Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 141-00RESOLUTION NO. 1 4 1 - O0 A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION PROPOSING PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD IDENTIFIED AS ANNEXATION NO. 416, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF STOCKDALE HIGHWAY AND RENFRO ROAD (WARD 4) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Bakersfield, in accordance with the provisions of Section 65353 of the Government Code, held a public hearing on MONDAY, DECEMBER 15, 1997, and THURSDAY, DECEMBER 18, 1997, on the prezoning for the territory, notice of the time and place of hearing having been given at least twenty (20) calendar days before said hearing by publication in the Bakersfield Californian, a local newspaper of general circulation; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 110-97 on December 18, 1997, the Planning Commission recommended approval and adoption of the prezoning by this Council and this Council has fully considered the findings made by the Planning Commission as set forth in that Resolution; and WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a change of organization, to wit, the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the hereinafter-described territory, pursuant to Section 56800 of the Government Code of the State of California; and WHEREAS, the proposed annexation territory is within and consistent with the City of Bakersfield Sphere of Influence boundary; and WHEREAS, the property owner has agreed to annex to the City; and WHEREAS, the City has agreed to serve the property upon annexation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield that it hereby finds and determines as follows: 1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the territory described in Exhibit "A" and shown on map marked Exhibit "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution as though fully set forth herein. 2. That a plan for providing services within the affected territory of the proposed annexation, in accordance with the provisions of Section 56653 of the Government Code, is marked as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as though fully set forth herein. 3. That this proposal for change of organization, to wit, annexation, is made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, and it is requested that proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith. 4. That the reasons for the proposed change of organization are that the owners of the affected territory desire to receive municipal services from the City of Bakersfield, and the City desires to receive tax revenues for benefits given and to be given to the territory proposed to be annexed. 5. That for this proposed annexation and the prezoning therefor, Ordinance No. 3819, which was adopted January 28, 1998, an Initial Study was conducted and it was determined that the proposed project would not have a significant effect on the environment. A Negative Declaration was prepared and posted on November 7, 1997. 6. That the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and adoption of the environmental document as set fodh in the California Environmental Quality Act and City of Bakersfield Resolution No. 107-86 have been duly followed. 7. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein has been determined to be uninhabited pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, Section 56046 of the Government Code. 8. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein has been determined to have one hundred percent (100%) consent to annexation. 9. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein is within the City of Bakersfield Sphere of Influence Boundary. 10. That the names of the officers of the City of Bakersfield who are to be furnished with copies of the Executive Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed Notice of Hearing, if any, are: Pamela A. McCarthy City Clerk City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 Alan Tandy City Manager City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 Bart Thiltgen City Attorney City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 11. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten (10) copies of this Resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern County at 2700 "M" Street, Suite 302, Bakersfield, California 93301. ......... o0o ........ I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on RO~j ~9 ?t~O~ by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER CARSON, DEMOND, MAGGARD, COUCH, ROWLES, SULLIVAN, SALVAGGIO COUNCILMEMBER COUNCILMEMBER~ COUNCILMEMBER CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Cl~rk of the Council of the City of Bakersfield' APPROVED. NOV 29 2000 BOB pRICE MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED AS TO FORM: BART J. THILTGEN City Attorney CARL HERNANDEZ Ill Assistant City Attorney MO:pah November 1,2000 S:~,nnexation~AN N416(a} ROA.wpd 3 EXHIBIT "A" "RENFRO NO. 4" ANNEXATION NO. 416 That parcel of land being a portion of the southeast 1/4 of the southeast 1/4 of Section 34, Township 29 South, Range 26 East, M.D.M., County of Kern, State of California, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the southeast comer of said Section 34, as located by Kern County Surveyor's concrete monument and designated (by conversion) to be 2,317,325.0669 feet North and 6,214,810.9134 feet East per California Coordinate System (NAD 83) Zone 5; Thence North 89 ° 29' 45" West, along the south line of said Section 34, a distance of 1325.17 feet to the southwest comer of Parcel B of Parcel Map Waiver No. 741 per Certificate of Compliance filed for record in Book 5885, Page 914, Official Records in the Office of the Kern County Recorder; Thence North 00° 25' 29" East, along the west line of said Parcel B, a distance of 55.00 feet to a comer on the existing corporate boundary of the City of Bakersfield, said comer being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence (1) continuing North 00° 25' 29" East, along the west line of said Parcel B (departing from said corporate boundary line) a distance of 606.69 feet to the northwest comer o£ said Parcel B, also being another comer on the existing corporate boundary of the City of Bakersfield; Thence Easterly, Southerly and Westerly on and along said corporate boundary for courses (2), (3) and (4) as follows: Thence (2) South 89° 29' 48" East, 1269.73 feet; Thence (3) South 00° 23' 13" West, 606.71 feet; Thence (4) North 89° 29' 45" West, 1270.13 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 17.69 acres (more or less) G:\GROUPDATxRon\Ex A Renfrog4.wpd 9546 P 29 $£2, 34 T. 29 S. LLA-353 PMW - 741 VICINITY MAP i(I) P.O.B. ANNEXATION OF RENFRO NO. 4 EXHIBIT "B" .SEC. 3 .30 .~.,r/._o E. M. D, M, EM. No. 4544 RM No. 5502 ANNEXATION NO. 416 (RENFRO NO. 4) PLANS FOR PROVIDING SERVICES AGENCY WHICH PRESENTLY CHECK SERVICES WHICH INDICATE HOW SERVICES SERVICES PROVIDES SERVICE CITY/DISTRICT WILL PROVIDE PROVIDED BY CITY/DISTRICT WILL BE Upon Annexation Future Date FINANCED (I.E., GENERAL TAX RATE OR (Specify) SPECIAL ASSESSMENT.) COUNTY CITY [ GENERAL TAX REVENUES Planning Parks & NORTH BAKERSFIELD GENERAL TAX REVENUES Recreation RECREATION & PARKS DISTRICT Library COUNTY N/A Police SHERIFF & HIGHWAY PATROL CITY GENERAL TAX REVENUES Protection Fire Protection COUNTY GENERAL TAX REVENUES, FIRE FUND Street COUNTY CITY GENERAL AND GAS TAX REVENUES Construction COUNTY PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT Maintenance COUNTY CITY GENERAL AND GAS TAX REVENUES Sweeping CITY GENERAL AND GAS TAX REVENUES Lighting CITY GENERAL TAX REVENUES Flood Control COUNTY CITY GENERAL TAX REVENUES Sewerage CITY USER FEE Water CITY USER FEE Other PRIVATE CONTRACT CITY USER FEE (REFUSE) EXHIBIT "C' G:~sub\SHAREDLO, ON~2000~Annex 414 Providing Services Plan.wpd I 1. Please provide the following information, when applicable, only for service which will be provided by the applicant city. Location Indicate location from which service will be provided (i.e. nearest fire station Library etc.) Service Level Capacity Indicate frequency and availability of service (I.e., street sweeping, response time for emergency services, recreation programs, etc.) POLICE - all police services in the City of Bakersfield are administered through the City Police Department located at the s/w comer of Truxtun and Eye Street approximately 8 miles easterly of the annexation. FIRE - Service will be provided by County Station 67 located on the south side of Brimhall Road, easterly of Renfi'o Road pursuant to exchange wherein the County protects certain property within the City jurisdiction. Thus, the City does incur the cost of providing fire protection and the fire fund collected from the City's taxpayers must be transferred to the City and County. PARKS AND RECREATION -The annexation project is within the jurisdiction of the North Bakersfield Recreation and Park District and is subject to all adopted requirements and standards of the district. LIBRARY - N/A STREETS - The City Cmporation Yard on Truxtun Avenue west Fwy. 99 will provides necessary facilities, personnel and services to accommodate Public Works efforts. CONSTRUCTION/MAINTENANCE/SWEEPING/LIGHTING - Maintenance and persgnnel will be dispatched from the City Yard on a regular basis for preventative maintenance as needed. Repair includes streets constructed/maintained, sweeping and lighting. SEWER - City sewer facilities now exist in Renfro Road which presently extend to the northeast comer of the territory. The Renfro Road facilities are part of the Allen Road Trunk Sewer System. WATER - The territory is being annexed into the Ashe Water Division whereby City of Bakersfield Water Resources Department will be the provider. OTHER - (Refuse) - When annexed, service will be provided by the City either by City forces or by contracts with a franchise refuse collector. 24 hour patrol is provided in the immediate vicinity of this annexation. First priority response is approximately 7.00 minutes or less. Fire protection is provided on a 24-hour basis. The annexation will not affect City/County Joint Fire service capability. Existing neighborhood Parks (city and District) are open to the public at reasonable hours. N/A There will be no reduction in the range capacity of the City to provide the necessary public work services to this area. Services will be on a regular basis and "as needed." There will be no reduction in the range capacity of the City to provide the necessary public work services to this area. Services will be on a regular basis and "as needed." Adequate capacity exists. Adequate capacity exists. City refuse pickup is twice a week. G:~?~HARED~RONX2000~Annex 414 Providing Services Plan.wpd IV. VI. VII. What effects, if any would annexation of this territory have on the existing level of city/district services (i.e., need for additional emergency service personnel or construction of new facilities, etc)? The annexation of this territory will not affect the near term level or capability to provide needed services. Additional police officers should not be required at the time of future development in the territory to maintain the current level of city service. Any planned public streets and municipal facilities within the territory will increase the future maintenance responsibility of the City but will not affect the existing level of service. Would city/district require any upgrading or change in facilities to serve affected territory (roads, fire hydrants, mains, etc.): If so, would city/district_or residents be responsible for financing? Private development provides and pays for major facilities and dedicates them to the City, No up.qradinq or chanqe in facilities will be required in the territory for annexation. Indicate and explain existing zoning in affected territory. The subiect territory is presently zoned County A (Exclusive Aqriculture) Zone. Indicate and explain proposed pre-zoning in area. (List effects on present land use that would occur as a result of annexation such as maintenance of livestock on property, etc.) The City prezoned the territory to the corresponding City A (Aqriculture) Zone, however the owner and the City have initiated a General Plan Amendment to chanC:le the zoninq to City C-2 (Reqional Commercial) Zone. List city/district services that area will directly or indirectly benefit from such as decrease in fire insurance rate, shorter emergency response time, use of community facilities, etc.: City Police should be able to respond in a more timely manner than present County Sheriff and State Highway Patrol services. The present City refuse collection rate is substantially lower than fees county residents now pay to independent companies. No special assessment or charqes for street sweeping, leaf collection, street lightinq enerqy costs and fire hydrants when located within the City's right of way. City government also provides increased political representation for residents within the corporate limits. Please provide the following information relative to city/district and county taxes: List List existing tax rate(s) in area. The existing tax rate in the area equals 1.108406% of assessed market value). This represents the total property tax rate. When annexed a desiqnated percentaqe of the total property tax of the area will accrue to the City and remainder to the County for providing health care and social services. (Rates shown are from 1999-00 County Auditor-Controller Tax Rate List). Would affected area be subject to any bonded indebtedness of the city/district: If so, explain: No, the last listed (1992-93), City bonded indebtedness has been paid off and the current 1999-00 tax rate list shows no City bonded indebtedness. How will the difference in tax rates affect a property with a market value of $50,000? The property rate will not increase due to annexation and re-assessment will not occur due to annexation. G:~sub\S HARE D\RO N'~000'C, nn ex414_Ex hibit C-3.wpd