Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 38-98RESOLUTION NO. 3 8 ' 9 8 A RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS AND APPROVING NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR RELOCATION AND EXPANSION OF THE AMTRAK RAIL PASSENGER TERMINAL IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA OF BAKERSFIELD, AND ASSOCIATED RELOCATION OF AND CONSTRUCTION OF TRACK AND WIDENING OF EXISTING OVERCROSSINGS AT "H" STREET AND CHESTER AVENUE, MAKING FINDING OF CONSISTENCY AS PURSUANT TO SECTION 65402 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE, AND MAKING APPROPRIATION FROM THE TRANSIT CAPITAL INVESTMENT FUND FOR SUCH PROJECT. WHEREAS, the goals of the Circulation Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan call for enhancing rail service capacities and usage in the planning area, while improving air quality through improved transportation services and providing planning area residents with a choice of travel modes; and WHEREAS, the aforementioned goals are to be achieved by more specific policies, among them a policy to encourage the development of a multi-modal public transportation terminal; and the adopted Implementation Programs contained in the Circulation Element call for cooperation with affected agencies in encouraging the prompt development of such terminal and in planning the delivery of Amtrak services; and WHEREAS, a Project Study Report for the relocation and expansion of the downtown Bakersfield Amtrak terminal has been completed as a result of cooperative efforts involving the City of Bakersfield, the Kern Council of Governments and responsible State transportation agencies; and WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield has agreed to assume the lead agency functions for carrying out the Amtrak rail passenger terminal relocation and expansion, together with associated realignment of tracks and widening of existing railroad grade separations as necessary in the downtown area; and WHEREAS, notice of time and place of hearing have been given at least ten (10) calendar days before said hearing by publication in the Bakersfield Californian, a local newspaper of general circulation; and WHEREAS, for the above-described project, an Initial Study was conducted, and it was determined that the proposed project would not have a'significant effect on the environment, and a Negative Declaration with mitigations was prepared; and -- Page 1 of 4 Pages-- ORIGINAL WHEREAS, the law and regulations relating to the preparation and adoption of Negative Declarations as set forth in CEQA and City of Bakersfield's CEQA Implementation Procedures have been duly followed by City staff and the City Council; and WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Bakersfield, in accordance with the provisions of CEQA and the City of Bakersfield's CEQA Implementation Procedures as amended, conducted and held a public hearing on WEDNESDAY, MARCH 25, 1998, on the above described Negative Declaration, notice of time and place of the hearing having been given at least ten (10) calendar days before the hearing by publication in the Bakersfield Californian, a local newspaper of general circulation; and WHEREAS, the Council has considered and hereby makes the following findings: 1. All required notices have been given. 2. The provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) have been followed. 3. An Initial Study has found that the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment. 4. Mitigation measures as incorporated in the Initial Study are included in the project to ameliorate impacts. 5. The proposed relocation and expansion of the Amtrak rail passenger terminal in downtown Bakersfield is consistent with the Circulation Element goals and policies incorporated in the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan; 6. The proposed project is consistent with the Implementation Programs listed in the Circulation element of the 2010 General Plan; 7. The City Council hereby finds in accordance with Section 65402 of Government Code that construction of the railway passenger terminal as proposed, in conjunction with all required acquisition, disposal and exchange of any land parcels, and vacation of any public rights of way in connection with construction of the proposed rail terminal facility and associated realignment of trackage and widening of existing railway grade separations, is consistent with the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan. 8. Based on the absence of evidence in the record as required by Section 21082.2 of the State of California Public Resources Code (CEQA) for the purpose of documenting significant effects, it is the conclusion of the Lead Agency that this project will result in impacts that fall below the threshold of significance with regard to wildlife resources and, therefore, must be granted a "de minimis" exemption in accordance with -- Page 2 of 4 Pages-- ORIGINAL Section 711 of the State of California Fish and Game Code. Additionally, the assumption of adverse effect is rebutted by the above-referenced absence of evidence in the record and the Lead Agency's decision to prepare a Negative Declaration for this project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED and found by the Council of the City of Bakersfield as follows: 1. The above recitals and findings, incorporated herein, are true and correct. 2. The City Council hereby approves and adopts the Negative Declaration for the proposed relocation and expansion of the downtown Bakersfield Amtrak rail passenger terminal and associated track realignments and grade separation widenings, as described in the Project Study Report approved in December 1997, subject to adoption the mitigation measures listed in the attached Initial Study. 3. The City Council hereby finds pursuant to Government Code Section 65402 that the proposed railway terminal project, together with all associated acquisition, disposal and exchange of land parcels, and vacation of any public rights of way in connection with construction of the proposed rail terminal facility and associated realignment of trackage and widening of existing railway grade separations, is consistent with the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan. 4. The City Council hereby appropriates from the Transit Capital Investment Fund an amount sufficient for completing construction of Phase I of the Bakersfield Amtrak Terminal project. ..... ooOOOoo ..... -- Page 3 of 4 Pages-- ORIGINAL I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on 14.&E ~ .~ 1~8, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER CARSON~EMOND, SMITH, MCDERMOTT, ROWLES, SULLIVAN, SALVAGGIO COUNCILMEMBER //~'~ COUNCILMEMBER COUNCILMEMBER CITY CLERK and Ex OfficicLClerk of the Council of the City of Bakersfield APPROVEd ROB PRI~E MAYOR of Bakersfield APPROVED as to form: JUDY K. SKOUSEN City Attorney By: JUDY K. SKOUSEN City Attorney T:~Planning~Rndamtrak,CC -- Page 4 of 4 Pages-- C)RIGtNAL INTRODUCTION A. Background Lead Agency: Address and Phone Number: Date of Checklist Submitted: Agency Requiring Checklist: Agency Contact Person: Name of Proposal: City of Bakersfield 1715 Chester Avenue Bakersfield, California 93301 (805) 326-3786 September 8, 1997 City of Bakersfield Marc Gauthier City of Bakersfield Planning Department (805) 326-3786 Bakersfield Aretrak Station Relocation Project B. Introduction to the Environmental Review Process This Initial Study has been carried out in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act {CEQA). The purpose of an Initial Study is to provide preliminary environmental investigation of a proposed project and to determine if it would have a significant adverse impact on the environment (CEQA Guidelines § 15063). Based on the preliminary investigation in the Initial Study, the Lead Agency - in this case the City of Bakersfield - decides whether it will be necessary to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) if a significant adverse impact would occur, or to prepare a Negative Declaration, if all potential impacts can be mitigated. A Mitigated Negative Declaration is proposed when the initial Study identifies environmental impacts which are potentially significant but can be reduced to insignificance by incorporating mitigation measures into the proposed project (CEQA Guidelines § 15070). it was determined that the proposed project, the reiocation and construction of the Bakersfield Aretrak station, could result in potentially significant environmental impacts due to the proposed action unless mitigation is incorporated, and thus a Mitigated Negative Declaration will be circulated for public review for a period of 20 days in accordance with Public Resources Code, Section 21091 (b). C: Introduction to the Proposed Project The project is the relocation and construction of a new Aretrak station. The new Aretrak facility would consist of a 7,000-12,000 square foot terminal building, a parking area with 265 parking stalls, bus parking and 'kiss-and-ride' facilities. The facility would function as an multi-modal terminal for Amtrak passenger rail service, and three transit services including the Airport Bus of Bakersfield, Aretrak Thruway Bus Lines and Golden Empire Transit (GET). Currently, these transit services operate from separate terminals in the downtown area. The City of Bakersfield 2010 General Plan states: September 8, 1997 Initial Study and Environmental Checklist - Preliminary Draft Bakersfield Aretrak Station Relocation Proiect "An intermodal transit facility, serving Arntrak and all of the intercity and regional bus carriers, would enable passengers to arrive by one carrier and board another without leaving the site. Also, it would give passengers the flexibility to use one mode or carrier for haft of the round-trills and another mode or carrier on the return fine, whichever fit their schedule.... The advantages of such an intermodal transit facility over the present disl~ersion of carrier terminals within Bakersfield have been established.' (Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan) Aretrak has developed recommended station parameters which detail station size and internal operational characteristics needed to efficiently accommodate peak-hour passenger volumes. The Type 150B station development program, as recommended by Amtrak's Office of the Chief Engineer, would be the prototype used for the development and design of this multi-modal transportation center. Under this program, the station would be designed as a moderate-volume "pass through' station to accommodate 150- 300 peak hour passengers. Standardized features include ticket counters, furnishings, seating units, interior/exterior signage, restroom accessories, and interior/exterior finishes. The existing Amtrak station at F Street in Bakersfield serves as both the end of the line for the current San Joaquin rail services and the transfer point for further travel to Los Angeles on various bus services. Future utilization of the new Amtrak station at S Street may include the introduction of rail services to Los Angeles, future light rail service, or high speed rail transportation between Los Angeles and the Bay Area. In order to accommodate future rail operations, such as expanded Aretrak service or high speed rail service, the station would be expandable to a Type 300A internal facility layout. The Type 300A facility is designed for high peak-hour passenger volumes ranging from 300 to 1,000 patrons. Future expansion would require buildout of the station's second story and possible extension of the building's canopy to the east. Relocation of the Amtrak station from F Street to S Street will require track modifications to accommodate existing Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway (BNSF) freight service and Amtrak passenger rail service. An additional track would be constructed for an 0.9-mile portion of the BNSF mainline, from S Street to F Street, to maintain operational capacity through the City of Bakersfield. Provision of an additional track will require that the existing grade separation structures at H Street and Chester Avenue be widened. Construction of a railroad grade separation at Q Street would occur in conjunction with station development. -This-will involve-the--temporary relocation of existing BNSF mainline tracks approximately either north or south of the railroad right-of-way. These temporary tracks, or shoofly, may be converted for use as the Aretrak station access tracks if constructed on the north side of the railroad right-of-way. The Q Street grade separation project is exempt from CEQA review by Public Resources Code Section 21080.13, defined as: September 8, 1997 Initial Study and Environmental Checklist - Preliminary Draft Bakersfield Amtrak Station Relocation Project Railroad grade separation projects eliminating an existing grade crossing or reconstructing an existing grade separation. [Pub. Res. Code Sec. 21080.13] Q Street is also identified as the location for the primary interchange serving downtown Bakersfield on a realigned SR 178 (Crosstown Freeway). Previous studies have found that an Amtrak station at the proposed site would be compatible with the SR 178 realignment and with future high speed and light rail services. D. Project Location and Description D. 1 Locatio n The project site is located within the City of Bakersfield in the southeast quadrant of the Bakersfield downtown area. The new station site is located approximately 0.9 miles east of the existing site at F Street. The site is situated along the northern side of the BNSF, between Q Street to the west and T Street to the east. The northern boundary of the project site extends west along 16th Street from Q Street to S Street, and continues along a public alley from S Street to T Street. S Street bisects the project site. The project site also includes three parcels located immediately east of T Street between the alley to the north and the BNSF line to the south. Truxtun Avenue extends east-west one City block north of the project site. Truxtun Avenue, a major east-west arterial, provides access to concentrations of commercial establishments to the north and west and industrial areas to the south and east. Intensive retail and office uses in downtown Bakersfield are located one-half mile west from the proposed station site. The site is centrally located between the eastern and western residential areas in Bakersfield. U.S. Highway 99 is approximately two miles west from the project site. The Bakersfield Airport is located eight miles from the site. The Kern island Canal extends north-south along the western portion of the site, parallel to Q Street. Figure 1 illustrates the location of the project site and its relationship to the regional surroundings. The project site is relatively flat. Although the tracks entering and exiting the site are straight, there is a spur curve on the southwestern portion of the site. The site, with a total lot area of approximately 260,563 square feet, or 5.98 acres, is divided into three areas by S Street and T Street. West of S Street, the site is a partially-developed, rectangular area measuring 98,090 square feet, or 2.25 acres. East of S Street, the site is square-shaped measuring 88,792 square feet, or 2.04 acres. The smallest of the three areas is located east of T-Street and measures 38,502~quare feet, or 0.88 acres. Portions of S Street, T Street and 16th Street would be acquired for project development. Approximately 11,818 square feet, or 0.27 acres, of S Street would be abandoned; 17,505 square feet, or 0.4 acres of T Street would be converted for station development. A 5,856 square foot portion of 16th Street, or 0.13 acres, extending along the south side of the street, would also be acquired for project development. September 8, 1997 .. OoRi~tNALc~ Initial Study and Environmental Checklist - Preliminary Draft Bakersfield Amtrak Station Relocation Project The project site is designated as Mixed Use Major/Office Commercial land uses in the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan. The zoning designation of the site is C-C (Commercial Centerl. Existing land uses on the site include retail, industrial and warehousing activities. In general, the project site is composed of several metal-framed, single-level structures and related parking areas. The former City of Bakersfield Public Works yard is located on a two-acre portion of the site between S Street and T Street. Currently, the yard serves as a general storage facility for the City. Industrial and commercial businesses, including an antique shop and an auto repair shop. are located along 16th Street between Q Street and S Street, The former City Merchandise Company building, currently owned by Purina Chow, is located east of the former City of Bakersfield Public Works yard. A concrete slab is all that remains of a demolished · structure at the northeast quadrant of the T Street-BNSF Railroad intersection. The City block south of Truxtun Avenue, which includes the Beale Memorial Library, is also designated as Commercial Center by the City's Zoning Ordinance. Land uses west of Q Street are zoned for C-B (Central Business) uses. Land uses in the immediate vicinity include the Bakersfield City Hall, Holiday Inn Select, the Convention Center and a new 13,000-seat arena (scheduled for completion in Fall 1998) located adjacent to the convention center. The St. George Church picnic area abuts the project site to the east. Figure 2 shows the location and boundaries of the project site and the surrounding land uses mentioned above. The City of Bakersfield currently owns two acres of the project site between S Street and T Street. Six privately-owned parcels are located on the western portion of the site, south of 16th Street. The BNSF owns property adjacent to the railroad, immediately south of these six parcels. The 0.88-acre portion located east of T Street is divided into three privately-owned parcels. Project implementation would require the acquisition of the nine privately-owned parcels and BNSF property in order to provide the land available for terminal expansions and additional support facilities. Station development would also involve the dislocation of the existing commercial and industrial buildings, none of which are known to be historic or of high architectural value. :D.2 Project Description Development of the Bakersfield Amtrak station would involve the construction of a Tf~pe 150B station, expandable to a Type 300A station, with a 7,000-12,000 square foot terminal building, a center station platform and parking area with 265 stalls. An overhead canopy would provide partial shelter along the southern side of the station building. TWO Amtrak siding tracks, separated by a 24-foot-wide platform, would be constructed immediately south of the station building. The raised platform structure for -passenger loading would-serve both Amtratc tracks to accommodate two-way service (north to Oakland and south to Los Angeles). Building materials would likely include stucco, brick and/or wood. Figure 3 shows the concept design for the Amtrak station. The proposed station would provide surface parking for approximately 265 parked vehicles, 40 spaces in excess of the standard identified for a Type 300A station. This surface parking would thereby provide capacity for future potential high speed rail service. This parking would be arranged so that patrons pass through or by the September 8, 1997 Initial Study and Environmental Checklist - Preliminary Draft Bakersfield Amtrak Station Relocation Project building, with its ticketing and baggage-handling facilities, on their way to or from the train. Bus parking would also be provided at the west end of the site adjacent to the train stopping location. Connecting bus/rail passengers transferring from one mode to another would be able to walk across the station platform without passing through the enclosed terminal building or across the auto parking area. Construction of a new grade separation at the Q Street-BNSF Railroad intersection has been approved and would be coordinated with station development. Right-of-way acquisition for the Q Street grade separation project and the Amtrak station project would occur simultaneously. Track, bridge and roadwork design for the two projects would be developed under one contract. The Q Street grade separation design plans incorporate the Aretrak siding tracks which require a lineover track lead and a railroad bridge over the Q Street undercrossing. Construction of a new O.9-mile Aretrak lead track between F Street and Q Street would occur wholly within the 15th Street right-of-way, which has been franchised for rail operations. It would be necessary to widen the grade separated structures at Chester Avenue and H Street to accommodate the additional track. Construction of Amtrak siding tracks north of the existing BNSF tracks would require the bridging of the Kern Island Canal on the west side of the site. The canal would be placed in a box culvert, similar in design to that used for the adjacent 16th Street right- of-way. The portion of the Kern Island Canal located south of the 8NSF tracks would also be bridged as part of the Q Street grade separation project. Traffic signals would be installed at the Truxtun Avenue and S Street intersection to accommodate increased vehicular traffic traveling to and from the proposed Amtrak facility at S Street. The site would also make accommodations for trucks exiting the Arena/Convention Center complex. As part of the arena project, a bridge and pedestrian sidewalk will be constructed over Q Street in conjunction with the grade separation project. Trucks exiting the arena will travel one-way from west to east, over this bridge and exit through the westerly bus circulation driveway onto 16th Street. Station development would also involve the relocation or abandonment of utility lines and public street rights-of-way. T Street, from the public alley to the BNSF Railway right-of-way, would be abandoned. The public alley would also be incorporated into the Amtrak facility and used to access the auto parking area on the eastern portion of the site. Existing underground water and gas lines would be relocated and an overhead electrical utility line would be placed underground or abandoned. It is anticipated that the project would require 29 months of construction activity, to include three phases. Although project phasing is not finalized at this time, it is expected that Phase t would involve the construction of the bus parking and kiss-and- ride areas. Phase II would be the widening of the grade separation structures at H Street and Chester Avenue, and the construction of a rail bridge at Q Street for the Amtrak rail sidings. Aretrak lead track work and the associated signaling and s~w~t~,9~ September 8, 1997 . ,~. ~O~iGiNAL Initial Study and Environmental Checklist - Preliminary Draft Bakersfield Amtrak Station Relocation Proiect work would also occur during Phase ii. Phase III would involve the relocation of Amtrak passenger rail activities to the S Street site and the construction of the station building. D.3 Proposed Facility Operations Passenger rail czperations and Aretrak train layover (overnight storage) would be relocated to the new Aretrak facility. Currently, the Bakersfield Amtrak station serves as the southern terminus of the San Joaquin Amtrak rail line, with four round-trip trains daily (four southbound arrivals and four northbound departures) and eight Amtrak Thruway bus routes to Los Angeles and other Southern California cities. Amtrak trains -currently arrive at the Bakersfield Aretrak station at 1:45 p.m., 4:32 p.m., 8:22 p.m. and 11:45 p.m. Trains depart from Bakersfield at 5:00 a.m., ~:30 ,a.m., 12:25 p.m. and 3:55 p.m. Of the four train sets, three are stored overnight at the existing facility; power is supplied to the individual passenger cars for general cleaning and heating and cooling purposes. The new, expanded facility would continue to serve as both an end- of-the-line station and a transfer hub for Southern California service with eight trains daily and overnight train storage. In 1996, the Bakersfield Amtrak station served 245,543 total passengers. It was the busiest station on the San Joaquin Route and the fifth-busiest station among all state- supported Aretrak stations in California. The Bakersfield Amtrak station operates 365 days a year and serves an average of 670 passengers daily. During the peak summer months, the eight trains typically serve over 1,500 passengers daily. Peak hour per train throughput is estimated to be between 175 to 200 passenger boardings or alightings at the Bakersfield station. Passenger volumes are anticipated to increase as the frequency of service and types of rail and bus services offered at the new Amtrak facility are implemented. September 8, 1997 c'"ORi§iNAL ~' Initial Study and Environmental Checklist - Preliminary Draft Bakersfield Aretrak Station Relocation Project Figure 1: Project Site Location and Regional Setting SeDtember 8, 1997 ~O~GtNALt:' Initial Study and Environmental Checklist - Preliminary Draft Bakersfield Amtrak Station Relocation Proiect Holiday Inn Select Hotel Parlcing .t Fig,ur? 2: Project Site Location and Surrounding Land Uses I Best Western Hill House Truxtu~ Avenue Bede Memotih 6th Street LibraryParking City of Bakersfield Offices former Public Works Yard Hellenic O~m'ch Concrele Slab Map not to scale September 8, 1997 8 Initial Study and Environmental Checklist - Preliminary Draft Bakersfield Amtrak Station Relocation Proiect ,Figur,e 3: Co,ncept Design for Bakersfield Amt.,rak Station September 8, 1997 9 Project No. I. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST EFFECT :iMPACT S P EARTH Gemog~c Hazems T:~:xxj~a~ny WATER F'OOdlnC. Dra,nage AIR A r Qual~ Odors BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Plants Animals Rare/Endangere~ Spemes Habitat Altemt~m TRANSPORTATION Tra ffic~CirculatJo~ Parldng Traffic Hazards AirANat~tRall Systen~ CULTURAL RESOURCES Archaeological HistoricaJ S = SIgnif~:ant X X X X X X X X X x !1 :MITIGATION I.AND USE Com~at mliity Growth Inducement X Storm Dmicage X Natural Gas X ElectScity X POPULATION J HOUSING J X HEALTH HAZARDS X NOISE X J AESTHETICS ::::::::::: ::1 UO~ANOGLA~ X X j ENERGY USAGE (NOTE: DISCUSSION REGARDING THE ABOV~ IMPACTS IS A'I-rACHED.) P = PotentiaJly Significant X X X X X X ~:MITIGA TION : Io. X I = Inaignifmant/No Effect X X X X X X X X X xl Y = Yes N = No ORD = Ordinance ORIGINAL II. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Does the project have the potential to degrade the qualily of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal species, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of Iong-tarm, environmental goals? (A shoE term impact on the environment is one of which occurs in a relatively btfef, definite period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) Does the project have impacts which individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more =eparete resource= where the impact on each resource is relatively =mall, but where the effect of the totel of those impacts on the environment is significant). Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Y N ORIGINAL III. FINDINGS OF DETERMINATION (Projects where a Negative Declaration or EIR has not been previously prepared, or where a previous do( not be utilized.) ON THE BASIS OF THIS INITIAL EVALUATION (check one): It has been found that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environmet therefore, a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. It is been found that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environmen not be a significant effect in this case because MITIGATION MEASURES, as identified in the Discuss Environmental impacts, have been incorporated into the project; therefore, a NEGATIVE DECLARA' be prepared. It has been found that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and a= (ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT) will be prepared. PREPARED BY: ORIGINAL IV. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ISSUES 1. Project Title: Bakersfield Amtrak Station Relocation Project Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Bakersfield Planning Department 1715 Chester Avenue Bakersfield, California 93301 Contact Person and Phone Number: Marc Gauthier, Principle Planner (805) 326-3786 Project Location: The 5.98-acre project site is located within the City of Bakersfield in the southeastern portion of the downtown area between Q Street to the west and T Street to the east. The site is situated along the northern side of the Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway (BNSF), south of 16th Street and a public alley which extends east-west between City of Bakersfield offices and the former City of Bakersfield Public Works Yard. Project Sponsor's Name and Address (Applicant): City of Bakersfield Planning Department 1715 Chester Avenue Bakersfield, California 93301 6. General Plan Designation: Mixed Use Major/Office Commercial 7. Zoning: C-C (Commercial Center Zone) Description of Project: The project is the establishment of a new Amtrak station to include a 7,000-12,000 square foot terminal building, a station platform and parking facilities to accommodate 150-300 peak hour patrons. The facility would function as an multi-modal terminal with Amtrak passenger rail service and three transit services. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The site is adjacent to Bakersfield's developing visitor/entertainment center. Land uses within the immediate area include the Beale Memorial Library, the Bakersfield City Hall, Holiday Inn Select, the Convention Center and a new 13,000-seat arena (scheduled for completion in Fall 1998). Specifically, the Beale Memorial Library is situated immediately north of the site between Truxtun Avenue to the north and 16th Street to the south; the City of Bakersfield offices are located immediately north of the former City of Bakersfield Public Works yard between S Street to the west and T Street to the east. ~The hotel, conference and arena facilities are located immediately east of Q Street, between Truxtun Avenue to the north and the BNSF Railway to the south. The St. George Church picnic area is located east of the project site. 10. September 8, 1997 Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): California Public Utilities Commission, Federal Railroad Administration and California Department of Transportation. ORIGINAL Initial Study and Environmental Checklist - Preliminary Draft Bakersfield Amtrak Station Relocation Project Earlier Analyses Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration [Section 15063(c)(3)(D)]. In this case, the discussion of environmental impacts identifies the following:~ a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of, and adequately analyzed in, an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "less than significant with mitigation incorporated", describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site- specific conditions for the project. All of the environmental effects identified in the above checklist were within the scope of, and adequately analyzed in, the environmental documents listed in ( a ) above pursuant to applicable local and State regulations and guidelines. Supporting Information Sources 1. Bakersfield Municipal Code - Title 17; March 1995. 2. Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. Project Study Report - Draft; July 1997. Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. Aretrak Station Site Evaluation - Draft; June 1997. 4. Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. Aretrak Station Program Requirements - Draft; June 1997. 5. City of Bakersfield Zoning Map; December 1994. 6. ICF Kaiser Engineers. Metropolitan Bakersfield High Speed Ground Transportation System Terminal Study - Subtask 8.1 - Decision Notebook; December 1993. 7. Martin-Mcintosh. Downtown Terminal Site Evaluation Criteria - Working Paper; ~ Authority: Public Resources Code Sections 21083 and 21087. Reference: Public Resources Code Sections 21080(c), 21080.1, 21080.3, 21082.1, 21083.3, 21093, 21094, 21151; Sundstrom v. County of Mendocino, 202 CaI.App.3d 296 (1988); Leonoff v. Monterey Board of Supervisors, 222 CaI.App.3d 1337 (1990), September 8, 1997 IVYoRiGiNAL Initial Study and Environmental Checklist - Preliminary Draft Bakersfield Amtrak Station Relocation Project September 1993. 8. Martin-Mcintosh. Station Area Development Zones; December 1993. 9. MetroDolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan; March 1990. 10. Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan Land Use Map; July 1996. 11. Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc. Bakersfield Intermodal Transit Facility Plan- Final Report; June 1988. 12. Soil Conservation Service. Boil Survey of Kern County. Northwestern Part. 13. Table 6-2 Screening Table for Operation - Daily Thresholds of Potential Significance for Air Quality, CEQA Air Quality Handbook; April 1993 (as amended). 14. Table 11-4 Mitigation for PM10 Emissions, CEQA Air Quality Handbook; April 1993 (as amended). 15. The Planning Center. Final Environmental Imoact Reoort: Metrooolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan; September 1989. September 8, 1997 ORIGINAL initial Study and Environmental Checklist - Preliminary Draft Bakersfield Amtrak Station Relocation Proiect Discussion of Environmental Checklist Issues EARTH Soils The predominant soil on the project site is Kimberlina - Urban Land - Cajon Complex. This is a deep, well-drained soil with moderate permeability and high water capacity with slow runoff.2 The project will cover approximately 98.5 percent of the site; the present uses occupy 80 percent of the site. The displacement of soil through cut and fill will be controlled by Chapters 70 and 29 of the California Uniform Building Code (UBC) relating to grading and excavation. Compliance with relevant UBC requirements will ensure minimal on-site impacts relating to soil compaction and associated issues. Therefore, there will be no impact on existing soil conditions. In addition, as required by the City, the City will identify an approved site to receive any exported cut earth. Geologic Hazards The project site is located within a seismically-active region with numerous active and potentially active faults. Therefore, the project has the potential to be impacted by earthquakes and earthquake-related hazards - primarily from ground shaking which occurs throughout the region. However, there are no known faults on the site. The closest active fault is the Pond Poso Fault, located approximately 10 miles north of the site. Other faults within a 30-mile distance include the San Andreas, Garlock and White Wolf faults. The Breckenridge Fault is located 35 miles from the project site. This project will not increase the potential occurrence of earthquakes. The risk of earthquake damage to future on-site structures will be minimized since the new structures wilt be built according to the Uniform Building Code and other applicable codes, and are subject to inspection during construction to ensure compliance. In addition, potential flooding of the Kern Island Canal on the project site during a major earthquake is not anticipated as the canal would be comp[etely enclosed in a box culvert from the BNSF Railway to 16th Street. Due to these codes and inspections, there will be no increased exposure to earthquake hazards as a result of project implementation. Erosion/Sedimentation Construction may temporarily expose the soil to wind and/or water erosion. Erosion caused by strong wind, exca~7ation and earth moving operations will be minimized by watering during construction and by covering earth to be transported in trucks from the site. 2 Source: Soil Survey of Kern County, Northwestern Part. September 8, 1997 ~lV-4 ORIGINAL Initial Study and Environmental Checklist - Preliminary Draft Bakersfield Aretrak Station Relocation Project Water erosion during construction will be minimized by limiting construction to dry weather, covering exposed excavated dirt during periods of rain, and protecting excavated areas from flooding with temporary betres. Soil erosion after construction will be controlled by implementation of an approved landscape and irrigation plan. This plan shall be submitted to the City's Building and Safety Department for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. Any project involving more than 250 cubic yards of cut or fill must have an erosion and sediment transport control plan as part of the grading plan. The grading plan must be approved by the City's Building and Safety Department prior to the issuance of any building permits. The City of Bakersfield should confine construction to the dry season (April 16 to October 14), whenever possible. If construction needs to be scheduled for the wet season (October 15 to April 15), the City shall: ensure that structural erosion and sediment transport control measures are ready for implementation prior to the onset of the first major storm of the season; locate staging areas outside major streams and major drainage ways; keep slope lengths and gradients to a minimum; discharge construction into smalt drainages at frequent intervals to avoid buildup of large potentially erosive lows; prevent runoff from flowing over unprotected slopes; keep disturbed areas to the minimum necessary for construction; keep runoff away from disturbed areas during construction; stabilize disturbed areas as quickly as possible, either by vegetative or mechanical methods; direct flows over vegetated areas prior to discharge into public storm drainage systems; trap sediment before it leaves the site with such techniques as check dams, sediment points, or siltation fences; make removal and disposal of all project construction- generated sittation from off-site retention ponds the responsibility of the contractor; and use landscaping and grading methods that lower the potential for downstream sedimentation. Modified drainage patterns, longer flow paths, encouraging infiltration into the ground, and slower stormwater conveyance velocities are example of effective methods to control runoff. Topography The project site is located in a relatively flat area. Development of the project site will require some land alterations involving excavation, grading, and fill. However, the project will not result in a substantial change in topography or ground surface relief features. No known unique topographic or physical features have been identified on the project site. Therefore, the proposed project would not pose any impacts to the existing topographic or physical features of the project site. II. WATER A. Quality/Quantity The project site is served by the City of Bakersfield's water supply system. The proposed project will use the existing water supply system. The proposed Aretrak station is consistent with the land use identified in the General Plan. Water usage associated with the proposed land use is reflected in the projections for September 8, 1997 IV-~)ORiGiNAL Initial Study and Environmental Checklist - Preliminary Draft Bakersfield Amtrak Station Relocation Proiect water consumption identified in the adopted General Plan and the associated Final EIR. The proposed project would not increase water demand beyond that already identified in the Final EIR. Therefore, there will be no impact on the local or regional water supply. implementation of the new Amtrak station would not increase the potential for contamination (resulting from non-point sources, such as vehicles on local streets, or from direct sources, such as the use of fertilizers on lawns and gardens). The Kern island Canal extends north-south on the western portion of the project site. As part of station development, the canal would be completely enclosed in a box culvert from the BNSF Railway north to 16th Street. This would protect the water supply and eliminate any potential for water contamination due to facility construction and operation. Compliance with National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements to reduce pollutants in construction runoff and protect stormwater runoff quality from pollutants that may be generated by operation of the Amtrak facility is required. This may include: regular parking lot and driveway sweeping; use of drought-tolerant plants; efficient irrigation systems and mulch; and use of screens at on-site catch basins. Groundwater There will be no topographical alterations to the site and, therefore, the direction of groundwater will remain constant. The proposed project will not affect any local aquifer, as the drainage of surface waters from the new facility will be controlled by building regulations and accommodated by the City's existing flood control channels, storm drains and catch basins. A site drainage plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the City's Building and Safety Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. The project will not have a direct discharge to local acquifers and, as a result, will not alter groundwater quality. In addition, project implementation will not create a demand for groundwater resources and, therefore, will not deplete existing groundwater resources. Co Surface Water Approximately 80 percent of the project site is covered with impermeable surfaces. Following development of the proposed project, approximately 98.5 percent of the site will be covered with impermeable surfaces. Although this represents a significant change, the new multi-modal facility will not significantly increase the amount of 'storm runoff above existing levels due to on-site stormwater drainage improvements. The amount of runoff will be insignificant compared to cumulative runoff in the region. In addition, the proposed project will not result in changes in currents or the course of direction of water movements in either marine or fresh waters because water on the project site does not directly drain into marine or fresh waters. September 8, 1997 IV-6°ORIGtNALc~ Initial Study and Environmental Checklist - Preliminary Draft Bakersfield Amtrak Station Relocation Proiect The drainage of surface waters from the multi-modal facility will be controlled by building regulations and directed toward the City's existing flood control channels, storm drains and catch basins. A site drainage plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building and Safety Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. Flooding/Drainage The proposed project site is not located within an identified 100-year storm flood zone. In addition, landslides and mudslides are not characteristic of the area and the chance of occurrence of such an event is remote. Therefore, the project site is not subject to threats of flooding, landslides or mudflows. No drainage problems were identified in the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan. Existing storm drain systems extend along the BNSF Railway, immediately south of the project site. The amount of impermeable surfaces on the project site will not change significantly from existing conditions. The drainage of surface water from the project will be controlled by building regulations and directed toward the City's existing flood control channels, storm drains and catch basins. A site drainage plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building and Safety Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. Due to the existing regulations requiring the submission and approval of a drainage plan, there will be no impacts related to drainage. III. AIR A. September Air Quality The project site is located between the Sierra Nevada Mountain Range and the Coast Ranges in the southern San Joaquin Valley. The site is situated in the southern portion of the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, a basin approximately 250 miles in length and 120 miles wide. The local air basin has a restricted ability to dilute contaminants and maintain air quality at levels which do not adversely affect the population. The topography of the southern half of the Central Valley is a significant factor contributing to the degradation of the air quality in Bakersfield. The elevations of the mountain ranges which surround the valley on three sides are high enough to impede the dispersion of pollutants from the basin and emphasize the effect of inversion layers. During the winter months, there are higher concentrations of carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxide, sulfur oxide, and particulates, with tule fog magnifying these poor air quality conditions. During the summer and fall months, there is a greater build-up of ozone, which persists due to stagnation of this regional air mass. For these reasons, the City of Bakersfield is designated a non-attainment area as it has exceeded the California Ambient Air Quality Standards for PM 10 and ozone. The air quality impacts of a project include (a) short-term impacts due to construction, and/or lb) long-term permanent impacts due to project operations. Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, issued by the California Office of Planning and Research (OPR) in July 1986, states that a project would normally b~.~K~ 8, 1997 IVJ~ ORIGINAL Initial Study and Environmental Checklist - Preliminary Draft Bakersfield Aretrak Station Relocation Project September considered to have a significant effect on air quality if the project causes a violation of any state or national ambient air quality standard, contributes substantially to an existing air quality violation, exposes sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, or conflicts with adopted environmental plans and goals of the community where it is located. The City of Bakersfield is within the jurisdiction of the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (SJVUAPCD) and adheres to state and federal mandates to reduce pollutant emissions and improve the regional air quality. Operation Impacts: The project is the relocation and development of a new Amtrak facility. The generation and concentration of vehicular traffic, including transit vehicles, at a new multi-modal facility represent a shift from the existing F Street location to the proposed S Street site. Therefore, pollutant emissions from vehicular traffic will remain the same and will not alter existing air quality pollutant emission levels. In fact, provision of a larger on-site parking area and air conditioned waiting areas at the new station may help to reduce pollutant emission levels generated by vehicles at the Aretrak facility. At the existing facility, the enclosed passenger waiting area and the outside canopy are inadequate to accommodate existing ridership levels. As a result, during the summer months, patrons typically remain in their parked vehicles with the engine running for air conditioning. Lack of adequate parking has also increased the number of "kiss- and-riders", which adds vehicular trips to the surrounding street network and contributes to the degradation of the regional air quality. Therefore, operation of the new Amtrak facility will have no adverse long-term impact on the regional air quality. In addition, the Conservation/Air Quality Element of the Metrooolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan indicates that the establishment of a multi-modal transit terminal could potentially reduce pollutant emission levels and, thus, improve the regional air quality. Policies listed within the Conservation/Air Quality Element include measures to (1) encourage the use of mass transit, carpooling and other transportation options to reduce vehicle miles traveled, and (2) establish park-and- ride facilities to encourage carpooling and the use of mass transit, Establishment of a multi-modal transportation facility may contribute to upgrading the regional air quality by reducing the number of vehicles in operation which relieves traffic congestion. A reduction in the number of idling vehicles results in a smoother traffic flow with fewer stops and shorter travel time. This directly affects the amount of vehicle emissions generated on a daily basis. Construction Imoacts: Preparation of the site for the Amtrak station will result in short-term exhaust emissions'from site preparation (the use of grading equipment that will generate fugitive dust emissions) and vehicle emissions. The facility's construction will comply with San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (SJVUAPCD) control measures to reduce air quality impacts (particulate emissions and fugitive dust) related to grading and construction activities, Specifically, all construction activities and ongoing facility operations shall comply with the SJVUAPCD's Regulation VIII - Fugitive PM10 8, 1997 IV-8 ORIGINAL, Initial Study and Environmental Checklist - Preliminary Draft Bakersfield Amtrak Station Relocation Project Prohibitions. The rules contained in Regulation VIii are required to reduce PM10 emissions; the rules are applicable to specified man-made fugitive dust sources. Controlling fugitive dust emissions when visible emissions are detected substantially reduces PM10 emissions. Suggested air quality dust mitigation measures, established by the SJVUAPCD, include the following: Pre-Construction All material excavated or graded should be sufficiently watered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. All clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation activities should cease during periods of high winds greater than a 20 mph average over one hour. All material transported off the project site should be either sufficiently watered or securely covered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. The area disturbed by clearing, earth moving, or excavation activities should be minimized at all times. Where acceptable to the fire department, weed control should be accomplished by mowing instead of discing, thereby leaving the ground undisturbed and with a mulch covering. During Construction All inactive portions of the construction site should be seeded and watered until grass growth is evident. All active portions should be sufficiently watered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. General Fugitive Dust 8. On-site vehicle speed should be limited to 15 mph. 9. All areas with vehicle traffic should be watered periodically or have petroleum-based palliatives applied for stabilization of dust emissions. 1¸0. During rough grading and construction, streets adjacent to the project site should be swept at least once per day, or as required by the governing body, to remove silt which may have accumulated from construction activities. 11. September 8, 1997 During rough grading and construction, access to the site should require the building of an apron into the project site from adjoining paved roadways. The apron should be paved or have a petroleum-base,~j, Kc,, ORIGINAL Initial Study and Environmental Checklist - Preliminary Draft Bakersfield Aretrak Station Relocation Project palliative applied. Ozone Precursors 12. All internal combustion engine driven equipment should be properly maintained and well tuned according to manufacturer specifications. NOx emissions related to on-site grading can be reduced by the use of electricity from power poles rather than temporary diesel power generators (which will result in a 97% reduction in NOx emissions during construction and grading); this reduction will be partially off-set by the use of methanol or natural gas on-site mobile equipment instead of diesel fuel (which will result in a 29% increase in CO). PM10 emissions during construction can be mitigated by the following: (a) apply approved chemical soil stabilizers to all inactive grading areas (a 30-65% reduction in PM10); lb) enclose, cover, water twice daily or apply approved soil binders to exposed piles (a 30-74% reduction in PM10); © water active sites at least twice daily (a 34-68% reduction in PM10); (d) all trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil or other loose material are to be covered and should maintain at least two feet of freeboard (a 7-14% reduction in PM10); and (e) suspend all excavating and grading operations when wind speeds exceed 25 miles per hour (a nonquantifiable reduction in PM10). Implementation of these measures will reduce potential short- term effects to less-than-significant levels established by the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District. Climate/Air Movement The proposed project will not alter air movement, moisture or temperature or produce a change in climate, either locally or regionally. It will not create any wind tunnel effects or contain sufficient reflective surfaces to raise the air temperature. Landscaping proposed for the site does not include ponding or flowing water; therefore, it will not increase moisture in the air. The climate in the area is influenced by regional factors that will not be changed or altered by the proposed project. Odors The proposed project would not create any adverse odors. The site will be equipped with the appropriate trash receptacles as required by the City of Bakersfield. IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Ao Plants/Animals/Endangered Species The project site is located in a developed urban setting; nearby land uses include industrial, commercial and institutional uses. No sensitive, rare or endangered species of animals inhabit the site. There are no locally-designated species or locally-designated communities of plant or animal on the site. In addition, the September 8, 1997 IV-10 ~ ORIGINAL Initial Study and Environmental Checklist - Preliminary Draft Bakersfield Amtrak Station Relocation Project project site has no rare or endangered species of plants or wetland habitat. 3 There is very little natural or native vegetation on the project site. Construction of the multi-modal transportation facility will not eliminate any native vegetative cover. The project site does not currently produce any agricultural crop. Development of the site will provide for the installation of ornamental vegetation around the terminal, in parking areas, and around the perimeter of the site. Habitat Alteration The project site is not located within an identified potential habitat area for sensitive animals, nor is it a migration corridor. In addition, the project will have no significant impact on wildlife dispersal or migration corridors. 4 TRANSPORTATION Traffic/Circulation Existing roadways provide access to the project site. These include Q Street and Truxtun Avenue, major arterial roadways which carry high traffic volumes. Other roadways providing access to the site include 16th Street, S Street and T Street; these roads are classified as local streets. Regionally, all streets that would be used to access the multi-modal transportation facility are City-designated arterials that currently serve trucks, Golden Empire Transit (GET) buses and intercity charter buses as part of their normal traffic stream. From U.S. Highway 99 North, southbound buses typically use Golden State Avenue (Highway 204), Q Street and Truxtun Avenue. From U.S. Highway 99 South, northbound buses use California Avenue, Q Street and Truxtun Avenue. Six Barstow buses travel on Highway 58, Union Avenue, California Avenue, Q Street and Truxtun Avenue. Establishment of the multi-modal transportation facility would affect existing transportation systems and alter circulation patterns and traffic levels in the immediate area surrounding the project site. The proposed Amtrak facility would access Truxtun Avenue via S Street; the parking area would be provided with exits onto both S Street and T Street. If existing traffic controls are retained, buses and cars turning left onto Truxtun Avenue from S Street would likely be delayed due to infrequent gaps in the traffic, especially during peak-hour periods. For this reason, operational improvements on adjacent streets would be incorporated into the project. Traffic signals would be installed at the Truxtun Avenue-S Street intersection to accommodate increased vehicular traffic traveling to and from the Aretrak facility. This improvement would help to maintain an acceptable level of service along these two roads. Source: Final EIR: Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan. Source: Final EIR: Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan. September 8, 1997 IV-~ ~ ~ ORIGINAL Initial Study and Environmental Checklist - Preliminary Draft Bakersfield Amtrak Station Relocation Project Current traffic volumes at the existing Amtrak facility are expected to transfer to the new facility at S Street. Average daily ridership at the existing Aretrak facility is 672 passengers (boardings and deboardings). Peak days include Fridays and Sundays; average daily ridership for peak days is twice that of average days. The projected number of peak-hour vehicles to pick up passengers deboarding the 4:32 p.m. train is 75 parked vehicles (outbound only) and 75 "kiss-and-riders" (inbound and outbound). The 12:00 p.m. to 1:00 p.m. hour is also a peak period; the 12:25 p.m. train departure generates vehicular traffic similar to the 4:32 p.m. departure. There are currently eight to 12 bus arrivals and departures per train arrival and departure at the existing Amtrak facility. It is estimated that of these eight to 12 buses, each has 12 movements, in or out of the facility, per day. The number of bus cycles would increase with any future increase in the frequency of passenger rail service. The new Amtrak facility will be designed to accommodate existing automobile and bus traffic, as well as projected traffic volume increases due to the possible implementation of high speed and/or light rail service to the proposed station. In fact, development of the new Amtrak facility will reduce existing traffic levels and improve circulation on the local street network by providing ample parking. The parking area at the existing facility (60 spaces) is inadequate to accommodate existing ridership levels. As a result, many Amtrak patrons kiss-and-ride instead of parking their vehicles, which adds vehicular trips to the surrounding street network. S Street would be abandoned and redesigned as part of the transportation facility from 16th Street to the BNSF Railway. However, provision of the Q Street grade separation one City block to the west is intended to compensate for the at-grade crossing closure at S Street. It is anticipated that traffic demand for the S Street thoroughfare would be eliminated. Therefore, there would be no access or traffic- related impact created by the closure of the S Street at-grade crossing. Widening of the grade separations at H Street and Chester Avenue to accommodate a fourth Amtrak lead track could occur with minimal disruption to cross street traffic. Therefore, no long-term transportation impact is anticipated. Location of the new transportation facility at the proposed location would provide pedestrian access to major activity centers. The potential for pedestrian movement on and off the site is good with pathway improvements along roadways and a grade-separated pathway across Q Street to the arena/convention center complex. Class II Bike Lanes extend along Q Street and Truxtun Avenue. Station development ~vill not affect existing biking Janes. The project will be reviewed by the City's Engineering Department - Division of Traffic Engineering to ensure that circulation patterns do not disrupt automobile and pedestrian traffic flows in and around the project area. B. Parking Station development will result in an increased demand for new parking at the proposed project location. On-site parking areas would include 265 parking stalls,,.~,KE~P September 8, 1997 IV-12~ ORIGINAL Initial Study and Environmental Checklist - Preliminary Draft Bakersfield Amtrak Station Relocation Proiect bus parking and a "kiss-and-ride" area. Provision of 225 on-site parking stalls is the standard number recommended for a Type 300A Amtrak station. The proposed parking provisions fully comply with Aretrak program requirements and applicable City requirements for on-site parking demands at a transportation facility of this size. Off-site parking would be limited due to the BNSF Railway to the south and the Q Street grade separation structure to the west. Some limited on-street parking may be permitted north of the site, near the City of Bakersfield offices and the Beale Memorial Library, and to the east near the St. George Church property. However, it is not anticipated that on-site parking accommodations at the Aretrak facility would exceed capacity and be unable to meet the projected parking demands. Traffic Hazards The proposed project will not create any design features (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or uses that will present any significant hazards to traffic safety. If fact, the Amtrak facility design incorporates several elements which separate vehicular, transit and pedestrian traffic, where possible. Station access for buses (16th Street) is separated from general automobile access to the parking area (S Street / T Street). The Q Street grade separation project includes a grade separated pedestrian walkway/truck access over Q Street to the area/convention center/hotel complex. In addition, connecting bus passengers will be able to transfer across a platform between train and bus without experiencing vehicular conflicts, thus avoiding conflicting automobile movements. This is currently a problem at the existing F Street Aretrak facility where connecting bus passengers must walk through a parking lot and along a public alley to reach their bus. Therefore, the new facility will have an improved circulation pattern that will not increase hazards or barriers to pedestrians or motorists. Air/Water/Rail Systems The proposed project, the relocation and development of a new Amtrak facility, will not affect waterborne, railor air traffic. Possible future development of high speed and/or light rail services at the proposed Amtrak facility may alter existing air and rail systems; however, at this time no additional or improved rail or bus services are proposed, and therefore are not considered as part of this project. September 8, 1997 IV~3 ~ ORIG1NAL Initial Study and Environmental Checklist - Preliminary Draft Bakersfield Aretrak Station Relocation Project VI. CULTURALRESOURCES A= Archaeological and Historical5 The project site is not among the 24 known archeological sites identified in the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan. No historic or prehistoric artifacts or sites have been previously recorded on or adjacent to the subject property. There are no local, state or federally-designated historical buildings on or near the project site. The site is not listed on the National Register of Historic Places or the Local Historic Register. a However, the area is located adjacent to the site of the original 10-acre "Baker's Field" and the site of other historic buildings and activities. Some of the structures within the project area are over 50 years old. It is likely that historic artifacts remain under these buildings and the other structures and pavement. It is also possible that Chinese and Native American artifacts exist in the project site. For these reasons, the area is considered to be historically and archeologically sensitive. Therefore, it is recommended that the following measures be taken. Assessment and documentation of all structures more than 50 years old by an architectural historian. A qualified archaeologist be present while pavement and foundations are removed. After the pavement is removed and before other activity begins, a surface survey be conducted by the qualified archeologist. The archeologist be present during trenching, subsurface excavation and earth removal, and/or other ground disturbing activities. The archeologist notify the local Native American Councils of this project. The treatment of discovered Native American remains shall comply with State codes and regulations of the Native American Heritage Commission. 6. The archeologist notify the Chinese community of this project. Measures be taken to prevent illegal artifact hunting and collecting (i.e. the project area be fenced and locked during non-working hours). 8. Should human remains be discovered, work must halt in the immediate Refer to "An Archaeological Assessment of the Proposed Aretrak Station Relocation Study, Bakersfield, Kern County, California", prepared by Three Girls and a Shovel in August 1997 for a more detailed discussion of the archeological and historic significance of the project site. Source: Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan. September 8, 1997 IV-14 ORIGINAL Initial Study and Environmental Checklist - Preliminary Draft Bakersfield Aretrak Station Relocation Project vicinity and the Kern County coroner be notified (Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code). Additional recommendations or adjustments may be required as the project proceeds. With the implementation of the above mitigation measures, potential impacts to archeological and historically significant artifacts will be reduced to a level of insignificance. VII. LAND USE September Compatibility The establishment of a multi-modal transportation facility at the proposed location would not significantly restrict or impact adjacent land uses. There are residential areas located one-half mile south of the project site and approximately one mile north of the project site. Commercial and industrial land uses are located between these residential areas and the project site, which is currently used for commercial, industrial and warehousing purposes. Thus, the development of a transportation facility will not disrupt these residential neighborhoods. in addition, the proposed project will not disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community, including a low-income or minority community, as the project is located within an existing commercial/industrial area. Although project development would not require the relocation of existing residential land use, the station would displace existing commercial and industrial land uses. The project site currently contains several single-level structures and related parking areas. Most of the existing structures are metal-framed buildings of relatively low construction value. Existing land uses would be demolished for construction of the station and parking facilities. The proposed project will result in an increase in land use intensity. The proposed facility would be located adjacent to, and support, major visitor destinations with cultural and sporting attractions. The project is intended to promote the existing activity centers and the overall development philosophy of the area as specified by the Metrooolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan which calls for "a direct transportation link to serve downtown Bakersfield as an attraction and regional destination". Specifically, the Amtrak station would provide pedestrian access to the Beale Memorial Library, Holiday Inn Select, the Convention Center and the new Bakersfield Arena, as well as downtown Bakersfield. General Plan/Zoning The Metrooolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan designates the project site as Mixed Use Major/Office Commercial. Uses permitted within the Mixed Use Major/Office Commercial area include major commercial centers combining professional office, major retail and commercial support services. The zoning designation of the project site is C-C, Commercial Center, consistent with the General Plan. The following uses are permitted in a C-C zone: "Bus, train and other transit station, provided that transit vehicles are not stored on-site and 8, 1997 I¥~ 5 ORIGINAL Initial Study and Environmental Checklist - Preliminary Draft Bakersfield Aretrak Station Relocation Proiect repair work or servicing of transit vehicles is conducted on site; parking garage or surface lot". The proposed use is a transportation facility providing passenger rail and transit services. This land use presents no conflict with the General Plan or Zoning. Plans and policies of the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan support the reinforcement of the downtown core with the provision of adequate transit to serve downtown. Growth Inducement The proposed Amtrak station is intended to serve the existing population and growth projected in the City's adopted General Plan. The project will not induce additional population growth in an area either directly or indirectly as the service capacity of the station is designed consistent with growth and demand projections identified in the City's adopted General Plan. The project is within the scope of projected future development for this area. Prime Agricultural Land Loss The project site is located in a developed urban area. Agricultural land does not exist on or near the project site. Therefore, the proposed project will have no impact on agricultural resources. VIII. PUBLIC SERVICES Police/Fire Existing uses on the project site are currently served by the City of Bakersfield Police Department and the City's Fire Department. The proposed project will not increase population and will not require additional police or fire protection services. The City of Bakersfield Police Station is located on Truxtun Avenue; the police department provides full law enforcement service to all areas within the City limits. Two fire stations are located approximately one mile from project site: Station No. 1 at 2101 H Street; and Station No. 2 at 716 East 21st Street. The project will be required to provide adequate fire flow protection during and after construction. Consequently, fire protection services are more than adequate to meet the needs of the project at full implementation, Schools No increase in residential or population growth will occur as a result of station development. Therefore, there will not be an adverse impact on the City's school system. September 8, 1997 Parks/Recreation No increase in residential or population growth will occur as a result of station development. Therefore, there will not be an adverse impact on the City's parks and other recreational facilities. The project will not affect the level of demand, level of use or physical features of existing recreational opportunities. IV-li~ ORIGINAL Initial Study and Environmental Checklist - Preliminary Draft Bakersfield Aretrak Station Relocation Proiect Solid Waste Disposal The proposed project is located within the City's refuse collection area. The project will not result in a need for a new system or substantial alterations to the existing system of solid waste collection and disposal. Facility Maintenance The proposed project will not have a significant impact on local roads or on governmental services. The project will reduce vehicular congestion and traffic volume on the roadways. Therefore, station development may contribute to the reduction of impacts on existing streets. IX. UTILITIES Water The project site is located within the Kern County Water Agency Improvement District No. 4. The project site is served by California Water Service Company, a private utility. Its water supply is obtained principally from wells and supplemented by Improvement District No. 4-treated State Water Project surface water supply. Six-inch diameter water lines extend along 16th Street; an eight- inch line extends along S Street. Six and eight-inch waterlines extend along Q Street to the northwest corner of the project site. Water is currently provided to existing uses on the proposed project site. The new Aretrak facility will obtain water from the same sources as existing development. However, redevelopment of the site for a new Aretrak station may require on-site improvements to include water line relocation to better serve the facility. These improvements will not create significant impacts on the existing water distribution system. September Wastewater The proposed project is located in a developed urban area where a sewer system is already in place. Sewer lines extend along 16th Street and Q Street, the north and west boundaries of the project site. The project will not result in a need for a new system or a substantial alteration to the existing sewer system. The project can be connected to the existing sewer system provided by the City of Bakersfield Building and Safety Department - Sanitation Division. The proposed project will increase wastewater generation on the site; however, this increase is not anticipated to be significant and will not affect the ability of the City's existing sewer system to meet demand. Storm Drainage The proposed project is located in a developed urban area where storm drainage is provided by existing storm drains, flood control channels, and catch basins. An existing storm drain system extends along the BNSF Railway, immediately south of the project site. Establishment of the Aretrak station and related facilities will not result in the need for a new system or substantial alteration to the existing drainage system. Further, the project must have an on-site drainage plan appro(~e~,KE~p~ 8, 1997 IVY7 ORIGINAL Initial Study and Environmental Checklist - Preliminary Draft Bakersfield Amtrak Station Relocation Proiect Do by the Building and Safety Department prior to the issuance of any building permits. The project will increase the amount of permeable surfaces and therefore, storm water runoff. However, this increase is not anticipated to be significant and will not affect the ability of the City's existing storm drainage system to meet demand. Any on-site improvements needed to provide drainage or to connect the project with the existing City drainage system are the responsibility of the applicant. Any potential improvements will not result in significant impacts. Electricity/Natural Gas The proposed project is located in a developed urban area where power and natural gas supply lines are in place. Electricity and natural gas, provided by Pacific Gas & Electric Company, are currently provided to existing uses on the proposed project site. Aerial electric lines extend into the site from S Street. A 1.25-inch high pressure gas transmission system extends along 16th Street between the project site and the Beale Memorial Library to the north. This project will not result in a need for new systems or in substantial alteration to the existing systems. However, on-site improvements, which may include power and gas line relocation, will be necessary in order to access this public utility. This action will not create a significant impact on the existing electrical or natural gas distribution system. Costs for these improvements will be borne by the applicant. Possible increased consumption of power and gas will be controlled by conformance to energy standards in the California Energy Code, Part 6 of the California Building Standards Code (Title 24), Communication The proposed project is located in a developed urban area where communication systems are in place. Pacific Bell, which currently provides phone service to the site, will continue to provide services to the new Amtrak facility. The project will not result in the need for new communication systems or in substantial alteration to the existing systems. X. POPULATION The proposed project will have no cumulative impacts on regional or local population projections. The proposed project will serve the existing and projected population. It will not induce substantial growth either directly or indirectly. Xl. HOUSING September 8, 1997 The proposed project will not have any discernable effect on either the demand or supply of housing. The proposed project will not displace any existing housing, including affordable housing. IV-18 ~ ~- ORIGINAL Initial Study and Environmental Checklist - Preliminary Draft Bakersfield Aretrak Station Relocation Project XII. HEALTH HAZARDS There are no known hazardous materials or hazardous waste on the project site. The proposed project is not a use known to create significant health hazards. The proposed Aretrak station will not introduce hazardous materials and/or explosives that would increase risks to patrons and the surrounding community. The proposed project will not introduce noise, odor, or dust that could pose a potential health hazard. Compliance with applicable laws and guidelines, including existing Building and Fire Safety Codes, will result in no significant risks to human health. The proposed facility will incorporate substantial security and safety lighting in heavily- traveled areas. The site will have high visibility and interaction with the major activity centers in the surrounding area. If it is determined to be necessary, station police or private security guards will be employed. Xlll. NOISE A quiet urban daytime sound level is typically 50 dBA (units of sound quantities). Sound levels below 60 dBA are generally accepted, while complaints are possible at 70 dBA. The Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) noise index recognizes that there is an increased sensitivity to noise in the nighttime (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.). Noise sensitive areas, as classified by the City of Bakersfield, include schools, hospitals, rest homes, long-term medical or mental care facilities, and other uses deemed noise sensitive by the local jurisdiction. ODerations-Related Noise The multi-modal transportation facility will not create incompatible noise levels. The primary noise source in the area is generated by traffic along Truxtun Avenue and industrial and truck hauling operations in proximity to the site. There are no sensitive noise receptors, such as schools, hospitals, rest homes, residences, medical or mental care facilities located directly adjacent to the project site. Residential dwellings along Truxtun Avenue are located over 500 feet from the proposed station site; it is not anticipated that noise levels will exceed local noise regulations during the hours of station operation. However, Beale Memorial Library is located at the northern boundary of the project site. Libraries, in general, may be considered to be a sensitive receptor. However, the two-story Beale Memorial Library was designed with noise-insulated windows and an interior atrium. As a result, neither the library nor the interior atrium would be significantly affected by noise from increased traffic on the adjacent arterial roadways; station parking areas or railroad activity. Therefore, noise levels generated by operations at the multi-modal transportation facility will not affect this noise-sensitive land use. Following project construction, the new Amtrak building will not generate incompatible noise levels. Noise levels will be similar to levels now being generated at the existing Aretrak station located at F Street. Buses serving the existing Aretrak station will be re- routed to the new facility at S Street. Noise levels will increase in the immediate project . September 8, 1997 IV-~9 ORIGINAL Initial Study and Environmental Checklist - Preliminary Draft Bakersfield Amtrak Station Relocation Project area with an increase in traffic and the provision of on-site parking. However, this is a predominantly commercial area designed for high volume traffic and, therefore, the impacts are not anticipated to be significant. Streets that would be used by transit services to access the Aretrak facility, including Q Street and Truxtun Avenue, are City- designated arterials that currently serve trucks, GET buses and intercity charter buses as part of their normal traffic stream. Local streets, including 16th Street, S Street and T Street, currently carry commercial vehicles accessing the various industrial and warehousing facilities in the area. Therefore, there will be no significant mobile noise impacts. In addition, operation of Aretrak passenger rail trains would not noticeably add to the noise already generated by the BNSF freight trains along this rail corridor. Buses, if parked on the site with engines running, will be adjacent to the railroad and will also have minimal impact. Therefore, no long-term, noise-related impacts are anticipated. Overnight storage of three train sets on the two Amtrak tracks on the eastern portion of the project site will not create noise impacts. At the existing Aretrak facility at F Street, locomotives are left "on" throughout the night to supply power to the passenger cars for general cleaning and for air conditioning and heating purposes. The locomotives currently produce a humming sound which reaches a maximum 80 dBA at 50 feet; noise levels for idling locomotives drop to 74 dBA at 100 feet. 7 As part of this project,"stand-by power" will be provided at the new Amtrak facility. Provision of stand-by power to the passenger cars enables the locomotives to be shut down, thus eliminating the humming noise.. This power unit will be installed along the railroad right-of-way and supply overnight "hotel power" to the three train sets through electric cords. Stand-by power is considered a common and cost-effective mitigation measure to eliminate potential noise impacts related to overnight rail vehicle storage and is currently used at commuter rail layover facilities throughout the United States. Construction-Related Noise There will be a short-term increase in noise levels during demolition of the existing buildings on the site and general site preparation and construction. With the implementation of the mitigation measures identified below, the impact will be less-than- significant on surrounding facilities. Therefore, construction-related noise will not significantly increase ambient noise levels. The following measures would reduce construction noise impacts to a level of "not significant" and should be implemented during the demolition and construction phases: 1. The project shall comply with all applicable City of Bakersfield noise regulations. ? Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment. Harris, Miller, Miller & Hanson Inc.; April 1995. (Report prepared for the Federal Transit Administration.) , ~KE~ September 8, 1997 IV-20 ~ ORIGINAL Initial Study and Environmental Checklist - Preliminary Draft Bakersfield Aretrak Station Relocation Project Construction hours will be limited to the hours of 6:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and between 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. on weekends, unless traffic volumes or public safety issues warrant otherwise (as determined by City, County or State officials). No construction on legally proclaimed holidays will occur. Operation of combustion equipment, such as pumps, compressors or generators within 300 feet of any occupied residence from 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 a.m. is not permitted, unless the equipment is surrounded by a noise protection barrier. Final determination of construction hours will occur prior to the issuance of a building permit by the Building and Safety Department. Construction equipment must employ sound restriction devices to reduce noise levels. Noise specifications for construction equipment should be written in compliance with City and/or County noise guidelines and should include a set of guidelines to enable contractors to bid accordingly. This is required by law. Where noise impacts from construction activities prove to unduly interfere with operations of businesses (as determined by the City Planning Department), the applicant will erect temporary noise barriers where they do not restrict access to residences or businesses and where they do not affect visibility of businesses. XIV. AESTHETICS The new transportation facility will replace existing structures and will not result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view to the public. The Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan does not identify any scenic vistas in the vicinity of the proposed project. The project is required, as are all development projects in the City, to be reviewed by the City's Planning Department for architectural compatibility and harmony with its surroundings, for zoning and building compliance, and for conformity with the goals and objectives of the City's adopted General Plan. Design review will ensure that the project will not be aesthetically offensive to the public. The site is currently developed with older industrial buildings and is surrounded by newer government and public facilities, The architecture of the proposed station building could visually improve the site and blend with the image of the Beale Memorial Library and the government buildings to the north. The views from the Holiday Inn Select, the Convention Center and the new Bakersfield Arena will also be enhanced with the development of this site as a multi-modal.transportation facility. XV. LIGHT AND GLARE The project site is located within an area where substantial interior lighting and exterior nighttime lighting currently exist. Major existing sources of light include parking area lights at the Holiday Inn Select, Bakersfield Arena and Beale Memorial Library, as well September 8, 1997 IV-2~o ORIGINAL Initial Study and Environmental Checklist - Preliminary Draft Bakersfield Aretrak Station Relocation Project as street lighting along Q Street and Truxtun Avenue. Development of the site will involve illumination of the station building, platforms, and parking lots. The station building and parking areas would remain dimly lit during non- service hours, from the 11:45 p.m. arrival to the 5:00 a.m. departure. The Aretrak tracks along the eastern portion of the site where the three train sets will be stored would also be lit all night for security and general maintenance purposes. Placement, type and intensity of on-site lighting will be reviewed by the City's Planning Department. Said review will ensure that the project will not create adverse impacts related to light and glare on adjacent uses. It is anticipated that the development of a transportation facility at the proposed site will generate more light than the current uses on site. However, increased lighting would be compatible with existing uses and light sources. The increased lighting would not create impacts on the residential uses located one half mile south or one mile north of the project site. Therefore, the proposed project will not result in the creation of light and glare on sensitive receptors. XVl. NATURAL RESOURCES The proposed project would not require a substantial increase in the use of natural or mineral resources because it is replacing existing industrial and commercial uses. No adverse impacts are anticipated. XVll. ENERGY USAGE The proposed project will not conflict with adopted energy conservation plans of the City or State. The proposed project will be required to comply with Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations established by the Energy Commission regarding energy conservation standards. These standards relate to insulation requirements, glazing, lighting, shading, and water and space heating systems. The proposed project is not anticipated to require development of new sources of energy. The utility infrastructure serving the existing on-site uses is expected to sufficiently accommodate the proposed project. The project would not contribute to a significant increase in energy usage. No adverse impacts are anticipated. XVlll. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE September 8, 1997 The proposed project would not result in changes in the diversity of plant or animal species. The project would not introduce new species of plants in the area which may become dominant over existing plant species or which may change the habitat of existing animal species. Therefore, the proposed project would not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or IV-22 0RIG~NAL Initial Study and Environmental Checklist - Preliminary Draft Bakersfield Aretrak Station Relocation Proiect wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, or reduce the number or restrict the range of a scarce or endangered plant or animal. However, the project site is located adjacent to the site of the original 10-acre "Baker's Field" and the site of other historic buildings and activities. For this reason, the project has the potential to disturb archeological and historically significant artifacts and affect unique ethnic cultural resources of importance to local and regional history. Section VI of this Initial Study/Environmental Checklist provides further analysis of potential impacts to archeological and historic resources resulting from the construction of the transportation facility. Mitigation measures are recommended where possible impacts are noted. The majority of impacts identified with the project are related to construction activity (air quality, noise) and, therefore, are short-term. These short-term impacts can be mitigated to less-than-significant levels. The project is not anticipated to create adverse long-term impacts. Construction of the new Aretrak facility at this location will not result in significant cumulative impacts in the immediate vicinity. Although nearby industrial, entertainment and government activities may expand with the establishment of a regional transportation center, no related projects (resulting in cumulative impacts) are identified at this time. The proposed project, because of its scale and type, may cause potentially adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. This initial Study identifies and provides analysis of potential impacts relating to the construction and operation of the Aretrak station facility. Where impacts are noted, mitigation measures are recommended to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. September 8, 1997 1'~23 '-' ORIGINAL