HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 033-07
RESOLUTION NO.
033-07
RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS, ADOPTING THE NEGATIVE
DECLARATION AND APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
NO. 06-0925, AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF
THE METROPOLITAN BAKERSFIELD GENERAL PLAN FROM R-
IA (RESOURCE - INTENSIVE AGRICULTURE) TO LR (LOW
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) ON 60-ACRES, LOCATED AT THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF PANAMA LANE AND SOUTH ALLEN
ROAD.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Bakersfield, in accordance with the
provisions of Section 65353 of the Government Code, held a public hearing on Monday, December 18,
2006, and on Thursday, December 21, 2006, on General Plan Amendment No. 06-0925, notice of the
time and place of hearing having been given at least twenty (20) calendar days before said hearing by
publication in The Bakersfield Californian, a local newspaper of general circulation; and
WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 06-0925, an amendment to the Land Use Element of
the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan, is as follows:
General Plan Amendment No. 06-0925:
Mcintosh and Associates for John Glenn Carmichael; Paul Dale Carmichael, Julie Anne
Carmichael Curtis, Estate of Charlotte F. Greer, Estate of Martha Faith Todd, Erwin
Franklin Wall, Jr., Estate of Hilton Frazier Wall, Jr., John Richard Wall, James Pearson
Wall, Jr. applied to amend the Land Use Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield
General Plan consisting of a change from R-IA (Resource -Intensive Agriculture) to LR
(Low Density Residential) on 60-acres. The project site is located at the northeast
corner of Panama Lane and South Allen Road; and
WHEREAS, an Initial Study was conducted for General Plan Amendment No. 06-0925 and it
was determined that the proposed project would not have a significant effect on the environment;
therefore, a Negative Declaration was prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA); and
WHEREAS, Policy No. 14 of the Conservation/soils and Agriculture Element of the Metropolitan
Bakersfield General Plan requires the City of Bakersfield to evaluate ten (10) factors when considering
projects that propose to convert designated agricultural land to non-agricultural uses; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has evaluated the ten factors provided under Policy C.14
of the Conservation Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan and finds the following:
1) Soil Qualitv
The soil types prevalent on the project site are listed in the Soil Survey of Kern County, California,
Northwestern Part (United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, September
1998). Based on the soil survey, the project site includes soil types 179 (Kimberlina fine sandy
loam, saline-alkali, 0 to 2 percent slopes). The amount of prime irrigated farmland that would be lost
with the approval and implementation of the land use change is considered insignificant.
!< fQ"I(C'~
o ~
).. -
~ rn
_ r-
~__._u. ..t:1
2) Availabilitv of irriaation water
The subject property has two (2) water wells. The water wells are primarily used for irrigation of the
crops on the site.
3) Proximitv to non-aaricultural uses
The subject property is in close proximity to non-agricultural uses. The subject property is
significantly and unavoidably affected by the close proximity of urbanized areas and Buena Vista
Elementary School. Farming practices are restricted as to the manner of application and type of
chemicals, pesticides, and herbicides that can be utilized in the vicinity of these urbanized areas.
The subject property, as well as others in the area, is the next step for urbanization in this area due
to existing and pending development surrounding the property and the significant impacts to the
crop production.
4) Proximitv to intensive oarcelization
There are several existing and proposed subdivision tracts lying within one-half mile of the projec:(
site on the north, south, east and west.
5) Effect on orooerties subiect to "Williamson Act" land use contracts
There are no properties within the project's Zone of Influence that are currently under a Williamson
Act land use contract.
6) Abilitv to be orovided with urban services (sewer. water. roads, etcJ
The site is currently accessible via Panama Lane and will be accessible via South Allen Road in the
future. Municipal sewer and water service are expected to be taken from Panama Lane or South
Allen Road.
7) Ability to affect the aoolication of aaricultural chemicals on nearby aaricultural orooerties
The proposal's level of impact to nearby agricultural properties is less than significant due to the
restrictions and limitations on the use of agricultural chemicals that will result from other planned and
approved residential developments in the immediate vicinity.
8) Ability to create a orecedent-settina situation that leads to the oremature conversion of crime
aariculturallands
The conversion of a substantial amount of prime agricultural land to urban development has been
occurring in recent years in the vicinity of the project site, and additional urban development is
planned and proposed in the area. Therefore, the proposal would not set a precedent in this regard.
9) Demonstrated oroiect need
Based upon the close proximity of the project site to other urbanizing lands, the proposal is
considered a logical step in the orderly development of the City of Bakersfield. Urbanization of the
site would allow for the incremental expansion of the infrastructure and public services that are
being constructed and provided in the surrounding area and would help to meet the need for
housing to accommodate the projected population growth in the Metropolitan Bakersfield General
!< f(," kC'-2
<:5 ~
.>. -
to- m
- r-
(.) C)
ORIGINAL
Plan area.
10) Necessitv of buffers such as lower densities. setbacks. etc
The project site adjoins properties zoned agricultural to the south. However, pursuant to the
Bakersfield Zoning Ordinance no buffers between agricultural zones are required.
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 264-06 on December 21, 2006, the Planning Commission
recommended approval and adoption of General Plan Amendment No. 06-0925 subject to the
"Mitigation/Conditions of Approval" listed in Exhibit "A" and this Council has fully considered the findings
made by the Planning Commission as set forth in that Resolution and as restated herein; and
WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Bakersfield, in accordance with the provisions of Section
65355 of the Government Code, conducted and held a public hearing on WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 7,
2007, on General Plan Amendment No. 06-0925, notice of time and place of the hearing having been
given at least ten (10) calendar days before the hearing by publication in The Bakersfield Californian, a
local newspaper of general circulation; and
WHEREAS, the Council has considered and hereby makes the following findings:
1. The above recitals and findings are true and correct.
2. The Council has considered and concurs with the following findings made by the
Planning Commission as set forth in Resolution No. 264-06, adopted on December 21,
2006:
a. All required public notices have been provided.
b. The provisions of CEQA have been met.
c. Based upon the Initial Study and comments received, staff has determined that
the proposed project could not have a significant effect on the environment. A
Negative Declaration was prepared for the project in accordance with CEOA.
d. The public necessity, general welfare and good planning practices justify the
amendment to the Land Use Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield General
Plan.
e. The land use designation change from R-IA (Resource -Intensive Agriculture) to
LR (Low Density Residential) on 60-acres is compatible with the land use
designations of surrounding properties and is internally consistent with the
Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan.
f. The laws and regulations relating to the preparation and adoption of Negative
Declarations as set forth in CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City of
Bakersfield CEQA Implementation Procedures have been duly followed by city
staff and the Planning Commission.
3. That the applicant by prior written agreement agreed to comply with all adopted
mitigation measures contained within the Negative Declaration.
~ fQ"I(~1>
o ~
.>. -
.... m
- r-
(.) t:1
ORIGINAL
RESOLUTION NO.
033-07
RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS, ADOPTING THE NEGATIVE
DECLARATION AND APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
NO. 06-0925, AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF
THE METROPOLITAN BAKERSFIELD GENERAL PLAN FROM R-
IA (RESOURCE - INTENSIVE AGRICULTURE) TO LR (LOW
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) ON 60-ACRES, LOCATED AT THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF PANAMA LANE AND SOUTH ALLEN
ROAD.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Bakersfield, in accordance with the
provisions of Section 65353 of the Government Code, held a public hearing on Monday, December 18,
2006, and on Thursday, December 21, 2006, on General Plan Amendment No. 06-0925, notice of the
time and place of hearing having been given at least twenty (20) calendar days before said hearing by
publication in The Bakersfield Californian, a local newspaper of general circulation; and
WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 06-0925, an amendmentto the Land Use Element of
the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan, is as follows:
General Plan Amendment No. 06-0925:
Mcintosh and Associates for John Glenn Carmichael; Paul Dale Carmichael, Julie Anne
Carmichael Curtis, Estate of Charlotte F. Greer, Estate of Martha Faith Todd, Erwin
Franklin Wall, Jr., Estate of Hilton Frazier Wall, Jr., John Richard Wall, James Pearson
Wall, Jr. applied to amend the Land Use Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield
General Plan consisting of a change from R-IA (Resource -Intensive Agriculture) to LR
(Low Density Residential) on 60-acres. The project site is located at the northeast
corner of Panama Lane and South Allen Road; and
WHEREAS, an Initial Study was conducted for General Plan Amendment No. 06-0925 and it
was determined that the proposed project would not have a significant effect on the environment;
therefore, a Negative Declaration was prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA); and
WHEREAS, Policy No. 14 ofthe Conservation/soils and Agriculture Element of the Metropolitan
Bakersfield General Plan requires the City of Bakersfield to evaluate ten (10) factors when considering
projects that propose to convert designated agricultural land to non-agricultural uses; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has evaluated the ten factors provided under Policy C.14
of the Conservation Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan and finds the following:
1) Soil Qualitv
The soil types prevalent on the project site are listed in the Soil Survey of Kern County, California,
Northwestern Part (United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, September
1998). Based on the soil survey, the project site includes soil types 179 (Kimberlina fine sandy
loam, saline-alkali, 0 to 2 percent slopes). The amount of prime irrigated farmland that would be lost
with the approval and implementation of the land use change is considered insignificant.
!< fQ"I<C'~
o ~
).. -
~ rn
_ r-
~ 0
~1t:lI~AI
2) Availabilitv of irriaation water
The subject property has two (2) water wells. The water wells are primarily used for irrigation of the
crops on the site.
3) Proximitv to non-aaricultural uses
The subject property is in close proximity to non-agricultural uses. The subject property is
significantly and unavoidably affected by the close proximity of urbanized areas and Buena Vista
Elementary School. Farming practices are restricted as to the manner of application and type of
chemicals, pesticides, and herbicides that can be utilized in the vicinity of these urbanized areas.
The subject property, as well as others in the area, is the next step for urbanization in this area due
to existing and pending development surrounding the property and the significant impacts to the
crop production.
4) Proximity to intensive oarcelization
There are several existing and proposed subdivision tracts lying within one-half mile of the projec;(
site on the north, south, east and west.
5) Effect on orooerties subiect to "Williamson Act" land use contracts
There are no properties within the project's Zone of Influence that are currently under a Williamson
Act land use contract.
6) Abilitv to be orovided with urban services (sewer. water. roads, etc.)
The site is currently accessible via Panama Lane and will be accessible via South Allen Road in the
future. Municipal sewer and water service are expected to be taken from Panama Lane or South
Allen Road.
7) Abilitv to affect the aoolication of aaricultural chemicals on nearby aaricultural orooerties
The proposal's level of impact to nearby agricultural properties is less than significant due to the
restrictions and limitations on the use of agricultural chemicals that will result from other planned and
approved residential developments in the immediate vicinity.
8) Abilitv to create a orecedent-settina situation that leads to the oremature conversion of crime
aariculturallands
The conversion of a substantial amount of prime agricultural land to urban development has been
occurring in recent years in the vicinity of the project site, and additional urban development is
planned and proposed in the area. Therefore, the proposal would not set a precedent in this regard.
9) Demonstrated oroiect need
Based upon the close proximity of the project site to other urbanizing lands, the proposal is
considered a logical step in the orderly development of the City of Bakersfield. Urbanization of the
site would allow for the incremental expansion of the infrastructure and public services that are
being constructed and provided in the surrounding area and would help to meet the need for
housing to accommodate the projected population growth in the Metropolitan Bakersfield General
!< f(," kC'-2
<:5 ~
.>. -
to- m
- r-
(.) C)
ORIGINAL
Plan area.
10) Necessitv of buffers such as lower densities. setbacks. etc
The project site adjoins properties zoned agricultural to the south. However, pursuant to the
Bakersfield Zoning Ordinance no buffers between agricultural zones are required.
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 264-06 on December 21, 2006, the Planning Commission
recommended approval and adoption of General Plan Amendment No. 06-0925 subject to the
"Mitigation/Conditions of Approval" listed in Exhibit "A" and this Council has fully considered the findings
made by the Planning Commission as set forth in that Resolution and as restated herein; and
WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Bakersfield, in accordance with the provisions of Section
65355 of the Government Code, conducted and held a public hearing on WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 7,
2007, on General Plan Amendment No. 06-0925, notice of time and place of the hearing having been
given at least ten (10) calendar days before the hearing by publication in The Bakersfield Californian, a
local newspaper of general circulation; and
WHEREAS, the Council has considered and hereby makes the following findings:
1. The above recitals and findings are true and correct.
2. The Council has considered and concurs with the following findings made by the
Planning Commission as set forth in Resolution No. 264-06, adopted on December 21,
2006:
a. All required public notices have been provided.
b. The provisions of CEOA have been met.
c. Based upon the Initial Study and comments received, staff has determined that
the proposed project could not have a significant effect on the environment. A
Negative Declaration was prepared for the project in accordance with CEQA.
d. The public necessity, general welfare and good planning practices justify the
amendment to the Land Use Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield General
Plan.
e. The land use designation change from R-IA (Resource -Intensive Agriculture) to
LR (Low Density Residential) on 60-acres is compatible with the land use
designations of surrounding properties and is internally consistent with the
Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan.
f. The laws and regulations relating to the preparation and adoption of Negative
Declarations as set forth in CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City of
Bakersfield CEQA Implementation Procedures have been duly followed by city
staff and the Planning Commission.
3. That the applicant by prior written agreement agreed to comply with all adopted
mitigation measures contained within the Negative Declaration.
~ fQAKC'-2
o %
.>. -
.... m
- r-
(.) c::,
ORIGINAL
4. That the infrastructure exists or can easily be provided to accommodate the types of
density and intensity of the development.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND FOUND BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD as follows:
1. The above recitals and findings incorporated herein are true and correct.
2. The Negative Declaration for General Plan Amendment No. 06-0925 is hereby approved
and adopted.
3. The report of the Planning Commission, including maps and all reports and papers
relevant thereto, transmitted by the Secretary of the Planning Commission to the City
Council, is hereby received, accepted and approved.
4. The City Council hereby approves and adopts General Plan Amendment No. 06-0925,
constituting changes as shown on the map marked Exhibit "B", attached hereto and
incorporated as though fully set forth, for property generally located at the northeast
corner of Panama Lane and South Allen Road, subject to the "Mitigation/Conditions of
Approval" listed in Exhibit "A".
5. That General Plan Amendment No. 06-0925, approved herein, be combined with other
approved General Plan Amendment cases in this same cycle described in separate
resolutions, to form a single Amendment to the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan.
---------()()()--------
4
~ fQA/(C'~
o %
.>. -
~ m
- r-
~ t)
ORIGINAL
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Council of
the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on Ff'R 2 8 2007
by the following vote:
~
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
-
-- ....-
---
...--
-
COUNCILMEMBER CARSON, BENHAM, WEIR, COUCH, HANSON, SULLIVAN, SCRIVNER
COUNCILMEMBER
COUNCILMEMBER
COUNCILMEMBER
PAMELAA. McCARTHY, CMC
CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Cle
Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED
HARVE L. HALL
MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED as to form:
VIRGINIA GENNARO
City Attorney
By /Jfmv!ib~
Exhibit A - Mitigation/Conditions of Approval
B - General Plan Amendment Map
JS - S:\GPA 4th 2006\06-0925\Resolution\CC GPA Resolution.doc
5
~ ~~/{C'~
o ~
).. -
~ rn
_ r-
" t:1
ORIGINAL
Exhibit A
Conditions of Approval
~ ~j\K~-9
o ~
>- -
t; l!'
~~C)
EXHIBIT A
Conditions of Approval
General Plan Amendment/Zone Change No. 06-0925
MITIGATION MEASURES FROM NEGATIVE DECLARATION:
Air Qualitv Mitication Measures:
1. Upon submittal of tentative tract or site plan for approval, the applicanVdeveloper of the project
site shall submit documentation to the Planning Department that they will/have met the following
air quality mitigation measures:
· Water all unpaved or haul road surfaces as needed.
. Limit speed on all unpaved roads to 15 mph.
. Water any exposed ground surfaces as needed.
· Stabilize all disturbed areas including inactive storage piles on an as needed basis.
. Maintain at least a 6 inch freeboard space during transport of materials and/or cover and wet
to limit dust emissions.
. Remove mud or dirt accumulations on public roadways immediately when track out exceeds
50 or more feet as well as at the end of the work day.
. Cease grading activities during periods of high winds where entrainment of dust will excee~
the SJVAPCD 20% opacity requirement.
Construction Equipment Mitigation Measures:
. Limit idling to no more than 20 minutes at a time.
. All construction equipment shall be maintained to manufacturers' specification.
. Where possible electric equipment shall be used in lieu of diesel or gas powered equipment.
Encourage employees at the construction sites to carpool to and from work as well as during
established lunch hours. Mitigation for potentially significant air quality impacts.
Culturallmoact Mitication Measures
2. If archaeological resources are encountered during the course of construction, a qualified
archaeologist shall be consulted for further evaluation. Mitigation for potentially significant
cultural resource impacts.
3. If human remains were discovered during grading or construction activities, work would cease
pursuant to Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. If human remains are
identified on the site at any time, work shall stop at the location of the find and the Kern County
Coroner shall be notified immediately (Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code
and Section 5097.98 of the California Public Resources Code which details the appropriate
actions necessary for addressing the remains) and the local Native American community shall
be notified immediately. Mitigation for potentially significant cultural resource impacts.
Traffic Imoact Mitication Measures:
4. Prior to the issuance of any building permit within the GP A1ZC area, the developer shall pay the
applicable Regional Transportation Impact Fee (RTIF) to as adopted at time of development.
Mitigation for potentially significant traffic and circulation impacts.
5. Prior to issuance of the first building permit within the GPAlZC area, the developer shall pay the
proportionate share contributions for the intersection and roadway improvements not covered by..
the RTIF as identified in Tables 7 and 8 of the project traffic study (TPG Consulting, Jan~~C'~
o %
).. -
!:: J!!
" t:1
ORIGINAL
Exhibit A
Conditions of Approval
GPAlZC 06-0925
Page 2 of 4
2005) and in the following tables:
FUTURE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS AND LOCAL MITIGATION
Stockdale Hi hwa & Old River Road
Panama Lane & Buena Vista Road
NB-Northbound L-Left Turn Lane
SB=Southbound T=Through Lane
WB=Westbound R=Right Turn Lane
EB=Eastbound
FUTURE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS AND LOCAL MITIGATION
Panama Lane:
Allen Road - Windemere
Add 6 Lanes
Add 2 Lanes
0.36%
Panama Lane:
Windemere to Buena Vista
Add 6 Lanes
Add 2 Lanes
0.59%
Mitigation for potentially significant traffic and circulation impacts
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
Public Works:
6. Along with the submittal of any development plan, prior to approval of improvement plans, or with
the application for a lot line adjustment or parcel merger, the following shall occur:
a. Provide fully executed dedication for Windermere Street to collector standards and Allen
Road to arterial standards for the full frontage of the area within the GPA request.
Dedications shall include sufficient widths for expanded intersections and additional areas
for landscaping as directed by the City Engineer. Submit a current title report with the
dedication documents. If a tentative subdivision map over the entire GPAlZC area is
submitted, dedication can be provided with the map. For orderly development.
b. This GPAlZC area is too small to support it's own storm drainage sump. The City will allow
no more than one sump per 80 acres; therefore, this GPAlZC area must be included within
the drainage area of adjoining property. Submit a comprehensive drainage study to be
reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. The drainage area to be covered in the
comprehensive drainage study will be larger than the GPAlZC area - the City is willing to aid
the developer in the formation of a Planned Drainage Area to provide a mechanism for the
reimbursement of oversizing costs to the developer. For orderly development.
c. Submit a comprehensive sewer study to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer.
The developer shall be responsible for the initial extension of the sewer line to serve the
property. This sewer line must necessarily be sized to serve a much larger area that t~"I(~
project area. This area is within the McAllister Ranch Planned Sewer Area; any s~er '9cP
.:... ~
t= f!!
<;) t:1
ORIGINAL
Exhibit A
Conditions of Approval
GPAlZC 06-0925
Page 3 of 4
improvements for the PSA are eligible for reimbursement from future connection fees within
the PSA. For orderly development.
d. In order to preserve the permeability of the sump and to prevent the introduction of
sediments from construction or from storm events, all retention and detention basins
(sumps) shall have a mechanical device in the storm drain system to remove or minimize the
introduction of oil, grease, trash, and sediments to the sump. This device shall be reviewed
and approved by the City Engineer, and shall provide the greatest benefit to the storm drain
system with the least maintenance cost. For orderly development.
7. The entire area covered by this General Plan Amendment shall be included in the Consolidated
Maintenance District. The applicant shall pay all fees for inclusion in the Consolidated
Maintenance District with submittal of any development plan, tentative subdivision map, Site
Plan Review, or application for a lot line adjustment for any portion of this GPA area. For orderly
development.
8. Construct full improvements for the north side of Panama Lane along the frontage of the 40 acre
parcel to the east of the GPAlZC area (APN52417014). If the adjacent Tract 6706 constructs
these improvements first, this condition will be considered as met. For orderly development.
9. Payment of median fees for the arterial frontage of the property within the GPAlZC request is
required prior to recordation of any map or approval of any improvement plan for the GPAlZC
area. For orderly development.
10. The tract design shall accommodate the access provided by the design of approved Tentative
Tract 6578 to the north. For orderly development.
11. If it becomes necessary to obtain any off site right of way and if the developer is unable to obtain
the required right of way, then he shall pay to the City the up front costs for eminent domain
proceedings and enter into an agreement and post security for the purchase and improvement
of said right of way. For orderly development.
12. Local Mitication: Pay the proportionate share of the following mitigation measures (not paid for
by the Regional Transportation Impact Fee nor included with normal development
improvements) as indicated in Tables 7 and 8 of the traffic study. An estimate and fee schedule
should be developed by the applicant and approved prior to recordation of a map or issuance of
a building permit. Proportionate shares from the study as follows: For orderly development.
a. Stockdale Hwy & Old River Rd, Add 1 SBL, 3.71% share
b. Panama Ln & Buena Vista Rd, Add 1 WBL, 0.55% share
c. Panama Ln, Allen Rd to Windermere St, add 2 lanes, 0.36% share
d. Panama Ln, Windermere St to Buena Vista Rd, add 2 lanes, 0.59% share
Notes: NB - north bound, SB - south bound, WB - west bound, EB - east
bound, L - Left turn lane, T - Through lane, R - Right turn lane
Citv Attornev:
13. In consideration by the City of Bakersfield for land use entitlements, including but not limited to
related environmental approvals related to or arising from this project, the applicant, and/or
property owner and/or subdivider ("Applicant" herein) agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold
harmless the City of Bakersfield, its officers, agents, employees, departments, commissioners or
!< <o"'K~~
o ~
5 ~
ORIGINAL
Exhibit A
Conditions of Approval
GPAlZC 06-0925
Page 4 of 4
boards ("City" herein) against any and all liability, claims, actions, causes of action or demands
whatsoever against them, or any of them, before administrative or judicial tribunals of any kind
whatsoever, in any way arising from, the terms and provisions of this application, including
without limitation any CECA approval or any related development approvals or conditions
whether imposed by the City, or not, except for City's sole active negligence or willful
misconduct.
This indemnification condition does not prevent the Applicant from challenging any decision by
the City related to this project and the obligations of this condition apply regardless of whether
any other permits or entitlements are issued.
The City will promptly notify Applicant of any such claim, action or preceding, falling under this
condition within thirty (30) days of actually receiving such claim. The City, in its sole discretion,
shall be allowed to choose the attorney or outside law firm to defend the City at the sole cost and
expense of the Applicant and the City is not obligated to use any law firm or attorney chosen by
another entity or party.
JS:S:\GPA 4th 2006\06-0925\Staff Reports\Exhibit A-1.doc
!< ~A/(~~
o %
).. -
~ m
- ,....
(.) t:1
ORIGINAL
Exhibit B
General Plan Amendment Map
~ fQ"#(C'~
o ~
.>. -
~ m
_ r-
(.) t:1
ORIGINAl
HI:) ~!
.-
;noo
<po
5'l ~I
q
<po
!i Z ~0 .:::::tI8 _ o'
~ CJ) 9'"
~ ~I'
t-
avo~ VlSlA VN3 Cl
J
!5
LO J
N
0")
0
I !5 I
CO
0 ~
.1-
Z !5 I tei !5 Ii tf3 !5
W I I
~ 0
!5
0
Z ~
w I
::E
<(
!5
Z
:5 AJ.IO
a. avo~ N3'11V
....I
~
W 8 !
Z
W
(!)
~ ~
J
I
~
!5
~ fQAI(C'~
o ~
.>. -
~ rn
C3 S
ORIGINAL
RR
ER
Oft
i,l . .
""
METROPOLITAN BAKERSFIELD GENERAL PLAN
Land Use Desl ~natlon.
Rural Residential
2.5 gross acres/dwelling unit
Estate Residential
1 dwelling unit/net acre
U
SI
HI
Light Industrial
Service Industrial
Heavy Industrial
-----
_.
. --
.
s 4 dwelling units/net acre
SRI LR County: S 4 dwelling units/net acre
City: S 7.26 dwelling units/net acre
Low Density Residential
S 7.26 dwelling units/net acre
LMR Low Medium Density Residential
> 4 units but S 10 dwelling units/net acre
LR
P Public Facilities
PS PubliclPrivate SchooII
PT Public Transportation Conidoi'I ,
P-SW Solid Waste Facilities
High Density Residential
> 17.42 units but s 72.6 dwelling units/net acre
os ,Open Space , .
OS.p Parks and Recreation
OS-S SlopeS exceeding 30%
R-IA Resource - Intensive' Agriculture
20 acre minimum parcel'"
R-EA Resource - Extensive Agriculture
20 acre minimum parcel'"
80 acre mln (WllllamM)n Act)
R-MP Resource - Minerals & petroleum
5 acre minimum parcel'"
HMR High Medium Density Residential
> 7.26 units b~ s 17.42 dwelling units/net acre
HR
HC
GC
MC
OC
.----
Highway Commercial
General commercial
Major Commercial
Office Commerdal
MUC Mixed Use Commercial
General Plan Street Classification
Freeway.
provide service to through traffic exclusivelY with no access to abutting property and no at-grade
intersectiOns.
EXDresswavs are arterial highways with partial control of access which mayor may not be divided or have
grade separations at intersections, and may be an interim facility ~ an ultimate freewaY.
Arterla'-
are used primarily by through traffic with a minimal function to provide acCess to abutting
. property.
function to connect local streets with arterials and to provide access to abutting property.
are exclusively for property access and through traffic is discouraged.
Collectors
Locall.
~ ~"Kc~
o ~
>- m
!::: r-
c.:> t:1
ORIGINAL
S:\forms\zone-gp.doc
LO ~
N
en * I ~
0 I
I H!
CO
0
W
C)
Z
<(
J: *
U
W J.J.IO
0
Z
0
N
~
i
HIO 8!
.....-
ot)o
....
...
0
It') ~~
q
~ ... ~ ;:
Z ~~ AS . o'
,... CJ) ...
0 ~I
It') to-
M
.. 0
I
N i
,~ I
:;(~
~
!
I
I
at')
I
~ ~
~ q
;S i
~ I
"
;S
~ i
12;
rrl
· . :lJ r
CITY OF BAi<ERSFIELD ZONING DISTRICT DESIGNATIONS
R-1 One Family Dwelling C-o Professional and Administration Office
6,000 sq.fl minimum lot size .
C-1 Neighborhood Commercial
E Estate
10,000 sq.ft. minimum lot size C-2 Regional Commercial
R-S Residential Suburban c-c
24,000 sq.ft./dwelling unit
C-B Central Business
R-S-1A Residential Suburban
1 acre minimum lot size PCD Planned Commercial Development
R-S-2.5A Residential Suburban M-1 Light Manufacturing
2% acre minimum lot size
M-2 General Manufacturing
R-S-6A Residential Suburban
5 acre minimum lot ,ize M-3 Heavy Industrial
R-S-10A Residential Suburban p AutomObile Parking
10 acre minimum lot size
RE Recreation
R-2 limited Multiple Family Dwelling
4,500 sq.ft. mln lot size (single family) Ch' Church Overtay
6,000 sq.ft. mln lot size (multifamily) ,
2,500 sq.ft. lot area/dwelling unit OS Open ,Space
R-3 Limited Multiple Family Dwelling HOSP Hospital Overlay
6,000 sq.ft. minimum lot size
1,250 sq.ft. lot area/dwelling unit AD ArchItectUral Design Overlay
R-4 limited Multiple Family Dwelling FP-P Floodplain Primary
6,000 sq.ft. minimum lot size
600 sq.ft. lot area/dwelling unit FP-S Floodplain Secondary
R-H Residential Holding AA Airport Approach
20 acre minimum lot size
DI Drilling Island
A AgricUlture
6,000 sq.ft. minimum lot size PE Petroleum Extaction Combining
A-20A Agriculture IC Senior Citizen Overlay
20 acre minimum lot size
Planned Unit Development HD Hillside Development Combining
PUD
TT Travel Trailer Park
MH Mobilehome
S:\Forms\zoneDistricts.doc
~ ~"'KC'-9.
o ~
'~ m
_ r-
(,) C)
ORIGINAL