HomeMy WebLinkAboutORD NO 4397
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION
AND AMENDING SECTION 17.06.020 (ZONING MAP 104-18)
OF TITLE SEVENTEEN OF THE BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL
CODE BY CHANGING THE ZONING FROM R-1 (ONE-FAMILY
DWELLING ZONE) TO R-2 (LIMITED MULTIPLE-FAMILY
DWELLING ZONE) ON 6.19 ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED
ON THE NORTH SIDE OF PANORAMA DRIVE (FUTURE),
APPROXIMATELY ONE-QUARTER MILE WEST OF VINELAND
ROAD (ZC NO. 06-0349).
139'Z
WHEREAS, in accordance with the procedures set forth in the provisions of Title 17 of
the Municipal Code of the City of Bakersfield, the Planning Commission held a public hearing
on a petition to change the land use zoning of that certain property within the City of Bakersfield
generally located on the north side of Panorama Drive (future), approximately one-quarter mile
west of Vineland Road; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 181-06 on September 21,2006, the Planning
Commission recommended approval and adoption of an ordinance amending Title 17 of the
Municipal Code to approve Zone Change No. 06-0349 as delineated on attached Zoning Map
104-18 marked Exhibit "A", by this Council and this Council has fully considered the
recommendations made by the Planning Commission as set forth in that Resolution and
restated herein; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, as a result of said hearing, did make several
general and specific findings of fact which warranted a negative declaration of environmental
impact and changes in zoning of the subject property from R-1 (One-Family Dwelling Zone) to
R-2 (Limited Multiple-Family Dwelling Zone) on 6.19 acres, and the Council has considered said
findings as restated herein and all appear to be true and correct; and
WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration with mitigation was advertised and posted on
August 18, 2006, in accordance with CEQA; and
WHEREAS, the general plan designation for this area allows for high-medium density
residential development; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered and concurs with the following findings
made by the Planning Commission as set forth in Resolution No. 181-06, adopted on
September 21,2006:
1. All required public notices have been given.
2. The provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act have been followed.
3. Based on the intial study and comments received, staff has determined that the
proposed project could not have a significant effect on the environment. A
Negative Declaration was prepared for the project in accordance with CEQA.
4. The proposed project is consistent with the surrounding land uses.
5. The proposed project, as shown on Exhibit "A," is consistent with the
Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan.
1
~ fQ"'I(~~
<:> %
~ -
/- rn
- r-
<.) C)
ORIGINAL
6. The public necessity, general welfare and good planning practices justify the
requested zone change, as shown on Exhibit "A."
7. Based on the absence of evidence in the record as required by Section 21082.2
of the State of California Public Resources Code (CEQA) for the purposes of
documenting significant effects, it is the conclusion of the Lead Agency that this
project will result in impacts that fall below the threshold of significance with
regard to wildlife resources and, therefore must be granted a "de minimis"
exemption in accordance with Section 711 of the State of California Fish and
Game Code. Additionally the assumption of adverse effect is rebutted by the
above-referenced absence of evidence in the record and the lead agency's
decision to prepare a Negative Declaration for this project.
8. The laws and regulations relating to the preparation and adoption of Negative
Declarations as set forth in CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City of
Bakersfield CEQA Implementation Procedures, have been duly followed by city
staff and the Planning Commission.
SECTION 1.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield as
follows:
1. That the above recitals, incorporated herein, are true and correct.
2. The Negative Declaration is hereby adopted.
3. Section 17.06.020 (Zoning Map) of the Municipal Code of the City of Bakersfield
be and the same is hereby amended by changing the land use zoning of that
certain property within the City of Bakersfield, the boundaries of which property
are shown on Zoning Map 104-18 marked Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made
a part hereof, and are more specifically described in attached Exhibit liB ".
4. Such zone change is hereby made subject to the "Mitigation/Conditions of
Approval" listed in attached Exhibit "C", subject to approval of GPA No. 06-0349.
SECTION 2.
This ordinance shall be posted in accordance with the Bakersfield Municipal Code and
shall become effective not less than thirty (30) days from and after the date of its passage.
---------()()()---------
2
~ fQ"'I(~~
(:) ~
~ j!!
<.) C)
ORIGINAL
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance was passed and adopted, by the
Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on DEe 1 3 7nmi
by the following vote:
n~
N :
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
..........-- ...--- t..-- v- &.-- ......- ...----
COUNCILMEMBER CARSON, BENHAM, WEIR, COUCH, HANSON, SULLIVAN, SCRIVNER
COUNCILMEMBER
COUNCILMEMBER
COUNCILMEMBER
PAMELA A. McCARTH , Me
CITY CLERK and Ex 0 icio Clerk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED
DEe 13 2006
HARVEY L. HALL
Mayor of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED as to form
VIRGINIA GENNARO
City Attorney
By: ~/n- ~
Exhibit A - Zoning Map 104-18
B - Zone Change Legal Description
C - Mitigation/Conditions of Approval
PH - S:\GPA 3rd 2006\06-0349\Resolutions\CC ZC Ordinance.doc
3
~ fQAI(~~
<:> ~
~ -
/- m
- r-
<.) C)
ORIGINAL
Exhibit A
Z()ning Map 1()4-18
~ fQA/(~~
<:> ~
:a... _
.... m
- r-
<.) C)
ORIGINAL
. III
92~
I ~
v
Q
~%::. I'
12 = i I
!e) !iJ" v
~~ fil I
Z!!! I J j 18
~2~ ~II B
t .
"
~
.
, I
I
.
+
I i- I.
I I -'
,I !!j , I'
U 1'1 I ,,~ . I ! ,
Ii I .. I I ,I "
I I! I
1IIIU;i!iJil!11 III I. 11.11 ~ .
IIMIM~:~:I'III"'II!L!:lillu!
I IIi II !iI dil!lh I: ,I III hli II I Iii m
'sl !~
.~:p ~ d s,....
,. .~...... ~.o_.u..._. II I. ~
:. r ..... ir .. Ill.:' i, U U c a il8. . 01" Ii lot 'I t t hi
ZONE CHANGE 06-0349
JI-IoOI'- ..
,
, .
-\. .
" "
~; .
. .. .. '... .,,', .".
'II
II
I'j
\.\ '
\\
;; \\
~\\
'-.
~ '.
~
\\
\\
J\
,.1 I
II
II
II
II
II
I'
'II
'I
I,
,II
. II
~---_:_---~. ~------.;
I II !
! ~Il!!
I u I f
I .
N
~
C).
.....
.,..
~
.
a:
,
,
I
.-
'.'
I'if_.. .
~----~.- --'J---+
" I
I
I
z
&
~
.
;
I
~
.. .. i ~
I
In
dd
I~L~
all.
~~,.,,~~
<:> ~
~'
, t:
17-'" ... ..
. ','--.'....-..",--- -...' .... ... ....+.
ZONtNG MAP 104 'OIRIGINAL
Exhibit B
Z()ne ehange Legal Descripti()n
~ fQt-.IC~~
o ~
>- -
.... m
_ r-
<.) C)
ORIGINAL
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR ZONE CHANGE & PLAN AMENDMENT
PORTION OF ASSESSOR'S PARCEL 531-010-17 - JACK HOOD
ZONE DESIGNATION: R2
PLAN DESIGNATION: HMR
BEING A PORTION OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF
THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 29
EAST, M.D.B.M. AS DESCRIBED BELOW.
COMMENCING AT THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 18; THENCE.S89027'51 "E A
DISTANCE OF 658.92' ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE: SOUTHEAST
QUARTER OF SECTION 18 TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF PARCEL B OF
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 323 DESCRIBED IN CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
RECORDED SEPTEMBER 1, 1993 IN BOOK 6902, PAGE 896 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
1. THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE S89027'51 "E A DISTANCE OF
658.92 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID PARCEL;
2. THENCE ALONG SAID EAST LINE S00029'53"W A DISTANCE OF
75.80 FEET:
3. THENCE S41001'08"W A DISTANCE OF 263.12 FEET TO THE
BEGINNING C)F A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST
HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,500 FEET;
4. THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE AN ARC LENGTH OF 620.69 FEET
THROUGH AN INCLUDED ANGLE OF 23042'32" TO THE WEST
LINE OF SAID PARCEL B;
5. THENCE NOo030'39"E A DISTANCE OF 652.48 FEET ALONG SAID
WEST LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 6.19 GROSS ACRES MORE OR LESS
Page 1 of2
Job 115-01-00
Last printed 12/16/2005 8:28:00 AM
~ fQAI(~~
(:) ~
~ -
I- m
- r-
c..> C)
ORIGINAL
Exhibit e
Mitigati()n/C()nditi()ns ()f Appr()val
~ fQ"kt-2
(:) ~
5 ~
ORIGINAL
EXHIBIT C
Mitigati()n/e()nditi()ns ()f Appr()val
General Plan AmendmentlZ()ne ehange N(). ()6-()349
MITIGATION MEASURES FROM NEGATIVE DEeLARATION:
Biolooical Resources
1, Because evidence of the San Joaquin Kit Fox and the American Badger was found on
the project site, all construction personnel shall be trained in sensitive species
identification and avoidance techniques and be instructed to be on the lookout for
sensitive species sign during earth disturbance phases of construction. Any evidence,
such as dens, shall be avoided and reported to the reviewing agencies for resolution,
Mitigation for potentially significant biological resource impacts.
2, A preconstruction clearance survey shall be conducted within 30 days of initial ground
disturbance in accordance with the provisions of the MBHCP. Any identified kit fox
dens shall be monitored, excavated, and backfilled in accordance with the
recommendations of the MBHCP, CDFG, and USFWS. Mitigation for potentially
significant biological resource impacts.
3, The applicant shall conduct California Department of Fish and Game protocol level
Blunt-Nosed Leopard Lizard (BNLL) surveys to determine if BNLL are present on the
project site, Any evidence shall be reported to the reviewing agencies for resolution,
Mitigation for potentially significant biological resource impacts.
Cultural Resources:
4, If archaeological resources are encountered during the course of construction, a
qualified archaeologist shall be consulted for further evaluation. Mitigation for
potentially significant cultural resource impacts.
5. If human remains are discovered during grading or construction activities, work would
cease pursuant to Section 7050,5 of the California Health and Safety Code, If human
remains are identified on the site at any time, work shall stop at the location of the find
and the Kern County Coroner shall be notified immediately (Section 7050.5 of the
California Health and Safety Code and Section 5097.98 of the California Public
Resources Code which details the appropriate actions necessary for addressing the
remains) and the local Native American community shall be notified immediately.
Mitigation for potentially significant cultural resource impacts.
6. If paleontological resources are encountered during construction, a qualified
paleontologist shall be retained by the developer to evaluate the significance of the
resources and formulate a mitigation program if necessary. The paleontologist shall
~ fQ"'k~-9.
(:) ~
:a... iii
!:: r-
t) c:,
ORIGINAL
Exhibit C
GPAlZC No, 06-0349
Mitigation/Conditions of Approval
coordinate with the City of Bakersfield Planning Department. Mitigation for potentially
significant paleontological resource impacts.
Traffic and Circulation:
7. Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the developer shall pay the applicable
Regional Transportation Impact Fee (RTIF) to the satisfaction of the City of Bakersfield
Public Works Department. Mitigation for potentially significant traffic and circulation
impacts.
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
Public Works:
8. Along with the submittal of any development plan, prior to approval of improvement
plans, or with the application for a lot line adjustment or parcel merger, the following
shall occur:
a, Provide fully executed dedication for Panorama Drive to collector standards for
the full frontage of the area within the GPAlZC request. Dedications shall include
sufficient widths for expanded intersections and additional areas for landscaping
as directed by the City Engineer. Submit a current title report with the dedication
documents. If a tentative subdivision map over the entire GPAlZC area is
submitted, dedication can be provided with the map,
b, This GPAlZC area is within the Breckenridge drainage area and shall follow the
requirements, build the proposed improvements and pay the necessary fees of
the area. If the entire Breckenridge drainage area improvements have not been
constructed, temporary drainage basins may be required to be constructed within
the GPAlZC area and remain in place until all of the infrastructure is constructed.
c. Sewer service must be provided to the GPAlZC area, This area is within the
Northeast Planned Sewer Area and shall follow the requirements, build the
proposed improvements and pay the necessary fees of the area, There is a
sewer trunk line at the south boundary of this GPAlZC area - the tract design
shall either locate a street over the existing sewer trunk line or, if approved by the
City Engineer, the developer shall relocate the trunk line to be within new street
right-of-way,
Page 2 of 4
~ fQAI(~~
<:> ~
:a... _
/- m
t3 S
ORIGINAL
Exhibit C
GPAlZC No. 06-0349
Mitigation/Conditions of Approval
d, In order to preserve the permeability of the sump and to prevent the introduction
of sediments from construction or from storm events, all retention and detention
basins (sumps) shall have a mechanical device in the storm drain system to
remove or minimize the introduction of oil, grease, trash, and sediments to the
sump, This device shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer, and
shall provide the greatest benefit to the storm drain system with the least
maintenance cost.
For orderly development,
9, The entire area covered by this GPAlZC shall be included in the Consolidated
Maintenance District. The applicant shall pay all fees for inclusion in the Consolidated
Maintenance District with submittal of any development plan, tentative subdivision map,
Site Plan Review, or application for a lot line adjustment for any portion of this GPAlZC
area, For orderly development,
10. With the development of the project area, approved, improved access to the site must
be provided. If it becomes necessary to obtain any off site right of way and if the
developer is unable to obtain the required right of way, then he shall pay to the City the
up-front costs for eminent domain proceedings and enter into an agreement and post
security for the purchase and improvement of said right of way. For orderly
development.
11. With the development of the project area, approved, improved access to the site must
be provided, The required improvements shall be 32 feet of paving meeting City design
standard, with a-foot graded shoulders. To provide access to the site, construct either:
(a) Panorama Drive west to Morning Drive as a two lane roadway, 32-foot minimum
paved width, with expansion at the intersection for dedicated left turn lanes east
and west bound with necessary restriping of the east bound leg; or,
(b) Extend Panorama Drive east to Vineland Road, if complete, as a two lane
roadway, 32-foot minimum paved width, with expansion at the intersection for
dedicated left turn lanes east and west bound with necessary restriping of the
north, south and west bound legs,
For orderly development.
Page 3 of 4
~ fQ"K~~
5 !
ORIGINAL
Exhibit C
GPAlZC No. 06-0349
Mitigation/Conditions of Approval
City Attornev:
12, In consideration by the City of Bakersfield for land use entitlements, including but not
limited to related environmental approvals related to or arising from this project, the
applicant, and/or property owner and/or subdivider ("Applicant" herein) agrees to
indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Bakersfield, its officers, agents,
employees, departments, commissioners or boards ("City" herein) against any and all
liability, claims, actions, causes of action or demands whatsoever against them, or any
of them, before administrative or judicial tribunals of any kind whatsoever, in any way
arising from, the terms and provisions of this application, including without limitation any
CEQA approval or any related development approvals or conditions whether imposed
by the City, or not, except for CITY's sole active negligence or willful misconduct.
This indemnification condition does not prevent the Applicant from challenging any
decision by the City related to this project and the obligations of this condition apply
regardless of whether any other permits or entitlements are issued.
The City will promptly notify Applicant of any such claim, action or proceeding, falling
under this condition within thirty (30) days of actually receiving such claim. The City, in
its sole discretion, shall be allowed to choose the attorney or outside law firm to defend
the City at the sole cost and expense of the Applicant and the City is not obligated to
use any law firm or attorney chosen by another entity or party.
Page 4 of 4
~ <?>"'I(~~
o ~
:a... _
I- m
- r-
<.) I::)
ORIGINAL
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING DOCUMENTS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) ss.
County of Kern )
PAMELA A. McCARTHY, being duly sworn, deposes and says:
That she is the duly appointed, acting and qualified City Clerk of the City of Bakersfield;
and that on the 14th day of December ,2006 she posted on the Bulletin Board at City
Hall, a full, true and correct copy of the following: Ordinance No. 4397 passed by the
Bakersfield City Council at a meeting held on the 13th day of December. 2006 and
entitled:
ORDINANCE ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND AMENDING
SECTION 17.06,020 (ZONING MAP 104-18) OF TITLE SEVENTEEN OF
THE BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL CODE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
FROM R-1 (ONE-FAMILY DWELLING ZONE) TO R-2 (LIMITED
MULTIPLE-FAMILY DWELLING ZONE) ON 6.19 ACRES, GENERALLY
LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF PANORAMA DRIVE (FUTURE),
APPROXIMATELY ONE-QUARTER MILE WEST OF VINELAND
ROAD (ZC NO. 06-0349)
PAMELA A. McCARTHY
City Clerk and Ex Officio of the
Council of the Cit)t of Bakersfield
By: ~ -=1-...vJL:-
DEPUTY ty Clerk
S:\DOCUMENT\FORMS\AOP .ORD.wpd
~ fQt>./(~-9
C) %
>- -
I- rn
c:; E;
ORIGINAL