HomeMy WebLinkAboutORD NO 901 · ORDINANCE NOo~_~__~W SERIES
AN ORDINANOE APPROVINGAN~'IEXATION OF A
PARCEL OF UNINHABITED TERRRITOR¥ TO TEE
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA.
WBE. REAS~ a petition was filed with bhe Cotu~.cil of the City
of Bake~sfield on the 29th day of J~,uuary~ 1951~ requesting that
certain tu~inhabited te~.~.i~ory the~-~ein desc~ibed be ~exed to ~d
included within the incorpo~ated limits .of the City of Bakersfield,
~d
W~AS~ said pet'ition was signed by the o%~n~rs of
'of t~ l~%d, by area~ ~d'by assessed value as sho~.;n on the last
equalized assessment roll of t~ Country of Kern~
W~REAS, the te~-ritory described in said petition ts conti~%-
ous to t~ City of Bake~,sfie!d, ~d
W~REAS~ t~ Cocci! of t~ City of Bakersfield did, on .the 29th
day of J~ua~y, 195!~ pa~s a ~,eso!ution in com~lisnce with the
visions of t~ ~nnexation of Unimd~abited Te~,rito~y Act of 1939~ being
'
Title [~.~ Division 2~ P~,t 2~ Oh%ote:~ !, A);tic!e ~ of the
Code of the State of California, specifically describing the boundaries
of the te~,ito~,y so proposed to be m~nexed to the City of Bakersfield~
~d desi~mting such ter~,ito~y by an appropriate identification, ~nd
setting Monday, February 19~ 1951, at the hou~~ of ei~t o~c!ock P~M,~
at t~ Co~cil Clh~mbe~s in the City Hall in t~ City of Bakersfield~.
State of Califosm~ia~ .as the d2~y~ hou~· ~.nd place when and where the
City CO~ZAc~I would hear prot~
__ m,s r, md(: by any person owning ~e~]. property
within the ~o~esaid te~'ritory; and
W~-~REAS~ said resolution was published fo~· at !e~.st once a
for two successive weeks prio:~· to = ..... d hearing tn The Bake:osfi~!d
of Bskemsfie!d~ the ~mnfcipa! corpo~:ation to Which i'b is proposed to
armex such ter-~,itory, ~d
WHEREAS~ nQ ~.~itten protests were filed against the proposed
a~exation by ~ny owner of property within the te~ritorY p'~-oposed
~o be a~exede
~OW~ ~REFO~E~ ~ I~ ORDainED by the Co.oil of She City
Ba~x~sfield~ am .follows:
SECTION 1.
That the Co,oil of the 'Cit~ of B~ersfleld l~eby approves tl~
~exation and inclusion within the incorporated li~ts of the City
of B~ersfield, of that ce~tein uninhabited ter?itoz~y ~si~ated as
SPRUCE ADDITION~ t~ boo~d~ies of which ~e described as follows:
'That portion of t~ SW !/~- of ~ction 36, Township 29 South,
R~ge 27 East~ M. D~ B. & M.~ particu~.mrly d~scrtbed as follows:
Begi~ing at the northeast corner of tl~ SE 1~ of the SW 1~
of said Section 36; thence southerly s. long the easterly bo~dary
line of said SW 1/4~ 132 feet~ more or less~ to .its point of
intersection with t~e prolongation westerly of the southe~y
line of ~d Street as said 2nd Street is shown ~d delineated
on map of the Goode Tract, reco~ded in Map Book l, Page 144~
Official Reco~ds of Kern Co~ty~ California; t~nce westerly
along the prolongation westerly of the southerly line of said
~d Stye't, and which said line is 132 feet~ z~ore or less~
southerly from~ me~s~ed at ~'.i$~t angles to, ~d p~al!el with
the northerly 'bo~ud~y line of s~id SE 1/~ of the SW 1/4 of said
Section 36~ a dist~uce o~ 802.1~ feet, mo?e o~ less, to a point
in a corporate bo~dary line of the City of Bakersfield~
fo~nia, ~d which said point is t~ true point of beginning
this certain parcel of land; the~ce southez~ly ~tud p~lel with
t~ eas~rly bom~da~y line of. tk~ .~azc~ SW 1%~ of Section 36 a
~st~ce of 233~31 feet~ more or loss, to the northe=st co~ner
of that ce~tsin parcel of l~ud conveyed to B. H. Welch end Eva
Welch, his wife, by deed'recorded July 12~ 1945, in Book 1267~
Page 127 of Official Reco~ds of Kern Co-~rhy~ Califo~nia$ thence
. westerly p~al!el with the northerly bo~da~y line of
SE 1~ of the SW 1/~ of Section 36 ~d ~ong t~ northerly line
of the afores~d ps, col of l~_ud~ ~d pa~m!!el with the prolonga~
ti,n ~esterly of tl~ s~utherly line of the aforeseid ~.d Strect~
~d which ssi d southsr!y line of ~d Street is~ insofar
is ~elated' to. this certain description~ m corporate bound~,y
line of a portion of the City of B~dce~sfte!d~ a distence of
16~ feet', mox~s or less~ to a point in the easterly bo~ud~y
line of F~pton Acres~ as said boundary line is shO~ ~d
delineated on Map of Fra:~oto~ Acres~ Filed for ~ecord in the
office of the Oo'~ty Recorde~ of Ker~n County~ Oalifo~nia,'on
the 21st day of j~e~ '19!2~ on Page 4T~ in Book 2 of Maps; t~nce
.. ng~th~!y' along the ~.z~o~esaid e~.ste~ly bo~udary line of Frampton
Acres a ~iStznce of 233.32- feet~ z~o~e ~-- tess~ -~a~d t~-mnst .......
northerly 20~.~96 foot of which is a present corpo~?ate
line of a portion of the City' of B~e:esfield~ to its point of.
intersection with t~ ~Tor~said prolongation x.~esterly of tl~.e
southerly li=~ of ~ud Street~ thence easterly ~ong the. said pro~
lo~ation westerly of t~ southerly line .of 2nd Street and ~ong
a 11~ 132 feet more o~ less, southerly from and p~a]~el with
~he northerly bounda~y line of the afore sml d SE 1/4 of l~be SW 1/4
of said Section 36, a distance of 165 fee~ more or less, to -h. he
point of beginninge
I HEREBY CERTI-~ that the foregoing Ordinance vas passed
and adopted by the Cotu~cil of the Ci'ty of Bake',?~field at a
meeting ~he~eof held on the 19th day of Februe_~y, 19~1, by 'hhe
follo~,ing vo~e:
AYES: CARNAKIS,
NOES:---~ ........... ~--~ .....
~£N~*' .__~r~}.J~...~-~_..~-~
Co~u~ci].. of the City of Bake.~?sfieldo
0
: ' '.,
~ ii
Afl~h of TI (~rht ,
, avtl osting nantes
STATE OF CALIFORNIA }
.
~ That she is the duly appointed, acting and qualified Ci~ Clerk of the Ci~ of Bake~field; and that
, I,.~
..~
:~ AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A~E~TION 0F A
,:~ PARCEL OF ~I~BITED TERRITORY TO T~ ;'
' ~I~Y 0~ Bg~8~I~BD~ C~I~0~II ,,.
~.'~,
· [,~.
~.~ ·
, ...............
'1 ....... ~--
I.
.
-~, ' [ / Notm~ubllc in and for the County~J Kern,
' ;- ~/ State of California. ~
,'
~..~ ·
· ~.~