HomeMy WebLinkAboutORD NO 3989ORDINANCE NO. 3 9 8 9
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE SEVENTEEN OF THE
BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL CODE AND ZONING MAP NO.
104-17, 104-18, 104-19 AND 104-20 BY CHANGING THE ZONING
FROM A (AGRICULTURE) AND R-I(ONE-FAMILY DWELLING) TO
C-2 (REGIONAL COMMERCIAL) ON 96.9 ACRES; FROM A
(AGRICULTURE) TO R-1 ON 500 ACRES; FROM A AND R-1 TO
R-3 (LIMITED MULTIPLE-FAMILY DWELLING) ON 18.12 ACRES,
FROM A TO R-2 ON 47.38 ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED
BETWEEN PALADINO DRIVE, STATE ROUTE-178, MASTERSON
STREET AND VlNELAND ROAD (ZONE CHANGE P99-0647)
WHEREAS, in accordance with the procedure set fodh in the provisions of Title 17
of the Municipal Code of the City of Bakersfield, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on
a petition to change the land use zoning of those certain properties in the City of Bakersfield
generally located between Paladino Drive, State Route-178, Masterson Street and Vineland Road
(extended); and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 96-00, on October 5, 2000, the Planning Commission
recommended approval and adoption of an ordinance amending Title 17 of the Municipal Code to
approve R-1 (One-Family Dwelling), R-3 (Limited Multiple-Family Dwelling) and C-2 (Regional
Commercial) zones as delineated on attached Zoning Map Nos. 104-17, 104-18, 104-19 and 104-
20 marked Exhibit "C", attached hereto and nade a part hereof by this reference by this Council, and
this Council has fully considered the recommendations made by the Planning Commission as set
forth in that Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, as a result of said hearing, did make several
general and specific findings of fact which warranted an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and
changes in zoning of the subject property from A (Agriculture) and R-1 to R-l, R-3 and C-2 and the
Council has considered said findings and all appear to be true and correct; and
WHEREAS, for the above-described project, an Initial Study was conducted and it
was determined that the proposed project would have a significant effect on the environment,
therefore, a Notice of Preparation (NOP) and an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared
for the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and
WHEREAS, the applicant entered into an agreement with the City of Bakersfield to
implement all mitigation measures identified in the environmental analysis contained within the
Program EIR; and
WHEREAS, the law and regulations relating to the preparation and adoption of
Environmental Impact Repots, as set forth in CEQA and City of Bakersfield's CEQA Implementation
Procedures, have been duly followed by city staff, Planning Commission and this Council; and
WHEREAS, a Program Environmental Impact Report for the project was advertised
and posted in accordance with CEQA; and
WHEREAS, the general plan designations for this area allows residential and
commercial development; and
WHEREAS, on October 13, 2000, an appeal of the Planning Commission's decisions
was filed by Steve Hollis; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, has considered the appeal of the Planning
Commission's decisions filed by Steve Hollis; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the project proposal and hereby makes
the following findings:
1. All above recitals are true and correct.
2. All required notices have been given.
The provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) have been
followed.
Based on the initial study and comments received, staff has determined that the
proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment. A Notice of
Preparation (NOP) was prepared and sent to responsible agencies and property
owners within 300 feet of the project site. A Program Environmental Impact Repod
(EIR) was prepared for this project in accordance with CEQA.
That this project was the subject of a Program EIR and the entire environmental
record is incorporated herein by reference as set forth in the resolution certifying the
Final Program Environmental Impact Report.
That infrastructure exists or can easily be provided to accommodate the types and
intensities of the proposed development.
That the project site is a portion of an irregular shaped parcel consisting of 693.90
acres that was annexed to the City of Bakersfield in 1977.
The public necessity, general welfare and good zoning practice justify the
recommended change of zone to R-l, R-2, R-3 and C-2 zones on 693.90 acres
generally located between Paladino Drive, State Route-178, Masterson Street and
Vineland Road (extended).
The project site, with prior approval of General Plan Amendment No. P99-0647, is
designated LR (Low Density Residential), HMR (High Medium Residential), HR
(High Density Residential) and GC (General Commercial) on the Metropolitan
Bakersfield 2010 General Plan Land Use Plan.
10.
The recommended Zone Change P99-0647 will reflect the previously adopted
General Plan Amendment P99-0647.
11. The recommended zone change is compatible with the surrounding uses.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
follows:
1.
The recommended zone change is consistent with the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010
General Plan, subject to prior approval of General Plan Amendment P99-0647.
That the applicant by prior agreement agreed to comply with all adopted mitigation
measures contained within the Final Program EIR for this project.
That Zone Change P99-0647 is hereby recommended for approval by staff and the
Planning Commission with mitigation measures adopted in the GPA/ZC P99-0647
Final Program EIR.
That Section 17.06.020 (Zoning Map) of the Municipal Code of the City of
Bakersfield is recommended for amendment by changing the land use zoning from
from A and R-1 to C-2 on 96.9 acres, from A to R-1 on 500 acres and from A and R-
I to R-3 on 18.12 acres and A to R-2 on 47.38 acres as shown o n Map Nos. 104-17,
104-18, 104-19 and 104-20 attached hereto as Exhibit "C" of that certain properly
in said City of Bakersfield as described in Exhibit "D" attached hereto and made a
pad hereof by this reference.
That Zone Change No. P99-0647, as outlined above, has been recommended by
the Planning Commission for approval with mitigation measures as shown on Exhibit
"A" and conditions of approval shown on Exhibit "B", both of which are attached
hereto and made a part hereof by this reference subject to prior approval of General
Plan Amendment No. P99-0647.
SECTION 1.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield as
The above recitals and findings are true and correct and constitute the findings of
the City Council in this matter.
All required notices have been given.
The provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) have been
followed.
Based on the initial study and comments received, staff has determined that the
proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment. A Notice of
Preparation (NOP) was prepared and sent to responsible agencies and property
owners within 300 feet of the project site. A Program Environmental Impact Report
(EIR) was prepared for this project in accordance with CEQA.
That this project was the subject of a Program Environmental Impact Report and the
entire environmental record is incorporated herein by reference as set forth in the
resolution certifying the Final Program Environmental Impact Report.
That infrastructure exists or can easily be provided to accommodate the types and
intensities of the proposed development.
That the project site is a portion of an irregular shaped parcel consisting of 693.90
acres that was annexed to the City of Bakersfield in 1977. ~,~,,F,4~
The public necessity, general welfare and good zoning practice justify the
recommended change of zone to R-l, R-2, R-3 and Co2 zones on 693.90 acres
generally located between Paladino Drive, State Route-178, Masterson Street and
Vineland Road (extended).
The project site, with prior approval of General Plan Amendment No. P99-0647, is
designated LR, HMR, HR and GC on the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General
Plan Land Use Element.
10.
The recommended Zone Change P99-0647 will reflect the previously adopted
General Plan Amendment P99-0647.
11. The recommended zone change is compatible with the surrounding uses.
12.
The recommended zone change is consistent with the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010
General Plan, subject to prior approval of General Plan Amendment P99-0647.
13.
That the applicant by prior agreement agreed to comply with all adopted mitigation
measures contained within the Final Program EIR for this project.
14.
That Zone Change P99-0647 is hereby approved as recommended by staff and the
Planning Commission with mitigation measures adopted in the GPA/ZC P99-0647
Final Program EIR.
15.
That Section 17.06.020 (Zoning Map) of the Municipal Code of the City of
Bakersfield be amended by changing the land use zoning from A and R-1 to R-l,
R-2, R-3 and C-2 on 693.90 acres as shown on Map Nos. 104-17, 104-18, 104-19
and 104-20 attached hereto as Exhibit "C" of that certain property in said City of
Bakersfield as described in Exhibit "D" attached hereto.
16.
That Zone Change No. P99-0647, as outlined above, is hereby approved with
mitigation measures as shown on Exhibit "A" and conditions of approval shown on
Exhibit "B", subject to prior approval of General Plan Amendment No. P99-0647.
17.
That City Council hereby denies the appeal of the Planning Commission's decision
recommending approval of Zone Change No. P99-0647.
SECTION 2.
This ordinance shall be posted in accordance with the Bakersfield Municipal Code
and shall become effective not less than thirty (30) days from and after the date of its passage.
......... o0o .........
4
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance was passed and adopted by
the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on November 15, 2000,
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBER CARSON, DEMOND, MAGGARD, COUCH, GREEN, SULLIVAN, SALVAGGIO
COUNCILMEMBER
COUNClLMEMBER
COUNClLMEMBER
CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerl~')bf the
Council of the City of Bakersfield "
APPROVED NOV 29 2000
MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED as to form:
BART THILTGEN
City Attorney
Exhibits:
A. Conditions.
B. Zone Maps.
C. Legal Description
S:\Dole\P99-0647\CC ZC Ordinance.wpd
November 17, 2000
EXHIBIT A
city i. Hit/s Mitigation Measures
CITY 1~I THE HILLS PROJECT
MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
(September 19, 2000)
' Mlltg~on Measure ."'Anil, B~g) * *' Engin~rlilg lqreDepartmant Comments
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
~;Me~'ial Status Sm~'ies Piaunlng
BR-I Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the ' Approved by
pro~ applicant shall pay a development foe in
aceordance with ~he Metropolitan Bakersfield on
Habitat Consea'vation Plan (MBHCP).
I BR-2 Prior to tho issuance of a grading permit on Planning
the 694-acre site, the project proponent shall comply
wi~ all appro~ te~ms and conditions of the Approved by
MBHCP. Tho MBHCP requires certain take
avoidance mcasu~a for the San Joaquin kit fox. on
MBHCP guidelines regarding tracking and
excavation shall be followed to prevent enwapmant
of kit fox in dons. Specific measures during thc
consm~inn pha~ of the projm shall be
implemen~ud and include the following:
a) A Ix'econsnucfion survey shall bo ceuduoted
prior to sits grading to search for active kit fox
dens. Tho survey shall bo conducted not mom
than 30 days prior to the onset of construction
aodvities in areas subjecn to development to
determine the _nec~*___sity of den excavation.
b) Monitoring and excavation of each known San
Jonquin kit fox don which cannot bo avoided by
I c~) ~otiflcafion of wildlife a~encies of relocation
Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Cit~ in the Hills
Verification of Compliance
.Mitf~atlonMeasure ~ ~dB~g) ~] g~g~ · ~eut CommeuO
of~o~ kit ~x dc~ s~ll ~ pmvid~
~ ~M or ~v~ to ~t ~ fox
m~ I:1.
di~ of fo~ ~ch~ or ~ sh~l ~
~ m p~t ~ of kit fo~ If~ ~ not
~ prior to b~al or cl~ ~ ~ no
kit fox~ or o~cr p~t~ s~i~, ~me
~p~.
All ~ploy~s, ~n~cm~, or o~ ~ons
invol~ in ~e ~n~on of ~e pm~
biol~ ~ ~tion m~ ~ will
~1 include in.etlon ~g ~ life
~u~ im~.
~tBAIW¢ 'tPWIlq~li~t (pN..~I)~)II$02160011~160011.MMP.doc 2 Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Cit? in the Hills
~V~4BA I WOL I ~WPW IN~licm (PN-JN)V)216V~ff~4X}l 1~2160011 .MMP.doc
Verification of Compliance
: ... , gn~inceflng
: ' i ! , Development Services and
· =:!~i, ~' Se~ ~ning Tramc
Ml~tion Measure :: .. , :~ And B~ding) Engi~n~ertng Fire Department Comments
from the site to minimize attracting kit fox or
BR-3 Because "take" of blunt-nosed Icoperd lizards Planning
is ~ om'~fly prohibited by Section ~050 of the
California Fish and G~'ne Code, additional Approved by
mitigation~ ave necessary in addition to those
z~quived by the MBHCP. The following me,utes on
at~ recommended to comply with this Section
n) Storeys for blunt-.no~,d Icop:u'd lizar~ shall be
conducted following CDFG protocols. These
surveys should be conducted between .April I
and June 30 under thc specified ttmo and
temperature conditions. This survey is necessary
to determine the curt'cnn stsms of blunt-nosed
Jcop~rd lizards on the project site.
b) If blunt-nosad leopard lizards are dotected, the!
applicant shall submit method~ for compliance
with Fish and Game Code Section 5050 to! .
CDFG for r, vtew and approval.
~P.~J~]~]IK~]~ Planning
BR-4 Prior to the issuance of n grading permit for Approved by
the npproximately 694-acre site, thc project applicant
shall comply with the following raptor nest on
mitigation:
n) If site grading is proposed during thc raptor I
nesting season (Feb~-Septamber), t focosed
survey for raptor nests shall be conducted by
qualified raptor biologist prior to grading
· activities in order to identify ~ctive nests in atces
':~ pxontiall~ italy-tod by proje~
3 Mitigation Monitoring Plan
City in the Hills
· Verification of Compliance
F,n~Ineertng
*' . Development ' Ser~i ~. ~d
Mitigation Measure ... And Buildlliiz~ · Engla~eeting Fire Department Comments
b) If construction is proposed to take place during
the raptor nestingforeeding season (February -
September), no construction activity shall take
place within 500 feet of an active nest until the
young have fledged (as determined by a
qualified raptor biologist). Any nests that must
be removed as a result of project implementation
shall be removed during the non-breedhg season
(October-January).
c) Pteeonstruct/on surveys shall include a survey
for bunowing owl. If active bun'owing owl
burrows are detected outside of breeding season
(September I through January 31), passive
and/or active relocation efforts may be
undertaken if approved by CDFG and USFWS.
If active bun'owing owl bun'ows are detected
during breeding season (February I through
Aulust 31), no distuffoance lo these burrows
-shall occur without obtaining appropriate
permitting through the Mig~'atory Bird Treaty
Act.
Sensitive Habitats/Jurisdictional Areas Planning
BR-$ A formal jurisdictional delineation will be Approved by
~:unducted. if project development would impact
jurisdictional areas, a Clean Water Act, Seetion 404 on
permit from USACE and/or a CDF(3 Section 1601
Slreembed Alteration Agreement will be obtained
from USACE and/or CDFG respectively Prior to the
issuance ora grading permit and/or approval of plans
~ specifications. USACE and CDF/3 t~tpically
require miti~atinn plans m be prepared pdor ta the
· ~ ~- X~IBA. IWOLI ~WPWlN~lient {PN-JN)V}216~2160011V~ 160011 .MMp,do~
4 Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Cit~ in the Hills
Verffien~n of CompDance
Engineering
- Deveinpment Services tod
..~ Se~ (Pinaning - Traffic
lVl~tlon Measure ~.~ '~: ',,~d.B'ullding) gngb~66fl, ng 'ltirel~ent Comments
Io~ of habha~ within jurisdictinflal areas.
Inditer lmnacts Planning
BR-~ The following invasive exotic plants shall not Approved by
be used in any project residential or commercial
lands:aping: mnarisk (all apples) and pampas grass. I on
In addition, v~ation at any ponds or wa~r f~w~s
shall be mana~nd in a way such ~hat none of the
invasiv~ ~xotie plants listed by the Deparlment of
A~ricultu~ albwed to become established. Typical
invasive ~xoti¢ plants that ~an become problemndc in
this ~-gien include: water hya~'inth and pamida grass.
BR-7 Dm'inS ~onsttnction, sit~ boundaries shall be Planning
ol~arly nmtcnd with flagging, fencing, or other
suhable mat~al to pl~,ant consmiedon equipment Approved by
and whi¢les from impacting adja~nt habitat areas
pot~ially ocenpied b,/sl~:ial status speeies, on
TRAFltIC AND CIRCULATION
TR-! Prior to the issuance of building p~mi~a, the Traffic
proje~ applicant shall comply with thc Me~opoliten Engineering
Bake~sfiald Tran~on Impact Fee Program.
These improvement fees shall be used to provide the Approved by
improvements listed on pages 44 and 45 in Appendix
C in the Draft EIIL The following improvements on
shall be included within the imp. rovement list. Prior
to issuance of building permtts, the applicant's
funding calculations for all improvements associated
with the fee program shall be submitted to the City
for review and approval.
?a? The following Iraffic signals shall be installed
~ prior to full buildout of the ptoje~ which is
~expectod to oncur in the },ear 2020.
~VVIBAIWOLI%WPWIN~Clieat (PN-JN)~0216~02160011Vl2160011.MMP.do~ 5 Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Cit~ in the Hills
Verification or Comphnce
, ~ .~ ~ Engheering
Miti~tion Measure~'-And.B~ldihg) · gngloeerlng Fire De~trtmeut Comments
Panorama Drive and Morning Drive
Morning Drive and Auburn Sit. et
Paladino Drive and Falrfax Road
Vin¢iand Road and SR 184
Paladino Dr/ye and Morning Drive
b) Thc following roadway segment shall bc
instal~J pr/or to full buildout of thc project
which is expected to occur in the year 2020,
Install two lanes of pavement on Paladino
Drive from Falrfax Road to Mastcrson
Street
Install 2. additional lanes of pavement on
Kern Canyon Road from $R 178 to Niles
TR-2 Prior to thc issuance of building permits, the Traffic
project applicant shall provide its fair share funding Engineering
toward thc following improvements. The funding for
the following improvements shall be distributed Approved by
equitably between future land uses through thc
devdopmant of a fee pa' unit for residential or per on
squar~ foot for non-realdential. The development fees
shall be paid prior to thc issuance of each belial'mR
a) Traffic signals shall be installed at the following
locations prior to one-half buildout of the project
which is expectnd to occur in the year 2010 and
full buildoot .of thn project which is expected to
occur in the year 2020:
Year 2010 (Project One-Half Buildout)
?, ~
~ - Vhehnd Road and Interior Collector St~ct
~. ~ ~dBAiWOL *~WPWJN~IJ~t (pN.~l)%O216~21600 j 1~02 I~0011.l~MP. doc
6 Mitigation Monitoring Plan
City in the Hills
Verification of Complhnce
Engineering
Development Services and
Services (Planning Traffic
Mltlpflon Measure And Building) Engineering FLre Department Comments
Panorama Drive and Interior Collector
Street (2 locations)
Panorama Drive and M~tcrson Stxeet
Morning Drive and SR 178
Maate~on Street (SR 184) and Old SR 178
Vineland Rmid and SR 178
Year 2020 (Full Project Buildout)
SR 184 and Chase Avenue
Queen SU~t and Paladino Drive
Alfred Han~ll Highway/Comanche Drive
and SR 178
h) The following intersection improvcmont shall
installed at the following location prior to one-
half buildout of the project which is expectod to
occur in the year
Year 2010 (Project One-Half Buildout)
Add one le~ tom lane to eastbound and
westbound lanes and re-time waffle signals
at the intersection of Fairfax Road and SR
178.
c) Thc following roadway segments shall bc
Lnstalled prior to one-half buildout of thc project
which is expected to occur in the year 2010.
Year 2010 (Project One-Half Buildout)
Install Vineland Road between SR 178 and
Collector Loop Street.
::~ - Instoll half width of Sg 178 and Mastorson
'i? ~'Yd~IAI~VOLI~WPWIN~Client ( PId-JN )~0216~2160011~0216001 I.MMP.do~
7 Mitigation Monitoring Plan
City in the Hills
~VMBA I ~VOL ~'"'PWlN'C[ie~I (PN-JN)~0216V~1600! I~i~(}11 .MMP. doc
Yertfleattg..n of'Compliance
,.. Engineering
: ~q~ment Services and
Mitigation Measure ' "'And'Bulldln~ Engineet4ng Fire Department Comments
St~cet along the project frontage.
Install 2 lanes of pavement on Panorama
I~ve from lvlorning Drive to Queen Street.
Install 2 additional lanes of pavement on
Old SR 178.from Fairfax Road to Alfi'ed [
Hafl~ll Hi~wa)'/Comanche l~Jve.
TR-.3 Prior to the issuance of' a building permit, the Traffic
proje~ applicant shall provide funding ~or the future Engineering
realigned SR 178 between Falrfax Road and Alfred
Hanell Highway/Comanche Drive, The pmj~t Approved by
applicant shall provide a fair share amount of that ~
portion of the future realigned SR 178 ~hut is on
de~ennined to be the obligation of local development.
The project's share of Iref~c on SR 178 is 7.5
perce~ Local funding for the future realignment of
SR 178 shall be distributed equitably between future
land uses through the development of a fee per unit
for residential or per square foot for non-residantinL
Local fees shall be paid prior to the issuance of each
TR-4 P~or to the issuance of building permits, the Traffic
project applicant shall provide the City of Engineering
Bakenfiald with a phasing plan of the onsite
roadway segmeat~. The project applieont shall install Approved by
~e following roadway segmenL~ that are not pa~ of
the Meaopolitan Bakersfield Tnmsportation Impact on
Fee Program.
Install Panorama between Queen St~"t and
Master, on Slicer.
..- Install the onsite Collector Loop Sl~ceL
-'4 Install Valley Lane between panorama
~ Drive and PaiM'mo Drive.
8 Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Ci~ in the Hill~
Ve~..eaflon of qT. omplhnce
EnR~a ~ FireDepartment Comments
Inst~ll Qu~n $1r~t bctw~'n P.o~
~ve ~d Pd~o Drive.
~ ~j~ ~li~t ~11 provide ~11 ~d~g for
~1 ~ ~ ~ ~j~ site ~d pwvide
~ ~ ~d~g io~ ~e ~on of
~U ~t ~ ou~ide of &e pmj~ si~ (Lc.,
~ ~y ~f-wid& of Queen S~
~ ~ md Palad~o ~ve).
~g f~ ~ ~Ve imp~vemmU
d~ ~ly ~ ~ ~d
~ ~ development of a f~ ~ ~it for
~ or ~ ~ f~ for non-~idmfi~. ~e
~el~t ~ ~ll ~ ~id prior m
NOISE
Cornmeal No~ ~u~ Planning
N-! ~r m ~e ~u~ of a building ~it for &e Appwv~ by
~ ~ pmj~ ~ ~ ~ on
~ ~ ~ ~iden~s ~ ~low
~ h ~ C~s bo~ly noi~ level ~o~
~ To ~on~e wmm~iM no~
im~ ~ ~low ~e CiF's s~
~li~t ~ n~ ~ include pmj~ d~i~
~ ~ ~ ~, buildhg I~o~
~1~ Relat~ Onsite T~le Noke 'Phnning
'W~2 ~or m ~ ~ of building ~i~ &e Appmvedby
~ ~pli~t ~11 ~u~ no~ I~eh on
· ~I~AIWOLI~,WPWI~Cli~at (PN-,~1)~0216~2160011~021~011.MMP.~ 9 Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Ci~ in the Hills
Yerfflc~tfon' of Complbnce
~.: i ~lopment Service~:~
Se ( inntng
· Mlfl~ation Measure. · .:' .:.=.~,:.:.,-: ,~d B~ifl~g) Enginee"'r~g' ' '~ M re:Department Comments
~rom the roads by a distance equal to or greater than
the 65 dB CNEL contour. For the future alignment of
SR 178, the minimum setback distance shall be
feet; for the rcnmining roadway mentioned above, the
minimum setback shall be 84 feet. As an alternative
to sed~ck.% the project applicant could use sound
walls to mitigate traffic noise levels. The exact he|ght
and placement of soundwalls would depend on lot
design and grading. Walls in the range of 6 to 10 ~t
probably would suffice for most situations. When lot
design and ~rading are established, an acoustical
consultant shall establish necessar~ wall heights end
AIR QUALITY
i ~L~l~ Planning
AQ-I The consU'uctiun of the proposed project Approved by
would r~ult in the generation of fugitive dust
Compliance with SJVUAPCD Regulation VIII and on
the Cb of Bakersfield air quality regulations would
result in no significant fugitive dust umissions. To
ansum compliance, the following measure shall be
impl~nented.
· Prior to approval of a grading plan for any
r~sldential tract, multiple family project, and
commercial projec~ the project applicant shall
submit a letter to thc Cit~ of Bakersfield
Planning Department ~'om the SJVUAPCD
stating the dust supprc'~inn measures that shall
? ~..~ completed during construction activities to
~:-~ompl~, with SJVUAPCD Re~intion VIIi,
~.M~AIWOJ ' '~WlN~Jlent (PN.JN)~0216V}216001 IV~216001 I.MMP.doc
10 Mitigation Monitoring Plan
City in the Hills
Verification of Complinn,.ca
Enginee~g
'i ~ Develol~ment. Servi~and I
MlflgaflonMunsure .~. , - And'Bulldlnl~) Engin~rlhg., Fire Department Comments
A(~-2 in addition to compliance with Rcguledon Planning
¥lll the following shall be incot~rated into building
plans. 'f~ following measures ~an ~urthcr reduce ^pprovcd by
fugitive dust emissions associated with the project.
on
The following shall be incorporated into building
dans:
a) Cover all accass roads and parking areas with
aspbelt-coacrete paving.
b) Asphalt-concrete paving shall comply with
SJVIJAPCD Rule 4641 and restrict the use of
cathack, slow-cure and cmulsified asphalt
paving materials.
c) Use water sprays or chemical suppressants on all
unpaved areas to con~'ol fugitive emissions.
d) Enclose, cover or water all stockpiled softs to
reduce fugitive dust emissions.
e) Cease grading activities during periods of high
winds (greater than 20 mph over a one-hour
pe~ed).
i0 Limit con~uction-related vehicle speeds to 15
mph on all unpaved mens at the ¢onsb'uction
site.
g) All haul trucks should be covered when
Iransporting loads of soil.
h) Wash off consm2ction and haul ~ucks to
minimize the removal of mud and dirt from the
i ojact sites.
~ ~-'~ ~ ~'~%MBAIWOLI%WPWIN%CIi~ (PN-JN)~O216V~2160011~RI60011,MMP.doc
I I Mitigation Moniwring Plan
Verffieatlon of Compffance
!! : :D~el~pmqnt Sergi~eSattd
Se~c~.(p~nning Tr~flic*~,
Mitigation Mensure ~ .. ~ . A~,dBuilding) Engincering~ Fire Dep&~tment Comments
AQ-3 The fullow~ng shall be incoqx)rated into Planning
grading and building plans.
a) Properly and routinely maintain all constrdction Approved by
equipment, as recommended by manufacturer
manuals, to control e~anst emissions, on
b) Shut down equipment when not in use for
ex.'haled periods of time to reduce emissions
associated with idling engines.
c) Eflcoura&e ride sharing and usc of transit
transporte~ion for construction employee :
commuting to the project sites.
d) Usc electric equipment for construction
whenever possible in lien of fossil fuel-fired
equipment.
Lf~,..T~ILM~I Traffic
Engineering
AQ-4 Prior to issuance of a building permiL
transportation comrol measures and design features Approved by
shall be incorporated into the project to reduce
emissions from mobile sources. A strateg~, to reduce on
vehicle ~ps, vehicle use, vehicle miles (rave~d,
vehicle idling, and traffic congestion includes the
following:
u) Improve sn'eet and uaffic signals for those
intersections and street segments that the
prolx~sed orojeet enn~butes traffic.
~Q-S The project ..~plicant shall incorporate the Building
¥~g into builthng plans: Approved by
a) ~ Iow-NO, emission water heaters,
~rdl~AIWO!
~WlI~Cli~ (PN-.IN)~0216~2160011~2169011
12
Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Cit~ in the Hills
.-~,~-~. ~:~..l~v~0Pment Se~ and- .-
Mitl~flonMeavuFe .~':~'/ ~ .'~d'~) . Eng~ng-, ~ent ,Commen~
b) ~vide ~c ~s to ~ducc buildinE ~l~g on
~u~men~.
c) In~l ene~-e~cient and automatM
d) ~or windows shell all be double-p~
g~.
0 ~cient (Iow-s~ium) p~k~g li~
0 U~ EPA~pmved w~ b~ing
fi~ h~ or ~llet stov~ in lieu of
CU~L R~URCES
A~ha~i~H~I R~urc~ Planning
CR-I if ~l~l ~es ~ un~ d~ng ~p~v~ by
~on ~vifi~, ~1 wo~ shall
~ of ~ fin~ A q~ifi~ ~o~
~ m~ m~u~. ~fof~l~
~ ny ~e~io~ ~ul~g ~m such
~l~fi~ if ~u~, s~l ~ submi~
~ ~ J~uin Valley A~logi~l
In~ ~n~ (AIC) at C~i~mh S~
Univolt, ~mfieJ~ ~d to ~e CiF of
~field ~velopment Se~ices ~mt.
? ~ ~ ~A'I~VOLI~WPWINICliem (PN-JN)~0216V)2 i 60011~160011 JvlMP.do~
13 Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Ci~ in the Hills
Verification of Compliance
· "' i.:.!i~ Developmen$ Services and
Mitl~flOn Me~sure ,-,~,. · Al~d Buflai~r~ E~ght~ering Fire Department Comments
P~leontolo~le~l Resources
CR-2 A paleontological monitoring program that
in,lades the following measures shall be
implemented to r~duce potential impacts on the
Sharktooth Hill bonebed:
a) Prior to grading* a paleontologist shall be
r~'med, at,nd a pro-grading meeting, and s~t
fo~h th~ procedures to be followed dm'lng the
monitoring proaram.
b) One paleontological monitor that is trained and
equipped to allow rapid removal of fossils with
minimal consUuction delay is expected to be
sufficient. Full-time monitoring of the portions
of the pro)eat sim that have m'th-distor~ing
activities a~ elevations between 600 feet and 700
feet shall be provided.
c) Jf fossils are found within an area being cleared
or graded, earth-clistuVoing activities shall be
div~ted als~wh~'¢ until the monitor h~
completed salvage of the fossils. If consUuction
personnel make thc discovery, the grading
contract' shall immediately divert constraction
and call the monitor to the site. lviajor salvage
time may be shor~ncd by grading contractor's
assistance (e.g.. removal of overburdeo, lifting
and removing large and h~vy fossils),
d) The project paleontologist shall prepare,
ideotif% and curate all recovered fossils. Upon
" ntologist
· compl~iOn of grading, the proje~'t paleo
~, shall prepare a summav/ report doonnentinl~
~A4BASWOP
*eWll~Client (PN*JN)~0216~02160011~ll~OOI I .MMP.do¢
14
Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Cit~ in the Hills
' ,Verification of Compliance
· . Engineering ~
, · .. ,~' . .?~.el, gpa?gnt Services and
Mlti~tion Measure . '.~ ~%.~ :~ A~d:Buililing) En~llJeering lqre Department Comments
mitigation and results, with itemized inventory
of collected specimens. Thc paleontologist shall
submit the report to thc City of Bake~3field,
designated dcpositor~, and any other appropriate
agency, and t2'ansfcr fossil collection to a
depository within thc City of Bakersfield or
County of Kern. The suromary report shall bc
submitted to thc City. This submittal will
sisnify completion of thc program to mitigate
impacts on paleuntolosical rcsuurc~..
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS COMPLLANCE
HMC-I Prio~ lo the issuance of grading permits, thc
~eding plans shall specif~ that in the event that
hazatduns waste is discovered during site preparation
o~ construction, the property owner/developer shall
ensm~ that the ideriti§cd ba~*xlons waste and/or
ha~mrdous material Js handled and disposed of in the
manner specified by the State of California
Hazardous Substances Con~'ol Law (Health and
Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.5) and according
to the C, alifomia Administrative Code, Tide 30,
~1C~-2 The applicant shall handle md dispose of
all hazardous materials and wastes during the
oj~afiun and maintenance of facilities in accordance
?*!: ! ~BA I wOb I ~WPWlN~Clieot (PN-/N)~0216%~216001110216001 $.MMP.doo
15 Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Cit~ in the Hills
Veriflc~fion of Compliance
·__De~lopmeat ~er~k~ ami
~g p~ ~1 ~i~ ~at in ~e e~t ~ ny
~ ~ ~v~ oil wells ~ ~v~ or
~ d~ng ex~fion or ~dinL
piing ~o~ will ~ ~qui~d.
HMCM No ~ ~ to be J~ ov~ a
~ plu~ or ~doned well.
PUBLIC SERVIC~ AND UTILITI~
~ ~t~on ~ie~ ~ire Depa~ment
~1 ~or m ~e i~u~ce of building ~i~. &e Approved by
~j~ ~pli~t shall submit building pt~s M ~d
~n ~l ~m ~e B~field Fi~ on
~t M &at fi~ dep~ent ~el ~d
~uJp~t ~ ~ ~viewed ~d eval~ to
~uipmmt m ~e ~ch individ~l pm~.
~2 ~or ~ ~e ~pmv~ of ~hg p~. &e Fire De~ment
~ ~li~t ~11 submit om~ ~ ~
p~ m ~e F~ ~ent for ~view ~ ~mv~ Approved by
~ ~ ~ ~i~ to &e site is in ~ with
~ ~fieM Fi~ ~mt ~qu~m~u. on
~ ~or ~ &c ~mmenceme~ of ~ Fi~ De~ment
~ing ~it~ &e ~j~ ~pli~t s~l ~1 ~
h~ h ~ wi~ ~e Ci~mv~ App~ved by
~ildhg pins.
on
~ ~or m &e ~pmval of s~et improvement Fi~ ~pa~ment
pl~ ~e pmj~ ~pli~t shall demo~ m &e
~ F~ ~em &at &e o~i~ ~ supply App~v~ by
~ is d~ m provide su~ci~t ~ flow
*i?~lWOt' '*WIN~lieat(PN-lN)~0216~02160011q~160011.MMP.do~ 16 Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Cit~ in the Hills
Verification of Complhnce
Engineering
Development Services and
~ Ser~es.(planning Traffic
Mltik, ation Meaanre . - - ~ - And Bulldin~ Engineering Fire Department Comments
presau~ and storage in accordance with ~ity Fire on
De~t requirements.
Polite Protection Services Planning
PPS-! Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Approved by
project applicant shall submit building plans to and
obtain approval from the Bakersfield Police on
Depamnent so that police dapamnent personnel and
equipment can be reviewed and evaluated to
dcm-mine the need to increase personnel and
equipment to serve each individual project.
School Ser'v~ces Planning
SS-I Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Approved by
project applicant shall pay District-adopted
development impact school fees that are in effect at on
the lime of issuing each permit. The Dis~ct-adopted
fees are required to be in accordance with State
s~atotes that are in effect at the tiroe of i~suing each
permit In lien of the above, the project applicant
may comply with alternative mitigation accaptsble to
the District.
Solid Waste Services Planning
SWS-! Prior to the issuance of building permits for Approved by
r~idential uses, the applicant shall demonstrate how
t~e project wo~ld poni¢ipate in a waste management on
program, which includes but is not limited to the
following:
a) A commiunant to contract with a recycling
business for the collection and repossessing of
~ glass, mixed and newsprint paper, plastics, and
', aluminum for all residential uses.
· ~:;-, ~.~dBAIWOLI~WPWIN~Iiem (PN-JN)~0216V}216001 l~fl~1600! I,MMP.do~
17
Mitigation Monitoring Plan
CiQ/ in the Hills
: ' Verificatio..n of Compliance
Es~gincet4ng
[~ ~.(!~nning Trnmc
Migration Me~sure A:na'BuNdlag) gnl0neerlng . Fire D~pnrtment Cgmments
b) A commitment to begin thc recycling when solid
waste collection begins.
c) Provisi°n of oesite receptacles for the collection
of glas~ mixed and newsprint paper, plastics,
and aluminum for recycling purposes shall be
provided. I.ocations of receptacles shall be
ind'_w_!~ on building plans.
d) Ensuring der hazardous waste disposal complies
with federalT starer and cit~ regulations.
W~lt~g Ptannlng
W-I Prior to the issuance of building permits, the ' Approved by
project applicant shall coordinate with the Califomin
Water Company to establish precise locations for on
wa~t dLslribution and storage facilities that would be
conslructed Onsite and offslte to adequately serve
each of the residential and non-residential water
needs or'the proposed project.
i~ Building
SD**I Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the ^ppmved by
project applkant sbal) submit drainage plans for the
project site for review and approval by the City of on
Bake~field. The drainage plans shall identify all
necessmy onsite end offsite drainage facilities to
accommodate project-related as well as cumulative
(in ancordance with the existing General Plan)
drainage volumes and velocities. Modifications to the
existing PDA for the Breckcrtridge area will require
~m) approval of an amendment to the PDA by the City
' ~WIBAI~VOI * "°WiN~Cli~nt (PN-JN)~0216V}2160011VY/16001LMMP.doc 18 Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Ci~in the Hills
Vertfl~flo,n of, Compliance
Engineering,
D~velOpment servl~'~~'
Mit~tion Me~sure .-,'~. :?-. ~And B~' ~- - F,n~m~g F4re Dep~rtment C(~mments
AI~-I-HETICS
AF.,S-I Prior to the issuance of grading p~rmits, cbc planning
proj~c~ applicant shall prepare landseap~ plans for
the projec~ aroa to provide visual r~lJct from projcc~ Approved by
s~ructurcs.
AES-2 Prior to the issuance of building [~flnits, the
proj~-'t aj~lJcan! shall outline specifications for
ovKJoor lighting locations and other intensely ligh~d.
ar~s. Thc apccifications shall identl~ minimum
lighting intensity nc~ts and d~sign lights to b~
diroc~d cowards intended ~s, Methods m r~luce
JiF, hi impacts ma)' include Iow-intensity light fixtUr~
AE~ Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Planning
project applicant shall submit and obtain City
· ppsoval of lighting plans. The lighting plans shall Approved by
v~i~ that outdoor lighting on private residanc~ is
d~igned so thal all direct rays are confincd to the site on
and ffuu adjac,~nt residences are protected from
subs~mtial li~,~ht and ~lara.
~ ~'gdBAIWOLI~WPWlI~Cli~t (PN-JN)~0216~02160Ol B02160011.MMP.doc 19 Mitigation Monitoring Plan
EXHIBIT B
Conditions
General Plan Amendment/Zone Change P99-0647
Planning
1. Comply with Safety Element policy numbers 11 and 12:
Policy Number Fault Rupture Policies
11 Prohibit development designed for human occupancy within 50 feet
of a known active fault and prohibit any building from being placed
astride an active fault.
To demonstrate compliance, this setback shall be shown on all
tentative tracts and site plans submitted to the City of Bakersfield
for approval.
12 Require site-specific studies to locate and characterize specific fault
traces within an Alquist-Priolo Fault Studies Zone for afl
construction designed for human occupancy.
Any tentative tract/site plan approval process will require site
specific studies prior to project approval.
Developer shall prepare and submit a "master park plan" to the Planning Director
for approval. Such "master park plan" shall be approved by the Planning
Director prior to the filing of any tract map or parcel map.
The R-3 zoning district is limited to 20.00 dwelling units per net acre.
Adjacent to Paladino Drive minimum lot sizes in the first tier of lots shall be 8,400
square feet. This shall be for a distance of 2,000 feet along Paladino Drive west
of the center line of Masterson or the last developed lot, whichever is greater.
Landscaping for medians and parkways along Paladino Drive shall include
meandering sidewalks and a mixture of trees, shrubs, and turf consistent with
landscaped strips for consolidated maintenance districts.
Public Works
Along with submittal of any development plan, tentative subdivision map, or
application for a lot line adjustment in the project area, the following shall occur:
Provide fully executed dedication for the expanded intersection of
Paladino Drive and Masterson Street and for Masterson Street at SR 178
to arterial standards. Also provide dedications for additional areas for
landscaping along Paladino Drive and Masterson Street as directed by the
City Engineer. Submit a current title report with the dedication
documents.
Provide offers of dedication for the other major streets in the approved
alignments, including Queen Street (a 110' side arterial).
Modify the Breckenridge Planned Drainage Area to conform with the
revised zoning.
A comprehensive drainage study conforming to the Breckenridge Planned
Drainage Area is to be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer.
Provide percolation tests for any proposed retention site. Any required
retention site and necessary easements shall dedicated to the City.
Submit verification to the City Engineer of the existing sewer system's
capability to accept the additional flows to be generated through
development under the new land use and zoning.
All development within the boundary of this amendment shall comply with the
traffic mitigation measures detailed in Section 5.3 of the DEIR and summarized
in the Executive Summary of the DEIR (Table 2-1 ).
The existing Northeast Trunk Sewer traverses this property. The street and
subdivision designs shall accommodate the sewer line easements - the sewer
line is not to cross private property,
Prior to the issuance of any building permit or the recordation of any subdivision
north of the proposed Panorama Street alignment, improve Paladino Drive
between the project area boundary and Morning Drive.
Prior to the issuance of any building permit or the recordation of any subdivision
south of the proposed Panorama Street alignment, construct the intersection
connection at the proposed collector and SR 178.
10.
Access to the arterial and collector streets will be limited and determined at time
of division or development. Determination of whether a right turn lane is required
at the access street(s) will also be made at the time of division or development.
A full access opening will only be considered if the developer funds and installs a
traffic signal at the site entrance.
As described in mitigation measures TR-1 and TR-2, the final traffic impact fee
program shall be based upon a fee schedule submitted with cost estimates and
share computations, subject to the approval of the City Engineer. It should be
noted that the fee schedule referenced from pages 44 and 45 of the Traffic Study
in Appendix C is considered preliminary and subject to correction. Several
facilities on the fee list within the influence of the project are not shown, but need
to be added, and several facilities appear to have incorrect project traffic shares
computed.
Prior to issuance of a building permit, the project applicant shall provide funding
for the future realigned SR 178 between Fairfax Road and Alfred Harrell
Highway. The project's share of the traffic on future SR 178 is 7.5 percent. No
policy has yet been adopted as to what share of future SR 187 local
development is responsible to fund. The Bakersfield City Council and the Kern
County Board of Supervisors, in their adoption of the Regional Transportation
Impact Fee Program (RTIF), established that the local development's share of
the Kern River freeway is 10%. Absent any policy decision to the contrary, we
recommend that the developer be required to pay 7.5% of the local share, said
local share to be 10% of the construction costs. Fifty percent of the right-of-way
costs are already provided for in the RTIF program and shall be included in the
RTIF calculations.
As noted in mitigation measure TR-4, a phasing plan is required for
implementation of various onsite improvements mitigation measures. Since
several mitigation improvements are also shown to be needed in at half project
build out (TR-2), the phasing plan shall also extend to these as well as any other
improvements. For example, any new connections to Hwy 178 requiring signals
at half build out should probably require signalization at the time of connection.
In addition, the phasing plan shall show how the project connects to the existing
roadway network at initial development, half build-out and full build-out. The
developer shall provide an appropriate mechanism to assure improvements
occur in a timely manner.
A requirement of disclosure in any Department of Real Estate filings or sales
contracts related to any property sale and an agreement to file a restrictive
covenant recorded on the Project Area, which will disclose the possibility of noise
11.
12.
13.
from Mesa Marin Raceway greater than allowable under applicable city
standards and based on that disclosure prevent purchasers of property from
instituting administrative or judicial action against Mesa Matin.
Prior to the grading, excavation or submittal of any tract or parcel map, applicant
shall consult with the Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas and
Geothermal Resources to determine if any (1) oil and/or gas lines and (2)
abandoned oil and gas wells are located on the project site. If such lines or wells
or located on site, the location of such lines or wells shall be shown on the tract
or parcel map.
Prior to, the grading, excavation or submittal of any tract or parcel map, USA
North shall be contacted and assess the map site and/or grading/excavation site.
A USA North identification number shall be obtain to identify all above and
underground utility facilities in accordance with California Government Code
Section 4216. USA North can be contacted at 1(800) 227-2600.
Mitigation measure TR-4 requires a phasing plan to address this issue. The
following list can be considered an example listing projects expected to be
complete with adjacent development, by the half build out and by the full
buildout, but the actual timing of the improvements will be contained in the
required phasing plan which will be presented to the Planning Commission prior
to the submission of the first tentative map in the GPA/ZC area. This list will be
overriden by the Planning Commission approved phasing plan. Upon
determination by the City Engineer that traffic and public safety necessitates
improvements be completed prior to the timing established in the Planning
Commission approved phasing plan, the developer shall submit to the City
Engineer design of such identified improvements and, upon approval, install
such improvements in a timely manner as directed by the City Engineer.
Improvements expected with adjacent development:
A. With connection of Vineland to Hwy. 178 installation of a traffic signal and
widening Hwy. 176 at the intersection to provide left turn channelization
from Hwy. 178 is anticipated.
B. With first development having connections to Masterson Street, realign
Masterson to its ultimate alignment having 90 degree intersection with
Hwy. 178.
C. Install Panorama Dr. from Queen St. to Masterson St.
D. Install the on-site Collector Loop street
E. Install Vineland Rd.Jalley Ln. from Hwy. 178 to Paladino Dr.
F. Install Queen St. from Panorama Dr. to Paladino Dr.
14.
15.
16.
Improvements expected by HALF BUILD OUT based upon the DEIR mitigation
measures:
A. Install traffic signals at the following intersections:
1. Vineland Rd. at Interior Loop Collector
2. Panorama Dr. at Interior Loop Collector (1 location)
3. Panorama Dr. at Masterson St.
4. Morning Dr. at Hwy. 178
5. Masterson St (re-aligned) at Hwy. 178
6. Hwy. 184 at Hwy. 17'8
7. Vineland Rd. at Hwy. 178 (if not previously connected)
B. Install one left turn lane to east bound and west bound lanes and re-time
traffic signals at the intersection of Fair[ax Rd. and Hwy. 178. Please
note, this will be superceded by the construction of a full interchange
which is funded for construction with completion expected by 2004-05.
C. Install entire half width of Hwy. 178 and Masterson Street along project
frontage.
D. Install 2 lanes on Panorama Dr. from Morning Dr. to Queen St.
E. Widen Hwy. 178 to 4-lanes from Fairfax Rd. to Alfred Harrel Hwy.
Improvements expected by FULL BUILD OUT based upon the DEIR mitigation
measures:
A. Install traffic signals at the following intersections:
1. Panorama Dr. at Morning Dr.
2. Morning Dr. at Auburn St.
3. Paladino Dr. at Fair[ax Rd.
4. Vineland Dr. at Hwy. 184
5. Paladino Dr. at Morning Dr.
B. Install 2 lanes of paving on Paladino Dr. from Fair[ax Rd. to Masterson St.
C. Install 2 additional lanes of paving on Kern Canyon Rd. (Hwy. 184) from
Hwy. 178 to Niles St.
The improvements needed at locations significantly and directly impacted by the
project to maintain City service level standards will be required to be in place
prior to occupancy of the relevant development phase. Improvements which are
included in an adopted fee program will be provided by the fee program
mechanism if funds are currently available. If funds are not available to meet the
circulation improvement needs at any particular development phase, then the
project proponent will either provide the off-site improvements directly (with
potential of future reimbursement or credits if a relevant fee program is in place),
or the development must await other sources of implementation.
S:\Dole\P99-0647\Conditions-Mitigation.wpd
MH
CiTY OF BAKERSFIELD
ZONING MAP 104-18
SEC 18 1~ 29s R 29E
LEGEND
........ ZON[ ~S?RICT ~OUNOARY
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
ZONING MAP 104-17
SEC. 17 I 29S R. 2cJE
LEGEND
os
C'2
I(")
o,.r
I11
CiTY OF BAKERSFIELD
ZONING MAP 104- 20
SEC. 20 T 29s R. 29E.
LEGEND
Rol
(b}
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
ZONING MAP 104-19
SEC (9 T 29S R, 29E
LEGEND
Legal Description
EXHIBIT D
Zone Change Pgg-0647
PROPOSED C-2 JFROM AJ
ALL THAT PORTION OF SECTION 17. TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, M D.M., CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD, COUNTY OF KERN. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 17; THENCE S.00°21'44"W
ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 17 A DISTANCE OF 988.37 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING S00'21'44"W ALONG SAID EAST LINE A DISTANCE OF
33000 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID EAST LINE AT RIGHT ANGLES, N89°38'16"W, A
DISTANCE OF 330.00 FEET; THENCE N 00°21'44"E, 330 00 FEET; THENCE S 89°38'16"E, 33000
FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING
CONTAINING 2.50 ACRES
PROPOSED C-2 (FROM A)
ALL THAT PORTION OF SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, MD.M., CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD, COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 17; THENCE S.00'2t'44"W.
ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 17 A DISTANCE OF 1408.37 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING S.00'21'44"W. ALONG SAID EAST LINE A DISTANCE OF
504.88 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID EAST LINE, S.39°45'39~N., 200.61 FEET; THENCE
N.89'38'16"W., 712.85 FEET; THENCE N00°21'44"E., 660.00 FEET; THENCE S.89°38'16"E., 840.18
FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 12.50 ACRES.
pROPOSED R-1 (FROM A)
ALL THAT PORTION OF SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, M.D.M., CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD, COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 17 THENCE S.00°21'44"W.
ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 17 A DISTANCE OF 988.37 FEET; THENCE
DEPARTING SAID EAST LINE AT RIGHT ANGLES, N.89°38'16"W., A DISTANCE OF 330.00 FEET;
THENCE S.00°21'44"W., 330.00 FEET; THENCE S.89°38'16"E., 330,00 FEET TO SAID EAST LINE;
THENCE S.00°21'44"W. ALONG SAID EAST LINE A DISTANCE OF 90,00 FEET; THENCE
DEPARTING SAID EAST LINE AT RIGHT ANGLES, N.89'38'16"W., 840.18 FEET; THENCE
S.00'2!'44'W,, 660.00 FEET; THENCE S.89°38'16"E,, 712.85 FEET; THENCE S.39°45'39"W.,
1264.86 FEET TO A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL TO AND 105.00 FEET NORTHWESTERLY AS
MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM THE CENTERLINE OF THE SPECIFIC PLAN LINE OF
STATE ROUTE 178 AS DESCRIBED IN THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD RESOLUTION NO. 83-95
APPROVED ON MAY 17, 1995; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE THE FOLLOWING TWO
(2) COURSES:
1) S.49°26'34"W., 2046.48 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO
THE NORTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 4895.00 FEET; THENCE
2) SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
14'11'18" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 1212.16 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY
BOUNDARY OF STATE ROUTE VI-KER-178 AS SHOWN ON "STATE HIGHWAY
MAP" FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE KERN COUNTY SURVEYOR. IN FILED MAP
BOOK 4, PAGE 114; THENCE
N.40'05'41"W. ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY A DISTANCE OF 20.59 FEET TO
THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID STATE ROUTE VI-KER-178. AND THE BEGINNING OF A
NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 4875.00 FEET
AND TO WHICH BEGINNING A RADIAL LINE BEARS S.26'18'41"E.; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY
ALONG SAID CURVE AND SAID NORTHERLY BOUNDARY THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
03'26'43' AN ARC DISTANCE OF 293.14 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID NORTHERLY
BOUNDARY. N.37'26'50"~N.. 1328.31 FEET; THENCE S.52'33'10"W., 160.46 FEET TO THE.
BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST. HAVING A RADIUS OF 1500.00
FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGL~ OF
19°39'11" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 514.52 FEET; THENCE N.57°06'01"W., 277.36 FEET TO THE
WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 17; THENCE N.00°28'22"E. ALONG SAID WEST LINE A DISTANCE
OF 4466.85 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 17; THENCE S.89°24'13"E.
ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 17 A DISTANCE OF 5271.39 FEET TO THE POINT
OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 470.92 ACRES.
PROPOSED R-1 {FROM R-l)
ALL THAT PORTION OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, M.D.M., CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD, COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 18; THENCE N.00°28'22"E.
ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 18 A DISTANCE OF 819.77 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE DEPARTING SAID EAST LINE, N.57°06'01~N., 0.84 FEET; THENCE
N.32°53'59"E., 1.33 FEET TO SAID EAST LINE; THENCE S.00°28'22"W. ALONG SAID EAST LINE
OF SECTION 18 A DISTANCE OF 1.57 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 0.56 SQUARE FEET.
PROPOSED C-2 ~FROM A)
ALL THAT PORTION OF SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, M.D.M., CITY ~)F
BAKERSFIELD, COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 17; THENCE N.00°21'44"E.
ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 17 A DISTANCE OF 307.61 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING N.00°21'44"E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE A DISTANCE OF
2082.21 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID EAST LINE, S.62°49'08"VV., 1215.98 FEET TO A LINE
THAT IS PARALLEL TO AND 105.00 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES
FROM THE CENTERLINE OF THE SPECIFIC PLAN LINE OF STATE ROUTE 178 AS DESCRIBED
IN THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD RESOLUTION NO. 83-95 APPROVED ON MAY 17, 1995; THENCE
S49°26'34"W. ~J-ONG SAID PARALLEL LINE A DISTANCE OF 240.64 FEET; THENCE
DEPARTING SAID PARALLEL LINE, S.00°21'44~N., 1616.46 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-
WAY OF THE 100-FOOT WIDE TEMPORARY CONNECTION OF STATE ROUTE VI-KER-178 AS
SHOWN ON 'STATE HIGHWAY MAP" FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE KERN COUNTY
SURVEYOR, IN FILED MAP BOOK 4 AT PAGE 115, ALSO BEING THE NORTH LINE OF THE
SOUTH 50.00 FEET OF SAID SECTION 17; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY THE
FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES:
1) S.89°28'51"E., 290.64 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE
NORTH, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1950.00 FEET; THENCE
2) EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 29°47'06'
AN ARC DISTANCE OF 1013.70 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 56.14 ACRES.
PROPOSED R-~[~FROM A)
ALL THAT PORTION OF SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, MD.M., CiTY OF
BAKERSFIELD, COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNI~ BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 17; THENCE N.00°21'44"E.
ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 17 A DISTANCE OF 307.61 FEET TO THE NORTH
RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE TEMPORARY CONNECTION OF STATE ROUTE VI-KER-178 AS SHOWN
ON "STATE HIGHWAY MAP" FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE KERN COUNTY SURVEYOR, IN
FILED MAP BOOK 4 AT PAGE 115, ALSO BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE
CONCAVE TO THE NORTH, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1950.00 FEET AND TO WHICH BEGINNING A
RADIAL LINE BEARS S.29°15'57"E.; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY THE
FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES:
1) WESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 29°47'06"
AN ARC DISTANCE OF 1013.70 FEET; THENCE ,
2) N.89°28'51"W., 290.64 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE
CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY THE FOLLOWING TWO (2)
COURSES:
1) N.89°28'51"W., 1761.76 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO
THE SOUTH, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2500.00 FEET; THENCE
2) WESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 07°01'28"
AN ARC DISTANCE OF 306.50 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY OF
STATE ROUTE VI-KER-178 AS SHOWN ON "STATE HIGHWAY MAP" FILED IN
THE OFFICE OF THE KERN COUNTY SURVEYOR, IN FILED MAP BOOK 4, PAGE
114; THENCE
N.40"05'41"W. ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY A DISTANCE OF 20.59 FEET TO A
LINE THAT IS PARALLEL TO AND 105.00 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY AS MEASURED AT RIGHT
ANGLES FROM THE CENTERLINE OF THE SPECIFIC PLAN LINE OF STATE ROUTE 178 AS
DESCRIBED IN THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD RESOLUTION NO. 83-95 APPROVED ON MAY 17,
1995, ALSO BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE
NORTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 5105.00 FET AND TO WHICH BEGINNING A RADIAL LINE
BEARS S.26°56'38"E.; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE THE FOLLOWING TWO (2)
COURSES:
1) NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
13°36'48" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 1212.94 FEET; THENCE
2) N49°26'34"E., 1427.92 FEET; THENCE
DEPARTING SAID PARALLEL L1NE, S.00°21'44"W., 1616.46 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 35.56 ACRES.
PROPOSED R-~(FROM A)
ALL THAT PORTION OF SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, MD.M., CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD, COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 17; THENCE S.89°28'51"E.
ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 17 A DISTANCE OF 753.70 FEET TO THE POINT
OF BEGINNING, ALSO BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE
EAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 500.00 FEET AND TO WHICH BEGINNING A RADIAL LINE BEARS
N.85°28'56'~/.; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
48°02'06" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 419.18 FEET; THENCE N.52°33'10"E., 6.63 FEET; THENCE
N.37°26'50"W., 765.33 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO
THE SOUTHEAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1500.00 FEET AND TO WHICH BEGINNING A RADIAL
LINE BEARS N.42°22'47"W.; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 04"55'57" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 129.13 FEET; THENCE N.52°33'10"E.,
160.46 FEET; THENCE S.37°26'50"E., 1328.31 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF
STATE ROUTE VI-KER-178 AS SHOWN ON "STATE HIGHWAY MAP" FILED IN THE OFFICE OF
THE KERN COUNTY SURVEYOR, IN FILED MAP BOOK 4, PAGE 114, ALSO BEING THE
BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS
OF 4875.00 FEET AND TO WHICH BEGINNING A RADIAL LINE BEARS S.22°51'58"E.; THENCE
SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03°13'58" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 275.06 FEET TO SAID SOUTH LINE OF
SECTION 17; THENCE DEPARTING SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY, N.89°28'51'~V. ALONG
SAID SOUTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 512.11 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 10.83 ACRES.
PROPOSED Ro'I~(FROM A)
ALL THAT PORTION OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, MD.M., CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD, COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20; THENCE S.89°28'51"E.
ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 20 A DISTANCE OF 753.70 FEET TO THE POINT
OF BEGINNING, ALSO BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE
EAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 500.00 FEET AND TO WHICH BEGINNING A RADIAL LINE BEARS-.,
N.85°28'56"W.; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE-:OF
04002'42 AN ARC DISTANCE OF 35,30 FEET; THENCE S.00°28'22"VV., 121.61 FEET TO THE
NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF STATE ROUTE VI-KKR-178 AS SHOWN ON "STATE HIGHWAY
MAP" FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE KERN COUNTY SURVEYOR, IN FILED MAP BOOK 4, PAGE
114, ALSO BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE
NORTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 4875,00 FEET AND TO WHICH BEGINNING A RADIAL LINE
BEARS S.13°19'22"E.; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-
OF-WAY THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 06"18'38" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 536.94 FEET TO
SAID NORTH LINE OF SECTION 20; THENCE DEPARTING SAID NORTHERY RIGHT-OF-WAY,
N.89°28'51"W. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF SECTION 20 A DISTANCE OF 512.11 FEET TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 0.98 ACRE.
PROPOSED C-2 (FROM A)
ALL THAT PORTION OF SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, MDM., CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD, COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 17; THENCE S.89°28'51"E.
ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 17 A DISTANCE OF 6.17 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING, ALSO BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE
SOUTHEAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1500.00 FEET AND TO WHICH BEGINNING A RADIAL LINE
BEARS N.85°25'46"W.; THENCE NORTHEASTERY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 42°02'59" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 1100.86 FEET; THENCE S.37°26'50"E., 765,33 FEET;
THENCE S.52°33'10"VV., 6,63 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE
SOUTHEAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 500.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 48°02'06" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 419.18 FEET TO SAID
SOUTH LINE OF SECTION 17; THENCE N,89°28'51"W. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE A DISTANCE
OF 747.53 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 12.99 ACRES,
PROPOSED C-2 ~FROM A)
ALL THAT PORTION OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, M.D.M., CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD, COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20; THENCE S.89°28'51"E.
ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 17 A DISTANCE OF 6.17 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING S.89°28'51"E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE A DISTANCE OF
747.53 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE EAST,
HAVING A RADIUS OF 500.00 FEET AND TO WHICH BEGINNING A RADIAL LINE BEARS
N.85°28'56"W.; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
04°02'42" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 35.30 FEET; THENCE S.00°28'22~/., 121.61 FEET TO THE
NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF STATE ROUTE VI-KERo178 AS SHOWN ON "STATE HIGHWAY
MAP" FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE KERN COUNTY SURVEYOR, IN FILED MAP BOOK 4, PAGE
114, ALSO BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE
NORTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 4875,00 FEET AND TO WHICH BEGINNING A RADIAL LINE
BEARS S.13°19'22"E.; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY AND
SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 08°57'54" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 762.79 FEET
TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 20; THENCE DEPARTING SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-
WAY, N.00°22'29"E. ALONG SAID WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF 144.95 FEET TO THE BEGINNING
OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE EAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1500.00 FEET; THENCE
NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05°11'45" AN ARC
DISTANCE OF 136.02 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. _
CONTAINING 3.95 ACRES.
? R_O P 9 S_E D_C_t2_( F RD M A)
ALL THAT PORTION OF SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, M.D.M., CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD, COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 17; THENCE N00°28'22"E.
ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 17 A DISTANCE OF 819.77 FEET; THENCE
DEPARTING SAID WEST LINE, S.57°06'01"E., 277.36 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-
TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1500.00 FEET AND
TO WHICH BEGINNING A RADIAL LINE BEARS N.57°O6'01"W.; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG
SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 27°19'45.' AN ARC DISTANCE OF 715.48 FEET
TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 17; THENCE N89°28'51"W. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE
A DISTANCE OF 617 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 1.79 ACRES,
PROPOSED C-2 (FROM R-l)
ALL THAT PORTION OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, M.D.M, CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD, COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 18; THENCE N.89039'39"W.
ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 18 A DISTANCE OF 382.95 FEET; THENCE
DEPARTING SAID SOUTH LINE, N.00°28'22"E., 105.83 FEET; THENCE N.25°40'11"E., 815.20
FEET; THENCE S.57°06'01"E., 42.52 TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 18; THENCE
S.00°28'22"W. ALONG SAID EAST LINE A DISTANCE OF 819.77 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 4.46 ACRES.
PROPOSED C-2 (FROM R-l)
ALL THAT PORTION OF SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, MD.M, CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD, COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 19; THENCE S.00°22'29"W.
ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 19 A DISTANCE OF 280.81 FEET TO THE
NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF STATE ROUTE VI-KER-178 AS SHOWN ON "STATE HIGHWAY
MAP" FILED tN THE OFFICE OF THE KERN COUNTY SURVEYOR, IN FILED MAP BOOK 4, PAGE
113, ALSO BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON*TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTH,
HAVING A RADIUS OF 4875.00 FEET AND TO WHICH BEGINNING A RADIAL LINE BEARS
S.O4°21'28"E.; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY THE FOLLOWING TWO (2)
COURSES:
1) WESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 04°08'50"
AN ARC DISTANCE OF 352.84 FEET; THENCE
2) S.89°47'22"W., 31.07 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-
OF-WAY, N.00°28'22"E., 297.26 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 19; THENCE
S.89°39'39"E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 382.95 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 2.56 ACRES.
PROPOSED C-2 (FROM R-l)
ALL THAT PORTION OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, MD.M, CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD, COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20; THENCE S.89°28'51"E.
ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 20 A DISTANCE OF 6.17 FEET TO THE BEGINNING
OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE EAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1500.00 FEET
AND TO WHICH BEGINNING A RADIAL LINE BEARS N.84°25'46"W.; THENCE SOUTHERLY
ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05°11'45'' AN ARC DtSTANCE;~E
..~
136.02 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAiD SECTION 20; THENCE N.OO°22'29"E. ALONG SAID
WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF 135.85 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 0.01 ACRE.
PROPOSED R-1 (FROM R-l)
ALL THAT PORTION OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE. 29 EAST, MD.M, CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD, COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 18; THENCE N00°28'22"E.
ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 18 A DISTANCE OF 819.77 FEET; THENCE
N57°06'01"W., 0.84 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N.57°06'01"W., 41.68 FEET;
THENCE S.25°40'11"W., 509.17 FEET; THENCE N64°19'49"W., 219.63 FEET; THENCE
N.89°39'39"W., 918.61 FEET; THENCE NO0°28'22"E., 848.60 FEET; THENCE S.89°39'39"E.,
1370.00 FEET TO SAID EAST LINE OF SECTION 18; THENCE S.00°28'22"W. ALONG SAID EAST
LINE A DISTANCE OF 503.66 FEET; THENCE S.32°53'59"W., 1.33 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 25.93 ACRES.
PROPOSED R-3 (FROM R-l)
ALL THAT PORTION OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, M.D.M, CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD, COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 18; THENCE N.89°39'39"W.
ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 18 A DISTANCE OF 382.95 FEET TO THE POINT
OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING N.89°39'39"W. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE A DISTANCE
OF 987.06 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTH LINE, N.00°28'22"E., 476.40 FEET; THENCE
S.89°39'39"E., 918.61 FEET; THENCE S.64°19'49"E;, 219.63 FEET; THENCE S.25°40'11"W., 306.03
FEET; THENCE S.00°28'22~N., 105.83 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 11.28 ACRES.
PROPOSED R-3 (FROM R-l)
ALL THAT PORTION OF SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, M.D.M., CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD, COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 19; THENCE N.89°39'39"W.
ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 19 A DISTANCE OF 382.95 FEET TO THE POINT
OF BEGINNING; THENCE DEPARTING SAID NORTH LINE, S.00°28'22~N., 297.26 FEET TO THE
NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF STATE ROUTE VI-KER-178 AS SHOWN ON "STATE HIGHWAY
MAP" FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE KERN COUNTY SURVEYOR, IN FILED MAP BOOK 4, PAGE
113; THENCE S.89°47'22~N. ALONG SAID NORTHERLY BOUNDARY A DISTANCE OF 987.12
FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID NORTHERLY BOUNDARY, N.00°28'22"E., 306.73 FEET TO
SAID NORTH LINE OF SECTION 19; THENCE S.89°39'39"E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE A
DISTANCE OF 987.06 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 6.84 ACRES.
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING DOCUMENTS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
County of Kern )
PAMELA A. McCARTHY, being duly sworn, deposes and says:
That she is the duly appointed, acting and qualified City Clerk of the City of Bakersfield;
and that on the 30TM day of November , 2000 she posted on the Bulletin Board at
City Hall, a full, true and correct copy of the following: Ordinance No. 3989 , passed by
the Bakersfield City Council at a meeting held on the 29TM day of November 2000
and entitled:
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE SEVENTEEN OF THE BAKERSFIELD
MUNICIPAL CODE AND ZONING MAP NO. 104-17, 104-18, 104-19 AND
104-20 BY CHANGING THE ZONING FROM A (AGRICULTURAL), R-1
(ONE FAMILY DWELLING) TO C-2 (REGIONAL COMMERCIAL) ON 96.9
ACRES; FROM A (AGRICULTURAL) TO R-1 ON 500 ACRES; FROM A
AND R-1 TO R-3 (LIMITED MULTIPLE FAMILY DWELLING) ON 18.12
ACRES, FROM A T R-2 ON 47.38 ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED
BETWEEN PALADINO DRIVE, STATE ROUTE 178, MASTERSON
STREET AND VINELAND ROAD.
/s/PAMELA A. McCARTHY
City Clerk of the City of Bakersfield
DEPU'F~ City Clerk [~
S:\Document~FORMS~AOP.ORD.wpd
November 30, 2000