The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About10/06/95_ � � B A K E R S F I E L D MEMORANDIJM Q�tober 6, 1995 T0: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER2�"�"� SUBJECT: GENERAL INFORMATION 1. As I think you know, there were some significant developments at the - Committee level this week relative to the stadium. There are some items enclosed which should be of interest. One is information gathered from one of our staff on the Convention and Visitors Bureau about the probable reaction to increasing the Transient Occupancy Tax to fund the downtown baseball stadium site. Another is interview information with other stadiums around the country. This is related to the southwest site and how compatibility has been found in other areas relative to residential neighborhoods. Also enclosed is information requested by the Urban Development Committee relative to Transient Occupancy Tax. Attached to the Administrative Report for this item is a matrix showing comparable data for the four proposed sites as best we know it at this time. You will also find enclosed a report from Don Anderson, our Property Manager. He is indicating that the estimates given at the Urban Development Committee of $2 million to acquire the land did not include goodwill or relocation assistance. Those would be significant additional costs associated with acquiring the downtown properties. We have no reasonable basis for estimating what those costs would be at this time. 2. CalTrans advised me by phone that they will be offering $5,000 of an estimated $10,000 cost to do an engineering analysis of the Bakersf.ield sign over Union Avenue to determine what the cost is to repair it and keep it in place. They want us to come up with the other $5,000, and they want us to oversee the contract. It will be passed on to you for a formal decision when it is received. In the short term, I would caution that they are getting our foot in the door, and the benevolence of sharing the cost will not be extended to long term maintenance or the repairs themselves. Perhaps the private sector advocacy group should provide the $5,000. 3. The status of the Operating Engineers' strike has not changed; no end in sight. 4. There are materials enclosed on the SART/SANE Examinations program in the Police Department. Also enclosed is communication indicating that we have completed transfer of the Bakersfield Senior Center property to the Senior Center group. Council Referrals responded to enclosed include bidding procedures on concrete repair, problem on Monterey Street, fire access to Quailwood, and street resurfacing at El Caballo and Mesa Grande. � HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL October 5, 1995 Page -2- 5. You will find enclosed: 1) a status report funded out of the block grant; 2) the Annual 3) a status report on transportation impact AT:rg cc: Carol Williams, City Clerk Trudy Slater, Administative Analyst on non-profit projects being CHAS Performance Report; and fees. � B A K E R S F I E L D MEMORANDUM October 3, 1995 TO: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER _ FROM: D.B. TEUBNER, ASSISTANT TO THE CIN MANAGER SUBJECT: INCREASED TOT TO FUND DOWNTOWN BASEBALL STADIUM SITE As you requested, I had some discreet discussions with various representatives of the Convention and �sitors Bureau including this year's president, Sterling Lundgren, General Manager of the Marriot Residence Inn and John Meroski, Executive Director of the CVB. John also discussed this issue with Mitch Van Wormer, General Manager of the Holiday Inn Select. These individuals were asked about their personal and professional opinions on whether or not the hospitality industry would be open to the idea of increasing the Transient Occupancy Tax (TO� from 12% to 14°/a for 20 years in order to fund land acquisition and utility relocation for a downtown baseball stadium site. A summary of their responses follows: Sterling Lundgren - While he personally thinks that an improved baseball stadium would be a good amenity for the community, he does not feel that the hotel industry should be "made to pay for it." He indicated that hotels have not had a measurable increase in sales due to baseball. The teams usually cut a deal for $30.00 per room per night with a hotel that needs to fill beds and therefore, the hotels don't make money on team stays. He felt that the hotel industry would scream loud and long about any increase in TOT. In his words, "the City would be crazy to try anything like thatl" John Meroski -"The hotels would go ballistic!" John reminded me that Bakersfield already has one of the highest TOT's in the state, 14% would make us the highest. He also confided that the hotel industry has already been antsy about the stadium and a few have expressed concerns that the City might consider increasing TOT. He has talked to severa! hotel managers including those from the Days Inn and Red Lion. They are unilaterally against any increase in TOT regardless of the stadium site. He felt that they would be extremely vocal against the stadium if it meant an increase in TOT. Mitch Van Wormer (interviewed by John Meroski) - Mitch's comments were similar those of Sterling Lundgren. However, he did say that a downtown site would benefit the Holiday Inn more than the other hotels, and he feels that the restaurant and bar would benefit. Because of the negotiated rates for out of town teams and because baseball games have not translated into increased business previously, Mitch did not feel that the hotel would bene�t significantly. He felt that an increase in TOT would unfairly burden one industry with the cost of the stadium. � B A K E R S F I E L D MEMORANDUM October 2, 1995 TO: LAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER FROM: D.B. TEUBNER, ASSISTANT TO HE CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: INTERVIEWS WITH JOHN PRESEREN, HARRY GROVE STADIUM IN - FREDERICK, MARYLAND AND JERRY LYON, FRANKLIN QUEST FIELD IN SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH These cities were recommended by Tom Tingle of HOK Architects, as being stadiums which would be similar to the one envisioned for Bakersfield and with similar challenges. I spoke with the General Manager of the stadium in Frederick, Maryland and Jerry Lyon, City Engineer in Salt Lake City, Utah. John Preseren, General Manager - Harry Grove Stadium 1) How close was the stadium site to residential development at time of construction and currently? When the stadium was built six years ago, residential development was within several blocks of the site. The stadium is part of a regional recreational facility with youth baseball fields and soccer fields surrounding it. Residential and support development existed around the park. Some concerns with compatibility with the surrounding area were brought up, however, the park and youth sports facilities were already in existence at the time the stadium site was chosen. So the stadium fit in well with existing facilities. 2) Did the stadium have any opposition from area residents during any phase of construction? A fairly large church abutted up to the north side of the stadium site. The church mounted an active and organized opposition to the stadium and drew on residents from the area as well. Their primary issues were noise and beer sales on the stadium premises and the perceived rowdy behavior which would result from this. Mr. Preseren was not with Harry Grove Stadium at this time, however, he has been told that the City Council, "stuck to their guns" and voted for the stadium site anyway. The City Council at the time were convinced that the stadium would be a family oriented amenity and would not cause the kinds of problems that the opposition was concerned about. At this time, the opposition has °been converted° according to Mr. Preseren. The stadium does sell beer on premises but the noise and rowdy behavior problems have not materialized. Further the stadium has been very proactive with security and keeping the atmosphere very family oriented. No opposition exists at this time. 3) Has the stadium had any negative impacts on the surrounding community? Mr. Preseren was honest in saying that parking and trafFc have been problems and they continue to work on solutions. They have just completed an expansion to the parking area and are working on better traffic control before and after games. They are working with the City to improve traffic flow around the stadium. There has not been any major community concern for these problems, however. 4) How was the stadium financed and what are the physical attributes? The stadium was flnanced through the City, Mr. Preseren is new to the stadium and was not sure of the exact financing mechanisms. He is supposed to get back to me on this. The stadium is 4,000 seats and can be expanded. The stadium is on a 10 acre site and is part of a regional facility which includes youth sports fields. The stadium is not used for other sporting events, but is occasionally used for concerts and other community events. Jerry Lyon, City Engineer, Salt Lake City, Utah 1) How close was the stadium site to residential development at time of construction and currently? The stadium sits between a major commercial district to the north and large residential area to the south and west. A stadium existed previous to the current stadium, which was torn down and the new, larger stadium was built. The City had to buy 8 homes and relocate the owners in order to accommodate the larger, new stadium. The expansion of the stadium was towards the residential azea rather than the commercial because it was viewed as less controversial than trying to relocate businesses. In addition, a major freeway runs along the commercial side of the stadium which hampered expansion to the north side. Mr. Lyon indicated that they were very fair with the homeowners which they bought out and did everything they could to ease the relocation process. He indicated that the process was friendly on both sides throughout. 2) Did the stadium have any opposition from area residents during any phase of construction? Residents were accustomed to having a stadium in the area and did not oppose the expansion. There was some early disagreement on the site of the new stadium. There was strong support for locating the stadium downtown, next to the Utah Jazz arena. However, an appropriate site in downtown could not be located and the existing site tumed out to be the most economical. There was strong local support for the team, the Salt Lake City Buzz, and the City worked closely with residents to address any concerns before they became opposition issues. 3) Has the stadium had any negative impacts on the surrounding community? � Primary access to the stadium is through the commercial district to the north. The freeway runs along the commercial side and all parking is located on the commercial side. The City worked very hard to keep all attributes of the stadium which might negatively impact residential, on the commercial side of the stadium site. In addition, the stadium developer is involved in the Utah Jazz and is a prominent local business person. According to Mr. Lyons, his involvement had a lot to do with the new stadium's community acceptance. 4) How was the stadium financed and what are the physical attributes? The original stadium was a 9,000 seat stadium but with no amenities and only a low block wall around the outfield. The new stadium seats 12,000 and can be expanded. It has full amenities, skyboxes, etc. and has berm construction which accommodated additional seating. The stadium was financed primarily through a City, County and State partnership. The stadium is owned and maintained by #he City and is used only for baseball. CALIFORNIA TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX Los Angeles 14% Anaheim 13% West Hollywood 12.50 Bakersfield i2� Berkeley 12% Fresno 12% Long Beach 12% Monterey/Sea 12% Napa 12% Sacramento 12% San Francisco 12% Santa Monica 120 Pasadena 11.49% Oakland 11% Redondo Beach 11% Vallejo 11% Palm Springs 10.8% Carmel 10.50 San Diego 10.5% Carlsbad 10% Contra Costa l00 Hunting. Beach 100 Laguna Beach 10% CALIFORNIA AVERAGE 10% NEVADA AVERAGE 8.280 ALASKA AVERAGE 7% OREGON AVERAGE 6.9% Mammoth Lakes 10% Newport Beach 10% Ontario 100 Oxnard 10% Redding l00 Salinas 10% San Bernadino 10� San Diego/N.C. 100 San Jose 10% San Luis Obispol0% Santa Barbara 10% Santa Cruz 10% Ventura 10% Visalia 10% Santa Clara 9.5% Sonoma County 9.50 San Mateo cty 9.23% Eureka 9% Modesto 9% Santa Rosa 9% Pleasonton 8% Stockton 8a Tuolumne 8% HAWAII AVERAGE 6% NEW MEXICO AV. 4.7% ARIZONA 4.7� *Source: Western Assn. of Convention and Visitor Bureau 1995 Bureau Survey. BAKERSFIELD MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS (individual survey based on 1,257 hotel rooms) Year Number Occupancy of rooms 1993 1257 1994 1257 66.94% 64.89% Aver Daily Rate $57.55 $55.36 Rooms Rooms Available Occupied 458,805 3U7,121 4 5 8, 8 0 5 2g7,729 *Bakersfield room inventory increased with Holiday Inn Select, Holiday Inn Express and Regency Inn. . „.,,,,,,,,,,,,.,. I�Il��llllr�� 1 � �1 J. JI =_ �.,_.. �_ 1 _ ��'�� -= �° � w = � �t' •; �� = e =-�v �iuw, 4 8 _r .�� =�;V.�,�:��}`"� � �• • .� . MEMORANDUM October 4, 1995 Gregory !. Klimko, Finance Director - Donald M. Anderson, Property Management Ball Park Estimate for powntown Multi-Use Facility -,.....�..R...,^�,,.�,�. .� -__._ .v__. 1 � � Q� � ��--�__ , :�� C � i40!"il�iY'i.t.3��...�, Y�.✓ v .'�10.�i�s �,. :�r:-�wac._•._""_"-. nra�cuo�ae.u. At today's Urban Development Committee meeting I was asked for an estimate to acquire four city blocks bounded by "N' St. on the west; California Ave. on the south; "P” St. on the east; and 1.3th St. on the north. I estimated it would cost approzimately $� 000, 000 to purchase these properties and would depend on the willingness of the owners to sel� However, I was not asked for and did not provide a cost estimate for loss of goaiwill and relocation assistance, which we may have to pay. Unlike property values, these costs vary considerably depending on the circumstances of the residents and%r businesses, e.g. handicap/poor residents,- special use properties. Any future discussions regarding the costs of a"downtown facility" need to include some provision for these costs. D�is baApark.mem cc: Alan Tandy, City Manager ;� _ .� � . � � . i.- w� �; : � � ..., � �pt,ERS'(f�� I �� s� �� A� �.,.�� .�'11 �'ouC� �. � i, -J �y `�i .. , • .� MEMORANDUM Honorable Mayor Price and Counci __ � Steve Brummer, Chief of Police i',t� j' � t`;� f �./ September 14, 1995 rs Agreement of Services for SART/SANE Examinations The attached agreements for Sexual Assault Examinations were recently signed and returned to our department from both Kern Medical Center and Memorial Hospital. These agreements were recommended by Council at the May 17, 1995 meeting (under reports), to ensure agreed services are provided; to amend the list of criteria as stated by Debra Johnston; and request Kern Medical Center agree, in writing, to the outlined requirements to provide the same level of service as Bakersfield Memorial Hospital. Memorial Hospital has included a short addendum with the original agreement. SEB/vrf Attachments Copy to: Alan Tandy Gail Waiters John Stinson � Councilmember Carson Councilmember DeMond Councilmember McDermott - Councilmember Rowles Councilmember Salvaggio Councilmember Smith Councilmember Sullivan � �, i.- �,� �.`; v....y '� �,6ERSFI£(D n� � � '� � �F� :,�#? � ,t .,,, P�Ly��C� i, �:� . f-�� TO • FROM _ SUBJECT �J MEMORANDUM � ;�� AUG l 4 1995 ��£'i 3'e:�i�J i i1i1�v W c,�n.�i'fifi!Si.Q May 31, 1995 DEBBIE TOUCHSTONE/MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, S.A.R.T. PROGRAM SERGEANT W. RECTOR, JUVENILE/SEX CRIMES, BPD SEXUAL ASSAULT EXAM AGREED LEVEL OF TREATMENfi The City of Bakersfield City Council has issued a directive for the providers of sexual assault exams . The objective of this directive is to ensure / maintain a standard level of service at each hospital the Bakersfield Police Department utilizes to conduct sexual assault exams. Ths City Council has requested that __each providing. hospital sign_the below-listed Agreement of Services_for._se�rual _ assault examinations. .�� :. .... Sergeant . �tector, Juve ileJSex Crimes WR : ddj **************************************************�*********************s***** 1, To ensure a S. A. N. E. nurse will be at the hospital within the maximum period of 45 mi.nutes after being notified by the Bakersfield Police Department of a pending examination. 2. • 3. � . To ensure a S. A. N. E. nurse will be pre�ent for all acute sexual assault exams requested b� the Bakersfield Police Department. To utilize the colposcope and take p�otographs on each exam to document trauma to the victim. 4. To ensure S. A. N. E. nurses involved in the se�zal assault exam are allowed ±ime for co��rt preparation prior to their testifying in court. The respective- hospital will compensate nurses for the overtime related to t�is court preparation or court appearance . Memorial Hospital S. A. R. T. Unit agrees ±o provide this level of service to the City of Bakersfield Police Department. Signed, � �✓�\�i/W� � +�./ � 1 \ \_ 0 i �� Sexual Assault Exam Agreed Level of Treatment Amendments � August 7, 1995 2. "All acute sexual assault exams" - SANEs are certified to examine victims a�e 14 and • above. They are not required to examine younger patients. It is the on-call SANEs decision whether she chooses to assist the ER physician or ca11 in the SART Coordinator/Child Abuse Examiner for exams of sexual assault victims less than 14 years of age. 3. The SANEs should utilize the colposcope for all exams. If trauma is �resent, , colposcopic photographs are taken to document trauma to the victim. • • . • , • � I � � � Bc�kersfield Memorial Hospitai a2o sam sr�eef ' i Mailing Address: i P.O. Box 1888 / Bakerstield, CA 93303� 1888 , � �� - . � ,I ; , 1 � _ j , i i� � . � ,�, . ; " � , �� , . - -- ti P Z 31 0 4 3 5 i N �� ;�. ,- _ .. "_ ---- ... �..� - __ ._ �� . � 6 ,� :;�., . _ �� Auc :w , ._. � �.,,�' . � y eR l `— .. RETURN RECEIPT � =.°�'-`��`' � . � �. . �: , : , ..._ =,.,� . ._� ;� � �,, . ... _. . � �- Sgt. Bill Rector . . �� ;,jf� Bakersfield Police Department ``% 1601 Truxtun Avenue '- � • e� Bakersfield, CA 93301 �- �� i � � i ��{�l��i��tiil��il�� i , � ,i t � . f . . . e � � . � PD 64•2759 �nr- ' MEMORANDUM ��d�� SEP � � ��y� 6�k�rs�ie(c1 Palice I3eparts�enf May 31, 1995 � TO CAROLINE EDWARDS/KER.N MIDICAL CENTER S.A.R.T. PROGRAM FROM SERGF..ANT w. R�CfiOR, JUVEIJILElSEX CHIMES, BPD SUBJECT SEXUAI� ASSAULT EXAM AGREID L�VF�L OF TBEATMENT _. The City of Bakersfield City Council has issued a directive for the providers. of � � sexual assault eicams. The objective of this directive is to ensurelmA;n �;r a� . standard level of service at ea+ch hosgital the HAkp*�f;p1d Police Department °� �`� �� ° utilizes to conduct sexual assault exams. The City Council has requested that �--- each providing hospital siga the below-listed Agreement of Services for sesual �� assault examinations . - ` . T . . ._- _ _- �� r � ,<�i _ . . ,i�!� : �� . . . . : . _ - _ : '' � : . Sergeant W. Rector, Juv �nilelSex erimes -'r�"�° -. :;.� ..� . � .,.. �� . ��-��'� . � . -.. - „ 5 ... � . . .� . .. ,' �:. � � ti� WR:ddj � - .: ,. ' '� '` �a� � . . . �,-•. , �. s a,� ��; :-... - . . . r. . � .. . . : _, , . . : ., ; 1 �_:�. . *******s*�***********ss************************s****s�s********:ws�ss***ss*�*:*�*ss '. � . '� . . •;.'.'r� r.,_��1py+. u� y �' •�'' , -. ,�,;,, .#;,y�"�"sa..'9i�^y�T c "�',a�. J �- .7: ': '' ,_ �". .. .�.. �. . . . _ . , ? ...,'�.: v; - - , .., ° .; .'. . . ., " J.. . . . �:' 41�.�'w Y�, f . � �'.;'. 1. To ensure a S. A. N. E. nurse will be at the hospital within the maximum �,�� :. , �period of 45 minutes after being notified by the Bakersfield Polvice `� r'��-�� Department of a pend.i.ng exa�nation. . Y "` �' .:- -� � �.�" � �,��.'5�� "�a �: - � � - _ � .. .- . . 'k�.�; .. -r � � �= . . �S. '•,—�� a,,in ;T�',r VL ,��.. - . . ..:' . . . " . . . . . . � �'. , , � � . � ; . " ' .n. . . � � .i- . � < : -. � # �F c . � . .. .. �. , . : �. �. y . � , ,. � 2. �o ensure a S.A.N.E. nurse will be present for all acute sexual assault �� exams requested by the Bakersfield Police Department. - '`: ;,�`�`�'� `'-� ``" � . . - �- i3. _;�;b . , ' . � � . • ' - . � .. . _�'" - 3. To' utilize the colposeQpe and take photographs on each exam to document trauma to the victim , as indicated. `__ 4. To ensure S. A. N. E. nurses involved in the sexual assault exam are allowed time for court preparation prior to their testifping in court. The ��`�`�"G�h� _�.� .��.' �, f�, respechve hospital will compensate�ses for the overtime re}ated to this . " court preparation or court appearance �, ° . ., � � � � �-,� ,� t K ; a,. , ' . t 4 . _� r . - w•- :�.:.. .. • . , X ��c; > �.+.- `a� ��w��.a.� . � . . t <. .� • , � . :- �+ .: _• t'� t �w � �s �. r � ��'� ,� �, 5 `� �Kern Medical� Center S. A. H. T. Unit agrees to�provide this le�el of �sez•vice to the � , ,� � City of Bakersfield Police Department �� z ��.�&,, � '.� ° " ,: �`= �`� �� } ��' ,- '�� { - .t .� �� B ..y � Sr..� M a�.� ry° � ._ �y i �` x . � �e� �,. �:� C,,� �k �;*V'rw.,,�.�_�*�-i6��3"'"�. 'r" ....Y `� '�,� '"�+} r .� . . �r . � ,��: � Y�:. �.t -� ��v : '�`Y� . ;7� $ �s �'- t �� `"�- � a'°��'"t.. ^. `"�' "ba z�' F �'�. . -t�� .,+. �.: �� y l � �ft . Sl�� - � rt t: .�t z„x �,VI. . % } a .y4 t r'�` �ii 3�'"�"ti�r'A '-1 �,�,� �', F f�. � � i '-v�`��'j��~ � �� Ee` ~ � � Ti.ai; .Q� °'�Zk,,�y��-4� �a y�� `� ��'' �. � µ .r.iS.K t,u.�.�v' R �-� W � �y � �.. � f .e� 4. � �r' ,y, rr , � �i� 5+ ,� F e�.�. _,1`�,' 5�,,. '+F �•,,4� y"'. - e j'' Wt. v`�. y _', P� z- � :^� t -t � Y� � a ' T � � �r," � '� � ��a� � �'. � �f�` � sr��.. �, ^t'� �,+!3 - 'aaN s � ....: _ �'' ` k-� . ' . y �. ,« .., i�, c, •v.,, ,,,�.-&i� �� ..�� s.� � . ''+� f� , ,. Z � !X�: .. ,Yr. ,. . f, f �" + ` .: Fr., a� . ' ,.x�,�a ��L�d�4x.-; ;:'tY�'�,P i��"s .. L �'�: �. t '�3� S��'" ,�3.� 5 i�� f,5a - .r �._� _ , ,. . r .G �rs+.�� -$�'' .�,,._:"��.....,x a..:-.�.a__ �.. zt' s � "5,��. , r � � ,� � �: Gerald �. �. � �: -t S�.f � �''h ��,5� . X� r4. x�,� , .: '�s ,��+- � a�tv L�� "L `fw r, riab,,�'r.,;.-T9 ,x. -rr ; �4it ,�� ,< , � � x� ,y� �j`r��, x.s � �. �er < _ . s »..?� �i`S�'`'Ri.� : �: C. E. O., Kern L�tedical Center :: �� .., �i . :.i = ` ,�.^ �� +w�:,. � �� z" d . �� '� � � 'Fl�t r1'. :. �e �. �•.. 71�i' - rs..J -'� �"t.�.a mtY. -'c h s�3 '°'F�.,, . . . _�F�.�''»+M` . ya'f ,y'��2i ..a..-� ..,�- . �,��"a e�� th5g" v . ' 'L`[` Y.F,t, .�^,� , a� . ,� n -�,. �_' +a' rg� Yic � .+ ,i;. TM' v' 4 �+� .. ��d.` � 'f .�,�, �; �� C .��a.�.b.�w�..t� F+�''s.�.,�.��f"4�i'..��. . . 3��..�.., '�3 ..��w�,`;�..� ' . . '.�1'?��ri+4.w.."��' �� 'r . . .. ��. ��:�'-�3w`�+'_'� � B A K E R S F I E L D September 29, 1995 Polly Warren, Executive Director Bakersfield Senior Center, Inc. 530 Fourth Street Bakersfield, California 93304 SUBJECT.• Notification of Transfer of Title Dear Ms. Warren: � �� 'I� + -�-_'.---.-.___''�o`J.��J,`n .��8`GT( ��=��,��rmi.,, � U��:��: : ._.� �--�—�:==_r------ --�- Congratulations! I recorded the transfer documents today so your organization now officially owns the Bakersfield Senior Center and storage facility. Attached for your files is a fcclly executed copy of the transfer agreement between the City and the Bakersfield Senior Center. Also, attached are the City's remaining keys to the storage facility. Please note that, per the agreement, your organization is to "retain a landscape contractor to maintain The Property within ninety (90) days of the execution of this Agreement." Since Lyndell Adams executed the agreement on September 28, 1995 the ninety days would be December 27, 1995. Thank you for your courtesti and professionalism in working through the difficult transition period. Sir�erely, IF ��.. � onald M. Anderson Propertv Management DMA(s senior2.11r Attachments cc: Alan Tarcdy, City Manager Leland J. Andersen, Community Services Manager Gregoiy J. Klimko, Finance Director John F. Wager, Jr., Economic Development Director Janice Scanlan, Assistant City Attorney Dolores Buddell-Teuhner, Assistant to the City Manager , .� City of Bakersfield • Property Management Division • 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield • California • 93301 (805) 326-3061 • Fax (805) 324-7483 �� `y � ' B A K E R S F I E L D PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDU�GI_ TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager FROM: Raul Rojas, Public Works DATE: September 28, 1995 SUBJECT: Council Referral Record #14147 -�>!'_. i, �� - o�T 2 �E'i � ---- -- - � +J U U/ U u � ��.L \ � , i L ✓C � l �1 L I � ' � . , . _. ._ .. . " . ��._ . Attached for your information is the response to Council referral regarding bidding process for concrete repairs. ### REF14147 Attachment „,�,�; � �°� �°---,_� �r �y =_ `\7`, . - �, _ ;,, �.= :� _.,�,' �1Nmu,,,, �: S __�W. f.Y `,��• =,,�; �:.t'�r�;��` MEMORANDUM �,d � �� Q n �!� 1r '��i`” �t°�r��'�� SEP 2 7 1995 �'�JBl�IC WORKS DEPARTi�EMT TO: RAUL ROJAS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR FROM: JOE A. LOZANO, PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS MANAGE DATE: SEPTEMBER 27, 1995 SUBJECT: REVIEW OF BIDDING PROCESS FOR CONCRETE REPAIRS - COUNCIL REFERRAL 14147 DATED NOVEMBER 11, 1994 INITIATED BY FORMER COUNCILMEMBER EDWARDS. Through prior years the Street Division has had different annual cement contractors. However, most of them do not bid on the contract a second time after they discover that our curb, gutter and sidewalk repairs consist of many small concrete jobs spread out all over the city. These jobs are difficult to schedule and require a lot of setup time. We feel that the current bidding process is fair and contractors are encouraged to bid. JAL/lh D1:M-092795 z � �� ,.'��• �` . `. . . � _ _ , � . � : v � _ _ z � v ��-C:IT:Y.��COU.NCI L__R.E.F_ERRA� _. ]�c '�e �, �,.� -;; --. . . �� . ,. ' �^►��.-, - =" ,, ,`"'v I MEETINGf OF: 11/16/94 NOV 2 � 1 1994 �; ` - REFERRED TO: PUBLIC_`WORKS R ROJAS PUBItC WORKS DEPARTMENT ITEM: RECORD# 14147 _ Accept bid to award Annual Contract to Jim Alfter Cement Contractor ($�49,351.80) for curbs, gutters and sidewalks. ACTI�N TAKEN BY COUNCI�: APPROVED AA. ****EDWARDS REG2UESTED STAFF ��'JIE'�I TFiE BIDDING AND NOTIFICATI�N PROCESSE��, THE SPECIFICATIONS AND WHAT CAN BE DONE i0 ENCOURAGE CONTRACTORS TO BID, ETC.)**** BACKUP MATERIAL ATTACHED: NO DATE FORWARDED BY CITY C�ERK: 11/i8/94 � � , _ : .�. � z . �f • �CT 3I995 B A K E R S F I E L D PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager FROM: Raul Rojas, Public Works Director DATE: October Z, 1995 SUBJECT: Council Referral to POLICE DEPARTMENT At a recent Council Meeting Councilmember Patricia J. DeMond referred a speeding problem on Monterey Street to the Police Department. Attached to this transmittal is additional information regarding a traffic analysis made by our Traffic Engineering section concerning the speeding problem on Monterey Street. ### MONTEREY.REF Attachment , , .. � � T B A K E R S F I E L D PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Traffic Engineering Memorandum DATE: September 27, 1995 TO: RAUL M. ROJAS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR FROM: STEPHEN L. WALKER, TRAFFIC ENGINEER SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL TO POLICE DEPARTMENT - 9-13-95 MEETING - SPEEDS ON MONTEREY STREET - NEWSPAPER LETTER TO EDITOR At the September 13, 1995 City Council Meeting, Councilmember DeMond referred a speeding problem on Monterey Street, which was the subject of a letter to the editor in the newspaper, to the Police Department for enforcement. For your information, and to aid the Police Department enforcement, a traffic analysis of the intersections mentioned in the newspaper letter was made by Traffic Engineering. The speed limit on Monterey is 40 miles per hour. Traffic studies show the average speed on the street to be 39.5 mph and the 85th percentile speed to be 44.7 miles per hour. The pace, a 10 mile per hour range with the highest percentage of the traffic, is 33 to 43 miles per hour. This information confirms that 40 miles per hour is an appropriate speed limit for police enforcement by use of radar per the California Vehicle Code. The intersection of Alta Vista at Monterey was analyzed for both 4-way stops and traffic signal warrants. Neither type of traffic control is warranted. Traffic volume passing through the intersection is low at 7,463 per day. Only three accidents related to traffic control were recorded at this intersection. The intersection of Kern at Monterey was also analyzed for both 4-way stops and traffic signal warrants. Neither type of traffic control is warranted. Traffic volume passing through the intersection is low at only 5,805 per day. No accidents were reported for this intersection. In summary, normal traffic speeds on this street are reasonable and the speed limit appropriate for traffic enforcement of drivers exceeding the speed limit. cc: Lt. Darbee, Police Department Traffic Section Bruce Deeter, CE III, Traffic Engineering Brad Underwood, CE III, Traffic Engineering PW Memo Files Traffic Engineering File - Alta Vista @ Monterey and Kern @ Monterey slw:\DATA\�\1995\Monte rey.Spd 4� � � � � �; ,� -=-1 L � d��-- � � �\ �f � d� i�.� . _ � i � �g r �� ' �' n ��d w: � � f :� � '�',,� i : . -`t , .� , �. , ',i 1� ��t� . - i ' ._ ` : ,_ � : "�'.'.. �� ,A/!{�M.;�.'� .:�i.��:C " ..� ..r. ;:° ` �ye �Y- .�r°'�..�%'n` '� Stop Monterey Street. ra,cers � � _ - _ �,:.�f� sr- r� � Y� �; �,� � ��,,, �;� � _m: � I�gs. Sa�ewh�+e alaog;tbe:waY,-�'lOm loc�l oc raoe track was lelt out: �I r�to the Ma►temeq Sh�et.#:�. .�.,�, �rag St�ip, located b� Uniau�Avenue and Baker °•, . SMeek No admis�on fees::,�! " - It has it aIl: fa4t cars, cr�shes;:i�. �, � t0 �— 8i1f1 I10 3C0�1]l�� np4$� 3jgR4, Il� . �1$.8n �_., $12 �VB,y t0 $�CI'.�. E1ib[��C �Ail�4 t0 �e, �Q' WAj� 8I'Ol� � 0�' TilCP.IS::�,. - . �,,.S,„O, f82' �1L4 yeBP, 8t NI�y $� 8I� �t3 VL4fA ++++.c, W@ �V8 � fOIII' Wl�' S3, �]l� Of Wh1C.�1 C8114� ��III'=C4� 8� III OIIQ� 8 �1� bOj► Wd3 �� 8 Cffi': , I noticed in a rece�rt paper that Rosedale g� a�w, , �P � (How manY accide�ts�at that.inters�tiaai so far this year?) I hope whoanever au�ha�es � �. �p ��"< :. far �is caty reads �is let�r, and would c�ot�sider �e M�� A s�PV' si� alaaig Monterey — one�at� :: Kern This wi71 slow otn' racez's d� at Mat�+ey, and "'�a s�eet a whole lot safer for a1L I�' and make this::_ ,.. __.. before saaneone gets �ed. � � � .° � . , ��_. :. i+�� -- ,. ..� -- � -�-GI� j F � CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL ME�T?NG OF: 09/27/95 �EF�RRED TO: PLANNING DE°T J HARDISTY ITEM: RECORD# ?538C Fire Access to Quailwood. (McDermott) ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL: MCDERMOTT REFERRED TO STAFF QUAILWOOD FIRE ACCESS AND REGtUEST A WRITTEN REPORT. BACKUP MATERIAL ATTACHED: NO DATE FORWARDED BY CITY.CLERK: 09/29/95 NOTE: STATUS CHANGES ARE TO BE ENTERED FOR EACH REFERRAL AT LEAST ONCE A MONTH EVEN IF NO ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN! , , .� OCT- 3-95 TUE 9�55 TO: PROM: SUBJECT: CITY PLANNING FAX N0, 805 3270646 MEMORANDUM September 21, 1995 ,AJ..,A�1 TA�1DX, CxTX !v[ANAGER JACK H.ARDISTY, DEVELO�'MENT S�FtVICES DIRECTOR COUNCIL REFERRAL TO �LANN��iG pEPARTMENT' REGA�tA�NG FXRE ACCESS TO TRACT 3883 P. 02 '�he attached is my department's response to the Council rcferral reg�rding tire access for 't"ract 38�3 in Quailwood, The dtlay was causcd by thc �nccessity to mect with the City Attc�r�n�y's c�Ffcc and revicw the issuc. Chief Kelly and I agree t� the attachcd resp�msc, however, you may Still receive comment from thc Attorney's oftice rc�arding this issue, JM:pjt Attachmcnt r�n\xnat :� : OCT- 3-95 TUE 9�55 CITY PLANNING FAX N0, 805 3270646 P,03 MEMORANDUM Scptember 19, 1995 �'O: JACK HARDISTX, D�VELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR �'�tpM: JIM MOVIUS, PRINCIPAL PLANNER SUBJECT: FIRE ACCESS FOR TRACT 3883 IN QUAILWOOD � COUNC�L REFERRAL RECORb NO. 15282 I have reviewed vur files regarding Tract 3883 and the�e is no requirement that the subjec[ casement bc available for fire access, The recc�rded wording of t�e access eascmcnt is as follows: "We also hcXeby dedicate an easemcnt for an equcstrian riding and hiking trail lying dircctly adjaccnt to the back lincs a�ci/qr sidc lines of thc: lots and is designated as 20' cyucscrian eascment on said map. Such strip of la�d to be kept open and trce from building and structu�es of any kind �.xcept those rcquired to restrict ingress and eg�css of vehicles from or co said strip �f land withouc restricti�g equestrian or foot trafEc access." On Septcrtlber 5, 1995, I met with Janice Scanlan, Deputy City Attorncy II, and Mike Kel[y, Fire Ck�icf, co rcview our tindings and discuss fire access. Chic� Kcliy indicated that the access is not necessary far hrc response in the subject area. Spceificalty, tire hc�ses wou�d be cxtended �rom fire hydrants on the street tv protcet thc main dweiling on the propercy and provide tirc protcction bctwccn thc clwclling and back yard vcgc:tation. Acccss to thc rcar c�f thc prc�perty is ava�lablc a�or�g the �anal bank if nced��1, 71�e con�c�lusion oF the mccting was that adequate tire access cxists and thcre is nc� basis fc�r the city ti� pursue tire access through this cascment. JM:pjt m\mjh9.18 ,. � z?r'� w , � B A K E R S F I E L D PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: Alan Tandy, City Manager Raul Rojas, Public Works rector October 4, 1995 SUBJECT: STREET RE5URFACING AT INTERSECTION OF EL CABALLO ROAD AND MESA GRANDE City Council Referral Record #15304 (Salvaggio) OCT 51� , . .- = p., - ��, -,', �; :. _ , � �' _ .- El Caballo Road and Mesa Grande intersection is in good condition. However, there were potholes on El Caballo Road, east of Mesa Grande. Potholes were patched by the Street Maintenance crew on September 25, 1995. El Caballo Road will be added to the Street Division's 1996 resurfacing list. REF15304 JAI..mro ,:, . �. _ , . . , �'i'� ;� . -�:. - - �. < , i- s-�°."'� _ . • - - - _ _ _. '` CITY COUNCIL hEFERRAL �� , • - � � � MEETING OF: 09/13/95 REFERRED TO: PUBI.IC WORKS R ROJAS ' _ _ • :.� ��i �� SEP 3 ,� �ggr� PUBIIC WORKS DEPARTME(�T iTEM: RECORD# 15304 ` � Street resurfacing at intersection of E' Caballo Road and Mesa Grande. (Salvaggio) ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL: , SA�VAGGIO RE�UESTED STREET RE�URFACING AT THE I"JTERSECTION OF EL CABALLO ROAD AND MESA GRANDE. BACKUP MATERIAL ATTACHED: NO DATE FORWARDED BY CITY CLERK: 09/15/95 NOTE: STATUS CHANGES ARE TO BE ENTERED FOR EACH REFERRAL AT LEAST CNCE A MONTH EVEN IF NO ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN! d :� . i `� � B A K E R S F I E L D Economic and Community Develo ment Department M E M O R A 1V� D U M September 27, 1995 TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager FROM: Jake Wager, Economic Development Direct SUBJECT: Status of Non-Profit Prajects Using CDBG and HOME funds, Community Development is assisting various non-profit organizarions to improve their faciliries and develop affordable housing opportuniries. In addition, for the first rime, Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG) funds are being awarded to homeless providers for facility improvements, operation, maintenance and essential services. The following is a summary report on the current status of each project. CDBG Society for Crippled Children and Adults The agreement was awarded for $40,000 in CDBG funds to assist with the cost of modifying the recendy acquired facility to meet the needs of the agency. Ladco Construcrion was awarded the bid; the project is approximately 50% complete. Work is expected to take another 45 days to complete. ��.►+�.,:�nitv Services Organization An agreement is being prepazed for the $150,000 (CDBG) facility improvement grant. Based on the proposed timeline, the agreement should go to City Council November 29. Construcrion of the improvements is expected to be complete by the end of March, 1996. Elderli e The $73,000 CDBG grant for design and rehabilitarion of a medical day care center for seniors has been approved by Council. The project is currently in the design phase. Expected completion is in the Spring of 1996. Alliance A�,ainst Familv Violence A$30,000 CDBG grant is being award to the Alliance to assist in the purchase of a larger �' �� 2 7 i995 S , • � outreach and counseling facility. The agreement will go before Council by November 29 with acquisition anricipated in January, 1996. HOME KCEOC HOME funds totalling $201,600 have been awazded to KCEOC for acquisition and rehabilitation of single-family dwellings for low-income first-time homebuyers. This Community Housing Development Organization (CHI�O) project began April 20, 1994 with Council approval of the project agreement. We anticipate that the funding will accommodate the purchase and rehab of up to 8 homes for re-sale. The project is on-going as revenue from sales of the homes will go into a revolving fund for purchase of additional units. Mercy Charities Housing, California Agreement has been approved by City Council for a$550,00(} HOME forgivable loan to assist with acquisition of land, design and other pre-development costs for a 52-unit multi-family complex on Madison Street in southeast Bakersfield. The land has been acquired and design is underway, but completion of the project is contingent upon approval of the agency's Low Income Housing Tax Credit Allocation application, expected in December of this year. ESG Bakersfield Homeless Center The Agreement has been forwarded to the agency and received boazd approval. The $60,000 ESG grant agreement will re-establish a part-time medical and dental clinic for the homeless. Funds will be used to purchase equipment, supplies and other basic tools as well as medical screening and the coordination of volunteer medical staff. The agreement is expected to go before City Council October 11. �liance Against Familv Violence A draft Agreement has been forwarded to the agency for board approval. The $14,950 ESG grant for shelter rehabilitation and the acquisition of a cargo van is expected to go before City Council October 11. Kern Count,�Mental Health Association A draft Agreement has been forwazded to the agency for board approval. The $11,500 ESG grant for facility rehabilitarion and expansion of their representarive payee pmgram is expected to go before City Council October 11. The accompanying chart summarizes the status and expected timeline of each of the non-profit projects. �:. � '� STATUS OF NON-PROFTT PROJECTS AGENCY GRANT TO CITY EXPECTED AMOUNT COUNCIL COMPLETION . SOURCE Alliance Against Family $30,000 November 29, January 1996 Violence CDBG 1995 Alliance Against Family $14,950 October 11, 1995 November 1996 Violence ESG Bakersfield Homeless $60,Q00 October 11, 1995 November 1996 Center ESG Community Services $150,000 November 29, March 1996 Organization CDBG 1995 Elderlife $73,000 already approved Spring 1996 CDBG KCEOC $201,600 already approved ongoing HOME Kern County Mental $11,500 October 11, 1995 November 1996 Health Association ESG Mercy Chariries Housing $550,(?QO already approved Fall 1996 HOME Society for Crippled $40,000 already approved November 1995 Children and Adults CDBG nonprof.mem/gen.6/jf � B A K E R S F I E L D Economic and Community Development Department M E M O R A N D U M TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager FROM: Jake Wager, Economic Development Director SUBJECT: CHAS Annual Performance Report (APR) ��.m-. � . . . -. '� I,_ � �_ _._.. __-. i! j; � ;. I' � � i� � -��` n . , , ,.,, . .;'v�y October 3, 1995 Staff has completed the HUD requirement for an annual performance report on the 1994 Annual Plan of the Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS). Because of conflicting timelines with the implementation of the Consolidated Plan, the CHAS APR annual reporting requirements were extended. As a result, the CHAS APR actually covers a period of 21 months (from October 1, 1993 through June 30, 1995). According to the instructions issued by HUD regarding the submission of the APR, staff is required to pmvide the DRAFT report for public review for a 30 day period prior to submittal. The review period began October 5 and ends November 2, 1995. There is no requirement for official Council review or action. Attached is a copy of the public norice and the APR. At the conclusion of the public review period, the document must be forwarded to HUD, accompanied by a transmittal letter and cover sheet signed by the Chief Executive Off'icer or his/her designee. Those documents will be forwarded to you for signature on November 3. attachments APRan.mem/chas 1995/jf NOTICE.OF PUBLIC REVIEW � CITY OF BAKERSFIELD COMPREHENSIVE HOUSING AFFORDABILITY STRATEGY PERFORMANCE REPORT - FY94 The City of Bakersfield, Economic and Community Development Department (ECDD) has prepared a DRAFT Annual Perfarmance Report for FY 1994 in response to federal requirements under the National Housing Affordability Act of 1990. The CHAS is a comprehensive planning document that identifes the City's overall needs for affordable and supportive housing and outlines a strategy to address those needs. The One Year Plan for Fiscal Yeaz 94 identified resources anticipated to be available for the provision of affordable and supportive housing, and established an investment plan for the use of those resources. The City is required to provide an annual report on the progress it has made in cazrying out the housing strategy. Before submitting the report to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the City must make the report available to the public for review and comment for a period of 30 days. The draft Annual Performance Report is available for review at the following Bakersiield locations: ■ Economic and Community Development Department, 515 Truxtun Ave. ■ City Clerk's Office (City Hall), 1501 Truxtun Ave. ■ Beale Memorial Library, 701 Truxtun Ave. ■ Holloway-Gonzales Library, 506 E. Brundage Lane ■ Northeast Library, 3719 Columbus Ave. ■ Southwest Library, 8301 Ming Ave. ■ Wilson Library, 1901 Wilson Rd. ■ Baker Street Library, 1400 Baker Street ■ Ca1-State Bakersfield University Library, 9001 Stockdale Hwy. If you need additional information, please ca11 George Gonzales, Community Development Coordinator, or Vince A. Zaragoza, Principal Planner at 326-3765. The thirty-day comment period ends November 2, 1995. All written comments must be received at ECDD no later than November 3, 1993. Mail comments to ECDD, 515 Truxtun Ave., Bakersfield, CA 93301, Attention: George Gonzales, Community Development Coordinator. � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 1 K Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy CHAS DRAFT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT FISCAL YEAR 1994 October 5, 1995 City of Bakersfield Lead Agency Economic and Community Development Department 515 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, California 93301 (805)326-3765 Contact Person: George Gonzales Community Development Coordinator � CHAS Appendix B U.3. Dspertment ot Houalnp �nd Urban D�vslopment O(fice of Community Plamir�g and Devebpment Cover Sheet Comprehensnre Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) Instructions tor Local Jurisdidions narnv v� ��nwiu�ui. CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Name ol Contact Person: GEORGE GONZALES ATOR Address: 515 TRUXTUN AVENUE, BAKERSFIELD CA 93301 The Jurlsdlctlon N2me 0� ANhorized OHidal: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER Type of Submission: (mark one) � New Flve-Year CHAS: ��,�� n� yn.� FY: through FY: Telephone No: I � Annual Plan 806 326-3764 �0f �� 1994,, 1995 (mark one) Initial Submission Resubmission of Disapproved CHAS HUD Approval Name of Authorized O(fidal: s�gnanua � oa�e: HUD 40090 -A (1/93) � CITY: OF BAKERSFIELD CHAS ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT FISCAL YEAR 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION........................................................... 1 PART I - ANNUAL PERFORMANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 A. Resources Made Available Within the Jurisdiction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 B Investment of Available Resource� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1. a. Rehabilitation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 b. Housing Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 c. Rental Housing ............................................. S d. Non-Homeless Person With Special Needs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 e. Homeless ..................................................7 Geographic Distribution of Investment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 � Households and Persons Assict� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 1 2. 3. Table 1- Households and Homeless Persons Assisted With Housing................................................. CHASAnnual Performance Report Table 1 Households and Persons Assisted with Housing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Documentation of Assistance Provided . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Narrative Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 13 15 15 1 1 �• :._ �s. ��•�?,'i � 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Public Policies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Institutional Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Intergovernmental Cooperation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Public Housing Improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Public Housing Resident Initiatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Affumatively Furthering Fair Housing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 17 17 17 18 18 18 PART II - ASSESSMENT OF ANNUAL PERFORMANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 City of Bakersfield CHAS FY 94 i Annual Performance Report � TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Page APPENDIX................................................................ 20 APPENDIX A PUBLIC REVIEW OF PERFORMANCE REPORT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 APPENDIX B SUMMARY OF CITIZEN COMMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 APPENDIX C FOCUS GROUP MEMBERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 APPENDIX D CITY OF BAKERSFIELD CENSUS TRACT MAP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 APPENDIX E HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF KERN ANNUAL STATEMENT COMPREHENSIVE GRANT PROGRAM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 APPENDIX F HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF KERN FIVE-YEAR ACTION PLAN COMPREHENSIVE GRANT PROGRAM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 City of Bakersfield CHAS FY 94 i i Annual Performance Report � INTRODUCTION The Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy Annual Performance Report (APR) is a twa part document. The first part is designed to report on the progress made in canying out the priorities and strategies addressed in the annual plan. The second part provides the City of Bakersfield the opportunity to assess its annual performance in relationship to meeting its overall Sve-year CHAS priorities and objectives and to discuss what actions or changes it contemplates as a result of its annual performance. With the adoption of 24 CFR Part 91, Consolidated Submission for Community Planning and Development Programs, in January 1995, HUD has mandated that the CHAS be replaced by the Consolidated Plan. Because of this new requirement, the City has just adopted its new Consolidated Plan 2000. The resulting document incorporates the planning strategies of the CHAS with the application aspects of the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Home Investment Partnership Act (HOME), and the Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG) programs into one comprehensive planning and implementation strategy and annual action plan. As such, any changes contemplated in the following annual performance report have already been incorporated in the new Consolidated Plan and are not specifically discussed in this report. The period in review (Federal Fiscal Years 1994 and part of 1995) covers October 1, 1993 through June 30, 1995. The "annual" period covered in this report was extended in order to coincide with the implementation of the new Consolidated Plan. All affordable housing activities carried out within the city limits of Bakersfield during that period, known to the City, will be discussed. Activities undertaken by non-profits, private enterprises and other entities not having a jurisdictional relationship with the City are not necessarily covered in this report. The City has no mechanism for tracking all activities and no direct authority by which such information can be obtained. The Final CHAS APR reflects, to the best ability possible, affordable housing activities during the report period. PART I - ANNUAL PERFORMANCE Part I of the APR is divided into several sections focusing on the actual performance of the City of Bakersfield during the report period: A) Resources made available within the jwisdiction; B) Investment of Available Resources; C) Households and Persons Assisted; and D) Other Actions Undertaken. C � � u : � � : : � . i i i � � � i i Resources available to carry out affordable housing strategies vary from year to year. The City of Bakersfield receives Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds annually, a percentage of which is dedicated to affordable housing programs, as well as HOME Investment City of Bakersfield CHAS FY 94 1 Annual Performance Report Partnership Act funds, all of which are dedicated to affordable h�ousing progams. Administration of these prograrns rests with the City and, as suc:h, the City has a rea:�onable amount of control over the usage of those funds. The same cannot be said for other funding sources which could be applied to affordable housing issues. Federal, State a.nd private sector funds, when available, rnay go directly to hc�using and supportive service pFOViders. The agencies would then report straight to the funding; source. The City has attempted to keep apprised of available resources �hich have been useci to meet the objectives of the CHAS. The Housing Authority of the County of Kern (HACK) receives rental assistance fun�ds annually &om HUD. These funds are distributed throughout Kern County► to supplement rent payments for eligible tenants and are considered to be a reliable resource. 'The information HACK supplied to the City reflects their best estimate of funds used for tenant assistance in �he City of Bakersfield. Because the tenants have the right to use their certificates or vouchers i� renting a unit anywhere in Kern County, the funds used to assist persons within the city limits are only an estimate. The annual plan outlined activities, programs and initiatives that vvere to be implemented during the report period to assist very-low to low-income senior renters; provide additional and rehabilitated rental units for the low- to moderate-income renters as well as those liying in overcrowded conditions; provide affordable housing opportunities for those with supportive housing needs, such as the homeless, people with AIDS, the disabled and the elderly; and initiate financial incentives for the development and maintenance of affordable housing within the community. � i i i• i i ; � •�• � This section describes the activities undertaken during the reporting period for each priority established by the five-year strategy. Under each priority for whi�ch action was planned during the fiscal year, the elements required of this performance report v�rill be addressed: * resources and program funds used; � * the activities undertaken to address the priority; arid * whether or not there was leveraging of non-federal dollars or a federal matching ' requirement and the amounts involved. Priority a: Rehabilitation The City will continue to aggressively market its rental rehabilitation and owner- occupied rehabilitation loan programs. Using both CDBG and HOME Program funds, City of Bakersfield� CHAS FY 94 , 2 Annual Performance Report Deferred Loan and Below Market Interest Rate loans are made available to property owners who qualify for `the program. Because the majority of properties are in need of moderate repair, the emphasis for use of available funds for owner-occupied units will be applied towards rehabilitation projects estimated to cost under $25,000. As a general rule, rental rehabilitation funds can effect more units, with a estimated average cost of $7,500 per unit. Resources Made Available - The City of Bakersfield is the administering agency for the following funds: CDBG FY 93-94 HOME CDBG FY 94-95 HOME Total Available Resources Eapended CDBG funds HOME funds Total Expended $279,022 270,500 270,000 450�000 $1,269,522 $436,456 506_363 $942,819 Activities Undertaken: The City offers below market interest rate loans to qualified homeowners throughout the city. During the reporting period the City provided Rehab Loans using both funding sources to fund the Housing Rehabilitation Loan Progam for single-family owner-occupied housing and the Rental Rehab Loan Program for multi-family units. These funds were used to rehab 32 multi-family units and 19 single-family homes to meet the City's Housing Quality Standazds. Leveraging and Matching Funds: Funds Leveraged Match Priority b: Housing Development $157,00 $126,590 The City's inventory of undeveloped and agricultural land, predominately in the southwest and northeast subareas of the City, combined with an aggressive annexation policy, has provided the land resources to support dramatic residential growth. In addition to these larger tracts of undeveloped land, there are numerous vacant lots scattered throughout the Central and Southeast subareas of the city, providing opportunities for "in-fill" housing development. With the signing of the Federal Tax Bill City of Bakersfield CHAS FY 94 3 Annual Performance Report in August, 1993, the reinstatement of the Low Income Housing Tax Credit provides an incentive for the development of affordable housing, espE;cially multi-family units. The City is working with the Resolution Trust Corporati��n (RTC) and the C�re Foundation, a private non-profit corporation, to acquire �� 42 unit apartment �omplex at risk of losing its affordability status. The project, locatedf in the Central subarea of the City, is predominately occupied by seniors and is in need of some rehabilitation. The City and Care Foundation propose to acquire and rehabilitate the property dwing 1993- 94 using the RTC's Affordable Housing Disposition Program. The project would access ' the City's HOME funds to finance a portion of the rehabiiGtation. The City's �First Time Homebuyers Mortgage Assistance ]Program will continue to received funding through the CDBG progam. Additionallenders are considering joining the program, thereby further diversifying the opportunities for potential first time homebuyers to access this program. Although there are a significant array of programs and resources available to provide funding of affordable housing projects, it is highly unlikely that such a project could reach fruition during the abbreviated planning cycle of this CHAS. The City will encourage the development of a consortium of agencies, builders and lenders who might begin planning affordable housing projects. Several agen��ies have expressed an interest in such a partnership. , Resources Made Available: CDBG FY 93-94 HOME CDBG FY 94-95 HOME Total Available Resources Eapended: CDBG funds RTC HOME funds Tota1 Expended $ 97,968 210,100 75,000 344_900 $727,968 $228,560 250,000 _�_ $478,560 Activities Undertaken: The City of Bakersfield, through its First Time Homebuyers Mortgage Assistance Program (FTIIlI�IAP), provided down payment and cic�sing costs assistance in the form of forgivable loans to 84 qualified low-income buyers. Applicants were required to pay, at minimum, 50 percent of the down payment. The City contributed CDBG funds towards the down payment and closing costs, not to exceed $3,500 per application. City of Bakersfield CHAS FY 94 4 Annual Performance Report The City worked with the Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC) and the Care Foundation, a private non-profit corporation, to acquire a 42 unit apartment complex at risk of losing its affordability status. The project, located in the Central subarea of the City, is predominately occupied by seniors and is in need of some rehabilitation. The City and Care Foundation acquired the property using the RTC's Affordable Housing Disposition Program. Mercy Charities applied for HOME funds for the acquisition of an undeveloped tract of land in southeast Bakersfield. The land will be developed into 52 multi-family apartment units for low income families. The project agreement was signed during the reporting period, but acquisition and construction had not yet begun. Leveraging and Matching Funds: Leveraged Funds $5,323,346 Match -0- Priority c: Rental Housing Rental assistance can take the form of d'uect financial assistance to reduce or subsidize the housing costs of individuals and families or it can take the form of a housing project whose basic rent is affordable because of the financial structure of the housing development costs. Housing development incentives to provide affordable rents was discussed in Priority b. Direct rental assistance will be primarily provided by HACK. The City supports any and a11 efforts by HACK to increase the supply of rental assistance programs. Tenant assistance is an eligible activity under the HOME Program. The City will explore the development of a tenant subsidy pilot program using 1994-95 HOME funds. Resources Made Available/Ezpended: The Housing Authority of the County of Kern provides 1909 Section 8 Certificates and Vouchers per year to eligible renters throughout Kern County. Because the renters may use their certificates/vouchers to subsidize the cost of monthly rent anywhere in Kern County, it is impossible to determine the exact number of certificates/vouchers used within the City limits of Bakersfield. At the time the Consolidated Plan was completed in May, 1995, it was estimated that over 700 Section 8 certificates/vouchers were being used in the City. In addition, there are currently a total of 772 units assisted with project-based Section 8 contracts, 541 units of which are assisted under HUU Sections 221(d)(4), 202 and 236(j)(1). Activities Undertaken: The HACK Section 8 program along with project-based rental assistance projects represent the extent of the known activities undertaken as it relates to this priority. The City chose not to explore the development of a tenant subsidy pilot program using 199495 HOME funds. City of Bakersfield CHAS FY 94 5 Annual Performance Report Leveraging and Matching Funds: None Priority d: Non-Homeless Persons with Special Needs The need for housing and supportive services are as acul:e and varied as the population intended to benefit from such prograins. Living Connec�tions, Inc. has been f�warded $1.43 million to construct 21 units of assisted housing fc�r the chronically mentally ill. The non-profit is working closely with HUD to impleme:nt the project. Bakersfield ARC has applied for CDBG funds from the (�ity to acquire a sin�►,le family dwelling for three or four developmentally disabled individuals. The objective of the project is to train the occupants in independent living skiills with the eventual plan of selling the home to them. Acquisition is expected in 1994. Kern County Department of Mental Health Services has issued a request for proposals to build a crisis center for the mentally ill. Funding for the project is dependent upon an affirmative vote of the statewide sales tax initiative. If a;proposal is found to be acceptable, the project could get underway in 1994. Funding for the City's Home Access grant program will c�ontinue through the CDBG program. Both physically disabled homeowners and rent�ers may access the program to install ramps, gab bars, widen doorways and make other modifications to their residence to make the unit more accessible. � During the summer, 1993, a housing conference was held. in the city jointly sponsored by the City, County and Living Connections, Ina The first-�;ver event brought over 40 agencies (representing each of the H[JD identified subpopulations) together to explore issues related io development of special user housing. As; a result of that conference, interest has grown to develop a network of agencies, lendlers, and developers to address special user housing needs. The City will continue its inv�olvement, along with the County, providing technical assistance as the organizatiornal structure takes form. Resources Made Available: CDBG FY 93-94 HOME HUD Section 811 CDBG FY 94-95 HOME Total Available $ 113,789 160,000 1,430,000 50,000 _0_ $1,753,789 City of Bakersfield CHAS FY 94 6 Annual Performance Report Resources Ezpended: Section 811 CDBG funds HOME funds Total Expended $1,261,000 119,557 160_000 $1,540,557 Activities Undertaken: Living Connections, Inc., a private non-profit organization incorporated in 1989 for the purposes of providing and maintaining a continuum of living arrangements for those who are chronically mentally ill, in cooperation with Self-Help Enterprises (SHE) was awarded $1.43 million to acquire the land and construct a 21 unit housing facility with supportive services for the chronically mentally ill. Construction was completed in June, 1995. Occupancy is expected early in the first quarter of the 1995-96 fiscal year. In addition, Living Connections, with the help of City HOME funds, acquired and rehabilitated a 6-unit SRO Board and Care facility for single women who are chronically mentally ill. The project was completed and occupied in Spring, 1995. Bakersfield ARC application for CDBG funds from the City to acquire a single family dwelling for three or four developmentally disabled individuals was not camed forward. The City's Home Accessibility gants to eligible owners and renters who need assistance to make their residences more accessible provided approximately 73 disabled owners and renters with accessibility improvements to their residences during the report period. The network of housing providers held organizational meetings, but did not continue to meet. Leveraging and Matching Funds: Leveraged Funds Match Priority e: Homeless -0- $40,000 The following activities will address emergency shelter and transitional housing needs for homeless individuals and families: a.) Bethany Services, operator of the Bakersfield Homeless Center, recently received notice of a grant award for the purpose of adding shelter space to the women and children's dornutory portion of the facility. The expansion will provide for 14 additional beds for women and children. Construction on the project is expected to get underway in early 1994. City of Bakersfield CHAS FY 94 7 Annual Performance Report The Alliance Against Family Violence (AAFV� i:> awaiting notificatian of the status of its appIication for Supportive Housing l?rogram funds. AA�V propose to use the monies to build and operate a transitional housing facility for families fleeing domestic violence. If approved, the City will match HOME fimds for construction costs. The following activities will address assistance for homelless individuals and families (including those with special needs) make the transition t:o permanent housing and independent living: . a.) In 1993 HACK received funding for the Sectiion 8 Homeless Assistance Progam, designed to provide permanent housing; assistance payments to eligible homeless households cunently residing in shelter;� or transitional housing progams. The referring agencies provide case management services to ensure an improved success rate of households in making thie transition to permanent housing and independent living. The City will continue its support upon renewal of the program in 1994. b.) In June, 1992, the City of Bakersfield and HA,CK were jointly awarded a$4.2 million Shelter Plus Care (S+C) grant. These fun�is will be used to subsidize permanent housing costs for qualified disabled houneless individuals. Although housing placement had not begun at the time of thie publication of the CHAS, it is anticipated that up to 90 units of supportive housing will be available by early � 1994. The S+C Progam provides supportive per.manent housing in single room ' occupancy utits for persons who aze suffering fro:m alcohol abuse, substance abuse, mental illness, a combination of inental illness and substance abuse, and diseases of AIDS. The following activities will address assistance to prevent low-income individuals and families with children (especially those with incomes beloNV 30 percent of inedian) from becoming homeless: � a.) Family Unification Demonstration Program, fiKSt awarded funds in 1992, DHS and HACK are providing 75 Section 8 certifiicates to families for whom the lack of adequate housing is a primary factor in the delayed separation, or imminent separation of children from their families. This pilot progam enables targeted families at risk of becoming homeless the opportunity to remain together. b. ) The City will continue its participation in and support of the Homeless Cornmunity Resources Network in its efforts to improve services to this population (including a11 subpopulations). A main focus of the group during the coming year will be the coordination of services an�d exploration of programs aimed at preventing very low-income families fronx becoming homeless. City of Bakersfield CHAS FY 94 g Annual Performance Report � Resources Made Available: State FESG $92,000 Resources Ezpended: State �FESG $84,000 Activities Uadertaken: Bethany Services, operator of the Bakersfield Homeless Center, recently completed the addition of shelter space to the women and children's dornutory portion of the facility. The expansion will provide for 14 additional beds for women and children. Construction on the project was completed in May, 1995. The $4.2 million Shelter Plus Care (S+C) grant has not been implemented due to litigation by the owner of the site. The Alliance Against Family Violence (AAF� was denied its application for Supportive Housing Program funds. HACK continues to receive funding for the Section 8 Homeless Assistance Progam, designed to provide permanent housing assistance payments to eligible homeless households currently residing in shelters or transitional housing programs. DHS and HACK continue to provide 75 Section 8 Family Unification Program certificates to families for whom the lack of adequate housing. Leveraging and Matching Funds: Leveraged Funds -0- Match $84,000 in-kind donation 1. GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION OF INVESTMENT In order to create substantive neighborhood improvement and stimulate additional, private sector funded improvement efforts, the City has focused a portion of its CHAS priority funds and programs in targeted neighborhoods. Based on the widespread need for affordable housing, however, assistance was also available city-wide. Housing progams have traditionally been targeted to specific Census Tracts with a high concentration of low- to moderate-income residents: Census Tracts 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 19.02, 20, 22 and portions of 6, 7, 26 and 30 (see map, Appendix D, page22 ). According to census data, there is a very high concentration of minorities in many of the ta.rgeted low-income City of Bakersfield CHAS FY 94 9 Annual Performance Report neighborhoods. In order to stimulate the de-concentration of minority and low-income residents, the city, whenever feasible, distributed funds in non-impacted areas. During the reporting period 180 projects, representing 202 affor�dable housing units, were funded; 116 of those projects, representing 138 affordable housing units (or 68 perc�nt) were located in the targeted census tracts. The remaining projects were scattered throughout the city. The following chart ("Affordable Housing Projects, Geographic Distribution by Census Tract") , illustrates the allocation of investment during the reporting period. Investments include the First Time Homebuyers Mortgage A.ssistance Progam, Owner-Occupied Home Improvement Loan ` progams, Rental Rehabilitation Loan programs, and the Home Access Grant Program. Affordable Housirig Projects Geographic Distribution by Census� Tract Census No. of Projects lvo. of Tract �Units *6 6 ( *� 2 2 8 4 4 9.02 4 4 *12 4 4 *13 2 2 *14 5 5 *15 8 14 *16 2 2 17 1 1 18 1 1 18.01 3 3 19.01 1 1 *19.02 11 11 *20 25 25 *22 . 25 41 *26 12 12 2� 2 2 28.01 2 2 City of Bakersfield CHAS FY 94 10 Annual Performance Report � � __ 28.02 1 1 28.03 1 1 28.04 4 4 28.10 5 5 29 4 4 *30 10 10 31.O1 7 7 31.02 9 9 31.12 1 1 31.13 1 1 31.14 3 3 31.15 5 5 31.21 4 4 31.22 4 4 32.02 1 1 TOTALS 180 202 * Targeted Census Tracts : � • i i � : i� '• � i i • � This section provides statistical information on the numbers of households and persons assisted during the reporting period. In addition, a report of the accomplishments by category versus the goals established at the beginning of the reporting period will be provided. 1. Table 1- Households and Homeless Persons Assisted With Housing CHAS APR Table 1 following this section attempts to itemize the numbers of persons assisted during the reporting period by category. According to the instructions, an assisted household (or person) is one which, during the reporting period, received benefits through the investment of Federal funds, whether alone or in conjunction with the investment of other public or private funds. City of Bakersfield CHAS FY 94 11 Annual Performance Report A renter is benefited if the household or .person takes occupanc;y of affordable housing that is newly acquired, rehabilitated, constructed, and/or receives rem�tl assistance. An existing homeovmer is benefited during the year if the home's rehabilitat:ion is completed. A first-time homebuyer is benefited if a home is purchased during the year. A homeless person is benefited if that person, or household, becomes the occupant of transition.al or permanent housing. A non- homeless person with special needs is considered benefited, hov��ever, only if the provision of supportive services is linked to the acquisition, rehabilitation or new construction of a housing unit and/or the provision of rental assistance during the year. Households or persons who benefited from more that one program aze counted only once. Only those householcis or persons whose units meet the Federal minimum Section 8 Housing Qualiity Standards are counted toward the goals. For ease of discussion and comparison, a copy of CHAS Table 3�B, "Goals for Households & Persons to be A.ssisted with Housing," for fiscal year 1994 follo��vs APR Table 1. The "Narrative Discussion" immediately following these tables will discuss the d.ifferences between the two tables. City of Bakersfield CHAS FY 94 12 Annual Performance Report CHAS Annual Performance Report Table 1 u.9. D�prim�nl of Maaing arM Urban D�wlopm�nt or� m comm�ny a�r� a�o o�►eio�,c I-IOU3@hOIdS 8nd P@t'SOt1S Ccmprehensive Housing Affordabiliry Strategy (CHAS Assisted with Housing Instructions for Lxai Jurisdidions � Nams ol JuA Wtalon: CITY OF BAKERSFIELD RenOers p��y A�slet�noe Prwided Elderly 1 a Small b9� �^00me C�ouP 2�� Retated Re a etad M Other ToLal E�dstlng st-Time Haneb�r (2 to 4) (5 or more) Houaer►olds RenEera Hort�eowr�s Chlldren M Otl (A) (B) (C) (�) (E) (FI (a) (H; 1. Wry Low-Inoom� (0 00 30�6 of MFI)•• 0 2 O O Z S -- -- 2 V�ry Low.inocm� (31 b SO°� of MFI)•• 2 10 � 21 8 20 -- 3.. cn»r �ow-Inoom• (51 Eo 80X of MFI)" 1 6 2 9 6 4. ToW Low�lnoon» (Ilnes 1 + 2 3) ��1 .� fil) '. 1994, 1995 Hometess' Non- � To�� IndtWduais FemAles S� Toml S� pts (�1 (�) • (KI (�) (M) (N) 5 13 12 3 34 34 9A -- -- d ..., ' 3 18 11 0 32 19 82 2 103 6 'Homelees tamltles and Indivlduals ae�bted wfth transitlonal a parmanent houslnp. "Or, bat�d u HUD b. R thn c Composltlon o � �� , n��. iln� 4, oolumn (lu� Total Low InoonN: t. F9sp�Nc Non-Hbp�nic � 2. VUhNa 53_ 79 � �� . 3. e�eac 41 ,. r�an�re ��n 3 5. Aslan d� PacMc I.qlander -- e. Other 7. TotN (mu�t equd Totel an pns �. adwm (Mq 166 City of Bakersfield CHAS FY 94 13 Annual Performance Report fortn MUD-40090�A (t/93) Goals tor Households b Persons to be Assisted wkh Houstna Assistencs E�dMY Sms9 Lerps Exfstlnp Provldsd 162 Member Rsletsd Relstsd M Other Totet F�ortis. bY �^�� Ci�ouP Flousshdds (2 B 4) (5 a mors) Howeholds Rentsrs ownen D Wry Low-Ineon» 2 4 5 2 13 Oto30%ofMF • s V� �OW'�^CO^� 3 3 5 2 13 10 �1 ro 509� o/ MF �� L�� 2 2 4 2 70 a 'S9 io 809i oi i�i�_ • � 1, 1 - 1 I " I 1 `^' ra.� t�ow�lnoonw 7 pines 1+2,31 U.S. Depertment ot Housing and Urben Devslopmem Offke of Community Plernlnp end Dsv�slopmsnt COf^P�^a� Housh+g AffadeWlit�r Stretegy (CHAS) �t16Q11C1�Of16 fOf LOC� .�U�3�C1j0f1� ��►+ Totd with M Fbms- hildrsn Othen Ownsn G 3 2 10 Hometess 6 a 8 e 3 � i� �^� Totd Hometess �� SPec�al Tofd 21 S lies Needs Gods Gods 10 � � � 10 � 79 � City of Bakersfield CHAS FY 94 14 Annual Performance Report ,.. �, ' 2. Documentation of Assistance Prnvided The City of Bakersfield maintains documentation of assistance provided to each household (or person) that received affordable housing assistance from the City. Other reporting entities maintain their own documentation of households and persons served. All city records contain the basic information: ■ Address of the property ■ Number of residential dwelling units occupied by assisted households ■ Type of assistance provided ■ The program funding source(s) and amount(s) of assistance provided ■ The name of the household or person assisted The income category The head. of household's raciaVethnic goup identification, and Whether or not the unit meets the CHAS Section 215 criteria 3. Narrative Discussion At the time the goals for persons assisted was deternuned, the City could not anticipate the exact mix of households by size, income or tenure. Based on past experience a determination was made that a fair representation of households or persons from each category would be assisted. At the end of the reporting period, a look at the actual numbers reveals a different picture. The reader should be aware that the CHAS Table 3B reflected the goals for one fiscal year, while this report encompasses a period of 21 months. Renters: This category does not reflect the numbers of renters who received Section 8 certificates and vouchers from HACK, merely those who benefited from the City's Rental Rehab Loan Program. The majority of those receiving assistance (21) were from the very low (31% - 50% MFI) income category. Owners: Although the total households/persons assisted was very close to the goal established, the mix of household types and income levels differed significantly. Even though rehabilitation loans are available on a deferred basis, requiring no monthly amortization of debt, only 5 very low-income (0% - 30% MFI) households participated in the available programs dwing the reporting period. The success of the First-time Homebuyers Mortgage Assistance Progam is reflected in the large number of other low income (51% - 80%MFI) income category. Because the existing program is geared toward families who can qualify for an FHA loan from a participating lender, their income levels tend to be higher. Homeless: The addition to the Bakersfield Homeless Center's Women and Children dornutory was open for the final month of the report period. During that time 12 families and 13 single women benefited from the additional room. By the very nature of their situation, the income category was very-low (0% - 30% NiFI). City of Bakersfield CHAS FY 94 15 Annual Performance Report Non-Homeless Special Needs: The residents of Living Connection's facility for chronicaUy mentally ill are reflected in this category along with all those rec��iving Home Access Grants through the City's progazn (the Home Access Grant recipients are not reflected in the "Totai Section 215" column). RaciaLEthnic Composition: The instructions require a discussi��n by racial and ethrnic group of the number of households/persons assisted iri the context of the r�elative needs of households/persons by racial and ethnic groups as displayed in C:HAS Table 1 A of the five-year plan. The City's FY 94 CHAS was completed using census data from 1990. Estimates of the numbers of households/persons needing assistance by racial and E;thnic categories we�e determined using very basic assumptions and percentages of race and ethnic groups within the whole community.: The breakdown by race and ethnicity reflects only those assisted by the City and the few reports obtained from other entities. li. Other Arfrinnc iT...�o.•±�t,e.. This section will describe the City's performance in carrying out other housing related activities during the reporting period. 1. Public Policies The FY 94 Annual Plan identified the negative effects of public pc�licies to affordable housing which affected all levels of government responsible for the provisi�on of affordable housing. Some of the issues explored were land costs, economic conditions�, rules, regulations, permits, fees, Davis-Bacon requirements and environmental regulations. To help ameliorate affordability housing barriers, the City designec� a"density bonus" program. Chapter 15.79 of the zoning ordinance was amended for purposes of calculating a density increase of at least 25 percent over the otherwise maximum allow<<ble residential density under the applicable zoning and land use sections of the general plan. Ttie density bonus is applicable to five or more dwelling units. It allows developers a reduction in site development standards or modification of architectural design or zoning code requirements 'vi return for qualified housing commitments. "Qualified housing" means one of the following: 1) At least 20 percent of the total units of a housing dE;velopment are constructed for lower income households; 2) At least 10 percent of the total units of a housing dt,velopment are constructed for very low income households; and - 3) At least SO percent of the total dwelling units of a housing development are constructed for qualifying residents. City of Bakersfield ' CHAS FY 94 16 Annual Performance Report ' In addition to the "density bonus" program, the City recently modified its C-C (Commercial Center Zone) zoning to allow R-3 (I,imited Multiple Family) and R-4 (Multiple Family) types of development to be constructed without going through the conditional use pernut process. 2. Institutional Structure As a means to improve the institutional structure for providing affordable housing, the City of Bakersfield established a CHAS "focus group". The group is composed of representatives of those constituencies affected by the CHAS. The group was instrumental in assisting the city in preparing the FY 94 CHAS by providing ideas, identifying potential funding sources, and making recommendations to proposals submitted by city staff. Approximately 8 individuals participated in the focus group. They represented one financial institution, one non-profit, three public agencies, one educational institution, and two private enterprises (Appendix C, CHAS Focus Group, page 21). 3. Intergovernmental Cooperation Since the inception of the City's Rental Rehabilitation Program (RRP), the City and the Housing Authority of the County of Kern have cooperated on projects. With the inauguration of the CHAS, however, that cooperation has seen further improvement. The Housing Authority partnered with the City to apply for the Shelter Plus Care gant, HACK has actively participated in the City's CHAS Focus Group to develop the objectives for Fiscal Year 1994, and has collaborated with the City to develop new affordable housing projects for the future. Through the HOME Progam's Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO) requirements, the City has partnered with a quasi-govemment agency, Kern County Economic Opportunity Corporation to develop affordable housing opportunities for first-time homebuyers. In addition, during the report period City staff undertook the establishment of a Mortgage Credit Certification (MCC) progam which became active in July, 1996 (after the report period). This project entails the cooperation of the City with the State and partnerships with six other cities in Kern County. The development of this Federal progam is a primary example of intergovernment cooperation. 4. � Public Housing Improvements The Housing Authority of the County of Kern (HACK) is a distinct and separate agency from the City of Bakersfield. Information provided to the City for the purposes of this report are summarizations of specific projects. Since all of the programs administered by the PHA are county-wide, it is very difficult to distinguish between jurisdictions with respect to actions and persons assisted, except on site specific projects. City of Bakersfield CHAS FY 94 17 Annual Performance Report HACK has completed the majority of its, CIAP progam during the report period. � copy of its 1994 Annual Statement for the �Comprehensive Grant Program ;as well as its Five-Y�ar Action Plan are attached to this report (see Appendixes E and F, Pages 24 and 33). 5. Public Housing Resident Initiatives In the prior reporting period HACK was awarded two Homeownership Opportutities for People Everywhere (HOPE 1) planning grants. These funds were used to evaluate the likelihood that a homeownership program could be successfully initiated in two t�Ugeted housing projects within the City limits of Bakersfield. Based on those planning gants, F.[ACK submitted HOPE I implementation gr'ant applications to HCTD for consideration. Tv��o southeast Bakersfield public housing sites, Oro Vista and Adelante Vista, were included in th�� application. HACI{ v�r� awarded the implementation grant. Over the next five-year peric�d the project will encompass more than two million dollars in housing rehabilitation and comrnunity improvements, including training and counseling for residents to assist them to achieve self-sufficiency. 6• Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction To meet the new Federal requirements, the City implemented its llead-based paint reduction policies and procedures during the previous reporting period. W;irnings as to the hazazds of lead-based paint are distributed with each application for home improvement loans regardless of the age of the property or children (if any) inhabiting the house. ][n addition, at the time each property is inspected for the rehabilitation loan program, the rehabilitation specialist determines the age of the property. If the property is built prior to 1978, the Specialist notifies ttae occupant if any children are under the age of seven reside there, of the hazards of lead-based paint and advises that the children be tested for elevated blood levels (EBL;�) of lead. A thorough inspection of the property for accessible areas of lead-based paint is conducted. Abatement of the lead-based painted surfaces are incorporated into the rehabilit��tion of the dwelling. During this reporting period, no abatements were required. 7. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Until August 1994, �the City had been contracting with the County of Kern for fair ho�sing services. The County Department of Weights and Measures had �ieen the County Department charged with the day-to-day fair housing responsibilities within thE: County, including the City of Bakersfield. Beginning in August 1994, the City has begun administering its own Fair Housing Program including education, a hotline service, mediation and coordination. The City's program has grown to include a bi-monthly newsletter to providers and oth�er interested parties, a fair housing coloring book to distribute to children, and continues to partner with Kem County to sponsor the annual poster and essay contest. City of Bakersfield CHAS FY 94. 18 Annual Performance Report° PART II- ASSESSMENT OF ANNUAL PERFORMANCE The following is an assessment of the City's activities over the report period and the effectiveness of its performance in the achievement of its overall strategy, priorities and objectives. Priority a: Rehabi�itation Assessment: Rental rehabilitation projects generally take more time to bring to fruition that single-family owner occupied projects, but it is the City's assessment that this goal is attainable. The single-family housing rehab program continues to function. Staff has explored certain procedural elements to make the program more efficient. Priority b: Housing Development Assessment: The costs of land and construction in a recessionary economy has placed addition barriers to achieving this goal. However, the introduction of the Mercy Charities housing project, still in its early development, looks very promising. The City will continue to work through partnerships with private lenders, other funding sources, non-profits and developers to produce additional housing projects. The ongoing success of the First Time Homebuyers Mortgage Assistance Program ensures the continued support of the progam through the Consolidated Plan using HOME funds. Priority c: Rentat Housing Assessment: It has been the experience of the City that generally the development of multi-family housing projects take several years from inception to operation of a progam (as discussed in Priority b). However, HACK, as the primary provider of subsidized housing certificates and vouchers, continues to dispense them as funding permits. Priority d: Non-Homeless Persons with Special Needs Assessment: The City has been successful in providing opportunities to disabled families to access and maintain affordable and accessible housing through existing progams. However, efforts are underway in the coming fiscal year to more aggressively market to this population so that they might be better served. Priority e: Homeless Assessment: Because of the scarcity of funds and the inherent difficulties in establishing and/or expanding emergency shelters, the City re-evaluated its goals regarding homeless shelter and services in the Consolidated Plan 2000. City of Bakersfield CHAS FY 94 19 Annual Performance Report a APPENDIX A Public Review of Performance: Report A public notice was published beginning October 5, 1995, in thr�ee newspapers, the Bakersfield Californicm, the Bakersfield News Observer; and EI Mexicalo. The Bakersfield Californiarr is a major newspaper with wide circulation and was used to ensure <<dequate notificatiora. A draft CHAS Performance Report FY94 was placed in the following lc>cations to ensure easy access for public review and comment for a period of 30 days before submittal to HUD: ■ City of Bakersfield Economic and Community Develo;pment Department ■ City Clerk's Office (City Hall) ■ Beale Memorial Library ■ Holloway-Gonzales Library ■ Northeast Library ■ Southwest Library ■ Wilson Library ■ Baker Street Library ■ Cal-State Bakersfield University Library Copies of the public notice was sent to approximately 150 interested organizations and citizens. The public review period ended on November 2, 1995. APPENDIX B � Summary of Citizen Comments City of Bakersfield � CHAS FY 94 ' 20 Annual Performance Report e � APPENDIX C Focus Gro��n Members 199�► �HAS Bakersfield City School District, Jerry Piper Bakersfield Association of Realtors, Ken Carter Bakersfield Association of Retarded Citizens, Randy Martin City of Bakersfield Development Services, Stan Crrady City of Bakersfield Planning Commission, Ken Hersh Housing Authority of the County of Kern, Randy Coats Paramount Savings Bank, Ed Estrada Writers in the Sky, Gene St. Amand City of Bakersfield CHAS FY 94 21 Annual Performance Report � ' APPENDIX D CITY OF BAKERSFIELI) CENSUS TRACT MAP City of Bakersfield CHAS FY 94 22 Annual Performance Report . _L .� ., I '' �� METR� AK SFIELD BLOCK�RDU S- Based on : �', , . o,.o� • � 1990 Censu '� ' m � , � , . I . , � . � ' � � • , . . 38A 1 • 1 09. t 0 • . � . . . . � , ' ' ' ' i ' 09. ' � , , � 0 . � e ' I ' 06.00 � 05.02 ' . + 14. ', , , y.o9 � , ' ' + �� I : . . , . a � 3 r ., i + : • i ' � � � • . � � � � •� � • • • � ' • ' � � • � ' ' � 38.02 � • � � � • � � • � � � i � � � � � � � � II � � ' � � � , , � 16. � � ' i � ' f ' � 43.01 � .. 10.00 �,I a � . � � a • � �28.08 • � � , • a .Q2 i � - � � � a i ' � I r • � . I � � • � • • � 28.0 � i �S. 5 ' � , , • ' , � �24.00 ' . � . a � 1 ' � � , ' � � . 31.11 � • . 31. � � ' � � � ❑ � • BLOCKGRO PS 202 , , � CENSUS TRACTS Milee City of Bakersfield CHAS FY 94 0 � 2 23 Annual Performance Report a APPENDIX E HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CO�JNTY OF KER1�T ANNUAL STATEMENT COMPREHENSIVE GRANT PRYJGRAM City of Bakersfield CHAS FY 94 � 24 Annual Performance Report ' tua[ StaEelpe�t l � a�� ^ torm�noe arid Evaluation Report o�uo. a��e �� ''�" t: Surnmary - �prehensive Gran� Program (Ct',� _ o��s �., ts�r�s��. v.r.� �+p 8udon fa n+s ooll�e,b. d raern�ir.i�..i�.�r�es rr a�oy. r.i.o �o�.s pe. MsPoa+.. inda,�in; nr r� b. n�leMwq +is��da� sr.adrne �ia�o� sa.ae�s�a►in� aid*�iwsf� wr �dadcOn'�� y�y bm�Istiowdi�Mo�nirs� SN�Ooor�w�nRhpai�nQM�it b�n�nalr. or.�ryMoaepsdd Nsco�eelio�dl�'��roK�'O�b� ��lr"a4+#rt 'Mpvd i�hnop��M 0111o�r� Obd �aio� Peides a�t S�►slems. U.S O�ir�w� ot Hortlq ad Ur6an �� lKssti�l0. ��10��Osdb b Ofo��l Yrrpw�l d e1i/j�l roA� A�/on � jeet Rs17�t6R��4�. QC. ?OrSO� Or nW sand R� os�0ler� bi��l �s �dia�s. . A �� 31��1 ❑wWw. �o. � � �14��rao�w iydn� IM+Aud Mwii�r :�I Mlw�fl�P F1w� ,.o. ��.o...��.ra...r y 1�1� �/�iiN�rn�l N11 J1r� �� M16 llrliMtOr��ws WO ►ws ad1 Cow r+,a sx.�oq,�r,ren - »eo sa.w�..w i1� Owi�'SMbwa 2 s ��t ori.�� taib MrM�q s��s 1't� N11Mw�i/ E!�'w� � t�.1 .Rr1�,sN�nOa� 1� prpYernf q1�� Aw�1�M�f w��wi Qn�A (9rr N�� 1�t� j 2 �.bwei�. tspwrdauerT.,wy MaeM d iir 1S AM��d b t��t N�wM o� ir b Irlwd N S�c� a Onwprlp� .�. �.��w�.��er/q+w�f MRM� 1s� rMA��MU��7'IadrR t! �►�'1� dM1S�r RMMW I�Mr��jr -� � _ 6/8/94 . CA� 61(ECilTIVE DIRECTOR o� 217,T05 159,607 6.000 �T1.710 110.400 399,926 5.000 1fl3.094 ��rM�Ow�M pi�Mt �Y �f 6wi�t�a�1 CA16P0�8703 ��¢ 1994 11rdw� wr1. �r+oe�e�w�tw�a.rrfrl� saM.L a�b�-»� 7— .., , A�a� Yiw Ewi� r�� E��1 � � 0 At� ? 4 F1�41 . � ,d 0 .� An��t Staten�eni i A@I'f+0AA8f1C@ Af1d FV�l18i�Or1 �!,'pOi� °utM: Suppating pap� :omprehe�iye Grarn Pro�ram tOGP! � �� o�.� M..a�r �d S MSE PA21R 1460 34b.8�3 �� TIIRE71? 11idp DF.RaIIZB KI1�Q�1S At�iD S � " 1660 406,525 LI�CE 68 ^ 1460 34Z.630 Gi�G! • s . ° 1460 303,928 � � P'L►YGR�iD l4?5 30,ppp I1.AC6' �p!lgii'!' -818-20 PZAYG�OtTilp 1475 26,179 �!�lSit FrQQIpl� �01�'.5 '� HO�f-�iiELI.INC 1475 46.3I5 EQQTPMZA�! �E �� 1465.1 5,000 EQUIpI�lfr ' SECDitI?Y FEYiC 1450 D�, 0� �1•� AHD LIGHTI�IG �8 �� F� 1450 lO.�r00 � AIlD LIGN'tIIiC • r. M qwipirw M M Mil a/ ti�o0r �. a�`� '� �q aio.rw�:e�i,~,,.� �ra � _ ti.as ti.�da �� i �� i �� i � , . � ^+- +�_. _ • r�\ . �� .ew�o�► r ' � � b 4� MA-S?�=� Y �.� ., .. n nua� Sta�en�ent 1 erfOnrlBnCe snd EValust�OR E�teport ul l!: Suppot'ri�'�9 P� amp�her�e Grant Pro�ran� �CGP"� � ► p�r�waM �.� A�oc��t �"0'n.+ mB �EES Alm OOSTS 1430 4T1,710 LDB AUDIT aQl 00lQ� 1411 6,000 GR�11T I IDE IH. A) SALABIES i l410 140,6l7 FRINGS BL�IHFI e} TR1�ygL F� 1410.1 S, 7�►O COKP GRAi! � ,I , c) r.�L i�ia•a 6.000 D) POaI.ICATI�II i;l0.l 4,S�tiO E) SUNDICY 1410.1 2.7S0 �I IDE MAM11G�! IifP�OYEF�! s) � �soa �t,�o� F�PDIliG MAIN'1'� MNCE C1.EitICAL SUPPOltT B) MAINTEIaA1nCE 1608 15,Q00 T�OG'�IlM C) COIiSQL!'AHTS 14�8 30.004 b PROFESSIOl1AL TitAl�liNG D) �SSIDEN� 1406 30.000 lAI?TA'iIVE , � �.rw�+nnacw..�+�rwr�•t�«■• 1�. Urprfe�ewl af I�ewiq srr uiae. O.M.+�p.wre cm..��+�c �. �.� � __1_� "�' -3 "6 Y � �d � ,., ,., . � � • �� r.�.. sn.s lw.�.swaa ? E+p�� a � 0 I�w� KA-Si?f ro 0 � . ual Stat�rrertt l orm�rn�;e and Eva�uatian i�eport ��: rmplsmematio�n sd�ad�. prehensi+re at8rit Prog�am {CG�. � � o� Na`.�g �.o. a r�c ar�i.m.�io�.� � • �r :� 0 .. � 0 ... ��,.� '� 0 • . ,.� �� S�terrient / Re�fonrtance and Eva�ua�tion F�ePort P�1't it: Sup�WtW�g �'a� ' Comp�l�eRS+re Gra+�t Program (CGP� �"i � �,� °r woowr . �~ 1r�bK Q� MIl�B } PI�tAP lI1�DI 1408 77.99�6 �.y cu. svcs. ) �c�ncu, i�o�s is,000 ces 9ogr- ��a ID11C BiJDG'ET f�IISTSDr.'TtON ) DRi1G Rd.II�lII'tA Ii08 15, 000 01� OOIi�I.rA�'� TRAINI.I�G !bB � j 7�rfdl�n�fMNd�M�w��r. tis. o.'..b..n� � �,r� Nrd We.no�wwpw��t dlbr ii A�fe a�s N�k�w Ib�iry fs�nrrsC�s1 �� ' F�M1� �i �� .� . ., . �.. � �� OIMoi ��r � 0 "tl 1�� UO-!?f]1 0°� �I State�rnertt f r�,�, a.p.�.,.� .� �oe and E�aluartiort �t a; . � ��+�+�""�,� . 3hertsi�e Cxa�* � . (�'� nt � ��dbd d01/Ilf FY� 6�d E�f�f'aMU11r QM� Ww�lr4 �► Aea�l � d� A�Aw� i Asa1 ! I�ar br Ir�/ T�tOrU� �r D . 3195 4/96 _ . . _ _ _ _. _ 1/9S y �% � D � 3/95 3 �� 4/95 4 j96 2�' . 3197 2/� 3197 �• �� 4197 _ _ . 3196 3197 . 3I9fi 3i97 ..�.��w��w�r, /rF�� . �� 0 b 0 !w� Mlod�ss ,., . =� .l �>> !� St�te:i�erlt % �u�s`��.�.°�'�o.�.�..°� ` �•'� � rn�oe snd Evah�et;on i�epolt o�. a��a t� �o '� i�rnmery o�„��p�rarwo, an-0rA� e�o�� hensireGrartt PrograrntCGPj . a.�..a.�o.�.�oe�.ti,�a�ar*�ri• . •ir0a.�ntoiei+aool.c�Me.dlaloeir.rowis«�4�wd�a.�.�p.rsone�.ap�r�.spa�..%dWM�,a.om.�or�.�i.wlrqiiM,�ciion...r.�w �o ��;�sisa�ra t�a.�ip.ndnrf�wYip/�.00�wonaMrMon��.1o�. s.�dao�rnei�hpM�oNsei.de.wi�a.aarqrar.rsy.aofMsaw.�fo�d++or�." '� ��t �� OMo� d I��nn�ow /af�irs aw SNt�. US. O�p�rtr� d 1�ausir� ad 1MV OurNo/��R M�• fl C. Z'0�10.1600 a�/ b Ih�Obdfl�r��t anQ 6�� f1tlu�.7on P'�ojratpaT7�OtS7�1Mr1iYrba. D.C. �0900�Os no�f■�drisconipMl�A lonwb�i�hwdMw�asd�ss�s. � ��G�tMrrir PFYd�"�t/I�P�wM � AUl�O�RI'tY OF THE Cat1lQ'rY O� �8l1 CA16P008704 �� 1995 Mn�1 s��wrt n.�ww wr 1�iM /Mnwl M.�o.r PM�.r.�o. ane EtiYi.row it.pat for P�� r f^aY+� tarl EsrrO�r1 al �� C++� - - r.n��...�.�.�.re �rqY�/ ' IMM�! �!�— E�� Tirl N�tf� Fi�ids ' 1� 1A�� % ta�o ��► t�t� Au� ss�s ua+�o.�..�. u10 F...aurCe.� u t� 81rAoq��on 1�0 i�M� f�rw��t � D�iq B�u��ns t�6.1 Dir�Mrq ts7b fua�.iys«r�drns ts�s �a.�..ip EQ+a..+ 1�6�.1 h1ea.Men d�b I�OV Rrpao��ll�unr� r Al�airM dA�ut OiwK {8�of Ww bt1) � Mio��lrf IMN► lSRMM�OpLBP Tii� ' ��1 i� fs Ad�bd 1s t�I1�Minl Arnaa� d iM 13A�0 b S�� i0� Car+P�r�as 222.090 165,746 6,000 359,045 1,572.G00 5,000 93,000 50,000 2,473,4�2 , �aAw��wilaMt�ie�rw� /0'�aR�r�S. -- ��wa0M�1A11�len�A7l�drrl6�o/f�dM�SOrhN�MsMrU��n�ea�u��prP rM�. 3l l�b�ae��tlr�dt�yw- ', �f�so�M fq1/ao� b�Mr� 6/8/94 k 'AVL J. CA.S? . EXECUTIIIB DZRFC'i0R '�'�"Ld�•. #� O� �1l6 2 � l9�� lovrw /�JO-02�,1T �ErYQ� rN fl�oak 7W � K� I' � b 0 a� Staiement I � �� r�ance and Eveluation id M'�"" °i"'°�""'"' Re�post 000.�r��.a�,�.o �upPorom9 Pepes ' +ensive Grant Pno�ram iCGP� c...�1o..nl�w.r 6r�.Ma c.a F.d► �I�a�■/MAa��s /1oo�Mt �r Nrw�/ �r Ol�a� � �d � 1AwiR A�ISTRA?I 1410 165.705 1�� 140Q II�!lO�VII�tT - . - - . - - _ . . _ , 11j P�IA! pII1aI 1408 36.4�i2 i�AillTFiXA11C� B) N�INTE�AIICE t�08 20,000 i ?�i7�I�16 C) DOOiSULtAliTS 1408 25.000 � PICQFBSSYOaIAL TLIIIiI�G D} ABSIDi.rt 1�08 30.000 ffiltATIYs E) Pil1Ap FI�TD 160e 82.898 TECBRICJIi. SVCS. . F} S0�"IVA�E ` 1488 13, 750 1 � •UPGBADES _ TbCi�IICAL SOCS. G) D�G EI.IMIII 2 4D8 15 ,000 A?IOIT IIIVESTI TRAIllI1+FG � �17IPMF.liT � � r••►. tiw 3.r E�� y � �� - ! . � 0 �� '� b r-. O n i•� 7r, r.. � APPENDIX F HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF KERN FIVE-YEAR ACTION PLAN COMPREHENSIVE GRANT PROGRAM City of Bakersfield CHAS FY 94 33 Annual Performance Report Five-Year Action Plan u.s. Dppartment ol Nousing P8i (: Summary and Urban Development Oflke ol Public and Indian Housing ��; Comprehensive Grant Program (CGP) � Public Reporting Burden Iw Ihk oolloction of infamation is esNmated to aver o 40.0 hours OMB App►oval No. 2577--0157 (Exp. 6i3pig3) dataneeded.andoomple�ingandreviowinglheoollecUonolinformation. Send�oommenCsregaMinglhis�bu�rder esima�oo�a �othe aspe�c of hsooltect'ronolinlo�r �tio ��S��s,gatheringandmainlaininglhe , to Iho Repo►ls Managemenl Officor, Offioo of inbrtnatfon Policies and Systems, U.S. DeparUnent of Housing and Urban pevel ^9 99�'s•`ons tor reduciny Ihis bu��. Paperwak Reduction Pro�ect (2577-015�. WasMngton, D.C. 20503. Oo not sond this compleled lorm lo eflher ol Ihese addresse�s, nt, Washinglon, O.C. 204143600 and to Ihe Oflice ol Management and Budget, ►�FUV111A Nama: lorailry: (Gry/Counry a s6i�e IOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF KERN BAKERSFIELD, �OUNTY OF KERN, CALIFORNIA Q Original � R9visfon No: Year 1 Yaar 2.._. Year 3 -- - Year 4 � A _ . _ pe�,elopment NumberMame/ . - - � _ - Year 5 FFv Physicallmprovements F�� FFY: 1995 FFY: 1996 F�r; 1997 FFy; 1998 �,,s1pp's"""� • Stanoard� CAL 8-5, LITTLE VILLAGE SEE 483,356 1,100,000 700,000 1999 CAL 8-6B, LITTLE VILLAGE �::;.:;;;�;:: ��NNUAL 1,071,356 �. � ' � . 2000 CAL 8-1, RIO VISTA STATEMENT 110,838 190,824 2001 CAL 8-2, ADELANTE VISTA .q��j; 150,000 _ 2001 • SletemeM � :. . B. Physlcal Improvements Subtotal 1, 665 , 550 1, 711, 5 9 7 1, 6 73 , 59 7 C. Managemem Improvemenls �42,636 245, 750 246,750 n. nu�.w=�tl ��vi�dw'viiiiiy Si►u�.iu�e3 1SS,000 102,000 8 Equipment 150,000 E. Administrat(on 173,140 173,140 173,140 F.Othor � . 234,116 240,955 229,955 G. Replacement Reserve . . / ' H. TotaICGPFunds 2,473,442 2,473,442 2,473�442 � I. Total Non-CGP Funds � :. J. Grand Tolal �' _ , ._ .., _ . . 2,473,442 2,473,442 ^ 2,473�442 r S�gnahxa ol E.ea,nv�Al.pc � ..-•-- -. x . c:n�i�tu, �xECUTiVC D1R a o I Flcld qliee Mnnagcr: �Reybryl /1drNntslr�or h to�l � x Paye 1 0l 5 � 2 q t 94 � fam IA1D-S29i�1 jL92) '' rcl H�ndbook 74A5 3 Five-Year Action Pian Part I: Summary (Continuation) ' Comprehensive Grant Program (CGPj � � Year 1 Year 2 eloprtient NumberMame/ Physipl improvements F�: F�: 1995 CAL 8-7, TERRA VISTA CAL 8-17, JOHN SAMS PARK HOMES `:;::::;'.`:;;?::::��<;�, SEE CAL 8-14, PLAZA TOWERS '��"� ��'> ANNUAL CAL 8-5, LITTLE VILLAGE '> �� STATEMENT :�Annual � CAL 8-6B, LITTLE VILLAGE CAL 8-6A, ORO VISTA Stateme�` ' CAL 8-4, MONTE VISTA � U.S. Department ol Housing and Urban Development 011ice ol Public and Indian Housing Yeaz 9 F�� 1996 Pago . ? ol ?. . Year 1 FFr: 1997 270,773 Year S F�: 1998 257,500 388,597 215,000 50,000 50,000 12,500 -, „_ ..� I� . '�P ' FFY ' DevebDmsnt Meeu td!l4�91_ 1999 1999 I� � 2001 ' 1999 2uuo 2001 2001 lam HUD-S?9» Five-Year Action Plan Part II: Supporting Pages Physical Needs Comprehensive Grant Program (CGP)• Yser 1 Year 2 FFY: • FfY: Developrnent Number / Nams / Estlma�ed G Wak Cal . .. ?` SEE ;;:>: �ee>;::<; �: > : Annual'` ANNUAL . _ _ _ . STATEMENT � . Subbhal ol Es6maled Cost Year 9 FFY: U.S. �eparfinent of Housing and Urban Development 011ice ol Public and Indian Housing / CAL 8-5� LITTLE 483�356 VILLAGE� LEAO BASE PAINT ABATEMENT_ AND -- -- _ - -- -- -. -. MODERNIZATION CAL 8-6B, LITTLE 1�011�356 VILLAGE, LEAO BASE PAINT ABATEMENT AND MODERNIZATION CAL 8-1 RIO VISTI HEATER/COOLER REPLACEMENT RELOCATION COSTS Year � FfY: / Name AL 8-5, LITTLE ILLAGE, LEAO BASE PAINT -ABATEMENT AND--- ODERNIZATION CAL 8-1 RIU VISTA HEATER/COOLER CAL 8-7 TERRA VISTA REMOVE AND REPLAC' FASCIA (LEAD BASE PAINT) 110,838 REMOVE ANO REPLAC CONCRETE FLOORS 25�000 �RELOCATION COSTS � PLAYGROUND I Ff111TPMFNT CAL 8-1 RIO VIST 46�0 CAL 8-6A� ORO 46,0 VISTA CAL 8-7 TERRA 46,0 VISTA CAL 8-5� LITTLE 5�0 VILLAGE RANGES IPLAYGROUND G��IiDM`A�T 00 CAL 6-4 MONTE VISTA 00 00 CAL 8-9� ROSA VISTA 00 CAL 5-66, LITTLE VILLAGE RANGES 1,833,550 Page 3 _ ol 5 Year 5 fFY: 1998 Oevelapnent NurtWer I Nams I 1�100,000 CAL 8-5� LITTLE VILLAGE, LEAD BASE PAINT ---- - ABATEMENT ANO MODERNIZATION 190�824 SECURITY FENCING AND LIGHTING REMOVE AND REPLAC 120,773 WATER VALVES AND REPAIR MAIN LINE 150,000 CAL 8-6B LITTLE VILLAGE� REMOVE AND REPLACE WATE 25�000 VALVES AND REPAI MAIN LINE CAL 8-6A ORO VIS nCiiuVC HiYU 1�1Ct�'LN 46,000 WATER VALVES AND REPAIR MAIN LINE COMMUNITY CENTER REMODEI 46�000 CAL 8-17� JOHN SAMS PARK HOMES HEATER/COOLER 5�000 REPLACEMENT � �� 700�000 165�0�0 50,000 50�000 50,000 150�000 257,500 lorm HUO•5109� �� C• �D Five-Year Action Plan ' u.s. Depertment ot Housing ' Part II: Supporting Pages � and Urban Development Physical Needs 011ice ol Public and Indian Housing Comprehensive Grant Program (CGP�• Year 1 Year ? f FY: Year � FFY: Year � fFY: 1997 FFY: Dev6loprnerll Mxtlber I Nam6/ Estlrlwted b Ueveloprnenl Number 1 Name I Estlrlmled Cosls pevcl Wak Ca� MaJor Wak Cat ��1 Number / Name / Eslkr►ated Cosls � ht�1or Work Ca�eporY re� s ffr: 1998 DeveloprtlBnl MMnber / Nam _� ,,� . � , �.r CAL 8-2� ADELANTE 150�000 CAL 8-4 MONTE 12�50Q VISTA, REMOVE AND VISTA, SEGUr�ITY REPLACE CONCRETE FENCING AND � '� '' `�" FLOORS LIGHTING ;;:;.'See;:::`.;�'::>. ... ..... CAL 8-14, PLAZA 40 000 .. vn�v��a�� ; :::, : ' Subrotat o1 Estlma�ed Cost Page [� . ol ,� TOWERS, TRASH � CHUTES MODERNIZATION OF 348�597 TEN (10) UNITS I1�833�597 I`.. , 1,823,597 iam r+uo•szea� Five-Year Action Plan � Part Iil: Supporting Pages Management Needs Comprehensive Grant Program (CGP) rse►� vearZ FFlr: 1995 FfY: �pr Work Catepory• Estlmated C � SEE �. Annual.:..: �NUAL � ��:` ::<;:::<;:>;:;�::��::; STATEMENT : Sta4emetit `: U.S. Deparlment oi Housing and Urban Development Oflice ol PuWic and Indian Housing Yesr 9 FFY: 1996 Year � FFY: nwo� w� cA�,,,.,,,.,• �.N__.�,.__._ 1997 _ rwr s FFY: 1998 PHMAP FINDING 37,500 MAINTENANCE SUPPORT MAINTENANCE -15;000 TRAINING RESIDENT 30,000 INITIATIVE PHMAP FINDING 83,400 TECHNICAL SERVIC S SUPPORT CONSULTANTS & 25,000 PROFESSIONAL TRAINING �-COMPUTER-SOFTWAR 16,736 UPGRADES SPECIAL UTILITY 17,500 VEHICLE 1 DRUG ELIMINATION 17,500 INVESTIGATOR .. TRAINING & EQUIP :.:. Subtota� of Esttmated Cost 242, 636 'Aslerltk pM, y�pk �� t Is Cevelapmenl spedlk and show q�e devebprt�enl no. In paremhesfs. Pa9Q 5 0l 5 � �� PHMAP FINDING 38,000 PHMAP FINDING 38,000 MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT SUPPORT MAINTENANCE - 18,000 MAINTENANCE 15,000 TRAINING TRAINING RESIDENT 25,000 RESIDENT 30,00( INITIATIVE INITIATIVE ' PIIlN�IP FINDING 84,750 PHMAP FINDING 84,750 � TECHNICAL SERVIC S TECHNICAL SERVIC S SUPPORT SUPPORT CONSULTANTS 30,000 CONSULTANTS 30,000 PROFESSIONAL PROFESSIONAL TRAINING TRAINING COMPUTER SOFTWAR 15,000 COMPUTER SOFTWAR 14,000 UPGRADES UPGRADES SPECIAL UTILITY 17,500 SPECIAL UTILITY 15,000 t1FUa�yL VGli1l:L� DRUG ELIMINATIO 17,500 DRUG ELIMINATION 20,000 = INVESTIGATOR INVESTIGATOR TRAINING & EQUI . TRAINING 6 EQUIP � 5.750 � � I246,750 lam t1U0-S28J� • .. _rt_ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: � B A K E R S F I E L D PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM Alan Tandy, City Manager Raul M. Rojas, Public Works Director October 2, 1995 Status of Transportation Impact Fee Program i � =_- 1 ,i . � ! OCT 3 i99� : ��, , , �-. � Currently, the Metropolitan Bakersfield Transportation Impact Fee Program funds regional transportation improvements only. Developers are required to have a traffic study done to determine what their "local" transportation impacts are and how those impacts can be mitigated. The Public Works Department staff then uses this information to determine what their proportionate share of the cost of those improvements will be. The developer is then required to either construct the local improvements or pay the cost as determined by the traffic study and the Public Works Department. This "two tiered" cost to the developer has resulted in unpredictable and varying costs to the development community. City staff was directed in August of 1994 by the Urban Development Committee to work with the County and the BIA to establish new transportation impact fees that would include 100% mitigation of local projects and eliminate the need far local traffic studies. Several of the major issues have been resolved, such as getting CalTrans' acquiescence for the new program and the treatment of current maps that have already had their local mitigation set (they will continue under the current fee structure). The County staff intends to take this program before the Board of Supervisors on October 24, 1995. Prior to that, they will make a presentation to the Plan for Growth Transportation Subcommittee on October 12, 1995. However, the City Attorney's Office is still concerned with the issue of "local" mitigations versus "regional" mitigations. Public Works staff will be working with the Attorney's Office to try to resolve this and any other concern they might have. In addition, Mr. John Stinson is still trying to schedule an Intergovernmental Relations Committee meeting to review this proposed program, as instructed by the Urban Development Committee. For your information, the total revenue remaining in the Transportation Development Fund for �scal year 1995-96 , collected under the current Transportation Impact Fee program,is $4,098,340.00. C 1-95:\TIFISTATUS. MEM RMR:mps xc: Reading File Project File Jacques R. La Rochelle Marian P. S6aw �.�- «'`C+�y A�toniey's Office TO Extension #3721 '— � DATE DEPL C� bJ 7-,I For your information REMARKS retum to me .�— .--___,_,. _ f� C=� -=(�;;�,i"i,,'/:" «�`��.�-�� : For your information i� ��=-___-- --- -� �-�- - For your handling ;; !i �� ' � I, � '� �CLeYs discuss �' I_- _ - =----_—_---.��.^_'! - �.- - - < - Sign and retum copies "- ` - `� �' ''�� ` - • ' - Investigate Appr vo aj Pleas Ae d 'vise You----_ � x�� ', � ��;�-�- Public Ldw . �zso r '��'�� 0 4 19�5 SPECIAL ALERT : �. - SUPREME COURT REVNES PROPOSITION 62 AND RESTRICTS TAXING POWER OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS On September 28, 1995 the California Supreme Court issued a decision with dramatic consequences for the finances of local goverament in California. 1'he decision may have especially serious consequences for general law cities and counties that adopted or increased taxes after 1986 without voter approval. In Santa Clara County Local Tir�nsportasion Auihoriry x Guardino, the Court disapproved previous appellate court decisions and upheld the validiry of Proposition 62. As a result of the ruling, cities and counties now lack the authnri�y to iffipose n�v general taxes without the approval of a m�jority of the electorate. In addition, the care draw� i:�ta ques'uon azry taz that was imposed or increased by a city or county since November 5, 1986 without voter approval. Proposition 62 was a statutory initiative adopted in 1986 to require a majority vote of the electorate for a city or counry to adopt a general tax and a two-thirds vote of the elecwrate to adopt a special rax. The measure defines a general tax as a"tax imposed for general governmenral purposes" and a special tax as a"tax imposed for a specific purpose." The voter approval requirements of Proposition 62 were struck dawn by a number of appellate courts on the ground that they required referenda on tax measures in violation of the California Consdtution. Many local governments relied on those appellate decisions to adopt or increase general taxes of various kinds, such as business license taxes, utility users taxes, development e�ccise taxes, and other ezcise taxes, without a wte of the elecwrate. The Case. The Guardino case involved a 1°Jb sales tax imposed by the Santa Clara County Local Transportadon Authority (Authority) to fund transportation improvements. A 549b majority of the County electorate 6ad approved the tax. The County Auditor refused to issue bonds backed by the proceeds of the tau, contending that the tax should have received the two-thirds voter approval required by Propositions 13 and 62. The Authority filed suit to compel the Auditor w issue the bonds. The lower court refused to do so, concluding t,hat the tax was a"special tax" within the meaning of Proposition 13 a� that a two-thirds vote was required under that Proposition. Surprisingly, the California Supreme Court used this case as a vehicle to disapprwe City of Rbodlake x Logan, 210 Ca1.Apn.3d 1058 (1991), and several other cases which had concluded that Proposition 62's requirement of voter approvat of general taxes violated Article II, Section 9(a) of the California Coastitudon, which prohibits referenda on taa measures. The Supreme Court expressly disapproved Rbodlake and therefore nwived Proposidon 62 as to general taxes, even though Guardino involved a special taz which was invalid under Proposition 13. Although Chief Justice Lucas' dissent argues the point forcefully, the Court was apparendy not deterred by the serious consequences for cities and counties that have relied on the prior case law which had held Proposition 62 invalid. The Implications of the Case. The decision is not final until October 28, 1995-30 days after it was filed—and a petition for reheazing will almost certainly be filed. Because of the intense concem of local of�cials in nearly every city and county in the state, the Court may well rehear the case. Given that the case was decided by a 5-2 majority, and that the Court reached out to decide the case under Proposition 62 rather than relying (as did the lower court) on sealed case law construing Proposition 13, it is doubtful that the Supreme Court will chaz�ge its mind. Ho�wever, there is at least some prospect that on rehearing the Court will clarify the initial opinion and address several critical issues, including: Continued on ►sext page FALL 1995 Page 1 Public Law Advisor ��_ „-%Y = = �_� ► Retroactivity. Is Guardino retroactive so that it invalidates taxes imposed in reliance on Nbodlake, or will it operate only prospectively from the effective date of the decision? If Guardino is prospective only, may a ciry or counry continue to collect a tax which was not approved at the polls, but which was adopted before Guardino was decided? ► Remedies. If existing taxes are invalid, what remedies are available to a taxpayer? Must the city refund taxes previously collected? Or is a taxpayer's only remedy an order baning further collection of the tax? ► Charter Cities. Dces Guardino apply to charter cities? Tt�vo Cour�s of Appeal have ruled that Proposition 62 cannot constitutionally be applied to charter cities, although the measure purports w do so. Therefore, charter cities currendy appear to be exempt from Proposition 62. Of course, the Supreme Court could disapprove these cases as easily as it did Hbodlake. The retroactiviry and remedies issues are especially important because coundes have authority under Proposition 62 to reduce a city's share of property taxes on a dollar-for-dollar basis for revenues the city receives in taxes imposed without compliance with Praposition 62. In addition, some taxpayers may seek refunds of taxes which were paid before the Guardino decision was decided. Defenses to Refund Claims. There may be a number of defenses to claims for refunds and attomeys at Richards, Watson & Gershon are now researching the law on these points w assist clients of the firm. Conclusion. Guardino is of major importance to local governments throughout the state. The full implications of the decision will not be known for at least several weeks and perhaps for many years: In the meantime, we are working to determine the fiill impact of the case. Events continue to unfold and we should know more in a few weeks. For additional advice or assistance on this subject, contact Michael G. Colantuono, Steven L. Dorsey, Michael Jenlons, or atry of Richards, Watson & Gers6on's pubGc law attorneys at (213) 626-8484. Can We Add You To Our List? Reading someone else's copy? Would a colleague or friend find this newsletter helpful? We would be happy to add names to our mailing list. Just fill out and FAX the form belaw to Michael Colantuono at (213) 626-0078 or simply call (213) 253-0207. tiatne: A�liation: Addt^ess: City/Zip: Telephone: FAX: Page 2 fALI 1995 - ` �_. _ CITY CLERK'S �FFICE City of Bakersfield ate V / - � To: � FOR YO R: � Information Note and return Action Note and file Signature Approvai PLEASE: Read Investigate Forward Follow up Review See me about this Retum � �`— , --�, i Make - . :rec4mmendation � i� i' � �' ; � � � ... , � $ � �� if`�OR��i�i r�E��ivt�� Ci � 1 i9�5 �v1A'��FlC� Chemical Company ■ P1 asti cs Di vi si on Ot4ice� caos� a9z-�aeo e� a2s•�osa � ' 2024 Norri s Road Shlpping: t605} 392•�418 iM 6Y6•1018 Bakersfield, CA 93308-229i �� of Pages Fal l ow: � � Destination: Attention of: � ' ("Gt�x � �0 S'�� sr�- °116� From: Ckarl-c�'-e S�a�s � pE� �$ 0 5/ 3 q2 • 4020� � �:.,:;:.. -. �. *� -=�:p„�:., ;: . ,.�. r,E : � � ` �' r'� � I � Confi.rmatio��:�� Per�ton�:. J � �� . ' �� .�� e � y,'^��.: Mecessary? _:. Phone Y� ��h� � ��r��4 „ M � -��,��y�.: �, . , , ,.,�.,. <, NIESSaGE. _. 3_� � � t �� . , �_:.. . � � . _ . . i. . . , _ . ...�. ., . .. .,. � . ,f . � . , . , � c;��irao�oocs�FUCS.s�M:bjd IQ� D�Xfl 'I��I➢��H� 'IIgO➢� �0�� Pd� 52�L0 56-ZO-Oi ,�� -- ,-� � 0 • r • • C{�QTAG�': Joha Lard or �il Csmpball �oolley � � Idi� 0�16"f7Y� �obi! r�ews ��ease ,��„ � �� laO�BTL es1.�,8 pLAS�YeB DiVt8Y0�1 FOR i.27 giLLSOD� 8�+11X. VA. , Oct . 9-- Mobil Casy4zatinet inaouaCli� tOd�y iC 1�� reac2�d a dsiiaie�ve ��eote��x ta ��il tbe Mebil ChatA3c�►l � Co��y� • Plutica Divi�ion to ren�eso� a Paatcs9lag Cor�oratson ci 7lenai'iCa 1 PC�►i . ,� ?!as ul�� ytica o!' $1. �7 pilllQn Mil� pYedttee tset inCOtee 1� exo�as o! v�-h�3t biilio� doli�:• to �obil� ?he sa2�� v��'��i�:...i.. ',,. �i eo� za ssqyl�tory sppxova�, s� exp�oz�a to ba ea�i.t•d 4t�s� ' '� `, �; r� �.,= � .� -;: ��:...,�, tlst iaurLh qwte�: di thia yaa:. Dsocaed� free� ��al� ail�„'b� _ ,. � , ��u.�d tp !�d ltobii �� tnar�y o�poxtuaiti�s !or growth in q�r ,00� ~ . `. __ , r°'.K?`'':< bwin��aa�, iaoludi� po��tial :cqs�i�iciao�u. .. . Mabil Plutics i� oae oi tbe �as+g+��t.aw�ul�vcur�r� 1t °; � � � , eutzkrter� ai plastic �ak�tqiag aAd cor�uaiez� yrod�ot� ia �tortb '. 1►m�rioa. Zea pr0!ltiOCe iapludA 8eity� brw:�d ara�ea bag�, tabl�Mar� aad iood ator�ge bsg� es w�ll a� op.aisltY F��A� ior �ood ��rviae, supes�xk�t �nd ��gtr3al �ppllCRCioaa. ea��d in f�ocli�ater� NaM Yozk, �il Plt�e�c� DlvisioaR smpioya �ppro�ci.s�►tely �, �ao p�oyi. aad tud rever�us� o! mose thRa �1 bil2io� in ll9�, PCA ha� ags�ed to ol�er �e�loymtnt W ai3. Kab11 al�tic� Divialer� on+p2oyese. p7c�is �a1e ir Q�nC 0! MObil � a•CraL�gy to s:tl�Itaoa ' ■ba�nhold�s valu� by toruoing on ies cox� bu�in��e� v# Ail, qa� arid peksooh�ra�cals, aad e�lll.ng kba�� aon-cora bu.ina��es.tiut � ��oreh ��taati�lly more to athoz�,M s�id Kobi1.C3�aixmaa intCio J1. �oto. ' � - moY� - , EOd 7�XB '?d�I➢4�R'1 'tI�O➢� I�ON_� � y�y SZ:�p 5�-7_.Q-pI ., � �; �Od _ Z .. �obil p��.tieB Divieien Musuf�eturin� niaA�a are i� bakesstie�d, CA; Govingtan, GA; Frarskfort, IL1 �sokppnvil�e, I�; C�daigua, atYr Mac�don, rn; Tempie, �rx= and aellevills, �tarso, caeuda. Th� ��la doss noe iavolv� idabi.7. Clasmical' s lileu, . Petroehentieals, Chemieal PYOdL'Ct�, ?uck�r Hc�u��aares o� c�osite �i'vdncts Divisioua. N !I M zo/o�/9g .� - ;, � �,, �, , �_w� . :, �� . , , .: .� - � �, , � 0 Q�?I8 'I�� I➢��H� 'I I SO➢� �0�� i�l 5Z � LO 56-ZO-0 i Mobil Chernlcal Cornpany Dear Community I►�ember: ��: � �� .�,�..� Qct�vber 2, 1995 � Mobil Carporation today announced tbat It w111 aell ita Plaati�a Dlviaioa to Teaneco'; — Packagi�$ C,orpo�atiun of America (PCA). 'i'he aale reflecm the divi�ion►'� impravai �ial perfv�man� and enbanoed �rowth aQpozdiaitiea rrsutti� &a� ita reoatt reatrttc�urfa�, si well as Mobil Corpo�adon's d�eciaion bo �oa�e on ita oore oit. �e aad pel�och�m! o�eratio�a. A�cbed � a copy of the praee releaee dietribv�ed �. . :;�- ..�: . : . ; , you �e cl�mga ia aw�ershi� wfll bave ao etdvN'�e �ct`on d� Baloerefleld plant's day-to-day o�eratioas. 'I'be $alaersfleld plant,' :to�atha�r with the Mobil : Corpo�ad�on end PCA, will wvrk 6ard � ansure the �anaition in a�w� u.: bod� i� ead seamlea. T� Pleatic� Division hae � tong hietary af qaslity a�d eerv�e, �tfd ,th� connmitmant wiil remain i�te�rat to rnu oo�tinued operations. _��:� �t ��. �. ,. . � �n: _ . an exc9ting timc fur the Plastic� Division. 0� reoent restruc� C11hSnOCd OUt Cf�CiEt1Cy SYId pl'pflt�ility. 8nd WO 8ro pOBitiO� � 00 dut lfER+ OWriGGt3hiQ� WC W�il B�C�CVB a11Y ftill pOtCIIt�61. :s� . .. �_. �' � � ThU u�an�ction i� oonsiste� with previous PCA acquieitione wh�d► t�r$eted �1. . oompanie� with superior man��mant d�at offorod a a�ic fit, PCA's a�cquieitio� ot Iaia Pacica�tng earlier thia year ia a typical �ampla o4 PCA'a etra�egic goal to doatble eales asd tripla operatuag incoma. Among the w�ocld's leading aod maet diver�e pac�cagit�g manufacdu�ere� PCA ia the lar�est U.S. producer of Bood aantainera mado �om.c,letr;�le�,. aluminum Roil� aad molded �tbre. PCA hsa mo�e thari 13,000 employaea: � Ia� Y99�4;`,10� , p�c3caging bnsin�ese oontribubod 18 peroent of total revenuss o� $2.2 billitm. . Thank you for your eontinued support duci�g th�s time of chaAga. If you bave aay addldo�al quest�ne, ple�ee c�raact me. � s�y; �!. C�arletbe seacs . . P9ant Matta,�t , i f .i,F�.•'?�. _ i ,_ �_. - 'f?? Q�!IH ��I�?➢d�H� ZI�OI� V�I�u�! � YZd 5?�1,0 y�-�0-Q1 PLANT FACT 51�ET MOBIL CHEMICAL COMPANY PLASTICS DIVISION ' 2024 Nonrfa Road Bakersfltld, California 93308 Main: (805) 392-4000 Plaat Manag�r: (SOS) 392-4�20 Plant apokesperson: Charleue Sears, Plant Manager. Years in operatian: 28 years. �� :� n►: C'uatome�rs: Polyatyr�c foam packagi�g producxa. Pricecostoo., wal-Marc. x�mber af employeas: 266 C33 profa9ionsls� 231 h+oquly eaiployeea). -:: ;r :'w; � , t - �_��t,_<� z� m oo��► a6� auc of zoo �g�t �,�y�. � �� _ aa eatployer: � `� �``�" '=� . � . Taxa paid: �363,OS8 in stau and local taxes.� `.. �3:�'� i. • Unioniz�tion: None. k � - ' . � .,in � � � � � t . . . �,.. b �}�,.��y�f��SN"' , r k��. Y � ' �+ >.x��4 .Y: 'Y_. Fuvironmental and The plant ia ia strict oompl�ance vvlth all advirammmml � safery concerna: laws and regulationa. Mobil Plae�ca is rexogn�zed by OSHA a8 a "Star Site." Corporate The plant ia one of Mobil P1astics' dght U,S. a�d organizarion; Canadian plants. Mobil Plastics, formod in 1962, bad revenues of $1.039 billian in 1994. Mo6i1 P1aSticd fg part oi Mobil Chcmical Company, which is whol�y aw�ed by Mobil� Corporadan, Headquartered ia FairFax. Va,� Mobil Corporatian is one of the world's lar�est producers of.oil a� gas. The company reported 1994 revenues of �6T billion. . -r 1 !t5 'R''V�rr` .. � 50d Q�xfl 'Id�I➢G�H� 'II�O➢� i�0�� P+� 5Z�Z0 56-7p-Ol 4 tq -i,A .: , �, � � � i . �� 0 90d COMPANY FACT 3SEET MO�IL PLASTICS DNISION 1139 Pittsford-Victor Road Pittsford, New York 14534 (?lb) 248-5700 H�s�ry: Mobil 1'laatics Diviaion was formed in 19b2 with�ihe acquisition of Kozdite, a manufacturer of waate baga, food baga, and laundry and dry clean3ng bags� and hsd .reveaues that yeat of �30 million, The Division's rapid $s�awth has resuloed Pcom anticipating areas where plasdc8 could be �t�d for othcr materials; developing inaovative produ�ta; creating proprietary manufacturiag procesaes; and a�po�rdng its efforts with e�i'ecdve marketing and eales progr�uns. Rev�ea: Scsni�or manageaneat: s�, $1.039 billi�on in 1994; 6S percx�t from p�mg products and 35 perceat tiom oanwma producta.. �. Stephen D. Pryor� Vice Prea�t. Mobil (�1 Compauy, aad Gmeral Managar, Plaadca Divisii�on �a�d MMark�g vice Preaident, Pac�ging Pr�uda Salea Robert L. Cauffman, Vice President, Con� Prodncoa Sal�a and Marketiqg . James D. Mortie� Vicx Preatde�nt,' Marni �� 7�a�d � " Dia�i�udon . #�� . . William D. Sheehaa. General Managcr, Tec�nical Operatioes & Naw BuBiness Develtfpmr,nt � Edward T. Walters, Controu�r , : � � Judith A. L'Itali�n, �anager, Resin S'�pply Jamca J. 0'LearY, ManaSa� EmPloYee R�latione , Producrs: eonsumer: wa$te bag9, tableWrare, fooa baga. Bra� include , �efty and Baggics. , Packaging: �oodaervice disposables, linere, m�eat. tray8, clear contaiaers, food bags, atrerch film. Plant locatione: Bakersfield, California Canandaigua, New Yark Covingt,on, Geargia � . P�a�ilcfort. Illinois . Jackaanville� Illinois �acedon� New York , . Temple, Tcxas -more- QdXB 'I9�I➢��H� 'IlSO➢� Y�'?xd }'� yZ �� 0 56-7,�-(ll ic e � �� , , COMPANY FACT 3HEET MOBTL PLASTICS D�VISION Page 2 Ctiatomcrs: L,�ading retailers such ae Wal-M�'t, Kmart, and Safeway, at� major distributora auch aa Bunzl, SYSCO, and Unisource. Emp�oy.oes: Unionization: Apgroximately 4,100. None. Market posidon: Fourth-largest plastics fabricator in the U.S. Numbra onc m sevetal product categories -� conaumer tablewar�, foodservice diaposable�, linexs, meat trays, stretch 81m — co�P�iaIDB approximataly 65 percent of salcs. . � Enviranment: � Recipient of ihe U.S. EnvironnQentat Prot�don A,�e�cy'a 1994 � Grem Lights Parmer 4P thc Year Award. . m ZOd Q�Rfl '?�7I➢��NJ '?Ia�P� �IOx.� Y�H 5':�n �,�-?p-��