HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 1-98RESOLUTION NO.
1-98
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION PROPOSING
PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD IDENTIFIED AS ANNEXATION NO.
398.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Bakersfield, in accordance
with the provisions of Section 65353 of the Government Code, held a public hearing on
MONDAY, APRIL 1, 1991, and THURSDAY, APRIL 4, 1991, on the prezoning for the proposed
annexation of certain properties to the City of Bakersfield notice of the time and place of
hearing having been given at least twenty-one calendar days before said hearing by publication
in the Bakersfield Californian, a local newspaper of general circulation; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 18-91 on April 4, 1991, the Planning Commission
recommended approval of the prezoning for the annexation by this Council and this Council has
fully considered the findings made by the Planning Commission as set forth in that Resolution;
and
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a change of organization,
to wit, the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the hereinafter-described territory, pursuant to
Section 56800 of the Government Code of the State of California.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield
that it hereby finds and determines as follows:
1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the annexation to the City of
Bakersfield of the territory described in Exhibit "A" and shown on map marked Exhibit "B",
attached hereto and made a part of this resolution as though fully set forth herein.
2. That a plan for providing services within the affected territory of the proposed
annexation, in accordance with the provisions of Section 56653 of the Government Code, is
marked as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as though fully set forth herein.
3. That this proposal for change of organization, to wit, annexation, is made
pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, and it is
requested that proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith.
4. That the reasons for the proposed change of organization are that the owners
and residents of the affected territory desire to receive municipal services from the City of
Bakersfield, and the City desires to receive tax revenues for benefits given and to be given to
the territory proposed to be annexed.
5. That for this proposed annexation and the prezoning therefor, Ordinance No.
3380, which was adopted MAY 8, 1991, an Initial Study was conducted and it was determined
that the proposed project would not have a significant effect on the environment. A Negative
Declaration was prepared and posted on March 14, 1991.
6. That the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and adoption of
Negative Declarations as set forth in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and City
of Bakersfield CEQA Implementation Procedures, have been duly followed and the Negative
Declaration for this proposed annexation is hereby approved and adopted. <~ ~,K~.~
ORfGINA~
7. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein has been
determined to be inhabited pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act
of 1985, Section 56046 of the Government Code.
8. That the names of the officers of the City of Bakersfield who are to be
furnished with copies of the Executive Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed Notice of
Hearing, if any, are:
City Clerk
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Alan Tandy
City Manager
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Judy Skousen
City Attorney
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
9. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten (10) copies of this Resolution,
with Exhibits, with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern
County at 2700 "M" Street, Suite 290, Bakersfield, California 93301.
......... 000 ........
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by
the Council .of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on
~JAN 1 ~, 1~ , by the following vote:
AYES. COUN ~,~,., ~.~
.... ,,. C.~ .SON, ,~MITH, McDERMOTT, ROWLES, SULLIVAN, SALVAGGIO
NOES: COUNC
~: ~UNCI~BER ~/~
C TY~~C LERK~nd~Ex~OffJcJ~Clerk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
2
OR GINAL
APPROVED ~AN ! ~, 1998
APPROVED as to form:
JUDY SKOUSEN
CITY ATTORNEY
MO:pjt
December 10, 1997
res\r398-roa
3
EXHIBIT "A"
PANAMA NO. 12
ANNEXATION NO. 398
A parcel of land being a portion of the southwest 1/4 of Section of the 24 and the north ~A of Section
25 of Township 30 South, Range 27 East. M.D.M., County of Kern, State of California, more
particulary described as follows:
Commencing at the common south 1/4 comer of said Section 24 and north 1/4 comer of said Section
of 25 as monumented by "California Division of Highways Brass Cap Set in Concrete Flush" located
within the right of way for Bakersfield Bypass (State Route VI KER 99), said 1/4 comer being
designated as 655,152.739 feet North, 1,692,891.593 feet East per the California Coordinate System,
Zone 5;
Thence North 89° 19' 12" West, along the section line common between said Sections 24 and 25, a
distance of 860.70 feet to a point on the west right of way line of said Bakersfield Bypass, also being
a point on the existing corporate boundary of the City of Bakersfield;
Thence departing from said corporate boundary, North 89° 19' 12" West, along said section line,
30.00 feet to the point of intersection with center line of Dennen Street (County Road No. 2394);
Thence North 00° 40' 48" East, along said center line, 325.00 feet to a point on the South boundary
line of Tract No. 3497 per map filed in Book 23 of Maps, Page 138 in the office of the Kern County
Recorder;
Thence North 89° 19' 12" West, along said boundary line to an angle point thereon, also being a point
on the existing corporate boundary of the City of Bakersfield, also being the TRUE PO1NT OF
BEGINNING;
Thence (1) departing said corporate boundary, South 89° 19' 12" East, along said tract boundary line,
114.01 feet to the Southwest comer of Lot 2 of said Tract 3497;
Thence (2) North 19° 56' 34" East, along the East line of said lot and prolongation thereof, 148.32
feet to a point on the center line of Springdale Drive;
Thence (3) North 24° 05'09"East, 30.09 feet to the southerly-most comerofL0t 73 of said tract;
Thence (4) North 49° 30' 00" East, 224.00 feet to the easterly-most comer of Lot 70 of said tract;
Thence (5) North 45° 55' 30", 69.00 feet to the easterly-most comer of Lot 69 of said tract;
Thence (6) North 34° 57' 23" East, 71.22 feet to the easterly-most comer of Lot 68 of said tract;
Thence (7) North 23°
36' 13" East, 71.22 feet to the Southeast comer of Lot 66 of said tract;
O~tGJ~AL
Thence (8) North i2° i5' 03" East, 7i.22 t~et to the Southeast comer of Lot 65 of said tract;
Thence (9) North 00° 42' 51" East, 6000 feet to the Northwest corner of Lot 58 of said tract;
Thence (10) North 87° 00' 00" East, along the North line of said lot and prolongation thereof,
131.31 feet to a pont on the center line of Denhen Street being a non-tangent, 490.00 foot radius
curve, concave northwesterly and having a radial hearing of North 87° 00' 00" East to said point on
curve;
Thence (11) Southerly along said center line curve through a central angle of 01° 51' 35" an arc
distance of 15.90 feet to intersect the prolongation of the North line of Lot 36 of said Tract 3497;
Thence (12) North 88° 51' 35" East, along said prolongation line and North line of said Lot 36, a
distance of 134.84 feet to a point on the easterly bounary line of said Tract 3497, said point also being
on the existing corporate boundary of the City of Bakersfield;
Thence (13) southerly, westerly, northerly, easterly and northerly along said existing corporate
boundary to THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING..
Containing 78 Acres (more or less)
~?-,.-.', , ,
VICINITY MAP
ANNEXATION OF
PANAMA NO. 12 _
....... ~ ,,~.~,~'ro~ m,.,~,.~ ~ l N AL
EXHIBIT "B"
SERVICES
Planrang
Parks and Recreation
Libraw
Police Protection
Fire Protection
Street
Construction
Maintenance
Sweeping
Lighting
Flood Control
Sewerage
Water
Other (REFUSE)
EXHIBIT "C"
PLAN FOR PROVIDING SERVICES
Agency Which Presently
Provides Service
Check Services Which City/
District Will Provide
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
SHERIFF & HIGHWAY
PATROL
CITY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
CITY
CALIFORNIA WATER
SERVICE COMPANY
PRIVATE
Upon Future Date
Annexation (Specify')
CITY
CITY
CITY
CITY (SEE PAGE 2)
CITY
CITY
CITY
CITY
CITY
CITY
CITY
CITY
ANNEXATION NO. 398
(PANAlMA NO. 12)
Indicate How Services Provided By
City/District Will Be Financed
¢i.e.. general tax rate or ~pecial
assessment. )
GENERAL TAX REVENUES
GENERAL TAX REVENUES
N/A
GENERAL TAX REVENUES
GENERAL TAX REVENUES,
FIRE FLrND
GENERAL AND GAS TAX
REVENUES
GENERAL AND GAS TAX
REVENUES
GENERAL AND GAS TAX
REVENUES
GENERAL AND GAS TAX
REVENUES
GENERAL TAX REVENUES
GENERAL TAX REVENL~S
USER FEE
USER FEE
USER FEE
EXHIBIT "C"
1. Please provide the following information. when applicable, only for service which will be provided by the applicant city.
Location
Indicate location from which service
will be provided (i.e. nearest fire
station. library, etc.)
POLICE-All police services in the City of Bakersfield are administered
through the City Police Department located at the s/w coraer of Traxtun and
Eye Street approximately 5 V2 miles north of the annexation.
Service Level Capacity
Indicate frequency and availability
of service I i.e., street sweeping,
response time for emergency. services.
rec. pregrams, etc.
24 hour patrol is provided in the immediate vicinity of
this annexation. First priority response is
approximately 7.00 minutes or less.
FIRE- Service will be provided by City Station No. 13 located on Stine Road
1/4 mile south of Panama Lane pursuant to exchange wherein City protects
certain property within the Connty~s jurisdiction. Thus. the City does incur the
cost of providing fire protection and the fire fund collecaon from the City's
taxpayers must be transferred to the City.
Fire protection is provided on a 24-hour basis. The
annexation will not affect City or County Fire
capability or response time.
PARIC~; AND RECREATION-UPOn any further development in the territory,
the open space element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan
provides for a minimum of 2.5 acres of park space per 1,000 population.
Existing neighborhood Parks (City and County) are
open to the public at reasonable hours.
LIBRARY-N/A
N/A
STREETS-The City Corporation yard on Truxtnn Avenue west Fwy. 99 will
provide necessary. facilities, personnel and services to accommodate Public
Works efforts.
CONSTRUCTION/MAINTENANCE/SWEEPING/LIGHTING-
Maintenance and parsonnel will be dispatched from the City Yard on a regular
basis for preventative maintenance as needed. Repmr includes streets,
constructed/nmintenance, sweeping and lighting.
There will be no reduction in the range capacity of thc
City to provide the necessary public work services to
this area. Services will be on a regular basis and ~'as
SEWER-An existing City trunk sewer line in Panama Lane and Dennen
Avenue is available for service to the territory whereby treatment would be
provided by City Treatment Plant No. 3.
Adequate capacity exists.
WATER-The territory will continue to be served by the Califorma Water
Service Company.
Adequate capacity exists.
OTHER- (Rcfuse)-When annexed. service will be provided by the City either
by City forces or by contracts with a franchise refuse collector~
City refuse pickup is twice a week.
IlI.
IV.
VIII.
A.
What effec~ if any, would annexation of this territory have on the existing level of ci _ty/district services (i.e.,
need for additional emergency, service personnel or construction of new facilities, etc)? The annexation of
this territory will not affect the near term level or capability of the City to provide needed services. Upon
annexatiun of this territory. additional police officers may be reamred to maintain the current level of City
service. A~y future dedicated streets or public created within the territory will increase the future
maintenance responsibility of the Ci[y but ~vill not affect the existing level of service.
Would city/district require any upgrading or change in facilities to serve affected territory. (roads, fire
hydrants, mains, etc); If so, would city/district or residents be responsible for financing? As future
development occurs. the developer provides and pays for major facilities and dedicates them to the City. No
upgrading or change in facilities will be required in the territory for annexation.
Indicate and explain existing zoning in affected territot3'. The portion of the territory north of Panama Lane
is County M S (Mobilehome Subdivision'} zone and CounW C-2PD (Commercial. precise developmentl zone
between Panama Lane and the mobilehome division. The portion south of Panama Lane is County R- 1 (Low-
dansitv residential) zone except for a small haft acre portion at the northwest comer bethe County C-1PD
(neighborhood commercial. precise development) zone.
Indicate and explain proposed prozoning in area. (List effects on present land use that wotfid occur as a restfit
of aane, xafion such as maintenance of livestock on property. etc.) The overall ironact on the territory will be
conversion of existing agricultural land to residential and commercial development south of Panama Lane.
The area north of Panama Lane will be prozoned City MH (mobilehome) zone and City C-2 (Commereial/
zone. The entire portion south of Panama Lane is prozoned City R-1 (one-family dwelling) zone.
List city-district setmoos that area will directly or indirectly benefit fro much as decrease in fire insurance rate,
shorter emergency response time. use of commumty facilities, etc. City Police should be able to re~pond in
a more timely manner than present County Sheriff services. The present Cily refuse collection rate is
Sll~fially lower than fees county residents now pay to independent compames. No special assessment or
cha~es for street sweeping. leaf collection. street lighting energy costs and fire lkvdrunts. City government
also 0treacles increased political representation for residents wilhin the corporate limits. The City ha~ recently
comnleted the Panama Lane Widening PrQject between Wible Road and Deunen Street. brineing Panama
Lane to full major arterial width adjacent to the annexation area.
Please promde the following information relative to city/district and county taxes:
List exisfin~ tax rate(s) in area. The existing tax rate in the area equals 1.187984% (portion of area north of
Panama Lane) and 1.146849% tremaining portion south of Panama Lane) of a~qsessed market value. This
represents the total properly tax rate. When annexed a desienated percentage of the total propero' tax of the
area will accrue to City and remainder to the County for providing health care and social services. (Rate as
shown on 1997-98 County Auditor-Controller Tax Rate Listl.
Would affected area be subject to any bonded indebtedness of the city/district? ff so, explain. No, the lasl
liqed (1992-93) City bonded indebtedness has been paid off and the current ( 1997-98'} lax rate list shows no
city bonded indebtedness,
How will the difference in tax rates affect a property, with a market value of $50,000.00? The proportly rate
will not increase due to annexation and re-assessment will not occur due to annexation.