HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/09/95.� J�
•
B A K E R S F I E L D
MEM�RANDUM
TQ: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY
FROM: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: GENERAL INFORMATION
COUNCIL �
November 9, 1995
1. If you happen to be traveling in the area of the Convention Center, you may
notice that the old feed bin property has finally been torn down. We are
still in the eviction process on the recycling center.
2. You will find enclosed a copy of the Public Works Department Capital
Improvements Status Report. We are making progress since the strike is now
over.
3. We are contracting for a codification review. It will check conflicts in
our various codes with State law and the like. A particular area of
interest to us is the personnel area where we have run across a variety of
conflicts because of the three sets of Civil Service Commission rules, the
Administrative Code, Charter, etc. This is a part of our Personnel
Streamlining process, but involves a variety of other code sections as
well.
4. Next week, on Wednesday and Thursday, I will be out of town at the annual
planning retreat for department heads. During our absence, Dolores Teubner
will be in charge. The office will be able to contact any of us in the
event of an emergency.
5. There is an important memorandum enclosed on the staff committee's work on
annexatior� strategies. We would ask you all to review it, and call with
comments or suggestions. As it develops, we will need your help in the
first stage of the annexation effort. This will, of course, be a lot of
work. It will create controversy, but it is a task well worth undertaking
even if we only achieve a 50% success rate. Again, it is significant, so
please give us your advice as soon as you are able to get to the document.
6. There are responses to Council referrals enclosed including an item
regarding having our Convention Center report include Holiday Inn
activities; street resurfacing in Ward 2; a report on merit step increases;
and, an update on the traffic problem at Centennial High School.
7. If you have City staff bid against the private sector on landscape
maintenance districts, the supervisory group involved in that wouid be
Fabbri, Andersen and Tandy. I think we will use the first letter of each
last name to form the acronym "FAT - your public sector alternative."
._
.,�
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
November 9, 1995
Page -2-
AT:rg
Enclosures
cc: Department Heads
Trudy Slater
Carol Williams
n
�
B A K E R S F I E L D
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
November 6, 1995 �
TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager
FROM: (j� ��' Darnell W. Haynes, Assistant to the Public Works Director
THROUGH: �°��� � Raul M. Rojas, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: CIP Status Reports - October, 1995
Attached is a new version of the CIP status report. The intent of this version is to better
inform the users of the various milestones a capital project goes through. The CIP status
report is comprised of the following sections:
1. Status of all 1994-95 and 1995-96 CIP projects (Design Engineering).
2. Status of all 1994-95 and 1995-96 Traffic Signal related CIP projects.
3. Construction Inspection Project Status Report.
4. Financial Summary 1995-96 CIP projects.
5. Financial Summary 1994-95 CIP Carryover projects.
6. Monthly Notice of Completion Report.
If you have any question or suggestions for improving this report, feel free to contact me.
cc: G. Waiters
T. Slater
D. Teubner
��� 6 19�:
�
B A K E R S F 1 E L D
PUBLIC WORKS DEPAItTMENT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: OCTOBER 30, 1995
TO: DARNELL HAYNES, ASSISTANT TO THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
FROM: JACQUES R. LaROCHELLE, CIVIL ENGINEER IV-DESIGN
SUBJE . 1995-96 CIP STATUS
Attached is the schedule of 1994-95 CIP projects. As promised, we are showing more
information this fiscal year. The following will describe the various milestones we are
showing on the schedule:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Consultant Contract Approval
PS&E Approvai
Advertise
Award
Pre-Construction Conference
Notice of Completion
The date a consultant is hired to perform design.
The date the plans are actually completed.
The date the project will advertise.
The date Council will award project construction.
The date the Contractor will begin actual work.
The date construction will be complete.
It should be noted that during this fiscal year, particular emphasis will be placed on
completing prior year projects. As such, a separate section of this memo will be dedicated
to the status of prior year projects.
PRO.iECTS BEHIND SCHEDULE
None.
PR0.IECTS AHEAD OF SCHEDULE
None.
STATUS OF PRIOR YEAR PRO.TECTS (In-House)
1. White Lane Improvements-Wibie Road to South H Street
This project is cunently out to bid.
2. Hughes/Pacheco Sewer Project
The pre-construction meeting is scheduled for Thursday, November 2. Construction
activity should begin the ne�ct week.
, 3. Coffee Road Widening-Brimhall Road to Rosedale Hwy
Plans have been submitted to CalTrans and the Bureau of Reclamation for their
approval and permits. The CalTrans permit will be issued this week. Construction
is slated to begin in November.
4. Resurfacing Major Streets-Citywide
This project was awarded at the September 13, City Council meeting.
5. Bridge Replacement-Manor Street at Carrier Canal
Plans are complete. We are currently awaiting funding approval from CalTrans
which will not occur until the Federal Budget is adopted. Once this is accomplished,
we will obtain approval to advertise by the State. This project will immediately bid
thereafter.
6. Landscaped Medians-Rosedale Highway @ F�vy 99 Interchange
Preliminary plans complete. This project will be done b_y City forces and will not
begin until CalTrans is complete with their bridge widening project.
STATUS OF PRIOR YEAR PRO.TECTS (Consultant)
Tevis Park Development
Plans are being finalized by the consultant. This project will immediately bid
thereafter.
2. Woodwaste/Greenwaste Facility
This project will be awarded at the November 8 Council meeting.
3. Coffee Road Grade Separation
Plans should be complete soon. Right of way to be cleared by the end of January,
1996. Construction should begin in March, 1996.
4. Police Building Addition
This project will be awarded at the November 8 Council meeting.
5. Bridge Repiacement-China Grade Loop at Beardsley Canal
Plans are complete. We are currently av�raiting funding approval from CalTrans
which will not occur until the Federal Budget is adopted. Once this is accomplished,
we will obtain approval to advertise by the State. This project will immediately bid
thereafter.
6. Fire Station 13 Construction
Bids have been received which exceed the budget. Staff is meeting with contractor
to determine if changes to plans could be made to realize significant reductions in
construction costs.
7. Canal Bridge Widening at Arvin Edison Canal (5 locations)
Consultant plans checked which found numerous problems. Consultant has
resubmitted plans which are currently being reviewed.
8. Canal Culvert Widening-Panama Lane c� Farmer's Canal
This project will be awarded at the November 8 Council meeting.
9. Median Construction-Various Locations
Consultant now making revisions based on City's peer review. Once these changes
are made, this .gro}ect will advertise immediately,
10. Diesel Exhaust Removal System-Various Fire Station I.acations
Project awarded and under construction.
�
B A K E R S F I E L D
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM
To: DARNELL HAYNES, ASSISTANT TO THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
From: STEPHEN L. WALKER, TRAFFIC ENGINEER `�������
Date: October 13, 1995
Subject: 1995-96 CIP STATLTS
Attached are two variations of the 1995-96 CIP schedule. The first shows all projects by
order of design schedule within the fiscal year. The second is grouped by project engineer
with each engineer's schedule in order of design schedule. As shown all projects are on
schedule. Also attached are the pages containing our projects from the detail status report.
Following are projects of special interest:
PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS --- CONSTRUCTION STATUS
Pre-construction conferences have been held and construction will begin shortly on new
signals at East Brundage Lane at Oswell Street, Coffee Road at Hageman Road and F
Street at Truxtun Avenue.
Construction is underway for signals on Gosford Road at North Laurelglen Boulevard (near
completion), Jenkins Road at Stockdale Highway, Akers Road at Panama Lane, Stine Road
at Panama Lane and Ashe Road at South Halfmoon Drive.
Construction has been completed in the past 3 months including the signal upgrades on 4th
St at Chester Ave, on Mohawk St at Trwctun Ave, on Castro Ln at Ming Ave, on Chester
Ln at Oak St, on Planz Rd at Wible Rd, the new signals on Ashe Rd at District Blvd and
the flashing beacon on Pin Oak Park Blvd at Tevis Jr High.
PRO TECTS ON SCHEDULE
All other projects are on schedule.
PROTECTS BEING DESIGNED BY CONSULTANTS
1. Signal, New - Christmas Tree Lane at Mt Vernon Avenue
2. Signal, New - Howell Drive at Old River Road
3. Signal, New - Camino Media at Old River Road
4. Signal, Operations - Traffic Operations Center Design
Final contracts have been executed this month for the first three projects. Notices to
proceed and initial design meetings will be complete by October 17th. The fourth project,
the TOC study is underway, phases 1 and 2 are 75% and 25% complete respectively with
final report (phase 7) scheduled for completion in March.
SLW:BJD:bd s:\lotus\sched\cip9610.mem
i ��
.,
REPORT DATE: 10/16/�J5 1995-96 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SCHEDULE (TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION)
,,.. 1995 1996
..: , : � ..<:,: ,
,,, _.. _._ �.
:..: � , . : x, .. � � c� . �;;1, «<<„ "c t .Lii�:cc�<t.<<< «. " .�.� ,.. ,'-:; 5 ..
, . ,,.tEC+,r.k4. - .� , . r. -.�;; , ., .
.,.,,,, .. �.. .y:�,. , ..,. . ,. c ' � ::
... ... , , � , i . :-, ,�>„ , , -.�;, ., - , , ��:;, _ .� .�w v ....: .... �:;.. 44< ,<,. � - < ,.:.. ,..,<...i�.:+,i<< <c� .n., .. � t
.',_, : '.,,,,,, z .. .,,:ae:e , . :,? ,.� -.:i�roi : �,..: �. ,,,,,, ,,, , „ <;:>..,. .:.. y�
,.�A�i�i,,-P �.i , e :.: ,.
�. I� ,;,:. k,, ,�, .: ,, �. � �f y x��y�-y
,. y�-} _.:... yy�,: ',� ., :.
.:.., ... ..i. �MR.-. . . .- n+ . ... .. . ..�.i .., .�ti �...,, ,,.,..,. ,i , .;,, ., ,,. . ::. . .,'.
. r ' n �`nr ��-
... ...... .. .. . ... .... .... }�:a�. � '� nr. 'i •.,. � - ... . . '.
�. t
... ., . ., ... ....� . .,, �..� :,.. ., , ,,,,,,:.�, ..,.,,,. ,:s , ti, ,�,��. ..�.., .......... ....... ,n
.� , , , , ., �,� .:-� . >,.
. . . .,,� ,.,,..,: �, �,. .,�,. .,. �?a. . ��ir .. ....._.., _......... ,,.,, „ „ .,,. .,,.. .,�,. �,..,. �., ��a l
�..... . e ,:, . .,. .,..,,,, , , .<,, ,,, ,,,, ,,, , .. . , .�. ��. �.�k.. ... . .�. � �.......,. . ..... , , � . ,,�� , , ��, . ,�.,
... . ., .,. ..x , ._.... �:e . ,..0 , .,:: , „ . ,.. �:.��'.� - �
.. . .. .. . .. . , w . .. . ,� ...., .. _ . . . , .,,... � .....:: . . ..... � . . .,. . ,.;: �,. .;;
.... .... ........ ., ,. , ,. .::. . ,., ... .,. ,,.. . .
� ... ... _.. . �N�` ,e ,� , , , �. ,,,� ,,, ,.,.A tRY , ..< '� _� f 33 ., t tiM��' ,:,i. �`t3�, r,i
..... ........ . ...,... .,,,. ........ ... �., ..�:,._y x .:..:.\ ,u, . ..., -.:,:..,. .,.,....� .,....,. -,.N. . ,.. .��,.. .... i....�,.... ,�i1"; .n.. ��;t ..� , ..� .n i.� , l� 1.71�3�.41,,.. ..�JRk,>,,..
... .... .. , . . ... .... ..... .. . ....... ..� ....+...: . .... ........... ..:..,,. te� ..,.,. ....... . ..... .;...n.. . . ...:,. J7 .. , . .:.,. ,. ..-... :.,. �,,...: ... .,,....: . : ':.:,. . , ,.,;, ..,:, ..,...,...,
�& 7 Signal, New - Monitor Street at Pacheco Road TABLIT 96 DESI[iN 98%COMPLETE --- RESOL�IN G UTILITY CONFLICT : `; „,;;;
Signal, Interconnect - TOC Arterial Infrastructure Conduit,Ph. 2- 5 Locations (Coffee, ` '
4& 5 Stockdale - Truxtun; Mina, Castro - New 5tine; Stine/New Stine, White - Stockdale; tINDERWOOD 95 70% COMPLETE, RECHEDLJL.ED FINAL, DESIGN PENDING TOC STLJDY 4:,..��z t,�;,,,�'��
Stockdale Gosford - Califomia� White Wilson - Wible ���, `` k>-
2 SIgf181, New - 19th Street at L Street TABLIT 96 PRELIM. POWER & EIV�'IRONMENT.AL REC'D. DESIUN 70%COMPLETE ;;,U4k,�:;;.;..;,u;.:,,,�
1 SIgi18l, Upgrade - Brundage Lane at Cottonwood Road TABLIT 96 DESIGN 10% COMPLETE, PRELIM POWER & ENVIRONMENTAL REC'D '`' �'
3 SIgf18l, New - Christmas Tree Lane at Mt Vernon Avenue EETER/CONSUL 96 CONSULT.�NT ,�GREEMENT FINALED 10/11195. NTP IVITH DESIGN + i
.
4 SIgf181, New - Hageman Road at Centennial High School Entrance GILLBLtRG 96 PRELIMINARY PO�VER & ENVIRONMENTAL RECD
4 Signal, New - Howell Drive at Old River Road EETER/CONSUL 96 CONSULTAIVT ,aUREEMENT FIN,�L.ED 10/11/95. NTP �VITH DESIUN
4 SIgf181, New - Flashing Stop Beacon on Buena Vista Road at Panama Lane GILLBURG 96 PRELIM. POWER & ENVIRONMENT;II.REC'D. DESIGN 90%COMPLETE •
4 SIgf181, New - Camino Media at Old River Road EETER/CONSLIL 96 CONSLJLTANT AGREEMENT FIN.4LED 10/11{9�. NTP WITH DESIGN `
VARIOUS Channelization, Signing & Marking - Bike Lane Installation on Various Streets EETER/GILLBUR 96 BASEMAPS 40%COMPLETE � : „,, �,�
Signal, interconnect - TOC Arterial Infrastructure Conduit, Ph. 3- 5 locations & Misc Branch GILLBURG /
i �
VARIOUS (Gosford, Kroll - White; "H" Street, Brundage - Truxtun; Mohawk, California - Truxtun; "t�." TABLIT 96 : ,
Street, Truxtun - W. Columbus; ruxtun, Beale -"N" St �
ALL Signal, Operations - Traffic Operations Center, Phase I Construction UNDERWOOD 96 PS&E DATE TENTATIVE PENDING RESULTS OF CONSULT.�NT STLJDY
1& 2 Channelization, Signing & Marking - Speed Control Features, Oleandar Area LJNDERWOOD 96 ONGOINGAS NEEDED FOR OPEI2r1TION,�L. PLTRPOSES
VARIOUS Signal, Modification - Install Emergency Vehicle Preemption Devices UNDERWOOD 96 TO BE INST.aI.LED BY CITY FORCES '
VaRioUS Traffic Control Modifications - Various Locations UNDERWOOD 96 ONCiOING AS NEEDED FOR OPER.ITION.aL PURPOSES
Scheduled P. S. & E. �
Scheduled Awa�d of Contract _
Plans Approved �
Conhact Awaz•ded _
The shading shows the pL•u�ned month.
The date is the actual date that the
P.S.&E. was approved or the conshvction
contract was awarded.
S:\LOTUS\SCHED\960CT95.WK4 08:58 AM
I
�'
October 16, 199�
i I
t
�
REPORT DATE: 10/16/95 1995-96 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SCHEDULE (TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION)
, �,,, 1995 1996
�,y� . . ,.:
.. .� <>: „> ;
�/' ,. . _ :,, ,; , . t , � , t :.. . . .,,: �5., , . :. , , ;� „ ,. ;: , ,. ,;;, ,
, , . , � , , > ,> , ,;; . , ,:, „ . :,, ,>:. �, s :. :. .
�..... ,,,, .,...:
, t .. . , , ,�.. ,. , , .
;; ;;, , ;:.;
,
� . ,. . . .�
,. ,
., �,. r,,� .:.. � � z .�. (,,
y y� ti. ,., . �,
, , >. ., ,... . ,�,,. .. �,� . � y„ 7� ��{ n}� .{ > } `�
.. . ...,+, � ,x , ,,.,.. .,.,...,. M �n: , \ r...;. ..:'r . . .
,,.,��Yl .�;r .� � , . ..: ,.,,.:. ' . ..
, .�,,, ,,.,.. . .� . �,.,,, .., t 1 ti �....:,: ,...,. ,: ., :.., , .., c:... .,, ,....: -., .,
...... .....ki. „ � �...: ...... .., -:�,.,. .,.., ,,:>,,, ;: ,... , -,.,.,. .. .,,�� .,., ..,. .,..,...t. .,,;...,
.., .. .... � ... .� � .... � , n. . � .. .... .... . . . ... , '�'.t.,., . . ,.,..a , .. ,�; ..�\�. ..:: ,. .,,., .;.,;; ,1:.: ::1�,:
"� ,�. ...,, ,,. �.. , , . , , ,..,:,,, „ ,. „ : .,,,.,,.
..._.r ......, i.�.,.. . ...1 ... ,' .,.. �., .,n. . :. � �,:, „ -;�-' '
... :� :., , .�.. . . . . .,.,... . . .. ....,.. ......... ............ .. ... :�:, -,,,,. , , .. , .
,�.. .. .,., .., .... .., ..� .... - e., . ... . . ,. . .. �.i ,,:
:;�,� ..... . .. ..... .�.. .,. „ -.... ,� � .. � . �y . �,
.. ,�> ,n ,e,-.. . .. , ,,.. „ , , ,. ., ..�1... . ,. V. Rst . #+k;#.v, � � ,. ,>...,. ..- . Y.. ... .. .�:, :. .:::�: �i;: �.o,.. ��
..� � - .� 7,A �}'i21�,. .l . ., ,,. , . . , „ ,.. ,. , „��� .:::
...,:. , ..,. . ..... . '. ....nr e. ........rn ....,.... ...... .. .. ... ...,. .,...,., ., -�.»,. ,�. , , , , .. � .V�� �.. .,��L.r ..�. i!' � .
...... ... .. . .z .�> e � . ..
. .:.,,. .... ... ... ... ...,:..�.�*"�d:,,, ..�. ......... . ........ . . ......:. . ,,., .., ,:-:." ��,.,. � �A4,.�,,,.;. ,.iT�.... . �
..... ,`� ..,.,, .. ::: , ,::.... .,. „�� ..,,.,��.a4.. ,..:::,.� .,,,,.,. � ..n.. �.,;
.x... .. , ..,:::, . ,: .,.:�. ,,::�,: , , .....
„ .,.,:. . �.z,.,.�a ,. ..: .. . . ...:.:�
3 SIgf181, NgW - ChClStfl'18S Tf22 L2I1@ 8t Mt V2f IlOI1 AV2f1U@ EETER/CONSLJL 96 L'ONSULTANT ACiREEMENT FIN.�L.ED 10/11/95. NTP WITH DESIGN ; �.; ,.;;
4 SIgt121, New - Camino Media at Old River Road EETER/CONSUL 96 CONSULTAIVT ,aGREEMENT FINALED 10/11/9�. NTP WITH DESIUN
4 SIgf18l, New - Howell Drive at Old River Road EETER/CONSUL 96 CONSLILT;�NT AGREEMENT FIN;ILED 10/11/95. NTP �VITH DESIGN
VARIOUS Channelization SI Illll & Markin - Bike Lane Installation on Various Streets EETER/GILLBUR 96 BASE M,1PS 40%COMPLETE ��L-
4 SI f181, New - Flashing Sto Beacon on Buena Vista Road at Panama Lane tiILLBURG 96 PRELIM. PO�VER Fi ENVIRONMENTAL RECD. DESICiN 90%COMPLETE 44;
4 SIg�81, New - Hageman Road at Centennial High School Entrance UILLBURU 96 PRELIMINARY POWER & EN�%IRONMENTAL, REC'D
' %l
Signal, Interoonnect - TOC Arterial Infrastructure Conduit, Ph. 3- 5 Locations & Misc Branch GILLBURG / : '� 4�-
VARIOUS (Gosford, Kroll - White; "H" Street, Brundage - Truxtun; Mohawk, California - Truxtun; '� 96 : � y,
TABLIT 5
S reet, Truxtun - W. Columbus; Tru un, Beale -"N" St
�, � .t;
1& 7 Signal, New - Monitor Street at Pacheco Road Tj1BLIT 96 DESIUN 98%L'OMPLETE -- RESOLVIN G UTILITY CONFLICT
: ;,
2 SIgf181, New - 19th Street at L Street T.�BLIT 96 PRELIM. PO�VER & EN\'IRONMENT�I. REC'D. DESIGN 70%COMPLETE
1 SI nal U rade - Brunda e Lane at Cottonwood Road T,'�BLIT 96 DESIGN 10%COMPLETE PRELIM POWER & ENVIRONMENTAL REC'D
Signal, Interconnect - TOC Arteriai Infrastructure Conduit,Ph. 2- 5 Locations (Coffee, ;
4& 5 Stockdale - Truxtun; Min , Castro - New Stine; Stine/New Stine, White - Stockdale; UNDERWOOD 95 70°/a COMPLETE, RECHEDULED FINAL, DESIGN PENDING TOC STUDY ` �
Stockdale, Gosford - Califomia; White, Wilson - Wible} } 4� ��`;
ALL Signal, Operations - Traffic Operations Center, Phase I Construction LTNDERWOOD 96 PS�E DATE TENTATIVE PENDINCi RESULTS OF CONSULT.�NT STUDY �'
1& 2 Channelization, Signing & Marking - Speed Control Features, Oleandar Area UNDERWOOD 96 ONUOING AS NEEDED FOR OPER,ITION.IL PURPOSES
vARlous Signal, Modification - Install Emergency Vehicle Preemption Devices UNDERWOOD 96 TO BE INST,AL.LED BY CITY FORCES
vARloUS Traffic Control Modifications - Various Locations tTNDERWOOD 96 ONGOING AS NEEDED FOR OPER,9TIONAL PLJRPOSES
October 16, 199�
Scheduled P. S. & E. �
Scheduled Award of Conti act _
PL•u�s Appiroved � s s:����i;
Cont�-act Awu�ded -
The shading shows the planned month.
The date is the actual date tlut the
P.S.&E. was approved or the consh�uckon
S:\LOTUS\SCHED\961095D.WK4 08:53 AM
N
m
�
a
�
N
„
�
�
0
�
�
Q _
_
CONIST��CT(Ot1i [�VSPECTION
��a.��c-� s-�ATUs
CAPITAL [MP�OVEME�VTS
11l09/�
E ; START EST_ CQMP � 46 �
; PRO,{ECTS TYPE CORiTHACYOA I�t1S�ECTOR ! OATE � DATE � COMP i
CALIFOR�VIA AVE. — EASTON TO OAK -: ROADWAY RECbNSTRUC7 GRANITE CONST. ° GRINDSTAFF � 07/08/95 12/29/95 i 5% `
GAll.OWAY, STOCKflAiE & HAGEMAiV � AOAOWAY WIDENING CRlFFI�H COMPA[�Y � FtCK ! 10y/15/95 � 12J20/95 � 096
CA��OWAY DRNE @ MEACHAM ROAD TRAFFIC SlGNAI A—C ELECTRIC ; � 0%
� CALLOWAY DR.— STOCKDALE TO BRIMHAI.L BRI�GE 8 ROADWAY GRANITE COI�ST_ : CALL 05/30/95 ' 20%
CHESTER AVE�VUE UNDERPASS BRIDGES SEISMIC REf#iO�iT GRANITE COIVSTREJCTION � • 0%
iCOFFEE ROAD @ HAGEMAN ROAD TAA�FIG SIGNA� AS ELECTafC ALLEN 10116/95 .- 12/05J95 ' 20%
CONVENTION CEl�1TEFi
CORPORATION YARD
FAST HRLiNDAGE LANE @ OSWEIL STREET
F ST. @ TRUX1i1N AVE.
' FIRE STATION # 4,6,10,11
HUGHES — PACHECO AHEA
MANOR STREE7 BRIDGE @ KERN RIVER
MING AVENUE & STOCKDALE H�GHWAY
MONI�OR STREET 8 FAIR�AX ROAD
�voRr�Easr aA��s�+��
':OI.EANDE#� — SUNSET AiEA
! PANAMA LAlVE @ STINE R0,4D
PARK STOCKDALE
�IANCHERIA ROAD BEilDGE
; STOCKDALE HWY @ JENI(�NS ROAD
� STOGlCDALE HWY.— GOS�ORD TO Ol.� Ri1iE
: UNION AVENUE � MOUf�fT VERRfON AVENt�E
� VARIOUS STREETS
PAFIKING LOT GRIFFiTH CON[P/�VY
WOMEN'S SHOWEA FACILITY HAWKiNS COMPANY
`TFIAFFIC SiGNAI. GRIFFC'fH COMPANY
SIG1�1A� MODIFICATCOl1f J A—C ELECTRlC
D(HAIJSTSYSTEM KEfiN fu4ECHANICAL
INSTAL� $EWEAS GILLFAM 8� SONS
' REPAIR GUARD fiA1t,S : G& W FENCE COMPANY
SIGNAl. It�TERCOPiNECT i TAFT ELECTRIC
- L.1FT STATION MOOIF[CAT�ONS � GRIFFITH COMPANY
SEWEH TFiUNK LlNE � SPIESS GONSTRUCTION
;-- --
CU�iB & GUTTER � GRIFFiTH COMPANY
� THAFFIC SIGNAL.Ii�STALL. � BRADFORD E�EC7RIC
RA
' RESURFACING j GRANITE CONST.
PAiN7iNG MERZI PAINTENG
� iRAFFIC SIGNAL McKEE EIECTafC
i ROAD RECANS7AUC7' ; GRiF�lT1-4 COMPANY
; MEDIAN SURFACE COf�FST. �GFiIFFITH COMPANY
� RESUFiFACING } GRANITE CONBTRUCTE0111
�
. c�on-r�
s McNEILL
� BOI.ANOS
MCNEILL
' eou�vos
UV
: ALLEN
10/02/95 :
: 10J30/95 �
j 1011 srss i
; 1 o/3ois5 ;
F-------•
; 11/14/95 '
11/14,f85
12J19/95
12/05/95
01 /04/96
o�l2slss
MCNEII� � 10J3Q195 11/20/95 �
MAHAFFEY ' t o/25�95 12/14/95 ;
BOLANOS � 11/1l95 02/22/9S
MiLLWEE j tW1o/94 11/t7/95
, _
ALLEN
SHAMSHOIAN
I FECK
; FtC K
i
o� :
40%
1096
�
o%i
D /o :
5%:
0%i
a�
96%
096 �
06j2S/s5 � t 1/� 0/95 � 609b �
09/ l 5/95 � t 2J29/95 ; 696 ,
;
( 0%i
10J9/95 ; 91/28/95 ; 50%�
Q8/� 4/95 � 01/17/96 i 2596 �
{ ��
' i
i �
N O',� — 3— 9 5 F R I 1 1 e 3 0
CONSTRUCTION INS�'�Ct14N
PROJECT STATU�
SUBDIVISION
� y �a2/ss
_.,...._..._ _ ._�. .._.....,�_._____........ .. . . .. . ... _.
P.M. OR
TRACT #'S � .. �._.��„��LOCATION .
7R 5018—D HAGEM,4N RD. 8� FRUINALE
TR 5292 (PRI) MOUNT�4fN VISTA @ WW{7E OAK
TR 5�34 JEWETiA — N(O BRtMHALL
7R 5372�-2 VERDUGO 8 R�INA
TR 5432-2 �IS STINE @ POPPYSEED
TR 5476-2 HAGEM�AN & RIV�RI.AKES DR.
TR 5544—D BRIMMALL ROAD 8� VERDUGO LANE
TR 5552—A&B RENFRO RD. & STOCKDALE HWY.
TR 5565-3 HAG�M,qN RD,—E/O OLD FARM R0.
TR 559i J�WE'fT'A — N/O BRIMHALL
TR 5646-2 FAIRFAX RD Q VALLEYVIEW pR
7Fi 5648—A WI$L� FiO. & McKEE RD.
TR 5678-� WHiTE l.N, S� PIN OAK PARK BLVD.
I TR 5683-A McKEE 8� AK�RS
_ . .. . .,.�....,...__ .....
DEV�LOPERI
CONTRAC70R
p�VIL1.E HOMES
CASTLE & COOKE
CARf�IAGE HOMES
CENTEX REAL ESTATE
CHAMBERS FUND
H[NESL�Y
I�ISPECTOR
LESH
LESH _ . ..
LESH, .,.�. . ,.... ..,
L�SH
Pl�RCE
LESW
CASTLE & COOKE LESH
WEST K�RN DEVELOPMENT t�SH
U.S. HOM�S LESH
CARRlAGE HOM�S LESH
W.D.J. CORPORAiION � PIERCE
FRANCO 6WLD�RS PI�RCE
CASTLE 8 COOK�
DaNDY HOM�S
�"p 5697-1 S/O WA�iRlS - W/O STINE KYLE CART�R
TR 5719-1 PATTnN, S/O HAG�MAN R0. PAOBUILT
TR 5728-2 J�W�TTA 8� WAG�MAN
TI� 5767 MOUNT�41N VISTA 8� CAMPUS PARK BILL W. GII.UAM
T� 5768 WI�LE F�D. 8� B��KSHIFi� FiD. CAStTAS DEL QUINTA
Tt� 5775 FFiUINALE AV�. 8� OLIVE bFi. COUNTY TRACi'
TR 5799 HAGE�I�N RD.— E/O FRUINAIE DEVILL� HOMES
7R 5809—A UNION AVE. @ PANAMA LN. WATTENBAAGER
iR 5810 (PRl) GOS�013D DR. Qa I.AUR��.CLEN BLVD.
� _ �__._.._...... . ....._.... � �_ w..... . . ..
KERN HB#3 STINE � McKEE COLOMBO
PM 8337 COFFEE RD. & DOWNING Rp, SOUI'HWE$T �ONT.
PM �oa5a COFF'�� RD. & OLIVE DR.
��5H.,_., ._.._...
PI�RCE
PI�RCE
LESH
LESH
L�SW
!'I�RCE
�.ESH
LESH
PI�RCE,,, ^ W,
t�ESH
CHOATE
I�ESH
LESH
P . 0 3
o�, '
CQMP._.
65%
, , 90%
95%
99°10
. „55%
1�%
54%
30%
35%
SQ%
50%
85%
80%
80%
99%
55%
10%
�oa°�o
45%
99°�
65°�
35%
80%
95%
90%
sa��o
PRO,ECT I F.Y. 1995-96 BUDGETED PROJECTS
NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION
T6K001 20th Street Area — Curb and Gutter
P6H001 Two Above Ground Fuet Tanks --- Sites to be Determined b need
P6J001 A re ate Base on North 2800 Acre Perimeter Levee RR to 2nd Poin
T6K002 Baker Street — Curb Cut Im rovement
P6K004 Bakersfield Municipal Airport Clear Zone
E6J001 Bellevue River Weir Reconstruction
T6K003 Bridge Replacement 34th St at Eastside Canal
T6K004 Brid e Re lacement Oak St. at Carrier Canal
T6K083
E6J003
Bridqe �deninq State Hwy. 58 at Fr'�ant Kern Canal
Canal and Storm Drain Fencinq — Various Locations
Chan
Protection For Station 11 & 12
ation State Rte. 178 — Fairfax Rd. to 1000 Ft.
T6K006 Channelization Si nin & Markin — Bike Lane Installation on Various
T6C001
— Sidewalks. Curb
E6J004 Kern River Transmission Water Main
T6K009 Lake Street Area — Curb and Gutter, Part II
95-96 CIPSUMM 03—Nov-95
1
WARD II FUND I FUND DEPT/
NO NUM SRC DIV
Various
4
2
1
1
4
2
2
2
2
7
All 7
All 7
4
3
3
ALL
ALL
1,2
2
2
2
2
2
2, 6 and 7
ALL
ALL
ALL
ALL
ALL
2
4
2
111
311
431
111
451
451
431
121
151
151
121
332
431
431
441
151
332
121
151
151
311
311
311
461
311
431
311
151
441
431
411
421
111
441
111
COF
AWF
CDBG
BAF
FAA
AWF
HBRR
GT
GT
HBRR
RBB
AWF
AWF
DWF
DEV
RBB
TEA
GT
GT
COF
COF
COF
PLF
COF
AWF
COF
GT
DWF
AWF
SE
RF
CDBG
DWF
CDBG
FIRE
WATER
PW
PW
PW
WATER
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
WATER
WATER
WATER
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
COMSE
COMSE
COMSE
COMSE
DEVSEF
WATER
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
COMSE
WATER
PW
FY 95-96
BUDGET
$34, 813
$24,000
$38,000
$15,128
$126, 800
$1,141,200
$45, 000
$15,400
$3, 800
$3, 800
$15,400
$40, 000
$92,000
$32,100
$22, 000
$0
$40, 000
$272, 000
$68, 000
$35,000
$40,000
$12,200
$2,295,500
$635,000
$38, 850
$235,000
$2,175, 000
$25,000
$12,500
$12, 500
$25,000
$25,000
$12,300
$175,000
$122, 542
°k OF
REMAINING BUDGET
BALANCE EXPENDED
$34, 813 0.00%
$24, 000 0.00%
$38, 000 0.00°k
$15,128 0.00%
$126,800 0.00%
$1,141,200 0.00%
$45, 000 0. 00%
$15,400 0.00°k
$3, 800 0.00%
$3,800 0.00°k
$15,400 0.00%
$40, 000 0.00°�
$92,000 0.00%
$32,100 0.00°k
$22, 000 0.00%
$0 0.00°k
$40,000 0.00%
$272,000 0.00%
$68, 000 0.00°k
$35,000 0.00%
$40,000 0.00°k
$12,184 0.13%
$2, 295, 500 0.00%
$150,977 76.22%
$38, 850 0.00°�
$235,000 0.00%
$2,175, 000 0.00%
$5,808 76.77°k
$12,500 0.00%
$12,500 0.00°k
$25,000 0.00%
$25,000 0.00°k
$12,205 0.77%
$175,000 0.00°k
$122,447 0.08°k
PRO.�CT F.Y. 1995-96 BUDGETED PROJECTS
NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION
P6K005 Land Ac uisition Freewa Fii ht of Wa - Various Locations
P6K001 Landfill Control Final Gas S stem
P6C003 Lowell Park - Game Slab
P6C004 Northeast Medians - Stam ed Concrete
�61001 OFFICE E�UIPMENT AND FURNISHINGS FOR POLICE BUILDING
�61002 OFFICE EQUIPMENT AND FURNISHINGS FOR POLICE BUILDING
E6K014 Panama #10 - Sewer Pro'ect, Phase III
P6C005 Park Development-Northeast-Site Undetermined
T6K018 Resurfacin Fairfax Rd. - H . 178 to 300 Ft. South of Paladino Dr.
T6K019 R
T6K020 R
T6K021
Minq Ave. - Old River Rd. to Gosford Rd.
C� St. - Truxtun Ave. to Golden State Ave
South H St. - Arvin Edison Canal to Panama Ln.
Stine Rd. - Pacheco Rd. to White Ln.
T6K023 Resurfacin White Ln. - Old River Rd. to Gosford Rd.
T6K024 Resurfacin Wilson Rd. - South H St to Chester Ave. •
T6K025 Resurfacin G1 24th Street - N St. to Golden State Ave.
T6K026 Resurfacin G1 Auburn St. - Redlands Dr. to Oswell St
T6K027 Resurfacin G1 Blade Ave. - Pasadena St. to Boise St
raKrna Aesurfacina (G11 Boise St. - Redlands Dr. to University Ave.
95-96 CIPSUMM 03-Nov-95 2
WARD
ALL
3
1
2&3
ODEL)
7
3
3
6
4
4
5
5
2
5
5
1,2
1,2
3
3
4
2
2
7
6
6
4
4
7
7
2
3
3
3
FUND
NUM
332
421
111
151
311
311
111
321
321
321
321
321
431
151
311
142
151
151
121
151
121
151
151
121
151
151
121
151
121
151
121
151
151
151
151
FUND
RBB
RF
CDBG
GT
SAF
SAF
CDBG
PKF
DEV
PKF
PKF
PKF
AWF
GT
SAF
TDA
GT
GT
STP
GT
� STP
RRR
GT
STP
GT
GT
STP
GT
STP
GT
STP
GT
GT
GT
GT
DEPT/
DIV
PW
COMSE
COMSE
PD
PD
PW
COMSE
COMSE
COMSE
COMSE
COMSE
COMSE
COMSE
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
FY 95-96
BUDGET
$40, 000
$300, 000
$19,818
$155,000
$77, 850
$54, 200
$369,750
$299,000
$500, 000
$so, o00
$100,000
$295,000
$70, 000
$70,000
$120,000
$90, 000
$19, 500
$14,100
$109,700
$36, 300
$284,600
$290, 200
$20, 300
$156,600
$47, 500
$15,000
$116,500
$34,100
$266,000
$11,400
$85, 800
$53,400
$41,700
$17, 500
$33, 000
% OF
REMAINING BUDGET
BALANCE EXPENDED
$40,000 0.00%
$300,000 0.00%
$19,818 0.00%
$155,000 0.00°k
$77,850 0.00°k
$51,532 4.92°k
$369,316 0.12°�
$299,000 0.00°�6
$500,000 0.00%
$60,000 0.00%
$100,000 0.00%
$295,000 0.00°k
$70, 000 0.00°�
$70,000 0.00%
$119,780 0.18°k
$90, 000 0.00°�6
$19,500 0.00°h
$14,100 0.00%
$109,700 0.00°k
$36,300 0.00°k
$284,600 0.00°k
$290,200 0.00%
$20, 300 0.00°k
$156,600 0.00°k
$47, 500 0.00%
$15,000 0.00°k
$116,500 0.00%
$34,100 0.00%
$266,000 0.00°k
$11,400 0.00%
$85,800 0.00%
$53,400 0.00°k
$41, 700 0.00%
$17,500 0.00%
$33,000 0.00%
PRO.�CT
T6K029
T6K030
T6K031
T6K032
T6K033
T6K034
T6K035
T6K036
T6K037
T6K038
T6K039
T6K041
T6K043
Resurfacin
Resurfacin
Resurfacin
Resurfacin
Resurfacin
Resurfacin
Resurfacin
Resurfacin
Resurfaci
Resurfaci
Resurfaci
Resurfaci
F.Y. 1995-96 BUDGETED PROJECTS
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
g(G1) Colgate Ln. — Boise St. to Kaibab Ave.
g(G1) Harvard Dr — Pasadena St. to Kaibab Ave.
g(G1) Kaibab Ave — Pasadena St to Harvard Dr.
g(G1) Oak St — Truxtun Ave. to 24th St.
g(G1) Oswell St — Auburn St. to Redlands Dr.
g(G1) Pasadena St.— Renegade Ave. to Kaibab Ave.
g�Gi) Purdue Dr — Pasadena St. to Oswell St.
g(G1) Redlands Dr — Wenatchee Ave. to University Ave.
g(G1) Renegade Ave. — Wenatchee Ave. to Boise St.
g(G1) White Ln — Madison St. to Cottonwood Rd.
g(G2) Gosford Rd — Pacheco Rd. to District Blvd.
g(G2) Manninca St — Ming Ave. to Outingdale Dr.
g(G2� North Half Moon Dr. — Ashe Rd to Scenic Wy.
g(G2) Panama Ln — 400' East of Colony St to South H�
�g (G2) South Half Moon Dr. — Ashe Rd. to Scenic Wy.
� G2 South Half Moon Dr. — OI m ia Dr. to Ashe Rd.
�.,�..,� �,w,..,,..,.,
T6K045 Resurfacin G2 Stine Rd. — Harris Rd. to Pacheco Rd.
T6K046 Resurfacin G2 Wible Rd. — Panama Ln. to Harris Rd.
P6K006 Roof Re air — Develo ment Senrices Buildin
E6K008 Sewer Construction — Telemet Ci Wide �
E6K009 Sewer Rehabiliation Gosford Road Lift Station Odor Control
E6K010 Sewer Rehabiliation Kern �sland Canal — 4th St to Sth St
E6K011 Sewer Rehabiliation Modif Lift Station — Bal I Station
E6K012 Sewer Rehabiliation Modif Lift Station — Bank St East of Oakdale Dr
E6K015 � Sewer Rehabilitation Red Lion Sewer Re lacement
E6K013 Sewe� Rehabititation Westchester Area Alle s Final Phase
T6K053 Signal, Interconnect — TOC Arterial Infrastructure Conduit, Ph. 3— 5
T6K054
�
�.'�.�
Modification — Install Emerge
New — 19th Street at L Street
New — Camino Media at Old
Vehicle
Road
New — Christmas Tree Lane at Mt Vernon Avenue
New — Flashinq Stop Beacon on Buena Vista Road at
New — Hacaeman Road at Centennial High School Eni
95-96 CIPSUMM 03—Nov-95
3
W OD �
3
3
5
3
3
3
3
3
1
4
5
6
7
6
4
6
6,7
1
ALL
4
1
2
5
5
2
ALL
ALL
VARIOUS
2
4
4
3
4
4
FUND
NUM
151
151
151
151
151
151
151
151
151
151
151
151
151
151
151
151
151
151
311
411
411
411
411
411
411
411
121
151
151
151
151
151
151
151
151
FUND I DEPT/
GT
GT
GT
RRR
GT
GT
GT
GT
GT
GT
GT
GT
GT
GT
RRR
RRR
RRR
COF
SE
SE
SE
SE
SE
SE
SE
CMAGl
GT
GT
GT
DEV
GT
GT
GT
GT
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
FY 95-96
BUDGET
$17, 500
$54�600
$38, 800
$125,600
$67, 000
$13,600
$35,900
$59,200
$27, 200
$67, 900
$69, 200
$61,100
$59,200
$57, 300
$58,200
$53,400
$97, 000
$60,100
$40,000
$75, 000
$16,000
$170,000
$80, 000
$80, 000
$350,000
$270,000
$507,000
$66,000
$50,000
$94,000
$82,000
$43,000
$110,000
$11,000
$27, 500
% OF
REMAINING BUDGET
BALANCE EXPENDED
$17,500 0.00%
$54,600 0.00%
$38,800 0.00%
$125,600 0.00°k
$67,000 0.00°k
$13,600 0.00°k
$35,900 0.00°k
$59,200 0.00°�6
$27, 200 0.00%
$67,900 0.00°�
$69,200 0.00°k
$61,100 0.00%
$5g,200 0.00%
$57,300 0.00%
$58,200 0.00°h
$53,400 0.00°k
$97,000 0.00%
$60,100 0.00%
$39, 985 0.04%
$75, 000 0.00%
$8, 085 49.47%
$170,000 0.00%
�80, 000 0.00%
$80, 000 0.00%
$350,000 0.00%
$270,000 0.00°�
$507,000 0.00%
$66,000 0.00%
$306 99.39%
$94,000 0.00°k
$82,000 0.00%
$42, g72 0.07%
$109,972 0.03%
$11,000 0.00%
$27, 500 0.00%
PRO.ECT
NUMBER
T6K061
F.Y. 1995-96 BUDGETED PROJECTS
- Howell Drive at Old River
T6K062 Si nal, New - Monitor Street at Pacheco Aoad
T6K063 Si nal, O erations - Traffic O erations Center, Phase I Construction
T6K064 Si nal, U rade - Brunda e Lane at Cottonwood Road
G16C003 Silver Creek Park - Automatic Pool Cover and Automatic Pool Vacuum
E6J005 Storaqe Reservoir for Interface Pipeline
E6K001 Storm Drain Landfair Lift Station U rade
E6K002 Storm Drain Truxtun Avenue Lift Station i
E6K003 Storm Drains Terrace Way - Union Ave.
95=96 CIPSUMM 03-Nov-95
TOTAL
4
WARD
4
4
1,7
ALL
ALL
1
4
4
4
5
5
1
1
ALL
ALL
ALL
5
6
2
1
2,5
6
5
5
4 and 6
VARIOUS
7
1
6
6
4
4 and 6
1
FUND
NUM
151
151
151
121
151
151
311
441
441
411
411
431
151
151
151
151
151
151
151
311
332
332
332
332
441
151
111
411
412
412
412
441
421
FUND IDEPT/
SRC DIV
GT
GT
CMA�
GT
GT
COF
DWF
CAL
SE
SE
AWF
GT
GT
GT
GT
RRR
RRR
GT
COF
RBB
RBB
RBB
RBB
DWF
GT
CDBG
COP
SE
COP
COP
DWF
RF
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
COMSE
WATER
WATER
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
WATER
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
WATER
PW
96 OF
FY 95-96 REMAINING BUDGET
BUDGET BALANCE EXPENDED
$87,000 $87,000 0.00%
$38,000 $37,972 0.07%
$116,000 $116,000 0.00%
$221, 300 $221, 300 0. 00°k
$28,700 $28,673 0.09%
- $121,000 $121,000 Q.00°h
$12,500 $12,500 0.00%
$1,550,000 $1,550,000 0.00°k
$3,000,000 $3,000,000 0.00°�
$100,000 $100,000 0.00%
$50,000 $48,032 3.94°k
$62,000 $62,000 0.00%
$62, 000 $62, 000 0. 00%
$50,000 $50,000 0.00%
$100,000 $100,000 0.00%
$50,000 $50,000 0.00%
$200,000 $200,000 0.00�
$65,000 $65,000 0.00%
$50,000 $37,925 24.15%
$75,000 $75,000 0.00%
$150,000 $147,054 1.96°k
$aso,000 $aso,000 o.00%
$200,000 $200,000 0.00°k
$200,000 $191,723 4.14%
$832,500 $727,181 12.65%
$65, 000 $57, 652 11.30%
$228,000 $228,000 0.00%
$33�,000 $330,000 0.00%
$i 22,000 �� 22,000 0.00�
$7,930,000 $7,930,000 0.00°k
$1,000,000 $999,992 0.00%
$190,000 $190,000 0.00%
$47,000 $47,000 0.00°k
$33,066 951 $32,364 532 2•12%
PRO.ECT F.Y. 1994-95 CARRYOVER PROJECTS
NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION
T5K014 21 ST STREET RESURF. - F STREET TO CHESTER
T3K002 CHINA GRADE LOOP BRIDGE REPLACEMENT AT BEARDSLE
T4K053 F STREET RESURF. - 14TH TO 24TH
T5K016 FAIRVIEW ROAD RESURF.- GWENDOLYN TO MONITOR
T3K039 MANOR DRIVE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT AT CARRIER CANAL
T5K054 MING AVENUE RESURF.- WIBLE TO HUGHES
T5K017 MONTEREY STREET RESURF.- ALTA VISTA TO BEALE
T5K019 P STREET RESURF.- STH TO CALIFORNIA
T4K018 P STREET RESURF. - BRUNDAGE TO 4TH
T5K020 PACHECO ROAD RESURF.- WIBLE TO HUGHES
T5K021 Q STREET RESURF.- CALIFORNIA TO TRUXTUN
T4K034 SIGNAL INTERCONNECT - SOUTHWEST ARTERIAL
T5K051 TOC ARTERIAL INFRASTRUCTURE CONDUIT - 5 LOCATIOI
T5K050 UNIVERSITY AVENUE RESURF.- WENATCHEE TO COLUMB
T5K023 WIBLE ROAD RESURF.- 600'N/O BELLE TERRACE TO BRU�
T5K022 WIBLE ROAD RESURF.-_PLANZ TO MING
TOTAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION FUND
95-96 CIPSUMM 03-Nov-95
1
WARD
NO
2
2
2
7
2
5
2
1
1
6
2
4, 5&6
4&5
3
1
6
2
4
4
2
7
2
3
5
4
VARIOUS
7
7
2
4
1
4
2&3
1
1
PROJ
FUND
NUM
121
121
121
121
121
121
121
121
121
121
121
121
121
121
121
121
151
151
151
151
151
151
151
151
151
151
151
151
151
151
151
151
151
151
151
FUND
SRC
STP
STP
STP
STP
STP
STP
STP
STP
STP
STP
STP
CMAGl
CMAG1
STP
STP
STP
GT
GT
GT
GT
GT
GT
GT
GT
GT
GT
GT
GT
GT
GT
GT
GT
GT
GT
GT
DEPT/
DIV
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
AMOUNT �
$60,305
$350,250
$157, 000
$156, 510
$215,000
$203, 719
$71, 657
$44, 305
$71, 350
$103,458
$73, 305
$178,000
$497, 800
$79, 300
$151,058
$272,410
% OF
REMAINING BUDGET
BALANCE EXPENDE
$60, 305 0.00%
$350,250 0.00°k
$157,000 0.00%
$156,510 0.00%
$215,000 0.00%
$203, 719 0.00%
$71, 657 0. 00%
$44,305 0.00°,6
$71, 350 0.00°�6
$103,458 0.00%
$73,305 0.00%
$178,000 0.00°k
$497,800 0.00%
$79,300 0.00%
$151,058 0.00%
$272,410 0.00°k
$2,685,427 $2,685,427 0.00%
$7,910
$50, 000
$266, 501
$20,000
$20, 320
$25, 000
$9, 000
$25, 000
$59,800
$146,670
$186,000
$26,900
$9,265
$84,330
$113,000
$8, 500
$149,847
$5,910
$10,910
$7,817 1.18%
$50,000 0.00°k
$254,526 4.49%
$20, 000 0.00%
$20,298 0.11 °k
$25,000 0.00%
$9,000 0.00°k
$25, 000 0. 00°k
$59,800 0.00°k
$77, 201 47. 36%
$186,000 0.00%
$26,577 1.20%
$9,265 0.00%
$84,330 0.00%
$113,000 0.00°k
$51,100 0.00%
$149,847 0.00%
$5,910 0.00%
$10,910 0.00°�
PRO.�CT
NUMBER
T5K020
T5K021
T4K037
T4K034
T5K052
T5K055
T5K051
T5K010
T5K050
T5K023
T5K022
T3K036
F.Y. 1994-95 CARRYOVER PROJECTS
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PACHECO ROAD - WIBLE TO HUGHES
� STREET - CALIFORNIA TO TRUXTUN
RANCHERIA RD. AT KERN RIVER BRIDGE REPAIRS
SIGNAL INTERCONNECT - SOUTHWEST ARTERIAL
SPEED CONTROL FEATURES VARIOUS LOCATIONS
STREET LIGHT ACCaUISITIONS - PENDING ANNEXATIONS
TOC ARTERIAL INFRASTRUCTURE CONDUIT - 5 LOCATIONS
TRAFFIC COUNT DETECTOR INSTALLATION, VAR. LOCATIONS
UNIVERSITY AVENUE - WENATCHEE TO COLUMBUS
WIBLE ROAD - 600'N/O BELLE TERRACE TO BRUNDAGE
WIBLE ROAD - PLANZ TO MING
WIDEN INTERSECTION - STOCKDALE AT CALIF(PHASE 2 8� 3)
WIDEN INTERSECTION - WHITE LANE AT WIBLE ROAD
TOTAL GAS TAX FUND
P5C007 KERNRIVER PARKWAYEMPLOYEE PROJECT
P00001 KERN RIVER BIKEPATH/PARKING
P1C004 KERN RIVER PARKWAY
TOTAL PARKLAND BOND FUND
PROJ ACOUNTS PROJECT % OF
WARD FUND FUND DEPT/ CARRYOVER REMAINING BUDGET
NO NUM SRC DIV AMOUNT BALANCE EXPENDE
6 151 GT PW $13,365 $13,365 0.00°k
2 151 GT PW $9,910 $9,879 0.31 °k
3 151 GT PW $44,993 $44,840 0.34%
4,5&6 151 GT PW $23,000 $22,955 0.20%
VARIOUS 151 GT PW $50,000 $50,000 0.00°k
VARIOUS 151 GT PW $20,000 $20,000 0.00%
4&5 151 GT PW $64,500 $64,455 0.07%
VARIOUS 151 GT PW $12,920 $12,410 3.95°k
3 151 GT PW $10,300 $10,300 0.00%
1 151 GT PW $19,565 $19,565 0.00°k
6 151 GT PW $35,320 $35,320 0.00°k
5 151 GT PW $48,637 $44,209 9.10%
7 151 GT PW $114,860 $44,209 61.51°k
$1,692,233 $1,577,088 6.80%
9�-96 CIPSUMM 03-Nov-95 2
5 162 5021 $11, 678 $9, 024 22.73%
5 � 63 5021 $66, 596 $59, 969 9.95%
5 163 5021 $27, 229 $16, 558 39.19°k
$93, 825 $76, 527 18.44%
VARIOUS 311
VARIOUS 311
2 311
2 311
5 311
2 311
2 311
2 311
2 311
6 311
2 311
2 311
VARIOUS 311
4051 $81,998
4031 $53,593
5011 $2, 658
5011 $54,207
5021 $121,989
1371 $211,105
2011 $1,302,480
5011 $500,000
2021 $133,620
3031 $524,543
4031 $10,788
5011 $19,816
3031 $32,000
$81,998
$48, 221
$2, 658
$370
$100, 583
$201, 300
$1,298,479
$500,000
$86,618
$522,816
$9,861
$19,816
$147
0.00°�
10.02°k
0.00%
99.32%
17.55%
4.64%
0.31 %
0.00°k
35.18%
0.33%
8.59%
0.00°k
99.54%
PROJECT F.Y. 1994-95 CARRYOVER PROJECTS
NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION
'ATION #2 RETR
I I- DATA STU DY
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND
P4C004 CONVENTION CENTER BALLROOM CONSTRUCTION
P4C005 CONVENTION CENTER MEETING ROOMS CONSTRUCTION
P5C006 TEVIS AREA AREA 1- PARK DEVELOPMENT
TOTAL TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT FUND
T3K015 CALLOWAY BRIDGE OVERCROSSING
T4K052 COFFEE ROAD OVERCROSSING CONSTRUCTION
E1 K001 PLANT #2 EXPANSION PHASE I& II DESIGN
E4K002 WOOD RECYCLING FACILITY - ASPHALT PAVING
P5K006 CONSTRUCT FUEL FARM AND REMOVE EXISTING TANK
P5K004 CONSTRUCT RESTROOM FACILITY
• TOTAL GENERAL AVIATION FUND
9�-96 CIPSUMM 03-Nov-95
3
PROJ ACOUNTS PRO,�CT % OF
WARD FUND FUND DEPT/ CARRYOVER REMAINING BUDGET
NO NUM SRC DIV AMOUNT BALANCE EXPENDED
2 311 3031 $52,956 $86,582 0.00°k
N/A 311 3031 $20,000 $20,000 0.00%
$3,121,753 $2,979,449 4.56°k
2 312
2 313
4 321
6 331
3 331
7 331
7 331
4 331
1 331
6 331
6 331
5 331
5 331
4 331
4 332
4 333
1 411
1 421
1 451
1 451
5011
5011
5021
4031
4031
4031
4031
4031
4031
4031
4031
4031
4031
4031
$837, 065
$16, 534
$210,199
$88, 500
$55, 000
$151,420
$81,300
$362, 040
$151,500
$151,500
$151,500
$378, 602
$17,000
$85, 340
$1,673,702
$837,065
$16, 534
$210,199
$88, 500
$55,000
$151,420
$81,300
$542, 380
$151,500
$151,500
$151,500
$378,602
$17,000
$0
$1,768,702
4031 $1,705,000 $1,703,091
4031 $7,904,000 $7,805,490
4071 $138,800 $138,800
4081 $156,735 $152,217
4051 $200,000 $200,000
4051 $35,000 $35,000
$235,000 $235,000
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00°�
0.00%
0.00°�6
0.00%
0.00%
100.00%
0.00°k
0.11°k
1.25°k
0.00°k
2.88%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
PRO,�CT F.Y. 1994-95 CARRYOVER PROJECTS w��
NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION No
P5K007 LAND ACC]UISITION - OFF STREET PARKING
TOTAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FUNDS
GRAND TOTAL - FY 94-95 CARRYOVERS:
TOTAL C.I.P. CITYWIDE
95-96 CIPSUMM 03—Nov-95 4
PROJ
FUND
NUM
2 461
5 658
5 658
4 661
7 654
3 655
3 655
4 659
4 659
4 659
4 659
4 659
4 . 659
4 659
4 659
4 659
4 659
6 657
FUND I DEPT/ II CARRYO�
SRC DIV AMOUNT
6580 $251,195
4071
4071
4031
4071
4071
4071
4031
4031
4031
4031
4031
4031
4031
4031
4031
4031
4071
$44, 750
$492,000
$599, 000
$100, 000
$36, 000
$3,289,000
$2,000
$4, 500
$9, 000
$20,700
$291,000
$9, 000
$6, 900
$5,900
$31,500
$471,000
$300,000
°� OF
REMAINING BUDGET
BALANCE EXPENDED
($49,70� 119.79%
$44, 750
$355, 321
$599,000
$100, 000
$36,000
$3, 289, 000
$2,000
$4, 500
$9, 000
$20, 700
$70, 975
$9,000
$6,900
$5,900
$31, 500
$471,000
$300,000
0.00%
27.78°k
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00°�
0.00°k
0.00°k
0.00°�
0.00°�
75.61 %
0.00%
0.00°k
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
$5,412,250 $5,055,546 6.59°k
$26145 396 $25 200 453 3.61 °k
$59 212,347 $57,564,985 2.78%
TO:
�
B A K E R S F I E L D
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
Alan Tandy, City Manager
October 30, 1995
FROM: Darnell W. Haynes, Assistant to the Public Works Director
THROUGH: Raul M. Rojas, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: 1995-96 CIP Status - Notice of Completion
Since the last monthly CIP status report, Notice of Completion was accepted for the
following projects:
95-173
95-113
95-45
95-61
94-213
94-162
C& L Coatings, Inc. Contract to repair and recoat 9/28/95
Bakersfield Convention Center
Floor and install expansion
gasket around ice floor
DeWalt Group, Inc.
Lutrel Services, Inc.
Improvement Agreement Tract
5716, Phase 1
Contract for removal and
installation of underground
storage tanks at the Police
Dept. and the Corp. Yard
9/28/95
10/10/95
Insituform Southwest Contract for rehabilitation of 10/10/95
existing sewer line in the
Westchester Areas - Phase 2
and in Stockdale Hwy.
General Development & Bid to award contract for 10/10/95
Construction construction of Fire Station No.
2 structural rehabilitation �
B.R.C. Corp. Improvement Agreement for 10/18/95
Tract No. 5644 Phase 2
95-131 Castle & Cooke Homes, Improvement Agreement Tract 10/18/95
Inc. 5464, southeast corner of Ming
Avenue and Haggin Oaks Blvd.
C.I.P. Status
through October 15, 1995
Page 2
94-99 Castle & Cooke Homes, Landscape Improvement 10/18/95
Inc. Agreement for Tract No. 5489
Phase B
95-87 Tevis Ranch, LP Improvement Agreement Tract 10/19/95
No. 5666, Phase II
94-243 Castle & Cooke Homes, Landscape Improvement 10/27/95
Inc. Agreement for Tract 5678,
Phase B
95-252 A& E Development Improvement Agreement for 10/27/95
maintenance of subdivision
work completed prior to
approval of Tract 5808
95-129 Castle & Cooke Homes, Improvement Agreement Tract 10/27/95
Inc. 5544, Phase C south of
Brimhall Road and west of
Verdugo Lane
cc: G. Waiters
T. Slater
D. Teubner
�
TO:
FROM
�
B A K E R S F I E L D
MEMORANDUM
November 6, 19�
/
ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER
:� j��.B. TEUBNER, ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: FINAL DRAFT OF ANNEXATION STRATEGY
�OH��DEHTI�I
As you are aware, the Annexation Strategy Working Group has been meeting for
approximately two months and has developed a detailed plan for approaching
annexation of four initial areas which include Dennen #1, Old Stockdale, Chester #3 and
Casa Loma. The entire strategy is quite lengthy and so I have provided a brief overview
of the plan and key issues impacting annexation of each area. I would like to present
this to the Department Heads as soon as possible, to begin putting together the City-
Wide Annexation Task Force. If you have any questions, please let me know.
OVERVIEW OF STRATEGY
The annexation strategy includes several key tasks which the working group felt were
critical to the overall success of the plan. These tasks are summarized as follows:
Establish and recruit members for a City-Wide Annexation Task Force
II. Review property owners lists of areas and identify possible supporters or
opponents
III. Organize Focus Groups or informal meetings with residents of each target
area to gather information and opinions on the City and annexation (See
attachment 3 for preliminary research on area specific issues)
IV.
V.
VI.
VII.
I IX.
IX.
Implement Staff Training and Education on Annexations
Establish and implement a Media Relations Plan
Implement Annexation Hotline to improve communications with the public
Network and Meet with area residents, both supporters and opponents
Develop and implement customized newsletters for each target area
Conduct Marketing Campaign Wrap-up to determine success of efforts
�
ANNEXATION STRATECY
November 6, 1995
PAGE 2
ANNEXATION AREA ISSUES
While the above steps provide a base method for approaching annexations, there is an
understanding among the members of the working group that each area is uniquely
different and will require customized approaches to successfully pursue annexation. The
working group has developed a profile for each area which includes customization
strategies that will provide a starting point for dealing with each area as an individual
unit. However, it is anticipated that Steps III and VI of the strategy will provide greater
insights as to individual concerns and questions that residents of each area have with
regard to the question of annexation. A summary of each area profile follows.
Dennen #1 - The sewer issue and unfounded resident concern over the extension of
Dennen into the Auto Mall are key issues. Staff has developed approaches for dealing
with these issues as well as overcoming street improvement issues expressed by Green
Lawn Southwest. Concentration on issues important to seniors such as service
discounts, public safety improvements and maintaining the atmosphere of the
neighborhood will be emphasized.
Old Stockdale - Strong resistance by long time residents is the primary issue in this
annexation area. Staff has developed several marketing concepts in an attempt to
overcome this resistance. These include appealing to younger residents, emphasizing
the area's strong sense of civic pride and community involvement and making changes
to City policies which insure the preservation of the area's rural atmosphere and
exclusive feel.
Chester #3 - This area is comprised of two distinctly different constituencies, the
residential neighborhood to the east of Chester Avenue and the commercial area along
Chester Avenue. This will require staff to cover a wider variety of issues in this area. In
the residential area, staff is suggesting use of themes such as improved law enforcement
and community policing and neighborhood pride and improvement. For the commercial
area, staff is suggesting an approach which might include waiving the business license
fee for the first year and involving businesses in improving the aesthetics of the area.
Casa Loma - Staff is suggesting the use of established groups in the community such
as churches and schools to distribute information about annexation and the benefits that
it could bring to the community. Another approach is to sponsor an annexation
information fair, similar in nature to the City's good neighbor festival, to introduce the
area to City law enforcement, ED/CD staff and other City amenities. This idea may also
be used in the residential area of the Chester #3 annexation area.
FIESTA AVE.
0
Q
0
�
23
26
w
J
m
�
0 500
SCALE IN FEET
T30S, R27E
DENNEN N0.1
ANNEXATION
�
OLDE STOCKDALE
ANNEXATION �
� 1� I
SiOCKDN F
.., .: ...�:
�
�
�'
/�
•
1,
�
�.�.
CHESTER NQ. 3
ANNEXATIDN
, _.
,
� �-
,�/�i
� - .
/�/ r
�/ �� � i
.� l . , ' /"�---
r► «�-��"
l-' �
�/r �i
/
�
','• r• �•.
:�t : •/ i
•� 7-
��
� �
A �(�
\��
� ���. �
��
.
��
� �� ��
� �
0 C
O C
��
I � --
Yl. '
I�
..ii �
,■ ■i ■
;■ � ■
� "i.�_ �
■ _ r■
��_ � ��� ■ ' ■
t�i�:�7 t�i�• 7�. ■ _ ��■
�� � � �� � ► � � r�r►�� � ■
�._ `. \ ■
f��.�n
CASA LOMA
ANNEXATION
,
BRUNDAGE LN. I E. BRUNDAGE LN.
, I HIGHWAY 58
�_
BELLE TERRACE
N 6
_ ��
� � �
rn �--- W
� � >
d
cirr
�
cau�vN --
cirr
�
�
�
_
LANZ RC
x
�
�
0
�_ J_
E. BELLE TERRACE I
4�
I
o �'
� ���
U
U
CASA LOMA DR
coukrr
cm --i
z !
a
Z �,.�
� WATfS DR. �
= A/RPORT �
oRUNWAY i
� i
�, E. PLANZ � ROA�
cn � ' '
WHITE LANE 1 E WHITE j]I LANE
719510
.� �
L _ �' ,
_ � �
,
) RD. couarr
�� � E. PACHECO RD.
I
�
� 9 I E. FAIRVIEW DO
�
�
�,N
�o�N�
0
........................
CITY LIMITS
___ AS OF
10/31/95
CASA LOMA
� SPECIFIC
16 P�'N
..............
�
�
� �
sa� a r�r
21 T30S, R28E
ANNEXATION STRATEGY
�°���t r
��� ��� a����g� i ���
I. Establish and recruit members for a City-�de annexation task force
A. Task Force should include 1 representative of each
department as well as all members of initial annexation
marketing working group.
B. Goals of Task Force
1. Insure participation in annexation marketing
effort from each department and make
annexation a City-wide priority.
2. Provide resource pool for addressing issues
that arise during marketing campaign, i.e.
police service, fire service, business licenses,
etc.
3. Draft an annexation mission statement and City
annexation pledge which will provide the
philosophical basis for the annexation effort and
provide guidelines to staff as to how they
should conduct themselves during the
annexation process.
4. Oversee and implement the internal education
plan for all staff involved in the annexation
process.
5. Update case sheets for target areas (See
attachment 1 for updates of revenue analysis
for target areas).
6. Oversee the Annexation Marketing Budget (See
attachment 2)
C. Task Force will be responsible for oversight of development
and implementation of City policy changes including but not
limited to (See attachment 3 for preliminary staff
recommendations on policy issues):
1. Phasing in Business License Tax over three
years for newly annexed businesses.
2. General Plan amendments as needed.
3. Ordinance changes as needed.
4. Animal Licensing issues.
5. Easing requirements for remodels/additions
D. Task Force Representatives, City Manager or designee to
meet with the County and with LAFCO to review the program
with them and ask for their cooperation. City Manager
should begin at earliest possible date to open dialogue on
this issue with County CAO. City Attorney to do same with
LAFCO Administrator.
E. A representative from the Task Force should be designated
as liaison to the City Council and will be responsible for
briefing the Councilpersons whose wards will be effected by
the target annexations and keeping the entire Council
informed of the Task Force's activities.
II. Review property owners lists to identify possible supporters and opponents
A. Try to identify at least 3 to 5 possible annexation supporters.
B. Identify all possible opponents.
C. Identify any public safety employees living in the areas or that
have relatives in the areas.
III. Organize Focus Groups or informal meetings with residents of each target
area to gather information and opinions on the City and annexation (See
attachment 3 for preliminary research on area specific issues).
A. Hire a focus group consultant to develop a format and
questions for annexation focus groups.
B. Send letter from Mayor to supporters asking for participation
in a focus group on annexation of their area into the City
(supporters may only require an informal discussing rather
than a formal focus group, this will be at staff's discretion).
C. Send letter from focus group consultant to opponents asking
for their participation in a separate focus group on what they
like and dislike about the City and what issues would be
most critical if an annexation were to occur.
D. Follow-up on the letters with phone calls confirming focus
group participation.
E. Hold focus groups and have key staff view the proceedings
and review the results to determine key issues for promoting
annexation, as well as determining key obstacles that must
be resolved to address the opposition. This will be the key
method for selecting issues and topics for the newsletters.
F. Follow-up focus groups with appropriate thank you letters.
IV. Implement Staff Training and Education on Annexations
A. Identify all staff in the City which might have some interaction
with the public on the subject of annexations.
B. Review mission statement and pledge with staff in order to
set the ground rules of the marketing campaign.
C. Outline the marketing strategy and the expected results and
familiarize staff with the procedure for handling annexation
inquiries.
D. Based on issues identified in focus groups, hold staff
workshops to brief staff and assign staff to address issues.
E. Hold staff briefings before each meeting with the public.
V. Establish and implement a Media Relations Plan
A. Send out press release prior to Council adoption of
annexation mission statement and pledge. Meet with
Newspaper Editorial Board to share strategy with them.
B. Send out press release introducing the Annexation Hotline.
C. Send out press release summarizing each neighborhood
meeting that is held. Press releases sent out after meetings
only, since we do not want to pre-publicize meetings and
attract a crowd.
D. Send out press releases on projects and programs which will
benefit residents of annexation areas as well as residents in
general.
E. Send out press release to announce distribution of first
newsletter.
F. Set goal of having one positive editorial and 3 to 5 positive
letters to the editor during each annexation marketing effort.
Use resident volunteers, core support group (as initially
identified through property lists) and community advocates
(Kern Taxpayers Assn., police, fire fighters, etc.) to
accomplish this goal.
VI. Plan and implement an Annexation Hotline to improve communications
with the public
A. Set meeting with the County to familiarize them with the
annexation hotline concept. Request that Hotline business
cards be available at selected County public counters.
Residents will be invited to call to ask questions, make
comments, requests for info., meeting, or to volunteer time or
endorsements, etc. The person answering will be trained to
answer simple questions and refer more difficult calls to
appropriate staff to be returned by the next business day.
B. Set up number and test response system. Hotline will be
connected to a desk in Planning. During peak periods the
desk will be staffed by a temporary employee that has been
trained to answer the hotline. During off periods the hotline
desk will be staffed by a small number of hand picked
individuals who will alternate answering the hotline with other
duties. The hotline will be picked up by either a recorder or
answering service during evenings and weekends (See
attachment 4 for proposed hotline procedures).
C. Develop marketing pieces, i.e. postcard and business card
type handout (See attachment 5 for an example).
D. Train City staff and elected officials to refer all annexation
calls to the number.
E. Send out postcards to residents in target area, announcing
the 800 number and how to use it effectively. Accompany
area mailings with press releases.
F. Monitor calls on daily basis to insure timely response and
randomly sample callers to ask for their feedback on how
they like the 800 number system.
VII. Networking and Meetings with area residents
A. Staff to meet with key support group and volunteers in area
to solidify support base.
B. Staff to meet with individuals or businesses which may have
a great influence over others in area to address their special
needs and issues.
C. Schedule small group meetings with residents as requested
through the hotline, through volunteers (identified through
core supporters and hotline) and through core supporters.
1. Limit meetings to small groups, preferable 10 or
less.
2. Hold meetings in homes in the area.
3. Send out question cards to meeting attendees
and collect back in advance of ineetings in
order to be prepared.
4. Tailor staff contingent to issues which are
anticipated to be discussed at meetings. Do
not overwhelm residents with large number of
staff.
D. Start at earliest date possible to schedule one-on-one
meetings with opposition to work on resolving issues and
negative image of City. Use area supporters, appropriate
staff, effective advocates, Mayor and Councilmembers, etc.
in meetings as necessary.
E. After one-on-one meetings, may graduate to small group
meetings of opponents (At staff's discretion).
IIX. Develop and implement customized newsletters for annexation target areas
A. Timing of first newsletter should coincide with first
neighborhood meeting.
a
B. Development of newsletter design and format should be
done in cooperation with a marketing consultant but
produced in-house.
C. Newsletters should be distributed by area volunteers and at
neighborhood meetings. Goal should be to distribute at least
2-3 issues over a 6 to 8 week period.
D. Newsletter should provide factual but not overly detailed or
technical information to area residents and should be tailored
to educational levels of the target audience.
E. Newsletters to be customized for each target area and may
include but are not limited to:
1. Articles addressing key issues identified in
focus groups and through the hotline.
2. Articles on benefits of annexation, highlight
positive comments of residents from other
recently annexed areas and do before and after
photos on recently annexed areas which have
benefited from capital projects.
3. Letters and testimonials from area residents
who are supportive of the annexation.
4. Reprints of positive stories appearing in the
Californian on annexation and its benefits or
editorials/letters to the editor which support
annexations.
5. Summaries of neighborhood meetings - both
the issues and what staff is doing to address
those issues.
6. Letters or comments of those opposing the
annexation and City responses addressing
concerns identified in letters.
7. Testimonials of those with high believability
such as Kern Taxpayers Association, Fire
Fighters, Police Officers, Sr. Citizens groups,
etc.
�
8. Simple comparisons of tax obligations in City
and County (use recently annexed areas as
examples) or projections of the target area.
IX. Marketing Campaign Wrap-up
A. Develop and distribute survey to residents at conclusion of
10 to 12 week campaign (See attachment 6 for sample
survey).
1. Distribute through volunteers or perhaps the
newsletter.
2. Review positive and negative responses to
determine effectiveness of the campaign and to
determine whether to hold a formal meeting.
B. Hold formal meeting for residents with, the Planning
Commission (based on survey results) to formally discuss
moving ahead with a formal application for annexation to
LAFCO.
C. Move Forward with Pre-zoning and annexation application
(based on results of survey and meeting).
Current Revenuea Diatributions
Property Tattes
Courriy Fue Fund
Gea Tax
2105
2106
2107
ToRel Gas Tax
Mo�or Vehicle In L.ieu
81.25%
18.7596
Total Moior Vehicle In Lieu
COBG
Frenchiae Texes
TranaieM Occuperx.y Taxes
Sdes Tax
Tc�tel Fie�renues
Proposed Revenues Distributions
ProPahY Taxee .:
CouMy Fire Fund
Gea Tax
2105
2106
2107
Totel Gas Tax
MaOor Vehicle in Lieu
City of Bakersfield
Analyais of Annsxntion Revsnues
Dsnn�n 1
County City Total
18.795 0 18.795
5,498 0 5,498
1,158
353
0
1,51t
5,003
1,235
8,238
0
1,647
0
8,000
41.6�
11,747
5,498 *
1,156
0
0
1,158
0 1,158
0 353
0 0
0 1,511
0 5,003
0 1,235
0 6.238
0 0
0 1,647
0 0
0 5,000
0 41.8�
7,048
0
.�
2,874
18,795
5.498
2,218
963
1.�89
4,0.92
81.25% 5,003 .......':s'::>$;��;: 11,1�
18.75% 1,235 0 1,255
Total AAabr Vehicle In Lieu 6,298 6.166 12,404
CDBG 0 0 0
Ftenchise Taxea 0 1,847 1,847
Transient Occupency Taxes 0 0 0
Sales Tax 0 8,000 8.000
Totel Ftev�enues 24.B41 25J35 50.576
* Courriy retina fire suppression resporreibiity.
*' City Portbn 37.596 — CouMy Portlon 62.596 (per MOU 9/9�
Gas Tax:
2105 Courriy dlxation based on 56.16 per cepita for 1994-95 per Stab� Controller
2105 City dlocation based on 55.63 per capifa for 1994-95 per Stnis Contrdler
2106 based on assessed valuation factor of .0000610138 (split between county 8 eily)
2107 City diocallon based on 57.78 per capi0n tor 1994-95 per State Contrdler
Motor Vehicle in Lieu:
81.25% couMy ellocation based on $26.61 per capitn fw 1994-95 per S� Contrdler
81.25% city allxation besed on 532.80 per capita for 1994-95 per StaDe Controller
18.75% county allocation based on 56.57 per capita for 1994-95 per Stnte Contrdler
Blxk Grant based on 533.49 per capita for low/mod income (split between couMy & cily)
Franchise Taxes based on $8.76 per capita (derived from 1992-1993 utilily iranchise revenue
divided by population).
ATTACHMENT 1
Current Revenuea Diatributiona
Properiy Taxes
Courrty Fre Fund
Gas Tax
2105
2106 �
2107
Total Gas Tax
Motor Vehicle In Lieu
81.25%
18.75%
Total Mc�or Vehicle in Lieu
COBG
Franchise Taxes
Trensient Occupency Taxes
SNea Tax
TaW Fievenues
Proposed Revenues Diatributions
Property Taxes "
Courriy Fre Fund
Gea Tax
2105
2106
2107
Total Gas Tax
Moior Vehicle In Lieu
Malysia of Annexation Rev�nuoa
Chester 3
County
46,545
13,615
4,022
873
0
4,895
17,376
4,290
21.666
21.900
5,720
0
97.000
151.341
29.091
13,615 *
City Totnl
0 46,545
0 19,615
0 4,022
0 873
0 0
0 4,895
0 17.376
0 4,290
0 21.686
0 21.900
0 5,720
O 0
0 97,000
0 151.941
17.454 46,545
0 13,815
....... .
...... ...
4�022 ........... ;:::::;`$:#�: 7.898
0 979 873
..................................
...................................
0 :::;::::::�fl9Q�: 8�080
4,022 9.629 19.651
81.25% 17,376 ;::::><:::i'�::'�1�4:: 98�794
18.75% 4,290 0 4,290
Totd Mo1or Vehicle In Lieu 21,666 21.418 /3,084
CDBG � � 0 2t.900 21�800
Franchiae Taxea 0 5,720 5,720
Transient Occupenry Texes 0 0 0
Sales Tax 0 57.000 37.000
T� �� 68.394 113.121 181.515
* Cainty retai� fire suppressan responsibility.
** City Portion 37.5% — CouMy Patan 62.5% (per MOU 9/9�
Gas Tax:
2105 County allocation based on E6.16 per cepitn for 1994-95 per Sta� Contrdler
2105 City allocamon based on 55.83 per capife for 1994-95 per Stabe Corrtrdler
2� os t�sed on assessed ��uwor, t�mr ot .0000s � o� 3a �spi�s �tw�n courny a cxy)
2� o� c�y �io��or, b�ed o� s�.�a P� ��� ro� � ssa—ss � s� c«mai�
Motor Vehicle In Lieu:
81.25% courriy allxation based on 526.61 per capita for 1994-95 per Staie Contrdler
81.25% city allocaHon based on b32.80 per capita for 1994-95 per Steme CoMrdler
18.75% courriy elixation based on 56.57 per capita for 1994-95 per Stame Co�trdler
Block Grant based on 533.49 per capitn for low/mod income (split between county � city)
Franchise Taxes based on $8.76 per capita (derived (rom 1992-1993 udlity iranchise rerenue
d'nrided by populamo�).
_ __ _
�
Current Revenuea Diatributions
Propeny Taxes
Courrty Fre Fund
Gaa Tax
2105
2106
2107
To1a1 Ges Truc
Motor Vehicle In Lieu
81.25%
18.75%
Totel Mobor Vehicle In Lieu
CDBG
Franchise Taxes
Transient Occupency Taxes
Seles Tax
Total Revenues
Proposed Revenues Distributions
Properly Taxes **
County Fre Fund
Gas Tex
2105
2106
2107
Totel Gas Tax
Mobor Vehicle In Lieu
City of Bnkersfield
Analysia of Annexation Revenuea
Old Stockdal•
County City Totel
185,116
54.151
7.928
3,225
0
11,153
34,247
8,456
42,703
0
11,274
0
1.000
305.997
115,697
0
0 185,118
0 54,151
0 7,928
0 3,225
0 0
0 11,153
0 94,247
0 8,456
0 42,703
0 0
0 11,274
0 0
0 1,000
0 905.397
69,419 185,116
54,151 54.151
7�928 ;::::::>:s:7e��i6:: 15�174
� 3.225 3,225
................
0 ;<::;;:1:O;tf#S:: 10.013
7,928 20.484 28.412
81.25% 34�247 ;;; :::;;4�2�4;;: 76.461
18.75% 8,456 0 8,456
Total Moto► Vehicle In lieu 42,703 42,214 84,917
CDBG 0 0 0
Franchise Texes 0 11,274 11,774
Tranaient Occupancy Taxes 0 0 0
Sales Tax 0 1,000 1,000
Total Revenuas 166.328 198.542 964.870
• County reteina fire suppression responaibilily.
** City Portion 37.5% — County Portion 62.5% (per MOU 9/95)
Ges Tax:
2105 County aliocation based on 56.18 pe► cepiGs for 1994-95 per State Corrtroller
2105 City allocebon based on �5.63 per capita for 1994-95 per Stabe Conb�oller
2106 based on assessed valuation factor of .0000610138 (split between courriy $ cily)
2107 City ellocamon based on 57.78 pe► cepita for 1994-9b per Staie Corrtrdler
Mobor Vehicle In Lieu:
81.25% courrty dlxation based o� 526.61 per capita for 1994-95 per StaDe Controller
81.25% city elixation based on $32.80 per capita for 1994-95 per Stame Controller
18.75% courriy alixation based on 56.57 per capitn for 1994-95 per Staie Controller
Block Grant based on $33.49 per capita for low/mod income (spiR betwee� couMy & city)
Franchise Taxes based on $8.76 per cepita (derived from 1992-19�i utility iranchise revenue
divided by population).
ATTACHMENT 2
x � �
:'.�i`� � � 'm���:
ANNEXATION MARKETING STRATEGY
PROPOSED BUDCET
FOCUS GROUP CONSULTANT $ 5,000 FUND FROM CURRENT BUDGET
DESIGN CONSULTANT/PRINTED PIECES
PRINTING AND POSTAGE (POSTCARDS)
SET UP AND OPERATION OF HOTLINE
MEETINGS BUDGET
TRAINING BUDGET (SUPPLIES)
TOTAL
$ 2,000 FUND FROM CURRENT BUDGET
$1,500 FUND FROM CURRENT BUDGET
$ 8,000 REQUIRES APPROPRIATION
$1,000 FUND FROM CURRENT BUDGET
200 FUND FROM CURRENT BUDGET
$17,900
TOTAL ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATION RECOMMENDED: $ 8,000
� � � �.
:..� �' �� � 'i� F � � �'"'�
' 1.,.
.. L ; . <. �. � �
CUSTOMIZATION STRATEGIES FOR ANNEXATION TARGET AREAS
As is discussed in the annexation marketing strategy, much of the emphasis for
identifying issues for customized promotional materials centered on the area focus
groups, small group meetings and surveys. However through research of past
annexation attempts, staff has identified a number of policy issues and themes specific
to each of the four target areas that we can begin to develop now in preparation for the
annexation marketing efforts. These issues may be refined with the additional
information that staff will obtain through the methods described above (focus groups,
meetings, etc.). It is the position of staff that for those issues which have been an
ongoing concern of residents in target areas, we should begin early to formulate
solutions and/or responses as soon as possible. Furthermore, we should begin to
develop themes and incentives which will improve our ability to sell the annexation as
beneficial to the area rather than punitive.
These issues and themes are grouped by target area. In addition, staff has made some
recommendations regarding specific strategies which may improve our chances in
specific areas.
Dennen #1
1) In terms of a marketing strategy, this island is divided into finro distinct
areas; the first area being the cemetery and small commercial strip along
Panama and the second being the mobile home subdivision. Green Lawn
Cemetery indicated in the last annexation attempt that they were open to
being annexed if the City agreed to do certain street improvements in front
of the facility. With the planned improvements to the Panama Lane ramps
at Freeway 99, staff believes that it can include certain street improvements
in front of Green Lawn as part of the work to the Panama on-ramp. In
addition, staff recommends trying for a package deal where we annex their
southwest and northeast facilities. The mobile home subdivision will
require much greater attention in order to successfully annex this area.
This area had very few supporters of annexation in the last attempt and will
require a lengthier marketing campaign. While it would be simpler and
less complicated to annex the area as a whole, we should keep our
options open on splitting the island into two annexation areas. Staff has
ongoing concerns that the residential area will stall annexation of the
commercial area.
2) Two issues surfaced during the last annexation attempt of Dennen. Both
issues came from the residents of the mobile home subdivision. Staff has
developed responses to these concerns and recommends that we begin
formally developing these responses immediately.
A) Several of the residents were concerned that Dennen Street
would be extended through to the Auto Mall, which is directly
behind the subdivision, and cause increased traffic and
noise. Currently Dennen dead ends into a block wall, with
the Auto Mall on the other side of the wall. Staff assured
them at the time that this would not happen but the residents
had no formal promise from the City. Staff proposes to have
the City Council agree formally to promise vacation of 5 to 10
feet of the street right-of-way on the Dennen side of the block
wall, as soon as annexation is completed. Public Works and
Planning have no problems with this action.
B) The sewer issue will be the primary issue in the annexation.
Staff has outlined alternatives for addressing this issue which
include the City subsidizing the costs of sewer installation or
exempting the area from sewer hook-up. Although the area
is primarily elderly and moderate income residents, the area
does not officially qualify for CDBG funds based on
information provided by the County. Community
Development staff thinks the area might qualify but
confirming this would require an income survey of the
residents. It is staff's opinion that this type of survey may stir
up residents and work against us in the annexation effort.
Staff would not recommend such action at this time. It is
important that we continue to review this issue and find a
solution.
Old Stockdale
1) Because of the education and income level of this area, staff looked at
possible themes which could be used to appeal to their sense of civic duty
and community pride. Staff is recommending use of the theme "Traditions
of Service" to enhance the appeal of annexation to this area. This area has
a strong sense of tradition in Old Stockdale as well as a long and
distinguished tradition of community service. This angle will be our
opportunity to introduce topics such as running for office, serving on
various City committees and voting. It is further recommended that if any
seats are vacant on any of the City's commissions (historic preservation,
Community Service Advisory, etc.) at the time of our annexation campaign
in this area, that we hold them open until after the annexation and appoint
residents of Old Stockdale, if possible. These might serve as perfect
examples of how they can get involved if they are annexed to the City.
2) Staff has also discreetly interviewed a few residents and individuals who
have recently interacted with the area. It is apparent that the younger
residents are more open to the idea of annexation than the older residents.
We recommend specifically targeting this younger less vocal group as
volunteers and supporters of the annexation effort.
3) Several public works issues have surfaced which need to be addressed as
part of the annexation attempt of Old Stockdale. They include:
A) A resident of the area has indicated that several residents
have recognized the need for additional street lights in the
area. The City could offer to begin a program of installing
street lights that the residents can choose (within reason). If
residents are interested in lighting with an historical or
nostalgic theme, we may even consider offering up some of
the old street lights that the City wants to get rid of in
Downtown. This may be one of the few benefits that we can
offer, that the residents want.
B) Secondary access into the community for police and fire
emergencies is not wanted by Stockdale residents because
they want to preserve the exclusive feel and "rural
atmosphere". Again, a formal agreement from Council to not
require such access might be helpful.
C) The residents do not want to have curb and gutter under any
circumstances. Staff recommends that we revise City
policies and ordinances to the extent necessary, to insure
that the area will not be required to have curb and gutter.
4) In recent meetings with Old Stockdale residents, the issue of the water
system has resurfaced. There seems to be a major concern that the City
will want to take over operation of the water system. The City needs to
provide some legislative assurance that this is not the case, perhaps a
resolution recognizing the water district and their authority or something of
that nature.
Chester #3
1) The first issue is dividing the area into two subareas with regard to
marketing strategy; Chester Avenue commercial, and the residential area.
These two distinctly different constituencies will require different strategies
to convince them of the benefits of annexation. Although different
strategies will be used on each area, the area should be annexed as a
whole.
2) Chester Avenue commercial (including County property)
A) This group, particularly Floyd's, was instrumental in killing the
last annexation attempt. Of particular concern was the City's
business license fee. Staff will be spending much of the
marketing efforts in this area on explaining how the
calculation of the business license fee works and how
minimal it truly is. In addition, staff recommends that we set
a policy of waiving the first year business license fee for
newly annexed businesses, as kind of a teaser.
B) Planning has indicated that we will need to do some spot
� zoning in order to insure that the City's zoning will be
compatible with the existing County zoning. This was an
issue in the last annexation attempt.
C) Staff also recommends that the City agree to extend the
Chester Avenue streetscape plan, which is being done for
downtown, out to this part of Chester Avenue. Improving the
aesthetics of the area is a benefit that we can offer
businesses along Chester Avenue. The Oildale Chamber of
Commerce president has indicated that streetscape
improvements may be an issue in this area.
D) According to Public Works, there is already a plan to connect
Stramler Park into the Kern River Parkway. Doing so would
be a tangible demonstration to businesses of the City's
commitment to upgrading the area.
E) Resolving the stadium site issue will be important, as well.
3) Residential area
A) This area puts a high value on improved public safety, so
staff recommends that we hit the improved police service
message hard in this area. Promising community-oriented
policing programs, neighborhood watch and improved school
crossing guard service will be a big incentive for this area to
annex.
B) This area also needs several basic public works
improvements such as curb and gutter, street lights and
street resurfacing. Planning for a program of these
improvements will also be a big incentive in this area. Staff
is checking on the CDBG eligibility of the area.
C) Staff has determined that a major issue is how to deal with a
number of non-conforming uses in the residential area.
Several homes have businesses being operated in them.
These would be non-conforming uses under current City
ordinances. Staff recommends finding a method for
grandfathering these businesses in and allowing them to
continue to operate after annexation. Staff would like to
proceed with working with the City Attorney's office to draft
the appropriate ordinance changes to accommodate this.
Casa Loma
1) According to recent staff interaction with the residents in this area, it is
largely a very close knit community centered around the area school and
church. The area is in a state of decay and will only continue to go down
without an infusion of resources. The area is quite large and staff is
suggesting splitting the area into two annexation targets, focusing first on
the area betweerr Casa Loma and East White Lane.
2) Because distribution of information will be more difficult in this target area
than others, staff is recommending that Councilmember Carson establish
good working relationships with the School Principal and Church leaders
and use these two community institutions as distribution points for
information about annexation. The newsletter format could still be used as
the method for conveying the information.
3) This area would likely be the only target area in which staff would
recommend doing larger group meetings. The initial estimate of resident
interest regarding annexation, is that interest will be low. Meetings
between Councilmember Carson and the community leaders and
interested residents, will probably be sufficient to resolve any issues or
concerns from the community. These meetings need not be limited in
attendance.
4) A program of improvements in the area and focusing on improved public
safety will be major selling points to the area.
A) This target area is lacking most major infrastructure and
therefore a phased program of infrastructure installation and
improvement, funded with CDBG, should be planned. Curb
and gutter, sewer, street lights and road improvements
should all be reviewed for this area.
B) In addition, familiarizing residents with the City's many public
safety programs will also be a strong selling point. Staff
recommends putting on a smaller version of the Good
Neighbor Festival at Casa Loma Park to introduce all of our
City services including law enforcement, code enforcement,
Community Development, Solid Waste, etc. K-9
demonstrations, information about Neighborhood Watch and
DARE Program information can be provided. The strategy is
to show the City as a partner in improving the area, not Big
Brother.
5) The area's problems are complex and appear to be deeply ingrained. It is staff's
perception that the leaders of this community will not be satisfied with a few quick
fixes. They will want to see a long-term commitment of resources to the area and
a true partnership developed between residents and the City. Staff's concern is
that the area requires significantly greater resources than the City has or will have
available in the foreseeable future. This should be considered carefully, prior to
introducing any annexation attempt to the area.
� ATTACHMENT 4
HOT LINE
RESPONSE FRAMEWORK
ASSUMPTION:
A) Although there is typically a primary question on annexations it is invariably the
case that questions will range far afield of the primary question and it will
therefore require that each department's identified contact have at least a
minimal background over a wide range of city related services, fees, ordinances,
codes and land use knowledge
B) Hot line nuinber not setup until after initial contacts/issues identified/data sheet
specific to annexation completed.
1) Call to HOT LINE service.
2) Referred to appropriate department/person:
• Needs list of subject matter matched to department's responsibilities.
• Each person identified needs backup person (vacations etc.).
• All calls logged on specialized form for data collection.
3) Answers primary question.
• Data sheet for specific annexation.
• Answers basic qccestions on issues identified by focccs groups.
• All calls logged on specialized form (how detailed?).
4) Data sheet generalized information.
• Answers basic annexation questions.
S) Question not covered by generalized data sheet.
• Takes message on specialized form..
• Refers message to appropriate depa►•tment/person.
6) Data from forms tabulated by planning.
• Data assed to alter strategy or con�rm previoccs marketing strategy.
• Task Force to critique process.
p:rf
Date:
Name:
Phone #:
Address:
ANNEXATION - PERSONAL CONTACT FORM
Time Preference
Question/Comments on:
Public Works
❑ Street improvements (Curb, gutter,
sidewalks)
❑ Street lights
❑ Signal lights
❑ Stop signs
❑ Sewer
❑ Hook-up fees
❑ User fee
❑ Assessment Dist.
❑ other (Specify)
Plannin�
❑ Zoning
❑ Land Use
❑ Non-conforming use(s)
❑ Proposed development(s)
❑ Business license �
❑ Property Tax increase
❑ other (Specify)
Fire
❑ Response
❑ Hydrants
❑ other (Specify)
Police
❑ Response
❑ 911 response
❑ Security alarm fee
❑ other (Specify) _
Water
❑ Service
❑ Rates
❑ other (Specify)
Sanitation
❑ Service
❑ Rates
❑ Collection dates
❑ other (Specify)
Politics
❑ Running for office
❑ Campaign for office
❑ Representative (Councilperson)
❑ other (Specify)
Referred to:
❑ Public Works
❑ Planning
❑ Fire
❑ Police
❑ Water
❑ Sanitation
❑ Politician
❑ Other
P:dataform.
Name•
Phone #:
Address:
Subject Matter:
Directed to: Name
Dept.
Name:
Phone #:
Address:
Subject Matter:
Directed to: Name
Dept.
Name:
Phone #:
Address:
Subject Matter:
Directed to: Name
Dept.
Name•
Phone #:
Address:
Subject Matter:
Directed to: Name
Dept.
Name:
Phone #:
Address:
Subject Matter:
Directed to: Name
Dept.
Name:
Phone #:
Address:
Subject Matter:
Directed to: Name
Dept.
ANNEXATION - HOT LINE FORM
Name:
Phone #:
Address:
Subject Matter:
Directed to: Name
Dept.
Name:
Phone #:
Address:
Subject Matter:
Directed to: Name
Dept.
Name•
Phone #:
Address:
Subject Matter:
Directed to: Name
Dept.
Name:
Phone #:
Address:
Subject Matter:
Directed to: Name
Dept.
Name•
Phone #:
Address:
Subject Matter:
Directed to: Name
Dept.
Name•
Phone #:
Address:
Subject Matter:
Directed to: Name
Dept.
P:dataform.
FIND OUT THE FACTS ON ANNEXATION
TO ASK QUESTION3, MAKE COMMENT8
OR SIC3N UP TO VOLUNTEER
PLEASE CALL THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
ANNEXATION HOTLINE
326-I N FO
CAIL 24 HOUR3. 7 DAY3 A WEEK
EXAMPLE OF MARKETING PIECES FOR
ANNEXATION HOTLINE
a
H
H
a
�
�
r�
z
H
�
m
a
�
H
z
w
�
U
d'
E-�
E-�
Q'i
'i�
W } W
�QO �"
H� J=F-
OWa~p
aV�Zw
pwLL �-
zZ z
�
�
�\
y �
� /
�
�/
�
,, b
�
�
�
V
�
�
� Y
--'- �
-- P
�
__' �
-- S
� O
�
_�
� �
�-+ d
� �
�
�=+ '
0
� z
F-
vr^J �
v/ �
z�
��� V
� �
Do you know annexatlon provides you wlth:
■ Enhanced potice protection
■ increased lighting with more streetlights
■ A neightborhood that will grow in a planned and logical manner
■ The ability to have curbs, gutters, and sidewalks
� More street maintenance
Just fill out this survey and mail.
Dear
I woutd like to hear irom you. Over the last tew weeks you have been sent several newsletters
tocusing on annexation. And as a resuft of your comments and suggestions, we have introduced
the city's first phone line to address your questions about annexation. i would like to hear how we
are doing. in eHect, I have provided you with a repoR card to grade to our eHorts.
It is important that you answer all o( the questions attached. Your responses will enable us to better
serve you.
Please tear ofi and keep this page oi the survey. Just drop the completed survey in the mail, no
' postage is necessary.
' If you have any questions about how to fill out the survey, feel free to call us. We look forvvard to
receiving your responses.
Sincerely,
Bob Price
Mayor
i�� A • -�
r � �-•---�
City of Bakersfield
32-Annex
You have been sent several newsleners focusing on annexation. Various topics were discuss
such as reduced garbage cotlection, increased police coverage, introduction of regular street
sweeping and weekiy leaf collections, increases fire safety, and the possibility ot installing se�
and sidewalks.
Did you find these newsleriers helpiui in hetping you decide your opinion on annexation? Ye:
(circle one)
Ot the following list, which topic did you find most helplui? (Select all that apply)
Annexation Means Discounts to Seniors Improved Police Prc
Report on Neighborhoods Recently Annexed Property Tax Comp.
Question and Answer Corner Reduced GaragE
Did you use the City's annexation hotline, 32-Annex ? Yes or No (circle one)
Ii yes, did you (ind it helptul?
Now ihat you know more about the measure (or this area to be annexed to the City oi Bakers
it the election was hetd today, would you vote yes in (avor o1 the measure, or no to oppose it'
(circle one)
Yes, I support annexation No, I oppose ann�
It the annexation is successiul and you became part ot the City of Bakersfield, oi the followinc
which improvements woutd you like to see in your area?
Curbs and guriers
Sidewalks Fire
Sewers Stre�
If you woutd vote against annexation. Please explain why.
�
If you feel that you did not have enough information on annexation to make a vote in support
annexation what additional iniormation would you tind helpful?
�
u
�
B A K E R S F I E L D
MEMORANDUM
November 9, 1995
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCI
FROM: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO COUNCIL REFE
Attached is the staff response to the Council referral regarding
street resurfacing in Ward 2.
AT:rg
Attachments
; -.
,,,,,���� � ����,,.
,-°,=,
,,`',��� . ��� _
; : �:;
� „ ._
��� _�����'�w��u„�� :
,�. - ;
_ , . �.r ,.�,
_ �.�; ,_,' ��. ,,o�
-,.,.�., _,i,�„�
MEIIAORANDUIIA
November 3, 1995
TO: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER
FROM: LELAND J. ANDERSEN, COMMUNITY SERVICES MANAGER
SUBJECT: COUNCIL REFERRAL FROM PAT DeMOND REGARDING MONTHLY
SCHEDULE OF EVENTS.
At the Council meeting of September 27, 1995, Councilmember DeMond
requested a schedule of events for the Holiday Inn be included in
the Convention Center's monthly calendar. Staff contacted Hotel
management immediately following the request and was advised they
would be happy to provide us with a monthly schedule. As
preparations began in late October for compiling our schedule,
contact was again made with the Hotel asking for their input. We
were informed that a schedule was not available at this time,
however, beginning in December, they should be able to comply with
our request.
We will continue to followup with the Hotel in an effort to provide
the requested information.
As always, should you have any questions regarding this matter,
please contact me at your convenience.
LJA/lg `� � �
� ��;
� C�
�------ -
NOV = 31995
� `_
-:�
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
�
B A K E R S F I E L D
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
NOVEMBER 9, 1995
ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGE
RAUL M. ROJAS, PUBLIC WO
SUBJECT: STREET RESURFACING IN WARD 2
(COUNCIL REFERRAL 15474)
�
�O�'
�
Nov w9 �5
The major resurfacing project awarded September 13, 1995 was scheduled to be completed
prior to the rainy season (November 15, 1995). Unfortunately, the strike by the Operating
Engineer's Union forced us �o� re-think our schedule. As a result, all work involving this
project will be postponed until weather permits which should be in April or May, 1996.
cc Jack LaRochelle
Gerry Claassen
Arnold Ramming
r�
� ,
e'_
CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL
MEETING OF: 10/25/95
�REFERRED TO: Pl•18LIC WORKS R R4JAS
TTEM: RECORD# 15474
Street resurfac� ng i n Iriard 2. (�eMond )
��������
OCT 2 7 1995
FUBLIC WORKS DE?ARTMENT
ACTION TAKEN BY �OUNCIL:
DEMOND REQIlESTED �TAFF INFORM HER OF ANY STREETS
IN HER WARD THAT WILL SE SCRAPED ANC NOT
COMPLETED DURING THE COLD SEASON. DEMCND A!SO
RFt�UESTE�J THAT THE EDGES 5E SMOOTHED OV�R.
BACk;U° MATERI,A� ATTACHE�: NO
DATE FORWARDED BY CITY uLERK: 10/27/95
Q
`11'''IIIIII�!U�. ,�I�-• j� ._
� '1
�\ � . 'r�
\
\;�� 11\ M'1� �, �
�'111N i"�'��IIW� \
\�.. � _��'\
\
_��; ., 4� `,�1`1`��
�'��/t�i��•" �I���I11
i//i///�llll
•
-•
MEMORANDUM
JOHN W. STINSON, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER DATE: 11/7/95
ANTHONY GONZALES, HUMAN RESOURCES SUPERVISOR
REPORT ON MERIT STEP INCREASES: JULY-SEPTEMBER 1995
Per the City Council's request, attached is a listing by department of the number of eligible
employees who received Step 4 or 5"merit" increases for the quarter July - September 1995.
Twenty-four (24) of twenty-six (26) eligible employees received Step 4 or 5 merit increases during
the period.
,� � � �
� . ��
STEP INCREASE REPORT
7ULY-SEPTEMBER 1995
16-Oct-95
S
v
'r •
�� 1�V _919�5
B A K E R S F I E L D
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM �
TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager ��
FROM: Raul M. Rojas, Public Works Direc o��
DATE: November 9, 1995
SUBJECT: UPDATE -- CENTENNIAL HIGH TRAFFIC PROBLEM
Transmitted hereto is the latest progress report regarding the
traffic problem on Centennial High.
ti w •
B A K E R S F I E L D
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Traffic Engineering Memorandum
DATE: November 3, 1995
TO: RAUL M. ROJAS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
FROM: STEPHEN L. WALKER, TRAFFIC ENGINEER �
SUBJECT: PROGRESS REPORT ON CENTENNIAL HIGH TRAFFIC PROBLEM -
HAGEMAN ROAD LEFT TURN INTO SCHOOL PARKING LOT.
On Thursday, November 2, 1995, Brad Underwood and I met with Principal Bill Hatcher
and Assistant Principal Lee Vasquez. We discussed the possibility of changing the
median opening on Hageman to align with the easterly driveway of the Centennial High
student parking lot. We explained that the move has the potential to improve visibility
of oncoming traffic for the drivers making left turns into the parking lot and therefor
recognize adequate gaps in eastbound traffic when they occur.
Mr. Hatcher and Mr. Vasquez were receptive to improving the traffic situation, but were
concerned that this proposal will impact the internal circulation. One concern expressed
was the increased conflicts of cars and students crossing the main internal drive aisle
to get to the classrooms. Another concern is that the special education buses unload
in the area, creating more conflicts. They asked for a short time to analyze their traffic
circulation and respond back to us. Mr. Hatcher will have Mr. Vasquez contact me by
Wednesday, November 8, with their comments on our proposal. He will also have the
other assistant principal, Mr. David Olds, contact me with his comments.
Overall, the meeting went very well. The principal is pleased we are continuing to work
on this matter and that we are keeping them in on the process. I will update our report
when we have received their comments.
cc: Bruce Deeter, CE III, Traffic Engineering
Brad Underwood, CE III, Traffic Engineering
PW Memo Files
Traffic Engineering File - Centennial High
s I w: \DATA�W P� 1995�C e nt_H g h. M e m
� _�� -----
Q��p<aEN*a,.�o`N U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
� + * � Los Angeles Area Office
1615 W. Otympic Boulevard
��"B�wo�E�°`=� Los Angeles, CA 90015-3801
November 1, 1995
Mr. Alan Tandy
City Manager
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, California 93301
Dear Mr. Tandy:
,., , �
�0l� � i���
-�-- `Thank you very much for-hc�s��-g-t�e Fair -F€ousi:ng- Flar�ni.ng----
workshop that we recently conducted in your City. This is the
second time in recent months that you have come to our rescue.
The purpose of the workshop was to present the Department's
� guidebook on performing Fair Housing Planning and to demonstrate
to some small degree the use of available information.
Your City's cooperative efforts and the advance preparations
so graciously provided were very a.nstrumental to the success and
outcome of the workshops. I commend your City and all of your
staff, particularly George Gonzalez and Brett Helgren, who worked
so marvelously in partnership with us. Your City's willingness
to host the workshop enabled us to provide valuabe information to
the representatives of the many other local governments who came
and participated.
•��� We look forward to working with you and your wonderful staff
_ fin the years to come in order to help create communities that are
~ indeed free of all impediments to fair housing choice.
Again thank you very much.
Very truly your,
�� �' ��a•�-d,--r ,
Thomas F. Honore'
Director
Civil Rights Division
�
4-
p, •�,.
FI CHIEF'S F.Y.I.
November 2, 1995 Volume 2, Article 1
CHIEF KELLY
Fire Station 2- Fire Station 2 continues to
look better and better. A well deserved
thank you to John Patterson, Chuck Todd,
all Fire Department employees who have
helped at Station 2 and all City employees
from various departments that have
helped work on the renovation project.
The new electrical main panel arrived
earlier than expected and we will continue
to work on this process daily in order to
move personnel back into the station as
soon as possible.
New Pumpers - We will be sending a Fire
Department representative along with a
representative from the Corporation Yard
to the Quality Manufacturing Company
factory shortly after Thanksgiving. They
will inspect and evaluate the first of the
four new pumpers to be delivered. Once
the final assembly team receives feedback
from this inspection and completes the
first pumper, we should receive one
pumper appro�nately every two weeks
until all four have been delivered. We
have been assured that the same final
assembly team will complete each of the
four pumpers so they should be identical.
The staggered two-week delivery time
should provide an excellent scheduling
opportunity for the installation of radio
eyuipment and mounting various
equipment on the new pumpers.
Traffic Preemption S, sv tem - At the City
Council meeting of October 11, we
presented a workshop for the
Councilmembers on Traffic Preemption
Systems. Captain Ron Fraze gave an
excellent presentation and the
Councilmembers seemed very interested
in the e�ansion of this project. 'Ifiat
evening, Council approval was given to
purchase additional components to expand
the Traffic Preemption System.
Throughout the remainder of the fiscal
year, the system will be expanded along
Ming Avenue from Hughes Lane to Ashe
Road, at California Avenue and Oak
Street, Califomia Avenue and Chester
Avenue and Columbus Street and Haley
Street. There will also be an upgrade of
the traffic signal at East Brundage Lane
and Cottonwood Road. We plan to install
emitters which trigger the system on the
fire apparatus at Station 3, 6, 7, 8 and 9.
The expansion of this system is a multi-
year project and additional response
corridors in all portions of the City will be
evaluated. We are also exploring grants
and alternative funding sources for
accelerating this process.
Station 13 - The bids for the permanent
fire station at the site of the present
Station 13 were opened on Wednesday,
October 18. The amount of the low bid is
significantly higher than the funding
budgeted for this project. We are
continuing to explore different options
which may be available that would allow
us to proceed with this project in the near
future. One option not being considered
�,
�
is a drastic change in the design of the
station.
Fire Services Studv - The draft of the Fire
Services Study is due no later than
November 17. Once this draft is received,
a review process will begin immediately.
As soon as additional information is
available, I will keep all of you updated.
Firefi�hter'sBurn Foundation -"Firefighter
Dan's Basket Sit" was, once again, a huge
success. Thank you, Dan and everyone
who helped with this very worthwhile
activity.
Miscellaneous - The activity level of actual
fires has increased recently. This is a
cycle that occurs infrequently and there
does not appear to be any one certain
reason. Some of these fires have been
very large such as the fires on October S
and the fire at Fourth Street and Union
Avenue. These emergencies, and others,
have been handled in a very professional,
competent manner. I truly appreciate
your efforts.
CHIEF PACHECO
Kern County Fair Booth - Congratulations
to all of you that worked the Public
Education Booth at the Kem County Fair.
Thousands of children were reached with
our fire safety message. A special thank
you to Steve Hamblet and Tyler Hartley
for co-chairing the event.
Fire Safety Presentations - I want to
thank all of you that are seldom
recognized who assist on a daily basis with
fire safety presentations. The Fire
Prevention Week Open House program
�
was co-sponsored by the Kern County
Health Department. The public feedback
was very positive and those who helped
organize this program can feel good about
its success. A particular thanks to Ron
Fraze for chairing this worthwhile
program.
Certified Unified Public Ag,ency - The
Bakersfield Fire Department will be
applying to the State by January l,' 1996,
to become the Certified Unified Public
Agency (CUPA) for the City of
Bakersfield. This is a program to
consolidate all fees, permits, inspections,
etc. to one source for hazardous material
handlers. This will centralize record
keeping and make the process easier for
our consumers.
Promotions - Congratulations to Doug
Webb and Bill Ballard on their recent
promotions. (Doug was so excited that he
went hunting!)
New Employee - Our newest employee is
Dispatcher Melinda Hunley and began
working at ECC on October 2. Melinda
comes to us from the Bakersfield City
School District and so far she loves her
job.
CHIEF TOBIAS
Captain's Test - The written and
simulation portions of the Capta.in's test
have been completed with the oral
examinations scheduled for the week of
November 6.
New Patrol - The new Patrol is currently
being outfitted at Telecommunications
and will go to the Equipment Division for
s; ,��
some modification. Discussions are
currently taking place regarding where the
Patrol will be stationed.
Hazardous Materials Team - Our
Haz,/Mat Team worked the Shafter train
derailment and did an excellent job.
Palace Restaurant Fire - Applause to all
who worked the Palace Restaurant fire.
The effort expended by all was
exceptional.
Teen Government Dav - Teen
Government Day is scheduled for
November 8. Please make all the
participants feel welcome at the Fire
Department.
Trainin� - There are a large number of
class�s being offered through O.D.F.T.F.
Please contact the Training Division to
take of advantage of this training.
MRK/kec
FYI/�DCT.95
3