Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/28/93 BAKERSFIELD MEMORANDUM May 28, 1993 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNC FROM: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT' GENERAL INFORMATION 1. We will be proceeding with listing the Department Head opening in the Water and Sanitation Department, shortly. 2. Henry Ross, the new Assistant City Manager, will be starting~ here on June 14th. 3. We need to be thinking about what we will do with the budget at the end of the formalized presentations. We are working, diligently, on sending out responses to the many questions and inquiries you make, but that is fairly time-consuming and we are running a week, or so, behind your meeting schedule in getting those back to you. My best assumption is that those responses will answer a large percentage, but not all, of your questions and concerns. One way to handle the issue would be for Councilmembers to list the specific topics they wish to have Council consider at the first meeting after the presentations are done. Once a list is established, you could start discussions and motions. There are probably other.ways of handling the situation, as well. You may want to give it some thought over the next couple of weeks. 4. You will find enclosed another partial set of responses to budget questions. One of the more significant documents within this packet is the letter of serious concern to you authored by the Finance Director, Information Systems Manager and me. The bottom line is that, if the computer is not budgeted this year, our best professional opinion is that the system may go down in the future, stopping us from processing payroll, vendor checks, and doing accounting and related functions. We are in the continual process of revising revenue estimates as new monthly receipts come in. We will be bringing before you a set of amendments to the proposed budget incorporating more updated revenue estimates. We will probably do that in a couple of phases, as the budget process moves toward completion. So far, the only trends are incrementally good news, but nothing with big money attached. We continue to work with Warner Cable without final information, as of this writing. They indicate they will give us an answer next week. Efforts to get Valley Wireless to pay 5% have failed. They will not do so voluntarily unless we ban restrictive covenants that prohibit their receiving dishes. Over 40 subdivisions currently ban them by CC&R's. An effort by us to ban the HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL May 28, 1993 Page -2- restriction would be unprecedented - we don't ban other CC&R's - it would be resisted by developers and the cable t.v. companies. We have no other solid legal base under which to impose a fee on wireless - the utility user tax does not cut it, unless imposed on a variety of others. I am cautiously optimistic that Warner may come through anyway - we'll see soon. 5. There is a memo enclosed on the South Beltway EIR. There is, obviously, some trouble with that, in terms of County and public support. 6. Enclosed is a memo from Public Works on the status of the street improvements and signal near the Walter F. Stiern Junior High School. 7. A memo from the Police Chief is enclosed in response to a Council Referral regarding police response to 911 calls on Nickham Court. 8. Thanks for the variety of favorable comments on Wednesday night. Jake, Greg, Lee and John, as well as Larry in the Attorney's Office, have all been great assets in working on the hotel prospects. 9. The second "letter of intent" on the hotel is very preliminary - it has been in a phase of being "a week to 30 days" from fruition (according to the spokesperson) since December. The original partnership, which included two well-known local names, has fallen apart. 10. The CDDA also approved the Hammons' Letter of Intent - it has been sent off and the clock is in motion. 11. LAFCO got a state agency to declare that they are the lead agency on our Sphere of Influence change - it is, apparently, legally binding. We will try a renewed positive approach with LAFCO and keep our lawyers on alert, if that fails. 12. I will be taking next Thursday afternoon and all day Friday off. 13. If you have comments to make on the draft letter to our commercial garbage customers, which was passed out at the Sanitation budget session, please let me know by early next week - otherwise, we'll go with it. 14. The County sent us a letter terminating the staff City/County Task Force, the new effort to cooperate - I'll write back expressing disappointment. On another County issue, their agenda had a listing for a change in annexation policies, which was delayed - they told us that there were no documents, when we requested them. We are alerting the other County cities for its later return. Isn't it interesting that these occur two weeks after the Fire Fund letter! Your thoughts about whether they are related? HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL May 28, 1993 Page -3- 15. Another Fire employee took the Golden Handshake - reducing layoffs to 9. AT.al b Enclosures cc: Department Heads City Clerk BAKERSFIELD PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER ~ FROM: ED,W. SCHULZ, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR~ . DATE: MAY 25, 1993 SUBJECT: SOUTH BELTWAY EIR Attached is a staff summary of the May 20, 1993 Kern COG meeting regarding a hearing on the subject EIR. D10 Attachment MEMORANDUM TO: Ed Schulz, Director of Public Works FROM: Marian P. Shaw, Civil Engineer III ~ DATE: May 21, 1993 SUBJECT: South Beltway EIR Public Hearing Kern COG Board Meeting; May 20, 1993 At the Kern COG Board meeting held at 7:00 P.M., May 20 at the COG conference room, the first item on the agenda was the public hearing to receive comments on the South Beltway environmental document prepared by Harland Bartholomew' The consultant was represented by Frank Wein (Project Director) and Traci Robinson. Mr. Wein gave a brief presentation to describe the purpose of a Tier I environmental document and stressed that this meeting was simply a first step in the process of adopting a route. After reminding the audience of approximately 75 people that the comments should be limited to the environmental document and not the actual route selection, the public portion of the meeting was opened. A letter from the Kern High School District (attached) opposing all three routes was read into the record, and then comments were received from Lamont business owners, Greenfield residents, and some of the local farmers. With the exception of Mr. Maurice Etchecherry (representing StanAntongiovanni, the Delfino brothers, the Thomas Antongiovanni Trust, and Destafani Farms), all comments received were negative. Very few of the comments actually referenced environmental .matters; most were concerned with the three routes studied. Comments ranged between destruction of valuable farmland (one comment) to the destruction of the communities of Greenfield and Lamont (all the other comments). Almost all of the comments ended with a statement of support of putting a beltway along Bear Mountain Blvd., five miles south of the preferred alternative. Some concern was also expressed that they would not know what they could do with their land for 30 years. There also seemed to be the impression that the land for all three alternative routes would remain tied up. Supervisor Shell stated that she will not support any of the three proposed alignments. Councilman Salvaggio said that he would be open to comments from anyone, whether or not they were constituents of his. Supervisor Austin, appearing for Supervisor Larwood, implied opposition to all alternatives and believes that there will be no money from impact fees for the South Beltway. Mel McLauglin made the point that if the alignment were moved to Bear Mtn. Blvd., not only would the entire EIR process have to be repeated, but that an entirely different group of people would, appear to protest. No representative for CalTrans attended. The COG Board will accept the environmental document after the co~ents from the may meeting are incorporated at their June 17 meeting. The minutes of this portion of the meeting will be available from Kern COG in approximately one week. KERN HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 2000 TWENTY-FOURTH STREET BOARD OF TRUSTEES BAKERSREI. B, CNJFORNIA Kenneltt E. Se¢~, President 93301-3899 David B. Stanton, Vice President Eade J. Gibbons, Clerl( (8O5) 631-3100 David C. Creflsl~aw Fred L. Stanl~ FAX: (805) 631-2133 THOMAS N..JONES, Ed.,D., Superintendent DR. NEAL W. OLSEN ASSOc~te Su~ennten(tent, Business May 19, 1993 Kern Council of Governments ATTN: Chairperson 1401 - 19th Street, Suite 200 Bakersfield, CA 93301 · RE: Southside Transportation Corridor Dear Chairperson: The District would like our position read into the record regarding the above subject. For several years the District has been in close communication with the City of Bakersfield staff regarding the alignment of the southside corridor. The City of · Bakersfield assisted the District in it's planning for Ridgeview High School site location. The District placed a great deal of reliance on the information provided. Enclosed are attachments which support what has been stated including suct~ communications with the City of Bakersfield. The present status of this project is that construction has begun and we are under contract with Roebbelen Construction. The high school will be completed in July, 1994. Ridgeview High School .investment at opening will be approximately $34,000,000. Information that has been provided to the District regarding 'the above subject, such as, off-ramps will greatly ·effect the . operation, function of the school and possible safety of it's staff and students. We are again requesting consideration of the alignment of the proposed East-West freeway. Please forgive the District for not being able to make a personal plea in such'an important issue. Thank you for your consideration. If you have any questions, Please do not hesitate to call me at (805) 631o3222. ' Sincerely~ ~ ~ ~Ja(~k W. Colvard i.,~ector, Facilities Planning . JWC:bj · Encl. xc: Roger Taylor Neal Olsen, KHSD AssOciate Supt., Business · Tom Jones, Superintendent KERN HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES I~)~:;[$FIEI. D. CAUF'OI:I}~ Oavid B. Stanton, Vice President Eaxte J. Gibbons, C~er~ David C. Cre~a~lt . Ffeel I_ Stallft (8135) ~31-31~ F~(: (al:E) S31-2133 THOMAS N. JONES, Ed.,D, Su¢lenrltamilent DR. NEAL W. OLSEN March 1. 1993 Kern Council of Governments A'ir'N: Roger Taylor 1401 - 19th Street, Suite 200 Bakersfield, CA 93301 RE: Southside Transportation Corridor Dear Mr. Taylor: ' The City of Bakersfield Public Works Department sent Jack Colvard a letter concerning the' potential freeway alignments on January 7, 1992. Mr. Colvard responded to that letter on January 27, 1992, directed'to Mr. Ed. W. Schulz, Director of Public Works Dept. (See Attachment). That response informed the Public Works Department that City staff had helped the Kern High School Distdct estal31ish our current site because the staff felt our site would be safe from the proposed East-West freeway alignment. We then received a letter dated February 3, 1992 from Mr. Ed. W. Schuiz, Public Works Director, stating he understood our concerns and stated since there would be extensive residential development in the area of the south alignment that would further reduce the probat~ility of that option being used (See Attachment). The letter also requested that the City of Bakersfield reconsider the pOtential freeway alignment. Since that letter and time the site has been purchased. Construction has started on the off site improvements end a contract has been awarded for the construction of Ridgeview High School valued at $23,694,088.00 With a total budget of approximately $33,000,000. We again are requesting that the City of Bakersfield. reconsider the alignment of the' proposed East-West freeway. By Septemt3er 1994 Ridgeview High School will have been constructed on the site and students will be attending classes. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Bruce K. Wahl Assistant Director Facilities Planning '. Attachment " RECEIVED BAKERSFIELD PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Faoillfi~S PlR~l~ir~l 1501 TRUXTUN ^VENUE BAKERSFIELD. CALIFORNIA 93301 (805) 326-3724 ED W. SCHULZ. DIRECTOR * CITY ENGINEER February 3, 1992 KERN HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT .: :.:-'~i 2000 24th Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 .. ~ ~ .. ~....- ; ",...., ,. .. Attention: Mr. Jack W. Co!vard Director, Facilities Planning ......... ~L."'.'t' ~ r.. , '"' SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE HIGH SCHOOL #3 -.c:..:. ::.:: KERN HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT ~;~-~,-. PROPOSED SOUTH BELTWAY LOCATION. _..~___.__._ Dear Mr. Colvard: .................... This letter is in response to comments in .y~ur_L~lul~-er:.tume~ dated January 27, 1992, regarding the City' ~-.{=r~~.. South. Beltway A1 i gnment. The South Beltway is still in the planning stage and the .alternatives in the alignment are still subject to change. The alternative with an alignment to the north of the school can~oved further north so that. the interchange will affect the school site very little, if 'at all. The alternative with an alignment to the south of the school cannot be moved as easily, but your .comments and the physical presence of the school will materially affect the 'feasibility 'of this option. .Also, extensive residential. development .is being proposed' along this south, alignment, further reducing the probability of this option. Thank. you. for your comments on the' alternate alignments of the South Beltway. If you have' any questions regarding these comments, 'please contact myself or. Marian Shaw at 326-3579. Very truly yours, ED W. Public Works Director cc: Thomas N. Jones, Ed.,D., Superintendent 'Dr. Neal W. Olsen, Associate Superintendent, Business KERN HIGH SCHOOL DISTR' £ 2000 TWENTY-FOURTH STREET · BOARD OF TRUSTEES BAKERSRELD, CAUFORNIA Earle J..Gibbons, President 93301-3899 Kennem E. Secor, Vice President David B..Stanton, Clerk (805) 631'3100 Brent P. Casioer ' Fred L Starrn FAX: (805) 328-1209 THOMAS N. JONES, Ed.,D., Superintenclent DR. NEAL W. OLSEN January 27,- 1992 City of Bakersfield ATTN-: Mr. Ed W. Schulz, Director Public Works Department 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 RE: Comprehensive High School #3 -- ·Proposed East-West Freeway Dear Mr. Schulz: Over the past 12 months, Dean Gay and I have communicated our site · selection with the City staff. We have reviewed at least four sites within the boundaries of Hosking Road to the north, McKee Road to· the south, Stine Road ~o the west, and Wible to the east. City staff was instrumental in helping us determine this site. This site was selected because City staff felt that we should be safe from the proposed freeway alignment. Since that point, the following has baen accomplished: 1. Escrow will close February'7, 1992. 2. Plans for this site are 80% complete. 3. Estimate construction to start February, 1993. 4. Completion of construCtion July, 1994. For the District to consider moving to another site at this late date, we must consider the following: 1. Delay opening of school two (2) years. 2. Complete redesign of site drawings. 3. .Loss of the cost for existing plans. . 4. Cost to·house 1200 unhoused students for two (2) years. 5. Increased cost of new site. 6. Costs incurred for backing but of present property sale con~rac~. Mr. Ed W. Schulz Janua~ 27,-1992 Page 2 These costs are estimated to be three to four million dollars. Dollars which are not available to, the Kern High School District. The Kern High School District cannot consider moving and must' formally .request the City of Bakersfield to realign the'.proposed freeway. if you need any information to substantiate our position, please do not hesitate to call. ~Colvard ~/Director, Facilities Planning JWC: bj xc: Neal W. Olsen, Associate Supt., Business Tom Jones, Superintendent "" B A K E R S F I E L D PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 1501 TRUXTUN AVENUE BAKERSFIELD. CALIFORNIA 93301 ~805} 326-3'/24 ED W. SCHULZ. DIRECTOR · CITY ENGINEER JanUary 7, 1992 R EG~{VED Kern Union High'School District JAN 2000 24th Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 Attention: Mr. Jack Colvard Director, Facilities Planninq SUBJECT: Cp~pre~nsive High School #3 K~rn High School District · ~'~ ' and Environmental Assessment'j ("~ra f tInitial. Study Dear Mr. Colvard; In Section 3.11, "Traffic and Circulation" of the above-referenced study, the proposed east-west freeway (South Beltway) referenced in the 2010 General Plan is stated as being located approximately one mile north of the high school campus, which is located on Stine Road between Hosking and McKee Roads. During the alignment Study for the South Beltway, it was determined that this alignment is not feasible due to the proximity of the Panama Lane/Hwy,99 interchange. Four alternate alignments are currently being evaluated. Two of these alternates pass within a quarter mile of the campus~ Both of these ·alignments show a diamond type interchange at Stine Road. The first alignment alternate parallels H0sking Road, which runs along the north section line of section 34, Township 30S, Range 27E. The centerline of the 210 foot'right-of-way is approximately 155 feet south of this section line. This places the centerline of the freeway approXimately 500 feet north of the north property line of the campus. The second alignment alternate parallels the McKee Road alignment and at Stine Road the- centerline of the 210 foot right-of-way is approximately 500 feet south of the. south property line of the campus.. In their initial review of the South Beltway alignment stUdy, CalTrans has requested that full cloverleaf interchanges be used at all local street-to-freeway intersections instead of diamond type Kern Union High School District' Attn: Mr. Jack'Colvard January 7, 1992 Page 2 interchanges. I.have enclosed schematic layouts of the right-of- way requirements for bo~h cloverleaf and diamond type interchanges. As can be seen, the campus' proposed access points onto Stine Road will be physically affected by the use of'any of these interchange' types for either freeway location. This freeway is now in the planning stage and the alignment is still subject to change. .The construction of.this facility may be up to twenty years in the future. If you have any questions regarding these comments, please contact Marian Shaw at 326-3579. Very truly yours, Ed W. Schulz Public Works Director by Marian P. Shaw Civil Engineer III Enc. BAKERSFIELD pUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER d; FROM: ED W. SCHULZ, PUBLIC .WORKS DIRECTOR--~/ . DATE: MAY 26, 1993 SUBJECT: WALTER F. STIERN JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL - MORNING DRIVE Attached is a copy of a letter from County staff regarding the status of the street improvements and signal which will benefit the new Junior High School at the southeast corner of Morning Drive/College Avenue. The City has completed the improvements on Morning Drive which are within the City limits, but considerable work still needs to be accomplished within the unincorporated area. DiO MOWING Atta¢l'~nent CITY JOEL HEINRICHS, AGEI~CY. DIRECTOR ?ES~yRC,-" ,.~. =__ MANAGEMENT AGENCY ,. _ F~ (~) NI~ ~ ~ ~ay 17, I~3 Kenneth E. Garland, Ph.D Assistant Superintendent-Business Bakersfield City School District 1300 Baker Street Bakersfield, California 93305. RE: WALTER F. S~ JUNIOR HIGH sCHooL- MORNING DRIVE Dear Dr. Garland: Kem County has recently received inquirieS regardini off-site road improvement needs for the Walter Stiem lunior I-Ii~h School generally located at the southeast quadrant of Morning Drive and Colle§e Avenue. The school is apparently anticipated to open September, 1993. In =~'~nse to these inquirieS, the County will be taking action to cause brush removal along the existing ..east sidewalk of 'Mornint Drive south of Willis Avenue. Installation of tra/fic si§nal iml~rove~ents at the intersection of Morning Drive and .Niles Street as a joint County/Caltrans project is currently anticipated to be C°mpleted within six tonine months, but attempts are being made to further expedite this project. As pa~ of the si~u~al project, Morning Drive immediately adjacent to Niles Street is planned to be widened to full width with a norhherly taper to match the existing.t, wo..1.ane roadway. No further transportation-related improvements are anticipated within the area. Additional transportation improvements.mil~,ht be warranted as a result of the school construction. However, since the school district exempted itself from. City/County' ordinances in' regard to development of the site, the County has not had an opportunity to review the transportation .impacts associated with the school (rel,.~vant documents attached). Il hope this information is helpful. I CO~ s~ WOuld 1 be pleased to meet with you to further discuss transportation or otl~er issues of mutual concern. Please contact my office with questions or cOt{ceres. Director Supervisor Ptuline I.m. wood Isck Hsrdi~, Cit~ Phnninf Cmmcilwomsn P~t Smith TMD, PADS, F,$SD PAINTEO ON,I~ECYCI. EO PAPE[~ .. · . BAKERSFIELD CITY SCHOOL .DISTRICT. Mr.'teary Taylor . County Administrative O~£ioer .. ~4~$ Trux~un ~vanue ~aXerB£1eld~ C~ 9330~ X~l ~gSO~U~XOH TO ~D~R QZT¥ ~D COI,~T¥ $O~ZMO OI~,,DZ~P~NC~8 ~noloeid' you"'vlll £~nd a' oop~ o£ a resolu~ion exempting the Bakersfield City BohooL D~etr~c~ ~rom Cl~¥ and Coun2y =on~ng requirements on one o£ our ne~ echool el2ee -' ~he ~al~er.S~ern ~r. H~qh'BaBooL. ThL~ r&molu~on ~ae adopted bY ~he Board of ~duca~lO~ O~ Geptombe~ ~L, 1990. ," : ..., 2~ yOU have any quest~one regarding this, please ~eel tree ~o call. me at 63~-4677 or Hr. Bd #a2ernan, Coordina~or o£ School PLanning and construction, at 631-$890. Yours. ~rUl¥, , . .. . ~ ~. ..... ,~ -, Aesie2ant Super~n~endent-Bua~neae eq enclosures '- ' xo~ County Planninq · ' · Ed'~aCerman"l '.' '-."":..: . . Z~ ~el 'A~ZON~O ~D~R ) R~OLU~ZON o~n~ t~ ~he Bakersfield C~y ~ohool D~o~ o~ ~n Coun~ _ B, ~e ~e~y ~s needed by ~he D~s~o~ ~o~ construction o~ disesteem C, Pureuan~ to ;overnmen~ Code Scot,on 53004, 'tho ~overnLnq board og a school d~s~r~c~, b~ vo~o o~ two-thirds ~8 ~embers, ma~ render a~'c~ or ooun2~ zoning ordinance Lnapp~loable 2o a proposed uso o~ propor2~ b~ such .,~.un~y =oncnrned og such i~t~on. . The Board hereby rendero.lnappl~cabZe an~ c~ty and/or coun~z3 o~dlnance8 ~h~ch would o~heru~se bo 'appl~=able .to propar~y as ~escr~bed ~n Rxh~b~ "A"~ tho Walter S~ern H~gh achoo~ s~e. 3. The.D$s~r~c~ Super~n~enden~ ~ d~rec~ed ~o g~ve no2~co · se~ ~orth ~n Governman~ Code Section 53094 2o ~ho c~Z Bakersfield and ~he count~ o~ Kern w~h~n ~o da~s o~ 2h~s ac~on. on no~$on off ara. Nnhn~ .... , seconded ~----.--~.~ . ,.. , ~h~ Ro~o~u~on vas A~S$t ~' BOARD OF ~DUCA~ZOH OF NOESl 0 BAKE~FZB~O CZT~SC~OO~ DZBT~ZCT rABSENT l 0 " ~ ~ X ce~i~M ~ha~ ~he. Resolu~Aon above to a ~u11 and oo~eot excerpt ~m ~he ~ou~nal~ ~e B~a~d ~ Education ~ ~he Bakersfield CA~y S~ool Dis~io~ per~ainAm~ ~o ~he ad~p~i~m ~ ~he Res~lu~iom at'a meeting ~eld on~~bmb~r X 9.90 - , .~ , .' ~duoa . ~he.~akegs~ield Baboo .D~a~ic~'.of'Ke~n-Coun~y *LEGAL .. Northeast Junior High School Site ,.STIERH dR, HIGH SCXOOL " acres more or less ~e~ng. porttofl of ~ Gefler&l n south of Col ' ege Avenue ~nd dtre¢~ly west Horntng Ortve. L. DALE MILLS PUBLIC WORKS. ~rector ~ Pubk Wefts 27~ "M' Street. S~te C~n~ Su~or ., lhkeubM. CA 9~01 Coun~ R~d Commissioner Phone: (805) F~: (80~) ~15 Augus~ 13, ~ ~90 ~.~da Ref: 3'7.1 Traffic Zndex 4-0.0 College Ave. S212F MartXn-McXntosh ' 4X30 Ardmore Avenue, Suite XOX Bakersf~eld~ CA 93309 Gentlemen: Reference ~s nade to your July 27, X990 -le~ter regarding the proposed Walter F. St~ern Jun~or H~gh School s~te on the ~uture extension of College Avenue east of Morning Dr~ve. There appear .... ~to be matters to be clar.~ed pr~or to th~e off,ce providing ...'~raff~c index as requested. T~e department hmo no direct notAce of the proposed schoo~ or ~nformat~on ag to anticipated o~ required ~mprovements~ ~t noted the eLte ~s apparently located on the southeast corner of College AVenue and Morning Drive. College Avenue does not currently extend east of Morning Drive. The south hal~ College east' of MornAng Dr~ve wou~d be the only road al~gnnenc - outside c~ty 1AmAte wAth~n a 1/4 m~le d~etance. It would appear desirable to address the following items as soon as practicable and prior to proceeding with deeignwork.. 1. I~ ~ school gate to be reviewed by the C.~ty or' County with improvement condAtAorm to be designated? ...... .: ..... 2. l£)'lt ie intended that the road be accepted for maintenance b~':the County, as a. minimum, the proposed.road extension wo111d I~eed ~o bo reviewed as · 'PeC~ttoned Road/Width and Al~gl~aent. ~t~tdyu wlth the Board or Superv~so're to.designate conditions of acceptance based upon department(s) recommendations. (~e: Type A SubdiVision'Standards, r~ght of way, drainage provisions) Page 2 3. KXCe~ton of ~he road wou~d haVe co be coordinated wl~h ~he C~y and County sAnce ~he c~¥ 1Lm~s ex~end along u~tma~e cen~erltne. (Grades, cross 8ec~on w~d~h, e~c.) ~ may be de,ermined desirable ~o have ~he en~re ul~ma~e w~d~h and cUrren~ construction proposal ~o be done completely ~der C~y Jurisdiction.' Prtor ~o ~h~s depar~men~ providing ~raff~c Index, ~he above should be resolved.. Please feel free ~o con~ac~ ~h~s off,ce you have any ~es~ton or co~en~. Very ~Nor~on Off,ce Engineer L-25.D15 cc: C~t¥ of Bakersfield, ~bl~c'Wor~ JulY'27, 1990 Kern County Road Department " 2700 #M" Street, $500 Bakersfield, California Attn=. Lloyd Norton Re= Traffic Index Request Dear Lloyd: Please provide our office wi~h a ~raffi¢ index for College Avenue-east of Morning Drive. We are currently preparing street improvement plans for the.proposed Walter F.* Stiern .~L.Junior High School. · 'Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Jeff Mar~in . c¢: David Do11, BFGC tpermo~l~4~bl fees ma described in subdivision (a)bulb not still residing'at the case, the impounding authority may deal witA me yetucle as los~ mi- ~o..,,o.c~ .,r dlrthe fees may make u claim for a refund to the agency collecting the fees. Section 1411 of the Penal Code. '. . ' -'- ' -- · ' ..... =-'urn of s vehicle · rson ma make a motion in municipal court for the immeum~e ret . nsutothoso.chimsaha, l.i'apply. · ;il.= ,._' .'.':.... ,<::-~ : ..: At any time_, _a pe . . Y ............. ,.. I, ,,r that there is some other good cauee, u c. 1558 (S~.1821), J 84 ""'. .: ~-'.' .'..~- ." . .. on the 8Tound that there was n.o prooaote .ca_us, w, ,._~; ..... . . : . .. i ' '.., - determined by. tho court, for the return mt the vemcJe. * · ~ ~ ~ .'.,. "' .. mud sewer ~ were remkred, ud are not int~nded to .... "waver shall impound any vehicle owned Or operated by'a nonprofit organize* · ~'L., ',-' .',' ~. :~ J... ' ~ ';" .qqdy to'rmoudde standby or av~ab0i.'ty chars--.= No peace officer, ho. , . . - ............. , ,L. *-*~rnsl Revenue Code t which serves · ' on ursuant to becuon outq, CAO; ut ,,u .,,,~ . f Aua'''' J~ IgC0 eoatdSed ihs i' ' 'The hte lhily Jo,md etAu~ St, I~O, contd,u the ties exempt frm,m...t~aU P. .......... ,.*~- I,,cidental to its prolTams or services. . following hter rom ldad~ B~p~m to l~r,yl.White yOUth or'asnl~r otizens aaa prq. vules Lrusmi, v~,, .... . . . . d ~ re~ ~imm ~'/ reprdi~ le~bhdve intern erS~.1821(Sta~l?~O.. ~. ISSl)~. ixpedtoSB 1021 (lJ~'u~n~m ' to the Oov~Jnor my Semte BIB llll. Amonl .o~thlnp~ "* ~t~ a m S~"~m.'*SJOI2 dr the . SB ll21 amcts' a new Sectlam $3012 to.the Govermncnt ~ 'For ano~ler swtion o/~4 fume number added 6~ StnLtl$$O, c. $~$ (~I.B.$II~), j J, edlect~d b wldch tm eud~ mdm we,, dctlvemL . 'f {,V08~,-an~ : . .. · ' ~ )~'* *-" / cmutn~d to require rd~ etgemembb standby or nvaik ARTICLE 5. REGULATION OF LOCAL AGENCIES BY COUNTIES AND CITIES {diems(medals etmdby or lvail- sMlilyckln hmmm4e~ I~lbepaYO~ettbe re--on* ' . : ., .~ i.dc~,M, lhelmyord, lkefkmo~' mldestandbywavdMdlil~dlarpbno~yetooanectMnto ., * ' bP b nm ~t ~ mo' m m~r. * · ~ · Section ' . . ~...:..:.: ;. :.~ ../..~ ,=..:... "11, proviskm et S~tioe $M82 mt the' Oovernmnl 53097. School districts; compliance with_ ordinances reining to on. si? fsc. ilitie, s. a,.nd improvements; , . ~ . ~..... ., · Code are Intended to oMdy to rrna co{letted for which no . city and county immunity; district noncompimnce remtin~ to el, side improvements. ion S~ol1 et ~ Oovemmmt Mud ,,wa m,ke,,,er,,aderd, mt ,d, no~ ini,.J,d to 5309';.5. Inspection of school buildings *by county or city;, guidelines; results to state architect. I to kan& ~ far. wllk~l tm aiq)ly to r(moambk ~ mr avallaMMty cherlms.' i *, . .-" = .,.,~ :., .. J 63091. Compliance of local agency with county or city building nd zoning .ordinances for tin,riehl '.!~ ~tan ~.,~; statement that applicant hu not been convicted of Each local n~ency shall comply with all applicable building ordinances and toning ordinances of the . .**~. ;. :* ,.~.-.. --~ · county or city in which the territory of the local a~ency is situate~L .... · * 'school building aid * requested by a local agency for construction of school facilities the county or tefinqd 'h Section 64951,' 'may require an *applicant for economic developmen~ sion in which enid agency is located shall consider in its review for approval ,~ flndncial mistance~.to map · statement under, penalty of perjury that he or* city planning cum&aZ ' information relating to attendance tree enrollment, adequacy of the site npon which the construction ... '~1 of.m f~** '/:': ? "f*. . *'*' ' ' ' ' .... · ' ' is proposed, safety features of the site nnd proposed construction, and Present and future land '~ than one city or county or partly in a city ,a. nd partly in a county, the local agency shall comply with advertising I~erVlce~"a~lating to 8Mca 9f public property; notice of relation- such ordinances of each county or city with respect to the terFitory of the local agency which is situated in the particular county or city and the ordinances of a county or ~:ity shall not be applied to ~:-' ,~-:** · .. -' ~', .~' ' - ...... to of the local agency which is situated outside the boundaries'of the county. ~o'i~~ or private .cum .pany, which advertises that it provides information or an rtloo of the terra ry . · · - · · · ties does not re mire male 0t~ pure~e.0[.~ublJc property of any kind shall prominently indicate in orYci~. Notwithstanding the precedmg provmlons of this section, thru sec q · · e state when acting under the Stats Contract' Act to. cum.ply wi.th the. buildi, n~' s 0ther'* .uon person omp y is not a sove,.ment ach..oo! ...... i-- So thstahmng the precedihs provislO..S or th-. scala.o? ......... :~...-'=~. :l ~:~ ' ' ............... oromaoces mi a coun.Ly u:.~. ?.. .... ~__~..os,t, ,J,, zonino ordinances mt a county o.r city um~ ara'of any~pHvata person or private company .to prominently ~ndicate m the r other M~lentat{oa:that the peroon or company is'j~ot m government a,enc, son}n, o.rdi~n.~ mmk. es p~mv~t~dn~Za~t~rl~l~nti.°n of public achaia Ith.d .u. nless thecit., or?c. , air bu~ine~ ~.within the meaning,nd f,0r:the p,ur~..se~ 9f Section 1'/200 planning commihlon nns soup i, · . Esch ~l'agenc~ required to comply with building ordinances ind zoning Ordinances pursuant to roi 'm~)n~, O)de,j.butjb no~ ·..o~me. ~. ',..-.. '.. , · *.. ** .... ';'** * "*'=': ' ~: "*' this section and etch school district whose school buildings are inspected by a county or city pursuant to Section 53092 shall be subject to the provisions of the applicable ordinances of n county or city c*' '~3": * '(A~' "~ 115)'; J'!! ' * ' ~"' '* ....... " ' f fees but the amount of such fees charged a local agency' or school di.et,'ict i~i~/~/~j':m~-~j~m, br mMcd bi; ~./eb. j,9.90, c. ,{ll~ (,4.~.$,~?~J, § .r, . requiring the p_ay.ment o ......... ,: ..... , ....,,vp entel agencies for the same nar em anger the orflllilall~G w ..v,,{)----~l~m · "~ ~L'~?¥ .'...': **.,~ ,'!' ~:;'. ~ .... · services or permits. Building ordinancek of a county or city shall not apply -,r~' ·~!~::publlc airport or California/Mexico International border;, construction of facilities for the production, gene.ration, storage, ,or transmission of' water, id Inpoundmnfe..noQce; return; exemption water, or electrical energy by m local agency. ·..' "' ~'.*'~ '*',; ' :" ~/:~"' ': ' ' ' oust or city shall not apply to the location or cons. t~ction of facilities for. ,f£~:e~* arrests' ny, perllon for' operatin~ as ·'taxicab without a ~slid taxicab ' Zoning ordinances of n c . Y ..... · .......,,r for the nroduction or generation ' the production, generation., . .... g '. .... ** .....e..,i,,, 08 6 of the Public Utilities Code, ~rndt required bY any ordinance, and the offense occurred at a public airport, ' s~ora e or transmmsion on w,w,~ * - . ·, . .-- -' ,/*-, -;£~= -**,-* -* ,~-- r-lifornia/Mexico'international border, electrical energy, nor to laciuues wmcn are suujc~, ,~ *~, ..... 128 . hl~ tlru6rt~'~or within two ,,,,co v, ,,,, ,,- . . .. ,. ..... which receives electricity et less · :'7~.~'u'-~'Mtd 'retain 'ix)alension of any vehicle usam in n vlolauon mi thu 0 000 volts Zoning ordinances of s'county or city shall apply to the location or construction y mJ~U.__. r' ''~' ' ~* ' ' ' ~ . . nor to electrical substations in an electrical transmission system ( .:..,..r,. **' ...~ .... , .... then 10 , · · · ' al ener b a local aaency;, provided, that {ed from m'~radn who is, not the owner of the vehicle, the impounding authony of facilities for the storage or tra.ns.m,s.s,on of. e!ect.,?, gY. Y . . ~ notice to th? b~er ,by fi~t~lnss, mail. ,/ ., : .... , :.......;. such zoning ordinances make previa,on for such lacmues. · * ':*' '.. .. *."' -.',' ;diatei/b retu ,ed to the ow.er w"?outees? to or. (^mended by Stats."", c. * '.) .. Pse}:u~ed or is dismissed, the_o.wner !s louse .n.o.t g~. !?y ,mi th,e ,oxten/consent Holes of I~chlo. ns !t,;rlp'~n, ~sed in violation of th~ drdinance WithOUt the xnowleoge s.nu ,. Htstodcai tad St~tutot~ Notes . · 1..t,e~se*purcns~ ...... for term exceedin~ 50 y_e~ for private development would, remo~xJ tflmslt districts from definition of "10cel agency,"; .... be sub~ect to Io~ building and zoning regulations' dep~nds:i ' thereby exempting Dist~ from local Zohi~g 'iud building · School f~cillties financed under the Lcroy F. Greene State section (under which the construction ~ Pti .q~..'of ~riva/~'developm'en/; ifuse furthers p .url~se,...i 'restflci!0nL ~ Rapid Transi~ AdVecates;' Inc. v. S°uthern School Building Lense--Purchase Ltw of 19'16 t~uc-C~e , subject to cay or camt~ ordin~n~ el conducting st/t· fair, private 'development WOuld/be: Callfomit Rapid Transit Dist. (ApI~ 2' Disci986) 230 Cal. § 17700 ct seq.] a~e not exempt from compliance with this'~ road hnpr°~,'emeats. .~d.'c?n.~J .o~. ~an section, i.e., comtruction of such fscifities is subject to city quiring rcvlcw of' Fading plans). =~ exempt from local re~vintlons, but if prlvnte development is Rptr. 21~, '!,8.S C.A..3d 996. .: ,; ~ ,, .,. :. ~ : . ~ .... · · ' § 53004.'' Auth-oritY'to i~nder":zoning'6rdinance inapplicable to: use of School district' P~oPerty; view and epp~o~;el.0f grad.la.* g p..l~ns..~..s.,uch ._r~a. t,c_.to_.~.c . f~cdre~c~.et.l 1S~770~ Bet~.S, 71L~.~ review by city'or e0unty : .- · ~ .~, .... ... ~ ' '. ='.', :' meats; in ~dmtion, when.such fsciaues are constmc,c~ ...,. ,-oo.' : · ' .... . ' Notwiths .tanding any other p~visions of. this.article except Section 53097, the governing board-of a ' '. '.": ' . :' , . . schOOl di~trlet, by'v~)te' of tWo-thirdi of its member~-' 'ma~ r~nder'a eit~ 'or ~0unty i0ning ordinance :' · § 5309'/.5, Insp~ction of school buildings by county or city; guidelines;' {.esuit~ inappliceble to a proposed use of prOperty, by such school district except when the prOposed use of or c~ ms inspect school buildings, 'as defined in Section 39141 o~ {.he A county 'ty Y ' 500 of the Health and Safety ( tho prop . V..b such,, school ,dint,i ret. nonc -,s m, llities,, including, not limit'd, to,. ldelines ado ted pu uan to Sec on ..... warehouses;' administrativel-buildings,' au~moti~5'storege and r~pair, b'uildings.'.( :The~b0ard-Shall,: life'inane· re~lating substandard conditions, m t~ufldin~s useu tot within 10' days, i{0tify the city or county concerned ~! such action'. '~ If.'s~ch gOre.ming board, has: The results of the inspections shall be.forwarded to the office of the. State ,Archit~ taken such action :the city or county may"oommence' an action in the superior cou~t of the"ceunty (Added by Stats3989, c~ 9&q~' §- 1.)', .::ii..' '-'"""' -,: ':.', .... ' whose zoning ordinance is. involved .or in which is .situated- the city whose, zoning ordinanca"'is .:' . '. ": '.'. / ...... ' ':' ' involved, seeking a review of such action of the governing board of the school district to determine .." .... whether it was arbitrary ~nd caPrici6us. '..The.clty-6r countYshalJ'eauSe a copy Of the complaint to be . ARTICLE 5.5. REGULATiOH OF THE E~iR(~BIM~IN~Ai~' served on' the ~ard.-' If the court determines tha~ anch action was arbitrary and.ca[~ricious; it; shall · .... PLAN BY STATE AGENCIES ... ' · :-. declare it to be'of no fro;ce and'effect, and the SOninE ordinance in question shall be applicable to the · . .; ..... · ..... . . .. .. plans to COmply with Clcen Air Act, ~xception For. this ... : (Amended'.b¥ Stats.~984, e. 65?, § 1; Stats.1990, e. 275 (A.B.2~81); § L)" . . ~ .. · ..: srdcle, .sc· lie. all and S~fety Code § 416!l . '. ' · 'Nores'of' Decisions '' Cruz V. Santa Cruz Schools' Bd. 'of Educ. (App. 6 Di~t. 1989) ' ' - ' ARTICLE 6. LOCAL EMERGENC¥ TELEpHoNE SYSTEMS Nonciassroom f.acfllgas 2 258 CaI.Rptr. lOJ, 210 Cal. App.~l I, modified; ·: . Evidence was sufficient to support finding that high Section serv . __ school's playing field, including ia light~ was not I "non- . classroom faciliiF," and thus school board.could uscmpt ~100.$. Legislative findings; implementation and enhancement of °'911" 2. Nonelassroom !-~!!~es 'lighting renovation for playing field from' city's zoning- ~109.5. Tahoe reLion; compliance time. , ordinance, pursuant to this section glowing school district ~119. Rural areas; conversion to enhanced '911" service. ~. . .... "Nonclussroom fa~lltlee," within meaning of ggs section" to render city zoning ordinance inapplicable to pro __~__'use 53120. Prompt implementation. uliowing scimol dhtrict to render zonlng ordinance inappii- of prepe~ eXcept when use is for.*'nonclnssroom facillti~" ' ' cable to prepm~ us~ of properly, except when 'us~ is for Clt~, of. Santa. Cruz v.' Santa Cruz..Schnois ad..'of EdUC. § 53100. Short title; legislative findings; numb·fl-."911" as emergency 'nonchssroom faclfltles." means those f~dlitks not directly * (Apl). 6 Dish1989) 258 'Cul. Rptr. 101,.210 CUl. App. M !, throughout state . md rot ~ related to ~tmient inm~c~n. C~t~ ~ Santa ' mod01~d. ' · '" - ....... ' good.faith attesnpt to usc it by tldrd § 5309?. f~,h001'districts;' iC°mpilance with ordinanc, es relatin~ to onsite facilities and impO'ore; .If telephone, privately contracted for, exists in public of another, asides v.. O'Daniels (19! · place such as inn, there is no privacy, or ownership interest.141 C.A.~d 443. ' menus;' city-and' county. ImmunitY;" district noncompliance' relatln[ to' offsi.to,' ira;- " " . provements ' ".- "':" ' "· '" ':'" § 53100.5. Leh4sl~tive findings; Implementation and enhancement of "911" set .i". · Notwithstandin~ any other provisions of this article, the gnverninS hoard'of · school district eh~ll The Legislature he'by finds and'declares: ', ..... ." . ', . comply with any city or county ordinance {I) regulatins'dra|nage imprOvements and conditions, (9_)' .. · .... . r Su ttn 't d improvmenta and oonditions;'.o CS) requiring'the re,e, ap..p_ro[a. o.f. Sred S · ia) The Co nanications ivislo of the'mparun; t of Oe; er S vicea is . plans a~ these ordinance' prOvisions reiste to the design and eonst~Uction ~f onmte '. · imprOve- -- of. updating its implementation of "911" emergency 'phone service to all ar~ " ments which ~ffect drignsge~' road conditions} or Irredinl~, and shall Live consideration to the specific . (b) The improvements to the emergency 911 nervice will enable the law en~ requirements and conditions' of city or county ordinances relatln~ to: the design and oonstruction of,. receivln~ the "911" cell to determine the exact location of the e~ller upon conn~ : offsite iinprovemente. If a. school district elect· not to comply, with., the requirements of. city er (c) The communications dlvisi~n prOvides for the enhancement of emergency reit county ordinsnees.relatin~ to the design and construction of offslte improvements, the city or oounW cities within the 'respective counties based on the populatio~ density of the .eot' shall no~ be liable for any ln~ or.for any danm~e .to prOperty caused by the failure of the school,, coUnties with greater density receiving en.hanced' "9!1". emerg, e .n~..s~ district, to complY with those ordinances. · ,. : ............... :'[.' telephone companies serve' sparsely populated areas; avenging stay ti tempnone "' · .' (d} Many ~f:~he"teleph'0ne 'c°rl~rati0ns ln"the rUral: Stats.1990, c. '2~5' ':,- -. enhanced "911" emergency telephone ··twice; but are' not. Sehedule~ ler ImprOw Additions: or.changns..'l.ndlcats.d=b¥: underline.; de,!etlon$..,b.y aster·ks.. ~;!..',..: ~ Additions. or. Changes Indicated by, underlln ,el .de,!etlona. by asterisk PD ~,4-2759 MEMORANDUM . . May 25¥ 1993 TO ALAN TAN-DY - City Manager ' FROM S.E. BRUMMER- Chief of 'Police SUBJECT RESPONSE TO COUNCIL REFERRAL In response to Councilwoman Brunni's referral of May 12, 1993, an inquiry was mad~ concerning the police department not investigating two 911 calls made from Nickham Court on Apr~i 30,_1993. A search of our records indicated no request for assistance was received from any residence on Nickham Court on April 30, 1993. Our' records, did reveal that on April 29th, police officers responded to 9417 Nickham Court on a "check the'welfare" case; however, this call apparently is not related to the inquiry made by Councilwoman Brunni. SEB:sml= cc: Councilmembers + Mayor (8) 26 ~IAY 95 ~_J 07 B A'K E R S F I E L D Alan Tandy · City Manager May 28, 1993 Mr. Joel Heinrichs, Director Resource Management Agency County of Kern 2700 "M" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301' Dear Joel: I haVe received your memorandum of May 25th, which indicates that your County department will no longer participate in the City/County Task Force. The Task Force was created with the intention of providing a forum for City/County cooperation. It is most regrettable that you have refused to participate based, solely, upon the inability to change multi-year problems in such a short timeframe. r AT. alb ~. cc:'. Honorable Mayor and City Council Mr. Joe Drew, County Administrative Officer City of Bakersfield · City Manager's Office · 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield · California · 93301 (g13~ '~76-~7~1 · FAX (805~ 325-9162 COUNTY OF KERN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AGENCY Office Memorandum TO: Alan Tandy, Manager DATE: May 25, 1993 City of Bakersfield ~/,,./~~ ' FROM: Joel Heinrichs, Director/ [/4~/ PHONE: 861-3502 Resource Management AgSn~y SUBJECT: METROPOLITAN BAKERSFIELD CITY/COUNTY TASK FORCE The Kern County Resource Management Agency (RMA) initiated the creation of' the City/County TaSk Force in November, 1992, in order to facilitate coordinated and cost-effective solutions to the full range of Metropolitan Bakersfield land use/fiscal/service issues. We have had a number of interesting meetings wherein a wide range of issues have been discussed. The primary areas of discussion have been: 'Land use planning within the 2010 General Plan area. · Transportation Planning within the 2010 General Plan area. · CitY/County annexation issues. · Waste management issues. · Service cOOrdination opportunities. The County 'of Kern~s 'senior management remains committed to the goals of the task force, however, it has become apparent 'th~i~ the current 'format. and process is ineffective., No substantiVe progress has ,been made, in this forum, on any of the items noted above. Therefore, the RMA and County Administrative Office (CAO) will not be scheduling any-further meetings of the task force. The issues discussed in the task force meetings will continue to be pursued by County staff. The process/venues we intend to use are outlined below for your information. Land Use Planning The key players in coordinating land use planning within the 2010 General Plan area are the City of Bakersfield (City), CoUnty of Kern (County), and Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO). Since LAFCO is vital to the provision of appropriate urban level services in unincorporated areas and Ran Tandy, Manager Ma~/25, 1993 Page 2 to a coordinated metropolitan planning process (through the City sphere of influence process), ~the best course of action is .probably to bring LAFCO into the land use coordination process as a full partner: Therefore~ 'the .RMA. intends'to'schedule regular discussion sessions with LAFCO' and City .:representatives. (if you desire to participate)' wherein our current and future land use plans will be Shared. Of coUrse, as previously indicated by County staff we will also offer to coordinate the County's Planning Advisory Committee process with the City Planning Commission process when appropriate. Transportation Plannlne The key players in transportation planning include the City and County, but also include Kern COG, Caltrans and GET. As you are aware, we have a very successful transportation consortium process underway wherein we are coordinating light rail studies. Kern COG intends to use the consortium to coordinate high speed rail terminal studies as well. The RMA recently hosteA a m~fing of appropriate consortium members to discuss these ~projects, beltWays, and land use plans which was very successful. Therefore, we intend to continue .to alse the consortium to coordinate these issues. City/County Annexation Issues (Fiscal) · This issue is most appropriately handled between the CAO and your office. Waste Management Issues We have an existing City/County Waste Management Ad Hoc committee composed of City and County representatives to the Solid Waste Management Advisory Committee. This is the appropriate venue for these issues. Service Coordination Opportunities We have a number of existing opportunities to coordinate and we will continue to work with you as appropriate. Summary_ The City/COunty Task Force appears non-productive and ultimat¢!y redundant. Thus, we ·intend to ~ cease participation and pursue improved services as outlined above./ Of course, we are always available to discuss any issue of mutual concern. JH:dc JMLR~ cc: County Administrative Office GOVERNOR'S OFFICE May 12, 1993 MAY 1 7 1993 CI~ OF BAKERSFIELD The Honorable Bob Price and Others WATER RESOURCES City of Bakersfield City Council c/© Department of Water and Sanitation 1000 Buena Vista Road Bakersfield, California 93311 Dear Friends: Many thanks fOr your letter regarding my request to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) to stop drafting interim standards and to begin preparing permanent standards for protection of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (Decision 1630). Enclosed for your information is a copy.of my letter · to the SWRCB. As you know, California's water must be utilized in the best interest of all Californians. We don't need a quick fix but a well-devised plan for future generations. That is why I continue to emphasize the importance of establishing a long- term solution to California's historic'water controversy. Any solution, however, must be fair and 'equitable for all major water-user groups. California's agriculture indUstry, which is inextricably tied to our precious supply of water, is a vital component of our state's economy. I believe that we must work together and build consensus among competing water users. I ask for your support as we coordinate with the Clinton administration to ensure adequate water resources for all citizens. CIT~ANaCiER~ Again, thank you. I appreciate your support. Sincerely, PETE WILSON Enclosure G:OVERNOR PETE WILSON · SACRA~{ENTO, CALIFORNIA 95814 · (916) 445-2841 GOVERNOR PETE V~ILSON April 1, 1993 Mr. John Caffrey Acting Chairman State Water Resource~ Control Board 901 P Street Sacramento, California 95814 Dear Mr. Caffrey: I had not intended to communicate with you prior to the Board's decistoh on D-1630, but feel comps!led to'do so now because of the actions of the federal government and statement~ made by federal officials at your March 22nd workshop. I extend my thar~ks to you and ~he other, board members for the tremendous energy which you have given to fulfilling my request t~.at Board set interim protection standards for ~he Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. I have every confidence that were you able to Dur~ue my charge to the Board free of the con&traints imposed'by federal law and federal agencies, the result would advance the goals se= forth in my statement of water policy in April of 1992. The cornerstone of. that policy and in fact the condlticn precedent'to its implementation is state control ~nd administration of all 'California's water resources, both ~tate and federal. Now regrettably, the federal government has made your completion of my request to you for interim 'standards all but impossible - or perhaps, more accurately, made it irrelevant. And, to Judge by the stated intentions of the federal officials at the March 22nd workshop, there exists a threat of federal action that will so undermine essential elements of our comprehensive water policy as to make impossible its implementation. 'My intent in requ'esting, intertm standards was to'provide additional protection for the fisheries in the interval before we are prepared to put in place a permanent solution for the Delta to be recommended by the Bay-Delta Oversight Council (BDOC). NOW, for all Practical purposes, the two federal fisheries agencies have set interim standards under authority of the Endangered Species Act for protection of the Winter-run chinook Salmon and Delta Smelt. STATE CAP~O~. SAc~.~ro. CAu~o~ 958 14 Mr. John Caffrey April 1, 1993 Page two The National Marine Fisheries Service and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, acting under the virtually unlimited powers of the Endangered Species Act, have set limitations on the operations of the Central Valley Project and the State Water Project. At .the Board's workshop on March 22, 1993,. federal government officials said =hat f~deral standards would build on the proposed D-!630, but might also go far further. Federal officials stated that an~rwhere from one to three million additional acre-feet beyond flows Prescribed by D-1630 could be required by F. SA to protect the Delta smelt. So imprecise a states, ant gives rise to great susp±cicn as to the quality of the science being employed. Mormover, ~it is ~.e ~-SA which permits the federal gover~zent to preempt the State in the allocation of water resources. The U.S. Supreme Ccur~,s interpretation of t~he Act makes clear that it is a blunt instrument that can'= be used to achieve a Judicious balancing cf the needs of endangered species and of Califor~lia's endangered economy. Instead, it has been interpretmd as demanding that t_he needs of endangered species be pursued absolutely without regard for any other consideration. In light of these events, I believe the wisest course 'is for the Board to tut1% now .to the. effort of establishing'D_9_~ standards for protection, of the Delta. It' is my strong intention to return control of Cal!fornia,.~ water allocation process to the State and to your Board. I' believe, the Board can provide a needed forum for resolving scientific questions and unresolved jurisdictional issues, Regrettably, despite the diligent efforts of the Board, additional action by the State to provide interim standards at this juncture would serve only to increase the regulatory confusion surrounding this issue. What is paramount is that the State proceed to identify a permanent standard and a permanent solution for the Delta, which will permit all of California,s major water-user groups -- urban, .agricultural and environmental -- to enjoy ass'urances.of adequate water resources well into the 21st century. ' Sincerely, 1~ WILSON STATE OF CALIFORNIA - BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY p__ET~..W__I_LSON, Governor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ~.~ c ~ ~. ¥ ~L~; ~ DIVISION OF STRUCTURES P.O. BOX 942674 MAY 1 8 1993 SACRAMENTO, CA 94274-0001 (916) 227-8048 TDD: (916) 654-4014 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FAX: (916) 445-0574 May 6, 1993 Grade Separation Fund Coffee Road OH Priority No. 12, 1992-93 06-Ker-0-Bkfl 'Mr. Ed'W. Schulz Public Works Director City of Bakersfield Public Works Department 1501 Truxton Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 Dear Mr. Schulz: This is a Letter of Notice that the amount of $3,192,000.00 was allocated and encumbered on April 26, 1993 from the Grade Separation Fund authorized by the Legislature for the 1992-93 Fiscal Year, to assist the City of Bakersfield in constructing the Coffee Road Overhead over the tracks of the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, pursuant to Section 190 of the Streets and Highways Code. "" Sincerely, Office of Structure External 26 ~,Y 9:l ~ 07, Liaison and Support P0'64.2759 MEMORANDUM ~a.? 21 _- 1993 TO AT.AN TAN~Iy - City Hnnnger ~ FROM s~ RR~R - ~ief of Police . SUBJECT POLICE DEPARTHENT NL~SL]~TTER Recognizing the importance of a team.effort in accomplishing our mission, as well as having a cohesive working unit, a department information sheet, or newsletter, was recently created. The first publication of this monthly newsletter, entitled "The 10-19 Times", was May 1, 1993. The purpose of the newsletter is to recognize department employees for individual accomplishments, as well as to inform all employees of events which have or are about to occur. A copy of the first newsletter is attached. SEB:AB:sml CITY ~ANAGER-~ Volume 1 s~ ~_ ~ ~ 7~~ May 1, 1993 May Events NEW FACES Milestones Mag 4 - 1st annual Greenacres School Chris Hill 5 Year Service Award vs. Bakersfield City D.A.R.E. Telecommunicator Basketball Game Mark Davis 6'.30 p.m. - 8:p.m. .. May 15 - BPD 4th Annual "Bacon 15 Year Service Award Ball" Golf Tournament at Kern River Golf Course Jack Smith Mag 16 - Benefit Association BBQ & Baseball Tournament at Greenacres Park. Tournament starts at 8'.30 a.m.; food will be served from 11:00 a.m. to 2:oo p.m. 3 X 5 File May 22 -P.A.Y.S. Tournament at Recognize a need, develop a plan, North Rosedale Park 9:00 a.m. - 3:00 share the plan with 'others who care, p.m. and dedicate yourselves to being a Chris Hill joined the Bakersfield positive influence on kids... That's the May 22 - BPD Motorcycle Drill Team Police Department in April as a District 8 Baseball League held at performs at Shafter Potato & Cotton Telecommunicator I. Chris is a long Williams School every Tuesday and Festival Parade. time Bakersfield resident with his Thursday at 5:30 p.m., April 30 - June wife, Rene, and children, Christian, 3, 1993 for kids in grades 4-6. May 29 - BPD Motorcycle Drill Team Lori, and Scott. Chris has an performs at the Coalinga Horned extensive background in law Sergeant Ed Bowen recognized a need Toad Derby Parade. enforcement and is a welcomed in District 8 for kids to be involved in member of our department, a fun focused interactive environment. Officers Frank Wooldridge, Craig Checklenis, Dave Schieber, Hajir Special Report Congratulations; ! Nuriddin, Tony Mosley, Felix Morales, " Detective Les Vincent & Serge'ant Ed Births Bowen coach 55 kids on 4 teams Parking Ticket Process AB 408 where the focus is on fun and learning 1/28/93 - Jacob Tyler Brown to Todd fundamental baseball skills. Effective July 1, 1993, parking & Charlene Brown When it comes to credit or acclaim violations are removed from criminal 2/24/93 - Stephanie Rae DeGeare to for the program's success, the founder penalties and procedures. The law Don & Mary DeGeare points to the coaches who volunteer established an administrative their time, Mrs. Susan Johnson, investigation and review procedure of 4/16/93 - Jason Alexander Borton to Principal of Williams Scliool, the contested parking citations to be Jay & Kris Borton Association of Bakersfield Police Officers (A.B.P.O.) for its financial conducted by an agency appointed ~. .,, . ,/__ contribution, and Chief Steve hearing officer. If denied by the ~t~1~%~ ,7'~ Brummer for his support. agency's hearing officer, a citizen may However the District 8 Baseball appeal the decision to the municipal League isn't about back-patting... court. We are now preparing for the · it's about making positive new procedure. ~!~ lc contributions to the community. ATTA TEAM !! Page two Check the Welfare Staff Notes From .the Corner Pocket May 1 - Judy Henry The Ten-19 Times is intended to I have talked in 'briefing sessions May 2 Brian Silvius about making "service" a priority of May 4 Jeff Bozarth provide information of interest to our department. Officers such as May4 Steve Brummer employees of the department. We the one described in this letter May 6 Terry Buss will try to acknowledge significant exemplify the attitude of "service": May 6 Matt Hilliard accomplishments, but we need your May 7 Richard Winslow "I am writing to convey a special May 9 Jeannie Denning help identifying newsworthy events, thank you to a BPD officer. On 2- May 9 Chad Jackman If a birth, marriage, or service award 18-93 my apartment was burglarized May 10 - Andrea Gavin is overlooked, we apologize. Please and I immediately called 911. The May 11- Kevin O'Rear contact Diane Melanson with officer that responded was quite May 14 - Ron Duchene prompt and extremely thorough in May 16- Ka~hyHayes information of interest, calendar his investigation. He was very May 19 - Alain Babin events, or even write an article for professional and at the same time May 19 - Mark Moore our "Special Report" segment, showed sensitivity to my losses. May 19 - James Ramos We're proud of the people of this even attempted to get fingerprints, May 20- Shane Denton however none were found. The May20- Steve Schaeffer agency and the Ten-19 Times is officer did introduce himself, May 20 - Chris Norman dedicated to express that pride, however, I am unable to recall his May 22 - Phil Shear name. It's not too often we have an May23- Mark Williams opportunity to thank the police May 24 - James James department for a job well done. If May 26- Steve Bratcher this officer's an example of the May 26 - Mitch Willoughby quality of policeman we have in our May 30- Robert Grady community, we can certainly feel May31- Steve London proud and at the same time feel secure in our neighborhoods. Again I would personally like to thank this "No Signed 180..." officer for a job well done." Near the Grapevine... ~ signed ~-'~J __ _" ~ I Ernest Martinez JOB WELL DONE... ~ . OFFICER CHUCK BRADY ...0~ Steve Brummer "2 Able 13, I've got a possible .... 10-22, it may only be a standing on a rock North and East groundhog. I must be trying too of my 10-20..." hard" MEMORANDUM May 25, 1993 TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager ~ FROM: Jake Wager, Economic Development Direc SUBJECT: "Clean Air" Street Survey (Thursday, May 20, 1993) A member of my staff has joined the marketing committee of the DBPOA. One specific project they have undertaken is to survey the street faire go'ers. Attached for your information is a compilation of the responses. On the whole I view the responses as very favorable. CITT RANAGER-, May 20, 1993 "Clean Air" Street Faire Survey Results What do you like. best about the Street Faire? The dominant responses to the question were food, a family activity', Street Faire activities and fun! How did you hear about the Street Faire? A large portion of respondents either saw it on live news coverage being broadcast the night of the Street Faire or they were regulars at the Street Faire and knew about it without benefit of the media. Newspaper as a way to inform the public about the Street Faire was the weakest response. Have you shopped downtown, other than the Street Faire, in the last 6 monthS? A resounding YES! Survey respOndents shop downtown and were eager to tell us where (even though that was not a survey question) Would you like the stores downtown to be open during the Street Faires and offer special bargains? It was unanimous, everyone wants extended business hours during the Street Faire. In addition, survey respondents expressed that they are definitely shoppers who enjoy bargains. What zip code do you live in? Dominate zip codes where: 93309; 93306; 93304; and 93305 What do you like best about downtown? People like the central location, the downtown'provokes feelings of nostalgia and fond memories, and respOndents commented on the positive efforts to revitalize downtown. Any additional comments you would like to include: Respondents were concerned Over safety issues, interested in more outdoor restaurants and. boutique type shops, plus wanted extended store hours. Merchants' comments Who participated in Street Faire with extended hours and/or participated in sidewalk sale: · 5 sales (which were over $70 each) were a direct result of store coupons handed out at Information Booth during the Street Faire. · One merchant reported to do one day's worth of receipts during hours of the Street Faire. · . Several merchants reported increased foot traffic and consumer awareness of their store. Why people like shopping downtown · The friendly and courteous service not available at local shopping malls. · People view downtown as the heart of town and feel it is a central location no matter what zip code they reside in. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 2700 "M" Street, Suite 225, P.O.Box 1229, Bakersfield, CA 93302 ._------,~,"~'_--- - Phone (805) 861-2774 Fax (805) 861-2817 Date: May 17, 1993 Chairman RAYBURN S. DEZEMBER Director To: KEDC Board Members/Alternates Wells Fargo Sank KEDC Public/Private Membership City Managers Assodation Secretm3r Manager, Kern County Board of Trade JACK HUNT President Directors, Kern County Board of Trade VejonRanch Kern County Board of Supervisors Bakersfield City Council ToM G. CROSS Community Advisory Council Gen. Mgr./Vice President Other Interested Parties. Pacific Bell Gompany From: Sharrnan Krauter Cummins Vice President & Client Services Manager WARREN CARTER Kern Economic Development Corporation Chairman Watson Gorporation Subject:. .. KEDC April 1993, Client Activity Report CATHY PROUT Council Member City of Shafter Thirteen (13) prospect files were opened and five (5) client visits were conducted in the month of April. The following is a brief description of. BOB PRICE Mayor the new projects started this month, dient visits with updates on selected City of Bakersfield ongoing projects. ROY ASHBURN New Projects Supervisor, District I County of Kern Decision Time Frame Under 6 Months ESTHER TORRES 04/059/93 Manufacturer - Oil Industry Products. This company is Real Estate Loan Officer Bank of Stockdale investigating the possibility of expanding their operations into Kern County. Project Requirements: Lease or purchase 3,000-5,000 square foot TOM 'TAZZ' LOGUDICE building and employ up to 6 people. Council Member California Gity 04/058/93 Office. A Northern California consultant contacted us for PresidentGLEN T. HIERLMEIER information on Kern County as a potential location for a new Corporate Castle & Cooke Development Headquarters facility. Project Requirements: Lease 15,000-30,000 square foot Class A office space, employ 50-100 people, needs excellent B~-r HILL telecommunications infrastructure and supply of quality professionals as President Kern County Board of Trade well as semi-skilled office workers. DAN SABOVlCH 04/053/93 Manufacturer - Containers. This lead cam e from a local Realtor Chairman in Eastern Kern County. Project Requirements: Lease or purchase a Mojave Desert Bank 20,000 - 50,000 square foot building, heavy utility requirements, employ VERNON STRONG 50-100 people, investment $1.5 million, needs financing options. Owner Strong Realty Company 1 A I UBLIC-I RIVATI£ PAR'IWERSIIII~ BRINGING NEW BUSINESS TO NE[LN COU,¥1¥ New Projects DecisiOn Time Frame Under 6 Months (continued) 04/052/93 Warehouse/Distribution -Small Appliances. This Southern California company is searching for a new warehouse/distribution location. Project Requirements: Lease warehouse space, employ approximately 75 people, requires excellent freeway access (12 trucks / day). 04/051/93 Manufacturer - Lighting Fixtures - TACA. The California Trade and Commerce Agency contacted us for information on Kern County for this project. Project Requirements: Purchase or lease existing 100,000-120,000 square foot building or build to suit on fully improved land, rail a plus, industrial sized utilities, employ over 120 people, air quality issues are important as well as quality of life. 04/050/93 Retail - Recreational Vehicles. A local Realtor is assisting a company with their relocation plans. Project Requirements: Lease 2-3 acres, employ 15-20 people. New Projects Decision Time Frame Over 6 Months 04/060/93 Service - Industrial Medical Center. A Southern California group is considering establishing an Industrial Medical Center in Kern County. Project Requirements: Lease existing medical office with 4-5 examining rooms. 04/057/93 Service - Commercial Landscaping. This Southern California based firm is gathering information on Kern County as a potential location for a branch operation. 04/056/93 Service - Personnel. A Southern California entrepreneur is analyzing the local market and may establish a personnel services branch office. 04/055/93 Manufacturer - Metal Products. This Midwestern company is interested in relocating their operations to California. 04/054793 Office/Retail. A marketing group is conducting a survey of the local economy for a Fortune 500 company. The company may establish several small office/retail locations. 2 A PUBLIC. PRIVATE PARTNER$11IP BRINGING NEW BUSINESS TO KERN New Projects Decision Time Frame Over 6 Months (continued) 04/049/93 Retail. A company is considering establishing a retail operation in Kern County. Project Requirements: Lease 4,500-10,000 square feet, employ 1-2 people. 04/048/93 Manufacturer - Oil Related Supplies. A local Realtor requested information for a cliem who is considering relocating their operation. Project Requirements: Purchase a 25,000-30,000 square foot building, with loading docks, rail preferred, employ 10-30 people. Client Visits 12/221/92 Manufacturer - Textile Mill - TACA. The Taiwanese textile company representatives arrived in Kern Kern County on April 1, 1993 for a brief introductory tour. Project Requirements: Purchase 7-10 acres of land, employ between 100-150 people. 05/100/92 Office. On April 8, 1993, a windshield tour of the available office buildings in Bakersfield was coordinated with the City of Bakersfield Economic and Community Development Dept. In addition to the building tour a lunch meeting was held with Mayor Bob Price. 01/001/93 Manufacturer - Ag Products - TACA A tour of available buildings and several meetings were arranged on April 13, 1993 for this company. Project Requirements: Lease existing building (20,000 'square feet), 16 foot minimum ceilings, two truck docks, prefer rail and existing storage tanks, employ 22 people and use about 7,500 gallons of water per day. 04/053/93 Manufacturer - Containers. A meeting was' held, on April 22, 1993, in Mojave with Supervisor Austin, the client and the local Realtor to discuss the project and possible assistance. Project Requirements: Lease or purchase a 20,000 - 50,000 square foot building, heavy utility requirements, employ 50-100 people, investment $1.5 million, needs financing options. 12/220/92 Recycling - Soil Remediation. A meeting was held on April 23, 1993 with engineers from the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District to discuss the Authority to Construct application and additional information needed to process the permit. 3 A PUBLIC-PR]kATE PARTNERSHIP BRINGING NEW BUSINESS TO KERN COUNTY Update on selected on-going projects 03/026/93 Manufacturer - Glass & Mirror Products. The business has put their relocation plans on hold for a least 6 months, because of the uncertainty of the current economic conditions. 03/032/93 Warehouse/Distribution - Linens. This Southeastern company has leased space a local public warehouse and may consider establishing a permanent facility in Kern County within the next year. 01/010/93 Warehouse/Distribution. The negotiations on a new building are progressing and an announcement is expected within the next several months. Project Requirements: Lease or purchase 15,000 square foot warehouse with at least 1 acre for parking, easy access to bus transportation and main highways. 12/226/92 Manufacturer. The Company Board of Director's has met and a decision is pending. Project Requirements: Purchase 30-40 acres, with available adjoining acreage (20 acres) for expansion, good truck access (100 trucks per day), available water for process and fire protection (70,000 gal./day), electricity min. 1500 KVA transformer w/480 Y/277 volt secondary, 3 pH, 60 Hz capable of delivering 1800 A/phase continuously, employ 120 people, $27 million investment. 07/152/92 Manufacturer - Food Processing. This project continues to move forward. A decision is pending. Additional Items The California Association of Local Economic Developers (CALED)had their annual meeting and conference in Monterey on April 6-9. Numerous educational sessions were held along with discussions on the status of California's business climate. A very interesting session was held on the North American Free Trade Agreement and what it means to local economic developers. Please give us a call if you have any questions on these projects. 4 A PUBLIC-PRIVATE pARTNERSIIIP BRINGING NEW BUSINESS TO KERN COUNTY KERN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION APRIL 1993 ACTIVITIES REPORT KERN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP. Kern Economic Development Corporation Economic Development Activities Report Summar~ of Client Activities Month endin~ April 30,1993 Fisad Year Results A]~ril Summnr~ of Client Activit~ 89-90' 90-91' 91-92' 92-93' 60 Total Prospects Year To Date 173 205 257 150 Number of Prospects 13 April Prospects 8 13 13 5 Number of Locations/Expansions 5 April Client Visits 4.62% 6.34% 5.06% 3.33% Success Rate Successful Locations # of Jobs Investment Buildin~ Size Acres Comments None to re~ort in the month of April. KEDC Assisted Successful Prolects Bureau of L~nd Management ** $4,000,000 58,000 Combined $ existin~ BLM offices into one new facility. Total 0 $4,000,000 58,000 0.00 Client Activit~ Summa ~: Includes aH new l~rosl)ects and current pro~ects with over 20 employees or 15,000 sq. ft. buildin~ size with ]~ro~ress made within the last 3 months. Decision Time Frame Within Six Months 04]059/93 Manufacturer- Oil Related Products 6 ilIA 5,000 IlIA General Demographics and Property Information. 04]058/93 Office 100 ll/A 30,000 Ilia General Demographics and Property Information. 04/053/93 Manufacturer- Containers 100 1,500,000 50,000 10 General Demographics and Property Information. 04/052/93 Warehouse/Distribution - Small Appliances 75 UdA UIA VdA General Demographics. 04/051/93 Manufacturer- Lighting Fixtures - TACA 120 UdA 120,000 10 General Demographics and Property Information. 04/050/93 Retail- Recreational Vehicles 20 U/A U/A 3 General Demographics. 03/043/93 Manufacturer - Building Materials 60 2,000,000 U/A 40 General Demographics and Property Information. 03/042/93 Manufacturer - Printed Materials 150 U/A 100,000 U/A Available Property Information and Air Quality Rules. 03/031/93 Service - Entertainment 150 U/A 40,000 U/A General Demographics and Property Information. 02/022/93 Manufacturer 100 U/A 100,000 10 General Demographics and Property Information. 02/021/93 Manufacturer - Precision Stone Products - TACA 20 U/A 30,000 2 General Demographics and Property Information. 02/020/93 Manufacturer - Paper Products 200 25,000,000 700,000 30 General Demographics and Property Information. 02/017/93 Manufacturer - Aviation Related 800 U/A 20,000 U/A General Demographics and Property Information. 02/013/93 Manufacturer - Home Furnishings 25 U/A 30,000 U/A General Demographics and Property Information. 01/012/93 Manufacturer/Recycler 100 7,000,000 U/A 20 Assistance with municipal financing. 01/008/93 Manufacturer - Clean Fuels 200 500,000,000 U/A 100 General Demographics and Property Information. 01/005/93 Service - Recreation 50 U/A 25,000 U/A General Demographics and Property Information. 01/004/93 Recyder - Used Tiros 20 4,000,000 80,000 25 General Demographics and Property Information. 01/001/93 Manufacturer - Ag Products -TACA 22 U/A 20,000 U/A General Demographics and Property Information~ 121228192 Manufacturer - Steel Processing 15 U/A 60,000 2 General Demographics and Property Information. 121226192 Manufacturer 120 27,000,000 140,000 60 Derision Pending 12/221/92 Manufacturer - Textile Mill - TACA 150 U/A U/A 10 General Demographics and Property Information. 12/219/92 Manufacturer - Asl~halt Batchin~ Plant 30 U/A U/A 20 General Demo~al~hics and Prol~ert¥ Information. IKern Economic Development Corporation ' Economic Development Activities Report Summary of Client Activities Month ending April 30, 1993 ................ ~ ....... ,. ............~..., ....... .........~..,........ ·.. · ,., · · · .-...... -......-~..-.. <.:........:..:.:.:.:.:.:+ .:..:~...:. ~ ....... ~<...-,-~....:.:.:~.~::~:¥.:.:::~ ..<:~:~:::.' :.:.: :.::'.::.:>;:::::.¢::~:::.,.~?.:.:~ ::: .;.-~ :-'~:: ::..'::::~ ~:~ :~'<: ::~:~: ~."~[~'".~ ~: ::::::::::' '::::~m.:::'[ [ :~.~ '" ":::::~.[::.'~:[: ¢.~ [::".".'"""':~:~:.~['"[-':':[:E'~:~:.":~:':~:.:~:[::' ;'.<~:~:[:[~'E:[~ ~:'."~:::[:~:.~ '~.'..'[:[.'.'.'.'-'[~[[:':'~ :~. CE: :~[:i:.:: :.:i::: :.~:: ::':: :5: :[:[:5:[:!.'.'.'.":!:!:~0 ~:~'"[:::::' ===================== :' :':':'"::':':':':':" ":':':':::'"':':":' ': :[-'.":[:i:[ ' - ':':'":'::i ~":'~: ::!:! ' ' ::i:~'j~i~" ............... : :i: :[:.~i::: ." -' :i:: :::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: .,.':.l..'."..." :::..'..~ .-.':[: ::: :.~ ~.':'.'~::...-':~:~:::~: Decision Time Frame Within Six Months (Continued) 12/216/92 Manufacturer - Poultry Processing - TACA 1,000 U/A U/A 75 General Demographics and Property Information. 11/208/92 Manufacturer 10 20,000,000 U/A 50 General Demographics 10/197/92 Manufacturer - Food Processing 60 U/A 60,000 2 General Demographics and Property Information. 10/191/92 Manufacturer - Equipment - TACA 40 U/A 30,000 2 General Demographics and Property Information. 10/188/92 Manufacturer - Food Processing - TACA 1,500 U/A 1,300,000 100 Labor Market and Available Property Information. 09/187/92 Office - Insurance Claims Processing 35 U/A 6,300 U/A General Demographics and Property Information. 09/182/92 Manufacturer - Electronics 30 U/A 20,000 U/A General Demographics and Property Information. 09/177/92 Manufacturer - Paper Conversion - TACA 230 U/A 125,000 U/A Labor Market and Available Property Information. 08/166/92 Manufacturer - Labels - TACA 20 U/A 20,000 ' U/A General Demographics and Property Information. 08/164/92 Manufacturer -Textiles U/A 15,000,000 90,000 10 General Demographics and Property Information. 07/152/92 Manufacturer - Food Processing 250 50,000,000 200,000 640 Permit Research and Assistance 07/145/92 Manufacturer - Equipment - TACA 10 $00,000 30,000 U/A General Demographics 07/142/92 Manufacturer -Co-Generation 14 60,000,000 U/A 2 Permit Research and Assistance 06/129/92 Manufacturer - Lighting 550 U/A 500,000 17 On Hold 06/126/92 Manufacturer - Automotive Interior - TACA 40 U/A 25,000 2 General Demographics 03/063/92 Warehouse/Distribution U/A U/A 350,000 U/A Available Property Search 11/154/89 Recyclin~ - Used Motor Oil 150 25,000,000 U/A 10 Permit Assistance and Property Information Sub Totals 6,572 737,000,000 4,306,300 1,252 Decision Time Frame Over Six Months 04/0~0/93 Service - Industrial Medical Center [I/A U_/A [I/A U/A Preliminary Research for New Facility. 04/057/93 Service - Commercial Landscaping [I/A U/A U/A U/A Preliminary Research ~or New Facility. 04/056/93 Service- Personnel [I/A U/A U/A U/A Preliminary Research for New Facility. 04/055/93 Manufacturer [I/A Ilia Ilia [I/A Preliminary Research ~or Hew Facility. 04/054Y93 O~ice/Retail [I/A [~A [I/A Ilia Preliminary Research for Hew Facility. 04/049/93 Retail 2 CI/A ~ 0,000 [I/A Preliminary Research for Hew 04/048/93 Manufacturer - Oil Related Products 30 Ilia 30,000 [Z/A Preliminary Research ~or New Facility. 03/028/93 Warehouse/Distribution 50 U/A 400,000 U/A Available Property Information. 01/009/93 Office 50 U/A 25,000 U/A Preliminary Research for New Facility. 01/007/93 Office 500 U/A 100,000 U/A Preliminary Research for New Facility. 12/212/92 Manufacturer - Precision Engine Parts U/A U/A 20,000 U/A Preliminary Research for New Facility. 11/206/92 Warehouse/Distribution 80 U/A 150,000 U/A General Demo~raDhics and Pro~ert~z Information. Page2