Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/30/95 - -------- "'-- '~ - - -- - ----- )j ,"v..,'p;r-':' Æ . - B A K E R 5 F I E L D MEMORANDUM June 30, 1995 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: 1. The complaints relative to the arrest of Mr. Palmquist were referred to Chief Brummer and myself for review. I will provlde you with a summary by saying that we have both reviewed the multiple statements that were available both from sworn personnel and from disinterested eye witnesses. The conclusion is that the activities of the Police Department were appropriate. 2. Good news! Negotiations with Police have been settled. The agreement will be on your July 19th agenda. 3. I will be taking off July 3rd. John Stinson will be in charge that day and will know how to contact me in the event of an emergency. 4. Report on computer conversion - We have been running dual payrolls; that is, running them on the old system and cross checking it with the new. We will reverse that for the next pay period, running it on the new system and cross checking it with the old - after which we will "pull the plug" on the old payroll system. We wi 11 then have accounts payable and utility billings to convert, but we are well along in the conversion process. 5. One of the economic development prospects that we have been working with may soon announce for another city. I have asked Jake Wager and ED/CD to look at our incentive package for southeast Bakersfield to see whether or not we need to add money or concepts to the package of i ncenti ves we already offer. We need to take a new look and get more aggressive than we have been. We continue to have over $800,000 which we cannot seem to give away. Any strategies or ideas you might have about how to offer up those incentives for job creation in the southeast would be appreciated. 6. Once again, LAFCO held off on the adoption of its proposed policy on sphere of influence changes. We will continue to work on that when it returns to their agenda in August. 7. You will recall that the greenwaste agreement with Kern County expires as of July 1st. Verbally, there has been progress on renewal of the contract and it is moving forward. I have cautioned the department to be aware of delays with the County which seem to go on forever. Rather than cutting off the County flow of greenwaste, we believe we should let it go 30 days, based on progress being made in the negotiations. We will monitor it, however, and you need to know that, if the negotiations break down, the possibility of cutting off the County users from the greenwaste site is still there. ---- --- .- --- ----~ ~ì ¡",:-,.-.r-- , .. -.,. ..~' HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL June 30, 1995 Page -2- 8. Simply a suggestion - We have had a number of close votes on procedural implementation items because Councilmembers are unhappy with the broader policy. In many of these instances, a real "no" vote on a procedural step could leave us lion the hook" for costs and would interrupt revenue flow. If I could, respectfully, ask for consideration i n those i nstances of making a statement indicating you are opposed but, due to previous actions of Council, need to vote "yes" on the procedural steps, you could still get your opinion on the record without putting finances at risk. 9. Enclosed you will fi nd a copy of a memo whi ch addresses questi ons to Planning and Legal about the potential for initiating a true change to our sphere of influence once the issues with the LAFCO policy have been straightened out. Our sphere change has been held up for over two years by LAFCO. Our municipal boundary is up against it in several locations and we need to have a substantive change initiated. 10. A copy of a letter to the County from North Bakersfield Recreation and Park District is enclosed regarding the proposed Park Development Ordinance. 11. Minutes of the last Mayor's Economic Development group meeting are enclosed for your information. 12. Responses to Councilmember inquiries and referrals are enclosed regarding refunds due to the property owners in Assessment District 87-1 (Buena Vista Road Sewer), property at Palm and Jewetta Avenues, the intersection of California Avenue and "L" Street, parking on Wible at Alum Street, closure of 17th, 18th and 19th Streets, and a hypericum plant problem within a maintenance district. 13. A memo on the second citizens meeting held regarding Panorama Hills Park is enclosed for your information. It went quite well. 14. Enclosed is a recent 1 etter we sent regardi ng proposed changes to the Metropolitan Bakersfield Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance. 15. We received a status report on the work being done by Kleinfelder at the old 1 andfi 11. The efforts made, to date, to control gas have been favorable. Further actions to control gas should be ready to put under contract by the July 19th meeting. 16. Several reports from the Grand Jury are enclosed. Where appropriate, staff wi 11 respond wi th i n the requi red time peri od and we wi 11 provi de the Council with copies of those responses. AT.alb Enclosures cc: Department Heads Trudy Slater taro 1 Wi 11 i ams ---- - - I . ~ . í~ -- B A K E R 5 F I E L D MEMORANDUM .June 29, 1995 TO: JACK HARDISTY, DEVELOPMENT SERV CES RECTOR JUDY SKOUSEN, CITY ATTORNEY FROM: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: SPHERE OF INFLUENCE In addition to reaching agreement on the tax split, I also have reason to believe we wi 11 be successful in "beating down" Mr. Turpi n I s desi red sphere change po 1 i ci es. I would like for us to be preparing a strategy and necessary documents to change our sphere, as i s appropri ate, once the pol i cy at LAFCO has been deci ded. Because we know Mr. Turpin wi 11 resist any change, there are several complications that need to be dealt with in that regard. Some of the tasks which need to be performed are as follows: 1. Jack - We need to prepare a map showing what the sphere should be changed to, exclusive of the land trade which is being separately processed. We should do a map based on what is right and not based on Mr. Turpin1s views. 2. Jack - We need to prepare personalized letters to each of the Board members explaining, in short form, our position to see if we can get this dealt with politically before the time of the filing. In plain language, talk about what the circumstances are in other jurisdictions, perhaps a map showing where the spheres are for some of the neighboring communities in Kern County which have extended them to extremes. Maps for other communities in the valley might be helpful to validate our point. 3. Judy - Turpin will revert to the role of i nsi sti ng he act as the 1 ead agency or, if he is the lead agent, imposing requirements which make it costly and unreasonably burdensome. We need to identify the policy issues he has relied upon in the past and see if we can politically appeal to his Board to waive those. If we are not successful, I suggest we set up a case for litigation to contest the validity of what he is attempting to do. It would have to be carefully crafted so that we would have a sound case, but it seems to me that it is the only way we will ever get our sphere changed if we cannot win on the political 9nd with his Board. The issues include denying our right to have agricultural and mi nera 1 property within our sphere, refusing to allow us to have residential holding property within our sphere, as well as others. These are abuse of discretion or are subjective determinations, which could certainly be challenged, it would seem. 4. Judy - I think we should check the legal ramifications of changing LAFCO. Could it be assigned to Kern COG, either under the auspices of the Kern COG Board or under the auspices of the current Board with the Kern COG staff - .-------- .. I r \ JACK HARDISTY . JUDY SKOUSEN June 29, 1995 Page -2- serving as the staff of LAFCO? Alternately, could it be collapsed into the CAO IS offi ce for the staff work? In this instance, I do not know the origin of how the Board is created and structured and whether that would have to remain intact, or not. Any other ideas either of you may have relative to being able to create a strategy which would allow us to get our sphere changed would be appreciated. I think after two weeks, or so, we ought to get together to di scuss these concepts and progress made on the work at that point in time. Your cooperation is appreciated. Please call if you have questions. AT.alb ----- -------- <. ~--- £:-(~.; North Bakersfield Recreation & Park District 405 ÇjaÚ1;cy:ÆvenU£1 ÐaJœrsjœ/d, CaÛfornia 93308 (805) 392-2000 June 22, 1995 Mr. Ted James, Director Kern County Planning Department 2700 "M" street, Suite 100 B~~ersfield; California 93301 Dear Mr. James: Thank you for providing the clarification correspondence regarding the June 7, 1995 meeting. We are currently compiling the justification documentation for consideration of the proposed Park Development Ordinance. This information will be provided for your review and consideration shortly. The recent adoption of the District's 2010 Park and Recreation Master Plan brings our park development standard into conformance with the city and County standards (2.5 acres per 1000). OUr 1995-1996 Preliminary Budget will provide a clear picture of the District's current fiscal positions. Your communication made no mention of the proposed Quimby Ordinance Amendment. We are assuming that previous information regarding this issue is adequate for the consideration of a new Quimby Fee Formula. However, we have recently been made aware of discussions with Tehachapi and- Bear Mouatain-Pa=k and Recreation Districts re~~rding the Qujmb? ~~~~ A meeting with concerned park agencies to discuss our proposed formula as a uniform Quimby Policy would appear to be timely. Thank you for your assistance. Si cerely, ~ . go' M nag '. - -~~~-~- [i RECE"Vr=O . \ . ~ U /..... '-" '. HRA:bc r-;; ~~¡ " \ l' =-, -~~~=-===, ,'::Y " v:::'S\~~f~G~I;ZcS aF(,-~': -,.--~",--~>~=,~ - -, '. ;;;=~~J...-",< .. Ted James June 21, 1995 Page 2 cc: Supervisor Barbara Patrick Supervisor Ken Peterson Councilman Kevin McDermott Joel Heinrichs, County Administrative Officer Alan Tandy, City Manager Adel Klein, County Administrative Office Jack Hardisty, City of Bakersfield Development Services Director Stan Grady, City of Bakersfield Planning Director Bruce Divelbiss, County Counsel -- -- -- -- . - Mayor's Economic Development Discussion Group June 21, 1995 cf;:Jt MINUTES Present: Mayor Bob Price Jerry Stanners John Meroski Jackie Belluomini Naomi Allen Deloris Slade Richard Russell Kay Meek Ray Dezember Jim Carstensen David Lyman Mayor Price said he thought the Multicultural Fair was very successful. Discussion is continuing on the stadium project. The downtown group is active and has adopted the theme "American Graffiti. II Specific kinds of trees have been selected. Downtown's vacancy rate is the lowest it's been in a long time. . Some problems have presented themselves with the Riverwalk concept. The use of existing canals is being investigated. The Fox Theater is doing well. Efforts are being made to bring together various groups in the southeast. Clinica Sierra Vista opened a new clinic there recently, and Mayor Price said he would like to see much more economic improvement. The Image Group is working toward improving Bakersfield's image among its own residents as well as others. Deloris Slade is leaving the Bakersfield Action Team to be employed by the Chamber of Commerce and will be assisting with Future Bakersfield. Mayor Price said there will be a Mayor's tent again this year at the Business Conference which will be held October 7, 1995. He was contacted today by Santa Fe Energy who would like to display a history of the oil industry in the Mayor's tent. Jackie Belluomini asked Mayor Price if he'd like to have a Mayor's tent at Mesa Marin again this year on October 14th. His presence last year was very favorably received. This group will not meet in July. The next meeting will be held in August and notification will be sent out regarding date and location. ------- -::"-', ~ =-- -- -"- -- , p [T' ;" i -' ,',. -! Æ . \ ,r.:C.;:... , r=~-~-~-- ¡ I L:3_~-, - B A K E R 5 F I E LO I ~ ""' 'C "17'-'"' PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTM L~ITY ~:~~~~~:;~,~i'<j,-"'" MEMORAND TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager ~!t i FROM: Raul M. Rojas, Public Works Dir ctor ~ i I I DATE: June 22, 1995 V SUBJECT: Councilman McDermott Inquiry AD 87-1 (Buena Vista Road Sewer) "Refunds" Councilman McDermott has received an inquiry regarding "refunds" due to the property owners in As~essment District 87-1. This memo will give some background to how these "refunds" are distributed in this assessment district when additional money is received to purchase capacity in the district's sewer system. The property owners of the parcels within the original boundaries of Assessment District No. 87-1 receive a reduction (the "refund") in their total lien when additional connections are made to the sanitary sewer system funded by the district. The "refund" is dependant on the amount of funds received by the district by March of each year and is proportional to the amount of the parcel's original assessment. This "refund" is credited only to those parcels which still have a remaining balance to pay. It is not returned as a cash payment to parcels for which the original assessment has been paid in full. The boundaries of this district were amended in 1992 to add 204 single family lots from Tract 5084 Phases 1 and 2 and a remainder parcel representing 127 lots from Tract 5084 Phases 3 and 4 (at the northeast corner of Stockdale Highway and Renfro Road). As a result of this amendment, the total liens on the 826 individual lots within the original boundary of the district were lowered. This change resulted in lower annual assessments. This amendment was finalized in November of 1992. The respread of the assessments appeared on the 1993-94 property tax bill. The only other "refunds" that might be made to this district will be as a result of the following: 1. Additional territory being added to the district; 2. Existing liens that may be paid off; 3. Additional connections made from properties outside the district; and 4. Accrued interest. II: is unlikely that any additional territory will be added to the district. The required Change and Modification process is lengthy and cumbersome. Existing liens can be paid off at any time. The average payoff amount for the parcels within the district ranges between $700 to $1,000. The money collected from these payoffs is held by the City until such time as there is sufficient funds to make a bond call. The Finance Department's criteria r- --- !> i' I . is that a minimum of $50,000 must be available before bonds are called. A bond call will reduce the annual amount payable on the property taxes, but, depending on the size of the bond call, the change may be insignificant. Accrued interest is also used to make bond calls. If there is sufficient capacity in the sewer system, properties outside the district can connect to the system at the same rate as the original properties. These monies are collected and used for call of bonds as outlined above. At this time, the sewer system is at or near capacity. We understand that a developer is having a sewer study d::me to determine if there is any additional capacity. Until such time as an approved sewer study shows otherwise, the only additional units that will be able to connect to this sewer system will be Tracts 5551 and 5552 which will pay approximately $769.29 per single family lot. There is no fixed time frame for these units to connect to this sewer, but when they do connect, a credit will be applied only to the still unpaid assessments. Tract 5084, Phases 3 and 4 (the remainder parcel representing 127 lots referenced above) are within the expanded boundaries of Assessment District 87-1 and have an existing assessment for that district of $73,171.56. This represents this parcel's total AD 87-1 lien; the original parcels in the district have already received the "refund" for this. These Tract 5084 Phase 3 and 4 parcels are also in the newly formed Assessment District No. 94-1 (RenfrolHughes). The financing ofthis district includes the payoff amount for these parcels for AD. 87-1. The AD94-1 funds will payoff and refinance the full amount of the existing AD 87-1 assessment ($73,171.56) on the Tract 5084 Phase 3 and 4 PéUCelS, and the3C funds will be used to call AD 87-1 bonds. This assessment payoff will not affect f!!}J: other parcels in AD 87-1 except Tract 5084 Phase 3 and 4. AD95:\8ì _l\REFUNDS,MEM RMR:mps ;;,~' Reading File Project File Jacques R, La Rochelle, Design Engineer Gil Rojas, Assistant Finance Director Bob Sherry, Cheif Assistant City Attorney Marian P, Shaw .., , I I Æ . "" ' , ~ ('~ .~'" -;. I,-~'="--u_- -- I' K E R 5 F I ;1 B A E L D ': if JUN 28 1995 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Ii II M E M 0 RAN DUM ' :r'\n;'r-;==--~'--~=-~' '~'J I ','J"f~~f:,C:l1:';;i~"c !~"-,, TO: Alan Tandy - City Manager ! ~ ., I . ""d" '. FROM: Raul M. Rojas - Public Works Direc~t2-.--- ; {; ~ ~ DATE: June 12, 1995 þ¡l1/1? SUBJECT: Palm Avenue and Jewetta Avenue Attached is a map of the area southeast of Palm Avenue and Jewetta Avenue showing the existing city limit line and the future right-of-way line on the south side of Palm Avenue. No right-of-way has been dedicated on the south side of Palm from Jewetta to 1/4 mile east. A tentative Tract has been filed over parcel 110-120-07 (City). Among the conditions of approval for this map are requirements to construct street improvements on the south side of Palm Avenue adjacent to the tract. In addition, construction on Palm Avenue between the westerly Tract boundary and Jewetta Avenue is required. The construction on Palm Avenue is to consist of a minimum of 16 feet of pavement with an 8' wide graded shoulder. These improvements are in the County adjacent to County parcel 110-120-40, and must be in place or bonded for prior to recordation of the final Tract Map. The Tentative Tract Map will expire August 5, 1997 if no further action (in the form of submission of improvement plans or a final map) is taken. At this time, nothing has been submitted. The County parcel (Parcel 110-120-40) was deeded to Hugh M. Reed, husband and Alice Reed, wife, as joint tenants on December 22, 1993 by court order from the estate of Robert L. Courtney, deceased. The Assessor's Roll indicates that they are the current owners. Per the County Planning Department this parcel is zoned E 1/2 (Estate, 1/2 acre minimum). If a house were to be built on this parcel it would have to meet the set back requirements for the future right-of-way; however, no dedication or street improvements would be required with the issuance of a building permit. The parcel is currently vacant. According to the County Planning Department, inquiries have been made regarding the requirements for a single family residence on the parcel. A "For Sale" sign is currently posted on the parcel. . There are no current plans to annex this area. However, the City Planning Department will be contacting the property owners in this area concerning annexation. The County has no plans to improve this portion of Palm Avenue. Also enclosed is a list of property owners of the parcels in this area. LD\MEMO\P ALMJEW2.RMR ,-- -- -- l' " 0 -, . ~ j I ---- - -- U ~ --: - -""r-- UI ,-' "') l'Ø6 -- ;C:-':: - 7' ! ~ Q: I (0 \ ' Q' l' . ' :. ~ Q -- j,\,~,..--- " ~ "", ' ,,', . .¡ r '" ~ .....j ,.~> ~'. : ',- í.. '. ."'- u_-, ," ::' '- W l h.. \~) ~ ';j':~:::' '.ðrç-------- - ----- '00.0, '-' ,- 0 " I'- '<r .' '.0'" - '., . (\ Q' , '. , \ ,:, -, ".' - - ""0. . I K - '.-'~ - " . 0:: ,- - >" ,Of" ' '. . \ " , " - o- J.:J ) ----, - ~c". Q) ^- Cf). I NNA71JU ,,;;,-. _-C"L_- - 4 ~ U VW ' '" ,;0: . Q, . .. . -. . '" ~ ~..' g ~ -- " '0, Q: N ~ .. ( ,,' ' -.- -"0. ~ . --.J "vI'(: g¡ ¡-: .... -~ --C:,-- ., ' : ~ - -~ ..... " " .. ,. . -- ' .oJ,- a I - -~ Q: ~- -\<I rt) @ ---- - ~ ~ 0 - ,'" ' --- Oc..:- 0) , . C) ~, U .~ C\J I '" - - -." W ~ . ' .(f) ,..:ï : lo... I : 0 ~ : ! ~ II\( .¡~ ~ ¡ I - ~ Ç) ~ ~,~ I ' 111/ ~ ' ~ ~ (~ I ! lL.. I :::. \3 I ' 0 ~ I ~ I N I :s I z I I. .' I " I T ,- I ',0'" ,J ~ . "'0;' u I. . ' --, ~~ ~~ .o@,-.~ ,@'U"'U " @: ~" ~ C) ~ "" '"0 " ,'"0 ' - ~ ~. '" '.C C C> ' '" r> " I -- ~ ~ ~J.C) i I qÞ I --, -. "') I' . I I , ì ~ ~~( I I I " ,~, : '~, I 1 r: \.~. ,~~ J :g ¡ .~ ¡.. l C (t.,) ~~ I G ¡ .~: Ù ~I .. ,.r : i tJl ~ ~ C\J . "J \ ~, ¡ (:) I - ill 0> t'<!"'.. I .,-... I ; I I . '¿ '.' '., Ir" 'Q.. , i 2 I ., . - . ,-~~"'( I ----"'---- - ~ --~ -- Y.l.1.:JM:1f'~"" /--~ . q \ ( ~ \ \ ~' ~./ ~I ~~ ~ f ~ &' ~ ¿'- l- ¿ - ¿ - ¿ - ¿ - ~ ¡ ~ : ~ ~ - ~, ~ ~f ~t~~ ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - , '. I i . "'11 """"" > .... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ;I.. ~ ;c, $ !l: ;: "-I ~~~ 1 ~. 0'" '" .... èiS .... '-"'" "'........ ...." ,; ò "" oÒ 0- 0- ~o.,. - "" "" ., ., - "" ~I ~ö 0 , ~ ~ 8 0 coo 0 0 Of 8 0 0 8 8~ 8 ~ .... ~"":ç ....' ....~ .... ~ :ç ::: - .. ~ ~ 0:!5 ~ ~ ~ 0 i! ~~ o~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 oi 0 0 0 0 o~ 0 0 'i' ~ ~ ~ ~~t '" ~ V> 5. ~~~ ~ ~:: ;t ~!~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ¡ 1 ' , '" I 'i' '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" I ; ~! 0 ! 0 ~ 0 ! 0 i 0 ! 0 ! 0 ! ~ i 0 ~ ~ ! ~ i ~ ~ ~ i ... ".... .... .... " " " "- "...... ""'...."'......,,..." > - "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" - "" - "" - "" "" ~ 0 0 0 0 i .t; t; t; t; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t; ,;:~ ,;:~ ,;:~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :~ :~ :~ 0'" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" 0'" 0'" 0'" """ """ """ ~ ~ '" '" '" ~ -;~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ..;~ ",;~ -;~ ~¡~ -¡~ ~¡~ "E ""'" "'" ~'" ~ .. '" !~~~ ~ ~ )~i I I 1 1 1 1 I ~~I ~~I ~~I 2:1 ;:1 ~:I ~-"'~ "'~ ~- - - - - - - - c- c- c- ~- ~- ~- ...~o(' "'- o. c. c. c ~. ~. ~. 06co ...'" ~ - - - ~ ~ ~ ~-- "'~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0 -0 -0 ~O ~o ~O ~ " OV> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ *~ ~~ ~~ ~!:ö ;t~~ o;~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 '~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ o~~ o~~ o~~ o~~ OV>~ o~~ ~~~~ :~~ ..- = = = = = = = 0- ..= 0= ~= go= 8= ... z-~ ""~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .ow o~ ~~ O-w ~ ....~ """ --... ~~ ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ""'" .o... ""'" 0... ... 0... c ",V>~ ~V> V> '" V> V> V> V> '" -V> -V> -V> -V> -V> -,^ ~: 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 ~8 ~8 88 88 88 88 '" '" . . . . ~w 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ~o 00 00 00 00 00 cc "" t ~ 0 I I 0 o~o Co 0 :. '" C 0 5~c c c ~ ... C $ ~ « ., « ., « ., «~"" ~ '" C> ~.. .. GO I roc 0 c 0 -... 0 -«0 - 0 - 0 ~oo 00 00 I ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ '" 0 ~ o~ ~ ~ ~ "'~ "'~ "'~ f'I') : :>' ">:>' -"" ">:>' ~ ">:>' ;~:>' ~:>' :>' ~ :>' ::~:>' t;:>'~:>' " -- ~c ~o ~C ~C Z>o",~ 0 !o I I I '"'I "'c c ~Z"" C C ..,..... "'wc 0< C '" C ..."'... ~... ... ... - \~ ... w li~ -~ liw ... li~ ... "" ~ w C ~ ~ w 5 ~ ... w ~... ~ , I ä¡o 0 ~:o- 0 !_w 0 ...¡:>' "'~o =""0 ~o ~~o ~~o «~O ~~o I ! ~ ~ ~ z ~ ~ ~ ~ z - ~ -~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ i ~ ~ ... ... ~... ... "" ... - ...... ~... ""... ......... ... ... ~ - -g- ~ w -g- ... ~ -g- ~...... ~- 0(-... - ~ - ~~- z~- ~- C I~' V> ~ ~ 0 ~ ~"'w ~6~ ~ ~O( "'~ ~~ '^~~ ~~ 0 V> ð", ~ '" zV>~ ~ ~ ...~- ~ ~...o ~w'" 22", ...O~ --~ « V> - '" ~ '^ "'... ~~"'...«... ...« ~m~ ... «~II:O II: ð II: -mil: «~'" ...00< ~8O< """'11: '"' ! ~... '^~... .... "'~... l "'§'" ~ ""'" ~..... I'" ... -~... ..~... ~o... \' ~ ~~ .:~! ~..! I~~ ~..! :::~! ~..! 9i~ =~! ;.! ~~! ! ! !~! $-~ ;t~! , Ò .. 1: ~% ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~% ~ ~ ~% ~z 8% ¿ .....~ .o '" .o ., ., '" .o .o '" - - '" '" ~ ~ ~ ~~ -~ ;:~ -~ ::~ ::~ ::~ ::~ ::~ -~ 8~ 8~ -'" -~ -~ , ~ ~ , ~ .... e~!- ¿~ î~ '~"" j"" 1"" "'" ?"" 19 "'g "8 18 18 "'- « ~~ 9~ 9~ 'i'~ 9~ y~ 'i'~ :¡;~ 9~ 'i'ö $;:;,$-ö ö ;:; $~ v ~ ¥~~ ~ ö ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ S 8 ~ ~ . ~~~; ~~, ~ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ~ ¿ ~ ~ ~~ ¿ ¿ ¿ ~ igg~ ~g~ ~ ¿- ¿- b- b- b- ¿ ~ ¿ 6 ¿ ~- ~ ~ " ':;'¡~~ ~ - .' - - - - - - - - .' .' - - ,:' f\..¡ "",,0- > .... - .. ~ '" ., "" '" 0 - 0 .... I ~ .~ "'" c - "" ~ 0 .. 0 .... '" - " "-, ~"... .... '" <> '" '" '" ... ;f.., :[, if. .... '" "" -' , -""1 :¡s '-"!:o: - .. ".. ---- ~ <> <> '" '" '" I ~ ';;1;5~- ~;¡ì 15 ð ð x ð .- ~ ~-. ~- ~- ~- ~- ~- ~- ~ ~~x _~d ~- ~- ~- ~- ~- ~- ~- * J' * ~ 6 6 6 6 6 ~ !~~:=:iI'" ¿ ¿ 6 ¿ 6 6 ¿ ¿ - - - - - - - 0. _1I:i!~.. - - - - -- -<: 0 '" , I . 0 0 '<I " ,þ ". '" rv-.. -",o. > 0 0 '" '" '" 0 '" S' - ". '" '" "'.., . -) - o. '" .. '" "- ,þ ,þ'" '" "'..[) "'" -,.. I -, 8 2i~' ~ ~:iS ..,~~ ~ :€:( - - '" < ~ó '" 8 '" 8 0 8 8 0 5 ~ 0 0 v: o~ 0 0 o~ 0 8 , ' ., - I>: i - " " "" i: - :." ~ 0 ~ :f ~: ~ i v: ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0., 0 0 o~ 0 0 ol 0 0 0 0 ~., ". ~~~ v: v: - ~~~ «= ~ ~!~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" :::: ! . I>: a: a: I>: a: 'r I>: a: I>: I>: I>: I>: a: 0 0 ,þ o! '" ~ " ! 0 ! ~ 0 i '" i 0 i 0 i '" i 0 i '" i '" ö: ~ :.~ z " .~ - ~ ".:,,~"" !:" " " " ... ... ".: " ... """"""" '" > "" '" '" '" '" '" """ a 0 - ~- '" '" ~! ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ,- - - ¡ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ",0 0 0 a! a! aCE a: a: a: a: a: a: a: ~ a:~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .... ... . .... .... .... . ~ ~~ ~ ~ ... =... =... ,... ... ... a ... o. o. ... o~v 0 v - v" '" ~~'" """'" ~~'" eo'" '" '" 0 '" 0 '" ~ '" 0 '" 0 '" o. ~ ~ ~ ~: ~ ~ L ;~L ~~L ~~L ~ L L L L ~ 0. a. a.~' ~ i;o. 0. ~ a. ~ ~ ~i~ ii~ ~i~ ~~ ~ 5 ~ ~ ~:€ ~ ~ ~~; ~ I... o. ... ~ >~ >~ >~ !..so ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" '" - e- e- e- K-""" - - - - - - - - ", ... o. o. ~ -... ~ a. " .. .. ~ . e. e. e. ..."", ~- . " , ~ - - - 0 co """ ~. ~~ ~ ~ 0 -0 -0 -0 v-- lEv 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ "'it it it '" ~~ \"" \"" .., "'~ '" '" '" '" '" '" '" \ - o~~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ o~! o~! o~! ¡!~ó ~~~ 0 ~ 0 ! 0 ! 0 ! 0 ! 0 ! 0 ! o. 0... ... ... - - - ðK~~ "'~~ - - - - - - - ~ ~~ ~ v ~ 8~ 8~ ~~ v ~o ~Za ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. oe e ~ ... _... _... "... ~~ --~ ~ ~ ... ~ ... ... ... ~ -0. 0. 0. ~ -~ -~ -~ c ~~~ ~ ~ ~ v: v: v: ~ ~ 88 88 88 ~8 ~8 ~8 ~8 :: 88 88 88 88 ~8 88 88 . . . ,. .. . . I>: I>: .. . , .. .. . . . . .. > 00 00 o~ -0 -0 -0 .0 vv 00 00 00 00 -0 00 00 ...... ~ ~ : - I J ;~! 0 ~ ~ - 1 -'" J 0 v: '" '" '" '" '" - .-,;, '" '" '" ......- ~ ~",' )! ., "0- 00 00 ~ <> - - <> I - 0 '" 0 -1>:8 - ~ "'~ """ """~ ., '" '" '" '" ~ '" ... ~ '" """ - e ~~~ ~~ L~~ ..-~ ~.. ~ ~ ~ 6 ~ ~ '" '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ì ~ < "'Ie Ie j¡e ";e ~:e ~:e ~ e ~ e ~-~ :~¡ a~ ~ e iée ,~~ ..~ a v v - va-v 0. v '" v I v ~ .. v IX'" ~'" ~I>:'" ..-v ,v 'r~ 0 .. -e e ~ ... - ~ - e...o. ~ ~. I~a ~....a l....a I.~a ~-a 0-0 ",a I v-a 2 ~Ie ~X ~ '" ~a:a a ~- ....~ ....~ Z4~ -~ -l-~ ~-~ ~~ ~~ ~~ - v t~~ ~I>:~ ~¡~ ""~e ~- .. ~ - .. ~ - <0: ~ - ~ - ., - ~., - ~ - 0 ð - ! ~ .. - - :!5: - IS - ~ 6'" ~ 'I r ~ ~ I ~ ~,þ~ !a: ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ "': :g~ ~~Ë ~~! ::~ ~~ ~v~ ~"'~ .,~ -~... ~... .:-... v: ... }2'" }O... !!ó'" N '" "'......~ ~ - ...-v: a-... lIS...... ".0\ õt~. ~ v:~ ~ . ~ ~~ ~'" ~o '" vo '^ ~- ....- ..... ~o -r ~~ n ~-! -! ~~i ð~! ~-! ~~! va.! r- ~~ %o.! ~~J ~~I ~~i r~! =~! i~, ~~ '" '" '" "" '" "" 0 I """' 0 0 0 '" '" "" '" '" 8 X 2 8 :r 8 ~ % S! X ~ 0 'j','" ~ ~ ~ S! 8 S! 8 ~ ' . '( .. '(. .... . . . '( . ' ' . ~ ~ ,þ,þ ,þ - ~ ~~ - - - ,þ ,þ ,þ ~ ='" -~ =~ ='" ='" ='" 8", r- ~ ~~ 8~ 8", 8~ =~ ='" ='" ='" -~ '" "" " 0 '" "" r- 3. 0""" - '" '" .. "" 98 .'" '8 8~ ¿8 ¿8 ¿8 v~ ó'" ."" f"" ~'" ~~ .'" .'" .~ ~. ó Ÿ ~ ? ;:; ~ 8 Q;t-¡; '.:ró 'i' ó .a:! Q ~ ;; ~ ~ ÿ ~ ? ~ ;¡: ~ l't? 1 ~ 1 ~ 1 c: '" s: ~ "'I ~ 1",- ~ ~ t...", ~ ~ '" ~ .. .. 0 Å ¿ ¿ 6' ¿' \'6 ó .. !-.-~ ~_ fJ.. Ó J.. J.. ) J.. c!. .I. x: "" "" "" '" "" ~ ~ K~" _gì~ '" ~ ~ ~ '" :>': ~ ~ ~-.~ ~- ~ ~ j ~i~i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ s: '" ~ '" 0 I C\.¡~ '" ~ ~ "" ~ þ. '" :g ~ " Q -. -, ": ~ ": ~ .....Iß~.., ~ "" ... j... '" ~ :)( - ------------- " - 1' ,4 . ,-<===---- -_. -- -. , -'-, - I ~~ ~::C~2;~ \r ~'.~ ,I B A K E R 5 F I E L 0 -I " r ~~----~_._;: " PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ' II I ~ 'I : , ~ I ! .JUN 21118, Ii MEMORANDUM ,, :' , :1 . ,._==-=J -,"' h,- - .' ::T -~::~-:~c:: .. , J" , - "-~~'--- --. . TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager Raul Rojas, Public Works Direcro~L I FROM: DATE: June 26, 1995 ~ SUBJECT: RESPONSES TO COUNCIL INQUIRIES Enclosed you will find an investigative report, as requested by Councilmember Irma Carson in her transmittal to you of June 15, 1995, regarding history of accidents at the intersection of California Avenue and "L" Street. Also, enclosed is information, as requested by Councilmember Galen Chow, pertaining to a parking removal issue at Wible Road and Alum Street. INQUlRY.626 EncIso " ., '" ! 4 . \' " .~ - B A K E R S F I E L D PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Traffic Engineering Memorandum . DATE: June 21, 1995 . TO: RAUL M. ROJAS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR FROM: STEPHEN L. WALKER, TRAFFIC ENGINEER~ SUBJECT: COMPLAINT REGARDING ACCIDENTS AT CALIFORNIA AND L STREET VIA COUNCILMEMBER CARSON, WARD ONE. I have made a preliminary review of the accident history of the intersection of California Avenue and L Street as requested by Ebony Counseling Center via Councilmember Carson in the letter dated June 15, 1995. The intersection has had an average of 2 to 3 collisions reported per year for the past 3 years. The number of reported collisions is not uncommon for this type of major intersection but the type of collision reported may indicate some improvements are possible. This intersection is of an older design without long mastarm signal heads and operations may benefit by upgrading the signal to current design standards. We will review the available accident reports in detail to determine what solutions, if any, are likely to improve the intersection operations and hopefully reduce accidents. A memo will follow in a few weeks with our conclusions and recommendations for this intersection. cc: Bruce Deeter, CE III, Traffic Engineering Brad Underwood, CE III, Traffic Engineering PW Memo Files Traffic Engineering File - Calif/L intersection, ward 1 slw:\DATA\WP\1995\Cal_L_1.Ref 18953241652' P.92 i ¡ COUNSELING CENTER 1301 - 13 California Avenue. Bakersfield, CA 93304 I ( OS) 324-4756 . FAX (80S) 324-1652 ^ R~eJÐ3]£VED ~ JLJN 1 6 1995 Inna Carson Exec:utn-e Director PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Date; June 15, 1995 ~E.CE.\\1E.O To: Alan Tandy, City, anager F~ . cilmember j\j~ , 6 ,qqS ~\~ t.t.~\ ~\) Re: Bad City Inters on \R~H\c' t~- -' ,.-"'-.-- There ,have been two ¡nj accidents at the intersection of California Avenue and L Street, within the last tw , weeks. Please have Traffic Engi eers investigate the danger at this intersection and the number of accidents. Thank you. ,--- I' r " , ..,-_._~:'---:~. JIoard of Directors fpOOR. ORiGrNAL fit Cliff Hurd. President ~,. / ,~- ~" Harold Tomlin - Vice President Diane McClanahan - Secretary AID CAn - Treasurer Jerry Shipman - Past President Art Powell Donna Warren I Katherin Ware Gloria Patterson-Peevy Geraldine Bradley Funded By: Kero County Mental Health Unltf'd Wit! or Kern Count,. ~. ..,~ . I .' I I - I BAKERSFIELD PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Traffic Engineering Memorandum , DATE: June 20, 1995 TO: RAUL M. ROJAS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR . FROM: STEPHEN L. WALKER, TRAFFIC ENGINEE~ SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO REFERRAL BY COUNCILMEMBER CHOW REGARDING PARKING ON WIBLE AT ALUM. As requested, Traffic Engineering staff contacted Mr. Eyherabide regarding the parking prohibition at the corner of Wible and Alum. As noted in the attached memo, Mr. Eyherabide disagrees with the removal of one to two spaces of parking to reduce accidents at the intersection. He indicated that he may take further, unspecified, action regarding the matter. I do not propose that we reinstate parking that has b!Pemoved to improve traffic visibility and reduce accident potential. cc: Bruce Deeter, CE III, Traffic Engineering Brad Underwood, CE III, Traffic Engineering PW Memo Files Traffic Engineering File - Wible/Alum - Ward 6 referral slw:\DATA\WP\1995\WibIAlum.Ref " , - -.-. -7- ;,' Æ. -- BAKERSFIELD PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM . DATE: June 16, 1995 , " TO: STEPHEN L. WALKER, TRAFFIC ENGINEER FROM: BRAD B. UNDERWOOD, CML ENGINEER III ßß l..\. SUBJECT: REFERRAL FROM COUNCILMEMBER CHOW WIBLE ROAD ON-STREET PARKING REMOVAL As requested by Mr. Raul Rojas, I contacted Mr. Steve Eyherabide who identified himself as owner of the apartment complex at the northwest comer of Wible Road and Alum Street. As you will recall we eliminated on-street parking on Wible Road from Alum Street north to the driveway -~ entrance into the apartment complex (one or two parking spaces).. The reason for this elimination was due to a recent citizen inquiry about an accident and request that we review the sight distance for this intersection. After our review we determined in accordance with Title 17 "Zoning," Chapter 17.08 "General Regulations," (17.08.175 "Clear Sight View") of the Municipal Code, that it would be beneficial for safety reasons to remove this short segment of parking to increase the sight distance. I explained to Mr. Eyherabide that the parking was removed to provide greater sight distance for public safety reasons. However, Mr. Eyherabide feels strongly that the removal of this parking will significantly impact his ability to attract potential renters at the apartment complex. The parking removed is directly in front of the . apartment managers office. I indicated to him that parking is available along Wible Road north of the driveway and on Alum Street adjacent to the managers office. Even with this available parking he still feels that we have significantly impacted his business because people will refuse to park further from the office to inquire about the available apartments, and indicated he may take some type of further action. c: \ data \ wp \ trafmemo \nopkwibl.mem /è; '" - - 4. - I . Æ . . - B A K E R 5 F I E L D I I PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT I ~ I MEMORANDUM I i : TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager ~ I FROM: Raul M. Rojas, Public Works Dir do . ~ DATE: June 27, 1995 SUBJECT: CLOSURE OF 17TH, 18TH & 19TH STREETS Recently, Councilmember DeMond requested staff to conduct a study regarding the possibility of closing 17th Street, 18th & 19th Streets from Union Avenue. A copy of this Department's response to the above subject matter is enclosed. CLOSE17.RSP -~---_c_- Attach. \ :,,-,,:.1. . nli\1 2 8 1995 4. /h . - , B A K E R S F I E L D PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Traffic Engineering Memorandum DATE: June 21, 1995 TO: RAUL M. ROJAS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR FROM: STEPHEN L. WALKER, TRAFFIC ENGINEER ~ SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO REQUEST TO CONSIDER CLOSING OF 17TH STREET AT UNION AVENUE (STATE ROUTE 204) - COUNCILMEMBER DEMOND I received a copy of the memo from Jack Hardisty regarding the proposal to close off access to Union Avenue (State Route 204) from 17th Street and possibly from both 18th and 19th Streets. Based on my initial review of the area, I have the following comments. 18TH STREET AND 19TH STREET Both 18th Street and 19th Street are non-local streets and identified as "minor collector" roads on the Functional Usage Classification Maps submitted to and approved by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). To close off access to Union Avenue would require approval from the FHWA to delete the streets from the system. These streets also have traffic signals, installed and maintained by CalTrans, at the intersections with Union that would require modifications. The traffic volumes on 18th Street are 4,375 on a typical day. On 19th Street the volume is about 4,700 per day. Blocking off these two streets would hamper the circulation and access for the area. 17TH STREET No recent traffic volume counts are available for 17th Street near Union Avenue. This street is a local street with a mix of residential uses, office conversions and commercial property at the corner with Union Avenue. There are no traffic signals at the intersection with Union Avenue. Based on my initial review of the area, the closure of the street's access to Union may not cause circulation problems for the neighborhood. Traffic would likely be pushed to 18th Street and cause a moderate increase in traffic on 18th Street. Since traffic counts were not available for 17th Street, I cannot estimate the impact the added traffic would have to 18th Street. I would not expect 17th Street to have as much volume as either 18th or 19th Streets. 1 . ~ I I Since the area of 17th Street does not have a volume count on file, I will have scheduled . a traffic and speed count of the street segment west of Union Avenue. Based on current work load, we should have data collected in 10 working days. I will then review the data and make a recommendation on the 17th Street closure proposal. SUMMARY In summary, my initial response is that it may be possible to close off 17th Street from Union and cause only minor degradation of traffic circulation if confirmed traffic volumes are low. Closure of 18th and 19th Streets would cause more traffic problems for the area and is not recommended. A recommendation regarding 17th and Union will follow after collection and analysis of the 17th Street traffic data. cc: Bruce Deeter, CE III, Traffic Engineering Brad Underwood, CE III, Traffic Engineering PW Memo Files Traffic Engineering File - 17th/Union, 18th/Union and 19th/Union files slw:\DATA\WP\1995\17 _UNION.REF 2 - ~ ~ ~ . . MEMORANDUM June 7, 1995 TO: RAUL ROJAS, PUBLIC WORKS DIREcrOR FROM: JACK HARDISTY, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRE SUBJEcr: SEVERANCE OF 17TH, 18TH & 19TH STREETS FROM A VENUE During a recent neighborhood meeting Councilwoman DeMond was asked if the city could sever 17th, 18th and 19th Streets from Union Avenue to discourage prostitution in that area. I have informed her that a traffic study would need to be conducted which would consider several items. A copy of that memo was forwarded to you earlier. She asked that I forward her request to do the traffic study to you so she could understand the feasibility of those closures individually ami/or in combination. JH:pjt cc: Alan Tandy, City Manager m\mrr6.7 R ~ <c ma If ~ 1 '""'1i' . .w l!, .~ l:::J, I! j..J; JUN 9 1995 ;¡UBLIC WORKS ûEPART~lENT ----- - ---- , . ]RJE.C JEJI'V". . - ~ Ii I ~ ó.k. . J~ -{19 ~ - ,95 ;;u¡, 'Jo! 'r V\f -I, OR/~S DEPART"r- -. !i'leN- June 6, 1995 TO: COUNCILMEMBER DEMOND //i FROM: JACK HARDISTY, DEVELOPMENf SERVICES DlRECT~, SUBJECT: CLOSURE OF 17TH, 18TH & 19TH STREETS / As a follow-up to a recent neighborhood meeting concerning the spread of prostitution west of Union Avenue along 17th, 18th and 19th Streets, you asked me how the city would evaluate severing those streets from Union Avenue. We would be concerned over the needs of those along the streets to access their homes, significance of the streets in the present and future circulation system, traffic volumes, travel patterns, possible effects of traffic displacement and public safety. These matters would be addressed initially by the city's Traffic Engineer and then by the Planning Commission and City Council. In some instances the final disposition of the former street and responsibility for it becomes an issue. Your interest in this will be forwarded to Raul Rojas, Public Works Director, and Steve Walker, Traffic Engineer, so that you will be better able to discuss whether or not this is an option when you next meet with the neighborhood. D,"" '"""'. ..'.""" ~ ." '?'" ?. . ,-.; i/'r-"l"-~-' t_~---"',i "'û, :..~ . " . "-' ..."', - ~ "' '"'= -~~ ~- JH:pjt cc: Raul Rojas Jilt,! '; 1995 Steve Walker ~.. , rnflCF"" -'N' '\'~I""RI'I\ir, m\mpd6.2 1':1-\1 .1.; t! b!i\tt . ,~.:! - - - - - - -- -- --- -- -- - ,- - :/.: =~ ' ,, !y MEMORANDUM RECr¿¡V~!DJ I . ~ I¡ J; .II'~I 29m) / ~ I' ': " ~ ;' "T"":':":~:~::~;~'r' i TO Alan Tandy, City Manager . ' , . ~.i FROM Lee Andersen, Community Services Manager r SUBJECT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PLANT PROBLEM COUNCIL REF. #15026 - 6-14-95 DATE 23 June 1995 Councilmember McDermott requested staff meet with Mr. Hedrick to determine how to remedy his plant problem. Allen Abe from the Parks Division met with Mr. Hedrick on June 15, 1995 at his residence to review his problem. Allen, along with Mr. Hedrick, inspected the hypericum on the street side of the wall and found it to be growing very vigorously and thick. They could see numerous (20-25) hypericum plants growing in his backyard. They originated from the street side and grew under the wall foundation. Why or how this plant material is growing under the wall is unknown at this time. We are investigating this situation. ' In discussing this plant problem with the Park Division's chemical specialist, a contact chemical known as Montar will be applièd. This will kill the plant material on Mr. Hedrick's side of the wall only, thus not effecting the hypericum on the streetscape side. Mr. Hedrick appears to be satisfied and pleased with the proposed plan of attack on his back yard and the spraying is being done with his blessing and permission. The Parks Division will continue to monitor the situation. LA: pah hedrick. memodisk cc: Frank Fabbri, Park Superintendent Alle~ Abe, Assistant Park Superintendent Terry McCormick, Park Supervisor Councilmember McDermott , _u_---- ~f, "- ~ i' , ¡ , .. ..... ~ " "'V> - ..' CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL fft1Þ~ '// ----' MEETING OF: 06/14/95 REFERRED TO: COMMUNITY SVC DEPT L ¡ANDERSEN REFERRED TO: PUBLIC WORKS R ROJAS ITEM: . RECORD# 15026 , Resolution merging four (4) Interim Maintenance Districts into the Consolidated Maintenance District, approving and adopting the Public Works Director's Report and the 1995-96 Budget, confirming the assessments and authorizing collection of assessments by the Ke~n County Tax Collector. ACTíON~AKEN BY COUNCIL: " MOTION TO OVERRIDE PROTESTS AND ADOPT THE RESOLUTION. APPROVED. NS: PD; IC; KM. AB: RR. .' MAYQR PRICE VOTED AYE TO BREAK TIE VOTE.***MCDERMOTT REQUESTED STAFF MEET WITH MR. HEDRICK TO HELP REMEDY THE PLANT PROBLEM*** ***MCDERMOTT, REFERRING TO,CORRESPONDENCE FROM FRANK J. MCKENNA, REQUESTED STAFF, IN THE NEXT .YEAR, STUDY: 1) WHAT THE APPROPRIATE ADJUSTMENT IS FROM INDUSTRIAL TO RESIDENTIAL, AS TO THE NUMBER OF UNITS PER ACRE THAT THEY ARE CHARGED; AND 2) WHAT THE STANDARDS ARE FOR DEVELOPMENr OF OUR MEDIAN ISLANDS (i.e. SHOULD WE HAVE EXACTLY THE SAME STANDARDS 'FOR AREAS IN FRONT OF INDUSTRIAL AND ARTERIALS THAT WE HAVE IN FRONT OF RESIDENTIAL AND ARTERIALS)*** BACKUP MATERIAL ATTACHED: YES DATE FORWARDED BY CITY CLERK:. 06/16/95 . . - ------ ------- ~~ ~ ... ;- I ~~."-,-,, -c--- MEMORANDUM REC~~YJ~~~~ { June 23, 1995 ! ' '1 JUN 2 6 ,gqs \: '; I: 'I TO: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER -- - - - FROM: LELAND J. ANDERSEN, COMMUNITY SERVICES MANAGER r SUBJECT: PANORAMA HILLS PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT On Monday, June 19, 1995, a follow-up meeting was held at Thorner school regarding development of Panorama Hills Park and establishment of a maintenance district. There were approximately 20 concerned citizens in attendance along with Councilmember Smith and staff from public works, community services, planning and attorney's office. After introductions were made, Frank Fabbri responded to questions addressed at the original meeting on May 8. Maps were available showing location of the site along with a proposed site plan showing the recommended amenities within the park. It was then opened up for discussion. Following is a recap of their concerns. 1) An individual wanted to make sure we received some kind of written commitment from Southern Cal Edison as to what can be developed within their easement, 2) What are the boundaries of the park site. Are they locked in and are there other sites available, 3) Again, there was concern for children's safety, vandalism and earthquake damage to the power lines, 4) Who appraised the site. It was felt too much money was spent acquiring the park, 5) There was a question asked regarding subsidized housing (Section 8) and were there plans for any to be developed in the area, 6) They wanted to know where the Destec money could be spent if the maintenance district was not established. They also wanted a copy of the agreement with Destec, 7) There were concerns about what type of amenities could go in and what their maintenance costs would be, 8) Can parking be moved to a different location within the site, 9) Questions arose regarding access. Can it be done by the developer or a joint effort with the City. Mr. Walt Heisey, developer and owner of adjacent property, indicated he would --- - "" ;þ.~" "-.; .' , :r like to see a joint effort, 10) Can we do a basic park and then complete development as the area develops, 11) Several individuals indicated they did not want softball, little league or soccer facilities in the area, 12) Comment was made why can't the City pay for the existing home owners and new development be responsible to pay for maintenance of the new park, 13) There were several comments regarding concerns with the possibility of increasing the fees each year, 14) Several individuals wanted to move forward and send out the survey to determine whether the community wanted to establish a maintenance district and park. If so, they wanted to move forward and be involved in determining the actual amenities within the site. There were mixed feelings that those individuals who did not respond to the survey should not be counted. I feel this meeting was very helpful and that those in attendance were pleased they had an opportunity to express their views. I also feel that almost all of their questions were answered and that the general consensus was to move forward with the survey. Based on these meetings, staff informed everyone that we will proceed with the survey that will be mailed out within two to three weeks. It is my understanding the results should be back in within 30-60 days. At that point, we will have results we can forward to Council for their action. A copy of the survey will be forwarded to you and Councilmember Smith prior to mailing. I will keep you posted. Should you have any questions, please contact me at your convenlence. LJA/lg cc: Marian Shaw, Engineer III Frank Fabbri, Parks Superintendent Raul Rojas, Public Works Director Jack Hardisty, Planning Director Alan Abe, Asst. Parks Superintendent I Wf;;!:i I ! pan.par - I ~. , " - . 'if ~~~----h' h ¡~ ;~~",=~~~2",:.,_,-", ,""...- " j, I, '29~ I '" I 99' ", ., '." "-- ".... . ¡ June 29, 1 5 , "'<:~~:~'~'~=::' , I' "._;,.~~::.:".~.~":.;..:..,,." 'I I, ¡':. ,I - I: I Ii 1994 -1995 It GRAND JURY SUBJECT: 1994-95 KERN COUNTY GRAND JURY ! FINAL REPORT 1, MEMBERS I j ~::nB. parkins: Enclosed is a copy ofthe final report of the 1994-95 Kern ...- 1 Arthur Adams . County Grand Jury. J Geraiå M. l\lderete : i ~ i¡ Gcacc Loe Bailey I This report is for infonnational purposes only. No i Tneìàa Carnahan Ii :1 Dorothy Clark ; response is required. ! Donna L. Engel :J I . ~J I , i . ì J Robert L. ;':loyd 'j . ¡',! Bndget Heath S. 1 I..j l mcere y, 11 Clauàia Young Holderness ' ii' Carl E. Howard ~ a 4 ,/J (), ¡I " I:, ¡ ./ /tI1/~~ -1/¡ 1e~vQ ¡f Deborah J. Phillips -' --1/' V I. It Grace F. Pierce Arthur B. Parkins i:,' Lynn À. Pitts I:', Foreman ¡' I, Raymond Rowiand : i~ , I: Joseph F. Silva ' 11 Earl O. Smith 1'1 Gordon Stringer : :.i Ronaid L. Wolfe , :1 tl 'í ,'jl ¡J ADMINISTRATION &; j !: COURTS BUILDING j !J 1415Truxtun Avenue ~ ,1 ~ I I~ Bakersneld,CA 93301-5222 : ¡j Telepnone: (805) 861-2150 ' - - -- - , ; ~. \ CITY OF BAKERSFI£LD The City of Bakersfield was first incorporated in 1873 and in the same year, the County seat was moved from the booming little town of Havilah to Bakersfield. Three years later, the town decided to disincorporate. It was not until 1898 that the community of Bakersfield incorporated again. In 1910, the City of Kern, formerly Town of Sumner (East Bakersfield), annexed and became part of the City of Bakersfield. In 1915, the citizens of the city adopted a charter calling for the city to operate under the council-manager form of government. This charter provides that the governing body of the city be a city council comprised of seven members, one to be elected from each of the seven wards within the city for a four-year overlapping term, with the mayor elected by the council. In 1957, the charter was amended to have the mayor elected at large. Bakersfield was one of the first cities in the United States to adopt the council - manager form of government. Bakersfield is the 13th largest city in California, with a current population of 210,000 within the city limits and a span of more than 107 square miles. The ethnic breakdown in Bakersfield is White 62%, Hispanic 25%, Black 10% and other 3%. The current operating budget is $163,344,389 of which $73,110,000 makes up the general fund. There are about 1,050 full-time employees for the city, who are represented by seven unions. The city has a Teen Government Day each year. This has been in effect for about 40 years. The City Teen Government Day is hosted by the City of Bakersfield in conjunction with the Kern High School District, The Optimist Clubs of Greater Bakersfield and the Kiwanis Clubs of Bakersfield. The city's goal is to help students understand a little more about how city government works. Police Department: The City of Bakersfield has its own police department. There are 258 sworn officers, 93 civilian employee personnel and 28 dispatchers within the department. They also have 60 Reserve officers, an explorer scout and cadet program. It is the goal of the police department to provide service fairly and impartially throughout the entire community while maintaining integrity and professionalism. Fire Department: The city has its own fire department. There are currently 13 fire stations within the city limits. The Bakersfield Fire Department has one of the highest rated fire departments in the United States. Its main mission is to serve all the citizens and property owners of the City of Bakersfield through the protection of life and property from the effects of fire and other emergencies. Current Projects: The city is working on a sewer project in northeast Bakersfield. The completion of this project will create additional growth in the Rio Bravo area. Two bridge projects are planned for the city. One is at Calloway Road, and it will provide access to California State University Bakersfield from the north. The other bridge will be located just south of Rosedale Highway on Coffee Road and will go over the railroad tracks. 1 - . \ A stadium / recreation complex is in the exploratory stage. The pullout of the Bakersfield Dodgers last year left the city without professional baseball. The city is trying to put together a financing plan that would not place a tax on citizens. However, a combination of various revenue sources is needed. Negotiations are in progress with the trade union organization and the owner of a baseball franchise about a financial contribution toward the building of the complex. Four sites for the complex have been proposed, including Sam Lynn Ball Park on North Chester Avenue. A southwest site is preferred by baseball officials. Ultimately, the player development agreement is what drives the plans for a stadium. The proposed cost for the complex is about $10 million. The plans include multi-purpose use for baseball, football, soccer and concerts. In addition to the above sports activities, the City has recently signed a five-year lease to keep professional hockey in Bakersfield. NO RESPONSE REQUIRED 2 f1.¡ I ,¡ 1 ; t ,j ê ._'-~',"'-:. 1 ' rl I: !~~. ') Q \ F ~ June 29, 1995 c " ,'i'ffJ,.- ¡ 'j 'I.,.," ' i¡ ~1 ' ' :-~~:~. " 'j 'j ~ CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ;11994 - ~995 ~ RE: BEAR MT. CO-GENERATION PLANT ; GRAND 1URY ~ 1 J ] ~j SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO 1994-95 KERN COUNTY GRAND JURY FINAL :¡ ~ REPORT j MEMßE"'S I 1 ~1 Pursuant to Penal Code Section 933 (c), your district or agency is required to file a , Arthur B,l';ukins ¡ Foreman ¡ response to the 1994-95 Kern County Grand Jury Final Report no later than 90 : Aïthur ,;\,öamsl days after the filing of the report, i C¡,:aid ,'It .-j!derete 1 , Ij : ' ~ïace :~~~3a¡jey î According to Penal Code Section 933, a copy of all responses to grand jury : . ~,:;~:¡__IT.Jnan :! reports is required to be submitted within 90 days, The response will be placed on :1 CorctiW::_i'K , file with the applicable grand jury final report by, and in control of the currently , :COI~nëì '." ,~ng'.:! I '~.. impaneled grand jury. ;{()l~P:: J' ,':\)\I(J ,¡ , , : Bnd2e~ .-i"at11 ì '~., . 'We respectfully request a copy of your response be provided to the Grand Jury no ! l ." '" "'unn...J')ldUm""" J .._...1"..,.", ..,"'" """"1 ,: .-' r; ,!" . .1 later than September 29, 1995, .¡C.. ¡".:owara I . I ,10' , ..,. "I' i : ebOr<1n",:1U¡PS j i G-- --, " "OpT" ! S. I ! ...t,'." . ..c 1 Incere y, I ! L'inn ,4.. ,'j~ts J , J 1 -~ , RavmOI1l.1 ,<ow/ana j ---' ,,; " ' : ' / (, ..', ), I ,'" ¡. ~; J' -,,"'{.'" """~"'I-'-' i Joseviì ,',:iiva 1 ""Arthur B. PárRIns ;j Foreman EaT! ;,~, .:J;nith i , GCToon Stringer II 'i 'I ' "'?"n'" I ", ,.,"" I i "",.,<"u ,'~. Iulft: ':.:1 ¡ ¡ i ',r"..1"""c'-"""T'O1>.J?- 'I '¡' ,~:,-,in.u'H.... l.,v-t> A~h:ls ¡ I, rlT,""'~'.; , --. ; Cu.u2\.....> 3U.l.DING j ," ""--'--l : 14,~5Tr.lAnm,_~:,~nue ,J {POOR. ORiGrNAL. :,'1 , BaKers!1e!d.Cc~ '7.ß01-,5222:1 ,t, -,~ '" r,..,,;pr.n"~'" , {)c;) 861 2150 .J :. .. '...-'" .,"L .¡,'~ - ~ r"\¡ BEAR MT.. CO-GENERATION PlANT Summary: The Bear Mountain Co-generation Plant is located in the northeast section of Bakersfield, northeast approximately one mile southeast of Alfred Harrell Highway and one and one-half miles north of the intersection of State Highway 178 and Fairfax Road. It is positioned within 500 feet ofthe Kern Bluff fault line and within one mile of the Dr. Thorner School. The facility staffs about 14 full-time employees. Concerns were voiced by several citizens regarding the facility. These concerns included: 1. Water use required for the operation of the plant; 2. Noise once the plant became fully operational; 3. PG & E power lines which run over one mile and consist of 30-foot wooden poles. This will impact the appearance of the area; 4. The state project was not in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and 5. A negative declaration was not prepared. Findings: Members of the Kern County Grand Jury through its Government Committee has studied these citizen concerns over a considerable period of time. Our investigation revealed the following: 1. The California water charts show there is sufficient water to provide for the plant's needs as well as those of the citizens. By the year 2010, the plant will have used 20,000 acre feet of water, but the wells will be producing over 80,000 acre feet of water. Therefore, there will be no shortage. 2. Setback and sound walls will buffer noise. They have been realigned with the co-generation facility so that a I OO-foot setback can be provided along the north property line. Consequently, this 100- foot setback will create a greater buffer between the site and the adjacent living residences (LR) designated land. Additionally, the California Noise Enforcement Level (CNEL) decibel (db) for the City of Bakersfield is 65 or less. The co-generation plant operates at a CNEL noise level of approximately 76 db. The property adjacent to the north is the closest noise sensitive land use, and any residential development on said site would be subject to noise impact generated from the facility. Because of this, an acoustical analysis was prepared for the project. The noise study recommended mitigation by installing sound walls along the north side and portions of the east and west sides of the plant site. Such walls would decrease the noise level to 63 db or less north of the site. I ""\, 3. PG&E power lines emanate west of the plant site are strung on wooden poles. In 1994, PG&E performed an interconnection study and determined the closest location to their transmission facility is approximately one mile northwest of the facility. The Bear Mountain interconnection point is located in the southwest comer of the site. The physical interconnection will be aIlS KV transmission circuit. The circuit will be constructed with single wooden poles spaced 400 feet apart. Pole heights will be 60 feet above the grade with mounting approximately 50 feet above the grade. The poles will be centered and routed along a I OO-foot wide easement. 4. The co-generation facility uses 48 mega watts. Since the facility will be under the 50 mega watt limit, the City of Bakersfield has the authority to issue all permits - Environmental Impact Reports (EIR) or conditional use permits. The state of California has no authority over EIR reports for co-generation plants under 50 mega watts within the city limits. 5. The San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District reviewed the proposed negative declaration. The district presently feels that the negative declaration would be satisfactory in dealing with all air quality issues providing the following concerns are addressed: a) Source emissions can be summarized from the application; b) Modeling impacts and assumptions; c) The permit application issuance process; and d) Letter received from WZI, Inc. stating the emissions of 10 parts per million, NOX and VOC will be offset at a rate of 1.2 to 1 or greater. Conclusions: 1. The provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act have been followed. 2. The operation of the co-generation plant will not have a significant effect on the environment. 3. The use proposed for the general plan amendment site is sufficiently isolated so that residents located south, southeast, southwest and west of the said site will not be impacted by noise, aesthetics or light / glare. 4. The hazardous materials used are regulated by state and federal law, and impacts associated with such materials are less than significant. 5. The provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act have been met through the preparation of an initial study. A negative declaration indicates no significant environmental impact will occur as a result of a proposed zone change. 6. The co-generation plant will not have a significant effect on the environment. 2 , " I"~ 7. The anticipated annual usage of ammonia is between 18,000 and 20,000 gallons per year, approximately two bulk truck loads. A transportation route for ammonia shipments is minimized near heavily populated areas ofthe city and schools. This system is being used by nine other co-generation facilities within California, seven of which are located in Kern County. This plant incorporates a 120,000-gallon water diffusion tank with automatic controls to dump the ammonia should an on-site emergency occur. This system also includes venting of all pressure relief valves into this diffusion system. Overall this appears to be a very well-designed and safe system. Recommendations: The Kern County Grand Jury recommends that: 1. The City of Bakersfield and the state and federal agencies monitor the co-generation plants using chemicals and anhydrous ammonia in residential areas; 2. The City of Bakersfield see that the hazardous materials used be sufficiently regulated by both state and federal law; 3. The City of Bakersfield require that the above ground steam pipes be clearly marked with paint and lights due to the off-road vehicle and equipment use in the area; 4. The City of Bakersfield require the plant management to monitor the hydrochloric acid, sodium hydroxide solution, and the tanks holding these chemicals so that they are not accessible to vehicle traffic. These tanks should be protected against vehicle damage as such damage could pose off-sight consequences or public threat; and 5. The 1995-96 Grand Jury monitor the co-generation plants near schools and residential areas. RESPONSE REQUIRED 3 , . i :1 .I '1 .." ~ 2 9 \995 ¡:j June 29, 1995 I :'T:.;;.=~~: ~=.:: I I' i: CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, . I !j 1994 -1995 ¡ PEDESTRIAN OVERPASS I: GRAND JURY I: SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO 1994-95 KERN COUNTY GRAND JURY FINAL Ii REPORT I' I I" MEMBERS j , , ¡ Pursuant to Penal Code Section 933 (c), your district or agency is required to file a 1 Arthur B, Parkins, I 1 Foreman :1 response to the 1994-95 Kern County Grand Jury Final Report no later than 90 j Arthur }"dams ~ days after the ruJg of the report, ;1 . 0 '\ '~ I ," oJ : , CeralO "II, j ..aerete I . j , ; i ~'O~~ L:,' BoUey ¡ According to Penal Code Section 933. a copy of all responses to grand jury , ! nëKJa L..rnanan ~ ,,1 b b. d 'h' 90 d Th 'II b I d i ; reports IS reqUlreu to e su mltte WIt In ays. e response WI e p ace on ; j Dormhv '.-:,:rk) file with the applibable grand jury final report by, and in control of the currently : ! Donna L. ::nge¡ j I : J " j impaneled grand jury, i R,'nn... ;::lova' 'j :"'U'-"'~'.', .1 " 'j ! 1 B~Ö ~et H eo< h" j We respectfully request a copy of your response be provided to the Grand Jury no i ,J Cia 1.;013 Y Gung HOiderness i I 'J ¡;:,. Ii,,::, later than September 29, 1995. 'I Car! L. dowara ¡ j 0 b ".". 'I" : ¡ e orail J, r hI Ii pS - 1 Grace ¿:, ¡'¡cree :¡ Sincerely 1 l' '1 ¡ i Lynn !\. ?itts¡ ," 'I' " . :1, (~r\V\,;>:..o_<,:,!,~,ì",~) i Ral1\1ìOna Row¡ana ,] :.- L I ~, ~ ," ' J Joseph ¡::. Silva Arthur B. Parkins :¡ Foreman ¡ Earí O. Smith ! , , ¡ I \'] Gord,m Stringer j : , ! 10 '." u i , ; ,,00"',;,1 L. /VOile j 'J ' 'j j " , , I ¡ \ ¡WMINISTRATlON« 1 j COURTS BUILDING 1 1 ! 1415Truxtun Avenue ~ 1 Bakersiield,CA 93301-5222 ~ ¡ oj Ii TdeDfione: '1::OS) 361-2150 d . ~ ~~ PEDESTRIAN OVERPASS ON 'L' STREET Purpose: The Grand Jury has received many complaints concerning foot traffic flow between the County parking areas south of the railroad tracks crossing 'L' street and the general business areas north of the tracks. Although it is also a problem to vehicular traffic, automobiles have a much simpler solution by using the Chester A venue underpass. Pedestrians, on the other hand, would be required to walk several additional blocks to use this access. Findings: 1. On numerous occasions, grand jurors and regular jurors have observed the trains passing by the courthouse at most inopportune times; i.e. 8:20 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.(these are approximate times). Many days the trains delay foot traffic in excess of thirty (30) minutes. 2. Individuals have been observed in engaging in the very dangerous practice of crossing over flat cars on the crossing or even worse, between cars while the train is stopped. 3. Members of the Kern County Grand Jury and people serving on other Municipal and Superior Court juries have been delayed in reporting for duty because of the trains. 4. The City of Bakersfield Planning Department has no plans for a pedestrian overpass in its Capital Improvements Program Five-Year Budget. Recommendations: In order to facilitate all pedestrian traffic across this railroad crossing, including Kern County Jurors, and serve as a deterrent for possible injuries and/or deaths, we highly recommend the placement of a pedestrian overpass over the tracks on 'L' Street. This crossing is within the City of Bakersfield corporate limits. RESPONSE REQUIRED 1 rKUM ötrU ~äW~ äU¡fUK¡AL lU ~J¿41bJU rUU1/UUJ Uö-¿~-~J UJ:JörM " .. ¿~ A 3 The anticipated annual usage ofanunonï is between 18,000 and 20,000 gallons per year, ~ proximately two bulk truck loads. transportation route for ammonia s!ùpments '. . ized near heavily populated arc ufthe city and schools. This system is being cd ~ by IÙn other co-generation facilities . thin California, seven of which are 10 din - Kern Co ty. ~ This plant in orporates a 120,OOO-gal on water diffusion tank with a matie controls to dump the onia should an on- ire emergency occur. This s em also includes venting of all pres relief valves in this' diffusion system. Ov I this appears to be ~ a very well-designe d safe system. - J Recommendations: I -4 The Kern County Grand Jury rec .J 1. The City of Bakersfield an .. f. ---ee geQer~~jo 13n19 usi" . residential areas; . t the hazardous -;atèiiãï8 Used fie ~ 2. The City of Bakersfield s t I sufficiently regulated by b hsta d federal law; 3. The City of Bakersfiel ve ground steam pipes be clearly marked with paint a oad vehicle and equipment use" In the area i 4. The City of akersfield requir the plant nagement to monitor the hydrochlo c acid, sodium hydr ide solution, d the tanks holding these chemic s so that they are not accessible to ye 'cle traffic. These tanks shou be protected against ve icle damage as su damage could pose oft ight consequences or pub c: threat; and he 1995-96 Grand Jury monit residential areas. PONSE REQUIRED CITY OF BAIŒRSFI£LD NOI5£. ABA T£M£NT Summary: As a result of several complaints, the Government Committee reviewed the noise abatement program of the City of B;Ùccrsficld. The concerns have to do wi~ the sound amplification that is associated with many of the commercial activities that are being pennitted within the city limits. Background: In researching this situation, the City of Bakersfield was contacted and a copy of the City Ordinance covering Amplified Sound was obtained. Section 9.24.050E states: 144 . Ub-¿Y-Y~ U~:~~YM ~KUM HK~U NhW~ hUITOKIAL 1'0 Yj¿41~~U rUU¿¡UUJ H 11 !' . "The volume of sound shall be controlled so that it will not be audible for a distance in excess of \\\ one hundred and fifty feet from the exterior boundaries of the premises upon which said sound r equipment is located, and so that said volume is not unreasonably loud, raucous, jarring, disturbing :: or 8 nuisance." ) .; ). . In the instances of soWld emanating from a single source and/or location. the one problem that exists ~ is the policing and enforcement of the existing ordinance. A secondary problem occurs when there are multiple sources and locations gathered together under the inclusion of one pennit, as in the case of the Downtown "Street Fairs". The entire downtown area is included in that pemùt, and the exterior boundaries are actually the boundaries of the city "Downtown" area. In addition, there has been no real oversight of this particular problem within the city, and consequently, very little control has been exerted toward the limiting of such sounds, which in many cases reviewed, did not comply with the ordinance. Findings: There are three genemI sources of sound pollutiun; 1. Area pennits that allow amplified sound to be produced over a large physical area such as the downtown area or a shopping center. 2. Permits that are provided to specific locations such as a business address, church or home. 3. Audio amplification that requires a permit but exceeds all reasonable allowances. such as automobiles and homes. There Wère many violations of the city ordinance observed, the majority of which were specific in nature and were the result of excessively amplified sound coming from automobiles modified to include high gain sound systems that could be heard at a distance of more than a city block. Conclusions: This is a city ordinance that does not appear to receive a great deal of enforcement priority. Understanding the limited budgets and the concentration of law enforcement on more serious crimes than "Disturbing the Pence", it is not an cosy ordinance to police:. In the case of large area permits, those involved in the activity should be held accountable for infractions, and they should be required to police their own operations. Individuals and/or organizations and businesses participating should be required to respond to these concerns or be chastised by the organizer. When the violations are from a single source at a physical location, the only recourse is for the police to be called and a complaint filed against the offender for "Disturbing the Peace". The most difficult of all to control and yet one of the most prevalent and obnoxious, i5 the greatly amplified sound produced by automobiles. These vehicles are modified with high capacity amplifiers and speakers that are. many times. so large that they are mounted in the heel of a pickup truck. It is Dot the intent of the Grand Jury to intrude on the freedom of expression by individuals 145 . Ub-¿~-~~ U~:~OrM rKUM HtrU ~tW~ tUl¡UKlAL iV ~.j¿4jo~U rUU.j/UUj "... ~ ~ who enjoy their music and build these traveling sound stages, but freedom of expression ends when --, that expression tramples the guaranteed freedoms to peace and quite of the neighborhood. At that .:.1U - point, it becomes a situation of , 'Disturbing the Peace". Traffic police should at least try to enforce .JLj the ordinance and cite violators. - Recommendations: ~ 1. Care must be exercised by the city department responsible for issuing --, permits, to stress the responsibility of the permittee to control the sound ;¡~ pollution of their event and to hold that individual and/or organization liable .- for any violation. ~ 2. A higher priority should be assigned by law enforcement to controlling noise pollution. This is to the own best interest ofthe policing agency since - - several studies have shown that individuals can strongly reactto noise and . lLIl - become increasingly agitated to the point of creating a confrontation with -, the source. Any police officer will tell you that responding to an "unknown aL~ disturbance" Is one of their most frequent and most dangerous types of - calls. Therefore, if a situation can be controlled at the outset and not - . allowed to escalate, there is a definite benefit to a patrolman who may ; lUll sooner or later become involved anyway. - -- 3. The City might be well advised to look into ways of controlling the ~ - modification of vehicular sound system, such as controlling vendors of -- such equipment and requiring certain limits of the capability of ~ non-commercial equipment. ~ RESPONSEREQUlRED Wi - DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS üiiii The Kern County Chamber of Commerce established the first airport in the county in 1925. On July --- 22, 1927, the land for the present Meadows Field site was purchased. Over the years, the Department - - of Airports has managed as many as seventeen airports, at one time. located within the coun~. The ø department currently manages seven airports which are Bakersfield's Meadows Field, Kern River - Valley at Lake Isabella. Taft, Lost Hills, Elk Hills I Buttonwillowt Poso and Wasco. ......, :wi For many years the Department of Airports was a "stand alone" department within county - -~ govenunent. Approximately 4-5 years ago the department became a division within the Division ~ of Transportation Management. In late 1993, the Division of Transportation Management was - incorporated into the Resource Management Agency (RMA). and the airports became a division -"- within that department. On January 31, 1995, the Board of Supervisors reorganized the RMA, and. ail once again, the Airports became a "stand alone" department within the county. - --~ The Department of Airports is located at Meadows Fieldt 1401 Skyway Drive. Suite 200, in the ~ - terminal building that. was originally constructed in 1957. Twenty-six positions are authorized to -- the department and their annual 1994-95 budgeted expenditures are $8.048,492. 1JI.f - i 146 ':\ . 'I _. r -- ~ - ---- r~~ -- ," J: \.,.., " II... I '" ~~I... I 51.... ' League of California Cities I 01... I il... 1400 K STREET. SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 . (916) 658-8200 51...... Mayors & California Cities Work Together ---,.= -r-- E~\ 7r=" n Council Members '; p. \Ç C c,!J t:. \y 1 "~~..9 -~=-=--===¡I > \, JUN 7. ~ \!!!is i June 1995 Newsletter \C\TY MANAGER'S OFf\CE, -- Useful, Inspiring Director's Report Program at League Board Highlights Executive Forum By Art Takahara, League Director time on the Board agenda for other discussion. More than a dozen practical sessions, The League of California Cities plus three outstanding keynote speak- Board met April 28-29, 1995 in President Andrews also appointed a ers, are scheduled for the Mayors and Chico, the hometown of President Strategic Planning Committee which Council Members Executive Forum, Mary Andrews. met on Friday morning before the 10 July 26-28, 1995, in Monterey. There a.m. Board meeting. One ofthe im- will be something for every elected This year, President Andrews imp le- portant items discussed was the task official on the program or in the infor- mented the board action to create a before the California Constitution Re- mal discussions afforded by the more Legislative Committee comprised of vision Commission (CCRC). The than 400 mayors and council members board members who are not members CCRC is focused on three major ob- who will be participating. of the Executive Committee and who jectives: will serve as liaisons to specific This ever popular meeting is a great policy committees. The Legislative . Finding ways to reconnect gov- way to get up to date on those key is- Committee met the day before the ernments with the people of Cali- sues facing cities. Focus will be on the Board meeting to review the numer- Cornia; revising government struc- latest information on the plans to ous legislative bills on the consent ture and how it functions to pro- make California's governments work calendar. The chair reported to the duce results for all those it serves. better; the effect of the new state bud- full Board on the actions taken by the To accomplish this goal, they are get on cities; and how you can be Committee. The priority bill list pre- looking at the Executive and Leg- more effective as you lead your city pared by staff was further discussed islative Branches as well as the ini- into the 21 st century. Particular atten- by the full Board. The purpose of this tiative process. tion will be given to the changes in Committee was to free significant Please see Director, page 7 the legislative process and how to work more effectively with your legis- Stay for the Rail Festival Following the Executive Forum lators. A full outline of the Forum program Stay for the Rail Festival setfor Friday and Saturday, was included in the announcement, July 28 & 29, also at the Convention Center. See the mailed to all elected officials and city new California Car, look at plans for statewide rail managers in May. If you didn't get a improvements, and vote for yourfavorite train copy please call the League's confer- menus and preferred schedules. You can even . ence information line at 916/449- ride on a hand car! 3254 and leave a message requesting one be sent right away. Admission is free. Contact the Transporta- tion Agency for Monterey at 408/755-4834 Don't miss this valuable program and (fax 755-4957). get left out of the loop! Mayors and Council Members Department Newsletter June 1995 Page 1 c_-~~ --_.~ - --- -------- --~ -~ , ~¡ ~ Department Officers Leadership Academy Launched President The League Board of Directors, with Annual Conference and executive Fo- Carolyn Ratto, Council Member, cooperation of the Mayors and Coun- rum. Initial plans call for credits for Turlock cil Members Department, initiated a participation in sessions which will new Leadership Academy to provide lead to awarding of certificates for First Vice President the special educational opportunities those who complete at least a core se- Ron Parks, Council Member, which elected officials and top ~ e s ries. Temecula staffwill need to lead cities in t e" years ahead. An advisory committ~e of city offi- Second Vice President cials will help guide the Academy's Roberta Cooper, Mayor, Hayward The Academy will bea planned and plans so that it best meets you needs. coordinated means for officials to eas- Suggestions for topics are always wel- Director ily get the information, abilities, and come. Art Takahara, Council Member, contacts they need to work more ef- Mountain View fectively with all levels of govern- The Academy, still in the formative ment, the private sector, the public, stages, will offer its first program July and the media. Special emphasis will 28-29,1995, in Monter~y; immedi--- be on new skills for community con- ately following the Mayors and Coun- Appointments to League sensus building, reconnecting with the cil Members Executive Forum. This public, policy formulation, strategic timing, on a Friday afternoon and Sat- Policy Committees planning, goal setting and perfor- urday, will make it easy for many of- mance measurement, and making gov- ficials to participate because they will Administrative Services ernments more responsive. already be in Monterey and can save Helen Kawagoe, City Clerk, time and money on extra travel. For Carson The Academy will include both new more information contact Terry programs and selected sessions at ex- Dugan at the League, 916/658-8265 Community Services isting League meetings such as the or e-mail to eyllcc7@statenetcom. (Vacant) Employee Relations Linda Calandra, Council Member, Fresno New Leadership Seminar Set Environmental Quality The first session of the League's new both provide insights and practice to The Rev. Henry W. Hearns, Council Member, Leadership Academy will debut Fri- help you back home. Lancaster day and Saturday, July 28-29, 1995, in Monterey, immediately following The Saturday morning session will Housing, Community and the Executive Forum.,The Seminar explore the special skills you will Economic Development will feature four topics, each covered need to be effective policy leaders in Carol Liu, Mayor, in more depth than is possible in tradi- your city. It will help you understand La Canada Flintridge tional League programs. the key elements of effective policies; how to formulate them; and how to Pu blic Safety The Friday session, titled "Power Lis- assure that they are doing what you Joy Defenbaugh, Council Member, tening: Breakthrough Communicating intended. Riverside to Build Community Support and Trust," focuses on an innovative way Saturday afternoon will offer a choice Revenue and Taxation of clearing the blocks to effective un- between a session on practical politics Roberta Cooper, Mayor, derstanding among the diverse inter- and a session on how elected officials Hayward ests in your city and creating a more should function during a crisis caused complete and open communication by a natural disaster or accident The Tranportation and Public Works with and among your constituents crisis session will tap the expertise of Art Takahara, Council Member, which will lead to increased trust and faculty from the renowned California Mountain View support. This interactive session will Please see Leadership Seminar, next page Mayors and Council Members Department Newsletter June 1995 Page 2 t ~,,-~ " " Boost Your City's The agenda will cover such topics as Leadership Seminar, how to help create jobs, how to attract Continued Economy! businesses, financing options foreco- nomic development, how to fund Specialized Training Institute, and Strong cities depend on strong local downtown revitalization, and much will give you valuable tips on how to economies. Learn how to strengthen more. plan so you and your city can best re- your city's economy and enhance the Your city will get the most benefit spond to a crisis. quality of life of your residents at the League's Economic Development and from the conference if a team attends, The practical politics session will fo- Downtown Revitalization Conference, including both elected officials and cus on understanding the political August 16-18, 1995, at the Long staff directly involved in revitaliza- arena at the regional and state levels, Beach Hilton Hotel. tion and economic development plan- and how you can get things done in ning and programs. Sessions will offer that arena. This conference is an expansion of the plenty of time for valuable discussion League's popular Downtown Revital- and learning from the experiences of Register for the Leadership Seminar ization Conference, in response to re- other cities. together with the Executive Forum quests of city officials to broaden its and save $25 on the combined fee. scope to include more for elected offi- Announcements ofthe conference For more information see the an- cials on economic development and were sent to all cities in April. If you nouncement which was mailed to all policies which support it. The progràm did not get an announcement and mayors, council members and city will continue to include sessions spe- would like one, just call the League's managers in May.To obtain an an- cifically on downtown revitalization. conference information line at 916/ nouncement, leave your request on the 449-3254 and request one. League's conference information line at 916/449-3254. (Note that this seminar is at the same time as the Re- development Seminar; you may regis- ter for one or the other.) Learn the Latest About Redevelopment The annual Redevelopment Seminar Advisory Commission regarding rede- Annual Conference: for Mayors and Council Members will velopment bonds. And Saturday after- "Share Visions" take place Friday afternoon and Sat- noon it will address applications of urday, July 28-29, 1995, in Monterey, the process in situations involving following the Executive Forum. This military base closures. In keeping with the League's strategic session will provide both an excellent plan priorities, the 1995 Annual Con- update on new policy and legal issues You may register for the Redevelop- ference has as its theme "Sharing the affecting redevelopment, and a great ment Seminar together with the Ex- Vision: Connecting with California's introduction to the whole redevelop- ecutive Forum and save $25 on the Communities." According to Mary mentprocess. combined fee. For more information Andrews, League president and coun- see the announcement which was cil member in Chico, "The Confer- Friday afternoon will present both an mailed to all mayors, council mem- ence will serve to help create the clear introductory briefing and a legislative bers and city managers in May.To ob- and common vision of the vital role and legal update. Saturday's session tain an announcement, leave your re- for cities in building California's fu- will focus on financing methods and quest on the League's conference in- ture." helping others who may be negative formation line at 916/449-3254. toward the redevelopment process to (Note that this seminar is at the same The Conference, scheduled for Octo- better understand what it can and can- time as the Leadership Seminar; you ber 22-24, 1995, at the Moscone Con- not do. The Seminar will also feature may register for one or the other.) vention Center in San Francisco, will the perspective of the California Debt Please see Annual Conference, next page Mayors and Council Members Department Newsletter June 1995 Page 3 ., ,. ~,-; " Annual Conference, 1995 Resolution Deadline August 24 Continued Resolutions for consideration at the action at the 1994 Conference to al- attract more than 2,500 city officials Annual Conference must be in the low more time for cities to review and and others. Some 50 sessions in 10 League office by Wednesday, August take positions on the resolutions. Be topical tracks will offer solutions to 23. Resolutions will be reviewed by sure you plan time on your council challenges facing cities today and to- policy committees by September 7 agenda before the Conference to act morrow. In addition, already nearly and 8, and sent with the policy com- on these resolutions. If you have any 200 exhibit booths have been reserved mittee recommendation to all cities. questions, please call Marian A vila at to show officialsthe latest in services The deadline for submission ofresolu- 916/658-8224. and products to help you operate more tions is two weeks earlier this year by efficiently and better serve your resi- dents. The Conference will also serve to ad- dress a number of policy issues on Department Officer Nominations Sought which cities want to take concerted action in order to meet the needs of The Department Nominating Commit- Members of the Nominating Commit- their citizens. The League's policy tee is inviting nominations for Second tee are: formulation process is a key piece of Vice President. Following tradition, a the work of the Conference, and mayor or council member from South- . Lara Blakely, Council Member, guides the League's plans and pro- ern California will be proposed to the Monrovia grams for the year ahead. membership atthe Annual Conference . Patricia Figueroa, Council Mem- Watch for the announcement of the for election to the Department Execu- ber, Mountain View tive Committee. Responsibilities in- . Ron Loveridge, Mayor, Riverside Conference in your mail box in July. clude assisting to plan Department Plan for a full delegation of both programs and services such as this If you would like to be considered for elected officials and staff to attend newsletter. Meetings are normally nomination, or want to recommend from your city so that your city is able held in conjunction with the Annual someone for nomination, please con- to cover all the important issues and Conference, Executive Forum and In- tact any member of the nominating sessions and get the most benefit from stitute, or by conference call. committee or any department officer the gathering. Be sure to register not later than September 15, 1995. early and take advantage of a reduced advance registration fee. And make your hotel reservations and travel plans to take advantage of discounts. Don't miss this great and valuable Fresno Goes Clean 'n Green city "family reunion!" Throughout the month of April, the celebrate the successful efforts of par- businesses and service organizations ticipants, thus encouraging even more Brag a Bit of Fresno were challenged to join involvement. The Clean 'N Green ef- schools, churches, and individuals in a fort was coordinated through the city-wide "spring cleaning." All par- Mayor's office, which reports that it Want to share a success story in the ticipants were invited to be creative in was a tremendous success, with over Mayors and Council Members choosing their projects. Activities 6,000 volunteers contributing over Newsletter? Submit a short de- ranged from abating nuisances, to 20,000 hours of work. For more infor- scription of your success, along with cleaning weeds, to painting out graf- mation contact Carla Glazebrook, contact person and phone number fiti, to planting flowers. The local me- Deputy Mayor, at 209/498-4351. to Terry Dugan at the League dia was enlisted to report on and help (fax 916/658-8220, e-mail eyllcc7@statenet.com). We'll tell your story as space is available. Mayors and Council Members Department Newsletter June 1995 Page 4 " "":'" '1 -¡< Three Strikes Groups to Meet During Executive Forum Against Graffiti I Several constituent groups are plan- and the California Elected Women's ning to meet during the Executive Fo- Association for Education and Re- The City of Fresno is attacking the rum in Monterey. Present plans in- search (CEW AER) reception, also set graffiti problem on three fronts. It re- clude the Latino Officials Caucus for Thursday at 5 pm. Other groups cently acquired two self-contained meeting and reception beginning may also plan events. Check the Fo- high volume paint trailers to use in Thursday, July 27, beginning at 5 pm, rum program on site for details. painting over graffiti. These trailers can paint up to four colors at once. Each unit carries fifteen standard co 1- ors and has custom tinting equipment to match unusual colors. The operator Smoke Signals can change co lors in just a few sec- onds. In addition, crews can use a high pressure water system to remove As all city officials and puffers and nances restrict tobacco vending ma- graffiti from surfaces not suitable for breathers now know, California has chines, or sales of single cigarettes, painting. Ifnecessary, solvents are established a statewide minimum stan- billboards, etc. also used. In 1994, over 2.2 million dard for indoor smoking, which says, square feet of surfaces were cleaned' "No smoking where anyone works." As local officials and others spread of graffiti. The law provides for enforcement by the word about what the law says, and local agencies, "including but not lim- does not say, voluntary compliance Fresno Police also join the abatement ited to local health departments, as has become the norm. Copies of the effort with a Graffiti Enforcement determined by the local governing League's "Guide to Understanding Team. With help from volunteer citi- body." Many cities have designated AB 13" are still available, as well as zen groups, and using a graffiti the county health department as the ordinances, signs and other materials hotline, police have identified over enforcing agency. suitable for distribution. Call Joan 275 tagging crews and 430 taggers. Hogan or Clark Goecker at the Help also comes from the school dis- Behind the law was the phenomenal League 916\658-8218. trict and the Scholastic Crime Stop- spread-and popularity- of LOCAL pers Program, which have provided smoke- free public environments. Any much information leading to arrests. interested city can now regulate in The League, in partnership with School officials report a 40 percent areas not covered by AB 13. Some California Healthy Cities, partici- reduction of graffiti on campuses. local ordinances for example, limit pates in California Smoke-Free Cit- smoking inoutdoor events or eating ies, funded by Proposition 99 rev- The third strike against graffiti is a areas, bars, bingo centers; other ordi- enues. joint city-county "tagger-to-work" de- tail, in which those arrested are sen- tenced to up to ten days of physically demanding work, painting over graf- fiti and cleaning up streets and alleys. Say It In Western City Those on the detail work eight hours per day on weekends and holidays un- cler the supervision of two probation Have a job vacancy or item for sale, Straight-line classified ads are $18 department employees. Thus far over or wish to conduct a "request for pro- per line, with a five-line minimum, 8,000 hours of work have been done, posal"? Submit your ad to the Adver- and approximately 41 characters per and police report no second arrests of tising Department. line. The deadline to submit is the those who have been through the pro- 15th ofthe preceding month. gmm. Closing dates for boxed ads are the 7th of the preceding month for space For more information, please contact: For further information contact Carla reservation, and the 16th of the pre- Jehan Flagg, Advertising Manager, Glazebrook, Deputy Mayor, at 209/ ceding month for submitting camera- 916/658-8256, Fax 916/658-8220; 498-4351. ready art. Costs vary according to 1400 K Street, Fourth Floor, Sacra- size of ad. mento, CA 95814. Mayors and Council Members Department Newsletter June 1995 PageS "" - - - - ,." <- . <"-.-.' , 'i. TalkAbout 1995 California Cities Helen Putnam Reforming Award for Excellence Government Applications for this year's award program sponsored by the Institute for Local Self Government are due August 11, 1995. Award categories include: One of the best ways for cities to re- Excellence connect with the public is to provide Excellence with Partnerships opportunities for people to come to- Children, Youth and Families Community Service gether to expand their knowledge and Economic and Community Enhancing Diversity in the Workplace understanding of the issues facing Development and Community their communities. Environmental Quality Financial Management Healthy City Government Efficiency and During the next year there will be Responsiveness much discussion about restructuring Public Safety government and revising the state Public Works and Transportation constitution. To help expand the Announcements were mailed to city officials the first week in June. For addi~ public's knowledge and understand- ing of the many and complex issues tional information regarding the California Cities Helen Putnam A ward for Ex- related to such changes, the Univer-, cellence, contact the Institute for Local Self Government at 916/658-8208, fax sity of California Davis Extension has 916/658-8240 or e-mail ilsg@statenet.com. just published its third California Is- sues Forum booklet. It serves to con- structively guide discussions to a bet- tel' appreciation of the issues involved. No particular solution is advocated. League Inquiries 50S Rather, the intent is to help frame the issues and inform the public so that By Lorraine Okabe the discussion is on a higher and more League library seeks information on: productive level, which can lead The League library loaned out 2,307 . Fees for employment application people to more informed decisions packets of library materials last year. processing or testing and actions. This is in addition to the thousands of . Compliance with the new Dept. of Cities, along with local service orga- inquiries we handled by phone or re- Transportation rules on drug and sponded to via CITYLINK. Weare alcohol testing nizations and interest groups, may very proud of the Inquiry Service and . Personnel rules and regulations wish to sponsor issues forums using strive to continue to meet your infor- . Personnel manuals this booklet and facilitators trained in mational needs. However, in order to . "Information kiosks" the issues forum process. Such forums serve you better, we'd like to share a . Policies on violence in the work- can form the basis for similar local few tips that would help make both place issues forums in which residents can our jobs easier: . Internships in cities discuss and learn about concerns . Residency requirements for city em- unique to your own city. You may . Please call us as early as you can. ployees also wish to send officials or local . Define your question clearly. . Team-building experiences volunteers to the Public Policy Insti- . Be sensitive to our priorities. . City CEQA guideline/policies tute, scheduled for August 26-28 at . Give us as much background as . Truancy reduction programs UC Davis, to become trained in the possible. . Fundraising issues forum process. For more infor- . Speak explicitly to our voice mail. . Dealing with shopping carts mation about this low cost way of en- . E-mail/voice-mail policies gaging people in the work oflocal de- We strive to provide competent re- . Safety in public buildings mocracy contact Lynn Read at UC search and timely responses to your . Impact of streetlights (or any light- Davis Extension, 916/757-8891. inquiries. If you collect additional ing) in deterring or encouraging information on your inquiry from criminal activity other sources, please send copies on to . Optical imaging (RFPs, staff reports the League library. We appreciate etc.) your thoughtfulness. Mayors and Council Members Department Newsletter June 1995 Page6 ~. .~--- -~ ~ 7. .","" ' ':> , i" Governor Releases Director, Continued May Budget . Balancing the state's checkbook fact sheet aimed at building local Revision - revising the state's budget con- support for programs for at-risk tent and process to present a youth as developed by the clearer picture of the state's finan- League's Investing In Our Youth The Governor released revisions to his cial condition. Task Force. January budget on May 22. It con- tained few surprises from the January . Making our way through the gOY" . Adopted the California Police proposal. Revenue estimates show a ernmental maze--beginningthe Chiefs Association position on fire- slight net loss for 1994-95 and 1995- process of changing the way local arms legislation as its own. 96. Caseloads in major entitlement government is organized, operated, programs have grown at a slower rate and financed. Beginning in late . Affirmed support oflocal control than anticipated in January. Overall ' April, 25 community forums have in the area of electrical industry Expenditures, including case load ad- been scheduled throughout the restructuring. justments and new proposals, are state in cooperation with the down slightly over the two fiscal League of Women Voters. A pre- . Adopted a final report of the years. liminary report will be presented to League's Immigration and Natural- the Legislature and the Governor ization Task Force which recom- Federal reimbursements for illegal im- in August 1995. mends a number oflocal, state and migrants are now expected to be $317 federal actions to educate commu- million less than is January. Federal Other actions taken by the Board: nities about the benefits of diver- disallowance of certain Medi-Cal sity and addressing fair housing claims will also result in an additional . Adopted an Economic Conversion laws to prevent discrimination, re- $360 million in state costs for Medi- Legislative Policy and an Eco- quiring federal government respon- Cal. The Revision includes $275 mil- nomic Strategy Policy developed sibility for the costs of its immigra- lion of proposed health and welfare by the League's Committee on tion policies, study guest-worker program reductions to offset some of Housing and Community Develop- and day-labor programs, support a these costs. ment. more active identification program of undocumented immigrants and Main points affecting cities are: . Unanimously endorsed the candi- "vi~a overstayers," and study the dacy of Turlock City Council short- and long-term economic and . There are no proposed changes to Member Carolyn Ratto for Second social impact of deportable felons city general purpose revenues Vice President ofthe National on the state prison system. League of Cities. . The State and Local Partnership This year's Annual Conference will Program is reduced from $200 million . Approved the development of a be in San Francisco. The dat~s are to $100 million. This program pro- League of California Cities Lead- Sunday, October 22 through Tuesday, vides direct tùnding matches for local ership Academy to assist elected October 24. The Board of Directors transportation projects from Propos i- city officials in acquiring creative and policy committees are scheduled tion 111 gasoline tax revenues. The and proven leadership skills. to meet on Saturday, October 21. state contributes a portion ofthe fund- (Please see article on page 2) ing based on partnership program The deadline for the submission of funding and the number of qualified . Approved the content and concept any resolutions is August 23, 1995 to local projects. Partnership projects of a public education effort with a the League's office. require a substantial local funding commitment and are most often 10- cated in areas where a dedicated local transportation sales tax has been en- acted. It is important to note that this Newsletter Deadline program is funded from the State Transportation Fund and any savings must be shifted to other state transpor- The Deadl ine for submission for the next department newsletter is Tuesday, Au- tation programs. gust 15, 1995. Please contact Terry Dugan at the League: 1400 K St., Sacra- mento, CA 95814, 916/658-8265, Fax 916/658-8220. Mayors and Council Members Department Newsletter June 1995 Page 7 ..... -- ~. /'" ~. to I .' , '.i~ \ . .- ". Making California's Governments Work, Part II By Mary Andrews Excerpted from Western City Magazine - June 1995 The League's Board of Directors has ernment agencies - schools, counties The League supports actions to better established a set of priority issues rec- and cities - to combine their re- balance some regulatory systems with ommended by the Strategic Planning sources to provide the best possible the public policy goal of making the Steering Committee. The aim? To service to their constituencies. state more economically competitive. take the necessary steps -locally 4. Government Accountability. The 9. Telecommunications. The coming and statewide - to make California's League encourages cities to establish years will witness the rapid develop- governments work. performance-based outcomes as the ment and deployment of advanced standard for delivery oflocal services telecommunications services. While Those priorities are: as well as for local regulatory efforts. the "information superhighway" pre- 1. Reconnecting With Citizens. In On a broader scale, the League sup- sents considerable opportunities, it recent years, the public has exhibited ports encouraging the state and fed- also poses significant fiscal and policy an ever decreasing level of trust and era! government to adopt similar mea- implications for cities: the need for respect for their governmental institu- sures of governmental accountability sufficient regulatory authority to en- tions, resulting in a lack of fiscal sup- for mandated programs, leaving local sure universal access to telecommuni- port for the services they demand and jurisdictions to decide how those out- cations technology, the need to plan a barrage of state and local initiative comes can best be achieved. for local telecommunications infra- measures designed to circumvent the 5. Youth Programs. The League structure, and the opportunity to use governmental decision making pro- supports development oflocal pro- new technologies. The League sup- cess. The League supports efforts to grams aimed at providing safe com- ports this effort through both legisla- make government more understand- munities for children; steering them tion and information exchange. able, to provide interactive communi- away from crime, gangs and violence; 10. State Strategic Plan. State gov- cation with citizens and establish a and improving educational opportuni- ernment structure in California is of- meaningful process for citizens to ties for California's youth. ten counterproductive to the proper connect with their governments. 6. Revenue and Taxation Reform. management of state programs and 2. Economic Development. For gov- The citizens of California are not be- resources. The League supports the ernment in California to be fiscally ing properly served by the current creation of a state strategic plan that healthy, California's communities state and local government revenue identifies the state's goals and estab- must have vital business, commercial and taxation structure. Tax policy is lishes a plan to meet those goals. and industrial sectors. To that end, the inconsistent and inequitable, causing 11. Strengthen City Authority Over League encourages cities to playa deteriorating public services. The Urban Development. Urban develop- catal}'1ic role in fostering economic League urges changing California's ment decisions are best made by city opportunity as well as eliminating un- revenue and taxation structure to bet- governments. Conflicts with counties necessary costly delays in permit pro- ter reflect current conditions and to over tax revenues in unincorporated cessing and other regulatory activities. distribute the tax burden equitably. fringe areas of cities slow proper ur- 3. Intergovernmental Cooperation. 7. Mandate Reform. Unfunded and ban development in these areas. The California's complicated overlapping underfunded federal- and state-man- League supports legislation to estab- system oflocal government finance dated programs have undermined the lish cities as the primary decision- creates conflict and competition for priorities of citizens for public ser- makers for urban development and to funding amongjurisdictions and vices at the local level, creating a strengthen city authority over urban proves confusing for citizens who can- governmental system that is unac- development in areas surrounding cit- not decipher who provides what ser- countable to its citizens. The League les. vice. The League supports legislation supports stricter accountability for to streamline this unwieldy system mandated programs, making local I hope you will be alert to information and bring both revenue raising and governments an equal partner in deliv- about these priority issues in Western service delivery responsibility to the ering public services. City, in the League's "Legislative Bulle- level of government closest to the citi- 8. Regulatory Reform. California tin," and League training programs and zens who receive the service. The has a number of regulatory systems ensure your city participates fully in League further supports development that no longer match the economic implementating these priorities. of incentives to foster regional coop- and societal needs of the state, reduc- [Part I can be found in the January, 1995 eration and encourages local and re- ing California's competitiveness and issue of Western City, by Don gional efforts to bring together gov- misdirecting scarce public resources. Benninghoven.] Mayors and Council Members Department Newsletter June 1995 Page 8