The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRES NO 24-85RESOLUTION NO. 24-85 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROVIDING FOR THE ADJUSTMENT OF PROPERTY TAX REVENUES UPON LOCAL AGENCY JURISDICTIONAL CHANGE RESULTING FROM ANNEXA- TION NO. 295, LAFCO PROCEEDING NO. 865 (CALIFORNIA AVENUE NO. 5). WHEREAS, Section 99 of the Revenue and Taxation Code (enacted by Chapter 282, amended by Chapter 1161, Statutes of 1979) provides that pior to the efffective date of any local agency jurisdictional change, other than a city incorporation or formation of a new district as defined in Section 2215 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, the governing bodies of all agencies whose service areas or service responsibilities would be altered by such change shall determine the amount of property tax reve- nues to be exchanged between and among such affected agencies; and WHEREAS, Section 99(b) of the Revenue and Taxation Code provides that no such jurisdictional change may become effective until each county and city included in such negotiation agrees, by resolution, to accept the ]negotiated exchange of property tax revenues; and WHEREAS, further provides Section 99(b) of the Revenue and Taxation Code that in the event that such a jurisdictional change affects the service area or service responsibility of one or more such special districts, the Board of Supervisors of the county in which such district or districts are located shall, on behalf of the district or districts, negotiate any exhange of property tax revenues; and WHEREAS, the Kern County Local Agency Formation Commission has requested that the Kern County Board of Supervisors and the City Council of the City of Bakersfield determine property tax revenues which should be exchanged between and among the local agencies involved in the pending jurisdic- tional change identified as: CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Annexation No. 295, LAFCO Proceeding (CALIFORNIA AVENUE NO. 5) No. 865 and WHEREAS, the County Administrative Officer, on behalf of the Board of Supervisors, and the City Manager, on behalf of the City Council of the City of Bakersfield, have examined and con- ferred regarding the Notice of Filing regarding LAFCO Proceeding No. 865 and found and reported to their respective governing bodies the determinations set forth in this resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield as follows: 1. That, provided the Board of Supervisors of the County of Kern adopt a resolution concurring in determination made herein, a determination is hereby made that there will be no transfers of service responsibilities to the City of Bakersfield from local agencies currently serving in the area of the proposed City of Bakersfield Annexation No. 295 by reason of such annexa- tion, except as follows: County of Kern General Fund . Partial and, accordingly, that property tax revenues which may accrue within the tax rate areas comprising the proposed City of Bakersfield Annexation No. 295 for fiscal year 1986-87 and thereafter should be transferred to the City of Bakersfield as follows: From County of Kern General Fund, that portion determined by multiplying the property tax revenues received by the County of Kern General Fund from the area of the proposed annexation in fiscal year 1984-85 by the quotient determined by dividing the amount of property tax revenues received by the City of Bakersfield in fiscal year 1984-85 by the sum of the amount of property tax revenues received by the County of Kern General Fund from within the City of Bakersfield in fiscal year 1984-85 plus the amount of property tax revenues received by the City of Bakersfield in fiscal year 1984-85. 2. The Clerk of the City of Bakersfield is directed to inform the board of Supervisors of the County of Kern, the mana- gers of the service areas named herein, the Kern County Local Agency Formation Commission, and the Kern County Auditor- Controller of the aforesaid determination by transmittal to them of certified copies of this resolution. ........... 000 .......... I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th day of February , 1985, by the following vote: CITY~CLERK and Ex 6fficio Cl~rk of the Council of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED this 20th day of February , 1985 MAYOR of the City of 1~ APPROVED as to form: the City of Bakersfield RRR/RJO/bl 4. BILL J. JACKSON Auditor-Controller W.T. WALLACE, CPA Ass't. Auditor-Controller JAMES A. RHOADES Chief, Auditing Division MICHAEL R. PARKER Supv. General Acctg. JOHN J. CeMARIO Supv. Special Acctg. Jan. 25, 198~ ~, City of Bake~sfield l~01 Truxtun Ave. Bakersfield, Ca. 93301 Attn: City Ma~age~ ~dmimst~ation and .Courts Building R/~(i~°m 111 1415 Truxtun Avenue ,,.,d ,3301 Gent I emen: In accordahce with Section 99 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, your Agency is subject to a service area or service responsibility change due to an annexation proposa~ filed with the Local Agency Formation Commission by Oily o£ Baker$£~elO and assigned Proceeding No. ~6~ . Your Agency's base property tax allocation and percentage of property tax increment in Tax Rate Area 056-0~[ , which is involved in the above annexation, is $ see be±O~and see belo~ % respectively. A 30 day negotiation period starts Jan.28sl98~ .and all taxrevenue exchanges must be adopted by Agency Resolution by Feb, 26,19~5. If the negotiations are not completed within the 30 day period, the annexation proceedings are terminated and must be refiled with LAFCO. If your Agency has any question as to the tax revenues or increment factor, please contact my office at (805) 861-2331. City of Bakersfield Annex.#295 (California Ave.#5) Gen. Fund $231.09: 32.548~J Fire Fund 67.60: 9~5215% Attachment File Very truly yours, BILL J. JACKSON AUDITOR-CONTROLLER JURISDIC~IONA~ CHANGE WORF~HEE~, LAFCO Proceeding No. Worksheet / , of / P~cee~ ~i~le: ~/~;~ .~. ~o ~ . ?ranafer from: ~OU~'~'~y ~' t~¢~"~ , (2) T~ Ra2e Areas In Area Se~ice Tr~efer Ret~n Covered by ~:~-o~/ J~is. Ch~6e (1) x (2) (1) - (~) (a) Prior Ye~ P~perty T~ Revenue ("Baae Amount") ,k3/. ~? ~,9o ~ c~ / (b) A~ual T~ Incremen~ (a) Prior leer ~oper~y T~ · ,~' ~ (b) A~ual ~ Increment - ' Factor ~ ~. ~2/~ ~a~ Prior Ie~rty T~ Reva~ ~'Base Amour") ., - ~b~ ~nnual T~ Increment Fac for . - ~a~ Prior ~e~ ~operty T~ Revenue ~'Baee ~b) Annuel T~ Increment Factor ~a) Prior Ye~ Property T~ Revenue ~"Base ~ount") - ~b) A~ual ~ Increment Factor ~a) Prior Ye~ Prop~-ty T~ Revenue ~'Base ~o~") '(b) Annual T~ Increment Factor (a) Prior Ye~ Property T~ Total ...... Revenue ~se (b) A~ual T~ Increment Avere~e ~ Factor *Co.putotion of Service Cost Ratio;. Property Tax Received by City Property ~x Received by County in City + Property Tax Received by City . ~/V. ? o~ KCAO Rev., 11/82 ~.SERVICES Planning Parks and Recreation Library Police Protection r-~re Protection Streets Construction Maintenance Sweeping Lighting Flood Control Sewerage her Refuse Agency ~ich Presently Check Services I~hich Indicate }iow Services Pro- Provides SerVice C_ity Will Provide: vided by City will be ~ Financed (i.e., general t~ Upon Future rate or snecial assessment Annexation Date (specify) COUNTY X G~noral Tax Revert.e, COUNTY X I General Tax Revenue COUNTY N/A COUNTY X General Tax Revenue CITY* X General Tax Revenue ~QUNTY X General Tax Revenue COUNTY X General Tax Revenue COUNTY . X General Tax Revenue .COUNTY X General Tax Revenue ~QUNTY X General Tax Revenue COUNTY X General Tax Revenue Union Ave. Sanitation District N/A Southside Sanitation District X ~_:~ -~ City User Fees ~Under present City-County Fire Consolidation Plan. .~At. CKC #4 Exhibit "C" Ill. h%at effects, if an)', would annexation of this territory have on existing level of city services (i.e., need for additional emergency setwice personnel or con- struction of new facilities, etc.)7 The annexation of this territory will not__ affect the near term level or capability of the City to__pr__oyj~_n~ee~de_d_~zvi_9_e2:_ IV. Would city require any upgrading or change in facilities to serve affected terr tory {roads, fire hydrants, mains, etc.)? If so, wo~Id city or residents be responsible for financing? lhe area the City proposed to annex is an existing developed County territory Wl-~ ~blfi--ffrban Bakersf~e]-d~he City would not requj~F _ any upgrading or change in facilities in order to serve the affected territory when ~t is annexed to the City. Indicate ~nd exp'lain existing zoning in affected territory. The existinq zone is M-~ (Limited Manufacturing) in the Coungy. Zonin~ Upon Annexation will be --C-~-2 (Commercial). vI. Indicate and explain proposed prezoning in area. {List effects on present land use that would occur as a result of a~nexation such as ma~ntevance of livestock on property, etc.) Accordinq to t~e adopted Bakersfield MetroPolitan Area General Plan (BMAGP) Land Use Element, the area and its adjacent properties to both the north and west are designated'for industrial use. Properties to the south of East 11th Street are designated for Medium Density Residential Use. The proposed commercial use is permitted both under existing County M-1 6nd City M-1 zoning and ~s compatible with adjacent zoning (M-I) and the Medium Density Residential designation to the south. The prezoning {C-2) will properly defTne the proposed use on the site whether it is being developed in the City or the County. _ V] I. List city services(that area will directly or i~d(~ectly benefit from such as decrease in fire insurance rate, shorter emergency response time, use of com- mamiry facilities, etc. City police should be able to respond in a more timely_ manner than present County Sheriff service. Current City_Police standard is~1_._6~ sworn ott.lcers per 1,000 populatl~ compared to County standard of 1.15. The City Fire Station No. 2 at 716 E. 21st Street i.5_abo,t 1/? mil~_n~r_th_of~he_anmexa+~ion which can respond in one minute or less. Other $P~E_~J_ccs su~c]l_as s_l;.reet]nai~ena. nc~ construction, street sweeping, planninq, etc. will be provided _~_o_n_ ann~exatio~ ~ area will directly benefit from these city services. 1III. A. Please provide the fol]owing information relative to city and county taxes: List existing tax rate(s} in a'rea. The existing tax raz~e_iJl_th~rea eq,al~ 1.047719 percent of assessed market value. This repre_~_~ts the~t;1]_geneya]___ property tax rate. When annexed, approximately 30 percent of the total ~e~ral property tax of the area will accure to the City, and the re_ma_(Q(n~ to the County for ~rovld~ng ~ealth care and social' services. I.ist city tax rate(s). When annexed, the total general proRe_E_ty. sL~2c_fc~ll;e~ill increased to 1.056437 percent of assessed market value which equ~!]~s the City --bonds rate of 0.008718 percent plus the original total genera~[op~rty_tax rate o$ 1.04/219 percent. (See A above) How will the difference in tax rates affect a house with a market value of ~50,000 If the house is used as the principal r~id~nr~ nf th~ n~ner~ .q2~(lO_-- value will be exempted from the qeneral property tax leaving a ma]~ke_t_~al,,~ mr_ $~,000 for taxinq purposes. Since there is no difference in the_gene_r_a] prnpe~ty tax rate whether the house is in the City or the County. the only difference _ ---w-]~ich may resuft from the annexation would be the City bonds rate o_f 0.008718 _ -- ~ercent. For ~his house, tLe diffe~-ence in total property tax Fquals 0.~718 percent x~d,OUO or a $3.75 increase. BILL J. JACKSON Auditor-Controller W.T. WALLACE, CPA Ass't. Auditor-Controller JAMEB A. RHOADES Chief, Auditing Division MICHAEL R. PARKER Jan. 25, 1985 Adm~nistr4tion ahd Courts Building Room 111 1415 Truxtun Avenue Rakee~ield, Califm'nim 93301 (805) 861-2331 Ker~ County Administrative Office 1415 Truxtun Ave. Bakersfield, Ca. 93301 ~Gent I emen: In accordahce with Section 99 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, your Agency is subject to a service area or service responsibility change due to an annexation proposal filed with the Local Agency Formatic~.~ommission by City of Bakersfield and assigned Proceeding No. ~bb . Your Agency's base property tax ~]location and percentage of property tax increment in Tax Rate Area 056 061 , which is involved in the above annexation, is $ see be£ow and see below % respectively. A 30 day negotiation period starts Jan.28,1985 .and all taxrevenue exchanges must be adopted by Agency Resolution by Feb. 26,1965. If the negotiations are not completed within the 30 day period, the annexation proceedings are terminated and must be refiled with LAFCO. If your Agency has any question as to the tax revenues or increment factor, please contact my office at (805) 861-2331. City of Bakersfield Annex.#295 (California Ave.#5) Gert. Pund ~ 231.09: 3e.548~ Fire Fund 67.60: 9.5215% Attachment Local Agemcy Formation Connuission File Very truly yours, BILL J. JACKSON AUDITOR-CONTROLLER