HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/16/96�
B A K E R S F I E L D
MEMORa1NDUM
�'��+ruary 16, 1996
T0: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY CO I
FROM: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER
�JBJECT: GENERAL INFORMATION
1. As a reminder, you will be go?ng to the Police B�silding immedi3tel.� a�ter
roll call at next Wednesday's Gouncil meeting for a ciemor-stracion oi the
Firearm Training System.
2. Public Works has prepared a report describing the functions and operating
guidelines of Loca� Enforcement Agencies. It also describes some possible
alternatives if we were to withdraw our LEA designation from the Kern
County Environmental Health Services Department. The report also refers to
examples of other cities which have their own LEA's or have contracted with
other enforcement agencies.
3. � Enclosed is a letter we sent to the County requesting that they consider
making improvements to a segment of Calloway Drive between Brimhall Road
and Rosedale Highway, which is entirely under their jurisdiction. The City
anticipates completion of bridge and roadway improvements on Calloway Drive
between Stockdale Highway and Brimhall Road by June, 1996, which will
significantly increase the traffic volume on that portion of Calloway
Drive. We've sent several letters in the past - they always say they have
no money.
4. A memo is enclosed from Development Services regarding the partial
construction of an abandoned car wash at 5221 Stockdale Highway. The
property is leased by the Bailey Group from Lawton Powers. We contacted a
partner in the Bailey Group who indicated they plan to begin construction
� witliin 30 to 60 days. We will send a first notice of violation, then a
second notice and hearing notice if the work doesn't commence.
5. Enclosed you will find a copy of the Fire Study, along with a brief summary
from Gail Waiters. We'll be setting up the advisory committee meetings in
the near future to start reviewing the proposal and do a more in-depth
staff analysis of what we see as the pros and cons.
6. We ]iad a very large prospect, at 1.3 million square feet under roof and 350
full time employees, �nterested in the 113 acres we own off Mount Vernon.
We conducted a site tour this week and have tried to put together the
strongest offer we can to attract this anchor to southeast $akersfield. We
have not even been given their name, except tnat it is a��ery large
war�n�using di�Lrinuti�n faciiiLy.
IiONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
February 16, 1�96
Page -2-
7. As mentioned in last week's General Information, enclosed is the 1996 Kern
River Water Supply Forecast prepared by the Water Resources Department.
AT:rs
cc: Department Heads
�arol Williams, City Clerk
Trudy Slater, Administrative Analyst
,
�� �
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
B A K E R S F I E L D
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT .
MEMORANDUM
ALAN TANDY, CiTY MANAC#ER
RAUL RC33AS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTQR ��=V-�
��/�
February 15, 1995
SUBJECT: SACKGROUND ON SERVICES PRQVIDED BY THE KERN CQUNTY
BNVIRC?NMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT LOCAL ENFORCSMENT
AGENCY
At their meeting of March lI, 1992, the City Council adopted Resolution #37-92
(attached}, designating the Kern County Local Enforcement Agency (KCL�A) for
its enforcement, inspeciion and pe�mitting needs for solid waste facilities.
The purpose of the Local Enforcement Agency is to enfar�e regulations adopted
by the Ca,lifvrnia lntegrated Waste Managemenfi Board (CIWMB}, Duties are
described by the 4 different certifications issued far an- LEA, including:
(1) TYPE "A" Solid waste facilities, i.e., active and inactive Iandfills.
The LEA conducts inspections of landfills to check compliance with
applicable state and local standards, or terms and conditions af the
permit.
Operational violations are covered under 14 CCR Division 7, Chapter
3 and Division 30 of the Public Resources Code (PRC). The LEA also
responds to emergency violations, i.e., those which represent an
imminent thxeat to public health, saiety or the enviranment,
pursuant to Part 5, Division 30 of the PRC.
LEA is also responsible for enfareing closure and postclosure
regulations pursuant t4 PR� Division 30, l�art 4, Chapter 2, Articles
3 and 4, Part 5, and 14 CCR Division 7, Chapters 3 and 5. For the
Bakersfield Sanitary Landfill, closure includes the landfill gas control
sy�tem recently installed, soil r$mediation project under
consid�ration, continuous gradin� af the fill to mitigate subaidence,
and installation af the fina.l cap to prevent water intrusion.
Postclosure pertains to the use of the landfill property, such as golf
course or park, that will nat be c4untergroductive to closure
ma.inten�.nce activities. That is, if a use of the landfill causes water
to pond and erode the protective cap that was installed, the LEA
would reject that proppsed use.
,�
(2) TYPE "B" Solid waste transformation facilities. An example is a
waste-to-energy plant because it takes solid waste and transforms
it to energy. The LEA provides permitting, inspection and
enforcement of regulations, in particular to burning solid waste.
Heavy metals are not destructed in the incineration process, and
because all other materials are burned away, the relative toxicity of
the remaining ash is increased. Also, a byproduct of burning solid
waste is dioxins which are considered carcinogenic. There are no
transformation facilities existing in Bakersfield; therefore, this
certification is not currently needed.
(3) TYPE "C" Transfer and processing stations, materials and recovery
facilities (MRFs), and composting facilities. There is one composting
facility, i.e., the Mt. Vernon Recycling Center, but there are
currently no transfer stations or MRFs in Bakersfield. A transfer
station may be required at some future time when nearby landfills
close and trash must be transferred to trains or long-haul trucks
for carrying waste to distant landfills. A MRF has been proposed
recently, to be built in conjunction with a prison facility.
The LEA approved the City's application for permitting the
composting facility. The Solid Waste Facilities Permit application is
being reviewed by the waste Board. LEA conducts inspections of
the compost facility to ensure that all applicable composting
regulations are being adhered to.
(4) TYPE "D" Inspection and enforcement of litter, odor, and nuisance
regulations at solid waste landfills.
The LEA conducts monthly inspections of the Bakersfield Sanitary
Landfill and the Mt. Vernon facility to ensure that adequate dust
and odor control is in effect. The LEA also inspects the sites to
ensure that they are not breeding grounds for vectors. Inspection
of trash hauling vehicles is also conducted to ensure vector and
odor control measures are in effect.
Certification Types A, C and D are required for Bakersfield.
Technical expertise The technical expertise required of an LEA is described in
14 CCR 18072. It generally states that the LEA "have one or more full time staff
members dedicated solely for solid waste issues." Staff is required to have at
least one registered environmental health specialist (REHS}, pursuant to Sections
514-534 of the Health and Safety Code. REHS training and experience must
include permitting and closure/postclosure duties.
Enforcement Pro�ram Plan (EPP) The LEA must develop an EPP and submit for
Waste Board approval. This document is a statement of goals and objectives; a
scope of work, i.e., a comprehensive list of solid waste facilities and disposal
sites and refuse collection vehicles in the area; procedure manuals for solid waste
facility permitting and closure/postclosure; demonstration of staff technical
expertise; operating budget which demonstrates adequacy of budget resources
pursuant to 14 CCR 18074; and procedure manual for disposal site identification,
assessment and corrective actions.
T
Desi�natin� an LEA The Kern County Environmental Health Services Department
is the designated LEA for the City.
Alternatives are possible, per PRC Section 18056, however, should the City � Council
wish to designate solid waste permitting, inspection and regulatory duties to a
different agency. Also, the LEA designation may be withdrawn without approval
from CIWMB. The process is relatively simple: send a letter from the City
Manager to a representative of the Waste Board, to serve as the 90 notice of
intent to withdraw. Official separation from the LEA would be done by Council
resolution at the end of the 90 notice. If no new LEA is designated, the Waste
Board becomes the enforcement agency.
There are three possible alternatives to Kern County LEA:
1.) Withdraw the designation from the LEA and have CIWMB become the
enforcement agency, by default. The City of Paso Robles did this to
resolve a disagreement with their LEA. The process takes approximately
3 months, i.e., Council resolution would make the change official at the end
of the 90 notice period. The City could later form its own LEA if it wished
while utilizing services from the Waste Board, in the interim. The cost of
this alternative is difficult to assess. CIWMB staff charges an hourly rate
of $58.37 plus materials, and per diem for travel/lodging to and from
Sacramento. Currently, the Kern County LEA charges $80.00 per hour for
services rendered.
2.) Develop an LEA program in-house and then begin the process to withdraw
the designation from KC-LEA. In order to form a City LEA, there must be
at least one permitted solid waste facility. The Mt. Vernon composting
facility is currently being reviewed for a Solid Waste Facility Permit by
CIWMB. However, per PRC, Section 43200(5), a"permitted solid waste
facility" includes a proposed solid waste facility for which an EIR or
negative declaration has been prepared. Per Conditional Use Permit #5540,
the City's composting facility has already received a negative declaration.
This condition, therefore, has already been met.
Forming an LEA in-house, however, is time consuming and care would have
to be taken to avoid conflict of interest concerns. The agency must have
its own budget, workload analysis and minimum of one full time staff
person, dedicated solely to solid waste inspection and enforcement. It must
also be completely separate from the department[s] administering solid
waste facility operations and maintenance. An Enforcement Program Plan
(EPP), described above, must be developed.
Finally, there must also be a Hearing Panel, appointed by the Council.
Organizational charts should show how separate this Agency would be and
who would act as Director and contact person.
Five (5) cities in California have their own LEAs: Los Angeles, Pittsburg
(in Contra Costa County), West Covina, Vernon, and San Jose.
3.) Withdraw the designation from the LEA and contract with a different LEA,
outside of Kern County. This may not be a viable option since it has no
direct precedent, but the City of Pasadena contracts with the City of Los
Angeles' LEA rather than the County. If Bakersfield wished to contract
n
with the City of West Covina's LEA, for example, the difference would be
that it is located in a different county.
West Covina's LEA consists of 1 LEA Officer and 1 clerical position. The
annual budget is approximately $500,000; consisting of $300,000 for staff
and engineering consulting plus $200,000 for legal fees. The LEA officer
reports directly to the City Manager.
HM:hm
c: Kevin Barnes, Solid Waste Director
LEA_FRY
i
ry-- _ .- ' � �
,4 M ..
�oisinia ��.s�� anos
RESOLUTION NO. 3 7- 9 2 g�31�Sl�314`d9 �O All�
ICERNSOCO.UNTY �ENVIPONMENTALDES�L�A�TZOS�OFVT���4 �_� ���
DBPARTMENT AS Tf� LOCAL ENFORCBMMSNT AGSNCY FOR
SOLIA WASTB MANAGffirIEPIT P�.RMITTING, INS'PSCTI���D��j ��
AND ffi�iFORCffi�NT. '
e�,r���:-:•..a•:�..
WHSRHAS, the California lntegrated Waste Manaqement Act
of 1989 (Stats. 1989, Ch. 1095) permits the desiqnation of a local
enforcement agency for purposes of enforcing the applicable
standards of Chapter 1, Part 4, of Division 30 of the Public
Resources Code (commencing at Section 43000) and the requlations
adopted thereunder pertaining to solid waste handling and disposal
for the protection of air, water and land from pollution and
nuisance, and for the protection c:f the public health and
consistent with the provisions of Public Resources Code Section
43209; and
Wi�REAS, pursuant to the provisions of Public Resources
Code Section 43202(a), the Board of Supervisors of the County may
designate the local enforcement agec�cy, subject to the approval by
a majority of the cities within the County which contain a majority
of the population of the incorporated areas of the County; and
WHBREP�S, the Kern County Environmental Health Services
Degartment is the currently designated local enfoLCement agency and
has the requisite technical exp�rtise, adequacy of staff resources,
adequacy of budget resources, and trai.ning in order to carry out
the function of the local enforcement ager.:y; and
i�1HBREAS, no currently designated enforcement agency may,
after August 1, 1992, exercise the powers of an enforcement aqency
unless it has been certified by the California lntegrated Waste
Management Board pursuant to the applicable provisions of the
California lntegrated Waste Management Act of 1989; and
WHB�AS, it is in the best interests of the County and
the incorporated cit�es within the County to maintain the
designation of the Kern County Environrzental Services Department
as the local enforcement agency �n ord�r to promote continuity in
the enforcement of the standards for solid waste handling within
the County and to ensure �hat the enforcement and inspection be
maintained as the local level.
NdW, Ti�RHFORH, BE IT HSRSBY RESaLVBD by the City Council
of th�_ City of Bakersfield, as follows:
1. This Council does hereby approve the designation of
tl�e Kern County Environmental Health Services Department as the
local enforcement agency pursuant te che provisions of the
California lntegrated Waste Management Act of 1989.
�� ��9s.�
�- m
UORK3iAb41 s
... �
. ' ' �
2. The City Clerk shall cause a copy of this Resolution
to be sent to the Kern County Board of Supervisors and the Kern
County Environmental Health Services Department.
----------000-----------
I HBRSBY Cffi2TIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed
and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular
meeting thereof held on MAR 1 1 1992 , by the followinq
vote:
ArES: C4UHCilMfM9ER5: EOWA :�eA1@M9. SMITM, BRUNNt;�ffftfl9Att. McQEAMOti, SALVAG010
NOf S; COUNi iIMElABERS: i'
�ssext cotnrau�EMeERS: � °''�
ABCTAiN: COUI1CILt�IfYBfR3 �
C���� . t�o
CITY CLE?.K and EX OF'FICIO of the
Counc�l of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED MAR 1 � 1992
CLARBNCB $. I� HRS
MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED as to form:
� �
WRffidCB M. LUNARDIN
CITY ATTORNEY of the City of Bakersfield
MS/jrr/meg
DESIG-LEA.R-2
2/19/92
- 2 -
� ����
3
ORIOtNAL
Post-it'"routing request pad 7684
ROUTING - REQUEST
Please
❑ READ To ���
❑ HANDLE
❑ APPROVE
and
❑ FORWARD
❑ RETURN
❑ KEEP OR DISCARD
❑ REVIEW WITH ME
Dat � �
From
------- J
//���/ �/
v v
. _.,`_ _
�� ° �
B A K E R S F I E L D
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
I501 TRUXTUN AVENUE
BAKERSFIELD. CALIFORNIA 9330I
(805) 326-3724
RAUL M. ROJAS, DIRECTOR • CITY ENGWEER
February 12, 1996
County of Kem
Transportation Management Department
2700 "M" Street, Suite 400
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Attn: Craig Pope, Director
RE: CALLOWAY DRIVE BETWEEN BRIMi�ALL ROAD AND ROSEDALE HIGHWAY
Dear Craig:
The City of Bakersfield is currently working on bridge and roadway improvements to
Calloway Drive between Stockdale Highway and Brunhall Road. We anticipate these
improvements to be completed by the end of June, 1996. Once ihis seg�nent Calloway Drive
is complete, it will provide a significant north/south corriclor connecting northwest and
southwest Bakersfield.
As you are aware, the referenced segment of Calloway I�rive consists of a two lane facility
located entirely within County jurisdiction: As a result of the bridge and roadway
construction south of Brunhall Road, we anticipate the segment of Calloway Drive between
Brimhall Road and Rosedale Highway will receive a significant increase in traffic volumes.
This increase will probably occur during non-peak hour times due to the current constraint
at Rosedale Highway.
The City has, in the past, requested the County impr�ve the referenced segment of Calloway
Drive. We are once again making this request. The following is a list of projects that we
feel" should be considered to improve overall traf�c flow on Calloway Drive:
1. Accept the right of way offers at this time.
2• Improve Calloway Drive to four (4) lanes from Brimhall Road to the school
north of the A.T.&S.F. tracks. 'The remainder could be widened to four (4)
lanes within the existing right of way as an intermi measure.
3. Begin a program of property acquisition necessary to widen the roadway to
its ultimate state.
4. Work with the Grade Separation District to develop an S.P. line for the
future grade separation projec� This will require annexation into the District.
I���'���:�lin,�� `
4 `Y�7 L., v
. �� - - �
__.�1'
���' .
w
'The City feels that this segment of Calloway Drive requires immediate attention. Since both
jurisdictions are currently developing their respective budgets for Fiscal Year 1996-97, it
would seem appropriate to budget a project accordingly. Please let me know if the County
is willing to program some funds for this project.
Thank you for your consideration and I look forward to hearing from you in the near
future:
Very truly yours,
Raul. M. Rojas,
Public Works Director
�G� ��%�
R. LaRochelle,
Engineer
cc Alan Tandy
- m'�))�111�r�i.
�
TO
FROM
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
February 9, 1996
Jack Hardisty, Development Services Director
Randy Fidler, Chief Code Enforcement Officer �'F
Abandoned Car Wash at 5221 Stockdale Highway
As you requested, I investigated the above-mentioned location. My investigation revealed
Permit No. 93-04828 was applied for on October 4, 1993 and approved on December 7,
1993. Work started and was over half completed. According to Mr. Thomas Jannino, the
applicant and architect/engineer on the permit, the owner, Bailey Group, started building
the project without a lender, using investors for funding. Half way through the project ran
out of funds. I also talked to the contractor, Mr. Mike Cosenza with Auto Wash
Development Company, who basically told me the same thing. Mr. Jannino did state that
the Bailey Group was finalizing the details with a lender to complete the project. I
contacted Lawton Powers and spoke with the secretary. She stated that Lawton Powers
owned the property and have a land lease with Bailey Group. I contacted the Bailey Group
and spoke with Mr. Bud Hill, a partner in the group. He stated they would be starting work
within 30 to 60 days. I told him I would be sending a first notice, second notice and a
hearing notice and hopefully the work would begin prior to the hearing date.
RF:km
cc: Alan Tandy, City Manager
Dennis Fidler, Building Director
' Judy Skousen, City Attorney
Councilmember Randy Rowles
��
�✓i�
G
�_ I 1 __ r r _.. _� ..
lr .� t'.1. \is. f �� __ �; �,.� �.,�. ! �:
��`�� 1 2 l9c0
, �,,. . , .
.. . .:;� `.:_.. .. __
�-�-� o
-.�
B A K E R S F I E L D
MEMOR�INDUM
February 15, 1996
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
�
FROM: Gai aiters, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: Joi t City/County Fire Services Study
Attached is a copy of the final draft of the study the City and County commissioned to
identify efficient and cost-effective fire service delivery within the metropolitan Bakersfield
area. We began this process in November 1994, so you can understand that we are
very anxious to start addressing some of the findings presented.
Initially, you may just want to focus on the Executive Summary as a way to become
familiar with the consulting firm's approach and its assumptions. Staff is prepared to
move ahead with the next step of the process, which is to bring together the members
of the Citizens Advisory Committee to review the study and prepare a presentation of
their comments on the findings and recommendations to the respective legislative
bodies. You may remember that in April 1995, staff notified the Council that technically
we no longer had equal representation on the Citizens Advisory Committee. When David
Wynn moved from the City to an unincorporated area of Kern County, the County gained
an additional represented member de facto. No action has been taken regarding this
matter. We have scheduled the first meeting of the Committee for Thursday, February
22, 1996 at 6:00 p.m. in the County Administrator's Office.
Several of the consultant's recommended improvements are worth highlighting to you.
They include:
• Increasing the level of operational coordination and enhancing the
efficiency of the Communications Center;
• Consolidating training to promote integrated operating procedures;
• Working more closely together in the areas of fire prevention, fire safety
education, investigations and hazardous materials;
• Increasing cooperation and/or consolidation of administrative and support
functions, including joint purchasing; and
• Increasing coordination and planning of service level standards, fire station
locations and apparatus and equipment specifications.
�--�.
� .�
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Joint City/County Fire Services Study
February 15, 1996
Page 2
On page 90 of the study, the consultant writes, "Most of the recommendations that come
from the analysis could be implemented by the existing organizations if the fire
departments, fire chiefs, administrators and elected officials could agree on working
more closely together and reach a consensus on the best approach for each issue. In
reality, it has proven to be difficult to achieve this level of consensus or agreement on
any of the issues. The need to conduct this study is evidence of the difficulties that the
City and the County have experienced in working and planning together."
While this may seem a bit harsh, staff concurs with the statement based on our
accelerated efforts over the past four years in working with the County. We do not want
to take lightly the consultant's recommendation to consolidate the City of Bakersfield Fire
Department with the County Fire Department, however, we are of the opinion that this
would be an arduous task. Even if staff thought this was a viable alternative -- and we
do not -- we would be hard pressed to know where to begin; and we believe that there
would be no support for it among the parties within the City organization. Nevertheless,
staff agrees that this study has resulted in some positive recommendations and we are
supportive of pursuing them further.
We anticipate that the next steps will be small steps achieved over time. Staff will keep
you informed on a regular basis of the progress and will be anticipating your feedback.
You are encouraged to attend any scheduled Citizen Advisory Committee meetings; and
in addition, staff will be scheduling a workshop to elicit Council comments and
suggestions.
cc: City Manager
City of Bakersfield
TRANSMITTAL SLIP
Date... 2..---� ���- -9�-..._......_.........._
ra ..... ....... i�...(:�o..�?��.,��.t�� ...T_�... ��. Y........._......- .........................._ �
From.:.......�.Q�,1....��JlR�
-� ..............................�--...._......---....................._.._._._...._
For Your:—
O Signature ❑ Action �nformation � File
Please:—
O Return ❑ See Me ❑ Follow Up ❑ Prepare Answer
Copy to:.. .....
�F�� ��....�-1�1�1t'�� .................
Memo : .... � �T�Ve. �(��C�-j-.....�� �......_.._.__
u�
-------------_...._.........._..
......... ....................... ...._ �----G � � .�.-�.._.�.:... � �?�:��:�:�.�.':......
................................................-�.� c �� c��.�..c..� .� .
...................................................................._...._................_..
...............................................................................................
.................. ........... ..........................--...................... .............
................. ....................................... _ ..... .......... .....
�
................................... ......
: � .
,
,
,%
..,;, _ -
F. Core
OZ-14-96
1996 KERN RIVER WATER SUPPLY FORECAST
Distribution List
,.
C.H. Williams
Kem River Watermaster
Dana S. Munn
North Kern Water Storage District
John L. Jones
Cawelo Water District
C.W. Bowers
Kern-Tulare W.D. - Rag Gulch W.D.
James M. Beck
Improvement District N�. 4 of the
Kern County Water Agency
� _ Hal Crossley
Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District
L. Mark Mulkay
Kern Delta Water District �
Alan Tandy
✓Gene Bogart '
Thomas Stetson
Scott Slater
Judy Skousen
Alan Daniel '
CITY OF
��C ��o ��,����� CALIFORNIA
r�
DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
OFNE HOOART. Msm;er
F[ARN QOR� Wster Resouroes Director
PKIRiC1C E HAUP7MAN. Saperinceodent
S1'EVE IwF�UND, Forcastio� aod Reoords
MAURICE RANDALI.. Bwioat Mameer
KERN RNIIt DiSPA'PCi�R 326-3716
February 14, 1996
RE: 1996 WATER SUPPLY FORECAST
��;.; .., ,,�_
. � � �-� _
� I' -'0'� -- �
The February 1,1996 forecast, issued lry the State of California Department of Water Resources for Kern River
runoff during the 1996 April through July snow-melt period is 69% of normal, or approximately 31A,000 acre-
feet. Snowpack verification was conducted by the State of Califomia and United States Forest Service during
the last week of January 1996 with measurements obtained at thirteen established snow courses and four
remote snow sensor sites located within the Kem River basin. The February 1, 1996 forecast of Kem River
runoff assumes median precipitation amounts will occur over the Kem River watershed subsequent to the date
of forecast. The forecast is somewhat conservative in that heavy rains euperienced duriag the first week of
February,1996 are not reIIected in the State runoff predictions. According to procedure, actual precipitation
received after February 1, 1996, will be reflected in the first of the month forecasts to be distdbuted by the
State of Califomia for March, April and May of 1996.
KERN RIVER FORECAST SUMMARY
1996 April through July runoff
April-July 80% probability range
(actual runoff should fall within
the stated limits eight times out
of ten)
1996 March-October runoff
�
�
�
320,000 acre-feet (69°I'o of normal)
140,000 to 640,000 acre-feet
410,000 acre-feet
Based upon this February 1, 1996 forecast, the following table reflects City of Bakersfield Kem River water
supply during the March-October period of 1996:
I. CTI'Y ENTITLEMENT SUPPLY:
MARCH-OCTOBER Period
Less: River Losses
Isabella Reservoir Losses
69% OF NORMAL RUNOFF
= 95,000 acre-feet
= 12,000 acre-feet
= 6,000 acre-feet
= Fstimated City supply available
for diversion MARCH-OCTOBER = 77,000 acre-feet
1000 BUENA VISTA ROAD • BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93311
(805) 326-371 S
February 14, 1996
RE: 1996 WATER SUPPLY FORECAST
Page 2
II. BASIC CONTRAC'T DELIVERY (March-October):
1. Lake Ming and Hart Park
2. North Kern Water Storage District
3. Cawelo Water District
4. Kern-Tulare Water District
S. Rag Gulch Water District
= 700 acre-feet
= 20,000 acre-feet
= 27,000 aae-feet
= 20,000 acre-feet
= 3,000 acre-feet
TpTpI, = 70,700 acxe-feet
A 69% of normal runoff will yield a fnll supply for "Basic" delivery obligations of the City during 1996. 'll�e
City also has a commitment to deliver 10,000 acre-feet annually to Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District.
Slightly more than one-half of City's basic obligation to Rosedale for 1996 was delivered during January 1996.
III. BASIC CONTRAGT PRIOR-YEAR DEFICIENCIES:
As of lanuary 1, 1996, prior year deficiencies in delivery oj Basic Contract water werr as follows:
1. Norlh Kern Water Storage District
2. Cawelo Water District
3. Kern-Tulare Water District
4. Rag Gulch Watcr District
= 0 acre jea
= 17,032 acre fect
= 37,313 acre jeet
= s,638 �� r�
Totol Prior-Year Deficuncies = 60,203 acse jeet
City entitlement yield as forecasted for 1996 will not yield a full supply for maximum delivery schedules of
prior-year deficiencies in basic contract water. However, when City's carryover storage at Isabella Reservoir
of approximately 16,000 acre-feet is added to City's remaining 1996 water supply, the deGvery of basic oontract
deficiencies for 1996 should be met as follows:
N.
1. Cawelo Water District
2. Kera-Tulare Water District
3. Rag Gulch Water Distrid
= 5,000 acce-feet
= 3,700 acre-feet
= 550 acre-feet
TpT,4I, = 9,250 acre-feet
OT�-�R DELIVERY OBLIGATIONS:
1. Water for use on. lands owned by the City and/or on
lands within City boundaries = 3,000 acre-feet
2. Notth Kem Water Storage District -"Borrow/Payback"
water, normally delivered between May and September = 10,000 acre-feet
It is projected that 1996 Kem River runoff coupled with City's carryover storage from 1995 will yield the City
adequate supply to deliver "OTHER DELIVERY OBLIGATIONS" as set forth above.
�
February 14, 1996
RE: 1996 WATER SUPPLY FORECAST
Page 3
V. MISCELLANEOUS QUANTITY WATER:
Afier deducting the basic contract deliveries and other obligations as set forth above from City Kem River
suppty available for diversion March through October, miscellaneous quantity water would not be available
during the March-October period, except in very limited amounts. Should water supply conditions imptove
and miscellaneous water were to become available during 1996, the priority tights to purchase such water
would be as follows:
1. Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District = 33.33%
2. North Kern Water Storage District = 19.05%
3. Cawelo Water District = 25.71°b
4. Kem-Tulare Water District = 19.053b
S. Rag Gulch Water District = 2•86°�0
TOTAL ' = 100.00%
Under the City/Tenneoo Agreement No. 77-71 dated May 2, 1977, assigned to North Kem Water Storage
District effective March 20, 1990, North Kern has the first right of refusal to miscellaneous watet following
Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District and the fow Basic Contractors, as follows:
a). Forty percent (40%) of all water City has available for use within
City boundaries solely for irrigation.
b). Fifty percent (50%) of Srst 24,000 acre-feet of other City
miscellaneous quantity water including water recovered from City's
groundwater banking operations.
c). Fifty percent (50%) of any other miscellaneous quantity Kern River
water that City would otherwise use for groundwater banking and
replenishment.
VI. DELIVERY SCHEDULES:
On the basis of the current water suppty forecast for 1996, the City will deliver basic contract water in
oonformance with the "Maximum Delivery Schedules" as set forth in Exhibit "B" of the Hasic Contracts.
Should you have any questioas regarding the above information, please do not hesitate to call our office.
Sincerely,
GENE BOGART
Water Re urces Manager
�
Flom Core
Water Resources Director
Attachments
Ciry ot BekerMleld
Water Reeources
SNOW
COUFlSE
Bighom Plateau
CottomNOOd Pass
Siberian Pass
Crabtree Meadow
Guyot Flat
Tyndall Creek
Sandy Meadow
Big Whitney Mea.
Rock(Xeek
Round Me�aw
Ramshaw Meadow
Uttle 1Nhltney Mea.
Casa Vieja Mea.
(�uinn Han9er Sta-
Bonita Meadows
Beach Meadows
g��-Wide Average
FEBRUARY 1,1996 SNOW SURVEY DATA FOR KERN RIVER BASIN
APRIL 1ST �� WA�
AVERAGE �EPTH �TEN� % OF
�� �JF. �Ey. WATER DATE IN DENS(TY INCHES AVERAGE M�B �
��pq NUMBER IN FEET CONTENT MEASURED INCHES (aN+)
Upper Tyndall Crk. 516 11,450 27.7 1-27 57.0 2796 15.3 55% DWR
2S0 11,350 21.9 1-26 39.3 27% 10.7 499t+ �WR
251 11,050 13.4 1-23 20.6 25% 5.1 38% DWR
252 10.900 18.3 1-24 26.9 2596 6.8 3796 DWR
253 10.700 18.8 1-28 46.8 24% 11.1 5996 DWR
Crabt�eeMeadow 253 10.700 19.8 1-28 50.0 22% 11.0 569t+ �WR
254 10.650 20.0 1-29 41.4 259b 10.4 5296 DWR
255 10,650 18.3 . 1-26 37.1 2396 8.6 4796 DWR
275 10.650 18.3 1-26 42.7 269b 11.0 6096 �WR
Chagoopa P�ateau � 51 a 10.300 21.8
257 9,750 16.6 1-24 23.6 25% 5.8 35% DWR
256 9,600 17.2 1-29 44.6 24% 10.5 61% DWR
P�pg 569 9.130 24.9 1-28 51.5 23�ib 120 4896 USFS
2S8 9,000 24.9 1-28 41.0 299b 11.9 4896 USFS
Tunnel Guard 830 8,960 15.6
Wet Meadow 518 8.950 30.3
259 8.700 11.3
260 8.500 13.5
262 8,400 19.6 1-29 39-9 23% 9.3 47% USFS
Casa Vleja Mea. 262 8�400 20.9 .
264 8,350 19.4
261 8.300 13.8 1-28 30.5 28% 8.6 62% USFS
�r ���� g,g �_29 21.5 23% 4.9 55% U3F3
BeaCh Meadows 860 7.660 11•0 1-29 23.1 19% 4.3 39% USFS
I�`!�
i
., . ,.
. ,
J'
CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE SNOW SURVEYS
February 1, 1996 Forecast of Unimpaired Runoff
In Thousands of Acre—Feet (TAF�
A ril—July Forecasts
% eo%
of Probability
April—July Average Range
Totai Inflow to Shaste Lake
Sacramertto Ftiver above Bend Bridge
Feather F�ver, Inflow to Lake Oroville
Yuba Wver at Smartville
American River, Inflow to Fdsom Lake
Consumnea River at Michigen Bar
Mokelumne River, i�lowto Pardee Reservoir
Stanislaus River, Inflow to New Melones Lake
Tuolumne River, Inflow to New Don Pedro Reservolr
Merced River, I�lowto lake McClure
San Joaquin River; Inflow to Millerton Lake
Iangs River, I�low to Pine Flat Reaervdr
Kaweah River, Inflow to Terminus Reaerv�oir
Tule River, Inflow to Lake Success
Kern River, Ir�iow to Lake Isabeqa
1,640
2,200
1,620
950
1,170
110
420
640
1,080
560
1,080
1,010
220
40
320
Water— Year Forecast and Monthlv Distribution
IMlow to Shasta
Sacramerrto, Bend Brg.
Feather, Oroville
Yuba, Smart�Alls
Ame�ican, Fdsom
Consumnes, Mich. B.
Mokelumne, Perdee
Stanislaus, N.M.
Tudumne, D.P.
Merced, LMcClure
San Joaquin, M.L
FOngs, Pine Flat
Kaweah, L Kawaeh
Tule, Success R.
Kem, leabella
Oct
thru Feb Mer Apr May Jun Jul
Jan
1,530
2,360
1,015
520
560
84
95
150
220
110
160
140
40
20
110
870
1,330
675
320
390
�
�
90
t40
�
�
�
20
14
35
810
1.150
600
300
370
85
70
100
170
90
120
100
�
20
45
650
840
660
370
440
50
120
190
270
150
220
200
55
20
80
480
650
550
390
470
35
190
260
430
235
420
380
100
15
110
Thie is the official State water supply torecast
Consult the DepartmeM's Bulletin 120 for more informaUon.
Prepared by the Califomia Cooperative Snow Sunreya.
290
410
260
150
220
10
100
150
320
140
320
320
50
3
90
220
300
150
40
40
5
10
40
60
�
120
110
15
2
40
90
88
87
91
91
85
90
90
90
91
88
84
n
63
�
1,000-2,550
1,400-3,850
�,02o-2,sso
590-1,610
670-2,070
55-220
270-660
400-1,020
750— t ,600
370-850
680-1,660
580— t ,520
120-370
15-80
140-640
Aug Water % 8096
6 Year of Probability
Sep Average Range
420
530
190
40
30
1
5
10
20
15
50
40
5
1
30
5,270
7,570
4,100
2,130
2,520
290
650
990
1,630
850
1,490
1,350
315
95
540
88
87
�
89
92
75
87
�
87
88
84
81
71
66
75
3,800-7,350
5,680-11,000
2,950-6,100
1,500-3,250
1,680-4,030
180-540
450-970
680-1,500
1,200-2,300
600-1,230
1,000-2,200
830-1,970
190-500
45-170
300-970
�,
`r.
tJ
�:
�
•
B A K E R S F I E L D
PUBLIC WORKS DEPART1v1ENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager
//�
�
-�" 0 ��'� a ,
as �
�
February 12, 1996
FROM: Raul Rojas, Public Works Director
RE: RESIDENTIAL REFUSE/GREENWASTE SERVICE PICKUPS
In response to Councilmember Carson's January 12, 1996 faxed request to review reasons
for City crews "red tagging" and not servicing certain containers, we have attached a list of
those problems reported and tagged by our crews during January. We have also attached
a pickup schedule map.
It should be noted that our education program includes a"yellow tag" warning i�ssued with
a pickup for first-time problems and a"red tag" with no pickup for repeat problems. Tag
information is radioed from the route to a customer service log, where staff can refer to it
upon a call from a customer. Ward one and other areas seem to have adjusted somewhat
following the initial taggings, and relatively few problems occur now. Please forward this
information to Councilmember Carson.
cc: KB: smp
�J KBCORMEM/CARSON2.MEM
V
Attachment
__ _ s,�-= .�r�.-i:_�-- ---
� �n�'���"'� �°�;, ��� ,
r'o i"u ,a�, �_, ;.
-�.�_ _-,"� .3�. - —
�I
,r
;� ��� p � 1996
;� _=—_-�_ :��_ _ _
� 1n��� �����. �. ,��� � . �
ADDRESS
1715 03RD ST.
1800 03RD ST. (BLK OF)
330 04TH ST.
905 04TH ST.
726 06TH ST.
930 06TH ST.
1017 06TH ST.
300 lOTH ST.
617 lOTH ST.
200 lOTH ST. EAST
208 IOTH ST. EAST
401 lOTH ST. EAST
830 11TH ST.
406 18TH ST. EAST
Ei1.� 7\ �_ •
231 BANK ST.
1909 BANK ST.
101 BLISS ST.
109 BLISS ST.
245 BROWN ST. SOUTH
249 BROWN ST. SOUTH
906 BROWN ST. SOUTH
908 BROWN ST. SOUTH
2111 BRUNDAGE LN.
2300 BRUNDAGE LN.
2100 BUENA VISTA (BLK OF)
1616 CALIFORNIA AVE.
1201 CALIFORNIA AVE. EAST
144 CEDAR ST.
225 DANIEL ST.
714 DOLORES ST.
615 DRACENA ST.
2312 DRACENA ST.
306 1/2 E ST.
1312 EUREKA ST.
229 EYE ST.
305 EYE ST.
400 EYE ST.
424 EYE ST.
430 EYE ST.
501 FERRY ST.
505 FERRY ST.
502 FTG ST.
622 FIG ST.
426 G ST.
411 K ST. (APTS)
528 K ST.
615 K ST.
DRIVER CALL-IN
LOG
PROBLEM
TRASH IN GREEN CART
BLOCKED BY TREE
WOOD BLOCKS IN GREEN CART
TRASH IN GREEN CART
CART BACKWARDS/CLOSE TO POLE
TRASH IN GREEN CART
TRASH IN GREEN CART
XMAS TREE IN GREEN CART
XMAS TREE IN GREEN CART
TRASH IN GREEN CART
PLASTIC/FOOD IN GREEN CART
TRASH IN GREEN CART
TRASH IN GREEN CART
TRASH/XMAS TREE IN GREEN CART
3 BAD WHEELS-BIN-SANDSTONE
TRASH IN GREEN CART
TRASH IN GREEN CART
TRASH IN GREEN CART
TRASH IN GREEN CART
TOO FAR BACK TO SERVICE
TOO FAR BACK TO SERVICE
BLOCKED BY PG & E
BLOCKED BY PG & E
CART NOT OUT TO SERVICE
BLOCKED BY VEHICLE
CONSTRUCTION
CART NOT OUT FOR SERVICE
CART NOT OUT FOR SERVICE
TRASH IN GREEN CART
TRASH IN GREEN CART
LATE SET OUT-MOVING
BLOCKED 2 CARTS BY 2 VEHICLES
TRASH IN GREEN CART
TRASH IN GREEN CART
BLOCKED BY VEHICLE
TRASH IN GREEN CART
TRASH IN GREEN CART
XMAS TREE IN GREEN CART
BLOCKED BY VEHICLE
TRASH IN GREEN CART
TRASH IN GREEN CART
TRASH IN GREEN CART
OVERLOADED/TRASH GREEN CART
DOG WASTE IN GREEN CART
BLOCKED BY VEHICLE
BLOCKED BY VEHICLES
CART BACKWARDS
TRASH IN GREEN CART
1
DATE
01-15-96
01-04-96
01-08-96
O1-15-96
01-08-96
01-15-96
01-08-96
01-08-96
01-08-96
01-09-96
01-09-96
01-09-96
01-08-96
01-16-96
O 1-22-96
01-15-96
01-15-96
O 1-09-96
01-09-96
01-17-96
01-17-96
01-17-96
01-17-96
01-16-96
01-15-96
01-17-96
01-13-96
O1-16 & 23A6
01-08-96
01-09-96
01-19-96
01-17-96
01-15-96
01-15-96
01-19-96
01-15-96
01-15-96
01-08-96
01-08-96
01-08-96
O1-08-96
01-08-96
01-08-96
01-08-96
01-15-96
01-04-96
01-12-96
01-15-96
4
ADDRESS
1102 K ST.
120 L ST.
600 L ST.
604 L ST.
608 L ST.
610 L ST.
618 L ST.
720 L ST.
704 M ST.
828 M ST.
408 MARCUS ST.
421 MARCUS ST.
110 O ST.
123 O ST.
325 OLEANDER AVE.
1115 OWENS ST.
119 P ST.
616 P ST.
700 P ST.
701 P ST.
704 P ST.
714 P ST.
800 P ST.
824 P ST.
830 P ST.
407 PACIFIC ST.
216 PALM ST.
2130 PALM ST.
1425 POTOMAC AVE.
630 R ST.
718 R ST.
807 R ST.
2000 ROOSEVELT ST.
923 SLTMNER ST.
500 T ST.
815 T ST.
815 V ST.
2118 VERDE ST.
19 VERNAL ST
1409 WII.KINS ST.
WILLIAMS ST.
1322 WILLIAMS ST.
KBCORMEM.ON'NERS. CAR
DRIVER CALL-IN
LOG
PROBLEM
TRASH IN GREEN CART
TRASH IN GREEN CART
TRASH IN GREEN CART
TRASH IN GREEN CART
TRASH IN GREEN CART
TRASH IN GREEN CART
TRASH IN GREEN CART
CART BACKWARDS
BLOCKED BY VEHICLE
PLASTIC BAG IN GREEN CART
BLOCKED BY VEHICLE
XMAS TREE IN GREEN CART
YARDWASTE IN BAGS
TRASH IN GREEN CART
PALM LIMBS IN GREEN CART
TRASH IN GREEN CART
FLOOR TILE IN GREEN CART
TRASH IN GREEN CART
TRASH IN GREEN CART
TRASH IN GREEN CART
TRASH IN GREEN CART
TRASH IN GREEN CART
TRASH IN GREEN CART
TRASH IN GREEN CART
TRASH IN GREEN CART
TRASH IN GREEN CART-SERVICED
TRASH IN GREEN CART
TRASH IN GREEN CART
WHEEL OFF-NEED TAN CART
TRASH IN GREEN CART
BLOCKED BY VEHICLE
BLOCKED BY VEHICLE
TRASH IN GREEN CART
TRASH IN GREEN CART
TOO FAR BACK TO SERVICE
BAGS IN GREEN CART
TRASH/PALM LIMBS IN GREEN CART
BLOCKED BY VEHICLE
PLASTIC BAGS IN GREEN CART
TOO CLOSE TO VEHICLE/MAIL BOX
NO COMMERCIAL CARTS OUT
MIXED TRASH/GRASS IN GREEN CART
2
/
DATE
O1-08-96
01-15-96
01-08-96
01-08-96
01-08-96
01-08-96
O1-22-96
01-08-96
01-15-96
01-08-96
Oi-09-96
01-09-96
01-08-96
01-08-96
01-15-96
01-23-96
Oi-15-96
Ol-08 &. 15-96
01-08-96
01-08-96
01-08-96
01-08-96
01-08-96
01-08-96
01-08-96
01-15-96
01-15-96
01-15-96
01-17-96
01-08-96
01-08-96
O1-08-96
01-08-96
01-23-96
01-16-96
01-08-96
01-08-96
01-17-96
01-08-96
01-17-96
01-16-96
O1-16 8c 23A6
I hr"�S���vy.. N.�.Y �( � 5l N b. `^'� �. /IOSP _ S'SI ..._``;;�,� ..ES e�. O O ��I,/y �CY.. Y y J
- R � S y I .,:
_ _ _ _ L
�
n rf I� P
N_ S �` < < _[
u °' _ _ � " � `� �ake A�/( f, o � ��e
� � � ` " � � � N 23rd � � /( ¢ � �n
f @8 !1 � a c� cn �n = � �Znd � �n " v 22nd ��S en���kY /� _ S STREFr
• P y y 21 ;� St. � y � LL u 2 F- CR�na Allev 2ist treet UMNfRJa�k�On Sr _" � y
� E� 20 ch St n w 20th ��^ P� � Street "fas� y� �
O W m 15 [h � CENTRAL PARX Gr� �eSr fas� '�� � `' =9' O
" � y S% � �
3, 18 ch Q m � o Sc ^ 18th Svee� East�g� c F R�
u� h a° ti� v�`Jt S y` FT 9
�� Q � �/A�TRO 171h FRANK / Y � 17th O a d Stree[ i f�c 'Y �
� iA ' oARK ' k St. P�: f.
CS�" � r �l�ctu
L N
t6ch MERCY �. t th � > o �o� Q � EaJ� �� r
HOSPITAL Shadr £ �h. es � I��
Ln. � t3" rp �R (,y 0 E4r�k� `Q v� �
�`� �—�--I _
� �r 14ch Stree� in • `. � . B�,r�e � .S� �v�� ,�;1 r� � 32 e r� G
Y ' -
Q �,d� AHEGHSF� �O 13th d �� i S[reet �� N Hnt ev= v,�e Q SC,y C�, C W W � �.:7
Q t' U� N SCHOOLL N N{N � N �� y Sm C v S�' �- , Q=�� 1�� RN
y` Y � � r W 3 i
U H
�� Park Wa I n h 1" [h � ` y E. 11 th y �; �:� 11[h �Z M4RAER 4VE. �
_ •. �=R ' ? fn 10t St. "y
, S�nset Ave. N �. Oran9e S�. 10 th N y �: C : E. .: 1M 1O y �
Emi i M� le Ave. r - 0 2 CLAREND n sr
E N y�h RAFER JOHNSON aD � � m CR7TCWAC Z h Sl. N y ��
w - Che:� r � �. Forest St. " \ Street �; E. 9M .Y ' y■ sC~ a° P omac v� = �I A
� > 8 th O oc $treet '. E. 8th °
; � Che�ry PENN -• $�, ' N � Gorrill St. De WOIf V St. / �
ti v, �n scH t x � i Z 7th a " = E. 7t� '� �
1 Dracena g�, S�. d Q Ralstun St. E _
Sth S� ST. rn` z BEALE = 6 th N St. � y � v',E. 6th �~��N^� � Rr Murduck St. Houser _ Sc ' Y N
FR NCIS PARK f' � 5 th LOW LL $t � . v� I IfllO � 3 U A
�^ d.c Palm G y YAR ) ERN MAVE - E 51 �.�
� p p ;° a 4M St. _.- . . 4 th St �> E IM • • • ' d m vi � o
� m � fn N (A � a N N H y i io 'J �
u c- a p J Buena a ata St. W � Chest r PI. C Me INL r 3' � �iM Y . • Q=�,. �� 3
-� '�� ak 3rd SL ' 3rd M E R S �C 8; 1:. Ave y �% e=� o. E. 3 �d $f N H N �
a+ m y PI, cn _•D $LfEP � JR. HIGH 3fd � '" « O�� ' tA � I
3 O Benk Q m_ St. = Bank SC(�r '� o• = Q�
Y �� �^ i t, N w Q p i'2 ][ T X35 •� $l. � CO Y
° � . Bowen = y 2nd w $treet (�V� � tl P 5 St: Marcuf , fREMDNT ' 3°_ �'= J
VertlP N.S� .--: �,, N ROOSF- Ver St W ORAVIST C J) � Nilkin . SCM. �' �« � L � U i
� � Egpers vEIT � O H I G H S C M. . •- � t .
�% � n� St. � � tst Street Y, '` tst 8 SL , � LIoVd �t jQ .� � vi Z �
¢ I = `" ° ci O "� BR NDAGE '�'� ' - Y Q BRUNQAGE_ _ _`
o N a �" .q g� Ro sevelt � i I nd St •u' � St. w�' No
Z = � 5 Srq OT�.. LN -' « ARD '' m0 D�frNl `%'� C �
'i � - . ~ 6 CoM011 }. �' ¢ ' F RRY � TOLLHO = Padre O ¢
W ' Vfl19C1 l4'..LN. 'U Q ) St
Tenxe �t° ame� • � � �, m \ � Z . �? cr+uacHiu Cros St $ c, �
k in Te�rxe c' ` Wy. `;7 > > Terroee W.=+"� � N c � Feliz E� Dr. c
�o W�Y . p � a Bridf rd St. ;, E' � � t r1d �.PItIAND DR. �'- E TERRACE WY Q � a McN[w Ct. �✓� N
rve ' N Terrel � o e - ° Dr. � � '� LN � � � Cannon Ave. LL
C evel,�nd ¢ LeslPi (, j r T- �-� . DANiELS 0� BAKER SCM.
Mona C�� � � - u Y o �M W /� O 'EV� A'vE ' � a A
�SEr d H r no • � c � s� rena ` � � . � $mith St.
c t g c 4 � 1 Qa ,�d, GOLDENSTAlf ., '�� �,:• >
�M. NI O > J a 4 0 > �� c �VV` JR. MIGH SCH -".a: -��. . .: a
Y E G v E E BEIIE Terrot =; �4 •` J . E'BECLE TERpACE �i"J��` co ��e Terrace
�. Q �' � o re -�` ` rock VJv. �( ' � " BelleTerrace 3y y ��( p eF<vF` J � E.
a S; u Cec�l � O O '
$ Lane wooa �n. 9 r. i. g L B`°"" `�' � o°' KfRN COUNTV = o g' tFq\• � Q
'� m m Ilen 1c Y'a TrinilV w y. Q 9�` U O
� uire Ln Q c ° Ro� M fiose M e�� �° ~ r�posa � DAM$"E j �p F�\ �
$� o la France � � W mador p J m � sr ~
.�v rne Ave. ¢ q u y y Rad�ance Dr u+ ,Z.` � z Cheaeh.:m
�n Radia c g Del Mar Dr. � � -
Ave. = Ki � ley Ln > �. o Reese Ave
i�d ve -- = Talis a �= Tal�sman Dr � W� �% fA/RGROUNOS
'_' � � Nirws Wr. 2 w Y g p• Q'r o�� WAYS/DE ..
Q L, June _� IAVe `0 ", Q _ � � CASA LOMA J DH 0
i'
CASA LOMA ��� • -�- - ' —�
i� w MING Faye Ln.� Monl omery Mint � I Vine AVE Dr. p oa PAR� `CASALOMA
J � c , � �+� O ¢ ;�.��;: SCH. c ;
rra _ �n � St. G l+wson " Q Rd. v � �.__ m
�� m ,� � � `n Ct. Bra lev Av �� � l� � i _ � _ � Z
J y I ar d 'f� N� Curtis Dr. � O
�. ; o Mo�a�� w tillma � � � Nina St.
�
v��u ." - Carol PI. Doolitde '� N � uth Gate Si�i,,�� �
e. o " Norman Ave � � . . R o O I
I � U v; � U um ve � �Custer Av ' � Y . �' � � no,� � V
� v ^ O . � E � ❑ ,tn C Phoen�a Av �
1 £o " Echo Ave ° m � m !� � « ��� r � o Bradshaw St i
'` " Alma d a- o ,� A Rro St. ^ o KirD� S
_ M � _ ` � Valorie WESt� ` Clar �� � � � � Y w > w �, � ^ � -+ Melwood $t _
^ �j o'i nrum � _ " -)
v;aD
Wilson C L�ons q'O kd �' SCH� „ N 9 i �- Y$ s Watts Drive3
N
�°- erwoo � Antonia Wv. �o�.�e$ °'° o CasmoSt.
541,APSGr' N Qt �T O q � � W l' Z
rC*� _ Gemline lELE 1Nesthav � W Dorian D�. `h' BAKERSFlELD Q Casa Grandr St I I
M 1� - - � � LL 4 - (
� � r = _ c� p w Woolard r. �= H� Rosalia Dr. � `� u;°��- A/RPARK i ¢ Hacienda $t. �
GmHEti�_` '-� �) °� - kwox D HendreksLr <n in sa O, � �C��" 'pi� � ' i
ev > z� ;[r,�;�._ - lUne W �a � �,�i
A 1- _:.' = Dr g Ivedere Oscar qv� . O� � S� r;[NE J sD � I : __ J i'
' ' � a Ion . $Vlvia p� � °d au � t' �A � /� I,
sCambm � � ' � Lacey St c'i ` i��r f` vt" � J..... � �
iunho � - - 8e�yl � � z l^ ;
' ,� `� 6le> A� p n E �. I �y �� Dr a J��w �En�nN4.AVF � �i
FEEOE�`_ < �' �- a�+ 3 P� w ¢ � M Cdith y's� Dr, a Q� � � o � W�,�CO,�eune� ��
;�,_ ,LANal _; ° � J - o `vuNISCH "> �i �! ° g" E D _ E. PLANZ a.�OA a �
�� � \ HIGH SC�f. O � z � 'a ,; L v _ I Filson S�. �
�r > YELL'OW — TOESDAY fi WEDNESDAY �� ` Idlew Iw-' �. Q' A a "' „"'
` � Carver St.
C�i�SUN AVE � �� O � � E Y y
? ORANGE — MONDAY � WEDNESDAY �� ���N `y�oo: 9L " ? � ° � o > I �ew�ss�. �
V M� f D(? D G� A v E rvn* n l, C �• � w L i J p i
r� W�r.� Fc mer Merrimac Ave. ...��- = in � = Q� `
,� � GREEN — MONDAY � THiTRSDAY Fa�`o" n° o Q= o .g _ _ U �--• e.�ok s,.
Z a ' Garfield A � �� N �� �
m Hub Ave A m� v> A oc a � �
� � � BLDE — TQESDAY � FRIDAY ,. I n Ave� > o ` ��^���� r , ; �i
� .—� --- -
Q; -:,��,,c-I i(�..� °�I ,I...:' WHIT_�I� LAN �n � '�^ 'b"' � E. WNITE � �
o ' qSan Vicente�i D�. A rea N I
' w� rF d =
F- p S� ' lybour J� dra \C�
_ . W c ��v E 0 y y � � " Riqbv �m
.
' . )
, ' .. . . . . -�.. . . .
. . . . . , . ... , .. ��.
JAN-12-96 FRI 10;54 CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE FAX N0. 805 324 1850 P.O1
„ � MN� 1 6—yb t K a i t� 24:d t HUHY COUN.^,CL I NG C7R 1 865324 l 6S2 , P. � 3
' �i , � � . ' • � •' �
I l� � ` •
,i � . '�
� , ' . . t �v�—' p�.:e- p/:�c. �%s t�i/ � ,
� , i�edi� at�e� �r .
!; � �r'�r's /�.�u��; � . �
' . �T�� ,�.. .
� �� � .. �An���j,�r��r��
�` A � . T � . . .
. . . � � ' � � � . Fex� �z4=zasa � -
. � ; ' � �.
' DAT�: � , . � �
. . . - � �:��.: � , .
TD: AL�EN TANDY ' �'
. �.
A�EACY' CITY OF AAKERS�IELD ' . , - _
nsssa�E: � _
- � .
- �. � , � � . . -
. t� . .
FAQIl�: � YRMA CARSON � ' ,
. • . • . � � � :, .
. . . . .. , � . . ' . : . .
; . . � � ' � . . . .- ._.; .
� '� � ��� ��I�S�� �Q5 ���� 1 ���� . ..�
, ....�� � ' '� �� nr� � r rt nT �HE�T � � � �
�,T�� ��,.. ,�, . �QPI�� iri��.V...?RC C���� , . � -
��-.-�._::;:-..;�;:... -.........., ..__� .
.. �� . . ..^t� . � . : � _ . . • ' .
. .• .\-1,1• ...• i••i: �i•. •'Sy... T,"- . ; • ' • , :., Y� .: .. .J'r . •. ... ' ' , •
. . . � r. , i . . _ r . � • . . _ . .♦ . .� • ' • e . .. , .. , - .
_ t- • 1 � i • ' ' � �
' � . _ . . , : . :r . . . • , . _ • , r
� � • . • � • .
, JAN-12A96 FR I 10 � 54 � � p C I TY MANAGER; , S OFF I CE ,,_ _,,FA}� N0. _ 805_ 324 1850 P, 02
�
. .
Fz
r TO: �'i�Qlt TRRI�y
:
Fro�n: Irrrta Carson
CouRCi�►t'oniQn Ward I
Re: Refuse Picku,p
Alaa, tl�e r�efuse pickup hos beea hus than satisfactory in N'ard I
I receive more tl�at avi average nuntber of complainis on tlee
l�k of p�ckup 1R n�vst arreas ojthe Eastside oj Ward l.
TYt�s neorning i�ove dn fhe orea, ple�te ltave sonreoae go
irnmediately atd reneove all the trnsh ���� �� � t�
b�trveen !f� and L Street between Sth �PP
be a poteredal l�abilily to �lee City, and �r is a health hazard
I have a�ttempted to contcut Kelvin Barr�es with reegaisv� results,
to addreSS t1�e pickup ploblem � this are�r, p�ople are receiving
red tags because can turnec� wrong, per�a�p.s son�e erlucativn
on tlt�s �ssu�
Pleasa forw�ud me a p�ckup schedr�le jor pickup rutcl for
street sweepir�g. -
m