the following information, when npll]Jcable, only for services which will be provided hy the applicant city. t,ocntton Service l,eveI (]apacJ Po I i ce Indicate locatlon from ~ich service will Ire provided (i.e. nenrest fire stn:tlon, librarya etc.) - Al/ police services in the City of Bakersfield are administered throtgh the Cfr>' Police Department located at the s/w corner of Truxtun Avenue ~ Eye Street about ~.S miles north of the annexation. Station No. $ is within 1-1/2 miles at 700 W. Planz Parks and Recreation l,~hrary N/A ~treets - Planz Park is located 1 mile to the north. Construction/Maintenance _ The City Corporation Yard on Truxtun Ave. west of Freeway 99 will provide necessary facilities, personnel and services to accomodate Public Works ~fforts. Maintenance Sweeping and personnel will be dispatched from the City Yard on a regular basis for preventative maintenance ag~needed. Repair includes streets, 'construction/maintenance, sweeping and Lighting lighting. Other Sewer COnnection will be available at the north/west corner of So. "H" Street and Pacheco Road. Eff]uant would then be treated by the City Wastewater Treatment PlaBt #2. (Water) - this area is served by the California Water Service Company. Indicate freqne!~cy and avnllnbilitv of Service (1 .e. ,street s~cepin~,, responqe ti,~ for emelKe,cY services, re_c_._.jB;o~'!U!inr,.,_etc. 24-hour patrol is provided in the immediate vicinity of this annexation. First priori~, response is approximately 6.35 minuets or less. Plre protection ~s provided on a J~-hour basis with response time of 3 minutes or less. The annexation will not affect City fire service capabilities. All City parks are open to the public at reasonable hours. Phere will be no reduction in the range capacity of the City to provide the neces- sary Public Works services to this area. Services will be on a regular basis and "as needed". Adequate capacity exists. Adequate capacity exists. Ill . What effects, if ,~n>', would :'r~nexation of this territory ?lax',, en existing ]eye! of city services (i.e., need for ndditzonal emergency se~wi~c pcrsonnri or cen-~ struction ef new facilities, etc.)? The annexation of this territory w~l] not affect near term level or c~q~ab~lity of the City to provide needed services. IV. Would city require any upgrading or change in faciliiies to serve affected terri- tory (roads, fire hydrants, mains, etc.)? If so, would city o__r residents be responsible for financing? /[JL¢ City will not require any up~radiu~ or cban~es in existin~ facilities. Should the residents of Pacheco No. 10 want area wide street lights and-sewers, the City would assist them in est~bl. isbing a public improvement district to finance installation of these inlprovements. Vo Indicate and explain existing zoning in affected territory. See attached zoning 123-24. The existing zone is R-1 tone Family Dwelling Zone). VI. Indicate and explain proposed prezoning in area. (List effects on vresent land use that would occur as a restilt of annexation such as maintenance gf livestock on property, etc.) Pacbeco No. lO is fully developed into 148 R-I lots. The Cit¥'s R-1 and R1-Ctt are compatible and consistent with the existing zonine and within adopted Metropolitan Area General Plan. There wonld be no effect on the present land use. VII. List city services that arca will directly or indirectly benefit from such as decrease in fire insurance rate, shorter emergency response t.~me, use of com- munity facilities, etc. City police should be able to respond in a more time]>' manner than the present County Sherrif and State Highway Patrol. Current Citw Pol,ce stan.dard is 1.65 sworn officers per 1,000 population compared to the County standard oi 1.15. The City will provide a street maintenm~ce which includes street sweeping. Reiuse service will be provided by the City and will result in savings to the homeowners within this annexation. VIII. Please provide the following information relative to city and county taxes: List existing tax rate(s) in area. Exi~tin~ tax rate in area e(lual~ 1 ~4xo9 percent of assessed market value. This represents the total nroperty t.x mr. When annexed, approximately 30% o1: the total tax of the area will accrue to the City. .Would effected area be subject to any ~ogde~d i~ebte~ness of the If so, explain. Yes, the tax rate for City bonds,equals 0.007320 of market value. When annexed, the total tax rate will ha 1 16171~ mF n~cesqed market value. How will the difference in tax rates affect a house with a market value of ~50,OOO The effect of the difference in tax rates will be nefligibl~ OF ZONING MAP 125-24 KERN COUNTY CALIFORNIA LEGENd.., , LA#E KERN COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FORM 30 A BEFORE THE I/DCAL AG~4CY FORMATION COMMISSION COUNTY OF KERN STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Proceeding No. City of Bakersfield Annexation: No. 304 (Pacheco No. 10) ENVIROk%~I~TAL ASSESSM~V9 PART "A": X X X X X X X TO BE FILLRD OUT BY APPLICANT Answer following questions by placing check: (Please put "N.A." if answer does not apply.) Will this project involve a different land use from those now in the area (i.e., cor~nercial in a residential area, residen- tial in a rural area)? (See Notes Page 6) 2. Is the project site in or near, or does it contain, an ir~por- tant recreational, scenic, or aesthetic resource? 3. Could the project affect the functioning of an established coalnunity? (See Notes Page 6) 4. Will implementation of the project require relocation of com- munity residents? Are any of the natural or man-made features in the project area unique, that is, not found in other parts of the County, State or Nation? (See Notes Page 6) 6. Will this project involve the use, extraction, or conserva- tion of a scarce mineral resource? (See Notes Page 6) Will this project result in the erection of structures, streets, etc., over a scarce mineral resource? (See Notes Page 6) LAFCKC #30 (1/78) -1- X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. Is the project area in or near nesting grounds, food sources, water sources, etc., used by rare or endangered species of birds, wildlife, or fish? Does the project site contain rare or endangered plant species? Is the proposed project within an agricultural preserve and/or under an Agricultural Contract with the County of Kern? If the project proposed within the boundaries of a Specific Plan? Is the project located in or near any public lands (i.e., Forest Service, Federal, State, or local parks, etc. )? Either during or after construction, could the project result in significant erosion of land? Is the project located in an urbanized or an undeveloped area? X urbanized undeveloped If in an urbanized area, will the project intensify use of the area by changing existing densities and uses (i.e., from single-family residences to multi-family, or coaluercial to industrial)? Is the project in conflict with the densities and land uses recommended in the Kern County General Plan or other adopted plans? Will the project involve application, use, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, either during or after construction? (See Notes Page 6) Will the project result in generation of significant amounts of noise, either during or after constructions? Will the project generate significant amounts of dust, either during or after construction? Will the project involve burning of brush, trees, construction materials, etc., either during or after construction? Is any part of the project area subject to inundati6n or located in or near a floodplain? Are any of the slopes to be graded 10% or greater? LAFC~C #30 A (1/78) -2- X 23. Is any part of the project located in the area of a known earthquake fault? X 24. Will this project require grading? If yes, explain. X 25. Is the project located near a major transportation source (i.e., freeway, highway, airport, railroad)? If you have answered yes to one or more of these questions, but you still think the project will have no significant environm~=ntal effects, indicate your reasons below. (Attach additional sheets if necessary). Briefly describe the proposed project. (Attach additional sheets if necessary). The proposal is to annex a 35 acre county island located near the south- west corner of South "H" Street and Pacheco Road to the City of Bakersfield. The island is entirely developed into a 141 R-1 dwelling neighborhood. There is one church in the annexation. LAFCKC #30 A (1/78) -3- PART "B": TO BE FILLRD OUT BY APPLICANT What specific off-site improvements, not now existing, will be required to provide services or access to the project? None. The area is already "built out." Percentage of ground area within project that will he cov- ered by buildings, streets, and driveways. N/A. The pro- perty is already developed. If project is residential, how many people will it ulti- mately house (using average family size as determined by most recent County Planning Departn~nt Population Estimate for your sub-region and a 6% vacancy factor)? The 1980 census indicates that 461 people live there. How many K-12 children? N/A. Area has been "built out" for many years. Distance to nearest elementary sc]tgol 3/4 mi. to Plantation Junior High 1/3 mi. to Greenfielcl'h~gh School 1~ mi. to South High School Existing Park 1 mi. to Planz Park Shopping Facility ½ mi. to s.e. corner of South "H" and White NAME, ADDRESS, AND T,:i.~DHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: City of Bakersfield, Planning Department 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, Ca. 93301 (805) 326-3733 zip code (area code) NAME, ADDRESS, AND TELEPHONE NL~MBER OF APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE, IF ANY: Date: May 22, 1985 Dewey Sceales, Planning Director 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, Ca. 93301 (805) 326-3733 zip cede (area cede) ~/~,z~ ~~_ ~ (Signature ~ Applicant or AgenL~ Planning Director (Title) LAFCKC #30 A (1/78) -4- PART "C": TO BE FITI,RD OUT BY LAFCO STAFF 1. The project is consistent with the Elements of the General Plan of the County of Kern: A. Housing B. Circulation C. Land Use D. Open Space E. Conservation F. Safety G. Seismic Safety H. Noise I. Scenic Highways Yes No (Initials) Date: Reviewed by: Local Agency Formation OaL~ssion County of Kern LAFCKC #30 A (1/78) -5- Will this project involve a different land use fr~m those now in the area? --The project area includes the ir~aediate location of the project as well as more remote areas that may be directly or indirectly affected by consultation and/or operation of the project. 3. Could the project affect the functioning of an established cc~m~nity?. 17. Examples include, but are not limited to: --Changes in traffic patterns --Effects on access within the cowanunity to cc~aercial establishments, schools, parks, etc. --Introduction of activities not presently found within the co~a~unity Are any of the natural or man made features in the project area uni- que, that is, not found in other parts of the County, State, or Nation? --Unique features include those areas, structures, biological pheno- mena, etc., that exhibit distinguishing characteristics not found in other areas, or only in a small number of other areas. Such feature can he either good or bad for human health, safety, comfort, or convenience. Will this project involve the use, extraction, or conservation of a scarce mineral resource? --Uses which effectively preclude the multiple use of regional natural resources in scarce supply --Activities which tend to diminish the supply or availability of regional natural resources that are in scare supply Will this project result in the erection of structures, streets, etc., over a scare mineral resource? --Developments which effectively preclude the extraction of the region' rock, sand, gravel, or other mineral resources Will the project involve application, use, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, either during or after construction? --Examples include, but are not limited to, toxic substances and radi- oactive wastes. LAFCKC #30 A (1/78) -6-