Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutORD NO 1105 ORDINANCE NO. 1105 i~.EW SERIES AN ORDINANCE APPROVING ANNEXATION OF. A PARCEL OF UNIN- HABITED TERRITORY TO Tt{E CITY OF BAI~RSFIELD, CALIFORNIA, AND PROVIDING FOR TIIE TAXATION OF SAID ~RRiTORY TO PAY T~ BONDED I~EBTED~SS OF SAID CI~. W~REAS~ a petition was filed with the Council of the 0!ty cf ~'~,~'s-...,,.~,.~ .field on the 21at day of August~ 19~6~ )oequesting that cc.?rain uninlYabit~d territory thez~ein desoribsd be annexed to ~d~cl included ~.~ith'in the inco~p~ orated .limits oftne':~ City of Bake:~sfie!d., and W~REAS.~ said pe~:~tf, cn was signed by the' owners of on.0-.~uu..~.th ~ ~ - ~,.i. the land; by a~ea: and by assessed value as sho~n on the last equalizod asssss~. merit roll of the Co'~ty of Kern~ and ~c.=-zo=,d in said F~'cz~zon is contiguous to the · ~ the territory de .... ,~ ...... : . City of ~akersfield~ and WHEREAS, the said t(~rz~itory does not form a part Of any cther city,and W~AS= on the 2~.th day of Septe~)ber~ 19~6~ thez~e was filed in the office of the City Clerk of tho City of Bakersfield, a written ccnsent=~ signed by ali. the owners of propsz~ty included in said t~r:?itory: that said te:~r~itoz~y be s%d~jected to t~xation aftez~ 'the completion of such annexation equally with props)oty in the City of Pake?sfield to pay the bonded indebted- ness of said City therein desc~oibed,, as p]3ovided fcr in Ordinance No~ 893, New Sez:ies of th~ City o~.~' ~akez~sfield, an~ in O)odioance No, 9~0: Ne~.~ Series of the City of BakersfieLd~ and any and all othe? indebtedness o? ].lability of the City whic~h may accrue fron~ and after the date thereof; and this Council ...... hernhy, d.stermines that said consent is signec~ by all_ the o~.~ners oF p~3oper'b'y included in said ter~itory: and complies in eve~:y respect with t'he .provisions of Section 3~319 of the d:-ov~rnment Code of the State of California~ and Wo.~REAS~ ~..~ Cotmcik of the City of 3~akersfie!d~ did on the 27tn day of Aue~ust: 1956: p .... s a Heso].ution beCk-,g. No.~ .,~-cA~ ~,~ in co~uo]~ance~ -.. with th~ pro- v~.sions_ of ~,.~ A:o.~l~xatt on' .... o~ UDin!').abitsd ~e:~.~qry Act of ~1939, a~d a~r2nd~ ments 'chereto~ o~ing -zt..s 4., Division 2, Part 2~ Chapte~ 1~ Article 5 oI~ the Go~ ..... ~,m,.:~, Code of the Sta'cs of Ca!iforn~ .... : s~cifica].ly de~cribing the boundaries of the "-~-~ ~ ...... .-- ~.~ xec~ to Cit~· of Pake~s- ~...~_.~,,..rj so proposed to '~ anne'- ~ the field~ and dosi,m-mtingo such te~:eitory by an zpp~op[~iate nau~e~ hnd setting.. Monday, October !, 1956, at the hour. of ~ight o'c].ock Po M.~ in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, Califo'?nia., as the day, hotu~ and place when and where tb~ City Council wo~d ~a~- protests made by any pe~son owning real property within the aforesaid territory~ and %~EREAS, said Eesolution was published at least twice, but not oftener than once a week in the Bakersfield Californian~ a ~wspaper of general circu- lation published in the City of Bakersfield, and also in The Oildale Nsc. rs, a newspaper Of general circulation published outside of the City of Bake:?s~ f%eld, but in the cowry'where said 'territory is located, said publications having been completed at least twenty days prior to the date set fo:~ said heari~ in compliance with Section 35311 of the Government Code~ and WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield. has caused written notice of '~uch pro~ posed annexation to be giv.~n by mail at least tw~y days before the p~Jolic ~aring on said proposed annexation in compliance with Subdivisions (a) and (b) of Section 35311 of the Government Code of the State of Ca]%fornia~ and ~EREAS~ at the time set for hearing protests, no written protests we~e filed against the proposed annexation by any owner of property within the territory p:~oposed to be an~xed~ NOW, T~REFORE, BE IT ORDAi2~:D by the 'Co~cil of the City of Bakersfield, as follows: SECTION 1. That the Council of the City of Bal2rsfie!d hereby approves the annexa~ tion and inclusion within the incorporated limits of the City of Bakersfield, of 'that ce~tain ~i~i~gmbited te~-~' ... . ~_~ory designated as UNION ~IVENL~E NO. 1, the bounda?ies of ~hiclh are described as follows~ That certain p~rcel of land situate in Section 20, To,reship 29 South, Range 28 East~ M~ D. B. & N.~ being a portion of Alta Vista No. more 'particularly described as Beginning at a point on the corporate bounSary of the City of Pakers- field, County of Kern, State of California~ as said corpo~ate bo~d~ ary is defined in Ordinance No~ 690~ New Series, as adopted by the -Comnci. t-~f~-th.~· City of Baker~fleld,'-'Octob~ 'iLM~ i9~.%~" November 15, '!9~5.~ by the Secro'hary of State, State 0f California, said point of beginning being~ the intersection of the westerly line of Eection 20~ Township 29 South, Range 28 Easts M.D.B. and N., and the westerly prolonga'~ion of the northe~ly !in~ of Lot 22~ Block 9, ~'~ ~ 2" filed for as said I,~.~, 22 is shown on me.p of '~Alta Vista No cord Apx~!l 9, .-~. __ 19~&~ in Book 3 of N~.os. at pages 158 and 159, ~ the O~'~'~ Ca of *~' ~ ........ x~ County Recorder of Keen'County; thenco easterly along said corporc~te bou~davy .as defined by me. id Ordinance No~ 690, New Series, and along said westerly prolongation of the Northerly line of said Lot 22, and along the northerly line of said Lot 22 tc in~ tersect the westerly line of an alley 25 feet in width¢ as said alley is shown on said map of "Alta Vista No. 2"; thence northerly and as defined in said Ordinance No. 6~0, New Series, and as de- fined in Ordinance ~?o, 796, New se:eles, adopted September 7~ '19~8¢ by said Council, and certified October 7, 19~;8, by said Se. cz~.etsry of .Sts. te, on and along the wester!.7 line of said alley and the north- er!y prolongation thereof to interoect the northerly line of tion 2" as said northerly line is defined in that pa;*ticu!a-~, des- cription for the annexation of a "Portion of the Alta Vista Tract" the last named annexation having boCen accomplished by an e!¢ction, held March 20, 1923, the result of, which was filed March 28, !9...°.3¢ with the said Secretary of State, the last named '.aorthe*.,ly line being on or ~ar the northerly linc of Pacific Street as said Pacific Street is shown on said map of "Alta Vista Nco 2"~ th¢¢nce westerly along said northerly line of "Exception 2", and along the corporate boundary as defined by s:.~.id "Exception 2" to intersect the westerly line of said S. ection 20, the last named westerly line also being the center line of Union Avenue as said center line is shown on said map of "Alta Vista NCo 2"; thence southerly along the corporate bounda:~y as defined by said "Exception 2"; and along said westerly line of Section 20 to the point of beginnings, containing 0°9569 acres more or lesso SECTION 2° Said territory, and th~ property located therein~ shall~ upon the pletion of the annexation of the same to the fit2 of Bakcrsfield~ be sub- Jected to taxation eql.~ally with other property in the City of Bake~sfield to pay the bonded indebtedness of the City of Bakersfield, descr-ibed in t~ aforementioned consent of the o~.~nel~s of prop¢;~ty located theretn~ the issu- ance of bonds to'represent said indebtedness being provided for in Ordinance No° 893, New Series of the City of Bakersfield, and in Ordinance HOc 950, New Series of said City, and any and all other indebtedness or liability of the City which may accrue from and after tl~ date thereof. SECTION 3o ~nis o;'dinance shall become effective thirty days from and s~fter the date of its passage° .... O00 i HEREBY CERTIFY That the foregoing Ordinance was passed smd adopted by the Council of the City of Paker~field at a regula-,'~ meeting thereof held on the let day of October, 1956, by the following vote: .... ' ....... "~' AyESFCARNAKIS,"COLLINS~N, EVELETH, 'SCHWEITZER, SULLIVAN ................... NOES: ~ Council of the City of Bakersfield° .APPROVED This let da..v~-~f October,, 1956o Affi av ! of J os ng ( r nan es STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ~ County of Kern~ ss. MARIAN S. IR¥IN, being duly sworn, deposes and says: That she is the duly' appointed, acting and qualified City Clerk of the City of Bakersfield; and that on.~..th.e...2n~..d~:__.~f___Qc_to.b.er. .............................. ,19...~_.6.. she posted on the Bulletin Board at the City Hall, a full, true and correct copy of an ordinance' passed by the Council of said City at a meeting thereof duly held on....O...c...t..o...b..e...r.....1...s...t. .............................................. ,19....5...6., which ordinance was numbered ........... ..1..1...0__5.. ............... New Series, and entitled: AN ORDINANCE APPROVING ANNEXATION OF A PARCEL OF UNINHABITED TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD~ CALIFORNIA~ AND PROVIDING FOR THE TAXATION OF SAID TERRITORY TO PAY THE BONDED INDEBTED~- NESS OF SAID CITY. Subscribed and sworn to before me this ..2...n..d.. ..... day of ...... ..O..~..t...o..b...e...r. ........ s .......... , 19..5...6.... ..... ~ ~..~ . . .