HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 44-85RESOLUTION NO. 44-85
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE
ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD IDENTIFIED AS PROCEEDING NO. 856,
ANNEXATION NO. 291, IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAFCO
RESOLUTION MAKING DETERMINATION (ROSEDALE NO
2).
WHEREAS, a proposal was submitted to the Local Agency
Formation Commission of Kern County ("Commission") for the annex-
ation of territory to the City of Bakersfield designated as
Annexation No. 291 (ROSEDALE NO. 2); and
WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing upon said pro-
posal was held before the Commission on the 26th day of
February, 1985, and continued to March 12, 1985; and
WHEREAS, following said public hearing the Commission,
on March 12, 1985, adopted
being Resolution No. 85-8,
Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council
City of Bakersfield as follows:
1. Preliminary proceedings for
to the City of Bakersfield designated as
its Resolution Making Determination,
recorded in Minute Book 31 of said
of the
annexation of territory
Annexation No. 291
(ROSEDALE NO. 2) were authorized by the City Council of the City
of Bakersfield by action at a regular meeting thereof held on
October 3, 1984; Application for Annexation dated October 4,
1984, was transmitted to LAFCO; the Certificate of Filing of the
Executive Officer of the Commission shows that the proposal was
filed by him on the 26th day of February, 1985.
2. The distinctive short form designation assigned by
the Commission to the territory proposed to be annexed is: "City
of Bakersfield Annexation No. 291 (ROSEDALE NO. 2)."
3. The description of the exterior boundaries of the
territory proposed to be annexed is contained in Exhibit "A",
attached hereto, and incorporated in this Resolution as though
fully set forth herein.
4. The territory proposed to be annexed is
uninhabited as determined by the Commission in its Resolution
Making Determination.
5. The reasons for the proposed annexation as set forth
in the proposal thereof submitted to the Commission are that the
owners of the affected territory desire to receive, and in some
instances already are receiving, municipal services from the City
of Bakersfield and the City desires to receive tax revenues for
benefits given and to be given to the territory proposed to be annexed.
6. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Wednesday, the 8th day
of May, 1985, at the hour of 7 p.m. (or as soon thereafter as the
matter may be heard) in the Council Chambers of the City Hall,
1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California, is hereby fixed as
the time, date and place of hearing on the proposed annexation
where any owner of land within, or any registered voter residing
within, the said described territory may appear before the
Council of the City of Bakersfield and show cause why such terri-
tory should not be annexed. Any owner of land within, or any
registered voter residing within, the described territory may
file a written protest against the annexation with the City Clerk
of the City of Bakersfield at 1501 Truxtun Avenue at any time
prior to the conclusion of the hearing on the proposed annexa-
tion.
7. That the Negative Declaration as to this project
having previously been approved by LAFCO (the lead agency) is
hereby adopted and approved by the City of Bakersfield. The pro-
ject will not have a significant effect on the environment.
8. The land and improvements within the territory to be
annexed shall be liable for the general indebtedness of the City
existing at the time of annexation.
9. A certified copy of this Resolution shall forthwith
be transmitted to the Executive Director of LAFCO.
........... o0o ..........
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was
passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at
regular meeting thereof held on the 27th day of March ,
1985, by the following vote:
NOES: COUNCILMEN: .,~
C~I~T'~CL~RK an~d'~x Officio Clerk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED this 27th day of March , 1985
MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED as to form:
of Bakersfield
bl
R.ROS2-IP
ANNEXATION NO. 291
ROSEDALE NO. 2
~ parcel of land situated in the County of Kern, State of California,
being a portion of Section 23, Township 29 South, Range 27 East,
M.D.B. ~ M., more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the south quarter corner of said Section 23, as said
corner is shown on Parcel Map No. 3S84 recorded September 22, 1976
in Parcel Map Book 16 at page 163, in the Office of the Kern County
Recorder, said corner being a.point on the Existing Corporate Boundary
of the City of Bakersfield; thence North 00°32'47" East along the
last named Corporate Boundary and the West line of the Southeast
quart~r of said Section 23 a distance of S4.02 feet to the True Point
of Beginning for {his description.
Thence (1) Departing from the Existing Corporate Boundary of the City
of Bakersfield North 00°52'47" East a distance of 500.39 feet;
Thence {2) South 89~08'13" East a distance of 692.51 feet to a point
on the west right of way line of State Route VI-KER-99, said point
also being a point on the Exist%ng Corporate Boundary of the City of
Bakersfield;
Thence {5) Southerly and Westerly along the last named Corporate
Boundary to the True Point of Beginning.
CONTAINING 6.534 ACRES +
PRE-CHF:CKED by
KERN COUNTY SUF.~/: ,
Date _ _~T._~...c~..:~.~..~
App: ov, ed by
. z-->,