The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About02/09/96 .~ '., Æ . I -- I B A K E R 5 F I E L 0 MEMORANDUM February 9, 1996 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUN~ ~ FROM: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER i SUBJECT: GENERAL INFORMATION I 1. Enclosed is a letter of intent from Canlan Investment Corporation summarizing the terms of the proposed management agreement with National Development Corporation for the ice rink. 2. Staff is continuing to work to bring forward what we hope wi 11 be a "settlement" on the issue of double taxation/in maintenance districts. The theory is that we are identifying the base level of service in the non- maintenance districts' portion of the City, both i n terms of parks and streetscaping. We would cover that same portion of costs with General Fund monies in the maintenance district areas, so that everybody receives the same base level of service from the General Fund. Only to the extent that some people ' i n the maintenance districts have, for example, more streetscaping than is the norm in the older parts of the city - would they be assessed for that over and above the base level. With any luck, we should have documents for you next week. 3. Enclosed you will find drafts of several documents pertaining to our four target island annexation areas. We provi de thi s as background to you, since letters will be going out and neighborhood meetings will be starting soon. 4. A memo is enclosed regarding the Joint City/County Service Efforts. The service areas have been split into three phases, as outlined on the attachments. Our pl an i s to complete the necessary pre 1 imi nary steps before sitting down with the County for negotiations. 5. We may have gotten a break on the upcoming conflict at Rio Bravo. As you are probably aware, we have a situation there where the tennis resort and hotel are closing and are proposed to become an elderly housing facility, with an Alzheimerls clinic. We have had appear at our door, quite fortuitously perhaps, a national resort hotel owner who would like to take it over and enhance it, and make it a major attraction. We hope that they can break through the lawyers and the bankruptcy, as that would be better received than the Alzheimer's concept. A staff member from Development Services attended a citizens group meeting regarding the proposed elderly community on February 7th. The proj ect applicant, Konny Boyd, was there to provide information and answer questions. The applicant will present the entire project with displays at the next meeting on February 13th. I ~. I r-"'-~ ;. HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL February 9, 1996 Page -2- 6. The Development Services Status Report for February, 1996 is enclosed. 7. There is a memo from Water Resources on the supply outlook as of February 1, 1996. We will receive more information regarding the City Kern River entitlement and deliveries next week. 8. There are two memos from the Fire Chief enclosed. The first one concerns the expansion of the Traffic Preemption System. Both Hall Ambulance and Golden Empire Ambulance have indicated their commitment for intersection retrofits. Included is a list of traffic signals and fire apparatus that have already been equi pped wi th the preempti on system, as well as the traffic signals that will be completed by the end of the fiscal year. The second memo is a review of the joint Bakersfield/Kern County Fire Department meetings, held on January 31st and February 1st. The County wants the fire study in before they consent to allowing us to locate a new fire station, and; Late Flash - On Friday, we received the revised draft of the City/County Fire Study. It contains a recommendation that we contract with Kern County for fire service, and that they assimilate our department. How about the other models for such a service arrangement - use of the jail with its 33% annua 1 escalation in costs and Environmental Health, where they don I t respond to heal th problems unless they are revenue produci ng? We III summarize the report and get it to the advisory committee, and weill get copies out to you next week. It won1t help the morale of our department. 9. There is a memo enclosed from Economic and Community Development regarding the status of funding for FY 96-97 HUD entitlements. We have not been officially notified of the amounts, but we expect at least a 10% cut in the CDBG entitlement. 10. We received a memo from the Kern County Emergency Medical Services Department regarding the renewal of ambulance service permits. All current providers have submitted their renewal applications, and the permit extensions will go before the Board of Supervisors on February 27th. 11. Enclosed are staff responses to Council requests, including: - traffic studies and appropriate action at the intersections of Planz/Sandra, Benton/Holden, and Planz/Laurel; - various traffic requests/updates for ten different locations, as referenced in the attachments; I - traffic enforcement action on Chester W. Nimitz Street. I I I :"".~ , . HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL February 9, 1996 Page -3- 12. There is a memo enclosed from the Chief Code Enforcement Officer concerning a complaint about sewer backup in an apartment. The County Health Department wouldn't respond, saying they have no contract with us? 13. Enclosed for your information is the 1995 Traffic Volumes analysis from the Public Works Department. 14. Council had sent out a referral asking us to see if the property owners along the unimproved portion of Brimhall would agree to a lien against their property if we installed the improvement at our cost. The answer is no, they will not. 15. I am planning to attend the California City Manager's Conference in San Diego on February 15th and 16th. During my absence, Gail Waiters will be in charge. Also, this is advance notice that 11m planning to take off from March 5th through March 12th as vacation time. Gail will, again, be in charge during that period, which does include a council meeting. 16. Research has shown that we can pull the LEA designation from Kern County with a simple Council action. It would revert to the State until such time as we were geared up to do it ourselves. We are working on the documents, perhaps for as early as the February 21st Council meeting. AT:rs cc: Department Heads Carol Williams, City Clerk Trudy Slater, Administrative Analyst ~~'.", FFR-PlR-19% 1:=¡::=¡ñ mNI AN ¡ N~)FSTMFNTS ñPl4 7~ñ 917P1 P. PlVPl? ,. <;',. cøjf February 07, 1996 VV Ü Mr, Alan Tandy j~ City Manager City of Bakcrsficld 1501 Truxton Avenue ---- .---_. Bakersfield, California 93301 .-- U,S.A. Fax (802) 324-1850 Dear Mr. Tandy, Please accept this letter as àIt indication of Canlan's intentions in regard to the: t)pCration of the .1:13Írermeld Ice Spong center, which we witt be managing on behalf of the National D(,:vdopIl1cnt Corporation (NDC), pursuant to a "quaJU'icd management agreement", Such an agreement, will provide pursuant to IRS regulations, that the faeiJily must be managed and operated as a public benefit. on behalf of the NDC, a 501 (C)(3) not for profit corporation. I As such. Canlan will obligate itself to ensure that the operation of this recreational facility will in a I number of ways benefit the Bakersfield community. The management agreement, in it's tenus, will , provide that the facility will, among ot1ter things; 1) offer access to the ice skating rinks by providing a program of public skating, at reasonable hours, to the pubJic at market prices. 2) provide a preference, in tenus of admission price:, to Bakersfield community based groups, with exact terms and times to be determined more fully in the text of the management agreement 3) Provide that the skating rinks will be available, at times when business is slower (summer months) to participate in City Parks and Recreation programs, at preferential prices, for learn to skate, introduction to hookey, and introduction to figure ~kating programs. 4) provide that school and school organizations and school teams (both public and parochial) shall have :¡c;cvu to th~ f:lciliti!Œ, :tnd £h:l11 be provided nwtel rate (off.peak.) hourly prices for ice time. 5) shall provide access to the rinks for figure skating dubs and organizations 6) çh:ill make thf.I fhdtilie~ :tv:til:tbll~, from ¡imr. h.llìlllt'" :~IIIII1JII11I I1l1lit;t'.. fill ('.iy f¡;iviljt'.N, I'Jlhlil,; recreation and activities, and public gatherings. We would "Quest tha\ a çQ~mi~, Qr ~elç~"tion be appointed by the City to work with us, and the NDC, 10 refine the above described points, for the inclusion with more definition, in the management agreement. Also, SInce the laCl111y will be operatea 1D a not lOr prom manner, certa11l revenues may be aenvea, over and above the expenditures necessary for operations and maintenance costs, debt service, salaries and the management fee. We wou1d suggest that a portion of any such " excessive revenues" be placed aside in a "rainy day fund" to pay the cost of any extraordinary maintenance cost (roof~ compressors, floor systems, VANCOUVBB. . .Jþl1fO un W8IIt ØpoadWCIY, VaRUOuv.r, B-c. V6H4C1- (60.) 7'36.~1~1 Ihx: (604) 736.~l1n TOIlOtrrð . *200 - 200 Cun:m~ll~n Ru..J, Wl11uwJ..l", 0.... WJ 4R.t - (-41G) ~8-"58" liax (0116) 501.16101 -. "'.' FEB-12I8-1996 15:57 CANLAN INVESTMENTS 61214 736 917121 P.12I2/1212 ~ ClC.) or in the event of an unexpected revenue shonfall. Over and above this suggested fund, other excess revenues could be made available for community programs benefiting the City of Bakersfield. I would alSo suggest that this same proposed committee be delegated to advise the 501 (c)(3) on how and where rueh fund!: could b8rt b8 J1JocJwd :lnd pbcæd. Please call me if you need to discuss this matter further or need additional infonnation. We are looking foIWaId lu ba;oming Ii mcmbcr of ilic Bakcrsfichl "uJlwlwuly. Yours veI)' tJUly; Canlan Investment Corporation ~na. Scott M. Ross Manager Ice Rink Development C.c Mr. Ron. Wareham TOTAL P.12I2 - I --- 'I I Dear Because you are resident/business owner of an unincorporated County island, the City is very interested in your views of Bakersfield and the possibility of becoming part of our fine City. In the next few weeks, I would like to visit with you and hear your opinion on annexation and the City in general. The information will be very helpful to the City in developing an educational campaign on the annexation process and what it means to unincorporated areas. You will be contacted shortly by City staff to set up a time and place convenient for your schedule so that we may discuss this issue in further detail. I look forward to meeting you. Yours truly, Bob Price Mayor ~ß t:Ç;fi Á ~ ~< ~vitf !Þ.~ I ~~ I! I I ¡ .- -----~------ --- - -- - -_u --- - ..- ANNEXATION MISSION STATEMENT The purpose of the City of Bakersfield's annexation efforts is to identify clear consolidated boundaries which result in the most effective use of tax payer dollars. Bringing the community within contiguous, consolidated boundaries provides quality, efficient services to taxpayers of metropolitan Bakersfield. In fulfilling this mission, we, the City of Bakersfield elected officials and staff pledge the following: . to deliver services to citizens within newly annexed county areas more efficiently and with a greater transfer of benefits as a result of becoming a part of the city . to provide quality services to citizens in the most efficient, effective and courteous manner possible . to encourage current and future residents to participate in determining the direction and spirit of the city and its neighborhoods . to assure our contact with citizens will be in the most honorable, courteous, informative and honest manner in our efforts to encourage adjacent residents to join the city . to =-continuaJ efforts to improve the qU~lity of life, the delivery of services and the community spirit within and around Bakersfield I I I ANNEXATION TASK FORCE MEETING FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 9. 1996 I. Finalize Annexation Mission Statement II. Status Report on Committee member assignments III. Set-up staff groups for meetings IV. Break into newsletter committees I Æ . I - B A K E R 5 F I E L D MEMORANDUM February 9, 1996 TO: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER FROM:~. B. TEUBNER, ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: ANNEXATION STRATEGY UPDATE Here is the update on activity for all areas. Casa Lorna - As you know, we met with Irma Carson this week to kick-off the Casa Lorna annexation. I will be following up with her next week for the list of contacts for Casa Lorna. Area captain, Andre Devereaux has already begun contacting potential meeting sites to begin the meeting process. In addition, Asst. Chief Matlock is coming up with a list of area contacts that might be useful to us. Andre will be contacting Lyn Edwards for an interview for our Casa Lorna newsletter. Old Stockdale - In working with Mrs. Pryor, Mrs. Burke and Mrs. Dezember -we have narrowed the possible meeting dates to about two dates for each meeting. They will be calling me back to let me know which date they want. The dates range from February 28 to March 12. They will go on your calendar and the Mayor's calendar when finalized. We are going for afternoon meetings rather than evening. In addition, I will be contacting water board members to set up meetings but will probably wait until we've had a couple other meetings and refined our presentation. Chester #3 - Letters have been drafted to be sent out on Monday to approximately 10 previous annexation supporters to set up meetings. I have also instructed the area captain, Martin Ortiz to precede with scheduling individual meetings with a few key business owners. We should have proposed meeting dates by next week. Dennen #1 - Area captain, Trudy Slater has been asked to set up a second meeting with the Green lawn people. We should have a meeting date shortly. Letters are also going out Monday to about 5 previous annexation supporters to set up meetings with them. Generally, the newsletter articles are being edited and the mock up being prepared. I anticipate having a version for our review by next week. We are having some trouble securing an annexation hotline number that we like. Pac Bell is continuing to research number possibilities and we should have one nailed down by next week. The Annexation Mission Statement is in final draft and if we are satisfied today, it will go on I ,- I I the Council agenda for the February 21 meeting. Also, planning is working on the revised case sheets which address your comments. New version will be available early next week. Lastly, we have identified our target group for annexation training and our finishing up training materials. We should have a product by end of next week. The memo scheduling the training sessions will also go out next week. Carrol Hayden has offered her assistance in organizing and conducting the training. It's been a busy week and will only get busier. If you have any questions or comments, just let me know. ! ,I I 1. CHESTER AVENUE #3, EAST AND WEST Area: County island between 34th Street and Columbus Street, east and west of Chester Avenue (N/E Bakersfield) North of Bernard, east of Golden State Highway. Inhabited: Yes. Population: 653:t. Housing units: 273:t. Acres: 196:t. County Island: Yes. Prezoned: No. CDBG (Area Percentaqe of Low/Moderate Family Income): 100% east of Chester Avenue, not eligible west of Chester Avenue. CDBG Description of Area: Entire area. County Service Area (C.S.A.): School crossing guards, Street lights and Fire hydrant maintenance. The area has a good commercial and residential balance, and private reinvestment in the area is likely. This area entails the Sam Lynn Ballpark, the Kern County Museum, the Military Training Facility, and the GET terminal. The County has indicated that they will not object to an attempt to annex this area. Although some of the business owners in the general area have indicated they would support annexation, survey cards which were mailed to the entire area indicated a generally negative response. At a public meeting in February 1992 on possible annexation for the entire Chester #3 island, there was extensive negative response by the 30:t property owners in attendance. Residents were unhappy with an apartment complex which was constructed nearby (which has been a police problem); they were concerned about traffic flow along Chester Avenue (Semi-pro baseball stadium issue); and whether or not they would have to pay for major improvements which they felt the City would require. (The City had in 1988-89 annexed an elementary school in the area.) Issues: Planning indicates that spot zoning could be done to keep it consistent with current County zoning; sidewalks; curb and gutter; street lights are needed in the area and supported by residents; nonconforming businesses and business license regulations are being reviewed by the City Attorney and Treasury; and traffic flow. An issue identified as an incentive to commercial owners are street improvements to Chester Avenue (landscape median). Fire Information: A maximum of four fire hydrants will be needed for the area'east of Chester ($10,000 - $15,000). Fire protection for the area west of Chester is split between the Kern County Fire Department, Station No. 64 (80%), and the Bakersfield Fire Department, Station No. 1 (20%). Ladder Company operations are provided by Station No.1 (2101 "H" Street). No additional fire hydrants are needed in the area. Public Works Survey: This area consists of 2 centerline miles of streets and would remove the county island east of Chester Avenue between 34th Street and West Columbus. There is approximately 500 feet of missing curb and gutter. There are only a few homes with sidewalk. The most significant area of maintenance in this annexation would be over 0.4 mile of Chester Avenue. Police Information: The following is a survey of the number of Part One crimes reported for Chester Avenue #3 east and west from July 1, 1993 to June 30, 1994. Calls for service for both east and west 671. Type of calls: murder--O: rape--O: robbery--2; aggravated assault--5; burglary--23; larceny--25; motor vehicle theft--7. Garbaqe Rates: The existing garbage hauler is Varner Brothers. The rate for a single family home is $9.34 per month. When annexed to the city the rate will increase to $10.50 per month or $126 per year. This rate includes street sweeping and leaf collection. I I I CHESTER NO. 3 ANNEXATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " . '[§ " ' . . . . . . . .' . . . . T29S, R27E T29S, R28E 119119 II ~~ I City at Bakersfield AnalYSIs at Annexation Reyenues Cheater 3 County City Total Current Revenues Distributions Property Taxes 46.545 0 46 . 545 County Fire Fund 13.615 0 13.615 Gas Tax 2105 4,022 0 4.022 2106 873 0 873 2107 0 0 0 Total Gas Tax 4,895 0 4,895 Motor Vehicle In Ueu 81.25% 17,376 0 17,376 18.75% 4,290 0 4.290 Total Motor Vehicle In Ueu 21.666 0 21.668 CDBG 21.900 0 21.900 Franchise Taxes 5.720 0 5.720 TranSient Occupancy Taxes 0 0 0 SaJes Tax 37.000 0 37.000 Total Revenues 151,341 0 151.341 Proposed Revenues Distributions Property Taxes .. 29.091 17.454 46.545 County Fire Fund 13.615. 0 13.615 Gas Tax 2105 4.022 3.576 7.698 2106 0 873 873 2107 0 5.080 5.080 Total Gas Tax 4,022 9.629 13.651 Motor Vehicle In Lieu 81.25% 17,376 21.418 38.794 18.75% 4,290 0 4.290 Total Motor Vehicle In Lieu 21.666 21.418 43 . 084 CDBG 0 21.900 21.900 Franchise Taxes 0 5.720 5.720 TransIent Occupancy Taxes 0 0 0 SaJes Tax 0 37.000 37.000 Total Revenues 68.394 113,121 181.515 . County retains tire suppresSIon resoonslbliity. .. City Portion 37.5% - County Portion 62.5% (per MOU 9/95) Gas Tax: 2105 County aJlocation casea on 56.16 per caoltð tor 1994-95 cer State Controller 2105 City allocation cased on 55.63 per caolta tor 1994-95 per State Controller 2106 basea on assesseo vaJuatJon tactor at .0000610138 (spirt between county & city) 2107 City aliocatJon casea on 57.78 cer capita tor 1994-95 per State Controller ,\1otor Vehicle In Lieu: 81.25% countY a/location oasea on $26.61 per caPita tor 1994-95 per State Controller 81.25% CItY allocation casea on $32.80 per capita tor 1994-95 per State Controller 18.75% county allocation oasea on 56.57 per caPita tor 1994-95 per State Controller Siock Grant casea on $33.49 per capita tor low/moo Income (spirt between county & city) ::rancnlse Taxes cased on 58.76 cer caclta (DeriVeD trom 1992-1993 utility tranchlse revenue Divided by poculation). 2. OLD STOCKDALE Area: County Island S/W of Stockdale Highway and Ashe Road. Inhabited: Yes. Population: 683::!:. Housing Units: 259. Acres: 360::!:. County Island: Yes. Prezoned: No. CDBG (Area PercentaQe of Low/Moderate Familv Income): Not eligible. CDBG Description of Area: Not applicable. County Service Area: School crossing guards, Street lights, Signal light on Stockdale Hwy. and Fire hydrant maintenance. This is an upper socio-economic County island in the midst of the City. Annexation attempts were made in 1987 and then in 1989. The City sent surveys to the property owners in December 1989, and the following results were returned: 1 6 for annexation and 126 against. The annexation was terminated based on the survey. Several owners of businesses in the downtown area live in the Old Stockdale area as well as other business and professional individuals, including the District Attorney. During meetings with some of these individuals, a generally favorable view of annexation was expressed. Although negative reaction to the original annexation attempts were substantial, it is thought that there may be residents in the area which would now support an annexation effort. The annexation task force is scheduling several informal "teas" to ascertain residential feelings and concerns regarding annexation into the City. Issues include residential concerns on annexation, the future of the water system, reassurance that fees/taxes will not increase, and ensuring residents that the area will not change in atmosphere if annexed. City could pledge to preserve their rural environment. Fire Information: This area is served by City Fire Station No. 11 (7000 Stockdale highway). Truck Company operations are provided by Station No.7 (4030 Soranno Avenue). No additional fire hydrants are needed in the area; however, the water system in the area needs some upgrading. Public Works Survey: This is an area of about 6 centerline miles of streets located adjacent to and includes the Stockdale Country Club. There are approximately 0.25 miles of missing curb and gutter. Very few of the properties have sidewalks. Most of the streets are in fair to poor condition. Police Information: The foilowing is a survey of the number of Part One crimes reported for Old Stockdale from July 1, 1993 to June 30, 1994. Calls for service: 213. Type of calls: murder-a; rape--O; robbery--3; aggravated assault--1; burglary--10; larceny/theft--8; motor vehicle theft-2. The area has a low crime rate. Garbaqe Rates: The existing garbage hauler is Varner and Sons, Inc. The rate for a single family home is $9.34 per month. When annexed to the city the rate will increase to $10.50 per month or $126 per year. City rate includes street sweeping and leaf collection. II OlDE STOCKDALE ANNEXA TION ~I 'ì - mxmu - ~ ¡ I . I - I I ... . ... ~ I T3IIS. I2J[ . I - City of Bakersfield AnalYlls ot Annexation Aevenues Old Stockdale County City Total Current Revenues Distributions Property Taxes 185.116 0 185.116 County FIre Fund 54,151 a 54.151 Gas Tax 21a5 7.928 a 7.928 2106 3.225 a 3.225 2107 0 0 0 Total Gas Tax 11.153 a 11.153 Motor Vehicle In Ueu 81.25% 34.247 a 34.247 18.75% 8.456 0 8.456 Total Motor Vehicle In Lieu 42.703 0 42.703 CDBG a 0 0 Franchise Taxes 11.274 a 11.274 Transient Occupancy Taxes 0 a a Sales Tax 1.000 a 1.000 Total Revenues 305.397 0 30S.397 Proposed Revenues Distributions Property Taxes .. 115.697 69.419 185.116 County Are Fund 0 54.151 54.151 Gas Tax 2105 7.928 7.248 15.174 2106 a 3.225 3.225 21a7 0 10.013 10.013 Total Gas Tax 7.928 20 . 484 28.412 ~otor Vehicle In Lieu 81.25% 34.247 42.214 76.461 18.75% 8.456 0 8.456 Total Motor Vehicle In lJeu 42.703 42.214 84.917 CDBG 0 0 0 Franchise Taxes 0 11.274 11.274 Transient Occupancy Taxes a a a Sales Tax 0 1.000 1.000 Total Revenues 166.328 198.542 364.870 . County retaIns tire suppresSIon responsibility. .. City Portion 37.5% - County Portion 62.5% (per MOU 9/95) Gas Tax: 2105 County aJloclitlon basea on $6.16 cer cacrta for 1994-95 per State Controller 2105 Citv aJiocatlon oasea on $5.63 cer CllClta for 1994-95 cer State Controller 2106 basea on assessee vaiuaaon factor of .aOOOS1 0138 (split between county & city) 2107 Gitv allocation cased on $7.78 car caorta for 1994-95 oar State Controller Motor Venlcle In Lieu: 81.25% county ailocation basea on $26.61 cer caclta for 1994-95 cer State Controller 81.25% city ailocatlon oasea on $32.80 oer capita for 1994-95 per State Controller 18.75% countV allocanon oasea on $6.57 cer caclta for 1994-95 per State Controller Block Grant caseD on $33.49 per caolta for low/mod income split between county & city) Franchise Taxes caseD on $8.76 cer caclta (denvea from 1992-1993 utility franchise revenue divided by pooulaaon). 3. DENNEN #1 Area: County island west of Freeway 99 north and south of Panama lane (Sm Bakersfield). Inhabited: Yes. Population: 250:t. Mobilehomes: 84. Acres: 92:t. County Island: Yes. Prezoned: Yes. CDBG (Area Percentaqe of low/Moderate Family Income): Not eligible as of September 1995. CDBG Description of Area: Not applicable. County Service Area: School crossing guards, Street lights and Fire hydrant maintenance. In June 1990, the City sent surveys to property owners of the mobilehome park located north of Panama Lane; the response was 6 for annexation and 14 against. Because of this low turnout, staff went door-to-door in October 1990. The response from this house-to-house survey was 14 for annexation, 35 against annexation, and 4 maybe. Analysis of the number of registered voters based on the door-to-door survey (47 against and 21 for) led staff to delay the processing of the annexation. The City continued the annexation in order to annex areas south to McKee Road, where property owners wanted to be annexed to the City. The annexation process for Dennen #1 was successful until the protest hearing, where significant protests were received. Therefore, the City decided to terminate the proceedings pursuant to State law. The City successfully annexed lands south to McKee Road. During annexation discussions, residents perceived that the City would extend Dennen Street to the north, where the Auto Mall is located. The cemetery requested the City pave the remaining right-of-way along Panama lane which may be done with overpass work. The property owner of the commercial sites along the north side of Panama lane at Dennen Street would like to annex to the City. The City cannot legally annex the property alone as it would form a County island. Issues include perception of residents regarding higher taxes on fixed incomes. lack of sewer doesn't seem to be a major consideration for residents. May consider dividing the area and leaving the mobile home area in the county if the residents can't be convinced. Fire Information: A maximum of one fire hydrant will be needed for the area. Public Works Survey: The only inhabited portion of this annexation includes a mobile home park, consisting of about 1.25 centerline miles of streets. There are no sidewalks, no storm drains and no sewers. The streets appear to be in fair condition; however, the construction is usually substandard in design. The remainder of the annexation is the Greenlawn Southwest Cemetery. Police Information: The following is a survey of the number of Part One crimes reported for Dennen #1 from July 1, 1993 to June 30, 1994. Calls for service: 71. Type of calls: murder-Q; rape--O; robbery--O; aggravated assault--2; burglary--1; larceny--4; motor vehicle theft--O. Garbaqe Rates: The existing garbage hauler is Southside Sanitation. The rate for a single family home is 9.34 per month. When annexed to the city the rate will increase to 10.50 per month or 126 per year. City rate includes street sweeping and leaf collection. --- DENNEN NO.1 ANNEXA TION IU I ~A AVE~ l to to i I ~ \ I ~ I I I I ~ CITY ~ I ! ;. I G1 ~ ~ 1! to ! . { ~ i 9 500 \ . SCAlf IN FEET I \ nos, R27E 3ERKSHIRE ROAD \ 1 1 9 ~ \ \../' City of Bakersfield Analys.s of Annexation Aevenues Dennen 1 County City Total Current Revenues Distributions Property Taxes 18.795 0 18.795 County Fire Fund 5.498 0 5.498 Gas Tax I 2105 1.158 0 1.158 2106 353 0 353 2107 0 0 0 Total Gas Tax 1.511 a 1.511 Motor Vehicle In Lieu 81.25% 5.003 0 5,003 18.75% 1.235 0 1.235 Total Motor Vehicle In Lieu 6.238 0 6.238 CDBG 0 0 0 Franchise Taxes 1.647 0 1.647 Transient Occupancy Taxes 0 a a Sales Tax 8.000 0 8.000 Total Revenues 41.689 0 41.689 Prooosed Revenues Distributions Property Taxes" 11.747 7.048 18.795 County Fire Fund 5.498. 0 5.498 Gas Tax 2105 1.158 1';058 2.216 2106 0 353 353 2107 a t;463., 1.463 Total Gas Tax 1.158 2.874 4.032 Motor Vehicle In Lieu 81.25% 5.003 6.166 11.169 18.75% 1.235 0 1.235 iotal Motor Vehicle In Lieu 6.238 6.166 12.404 CDBG 0 0 a Francnise Taxes 0 1.647 1.647 Transient Occupancy Taxes a 0 0 Sales Tax 0 8.000 8.000 Total Revenues 24.641 25.735 50.376 . County retains fire suppresSIon responsibility. .. City Portion 37.5% - County Portion 62.5% (per MOU 9/95) Gas Tax: 2105 County allocation oasea on $6.16 per capIta for 1994- 95 per State Controller 2105 City allocation basea on $5.63 per capita tor 1994-95 per State Controller 2106 basea on assessea valuation factor at .0000610138 (sclrt between county & city) 2107 City allocation basea on $7.78 cer cacrta tor 1994-95 cer State Controller Motor Vehicle In Lieu: 81.25% county allocation basea on $26.61 oer caclta for 1994-95 cer State Controller 81.25% cITy allocation oasea on $32.80 per caclta tor 1994-95 per State Controller 18.75% county allocation casea on $6.57 oer cacl1a tor 1994-95 per State Controller Block Grant Oasea on $33.49 per capita for low/moo Income (split between county & city) Francnlse Taxes cased on $8.76 oer capita (denvea from 1992-1993 utility franchise revenue DiVIded by coculation). ------ -- 4. CASA LaMA #6 Area: South of Casa Loma Drive between Union Avenue and Cottonwood Road and north of East White Lane. Inhabited: Yes. Population: 3,034:t. Households: 930:t. Acres: 560:t. County Island: Yes, area is a small piece of an area which includes the Southgate neighborhood, the Fairgrounds and the Mt. Vernon extension area. Prezoned: Yes, this area is prezoned as part of the Casa Loma Specific Plan adopted by both the City and County. Other portions of the larger area may not prezoned, however. CDBG Eliaible: 100%. CDBG Description: Entire area. County Service Area: School crossing guards, Street lights and Fire hydrant maintenance. The Casa Loma No.6 area has not been targeted for annexation prior to now. However, parts of the larger Casa Loma area have been considered previously. In 1992, the area around and including the Fairgrounds was considered, but because of concerns internally about high crime and infrastructure needs, consideration was dropped. The area is primarily residential and vacant land with scattered commercial and industrial uses. Commercial properties include motels, convenience stores and industrial uses including a wrecking yard and a trucking operation. The area also includes an elementary school and park. It is not anticipated that there will be significant interest and/or participation from the residents. However, internal issues do exist, including a lack of infrastructure in the area which is currently being assessed by Public Works; code enforcement and sanitation problems are considerable, also being assessed by Public Works and Development Services, and perhaps most importantly, a need for economic development and law enforcement. Fire Information: The area is served by Stations No.5 and 6. A maximum of 19 fire hydrants will be needed for the area. Public Works Survey: Casa Loma #6 has a total of 8.5 centerline miles of streets. The streets are in poor condition with significant gaps in the curb and gutter with no sidewalks to speak of. The streets are littered with dirt and debris and some places are unpaved. Police Information: The entire Casa Loma area had 9,500 calls between August 1, 1993 and July 31, 1994. The Casa Loma #6 area experienced 3,800 calls including: murder--5; rape--3; robbery--71; assaults--115; larceny--79; vehicle theft--66. The area has an extremely high crime rate. Garbaae Rates: The existing garbage hauler is Souths ide Sanitation. The rate for a single family home is $9.34 per month. When annexed to the city the rate will increase to $10.50 per month or $126 per year. City rate includes street sweeping and leaf collection. _m____- , i ; I I I ! ! j 9 z 0 z ~ , " . EAST PLANZ :::1 f-! ::JI 01 (î & (.f)! ~ -1~ ~ I EAST WHITE LANE II.: /- T30S, R28E , I errr CITY 1.---- i I COUNTY . ---- : I I COUNTY I 29511 City of Bakersfield Analysis of Annexation Revenues Casa Loma County City Total Current Revenue Distributions Proeeny Taxes 72.353 0 72.353 C';¡l;:1TY Fire Funa 21.165 0 21.165 Gas Tax 2105 18.750 0 18.750 2106 1.441 0 1.441 2107 0 0 0 Total Gas Tax 20.191 0 20.191 Motor Vehicle In ueu 81.25% 81.038 0 81.038 18.75% 19.933 0 19.933 Total Motor Vehicle in ueu 100.971 0 100.971 CD8G 101.600 0 101.600 Francnlse Taxes 26.578 0 26.578 Transient Occucancy Taxes 0 0 0 Sales Taxes 5.000 0 5.000 Total Revenues 347.858 0 347.858 Proposed Revenue Distributions Property Taxes .. 45.221 27.132 72.353 County Fire Fund 21.165 0 21.165 Gas Tax 2105 18.750 17.385 36.135 2106 0 1.441 1.441 2107 0 24.575 24.575 Total Gas Tax 18.750 43.401 62.151 ,'Aotor VenlCle In ueu 3125% 81.038 100.092 181.130 : 8 75% 19.933 0 19.933 T ota! Motor Venlcle In LIeu 100.971 100.092 201.063 CD8G 0 101.600 101.600 Francnlse Taxes 0 26.578 26.578 Transient Occucancy Taxes 0 0 0 Sales Taxes'" 0 5.000 5.000 T olai Revenues 186,107 303.803 489,910 ~otes: "C:tv portion 375%. Countv 62.5% Gas Tax: 2105 CountY aliocatJon caseD on $6.18 oer caolta tor 1995- 96 oer State Controller 2105 CiN allocation caseD on :55.73 oer caolta Tor 1995-96 cer State Controller. ::: 1 06 baseD on assessee valuatIon Tactor oTOOO064819169 (sollt between county & city). 2107 CoN dJJOcatJon caseD on $8.10 oer caolta Tor 1995-96 oer State Controller 'Aotor Venlcnte In Lieu: 31 25% countY aJJocatton casec :526.71 oer caPita Tor 1995-96 per ;:o:ate ComtTolier 31 25% CItY aJJocatJon caseD $32.99 per caPIta Tor 1995-96 per State Comtroller . 375% countY allocation caseD on :56.57 oer caelta tor 1995-96 eer State'Controller SlacK Grant caseD on :533.49 oer caPita Tor low/moo Income ISClit cetween counTY & City). .=rancnlse ï axes casec on :5 12,15 oer caPita ¡oerrveo from 1993 - 1994 utilITY trancnlse revenue JIVIOea ell COCulatlon, ----- ~ Bakersfield - Be a Part of it All Part of all what you ask? Well that is exactly the purpose of Borderline and the information that it will contain over the next few months. In the past, the City has not done an effective job in telling its "story" to residents of County islands, about the benefits and advantages of being part of Colonel Bakers' Field. It is only fair that as residents, you be able to make well informed, educated decisions about the future of your neighborhood. The purpose of Borderline is to provide you with the information you need about City services and projects which could benefit you and your neighbors if you decide to become a part of it all. The history of Colonel Baker and the beginning of Bakersfield is rich with stories of the I ' hospitality and service that Colonel Baker provided to the many visitors to his field. I Weary travelers didn't have to stop at his "field," they wanted to because they knew they could count on quality service at reasonable costs and commitment to honesty and excellence. The City of Bakersfield is equally committed to continuing in the tradition of Colonel Baker by providing quality services that residents want and need at a reasonable cost with honesty, courtesy and efficiency. We understand that annexation will only be successful if residents recognize the values and benefits of being a part of it all and willingly join Bakersfield and all it has to offer. The City of Bakersfield does have much to offer from efficient, timely street repair and improvement, community oriented policing, and earth-friendly recycling programs to productions of Les Mis'erables at the Convention Center and affordable recreation programs. The City strives to provide a well-rounded, safe and aesthetically pleasing community atmosphere for residents, and we invite you to be a part of it. The County does provide excellent services such as the court system and County jail, health services, welfare services, regional parks and basic services to rural areas. The City also has its service niche in that it is best equipped to provide services in urbanized areas, including residential neighborhoods and commercial and industrial areas. Services such as police protection, street sweeping, garbage collection, recycling, street maintenance, and recreational services are what the City does best and by choosing the City to provide these services through annexation, you will be allowing for the best, most efficient use of your tax dollars. Remember your property taxes can't increase when you annex, due to Proposition 13, but those tax dollars can be used more economically and efficiently thereby allowing you to get the most services out of each tax dollar. The decision is yours. The City of Bakersfield indeed has a long and proud history of quality service. A history that you are likely part of in some way, large or small. Why not choose to truly be a part of Bakersfield and be a part of it all. - --- --- , ~ . ¡ !-¡;~ I ~()r-~ ,> - B A K E R 5 F I E L D , \I MEMORANDUM I February 5, 1996 TO: Dep~ Heads FROM: ~.: ~~n, ~~~rt ~W ~~- SUBJECT: Joint City/County Service Efforts The City and County have agreed to work together to identify areas of service where there may be duplication of effort or where some greater efficiencies can be achieved. We have split the service areas into three phases so that they will be more manageable to address. Please review the attachments and specifically those areas for which you are responsible. Some preliminary work will be required in some of the areas before we sit down to the table with the County. I will be contacting you to set up those sessions. You will note that some of these items are already in progress. That direction will continue. Once the preliminary steps have- been completed, the staff identified on the attachments will sit down with the representatives from the County to share information and, hopefully, negotiate some cooperative alternatives. Meetings should commence before the end of February. If you have questions or concerns prior to my scheduling our preliminary steps, please giv~ me a call. cc: City Manager Administrative Analyst Parks Superintendent. General Services Superintendent Purchasing Officer Operations Manager Streets Superintendent Equipment Superintendent ,;:', ¡ " JOINT CITY/COUNTY SERVICE EFFORTS PHASE ONE 1 . Explore boundary improvements to provide for a more efficient delivery of services. City to provide up-to-date map of City limits. County will identify County-owned properties with boundaries congruent to City limits. After information is developed, feasibility will be explored. Representatives: Alan Tandy (lead), Adel Klein 2. Explore standard rules and regulations for refuse collection in the metropolitan Bakersfield area, and review realignment of service area responsibilities to improve cost effectiveness. Initiate process by holding meeting with haulers, City and County staff. Representatives: Alan Tandy (lead), Raul Rojas, Joel Heinrichs, Adel Klein, Daphne Washington, Roland Burkert 3. Explore development of consistent building and fire codes between City and County. Representatives: John Stinson (lead), Mike Kelly, Jack Hardisty, Adel Klein, Dan Clark, William Wilbanks 4. Review feasibility of City absorbing Heritage, College and Panorama Parks in exchange for other services or monetary allowance. County Parks Department to identify associated costs for these parks and others, as well as ancillary services that could be included. Representatives: Gail Waiters (lead), Lee Anderson, Frank Fabbri, Adel Klein, Bob Addison 5. Explore County taking over City's Airport in exchange for other services or monetary allowance. Representatives: Gail Waiters (lead), Raul Rojas, Larry Jamison, Adel Klein, Ray Bishop I I I ,,:, i, JOINT CITY/COUNTY SERVICE EFFORTS PHASE TWO 6. Explore a more efficient and consistent means of providing crossing guards. Representatives: John Stinson (lead), Steve Brummer, Adel Klein, William Wilbanks, Chuck Lackey 7. Explore consolidation of graffiti programs in the metro area. Representatives: Gail Waiters (lead), Jake Wager, Larry Jamison, Adel Klein, Victoria Pendleton, Jim Webdell 8. Explore consistent purchasing and bidding specifications between City and County. Representatives: Gail Waiters (lead), Greg Klimko, Darlene Wisham, Ernie Medina, Adel Klain, Steve Ladd 9. Explore consolidation/collaboration for supervisory training programs. Representatives: John Stinson (lead), Carroll Hayden, Adel Klein, Larry Espinosa -- --- \>'. Ii " JOINT CITY/COUNTY SERVICE EFFORTS PHASE THREE 10. Review of coordination/collaboration in the delivery of animal control services. Representatives: Gail Waiters (lead), Trudy Slater, Adel Klein 11. Review possible efficiencies in waste water treatment and line maintenance through an exchange of service area boundaries, Representatives: Alan Tandy (lead), Raul Rojas, Adel Klein, Daphne Washington, Joe Gillick 12. Review efficiencies in plan checking and inspections conducted by Environmental Health Services. Representatives: John Stinson (lead), Jack Hardisty, Adel Klein, Dave Price, Steve McCalley 13. Explore consolidation/collaboration of street sweeping services. Representatives: Gail Waiters (lead), Joe Lozano, Luis Peralez, Adel Klein, William Wilbanks, Chuck Lackey ¥ ACA TIONLAND RESORTS c ~.\\I ~ 0 ~.~ 08 February 1996 ~€ ð \qqb tt.ô \) rr\C€. .;:f 'SO . Bob Price, Mayor ~t>-'<O~ City of Bakersfield FAX. 805-326-3779 - - re: RIO BRAVO RESORT Dear Mayor Price; To sunnnarize our telephone conversation of this morning, I am a hotel investor working with Outrigger Lodging SetVÏce which owns/operates 5 I hotels on the Mainland United States in addition to their 16 flag hotels in Honolulu. I have been pursuing the acquisition of Rio Bravo Resort: but I have yet to receive any written response ITom the attorneys controlling the Trust. At the upcoming hearing for converting this lovely Resort into an Alzheimer's care facility, I would appreciate if the "powers to be" are infonned there is another buyer who. would not only invest $1,000,000 in the renovation of the existing Resort but continue to operate the Resort as such. Furthermore, I am in negotiations with Wells Fargo Bank for the acquisition of their 800 acres in Rio Bravo with the intent of a long tenD development plan. Sincerely, );Þ-- Je M. ShuIrn.an President .==--, -~. i RECFJ\/ED -~-= ! : I FEB - - ~ '998 :1 'CiTY M¡':\NAGEB'S OFFICE . ,. ~--=~Jj CORPORATE OFFICES: 1711 IRVINE AVENUE. NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 . (800) 600-3500 't'd ~S~OJ O~ ~S~OJ W~ES:01 96. 80 iB..:! m I I I I MEMORANDUM ~:t! vv. ! I I, February 8, 1996 ! TO: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER!~ FROM: JACK HARDISTY, DEVELOPME "SER ICES DIRE SUBJECT: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (PUD R RETIREMENT COMMUNITY AT RIO BRAVO TE AND FITNESS RESORT In response to your request, Jim Movius of my staff attended (as an observer) the citizens group meeting held February 7, 1996, at Cadillac Ranch regarding the above issue (newspaper article attached). Following is a brief summary of the meeting. Approximately 200 people were in attendance. There was standing room only and it was difficult for the entire audience to hear. George Nickle and Konny Boyd (project applicant) sat at the head of the room along with two other~ whose identification is unknown and a public relations person working for Ms. Boyd. The applicants were there to provide some facts for the concerned citizens and invite them to the February 13 meeting where the applicant will present their entire project with associated graphics. The newspaper article accurately reflects what was discussed while Jim was in attendance. Persons in the audience asked questions of the applicant which indicated they were either very skeptical or against the change of use and proposed uses. A small minority were either neutral or for the project. Most appeared willing to listen and let the vocal few on either side of the issue talk. The applicant did an excellent job of responding to questions and explaining the proposal. Jim expects the February 13, 1996, meeting (which he will attend) to be more valuable because the applicant will have displays for the citizens to look at and people will have had time to think about what the applicant has said. The primary concern of the citizens appears to be that they want the resort to remain as a resort. Jim has indicated from the phone calls he has received that people do not want the elderly environment to "take over" what they envision as a very active tennis/golf/fitness resort amenity of Bakersfield. The applicant has attempted to respond to these concerns by proposing to leave much of the recreational and dining facilities open to the public, but run an independent adult living facility by converting the existing motel facilities into apartments for the active elderly. An assisted living facility is proposed about a quarter mile w~st of the resort facility for Alzheimers clients. Single family cluster housing is proposed between the existing resort and the Alzheimers facility. The details of the cluster housing are not being presented at this time. The PUD application as submitted to our department is incomplete. Staff has provided the applicant with correspondence describing what is required to complete the application. If this information, which is substantial, is provided by the applicant by February 15, 1996, the tentative hearing dat~ before the Planning Commission will be April 4, 1996. ! RECEIVED -1 JM:pjt r FEB'~8. [ cc: Laura Marino m\mat2:8 k .: Crry ù\'~ANAGER'S OFFrCE~ "- ..-', I u_----- --- ~~ '" Æ' - .. D EVELO PMENT S ERVI CES STATUS REPORT ob~~,' February 2, 1996 \}j'-- 1. Our most intense project over the last couple of months has been completion of the Marketplace EIR. A tremendous amount of work has been completed very professionally in a relatively short period of time. 2. The Trails Plan and Ordinance are being revised to reflect our ability to fund the trails with the park development fee. Because of the complexity of changes required in the existing park fee ordinance and the requirement for a noticed public hearing this matter has been scheduled for the City Council on March 6. 3. The Memorandum of Understanding between Kern COG, Kern County and the City setting forth our agreement to work together to develop a compatible and mutually supportive geographic information system has been negotiated and should be to the City Council on March 20, 1996. 4. The NOR Recreation and Park District fee proposal will be formally presented to the BIA on February 7, 1996. The Intergovernmental Relations Committee is awaiting John's return to schedule a meeting to discuss the proposal. My staff reports that at this point the County Counsel's office has assumed the role of obstructionist. 5, The proposal to adopt a hillside grading ordinance is in Planning Commission committee. The committee will be scheduling a field trip to get a better understanding of problems it would address. 6. The kiosk sign ordinance has been reported out of Planning Commission committee and the Planning Commission conducted a hearing on February 1, 1996, and recommended City Council adoption of it. Castle and Cooke asked for a continuance because they were unprepared to deal with it after attending a year and a half of committee meetings about it. 7. A final draft of the agreement with Castle and Cooke to build the parks in Seven Oaks should be completed by the City Attorney by the end of this week. Staff from the City Attorney, Parks and Planning have nominated me to present it to Castle and Cooke. 8. The Ice Palace proposal to convert the former Price Club to an ice skating rink is progressing. Plans are expected in during the latter part of next week - February 14-16. RECEIVED \ I , \i FEB ~.. I: r n "CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE; "0_- - -", --, ---- - - - ,I _r'"-:.. -, tor;--' " -2- 9. Mervyn's Shopping Center has been talking to Planning staff about a full face lift and relandscaping. 10. Jim Movius attended the neighborhood meeting concerning conversion of the Rio Bravo Resort into a care facility for the elderly. A memo about the meeting is attached. 11. Planning Commissioner Hersh has been expressing his discontent with the City Council's review of the proposed traffic fee revision without having referred it to the Planning Commission. He had it placed on the March 15, 1996, Planning Commission agenda. 12. K-Mart representatives met with Stan and me last Wednesday to reconfirm their interest in proposing a Super K and other retail development in the Northeast. They understood the need for an EIR and didn't see it as a problem. They said they'd be back in about six months with an application. p:sr2.2 II -- -- - ---"- m- -----------. '\ i MEMORANDUM February 8, 1996 TO: Gana Bogart. WaMr ~soaKas Managar : G ý f FItOM: Steve Lafond. Hydrographic Sapervlsor # ¡¡V' SUBJECT: February 1. 19'6 Water Supply Outlook ~ The State of California DWR forecast of Kern RIver April-July runoff as of February 1, 1996 Is for an estimated 320,000 acre-feet. With just over half of the rainy season behind us, and with the heavy rains experienced during the first week of February. snow surveys In the Kern basin found roughly 10 Inches of water content, which Is 80% of average for this time of year. Due to the great uncertainty as to future weather conditions, the actual runoff as predicted by the State could be as little as 30% of normal or as high as 140% of normal. This range of forecast will narrow as we move through the remainder of the winter. The Sacramento River Index for northern Calfornla runoff Is for 16.3 million acre-feet or 86% of the average SRI of 18.9 million acre-feet. Current state water allocation for Kern County Is at 75% of Table 1 entitlement., or approximately '40.000 acre-feet. The City's yield through Improvement District #4 during 1996 Is estimated to be 90.000 acre-feet. Of this amount. 7.000 acre-feet has been set aside for continual operation of Truxtun Lake. and roughly 10.000 acre-feet for direct recharge Into the Kern RIver channel through metropolitan Bakersfield. Another 30.000 acre-feet Is scheduled for delivery to the ID#4 Treatment Plant. CE Ea The flow of the San Joaquin RIver Into Lake Millerton on the Frlant-Kern system Is forecasted by DWR to be 84% of average this year. Hormal annual water deliveries of Frlant ""ater to Kern County of 400,000 acre-feet will be reduced by roughly 50,000 acre-feet this year should the current forecast not Improve. -----.....,.,." , :'~ÇEnVED c~ : 8 -1 -, ~~R'S OFFICE ------~- ,_n -'--' I ~----- ., '1' Based on the above information and with normal future prczclpltatlon events In the Sierra nevada. following are particular hlghllg~ts of the upcoming water runoff season: 8 Isabella Reservoir storage peak of 370,000 acre-feed In early June 8 Summer-time flows In the Kern Canyon of 1,500 cis to 1,000 cis 8 Full annual operation of Truxtun Lake . Continual flow of the Kern RIver to Calloway area . Minor flows of City Kern RlverlState water In the Kern RIver bed upstream of Stockdale Hwy. throughout the year, with larger flows expected around holiday periods Quly 4th etc.) . Some fairly large volumes of recharge along the banking corridor (Stockdale HWY. to Enos Ln.) . Full delivery of City's Basic Contract obligations More detailed Information concerning City Kern RIver entitlement and deliveries during 1996 will be presented In City's annual Water Supply Forecast letter to be Issued next week. Attachments cc: Florn Core, Water Resources Director -~ ¡ï I I I ,..~....,.................,.. \ :>. \ / : / X ( /"" < . r / ì / / / }I / / I " -""'--1:-::':\""""" ...............................-..- """""""""""00"""" """"""""""""""""""""""-"'l-"""""""""""""""""""""""'" ...............-- -........ -'" Q) j .;) C) ¡ ..c. i ~ í u ( Q) í ~7 Ìii Z i .3! ~< :E , -". 0 ""............................., !~:... ~ ~ --- ~ _.L_~-~ - ~ 1r; c ~ ~ .: 0 "'-J => 'I ~ 0 ¡ ~ ~ ~ I "'" ... ~ I I ~ 0 10 7 i L........., as enQ) <C m ". '.:J rY' C m< -.... 1'" ~~ .., '.D C ~Z <C :¡ *! l ~ 0 0-0') m~ '. \ "¡::; <c a: 0') ~ "-', """"" , CO ~ a..O""- 1 ! '3 ~ ~~i- --- y--- -t- ~ S en en .0 ~ ..'........... \'1 ~ ~ Z t- æ. I ~ "'., I ~ ~ - J: Q) I I ~ 0 r'1'i en C) :> \... . ~ CtS - ~ <c - .q: """" I: Co ~ m W """ ......... as ~ ~ - .. ~ > a: .¡: """ 0 W ~ ~ ~ > ..... a: ............-.......................-- -............................................... ............................2... ~ Z ~ C a: c ~ W """ ~ ~ .8 U E Q) u Q) C -.......................-...................................................-........- ........................................... ....................--....................... êD .D E Q) ~ Z ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 M M N N ,... ,... (SaLpUI) ¡Ua¡UO~ Ja¡eM "" ¡s. \ -' ------ I -.. i" C ~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~U)U) U) U)U)U) ~~ ~~C~C~C~~C~3:C~C ~~C~~ ~ ~~~ U)m c c c c ~~ ~ ~~~ Llj :::!i: ~W ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~mø~m~N~O ~~øø ~ Ñ~m 0 O~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ æW ~~ enz ~~ U) ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~~~ W~ ~ ~O~~~~Oø~ ~ON~ m ø~~ < ~ Z~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ aJ :;O-~ a: ;>() - W ~ ~ &&&&&&&&& &&&& & ~~~ a: ~~ ~~~~~N~~~ ~~~m ~ ø~m U)~ NNNNNNNNN NNNN N NN~ Z Z...... a: W w c ~ ~ U) o~~møo~~~ ~~~O m ~~~ a: O~ W ~md~~d~~N ~~~~ m d~~ 0 Z:I: ~~NN~~~~~ N~~~ ~ ~NN ZW-() LL U)C Z ~ - < C C W ~~~~øøm~~ ~møø m ømm w~ NNNNNNNNN NNNN N NNN > ~~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~~~ ~ :::!i: ::J en ~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~C'!~~~~~~~~~~~C! I > ~<WW ~~~øømoøø~~~~~~o~~mom~ø~ , ~ ~~~~ NN~~~~N~~N~~NN~~~~~N~~ ~ ~ ~~~8 en ~ ~ 000000000000000000000000 ~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~ooooooommmmøøøøøøøø~~ - w~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~ > a: '~W ~O~N~~~~~~~~møOømONN~~~O < ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~m ~NNNNNNNN~NN~NØ~NNNNNNNØ ::> <:::!i: a: ()~ £:C Z W LL ~ ~ ~ ~ š m ~ ñi lIS .!!! 'O~ :æ 0 ~ '0 ~ ~ ~o lIS æ ~~ ~ ~ ~8 ~ ~ :~ :E ZZ"" .... ~ CD:::!i: > .c:: U)~ ~ ~ ~ ~ êã) !i ~ w Co .... .c:: lIS ~ ëd CD ~ () () ~ ~3: () m CD .. . C) !!I ~ . 5m S ! "C ~ëd 0 m ~ 'O:::!i:ni U)~~ CD ~~ m~!!I~ ~~:æ ~ m>-~ ~oo ~ "'~ lií);¡ëdCD CD '0 >-..1<: lIS :::!i:CDoIII: C)'O'O CD 1i£ >~ ä:CS~:E liíè3m ~~ ~ ~ã.!!. æmm :2 Ææ õ~ E ~ æ ~ ü:=:E :!:è3 0lil: 1IS$5 ~:E:æ ~ - ~ 0 c: '¡:.= - lIS >-.E '0 'fã ;> c: lIS .c:: I OQi Zo .c::'sCD.c 2.'0'0 S..l<: c: eCDIIS c::!:U .5 >-(;í U) C)-.c1lS ~c:c: C)U ~ -I/ .-C:IIS I/ ~> () _8-"" ~>-IIS _0 0 lIS = lIS ~OCD lIS u> m U)() ~~U) m~ ~ ~~() omm m I .:""~ " ;-. ¡;if MEMORANDUM "WE CARE" DATE: February 5, 1996 TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager FROM: Michael R. Kelly, Fire Chief "~ SUBJECT: Traffic Preemption System A meeting was held February 2 regarding the expansion of the Traffic Preemption System. Representatives from both ambulance companies, Assistant City Attorney Michael Allford, and the Fire Department staff were in attendance. The City Attorney's Office will continue to research the concept of a donation or franchise agreement in order to make a financial commitment to the expansion of the Traffic Preemption System. At the conclusion of the meeting, Hall Ambulance Company indicated that they would make a five-year commitment for at least two intersection retrofits per year in order to be a system user. Golden Empire Ambulance also made a five-year commitment for up to three or four intersection retrofits per year. The details of the necessary agreements should be in place prior to the 1996-97 Fiscal Year which will allow us to accelerate the Traffic Preemption System expansion process. Enclosed is an update from Captain Ron Fraze on the system. MRK/kec Enclosure MEMO\KELLY\PREEMP.l --~ RECE~VEP "- ~1995 \, L I -~~~,<",=,"J '~!TY ;,/1/\ \,1/1.. Gc¡:rs :- .~.> " .Ii' ,:0,-"'" -- - - ,~".~"- ,," , ' - , - n______-- - -- --- -110' ~I '" -- - ~- MEMORANDUM "WE CARE" February 2, 1996 TO: Chief Kelly, Fire Chief " .. FROM: Capt. Fraze, Interim Fire Marshal " SUBJECT: Signal Light Preemption Installation , . Chief Kelly, below is a list of the traffic signals and fire apparatus that have been' , , " '" , equipped with the preemption system. . -,,' ' , '; '.' -- ',', ' ;- TRAFFIC SIGNAL~':~' ". ~, , .<,;'fl'RE APPARAT~'S:';' ,:;' - : ' - ,- '",:,i-,:,,";',;,{" - '. ,- "', - ", "'j "c. "'" 21st &'P' "',Ming & Hughes' ,/>:;,::::t:~::~~1~',': ,Bàttalioh(~2 -~":,~ "", ' " 21st & 'HI! '" ',Ming & Castro '.,,?';":::1:';',:",<;:'Engine 6,':' ';" ,F,:"~,,' " , 21 st & Chester,;' Ming & Valley Plaz,â:':?<:~;i:,'::(',<Engine 1, Trúck '~, P?itrol Jo, ' Chester & 20th' , ,;-,,' .'Ming & Wible 'i\{:.'.~>}:'-,:::':;'~:Engine7" patrol t,;,::',:", ' Ches~er& 19th:., ,', Ming & S: Real ..' ", -', '-', "-:i'Engin~,9"Erï9iri~:f:; Chester & 18th' , ,>,';-'Ming '& Stinè ',. .,:,,:,::patrol 8:'6..';'?:}:<;:~'::-' ¡, , . . ..' - ," . " ,-',-' " - ," , - .-",.",'. Chester'& 17th, "Ming & Valhalla u" ' ',<~:\"" ,'/t;",:/i::'f.::\: Chester & Truxtun\-'. "Ming & New Stine,:' -" - :';" .<:;f-;<>:,':~!:;,;.'>:-, , , ' ,", ,':'::' , '::, ':~-"':<ii;:" ;':.'. .<::":;.";::1jfj,;¡;,...;-" , ' By the end of this ,fiscal year, we wilí,have jh~~ollowìng tråffic sì'gfJ?IS,c#rnpl~te~'. ',-' ' Akers & Wilson ",' "-';,;'. "',','" -,,-'" Akè/,s'& Planz ,'J' ," ':,;~'" California & Oak ",\' ',,', '" ,-.TruXtun & Oak - ' ,,' ,," , , ,,:: .. Càliforniå & Chester'. , ,;," -- Còlumbus&Haley"" ' -, , ,'.. - - ,'-, I wanted to inform 'you the installations hàve'gort~ very smoothIY~:-.The', . cooperation I have receivåd from Public Wor~s and the, Cqn;mlÚricati9n _~~op:has Igr~~tly ,;'i\'>., ,- added to the success of"_~~i,~ program.l.woù,ld,liketÒ tryal1k,both ,d,ep~~~e~ts,-tor:thËj!jr:</':' ,- ,assistance. The tr'affi,c ,,~igrìal . prßemption :sys,t.em is:a, very i~lJov~t,iv~, jq-~~. -~',""A~' v:{e ":"'" , " expand this system thröughout the city, lam ,Iodkingforvvard to, 'wOrking 'with:Public';"" Works and the, Com'11unlcàtion Shop in' maldng thisprogr?rp" a s~cê,êss. "', ,,:' ;:,:"~,' ';"'.: , ,', ' , , . ,Q.;:,',~' 'r~. "",- ,-"""-",' , ~~~,~ " ~ Â. Fraze, Captain""; 'Interim Fire Marshal R~ " A:\FSC5:PREEMPT MEMORANDUM «WE CARE" DATE: February 2, 1996 &Jj TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager FROM: Michael R. Kelly, Fire Chief~ SUBJECT: Meetings with the Kern County Fire Department' I The following is a review of the joint Bakersfield Fire Department and Kern County Fire Department meetings: 8 January 31, 1996 - Kern County Fire Department Headauarters The purpose of this meeting was to discuss future fire station locations. In attendance were County Fire Chief Dan Clark, County Union President Jimmy Ahl, City Union President Tim Luken, Board Member. Ed Watts, and myself. The meeting was productive and all those present agreed that planning for future facilities needs to be a coordinated effort. Chief Clark indicated that he is not in a position to support any specific recommendations at this time. 8 February 1, 1996 - Bakersfield Fire Departmènt General Office Several organizational issues such as areas of responsibility, budgeting practices, and operational concerns were discussed. In attendance were the Chiefs and management staff of both fire departments. All in all, I felt the meeting was very productive and is a step in the right direction toward a more cooperative effort. To the best of my knowledge, there have been no previous meetings of this type for many years. MRK/kec MEMO\KELLY\KCFD.MEETINGS --~----_. - =~. "" !p¡ë~Ci=" r¡ -- ,=, ...1 \1 '.- "i:.~ 'JL.l ' l. i L ~~~~ ¡ --_...ö ¡¡CiTY MANAGER'S OFf+..: - ~~~='" I I ';¡.- ?;'"> £..:.? Please...' ..0-Read 0 Handle 0 Approve And... ' I ! 0 Forward I 0 Return i I : 0 Keep or Toss . OHeview with Me From: , ,bda ~ ~ ( Post-¡t@7664@3M 1994 J.. Dale: . ~ / ~ /) "..'. - --"~- ,.. . ~. Æ 8 - B A K E R S F I E L D ~#u;:t; Economic and Community Development Department t:L,. ~ M E M 0 R A N D U M January 31, 1996 TO: Alan Tandy City Manager FROM:-: Jake Wager . Economic Development Dire or SUBJECT: Status of Funding Amounts for FY 96-97 HUD Entitlements Last month we informed you by memo that we had not been notified by HUD as to the amount of entitlement funds available for next fiscal year, and that we were hoping to receive federal budget confmnation by the end of January. As of today, we have yet to be officially notified regarding our HUD entitlements for FY 96-97. Due to on-going congressional budget negotiations in Washington, it is unknown when the City will receive official notification. However, a recent conversation with our HUD representative informed us we should probably expect, at the minimum, a 10% cut in the CDBG entitlement and approximately a 50% cut in the ESG entitlement as indicated in our memo dated January 30, 1996. The HOME entitlement is anticipated to remain about the same. Given this scenario, potential FY 96-97 funding amounts for the CDBG and HOME programs are $2,657,770 and $974,000, respectively. Until we receive further notice from HUD, we will be using the above noted estimates for our FY 96-97 budget preparation. Also attached for your review are our timelines for submission of the FY 96-97 Action Plan and proposed Amendment. Feel free to call if you hav~ any questions or comments regarding this matter. -=- RECEIVED - " \ ij :' 1\ 1 !i :1 FEB - 2 \996:: 'I I' I, ii I: i: ~~=~=~ I - ~,:TY W;.i,,~\!AGER'S OFF!Cr' -'~~~'-'~ ._--~~----~ " ",' -;~ "\ ."' "'... c'. I DATE BUDGET ACTION AMENDMENT ACTION I March 6, 1996 Submit Draft Amendment to Council & Request to Publish 30 Day Notice March 10, 1996 March 20, 1996 Submit Draft FY 96-97 Action \ \ ~ (( (:: ~: ~::' (( ((: ~,~ ':::':::' ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~, (~~ ~ ~ ~,~ ~ ~~~ \\ ~,~:: ':' ~ ':'~ ,~~~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~: ::( t: \: ::'::: :'t ':::':::':: :::::: :~'::: Plan to Council & Request to :::::¡:¡¡¡:¡:¡¡:¡:¡:::¡¡¡::::::::::::::¡:::::¡:::¡¡:¡¡:¡¡:¡:¡:::¡:¡¡¡¡¡:¡:¡:¡¡¡¡:¡¡¡::::::::::::::::::::¡:¡¡¡::::tt:t:::::::::::::::¡::¡:t:::¡::::::::::::::¡:::¡:¡:::t:t:¡::: Publish 30 Day Notice III:III:I.I::.!!I:I:.:!.IIIII:I.III.I:!!!:!'!::::'!::I:::::,:,,:':,::.IIIIIIIIIII!!I!I!.I.!I:II....:I'I:.',:::':::':::j':.!::.!:!:I::,:I'I:.I"j"'II.III!II:::I!t.:.:.:"j::. March 24, 1996 April 17, 1996 April 18, 1996 April 19, 1996 May 8, 1996 Request Council to approve FY 96-97 Action Plan May 10, 1996 Submit FY 96-97 Action Plan to HOD May 16, 1996 Deadline to HUD for FY 96-97 Action Plan file:hudfy96-7.v27 2 II EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM Fred A. Drew Director Robert Barnes, M.D. Medical Director February 1, 1996 TO: Distribution ~~ :)1.>'/1 .; .1' 1 ,¡J--lk;, - 11,1 'Af'¿' L" <-( JO f/ ~ FROM: rÇed Drew, Di~ector ~.- SUBJECT: AMBULANCE PERMIT RENEWALS The purpose of this memorandum is to provide notice and information regarding the status of Kern County Ambulance Service Permit renewal for each service operating within Kern County. The Kern County Ambulance Ordinance (Ordinance Code Chapter 8.12) provided for ambulance permit holders to be issued an initial permit for ten years (February 28,' 1991 to February 28, 2001). In addition, a permi t renewal at five-year increments is included, after submission of certain application materials. That five-year renewal is now upon us, and all current ambulance providers have submi tted their renewal applications. Except for a few minor discrepancies with the applications, all current providers' applications have been reviewed and accepted by the Department. The five-ye~~ renewal date is February 28, 1996, which will extend the original permit expiration date from the year 2001 to 2006. On February 27, 1996, the Board of Supervisors will be asked to approve the permit extensions. If you have any questions regarding permit renewal process, please contact the EMS Department. FAD:kb\ambpmt.026 ~ . . . ~ RECEl\/:"~'\ ,.~ Dlstrlbutlon: I -~,=_. Kern County Ambulance Permittees . Kern County City Managers FEB - 5 199'~ 1'1 Kern County Hospital Administrators I cc: County Administrative Office CITY MANAGER'S Ot County Counsel Emergency Medical Care Advisory Board - -. " Æ . I ~~ I I - B A K E R 5 F I E L D ~ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM I TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager FROM: Raul Rojas, Public Works Dir toï~ DATE: February 7, 1996 SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO COUNCILMEMBER MARK SALVAGGIO'S INQUIRY Councilmember Mark Salvaggio requested Public Works staff to provide him with information relative to the intersection I BentonlHolden. Attached you will find our response to such request. I Attachment --=-Re~r~~-;-,;,."-,- " , ( "',1.:= ( '"' I ~"~" ' r='.":~L~~~~L~'~ I' : ¡=FB 7 'V'.o"é?> II . b~;,.Q, I .C.,.'" - ,'f:, -, ~~ ~--~ ~ . I - B A K E R S F I E L D PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Traffic Engineering Memorandum DATE: February 1, 1996 TO: RAUL M. ROJAS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR FROM: STEPHEN L. WALKER, TRAFFIC ENGINEER.ØJ SUBJECT: PLANZ/SANDRA TRAFFIC STUDY, 01 RECT REFERRAL BY COUNCILMEMBERSALVAGGIO, FINAL UPDATE As noted in the last update, a final review and verification of multi-way stop warrants for the intersection was made after the winter break for the adjacent South High School. Based on data collected and direct observation of traffic operations, a multi-way stop warrant was met and verified. Arrangements have been made to remove the many pedestrian markings and signs in preparation of the stop signs and road markings for the stop installation. Work on some of the changes began this week and General Services expects the new stop signs to be completed in the next week. No further action proposed after completion of the stop sign installation. cc: Bruce Deeter, CE III, Traffic Engineering Brad Underwood, CE III, Traffic Engineering PW Memo Files Traffic Engineering File - Planz/Sandra intersection slw: P:\DATA\WP\1995\PlnzSdra.Ref . I I '. 4 . I - B A K E R S F I E L D PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Traffic Engineering Memorandum DATE: January 31, 1996 TO: RAUL M. ROJAS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR FROM: STEPHEN L. WALKER, TRAFFIC ENGINEER ~ SUBJECT: BENTON/HOLDEN INTERSECTION, FINAL UPDATE TO COUNCILMEMBER SALVAGGIO'S DIRECT REFERRAL As noted in the previous update, the intersection is far from meeting any warrants for stop signs in all directions. With this in mind, we reviewed the area for other improvements that may reduce problem traffic, mainly speeders. As a solution, we had installed speed limit signs on both streets at the intersections with the arterial streets and at the intersection of Benton and Holden itself. I have talked with Mr. Robert May, a resident of the area who initiated the request, and discussed our solution. He was pleased with the speed limit sign installation and understood that the 4-way stop was not warranted. He felt the speed limit signs would help greatly. Based on my observation of the area since the signs were installed, it appears the problems have been reduced. No further action proposed at this time. cc: Bruce Deeter, CE III, Traffic Engineering Brad Underwood, CE III, Traffic Engineering PW Memo Files Traffic Engineering File - Benton/Holden slw: P:\DATA\WP\1996\BenlnHdn,Ref . I '. ~ . -- B A K E R S F I E L D PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Traffic Engineering Memorandum DATE: February 1, 1996 TO: RAUL M. ROJAS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR FROM: STEPHEN L. WALKER, TRAFFIC ENGINEERþ SUBJECT: FINAL UPDATE, PLANZ/LAUREL INTERSECTION TRAFFIC CONTROL STUDY, COUNCIL REFERRAL #15541, COUNCILMEMBER SALVAGGIO. Traffic analysis of the intersection and its operation is complete for the intersection of Planz and Laurel. The intersection is a "tee". No warrants for traffic controls were met with this study. Side street traffic volume was about half of the minimum needed to considered additional stop signs. Because of the adjacent rail tracks and visibility factors, stopping sight distance was also checked and found to be adequate. A multiway stop is being installed at the next intersection east of this intersection, Planz and Sandra. That stop may reduce some of the residents' traffic concerns for the Planz and Laurel intersection regarding ,gaps in traffic and general speeds on Planz. No further action proposed for the intersection at this time. cc: Bruce Deeter, CE III, Traffic Engineering Brad Underwood, CE III, Traffic Engineering PW Memo Files Traffic Engineering File - Planz and laurel slw: P:\DATA\WP\1996\PlnzLarLRef , ~ . . . ~~ - B A K E RS FIE L D PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT .- MEMORAN ~M TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager l ( FROM: Raul Rojas, Public Works Dir c~ DATE: February 8, 1996 SUBJECT: RESPONSES TO COUNCIL INQUIRIES Attached you will find responses and updates to the following Council inquiries: 1. "Speed Bumps" or "Humps" in alleys. (Councilmember Jacquie Sullivan) 2. Request to remove traffic control at Planz Road and South Real Road. (Councilmember Jacquie Sullivan) 3. Potential U-Turn modification at Ashe Road and Stockdale Highway. (Councilmember Randy Rowles) 4. Ms. Teri Bolerjack's traffic concern on White Lane at Park VIew Drive. (Councilmember Kevin McDermott) 5. Update - Traffic control study at University and LaCosta. (Councilmember Patricia M. Smith) 6. Request for painted crosswalk across Earlene Court at Jewel Court. (Councilmember Mark C. Salvaggio) 7. Update - Vehicular closure proposal for McCleary between Parsons and Camp Streets. (Councilmember Mark C. Salvaggio) 8. Update - Traffic control study at Fairfax Road and Highland Knolls. (Councilmember Patricia M. Smith) 9. Update - Traffic control study at Panorama and Meadow VIsta. (Councilmember Patricia M. Smith) 10. Update - Speeding analysis on Christmas Tree, University and Panorama. RECEIVED (Councilmember Patricia M. Smith) I ~ .~ ! P~ease handle in your usual prompt manner. If you have any questions please - gIve me a call. rrv MANAGER'S OFFICE INQUIRY'PES ~- --- I (1 ) , ~ . , " - B A K E R S F I E L D PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Traffic Engineering Memorandum DATE: February 5, 1996 TO: RAUL M. ROJAS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR FROM: STEPHEN L. WALKER, TRAFFIC ENGINEER.~ SUBJECT: ALLEY "SPEED BUMPS" - DIRECT REFERRAL BY COUNCILMEMBER SULLIVAN The use of "speed bumps" in an alley is not recommended. I an not aware of any agency that uses bumps of the type sometimes found in private streets as described by Councilmember Sullivan in either alleys or public streets. The primary reason private street type bumps are not used on public streets or alleys is that such bumps cannot be justified as a pavement design feature like the pavement undulations or humps used only on local public streets in some communities. For reference, the pavement undulation or hump is the type we have been testing as part of our pilot program. The private street type bump is also not a traffic control device per the State of California. This leaves the local agency open to liability for vehicular damage and potential litigation without any protection afforded by state, or nationally accepted, uniform design standards. cc: Bruce Deeter, CE III, Traffic Engineering Brad Underwood, CE III, Traffic Engineering PW Memo Files Traffic Engineering File - Pavement undulation/speed hump file I' slw: P:\DATA\WP\1995\JS_Bump.Ref C = (2) ~ . . - B A K E R S F I E L D PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Traffic Engineering Memorandum DATE: February 5, 1996 TO: RAUL M. ROJAS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR FROM: STEPHEN L. WALKER, TRAFFIC ENGINEER ~ SUBJECT: REQUEST TO REMOVE TRAFFIC CONTROL AT PLANZ AND SOUTH REAL - DIRECT REFERRAL FROM COUNCILMEMBER SULLIVAN. I have made an initial investigation of the traffic control (stop sign) at the intersection of Planz Road and South Real Road as requested by Councilmember Sullivan. The intersection was changed to a multi-way stop condition in September 1994. The intersection had been analyzed as the result of a City Council referral/request to have stop signs installed. The resulting study showed traffic volumes were more than double the minimum volume needed to meet the stop sign warrant. In addition, the intersection met five warrants for a traffic signal. Since the intersection would not be funded for a traffic signal for several years due to other, higher priority, future signal locations ahead of it, the intersection was made into a multi-way stop as an interim solution. Since the installation of the stop signs, the traffic has stabilized and there have been no reported accidents. Since it is possible that traffic patterns have changed in the area and it has been nearly one and a half years since the stop signs were installed, a review of the stop sign and signal warrants for this intersection will be scheduled. Our findings will be reported back to you when the study is completed in a few weeks. cc: Bruce Dèeter, CE III, Traffic Engineering Brad Underwood, CE III, Traffic Engineering PW Memo Files Traffic Engineering File - Planz/South Real slw: P:\DATA\WP\1995\Plnz_ReI.Ref Þ,JAN-a3-96 TUE 17:19 CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE FAX NO. 805 324 1850 P,03 .. CITY OF BAKERSFIELD CAUFORNIA CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE FAX NO. (805) 324-1850 TELECOPIER MESSAGE DATE January 23, 1996 'I NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET: 3 PLEAS ROUTE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE TO: Raul Rojas Public Works Director FAX NUMBER SENDING MESSAGE TO: 328..1027 FROM: Alan Tandy City Manager Message: Attached are two refeffaJ items I received today from Jacquie Sullívan. She would like to be contacted personally with your response, in addition to your written communication. Thank you. 1501 TRUXTUN A VENUE. BAKERSFIELD; CA 93301 (805) 326.3751 II no 0'.0 --- -- -- .. - - ----- -~ JAN-2?-96 TUE 17:18 CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE FAX NO, 805 324 1850 P, 01 . .- 0 .al/23"J'¡I'Jf. 1:S:;¿:) F~OM SULLIVR"~~ULLIVRH RE TO 3241959 P.92 .. ~J J!d,,/ I . I. ~ ry~ ----.. . ~ --- - ..?~../~2~=~_~. . . .' .... . . ... . ...-..... .-.. ......... --~ -_._~. ~¿~¿,. r- o' -,~y~ a¿~~.~... '7, . '... .._"-;' I .- --- '~:~:.. =-3~--A-¿;' ~- d. . . ~. ~=- ~ ~.. - { -- -- ....... -'-"-' -- d . -- -. -- - - ,,--..------ ..--..,....-- þ-""- --------------------i .., ,"'" ,...... "~ .._...~~'-,._,..... ~~-~~ ¿' - ~-~-L £ ~..~.: 4~~~)- -if.,.. - ------ I ---- _.aM~ - --".. .:1.~ /2. .~;¡- - -,../ I, J2 2¿~~ .. - ---. ~ - , - - - ----------.. "" --- -.- ---- - ' - -" --. -- --,,------,,_._. - --~----..- --~, '__H' -~._.,~~..~~/"4"¿L/~AIlk ~~ -'s.~ ". :' \ .,..,.~~~.J_~...~,..~~P~,~....~d..4_~-Y- ' ..,.._",..¿,., .¿r-..,..~..~L ~--.¿~~ar~~ /.../~<..~ -~ , T' """""',"- ,,- - ..~.C!d.rr.~~C--=,-,. --'r~-.J ¿f¿~r '1'!...- ' ._..,.~øO,,-" '~--~~~LI:=~.--' ..~. ,U_-~ 4~:~_1 .. -~-~¿.~~~.- .. ..A,...L..4 ~--- P-..~."""¿ ~1LL-d.;..,_:/ J- - . - ---~----- ~e. r.,¿_.d~~ ~~? .~- .._...._..,,~~:~.~~-~~~---.... .. ".. ..... ..... ,."""'~",-,--"-,,,,,,-'--" _w- ..' ",....;:)..~~..d.._a~;.-~.._,....._...._--' ,," ,,~-~- .r;y :.. .~ ~ Et:I--. ~..._...-:.. ------.a~ a.- ..Að~..~.....¿y.r:-.~~~~.<r----.. -.. . '-'___"'H'a.-_~~,._.~,.,~-,~ -UI-..~'O"_.,._--,...._--,_.._-",_.,,.... ....,-... ' , ..."...-,.,""..,.., ',""'H'__,__""""-'---""" ,._,M"',,' " ... . , ",., ..-.----..-"",", ",.. '-' ..-.----;- " -......-...-..,'. ."'-'" .. ..--.." "......-..,.M......,.. .""'.'--""'-""'-----,--,---.. "."'-""".""" ""---. _--m JAN-2.;3-96 TUE 17: 19 CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE FAX NO. 805 324 1850 P.02 .. ". et/23/199~ 13:27 FRO" SUU.II,IIHnSULLIURH Ri TO :32418~1: """'. " ., ~¿ ß;O'¡ I 'f!~4'...r7-~~!:.' 0 . - ..... 0' '0 ..4/ ',:_~¿;--~-" ,.... .. "'m'~'" ~..~y--~~R'~.~--< .. . ~ . ~,-z.~~~ .... . .. ... no .._-~--_. , .--.----. ". . . .. .7-"----"~ ..,.--... .-.., . - - ---- -'" ... . " ..._~. :..~..... 6~.~~-~th- Z"--~~~.i_?'=-- .- u_- .. .. ~.;¿,.~~ ~<~. ~- ~-?u;~:¿" --- ~, tI" 7. _.-"'..-- . _.-- -'--~~T~~ ~- ....._-~..a4 L~-"- - - ¿ - - '.... ¿;,.~ ...c:- .-4..,-." -i ý ~ ¿-~ ~ ~ ---~ - a ~ ! ---,-.-.. -,...,..--...., -.....' ---,.. - . "...---., -- ---=.., 'd? -c..,...- c ~'" . ' . "- .. - . -, .. . .._-~'" ~--~ -~~- cLz..r.¡., .J, .A 7 J ~ .- .-"','" I ,... ,..- ---0 ,""- ~-4.~~...~ ~ --~cMJI~. rI2~¿ '~fI.!! (1t(? - '; ,I 7 ,,'-- ,"~ -... -'~""-'-'-' : ."...~"".,a,d~...¿.?_.þ?t:~~~~-->,! ¿, ~"Ž~:-'-7' ,. . ì "n. ... ..:;¿, /7r'.. -¿~ - - - .. ~~ A", - ~ ~... ......- ~ ;.. ".to.... ~~ ou_- .. A Á- ð~~ _"_0"'----- d dO- - .0-- ' - O' - -_........,,~ . "l ......-..-----...."-"""" ...._.J!? '-LL~.~.. -, .~~ .. .- --.....---- .... . ,... -----.. ...~ - -iL--L~ - ¥'" C72 - ; ... . -""""----'---"""-'-- ..........."..----.--. .'....."'.""--"""'. -"""--'-""'~"""""--'- -' I -~-: :~~- ~~~~~. ~'-~~-~....:_-~~:_<::. ..:. '- -~ .~. .: ~ .--~-' - -" -,.'~ -'~'.- -- ~-:~-'_-=-'1 ... ._-_.-~.."...._........... .'..'.'--""'-----"" ....... -.... ....... ...... ,-"""."'."..----.-- --_---i~~ . . ..., .-...-.--... .....-....-..... ._._..~_..... ..-.-.-..........-... """",,""""... ._.... ""_'_'.O'_---.'^.~---'.- . -....--.-..........-.. .-....-". ..-...--.. ."""--'" ... .... ",..... .-_. '. . --.. ....._---,,-_._--_ft_~~ 1 .-------..-..... . --.. ------.. ..... ....... .. ....n.'" 0..." .-.----- ""'-'--------~""---1 .....--..........-..--.... .",.... .... .-. -.-""----...... ..-..-.- "---'-'.'..- TOTRL p.e4 ~. ---- .-. -..- --~.~~ --~---- ~~- -~--- ----------- ~ -------~._-~----- ----...-. (3) ~ . . I ' - B A K E R S F I E L D PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Traffic Engineering Memorandum DATE: February 5, 1996 TO: RAUL M. ROJAS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR FROM: STEPHEN L. WALKER, TRAFFIC ENGINEER -#z,J SUBJECT: ASHE ROAD AT STOCKDALE HIGHWAY, POTENTIAL U-TURN MODIFICATION, REFERRAL BY COUNCllMEMBER ROWLES. As requested by Councilmember Rowles, I made contact last week with Mr. Craig Pope of the Kern County Roads Department regarding future changes possible for the intersection of Ashe and Stockdale. Since the County project to signalize the intersection of Fairway and Stockdale could force the modification of the signal and median at Ashe to allow U-turns, could a portion of the changes by done by the County with their project. Mr. Pope and I discussed the possibility of the County constructing the chànges to the median to make a left turn (u-turn) bay. The City could then modify the electrical/signal portion of the intersection to allow the U-turns with a protected signal phase, either at the same time or at a later date. Mr. Pope indicated that he thought this could be a good idea and he will pursue that possibility with his engineers and discuss it with County Supervisor. He said he would get back to me on this idea within the next few weeks or sooner. cc: Bruce Deeter, CE III, Traffic Engineering Brad Underwood, CE III, Traffic Engineering PW Memo Files Traffic Engineering File - Ashe/Stockdale intersection slw: P:\DATA\WP\1995\AsheStok.Mem I "' (4) I . c¡ ~ . - B A K E R S F I E L D PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Traffic Engineering Memorandum DATE: February 2, 1996 TO: RAUL M. ROJAS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR FROM: STEPHEN L. WALKER, TRAFFIC ENGINEER Þ SUBJECT: REFERRAL FROM COUNCILMEMBER McDERMOTT - WHITE LANE AT PARK VIEW DRIVE INQUIRY BY MS TERI BOLERJACK (WARD 4) I Ms Bolerjack was contacted via phone at 589-4600 regarding the intersection of White Lane at Park View Drive. She asked that we consider a traffic signal at the intersection to stop cars from speeding on White Lane. I informed her that we had already investigated the intersection and determined that a traffic signal was needed. The intersection is currently number 15 of 31 intersections that need a traffic signal in the City. Since Ms Bolerjack's main concern was speeding on White Lane, which would not be reduced by a traffic signal, I told her I would contact the Police Department to request speed limit enforcement on the street. She was satisfied with our response and did not request further action or contact. Lt. Moore, Police Department Traffic Section, was informed of the request and will have officers patrol the area for speed violations. cc: Bruce Deeter, CE III, Traffic Engineering Brad Underwood, CE III, Traffic Engineering PW Memo Files Traffic Engineering File - White Lane/Park View Drive, Ward 4 referral slw: P:\DATA\WP\1995\WhtPkVw,Ref - -- ---~-" ----- --- --- ------ (5) I ~ . ; ; - , B A K E R S F I E L D PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Traffic Engineering Memorandum DATE: February 6, 1996 TO: RAUL M. ROJAS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR FROM: STEPHEN L. WALKER, TRAFFIC ENGINEER.~ SUBJECT: UPDATE - UNIVERSITY AND La:COSTA TRAFFIC CONTROL STUDY, REFERRAL BY COUNCILMEMBER SMITH A four-way stop warrant study was completed for the intersection of University at LaCosta. The study indicated that no accidents were recorded by the Police Department that could have been corrected by a 4-way stop. The volumes warrant was not met for a 4-way stop due to side street volumes of less than the minimum 140 per hour average. The actual count was an average of 121 per hour for 8 hours. Since this is close to the minimum needed and pedestrians can be counted towards the minimum volume, I have directed that a sample pedestrian count be taken of the intersection. The intersection is heavily used by student pedestrians to get to Chipman Jr. High and to Highland High schools with some elementary students using the intersection. I will make a recommendation regarding the traffic control at the intersection when the additional data is collected and analyzed. cc: Bruce Deeter, CE III, Traffic Engineering Brad Underwood, CE III, Traffic Engineering PW Memo Files Traffic Engineering File - LaCosta/University slw: P:IDATAIWPI1995IUnivLcos.Ref ~ --~- --- I (6) ~. ~ . , . -- B A K E R S F I E L D PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Traffic Engineering Memorandum DATE: February 5, 1996 TO: RAUL M. ROJAS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR FROM: STEPHEN L. WALKER, TRAFFIC ENGINEER~ SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR A PAINTED CROSSWALK ACROSS EARLENE CT AT JEWEL CT, DIRECT REFERRAL FROM COUNCILMEMBER SALVAGGIO I have investigated the painted crosswalk request for the intersection of Earlene Court at Jewel Court. Jewel Court is a short cul-de-sac street off of Pacheco Road. Earlene Court intersects Jewel Court and continues a few blocks to the west and terminates. At the end of Jewel Court, Kendrick Elementary School has developed a gated access to the playground. Per discussions with Principal Jim Mayberry, the gate is now open at all times for students to use to get to the school instead of having to go several blocks around and south to the front of the school on Faith Avenue. Principal Mayberry indicated that the school is not requesting a painted crosswalk at the existing corner crosswalk area. He was of the opinion that a painted crosswalk would not normally be needed to direct pedestrian students to cross at a minor "tee" intersection and he is not aware of any problems for students. Although the intersection is not one that would normally be considered for a painted crosswalk since it is a "tee" and Earlene is a minor street, a painted crosswalk would probably not adversely affect the intersection operation. A painted crosswalk does not function as a traffic control or safety device and simply directs pedestrians to an appropriate location to cross a street that may not otherwise be obvious to the pedestrian. Standard yearly maintenance costs would be incurred for initial installation and normal repainting. Please advise if a painted crosswalk is still desired and we will prepare the plans and work orders to install a painted crosswalk. cc: Traffic Engineering File - Earlene/Jewel intersection file slw: P:IDATAIWPI1995IJwIEarln.Ref --------~ -~- ~ - (7) ~ . , -- B A K E R S F I E L D PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Traffic Engineering Memorandum DATE: February 6, 1996 TO: RAUL M. ROJAS, P~BLlC WORKS DIRECTOR FROM: STEPHEN L. WALKER, TRAFFIC ENGINEER "4ðÞ SUBJECT: UPDATE - VEHICULAR CLOSURE PROPOSAL FOR McCLEARY BETWEEN PARSONS AND CAMP STREETS, REFERRAL BY COUNCILMEMBER SALVAGGIO. The closure of McCleary Street is to be before the City Council on February 7, 1996 to make the formal referral to the Planning Commission to take public testimony in a hearing format. Two other locations will be on the same hearing date. A firm date has not been set for the hearing by the Planning Commission, but is expected to be within 4 to 6 weeks after formal referral by the City Council. Affected property owners will be notified of the hearing date for their comments on the proposal. I will advise you when I know a firm date for the hearing. cc: Bruce Deeter, CE III, Traffic Engineering Brad Underwood, CE III, Traffic Engineering PW Memo Files Traffic Engineering File - Parsons/McCleary slw: P:\DATA\WP\1995\Mcleary.ref (8) Æ . I . ,. - B A K E R S F I E L D PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Traffic Engineering Memorandum DATE: February 6, 1996 TO: RAUL M. ROJAS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR FROM: STEPHEN L. WALKER, TRAFFIC ENGINEER ~ SUBJECT: UPDATE - FAIRFAX AT HIGHLAND KNOLLS, REFERRAL BY COUNCILMEMBER SMITH Traffic control study for this intersection is in progress. Accidents at the intersection have been reviewed. Data collection for traffic volume analysis will begin soon to complete the warrant study. Both 4-way stop and traffic signal warrants will be analyzed. When the traffic control warrant study is completed, I will make a recommendation on action. cc: Bruce Deeter, CE III, Traffic Engineering Brad Underwood, CE III, Traffic Engineering PW Memo Files Traffic Engineering File - FairfaX/Highland Knolls slw: P:\DATA\WP\1995\FfaxHlnd.Ref I I I ~ (9) . . , ¡ - " B A K E R S F I E L D PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Traffic Engineering Memorandum DATE: February 6, 1996 TO: RAUL M. ROJAS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR FROM: STEPHEN L. WALKER, TRAFFIC ENGINEER ¡~ SUBJECT: UPDATE - PANORAMA AT MEADOW VISTA TRAFFIC CONTROL STUDY, REFERRAL BY COUNCILMEMBER SMITH. The intersection of Panorama at Meadow Vista has had one recorded accident in the past 30 months. The traffic volumes do not meet minimum levels for consideration of a 4-way stop. The side street traffic volume is low. Although some high school and junior high school pedestrians cross in the area (most away from the intersection), the pedestrian volume had no effect on the side street volume count. No elementary school pedestrians use this intersection to cross Panorama due to school attendance boundaries. No warrants are met at this time for a 4-way stop control. cc: Bruce Deeter, CE III, Traffic Engineering Brad Underwood, CE III, Traffic Engineering PW Memo Files Traffic Engineering File - Panorama/Meadow Vista slw: P:\DATA\WP\1995\PanMVist,Ref - - - , (10) . ~ (i, . . ¡; , - ,L ,J'., B A K E R S F I E L D PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Traffic Engineering Memorandum DATE: February 7, 1996 TO: RAUL M. ROJAS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR FROM: STEPHEN L WALKER, TRAFFIC ENGINEER !~ SUBJECT: UPDATE - SPEEDING ANALYSIS ON CHRISTMAS TREE, UNIVERSITY AND PANORAMA - REFERRAL BY COUNCILMEMBER SMITH As requested, an analysis of speeding on Christmas Tree, University and Panorama was performed over the past several weeks. This information will be given to the Police Department to help them in enforcement of the speed limits. As a summary, the following information was gathered: On Christmas Tree Lane Total # of Vehicles Surveyed 2,085 # of vehicles exceeding 35 mph 757 % of vehicles exceeding 35 mph 36.3 # of vehicles exceeding 40 mph 401 % of vehicles exceeding 40 mph 19.2 # of vehicles exceeding 45 mph 173 % of vehicles exceeding 45 mph 8.3 Christmas Tree is a 25 mph speed limit street. The average speed was 28.6 mph. The 85th percentile speed, which is an indication of that speed most drivers feel comfortable driving, was a high 42.9 mph. On University Total # of Vehicles Surveyed 6,223 # of vehicles exceeding 45 mph 1,188 % of vehicles exceeding 45 mph 19.1 # of vehicles exceeding 50 mph 313 % of vehicles exceeding 50 mph 5.0 University is a 40 mph speed limit street. The average speed was 38.9 to 40.0 mph. The 85th percentile speed, which is an indication of that speed most drivers feel comfortable driving, was 46.8 to 47.9 mph. This is moderately high. ! I - -- - --- u ---- -." ~ .' .... .1 ¿ . , .' . , I c. ~ - page 2 of 2 On Panorama Drive Total # of Vehicles Surveyed 7,576 # of vehicles exceeding 50 mph 533 % of vehicles exceeding 50 mph 7.0 # of vehicles exceeding 55 mph 89 % of vehicles exceeding 55 mph 1.2 Panorama Drive is a 45 mph speed limit street. The average speed was 37.2 to 37.8 mph. The 85th percentile speed, which is an indication of that speed most drivers feel comfortable driving, was 48.9 to 49.6 mph. This is moderately high speeds for this type of street. cc: Bruce Deeter, CE III, Traffic Engineering Brad Underwood, CE III, Traffic Engineering PW Memo Files Traffic Engineering File - to each street file slw: P:\DATA\WP\1995\NE_Speed.Ref L --- - --- , , / ,,' "'-, BAKERSFIELD POLICE MEMORANDUM February 9, 1996 To: City Councilmember Mark C. Salvaggio From: B. R. Horton, Assistant Chief, Operations Division I' I Subject: Traffic Enforcement/Chester W. Nimitz Street In reference to our conversation February 8,1996, regarding traffic enforcement on Chester W. Nimitz Street, attached is a brief summary of traffic enforcement action taken. Per your request, a traffic study was accomplished. Lieutenant T. Moore, Traffic Commander, indicated there appeared to be no overwhelming problems on Chestel 'N. Nimitz as compared to other city streets. However, be assured of our continued t;. ¡fic control observations and enforcement. Refer to the enclosed traffic study and memos. If any further information is needed, please contact me at 326-3824. g/ ~1~ B. R. Horton, Assistant Chief Operations Division BRH/ik memos96\salvaggio.brh Enclosures . L - ¡ r-~~"', ;;" , BAKERSFIELD POLICE MEMORANDUM DATE: February 8, 1996 TO: LIEUTENANT T. R. MOORE, TRAFFIC DIVISION FROM: OFFICER L. MILLS SUBJECT: TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT - 5500 TO 6500 BLOCK OF CHESTER W. NIMITZ STREET BETWEEN FAIRVIEW ROAD AND PANAMA LANE I conducted traffic enforcement on Chester W. Nimitz Street between Fairview Road and Panama Lane from 01/23/96 to 02/08/96, Monday through Friday, from 0730 to 0900 hours and from 1200 hours to 1300 hours. I issued a total of sixteen (16) citations during this time for speeding. This was a total of 26Yz hours of enforcement. About 95 percent of the vehicles I observed were traveling at or below the posted speed limit of 25 miles per hour. A lot of the citations I issued were issued to people who live in the immediate neighborhood. During my enforcement, I did not observe what, in my opinion is a serious traffic problem on this street. I was contacted by one resident who indicated to me that he had been approached by a subject who resides in the neighborhood, and asked to sign a petition to erect speed bumps on the street. I advised this resident that the Bakersfield Police Department and the City Council had received several complaints about speeding on this street. He advised me that 1,;: 1 '+;:wed most of the complaints came from this subject who was passing around the petition, ar fie, ¡self had not noticed any serious problems of speeding on this street anymore than any other residential street. The following is a list of the citations issued during my enforcement period: Date Time Citation Number 01/23/96 0820 hours Citation # BM04562 for 41 mph in a 25 mph zone 01/23/96 0840 hours Citation #BM04563 for 42 mph in a 25 mph zone 01/23/96 1255 hours Citation #BM04569 for 42 mph in a 25 mph zone 01/24/96 0740 hours Citation #BM04572 for 41 mph in a 25 mph zone 01/24/96 0753 hours Citation #BM04573 for 42 mph in a 25 mph zone 01/24/96 1225 hours Citation #BM05354 for 40 mph in a 25 mph zone 01/24/96 1255 hours Citation #BM05355 for 44 mph in a 25 mph zone 01/25/96 1211 hours Citation #BM05357 for 40 mph in a 25 mph zone 01/25/96 1230 hours Citation #BM05358 for 42 mph in a 25 mph zone 01/25/96 1257 hours Citation #BM05359 for 43 mph in a 25 mph zone 01/29/96 0750 hours Citation #BM05364 for 39 mph in a 25 mph zone 01/29/96 1210 hours Citation #BM05366 for 41 mph in a 25 mph zone 1 - - -- -- -- -- -- --- - - -- ,¡;;-~f, >;Þ- > 01/29/96 1230 hours Citation #BM05367 for 39 mph in a 25 mph zone 01/29/96 1251 hours Citation #BM05368 for 39 mph in a 25 mph zone 02/01/96 1300 hours Citation #BM05853 for 38 mph in a 25 mph zone 02/06/96 1205 hours Citation #BM05866 for 44 mph in a 25 mph zone Respectfully submitted, OFFICER L. MILLS, Badge #635 LMJkdc me: f:\...memos\cites.63S ,I ! 2 I ,d' 7'-. ,- BAKERSFIELD POLICE MEM 0 RAND UM .- DATE: January 26, 1996 TO: CAPTAIN N. MAHAN, OPERATIONS CAPTAIN FROM: LIEUTENANT T. R. MOORE, TRAFFIC COMMANDER - SUBJEcr: SUPPLEMENTAL IN RESPONSE TO A LETrER AND PETITION RECEIVED FROM MARK SALVAGGIO, CO UN Cll..MAN, WARD 7,. REGARDING SPEEDING ON CHESTER W. NIMITZ I As I indicated in the previous memo, five speeding tickets were issued in November, 1995, and a survey was completed the traffic engineer regarding speèd bumps on Chester W. Nimitz and the speeding situation where it was determined if there were vehicles speeding; however, the majority of these vehicles resided in that area. Officers were dispatched to Chester W. Nimitz for traffic enforcement in December, but I am unable to retrieve that information regarding how many citatio~s were written.' During the month of January, 12 citations have been written on Chester W. Nimitz, and the officer indicates that the traffic was very light, and that 95% of the vehicles on that street were under the speed limit of 25 ,miles per hour. . . I went out and personally looked at this street and found that there was a four block area from Panamal.ane to Maurice Avenue to where there was a stop sign. Then there was a three block area from Maurice Avenue to Fairview Road. Because of the stop sign stopping the vehicles halfway between Fairview Road and Panama Lane, in my opinion thiS was also acting as a speed deterrent One of the officers assigned to issue citations on Chester W: Nimitz contacted a resident who indicated he did not feel there was a speeding problem on Chester W. Nimitz, but one individual was determined to have speed bumps placed on that street and had passed a petition around and tried, to get residents in the area to be willing to contribute to a fund to install speed bumps at $1,000 a .- pIece. Based on the information I have at thè present time, I feel that there was no overwhelming problem on this street, as compared to other streets in the City of Bakersfield, that would warrant further priority type enforcement Officers will be working Chester W. Nimitz from time to time; however, it will not be on a priority basis. Respectfully submitted, ;) . ........................................................ ~................ T. R. MOORE, LIEUTENANT TRAFFIC CO MMAND ER 1 - ;,,' . I /" BAKERSFIELD POLICE -- MEMORANDUM DATE: January 2, 1996 TO: MR. MARK SALVAGGIO, COUNCILMAN - WARD 7 ~ FROM: LIEUTENANT T. R. MOORE - TRAFFIC COMMANDER " SUBJECf: STREET SPEEDING EVALUATION OF CHESTER W. NIMITZ STREET In response to the letter and petition received through your office, a street speeding evaluation was completed by the City of Bakersfield Traffic Engineer. The evaluation data collected showed there was a speeding problem, and the majority of vehicles speeding are residents of this area. Five speeding citations were written in November and we will continue to enforce and monitor this street. ,""::.' .. ~,' . ., . 1 - - ---------- I " /' .' 4 . - .---. B A K E R 5 F I E L D PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: December 27, 1995 TO: STEPHEN L. WALKER, TRAFFIC ENGINEER FROM: BRAD B. UNDERWOOD, CML ENGINEER III í3ß L( SUBJECT: CHESTER W. NIMITZ STREET SPEEDING EVALUATION - COUNCIL REFERRAL We performed a speed profUe for a three and one-half day period on Chester W. Nimitz Street at two locations between Panama Lane and Fairview Drive. The results revealed that there is a problem with speeding on this 25 mph residenúal street. The average speed being 28.1 mph north of Maurice. 24.3 mph south of Maurice and [he 85th percenúle speed 35.8 mph norch of Maurice, 34.5 mph south of Maurice, which for a residential street with a 25 mph speed limit are higher than desired speeds. The results revealed 14.3% (north of Maurice) and 9.9% (south of Maurice) of the vehicles exceeded 35 mph. Speeding is prevelant throughout I the entire day in both directions. Speeding occurs most frequently between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m., and 2:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. (commute and school hours). North of Maurice Avenue Total # Vehicles Surveyed - 3,824 # Vehicles Exceeding 35 mph - 542 % Vehicles Exceeding 35 mph - 14.3 I; Vehicles Exceeding 40 mph - 188 % Vehicles Exceeding 40 mph - 5.0 # Vehicles Exceeding 45 mph - 136 % Vehicles Exceeding 45 mph - 3.6 South of Maurice Avenue Total # Vehicles Surveyed . 5.404 # Vehicles Exceeding 35 mph - 534 % Vehicles Exceeding 35 mph - 9.9 # Veh~cles Exceeding 40 mph - 131 % Vehicles Exceeding 40 mph - 2.4 # Vehicles Exceeding 45 mph - 37 % Vehicles Exceeding 45 mph - 0.7 As part of the speeding evaluation, additional counters were set to determine if there is a significant number of vehicles using Nimitz as a short cut to avoid South H Street. The data collected showed volumes ina-easing and decreasing at logical locations along the entire street, which indicates only a small percentage, if any, vehicles are "cut through" traffic. Volumes are consistent with that of other residential streets that serve as entrances into a residenúal neighborhood. This street was observed twice a day during the study and during these times there was not many "cut thro~. vehicles.~ would lead to the conclusion that tbe rñâjortty of vehicles speeding oo°tKfSò'stteè( ãiC"" J rëSidé:iíiš iñtJìëârêà. :;, original: Intersection File - Chester W, NimitZ / Maurice cc: Lt. Darbec. Police Dcpanmcnt ~ 4. s: \ wp\ brad \ tcon trol \spced9S\ n im itz.mem .- - /6 ," -' r, ,- '/./r:~r t.. ,"'",. I /~/ul ;':~-) ;r7'...- - Î " i . I. -.,>,..- "'07<"'/ '-~O"" 0, ROBERT and JERI PRESS - ,1;:4/1 '7,""'-/(J 5717 Chester W. Nimitz Street ( Bakersfield, CA 93304 (805) 831-8589 (C(Q)(F>1f December 28, 1995 MR. MARK SALVAGGIO Councilman, Ward 7 1501 Truxtun Avenue i . Bakersfield,' CA 93301 RE: Speed bump program and control of speeding problems on Chester'W. Nimitz Street Dear Mr. Salvaggio: I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your support concerning the above entitled matter. Since our initial letter dated November 8, 1995, the street received four (4)'posted speed limit signs stating the speed limit of 25 M.P.H. Your efforts have also brought forth a study of traffic flow and speed as well as one (1) ticketing effort by the Bakersfield Police Department. The residents on this street look at this as an initial first step to a large problem and don't want the effort to stop with this initial response. We feel that one traffic citation incident over 45 days is notenough effort on the part of the Bakersfield Police Department's traffic division. There needs to be several more instances, of ticketing speeders on this street than just one between November 8, 1995 and present. However, the effort is. appreciated by the residents. I have also had an opportunity to peruse the Pilot Program Test Results Report you sent me in mid November. Although I did not read the entire 30 page memorandum line by line, in summary, it appears the majority of the residents involved in this pilot program were pleased and satisfied with the speed bump results. However, because of the .. recommendations of ONE (1) Traffic Engineer who wrote the following in this report: "In Summary, the technical results do not indicate that speed bumps really slow down traffic to the extent desired. The public', however, seems to embrace the speed bump as a cure to speeding and perceive the results to be a positive improvement. Based on the technical data ~ collected, I cannot make a recommenqation for speed bumps 'of the type tested." , -- RECEIVED . .',~.N 2 I~-~ \ - '!TY ío¡'þ,N,ð..GER'S OF!: .' v The Urban Planning Committee never brought any recommendations to the City Counsel.' They simply "shelved" it in hopes that the speed bump program would simply go away. This paragraph and the actions of the Urban Planning Committee seems to state, "your opinion and perceptions (the residents and general public) regarding this program DON'T MATTER" This angers us, as citizens and tax payers who live with this problem of speeding vehicles 'on our street on a daily basis. In short, we as a community look at the initial efforts you have pùt forth as a good starting point and intend to continue to emphasize this problem to the City Counsel as a vvhole. I For the .present, we would appreciate being kept informed as to the results of the traffic I , 'flow study which was conducted on Chester W. Nimitz Street during the months of November and December 1995. We also Would like to be notified when this study will go before the City Counsel as well as any meetings having to do with the adoption and . allocation of speed bumps on our street. Again, please encourage the Bakersfield Police to patrol our street using radar to keep' speeding to a ,minimum. Thank you for your courtesyanc;t cooperation regarding this.matter. cc: The Bakersfield Police Department. Traffic Division, Attn: S,E. Brummer Bakersfield Public Works Dept. The Bakersfield Californian. Attn: Mark Benjamin .. ~ ., .- . -, . ' ROBERT and JERI PRESS RECEIVED 5717 Chester W. Nimitz Street !H1V 1 0 1995 Bakersfield, CA 93304 Bakersfield Police Department (805) 831-8589 November 8, 1995 Mr. Mark Salvaggio Councilman, Ward 7 1501 Truxtun Avenue' Bakersfield, CA 93301. RE: Speed of traffic on Chester W. Nimitz Street Dear Mr. Salvaggio: Enclosed please find a petition signed by all the' citizens who reside on the above mentioned street. This petition has been adopted and signed by the home owners and residents of this neighborhood which is located within your district, Ward 7. It is a residential street within the City of Bakersfield and it is located as a north-south thoroughfare; connecting Fairview andcpanama Lane. Our family has lived on this street for the past 8 ~ years and many of the petitioners have lived on this street since its construction in 1979. Our concern is the speed of the vehicles which travel this street on a daily basis. (See attached map) This is a residential street, yet there are no speed limit signs posted ,stating 25 M.P.H. It is also the only street connecting traffic which travels from the north side residential areas off of Fairview to Panama Lane and ultimately Highway 99, as well as numerous stores, fast food restaurants and service stations, without having to travel South H Street Most of these vehicles are non-residential vehicles in a hurry to get to the above places wi~ou'~ having to continue down tc South H Street to get to Panama Lane and their ultimate destination. They also,have no concern for the safety of the children who play ball in their font yard and ride bicycles along the street. The speed of this non-residential traffic is extremely reckless and has kept many children from playing in their own front yards because of the fear and danger this street and speeding vehicles pose. The majority of traffic travels an~ere from 25 to 60 M.P.H., with the average speed on this street being about 40 to 45 M.P.H. This cannot continuel In addition, the property value of the homes on this street have not increased in value since my husband and I bought our home almost 9 years ago, yet the property taxes on ;> these same homes.have 'increased many times over. I I I I . '¡ I I S:' I,' "\:J.r v. Lt-v - - A.f;<..£," r\.. ~. - I - -- I ' .~. November 2, 1995 Page 2 ¡ The reason we of this small community have turned to you and the City Counsel is that the numerous requests for law enforcement and traffic patrol have fallen on deaf ears, in that the Bakersfield Police Department is busy in other areas of law enforcement and considers our streefs speeding pr9blem triVial in looking at the big picture of catching criminals. We as a community tend to agree with that to a point, but they have NEVER set up a speed trap or done any investigation on the speeding problems involving this. street. What our neighborhood is proposing is that the City of Bakersfield install several large speed bumps, as many as up to six (6), along this entire. street to curb the speeding problem of this non-residential traffic. We as taxpayers and voting citizens of this community think this is the least yòu as a Councilman could, and should, recommend to the Bakersfield City Counsel and support such an effort by the constituents in your ward. . . I Your immediate response to this recommendation is greatly appreciated. ¡ Æ-. truly yours, ~p~ , bert and Jeri Press and the entire residence who live on Chester W. Nimitz Street. JLP:jp/misclspeedbump Enclosure cc: Bakersfield Planning Department Bakersfield Police Department, Traffic Division :J.' .'. . I ,": - ~ ~ ~~ I tD Co " -' I, . \ ) ~ I - - - reol,,"" This is too much traffic for a residential neighborhood. We ask that additional streets be opened up to Panama Lane, (fië., WaltOn and~Hùgb.~ ,~ LoWI y St. ::D n 0 1~. Betty St. Q §t.. 0. I \ N,deau s~ ::D 0 I» aJ Q. Q:þ Z :J n , :J 0 m ~ 3 \ ~Q STATE I HIGHWAY - .. aJ. . . . tD., ... renda PI. "Martin St. ~ m !!r £! PI. Q VI ... Karen PI. ... tD en -1 Wy, I ::D I ïJC')CD ::D 0 St ~" ~ -< tD Q I "'a n I» x 0.' CJ) ('I) ~ :J :Þ "C... I» - I ('I):J :J - .., a. - ~ ; , PETITION FOR SPEED BUMPS BY CITIZENS WHO RESIDE ON CHESTER W. NIMITZ STREET, IN THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE 5<ß \ ~ C. uJ IN i (h ;f-z.. q 33 bV ~I It 1- q330~ ICft>5 m~ M-. (; 100 ù) ý} "'" f.z.- ßLJ4.c..c..... ~ ~ -' - ., . IV - -- . , \ , --' . PETITION FOR SPEED BUMPS BY CITIZENS WHO RESIDE ON CHESTER W. NIMITZ STREET, - IN THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD NAME ADDRESS /Ì1£t r( f..- ~ P ô ~ ~a C!-; ú). W. v..c-t z- ~~. Vo.o~jJ,ø (0::20<6 , ~,¿). r\) ì n, it?" I i ' " I , ~ - . " - . PETITION FOR SPEED BUMPS BY CITIZENS -WHO RESIDE ON CHESTER W. NIMITZ STREET,. - IN THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE " I \ :' . ~.. .- - . --.----.-- ,I, . '" . >'.4 ' REceIVED JAN U ¿ 1996' ROBERT and JERI PRESS Bakersfield Police Department 5717 Chester W. Nimitz Street Bakersfield, CA 93304 t(Ö)[P))f . (805) 831-8589, December 28, 1995 MR. MARK SALVAGGIO Councilman, Ward 7 1501 Truxtun' Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 RE: Speed bump program and control of speeding problems on Chester W. Nimitz Street Dear Mr. Salvaggio: I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your support concerning the above entitled matter. Since our initial letter 'dated November 8, 1995, the street received four (4) posted speed limit signs stating the speed limit of 25 M.P.H. ,Your efforts have also brought forth a study of traffic flow and speed as well as one (1) ticketing effort by the Bakersfield Police Department. The residents on this street look at this as an initial first step to a large problem and don't want the effort to stop with this initial response. We feel that one traffic citation incident over 45 days is not enough effort on the part of the Bakersfield Police Departmenfs traffic division. There needs to be several more instances of ticketing speeders on this street than just one between November 8, 1995 and present. . However, the effort is. appreciated by the residents. I have also had an opportunity to peruse the Pilot Program Test Results Report you sent me in mid November. Although I did not read the entire 30 page memorandum line by line, ' in summary, it appears the m'ajority of the residents involved in this pilot program were pleased and satisfied with the speed bump results. However, because of the ~ recommendations of ONE (1) Traffic Engineer who wrote the following in this report: , "In Summary, the technical results do not indicate that speed bumps really slow down traffic to the extent desired. The public, however, seems to embrace the speed bump as a cure to speeding and perceive the results to be a positive improvement. Based on the technical data ~ :. collected, I cannot make a recom~end~ation for speed bumps of the type tested." - . . . "... '? ,; ß ,'>' i The Urban Planning Committee never brought any recommendations to the City Counsel. They simply "shelved", it in hopes that the speed bump program would simply go away. This paragraph and the actions of the Urban Planning Committee seems to state, "your opinion and perceptions (the residents and general public) regarding this program DON'T MATTER" This angers us, as citizens and tax payers who live with this problem of speeding vehicles on our street on a daily basis. ' In short, we as a community look at the initial efforts you h~ve put forth as a good starting point and intend to continue to emphasize this problem to the City Counsel as a whole. For the present, we would appreciate being kept informed as to the results of the traffic flow study which was conducted on Chester W. Nimitz Street during the months of November and December 1995. We also would like to be notified when this study will go before the City Counsel as well as any meetings having to do with the adoption and allocation ot speed bumps on our street. Again, please encourage the Bakersfield Police to patrol our street using radarto keep speeding to a minimum. , Thank you for your courtesy and cooperation regarding this matter. V truly yours, #L~'~Î1M # 0 ert and Jeri Press ' cc: The Bakersfield Police Department, Traffic Division, Attn: S.E. Brummer Bakersfield Public Works Dept. ' The Bakersfield Californian, Attn: Mark Benjamin ~ ~ .. - '; ~ /" ,,~ '" MEMORANDUM I February 6, 1996 i ~ + TO: Carl Hernandez, Deputy City Attorney !/V 4 FROM: Randy Fidler, Chief Code Enforcement Officer SUBJECT: Complaint from Cynthia Newton regarding sewer overflow on carpets at 1 Rio Bravo, Apartments C and D On January 3,1996, we received a complaint regarding sewer overflow at the above location. Officer Harrelson responded on the same day. Upon his arrival, he noted the carpet had been cleaned. He spoke with Ms. Newton and the carpet cleaner. Ms. Newton voiced her opinion regarding the disinfectant. Officer Harrelson relayed the message to the property manager and carpet cleaner. They assured him a disinfectant would be used the second time and the pad would be replaced. Officer Harrelson returned a few days later and observed the carpet cleaners recleaning the carpet. On January 30, 1996, I received a telephone call from Mr. Mike Parker, the business manager for the County Health Department. He stated he had talked with Ms. Newton regarding the above matter. He suggested I speak with Officer Harrelson about the matter. I asked Mr. Parker if Ms. Newton had talked with Guy Shaw of Environmental Health Services and he indicated he did not know. I spoke with Officer Harrelson and he explained what had taken place during the investigation. At that time, I thought he had done everything he could to resolve the problem. The following day I received a call from Ms. Newton. She asked if Mr. Parker had contacted me. r indicated he had and that I also spoke with Officer Harrelson regarding this matter. She again voiced her concern, I explained to Ms. Newton that our officers are not health officers and cannot write health violations, and furthermore, do not know anything about disinfectants. Ms. Newton stated she understood this, however, Guy Shaw told her we were responsible for taking care of these matters in the city. Mr. Shaw also stated she should get in touch with me and if I did not solve the problem she should contact Dennis Fidler. If the issue was still unresolved at that point, Mr. Shaw stated she should contact her councilmember and the city manager. I told Ms. Newton she should contact Jack Hardisty first. Ms. Newton stated she would do this and indicated that although Officer Harrelson had done his best, she still worried about the health of the children next door. I went to Dennis Fidler with her concerns and explained what had happened. At that time, Jack Hardisty came in and indicated he had just talked with Ms. Newton. Mr. Hardisty instructed me to write a letter to the property manager and to get Environmental Health Services to verify that proper disinfectant was used (see attached letter). On February 2, 1996. Steve McCalley with Environmental Health Services, contacted me after receiving my letter. He stated if the carpet had been steamed cleaned and dried out it should be sufficient. He also stated it would not be of any benefit to test the carpet for bacteria, as all carpet has bacteria. . - ~ ~-' -==-- D IbCV=fì~pn~':n tr H.... IL. lj~" \..- th) cc: Alan Tandy, City Manager r ~. -,- -~- 'i Jack Hardisty, Development Services Director ~ FEB 7 1901"- Dennis Fidler, Building Director r - .;.¡Ô Judy Skousen, City Attorney L'"-_c~~=.=.~-,--~~_._~~~~--->j Councilmember Rowles -- .::Y r'/.f-¡jU-'-~:~:_H'S f' ~: . ", .-.z, -- - - I I I I I ? ~ (fir. ..~, ~ D~~~."":'~~ ~ '. ( . c~ \-'\~ v~ i t-A. ~ 0 Y" . . ' I c;~ ~~~ l ~~~ , .z/7 //4 - IYad tAdeAdocd -f~ £/'Ó.Jfk CO;P/~ of t/l,,;s -10/ . -L-ç t/Jeí~ dk¡ihll1p ValL t.dJ4t to 3ùt -to -tJf.e./l- ' íé 7/Ÿ1tSIJ11C&¿ 0-- C1:lA, deJr co//es '.~i ,.7. Vv ?2 ~ -t!;elr' ~.:; J - fl- " . !" "' -~ 1995 TRAFFIC VOLUMES q TRAFFI C EN G INEERIN G ."?PUBLICWORKS DEPARTMENT I .' 'oJ. ': '..' 0 ~ ......~.'..O . . ' . ,::~":' , ,~" ~j, "',.. ", . " í ! "', ., .J ¡ ! "E' R S FIE L D , ~,"1i~ì~ì~{~( ", '. ;t:~;,;':;'~~::;"áf' " CALIF 0 RNIA JANUARY 1996 . .~ ,'," I ' INTRODUCfION This booklet is a tabulation of existing traffic volumes in the City of Bakersfield on arterial and collector roads. These volumes are helpful in analyzing the effectiveness of our present road system in planning and construction of the system. All traffic volumes in this booklet are Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT). AADT may , be thought of as the total number of vehicles in both directions, passing a point during the year, divided by 365 days. Many variations in traffic volume occur. These variations are from hour to hour, from one day of the week to another, from one month of the year to another, and from one year to another. These variations are predicted by the use of the traffic count control stations. The control stations are on selected roads that have the same general traffic characteristics as other roads in the area. Each control station is counted each day throughout the year. With this infonnation, we are then able to take satellite counts for a 24-hour period at any time of the year, apply the daily and seasonal factors derived from the appropriate control station data and obtain AADT estimates for other locations on the City street system. The figures in this booklet are the 1995 AADT on the various roads in the City of Bakersfield. 50 HIGHEST VOLUME INTERSECTIONS (1995) Intersection Volume ..1. CALIFORNIAAYE/NEWSTINE RD AND STOCKDALE HWY 58,5001 2, ..COFFEERD/GOSFORORDAND STOCKDALEHWY I . 53,700 I 3. ..WIBLERDANDWHITE.LN I 52,900 i 4. MING AYE AND WIBLE RD ! 52,000 5. OAK ST AND TRUXTUN AVE 50,900 6. 24TH ST AND OAK ST 50,800 7,.... .ÇALIFORNIAAYEANDUNIQNAYE(204) 48,1 00 8. ....MINGAVEANDSQUTHREALRD 48,000 ..9.<iÇOFFEERDAN DR OS E DALE H WY 47,700 10. PIERCE RD AND ROSEDALE (178) 47,200 11. CALIFORNIA AVE AND OAK ST 46,900 12. MING AVE AND NEW STINE RD 46,100 43i>COFFEERDANDTRUXTUNA YE 46,000 .... 44,STtNERDANOWHITELN .. 44,600 ./1Sf23RDSTAN DCHESTERAVE.. 44,000 16. "F" ST AND GOLDEN STATE AYE (204) 42,700 17. CALIFORNIA AVE AND REAL RD 42,100 18. WHITE LN AND FWY 99 RAMPS (SB) 41 ,1 00 .<19j. ..ASHEROANDSTOCKDALEHWY .. /40,600 ..20. .CAMINODELRIOANDROSEDALEHWY 40,500 ..CH E STERAYEAN DTR UXTU N.A YE 40;500 22. ROSE DALE PLAZA AND ROSE DALE HWY (58) 40,300 23. COFFEE RD AND TOWN & COUNTRY CENTER 40,200 24. 24TH ST AND CHESTER AVE 39,500 2~;.R JOB RAV OD RAN DSTO C KD AL EHWY 39,300 ...26. MINGAVE AND STINERD 39,200 27; . 24THSTANO"F"ST 39,100 28. 4TH ST AND UNION AVE 38,300 29. CALLOWAY AND ROSEDALE HWY (58) 38,000 30. BRUNDAGE LN/STOCKDALE HWY AND OAK STIWIBLE RD 37,600 CQLUMBl.JSSTANDMT;\1ERNONAYE .. .... ........... ..37,600. />32>..... GOSFORDRDANOMINGAVE .. 37,200 33,BER NARD.$TAN DOSWELLST 37,000 34. CALIFORNIA AYE AND MOHAWK ST 36,500 35. CALIFORNIA AYE AND CHESTER LN 36,400 36, CALIFORNIA AYE AND CHESTER AVE 36,300 ..37, ..JVlOHAWKSTANDTRUXTONAYE 36;200 . <38,> >>HUG HESLNAN DWH ITEEN 36,000 <39/COMM ER CIALWYAN D<TR lJXTU N 35,700 40. FAIRFAX RD AND HIGHWAY 178 35,400 41. MT. YERNON AYE AND BERNARD ST 35,300 42. 23RD ST AND "H" ST 34,900 ASHEANOWHITE 34,900 REALRDANDSTOCKDALE AWY 34,900 ¡:JS\ < ASHERDANDMING AVE 34,500 46. 24TH ST AND "H" ST 34,300 47. SOUTH "H" ST AND WHITE LN 33,900 48. 23RD ST AND "L" ST 33,600 I> ...CALIFORNIAAVE AND EASTON DR(WEST) 33,600 ..50. .BRIMHALLRDANDCOFFEERD 33,300 I.... CALIFORNIA AYE & FREEWAY 99RAMPS (N/B) 33,300 ANNUAL ADT STREET LIMITS 1995 I 1994 I 1993 A STREET BRUNDAGE LN.lPALM ST. 4,3251. 5,775 i 5,825 A STREET PALM ST.lCALIFORNIA AVE. I 3,725 3,075 3,375 I i AKERSRD HOSKING AVE.lPANAMA LN. 2,475 1,550 1,875 AKERSRD PANAMA LN.lHARRIS RD. 2,250 2,350 2,850 AKERSRD. .. . HARRISRD.lPACHECO RD. 3,250 3,200 2,750 AKERS RD WHITE LN.lPLANZ RD. 3,850 4,175 4,150 AKERS RD PLANZ RD./WILSON RD. 5,850 5,275 4,550 AKERS RD WILSON RD.lMING AVE. 5,450 I 5,350 5,250 :. ..:. . . AL.FREDHARRELl.....HW'Y:... MORNINGDR1LAKEMING..RD. 2,100 1,325 1 ,425 ALFREDHARRELl..HWY LAKEMINGRD.lHW'Y.178 3,050 2,600 2,750 ALLEN RD STOCKDALE HWY/BRIMHALL RD. 8,825 7,925 8,100 ALLEN RD BRIMHALUOLDTOWN 7,950 N/A N/A ~...........................:.. NILESSTdBERNARDST. 4;325 5,225 5,950 ALTAVISTA> . .. 1«...... ......:. ASHE RD . HARRIS RDIDISTRICT BLVD 4,575 N/A N/A . ASHE RD DISTRICT BLVD./WHITE LN. 10,075 7,125 8,950 ASHE RD WHITE LN.lNO. HALFMOON 11 ,425 9,250 10,175 ASHI3RD. NO.HALFMOONlMINGAVE. 15,125 13,950 14,350 ASHERP .. MING/SANDERS 10,700 9;675 11,300 ASHE)RD . SANDERS/STOCKDALE 12,325 N/A N/A AUBURN ST COLUMBUS ST.lOSWELL ST. 7,550 8,575 9,675 AUBURN ST OSWELL ST. LA COSTA ST. 14,700 11 ,425 10,125 AUaURNST. .. ..... . . ...:.:.. LA GOSTAST.1FAIRFAXR D. 7,425 8,075 6,250 AUBURNS.,-..... ....:....::.............. .>...::........ E/OFAIRFAXRD. .. 2;900 3,125 2,675 ..~d<..> :.. ... BAKER ST CALIF. AVE.fTRUXTUN AVE. 4,875 6,050 7,900 BAKER ST TRUXTUN AVE.lSUMNER S1. 7,525 7,050 8,000 BAKER ST SUMNER/NILES 8,200 6,125 7,725 BAKERST ..... ....> :.: NI LESSTOIFLOWERST. 5,900 4;925 5,950 BAKERS,. < ... .. .. .... FLOWERSTdBER NARDST. 4,250 4,175 4;225 ...............~........... .... .... ... .: ... BEALE AVE CALIF. AVE.fTRUXTUN AVE. 3,150 3,000 4,925 BEALE AVE TRUXTUN AVE.lMONTEREY S1. 15,550 16,350 17,550 BEALE AVE MONTEREY ST.lFLOWER ST. 11 ,300 11,175 13,225 BEALEAVE.::....... FLOWER ST.lBERNAR DST. 11,825 11 ,325 12;850 BELCETERRACE NEW STINE RD.lSTINE RD. 12,025 14,875 9,675 BELLE TERRACE SO."H" ST.lSO. CHESTER AVE. I 4,800 5,275 4,600 BELLE TERRACE SO. CHESTER AV.lSO."P" S1. 5,2251 4,325 6,075 BELLE TERRACE SO P /UNION AVE I 3,150 N/A N/A . .d BERKSHIRERD SO HIUNION 725 400 675 ........ PAGE 1 I ANNUALADT STREET LIMITS 1995 ! 1994 1993 BERNARD ST UNION AVE.lBEALE AVE. 11 ,000 11,950 12,275 BERNARD ST MT VERNON AVE.lOSWELL ST. 15,250 15,300 16,075 BRIMHALLRD ALLEN/J EWETTA 3,150 N/A N/A BRIMHALLRD dEWETTAST.lCALLOWA Y DR. 4,550 3,275 2,150 BRIMHALL..RO CALLOWAY DR.lCOFFEE RD. 14,525 16,000 12,000 i BRUNDAGE LN WIBLE RD.lHUGHES LN. 14,125 14,475 16,250 BRUNDAGE LN HUGHES LN."H" S1. 13,900! 16,200 15,050 BRlJNDAGELN. SO:"H" ST"P" ST. 11,000 12,625 11,975 BRUNDAGEL.N PST/UNION 11,375 N/A N/A aRlJNDA(3ELNlEAST) .. ... UNION/COTTONWOOD 15,825 N/A N/A BRUNDAGE LN (EAST) COTTONWOOD/MT. VE R NON 11,300 12,025 8,650 BRUNDAGE LN (EAST) MT. VERNON AVE.lOSWELL S1. 3,900 4,150 4,300 BUENAVISTARD .. ........ ... ...... PANAMALN.lPACHECORD. 2,050 2,125 N/JI aUENAMISTARD.. ... ................ PACHECORD./VVH ITE LN. 2,400 3,150 2,450 auENAMrSTARD .. .. .. ......... ..... WHITELN.1M I NGAVE; 5;825 5,950 6,325 BUENA VISTA RD MING AVE.lSTOCKDALE HWY. 8,425 8,175 6,550 CALIFORNIA AVE STOCKDALE HWY.lMOHAWK S1. 28,125 29,025 31,025 CALIFORNIA AVE .. .d~ MOHAWKST./EASTONDR. 28,400 27,200 28,650 GAI1IFORNIAAVE. ... .... . . .... BASTO NDR.1REAL RD. 32,375 30,625 34,925 GALl FORNI A AVE . .... REALRD.lOAKST. 30,800 .31,075 36,675 CALIFORNIA AVE OAK ST."A" S1. 17,950 21,950 23,250 CALIFORNIA AVE A ST."H" S1. 17,350 20,000 20,225 CALIFORNIA AVE H ST.lCHESTER AVE. 17,425 25,650 21,150 GA.L]FORNIAAVE . . CHESTER AVE.f'P" S1. 17,550 18,150 16,775 GALIFORNIAAVE . .... PST.lUNIONAVE. 14,925 19,025 .17;400 GAIlIFORNIf,.AVE ... UN ION AYE.1BAKERST. 18,350 20,950 17;475 CALIFORNIA AVE BAKER ST.lBEALE AVE. 15,825 18,325 17,275 CALIFORNIA AVE BEALE AVE./WILLIAMS ST. 13,250 12;450 15,150 QALLOVVAYDR.. ................................. BRI M H,A.LbRD.lS H E LLABARGERRD. 6,600 8,425 6;850 .[0.. ... ....., ROSEDALE/MEACHAM N/A N/A . ...... ... ..... d. . CALWA"{DR . 13,250 GAIJLOWA¥DR ...... MEACHAMRD.lHAGEMAN RD. 8,750 8;600 8,700 CALLOWAY DR HAGEMAN RD.lNORRIS RD. 3,950 5,050 4,450 CALLOWAY DR NORRIS/SNOW 2,975 N/A N/A CAM1Nc>MeDI,A. .......... .......... ..... GQSFORDRD/HAGGINOAKSDR 5,225 4,975 4,125 GAMINoMEDI,A.............."'. ............ HAGGINOAKSDR./OLDR IVER 1,325 1,100 650 . . CHESTER AVE SO. UNION AVE.lPLANZ RD. 4,700 5,250 4,700 CHESTER AVE PLANZ RD./WILSON RD. 7,625 6;425 6,975 CHESTER AVE MING AVE.lBELLE TERRACE 20,525 17,200 11,250 CHESTER..ÂVE BELLE TERRACE/BRUNDAGE LN. 16,225 13,000 14,000 CR ESTERAVE BRUNDAGE/CALIF 19,000 15,450 16,450 CH ESTER AVE CALIF. AVE.fTRUXTUNAVE. 18,700 20,650 18,950 PAGE 2 ANNUAL ADT STREET LIMITS 1995 I 1994 I 1993 CHESTER AVE TRUXTUN AVE.l19TH ST. i 16,075 I 16,875 16,8251 CHESTER AVE 19TH/24TH 15,975 15,925 17,250 CHESTER AVE 24TH ST.lGOLDEN STATE I 15,975 16,150 16,9751 CR ESTERAVE ", GOLDEN STATE/34TH S1. ! 30,475 24,900 26,700! CRESTERAVE ' COLUMBUSSTJBEARDSLEY AVE. I 17,375 19,200 20,325 ! ...."":'::..'.. CHESTER LN REAL RD.lCALIFORNIA AVE. 3,475 3,900 4,200 CHESTER LN CALIFORNIA AVE.lEASTON DR. ! 4,550 8,025 6,900 ORINAGRAQELOOP ...... PANORAMA DR/ALFRED HARRELL 1,825 3,225 1,675 OR I NAGRADELOOP ALFREDHARRELUROUNDMN1. 3,925 5;925 4,100 " COFFEE RD STOCKDALE HWY.rrRUXTUN AVE. 39,150 40,200 35,250 COFFEE RD TRUXTUN AVE.lBRIMHALL RD. 30,275 46,250 32,775 COFFEE RD BRIMHALL RD.lROSEDALE HWY. I 21,200 25,125 18,275 I COFFEERD. ROSEDALE HWY.lHAGEMANRD. 13,475 18,200 11,500 COFFOE E:.::RD HAGEMAN RD.lOLIVE DR. 10,650 11,325 9,025 COFEEERO OLIVE DR./NORRIS RD. 4,250 5,825 3,725 I COLLEGE AVE SINGING HILLS/FAIRFAX RD. 5,725 5,550 5,800 COLLEGE AVE FAIRFAX RD.NALENCIA DR. 4,050 4,400 3,425 ~.....,. . . I COLUMBlJSST '... ....,...," Cl--iESTERAVEJ'}Q'.' ST. 9,275 10,325 10,075 C(¡)LOMBÙSST..,. .. "Q"ST.lUN 10 NAVE. 9,200 11,175 ....9,175 COLUMBUS ST UNION AVE.lLOMA LINDA 11,075 12,950 13,675 COLUMBUS ST RIVER BLVD.lHALEY S1. 14,350 15,275 12,900 COLUMBUS ST HALEY ST.lM1. VERNON AVE. 12,675 16,550 15,450 COJ.jUMSUSST .. .",:':: " ..> MTVERNONAVEJ\NENATCHEBST. 14,475 18,075 13;650 COJ.jOMSOSST....." ......... ,.,.......'..'.', VVENATCHEESTO/AU B UR NS1. 9,350 9.125 9;700 COlliUMSOSST .". ..,.,'....".. ..,.. Al..J8URNST.lOSWELL..ST. ,.. 5,500 4;475 .4;625 COLUMBUS ST OSWELL ST.lUNIVERSITY AVE. 9,050 8,625 10,200 COLUMBUS ST UNIVERSITY AV/PANORAMA DR. 5,450 5,350 5,175 D1STR1CmSLVD PIN OAKPAR KlGOS FORD RD. ... 4;075 3,650 .4,050 DlsTRICmSLVO '... . ..,.... GOSFORDRD.lASHE RD. 8,225 8,775 7,350 ÐISTRICTBl.;\/O...'..' ASHE RD.lSTINE RD. 8,300 12,925 10,725 EASTON DR, EAST CALIF. AVEO/CHESTER LN. 3,800 5,625 4,500 EASTON DR, WEST CHESTER LNO/CALIF. AVE. 5,325 8,475 9.250 .. . .,,:':: . . .. ..,... ELRORTAL . .....d...'.". N.LAURELGLEN/M I NGAVE. 4,250 4,650 4,400 .... ... '..., . ........ '.,',. " ." EL RIO DR STOCKDALE HWY.lSADDLEBACK DR. 4,225 5,775 3,275 "F"ST TRUXTUN AVE.l20TH S1. 7,750 7,250 12,775 '", .. .... 20TH ST./24 THST. 11,175 11 ,525 12,625 I ., ..,......., , <, .'.'.... ", 24THST./GOLDEN STATE 12;975 12,725 13,300 . ,. I PAGE 3 I ANNUALADT STREET LIMITS 1995 ¡ 1994 1993 FAIRFAX RD COLLEGE AVE.lHWY. 178 I 15,725 i. 13,900 18,350 I FAIRFAX RD HWY. 178/AUBURN S1. ¡ 16,725 16,200 19,925 FAIRFAX RD AUBURN ST.lPANORAMA DR. 10,925 10,650 11,775 FA1RFAXRD PANORAMA DR.lPALADINO DR. ' 5,875 6,775 5,325 FA1RFAXRD> PALADINO/ALFRED HARRELL 2,425 3,250 3,225 '<"" ,::"" ," ::': FAIRVIEW RD HUGHES LN.lSO. "H" S1. 3,950 5,125 4,100 FAIRVIEW RD SO. "H" ST.lMONITOR ST. 3,675 4,600 4,350 FAIRVIEW RD MONITOR ST.lGOLDEN STATE 3,550 4,900 3,150 ,':~ ",,' FLOWERST: :' ".:: ", ':' ,:" ALTAVISTADRJBAKERS1. 2,125 2,475 2,650 FLOWERSm ' , , ,':,',: ,:,', BAKERST.lBEALE AVE. 3,500 3,800 3,575 FLOWER ST BEALE AVE.lOWENS S1. 12,525 13,725 12,700 FRUlìVALE AVE KREBS RD.lOLIVE DR. 7,750 8,800 8,225 ,::::',:':", ",:", ,", GILMORE AVE ' HWY;99JPIERCERD.10,400 8,875 ,81850' GILMORE AVE '::' ,'" PIERCERD.lSILLECTAVE. 7,450 7,550 7,325 GOSFORD RD BERKSHIRE/PANAMA 3,025 N/A N/A GOSFORD RD PANAMA LN.lPACHECO RD. I 12,825 6,475 7,825 GQSFORORO PACHECORD.lWHITE LN. 12,350 12,175 15,550 GOSFORORO WHITE LN.lS.LAURELGLEN 15,575 15,950 18,725 GO$FORORD S;LAURELGLEN/N.LAURELGLEN 20,250 18,250 19,650 GOSFORD RD N. LAURELGLEN/MING AVE. 21,650 22,725 23,250 GOSFORD RD MING AVE.lSTOCKDALE HWY. 24,450 21,825 26,775 HAGEMANRD "FRUlìVALEAVEJPATTONWAY 4,300 4,000, 2,525 HAGEMANRO RATTONWAY/COFFEERD.6,725 6,800 2,700 HAGEMANRD,:,. < GOFFEERD/CALL.OWAYDR. 9,000 8,550 N/A HAGEMAN RD CALLOWAY DR.lJEWETTA AVE. 6,675 4,925 4,300 HAGEMAN RD WID JEWETTA AVE. 3,825 3,600 2,650 I H_~K~BUVD ,:":::",,,.,......MClNNE$BLVD.lMING AVE. 2,925 2,800 3,125 HALEYST> ,,:'::::', " "",:':' :',:".... CALIF.AVE./TRUXTUN:AVE. 2,325 2,625 2,750 HALEY ST KENTUCKY ST.lNILES S1. 4,475 3,675 3,900 HALEY ST NILES ST.lQUINCY ST. 5,150 3,550 4,800 HALEY ST HWY. 178/COLUMBUS S1. 11,625 9,300 8,600 HALEYST '" :: COLUMBUS ST/UNIVERSITYAVE 5,950 5,125 5,225 HALEYST UNIVERSITY AV/PANORAMA DR. 3,800 4,375 4,125 :'",:""" :',', ',' ,:: i "H" ST (SOUTH) McKEE ST.lHOSKING AVE. I 5,000 4,625 4,675 "H" ST (SOUTH) HOSKING AVE.lPANAMA LN. i 6,825 6,125 7,300 "H" ST (SOUTH) PANAMA LN.lFAIRVIEW RD. 6,425 6,525 6,800 "H"§T(SC>.lJTH) FAIRVIEWRD.lPACHECO RD. 10,025 9,20010,375 "H"ST(SOUTJ'¡Y "PACHECORD./WHITELN. 15,77516,150 10,925 "H"ST(SOUTH)..WHITEtN.lPLANZRD. 14,975 13,900 16,525 PAGE 4 - - ------- - ------- ------- ~ ANNUALADT I STREET LIMITS 1995 1994 1993 I "H" ST (SOUTH) PLANZ RD./WILSON RD. i 13,300 I 15,800' 15,650 I "14" ST (SOUTH) WILSON RD.lMING AVE. 15,275 13,200 15,000 "14" ST (SOUTH) MING AVE.lBELLE TERRACE 17,825 13,675 19,575 ~'H"..ST«SOLJTH) BELLE TERRACE/BRUNDAGE LN. 18,375 14,450 21,075 "H"ST: " ,'" BRUNDAGE/CALIF AVE 15,250 13,200 15,175 "H"ST',', CALIF. AVE.fTRUXTUN AVE. 14,775 13,900 14,750 "H"ST TRUXTUN AVE.l19TH ST. 12,350 11,500 12,475 ' "H"ST 19TH ST/24TH ST 6,925 9,975 9,350 "H"ST 24TH ST.lGOLDEN STATE 7,575 6,000 6,400 HARRISYRD " GOSFORDRD.lASHE RD 4,975 4,775 4,625 HARRISRD ' ASHE/STINE RD 4,900 2,000 NA HARRIS RD STINE RD.lAKERS RD. 5,550 3,900 4,375 HARRIS RD AKERS RD./WIBLE RD. 4,975 2,100 4,525 HQSKINGAVE, "', ""'.""',',.'" "" WIBLE/SOH 1 ,100 775 700 HOSKINGAVE.., """"" ".. SOH/ECL 1,000 850 850 y>,<",,',,'.., ,.', ,,',' , HUGHES LN FAIRVIEW RD.lPACHECO RD. 4,600 4,000 6,025 HUGHES LN PACHECO RD./WHITE LN. 8,650 7,750 8,725 HUGHES LN WHITE LN.lPLANZ RD. 12,450 9,750 12,325 HUGH E5LN "., '" PLANZRD.lWI1..50NRD. 10,150 8,625 9,275 HLJGHESLN '" ,'WI LSONRD.lM INGAVE. 8,950 9,850 9;825 HUGHESLN HWY.58/BRUNDAGE LN. 5,375 6,600 7,625 JEWETT A AVE BRIMHALL RD.lPALM 5T. 1,475 2,575 1,725 JEWETTA AVE HAGEMAN RD.lNORIEGA ST. 3,950 2,375 1,800 '.""",, "',"',"', KENTUCK¥$T UNION/BAKER 2,325 3,425 4,200 ,KENTUCKYST " BAKERST./WILLIAMS ST. 4,100 4,675 5,000 KING ST VIRGINIA AVE.lCALIF. AVE. 4,825 3,550 6,175 '",.," ",< "'" ".'. CAl..IFOR N IAAVE .114 THST. 2,875 2,900 3;175 HI~~ "'. 14TH>ST.fTRUXTUNA VB. 4,800 4,925 '3,850 >~""",.,.""""""",.""".",.,. TRUXTUNAVEd20THST. 5,750 4;650 5,600 L ST. 20TH ST.l23RD 51. 5,550 5,075 5,675 LAKEVI EW AVE BRUNDAGE LN.NIRGINIA AVE. 5,300 5,525 5,800 LAKEVIEWAVE,"','.', " ,',. VJRGINIAAVEJCAl..IF. AVE. 5,800 5,800 5,425 "..',.'..'" ,'".,'" ". ,,' ".. ,.... LAKEM I NGRD A HARRELUOLDA HARRELL 2,950 2,300 2,250 LILY DR WHITE LN.lOL YMPIA DR. 1,600 2,525 1,825 LEN NOXAVE , CALIF. AVE./WINSTON DR. 4,700 7,325 7,275 ',',',', MANORSm', PANORAMA DR.lROBERTS LN. 16,550 24,925 19,875 f PAGE 5 --- ANNUALADT STREET LIMITS 1995 1994 1993 MARELLA WAY CALIF. AVE.lMONTCLAIR S1. 2.475 2,200 2,025 I MING~AVE . BUENA VISTA RD.lOLD RIVER RD. 5,200 3,100 3,650 MINGAVE. ,. ... OLDRIVER RD.lGOSFORD RD. 12,025 15,575 13,575 MINGAVE.. ..:. GOSFORDRD.lEL PORTAL DR 16,325 14,100 18;900 MING AVE EL PORTAL DR.lASHE RD. 18,825 16,700 25.475 MING AVE ASHE RD.lNEW STINE RD. 24,425 20,000 29,875 MING AVE NEW STINE RD.lSTINE RD. 27,025 23,800 28,300 MINGA.\lE.... ..." STINERDJSO. REALRD. 35,675 30,225 34,300 MINGA.VE . .......... SO. REALRD.lWIBLE RD. 39,475 37,650 38,700 MINGA\lE.. ... .... .. WI BLER D.N ALLEY PLAZA 33,375 30,850 36,250 MING AVE VALLEY PLAZA/CASTRO LN 24,475 21,650 27,850 MING AVE CASTRO LN.lHUGHES LN. 18,225 16,400 20,675 MING AVE HUGHES LN.lSO. "H" S1. 16,900 14,550 17,800 MINGA.VE.. . SO . "H"S1./CHESTER AVE. 14,300 18,525 16,125 MINGA.VE. .. CHESTER AVE.lSO. "P" S1. 9,425 10,325 12,225 I......~.".. .. ... .........:........:'.".........'..:.. .:,.",. MOHAWK ST CALIF. AVE.ITRUXTUN AVE. 14,875 21,650 15,150 MONITOR ST PANAMA LN.lFAIRVIEW RD. 2,550 2,800 2,325 MQNITQRsT .. " FAIRVIEWRD.lPACHECORD.... 3,075 4,175 3;050 MQNITORST .:.. .::~ RACHECORD./WH ITELN. 4,750 4,600 4,300 .. ',:,.:.~<::.:... . MONTCLAIR ST STOCKDALE HWY.lMARELLA WY 5,750 4,150 4,125 MONTCLAIR ST MARELLA WY/EASTON 2.425 N/A N/A MmVERNONAVE.,...,.. .': CITYLIMIT/E. BRUNDAGELN. 18,400 16,775 18,175 .MT\lERNON...AVE .. .HWY . 17.8/CO LU M BU SST. 27,500 29,30Q .. ... .. 25,725 MmVERNONAVE. . ......', COLUMBUSST/UNIVERSITYAV 20,500 21,575 . .14,300 MT VERNON AVE UNIVERSITY AVE.lPANORAMA DR 14,175 18,700 9,000 MONTEREY ST HWY 178/BEALE AVE 4,575 5,000 5,025 MQNTE;REYST. ...,': ... BEALE AVE.lNILESS1. 7,700 6,850 8,375 ...,::"..... ........ NEV\lSTI NERD . . WILSON RD.lMING AVE. 19,550 17,375 24,575 NEW STINE RD MING AVE.lBELLE TERRACE 21,250 14,800 24,825 NEW STINE RD B. TERRACE/STOCKDALE HWY. 24,200 19,975 27,950 NILESST ... UNIONAVE/BAKER 4,700 5,050 ..5,800 NlLESST.. . BAKERSTJBEALEAVE. 5,400 4;600 6,150 NlLESST..... .. BEALEAVE/MONTEREVST. 7,775 7,900 9,050 NILES ST MONTEREY ST.NIRGINIA S1. 14,100 18,550 21,875 NO HALF MOON DR PULLMAN DR/ASHE RD. 5,325 5,550 4,825 ...:... ... . .....:...... ..". NO.LALJ.RELGLENBLVD GOSFORDRD./EL PORTAL DR 3,475 2;650 2,675 PAGE 6 .. -- --_u I I AN N UAL ADT STREET LIMITS r 1995 I 1994 1993 OAK ST BRUNDAGE LN.lPALM ST. I 21,325 i 14,850 ' 17,425 OAK ST PALM ST.lCALIF. AVE. ¡ 20,350 , 15,100 22,775 OAK ST CALIF. AVE.fTRUXTUN AVE. I 24,675 I 24,800 25,325 ' OAKS'- TRUXTUN AVE.l24TH S1. 25,150 23,200 23,950 I . 1 '. OLYM PIA '.' . S.tAURELGLEN/S HALFMOON 2,975 N/A N/A OLD RIVER RD WHITE LN.lMING AVE. 4,050 5,050 4,225 OLD RIVER RD MING AVE.lSTOCKDALE HWY. 5,500 5,625 6,250 ., '." . OSWELlliST '., ~c--- HWY.58/E.BRUNDAGE LN. 7,825 10,050 9,650 OSWEI..l.ST.'" " '.' . "') EBRUNDAGE tN/ALLOWAY LN 9,075 12,100 9,950 OSWELL ST PICO ST.lBERNARD ST. 30,050 34,650 29,375 OSWELL ST BERNARD ST.lHWY.178 27,750 27,625 30,475 OSWELL ST HWY. 178/AUBURN S1. 29,100 30,975 29,825 OSWELLST AUBURNST.lCOLUMBUS S1. 10,875 11,675 10,400 ",,'.'.' . ,,', ,.'",<" "P"/ST '. ........" .'.,.'" . BELLE TERRACE/BRUNDAGE LN. 5,225 5,200. .5,325 "P"ST BRUNDAGE LN.l4TH S1. 5,275 4,875 4,925 "P"ST 4TH ST.lCALIFORNIA AVE. 4,775 4,750 5,400 PACHECORD BUENA VISTAIGOSFORD 475 N/A N/A PAC HEGeR D '. STINE ROIWIBLE 8,575 8,275 6,550 RACHECORD. .,' WIBLERD.lHUGHESLN. 9,300 8,475 7,825 PACHECO RO HUGHES LN.lSO. "H" S1. 8,000 7,850 7,500 PACHECO RD SO. "H" ST.lMONITOR S1. 9,900 10,750 8,900 PACHECO RD MONITOR ST.lSO. UNION AVE. 7,800 7,575 7,125 '.' ""',. PALMS" ,... "":".,.,'" REACH DOIOAKST. 5,250 7,400 5,425 RALMST) ..." OAKSTLA. 4,850 5,150 . 5;875 PALM ST A ST / H ST 4,525 3,375 3,950 PANORAMA OR UNION AVE.lAL TA VISTA DR. 10,200 8,575 10,525 PANORAMADR .' .'. '~..' ALTAVI$TAD R./RIV E RB LVD. 10,150 7,975 '10,725 RANORAMADR .) ,.=-.,.. RIVER BlVD.lHALEYST. 9,325 7,250 9,850 PANORAMADR '...., =-. HALEYST.lMT.VERNONAVE. 9,700 '9,175 ..5,800 PANORAMA DR MT. VERNONIWENATCHEE ST. 6,175 6,650 6,175 PANORAMA OR WENATCHEE ST.lCOLUMBUS S1. 4,775 5,725 4,950 PANORAMA OR COLUMBUS ST/UNIVERSITY AVE 3,525 5,475 6,900 PANORAMADR UNIVERSITY AVE/FAIRFAX RD 5,700 2,950 3,025 PANORAMA DR FAIHFAXRD.lMORNING DR. 4,975 4,400 5,225 .' PANAMA LN BUENA VISTAIGOSFORD 2,775 N/A N/A PANAMA LN GOSFORD RD.lASHE RD. 4,025 4,000 3,750 PANAMA LN ASHE RD.lSTINE RD. 4,700 5,200 4,700 PANAMALN", ."'.', '." STINERD.lAKERSRD. 8,650 9,700 7,975 PANAMALN .' AKERS RO./WIBLE RD. I 11,825 10,925 9,950 PANAMALN . WIBLE HD.lHWY. 99 -1 14,050 13,200 12,900 PAGE 7 ----- ANNUALADT STREET LIMITS 1995 I 1994 1993 PANAMALN HWY. 99/S0. "H"S1. 11,500¡ 11,9751 11,1001 PANAMALN SO. "H" ST.lUNION AVE. I 8,8251 11,1501 10,1501 I I i PAR KNI EW DR CARVALHO C1./WHITE LN. 4,600! 1,700 I 1,100 PARKVIEWDR WHITE LN.lPIN OAK PARK 2,050 1,875 I 1,450 , .. .... .. PATTON WAY MEANY/HAGEMAN 1,250 N/A N/A PATTON WAY HAGEMAN/NCL 3,425 N/A N/A PIERCERD ..... ROSEDALE HWY./GILMOREAVE. 17,325 16,000 18,200 PIERCERD .. .. GILMOREAVE.lGOLDEN STATE 12,000 10,150 10,200 ......'..'. ... .. ..... ..,.. .>i .......... PIN OAK PARK BLVD DISTRICT BLVD./WHITE LN. 3,725 1,425 1,325 PIN OAK PARK BLVD WHITE LN.lPARK VIEW DR. 1,825 2,225 2,350 PLANZRD ......WILSONRD.lSTINE RD. 7,275 6,150 5,925 PLANZRD ...'..d STINERD./AKERSRD. 10,125 11,22510,425 PßANZRD .... .. ......."........... AKERSRD./WIBLERD. 11,725 11,325 10,900 PLANZ RD WIBLE RD.lHUGHES LN. 9,900 9,175 9,325 PLANZ RD HUGHES LN.lSO. "H" S1. 8,400 7,325 7,450 PLANZ RD SO."H" ST./SO. CHESTER AVE. 9,075 8,525 9,125 PLANZRD . .. SO. CHESTER AVE./UNION AVE. 3,850 4,675 3;650 PLANZ ßP (EAST) UNION AVE/AIRPORT 275 225 275 .,........,.....,./...,'.'... "Q" ST 13TH STfTRUXTUN AVE. 4,075 4,425 5,100 "Q" ST TRUXTUN AVE/24TH ST 5,700 6,175 6,025 "Q" ST 24TH ST./GOLDEN STATE 5,650 7,175 7,600 "O'lS]"~'>, .,...i GOLDEN$TATE/30THST. 7,675 10,050 7,725 ~'d ....,.30THST.l34THS1. 7,325 7,525 7;475 [> 34TH$TJW.GOLUMBU$,$T. 6,975 5,400 4;875 RANCHERIA RD HWY 178/NCL 300 N/A N/A QUANTJCOST . . .. EBRUNDAGELN./GiTYLlMIT 2,625 1,875 2,575 .."""'"............ .. REAL.. RD ($OUTJJY ...PLANZRD;/WILSONRD. 5,175 4;275 4,725 REAL RD (SOUTH) WILSON RD.lMING AVE. 6,625 8,100 7,350 REAL RD (SOUTH) MING AVE.lMADRID AVE. 14,275 14,700 10,025 REAL RD (SOUTH) EL CIA DR.lSTOCKDALE HWY. 22,850 20,900 18,550 REALRD ..,'.. ...... .... STOCKDALEHWY.lPALM ST. . 9,225 7,350 7,450 REALRD.. PALM ST./CHESTER LN. 11,425 11,500 8,025 REAt..RD ... . GHESTERLN.lCALIF. AVE. 8,700 7,150 3,550 - I RELIANCE DR PANAMA LN/ HARRIS RD 1,175 1,475 1,075 1 RENFRORD STOCKDALE/JOHNSON 1,300 N/A N/A .....",> . d R/DGEOAKDR OLDRIVER RD./MTN. OAK 1,750 1,175 1,100 PAGE 8 ANNUAL ADT STREET LIMITS 1995 I 1994 ! 1993 I ' SAN DIMAS ST 34TH ST./W. COLUMBUS ST. 5,350 5,500 5,400 SCAREETOAKBLVD MTNOAKIMING AVE 2,400 1,975 3,925 . .. ...., SILLECTAVE PIERCE/GILMORE 5,875 3,500 N/A SILLECT AVE GILMORE/ARROW N 4,100 N/A I N/A SO HALF MOON DR PULLMAN DR.lASHE RD. 3,075 3,100 3,100 .. ... ..'........' ..' SOLAURELGLENBLVO. PINOAKPARKIGOSFORD RD. 3,775 3,5751 3,900 SOLAURELGLENBLVD GOSFORD RDJOL YMPIADR. 4,875 4,025 2,100 SO LAURELGLEN BLVD OLYMPIA DR./WILFORD CT. 2,275 2,325 2,275 STINE RD HOSKI NG/P ANAMA 4,275 N/A N/A STINERD............ ..... .., PANAMA LN .IHAR RI SR D. 7,450 7,125 5,850 STINE RD..... ... ... HARRISRDJPACHECO RD. 9,950 9;175 8,600 STINE RD.".... PACHECORD./WHITE LN. 17,025 13,300 15,825 STINE RD WHITE LN.lPLANZ RD. 16,350 14,300 16,950 STINE RD PLANZ RD./WILSON RD. 21 , 1 00 15,175 20,450 STINE RD WILSON RD.lMING AVE. 5,675 6,150 8,150 $TINERD; MINGAVE.lBELLE TERRACE 9,925 8,175 8,475 ... ,'. ,. ....... .." :.. STOCKDALEHWY ,. RENFRORDJALLENRD. 13,875 11,525 13,750 STOCKDALE HWY ALLEN RD.lBUENA VISTA RD. 15,675 14,500 18,475 STOCKDALE HWY BUENA VIST AIOLDRIVER 11,250 N/A N/A STOCKDALE HWY OLD RIVERIDON HART E 15,800 12,000 19,475 STO,CKDALEHWY DON HART DR.(E)/COFFEE RD. 20¡975 20,475 23;800 STOCKDALEHWY COFFEE RDJEL RIO DR. 22,775 20,900 24,000 STOCKDALE..HWY EL RIO DR.lASHE RD. 32,950 33,975 31,275 STOCKDALE HWY ASHE RD.lCALlF. AVE. 37,575 29,800 42,150 STOCKDALE HWY CALIF. AVE.lMONTCLAIR ST. 27,125 26,300 35,325 STOCKDALE HWY MONTCLAIR/REAL 31,550 31,375 28,975 STOCKDALE~HWY, . . ..". REALlWIBLE 22,200 35,850 40,500 I................................... .......................................>~. ...' ... '...:. .. .. ., SUMNESR$T.,.,.'... .....,...",., UNIONAVEJBAKERST. 4,500 3,825 .4,600 SUMNER ST BAKER ST.lE. TRUXTUN AVE. 4,450 3,750 4,300 TRUXTUN AVE COFFEE RD.lMOHAWK ST. 22,500 19,275 20,000 TRI.JXTUNA\lE, " ... ... MOHAWKST.lEMPIRE DR. 26,050 22,700 23¡300 TRUXTUNAVE. ... ..', EMPIREDR.IWESTWINDDR. 34,675 30,775 29,400 TRUXTUNAVE. WESTWINDDR.lOAK ST. 29,125 25,850 24,700 TRUXTUN AVE OAK ST.rA" ST. 22,850 20,675 18,475 TRUXTUN AVE "A" ST.rF" ST. 18,725 16,225 16,800 TRUXTUN AVE "F" ST.I"H" ST. 17,975 14,925 18,375 TRUXTU NAVE "H"ST.lCHESTER AVE. 19,000 13,200 15,325 TRUXTUNAVE CHESTER AVE.f'L" ST. 27,1251 16,200 17,800 TRUXTUNAVE "L" ST.I"Q" ST. 15,9751 17,300 13,025 PAGE 9 I . ANNUAL ADT STREET LIMITS 1995 1994 1993 TRUXTUN AVE "Q" ST.lUNION AVE. 11,400 I 14,325 11,275 TRUXTUN AVE (EAST) UNION AVE/BEALE 13,575 17,075 13,425 TRUXTUN AVE (EAST) BEALE/HALEY 10,975 16,450 13,55Ò .... .. .. UNIONAVE(SOUTH) WHITE LNJPLANZ RD. 14,425 13,200 18,500 UNION AVE... SUMNER STJMONTEREY S1. 17,000 19,100 19,200 UNION AVE MONTEREY ST.lBERNARD S1. 23,475 34,175 26,800 UNION AVE BERNARD ST.lCOLUMBUS ST. 15,575 19,725 15,650 UNIVERSrrVAVE. RIVERBLVD.lHALEY ST. 2,400 3,650 3,425 UNI\lERSITYAVE.. HALEY ST.lM1. VERNON AVE. 6,225 7,150 6,675 UNIVERSITYAVS. MTVERNONAV/wENATCHEE S1. 6,225 6,050 5,825 UNIVERSITY AVE WENATCHEE ST/COLUMBUS ST. 4,500 4,650 4,300 UNIVERSITY AVE COLUMBUS ST.lPANORAMA DR. 4,550 5,475 4,400 VIRGINIAAVE....... ........... ..... KINGST.lLAKEVIEWAVE. 4,525 4,600 6,750 VI RGI N IAAVE . .. ....... LAKEVIEW AVE.lSP RAILROAD 2,700 2,700 2,900 ........ ... ........ ../ WATTS DR UNION AVE.lMADISON AVE. 4,150 4,600 4,200 WENATCHEE ST COLUMBUS STIUNIVERSITY AVE. 2,700 2,725 2,350 WENATCHEE ST. ... ..... UNIVERSITY AV/PANORAMA DR 2,625 3,025 2,750 ............... .... .....'........... ... ....</........... Vv'ESTWINPDR .......... ..... .... TR U XTUNAVE.l21S T ST. 3;450 6,050 8,600 WHITE LN BUENA VISTA RD/OLD RIVER RD. 11,525 9,600 11,425 WHITE LN OLD RIVER RD/PARK VIEW DR. 10,075 8,400 9,450 WHITELN'" PARKVIEW DR/PIN OAK PARK BLVD. 12,875 10,750 11,475 Vv'bUTfSt..N .... PIN OAK PARKIGOSFORD RD. 16,200 11,950 15,625 WHITE1.N. ... .. GOSFORDRD.lASHE RD. 19,200 19,075 25,850 WHITE LN ASHE RD/STINE 29,075 21,325 24,575 WHITE LN STINE RD/WIBLE RD 26,725 26,450 29,550 WHITE LN WIBLE RD.lHWY. 99 45,150 37,525 49,450 . <-._-. HvvY.99/t-IHGHES LN. 28,950 32,500 33,350 Hl..JGHESI..N.lSO."H"ST. 22,025 26,025 18,600 SO. "H"ST.lMONITORST. 15,025 13,725 16,200 WH ITE LN MONITOR ST.lSO. UNION AVE. 10,875 9,925 11,725 WHITE LN SO.UNION AV/COTONWOOD AVE. 4,475 4,075 4,825 WHITEOAKÐR.... . OLDRIVERRD/MOUNT AIN OAK 1,750 1,625 1.475 .. ... . . .... WJBl..ERD ... ... ..... HOSKING/PANAMA LN 4,325 3;575 3,300 WIBLE RD PANAMA LN.lHARRIS RD. 8,300 5,150 5,700 WIBLE RD HARRIS RD.lPACHECO RD. 9,050 8,775 7,500 WIBLE RD PACHECO RD./WHITE LN. 17,500 11,650 13,425 WIBl..ERD . WHITE LN.lPLANZ RD. 16,325 12,675 14,425 WIBLE"'RD .. PLANZ RD;/WILSON RD. 14,750 11,450 13,025 WIBLE.RD WILSONRD.lMINGAVE. ! --~-~~~QQJ__~?~750 17,675! I PAGE 10 II. --. -- - . ~ I ANNUALADT STREET LIMITS 1995 1994 1993 WIBLE RD MING AVE.lBELLE TERRACE i 14,325 13,350 14,975 WILSON RD WHITE LN.lPLANZ RD. 6,250 I 7,050 7,450 WILSONRD PLANZRD.lNEW STNE RD. 9,225 8,325 7,975 WILSONRD . NEW STINE/AKERS 11 ,300 11 , 150 11,400 WILSONRD. . AKERSRD./WIBLE RD. 9,900 11,475 11,100 WILSON RD WIBLE RD.lHUGHES LN. 10,700 13,900 11 ,900 WILSON RD HUGHES LN.lSO. "H" S1. 8,500 11 ,300 9,925 WILSON RD SO."H" ST/CHESTER AVE. 10,825 4,975 7,450 ..... ... .. .. 4THST . ... .. . .. .. SO."H"ST/CHESTER AVE. 5,050 5,150 4,125 . 4IHST. ... CHESTER AVE.rp" ST. 4,500 4,350 4,450 4TH 5T "P" 5T.lUNION AVE. 5,525 5,725 7,300 4TH ST UNION/SOUTH KING 4,575 N/A N/A 18TH<ST . OAK S1.f'F" S1. 3,075 3,975 4,250 18THST "F" ST.f'H" S1. 4,650 6,050 5,400 18THST. "H" ST.lCHESTER AVE. 5,700 6,950 6,450 18TH S1. CHESTER AVE.f'L" S1. 5,000 4,500 5,250 18TH S1. "L" S1.ro" S1. 3,875 3,650 4,150 18TH S1. "Q" ST.lUNION AVE. 2,975 4,375 3,075 18THST;(EAST) < . UNIONAVE./BAKERST. 2,225 2,175 1,775 ...<.< .... ... .... ..... .... taTHST. . ............... WESTWIND DR.lOAKST. 2,30b 2,850 1,675 19TH S1. OAK ST.rF" S1. 2,900 4,375 2,550 19TH 51. "F" ST.lCHESTER AVE. 2,150 3,300 3,550 19TH S1. CHESTER/UNION 2,925 4,500 3,650 1.9THSTY(EA$T).. .............. UNION.AVE./BAKERST. 5;425 6,625 5,600 19THS1WleAST). BAKERST.lBEALEAVE. 4,550 3,575 4,100 . ....... .... .«~ 21ST S1. WESTWIND DR.lOAK ST. 7,300 9,175 7,300 21ST S1. OAK! F 5,550 5,075 5,650 21ST S1. F / CHESTER 4,100 5,050 5,025 21$T5T. ... CHESTER AVE.f'L" S1. 4,150 .6,850 4,650 21STST.~ . L / UNION 3,175 5,200 4;850 21ST...ST...(EAST) UNIONAVE.lBAKER5T. 2,150 1,500 2,000 30TH S1. BEECH ST.I"F" S1. 5,525 5,150 5,250 30TH S1. "F" ST.lGARCES CIRCLE 6,900 7,125 7,225 30TI'.18T. .. GARCESCIRCLErQ" S1. 3,775 3,275 3,150 30THST..... .. . "Q"ST.JUNIONAVE. 2,125 2,350 2,550 ..< .... .. . . .... ........ 34TH S1. CHESTER AVErQ" 51. 12,375 11 ,000 10,750 34TH S1. "Q" ST.lUNION AVE. 12,100 12,525 13,200 PAGE 11 . .------ ~ . \ I -- B A K E R 5 F I E L 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 1501 TRUXTUN AVENUE BAKERSFIELD. CALIFORNIA 93301 (805) 326-3724 RAUL M. ROJAS, DIRECTOR. CITY ENCINEER February 5, 1996 ~~ J ames Carstensen Castle & Cooke Communities, Inc. I ~ P.O. Box 1165 Bakersfield, CA 93389 Dear Mr. Carstensen, This letter is the latest update on the status of the City's application for Federal Aviation Administration grant funding for acquisition of a clear zone at the Bakersfield Municipal Airport. The most recent contact with Mr. Kevin Flynn, Federal Aviation Western Region Project Manager was about a week ago. Mr. Flynn indicated our grant request was forwarded to the federal government in Washington D. C. for final approval and a firm commitment for the funds. Mr, Flynn believes the final approval could take anywhere from 30 to 60 days. II Mr. Flynn cautioned us that "business is not as usual" in Washington these days, and there I, are remaining budget issues that need to be resolved. When and if the City receives final approval, we will prepare a Request For Proposals (RFP) for appraisal services and move forward with the project. We will keep you apprised of all further developments relative to our grant application as they become available. If you have any questions, please contact Darnell W. Haynes at (805) 326-3572. Very truly yours, . . 'h~l/1 RAÚL M. R~ . Public Works Director .,..... CálaILIaIJ9Y. oJ ~ RECEtVED- cc: \ l FEB -~ 5 I~! \ Larry Jamison - . ~ \ -1 :; l~ITY MANAGER'S O~~ICF' I ! I I f I -. ,A.. I ".. ~ ~ ;,-:r / .;,.. i BUILDING DEPARTMENT ¡ City rLBakersfield Date J-IJlqf¡J '. I. TO: \ - CITY MANAGER : ALAN TANDY : - ! ! FOR YOUR: I I I Information-~="~~'-'~ote &'Return - .' . (êjI ,,- C=-:'-.'" .'" ê\ Ii. ' . In t:' F¡" ~ \j \: 'LY - ^c~ion f~~Plc ¡ , \ \ n~ \ S. 1\ FEB ---- c::\\~~O 1 19nature .~~ pprova . i \ - . II ---.,.- ~.' I . .' -~~ i PLEASE IL.=~--- ~c:c:'r"~¡ :' ,r-\1'( MANAGE.R'S',(:h-.:;~'-'":' ¡ ¡'::~O~=.=~ ' _follow Up _Keep or Discard _Forward _Investigate I _Review _See ~Ie About This i I _RetUrn _\lake Recommendation 1 , ,;...--- I I I --, .-' , .- '/""\;, ,..>- I /1vrv~ REPORT OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD BUILDING DEPARTMENT ! For the Month of January, 1996 --.. - 0------- -_.- Permits Valuation Permits Permits Units Units Valuation Valuation No. No. This This To Date To Date To Date To Date To Date To Date CLASS OF BUILDING Bldgs Units Month Month, $ 1996 1995 1996 1995 1996, $ 1995, $ 1 single Family Residence 76 76 76 7,647,017 76 74 76 74 7,647,017 7,705,521 2 Condominium 3 Two-Family Bldg. (Duplex) 1 2 92,640 4 Three-Four Family Bldg. 5 Five or more Family Bldg. 13 Hotel/Motel 18 Amusement Recreational Bldg. 19 Church/Religious Bldg. 20 Warehouse Bldg. 1 1 46,368 1 1 46,368 261,048 21 Commercial Garage 22 Service Station/Repair 2 507,906 23 Hospital/Medical Office 24 Office/Bank Bldg. 1 310,688 25 Public Works Bldg. 1 1 949,130 1 949,130 26 School/Educational Bldg. 27 Restaurant/Store Bldg. 28 Other Non-Residential Bldg. 3 3 27,490 3 27,490 29 Swimming Pool and/or Spa 36 474,800 36 19 474,800 276,400 33 Garage Conversion 1 2,736 34 Residential Alt/Rep/Add 31 405,982 31 25 405,982 268,834 35 Fire Sprinkler System 6 6 4 37 Commercial A1t/Rep/Add 31 1,405,660 31 27 1,405,660 1,319,431 38 Residential Garage/Carport 1 700 40 Mobile Home Accessory Structure 1 10,000 1 10,000 41 Mobile Home Installation 42 Commercial Coach/Office Trailer 2 50,000 2 1 50,000 10,000 45 Demolition/Single Family Reside 4 2,000 4 1 2,000 1,500 46 Demolition/Multi-Family Residen 49 Demolition - Commercial Structu 1 1,500 1 1 1,500 1,000 50 Fire Damage Repair/Residential 5 107,106 5 6 107,106 112,345 51 Fire Damage Repair/Commercial 1 16,478 52 Moved B1dg./Residen 1 1,500 1 1,500 64 Other Miscellaneous 1 1,500 1 5 1,500 43,500 54 Re-roof/Residential 34 285,760 34 16 285,760 61,440 55 Re-roof/Commercial 5 101,120 5 1 101,120 13,920 80 CD/ED Rehab Project 4 30,600 4 3 30,600 30,000 65 Permanent Sign 24 107,400 24 17 107,400 37,150 66 Temporary Sign 12 3,750, 12 20 3,750 5,300 70 Mechanical Permit 24 40,400 24 6 40,400 116,000 71 Plumbing Permit 35 17,500 35 31 17,500 13,300 72 Electrical Permit 32 23,000 32 24 23,000 13 , 400 73 Combination Mech/Plbg/Elect 6 9,300 6 4 9,300 3,800 90 Other Permits 6 6 2 TOTAL 81 76 382 $11,748,883 382 295 76 76 $11,748,883 $11,225,037 FEES COLLECTED THIS MONTH -----> $99,724 CONSTRUCTION OF INTEREST THIS MONTH VALUATION $ FEES COLLECTED TO DATE 1996 -----> $99,724 1. 1601 TRUXTUN AVE POLICE STATION $949,130 FEES COLLECTED TO DATE 1995 -----> $101,955 2. 2661 OSWELL ST RETAIL TI 25526 SO $496,410 I ----'~-~ - l~{\i ~~'ò. ~, ~ fl¡l /.. é~~ 1 £ (,~Y {,<o f\- ~.. v . ? ~ '\- /' w ;I '/. ,. / .,. ( , ~~. ~ / ,;.c,., '\ X .':; ( .1J", «A;::~lv \ r:, \, C ~\~>'~J"':f t " c '. '. - , -- --~-- -- - . '---- ,-" I - ~- 1- IDGHLAND HIGH SCHOOL MULTI-USE STADI~I PROJECT ~ , The~Highland High School Stadium Committee is charged with raising $750,000 to complete ,our multi-use stadium.. We need lights, bleachers, restrooms, concession stands, landscaping and fencing. The stadium will provide a place for school rallies, football games, soccer games, track meets, band reviews, A YSO soccer practice, and other community events. The City Schools have also expressed an interest in using the completed facility for special events (graduations, track meets, fundraising). We need your support! Weare pleased that an opportunity for a large donation exists with respect to a' $500,000 donation made to the City of Bakersfield by Destec Energy, Inc. The money is to be spent ón recreational improvements in northeast Bakersfield and the funds must be expended by 1999. The City is researching sites to utilize these monies within the boundaries in the agreement. Those being considered are University and Siemon Parks, elementary schools within the area, fields utilized by the Kern County Soccer Foundation and Highland High School. Highland High School is the only high school in the designated area. The school is over 25 - years old and still-does not have a-lighted multi-use stadium. We "borrow" fields from other schools for our activities. . The HHS Stadium Committee is proposing tbat the City of Bakersfield work coopera~ively with us in funding the stadium. The HHS Stadium Committee is requesting that the bulk of the Destec donation be used on our multi-use stadium. The HHS Stadium Committee is committed to raising the remaining dollars in the next six months. The Kern High School District has committed to maintain and operate the stadium with no additional taxes being levied on the homeowners. Your signature on our Petition of Support will let the City Council know that the citizens of the northeast believe the Highland High School Stadium Project is the Number One Priority Project for the Destec funds. Join Highland High's Grand Reunion on February 24, 1996! There will be dining, dancing and Adopt-a-Seat Competition! All Highland Alumni, parents and friends are invited to attend. Tickets are $15 each and can be purchased at the school, McCan Family Chiropractic on Auburn St. or Action Sports on Stockdale Highway. ?Questions? Call the HHS Stadium Committee Co-Chair Cyndi Crabtree at 871-2902 or I 872-1258 I I ~ I I I I STATE CAPITOL COMMITTEES, ROOM 2054 SACRAMENTO,CA 95814 aIalifnrnia ~tat.e ~£nat£ CHAIRMAN (916) 445-4641 COMMITTEE ON 2550 MARIPOSA MALL AGRICULTURE & WATER SUITE 2016 RESOURCES FRESNO, CA 93721 SENATOR (209) 264-3078 MEMBER 901 TOWER WAY JIM COSTA BUDGET & FISCAL REVIEW SUITE 202 SIXTEENTH SENATORIAL DISTRICT FINANCE, INVESTMENT & BAKERSFIELD, CA 93309 (805) 323-0442 INTERNATIONAL TRADE HOUSING AND LAND USE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT & RETIREMENT CALIFORNIA WORLD TRADE COMMISSION January 29, 1996 Alan Tandy City Manager City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 Dear Alan: Thank you for your letter expressing the City of Bakersfield's support for ÀJ{Ü4i (Sweeney): - relating to the annexation agreement process. Unfortunate}y, this mêasure failed- passage iIi the Assembly Local Government Committee. - -- Thank you again for taking the time to share your views with me. Please continue to keep me informed of your concerns on state-related issues. S' ~~ . ~ ~ J COSTA Member of the Senate 16th District JC:pc ..; ,:., . .',' '. .:: ',' Co" , ... -. " ,L~';':::_~=iT- ". \R¡::Cf~":~'\ .',. ' tbv,,~:i.,.;o ~~lJ . " " ~--_. ;' :F8f - 2 '~8 I' . , I: ~ -H _J " kin' MANAGER'S OFFICE.. L. ~<~_._" - ----- -/it,::' ./~ IQ;U.... , ¡' :1~. 86]11.. §III." League of California Cities ~6]II.. ~6]II.a 1400 K STREET. SACRAMENTO, CA 95814. (916) 658-8200 IfZl..-- . California Cities Work Together Breaking Out And Moving On: Tools For Changing Community Services Management Community Services Conference Wednesday - Friday, April 10 -12,1996 Doubletree Hotel 2 Portola Plaza - _u.-' ~ -- .-~ ,- --- -- - - . ,- - -. -- ~ - - Monterey,~CA 93940 - ' .- ~ - . 408-649-4511 Who Should Attend jk~ -+ Arts, Community Services, Library, Park and Recreation Professionals and Commissioners ~ -+ Community Services Policy Committee Members, I I -+ Mayors and Council Members -+ City Managers Why You Should Attend '------- - - This year's program is something different! Join us in Monterey and learn the concrete leadership skills you need to do your job more effectively and efficiently. Learn how building collaboration will benefit your department. Interact with community services policy makers and professionals at the only educational opportunity in California designed for community services professionals, commissioners and elected officials, to explore the delivery of community services under current conditions of change and limited resources. Although community services programs differ among cities and may be operated by various departments, all share common elements. , Don't miss this opportunity to learn from organization development professionals as well as innovative community services '",. colleagues. Enhance your network of community services contacts and your knowledge of successful programs. The Thursday afternoon mobile workshop will showcase the multiple resources which the Monterey Bay area has gained through the establishment of California State University, Monterey Bay, at former Fort Ord, with special attention to tools for community services. 0+ Hotel Reservation Deadline: Wednesday, March 20, 1996 /' '0+ Advance Conference Registration Deadline: Wednesday, March 27, 1996 Registration Fee. You can reduce your cost by registering in advance; advance registration must be postmarked no later than Wednesday, March 27,1996. After that date the full fee will apply. The fee includes program materials, 1 continental breakfast, 2 luncheons, breaks and a reception. The one-day fee includes all materials and events for that day. For any questions regarding registration, please contact the League conference registration office at 510/283-2113. To ensure that this program benefits all who attend,please advise us on the registration form if any attendee has a disability requiring special accommodations. The one-day registration option is intended primarily to encourage attendance by mid-level staff who might not otherwise be able to attend this meeting. The program and contacts will benefit staff professional development. Please consider-,hav,ing4hem3jøin-Y9u-for at least one day of the program. :¡, R E C E ~VE: D i r FE~ - ;~~ ~ , l , CITY MANAGER'S OFFICC:; ~--~,,- , ,.--,-, ------_u .... "'t.ci- ." 1>:' ~ - * Adv~nce Registration * ..¡";, .After March 27 register on-site as follows: , Full In'stitute' .., 1- Day Only lYll ' ' 1.:Du City Officials $200 $120 City Officials $235 '$140 , Non-City Public Officials $225 $145 Non-City Public Officials $260 $165 All Others $250 $170 All Others $285 $190 Refund Policy. Advance registrants unable to attend this meeting will receive a refund of the registration fee, less a $35 processing charge, by submitting a written request to the League of California Cities, Conference Registration Office, Box 1519, Lafayette, CA 94549; FAX 510/283-7833. Requests for refunds must be received by Friday, April 5, 1996. Payment. In order to process registration, payment in full must accompany the attached forin. You may pay your registration fee by check, money order, Visa or Mastercard. No purchase orders. American Exoress or Discover cards please. If paying by credit card, you are welcome to register by faxing 510/283-7833. Hotel Reservations. The Doubletree Hotel is offering a specÏ¡il League rate of$107 for a single/double~bedded room (plus 10 I-perc en t.c ity - h 0 te I-tax) . - T. o-co nfinn-h 0 te 1- reservati ons,-a-depos i t -in-the.. amo un t -of-. th ~ - first -ni gh t~ s. gu est-room. rate. or- a -gu aran tee-wi th- a-- - -, major credit card is required. Deposits are refundable if your reservation is canceled by 6 pm on arrival day; record your cancellation ' number. Check-in, time is noon; check-out time is 3 pm. Luggage may be stored at the Bell Desk. Transportation Southwest. Discount airfares are available for city travel on Southwest Airlines in California. Unrestricted ticket vouchers priced at $42.00 per segment ($84.00 round-trip) may be purchased in advance through the League Sponsored Statewide Purchasing Program by calling toll free 1 800 435-9792. Tickets ordered by the 10th of each month will be received by the end of the month. If your city has not already purchased a block of ticket vouchers (minimum six segments) contact Neal Lindhjem at the League at 916/658-8262, .. for Southwest information and to request order forms. Shuttle Service from San Jose and San Francisco Airports. Express bus service to and from San Francisco Airport and San Jose Airport is available from Monterey/Salinas Airbus, which has a stop in front of the Monterey Doubletree Hotel. Round trip fares ", range from $35 - $60. Contact Monterey/Salinas Airbus directly at I 800291-2877 for further information and reservations. Hertz. Discount rates with unlimited mileage are available one week prior and one week after this meeting from Hertz. Call Hertz Meeting Servic'es at 1 800 654-2240 and indicate the League of California Cities Meeting Number CV#14655. ' Amtrak. Amtrak offers a ten percent discount off round-trip regular or excursion coach fares for travel throughout cities in California. For information and reservations èontact Amtrak at 1 800 USA-RAIL and give the agent the Amtrak Fare Code X-52F~932. Discount does not apply to additional accommodation charges for sleeping car or custom class. .. 'Directions -- .... From the North on Highway One - Take the Del Monte, Pacific Grove exit. .. Continue straight for seven stoplights. At the seventh stoplight, get in the left turn lane to continue straight on Del Monte to the Doubletree Hotel. From the Airport/Jlighway 68 from Salinas - Take the Monterey Fisherman's Wharf exit. At the fIrst stoplight make a right turn onto Aguajito. Continue on Aguajito until it ends at Del Monte. From Aguajito make a left onto Del Monte and continue straight for three,stoplights. At the third stoplight get in the left turn lane to continue straight on Del Monte to the Doubletree. From the South/Carmel on Highway One - Take the Aguajito exit. Turn left at the fIrst stoplight (going under the freeway). Continue on Aguajito'until it ends at Del Monte. From Aguajito make a left onto Del Monte and contiÌlUe straight for three stoplights. At the third stoplight get in the left turn lane to continue straight on Del Monte to the Doubletree. Parking. Self parking is $8 per day with in and out privileges. 2 - - ,~-:' ...f .'~ , ' Breaking Out and Moving On: Tools for Changing Community Services Management PRELIMINARY PROGRAM Wednesday. April 10 10:30 am - 5:00 pm REGISTRATION OPEN - De Anza Foyer 12 noon - 2:00 pm GENERAL LUNCHEON - Innovative Thinking for the Future Mark Towers will introduce the afternoon training workshop, designed specifically for community services professionals, by showing why change is necessary now. ','~ ~--'; . '.,"'~;'. .. Speaker:o'- ... '., .... "-' + Mark Towers, Speak Out Seminars, Overland Park, Kansas 2:15 - 5:00 pm GENERAL SESSION - How to Break Out of Your Box Change begins with you. Come ready to work on the changes within your own thinking that will provide the foundation for leading your department into the future. Speaker: + Mark Towers, Speak Out Seminars, Overland Park, Kansas 5:00 - 6:00 pm HOSTED WELCOMING RECEPTION Thursday. April 11 8:15 am - 5:00 pm REGISTRATION OPEN - De Anza Foyer 8:45 - 11 :45 am GENERAL SESSION - Changing Your Department and Building Collaboration Learn specific management tools required for implementing change within your department, making it into the team you want and your city needs. Collaboration with other departments and organizations means not simply cooperation but a willingness to cross boundaries and to enable others. Speaker: + William Daniels, Senior Partner, American Consulting and Training, Inc., Mill Valley 11:45- 1:00 pm GENERAL LUNCHEON - Collaborative Opportunities for Strengthening Families Come and learn what opportunities are available through collaboration and what the implications of the Federal Block Grant Reforms are for community services. Speaker: . + Judy Chynoweth, Executive Director, Foundation Consortium for School-Linked Services, Sacramento 3 -'_____n- - -------- ~k II I .-j\ Thursday. April 11 ~continued) 1:15 - 5:00 pm MOBILE WORKSHOP Tour of California State University, Monterey Bay (part offòrmer Fort Ord) The mobile workshop will showcase the multiple community sèr:Vices resources CSUMB offers to the Monterey Bay area. => See sophisticated computer technology and learn what it can mean not just for efficient community services but for enabling community services to become a basic resource to other departments by, for example, developing and analyzing data bases unique to community services but with implications for other city services. => Learn the concrete steps necessary for joint use of existing facilities belonging to other agencies, such as a pool, golf course and housing. => Learn the keys of collaborating to build a regional performing arts center. - - -.- ~ ~- -' - -- ._- :P-articipants.shouldplan.to_wear_comfortable,clothingand.shoes Buses.will.depJlIt fr<?!!Lan(tretu(l1o to the front entrance of the hotel and will return in time for you to enjoy an evening on your own in Monterey. 5:00 - 6:00 pm NO HOST RECEPTION Friday. April 12 8:00 - 11:15 am REGISTRATION OPEN - De Anza Foyer 8:15 -8:30 am INFORMAL CONTINENTAL BREAKFAST Please arrive in time to enjoy an informal continental breakfast before the start of the conèurrent sessions. 8:30 - 10:00 am CONCURRENT SESSIONS Learn from successful collaborations. These will be interactive sessions, so bring your questions! , ,- " " "', I. Developing a Collaborative Strategy for Dealing with Youth Violence, This session includes an experiential learning exercise in dé~eloping a collaborative, involving you in actually practicing what you have learned at the 'conference. Facilitator: + George Caravalho, City Manager, Santa Clarita; Chair of the League's Investing In Our Youth Task Force ~.._..= --' - II. Nitty Gritty Ways to Change Entrepreneurial Ideas to Reality - --'-~whãt is ãfrtlUsTállt à6õutèÏitrepreõëúiIãfgovemmentš?"'LearÖhowmaiketing ýOiífServices 'ëãñrè~lf - '-- in the attraction of new resources to your community while at the same time taking you a step closer to dealing with the new realities facing community services professionals. Facilitator: + Frank Benest, City Manager, Brea 10:00 ~'11:30 am CONCLUDING GENERAL SESSION - Failures and Forward, ", " Put the skills learned at this conference to use to implement important changes for your department and" city. Leon Younger became well-known to community services professionals for the changes he implemented in his role as Director of Parks and Recreation for the City oflndianapcilis.. " " Speaker: + Leon Younger, Leon Younger and PROS, Consultants, Indianapolis; IN 11:30 am ADJOURN 4 ._~ ,-' p .,.'" , ;<¡;¡ . LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES Community S~rvicesConference " Wednesday - Friday, April 10 - 12, 1996 . . ., Doubletree Hotel, Monterey HOTEL RESERVATI ON FORM Please make copies of this fonD if more than one room is to be reserved. If you choose to FAX this fonD, please do not mail duplicate. Name: Title: Address: - .. " .., ~'.. .. City: Zip: Telephone: L-J Fax: ( ) Arrival Date: am/pm Departure Date: am/pm ACCOMMODATIONS REQUESTED - Single room (1 person/I bed) at $107/day+ 10% city hotel tax - Double room (2 people/l bed) at $107/day + 10% city hotel tax - Double/Double room (2 people/2 beds) at $107/day -+ 10% city hoteltax ~ No smoking room _Handicapped aècess I will share a room with: DEPOSIT INFORMATION: All reservations must be guaranteed with one night's room deposit or credit card. _City Check Personal Check _Credit Card . Name on Credit Card: Type of Credit Card: Credit Card Number: Expiration Date: Authorized Signature: RETURN THIS FORM BY Wednesday, March 20, 1996 to: Doubletree Hotel 2 Portola Plaza Monterey, CA 93940 408/649-4511; FAX 408/649-3109 I -------- - ~~- ~. :~:. ;'"7ì, City/Agency Community Services Conference Wednesday - Friday, April 10 - 12, 1996 Doubletree Hotel, Monterey. ADVANCE CONFERENCE REGISTRATION FORM Enter fIrst and last name and official title as they should appear on conference badge and registration card. Please indicate spouse's name if attending. NAME TITLE SPOUSE INDICATE DAY IF 1 DAY REGISTRATION To help us plan for any special needs, please indicate if any registrant requires special accommodations for disabilities. Who? What? REGISTRATION FEES: Full Seminar One Day Only City Officials - @ $200 . City Officials _@$120 Non-City Public Officials - @ $225 Non-City Public Officials - @ $145 All Others - @ $250 All Others _@$170 TOTAL $- TOTAL $- PAYMENT INFORMATION: Check which is enclosed (no purchase orders, American Express or Discover cards). Make checks payable to League.of California Cities. _City Check Personal Check VISA MasterCard Name on Credit Card: Credit Card Number: Expiration Date: Authorized Signaturé: REGISTRATION RECEIPTS will be mailed to the person below, who agrees to give receipts to each registrant: Name: Title: Address: City: Zip: Telephone: <--> Fax: ( ) RETURN THIS FORM BY Wednesday, March 27,1996 to League of California Cities, P.O. Box 1519, Lafayette, CA 94549, 510/283-2113; FAX 510/283-7833 (for those paying with credit card ONLY!) I I I I ,-~~ '~~:-- r - ...' , mf]... ~~... I(¡B..II' League of Califo'rnia Citie.~ ,', Di..., gl2:]... 1400 K STREET" SACRAMENTO, CA 95814. (916) 658-8200 , ,.' ,. ..;.. ' IruJ...... o<_,-~ ., - ~=. p,cCr-:'VED 'I CalifornIa Cities ",, ..ik~;I..;"..,1 Work Together . r. ""'J' ..' .. L FEB~ l~ ( , . ,.-, , J "MEMORANDUM ICITY MANAGER'S OFFICE L ~ ---.,,:J TO: ' City, Managers ( , .., '. FROM: T6rrlMauk; City M~ager, Whittiér ,. i,' " ,," '. 'President~ City Manag~f,siÐepàrtment':' , ;, '"" '..", ',', ¡. ,," ",' ." ,J - ~ - ,-, '~-'DATE: .. ~<"JanlÌåty'29:~1'996;'-""'-- - "':,,;,,.' ", ':i ,\.J.. - ., '," ': ,'" - c, ,I-, ,,-... ',' ,r" ,:,' -- -' ,, '" RE: Update on Constitutional Revision Process; CCOP Prograril Announcement Recently, a number of you may have received an announcement for a program on February 22 and 23 from the California Council on Partnerships, which is a non-profit organization affiliated , ", '",' : ' " with the California State Association of Counties. The program is the first step in an effort similar to the one the city managers initiated over two years ago which culminated in the League's adoption ofthe policy document called "Making California's Governments Work." State/County Realignment MayBe On The Horizon This discussion seems particularly important and timely for counties, since it appears the Constitution Revision Commission's final report wiÚ include a requirement the Governor submit a "State/County Realignment Plan" to the Legislature in 1998. The Plan would determine how the state/county relationship should be structured. If the Commission's proposal on this point is approved, it will be helpful for county officials to begin discussing now how they would like that relationship structured. Community Charters And Home Rule Remain Under Discussion -, Those aspects of the Commission's report that most directly affect cities is also taking shape, in preparation for the Commission's February 5 meeting. However, they are the subject of virtually daily discussion and negotiation among those most directly involved and, even at this point, it is not clear what the Commission will approve. Join Us In San Diego City managers will be devoting a significant portion of time to the issue of constitutional rèyision ',at their upcoming meeting February 14 through 16. At that point, we will know what the ,,:)\ Commission's final recommendation is on the parts of the constitution which affecdôcal j: <".. government. Although we will not know the Commission's final decision until its meeting on' ':; February 5, I am confident that, whatever it is, it will generate meaningful thinking and discussion at our meeting. (over) ,- .." , " . .' I - ~, .. c .. ....- -, -->' tJ - - \ ',' > ' " 'r Update OnC9nsti~tion Revision- ,. .. January 26, 19Q() , " ",' ," Pagf;'2' ¡:¡ ,,' -, ,,0, : ',fi -"," ,:, '.. : ,', '" "f " i., "'¡, ,,;1 I hope this clarifies how allthese various efforts to improve government in California fit together. Moreover, I look forward to 'seeing you in San Diego. If you have not yet registered and need registration materials, please fèel free to call Annaliese Parnell with the League's conferences, and educatio~ unit (916/658-8227). She will be happy to f~you duplicate tÌlat eri at s ;- A Itheugh7 âH-of our -managers -meetings-are -important, you- es pee i all y-d D--Het- want-- t 0 miss out on this next one. g: \customer\cust\depts \mgrs\ccop. doc ,'-' ~ -- ---'.. ~ ,~-