HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 044-06
RESOLUTION NO.
04-1=06
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
CERTIFYING IT HAS RECEIVED, REVIEWED, EVALUATED AND
CONSIDERED THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE FINAL
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
AND CONCURRENT ZONE CHANGE NO. 04-1746 AND CERTIFYING THAT
THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT HAS BEEN COMPLETED
IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
ACT, THE STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, AND THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
CEQA IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURES, AND MAKING FINDINGS AND
ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Bakersfield in accordance with the
provisions of Section 65353 of the Government Code, held a public hearing on Monday, December
12, 2005, and on Thursday, December 15, 2005, on the certification of the Final Environmental
Impact Report (EIR) for General Plan AmendmenUZone Change No. 04-1746 for the proposed
amendment to the Land Use Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan and the
proposed zone change, notice of the time and place of hearing having been given at least ten (10)
calendar days before said hearing by pUblication in The Bakersfield Californian, a local newspaper
of general circulation; and
WHEREAS, Mcintosh & Associates for Centex Homes made application for a concurrent
general plan amendment and zone change for property generally located north and south of Taft
Highway (SR 119), between Ashe Road and future Mountain Ridge Road, as shown in attached
Exhibit "A," to allow development of a single-family residential development on 186,66 acres, more
specifically stated as follows:
General Plan Amendment No. 04-1746:
A request to amend the Land Use Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield General
Plan from R-IA (Resource -Intensive Agriculture) to LR (Low Density Residential) on
80.07 acres, from RR (Rural Residential) to LR on 37.06 acres, and from RR to LMR
(Low Medium Density Residential) on 69.53 acres.
Concurrent Zone ChanGe No. 04-1746:
A concurrent zone change requesting a change in zone from A (Agriculture) to R-1 (One
Family Dwelling) on 117.13 acres, from A to R-2 (Limited Multiple Family Dwelling) on
12.94 acres, and from R-S-20A (Residential Suburban, 20-acre minimum lot size) to R-2
on 56,59 acres.
WHEREAS, for the above-described project, it was determined that'the proposed project
may have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, an EIR was required for the project
in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield retained the professional consulting services of Michael
Brandman Associates to prepare the Initial Study, EIR and related documents; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 201-05 on December 15, 2005, the Planning Commission ~A/{
recommended certification ofthe Final EIR for General Plan AmendmenUZone Change No. 04-1746 r;} ~t.
and this Council has fully considered the findings made by the Planning Commission as set forth in ~ .."
that Resolution and as restated herein; and Q /!!
OR/G/NAP
WHEREAS, a Notice of Preparation was filed with the State Clearinghouse on April 6, 2005,
for a 30-day review period in accordance with CEQA; and
WHEREAS, a Public Scoping hearing was held on May 3, 2005, to receive input from the
public and agencies on the Initial Study and scope of the Draft EIR; and
WHEREAS, a Draft EIR was prepared and circulated to interested parties and agencies and
a notice of availability was sent to property owners within 300 feet of the project site and all those
who requested notification at the Planning Commission public hearing(s) or requested special notice
to the Development Services Department on September 30, 2005, in accordance with CEQA for a
45-day review period to end on November 14, 2005, in accordance with Section 15087 of the State
CEQA Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, the public hearing on the Draft EIR was held during the latter half of the public
review period as is required by the City of Bakersfield CEQA Implementation Procedures; and
WHEREAS, the Notice of Completion was filed with the State Clearinghouse and the Draft
EIR was submitted to the State Clearinghouse (SCH #2005041 033) on September 30,2005, to start
the 45-day review period to end on November 14, 2005, in accordance with CEQA; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Bakersfield in accordance with the
provisions of the City of Bakersfield CEQA Implementation Procedures, held a public hearing on
Thursday, December 15, 2005, on the adequacy of the Draft EIR; and
WHEREAS, on December 5, 2005, the Final EIR was completed and notice of its availability
was made to interested parities and agencies; and
WHEREAS, on December 15, 2005, the Planning Commission considered the Final EIR;
and
WHEREAS, based on comments received prior to and at the December 15, 2005, Planning
Commission Hearing, the Planning Commission recommended certification of the Final EIR; and
WHEREAS, the environmental record prepared in conjunction with the project includes the
following:
1. The Notice of Preparation, Draft Environmental Impact Report, and Final
Environmental Impact Report;
2. All staff reports, memoranda, maps, letters, minutes of meetings relating to the
project;
3. All testimony, documents and evidence presented to the City by consultants working
with the City relating to the project;
4. The proceedings before the Planning Commission relating to the project, the Draft
EIR and the Final EIR, including testimony and documenting evidence introduced at
the public hearings; and
5. Matters of common knowledge to the Planning Commission which it considered
including but not limited to the following:
2
!<~AK~'9.
C) iP
>- ....
I- -
- f!!
..,
ORIGINAl.. t>
a) The Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan;
b) The City of Bakersfield Zoning Ordinance;
c) The City of Bakersfield Municipal Code;
d) Other formally adopted policies and ordinances of the City of Bakersfield;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 201-05 on December 15,
2005, recommending certification of the Final EIR for General Plan Amendment/Zone Change No.
04-1746; and
WHEREAS, the Council has considered and concurs with the following findings made by the
Planning Commission as set forth in Resolution No. 201-05, adopted on December 15, 2005:
1. The laws and regulations relating to the preparation and adoption of Environmental
Impact Reports as set forth in CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City of
Bakersfield CEQA Implementation Procedures, have been duly followed by city staff
and the Planning Commission; and
2. The Final EIR for GPAlZC 04-1746 was prepared in accordance with CEQA
Guidelines Section 15132; and
3. In accordance with State CEQA Guidelines Section 15151, the Planning
Commission considered the following direction regarding "standards for adequacy"
of an EIR:
An EIR should be prepared with a sufficient degree of analysis to provide decision-
makers with information which enables them to make a decision which intelligently
takes account of environmental consequences, An evaluation of the environmental
effects of a proposed project need not be exhaustive, but the sufficiency of an EIR is
to be reviewed in the light of what is reasonably feasible. Disagreement among
experts does not make an EIR inadequate, but the EIR should summarize the main
points of disagreement among the experts. The courts have looked not for
perfection but for adequacy, completeness, and a good faith effort at full disclosure;
and
4. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Sections 15151 and 15090, the Final EIR was
considered for adequacy, completeness and good faith effort at full disclosure and
has been completed in compliance with CEQA; and
5. Attached Exhibit "B" containing the "Statement of Facts, Findings, and Mitigation
Measures" are appropriate and incorporated into the project; and
6. Attached Exhibit "C" containing the "Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program" is
incorporated into the project; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with State CEQA Guidelines Section 15132, the Final EIR
consists of the following:
1. The Draft EIR;
2.
Comments and recommendations received on the Draft EIR either verbatim or in
summary;
3
L. ~M('?>
à ú}
>- .,
1;: J!!
Q t:>
ORIGINAL
- ---_._~. .., ---"_._--_...~---,-_.._-
3. A list of persons, organizations and public agencies commenting on the Draft EIR;
4. The responses of the Lead Agency to significant environmental points raised in the
review and consultation process; and
WHEREAS, the Final EIR for General Plan Amendment/Zone Change No. 04-1746 was
prepared in accordance with State CEQA Guidelines Section 15132; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with State CEQA Guidelines Section 15090 the lead agency (City
of Bakersfield) shall certify that:
(a) The Final EIR has been completed in compliance with CEQA; and
(b) The Final EIR was presented to the decision-making body of the Lead Agency and
that the decision-making body reviewed and considered the information contained in
the Final EIR prior to approving the project.
WHEREAS, in accordance with State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15151 and 15090, the
Final EIR was considered for adequacy, completeness and good faith effort at full disclosure and
has been completed in compliance with CEQA; and
WHEREAS, the Final EIR analyzed a reasonable range of altematives to the project, each of
which has been rejected as infeasible due to specific considerations in accordance with State CEQA
Guidelines Section 15091, as supported by the substantial evidence contained in the "Statement of
Facts, Findings, and Mitigation Measures" in Exhibit "B"; and
NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND FOUND BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF BAKERSFIELD as follows:
1.
The City Council hereby certifies that it has received, reviewed, evaluated and
considered the information contained in the Final EIR for General Plan
Amendment/Zone Change No. 04-1746.
2.
The City Council hereby certifies the Final EIR for General Plan Amendment/Zone
Change No. 04-1746.
3.
The above recitals and findings incorporated herein by reference are true and
correct and constitute the Findings of the City Council in this matter.
4.
That all required notices have been given.
5.
The provisions of CEQA have been followed.
6.
The City Council hereby finds the mitigation incorporated into the project avoids
impacts or mitigates impacts to a less than significant level.
7.
Based on the absence of evidence in the record as required by Section 21082.2 of
the State of California Public Resources Code (CEQA) for the purposes of
documenting significant effects, it is the conclusion of the Lead Agency that this
project will result in impacts that fall below the threshold of significance with regard to
wildlife resources and, therefore must be granted a "de minimis" exemption in
accordance with Section 711 of the State of California Fish and Game Code.
4
~ 'òþ.Kê~
Q ~
>- -
m
I;:;. r--
() t)
ORIGINAL
Additionally the assumption of adverse effect is rebutted by the above-referenced
absence of evidence in the record and the lead agency's decision to prepare an
Environmental Impact Report for this project.
8. The Final EIR has been reviewed by the City Council of the Lead Agency and the
findings contained therein reflect the City Council's independent judgment and
analysis.
9. All of the foregoing findings are supported by substantial evidence in the record of
the proceedings before the Planning Commission, which is maintained by the City's
Planning Director in the Planning Department's offices at 1715 Chester Avenue,
Bakersfield, CA 93301, and of the proceedings before the City Council, which is
maintained by the City Clerk in the City Clerk's offices at 1501 Truxtun Avenue,
Bakersfield, CA 93301.
10. The Planning Division of the Development Services Department is hereby directed to
file a Notice of Determination with the County Clerk of Kern County, pursuant to the
provision of Section 21152 of the Public Resources Code and Section 15094 of the
State CEQA Guidelines adopted pursuant thereto and a Certificate of Fee
Exemption pursuant to Section 711.4 (c)(2)(B) ofthe State of California Department
of Fish and Game Code.
---------000--------
5
~ 'òA/(~?-
o 0
>- :'.
I- JT,
- r-
'-' b
ORIGINAL
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and a~ed ~ ~
Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on 6
by the following vote:
.~
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
v- 1,./.....-- 1..-- L--- ¿,---
COUNCILMEMBER COUCH. CARSON. BENHAM, MAGGARD, HANSON, SULLIVAN, SCRIVNER
COUNCILMEMBER
COUNCILMEMBER
COUNCILMEMBER
~á,
PAMELA A. McCARTHY, CM
CITY CLERK and Ex Officio rk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED
FEB 8 2006
HARVEY L. HALL
MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED as to form:
VIRGINIA GENNARO
City Attorney
By: ~1n- ~
EXHIBIT A
B
C
General Plan Amendment/Zone Change Location Map
Statement of Facts, Findings, and Mitigation Measures
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
PH - S:\GPA 2nd 2005104-1746 Centex EIRIResolutionslCC FEIR.doc
6
,~-_._--_.._,,-_.__. ------~--_..~---_._,.,.__._-
x ~AJ(~~
Q u
>- ~
t;:; ,...
'-' ORIGINA~
Exhibit A
General Plan Amendment/Zone Change Location Map
~ ,¢Mf'1'
o <I'
>- '1
I- m
- ,...
'-' C:>
ORIGINAL
...._. ,_.__.~.~,..__. __M,·.'__~__·· ,...,_.._._.__._____.__.._.,._.,....
"1'
.:\L.: !
,
.._........L._.
"-:"-"r"---
«
::;;
«
:¡!:
a:
Z;x
;¿w
""I-
",,""
_ W
ë{<->
",.I,;
0<1 3Nll$
;
I
,
, >------~-"
CD
-
ëi)
-
U
CD
.~
2
Q.
GOSFORD RD
0<1 <l3AI<I 010
'.
~
~
'c
13
">1
.~
" 0
Œj'~~1
a-
-'"
<0
HllfON ~ ~
I; "So
E .
"'::;
- 0
flI~ ~ ~
~~. 1fS'?,
çj ~
:> -
I- m
_ r-
() (;:)
ORIGINAL
o
'"
o
~
o
¡g
o
'"
¿
o
'"
'6
w
2
'c,
i5
"
'0
'5
C>
..
"
E
o
r=
~
"
o
m
o
g
N
o
'"
o
~
a.(}
CO ~
~ z
>-15
~ ()
z
a:
w
'"
c::
'(3
>-
CO
U
o
-.J
>-
o
:J
I-
m
..J
«
¡::
j¡
if)
w
::;;
o
I
X
w
I-
Z
W
o
1i:i
w
u.
~
w
ð
en
Exhibit B
Statement of Facts, Findings, and Mitigation Measures
X 'ò M('1'
o ú'
.,
>- -
r:: fT.
'ð {;;
ORIGINAL
CEQA Findings and Findings of Fact
for the Ashe Road and Taft Highway Residential Project
General Plan Amendment/Zone Change 04-1746
and Ashe No.3 Annexation
(State Clearinghouse 2005041033)
Prepared for:
City of Bakersfield
Development Services Department
1715 Chester Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
661.326.3043
Contact: Mr. Marc Gauthier, Principle Planner
Prepared by:
Michael Brandman Associates
220 Commerce, Suite 200
Irvine, CA 92602
714.508.4100
Contact: Michael E, Houlihan, AICP, Project Director
Kara E. Palm, Project Manager
I
U,aùd ;\Ói1dtf'N~\H;K¡~~(~'i
December 5, 2005
~ y>AK~1'
o <f
>- .,
1;; iT
"ORIGINAf
City of Bakersfield· General Plan Amendment!
Zone Change tu-1746 and Ashe No.3 AnnexaUon
CEQA Findings and Findings of Fact
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section 1: Introduction .........................................................................................................1
Section 2: Project Description .............................................................................................3
Section 3: Mitigated Project-Level and Cumulative Adverse Impacts ............................. 4
3,1 - Transportation .......................................,..................................,..........,...............5
3.2 - Air Quality........,...,.......,..............."",...............,........,........,.............,.................., 5
3.3 - Noise... ...,......... ........... ......",.......... ......,........",......... ....,...,... ..... ...... ...................8
3.4 - Hazards and Hazardous Materials...................................................................... 8
3,5 - Biological Resources......,.............................................·.......,..··.......................,.. 9
3,6 - Cultural and Paleontological Resources ..,........................................................11
3,7 - Cumulative Impacts.......................",...................."...............,....................,......12
Section 4: Significant and Unavoidable Adverse Impacts ..............................................18
4.1 - Significant and Unavoidable Impacts................................................................ 18
Section 5: Feasibility of Project Alternatives ...............................................................'....19
5,1 - No Project/No Development Alternative........................................·..·..·........···.. 19
5.2 - No Project/Development in Accordance with the General Plan Altemative ...... 20
5.3 - Reduced Density Alternative..............,...."..",.............".......,..,....,......,,......,.....20
5.4 - Environmentally Superior Alternative .............,.."..............,...................,..,........ 21
MIchael Srandman Associates
H:\CIÎent (PN-JN)\0216\0216003 7\Findings\0216003 7 Findings-Centex.doc
~~MS'?,
o %
>- -
t:: ~
() 0
ORIGINAL
City of Bakersfield - General Plan Amendment!
Zone Change 04-1746 and Ashe No.3 Annexation
CEQA Findings and Findings of Fact
Introduction
SECTION 1:
INTRODUCTION
In compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the
CEQA Guidelines; the City of Bakersfield has conducted an environmental review of the proposed
project. A Notice of Preparation was released for public review in April 2005, In September 2005,
the Draft EIR was released. After receiving public comment on the Draft EIR, the City prepared a
document entitled Responses to Comments on the Draft EIR (RTC). The RTC document includes the
verbatim comments received on the Draft EIR, a list of those commenting, and the City's responses to
the significant environmental points raised in the review and consultation process, In response to
certain comments, the Draft EIR was modified, as set forth in the responses to comments. The Final
EIR for the project consists of the Draft EIR and the RTC document. The RTC provides responses to
comments on environmental issues describing the disposition of the issues, explaining the EIR
analysis, supporting the EIR conclusions, and/or providing information or corrections as appropriate.
These Findings are based upon the information in the record of proceedings, including the Final EIR,
staff reports, project applicant's materials, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and the testimony
presented at public hearings,
CEQA provides in relevant part, at Public Resources Code Section 21081, that:
[N]o public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an environmental impact
report has been certified which identifies one or more significant effects on the environment
that would occur if the project is approved or carried out unless both of the following occur:
(a) the public agency makes one or more of the following findings with respect to each
significant effect:
I. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project
which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment.
2. Those changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of
another public agency and have been, or can and should be, adopted by that
other agency,
3. Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations,
including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for
highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or project
alternatives identified in the environmental impact report,
Michael Brandman Associates
H:\Clicnt (PN~JN)\0216\0216003 7\Findings\02160037 Findings-Ccntex.doc
~ ~Mê~
o ~
>- -
m
':;: ,...
Q 0
ORIGINAL
City of Bakersfield - General Plan Amendment!
Zone Change 04-1746 and Ashe No.3 Annexation
CEQA Findings and Findings of Fact
Introduction
(b) With respect to significant effects which were subject to a finding under paragraph (3) of
subdivision (a), the public agency finds that specific overriding economic, legal, social,
technological, or other benefits of the project outweigh the significant effects on the
environment.
Because the project Environmental Impact Report (EIR) identified significant effects that may occur
as a result ofthe project, and in accordance with the provisions of CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines,
the City Council of the City of Bakersfield hereby adopts these Findings. For each ó[the significant
effects identified in Section 3, as set forth in greater detail in these Findings below, 1he City Council
makes the finding under paragraph (I) of subdivision (a) above. For each of the significant effects
identified in Section 4, as set forth in greater detail in these Findings below, the City Council makes
the finding under paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) and under subdivision (b) above.
CEQA requires that the EIR reflect the City's own independent judgment and review, Accordingly,
the City Council expressly finds that the Final EIR for the project reflects the City's independent
judgment. In accordance with the provisions of CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, the City Council
of the City of Bakersfield has independently reviewed the record of proceedings and based on the
evidence in the record adopts these Findings,
Michael Brandman Associates
H:\Clienl (PN-IN)\0216\02160037\Findings\02160037 Findings-Centex.doc
~ '9M~-9
\3 ~
~ -
m
~ l;
ORIGINAL
City of Bakersfield - General Plan Amendment!
Zone Change tJ4..1746 and Ashe No.3 Annexation
CEQA FIndings and Findings 01 Fact
Project Description
SECTION 2:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project is the development of a single-family residential community on 186,66 acres
that includes approximately 874 single-family residential units. The gross density is 3,13 units per
acre with a net density of 5,96 units per acre.
Project implementation will require a General Plan Amendment to re-designate 80,07 acres from
Resource Intensive Agriculture (R-IA) to Low Density Residential (LR), 36,56 acres from Rural
Residential (RR) to LR, and 70,03 acres from RR to Low Medium Density Residential (LMR) (see
Exhibit 3-3). Accordingly, the zone change will re-zone 116.63 acres from Agriculture (A) to One
Family Dwelling (R-I), 13.44 acres from A to Limited Multiple Family Dwelling (R-2) and 56,59
acres from Residential Suburban (20 acre minimum lot) (R-S-20A) to R-2 (see Exhibit 3-4), It is the
intent of the City of Bakersfield to annex the project site into the City's incorporated boundaries,
Michael Brandman AssocIates
H:\Client (pN-JN)\0216\0216003 7\Findings\0216003 7 Findings-Centex..doc
~ ~Þ.Kê-9
c ~
>- ñí
\:':: ,-.
"" c::.
(;) ORIGINAl
City of Bakersfield - General Plan Amendment!
Zone Change 04-1746 and Ashe No.3 Annexation
CEQA Findings and Findings of Fact
Mitigated Project Lave/and
Cumulative Adverse Impacts
SECTION 3:
MITIGATED PROJECT -LEVEL AND CUMULATIVE ADVERSE IMPACTS
The EIR identified significant project-level and cumulative adverse impacts of the proposed project
and proposed mitigation measures to avoid or substantially lessen those impacts. Those impacts and
mitigation measures are identified in the following sections, The Bakersfield City Council finds,
based on the record and on the facts as set forth below, that the incorporation of the identified
mitigation measures will mitigate all of the identified significant project-level and cumulative adverse
impacts to a level that is considered less than significant.
Michael Srandman Associates
H:\Client (PN.JN)\0216\0216003 7\Findings\02160037 Findings-Centex.doc
4 ~ ~A/(~?>
o <P
>- ..,.\
I- m
_ f-
o C::>
ORIGINAL
City of Bakersfield - General Plen Amendment!
Zone Change 04-1'1'46 and Ashe No.3 Annexation
CEQA Findings and Findings of'Fact
Mitigated Project Level and
CumulaUve Adverse Impacts
3.1· TRANSPORTATION
3.1.1 - Potentially Significant Impact
Project Trip Generation and Intersection Analysis. Implementation of the proposed project will
result in the gene~tion 00,991 average daily trips that will be added to the existing and planned
circulation infrastructure within the project area, which will result in an unacceptable level of service
(LOS) at one intersection in the year 20 I 0 (Taft Highway at Mountain Ridge Drive) and two
intersections in the year 2030 (Ashe Road at McCutchen RoadIHosking Avenue and Stine Road at
Hosking Avenue),
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which mitigate or
avoid the significant effects on the environment.
Facts in Support of Finding
TT 5.1-1 Prior to 1he issuance of building permits, the project applicant shall pay the proportionate
share for local mitigation improvements (those not covered by the Regional
Transportation Impact Fee [RTIF] program) as follows:
Year 2010
Intersections
· Install an eastbound turn lane at the intersection of Taft Highway and Mountain
Ridge Road,
Year 2030
Inlerseclions
· Provide an all-way stop at the intersection of Ashe Road and McCutchen
RoadIHosking Avenue; and
· Install a signal at the intersection of Stine Road and Hosking Avenue,
3.2 . AIR QUALITY
3.2.1 - Potentially Significant Impact
The project will result in the generation of air quality emissions during the short-term construction
phase that will exceed the established thresholds for nitrogen dioxide CNÜx).
Michael Brandman Associates
H:\Client (pN·JN)\0216\0216003 7\Findings\02160037 Findings-Ccntex.doc
5
~ <õÞ-.Kt'9
Q ú'
>- êè
1;:: m
(] r--
ORIGINJ'
City of Bakersfield - General Plan Amendment!
Zone Change 04-1746 and Ashe No.3 Annexation
CEQA FIndings and Findings of Fact
MIUgal8d Project Love/end
Cumulative Adverse Impacts
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which mitigate or
avoid the significant effects on the environment.
Facts in Support of Finding
AQ 5.2·1 Prior to the issuance of a grading pennit, the project applicant shall submit verification to
the City of Bakersfield Planning Department that the following actions will be
implemented in grading plans and grading activities:
· All construction equipment shall be maintained as recommended by manufacturer
manuals;
· All equipment shall be shut down when not in use for extended periods of time;
o Construction equipment shall operate no longer than six (6) cumulative hours 'per
day;
o Construction activities shall include the use of electric equipment for construction
whenever possible in lieu of diesel or gasoline powered equipment;
o The use of high-emitting construction equipment shall be curtailed during periods
of high or excessive ambient pollutant concentrations such as "Spare-the-Air" days
as declared by the SN APCD;
· All construction vehicles shall be equipped with proper emission control
equipment and kept in good and proper running order;
· Construction shall incorporate the use of caterpillar pre-chamber diesel engines;
· All construction activities within the project area shall be discontinued during the
first stage smog alerts; and
· Construction and grading activities shall not be allowed during first stage ozone
alerts (first stage ozone alerts are declared when the ozone level exceeds 0,20 ppm
[I-hour averageD,
3.2.2 . Potentially Significant Impact
In the long-tenn, project vehicle trip generation in addition to energy consumption (heating and
cooling) will produce air quality emissions, Of particular concern are reactive organic gases (ROG)
and NO,.
MIchael Srandman Associates
H:\Client (PN-JN)\0216\02160031\Findings\02160037 Findings-Centex.doc
6
~ 'òM~~
o '!;,
>- -
':: ~
" e;,
ORIGINAL
e_ _~.______ ____.__,~._ _________...
City of Bak8fSfleld - General Plan Amendment!
Zone Change 04-1746 and Ashe No.3 Annexation
CEQA Findings and Findings of Fact
MltlgJlted Project Level and
Cumulative Adverse Impacts
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which mitigate or
avoid the significant effects on the environment.
Facts in Support of Finding
AQ 5.2-2 Prior to the issuance of building pennits, the project applicant shall submit verification to
the City of Bakersfield Planning Department that the following actions have been
implemented into project design plans:
· The developer shall position as many home sites as possible with a north/south
exposure;
· The developer shall petition the Golden Empire Transit District (GET) to conduct a
service study to detennine if the project site warrants being annexed into the GET
operational system; and
· If bus service will be provided to the project site, specific bus turnouts and shelters
shall be located at appropriate locations to serve residential sites within the project
area in consultation with the GET. The bus turnouts and shelters shall be planned
by developers in the project area and local transportation coordinating entities to
encourage the efficient and practical use of public transit entities servicing the
project area.
AQ 5.2-3
In order to reduce the project's net emissions of 17.53 tons ofROG and 12.95 tons of
NO.. the project applicant shall provide emission offsets through participation in a
voluntary emission reduction program (VERP) though the SN APCD, The VERP will
require the developer to enter into a binding agreement with the SN APCD that will
require that the SN APCD:
· Review air emission impact assessment protocol and quantification of emission
estimates attributable to the project;
· Acceptance of the estimated monetary value of the emission reductions to equal
the emissions from the projec¡1;
· Locate and implement emission reductions; and
· Certify that the emission reductions have been made to the lead agency and the
developer in a fonn of a certificate.
I September 2005, cost is $15,000.00 per ton ofROG and NO,.
Michael Brandman Associates
H :\Client (PN_JN)\0216\02160037\Findings\02160037 Findings-Centex.doc
7
~ ~A/(~?,
Q rJ
>- ~
....-: (Ti
- r-.
Q ORIGINALtJ
City of &ok....fI.,d - General Plan Am.ndment!
Zone Change 04-1746 and Ashe No.3 Annexation
CEQA Findings and FindIngs of Fact
MItigated Project Level and
Cumulative Adverse Impacts
AQ 5.2-4 During the life of the project, if the City of Bakersfield adopts an emissions mitigation
program that provides equal or more effective mitigation than measures listed in this
analysis, the developer may choose to participate in the City's program to mitigate air
quality impacts,
AQ 5.2-5 Fees paid to the SN APCD through an approved indin:ct source emissions fee program
may be utilized to provide applicable offsets for the proposed project.
3.3 - NOISE
3.3.1 - Potentially Significant Impact
Vehicle related noise generated on existing and planned future roadways will result in exceeding 65
dBA along Taft Highway and Ashe Road.
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which mitigate or
avoid the significant effects on the environment.
Facts in Support of Finding
N 5.3-1 An eight-foot tall masonry wall shall be constructed along the project site boundary
adjacent to both Ashe Road and Taft Highway (north and south side). These walls shall
be included on all applicable subdivision maps and shall be constructed prior to the
recordation of each affected phase. All barriers shall be set back 60 feet !Tom the
centerline ofthe roadways and not interfere with easements,
3.4 - HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
3.4.1 - Potentially Significant Impact
Due to the age of the onsite structures, there is the potential for asbestos containing materials or lead
based paint, which if disrupted can become a hazard,
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which mitigate or
avoid the significant effects on the environment.
Michael Brandman Associates
H:\Client (PN-JN)\0216\021600311Findings\02160037 Findings..centex.doc
~ 'òMS'?,
8 0 ~
>- -
r IT;
- ,...
" <:::.
ORIGINAL
City of Bakersfield - General Plan Amendment!
Zone Change 04-1746 and Ashe No.3 Annexation
CEQA Findings and Findings of Fact
MItigated ProJacl Laveland
Cumulative Adverse Impacts
Facts in Support of Finding
HM 5.5-1 Prior to the demolition of the onsite structures on the project site, an asbestos survey and
sampling as necessary shall be conducted, in accordance with the National Emissions
Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), In accordance with NESHAP, all
potenti,ally friable asbestos containing materials shall be r~moved prior to building
demolition,
HM 5.5-2 Iftransite piping con1aining asbestos used in subsurface irrigation are discovered on the
project site, the materials shall be removed and disposed of in accordance with NESHAP
and all applicable standards and regulations,
HM 5.5-3 If lead based paint is discovered at the site, it shall be removed and disposed of in
accordance with NESHAP and all applicable standards and regulations,
3.4.2 - Potentially Significant Impact
The project site has one water well that has a small amount of discolored soil around the 100 hp diesel
engine on a concrete pad.
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which mitigate or
avoid the significant effects on the environment.
Facts in Support of Finding
HM 5.5-4 Prior to any earth moving activities on the project site, discolored soils shall be tested to
detennine the level of residue for hazardous materials/wastes, petroleum hydrocarbons,
chemicals, and associated metals, Ifthe residue is found to be greater than the DTSC
standards, all contaminated soils exceeding the acceptable limits shall be remediated
and! or properly disposed of per DTSC requirements,
3.5 - BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
3.5.1 - Potentially Significant Impact
The site provides marginally suitable habitat for the state and federally protected burrowing owl and
foraging habitat for San Joaquin kit fox.
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which mitigate or
avoid the significant effects on water quality that could be caused by construction activities.
Michael Brandman Associates
H:\Clicnt (PN-JN)\0216\0216003 7\Findings\02160037 Findings-Centex.doc
¿~Mç",
9 Ò' ''cp
>- ~
b ~
" (:)
ORIGINAL
-----_._~._-~~--
City of Bakersfield - General Plan Amendment!
Zone Change 04-1746 and Ashe No.3 Annexation
CEQA FIndIngs and FIndIngs of Fact
MItigated Project Level and
Cumulative Adverse Impacts
Facts in Support of Finding
BR 5.6-1 Prior to the issuance of a grading pennit, the project applicant shall pay a development
impact fee in accordance with the MBHCP,
BR 5.6-2
Prior to the issuance of a grading pennit on the I 86.66-acre site, the project proponent
shall comply with all appropriate tenus and conditions, of the MBHCP to the satisfaction
of the City Planning Director. The MBHCP requires certain take avoidance measures for
the San Joaquin kit fox, MBHCP guidelines regarding tracking and excavation shall be
followed to prevent entrapment of kit fox in dens. Specific measures duting the
construction phase of the project shall be implemented and include the following:
· A preconstruction survey shall be conducted pnor to site grading to search for
ac1ive kit fox dens. The survey shall be conducted not more than 30 days prior to
the onset, of construction activities in areas subject to development to detennine the
necessity of den excavation.
· Monitoring and excavation of each known San Joaquin kit fox den which cannot
be avoided by construction activities.
· Notification of wildlife agencies of relocation opportunity prior to ground
disturbance in areas of known kit fox dens.
· Excavations shall either be constructed with escape ramps or covered to prevent kit
fox entrapment. All trenches or steep-walled excavations greater than three feet
deep shall include escape ramps to allow wildlife to escape, Each excavation shall
contain at least one ramp, with long trenches containing at least one ramp every
quarter mile. Slope oframps shall be no steeper than I: 1.
· All pipes, culverts or similar structures with a diameter offour inches or greater
shall be kept capped to prevent entry of kit fox, If they are not capped or otherwise
covered, they will be inspected prior to burial or closure to ensure no kit foxes, or
other protected species, become entrapped.
· All employees, contractors, or other persons involved in the construction of the
project shall attend a "tailgate" session infonning them of the biological resource
protection measures that will be implemented for the project. The orientation shall
be conducted by a qualified biologist and shall include infonnation regarding the
life history of the protected species, reasons for special-status, a summary of
applicable environmental law, and measures intended to reduce impacts,
· All food, garbage, and plastic shall be disposed of in closed containers and
regularly removed from the site to minimize attracting kit fox or other animals.
MIchael Brandman AssocIates
H :\Client (pN-JN)\0216\0216003 7\Findings\0216003 7 Findings-Centex.doc
ð 'òA/(~"t
10 >- -:..
I- fT,
- ,...
Q ORIGINAl~
City of Bakersfield w General Plan Amendment!
Zone Change tJ4..1746 and Ashe No.3 Annexation
CEQA FIndings and Findings of,Fact
Mltlgal8d Project Level and
Cumulative Adverse Impacts
3.5.2 - Potentially Significant Impact
A pair of nesting raptor species (red tailed hawks) were identified on the project site.
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which mitigate or
avoid the significant effects on the environment.
Facts in Support of Finding
BR 5.6-3 Prior to the issuance of a grading pennit for the approximately I 86-acre site, the project
applicant shall comply with the following raptor nest mitigation:
· If site grading is proposed during the raptor nesting season (February-September),
a focused survey for raptor nests shall be conducted by a qualified raptor biologist
prior to grading ac1ivities in order to identity active nests in areas potentially
impacted by project implementation,
· If constroction is proposed to take place during the raptor nestinglbreeding season
(February-September), no constroction activity shall take place within 500 feet of
an active nest until the young have fledged (as determined by a qualified raptor
biologist). Trees containing nests that must be removed as a result of project
implementation shall be removed during the non-breeding season (October-
January),
· Preconstroction surveys shall include a survey for burrowing owl. If active
burrowing owl burrows are detected outside of the breeding season (September 1-
January 31), passive and/or active relocation efforts may be undertaken if approved
by CDFG and USFWS, If active burrowing owl burrows are detected during the
breeding season (February I-August 31), no disturbance to these burrows shall
occur without obtaining appropriate permitting through the Migratory Bird Treaty
Act.
3.6 . CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES
3.6.1 - Potentially Significant Impact
It is possible that yet unknown archaeological remains may be present within the project area,
Michael Brandman Associates
H:\Client (pN-JN)\0216\02160037\Findings\0216003 7 Findings-Centex.doc
11
~ 'òA/(f~
C) ö>
>- .."
I- ¡;:¡
- r--
°OR/G/NAf'
City of Bakersfield - General Plan Amendment!
Zone Change 04-1746 and Ashe No.3 Annexstion
CEQA Findings and FIndIngs of Fact
MWgal8d ProJ8ct Level and
Cumulative Adverse Impacts
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which mitigate or
avoid the significant effects on the environment.
Facts in Support of Finding
CR 5.7-1 If during construction, archaeological resources are uncovered at the site, all work within
50 meters (165 feet) of the find shall cease until a qualified professional archeologist can
evaluate the find. The City of Bakersfield Planning Department and a qUalified
archaeologist (approved by the City ofBakersfielð) shall be immediately contacted by the
project applicant, or designated representative thereof. When contacted, the
representative of the City and the archaeologist shall visit the site within the following 24
hours to deteI1I1ine the extent and significance of the resources and to record, map, and
catalogue artifacts as required by standard archaeological practices.
3.7 . CUMULATIVE IMPACTS
3.7.1 - Potentially Significant Impact
On a regional basis, the proposed project represents approximately 0,01% (one one-hundredth of 1%)
of the ROO and 0,0064% (six one-thousandths of 1%) of the NOx emissions in the air basin.
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which mitigate or
avoid the significant effects on the environment.
Facts in Support of Finding
See AQ 5.2-1 through AQ 5.2-4,
3.7.2 - Potentially Significant Impact
Implementation of the proposed project, in conjunction with future developments would contribute to
the ongoing loss of open space in the region, resulting in a decline of biological resources and species
diversity. Cumulative development would also result in an increase in traffic and human use of the
project vicinity, which would increase human intrusion and activity levels in proximity to habitat
areas and wildlife use areas and, therefore, further reduce the quantity and quality of wildlife habitat.
Michael Brandman Associates
H:\Client (PN.JN)\0216\0216003 7\Findings\02160037 Findings..centex.doc
~ 'òA/(~.<'o
12 Q "-(p
>- ~
t;:: ~
.., ORIGINA~
City of Bakersfield· General Plan Amandmantl
Zone Change {u"1746 and Ashe No.3 Annexatlon
CeQA Findings and FindIngs of Fact
MItigated Project Lave/ and
Cumulative Adverse Impacts
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which mitigate or
avoid the significant effects on the environment.
Facts in Support of Finding
See Mitigation Measures DR 5.6-1 through DR 5.6-3.
.3.7.3 - Potentially Significant Impact
There is the potential for unknown resources to be unearthed during construction activities associated
with this project and other cumulative projects.
Finding
Changes or alteration shave been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which mitigate or
avoid the significant effects on the environment.
Facts in Support of Finding
See Mitigation Measure CR 5.7-1.
3.7.4 - Potentially Significant Impact
There are several intersections and roadway segments that will operate at an unacceptable LOS (LOS
D or worse) in the years 2010 and 2030, prior to project implementation. The improvements of these
intersections and roadway segments have been identified in the RTIF program. The addition of
project traffic will result in cumulatively contributing to the degradation of these intersections and
roadway segments.
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which mitigate or
avoid the significant effects on the environment.
Facts in Support of Finding
Yea, 2010
TT6·1
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the project applicant shall participate in the
RTIF program, paying the standard per lot rate for residential development and the
Michael Srandman Associates
H:\Client (PN-JN)\0216\02160031\Findings\02160037 Findings-Cc:ntcx.doc
13 ~ 'òAK~?,
o ~
>- -
t:. ~
Q ORIGINAP
CIty of Bakendleld - General Plan Amendmenll
Zone Change 04-1746 and Ashe No.3 Annexation
CEQA FindIngs and FIndIngs of Fact
Mitigated Project Level and
Cumulative Adverse Impscts
project applicant shall submit the funding calculations for all improvements associated
with the RTIF program to the City for review and approval. The following RTIF
program projects are identified for the project area by the Year 2010:
Signalization
· Install a traffic signal at the intersection of Panama Land and Ashe Road;
· Install a traffic signal at the intersection of Taft Highway and Stine Road; and
· Install a traffic signal at the intersection of Taft Highway and Wible Road,
Intersection Improvements
· Add a westbound turn lane at the intersection of Panama Lane and Wible Road;
· Provide an all-way stop at the intersection of Taft Highway and Gosford Road; and
· Provide an all-way stop and add a westbound lane and an eastbound lane at the
intersection of Taft Highway and Ashe Road.
Roadway Segment Improvements
· Improve White Lane from Wible Road to the State Route 99 southbound ramps to
an eight lane divided arterial;
· Improve Panama Lane from Buena Vista Road to Old River Road to a two lane
divided arterial;
· Improve Panama Lane from Old River Road to Gosford Road to a two lane divided
arterial;
· Improve Panama Lane from Gosford Road to Ashe Road to a four lane undivided
arterial;
· Improve McCutchen RoadIHosking Avenue from Gosford Road to Ashe Road to a
two lane undivided arterial;
· Improve McCutchen RoadIHosking Avenue from Ashe Road to Stine Road to two
lane undivided arterial;
· Improve McKee Road west of Ashe Road to a two lane undivided collector;
· Improve McKee Road from Ashe Road to the future Mountain Ridge Road to a
two lane undivided collector;
· Improve McKee Road from the future Mountain Ridge Road to Stine Road to a
two lane undivided collector;
· Improve Taft Highway from the State Route 99 northbound ramps to South H
Street to a four lane undivided arterial;
Michael Srandman Associates
H:\Client (PN-JN)\0216\02160037\Findingß\02160037 Findings-Centex.doc
,. 'QMè.
1413' '"
>- ::
I-- n
- r-
Q c::,
ORIGINAL
City of Bakersfield ~ General Plan Amendment!
Zone Change 04-1746 and Ashe No.3 Annexation
CEQA Findings and FindIngs of Fact
MItigated Project Level and
Cumulative Adverse Impacts
· Improve Taft Highway east of South H Street to a four lane undivided arterial
· Improve Buena Vis1a Road from White Lane to Panama Lane to a two lane divided
arterial; and
· Improve Gosford Road ITom Panama Lane to McCutchen Road to a four lane
undivided arterial.
Year 2030
TT6-2
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the project applicant shall participate in the
R TIF program, paying the standard per lot rate for residential development and the
project applicant shall ,submit the funding calculations for all improvements associated
with the RTIF program to the City for review and approval. The following RTIF
program projects are identified for the project area:
Signalization
· Installation of a signal at the intersection of Hosking Avenue and Wible Road;
· Installation of a signal at the intersection of Taft Highway and Gosford Road;
· Installation of a signal at the intersection of Taft Highway and Ashe Road;
· Installation of a signal at the intersection of Taft Highway and the future Moun1ain
Ridge Road;
· Installation of a signal at the intersection of Taft Highway and Stine Road; and
· Installation of a signal at the intersection of Taft Highway and AkersNan Horn
Road,
Intersection Improvements
· At the intersection of White Lane and Stine Road, add a westbound right turn lane,
a northbound right turn lane, and a southbound right turn lane;
· Add an eastbound left turn lane, two eastbound through lanes, a westbound left
tuTJ1lane, two northbound left turn lanes, two northbound through lanes, a
southbound left turn lane, and two southbound through lanes at the intersection of
Panama Lane and Ashe Road;
· Add a northbound right turn lane at the intersection of Panama Lane and Stine
Road;
· Add a westbound left turn lane, a northbound left turn lane, a northbound through
lane, a northbound right turn lane, and two southbound through lanes at the
intersection of Panama Lane and Wible Road;
Michael Srandman Associates
H:\Client (PN-JN)\0216\02160037\Findings\0216003 7 Findings-Centex.doc
15
,. <òM(
Ò' '>c
:>- :..
I- n
- r
QORIGINAP
City of Bakersfield - General Plan Amendment!
Zone Change 04-1746 and Ashe No.3 Annexation
CEQA Findings and Findings of Fact
Mitigated Proj8ct Level and
Cumulative Adverse Impacts
· Provide an all-way stop at the intersection of Sine Road and Hosking Avenue;
· Add an eastbound left turn lane, a eastbound through lane, a westbound left turn
lane, a westbound through lane, a westbound right turn lane, a northbound left turn
lane, a northbound through lane, a southbound left turn lane, and a southbound
through lane at the intersection of Hosking A ve~1Ue and Wible Road;
· Add a westbound through lane and eastbound through lane at the intersection of
Taft Highway and Gosford Road;
· Add an eastbound through lane at the intersection of Taft Highway and Ashe
Road;
· Add an eastbound through lane and westbound through lane at the intersection of
Taft Higjlway and future Mountain Ridge Road;
,
· Add an eastbound through lane, a westbound through lane, a northbound left turn
lane, and a southbound left turn lane at the intersection of Taft Highway and Stine
Road;
· Add an eastbound through lane and a westbound through lane at the intersection of
Taft Highway and AkersNan Horn Road; and
· Add an eastbound through lane, a westbound right turn lane, a westbound through
lane, a westbound right turn lane, a northbound left turn lane, and a southbound
left turn lane at the intersection of Taft Highway and Wible Road,
SegnoentIll1provell1ents
· Ill1prove White Lane (Gosford Road to Ashe Road) to an eight lane divided
arterial;
· Improve White Lane (Stine Road to Wible Road) to an eight lane divided arterial;
· Improve Panama Lane (west of Buena Vista Road) to a four lane divided arterial;
· Improve Panama Lane (Buena Vista Road to Gosford Road) to a six lane divided
arterial;
· Improve Panama Lane (Gosford Road to Ashe Road) to an eight lane divided
arterial;
· Improve Panama Lane (Ashe Road to Stine Road) to a six lane divided arterial;
· Improve Panama Lane (Stine Road to the State Route 99 southbound ramps) to an
eight lane divided arterial;
Michael Srandman Associates
H:\Client (PN-JN)\0216\02160037\Findings\02160037 Findings-Centex.doc
16
~ ~f>.K£'1'
<:) ú
>- -<
I;:: ~
() c::,
ORIG1N~
City of BaketSfleId - General Plan Amendment!
Zone Change 04-1746 and Ashe No.3 Annexation
CEQA Findings and Findings of Fact
MItigated Project Level and
Cumulative Adverse Impacts
· Improve Panama Lane (State Route 99 southbound ramps to east of State Route 99
northbound ramps) to a six lane divided arterial;
· Improve Taft Highway (west of Buena Vista Road to State Route 99 northbound
ramps) to a four lane undivided expressway;
· 'Improve Taft Highway (State Route 99 northbound ramps to east of South H
Street) to a four land divided arterial;
· Improve Buena Vista Road (White Lane to Panama Lane) to a six lane divided
arterial;
· Improve Buena Vista Road (Panama Lane to Taft Highway) to a four lane
undivided arterial;
· Improve Old River Road (north of Panama Lane) to a two lane divided arterial;
· Improve Old River Road (south of Taft Highway) to a four lane undivided arterial;
· Improve Gosford Road (White Lane to McCutchen Road) to a six lane divided
arterial;
· Improve Gosford Road (McCutchen Road to McKee Road) to a two lane divided
arterial;
· Improve Wible Road (Panama Lane to Hosking Road) to a four land undivided
arterial; and
· Improve Wible Road (Hosking Road to Taft Highway) to a two lane divided
arterial.
Michael Brandman Associates
H:\Client (PN-JN)\0216\02160037\Findings\02160037 Findings-Centex.doc
~ 'QM~1
170 ~
>- -
I- m
- ,...
'-' t>
ORIGINAL
City of Bakersfield - General Plan Amondmenll
Zone Change 04--1746 and Ashe No.3 Annexation
CEQA Findings and FIndings of Fact
Slgnfflcant and Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
SECTION 4:
SIGNIFICANT AND UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE IMPACTS
4.1 - SIGNIFICANT AND UNAVOIDABLE IMPACTS
There are no significant adverse impacts that cannot be lessened or eliminated via implementation of
the mitigation measures; thus, implementation of the proposed project will not result in any project-
related or cumulative significant and unavoidable adverse impacts,
Michael Brandman Associates
H:\Clicnt (pN-JN)\0216\021600371Findings\02160037 Findings-Centex.doc
18
~ ,¢Mf/ì
o ~
>- -
,... "'
- ,...
<.J t:)
ORIGINAL
City of Bakersfield - GenOl'a/ Plan Amendment!
Zone Change ,04-1746 and Ashe No.3 Annexation
CEQA FIndings and Findings of Fact
Feasibility of Project Alternatives
SECTION 5:
FEASIBILITY OF PROJECT ALTERNATIVES
CEQA requires that an EIR include an analysis of a reasonable range of feasible alternatives to a
proposed project c~pable of avoiding or substantially lessening any siw>ificant adverse environmental
impact associated with the project. The discussion of alternatives is required to include the ''No
Project" alternative. CEQA requires further that the City identify an environmentally superior
alternative. If the ''No Project" alternative is the environmentally superior alternative, an
environmentally superior alternative must be identified from among the other alternatives, (CEQA
Guidelines, Section 15126.6,)
As set forth in these Findings, the project, with the mitigation measures incorporated, will have no
remaining significant adverse environmental impacts, The City has, in addition to incorporating the
recommended measures to mitigate the identified impacts, reviewed a range of potential alternatives
to the proposed project. The proposed project's EIR discussed the No Project/No Development
Alternative, the No ProjectlDevelopment in Accordance with the General Plan Alternative, and the
Reduced Density Alternative. An Environmentally Superior Alternative has been selected !Tom
among the three alternatives evaluated in this Draft EIR, An alternative that is environmentally
superior will result in the fewest or least significant environmental impacts and will achieve the
project objectives of the planning effort. The City Council rejects each ofthe Alternatives, on the
grounds that they are infeasible, fail to meet the objectives of the Project, or fail to avoid adverse
environmental impacts, as set forth in greater deta.il below.
5.1· NO PROJECT/NO DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVE
Under the No Project/No Development Alternative (No Project Alternative), the entire project site
would remain unchanged and no new development would occur onsite, In general, the GPNZC 04-
1746 and Annexation project site would continue to support in part, agricultural production, a single-
family residence and associated outbuildings, and the site would continue to be undeveloped,
The No Project Alternative would result in fewer transportation/traffic air quality, noise, utility and
service system, hazards and hazardous materials, biological resources, cultural resources, and
agricultural resources impacts in comparison to the proposed project. Under the No Project
Alternative, the site would remain in its present state primarily supporting the one residence and
agricultural efforts. Onsite agricultural activities are currently somewhat restricted due to the
presence ofthe two nearby schools and the approaching residential development. In contrast, the
Michael Srandman AssocIates
H:\Client (PN-JN)\0216\0216003 7\Findings\0216003 7 Findings..centex.doc
19
I. ~I\K".ý
Ò' ~
>- m
t- r-
"õ (:)dOfIIG\mIl
"~. .__.. m_U_'__..,,~,_ .__..._~__._ __ . ..._____~.__."~.. ~__
City of Bakersfield - General Plan Amendment!
Zone Change 04-1746 and Ashe No.3 Annexation
CEQA FIndIngs and FindIngs of Fact
Feasibility of Project A/lematlves
proposed project is an extension of the existing pattern of development in the project area, Moreover,
this alternative would not meet the project objectives to create a residential community with single- '
family dwelling units that will enhance the quality ofthe City of Bakersfield and create a desirable
lifestyle for homeowners who reside there, provide residential development of sufficient scale to
penni1 master-planning of infrastructure, parks, open space, and public services to achieve the
greatest possible efficiencies and synergies, and lastly, the No Proj'ect Alternative would not supply
housing to meet growth projected for southwest Bakersfield.
5.2 - NO PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GENERAL
PLAN ALTERNATIVE
The No Project/Development in Accordance with the Existing General Plan Land Use Designations
Alternative (General Plan Alternative) evaluates the development ofthe proposed project under the
land use designations assigned to the project site in the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan, '
Under the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan, the project site is designated as follows: 80.07
acres are designated Resource-Intensive Agriculture (R-IA), and 106.80 acres are designated Rural
Residential (RR). With the R-IA designation, parcels must be a minimum of20 acres, Under the RR
designation, each developed unit must be on at least a 2,5-acre parcel. Thus, under the limitations of
the General Plan, there could be a maximum of 42 developed units on the project site, This
alternative would result in 832 less residential dwelling units than the proposed project, It is using
this assumption that this alternative is compared to the proposed project.
The General Plan Alternative would result in fewer transportation/traffic, air quality, noise, utility and
service system, hazards and hazardous materials, biological resources, cultural resources, and
agricultural resources impacts in comparison to the proposed project. While this alternative partially
meets the project objectives, the amount of housing allowed under the General Plan Alternative (42
homes) would not be sufficient to create a residential community with single-family dwelling units
that will enhance the quality of the City of Bakersfield and create a desirable lifestyle for
homeowners who reside there and provide residential development of sufficient scale to pennit
master-planning of infrastructure, parks, open space, and public services to achieve the greatest
possible efficiencies and synergies. Moreover, the General Plan Alternative would not supply
housing to meet growth projected for southwest Bakersfield.
5.3 - REDUCED DENSITY ALTERNATIVE
Under this alternative, a total of 504 dwelling units would be constructed, which would be 370 units
less than the proposed project. All other project components would be similar but incrementally
Michael Brandman Associates
H:\Client (PN-JN)\0216\02160037\Findings\02160037 Findings-Centex.doc
20~AK~
ð ?>ú'
>- ~
':: ~
to) t>
ORIGINAL
City of Bakersfield· General Plan Amendment!
Zone Change CJ4.1146 and Ashe No.3 Annexation
CEQA FIndings and Findings of ' Fact
Faaslblllty of Projact Altamatlvas
reduced in relation to the reduction in development. This alternative would meet the San Joaquin
Valley Air Pollution Control District air quality thresholds,
The Reduce Density Alternative would result in fewer transportation/traffic, noise, utility and service
system, hazards and hazardous materials, biological resources and cultural resources impac1s in
comparison to the proposed project. Conversely, the Reduced Density Alternative w~uld have greater
air quality impacts (because the proposed project will mitigate air quality impacts to net zero) and
similar agricultural resources impacts in comparison to the proposed project. Under this alternative,
the site would support 504 homes. This alternative would meet most of the project objectives;
however, the Reduced Density Alternative would not fully meet the project objective to supply
housing to meet growth projections in the southwestern Bakersfield planning area, Specifically~ the
Reduced Density Alternative would contribute 370 less residential units, reducing the amoun1 of
residential growth in southwestern Bakersfield, an area that is rapidly developing to accommodate the
City's growth projections, Moreover, if as a result of a reduction in development in southwestern
Bakersfield, growth is transferred to other areas of the planning area, the proposed development areas
may not meet the City's objectives oflocating growth near major arterials or in areas of relatively
lesser environmental sensitivity. Accordingly, the Reduced Density Alternative does not meet some
of the project objectives,
5.4 - ENVIRONMENTALLY SUPERIOR ALTERNATIVE
CEQA requires that the City identify an environmentally superior alternative. rfthe No Project
alternative is the environmentally superior alternative, as in this case, the City must iden1ify an
environmentally superior alternative among the other alternatives considered in the ErR (CEQA
Guidelines, section 15126.6), Comparing the remaining two alternatives, the General Plan
Alternative partially meets the project objectives; however, the amount of housing allowed under the
General Plan Alternative would not be sufficient to create a residential community with single-family
dwelling units that will enhance the quality of the City of Bakersfield and create a desirable lifestyle
for homeowners who reside there and provide residential development of sufficient size to permit
master-planning of infrastructure, parks, open space, and public services to achieve the greatest
possible efficiencies and synergies, Moreover, the General Plan Alternative would not supply housing
to meet growth projected for southwest Bakersfield, The Reduced Density Alternative meets many of
the project objectives; yet, it would still have greater air quality impacts in relation to the proposed
project. While the General Plan Alternative does not meet the project objectives, it is considered
environmentally superior as it results in less transportation and traffic, air quality, noise, utility and
services systems, hazards and hazardous materials, biological resources, cultural resources, and
agricultural resources impacts,
Michael Srandman AssocIates
H:\Client (PN-JN)\0216\0216003 7\Findings\02160037 Findings-Centex.doc
21 ~ ~AK~~
o <!;,
>- -
'=- ~
"ORIGINA~
Exhibit C
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
'òAK$1J
cJ '!;
>- -
-- m
- ,...
(.) ~
ORIGINAL
"
.!!
..
i
"
:¡¡
..
-ê
~
~
~
i
i
~
¡
"
"
'<I:
i
t
ti
~
~
I
Ii
e
'<I:
"
e
it
I-
0",
w...
~,...
~¡
0..0
...IW CI
<CI æ
¡:::iZt:
ffi:z:Qo
COI-~o..
-w W
(/ z II:
!li!ozc
>-NZZ
<~«
:¡:ZMCI
:z:WÓæ
CI:::EZII:
-c 0
:Z:ZW
I-W:z:!::
L&.:::E(/ Z
«<0
I-ZC:::E
CSZZ
:io..<Q
C...I !;(
<~ CI
~W E
WZ :::E
:z:W
(/ CI
<
1
CI
I
II:
I
i
'"
I
'§,
:¡;
òI::
~
~
e
~
'"
~
.c:
~
'<I:
Z
<
...I
0..
,.,
00..<>
.§ '13
¡¡ >
·a ~
" 0.
.,¡ «:
§
00
'"
~
"'""
-5-
,.,1;;
ß.",
--5
0; ,.,
.¡j¡..<>
ij]
.~ ~
]:8
"'õ
'¿J "
'" '"
'=00
~~
"'~
.:a~
. ¡¡
'g ~
8.e
00S'
u ~'=
ii: ·S.9
u.. ,.D ~
~ .... 00
o 'p
1$ 13
Q [¡j 0; E
Z ¡¡ g a
<C 0:11_ "'0
Z '-... "
o -š~ .8
¡:: B ~ t;
<.... s-5j ~
'c:: 0 <;.oJ 0
0::: ~~ -= § ~
o . c ""'".t::...... "I:i
Q.. ..... 9 .. =' ~ g œ
tn 1't::;M ~ mo
Z:;i°o;~.s~
< 0.- '" _
~ ~ s.:Ë > ~ .
'"
00
"
¡;¡
"
.~
o
::E
§
,.,
'"
!
æ
¢:
~
....
o
.§
'¿J
'"
~
.Š
-š
1;
'"
]
00
]
00
o
~
~
¡¡
~
i
"
[¡j
]
~
'"
.¡j¡
«:
"õ
"
o
~
"
~
,EO
¡¡¡
o
...
...
..
..
><
g
!
00
~
~
§
]
~
'"
.S
~
'"
'E
§
.~
00
~ B
0.. .S
~ 11)
-5
~ ~
~ 0;
~"O c:
,,[¡j .!:!'
~ (d... :
o '" '"
.;:: :s a '3
~ > it) t;I)
~ e > 0
I..; ~< _
~
..!i .
'"
-6
,.,
..<>
00'13
.; ~
¡¡; «:
"
o
.
;,;
~ ~
.~ g "
.¡ § ~ ' t
,.Q'p ä ~ ~
¡¡~ ~'P6
If ! ~ ~
~ ~ >. 'r:: ''ª
.!::! cS ,.D 8. "3
Q..o 'E-o ~
¡r-6 -g ~ 8
y~ ë E €
'8' õ §:¡,~
c.. Qj 0.... =
'" ~ ~.s..
-6 ¡¡.. 00 1A -5
..r ¡¡. r¡ '" " ~
'§ o:E ] .S gp
8. OO'È T~ õ ..9
01).8 ~ 0 = 0
o !3 on'¡:; 5 =
.... .!š 8 8 ..t:: B
'!...·1'" ~ ~
00" ,.Q £' '"
t'j Õ ;:;;¡:J; §'
~~]~.g~
°0 -'$..c
ª~ ~ ¡¡ .¡j¡ Ê
~eø.[o II)
.~ 0 OJ:) 'S :: e
~ 11) Þ.8 g- ";j .~
I: .s.... "0 ,.d_
·S U ttI C c/) ~
~ £ 0 ~.9 C c
"e .5 -5.5 g 13 .,g
~ ~ ¡::.8"O J: 0.. C)
::::¡ e ": § ~ :!:J 'g. Ë
c:( ... - '+:; it) 0 11) ~
~~r1~eu 0
o 1!:on..:.2:;;::;;:u
II: "0'1; 0. .
;¡¡: ¡::¡ «: >.5 . .
'"
,.Q
~
8
~
~
",
~
§
~i
uM
~8
.(~
i§
.§§.
~;¡
,. "~7
Ò'~~ ~
uu _
>;¡;-:: JT¡
~ c:::I: r-
..., t>
<,;) ORIGIN~
~
.!!
Q.
~
i
~
.
'"
-ê
i
~
.
~
:&
~
¡
~
«
1
t
ti
a
I
~
«
~
~
~
¡¡
"
¥
è'
Q.
i
~
i
;
t
'"
~
"
~
·
"
·
~
J!
·
«
,ª$'
:a "'8
~.š
§ "8.8
... 1; ~
10 ~ ~
" '§ ~
... "O.~
tS¡.r"O<
de ..2 ¿
" s '-.;3
[,eo ~ p.
.....;::i u a
50 ¡¡' " ""
u "'0 ..c 51'
.Eo ~ ;:; "fI'J
" "
¡¡ ~ ~.c
,¡&~~
~ 0 e CI'J
~ 3 .9- §
1;1.1 0 ::I '.¡:j
~~ n
-B... = 5
\\) 0 ,0 0
"0- -= =
.fi § ~ 8
.5 'i3 ~-
=..... 0 B
~ 0 (.);:::::1
..c::l bO=
~" ,,0
~ '" .", ""
·~.S .~ Q
:E..2 E·~
-..c l..c
:.!.¡;; 'ª ~ ..
" :S:a 0
.9 Q, c.¡... ~ ~
õ ~ O'r;: <
g ~ ~ i! ~
tJ'J 4) >< U')
=..d U U 11)
8~~S-B
. .
]""
"" ~"
iiI ] ~ i
~ u œ ~
Q, ~"~ §~
.~ .S" N S
" "" '§ 0""
õ e "0 ~::.
t:" ,¡ "" g S
~ ~ CI'J Q.
8 ~ d Y; c..
= ... ....".... tE~
.~ ~~ 0 gfo
~ ~.".!!J
.~ -5 ~ .e 3
b è..c "'g ~
c.. Q,~ ~~
e ~~ .9~
"" S" <I"
-B e- IU II) f J
'r; B tiI ~ ~
13 ¡¡1j "0
§:." ~ '8' ;;]
'S ~ 0 Q, .s -"
C""'O rI'; (1) ....
u...~.s ~]
o 0 ..c = 'P ~
,D ~ _." ,-
=..... B -= .~ 13
~ S ~ 'r; g tiI
(/J ï: 0 ø ooõ
~... 8<.~ 5"
Õ ( ) 8 .-:: "0 . "0
.- §' " .:: " ],,,
-fi ... .::¡ õ éd 00 ca
;> c.. = œ'" "O.e
§"8'; gi~..2
,.=œc'p";=œ
0"'0 0 CJ .", 0 u
g8·.,gõ·.,,,
</'Jooorn8o¡;j
§.5 ~ § ~ g 0
_01=:=oo~~~
- =g og
<~u<VJurJ
.
. .
-'-~-_..__._---
»
,D
",,13
.S Èí
~ 5.
~ <' §
.
"
"
o ö 'E
~ ~ ~]
'-S~§ &"0
>( ......<:1
Go) ~ œ
,.c'::J .. ¡.;,
~o -5]0
-«I 50 go
"¡bO Cl'J0r--
~ '~ i! B <I'
13 0 0 ¡::;C)
11 - "<I' j!
.....:s «I 0 +:J
"'a.u ..s--9
ê-.;3 ·r;,~.s
.! ~ ~.~ ]
0.... 'r;: 0 IV
~~ &'~~
.;3 ~ g¡ _ ""
.2ie- ~~]
§ 0 .;¡ ,š.tJ
~·i ~ ~ Jj ê
~§¡¡¡.c ¡¡~
oo;:::ø::ø.~;go
2:E~\! c3;¡
<0.... f;:i .....
'õ't1~~~~
<01-0"'0 ':µ ''=">
uJ2.....81:8
iiI'''' ¡¡ .., .g ""
:::I CQ 'õ' '¡;,: .1j <0
~ ~ I-< 0 Q,) oS
.... 0 Q. 0.. Q. C;.;
~ 0 i:'> 0 - _.....
I: ..g.... d "'; ca Q,)
sou·... .;; ~.8
.'~ ..... 0 "'C ~
"s;9~~~5
~ '''B ¡¡ §' §';¡'"
....."S,¡,¡""iiI
f . 0 ~ > > 0 ."
L'\IN.;:2Q.OO.....e
......r4i:1SS "'0 "'0>'0
I . 0.... <I) 11) "'0 t;
~II),-=,,~'::::.a>.
... I""\J'¡:: ... E-< r.f.I r.f.I
.. ':::' " ~
~.......>.o..
..8 ,S ""
~ iiI
~ l~
~ ""
B.S ~!S
_ CIS "'00
~ ~È..9
"" 1j -¡¡ 11
; 'õ' s e
;:I !=:..59. 0
0- Q.¡ (.)
~ -5 ~ ¡¡ ,
!!J~]B~
.0.... r.f.I.~ ca
" ~ ~ .., 1j
SKU! ¡¡'õ'
8.'¡;; jj I"" 5.
~.];. -5
.~ ¡¡!ii. ""
~ "" tJ 'E S
'5'¡;;" 8'"
'5- ¡¡ ~o ,,'E
... 0 ¡:: 0
c.. t: 0 en
<0 <I) r.n '::I [ß
.c '" " ~._
;g.Do'ã
:g¡g~~~
"" 0 5._
';;'~ ¡..; ~ 5
I: 0 <I' " .E
c..- t? g 0
oBa.>-:'=
:: ,e .;3 -g .g
:::: "".;3 '" ""
~ e·... CIS '-
" "" ~ ~ 0
.~ g. § ~
ì:~,.,1j"
~~l!ë5"13
ø.B::Ia:J:I
.sB§oë
~..9 (.) oS Q.
.
$'
",,13
.8 ð
~ 5.
0:<-
"
o
~
,~
~ "
~,,~!
],~~~
o·g~,;
0">.;3
ø:: ,eo..1! 0
~'~E-<U
~ ii ,~
"""0 ".
B.cu...
M gr~oo
2~~-5
..... en.c
o :3 4;1''';:::
¡g~.;3 ~
,g 0 'ª ¡j
l~j ~
<I) r.f.I __ 5b
;¡ 's'" "
o 11) er:::¡ tIO
IT.! 0 \.tJ. =
~ ~ è,,:a
" ~ ".5
'õ' '"' ;.0
a.~ 6b CIS
0";10.9
;9.;; 6,..s
815=.8
::I ~.g =
"E.... g 11)
'""Q..1:!.8
.s g. ~ a
a 1:) § g.ö
'E .~.¡¡; õ u
0l:~>'"
.E ~.~ ~ ~
.¿ .;3. t-.;3 en
NI 1'1.500
; ~ ] .~ ~
-< ~ ~ ~g
¡¡~
';:::. ,..
Q t:>
ORIGINAL
..
p.. (
~
~
~,
§
~
Ñ
~
h
.!!~
UM
h¡
«Ñ
Iä~
.§9
~-
~1¡
IZIß
¡¡
:>,
:>, :>, ,0
,0 001
,0 a¡
1 00
00 ,S e '1 0
'1 !j ~
~ ~ " 0:< 5
" 0: 0
0: 0
~ ~" 5
~ ""
fä } .S "O.D 'p
i 00 .:' !3 :¡; 'ª "
" (;) "" oS Jì
~ 0 00 B " ,8';;0-s
~ " § ~ i 00 OCf.l~(.¡..o
"t .", -še: ¡; " .";:: = 0
i 00 "" ';) a'}'P .51 ( ') cu U (1)
" _ 0 " 00 "ï§ 00 ,,~-S;§
5 oS " -S .- 9 00 .
.. g.: 8 00 £ 'ê g o 11) .s ...
~ .¡¡; ] " oS '8':S "" ~
00 ~ ë ~ ".= ""¢:.g ~
. lj £8- " 8
~ §~ :>, ¡;: .; . ¡:¡. 4)
.. "" ~ §' ~ 8 ~""-S
~ 0 :> ~ 00-8 ~
" 'f¡ § ¡;¡> 'g",," ~ 8. 8';; (,,) S
0 " . :2.g ..VJ ~~ õI-SSo§
1 'iI ]~ ] " oSþ ]::1 ¡g....
" t.:: 01).-
'!3 ,,'" ~ .", u .8 -Š 00"
" (,,) V,) (,,) 0
¡¡ ~ .2 .~ -S 0''''' 0 S"" '"
! ~~ -':1 8-S a¡ ~ ¡¡j"o
E ï§ 8 £ co ~ s::: ><£ ¡g ,0-0
"t 1 .....- ..... ~s 8~]-g
i ] " . O¡jB
,,:9 þ'fi ¡!, g.J!J o¡::VJ,.c
-So ...-'"0....
; '8 ",,'" "'2 ..... 0''''' fä 0 = ~ ª ~ ~
o t oS j U ~.~ " ]I ~ s..8 <i ~,
£ " 0 ,ªij
~ Ë~ ~ ~S"" 00,0 _
~ " " " -ooE!-¡¡
oS " 0 ] ..... '"" 0 o ,_ "is'- 'a e
>¡¡. .", . 0- .9- ~:I:: c:: ~
15 8: ~
~'" .g g"ii ~ ¢: 0 " §
" 00 o oS i3 oS .¡¡; ~ g¡
~ .~ = 0
,,"" ~ " ~ if.fi <~ Eo-<'''' II) 0 Ñ
0 > .~
¡ 00 " 0 .~ .", ~ '"0'- ~ ~I
" 000 g ,,00 :>, ~ ~ E! ¡¡j:g,o'~
00 8$
j g¡ 00 ] -s-8t'j ",15..
00 ,- 8 "gv.l-o
~ "". i3 "" > " 0 ]lo.!!<t
~~ ~¡j o 0 ~ g~
0) " " oJ <B~&. -S~ ~~{i ,'e
&1 E' ~ 'õ' 11 .2 ~ £a¡ 00 () ~ E ::$
00 " ..... ..... 0
.~ '.,C... -,,ª- "Ø~ 0..c::.=: s::: "tÑ
" .... e rn ¡:¡. .:!at+:: " " c.¡;;. a'} ¡:¡",.d'''''
I s::: ¡:¡.. 11) 0 8 8 .- -S > ';:¡';:: :È< ~Q,õ ~~
.2 0 It).s .!! "Š bO~~ """ .-
.c: .~-S:=] ~ .@~
.!!' 00 -S "" "" 00 "
.¡g -S "" 8 "1;0" .
:t: 8 -S oS '§ -S lJ ",0 0.2: t'; ~ !: "i!':
£ 0,g :; 1; 'õ " :>, ~gg~:
t: "" " Oevf~ "" oS ~~
~ .!:I:õ ~ In fä -S ê Q...... 0.. . 8 '75:g~f
. s::: ~ E 'Q[ .=-
." oS JS " £ ~<.S ,. 0 õI .- W ftI~
~ ~::I &'~--=- <' I/)
. 2,.c </I.. ß '€ t'; <' 'iI ¡¡j Þ on Õ ~~.ao"'g x'ò
." '>',§ e ,- 0 'i) boO ;.::: V'l '=> 0 f+-o e
l .;J oS < ¡j z o "" .- 00 ¡¡ 0'8 z z'g.8 0 ~
...¡ U._ 0'." ;¡¡ < "" ()
. . <8~<:r "-
! . . I- m
T-
O) ;:; <::>
"t ORIGINAL
.,
"
.!
IL
~
~
II:
i
..
"
~
~
!
t
~
e.
i
i
'"
€
.e
i
~
'"
~
¡
~
~
¡
~
~
-.:
"
Ii
"
~
~
"
~
Ii
.§
~
-.:
~
.æ
..
¡
~
g
ì1
l
¡
~
~
,¡;
~
.c:
~
:t
òI:
{!.
"
~
'"
~
~
~
-.:
:>,
,0
001š
,8 >
~ ..
ø::~
"
°
I/
...
c(
ii2
w
!;(
::IE
I/
:I
o
Q
II::
~
:I:
Q
Z
c(
I/
Q
II::
~
:I:
~ ~
B '"
~ 'iJ ~ OÐ
~ § Z,S
'" .'" -5 :;¡
¡:¡~'ii]
i'] 8 B
'r;;..... 5 "'"
Õ ~ "Ë ·8
.~ ~ 0 c..
8og"O
c.. C,,) ~ 0
,,¡:¡..s ¡:;
-5'E S
dO"""'~
° "~ "
v.læ! ,D
"", -
ii·" "''¡¡j
g]~:
V, o.!!l'iJ
11,).s ~.¡::
.-;:. == .s B
~ ° " ê
""-
0,,_
0,.0 0 be
-5 := ~'" ,j
'" "',
Ood .
" ~ ~
° ~" "
._ 0 0
.." ~)"
- ~ ~
~ 0 B
-8 ~ ]
4) rn "'" {/)
...J:! ~ 0 ø
.::¡ -.;J bJ)~ 0
~ 0 ~"'O:õ
1:3 .... ~ ; ~
&.5Q.."'O;E
.!! .¡:: e ~ :>,
"'~ -
¡¡ "''¡¡j'
... .....: "C rJ)._ =
~oJ¡¡:¡§¡¡.g
~ .ñ ~.~ Õ ~
,,¡¡ ::;: ~'§ ~ 5
f.ooj == <I1~'iJ'"O
£
'"
Ii
¡¡; ....
'"
e
"
>
°
.~ .:;
'" .-
" ~
!a 8
§ 5
.'" -ð
"' 5
00"
:§á!
" .5
f"
~1š
,0 ~
" °
~ ~
.5 'B
13 '"0 rr.i
g¡ Iii .g
~ '" '"
g"-
~ ¡:; 6\,
] e e
g¡ ~ "0
00" ¡:¡
",0 ~
'S = "0
.- '" !a
.f9";;"'O
" ~ "
8 "a ~
~P"5 ..2
.;;;1 ~,.o
.S< e "'
Q. .~
~~P..
.- .... 0..
~ "'"
!ã 11)_
-l:i .~ t;
"'-'"
-" "
. .g, èd
MO",
, ~;'i
"'".
,,¡ "
::;:,sg¡
=§z
"
°
:>,
,0
001š
.S ~
~~
.5
'"
°
'"
1J!
~
'B
]
1š
> ,
° ~
e §
~ 'p
",g
,051,
::; ~
.¡;;'"
.." ¡:¡
i'~
.¡;; .3
~~
<¡ ~
",'!!
e.g
~ .~
8Q.
.~ ª"
"'-
~'¡¡j
'':'''0
,5 Iii
'"
".'"
]~
"''''
~~
Æ-E
:::: 'i
."
'" "
oJ¡ Iii
.'"
~ 8
== áj
is
:>,
,0
001š
.~ ¡:;
; 6..
s:~
"
°
"
] ~~
] ,s~
$~~~
.~ ~ tí,g
"'0-0_
e,§.cca
~ 8. B'¡;;
~ ¡ )~] Æ
.- ~ " e
"'O~ ~ ¢:: ;..:::
.~ ~.~..2
{/)""r;s CI,)..c
-'¡¡j"S
¡'¡:::'5! ¡¡.
'~B ~ 8
o..~""'t'j
" 1:0 "
-5g¡~-Šfj
§.g--: ~5
~ !a ~ 'B "
·lHj'ß 8 g
.-,J::: 0 C,)'::3
'~8e~8"
g~].!au~
o.o;:::s t':J''''
~ "0'- ~ rn
..,.- 8 f-<
g~~]O
Q..... ø t)
.c 0 '8,S c..
~] ~B~
»:: ~ §]
r:: ... <:.> 0 f/J
¡:¡ "' -5 '§:= 8-
¡¡ t :.o~~~;š
,0 C,,) "0 >.
-.;¡ æ (I) {/)~ ta'i:
.... ¡:: "'0 0
@~.g.ßBg.
~J:.saVJa.
!\,"'1š8u5
~ ª ~]-~]
:>,
,0
001š
.5 ð
~ ~
¡¡;~
I/
w
~
:I
o
I/
W
II::
...
c(
(J
is
o
...
o
ãi
'"
~
".
~
¡j
.~
is.
ª'
"
"
.§'
~~
-5u
....:I:
1~
00-5
11
~~
° ~
8 §
¡:¡ '"
ª.S
.23: 0
".¡¡
-5-
° i;j
-".
5 §
æ '¡¡
...; e
~§<
"''iJ
¡:,: ¡;
¡:Q",
...
"
°
~
~
~I
§
J
~i
hi
~~
-':Ñ
Ii~
.§51
!~
III¡¡;
ð- ,"'..,
>- i~ ~
'=- J!1
o (:>
ORIGINAL
c:
.æ
..
~
I
~
€
I
~
t
~
¡
¡¡
-.:
~
~
B
"
c:
~
i
i
e
-.:
l
~
~
I
i
I
~
'"
;
.c:
.2'
:t
..
I!
b
c:
"
¡
~
!
~
-.:
»
-"
b013
.~ ¡;
~ 6.
E: ~ 8
"
o
.'" ¡¡ ¡¡
11,)~11,) o~'O
~-Š~B~ 'Èi0~
'5' B ~ ¡j." g Q Þ
... 0"'0 §.. .... ~'¡;';
~~ ~ fä "'O.~ ~ ~ ~
-£I :¡:: " bO rJ ~ -" <3 ¡¡
.!f~~~s,g ~,9~
,¡¡ (1) ª U ~ tS ~.... ~
e <3 'J:! g ë -š ,9.¡j "
~c......l1,)bO(,,) bOo..'j
IOU] 1.1: 11) .e r/.)
~ § rJ'!ä '¡¡] '6 ~
~:B'Š ~~.Š ~O"'d
-"0 "'. ~"'''
iU ¡:: e. CI) . "'0 .9 CI.¡:o
..d0ø..u~ª rlJCd~
;;~Uª-813 ,9<3 g
o ":¡::-8 ,,_ ·e'"
.~ Cd ~ ._..... d .8 0 §'
ê rIJ~ 5h~ ë ø.SQj
oÊo~l.i=io"'O"">
c..B"r:: U·~ø. B g.g
bO " ..... :¡::...." ""0 0
.= ~ . ¡:o t+-;.= .e B .....
~ 'C 1-0 ~ 0 U d (J ......
~o..B~d.J:) o=~
~g~><š::;¡ ~]:ö'
«I µ..= 0 c:¡....d .J:) 0 ::I
~ fi"Q ~ t'd :; :::: t,) rJ)~
11,):::: 01):.;;2 J: (.) «I]
"os'I'" ¡¡.~';¡=
; oS .¡:;¡..... e >. «I
::1'- ::s C 0.. u..Q CI
~ ~.-. i ~ 4) j> CI) ';;;
.~ .Q ø.. .Q !2 oS ~ ~.~
- Q, þ " Q, "'" ~ .-
- ~..... Cd 0 d 3 >
~ 5 U en .s 11) .9 ø'P
-:::0.5013~ õG)~
·8 =ä ~;9 ~ -ã. 5 ~ § d
ø...c 0 """ 0 den..... 0
00 =r.E= 0 §rJ5Õ'p
Më.goo~·.c u5E~
...c II) (.) ~ 11) ~ ~ "0 rIJ t'd
.,.)êL.s::s.ctJ Oq(ClO
_c..oo~=~<tS8~
; ~.¡ ë ~ 8 .
"
-"
õ
~
"
.¡¡
:s
~
"
"
"0
"
<8
]
.13
i
o
-
¡¡
'"
~
o
j¡
-" .;
g"
" .",
"'" .-
o .::
" 1)
o os
'+:: c
~ .g
os "
~ È
"0 ¡g
¡¡ 8
~»
.¡: -"
.813
'S "0
o 'õ
::E ¡o
.
.S
"
"
j
~
'6
§
~
><_ t:.:~
o ca g:J 0
~..c=_o
.~ r/} _ 0..
.¥ c.. «I ..s
d H.S CI)
11,)"0 S .
> ..... = 11)
eoo==
0..<.2 (,) e
B H::;; a
'E,g.;¡i
a;§&
8<3'ib'
2; B B i>
Cf} ~ x Q,
"'ti; S
~ ¡g g ~
11) 0 ¡.L ~
Q,'- 0
~ ';j .
Cf} ~ g. ~
Q)oo]
<3 " '"
._ 11) Q) ~
~ 1š B 0.0
13 =ä ~ .5
Õ ~;.=.s
" ' "0 S .
J: Q,:-;::: c: ":":
~M~8-
o Cf} !$" Cf} ã
~:::S.,g-E
..0 Cf} ~ ~ t1
k>].9oQ.
<3,,~J:I¡¡
'õ ~ Q.~ ~ ø
=.... 00
~= - c:
-5.0( g.:§]
" . ¡¡ ~-
.~ "5 Cf} ~ li
';j e ~ §-.;¡
> Q."O ;¡ Cf}
~e.El-<~
>( ¡: g ~
w 11)._ 0 e
,9
·
o
.¡:
Q,
þ
'~
8-
§'
"
.51
õí
15
oJ
·
"'"
o
~
"
'6
¡¡ .;
~fl
"0
.e "
:e~
~]
'õ ~
" 0
.g .!i
os"",
~ 0
.", ¡(j
~ ~
·
.
,;
>..~
" " ~
:: <3 is.
- .~
os ';1 "0
.;1~B
~ ~ ~
';j 0 0
~ " .
6b~Q,
.- ¡¡
is ~ <3
~ " 0
.,g-EI-<
" 0 0
,13 is if
S"O "
~o~
"'" ~.,,\
o "....
B õ 8
~ " ~
,- ~ "'
"0 » "
'" " "
<3<3,9
.~::: ~
~ ''''
e " 0
.E!~Q
0] I-<
È"",~
] ~§
.¡¡ ¡¡ 8
'¡;': 1:: I-<
::: Q).g
'" ¡¡ Q,-d
'E Q,13 g.
> 0 - î
- - ¡¡
""0
" " Q, "
~ Q, ¡g Q)
~ Q,';;;¡ Q)
.S- ¡¡ Æ S
~ ø.= 8
- Q)'- 11)
<"'~-"
.
~]
_ -""
" ';1"
" :J-
'§'.~ g s.-g
Q,..... "0 Cd
"M ,," .
<300<3~
c+-;I-<OC+-;_
oQ,oO_
",,-"t's
.g~]~~
o ~ Cf}'- i3
~E§~o
" 'B .", := .~
~ 'Q¡ i -š ~
,.cI..S!.¡:: 0.0-
-001'1-"
.s:E "'6 ¡¡
1-š¡::~8:
_C+-;..... I-< (13
~ 0 ~ : 'ê:
: e·~ 0
'~ ! [¡ i
t ,13 -š <8 13
Q, e: 6.S fIJ <Ii
I-< 0 ~ Q) ~ ~
Q) e,¡;;, "0 "0 '" 0
....0 c:I Q) ::s fIJ ~
'5 ,- - - .a Q,
I-< § fl g s.§
O",'~ 5:: ~ 8
CI:.I CI:.I_";";::s
5 ~ §..cI'- "0
-. '" ~ "
0"' . "0 èS. I-<
g ~ " " '" 0
c: o.o..c Cd 1-<....
0:-;:::= ~~ "0
U S .- .- .g
CI:.I~:: ~go~!:I
~~=õ~E
>>"OJ-E:Ö Q)'S
oS fIJ "0 I-< CI:.I
Q, Q) Q) "' 11)
e~at+::~5
11)=~~'õ~
= ~ Q) ::s Q) Q)
<.;¡ e "'¡¡¡.s
.
~
],
e
]
t .;
'11
" .
'E "
~~
Q 5
.S >(
""'<8
0_
1š~
~ bO
~·iI
.- "
~Ë
-" os
l~
" .S
i·ê
c.,9
"0 "
ã .;;
o".,g
~-
~]
"Ô--g
o >
<8 0
< ~
.
,'"
~
~,
§
II
~8
~~
-':Ñ
c:~
"-
.§9
c:~
~2¡
IIIZ
ð ~ t7<1'
>- ::&::i;¡ ~
t;; m
<,) ,..
ORfQfNAl..t>
c:
,t!
0;
~
f
."
c:
..
I
~
.. '
i'
i!
êi
~
~
c:
...
11
..
..
~
..
<1
..
c:
~
¡
.§
c:
~
...
c:
.!!
0;
~
c:
..
ø
¡¡
e-
O;
¡
c:
-!
!
~
t
'"
I!
i
!
!
..
...
Q,) ë:t- ~t;oo
> 0 - ~.!3
_ot) 'Oø oo~OO......tI
II) = 3 d ..... ~ ...... 'F;
5 '8' !iI ~" .~ ~ ... -i' 5
as'¡:: ø. = '+-0 .... .c 0 0..00 Q.,
Ao..>, 00,.....:...:; t:::.-:-::J .u
~~.c ~"'-..C:I :3,. ~
.c '50 "0 11) 11).:!oJ VJ .c ;;; 'E .c .~
SoB ø~~=o !:¡"'''''''
B Õ ~ 000 Õ·"" ''¡:: (;) ~ e
¡¡<:s ""8 ~ ~:s !i ~ ..." 8:
>-> '1 5,~ Ii ,8 i'; ¡¡ ~ ~ e ~ ~
11 § ~ ~G Ji fJ g. ¡¡ -;; _ È ¡¡.8
~'.o 2 100< .~ 6b ~ "'" Q.. ~ ~ "0 bO.S
,,. g¡, .&> 13" .§ 1] 13 8 00.&>8" is
>< '.d \\) t,¡: U ø as ~.- . s::: ;> .c
e 13 ~~ õ ~ õ.~ õ ~ ..... Be.... ~
§: ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ 0 ~ '5> § ~ go E:.c g
~~ a:s= ª"~~~~ ~~~.ä3
-.... ø >. 1-<:= >,'- , .c 0 d 00 ~
.š .9~ ,gp~.; -Š~~~2.š ~~.8 s
... +:3~.. oo>..0ø.E >.rni:S8
'8 ø 0 ø C .f:f.8 12 0 v 00 C1) "0 0
5.rf ~.g ~ '§'È 8 "Q, ~] § ] :¡;¡
o..~ co> "O~bI110 ø¡s ~..c:I"""
OCIO ..;;.u·:::: 11) õ=~ Cl: G,)0::Søu
d::::= ~Q,)o t.>d"O"'OCI: o,E.coø<
;.e¡ ~ I\) ~ ~ .!.~ ~ ~ ~ -g 11) ~"O ~ ~
~-Š .;; 'õ1.~ ~ ¡j ~ ~ 00 '¡j'¡¡ 8 ~ ~ ~
"-" oo';¡" '" :> 13 ~ ,8 ,8 '6 '" "'.&> Þ
""§ 0: SrJ'Jbl) "0_ l;~
'ê: 's= . ~ ~o 0 §15 11) ~ "'¡.g ~ ~ ~."
;;;>- ... ... (,) __.c I-< ..c:I..... I.i-i II) .:::1
8>."Og.... "0 -....c ø~o -5¡:Q
8-"0""'.... ~8~~6 ~g§:::o>->
S""8 ~g..g 0""':'==8 o-'-=-;:_~f
tIJ OQ..~ o.......c.... r>'.....co:S;;õ>-o...
.~ 8 g. l'! ~ 1::.8 oo.£i -Š 3.!!" 0 g ~
OJ - """;'; ~ ê 130 rn ~ ~ ~ ~ .f3 ] ;,;
.;; 'õ1 ""<s" . '~., ~"o _ _ :< "' ""
o ~ .~ >. '.0 § d & >. ~"I: ..,p"'O OJ 0 .¡:: 11)
~ 8 .rf ~ :~.~ .g '1-Š~.g ¡j ~'B 3:ä .¡¡
'C 1$ ." 3 "" ¡j i- 8." :> '" ".&> 0""
~:.:::= ~ Vl ~ 11) ti ·.o·c OJ ¡g ~ .. 11) c gp
"" 5b 13 00 8 '" §.= ¡; 0 0 ~;. . 0
..; It B "'~..!! êi.&>~'i! 13 ¡j 321'£;:::-.,5
..c - .... B «; (l. (,) ,? OJ 0 Q) Ò::.D Co::! ~ M
.~(,) VlOhS....ccu¡;;;.
... 11) '- 1+:¡ 01.).... _
",'ë' - .
=:I "" .
.
...
>->
.&>
001
.13 0
ã lõ..
""" "
ø:: -< 0
--
~ 0 OJ
o t;; OJ =
;..~ ";. ,3 ~
;;>~ ;9'::1::
~]13Èi~~
'Vi ~..: ] ~ .9 i
-Š-;l~@'~1!
-§C"O~OèCI
~.... ~ CJ ';I,..I: 0
]¡:¡"'.1:>"''''S
r£C~OJN~
o Cd Co::! - bO CJ
[3 lõ.. ¡¡ ] ~ .13 ]
!3]-ªª8~ ~
~ 1 ~.~ 5 <s ~
~ O"Ö::~-Š-ë
e '" 00 'õ1 .13 8
~ :¡:¡ .¡a ~J¡ :g ~
~~hh.9
] ~~~~.~] vj
'6h (,) Õ 11),~ 11) Vl 8
0=..: -'" 101';; "'':;
õ = C/. "ed.Q; CJ CJ
g~~~5'~S~
.c "'d ~ ~ ~'> ~ 2-
~ 1Ê ~ Þ 5.=; ~ 3
¿ 11) ~ u ~.c ~ '6'0
00:9>,0"'O,:+=>.,9
.- .... .-:;:"..J:I B Vl '- 0
(/) t) 0 U +=> =.- 0 OJ
W~,......., >.=~O)=
o ti t) ] ~ ,~- g -5
0:: ¡gr£~-g~~~~
::::) 0 V') .:>"'d..c: l:I "'C
o ~ '-D 'C 8 8 (,).r:! !;
I/ E~Jj "".; 6i"¡:J
~ ~~-Š-!~-Š:;¡
..J :::: g O).~;.;:! -g ã >.
04: ¡;¡~bO-«I"".D
iii: "';0..s.si It 513
- I V') = 0.... i:>~ '"'
- r--- :> 0) (,).... "".;"¡
!:i .,.j~O)~O)UI1)=,
13 5'~ ~ ~'[ -š -š [
.§
~
)(,
~
Ñ
Ii
~g
.(~
¡§
-šg
~~
..~
li"
~~ ~
J :I~
>- m
I- T-
is CèJ
ORIGINAL
"
.!!
..
f
~
."
¡¡
'"
-ê
~
~
~
i
~
¡¡
Iii
«
i
..
!!'
ð
~
~
I
~
«
"
it
-;
Iii
'"
I
~
¡
"
:1J
&
>,
;
.c:
~
:t
4::
{!.
."
¡¡
."
&
..
.c:
~
«
00£
.§ '"
¡¡ ~
.5 e
00 8:
Jj ...:
o
o
.š ~
.8 g " tJ
~ '§' oS .g,
0. 0...;3 E::
:i~~ §
c.. Q B 6b
- .. .. g
~ E'~~
- 8 ~-
ã go 2J ~
~õS::
8: ¡; ~.~
«I "0 0 ~
..... - > 0
~.~ e =
'õ' d §'<S
~ "
c..:-g. ]
orn-~
;9~c;
..........:
."'~~~tS~..
B ¡a e:;::
e ,9 8:0
Q.,_~«IN
ooSi"3't !:I
.5 ~ ~ ã ~
"0 C. «I r
;: u~o
~ ~ .ë·~;
°a"8~.D
I ) .B :::1 1-0 «I
12 II¡ ¡¡~""<S~
U I! "..0" þ-
rn ......:;.... 0
~..- .~ 00.... U 0
::E_." 1! .~ ï§ -Ë 'ë'
i .... «I..c 0..
~c:: B'::~B.š
- ~ Sª~~-
S ~ 0 'C 5o~ 5o<S
_ 0 ö~eëe"E
_ ~ N - c.. CI:I o..~
:::IE I:: ......0 ¡,¡,..~ µ"'p
B ~ ~ ~ ~ ]:~ ~
.~ i
g 'õ]
'" ~ ã·~
ã .8 B:;;
"0 -g"sf~ ~ g
o 0 .. - ~..!!
= ~~~ ~
-i:i -i:i ¡¡ " " '" S;:
","0 ;Õ'Eã o'¡:¡
~~~ ~~:; is Š
~j~ ]~g ¡ '8
-.... <I) ª oS rJJ ~
]]] ã>-~ ~ t1
!j~~ ~~ã Š ~
'..o~.c~ ;~'"O .9 "0
- ã æ ã - Õ
~ææ o..<¡;" ~ B
¡¡ <¡; <¡; 'S f-< ] en '"
¡.... Q '- "'CI ou II!
e:t..... go§ .;; ~
o 0 0 .~ § ..8 .9
coc ~.",- 't t!
.~.g.g og~ œ>
~tl~ c~;:t ~ «I
~ I!J I!J ';;".. ¡¡
!¡BB .;;.Š:gæi ~ "
.S .8.S ~.5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ " 0" .-
.,.,., ]"....01:8 .g
(;j ~ ~ ~ E c.. ~< ~ r.§ I )
edl'Òta~a~~"OIo.,Q)",s::
.ê> .ê> .ê> ~ '" ~ ~ ã ~ j] j
~~~E:§~~~~o~~
!SS~ ~.8:¡;¡:¡;¡i~Ji~ ~
;:: ~ ~ .ê ~ ~ ª ª.... ~:$ -8 =..
..g «I «I C':S ,5_ 3: 4.> QJ:I: t.o:¡ 0> '> O.~
~ _ "0 "0 ¢:: ~ .... > "';;
.~ S '3 ~ ~ «I .- ..... «I ~. 8 "0 8'J::
13 ¡fJ en ~ ~ :g 8 eE-t ~ ª,8 ª'ª
t:..e.E.E § -< Q.. Q..~~.=..:!..sea
~...~... ~. .
'"¡'f
'C 0
~ ~
~g
.;; --g
:;; ~
§ "
" ~
ã ...:
~ B
<S ~
.. ~
.9 'E
~ <S
o ~
~ 0
" "
~ e
...: .g
o
! -g ~
~ ~ >
~ 't -<
æ cŠ ~
'" ~:;;¡
õ c3 <n
] ] t
~"ii
~ ~ o'C
œ cu ~ i
~ ~ ª ~
0':: ~::::.;;
~..:..." ~ ~;g
8'~ 8 8::1
]:~ ]: ]:]
~
.;;
:;;
"
.§
o
~
..
.9
~
~
'E
<S
~
o
"
.9
. ..
...
~
~
~,
§
¡~
.!!~
~§
«Ñ
,,9
.",
.§9
,,-
~i?i
Iaß
..
~~
Cj i:i:~
:..
I- m
- ,....
ø ~
ORIGINAL
l
co
~
8.
&!
...
c:
..
f
c:
~
~
i
¡¡¡
..
c:
~
" -š ~
= " " .. "
c: '" .6 Y " tj .g>
~ " ] ] £ "
] '" ¡¡:J ~
... 0 ~ õ '~ ~ 'g'oS .~
Iii ~ ~ g ¡¡ ~ c.. c...;¡ e 'Ë .¡j
'"
" .. .. '" .~ '() 11)'''' c.. Ei
'~-S~ [ I '"
i!' £ £ £ ::c - '6 ] .g- .g- ª 0
..
~ --g L:' --g --g '§ ·C ] 0.1 ~ .¡j ::c
£ ~ ] .!! e .¡j "i" .g- ª
.¡j J! .¡j .¡j 0 13 j
~ '" -¡¡go. " 'E .¡j .¡j ~
'" 0 ..s ;:s
" ! " ~ :Ei~~
.13 0 £ " ..s
<.> .J! '" .. ~ " " ~
ø ~ ~ '~ .. £ ª g.2J~ ~ -= .J!
¡ ¡¡:J '" ~ '" 8 ~ "
{; £ £ ~ £ ] ]~5òO ª -( -s '"
> 'Ë ~ h ¡¡.~ 1 1 1 '" 1
c: --g '6 --g '" " 0:: ~ ª
~ .¡j § I .¡j § ] ....¡ ~ -=>0 >- ~ ~ ~ ~
"t ~ ~ ~ 'þ :: :::: > ..
" ] " 'è e ~tE -( ~ ~ ~ ~~
c: -= .g> 13
.!! ~ j ..s !3 o..:E..... ~ OJ)-§,'ÉÌ>'ÉÌ>
II; -( 0 ¡¡:J 0 ª U ( )rI'J::::f-< ~ æ æ æ æ æ
; ] ~ " .. 0- <.> -Sf:!"
'Ë '" £ £ ::E ..... I-<,.....J ~ 'iä <t: <t: <t: 'iä
c: .. '" ~ 1!1 0 c.S cD o .... ..
-š ¡¡ £ '§ "" > ::c f-< f-< f-< f-< f-<
<1! ~ £ § ~ " B ~ 0
g ~ " IS, '- '- '- '- '- '-
--g £ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 .§
¡¡ .¡j '" ....¡ o e.g c.. " " .§ ã .§ ã
< .¡j --g ::c B ....¡ t:I.... ~ œ .S 0 :i
e- M bL).9 - "'0 ';:1 ';:1 ';:I
3 ~ ~ ~ ¡¡..h ~ I 1:)
.¡j -s <.> I <.> ¡¡ ~,
"- OJ) " ~ ~ "
i ~ -= ..a '" " _ ::I.. œ ~ ~ .1
~ " 0 ] ª 'S"O c.> II) ~
-( -= -š '"
~ ~ '- ~ " '- 0- '" ~ rr- .13 .13 .13 .13 .13 ~
-( -s '- . >
0 Ei"", 0 ] o ~ '" f:!
~ 8 8 g¡ " -Š " " " " Ñ
& ~ ,g .¡3 --g II) : ... id -S -S -S -S -S Šl
" ,g ,g ª~<EcS~
.¡j ~ ~~ ~~ 1;j 1;j 1;j .. .. 1;j
... --g --g --g --g ::I.d oþ.... - - - ea ]]
; " ]-g .. S ~ rI'J .... 13·.... 0 .~.~,~ ,§ .!!
.c: " .¡j 0 L:' 0 L:' ~ ~ .~ bI).... U II) g2
..c..:..:' 0::£ 0::£ -= .~ ~.- ,,'õ'
~ ~'i .~"'O ,~ > 'E ". 8 -S ~ CII rI'J ø UI ~ ~ =:;:
3: " " <.> " ¡¡ oS co,.c c..
::i " " ::c :~ ::c .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
it: ><::= ::i:= " ..s S':~3~ '- '- '- '- '- '- "tÑ
~ ~ <.> 0 <.> 0 ~§ 4:: ~"O ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 c:%
::E¡¡ ::E~ ::E <.> ~ a¡ ª 0 ~ r ~~ ã " § § § .§ ,,-
... c;¡ o .. ~ c: 0 .§9
c: "", ~ ~ ~ ,,¡¡ " " ( ) IU... " C> æ ~~..s .~ ';:1 ] ';:1 .., ';:I 1;j c:~
" b >'" > ¡¡ > ;> ';j >-' ..!! .. .. ..
'i o 0 'S: o 'S: e- e e·¡:: e .~ .., e~e¡¡~ '3 3 ¡ï ~ 3 ~,
a t1.~ t:..:a C> .... 0. ¡¡ o.te J:! '3 D3~
~ 8''6 .U .§ .§~ .§~ N ...c to) .... r::s rn ~ ~ ~
- § .§.§§ .§ § ~ ~"'~-¡¡§,.s .s .s oS.¡j oS oS ð 'ò ~ ~~
.! ..
. . . . . . . . ~ ~ ~ 8:~ "'- . .
~ œ .... I:I:¡ . . . .
>- "'-
t- m
- ,....
Q t>
ORIGINAL
...~._._.- --- ..._..._--~_..".. ,-~_.__._---_.._-
~
-i!
0;
f
!
]
'"
I
i
~
i
:Ii
~
I
-.:
...
Iii
..
r
ti
I!
~
Iii
.§
Iii
e
-.:
æ
1
(!
1:i
.t
.t
¡
~
=
It:
;
.c:
.2>
~
..
{!
~
..
...
1:
0::
..
.c:
..
-.:
..
oJ'l£ ..~
ª..!! ,. .; ª
.. -e"g .¡¡¡,,-
oJ' ~B~~i'õ
] ct:¢::: (1) ~ =' §
~ dJ ~ -;j 11) 0 '¡:
-"O<.!J.£jg
§ Ei "0 '" "0 ~
.§, ooª-gEi~
,¡:: of!;g 11) i:I:I 0'-
§ n~š~-š
~ œ..ø..~~8:
- "-I rJ);j i .. "
~ ~ 11 ¡¡ª .. oJ' ¡¡¡
..- --"- ¡¡¡-
~~~~]~jt
-g.§, ~ ~." .,8 -=.£j
o·¡:: "0 "0 g å3 ..£ "0
0:: "O§ § ~ ~ í! §
"9 §o .8.8.Ë - "'"
'.... .... .c u .S 0-5
(/);g~t:.fI"~~
1~ og-æ-£l·Š~
~ .. 0 "' ¡;; ,:..
o = .¡::; ~ 0 OU .".G
~-g 1£ d ª oJ'-g
"....!!¡¡-aÊ]...
:ã~eeea8~
t.¡ ~.- B â oS := a - ...
~ ~ ~ ~ -= -g .gf ~ ~ ~
~ o_'9..2::3]"O....~
!2 '-Eo§¡ $-0] ;::J §-fo~
~ ".¡:: .8 Ei -.9 .8 .8'¡::,e
.... ~'" ~.8 i5 "€ 1;i-g~
lõ:ç.:9 o..c::rJ) 0°::\"'0
c ,_ 0 ã 1:: 0 " ~ 0 ¡¡¡
~-š~ 8~i:l:li:I:I~(I)
t:_Ei:go-o:g:gt:¡ä
~<,,<¿¡¡¡«:L...¡
~.. ..
-š
.. .,;
oJ' "
ª .. ª
ë 0";;
¡¡B]~
5 ~ ~~
< "Oct="'d
bI) §..!! Ei
~ ,ßOO·]
;s ¡'Jl~
::I: ~ ~ ~
"0 i:I:I t:; i:I:I
ª ~ 8 '"
"i .- co; ª
~ ~õ ~
" ¡¡¡ ..
.Š ] -~ -~ 'i
'" _ 0
..... '" 0::
§ g i~ ~
.~ ,Lj'C'1;j·...
g '"'" § ~
~ a:s § 0 "0
£ "'~~ §
.9 Õ rn ::I ~
~j~~B
~ .. .. >
~ "õ<
Q. "¡¡¡ bI)
B -= § _ .a
u ..2~..c~
~"ObDbDO
~ d::S s::t
.2. i5 g.a.....
"'; ..&J,.C.... 0
" ~.; "0 êi
.. ,," Ei·"
..g d:5 0 Q
';> i:I:Iof! ~ ~
o "0 v.I 1::: 11)
Q:~~g.š
. .
] i:I:I....
oJ' 'ã g:
.¡j~ ..§ t -ª
os..... ~ 0 -a-
~.i -=1,1 J!
..( ~ ..!2 ~ ~ "'0..2
] ,¡ l~·~ J 1
~~ ~"O,g ~~
~- oª"; ~"
ih~ =>'0 «I~
ê\t:E0 ~~j r.f=
_1! ª ,,'" ]-g
.. :§:;; ª~-a e'"
.d f: -gp ~; g a ~
l °i g~-š ....-.
oS .,8", .fJ'õ§ ~~]
§ ~ §.. §.,8 ~ § 'iJ ~
o O.fl:"iO()~ o-.c
-s ,Š¡¡~£1l~ ~'g~
~ O~I1)~§i:I:I us",,=,
"0 .;3]~~d"O-g~.8ª
¡¡¡ 1;1.. '.., ",'~ ¡¡¡.9 .. ~
( ,) g:¡ oû oS ( ,)..... ~;:: ~
].¡j] ]'3]¡;;]~ j~~
'" .. '" -a Ei -a" -a::l: -a .,-
bI)~ ~ "~ ,,] ,,¡¡¡ ,,11::1:
!~!!~!~!]!]ë
Ei8 êJ êJ<E êJ:!î êJ~ êJ.§,§
~ -g -e -e -g -e -g -e -g -e'¡::'"
~.. ¡(j ¡(j" ¡(j" "' '" ¡(j '" g
( ,)>-,( ,) ( ,)>-.00 ß>-.IU§~
~.." ,," ,,:§ ,," "0"
"'~....~ "'.....~ ""'Ë
"'O"5b "'0 "'O"5b "'0 6 "'O~ "'O~.
"'0._ "'0 "'0._ "'0 <n "'0._ "'0 0 0
<::I: < <::I: <.. <::I: <:<-.9
-=
'"
¡..
.....
o
êi
."
I
.13
"
-.9
.
.
.
.
. .
-ä
'¡::
~
-¡¡
'"
';;:
:a
"
..§
.§,
'¡¡
¡¡¡
B
1
..1!
..<:
.9
"g
~
'E
..e
"'
o
~
~
~ 8
¡¡ .:¡
~ .2
;:.. :E
¡: ~
~ "
.... >
~ e
~ e-
~-
'" .
..
.g
~
~I
§
¡~
-i!~
8M
..8
..~
-':Ñ
~¡¡;
..-
i9
~~
e'i
~~
~'Q
o ii..,
>- ¡;;
':: r--
.., ~
ORIGINAL
c:
.!!
0;
{
c!!
1
'"
I
I
~
" ,
f
c:
.£!
I
c:
<0:
...
Ii
·
J
·
~
!
Iii
E
<0:
c:
.!!
0;
1
~
'G
~
~
i
~
&
"
;
.c:
.2>
:t
'"
~
...
c:
·
...
~
·
.c:
..
<0:
B
" ~
.~~ ~ ~ t
~~:g~~~ ~ -g
~~~:g'j~ ~ "
-¡¡ -¡¡ " ~ ti! ~ ~ ~
~~j ""8 ~ en 8
:a :a ,~ j ~ § 'õ ~
j~gi~~ ~ !j
i -¡; ~ '¡; ] íì B ~
.- '"' 0 [;¡ .~ ~ 1;;
o ...::J 11.1 0'1 Q. ..w
~ ~ ~ B ~ 0'1 = 00
B~]îB!j E! B
~]~c:;î~ 1~]
o ~ ~! ~.~ ~
~.s.8~~.w -SoB
~ .~ --g ~ .Ê '" "1â.~
r9>oBr.n.-Ë ~'"O>
~~~'S.Qg g;~5
.s ::s o:IJ .s '"0 "'0" ~.::;::S. ~
.., ~ .~ - " 0"" ~ '"
......>'E~~ "'1J'õ~
~~a<Boo t'd ...
,8 ~ g ~ ~..§ Ë ~ ~ ~
.¡::: ~ ¡:o 0 -< VJ. CI)'(,I) ~ Q.,
00----- -~-><
_uoooo 00>.0
ª j ~ j j j ~ j; ¡~
....:I(I: ~aS(I: ccl )ccc.e·_>
~E~!!~~~1â~f!:I::a
[;¡ [;¡ [;¡ [;¡ [;¡.., [;¡" ~ §
~~Ø,.¡Q..ø....g,Q.¡§F;;~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ !::~ ~ 0 >.s
o see e e~ e;g e 8
i.§.§ i.§]j i~ §~
......
.
..
B
""
"
~
en
:I:
~
o
en
....
o
~
B
t
§
;§
1::
o
c
~
0\
"
:;
~
E
g
~..¡;~
~'5
~~
æ:g
~ :~
¡..."
" "
i:i.Ë
.. ..
"'e "
-'"'
.
"
.¡:: -¡¡
~ ~
-¡¡ :a
:'5! §
> "
:a [;¡
" -
] g
.~ ~
~
" B
B ~
~ ~
~i
I ~
... g
o
~ ~
§ ,..;¡
j j
~ ~
-g -g
ciii ciii
5 g
~ ~
;; ;;
" ..
~ g
~ ~
~ ~,.:..."
o 8'~
f ì~
.
. .
..¡"
- .¡:: "
¡¡ E '¡::
{~~~~
"E":g-¡¡1â
]ti!:Š:a~-¡¡
i""ß:a o~~
-¡¡ ~ " .Ë § :a
":a[;¡o",,
~§:;;L~]
(1) ø «I 9 0
~.ËgB,",~
"ë:s_'gcccc
~,",-goBB
cc cc ~ c:: î ~
BB¡¡~.9~
-.. '>;,J:I _..CI
~ eà B ~ CD æ
j~8B~'"
~æ~--g~~
§'1ä.9~.9B
A-. E-< 11,) c::: 11) "Ô
....... ...... ;¡ l! 1::1 ~
o 0 .:¡ B j oii
~ ~ ] 8 ~ ,~
5~~~ ca~
"--g~~[;¡:ß
~ o--g~ê~
'::~~~]]
~ ~ "E "E c:: c::
~~~cE~.£
"'0"'0 ~ :!5:9:9
õõC)C)~~
11) <I.) 4) IU IU 11)
;> ... ;> ;> ;> >
o 8 8 8 8 8
iîï]]]
......
.S>
g
01
..
:.;:
C>
~
'"
N
vi
!5
'p
"
"
en
,e
-¡¡
0::
J
"
~
o
-s
"
c
~
.c
~
~
..
13
!5
.~
.~
13
~
'p
:a
--g
o
Z
~
~
~,
~
§
~
¡~
.!!~
8~
=~
<0:';
~:;;
"-
-89
c::f{
£Š
«>t>. j;-
ð- ~~
>- ñi
~ b
ORIGINAL
~
i
c:
'"
"
¡
I M "!
~ r-:
§ '"
'" §
.~
J ¡¡ '~
'"
'" .51
~ .8 13
13 !¡::
'" !-5 ..,
c: 5 ~
l
) :g 1i
1i 0
.s -s
"8
¡¡ "8 ~
0
I ~ "
,r;,
,r;, ~
¡ ~ i
~
I ~
¡¡
8 e
" §
; 0 '.,
~ .., .~
.c: ~ g¡, ~
f .., ~ !§
~ ·s "
'" c: -¡;;
~ Or: ~ ~ §
1 ;¡ 0 Or: ~
:€ - :a
.¡j !!
! ~ :g " --g
os ... 0
1j 0 ð z
~ öQ z
'"
~
~
c:
,!!
II;
i
"
¡
I
~
t
~
~
~,
~
§
§I
~
,!!
8M
=§
"';:¡
¡§
i~
Pi
..~
~~ It~
c=_
>- m
I;; &
"ORIGINAL