HomeMy WebLinkAboutORD NO 887 .AN ORDINANCE AP~0VING &,'~.~Z~-ATION OF &
PARCEL 0F UNi~t6~IT~ TE~RITORY TO T~
CITY 0F B~2[~{SFIELD~ C~iFORNI.&,
V~qEAS~ a petition was filed with the Council of th8 City of
Bakersfield on the 2$th day of &ugus't~ !95'0: requestir~ that ~ertain
u~abtted, territory therein described be aDm. exed to a~ included
within the incorporated limits of' the City o2 Bakersfield~ and
V,I~E~S~ said petition was signed by the owners 6f one-fo%~th
of the l~ by area~ m~l by assessed value as sho%~n on the last
equalized assessment roll of the Celerity of !~ern~ and
~{E~.S~ the territory described in said petition' is conti~ous
to the City of Bakersfield: and
%'~E&Ss the' Com~cil of the City of Bakersfield did~ on' the
28th day of August~ 19~0~ pass a resolution in compli~ce with the
provisions of the ~.exation of U~nhabited Territory dct of 1939~
being Title ~ Division 2~ Part 2~ Chapter l: ~rticle ~.of the .Gover~
ment Cede of the State of California~ specifically describing the
bo~daries of 'the territory so proposed to be a~exed to the City of
Bakersfield~ and desig~$ing such territory by an approp)~iate identt~
fication~ arid sstti~ Monday~ September i8~ 19~0~ at the hour of eight .
o ~clock P.N. ~ at the Co~%cil Chambers in the City H~I in the City
of Bakersfield~ State of California~ as the day: hour and pla(:e ~hen
and where a~ person ov:ning real property within such territory so
proposed to be a~ex~d and having any objections to the proposed
annexation may appear before the legislative bod~ and show cause w~
such territory sho~d not be so aD~exed$ and
~I~I{EdS: said resolution uae pufolish~d for 'at least once a
week_for two successive .weeks prior, to said hearing in the Bakersfield
Californian~ a nswspaper L of general circulation published in the City
of Bakersfields the mu~cipal corporation to'¥d~ich it is proposed to
annex such territory~ and
;'~ItERE~S~ no ~itten protests were filed against the proposed
annexation by any m-~ner of property ~'~ithin the territory proposed
to be annexed.
NOW, THEREFORE~ BE IT 0BD~I]ErD by the Councii of the City of
Bakersfield~ as follows:
SECTI0~ !~
That the Council of the City of Bakersfield hereby approves
the armexation and inclusion ¥~ithin the incorporated limits of the
City of Bakersfield~ of that' certain uninhabited territory designated
as Cedar Gardens No. ~ being situate in Section ~6~ T 29 S~ R 27 E~
M. Do B. & L~.~ and more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at. the southeast corner of the southwest 1/.¢
of Section ~6, T29S~ R27E~ N,,D.Bo & ~.~ as said corner
is shown and delineated on "gap of Tibbet ~s Tract"~
recorde.d in ~..!ap Book %~ Record of Sur~eys~ Page
the offmce of the County Heco~der of kern County~ California$
thence N 0° ~0~ ~3'~ E alom~ the easterly boundary line'
of aforesaid Tibbet ~s Tract ~a distance of 601.~8 feets
thence N 89° ~9' 29" W s. distance of $77~87 feet to the
t~..is certain p~rcel of landS
true point of beginning of
thence alo~ a c~ve of %0 feet radius~ concave to 'the
west~ and v~nose'center bears S 0° ~0~ ~" ¥~ %0 feet~ a
distance of ~8.8~ feet to a point of reverse c~ve from
~'~hic~ the center of the last followed curve bears
N ~$~ 19 ~ 20" E 50 feets thence alo~ a curve of 1% fe~t
radius, concave to the northeast~ and ~?hoss center bes. rs
S ~P I9~ 20" ?f 1% feet~ a distance of 12~09 feet to a
point of ta~ency with the m~xt course; thence S 0° 30~
~3" U a distance of 42~.~6~ feet to the begir~ of a
c~ve of 20 feet radius$ con(~ave to tho southeast~ and
whose center bears N 89 29 2~ ~/ a distanc~ of 20 fe~t,
thence southwesterly alo~ said c'~ve a distance of 31~3~7
feet to its point of tangency ~vith the northerly line of
BRUI.~GE La}~ as ~ame is shown and delineated on afore-
said map of Tibbet~s Tract~ ~nd from which Roint of
tangency the center of said curve bears N 0~ 20~ 31'~ E
a distance of 20 feets thenc(, S 89° 39~ 29" E ~ong th,~
· ' northerly li~_~ of s. forssaid BRUI~AGE L~ a distance o:~
~9.9~ feets thence N 0° 30'.,u~'~" E a distance Of
feet to the aforesaid tr~e point of begi~ing~
.~,m,. CEIlTIt,~Z that the foregoing Ordillmlce vlas passed
and adopted by the Council 'of the City of B~kersfield at a r~gu-
lar meeti~c thereof held on the ~ day of
l~O, by the follor~ing vote:
RYES: CAR~IAKIS, CROSS, I~U~i,m, MU~=LUbR,
·
NOES: _--_ .~[~"~ ............................. ~ ..... ...,...
~) A ~ .t..d)...', ....
~ r.~
(lay of ~~~m~, 1,~o.
:! !.,
A hav t of ostmg rhmanres
~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA }
' ~oun~ of Kern ss.
.,,
.
~'.
That she is the duly appointed, aOing and qualified Ci~ Clerk of the ~i~ of Bake~field~ and that
on ...... ~e.pg~....iO ..................................................... 19~O.. she posfed on fhe Bulletin Board af fhe
nu~b~r~...O.~.~. ................ R~ $~ri~, ~n$ ~fifl*$:
~ ~t~ O~ ~I~I~ ~R~I~O~Y ~0 ~ ~'~
~I~ O~ B~ERS~ELD, OALIFO~IA
.:~
i.I
~'1
~..~
i'
I
!.~
· i ............................. ~..~
- - ~ ..... Subscribed and sworn fo.befo~ me this
.
"~' ..:.¢~.~.i~a~y o,..~.~.~ ................. ~,...sa
I'