HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/26/93 '1
BAKERSFIELD
MEMORANDUM
February 26, i993
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CiTY COUNCIL//~ .~
FROM' ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: GENERAL INFORMATION J
1. On a positive note, you will find enclosed the Water Department's supply
forecast for the/upcoming year. It is very good in comparison to the
rec6nt past.
2. You~will note enclosed amemo that indicates we were able to facilitate the
Driller Tournament referred to at the last City Council meeting.
3. Youlshould be aware that, as soon as we can administratively put it in
plaae, I intend to bring forward for your consideration the Golden
Handshake Program of PERS.~ It offers two years of retirement credit
incentive to retire. The cost varies by wage and tenure of the employee,
butl as an example, for a cost of $15,000 we might save $100,000 plus
unemployment benefits. In fact in most cases, the cost of the retirement
'incentive is below what we would pay for unemployment on a layoff.
4. Councilmembers called to my attention the security issue~outside the
council Chamber last week. The hallway has been open' which allows access
to She back door into the Council Chamber, because that is' the official
handicapped access for the City. We· have a severe problem in closing off
thelback door entrance and, therefore, the doorway between the lobby in
from of the Council Chamber and the hallway. The only alternative would be
to lock the door'into the Council Chamber and provide you all with keys or
to hut in a combination lock. You might individually think about it and
letlme know your feeli'ngs.
5. Sometimes our economic development efforts are rather quiet and not visual.
Youlwill find enclosed a promotional letter from the Economic Development
Department to a prospect encouraging Bakersfield. I think you will like
the! upbeat tone. I want you to know this goes on regularly behind-the
scenes.
6. Youi will find enclosed a list of graffiti arrests made by the Police
Department. It is a difficult thing to make arrests on and they have
really done an excellent job. Unfortunately, the part of the system
outside of our control may not result in the full penalties we would
desire. None-the-less, my compliments to the Police Department.
7. I w!ill discuss this more at the Pre-Meeting Workshop next week, but you
should be aware that we are undergoing staff review of those potential
rev. enue sources we can increase. We will be contacting members of the
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
February 26, 1993
Page -2-
impacted Communities to get their feeling for technical problems and levels
of resistance, as an exploratory measure before deciding whether to put
them into the budget. You might get feedback from these agencies about our
contacts~ They include such things as the Transient Occupancy Tax and
cable television franchise fees, as well as a utility user tax, among
others. Again, none of these have been decided to be put into the budget,
but we feel that preliminary contact with impacted parties is necessary to
explore whether or not we could put them in.
8. You will find a response to a Council Referral enclosed regarding a "Kid
Power" issue. Also, enclosed is a response on the Panama Lane and Reliance
Drive street light inquiry.
9. We do not know the likelihood at this point in time, but we received
information that there is a grant program for public building seismic
retrofit for which we may qualify. We were getting ready to bring forward
demolition documents on Fire Station 2. I have pulled that off of the
Agenda in order to monitor the likelihood of getting the seismic retrofit
money from the State. Over and above the issue of the possibility of
getting a grant is the issue of whether that project can be frozen or the
personnel in the Station left in modular units rather than rebuilding in
order to save cash to buffer against layoffs. That is also under review.
10. You will find enclosed a sales tax update. This does not include the new
quarter's distribution which we will find out about in a month.
11. You will find enclosed a memo from Public Works discussing costs and
alignment for Coffee Road. Please review it as background material.'
AT. al b
Enclosures
cc: Department Heads
City C1 erk
1993 WATER SUPPLY FORECAST
Distribution List
C.H. Williams
North Kern Water Storage District
24 ~ 95 ~ 3~
jOhn L. Jones
Cawelo Water District
C.W. Bowers
Kern-Tulare W.D. - Rag Gulch W.D.
Robe~ K. Bellue
~provement Dis~ct No. 4
Ma~ CoHup
Rosedale Rio Bravo Water Storage District
Gilbe~ Castle
Kern Delta Water District
~//~an TandY.
Paul Dow
FlOrn Core
Th°mas Stetson.
Scott Slater
Lawrence Lunardini
G. Bogart
02-23-93
PAUL DOW, Manage~ _ _ .
GENE BOGART Director of Water Resources
FLORN C~RE. Assistant Director of Water Resources
MIKE SIDES, Sanitation Superintendent
Februa~.22, ~993
RE: 1993-WA~R SUPPLY FOREC~
The February 1,-1993 forecast, issued by the State of-California Department of Water Resources for Kern
Rive~runoff during the 1993-April through July snow-melt period is 102% of normal, or_approximately 470,000
acre-feet. Snowpack verification was conducted by the State of California and United States Forest Service
(Cannell Meadow Ranger District) during the last week of January 1993 with measur_ements obtained at fifteen
snow courses and seven t61emetefed snow sensor sites located within the Kern River basin. The February 1,
1993 forecast of Kern-River runoff assumes median precipitation amounts will occur over l.h_e Kern River
watershed subsequent to the' date of forecast. Actual precipitation received after February 1, 1993, will be
reflected in the first of the mgnth forecasts to be issued by the State of California for March, April and May
of 1993. -
-KERN RIVER FORECAST SUMMARY
1993 April through July runoff - - ' = 470,000 acre-feet (102% of normal)
April-July 80% probability range = 290,000 to 820,000 acre-feet
(actual runoff should fail'within - -
the stated-limits eight times out . _
1993 March:October runoff = 590,000 acre-feet
Based upon this February L 1993 forecast,_the following table reflects City of Bakersfield Kern River .water.
supply during, the March-October period of 1993:' - - .
I. CITY ENTITLEMENT SUPPLY: 102% .OF NORMAL'RUNOFF
MARCH-oCToBER Period = .135,000 acre-feet ....
Less: River Losses -= 15,000-acre-feet '
Isabella-Reservoir Losses = 10,000 acre-feet
' - = Estimated City supply available .~ - - .
- for diversion MARCH-OCTOBER = ll0,000-acre-feet' < - . ---
1000 BUENA VISTA ROAD * . BAKERSFIELD, CAL_IF~RNIA 93311 ~ _. (805) 326:3_7-15
February 22, 1993
1993 WATER SUPPLYFORECAST
Page 2
II. BASIC CONTRACT DELIVERY (March-October): _
~1. Lake Ming and Ha;t Park -- - 700 acre-feet
2. Kern River Canal & Iffigating Co. = 1,300 acre-feet
3. North Kern Water Storage District = 20,000 acre-feet
4. Cawelo Water District = 27,000 acre-feet
5. Kern-Tulare Water District = 20,000 acre-feet
-. 6. - Rag Gulch Water District = 3,000 acre-feet
TOTAL = ~ 72,000 acre-feet
A 102% of normal runoff will yield a full supply for "Basic" delivery, obligations of the City during 1993. The
City also has a commitment to' deliver 10,000 acre-feet annually to Rosedale Rio Bravo Water Storage District.
The City's obligation to Rosedale for this year was fulfilled during January 1993.
III. BASIC CONTRACT PRIOR-YEAR DEFICIENCIES:
As of January 1, 1993, prior-year deficiencies in delivery of Basic Contract water were as follows:
- ~ 1. North Kern Water Storage District = 5,619 acre-feet
2. Cawelo Water District = 23,812 acre-feet
3. Kern- Tu_lare Water District = .42, 513 acre-feet
4. Rag Gulch Water District = _6,378 acre-feet
Total Prior-Year Deficiencies = 78,322 aCre-feet
City entitlement yield as projec!ed for 1993 should be adequate to allow for delivery of portions ofprior-Year
deficiencies in basic contract ~water. The.delivery of basic contract deficiencies for 1993 will be made in
accordance to the 'Maximum Delivery SchedUle as follows:
!. North Kern Water Storage District = 3,700 acre-feet
' ' 2. . Cawelo Water District = 5,000 acre-feet
3. Kem-Tulare Water District = 3,700 acre-feet
4. Rag Gulch Water District = 550 acre-feet
TOTAL = 12,950 acre-feet
IV. OTHER DELIVERY oBLIGATIONS:
1. Water for use on lands owned by the City and/or on
lands within City boundaries = 3,000 acre-feet
2. North Kern Water Storage District - ~Borrow/Payback"
.... water, normally delivered between May and September = 10,000 acre-feet
It is forecasted that 1993 Kern River runoff will yield the City sufficient supply to deliver "OTHER
DELIVERY OBLIGATIONS" as set forth above.
February 22, 1993
1993 WATER SUPPLY ~:ORECAST
Page 3
V. MISCELLANEOUS QUANTITY WATER:
After deducting the basic contract deliveries and other obligations as.set forth-above from City Kern River
supply available for diversion March through October, a miscellaneous quantity water supply of approximately
12,000 acre-feet would be available during the March-October period. This miscellaneous water would be
offered under the following priorities:
1. On~-third (1/3) to Rosedale Rio Bravo Water Storage District
2. Two-thirds (2/3) to Basic Contractors (if all contractors participate, pro-rated by
contract amount)
3. Tenneco-West, Inc. (NIC~SD-RRID), as follows:
a).Forty percent (40%) of all water City has available for use
within City boundaries solely for irrigation.
- b). Fifty percent (50%) of first 24,000 acre-feet of-other City
miscellaneous quantity water including water recovered
· from City's groundwater banking operations.'
c). Fifty percent (50%) of any other miscellaneous quantity
Kern River water that City would otherwise use for
groundwater banking and replenishment.
VI. DELIVERY SCHEDULES:
On the basis of the normal water supply forecast for 1993, the City will deliver basic contract water in
conformance with the "Maximum Delivery Schedules" as set forth in Exhibit "B" of the Basic Contracts.
Requests for delivery of Miscellaneous Quantity water should be submitted to City by those Districts wishing
to participate as soon after March 1st as possible.
Should you have any questions regarding the above information, please do not hesitate to call our office.
Very truly yours,
PAUL DOW
Gene l~oga_rt . \ ·
Direct r Resources
Direc~t~r of Water Resourc
Attachment
FEBRUARY 1, 1993 SNOW SURVEY DATA FOR KERN RIVER BASIN
City of Bakersfield _
Water ReSOUrces
· APRIL 1ST SNOW WATER
AVERAGE DEPTH CONTENT % OF
SNOW SNOW CALIF. ELEV. WATER DATE IN DENSITY IN APRIL 1ST MEASURED
COURSE SENSOR NUMBER IN FEET CONTENT MEASURED INCHi=S (%) INCHES AVERAGE BY
Upper Tyndall Creek 516 11,450 27.7 1-26 83.0 31% 26.1 940/0 DWR
Bighorn Plateau 250 11,350 21.9 1-26 62.9 310/0 19.7 90~ DWR
Cottonwood Pass 251 1 !, 050 13.4 1 -22 44.1 31% 13:5 101% DWR
Siberian Pass 252 10,900 18.3 1-23 62.5 29% 17.9 98% DWR
Crabtree Meadow 253 10,700 18.8 1-27 59.5 ' 30% 17.9 95% DWR
Crabtree Meadow 253 10,700 19.8
Guyot Flat 254 10,650 20.0 1-24 70.7 30% 21.2 106~ DWR
Tyndall Creek 255 10,650 18.3 1-25 61.6 29°/0 17.9 98% DWR
Sandy Meadow 275 10,650 18.3 1-26 62.8 30% 18.8 103% DWR
Chagoopa Plateau 514 10,300 21.8 1-28 67.0 29% 19.6 90% DWR
Big Whitney Mea. 257 9,750 16.6 1-23 61.1 29°/0 17.6 106% DWR
Rock Creak 256 9,600 17.2 1-29 66.1 33% 21.5 125% DWR
Pascoe 569 9,130 24.9 1-27 83.5 320/0 26.7 10'Z~ USFS
Round Meadow 258 9,000 24.9 1-27 76.7 36°/0 27.6 111% USFS
Tunnel Guard 830 8,960 ' 15.6 ~ 1-30 53.3 31°/0 16.4 105% DWR
Wet Meadow 518 8,950 30.3
Ramshaw Meadow 259 8,700 11.3 1-30 48.5 29% 14.2 126~ DWR
Little Whitney Mea. 260 8,500 13.5 1-30 60.1 31% 18.7 139~ DWR
Casa Vieja Mea. 262 8,400 19.6 1-28 67.4 33% 22.0. 112~ USFS
Casa Vieja Meadows 262 8,400 20.9 1-28 67.0 31% 20.5 98% USFS
Quinn Ranger Sra. 264 8,350 19.4
Bonita Meadows 261 8,300 13.8 1-27 56.5 33°/0 18.5 134% USFS
Beach Meadows 265 7,650 8.9 1-28 40.1 32% 13.0 146% USFS
Beach Meadows 265 7,650 11.0 1-28 43.6 33% 14.3 130~ USFS
MEMORANDUM
TO.ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER ~~ ~-~1~,~~
FROM:LEE ANDERSEN, COMMUNITY SERVICES MANAGER
~..~ ~ p~R~JECT: BAKERSFIELD HIGH SCHOOL GIRL'S SOFTBALL TOURNAMENT
FOR THE PAST SEVERAL YEARS THE BAKERSFIELD HIGH 'SCHOOL DRILLER
GiRLS'--iSOFTBALL TOURNAMENT HAS BEEN HELD AT THE BAKERSFIELD SPORTS
COMPLEX. IT WAS SCHEDULED AGAIN THIS YEAR FOR MARCH 4,5,6, 1993.
BECAUSE THE LEASE .EXPIRES ON MARCH 3 BETWEEN THE CITY AND FRANK
COLLINS AND THE PLANNED TOURNAMENT IS WITHIN THE SAME WEEK SOME
CONSIDERATION WAS GIVEN THEM IN ORDER TO ALLOW THEM TO USE THE
FACILITY.
A MEETING WAS HELD ON FEBRUARY 19, 1993 WITH FRANK COLLINS, NICK
GRAHAM (ATHLETIC DIRECTOR FOR B.H.S.), MIKE ORNELAZ (COACH FOR
B.H.S.), AND PARK STAFF~ATTENDING. 'A VERBAL.AGREEMENT~WAS REACHED~
BETWEEN~ALS3-pART'iES FOR THE FOLLOWING-ITEMS TO_ FACILITATE THE
<iPLAYING OF THE TOURNAMENT~
1. FRANK COLLINS WILL ALLOW THE HIGH SCHOOL TO USE THE FACILITY
WITHOUT CHARGE. BAKERSFIELD HIGH SCHOOL WILL TRANSFER THE
ELECTRICAL INTO THEIR'NAME UPON THE EXPIRATION OF THE CITY'S
AGREEMENT ON MARCH 2, 1993.
2. THE CITY PARKS DIVISION WILL MOW THE OUTFIELDS, CLEAN THE
RESTROOMS, EMPTY TRASH CANS AND DO A GENERAL CLEAN-UP OF THE
FACILITY ON TUESDAY, MARCH 2, PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION OF THE
CITY'S AGREEMENT.
3. THE PARKS DIVISION WILL LEND THE HAND EQUIPMENT NEEDED TO
PREPARE THE SOFTBALL DIAMONDS-(CHALKERS, BASES, HOSES) TO
BAKERSFIELD HIGH SCHOOL FOR THE DURATION OF THE TOURNAMENT.
4. BAKERSFIELD HIGH SCHOOL WILL PROVIDE VOLUNTEERS TO DO THE
MAINTENANCE OF THE FIELDS AND RESTROOMS FOR THE TOURNAMENT.
IF YOU HAVE FURTHER QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT FRANK FABBRI OR
MARGUERITE SMITH AT 3117.
FILE:BHS
B A K E R S F I E'L D ~- ~
February .23, 1993
via Airborne Express
Mr. David R. Carpenter, Chairman and President
Transamerica Life Companies
1150 South Olive Street
Los Angeles, California 90015
Dear Mr. Carpenter,
Bakersfield is. the low cost'alternative to doing business in Los Angeles. Rather than leaving
California because of the costs in Los Angeles, consider the "affordable" California that
Bakersfield offers in a nearby location. State Farm Insurance will build a new 585,000 square
foot administrative canter in Bakersfield. Let me tell you why:
· Low housing costs--Bakersfield's housing is the most affordable in California,
according to the National Association of Home Builders.
· Low employee costs--our office worker salaries are 15% lower than Los
Angeles County and'the lowest in the six county Southern California
region, according to Thomas Temporaries. '
· Cooperative local government--State Farm's engineering firm has noted that
they have yet to deal with a municipality as Cooperative and approachable
. as Bakersfield. I promise you the same responsive level of customer
service.
Of course, there are many more reasons why companies like State Farm Insurance have chosen
Bakersfield. Ask any of our 24 Fortune 500 companies why they picked Bakersfield and you'H
also learn about our large pool. of qualified workers, low cost of land and construction, positive
local business climate, and prospects for the future.
They will also tell you about how easy it was to transfer their employees to Bakersfield. Their
workers praise our easy commute times, neighborhood schools, low crime rates, numerous retail
opportunities, available, and affordable homes in a variety of neighborhoods, recreational
activities, and the fact that paychecks go much further in Bakersfield. And-we are so close to
many of the features that make living in Los Angeles attractive, yet worlds apart in others.
City of BakerSfield · Economic and Community Development Department
5'15. Truxtun Avenue · Bakersfield ·~ California 93301
Mr. I~avid R. Carpenter
Febr~dary 23, 1993
Page Two
I've enclosed some information about State Farm's new Bakersfield facility. Our team can tell
you more about how we can turn your cost of doing business in Los Angeles into cost savings
of doing business in Bakersfield, the "affordable California."
John F. Wager, J!. ~
Economic Development Dkector
Alan Tandy, City-Manager
~' P6 '64~;2 59 ~
MEMORANDUM
February 22, 1993
TO ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER ~
FROk~ S.E. BRUMMER, CHIEF OF POLICE
SUBJECT GRAFFITI ABATEMENT
With growing public concern regarding graffiti throughout
Bakersfield, the police department has endeavored to address the
problem. On January 14, 1993, in conjunction with a,series of
community and inter-agency meetings, the department intensified
enforcement efforts. We initiated increased surveillance and
targeted areas plagued by graffiti. Our reserve officers have been
instrumental in providing necessary manpower for this project, and
I issued a statement encouraging all field personnel to direct
available time and effort towards apprehending those responsible
for these malicious acts. As of February 20, 1993, twenty-eight
arrests have been made for violations relating to graffiti. In
slightly over one month, the following activity has been reported
by our officers:
Date Location Charges
1-22-93' Maurice & Hughes 5 graffiti suspects detained,
field interviewed, vehicle
impounded, spray paint seized,
3 suspects arrested for curfew
violations
1-23-93 3500 Akers, 2 suspects arrested for 4 counts
1400 White Lane of malicious mischief
(graffiti)
1-25-93 Ming & Real 7 graffiti suspects field
interviewed, no arrests
1-29-93 3500 Akers 2 suspects arrested - graffiti
Sandrini School 1 suspect arrested - graffiti
.1-31-93 500'blk Niles Street 1 suspect arrested - graffiti
1-31-93 1233 E. California 3 suspects arrested - graffiti
2-7-93 ~Maurice & Hughes 1 suspect arrested - graffiti
2-10-93 1619 Columbus (Big 5) 1 suspect arrested - graffiti
2-12-93 4012 White Lane 4~suspects arrested - graffiti
2-14-93 800 Adelaide 1 suspect 'arrested - graffiti
22 FEB 95 4.__: 18
2-16-93 4100 Planz Road 1 suspect arrested - graffiti
2-20-93 2600 New Market Wy 7 suspects arrested - graffiti
1 suspect arrested -
contributing to the delinquency
of a minor
The arrests were initiated by.both surveillance officers and
patrol officers. On three occasions, citizens reported the
criminal acts.
In addition to enforcement activity, representatives of the
police department have had three meetings wSth concerned citizen
groups. We have also met with the Chief County Probation Officer,
Bill Williamson, in an effort to ensure that those convicted of
malicious acts of graffiti will be ordered to remove graffiti as
part of their sentence. To date, three of those we arrested have
been ordered to do clean-up. We will continue to monitor the
disposition of those suspects arrested by our officers for graffiti
related offenses.
On January 15, 1993, I met with city and county elected
officials, probation department representatives, and other
concerned individuals to discuss a county-wide strategy for
graffiti abatement. We intend to develop program guidelines that
are consistent throughout the county, particularly in metropolitan
Bakersfield.
Lieutenant Allen Brown is currently researching options for a
comprehensive graffiti ordinance that includes measures for
prevention, enforcement and penalties related to graffiti.. In the
very near future, we will submit a recommendation for your review.
It is-extremely doubtfuI that law enforcement alone can
mitigate the graffiti problem in Bakersfield. However, law
enforcement working with elected officials, allied agencies,
schools, parents and citizen groups can impact this problem if, and
when, a program is in place that directs efforts to prevention,
education, enforcement and abatement issues.
SEB:dpm
cc: Bill Williamson, Kern County Probation Department
Assistant Chief J.M. Lewis, Investigations
Captain E.W. Matlock, Operations
Captain J.M. Sorrell, Support Services
~Captain J.D. Jackson, Investigations
Lt. Allen Brown, Headquarters
Jake Wager, Economic Development Director
BAKERSFIELD
February 23, 1993
Ms. Metee Brown
Kid Power
807 South Brown Street
Bakersfield, CA 93307
Dear MS. Brown,
It Was a pleasure meeting you on Tuesday, February 16, 1993. I enjoyed your vision for how
Kid Power can help young people contribute to their community while engaged in experiences
that are personally enriching. As we discussed, there are a number of issues faced by public
agencies that make it impractical for the City of Bakersfield to become directly involved. Those
issues however, should not distract others Who you might approach for the merits of Kid Power.
You are to be commended for your initiative and we wish you the very best.
· John F. Wager, Jr, \. ~.- ' ~,
Economic Development Director
cc: !-Alan Tandy, City Manager
kidpower.ltr
City of Bakersfield · Economic and Community Development Department
515 Truxtun Avenue · Bakersfield · California 93301
{Ot-~ '~'3f~ ")-7t2~ a. [~-, 10(-I~'~ ~0 1-~40
BAKERSFIELD
PUBLIC WO~S DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
FROM: Z B RKS D
DATE: .FEBRUARY 24, 1993
SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL REFER~L RECORD #11493
~CK OF STREET LIGHT AT CORNER OF PANA~ ~NE AND
RELIANCE DRIVE. (Brunni),
Included in improvements under construction for Tract
4902 is the construction of Harris Road and Reliance Drive.
Included with these streets are street lights, including one at
Reliance Drive at Panama Lane. Construction is scheduled for
completion in mid-May of this year.
CIT]f ~ANAGER~
~5FE89~ 9:54
D9
ITEM: RECORD~ 1'1493
Lack of Street light at corner of Panama Lane and
Reliance Drive. (Brunni)
-ACTION 'TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
BRUNNI REQUESTED STAFF RESEARCH THE NEED TO A
STREET LIGHT AT THE CORNER OF RELIANCE DRIVE AND
PANAMA LANE, THEN-REPORT BACK TO COUNCIL.
BACKUP MATERIAL ATTACHED: NO
DATE FORWARDED BY CITY CLERK: 02/18/93
RESPOND BY: 03/08/93 (CM)
NOTE': STATUS CHANGES ABE TO BE ENTERED FOR EACH REFERRAL
AT LEAST ONCE A 5tONTH EVEN IF NO ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN!
FEB 2 2 1993
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
ALAN TANDY FEBRUARY 24, 1993
CITY MANAGER
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL R~~
FROM: GREGORY J' KLIMKO, FINANCE DIRECTO
SUBJECT: SALES TAX
Attached is a schedule (2 pages) of sales tax for the last 13
quarters by business category. The most recent information
available is for the third quarter ended September 1992.
Also attached is a calendar which reflects the time period over
which the sales tax were generated in July, August, and September
1992 (third quarter) versus the time period over which these taxes
were paid to the City (September through December).
Ihformation finalizing~the City's Sales Tax Revenue-for-0ctobe~,
Novemb.er~an~-December 1992 '(fOUrth quarter) Will be aVailable abOUt
,mid~Ma~hli993...~
krc
MGJK.13
cc: Alan Tandy
cITY ~ANAGE~ttachment
24 FEB 95 ~ ~7
~RD QT 89 4TH Q~' 89 IS{ QT 90 2ND QT 90 3R0 QT 90 4TH QT 90 I~T QT 91 2ND QT 91 3RD 'QT 91 4TH QT 91 lET QT 9Z
ID I~DUSYR¥ DE$CRIP{IO~ RECEIPTS ERCHIP?S RECEIPT9 EBCHIPTS- H~CHIP?S EBCEIP{S RECEIPTS EECEIP{S EECRIP?S EHCEIP?S EECRIP?S EECEIP{S ~_ HJ~RI£TS. ~ .
60 NBN CAR DEALER8 496,393 645,131 527,792
? DEPARTMENT HTORR8 567,608 856,146 534,084 624,562 627,727 913,043 541,512 652,338 612,193 899,165
..... 6~SRR~[CR.~AUU~ _Z6~Z~ ..... 23~,U? ..... 267,414 271,866 329,503 38~3?8 338,111 229,929 45?,205 355,300 312,083 372 096 384,860
34 GROCER{ 9?0888 M/GBNHR&L LIQUOR LIC 21 265,606 216 26~ 221,?73
9 $ERERAL STORES 115,321 113,668 84,634 9?,652 132,515 133,364 159,658 174,102 24?,589 285,531 204,22? 237,{41 267,163
82 CONTRACTORS I WFOS t MBOLBSALRR9 OF BUILDING ~A~BR 183,261 164,466 15~,51~ 139,419 176,334 152,834 156,012 367,681 21~,319 196,154 1~4,02~ 161,693 193,141
50 BUILDING M{TERI&L 196,693 189,011 204,585 221,205 204,513 193,119 18?,040 218,331 204,{20 158,506 158,~85 199,583 178,561
..... 19_~.~H~IIL~I_~{OR~ ..................... U!,!~J 165,281 {0~ 280 125,946 140,435 18~,241 129,153 153,50~
36 {{{I{GlURIM~I~O PL{C{ M/~{IER{L O~-SAL{ LIC 141,404 149,092 147,594 166,600. 148,501 169,636 156,121 16Z,130 181,641 168,2V4 151,211 181,161 153,415
.... {L.APPLI{{C{ ITOR{S 106,111 13?,915 .).3~,{~L_._}!~618 117,631 160,94Z 104~956 IILIOZ 111,610 11V~968 114,555 _.J{},9~L ..... ~30 .~3 ....
98 BEAVY INDUSTRIAL EQUIPHEMT i ~lSC ~ACBINERY 162,256 198,036 173,066 181,552 131,411 140,{19 153,889 189,950. 139,640 129,229 121,458 133,304 126,840
31 GROCERY'S~RE8 M/BEER I EINE LIC 20 68,500 65,849 58,?92 63,149 65,933 61,864 61,502 66,655 8?,154 76,544 {4,034 94,543 110,406
...... il..~8OYIV{ 9~PLY STORES ~_l~f~ 93,697 89,?30 10?~838 113,363 102,52l 88~11 ~ 111,028 105,618 96,999. 9?~84
~ 30 BOKS VUR~ISBI~G STORES 88,744 115,858 103,078 10~,636 102,233 122,03Z 102,745 103,750 99,948 110,736 94,751 91,935 92,992
35 EATIMO/OEIMKi~o PLACE {IB18~ I {IN{ LIC 40 OR 41 18,~'62 69,981 73,'603 80,559 85,V{0 84+0V9 89,524 88,284 90,259 89,265 85,116 99,973 91,392
: 56~155 11,561 69,982 18,309 90,111 {9,508 15,410 83,621 92,813 82,684 16,691
~ 18 OFFIC~,STORE,t SCHOOL FURMITU~ i ~OIP 13,122 66,855
...... 9Z..D~~L~IS~ pBODUCT~_ !4,840 47,652 46,452 68,660 65,892 ~662 70,176 6L217 6~1 .~L4~_5_~ .....
VI AUTOHOT[VB BBPAI8 55,105 58,104 5~,30~ ]8,609 "64,~]4 63,43~--~'~,441 ~-6~,'~1 ~2,434 60,142 = 60,499 6?,762 64,?85
HOHBM'S APPAREL 61,996 ?8,6?9 54,002 64,926 63,183 78,?26 53~882 68,635 67,781 82,925 59,548 ?3,604 60,?63
I~.~TA~IO,~_I. B00[.ST0~8~ _ 56~847 6~,18.9 ......62,380 .... ~,6~1 .......63,661 83,982 64,386 65,924 ~1,015 85 416 .61,858 ......... 63,V11. 57,116..
4SBOE 8~0~88 ........................................ ~I:,~F ........ 58,692 41,056 '52+5V0 5~,2~ ........6~,V03 .... 41,69~ 52,258 ....... 50,'~ ..... ~,68F':- 42,5VV 50,913 53,{56
V2 REPAIR t HAND-TRADE SHOPS 49,366 53,589 59,051 62,632 59,23~ 5V,6;8 54,~42 53,325 69,834 5V,261 52,284 60,V44 51,585
.... 1ZSPO~ti~.0OODS.i_Bi~{~S.~TO{~. ................. 53,~81 55,2{5 _~.._ 44,095 ..... 52,564 62,027 60,971 45,22~ ..
86 ELECTRONIC i ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT '58,8~ ...... ~4,~F'- 116,06V -'~,0V~0,~1~ ....... ~,'~F ...... 5~,808 76,435 61,945 6V,553 64,838 59,893 51,248
64 USED CA~'DEALBBS 44~.961 34,?79 35,632 35,517 39,141 31,421 '33,548 40,2?3 41,676 34,884 41,759' 44,810 43,520
40 F{SH i ~MSTBUCTIOM EQUIPMENT 8TOBB8 ' 31,103 44,601 -40,98t
90 ~ABW,TOBACCO,&L~BOLIC BEV,FOOD & FOOD P~CSSMG EQU 37,?86 35,871 33,?73 39,196. 39,~18 21,083 33,053 37,796 40,843 35,955
.._ 89.B~B38..SEBV~J~MCE~MS ............................... 53,808 ....... 31,85.~ ........ 4?,454 ......48,65Q 56,193.L.._.'._5~,0T~ .....55,0~ ._ 41,410 39,{0~ .... !2,57} ....... 3~,568 ~Z {99 39,34~.
94 AUTO,T~A[LB~3,PA~TS, EQUIP i SUPPLIES (MOT PR{BOLS 33,665 32,644 35,026 35,303 .... 40,619 38,238 39,313 ''~5,'89~ ..... 34,861 34,463 40,969 3?,?36 3?,888.
53 PAINT,GLAS3 & MALLPAPBB STOB~S 39,342 36,451 '35,157 38,248 41,194 36,086 31,366 38,?05 40,397 31,338 30,996 39,234 '35,941.
'SI pLUBBIgG_i~L~CT~IC&L_3~YLi-.STOB88 ...................... 55,819__: 50,188 ........ 46,301 .53,~05 ...... ~8,598... 5~,~4~ . 46,753 52,941 4?,330 4'2,?~ .... 28,910 .. 37,633.. 32,871
85 PUBLIC UTILITY,TRANSPORTAtION, & ALLIED SERVICES 44,{80 58,480 46,585 29,373 31,912 ' 24,516 26,066 ' 30,?~2 ..... ~1,36~ ..... 30,544 .35,283 30,393 31,?76
11 JS{ELRY STO~SS 3{,350 '62,{89 37,228 50,390 38,{06 80,111 35,5{2 43,469 32,659 60,086 30,138 35,966 29,060
24,6~8 .... 28,12) ..... 29,~)... 24 203. ~ 24,911. 29,08~. 26,333
22 PACKAGE LIQU08 fl{ORBS 22,782' 22,923 20,947 24,991 .... ~,77~ ...... 27,087 24,141 24,253 28,752 26,{58 22,583 24,079 25,726
3RD Q? 89 4TH Q? 89 1ST QT 90 2MU Q? 90 3RD QT 90 4TM'QT'~O-'-~'~'~¥~-i'"- 2MO"~T 91 3RO QT 91 4TR QT'Si iST'QT'92''2MD QT
84 HEALTH SERVICES 14,057 12,880 12,960 14,354 12,546 12,951 14,665 14,728 15,055 15,401 15,042 18,462 2J,716
93 ~0~I0~ ~ICYU~, ~UIP~8~Y I S~P~LI~$ 16,{81 {,10~ 6,840 {,49~ {,466 {,471 {,849 Z4,4~9 ~0,392 21,293 21,4~1
83 8Y08~ t O~FIC~ 8~IP~8~Y ~0,156 ~4,698 23,902 . 28,951 ~3,129 15,065 19,856 18,951 Z{,808 25,~9 2~,~54 ZI,91{ 21,982
13 FLORIST 8BOP8 ~ 10,961 20,211 23.,166 Z1,216 19,236 29,766 24,683 Z5,1~4 2~,696 29,949 24,363 23,328 ZO,OI3
66 BOAT I MOTORCYCLE ~ SUPPLY SOYRES ZI,J79 I~,63~ Z3,665 31,314 Z~,166 20,619 Z5,852 36,919 25,574 14,366 . 19,J65 26,336 11,829
..... 5 VA~I~.L~OR~.. !~.,.4~ ....... ~,~{.~ .......... 1_~,{~ ......... J~.,{J: .... {~{~: .......~ 16~ }J,~]~ ..... !~,J~O __J~,~}~ .... 3J ~ ...... {~lj{ ......... ~ !5: .... 11 ~48 .
91YglYIL~ ~O~OCY~ MIYB ~OUS~BOLO ~00~8 16,{1~ 18,{~0 9~155 11,914 16,486 19,68J 12,{~3 1~,204 13,149 ~1,455 1~,890 11,319 16,181
0 ACCOUMTS REC~IViBL~ pAYM~MYS ~5,64Z 50,668 35,536 41,094 30,963 56,574 ~5,666 35,216 23,980. 145,831 50,991 22,534 16,169
' 75 BOTEL M/OM-~ALE GENERAL LICE~S~ 18,450 18,785 16,102 15,460 24,611 21,021 28,762 15,5~0 15~87 19,811 15,252 25,068 15,193
21 SPECIALTY POOD 8TO~E8 10,054 11,042 10,899 10,669 8,912 13,264 8,639 12,265 9,236 13,8~2 11,183 10,200 11,273
32 SECOND-BAND 8TO'ES 5~863 6,119 5,589 6t467 ~,882 9,001 9,250 9,286 11,106 10,292 9,541 9,246 10,0~2
62 tUYO T~AIL~R i SUPPLY 8~R~ 30,~4~--~,096 22,158 (41,115) 2,029 3,149 (30,637) 3,099 1,160 1,402 2,159
2 HEM'S APPAREL 18,636 27,332 16,664 18,0?8 16,315 28,528 13,900 20,502' 5,892 l?,21l 9,563 10,939' 9,753
51HARDMARRS 6~851 9 324 8,643 10 669 9,404 11,593 9?74 '11,086 10,664 11,459 12,324 8,743 8,383
28 MOM-STORe RETAILERS (FULL TIHB) ~,~ ....... ~,22t .... ~,'365TM .... ~,~ ..... ~,6~ .... 8;4~- ~'{'~] ....... i~,~ ........... 6,~J~ .......~'~2~9- ........ 7,'4~ ........8;39J .... 8,330
73 PORTRAIT STUDIO , 6,827 7,449 5,804 ~,082 6,405 9,371 5,955- 7,435 ~,068 9,513 6,211 8,837 8,263
' 29 ~&~T.~H~.~I~BES ......................................... ~ 30~ 16,8~5 9 422 14 ~.~9 .... 8,250 !0 32~ .... ~,.~3 6 406 - 6,463 . 9 0~ ....... ~ 275 _ 5 26~ . 8,213.
16 ~LUB~ t PL{C~8 OF A~US~8~T ~/O~-SAL~ ~ LIC l~,lS1 15,304 10,484 3,916 11,230 14,861 12,{14 14,138 11,998~ 14,ZOO 11,955. {,920
ll~Ol~'l ~OVSLT{ 8~8~ 14,082 16 480 ? 272 16 057 5,6?5 ' 12,38~ 6,0~9 6,958 11,~35 8,564 ~,016 8,408 6,605
...... ~-CANBRASYORES 5,562 '8,'~8~ ............. 5,~ .......... ~:~6~ ..... ~6]--- ~;~ ..... 6,9~ ....... ~;4~ ....... ~,~8J ...... 8,~0i ...... 5,68~ .......... ~,09~ ...... 6,JJ'~-'"
A~L OYB~R YOYiL 6,983 9,848 6,568 8,875 10,426 1~,222 13,4~0 8,158 14,909 21,755 18,1~{ 15,955 13,Z51
..'~O~'~.J~O~ PJO~i~[OJ. .................................... 6~ ~{ .... 89~j{~8 8~,168 ~OJ,l~ .... {{~}~ 83{ 3~ . {ll,{{J' 9~ JR9 _ 934,0~6 ..... ~8,~{~ .... 66},~ ~,{~
COST OF ADHZM:STRA~IOM (50,705) (54,263) (~8,401) (50,128) (53,024) (58,117) (49,99?) (51,277) (54,071) (55,404) (45,671). (50,421) (48,~33)
._ ._ JU~ ....................................... * ........ ~ ..... Lug.,~0o ................................................... ~,~v.,]~O ........ * ................... L ........
JULY 1,609,200 1,~56,800 1,762,900 1,866,400
AUGUST .................... 1~609,200 1,~56,800 1,7.62,900 . 1~866,400
~{p~,h~- ....... ' .................... .~,~i~,60~ .................. ~,~,~,~00 "' ~,99v,900 ~,488,~00
QUARTERLY CLEAH UP OCTOBER ?68,?92 557,271 1,266,625 . (101,282)
..... O~Toeu :,~,~0 .................................................. :,~8~,s~ ................................... ],s:~,5oo ..... .
NOVBHBER 1,838,800 1,888,800 1,81Z,500
DBCEHBER 2,451,700 ~ 2,518,300' 2,416,600
..... QUt~LI.U~BAH~_.;AMUARY ...................... 4~,~.5_~ ...................................... 73.3,J63 ............................................... 9.~ ~ ............................... .......
3tHUiSY 1,560,500 1,588,200 1,612,700
.~BRUiBY' 1,560,500 1,588,200 1,612,?00
~t~ ~, ~.~oJ LO: .~ .................. L ..... : ....... ~:~:~! ............................
QUiRT~RLY CLBAM UP 'APRIL 652,503 491,881 359,830
FY ~YiB ' ~-. :." ':'j.' ' FY 1989-90 24,110,989 FY 1990-91' 25,606,593 Fy 1991-92 26,466,506
IZ~Hi '' · .............................................
92~
SUMMARY PAYMENT AND ALLOCATION TIMINGi CALENDAR
4th Qtr . . .........
Payment Advance Advance ::'I:St:A~ ~:~~. '~::A~.'. 1st Adv' A~ance Adva~e ?';~i{t?A~':~?'::::~Ad~Ce.' Advance.' 1st Adv
4th Qtr 4th Qtr ).. l~.Qtr '.:~;i' - ............
Return Period ~' July .August September
forAIIocation . October November December Janua~ Februa~ March ~ril May June~
Info~ation on 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr
Mag TaPe~iskette Yearly Fiscal Yr
Dec ~h Jan 9th Feb 9th ::'M~'~b~:::::· :::::AP~::~h':May 9th Jun ~h Jul 9th Aug 9th ::::':: ~p~h Oct 9th Nov ~h
· Tho allocation period represents the dates that the Board accepts the returns for the return period.
This period is the tenth working day of o~ moth to the ninth wo~ing day of the ne~ moth, ..
excluding weekends and holidays.
City of Bakersfield
sales Tax Revenue Analysis (Net)
1988/89 - 1991/92
Collected Received Detail
by by City Available
Businesses Month Percent to City' 1988-89 1989-90 .1990-91 1991-92 1992-93
July September 30% .~ $. 1,418,200 $ 1,609,200 $ 1,756,800 $ 1,762,900 * $ 1,866,400
· AuguSt October 30% 1,418,200 1,609,200 1,756,800 · 1,762,900 * 1,866,400
September November 40°/0 2,060,800 2,145,600 2,342,500 1,997,900 * 2,488,500
Quarterly December Bal January 931,002 768,792 557,27! '1,266,6~_5 * (101,281)
5,828,202 6,132,792 6,413,371 6,790,325 6,120,019
October December 300/0 1,587,600 1,838,800' 1,888,800 1,812,500 * 1 ,~)84,000
November January 30('/0 1,587,600 1,838,800 1,888,800 ~ 1,812,500 * 1,912,700
December February 40% .2,116,900 2,451,700 2,518,300 2,416,600 * 2,550,200
Quarterly March Bal April 1,053,710 433,952 · 733,463 916,221 *
6,345,810 6,563,252 7,029,363 6,957,821
January March 30% 1,439,000 1,560,500 1,588,200 1,612,700 *
February April 30('/0 1,439,000 1,560,500 1,588,200 1,612,700'
March May 40% 1,918,600 2,080,700 2,117,500 2,150,300 *
Quarterly' June Bal July .601,454 652,503 491,881 359,830 *
~ 5,398,054 5,854,203 5.785,781 5,735,530
April June 30% 1,653,200 i,589,300 1,748,300 1.903;300 *
May July 30°/0 1.653.200 1.589.300 1.745.300 1.872.200 *
June August 40% 2,204,300 2,119.200 2,327,100 * 2.496,300
Quarterly September Bal Octobei' !77,842 765,278 880,230 * 60,211
5,688,542 '6,063,078. 6,700,930 '6,332,011
Fiscal YearGenerated $ 23,260,608 $ 24,613,325 $ 25,929,445 $ 25,815.,687' $
Fiscal YearRealized $ 23,622,521 $ 24,110,989 $' 25,606,593 $ 26,466,506 *
Note: Sales Tax are distributed to the City I~y estimating the quarterly t.ax based on the prior year comparative quarter and making monthly advance~
of 30%, 30%, and 40% and a final ".clean up" (balance) payment.
.. IFile Name: . STAX92 I
' ' I Prepared by: GK
I
~ ~ IDate Prepared: 02/23193 ·
B A K E R $ F I £ L D
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
54 [EB95 ~ 01 MEMORANDUM
TO: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER ~
FROM: ED W. SCHULZ, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR .
DATE: FEBRUARY 24, 1993
SUBJECT: COFFEE ROAD GRADE SEPARATION AT AT&SF RAILROAD
Some time ago I discussed with you the subject project and the
alignment alternatives involved.
As I indicated in our conversation, every effort will be made to
maintain the present Coffee Road alignment in the area of the
railroad.
The consultant and staff have investigated this matter at length
and it appears that realigning Coffee Road westerly from its
present crossing of the railroad is the only viable alternative.
The attached drawing shows this alternative alignment.
We have developed cost estimates for the alternatives and the cost
differences are substantial. The preliminary estimate for
constructing an overpass on the present Coffee Road alignment is
$14 million. The estimate for the realigned alternative is $8.3
million. The huge difference can be traced almost entirely to the
extensive earth retaining walls which would be needed for the
present alignment option and also rerouting of traffic which would
be necessary during the construction of this option.
There are some other advantages to the offset alignment and they
are as follows:
® Relatively unobstructed right-of-way is available, which
offers a much more efficient construction work plan 'for the
contractor.
· During construction, vehicular traffic can use the present
grade crossing. No detours are needed, and it is not
necessary to modify the existing gate installation to
accommodate detour traffic.
Page 1 of 2
February 24, 1993
Alan Tandy, City Manager
Subject: Coffee Road Grade Separation at AT&SF Railroad
Averts the construction delays and heavy expense of relocating
the several petroleum pipelines in Coffee Road.
· Extensive overhead power lines paralleling Coffee Road need
not be relocated.
· The present Coffee Road pavement can remain as access to the
refinery and PG&E entrances without the need for extensive
frontage road construction within the refinery (the railroad
grade, crossing, of course, will be closed and barricaded to
traffic).
I am allowing the preliminary study and design of the project to
proceed on the basis of an offset alignment.
Should you have any questions or need additional information
· regarding this matter, please let me know.
D9
cc: Councilmember Conni Brunni
Attach.
Page 2 of 2
~:~'. , - ~':~..~ ~.-.: .~g'~i~.l~. ~ ..~ " ~ ~ , ' ' ~-, ..... 1, // ~ ' ~ ~
~' - ' , ~;' ~-~' ';'&' ';'~'~ ~":' · - ~'- ~ : ~ ~ ~ ' 'i :' ~- ~'~ /-~ ....
· ~ J ~,, ,~....,. · . ."~.~ .. . .~ ,. . ~.~ -..... , ~ ~ : ~ - ~ ,
I ' ~'.~,..tt 'i:J~ ' ' I- '~:'~' ' · j: ' '~J ~ ~' -'., , "' ' '__ ,' ~ - - · - · ' .
~ ,o'~t~ 'J.J~ '~ '~" :..~-, ~' ,~ ~, ':'- ''~ : .t~ '~ J ~-- ' ~I~ · · . .. ·
~ ~ · ~ ,- ,:.-- ~,'~, . .. ~ .--. .~ - .
~" , .-I -' ~ ~ · ~ - '4~ ......... *~ ~ ~----~
' ~ ~"""' '"~" "'~;!~'' ' "~'~""':"'~'":'"'~"" ~g4~f~'~['?~-~ ~¢~¢. ~ ~ ~- L ~ -t~~ L'-'
~. ~.. ~, ~.. ~-k..;~?. :, ~ ~ ~'' .,.~ ,. ' -~,..'~,.-~," ,' 'i~ ::,--:,~,: :~ ~"
1~ . ~j .... ,~ .,~,~ ~., ~. , ~, ~ . ,,.~ . ~ - ~. = . -
' .~ i . '~', ~:' ,.1 2 -.. ': · 'T~ ~ U1. ~ .....
· ~=~~ .~ . . . ...., _
~ J.'~ ,,J- . . ': ...' ~ . -- . ~ ~ ; -~ - - ~. · ~_~ - ~~ ·
~' .... ~ ' ",' ' '' ~ ~,~_? . I N)./ ~ ' ]~' T~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J~ '~ · ' ~ ~
- , ~ ' .' '- : · .' ~.-z, ~ ~. ~,~ ~ ~=" ~ ' ~ -
I- ~ -, ' -.- ' .... '~' -'~' ' -'L4 ~- · ~ ~ ~ =~"~"'~=,, J ~~ ......
- .~ = : , " ~ ; - ----'' ~ ~.:~ ~ ' .-~ '-T / . ~ ~' / :, ~
m ~ .
;
/'/ / ..... ..... _ .... ,,- "~:L ~"~'
~ ~ ,,.,~ ....
~ PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION SHEET
~ EXHIBIT "B" SHEET No.
};~ 1~ 11d'~:' CITY OF B~ERSFIELD
o ~{ ~oo 50o ~l COFFEE RO~ OVERHE~
' , ~/~ ~T. & S.F.P.U.C. No. 2-sg1.7A
5CAL~ F~[T '~; PL~ & PROFILE
EEB-24-93 WED t4:27' P, O1
-- Golden Empire Traneli Diatrict-- . ·
Rober~ P~ice, ~ayor
City o~ Bakersfield
i501 TruxCun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Dear Hayo~ Price:
I ~ould like co update you and ~he o~her ci~y councllmembers on che
progress of cG~[~- Empire T~anS-i~-D~s~ic~,s--Souch~es~--Transfer -Site-~ ~-~
project. ~ile you ~y' hoc be able Co see ic~ steady advances are
bein8 made coward completion of the neu si:e and ye ara very pleased
vith ~he proEress.
Leonard Sch~oede~ and' tso~iaces~ Inc. vas selected in January co
flesi/n and oversee the p~ojecc.. ~e are cur[enCly vorkint
~o develop a desitn ~hich viii allo~ [he maximum .number of buses
possible to meec simultaneously aC the si~e. In addition to
developins a desisn ~h/ch aceo~odaces the buses, ~e .a~e also
investigactn~ a 'variety of customer amenities vhich will' make our
customers' trips more comiorcable, Ve plan co include, rescrooms,
. drinking fountains,, covering~ and seacint tn the design, ~e are
also considering the p.ossibilicy oi all°ring a food vendor co locate
in a pe~anenC structure on the
~he~ end-~of-February~ -~ ....
Iny-che meancSme~ GET~ ~ha~ demel-is~e~ the building- 'vhich ~as located
on the prepercy, in preparation for construction vhlch should begin
in Hatch.
If you have any ~uescions, please feel f~ee Co call me aC 32~987~.
Sincerely,
SCe ~g
SR/eb
MEMORANDUM
February 5, 1993
TO: Mr. Alan Tandy
City Manager
FR: Jake Wager ' !~~/..~'--~
Economic Development Director ~
RE: MOU Between the City Of Bakersfield and the Kern Council of Governments for the
Baker Street Improvement Plan
On January 21, 1993, the Kern Council of Governments (KemCOG) approved the referenced
MOU which provides funds earmarked for an improvement plan for the Baker Street retail area.
The not-to-exceed amount is $10,000 which will allow ED/CD staff to be reimbursed for costs
associated with this study.
Because this MOU is below the $20,000 threshold established under Municipal Code 3.20.105,
no Council action is necessary for the MOU. However, Council will be required to appropriate
$10,000 of KernCOG revenue into the 1992-93 Community Development operating budget to
fund the Baker Street Improvement Plan. We anticipate that we will go before the City Council
on March 3, 1993, for appropriation of the funds.
As you are aware, a team of urban planning students from California State Polytechnic University
at Pomona are providing technical assistance in the preparation of this report. A portion of the
funds from KernCOG will be used to reimburse the students for direct out-of-pocket costs
connected with the development of the improvement plan.
~a~ta~l~inal report for the Baker Street commercial area is anticipated to be completed prior to June
30, 1993. There will be no City funds expended in the preparation of this report.
Feel free to contact me if you have any questions concerning this update.
· xc: Mayor
City Attorney
Finance Director
FILE-NBAKE I UPD.V02'q~.ANNIN G SECTION
CHANGES TN GAS P~TES
Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas) filed Application
No. 93-02-007 on Februar~ l, 1993~ asking the California
Public Utilities"commission's (CPUC) approval to increase
rates for some customers and decrease rates for others.
SoCalGas 'alSo asked for approval to make' the new rates
effective on or about September 1, 1993.
WHAT WE ARE REQUESTING
SoCalGas' proposal will not change the total amount of
revenue the company collects from customers; However, it
will affect the rates that different classes of customers,
such as residential or industrial, pay for gas.
Specifically,~ SoCalGas has asked to increase rates for
residential and some business customers and to lower rates
for most'large.industrial customers. (See table below).
SoCalGas is also proposing to create new subclasses within
its nonCore customer class (which includes larger commercial
andlindustrial gas users).
WHY WE ARE ASKING FOR H CHANGE
SoCalGas' request would implement a new CPUC'policy to have
rates/for each customer class based on what it will cost
SoCalGas to serve them. This policy was established in'a
recent CPUC decision (D. 92-12~058).
CITY '/~ANAGF~t~ ~
HOW THE R~TE CHANGE WILL BE APPORTIONED
Based on the rates in effect January 1, 1993, SoCalGas
proposes .gas rate changes as follows:
Proposed Allocation of Gas Revenue Changes
TranspOrtation Revenue Percent Change
Customer ~ Increase/(Decrease) From January 1,
Category $ in Millions 1993 Rates
* Core:
Residential 96.1 5.4
Non-residential 36.3 5.4
Noncore:
**Industrial/
Commercial
0-12 MDTH/Y (0.2) (13.0)
12-50 MDTH/Y (4.5) (23.1)
50-200 MDTH/Y (16.7) (34.3)
Over 200 MDTH/Y (36.6) (45.1)
Total (average) (58.0) (38.4)
Cogeneration (22.5) ( 36.2 )
Utility Electric
Generation (66.4) (36.2)
Wholesale:
Long Beach (2.6) (12.6)
San Diego
Gas & Electric ~ (6.0) (6.9)
* The percentage changes for core bundled .services .are
5.4%. The percentage changes for core transportation
service only are 7.7%.
** The Industrial/Commercial market is propo~sed to be
segmented by customer size in thousand decatherms per
year (MDTH/Y)C
If .this rate .change -is approved, a residential customer's
monthly winter bill for 71 therms of gas would increase by
about $2.43 from $43.88 to .$46.31. The impact on each
customer and each customer class could vary depending on
individual usage' and the CommisSion's final decision.
WHAT YOU C~N DO
Before acting on our Application, the Commission will
provide an opportunity for formal hearings to analyze the
rate changes proposed. At these hearings, the Commission
will accept testimony from SoCalGas, the Commission's
Division of Ratepayer Advocates and other interested
parties.
Parties at these hearings may offer proposals that differ
from those made by SoCalGas. After considering all
proposals, the Commission will issue a decision.
The Commission welcomes your comments. You may write to the
Commission at the address belOw. State that you are writing
about Application.No. 93-02-007. You may view a copy of the
Application at the address below:
Public Advisors office
California Public Utilities Commission
107 South Broadway, Room 5109
Los Angeles, CA 90012'
If you wish to participate in the hearings:and need advice,
you may also write to the Commission's Public Advisor at the
address above.
You may also view a copy of the Application at our ·
headquarters at the address listed below or obtain a copy of
the ApPlication and related exhibits by writing to:
Regulatory Affairs (M.L. 27 Hi)
Southern California Gas Company
555 W. Fifth Street
Los Angeles, CA 90013-1011