Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/02/96 - ~ . -- B A K E R S F I E L D MEMORANDUM F=bruary 2, 1996 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER J9ï' ~ rk', SUBJECT: GENERAL INFORMATION 1. There i s a memo enclosed from Economi c Deve 1 opment regard i ng Emergency Shelter Grant Funds for FY 1996-97. The recommendation is that we decline our estimated allocation of $45,000, as we did the first year, in order for our local non-profit homeless providers to compete for a larger pool of State ESG funds. 2. Also enclosed is a memo showing that Riverlakes Ranch is now up to $1.65 million dollars in delinquent debt to us. 3. There is a letter enclosed indicating that the Convention Center air handler tests we were suddenly required to take were clear, as we expected. 4. There is a IIthank you and congratul at; ons" due to the Conventi on Center staff. Les Mis sold 16,000 tickets and grossed $643,000. It was a superb effort from the Convention Center staff, and they deserve strong recognition of their efforts. 5. On the February 12th agenda, the CDDA wi 11 consi der award of a desi gn contract for the downtown streetscape. They are contributing the first dollars into that project. 6. The Fire Chief has met with the County Fire Chief on the subject of a new station for southwest Bakersfield, which requires County approval. Their official position seems to be that they don't want to do anything or talk about anything until the fire study is disposed of, which is due from the consultant any day now. AT:rs cc: Department Heads Carol Williams, City Clerk Trudy Slater, Administrative Analyst - ~ ------ I 1:Jv~ Æ . ~ ..---- , -- B AKERS F I E L D Economic and Community Development Department MEMORANDUM January 30, 1996 TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager @ FROM: Jake Wager, Economic Development Directo SUBJECT: Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG) Funds for FY 1996-97. Although funding announcements for FY 1996-97 are a few weeks away, staff has been analyzing our FY 1996-97 ESG funding prospects. The best case scenario is that we might receive approximately $45,000. This amount constitutes an estimated fifty percent reduction from last year's allocation. You may recall that in the first year that the ESG funds became available we declined our fair share allocation. This was due primarily to the small amount of funds offered to us. By taking this approach, our non-profit homeless providers benefitted by applying to the state for a considerably larger funding amount than that available to the City. This last year we reversed our direction and claimed our fair share allocation. Given the downturn in the amount estimated to be offered to us in the upcoming year, I am again recommending that we decline the offer. This will again allow our local non-profits the opportunity to compete for a considerably larger pool of State ESG funds. We have discussed this strategy with our local non-profits and they concur with this approach. As an additional note, if we decline to participate in FY 1996-97 this will not prevent us from being funded in future years. Please advise as to your thoughts. dlt:jw8 esgupdtmem --~_..~-~- -.. - F1\ ',=0 "'" r.. í_~ iO', F.cC~" \_l-oÓ r~=~=.=.'-~ ¡ I JAN_~ I 1996 -j . !cITY IVIANAGER'S O¡:F!C'~ ' . -- , - -~-=-_.. . - - ~ MEMORANDUM JANUARY 30, 1996 TO: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER FROM: GREGORY J. KLIMKO, FINANCE DIRECTOR~~ SUBJECT: RIVERLAKES RANCH DELINQUENCIES ~ ¿ï The projected special assessment delinquencies for Riverlakes Ranch are below: Delinquent June 30, 1995 (actual) $881,247 Penalties & Interest on Delinquencies 98,905 1/2 Annual Levy (1995-96) due December 11, 1995 289,203 Delinquent December 11, 1995 1,269,355 Penalties & Interest on Delinquencies 34,436 1/2 Annual Levy (1995-96) due April 10, 1996 289,204 Delinquent April 10, 1996 (estimated) 1,592,995 Penalties & Interest on Delinquencies 63,885 Delinquent June 30, 1996 (estimated) $1,656,880 mf MGJK.73 I , : ' j) " ~ylV; <V' ~. " --~"-~~¡ê((~;, \:. ,\ '. \r'~ b '-'."" ~,: ': ' , \r~--~:--- OC" \ JA~! 3 ü bJ} L-==.,,-- '\crrv MANP,Gf::::'~; - I ,- " ~~_c' --- "; '. ~ . . - BAKERSFIELD PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 'I I 150\ TRUXTUN AVENUE , BAKERSFIELD. CALIFORNIA 9330\ (805) 326-3724 RAUL Ñ1. ROJAS. DIRECTOR' CITY E~lìl\iEER January 26, 1996 Steve McCalley, Director Environmental ,Health Services Department 2700 "M" Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 Re: Air Monitoring - Bakersfield Convention Center Dear Mr. McCalley: On January 25, 1996, ambient air was monitored at ten locations within the Convention Center. Monitoring with the use of Rotometers began approximately one half hour after the show ended and proceeded for approximately 160 minutes. Locations for monitoring varied throughout the arena, stage area, seating section and main lobby. Air handlers associated with the penthouse mechanical room were locked out at the electrical disconnects and sealed off. All other air handlers were operating. Once monitoring was complete, / samples were immediately driven to Forensic Analytical in Hayward, California for testing (// by Transmission Electron Microscopy (T.E.M.). A copy of the results are attached. As you can see, analysis indicated no trace of asbestos detected in any of the ten samples. . Additionally, attached for your information is a copy of the interim operating procedures for the air handler units supplied by Honeywell Inc. Should you have any questions or comments, please feel free to call me at (805) 326-3724. Very truly yours, '~'7'---Ø-- -' " {/- cc'/.' / t/- Raul M. ~Rojas Public Works Director cc: Alan Tandy - City Manager Judy Skousen - City Attorney ~ [R!r:CEä\f - ~-~, DeWayne Starnes - Civil Engnieer 1II r,L; ,::.!,D , ,J JAN 2 9 /996 J II L.~=,==~~~j , ""'v c" ^ "I I' <"' , :~~r:~;,,{....;Ef..rs G~:-'", -- .. ., , ' .. ".:.' '....' ,. ---," ".. - -- '.~_-""':'." -~--':, ,...-." ." -- ". " I I I, I , J~1 26 '91; 02: 3ØPM rORENSIC MN¡::¡L YTICRL P, 1 I ~ . 1 ~. æ J 'a ~ ~ A ~~. \J I~ - J,; ~ ( >~ I t Æ Æ.. ~ ~ 9.'" 1 ~ ¡ a I J ~!! I' í . ~ 1 & ~ ~ ~ I" . = ~ ..b . j '..v ~i I -;" ~ v~.¡ il~ ~~ \01-1.1 t I... ~ Z ' 3! ! -~J. = !:!J I I 1\ l \ I 1\ l ] ~~ I ~ .9 -] Þ- ^I & ~ ~ 0 ~ C II ~ ~I fð . . " 0. .... - ~ .. - lii Z ... : i Cl)E"" I <4 j~ ~ ~ \ f,J 11 2~ er- z .1 i.f ~ ")'" e,.J )1- CI)~ ~ ¡ u -< ~ 0 u.¡ ~. z.:= i ,., ~ & ~ ~2 ~~ « 0 ~ J j!- {! ~ .. toe ..... - .!! '! =.;¡ J - J .! !II! ~J p.! . : \ I ~ rA J (I) ill I \ ¡ I ¡II ~~ i >< .! < e! t .e -~ «~ 'I ~ "-~ ~I \ II II II t 'ur¡ .j -e . tS OJ ..: ~ rÐ If -j CI) r ..! ! 0 ~ J! ~~ ~ d I~ I Ii .J ~ J] . .. .. ': I t'13 391;1d NO:JS3M 13 t136 tE8S138 85 : to t 966 t /sz; n13 ,,'" y' :;:;~t::;~;::.':~?,;~,:U:,:~'; Is f?, ;:"',"¡ """",' 'J",",' , , I IF. IF. ,.";:!¡; {,:;:,j¡ ';;;r%" 1" 1 ~ i ~ ,',', ' ':;;, 0': '..' ,..' 'I ',! 'I C ~ !! ~ ...~ IIO~ "'~ ;;,~:b ;\.¡;'¡:; :~;-:,¡.>~ ~,;);¡¡¡ ¡¡D!~j1 ! ~ ! "":'n. ;,;,',,:' ',' 2 2 2 :/,;;; ::::L>? ! ! :z¡ ~ !~ !~ !~ 0 ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ "~ "~ "' Z 0. " ~ 0 ~2 ~~ "~ ::..: ::.. ::.. -.¡ E- ~ ~ ~ ~ Q Q Q Zj ~ - - - °1 ~ u_~ en) Q ~ ~ ,,:,', ,';' q ~;;t :::~,:" 3 .. ~ ,;.¡;;¡ ;'",,;;..;¡ J j i 0 ;;~:m¡ ':;í;::;¡:';¡ f f ~ t...... :,;.,¡;.¡ . ,¡,,;',,~, "iii ~ "...""",.",~", . Z"":!;!: '\~'¡~~: 2 S§ J J I ~ J J I ~ ~ 'Ø '"' '"' ~ ~ S S ~ ~ ~ '"' '"' '"' S ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. ... ~ ,'.. ~ â ~ . ~ ~ £0 39~d NOJS3M 01061£8508 85:Þ1 9661/S~/10 > " , """'" '". ... _110 - 0 0 Io 10 ~ Q ,:; ;:.. r: ;;: ~.,',,:,: i'~ i!:: ,Q~ I' ~ . ¡:: it: ; """" """", " f~ t! ~ ~ ~~I~ .. ,., ~ 'I!! g~ !Z! g~ ~~ ~~ .' ':~~ .".¡.;: ~,.. .. z j ! "" î ~... i ... i .. ž , :: "." . : . ~ '. '.,,' .: ': 'd:;:>;:::::1: .;.,..¡¡ ";~""M;:' ,:::,:,;,.,:".::; S 6 & & & ;í;.:..: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :"'¡~" <:) § § § ~ ;,:~d,; - -~, ~ ':~;;í;; - - -- ':o;;ii. j(j¡¡", .;,:~:t¡ ~:'" S ~ ! ~ ~! ~ H H 0 c;i f"I;i ;i w::!! ~2 ~~ r-. ~< ~< '< ~< ~< ..< Z 0.. R ......,-c 0 :~ .:.;~ ,~ ~~ :~ :::It .... -. . -Go -Go -Go .. E- < Š Š ~ ~ Š ~ I ; .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ uJe en) ~ ~ ~ ...... ! J 0 ?;:¡¡: i a !! 1 ~ ...." ; ~ - :;;~'¡i; ~ ~ J t t ÞO:r . .. .< .. ~ ".,:;¡ 0 .'.,"'" ~:!¡¡~ :;1 J J I J J ~ J j J j J ~! ~,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ § § ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ¿, ~ Z:13 3Ðt1d NmS3M 131136 tE89138 89 : In 9661/9Z:j1@ , -¡," . "c. " " " '.~ ,> " >: ; ' c' ., I 1/26/96 RECOMMENDED INTERIM OPERATING PROCEDURE BAKERSFIELD CONVENTION CENTER AIR HANDLING UNITS 1) Air Handlers S-3, S-4, & S-5 located on the south end of the Penthouse Mechanical room to be remain locked out at the electrical disconnects, 2) Air Handlers S-2 and S-8 located in the Penthouse Mechanical room, serving the stage house and dressing rooms respectively, to operate on an "as needed" basis only. 3) Two utility set exhaust fan located just outside of south end of the upper cat walk to run continuously 24 hours per day. 4) Air Handler S-1 located in the East Mechanical room to operate continuously 24 hours per day with outside air damper in full open position. Exception to this mode made during warm up period before Concert Hall events begin. During wann-up, outside air dampers may be closed. After wann-up period, outside air dampers to be returned to the 100 percent open position. 5) Exhaust Fan RÆ-llocated adjacent to Air Handler S-1 to remain locked out at the electrical disconnect. Exception to this mode made during Concert Hall events. During an event RÆ-l may be operated. 6) Exhaust Fan E-9located in the East Mechanical room to run continuously 24 hours per day.' ' 7) Exhaust Fan E-810cated in the West Mechanical room to run continuously 24 hours per day. 8) Exhaust Fans E-l and E-2, located on the southwest comer of the roofto operate continuously 24 hours per day. 9) Lobby air handlers S-10 and S-ll located in separate mechanical rooms on the upper . level of the Concert Hall to run continuously 24 hours per day. 10) Return air grilles located on the east wall of the upper cat walk to remain sealed with polyethylene sheeting. 11) Outside air louvers on the south and east wall of the Penthouse Mechanical room to remain sealed with polyethylene sheeting. . ,,' ,. .. . ... 0" ,- '."'- ,- . -."'" .. - ._,', '.' .. - ' ,.., ,~,~' "'. , --.. ... .. " ë,: ¡..' . . . " - .. ' , . -_._~---- -- . ' ,- ---,------- - .. no. -- ---- ----' _n ___m- - - --- _om_-- - - -- - ------ ~-- .. ----- . -. --- ---7~=- -- ,.~ Bakersfield Fire Dept. Page 1 CONSOLIDATED MONTHLY REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF 1:EœTber, 1 9 ~ This last This This last CLASSIFICATION OF ALARMS Month Month Month Year Year last Year to Date to Date HOW ALARMS WERE RECEIVED: TOTAL ALARMS 1535 1376 1200 17,œ6 14,946 FIRES: Fire Explosion Not Classified 10-19 4 3 2 54 43 Structure Fire 11 45 28 26 332 319 Mobile Property Used as a Structure 12 2 - - 5 3 Mobile Property Inside Structure 13 ~ 1 3 10 14 I Mobile Property Outside 14 34 22 23 325 355 Trees, Bush, Grass 15 10 15 5 378 316 Refuse Fire 16 41 27 40 412 519 Other Ouside Fires 17 5 6 6 70 .79 TOTAL FIRES 141 1CY2 105 1586 1648 CAllS OTHER THAN FIRES: Overpressure, Explosion (no fire) 20's 10 5 3 75 84 Medical Call 30's 621 570 547 6870 6392 Rescue Call 35 1 2 5 35 26 Miscellaneous Medical 30-39 7 5 2 49 44 Hazardous Condition 40's 94 78 76 1140 800 Public Service SO's 153 137 129 14æ 1074 Good Intent Call 60's 429 412 339 5012 4241 False Call 70's 72 64 53 731 522 Natural Disaster 80's 1 - - 4 4 Not Classified 00-90's 6 1 1 45 21 TOTAL CAllS OTHER THAN FIRES 1394 1274 1155 15 . 450 13 . 928 TOTAL EMERGENCIES 1535 1376 1200 17.006 14.946 DIRECT FIRE LOSS This This Month This Year Last Year Month last Year to Date to Date Fire Loss (Best Figures to Date) 572, 6aJ Em , 650 6,377,685 5,006,355 PERSONS KILLED BY FIRE: Civilian N/A WA N/A N/A Firefighters - - - - PERSONS INJURED: Civilian N/A N/A N/A N/A Firefiahters 2 1 45 15 This Year last Year INDEX FIGURES to Date to Date Fires per One Thousand population 1.58 1.00 Fires per One Million dollar valuation .00 .00 Fires per One Thousand buildings 5.68 5.55 Fire loss per capita 30.00 25.21 Fire loss per One Million dollar valuation 1510.23. 1259 . 31 Average Fire loss per building 19 æ7.87 15 700.13 Additional data used in INDEX FIGURES: Population 212,Em Valuation of Real Estate, corrected to true value $ 4,238,749,9)) Buildings in City 59 ,930 Building permits issued ~ 122, [Broliti.a1s 4 NOTE: Building Fires and Losses only are used in INDEX FIGURES and LOSS BY SIZE OF FIRE. --- . . Page 2 I STRUCTURE LOSS IV SIZE OF FIRE This Month This Year to Date Last Year to Date '- I' Fires Losses Fires Losses % of Fires % of Loss % of Fires % of Loss Over $ 50,000 $ 1.000 - $ 49.999 Less than $ 1,000 No Loss - - - TOT.AL 6 377 685 100.00 100.00 , VEHICLE LOSS IV SIZE OF FIRE This Month This Year to Date Last Year to Date Fires Losses Fires Losses % of Fires % of Loss % of Fires % of Loss Over $ 25,000 .... - 4 220 OJ.) 1.22 22.25 - - .$ 1.000 - .$ 24,999 23 91. OJ.) 191 728 665 58.41 73.71 52.57 78.27 Less than $ 1,000 9 3.DJ 1œ 39 935 31.19 4.04 37.94 21: 73 No Loss 2 - 30 - 9.18 - 9.49 - TOT AL 34 94.DJ '327 '988~lm 100.00 100.00 100 . 00 100.00 FIRES AND LOSSES BV TYPE OF BUILDING 1. Type Not Classified/Undetermined 2. Type I Previously Fire Resistive 3. Type II Previously Non-Combustible 4. Type III Previously Ordinary 5. Type IV Previously Heavy TImber 6. Type V Previously Wood Frame 216 4 æ9,005 TOTALS IN BUILDINGS 322 5,006,355 No. of This Year to Date Last Year to Date CAUSES OF FIRES IN BUILDINGS Fires No. of %of No. of %of this Fires Loss (Best Figure) Total Fires Loss (Best Figure) Total Month Loss Loss 1. Outside Fires O's 2 38 1 674 985 26.26 30 962 . 070 18.91 2. Spark from Cutting/Welding Torch 11-12 1 38 æ3 675 14.01 36 9J5 .100 9.93 3. Heat/Spark from Natural Gas/LP/Liquid Fueled Equipment 13-19 5 32 939 830 14.74 22 213.150 4.19 4. Chimney (Spark/Heat) 21.22 15 70 522 . 600 8.20 50 298 .475 5.87 5. Heat/Spark Coal/Sofid Fuel 23-20 - - - - - - - 6. Electrical Short 31-36 - 16 298 ,100 4.67 23 118.200 2.'32 7. Defective Electrical Equipment 37-30 2 7 51.200 .00 8 38 . 200 .75 8. Heat from Hot Object 40's 2 13 49 . OJ.) .77 12 63 . 550 1.25 9. Munitions/Explosives 51 -53.55.59.50 8 44 4æ . 535 7.68 44 461 550 9.07 10. Fireworks 54 1 3 3.0J.) .Œ 6 2.DJ .Œ 11. Incendiary Device 56 1 8 25.Em .4O 3 9.850 .20 12. Open Fires (cigarettes. matches) 60's 3 8 212.675 3.33 5 89 DJ 1.76 J3. Natural Source 70's 5 26 289 , gx) 4.55 33 332.700 6.54 J4. From other Fire SO's - 1 4,0J.) .00 2 4.Em .00 15. Other 90's 2 31 923,5œ 14.48 48 1,987.250 39.07 TOTAL BUILDING FIRES 47 335 6.377.685 100 . 00 322 5.006.355 100.00 -------- - ----- . ~3 I" "' "HOW ALL FIRES WERE CONTROLLED This Month This Year Last Year to Date to Date Self Extinguished 1 ':¡ 11 ' 71 Makeshift Aids 2 1A 7':1 ; 7~ Portable Extingusher 3 2 17 ~ 27 Automatic Extinguishing System 4 - 8 . 1 Water Carried on Apparatus 5 22 131 116 Water from Hydrant, Draft, Standpipe 6' 5 65 . r:s7 Water from Tanker Shuttle 7 - - 1 Ground Crew/Air Support 8 - - - Undetermined/Not Reported 9110 1 10. 14 TOTAL FIRES 47 335 322 MISCELLANEOUS WORK This This Year Last Year Month to Date to Date New hydrants installed 2 26 . 129. ::- Hydrants painted 1 1fi31 . 2157 - Hydrants repaired 127 6669 : 6005 ,- -. - I PERSONNEL DATA This Last ~c;~{h CHANGES: This This Year Last Year Month Month Last Year Month tol Date to Date MANPOWER: Appointment - : 19 2 Total personnel at end of month 194 196 185 Resignations - 9 4 Total Days lost for sickness 76;92 95.58 71 R? Retirements 2 3 8 Total days lost for injury 16.56 2.12 31 LU1 Dismissals - - - Average daily absences 2.48 3.19 1.11 Deaths - 1 - Smallest fighting force on duty 47 48 44 Promotions' 3 I 19 12 Largest fighting force on duty E:¡? ~ AQ Demotions - . - - This Year to Date Last Year to Date INSPECTION BY REQUEST ONLY Total No.of Fire Total No.of Fire Inspections Fires Loss Inspections Fires Loss Residential 562 257 5.192.00) 600 253 3 432 925 I I This Year to Date Last Year to Date REGULARLY INSPECTED OCCUPANCIES Total No.of Fire Total NoJof Fire Inspections Fires Loss Inspections Fires Loss Exclude apartments, houses. private garages, and incendiary fires 4,341 78 1,185,005 6,207 69 1,653,430 I . .. .. - Page 4 This Year to Date Last Year to Date INSPECTIONS, FIRES AND LOSSES BV OCCUPANCIES Inspections Ares Losses Inspections Ares losses Eng. FSC Eng. FSC OCCUPANCY OF BUilDING A. Flammable Liquids 1. Bulk Storaae 16 2 - - 15 6 - - 2. Dry cfeanina plants 10 - - - 18 - - - 3. Flammable finishes 12 10 - - 13 12 - - 4. Oil bumina Eauioment 1 - - - 1 - - - 5. Service Stations 59 4 - - 59 5 - - 6. Underaround Installation 12 3 - - 11 7 - - 7. Transoortation 5 2 - - 8 - - - 8. Other flammable liauids 8 3 - - 8 4 - - B. Special Hazards 1. Combustible fibers 4 - - - - 4 - - 2. Hazardous dust 4 - - - 1 / - - 3. Exolosives 2 48 - - 15 20 - - 4. Repair aaraaes 176 11 2 8ern 122 11 1 fi) 5. TIre recaoDina plant 13 - - - 29 - - - 6. Hazardous chemicals 229 2 - - 194 2 - - 7. Hazardous Dlastics 29 - - - 2 - - - 8. lumber Yards 14 4 - - 3 4 - - 9. Woodworkina Dlants 11 1 - - 11 19 - - 10. Metal Process 15 - - - 12 1 - - 11. Radioactive material 3 - - - 3 - - - C. Miscellaneous Hazards 1. Solid fuel and ashes - 1 - - 1 - - - 2. Incinerators - 1 - - - - - - 3. Railroads - - - - 4 - - - 4. Junk storaae 3 2 - - 4 31 - - 5. General storaae 16 2 2 55ern 11 20 5 18 ern 6. Wholesale houses "", 28 12 - - 24 10 - - 7. Weldina and cuttina 24 4 3 23ern 17 10 - - 8. Restaurants 216 63 3 351 ern 220 72 3 1300 9. Warehouse aJ 32 - - 47 52 1 - 10. Oilwells/Tank facilities - 1 - - - 1 - - D. Flammable or compressed gas 1. Liquid petroleum gas 7 23 - - 1 19 - - 2. Compressed aas 30 3 - - 31 8 - - 3. Other flammable nas 3 3 - - 1 11 - - 4 .Transoortation 2 - - - 2 1 - - E. Supplemental Fire Prevention Activities 1. Schools 9 111 1 1.:n1 8 202 5 1 ŒD 2. HoSDitals 7 29 3 5025 17 93 - - 3. Rest Homes 13 23 - - 3 23 - - 4. 24 hr. Child-Adult Care 3 199 3 10 1 211 2 100 5. Dav Care Nurseries 13 aJ - - 4 97 - - 6. Jails . 1 1 3 - - - - 7. Churches 69 17 2 47 200 59 35 2 30. 2fi) 8. Hotels 16 25 - 23 9 - - 9. Theaters 7 20 - - 9 19 1 200 10. Auditoriums 4 18 - - 2 35 - - 11. Gymnasiums 8 4 - - 8 13 - - 12. Public Assembly 22 117 ~3 50 200 'Zl :D3 2 -:--:- 300 13. Game Rooms 1 3 - - 11 18 - - 14. Mortuaries - - - - - 11 - - 15. Like Occupancies 7 4 1 l,ern 9 16 - - "INSPECTIONS BY OCCUPANCY" CONT: ON NEXT PAGE , II . " -- - Page 5 , '. I This Year to Dote Lost Year to Dote INSPECTIONS, fiRES AND LOSSES BY OCCUPANCIES Inspections Inspections CON'T Ares Losses Ares Losses Eng. FSC Eng. FSC OCCUPANCY OF BUILDINGS F. Miscellaneous Inspections 1. Acartments 298 196 78 2,171,395 394 125 78 aE,CXXJ 2. Dwellinas 9 41 177 3 011 205 55 69 174 2 599 925 3. Miscellaneous structures 54 12 5 56 . CXXJ 35. 23 3 49)) 4. Motels 37 19 2 6CXXJ 29 22 - - 5. Office buildinas 361 192 1 500 554 413 6 1 ')QQ 1;'Jrl 6. Private aaraaes 15 3 2 1OCXXJ ,20 17 1: 25.ml 7. Retail stores 332 1œ 22 2œ 925 482 193 10 55:m 8. Miscellaneous manufacturina 42 6 - - 33 10 3 1O:m 9. Automatic scrinkler sYStem 40 459 - - 50' 001 - - 10. Alarm sYStem 13 200 - - 6 279 - - 11. Are extinauishina survev 9 Z37 . 571 - - - - - 12. Other 27 77 22 376 925 93 22 25 242 100 TOTAl INSPFCTIONS FIRES ANn LOSSES 24?R ?47!1 ~Ii 6.377 .ffil:) 2R21 14Œh m I; ~ ~I;I; FOLLOW.UP ON INSPECTIONS AND OTHER fiRE PREVENTION WORK This Month Last Month This Year to Date Last Year to Date Are FSC Are FSC Are FSC Are FSC NUMBER OF CASES IN WHICH THE FOlLOWING WORK WAS DONE: Inspections 241 273 144 284 2428 2475 2821 4œ6 Complaints received 10 2 12 - 201 356 194 284 Violations found 40 40 15 35 451 584 453 400 Notice of Violation 16 24 10 14 :m fíJ1 :m 575 Violation corrected - 12 - 34 - 4Œ - 374 Items rettered to other departments 3 - 3 - 50 36 30 72 Total reinspections 6 15 14 12 262 448 326 436 Extensions of TIme 3 1 2 2 57 39 63 65 Fir e- Ars on-Inve stigations - 65 - 59 - 747 - 137 Folse alarm investigations - 1 - - - 1 - 2 Arrests made - 1 - - - 29 - 65 Court actions - 1 - - - 27 - 49 Weed abatement 5 - 6 - 322 1318 254 '1747 Are drills supervised - - - 4 - 130 - 86 Talk or lectures 3 3 11 4 127 .25 139 55- 25 31 æ !-- - h_' 300 Total audience 710 5395 6594 1154 stoke out - 6 - 2 - 12 - 3 Special inspections 44 2 6 4 1m 92 715 264 Office time (reports, etc.) - 250 - 272 - 2295 - 33fI) Meetings attended 17 00 23 59 204 749 123 1126 Demonstrations 5 - 12 1 87 3 107 8 Photographs taken - 169 - 117 - 2202 1421 , .', - ., Page 6 , '. . " , This Last This Last :, INVESTIGATION OF FIRES Month Month Year Year to Date to Date . TOTAL FIRES INVESTIGATED 21 14 Z38 2œ Determined accidental 1n Q R::1 ~ Under investigation R 1LI. 1I=V <¥1 Undetermined 1 - 1'l 1'l Incendiary 1n S 1':IQ 11Q INCENDIARY FIRE: Ares for which arrests were made 1 1Q M Number of arrests 1 - ?LI. 7? Cases in which convictions were secured - 1 7 ?h Number of convictions - ¡:; ':I? FALSE ALARMS: Alarms for which arrests were made - - - Cases in which convictiöns were secured - - - - MISDEMEANORS (in connection with fires) Convictions " - - - REMARKS ON INVESTIGATION WORK Ca.nsel an:! Felease - 1 5 22 Court Þppearances 1 - 21 46 II -" " I ( , II, -,; ,.~. Page 7 WORK OF FIRE COMPANIES ENGINE COMPANY No. Number of Quns --- Engine 1 175 Truck 1 77 I Patrol 1 111 Engine 2 179 Engine 3 112 Engine 4 148 Engine 5 236 Engine 6 194 Patrol 6 98 Engine 7 216 Truck 7 72 Patrol 7 145 Engine 8 129 Patrol 8 100 Engine 9 Æi Engine 11 ~ Haz-Mat 11 --, Engine 13 hR 'fffiine 10 12 Patrol 10 1 to r> , - l', ,-'" f-_)I.,~ ¿', -- : ': f'- , '¡ ," ,.' ", IJLO( "":':::(7");:, ,,' ,,), '" ;'1 I'J ':', - -,". :;-:' '; !' fj) ~ ~ ,', . ""'j i, ",., , ~ ," " .' ,; .i'll' I . ., & êi «!J~ . '; .'~ti n ' :. 1/: ,r k,f -,' u I ," , - <~1 4; -- - --- - ----- 07, ' ; " ", .' ,~""" "'-. '. I, :¡i,-., J i\-=' , -- .-. i RECEûVED 'I II ¡ ~ JAN 3 0 1996 ¡ II ' j ! =-~, 1~!~I\.~N~~:S,.qT-~F::' ' 1- ._---~-~~-----~._-- ._- ~-..- ---.-