The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About06/18/93 BAKERSFIELD MEMORANDUM TO' HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL~~~/~/June 18, 1993 FROM: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: GENERAL INFORMATION 1. You will find the CDDA Goals and implementation timeframe enclosed. I think they are a fairly logical set of goals and they have been reasonably well coordinated with the DBPOA and other groups. 2. A copy of the revised notice on the gate fees to our commercial customers is enclosed, for your information. We did attempt to work with the County in this regard, and believe that it still conveys the essential components of the message we need to pass on. 3. I will be taking vacation time from July 9th through July 17th. On this occasion, I will have John Stinson be in charge and will probably rotate that between John and Henry in the future. 4. There is a memo enclosed from the Legal staff to the Planning Commission. There has been a problem with them taking actions that may create a problem for us with State law. This is an effort to correct that problem before we have to take it to Council for additional assistance. 5. You all received a communication from B-Flag on a grievance-threatened lawsuit issue. We are working that through the grievance procedure. It involves a frozen position, and whether or not there should be a two or three week promotion followed by a demotion. 6. There is a document enclosed showing what the current discussion is of a budget committee at the State legislature on their proposed "take". If this particular one comes into being, this year, we would lose $2.1 million, rather than $3.8 million, presumably with the balance to be lost next year. A logical question is, "What if the State relents in its property tax capture, in regard to our budget adoption?" My opinion, at this time, would be to put it into contingency to be reserved for public safety transition needs. That is, the monies could help us deal with public safety emergencies, should they arise; or they could help us to do further downsizing through attrition, rather than layoffs. 7. Enclosed you will find a copy of responses to the last set of budget questions raised. We have the Pre-Meeting Workshop on that Wednesday, and then, at least until County or State actions impact us further, the staff is looking forward to being done! HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL · June 18, 1993 Page -2- 8. You will find some documents enclosed from the Grand Jury. They are doing a County-wide recommendation to reduce governmental travel expenses. Our per diem is .higher than some of the other jurisdictions. It is my understanding that it has been at this level for five or six years. We will have a staff committee study the matter to see if changes are warranted. Grand Jury studies usually "hit the press." 9. We had a meeting with Texaco on annexations this week - it went very well - they want water and sewer service. We had another meeting with the other property owners in that area - it went less well - about 10 of them are protesting. We will continue to work with them and, will separately, see if any should be carved out. 10. We got the sales tax information this Friday. Our 1% growth assumption in next years budget was precisely accurate. The amount received showed a seven tenths of one percent increase from last year! The budget estimates do not need revision. AT.alb Enclosures cc: Department Heads City Clerk Central District Development Agency of the City of Bakersfield MISSION STATEMENT, GOALS, AND OBJECTIVES adopted xxx xx, 1993 MISSION STATEMENT Work cooperatively with the community to develop a shared vision that enhances and creates value, focuses on quality growth and development, and results in a positive image and positive economic environment' in. downtown Bakersfield. GOALS & OBJECTIVES GOAL: Foster teamwork: Create and maintain a cooperative atmosphere among all parties interested in improving downtown Bakersfield. ( Objectives: · foster teamwork among all Parties working to improve downtown · improve the image of redevelopment efforts and promote a POsitive image of downtown GOAL: Create a vision: Establish a vision and develop a master plan for downtown Bakersfield which... oanticipates constraints and opportunities ofocuses on the first five years Oencourages the adoption of a theme Opromotes the greening of downtown oidentifies resources Oretains historical and cultural values oaddresses the issues of aesthetics Oencourages a variety of uses downtown. Objectives: · after the vision has been developed, communicate it , research role models of communities which have been successful at redevelopment · determine our geograPhic focus · examine current parking configurations and explore possible parking changes that support existing uses and encourages new development. Central District Development Agency of the City of Bakersfield MISSION STATEMENT, GOALS, AND OBJECTIVES adopted xxx Xx, 1993 GOAL: Strengthen economic health: Strengthen the economic health of the Central District Development Agency. Objectives: ·creative a positive cash flow · continue management of the agency's debt and finances '· complete refinancing of Agency's existing debt GOAL: Promote development: Promote development opportunities within the redevelopment area which Outilize public/private partnerships Ocreate and retain employment Objectives: · enhance and create housing within downtown · encourage projects which can provide immediate successes · develop h marketing plan which identifies our target groups and brings additional activity to the downtown ,provide information'to the general public and developers how the agency can assist in revitalizing the downtown. GOAL: Streamline the process: Improve and simplify the deVelopment process by... oremoving obstacles to development orepealing regulations which impede quality downtown development .ooffering CBD zoning and other incentives . ostreamlining the permit process Opromoting .certainty and introducing predictability. Objectives: .to simplify the development process, develop a "blueprint" of documents developers need to complete · ask past participants to evaluate the redevelopment process · develop a road map, or a "who's who~" in downtown development Central District Development Agency of the City of Bakersfield MISSION STATEMENT, GOALS, AND OBJECTIVES adopted xxx xx, 1993~ GOAL: Maximize assets: Maximize downtown assets by maintaining and improving 'existing properties and taking advantage of special opportunities as they present themselves. Objectives: , Complete the convention center hotel · address the URM issue · maintain and upgrade downtown's infrastructure · identify our resources (assets) · support efforts to upgrade, the Fox Theatre · support public transit downtown · encourage housing downtown · explore the agency's role in the city's upcoming centennial · encourage the maintenance and enhancement of'public rights-of-way all/goals. I'm -3- MEMORANDUM June 15, 1993 TO: Central District Development Agency Members FROM: Alan. Tandy, Executive Director z/ / SUBJECT: Timeline for Goals and Obiectives Before you today is the issue of a mission statement, goals, and objectives. Chairman Gaskill has asked staff to develop a timeline for when these goals and objectives will be addressed. Based upon the draft included in your agenda packet, I have prepared a _timeline for implementation of your goals and objectives. Please consider that the city's Economic Development Division has several other requirements and obligations besides redevelopment. With their existing staff levels, as well as budget constraints affecting all city departments, completion of these goals and objectives will perhaps take longer than any of us would like. One of these goals--"Establish a vision and develop a master plan for downtown Bakersfield"--is a very complex and time-consuming issue. If fewer funds are captured by the state than expected, then this (or any other goal and objective that is viewed as a high priority) may be expedited by using outside consultants. Otherwise, please be aware that you may be looking at a multi-year commitment should such a master plan need to be developed by staff. I mention this so you can keep in perspective that while staff has committed to carry out the necessary requirements related to meetings and other Agency obligations throughout the year, work related to goals and objectives will be accomplished over a more extended period of _time. Also, staff is working closely with the Hammons group regarding the convention center hotel. This is additional work which we are doing, but it takes away from something else; should the hotel project proceed as we all hope, this will be a high priority which may delay some other very important, though not as time-sensitive, items related to the goals and objectives. Also, please note that some of these objectives are already on-going activities being handled by staff. We will strengthen our commitment to carrying them out and search for new and improved ways to accomplish these tasks. Members of the Central District Development Agency June 15, 1993 Page 2 PROPOSED GOALS AND OBJECTIVES WITH SUGGESTED TIMELINES FOR COMPLETION GOAL: Foster teamwork: Create and maintain a cooperative atmosphere among all parties interested in improving downtown Bakersfield. Objectives: , foster teamwork among all parties working to improve downtown TIMELINE: ongoing ,improve the image of redevelopment efforts and promote a positive image of downtown TIMELINE: ongoing (use news releases, "Blueprints") GOAL: Create a vision: Establish a vision and develop a master plan for downtown Bakersfield which... oanticipates constraints and opportunities ofocuses on the first five years Oencourages the adoption of a theme opromotes the greening of downtown Oidentifies resources Oretains historical and cultural values oaddresses the issues of aesthetics oencourages a variety of uses downtown. Objectives: , after the vision has been developed, communicate it ,research role models of communities which have been successful at redevelopment · determine our geographic focus · examine current parking configurations and explore possible parking changes that support existing uses and encourages new development TIMELINE: ..o. ption 1: if prepared by staff, 1-3 years option 2: select a consultant which would develop such a plan within (1) year from the issuance of a Request for Proposals (RFP). Members of the Central District Development Agency June 15, 1993 Page 3 GOAL: Strengthen economic health: Strengthen the economic health of the Central District Development Agency. Objectives: · creative a positive cash flow TIMELINE: ongoing · continue management of the agency's debt and finances TIMELINE: ongoing · complete refinancing of Agency's existing debt TIMELINE: completed GOAL: Promote development: Promote development opportunities within the redevelopment area which... outilize public/private partnerships Ocreate and retain employment Objectives: · enhance and create housing within downtown TIMELINE: Community Development Division will be preparing a Housing Market Study of Bakersfield; Part 11 of this proiect, "Feasibility Study of Affordable Housing within the Redevelopment Area," will assist the Agency in this goal. The results are due by the end of 1993. · encourage projects which can provide immediate successes TIMELINE: ongoim[ · develop a marketing plan which identifies our target groups and brings additional activity to the downtown TIMELINE: this task should be included with the completion of a master plan as mentioned previously. · provide information to the general public and developers how the agency can assist in revitalizing the downtown. TIMELINE: ongoing Members of the Central District Development Agency June 15, 1993 Page 4 GOAL: Streamline the process: Improve and simplify the development process by... Oremoving obstacles to development Orepealing regulations which impede quality downtown development Oofering CBD zoning and other incentives ostreamlining the permit process Opromoting certainty and introducing predictability. TIMELINE: A CBD zoning ordinance, which is being coordinated by the Development Services Department, is scheduled for implementation in FY 1993-94. Objectives: , to simplify the development process, develop a "blueprint" of documents developers need to complete TIMELINE: The existing Development Submittal Guidelines already provide this information. Staff will update by December 31, 1993. · ask past participants to evaluate the redevelopment process TIMELINE: Develop a questionnaire and distribute it by September 30, 1993. · develop a road map, or a "who's who," in downtown development TIMELINE: This will be included in the updated Development Submittal Guidelines which will be updated by December 31, 1993. GOAL: Maximize assets: Maximize downtown assets by maintaining and improving existing properties and taking advantage of special opportunities as they present themselves. Objectives: ·complete the convention center hotel TIMELINE: FY 1993-94 · address the URM issue TIMELINE: implementation during FY 1993-94 · maintain and upgrade downtown's infrastructure TIMELINE: ongoin~ · identify our resources (assets) TIMELINE: this objective will be included with the completion of a master plan as discussed previously. Members of the Central District Development Agency June 15, 1993 Page 5 , support efforts to upgrade the Fox Theatre TIMELINE: on~oine · support public transit downtown TIMELINE: on~oin~ · encourage housing downtown TIMELINE: ongoing · explore the agency's role in the city's upcoming centennial TIMELINE: An Agency member selected by the Agency and supported by staff could assist the Centennial Committee in planning this event, scheduled for 1998. · encourage the maintenance and enhancement of public rights-of-way TIMELINE: ongoing dl/goaltime, lin : June 15, 1993 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION 'FROM: LAURA C. MARINO, Assistant City Attorney SUBJECT: PRE-I~m'FINGS OF THE PLAHNING COI~IWr~-c:TON I have some grave concerns about the Monday pre-meetings of the Planning Commission. Evidence is being presented and issues are being debated on projects scheduled for a public hearing the following Thursday. This is an impermissible violation of due process and places the city in a position"of potential liability. Moreover, it appears that the only.purpose.of the Monday meetings · is to take evidenCe outside of the public hearing. If the CommiSsion wishes to continue with the Monday' meetings, they must be noticed as public hearings. Then the Commission can receive the testimony of staff and continue the remainder of the public hearing to Thursday night, or it may take other public testimony if it wishes. This is the only procedure under which the Commission may continue with the Monday meetings without jeopardizing the city. An item will be placed on the agenda for the July 1 meeting to amend the by-laws to remove the requirement for Monday meetings. If the by-laws are not amended at that time, we will begin to notice public hearings for Mondays. LCM/meg PC\PRE~R. RTG.HEM 'cc: Jack Hardisty, Planning Director Lawrence M. Lunardini, City Attorney Z1:~1:98 -~ 885~Z9S788 Bakcrsficld P~c 18:35 LERGUE 0F OR CITIES F~ N0, 9184448671 P, 01 ague of Califomia Cities 1993 TO:. Ci~ M~u~ers RE: Budget Negotiations Update After several days of negotiations over the "local government' portion of the state budget, thc Budget Conference Coromitt~ today!iasucd an outline of a proposed budget solution for local government finan, ce.' _.WMle the ouflinc is fir from a "done deal" it is representative of the Committee's thimking on a budget package for local government. The primary components of. the package are as follows: 1. A 5;1.2 bil/ion reduction in loca]govemment revenues'with the following cot levels: : ..: , Counties " $$$$ million Cities $355 million Special Districts Enterprise; $112,5 million Non-enterprise: $11;L$ million Redevelopment Agencies $ 65 million 2. The continuation of the state 1/2 cent sales tax, set to expire ou June 30, 1993, for a. period long enough to retire the budget deficit in the current year and certain outstanding school loans (estimated to be $ years). 3. A statewide option for an' additional' l J2 cent. sales tax on a future ballot (presumably June of 1994) dcdicaicd to' Schools (this reduces thc need to take r ther prove tr t= s rom lo, Sovcra .,nts ii, fu e rears?. 4. Allocation of the cuts among 'cities is not yet settled, however, the Committee appears to be leaning toward a reductiOn-through a formula which calculates 1/2 of thc loss on an AB 8 formula and thc remaining 1/2 on general prop©try tax©s (general PropertY taxes being siml'~ t° the formula used last ),car to effect a 9 percent reduction in property taxes). Estimates of thc reduction by city, prepared by the Legislative Analyst, are attached for your review. ~ ~ ~AY~, ~ ~g 1400 K ~TRE~, ~C~O, CA ~14 m2 ~T H~T~ D~, S~E C 31 JUN-16-g3'HED 18:35 LEAGUE OF CA CITIES F~ NO, 9164448671 P, 02 Cautionary Note_: The estimates from Go Legislative Analyst's Offic~ are based on data from the Controller's offic~ and does not include accurate figures for No and Low properly cities and c/ties which have incorporated since the enactment of AB 8. These figures arc only examples of thc potential impact of a $355 million reduction based on a '1/2 AB 8 and 1/2 general property tax formula.' Ilo_not usc these flgure~ far budgetary Purposes. The figures are only general comparisons. Data from your coun~ will l!kely _vary_ from the estimates pre.oared by_ the _Le_eislative Aha .lyst~. 5. Allocation of redevelopment agencies' "one-time" reduction pursuam to one of the following: .. a. Uniform percentage raduction of statewide mx increment' (aet after pass- tlu~gh) for all agencies, with no. ~cquircmcnt that cities pay if agcncics do not have the funds. - b. Provision a. above with additional option of access to Low-Moderate Income housing funds, Actiou We a~e askh~g a~l cMes to contact, the~ Leg~siators. and tell them thal lhe property ~educfions at th~ $355 million are ~oo great and to explore furlhe~ options for rcdu¢~on of th~ cut to city revenues. We sugges~ Phon~ calls, but FAX works also, if you are fortunate enough to have your L~gislator's FAX number. J~-16-93 ~D 18:36 LEAGUE OF'CA CITIES FAX NO. 9164448671 P, 03 In Thousands of Dollars 1 Alam'eda 1,~9 - 274 1 AIb:~ny 3,121 I Berkeley 307 10ubfln 287 1 Emeryville 3,458 1 Fremont 1.964 1 Hayward 1,105 1 Livermore ?69 1 Newa~'k 1 Oakland 6O7 I Piedmont I Pleasanton 839 1 San Leandro 908 I Union City ~, 2 3 Amador '-:" --' 3 lone ;.-~;,; 18 ' ' 41 3 Jackson 14. 3 Plymouth 27 3 Suffer Creek 7 4 Biggs 270 4 Chico 37 4 Gddley 134 40roville lg0 4 Paradise 30 5 Angels Camp 48 6 Colusa 26 6 Williams 742 7 Antioch 7 Etrentwood ' 170 91 7 Clayton 1,022 ? Concord 149 7 D~viile 456 7 Et Cerfito 7 Hercules 161 45 7 Lafayette '621 7 Martinez 111 7 Morega 75. 70rlnda 206 ' 7 Pinole 711 7 Pittsburg 38 7 Pleasant Hill 7 Richmond 3,282 7 San P~blo 110 7 San Ramon 363 7 Walnut Creek 526 16 8 Cresoent'City 112 9 Placervflle 456 9 South Lake Tahoe 519 10 Clovis 50 10 Coalinga 23 10 Firebaugh 10 Fowler ~ 22 5,398 10 Fresno 22 . Legis~a~ve An~ o~1~ 10 Ke~ 31 10 ~ebu~ 45 10 M~do~ 47 10 P=rller · 20 10 R~ey 10 S~r t0 ~0 Selma 87 12 Eur~ 2~ 12 Trinidad . 3 13 C~e~ 127 13 C=lipalHa 13 E! Centre ~6 13 lmped~ 303 13 Westmo~land 14 B~hop 40 2,~ 15 D~eno 127 15 McFad~d ~5 15 Ridgecrest ~48 ~5 Sha~e~ 32 ' 15 Taft 48 15 T~a~h~i 80 15 Was~ 27 16 Aven~ 12 16 Cor~r~ 16 Hanford 16 Lem~e 17 Clear Lake 19 Agoura Hills ~13 19 A~ambm ~8 19 ~es~a 0 19. Ay=Ion ' 19 ~usa ~ 414 19 B~dwin P~ 86/1G~'93 Zl:33;SZ ->' 8853Z3378§ ]}a]~cz,s.rlcl& ?a9'c 5 · : J~-18-§3 lIED 18:37 LEAGUE OF CA CITIES F~ NO, 9184448671 P. 05 LegislaUve Analyst 06/16/93 19 Beverly Hills '~'- 2,518 19 Bradbury 16 19 Burbank 2,418 19 Calabasas. 42 19 C~rson 19 Cerritos 0 19 Claremont 444 19 Commerce 0 19 Compton 431 · 19 Covina 579 19 Cudahy 0 19 Culver City 544 19 Diamond Bar 107 19 Downey 1,oo4 19 Ouarte -;' !!;' 127 19 El Monte '~:. i .... ;:; 639 ' ' 19 El Segundo 220 19 Gardens 578 19 Glendale 2,603 19 Glendora 549 19 Hawaiian Gerdens 21 19 Hawthorne 571 19' Hermosa Beach' 702 19 Hidden H[lls 50 19 Huntington Park 212 19 Industry 369 19 Inglewood 1,134 19 lrwindale 186 19 La Canada Flintridge 0 19 La Habr~ Heights 45 19 Lakewood 77 19 La Mirada 0 · 19 Lancaster 216 19 La. Puente 68 19 La Verne 19 La.wndale 0 t9 Lomita 19 Long Beach : g,676 19 Los. Angeles t06,408 19 Lynwood 245 19 Mal~u 78 19 Manhattan Beach 1,074 19 Maywood 91 19 Monrovla 641 19 Monte Be~o 159 19 Monterey Park 761 19 Norwalk 0 r 19 PalrndaJe 0 19 Pates Verdes Estates 445 19 Paramount 0 19 Pasadena 3,515 19 Pice Rk, em' 0 19 Pomona - ' BG/IG/93, Zl:94:Z~ -> 8§S3Z9978§ Ba~crs£icl& P~rc G ~. JUN-18-93 WED 18:38 LERGUE OF CA CITIES FAg NO, 9184448671 P. 06 Legislative Analyst 06116/93 19 Redondo lleach .. 1,724 19 Rolling H~lls 27 19 Rolling Hills Estates 0. 19 Rosemead f 0 19 San Dimas 341 ~ 19 San Femando 242 19 san Gabriel 314 19 San Mmino 708 19 Santa Clarita 332 19 Santa Fa Springs 292 19 Santa IVlonlea 2,131 19 $1erra Madre 262 19 Signal Hill 6 19 South El Monte 0 19 South Gate -:" !~:~ 96 lg South Pasadena ~" '":. : "':' !: 757 19 Temple Clty 0 19 Torrance 2,588 lg Vernon 336 19 Walnut 436 19 West Covina :. 1,005' 19 West Hollywood 418 19 WestJake Village 61 19 whittler 504 20 Chowchilla 55 20 Madera 200 21 Belvedere 120 21 Code Ma. dera 230 21 Fairfax 142 21 Larkspur 376 2t Mill Valley 552 21 Novato '467 21 Ross 102 21 San Anselmo 286 21 San Rafael 707 21 ~ausalito 309 21 TJberon 160. 23 Fort gragg 26 23 Point Arena 3 ~ Ukiah 81 23 WilUts 55 24 Atwater 159 Z4 Dos Palos 27 24 Gustine 42 ' 24 Uvingston eo 24 Lo.e, llanos 182 24 Merced 507 25 Alturas 24 26 Mammoth 48 27 Carmel 105 27 Del Rey Oaks 24 27 Gonzales 75 27 Greenfield 44 86/16~'93 2-1:34:56 -~ 8§53733?0§ B~rs~icl& P~c ? JtlN, 16-03 WEI) 18:38 LEAGUE OF OA OlTIE$ FAX NO, 9104448871 P, O? Legislative Analyst 06/16/93 ~27 Marina 133 27 Monterey 527 27 Pacific Grove 27 SaJlnas 860 27 Sand City 27 Seaside 190 27 Soledad 43 28 American Canyon 0 28 Calistoga 77 28 Napa 1,068 28 St. Helena .. 102 28 Yountville 24 29 Grass Valley 157 29 Nevada City 74 30 Anaheim -:, !!~ 2,227 30 Brea .... i:" . ' '-; 512 ' 30 Buene. Park 637 30 Costa Mesa 1,676 30 Cypress 429 30 Dana Point 126 30 Fountain Valley - 617 30 Fulierton 1,536 30 Garden Grove 1,060 30 HunUngton Beach 3,212 30 lrvine 755 30 Laguna Beach 372 30 LagUna Hills 0 · 30 Laguna Niguel 99 30 La Habra 803 30 La~e Forest 30 La Palina 491 ,'30 L°s Alamitos 149 30 Mission Viejo 677 30 Newport Beach 2,824 30 Orange 892 30 Placentia 450 30 San CIemente 800 30 San Juan Caplstrano 392 30 Santa Ana 3,012 30 Seal Beach 421 30 Slanton 211 ~ 30 TustJn 580 30 Villa Park 30 Westminster 338 30 Yorba Linda 420 31 Auburn 166 31 Coifax 17 31 bTncofn .. 101 31 Loomis - 25 31 Rocldin 307 31 Roseviile 32 Portola 114 33 I~nning . 216 ~:~ '~, ~,,-, ..... ~. 111 8~/1~9~ 21':35:28 -> 8853Z3~788 Ba~ersfielcl P~c 8 JUN-16-93 WED 18:39 LEAGUE OF CA CITIES F~ NO, 9164448671 P. 08 Legi~l~tJve Annlyst ~ B~he 78 ~ Calimesa 24 ~ C~yon ~ke 17 ~ Ca~ral Ci~ ~ Coach~ia 33 Gores 1,~2 33 H~ 478 ~ In~o 304 33 ~ke Ebl~m ~ La Quin~ 86 ~ Morro Valley 202 33 Mu~ta 0 33 Palm Dese~ "'; 41 ' ~ P~m Springs 1.379 ~3 Pe~s ~ 320 ~ Rancho Mimge ~ Riversi~ 1,660 33 San Jadnto 164 33 Tem~la 88 34 Folsom 34 G~ 91 34 Isleton 17 34 Sacramento 8,~8 35 Holl~ter 140 35 San dUan Bautis~ 54 36 Adel~to 1 36 A~e Valley 70 36 Bamtow 175 36 Big ~ar ~e 95 38 Chino 861 36 Chi~ Hil~ 0 36 ~ 36 Fon~a 1,~0 36 Gr~d Terms' 36 38 H~pe~ 32 36 Highland 99 36 LomaLinda 104 36 Montdair 380 36 Ne~l~ 78 36 Rancho Cu~onga 573 3e Rialto 739 36 Twen~nlne Palms 36 Yu~ 36 Yu~V~ · .0 37 C~ls~ ~017 " 86/li/Q3,. ? ?-1;36-'81 -> 8853Z33788 Bakcrs£icld P~c 9 JUhI-1B-93 NED 1B:39 LEAGUE OF CA CITIES FAJ( NO. 9184448871 P. 09 Leg)slaUve Analyst 06/16/93 37 Coronado 814 37 Del Mar 168 37 El Ca]on 650 37 Encinilas 245 37 Es~;)ndido 1,004 37 Imperial Beach 142 37 La Mesa 447 37' Lemon Grove 134 31 N~tional City 292 37 Oceanslde 2,440 37 Poway 330 37 SanDiego 16,209 37' San Marc, os 213 37 Santee 358 37 Solana Beach --.. ~.! 179 39 Escalon 57 39 La, throp 60 39 Lodi 668 39 Manteca 425 39 Ripon 76 39 StOCkton 2,575 39 Tracy 675 40 Arroyo Grande 202' 40 Atascadero 173 40 El Paso de Robles 343 40 Grover City 107 40 Morro Bay 178 40 Pismo Beach 140 40 San Luis Obisp° 525 41 Athedon t79 41 Belmont 201 41 Bdsbane 183 41 Budingame 486 41 Colma 2 41 Daly Oity 1.092 41 East Palo Alto 139 41 Foster City .,., 0 41 Half Moon Bay 60 41 H~lsborough 447 41 Menlo Pa~ 441 41 Millbrae 217 41 Pacifica 518 4t Po~tola Valley 21 41 Redwood City 1;459 .41 San Bruno 327 41'. San Carlos 348 41 San Mateo 1,009 41 South San Francisco 862 41 Woodslde 55 , .42 Buetlton 0 42 Carpinteda 115 42 Guad~lupe 22 8G/1G/9~ 21:3G:34 -> 8853233?88 Ba]~ers£'icld Page 18 J~L16-93 KD 18:40 LEAGUE OF CA CITIES FAX hi0, 9164448671 P, 10 r Legislative Analyst 06/16/9~ 42 Santa Barbera 871 42 Santa Maria 456 42 Solvang .. 57 43 Campbell 415 43 Cupe~llno 150 43 Gilroy 319 43 Los Altos 348 43 Los Altos Hills 124 43 Los Gat0s 475 .. 43 Milpltas 1,118 43 Monte Sereno 14 43 MoFgan Hill 310 43 Mountain View 7'82 , 43- Palo Alto 1.234 43 San Jose --" [~ 8,373 43 Santa Clara "~" ;.', 1,225 43 Saratoga 149 43 Sunnyvale 2,397 44 Capitola 64 44 Santa Cruz 656 44 Scotts Valley 88 44 Watsonville 410 45 Anderson 65 45 Redding 798 48 LoyaJton 3 47 Oorris 7 47 Dunsmuir 26 47 Etna 8 47 Fort Jones 7 47 Montague 13 47 Mount Shasta 924 . 47 Tulelake 7 '47 Weed 21 47 Yreka 76 48 Benicia 801 48 Dixon 2o8 48 Fairfield 1,149 48 Rio Vista 46 48 Suisun 128 48 Vacaville 948 48 Vallejo 1,361 49 Gloverdale '97 49 Cotati 59 49 Healdsburg 127 49 Petaluma 584 49 Rohne~t Park 339 49 Santa Rosa 1,527 49 Sebastopol 97 49 Sonoma 138 50 Cer~S 214 50 Hughson 13 50 Medesto ' 1,168 50 Newman ~ 56 8G/1~G/93~ 21:37 :BG -> 0853233708 l~crs£ icld Pagc 11 · ~(m JUN--18--93 WED 18:40 LEAG~ O~ CA CITIES FA~ NO, 9164448671 P, 11 L~slaUve An~yst ~ Pa~emon ~ R~e~ank 113 50 Turl~k 50 Watedo~ 51 L~eO~ 32 51 Yu~ Ci~ 412 52 Cornl~ 52 R~ Bluff 52. Teh~a 2 ~ Dinube ~ Exeter 67 ~ F~mersville 21 ~ Linsey 52 54 Pode~ille 210 54 Vlsalia ..... :; 658 ~ Wo~l~ke 22 55 So.fa 43 58 Cam~lo 92 58 Fillm~e 87 56 M~a~ 96 ~ Oxnard 1,781 m ~ Po~ Hueneme ~ San Buen~ventura 1,316 56 San~ Paula 307 S6 Thousand Oa~ 295 ~' 57 Davis 7~ ~ 57 W~t ~acramen~ ~2 57 Winters ~ 58 Ma~svil~ 141 58 ~eafl~ 11 Totals :~ ~55,~0 K E R S F I. E L .D Alan Tandy · City Manager June 16, 1993 Mr. Joel Heinrichs, Director Resource Management Agency County .of Kern 2700 "M" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 Dear Joel: Attached you will find a copy of the revised Notice going out to our commercial customers on gate fees. I think you will find that, with the exception of a couple of minor wording changes, it is precisely as you have suggested it be in your communications to us. I would appreciate it if you woUld relay this on to Supervisors Shell and Larwood so that they are aware of the modifications we made at your suggestion. ,n Tandy / City Manager AT.alb Attachment · cc: Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Bakersfield · City Manager's Office · 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield · California · 93301 NOTICE COMMERCIAL GARBAGE CUSTOMERS · Effective July 1, 1993 all commerdial businesses will be charged gate fees to cover the cost of waste disposal..The gate fees have been enacted by Kern County. · The County will no longer assess land use fees on commercial properties. You will not be double charged!. Customers should be aware, however, that gate fees may be substantially higher than their original land use fees (average 50% increase in most instances); · The City, in addition, is considering a 13% increase in rates to deal with higher costs. · You may want to 'review recycling opportunities, container siZe and frequency of collection before the rate change and gate fees go into effect. Changes in your practices may save you money! · To determine your overall increase, look. at the attached chart. · 'Please read the attached information for more details. For further information, please call 326-3114. COMMERCIAL BUSINESS OWNERS CITY. OF BAKERSFIELD The Kern County Board of Supervisors recently-approved the implementation of commercial waste disposal fees (or gate fees) at all Kern County Sanitary Landfills. In implementing disposal charges, the commercial land use fee currently appearing on property tax statements will be removed. A $29 per ton ($2 per cubic yard) disposal charge will now be added to your commercial collection' bills, which is estimated to increase commercial refuse rates by an average 50% The City objected to the implementation of "gate" fees. in part because the County does not. require County residents in the metropolitan area of Bakersfield to have mandatory garbage Collection. We frequently receive · complaints that refuse is illegally deposited into City commercial and alley' containers or illegally dumped on private property; this practice will further impact your fees, and all instances should be reported to the City Sanitation Division.' The County did agree to study the issue of requiring collection in the unincorporated urbanized area and County staff will report back to the Board of Supervisors on July 27, 1993. In providing this notification, the City Wants all commercial owners to be aware that unauthorized dumping in commercial containers may increase as a direct, result of gate fee implementation, and each. instance needs to be reported to the City Sanitation Division. This information will be provided to County staff, which will be reporting back to the Kern County Board Of Supervisors. Each commercial business owner is encouraged to evaluate existing containment size and service levels prior to July 1, 1993 to determine adequacy. A rate sheet depicting "proposed" City collection and Kern County disposal charges (effective July 1, 1993) is provided on the back side of this notification. In the event you believe an adjustment to your' service is necessary, you are requested to contact the City Sanitation Division at 326- 3114. Accounts can normally be adjusted on the first and .fifteenth of each month, provided prompt notification is received. You can save money by reducing container_size/level of service or implementing a recycling program. Please be aware that businesses engaged in food storage/preparation are required to maintain specified service levels to comply with State regulations; Kern County Environmental Health Officials must be consulted in such instances to allow service, changes to be processed. In closing, the City of Bakersfield is dedicated to providing the best possible refuse services and we stand ready to assist each business owner in that regard. Questions or inquiries about this notice should be directed.to the City Sanitation Division. MONTI-ILY CITY BIN COLLECTION RATES TO BE ADDED TO COUNTY DISPOSAL FEES: PICKUP DAYS PER WEEK 1 2 3 4 5 6 1.5 YD $56.24 $70.30 $111.31 $155.24 $202.10 $252.87 BIN SIZE 2 YD $70.30 $8'/.87 $139.13 $193.81 $252.39 $315.36 PER CUBIC YD '. 3YD N/A $105.445166.95 $2'32.36 $302.66 $377.84 = 4 YD N/A $141.57 $222.60 $311.45 $404.20 ' $504.76 'ALL REAR LOADING BINS & CONTAINERS LARGER THAN 4 YD ARE BEING ELIMINATED · "DETACHABLE COMPACTOR BINS are charged three times the standard bin rate PICKUP DAYS PER WEEK 2 3 4 5 6 COMMERCIAL CANS: # OF CANS 2 $16.11 $23.44 $31.24 $39.05 $46.86 3 $23.44 $35.14 $46.86 $58.58 $70.30 4 $31.73 $47.35 $62.97 $78.59 $94.22 RATES FOR SPECIAL SERVICES PROVIDED BY CITY SANITATION DMSION: REFUSE ROLLOFF COMPACTOR BINS: $175.00/PICK UP RECYCLING ROM_OFF BINS (ALL): $ 50.00/HOUR DETACHABLE BIN RENTAL: $16.00/BIN/MONTH (when available) ADDITIONAL AUTOMATED. CART: $123.00/YEAR COMMERCIAL AUTOMATED CART: $ 23.44/MONTH (when available) $29.00 PER TON OR $2.00 PER CUBIC YARD PICKUP DAYS PER WEEK 1 2 3 4 5 6 1.5 YD $12.99 $25.9~ $38.97 $51.96 $64.95 $77.94 BIN SIZE 2 YD $17.32 $34.64 $31.96 $69.28 $86.60 $105.92 PER CUBIC YD 3 YD N/A $51.96 $77.94 $103.92 $129.90 $1.55.88 4 YD N/A , $69.29 $103.92 $138.55 $173.20 $207.84 2 N/A $4.33 $3.50 $8.66 $10.83' $12.99 # OF CANS 3 N/A $6.50 $9.74 $!2.99 $16.24 $19.49 4 N/A $6.66 $12.99 $17.32 $21.65 ' $25.98 EXAMPLE CURRENT SERVICE PROPOSED COLLECTION COUNTY GATE MONTHLY FEE FEE TOTAL 3 YD BIN 2X/WEEK 105.44 + 51.96 =. 157.40 2 YD BIN 4X/WEEK 193.81 + 69.28 = 263.09 '1 1/2YD BIN 1X/WEEK 56.24 + 12.99 = 69.23 MEMBERS 1992 - 1993 ADMINISTRATION AND COURTS BUILDING Pearl Minor, Forap~son GRAND JURY 1415 Truxtun Avenue Gera~d M. Aldereta Bakersfield, Callforn~ 93301-5222 Ellen L. Calaustro Telephone (805) 861-2437 Matthew Cruise Bobbl Cunningham John A. Devine George E. Dew Toni Goff RECEIVED Carl E. Howard Richard A. Larson .ob... J. McO..I., ?JUN 1 ? 1993 Donald R, Morgan Edward B. Ochoe Charlea A. Owen, FI NANCE DEPT. Robert E. Paaren Jan Petrlnl SallyRalney June 15, 1993 Joseph F. Silva Dorothy Lee Tomlln Finance Director City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield CA 93301 RE: AUTHORIZATION AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EMPLOYMENT RELATED EXPENSES Dear Sir: The cities and Community Service Districts have a myriad of policies relating to Travel and Per Diem reimbursements. It is the intent of this. letter to have a more unified policY for Travel and Per Diem. Some of the Grand Jury's findings were: 1. Most entities indiCate that the expenditures should be reasonable. What one individual may deem as reasonable might be interpreted differently by another individual. 2. Cities and/or Special Districts authorize varied dollar amounts for meals; whereas the county authorizes $34.00. for · high cost areas and $26.00 for low cost areas. It has been Concluded by members of the Grand Jury that the travel and per diem reimbUrsements for Kern County Cities and Community Service Districts are too liberal. Travel expenses, by category, should be more definitive. Pursuant to the Joint Travel Regulations (JTR), the Audit/Finance Committee of the 1992-1993 Kern County Grand Jury recommends the following .procedure changes be implemented: 1. Travel expenses, eXcept meals and lodging, should be allowed as described below: a.. Mode of Travel should be-that which is more advantageous to the City or Special District. (1) Air Fare: When travel' by air is permitted, ..coach fare should be utilized. Finance Director City of Bakersfield June 15, 1993 Page Two (2) Automobile Rental: When City or District vehicle is not available, Privately Owned Vehicle (POV) and/or automobile rental should be authorized. . If POV is utilized, the reimbursement rate should be that which is prescribed by the IRS. -When use of POV is .not feasible, and automobile rental is authorized, the traveler should be restricted to a compact or, if others are involved'in the travel, a mid-size vehicle. (3) Other Expenses: Expenses incurred for personal needs shall not be ' reimbursed. Telephone and telegraph, facsimile (FAX), registration fees, auto parking or storage fees, 'and any other business connected expenses should be reimbursed at actual cost. 2. We recommend all County Cities and special Districts implement the following per diem rules:· a. Employees should be reimbursed for~meals at the rate of $26.00, $30.00, $34.00 or $38.00 per day dependent upon location. b. No reimbursement should be allowed for expenses exceeding these allowable per diems. c. To determine the daily rate, refer t© enclosure 1: "Per Diem Locality." 3. Reimbursement for lodging should be based upon the rates prescribed in the JTR. Enclosure 2 lists the~1993 Lodging Plus Rates effective March 12, 1993. If you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact Mr. Silva or me at (805) 861-2150. · Ve~Uly yOurs, oreperson ~~aSn IcLeVcA;mCm~itremean Enclosures AUTHORIZATION AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EMPLOYMEN~ RELATED EXPENSES AUDIT/FINANCE COMMITTEE: Joseph F. Silva, Chairman George E. Dew, Co-Chairman Members of the Committee:. Matthew Cruise John A. Devine Toni Goff Don Morgan Robert A. Paaren PURPOSE: Kern County Departments, Cities and Community Service Districts have a myriad of policies relating to Travel and Per Diem reimbursements. It is the intent of this report to have a more unified policy for Travel and Per Diem. FINDINGS: 1. Most entities indicate that the .expenditures should .be reasonable. What one individual may deem as reasonable might be interpreted differently by another individual. 2. Cities and/or special districts authorize varied dollar amounts for meals; whereas, the County ~uthorizes $34.00 for high cost areas and $26.00 for low cost areas. ~' 3. The County Departments are ~authorized a daily reimbursement rate of $110.75, plus sales tax, for lodgings, pursuant to the County Administrative Office's memorandum, dated February 9, 1993. 4. Supervisors elected for the first time and. Department Heads elected and/or appointed subsequent to July 28, 1987, are aUthorized the use of their personal vehicle in the performance of their~ duties.' These individuals are·, entitled to a monthly allowance plus mileage reimbursement. CONCLUSIONS: The Travel and Per Diem reimbursements for Kern County Departments, cities and Community Service Districts are too liberal. Travel expenses, by category, should be more definitive. RECOMMENDATIONS: Pursuant tO the Joint Travel Regulations (JTR), the Audit/Finance Committee of the 1992-93 Kern County Grand Jury recommends the following procedure changes be implemented: 1~ Travel expenses, except meals and lodgings, should be allowed as'described below: a. Mode of travel should be that which is more advantageous to County (City and/or Special District): (1). Air'Fare: When travel by air is permitted, coach fare'should be utilized. (2). ~ Automobile Rental: When County, City or District vehicle is not available, Privately Owned Vehicle (POV) and/or automobile rental should be authorized. If POV is utilized, the reimbursement rate should be that which is prescribed by the IRS. Currently, the County authorizes $.28 for such reimbursement. When use of POV is not feasible, and automobile rental is authorized, the traveler should.be restricted to a compact or if others are involved in the travel, a mid-size vehicle. (3) Other Expenses Expenses incurred for personal needs shall not be reimbursed. Telephone and telegraph, facsimile (FAX), registration fees, auto parking or storage fees and any other business connected expenses should be reimbursed at actual cost. 2. Whereas, the County has implemented a new procedure: "Adoption of a Per Diem.Rate for Reimbursement of Meal Expense for County Business Travel, ,' effective October 27, 1992, we recommend all County Citi~sand Special Districts implement these per diem rules: a. Employees should be reimbursed for meals at the rate of $26.00, $30.00,~ $34.00 or $38,00 per day dependent upon location. b.' No reimbursement should be allowed for expenses exceeding these allowable per diems. c. To .determine the daily rate, refer to enclosure 1: "Per Diem Locality." 3. Reimbursement for lodgings should be based upon the rates prescribed in the JTR. a. Enclosure 1: "Per Diem Locality," is an extract from that regulation. b. The enclosure outlines most California cities .and/°r counties. Additionally, a few primary cities in some other states where the employee may be required to travel have been included. c. Whenever double occupancy oCcurs, the traveler should be reimbursed only for that portion attributed to.single occupancy. 4. All Supervisors and Department Heads should be granted a monthly allowance~ for use 'of their POV. ~Mileage reimbursements should be eliminated. PER DIEM LOCALITY STATE COUNTY LODGING M&IE TOTAL CITY ARIZONA: Phoenix Mari¢opa $ 72 $ 34 $106 Tucson' Davis 60 30 90 Pima 60 30 90 CALIFORNIA: Barstow San Bernardino 60 34 94 Bridgeport Mono 46 34 80 Chico Butte 54 30 84 Death Valley Inyo 89 38 127 E1 Centro Imperial 49 30 79 Eureka Humboldt 65 . ~ 30 95 Fresno Fresno 62 30 92 Gualala/Pt Arena Mendocino 85 34 119 Herlong Lassen, 45 ~26 71 Los Angeles Edwards AFB i'02 38 140 Kern 102 38 140 Los Angeles 102 38 140 Orange 102 38 140 Ventura 102 38 140 MOdesto .Stanislaus 54 34 Monterey ~ Monterey 77 34 111 Napa Napa 67 34 101 Oakland Alameda -- 71 38 109 Contra Costa 71 38 109 Marin 71 38 109 Ontario San Bernardino 60 . 34 94 Palm Springs Riverside 73 38 111 Redding Shasta 60 30 90 Sacramento Sacramento 67 34 101 San Diego San Diego 77 38 115 San Francisco San Francisco 96 38 134 San Jose Santa Clara 65 ,38 103 San Luis Obispo San Luis Obispo 54 34 88 San M~teo' San Mateo 67 38 105 Santa Barbara Santa Barbara 77 34 11i Santa Cruz Santa Cruz 77 34 111 Santa Rosa Sonoma 55 34 89 South Lake Tahoe E1 Dorado 66 34 100 Stockton San Joaquin 56 30 86 Tahoe City Placer 52 38 90 Vallejo Solano 43 30 73 Victorville San Bernardino 60 34 94 Visalia Tulare 61 30 91 West Sacramento Yolo 45 26 71 Yosemite National Park Mariposa '68 38 106 PER DIEM LOCALITY PAGE 2 STATE ~. COUNTY LODGING M&IE TOTAL CITY COLORADO: Colorado Springs E1 Paso $ 51 $ 26 $ 77 Denver Adams 77 38 115 Arapahoe 77 38 115 Denver 77 38 115 Jefferson 77 38 115 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA: ~ Washington 110 38 148 MARYLAND: Montgomery i10 38 148 Prince George's 110 38 148 MASSACHUSETTS: Boston Suffolk 101 38 139 NEW YORK: New York Bronx 140 38 178 Brooklyn 140 38 178 King 140 38 178 Manhatten 140 38 178 Nassau 140 38 178 New York 140 38 178 Queens 140. 38 ~178 Richmond 140' 38 178 Staten'Island 140 38 178 Suffolk 140 38 178 TEXAS: Austin Travis 65· 30 95 Dallas Dallas 72 34 106 Fort Worth Tarrant 72 34 106 Houston Harris 78 34 112 OTHERS: Refer to latest Joint Travel Regulations (JTR). LEGEND: M&IE - Meals and Incidental Expenses Here are the1993 Lodging Plus rates, [~d~ Meals Total bXJl~g Meals Telal Led~ing Meals Total ~ Meals effective March 12. Had/ord $69 $38 $107 Eikhat $50 $26 $76 Ma~ha'sV~nayard/ Helena $45 $26 S71 NewHavm . 67 34 101 Evans~'lle 53 30 83 Nantud~t $119 $38 $157 N[]R/~KA New ~ 63 30 93 Foal:Way'ne 57 26 83 No.hampton 62 26 88 . ~(ea~,y 43 26 69 Pub'~m/Daniet~n 63 26 89 Gay 52 30 82 Pitm~d 52 30 82 b~d~i~ Meals Tetal Sallax.7 .63 38 101 Indianapolis 71 30 101 Mymouth 92 26 118 Uncoln 47 26 73 ALABAMA DE]AWARE, Jasper 45 26 71 Quincy 81 30 111 Norm Mat~ 42 26 68 Annlsm~ $41 $26 $67 Dove~ " 51 26 77 Lafaye~e 52 30 82 S. Deerf~, 61 38 ' ' 99 ' Omaha 57 30 87 ~i~mingham 52 ; 30 82 -Lewes · '54 30 84 [z~ar, Aoo~. 47 26 73 S¢,ingf~d 64 30 94. NB/ADA Do*hah 43 26 69 ~ 78' 34 112 Madison 50 26 76 Taunmn/NewBadfo~d 58 26 84 I~1~ 51 30 81 ~ 41 .26 67 DISTRICTOFCOLUMBIA . · Maw 44 26 70 We.'cestu 61 30 91 LasVegas/Ne~isAF8 69 38 107 GuffShoms 76 26 102 Ab~lflecit~sofNexa~lria, FallsChurch, and Muncie 55 26 81 ~ · ~ 45 26 71 Hunts~]le 55 30 85 Fa!trax, and the counties of Arlington, Nash~'lle 57 30 87 MICHIGAN i Mobile · 55 30 85 Loudoun, and Fa!flax in Virginia; and the NewNbany 43 26 69 Adrian 46 26 72 R~ 52 30 82 Mcmtgome~y 51 ' 26 77 cra. aries of Montgommy and Prince Georges Richmond 43 26 69 Npere . '; 42 26 68 iW~nne~ 46 ' 26 72 S;~elield 56 26 82 irtlVla~land. Gee also Ma~3~and and Vi~nia.) Sou~ Bend 61 26 87 Ann Arbor 65 30 95 NBA/~E . AREONA '- Washington, DC 110 38148 Teee Haute 51 26 77 BatUeOeek 43 26 69 Concon:l 56 26 82 BayCAy 50 26 76 Conway 78 30108 Casa Grande 50 26 76 FLORIDA IOWA Oinle 68 26 94 AJtarnon~Springs 62 26 88 .BettendodYl3avenport 56 26 82 Be~kmB~aimHa,'boeSt. 51 26 77 LaconiaDUrham 6652 3026 9678 G~ndCanyonNat'l Bradenton 60 26 86 CedarRapids 48 26 74 .le~q:~iles 49 30 79 Manches~r 68 30 98 ParkA:lagstaff 74 30 104 Oe,,vist~n 54 26 80 Des Maines 55 26 81 r-.,an~,- 49 26 ..75 Plymouth 41 26 67 Ka~ 62 26 88 Cocoa Beach 63 30 93 Dubuque 43 26 69 DeVoir 80 38 118 PoK~smoub'f Plxm~x/So3t'~:~ale 72 34 106 Daytr~na Beach 65 26 91 Iowa Ob/ ' 48 26 74 Drummond Is/and 52' 26 78 Newington 66 30 96 Pmsc~l 48 30 78 Fo~t Laudemlale 72 34 106 S~,oux Oty 47 26 73 Escanaba 44 26 70 NBA/JERSEY S~enaV'~a 48 26 74 F~tMye~ 77 30 107 Waterloo 47 26 73 Flint 45 30 75 AUantJcOt'/ 107 38 145 Tucson 60 30 90 Fo~t Piece 57 30 87 KANSAS Frantd~t ' 41 26 67 BeJle Mead 57 34 91 Yuma. 58 26 84 Fo~Walton Baach 62 30 92 Hays 42 26 '68 ~ 54 26 80 Carnde~ 63 34 97 ARKANSAS Gaines~l~e 52 30 82 Kansas C~ty (See also Grand Rapids 60 30 90 I:k)ver 61 26 87 Fa~lle · 45 26 71 Jacksonville 50 30 80 KansasrJb/Mo.) 67 34 101 Graying 50 26 76 Edison 65 38 103 F~t Sm~ 42 26 68 ' I~/West 133 38 171 Manhattan 53 26 79 Hancock · 49 26 75 Fmehok:VEato~own 68 34 102 Helena 44 26 70 Kis~mmee 6830 98 Topeka 48 26 74 Holiar~ 51 26 77 Millville 53 30 83 Hot Springs . 50 30 80 Lakeland 53 26 79 W*,:hita 62 30 .92 Houghton Laka 50 26 76 Moomsa~m 71 34 105 Jeaesbom 41 26 67 Miami 63 34 97 KENTUO(Y ~ 49 26 75 NewaA 87 38 125 Utl~Rock 52 30 82 Naples 76 34 110 Ashland 41 26 67 Kabmaz~o 60 30 90 .. Oc~anOty~CapeMay 96 38 134 Orlando 68 26 94 BowtingGmen 44 26 70 . Lansing/East 55 26 81 Pdnc~toe/Tmr4~n 75 34 109 CALIFORNIA Panama City 52 26 78 Covington 48 30 78 L~and 57 26 83 Salem 6). 26 87 Bridgepo~l 46 34 * 80 Pensa(:da 54 26 80 Flonmce 49 26 75 Lud/ng~m 57 26 83 Tom's ~ 79 30 109 ~ 54 30 84 puntaGon~ 62 30 92 Lewr~ton 51 30 81' Maddnacl~nd * 76 34110 OeathValley 89 38127 SaintAugusfine 60 30 90 IJ3uiswille ' 60 34 94 Manistee 51 26 77 NBA/ME/]CO EIcontm 49 30 79 Sarasota 62 26 88 Owensbom 47 26 73 Marquette 42 26 68 AJbuque~que 60 34 94 E. umka 65 30 95 Stuar~ 63 30 93 Paducah 43 26 69 Midland 54 26 80 AJ~s~a 44 26 70 Fresno 62 30 92 Taliahassee 53 26 79 'Pikev(lle 42 26 68 Monroe 41 26 67' ~ 67 26 93 Gualab/Point Arena 85 34 ! 19 Tampa/SL Petemburg 57 30 87 ' Prestons43urg 44 26 70 Mount Pleasant 43 26 69 Farmington 54 30 84 Herlong 45 26 71 Veto Beach 64 26 90 49 26 75 Los Ange(es 102 38140 West Palm Beach 69 34 103 ~OUISIANA Muskegon 49 26 75 Gallup A~e. xandria 45 '30 75 Ontonagon 49 26 75 LasC~c~/ Me~:ad 46 30 76 GEORGIA Bat~q Rouge 53 30 83 P~ 58 30 88 White Sands 44 30 74 ' P~t Huron 47 30 77 Les~Jarn~s 58 26 84 ' Medesto 54 34 88 A~bany 51 26 77 8essierOty 57 30 87 Saginaw 51 30 81 Raton 54 26 80 Mont~ 77 34 111 A~ 44 26 70 ~ 52 30 82 1.Napa 67 34, 101 A~anta 81 38 119 LakeC~aries 43 30 73 SoutbHaven 52 26 78 Rc~'wdl · 41 26 67 0aldand 71 38 109 Aagusta 47 26 Z3 Monroe 47 26 73 TawesC~b/ 44 26 70 San~3Fe 80 34 114 Ontade~ctorville/ 8runswic~ 41 26 67 NewOrleans 66 34 100 Trave~eOty 85 26' 111 $i~rCity 42 26 68 Ba~ 60 34 94 Columbus 48 26 74 Shr~,epo~t.-.:~.. 54 30 84 Warren 47 26 73 Taos 66 30, 96 Pa~mSprings ' 73 38 111 · Macon -"44" 26 70 $1idetl . ': 43 30 73 MINNESOTA ' N[WYORI( Redding 60 30 90 No~:mes/ Sao3mento 67 34 101 Lawmnceville 56 30 86 MAINE A~bertLes 44 ,26 70 Albany 64 30 94 SanDiego 77 38 115 Sa,annah 49 30 79 Aa~m 54 30 84 Au~n 42 26 68 Auburn 43 26 . 69 San Francisco 96 38 !34 Warre~Robins 44 30 74 AUgUSta 53 26 79 8emidji 42 26 68 Batavia 60 26 86 Bangor 60 30 90 8rai~e~ 46 26 . 72 ~n~2. rna~ 58 30 88 San.A;r~e 65 38 103 IDAHO * BarHarbor 61 34 95 Dutuffi . 52 34 86 Buffalo 72 34 106 San Luis Oblspo 54 34 88 8oise 49 30 79. Bat~ 64 26 90 Fergus Falls 57 26 83 Catsidli 48 26 74 SanMateo 67 38 105 Coe~d'Ate~e 58 26 84 Kamebunk/Sanfo~l 54 30 84 G~ndRapid~ 4'/ 26 73 Coming 62 30 92 Sarma Barbara 77 34 111 Idahe Faits 43 26 69 Santa C~z 77 34 11! Iruttery 66 30 96 Mead~a Heights 58 30 88 Elmira 56 26 82 Ketc~nVaJL-.,y 67 38 ]05 1:~3~and 67 30 97 Minneapoas/St. Pad 64 34 98 Gler~Fa~ls 56 30 85 Sanla Resa 55 34 89 L-.wiston 44 26 70 Pr~quelsle 44 26 70 Rochester 56 26 82 Ithaca 61 30 '91 Sa.eh Lake Tahoe 66 34 [00 McCa~ 52 30 82- Rodqoort 68 30 98 St. (3oud 44 30 74 Ja~ 43. 26 69 St~ 56 30 86 Poca~lo 47 26 73 ~r_ ~,-_~-~,~. 51 26 77 W'mona' 41 26 67 I(Jngston 53 30 83 Ta~ee Ob/ 52 38 9O Lake Placid 78 30 108 Valle~o 43 30 73 Stanley 45 26 71 MARYLa.ND MISSISSIPPI Montk~io 55 30 85 V'tsalia 61 30 '91 IUJNOIS (Forb'",eo3uni~esofMon(~3meryandPrino' Gulflxxt/Pas~agouia/ NewYorkC~ty 140 38 178 West Sacramento '45 26 71 Alton 48 26 74 Geo~,seeDist~ct BaySLLouis 52 26 71 Niag3raFalls 83 34 117 Yo~nite Nat'l Park 68 38 106 Charnpaign/Urbana 49 30 79 of Co/umbia.) Jackson · 52 30 82 Owego 44 26 70 YubaCity 46 30 76 Chicago 104 38 142 Annapoli~ 76 ,34 110 Nab:he.z 47 26 73 Palisades 58 34 92 DarMlle 46 26 72 BalUrnore 78 34 112 Ox~ 44 26 70 Poughkeem~ 66 26 92 COLORADO Decant 48 26 74 Columbia 87 34 121 Vicksburg 45 30 75 Rochester 67 34 101 Aspen 115 38 153 Di~n 45 26 71 Cumberland 49 26 75 Boumder 54 34 98 E. ast SL Louis 46 26 72 Easb3n 52 26 78 MIS~:~OURI Romulus 67 26 93 Co~3radoSp~ings 51 26 77 Jdiet 54 26 80 Fred~ck ' 55 34 89 B~nson 57 26 83 SaratogaSp~ngs 64 38 102 ~ 77 38 115 pe~qa 62 30 92 Hagemb3wn 55 30 85 Cape Giramleau 45 26 71 ~ 62 30 92 Duran~o 65 34 99 Ra:A island/Moline 64 - 26 90 Lexington Park/ Columbia 50 26 76 Syracuse 64 30 94 Glenw(x~dS~ngs 53 30 83 Rockt~m:l 56 30 86 St. Inigoes, Hannibal 46 26 72 Troy 49 30 79 G~anU Junction 41 26 67 Springfield. 53 30 83 Leonardtown 44 26 70 .le~ C/by 49 26 75 Utica 60 30 90 C,~nnison 48 26 74 Kansas Oty (sae also Wate~J3wn 55 30 85 Keyston~Sil,~'~,n~ 107 38 145 INDIANA Lusby 58 34 92 Montmse 43 26 69 Anderson 54 26 80 OceanCity 92 34 126 Kansas C~b/, Kan.) 67 34 101 WabkinsGlen 64 30 94 Pagosa Sp~ngs 48 26 74 Bloomington 52 30 82 Salisbury 53 26 79 Lak~ Ozark 57 34 91 West Point 50 30 80 PueO)o 48 26 74 Buriirtgton Waldorf 44 26 · 70 OsageE)each 64 30 94 White~ains . ]04 38 142 S{eambcatSprings 75 30 ]05 BeadvValpariso 52 26 78 MASSACHUSETTS S43~'~fleld 56 26 82 NORT~CAROUNA ' Vail 136 38 !74 Char)estown/ ~ 80 30 110 St. b3uis 74* 34 ),08 Ashemlte 53 30' 83 Jeff, e~onWlle 42 26 68 Boston 101 38 139 MONTANA Boone CONNECTICUT Columbus 44 30 74 Cambddg~/l. oweil 95 38 133 &llings 48 26 74 Chado~ 6344 3426 9770 Dnd~port/Danbu~y 7! 30 IO! Dale 45 26 71 Hyannis ' 80 26 106 G~.at Falls 5! ?h 77 See RATES, Page 17 ~l U j~.~ ~ l~ e I ~ief hV [rg,~ ;~ l~ l i,,~ : t, ~ l :g~ RATES, From Pa~ 16 ~ M~b 'T~ ~ ~ T~I ~ ~b T~ ~ 78 26 1~ ~E~ R~ 41 26 . 67 ~n~io ~G~ 48 26 74 ~ 61 26 87 G~lle 43 26 69 .T~ple F~IM 42 26' ~ ~ 53. 30 ~ Hi~H~ 78 30 108 T~ ~i~P~m ~ 30 ~ C~ 55 26 81 M~e~ 74 30 104 ~ ~ 26 ~ ~. 56 26 ' 82 R~Hiil ~ 26 .72 W~ ~ 42 26 ~ ~ 49 ~ 79 ~n~ 49 26 75 ~i~Falb . ~q~ 42 26 ~ ~ ~ 52 26 78 ~ ~A ~ ~ ~ 26 74 U~~ 57 ~ 87 ~ . 5] 26 77 BuJ~ ~ ~ 59 26 85 P~ ' 67 ~ 97 H~ S~. 62 26 ~ ~r G~ ~ ~ 49 26 75 R~ ~ 26 ~ M~b ',:~H~II 66 30 96 ~ 75 26 101 S~Falb ~ 26 80 P~ '~mi~ 49 26 75 P~V~ S~ ~ 26 ~ ~lt ~C~/ ~ 55 26 81 ~ 59 ~ 93 ~N~ :~ ~ 47 26 73 ~ 45 26 '71 SL~ ~ D~A B~ ~ ~ 78 Oa~l~ ~ 26 69 Ve~l B~n 45 30 75 ~ ~ ~ 121 ~umb~ 49 26 75 ~M~ F~ 46 26 72 ~ ~ 49 26 75 ~UJn~ ~ 30 94 Budin~n ~ F~ 46 26 72 ~ 50 30 ~ ~h~ Ci~ ~ 26 80 Mi~l~ M~t 45 30 75 ~ 56 26 82 ~ 45 30 75 M~Ii~ ~ ~ 60 ~ 90 K~lle ~ 26' 80 R~ ~ 62 30 92 ~ 76 ~ 110 M~ 57 30 87 ~R~Ju~ ~lk 55 26 81 ~ ~ 26 74 Mu~ 42 26 ~ ~RGIN~ ~ 45 26 7 ~ ~ ~ P~ N~I~ 52 30 82 (F~ ~ ~ ~nd~. ~~le 62 34 ~ ~ w~ (~ s~t~q~ 49 26 .75 ~u~, ~ 78 38 ]16 a~ph~) . ~ ~ 117 ~ a~,~ ~ 69 34 103 ~ ~ 30 94 A~ 47 26 73 ~1~ ~aJ~ 63 30 93 ~ 51 26 77 ~dlb 51 30 81 81~ ~ 46 26 72 M~n~ 55 30 85 ~n 65 30 95 8~1 ~ ~1 48 26 74 ~ 51 26 77 B~ ~ 26 70 ~lle ~ 5[ 26 77 ~ 8g ~ 123 B~lle 55 30 85 ~in~ Fai~amil~ 59 26 85 P~ 75 ~ 109 B~n~ 42 26 68 F~ R~ 45 26 71 R~i~ 51 26 77 ~ll~ S~n ~ 26 74 L~n~ ~ · 57 26 ~ ~ ~ 30 . ~ ~d~ . ~ 30 94 L~ ~ ' 45 26 71 Sh~i~ 47 30 77 DalI~W~ 72 34 106 Ma~ ~ 47 26 73 ~ ~ 26 ~ ~ 47 26 73 Ma~ Pa~ ~'s Fe~im 42 26 ~ ~ ~1~ 53 30 ~ ~ P~ 59 30' 89 N~k ~ ~ S~ 43 30 73 Fo~ ~ 52 26 78 ~in~ ~, ~ ~ 30. 94 Un~ 67 26 93 ~ ~ 34 98 ~, ~m~, ~ ~ 26 74 Va~F~ ~ · ~ 117 Gmn~ . ~ 26 ~ N~N~a~ ~ 76 30 1~ Wa~ 59 30 89 H~ . 78 34 112 ~ke) S~e~ ~ 30 78 ~l~ 52 30 82 ~q~lle 41 26 67 Pe~u~ ~t 47 26 73 WilI~K 45 26 71 ~ji~ 56 26 ' 82 R[ch~nd T~ " 56 30 86 Yo~ ~ 30 ~ ~ 55 30 85 R~ wa~ 42 26 ~ ~ ~D ~ ~ 26 74 S~un~n 0~0~ ~ 80 34 ~ 14 Lub~ 60 26 86 Wallo~ Island ~ ~ 26 72 N~ 102 ~ 140 ~in 42 26 ' 68 Wa~n ~ 45 26 71 P~ - 78 ~ 112 M~I~ 57 26 83 ~llia~ M~ 41 26 67 ~ 47 26 73 Mid~ ' 55 26 81 Wi~ ~n 47 26 73 ~ ~OU~ Na~ ~ 26' 74 W~HIN~ON ~G~ 51 26 77 Ai~ 41 26 67 P~i~ 42 26 68 ~a~ SUI~ 44 26 70 ~ 59 34 93 P~ 72 30 102 Beilin~m Tunable ~ 26 79 ~um~ ~ 30 ~. ~n~ 45 26 71 Br~n City of Bakersfield Sales Tax Revenues 1990-91, 1991-92 and 1992-93 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 For the Monthly Quarterly Cumulative Monthly Quarterly Cumulative Monthly Quarterly ' Cumulative month of** Advance Residual . Total . Advance Residual 'Total Advance Residual Total June ' $ 2,119,200 $ $ 2,119,200 $ 2,327,100 $ $ 2,327,100 $ 2,496,300 $ $ 2,496,300 July 1,756,800 765,278 4,641,278 1,762,900 880,230 (B) 4,970,230 1,866,400 60,211 4,422,911 August 1,756,800 6,398,078 1,762,900 6,733,130 1,866,400 6,289,311 September 2,342,500 8,740,578 1,997,900 8,731,030 2,488,500 8,777,811 October 1,888,800 557,271 11,186,649 1,812,500 1,266,625 11,810,155 1,984,000 (101,281 ) 10,660,530 November 1,888,800 13,075,449 1,812,500 13,622,655 1,912,700 12,573,230 December 2,518,300 15,593,749 2,416,600 16,039,255 2,550,200 15,123,430 January 1,588,200 733,463 17,915,412 1,612,700' 916,221 18,568,176 1,624,100 365,872 17,113,402 February 1,588,200 19,503,612 1,612,700 20,180,876 1,566,300 18,679,702 March 2,117,500 21,621,112 2,150,300 22,331,176. 2,088,400 20,768,102 April 1,748,300 491,881 (A) 23,861,293 1,903,300 359,830 24,594,306 1,679,300 331,869 22,779,271 May 1,745,300 25,606,593 1,872,200 26,466,506 1,679,300 E 24,458,571 Totals $ 23,058,700 $ 2,547,893 $ 25,606,593 $ 23,043,600 $ 3,422,906 $ 26,466,506 $ 23,801,900 $ 656,671 $ 24,458,571 * *.Paid to the city the 15th - 20th of the second month following the month of sale. (A) Received $261,364 more (B) Received $261,364 less Prepared By: JJ Ellis (E) Estimate Prepared On: 06/18/93 -' File Name: EXHB2A.WKI' [D sk: GK City of Bakersfield ~' Sales Tax Analysist~ Calendar Year Basis 1990 - 1993 · Increase Increase Increase 1990 (Decrease) 1991 (Decrease) 1992 (Decrease) ' 1993 First Quarter City $ 4,971,677 $ $ 5,085,888 $ $ 5,081,854 $ $ County Pool 872,468 711,414 661,073 State Pool 58,459 38,475 38,273 Administration· (48,401) (49,997) (45,671) Jan. - Mar. 5,854,203 (68,423) 5,785,780 (50,251) 5,735,529 43,340 5,778,869 Second Quarter City 5,257,728 5,753,959 5,639,586 County Pool 804,120 937,449 702,782 'State Pool 51,358 60,800 40,082 Administration (50,128) (51,277) (50,421) Apr. - Jun. 6,063,078 637,853 6,700,931 (368,902) 6,332,029 0 0 Third Quarter City 5,628,558 5,840,726 5,443,069 County Pool 770,·179 934,056 681,808 State Pool 67,658 69,614 43,876 Administration (53,024) · (54,071) - (48,733) Jul. - Sep.' 6,413,371 376,954 6,790,325 (670,305) 6,120,020 0 0 Fourth Quarter City 6,175,649 6,193,029. 6,073,595 CoUnty Pool 834,355 758,576 ·.733,846 State Pool 77,475 61,620 59,580 Administration (58,117) (55,404) (54,249) Oct. -'Dec. 7,029,362 (71,541) 6,957,821 (145,049) 6,8!2,772 0 0 Calendar Totals $ 25,360,014 $ 874,843 $ 26,234,857 $ (1,234,507) $ 25,000,350 $ 0 $ 0 File Name: STA_NK3 Prepared by: N.K. Smith Date Prepared: 18-Jun-93 -- City of Bakersfield Exhibit B-1 General Fund Sales Tax Analysis 1986/87 - 1992/93 Fiscal Year July - Sept. Oct - Dec Jan - Mar Apr - June Increase 1987-88 · Quarterly 5,250,914 5,076,688 5,556,392 4,826,267 Cumulative 5,250,914 10,327,602 15,883,994 20,710,261 305,595 % of Total 25.35% 49.87% 76.70% 100.00% 1.50% 1988-89 Quarterly 5,580,455 6,167,002 6,048,61'0 5,826,454 Cumulative 5,580,455 11,747,457 17,796,067 23,622,521 2,912,260 % of Total 23.62% 49.73% 75.34% 100.00% 14.06% 1989-90 Quarterly 5,600,542 6,591,992 6,006,652 5,911,802 Cumulative 5,600,542 12,192,534 18,199~186 24,110,988 488,467 % of Total 23.23% 50.57% 75.48% 100.00% 2.07% 1990-91 Quarterly 6,398,078. 6,677,371 6,428,163 6,102,981 Cumulative 6,398,078 13,075,449 19,503,612 25,606,593 1,495,605 % of Total 24.99% 51.06% 76.17% 100.00% 6.20% 1991-92 ' Quarterly 6,733,130 6,889,525 6,558,221 6,285,630 Cumulative 6,733,130 13,622,655 20,180,876 26,466,506 859,913 '% of Total 25.44% 51.47% 76.25% 100.00% 3.36% 1992-93 QUarterly 6,289,311 6,283,91 9 6,106,472 5,778,869 Cumulative 6,289,311 12,573,230 18,679,702 24,458,571 (2,007,935) % of Total 25.71% 51.41 % 76.37% 100.00% -7.59% 1993-94 Quarterly Cumulative ?~:?' "?;:. 291,429 % of Total ; :.';;: ;~;:i: i.:.:~:?::;7257'~!~0/°: '~i! :).QQ~t.00o/° 1.19% sales tax for a month is received about the 20th of the following month (i.e. sales tax for Sept. is received in Oct,.). Prepared By: JJ Ellis Prepared On: 06/18/93 File Name: EXHB 1,V~K. 1 Disk: GK · ~III ~I~ 1400 K sTREET -" SACRAMENTo, cA 95814 o (916)444-5'790. California citie~ [ wor~ Together -. ., - June 11, 1993 To:'..City Managers andClerks'~in Non'~Manager Cities ~ ~-~--~he-.upcoming-Mayors.and Council Members Executiv_e~Eorum.~ilLb. e_a_particu!arly important meeting. We will focus on several critical issues related to the State budget and its effects on cities, providing vital information and' developing ideas about what cities can do to adapt. I am writing to ask that you .encourage your council members to attend the Forum and take an active role in the work of the meeting. In addition, I urge you to join them so that you, too, can keep current on the latest informatiOn and strategies we need-to f011ow''~' with regard to the budget and cities response to it. An abbreviated outline of the Forum program is included on the .reverse side. Announcements of the meeting, with a more detailed outline of the program and full information on registration, were sent to all mayors, council members, and city managers . in,May. Extra copie~ are available by contacting the League at 916/444-5790.' Thank you for your assistance. I know all cities will benefit from"this meeting, especially if we have strong attendance from all cities. Sincerely, Art Takahara Council Member, Mountain View President, Mayors and Council Members Department ' t\td\mcxfltr.1, 17 J~N 95 ~ MAYORS AND COUNCIL MEMBERS EXECUTIVE FORUM Wednesday - Friday, July 21 - 23, 1993 Monterey Conference Center PRELIMINARY PROGRAM OVERVIEW Wednesday, July 21 9:00 am - 12:15 pm PRE-FORUM SESSION: New Mayors and Council Members Orientation 2:00 - 3:30 pm FORUM OPENING GENERAL SESSION: Cities and the State Budget 3:45 - 5:00 pm CONCURRENT SESSIONS I.. ~Fhe-(~hanging-Roles-and-Respon sibilities-of-Mayors-and-Couneil- Members II. Update on Growth Management Proposals Thursday, July 22 7:30 am INFORMAL "ISSUES" BREAKFASTS 9:00 - 10:30 am GENERAL SESSION: Building the Economic Base of Your City 10:45 am - 12 noon cONCURRENT SESSIONS · I. Building ~the Needed Sense of Community II. The Effects of Mandates on Local Government 12 noon - 1:45 pm GENERAL LUNCHEON: The Future of the California Economy 2:00 - 3:30 pm TOWN HALL FORUMS: Creating and Adapting to the Future of Local Government 3:45 - 5:00 pm CONCURRENT SESSIONS I. Building an Attitude of Service in City Hall II. Survival Tips for Elected Officials Frida_v, July 23 ' 7:30 - 8:45 am INFORMAL "POPULATION" BREAKFAST DISCUSSIONS 9:00 - 10:30 am CONCURRENT SESSIONS I. , Tapping Your Hidden Resource: How to Use Community Service Programs to Enhance Local Identity and· Support II. Is Your Land Use Planning Doing What You Want? III. "Rightsizing" for Elected Officials 10:45 am - 12 noon CONCLUDING GENERAL SESSION: The New Opportunities Facing City Officials 12 noon ADJOURN ' ' · ~_ Cox Cable Bakersfield A Subsidiary of 820 22nd Street Cox Communications, Inc. Bakersfield, CA 93301 Cox Cable Bakersfield June 15, 1993 Alan Tandy City Manager 1501 Truxtun Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 Dear Alan: Attached is a letter we are sending to our customers concerning the new cable law. I wanted to get you an advanced copy should you have any questions. I'll keep you advised as more develops. Sincerely, Jill Campbell Vice President/ .............. Geh~r-dl~M a-h~a-g er ............................................. . .......... Cox Cable Bakersfield A Subsidiary of 820 22nd Street Cox Communications, Inc. Bakersfield, CA 93301 Cox Cable Bakersfield Dear Cox Cable Customer: You may be aware that the Federal Government has passed a law , regulating the cable television industry. The law is very complex (over a thousand pages) and we are sorting through it now to understand exactly what we must do 'adEt h~-it-~'ili=c~ff~Et-yo'~'So'fdrFt~e'O-n-I~/Jthlh-g'th~tis 're-ali~/-cle'a'r is-that~the-r01es will greatly reduce our flexibility in serving our cust~omers. For the past five'years, Co)~ Cable has invested hundreds' of millions of dollars to improve customer service and td provide you with the best programming and the most advanced technology. This investment has paid off in increased customer satisfaction as measured by annual surveys. In making all these improvements, our goal was to provide you with the best possible value, and as needed, to change our policies and procedures to best serve the community. While we want to continue these efforts, the regulation will greatly reduce our flexibility in being able to allow this business philosophy. Over the next several months, we will be required to make numerous changes to compiy with the regulation knowing this will cause you inconvenience. Please understand that we have no choice in the matter, We want to give you an idea of the changes you are likely to see by answering the most commonly asked questions: WILL MY MONTHLY BILL CHANGE? Cox Cable Bakersfield meets the standards for effective competition as ........ obtiined-by'-'the n'ew-Jaw:--Th[s-mea~s-thct.since.we face competition frpm two other multi-channel video providers, our rates will be governed by the local competitive environment and not by our local franchising authorities or the FCC. This allows us to continue providing you with the best service and programming available today at a competitive price. WILL THE CHANNEL NUMBERS CHANGE? It may be necessary to rearrange the channels to offer the services the law requires us to make available. We fully understand that changes in channeJ position will cause you inconvenience and make it difficult to find your favorite programs. We apologize in advance for the disruption, and remind you that we are required to do this. WILL WE CONTINUE TO CARRY ALL LOCAL 1V STATIONS?. The new law makes it possible for every local TV station to demand to be on our channels. In fact, ~f there are no open channels available in our line-up, the local TV stations can even force us Itc drop popular cable programming services. Alternatively, the stations can ask us to pay them for the same programs you and everybody else in the community Icon receive free with an antenna. If we do not agree to pay, we can be required to stop 'carrying those channels. if'we were to pay the stations, sooner or later our customers will bear the brunt of it. We simply do not believe it is fair to pay for programs that you can receive free with an antenna [as do ,people who are not cable customers].' We want to carry all local stations, but will do so only if we can do that as we do today -- at no cost to the customers or the ~able company. Whether or not we will be allowed to carry them is entirely in the ~ands of each TV station. We wilt do our ,_best~o~cenvip.,ce.-them that..tbey_should_co~nt~nue_to_.help__us~s,er~_e_the~r__v.~.e_, ers_b.y_ making it possible for us to include them on our channel line,up. Local stations as defined by the Cable Act include: KBAK-T~ 29, KCET-TV 28, KGET-TV ~ 7, KUZZ-TV 45, KERO-TV 23 and possibly others. . / WILL WE CONTINUE TO CARRY THE L.A. AND FRESNO TV STATIONS?. The stations we bring you from Los Angeles and Fresno can also ask us to pay them for carriage of their station. We Currently pay copyright and m crowave transmission fees to bring these stations to you. As with our local stations, if we do not agree to pay these stations, we can be requ red to stop carrying these s gnals as well. We'd like to continue offering th~se channels at no added costs to you. But again, .that 'is entirely up to the TV stations. -- WHEN WILL THESE CHANGES TAKE PLACE? These changes will take place through the Summer and be completed by the end of the year. We will give you additional information as it becomes available. , Even with the new requirements, we are committed to providing you ~with the best in service. We will work to minimize any negative impact these upcoming ~changes could, have on ygu as.we comF ly with the law. Yours truly, Vice President/' General Manager ~S ANGELES TIMES l ~ I ~ ~ ~ The governor 1~ ~s put county gove~- - .... men~ on ~e ho~ of a politic~ ~d legal ~e~a. Wil~n'sI lawye~ ~gue that co~ may adopt a "gener~ p~se" ~ ~ ~e apprdv~ of 50% of codnty vote~. ~at conclusmn h~ been subject to considerable legal challenge. In ~en-Atty~ Gen. Jo~n Van de K~p issu~ - ~ offici~ opinion~.Concluding ~at such .~ .,But ~1 ~is ~ avoidable if W~n would gener~-P~se ~es were ~leg~ even if ~ccept a solUUon ~at is both simple and ..... . ........ ~.,~ ~.:.. endors~ by count~ voters. ~t mon~, cons~tu~on~Y un~lable: eon~nue the T ~;~C~LI: ~'~ ...... ~ ...... ~' '~~_:~' Atty. Gen. D~ ~un~en ~1~ to ~e '-~a~te's c~ent, leggy unques~oned ~d ~~~~ ~S a con~y..But.if V~.: ~ de K~p w~. fight .:. ~ost'popul~ h~f-cent ~a s~es ~ for' ~d L~en m .~ng, even a genera- ~e d~ation of the bu~et'c~s. This, ' p~e ~ ~d not be consfituUon~y ~ '.'~ "~' ~ '~ ~? ~: '~ .,~ge~er with prudent budget ~mming .... ~ ~/'~:. , :;~adop~ by count~,~ote~.~. ~ .... ~.: .,. :~:.~ ' ' ~d a bit of ~l~phole closing, shoed Boo y',; Trap . 'Yet :Wil~n d~s ,not eVefi. ~uggest that :~iow .c~ifomia ~ m~t i~ obligations ~ .. ; ??.~' ,~.. : co~ties should adopt a ~r~ghtforw~d · ~uca~on without hijacking county pmp- · W~n ~ ~fi~ to p~ gener~-p~ose ~. The governor instead ~_~;~Y-~ revenues. ~g~ co~ties ~ adopt an increased coun- pu ' ~ ~ for ty ~es ~ ~ f~d~ public ~ety--~at is; ~:?; ~B~ S~n ~ c~i~n of the B~rd~of pHblic ~; ~e cOH~ obj,. ~.~Hce, she~ff ~d f~e so, ices. The gover- ' ' ~t~, whkh ~min~s ~te and .:~.~:m~s .~at ~e only ch~ce ~ get ~e~n ~% of ~e vbters to endorse a ~ - Ov. Wilson p~ses that we throw ~ -~ .: ~ ~ty govemmen~ overboard by .... ~ .:' ' -:- ~ng $2.6 bflHon, in property-~ reve- .--:., - . .f" · :~ ~:. ~- ' .~ .' ~. · '?~ ~.... nu~ away fmTM them ~ meet the s~te's ;' '~ e gove nor has put county. ~unty. sh~fs ~y that, ~ a result, they ? :,. political and[,egal dilemma,. ~ have ~ ~h~ge ~ i~ates. County .p~Umm ~y,that.sherfffs won't haVe ~; '~r~:~ ::~'' :.: i~:'1'' ~.'" .... ~y inmates ~ rele~e, b~use the ~s~ict I ~ ' .. ~ ~ ..~. ~'~ ~ incre~e is ~ promi~ ~at ~e.f~ ~11 be at~meYSc~min~s, won't~s haveAngeles~e s~fi~st.to Atty.pr°secute~il r - ~: e~k~. BUt ~at ~li~y~ ~- ~etti, for ~ple. says ~at he may ~ ~Y pm~e creates a mawr le~ problem.' h. e to toy P o e .ting revenues tot i s~f--~ many ~ ~9 lawyers. ~ ~e,~ ~e me~ Creates a ~i~.'~-.~. Under pre~, the governor has hinted ~..~tion 13 el~y ~ '~ '~t~0-.:. ~.~s voter majo~t~ for appmv~ df a new · at he ~ght. limit ~e revenue ~ab to ~.~ No one ~in~s that ~y s~es ~ $1.3 billion for ~is f~c~ ye~, perhaps ' ,.~n~re~e in any county will g~ner Such ' incre~ing ~ ~e f~ $2.6 billion ne~ ye~. ,:. ~..~V . But he ~ys not ~ wo~y--he is willing ~ .:o e~helmlng approv~ ~is November. ~w county governmen~ a life r~t. On ~ . Rea~ng between]~e hnes of ~e gover- J~e 7, he pr~laimed a ~eci~ Nov. 2 ,. 'nor's propose, one sees an invi~on m el~on (which will c~t the s~te about' '.'~un~es to threa~ a. ne~e. He ~ges $~ minion), at ~hich cowry su~rvisors ~. ~9pe~m f~st ~ prop~e a public-s~ety can s~k appmv~ of county s~es ~es. ~; which just might garner more. ~ ~fore ~ey Club a~d, county gov- 50% of the vote, and then to tell ~e co~ e~en~ shoed be aw~e of cons~tution~ ~at ~e ~ ~s a gener~ levy so ~at a mere ~by ~aps' In Wflmn's home cowry, San ~% majo~ty is S~ficient, at least in ~ego, 51% ' of, the 9ote~ · approved a ..: Luden's view. If ~e promise to e~m~k ~i~ .. h~-cent ~es ~ ~ provide ff~ for public ~ty is t~ weak, voters money for ~ c~minal j~ce system, only ~ W~n't ~t it; if ~ promise is too s~ong, ~.have the $~ million r~sed by the ~ . ~e"me~e ~11 ~ invalidated by ~e' Co~ ~ a ~eCl~ ~ unless ~t receiv~ a ~und~ by ~e co~. Not a penny has "' .... " ' b~n us~ to b~ld j~ls or police s~tions in ne~ y lmpo~ible two-~r~ ma~ty. ~ Diego ~tY.'Elsewhere, 1~ s~es : ;'H ~e governor]' insis~ on throwing. ~es have b~n inv~idat~ and impound- ~ ~es over~ard, he should at least ~/, ~ Money ~ty and have ~en the L,' ~ro~se ~d push ~roughthe ~slature subj~t 0f ~ i~ly succes~ (~d still ~F a ~nsfitution~ ~en~ent m v~idate h~ ~?~ ~h&ngj leg~ ch~enge in San ~cisco. /I ~ty ~ Pi~. V0tem co~d decide on ~] ~ch.~ ~en~ent 0n Nov. 2, since ~ ;~ ~eady l~k~, 'inm ~e governors ~mive ~i~ ~l~fion. To Put the pm~ on ~at b~!ot, the governor wo~d ~ve ~ P~h ~e pmW~ ~o~h the. .. ~lat~e by~J~ne,~4, An fiaehlable F,Scal Tr6th Today is .the state cOnstitUtional misdemeanors and about laying off deadline foe the./~gialature to send· the Probation DePartment Workers and governors budget; even if that ,rarely eliminating programs that monitor the met deadline is kept,.mUeh wrangling is: county's i most v, iolent ·felons. Even in, left to be ·done .before the state has an less-strapped Orange County, officials': final and approved .sPending pian..What· are predicting that libraries will close' may be getting lost 'in all of~ the': on Fridays and warn that two fire bickering.over, key budget questions is stations and ajailmight close. that Democrats. and RepublicanS. no. Even if the countieS' intense lobbying longer disagree about one fundamental in. SacramentO save them from these truth: The state is in a fiscal crisis the worst-case scenarios, there's no avoid- like of which has not been seen in more lng the 'fact. that services will be than half a Century. curtailed, tremendouslY. In the words of .. The budget Choices now facing call · 'L.A, County Supervisor YvOnne Brath- fornia are gruesome. Los Angeles. waite Burke, "We have to face the idea CoUnty is bracing for what could be $1.6 that some' libraries and other facilities · billion in cuts, meaning that one public will close." . hospital, 41 fire.stations, four jails, eight ' Setting a State budget is a process of sheriff's stations and eight parks would ' 'setting priorities, and those priorities shut down. Lifeguard and beach main- are not decided only in Sacramento. tenance services .at. eight state beaches'Californians must ask: Just how much would be terminated. At a time when quality of life are we Willing'to sacri-': one in six Los Angeles County residents rice? How much is an open, well-main- receive some So~t of government relief, '.' tained beach with the appropriate num- about 200 welfare case workers would ber of lifeguards worth? How much is be laid off. And the' district attOrney is an open, staffed public library worth? talking about .'no longer' prosecuting California is about.to find out. BAKERSFIELD Ma/n ? Daniel Kane, Chair Alan Tandy, Ci ad Kevin McDermott Staff: Jack Hardisty Patricia M. Smith / AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Wednesday, June 16, 1993 12:00 Noon City Manager's Conference Room 1. Vehicular Food Vendors Ordinance ' Ordinance revision proposed for safety, insurance and indemnification. It defines terms, clarifies applications and grounds for denial, and requires possession of permits. Staff to discuss proposal with vendors and report back to committee. 2. Commercial Vehicle Parking In Residential Neighborhoods (Jack Hardisty) This ordinance to clarify the intent of the code originally adopted to prohibit large commercial vehicles in residential districts. Recommend to the City Council, but not to include Residential Holding Zone which is essentially Agricultural. 3. South Beitway Update (Ed Schulz) Kern COG to approve EIR Thursday nigh:t. It evaluates three alternative alignments. Next step wiIl be hearing by Planning Commission on adoption of alignment, then to the City Council. 4. CSA 71 (Ed Schulz) The proposal is to trade service areas for more efficient service. NOrth of NOrris Road to CSA 71 and west of Rudd Road to be served by the City. Committee recommends approval. 5. Discusgion Disposal of rubble from URMs and roadS may be facilitated ~by an inert recycling center being discussed by staff with private firms. 6. Hotel Update (Alan Tandy) Hotel review is proceeding well. We are maintaining our options, bUt nothing new of substance has been brought forth by others interested in the project. 7. Set Next Meeting Next meeting will be scheduled when members have calendars available. In Attendance: Chair Daniel Kane, Kevin McDermott, Patricia M. Smith, Alan Tandy, Henry Ross, Jack Hardisty, Ed Schulz, Mike Allford, Gene Bogart, and Mike Sides. cc: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council JH:jp ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE REPEALING CHAPTER 8.16 AND ADDING CHAPTER 5.48 OF THE BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO VEHICULAR FOOD VENDORS. BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield as follows: SECTION 1 Chapter 8.16 of the Bakersfield MuniCipal Code is hereby repealed. 'SECTION 2' Chapter 5.48 is hereby added to the Bakersfield MunicipaI Code to read as follows: CHAPTER 5.48 VEHICULAR FOOD VENDORS Sections: 5.48.010 Definitions 5.48.020 Permit required 5.48.030 Application--issuance--fee 5.48.040 Regulations 5.48.050 Revocation 5.48.060 Appeal 5.48.010 Definitions. Whenever used in this chapter, unless a different meaning clearly appears from the context, the words set out in .this section shall have the following meanings: A. "Person" means any individual, partnership, corporation or association of any nature whatsoever. B. "Vehicle" means any duly registered and licensed device by which a person or property may be propelled, moved or drawn upon a highway, including, but not limited to, Cars, trucks, coaches, motorcycles and motor scooters. C. "Vehicular food vendor" means any person who· engages in a business of selling consumables from a vehicle.on any city roadway,~ street, highway or other right-of-way, excluding sideWalks,~within thecity. D. "Consumables" means food and drinks of any kind, including, but not limited to, ice cream, ices or other frozen desserts, candies, soda, ·soft drinks, confection~ and all substances and ingredients used in the preparation thereof. E. "Public Building~' is held to mean and include any drugstore, confectionery store, ice cream parlor, ice cream stand, soft drink stand, soft drink store, lunch room, lunch counter, cafe, restaurant, hotel, schoolhouse, college, all buildings owned by the city, and all buildings owned by the county and state, and any other store or business house~which trades or sells' to the public generally its foods, merchandise, goods, wares and articles therein, situated within the city. 5.48.020 Permit required. It is unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to operate as a vehicular food vendor on any city roadway, street, highway or other right-of-way in ·violation of this chapter, or without having first procured and maintained a valid permit from the city manager or his designee. 5.48.030 Applicati°n--issuance--fee. A. Applications for permits under this section shall be made on forms to be furnished, by the city manager or his designee·, shall be·signed under penalty of perjury·by the applicant and shall require' the following information: i. The name, address and telephone number of the applicant; 2. The name, address and telephone~number of the business; 3. Prior and current permits held and whether. such permits were ever revoked or suspended and the reasons therefor; '4. The business tax certificate number of the business; 5. Whether a health department Permit for this business· has been issued; 6. The license number of the vehiCle(s) to be used for the sale of food items. B. The application Shall be accompanied by evidence, satisfactory to the city manager or his designee, of general liability insurance providing coverage on an occurrence basis for bodily injury, including death of one or more persons, property damage'and personal injury, in an amount of not.less than one million dollars ($1,000~000.00). Insurance required of the applicant hereunder shall be primary insurance as to the city, its mayor, council, officers, agents, employees and volunteers and any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the city, its mayor, council, officers, agents, employees and volunteers shall 'be considered excess insurance, over and above the appliCant's 'insurance and shall not contribute with it. The applicant shall save, hold harmless and indemnify the'city, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers from all claims, demands, damages, judgments, costs or expenses in law or equity that may at any time arise from, or are in any way related to, any activity addressed by this chapter. ? C. The city manager or his designee shall, in his discretion, issue a permit'if he finds: 1. The application is complete and truthful; 2. The business for which the application is made will be maintained and conducted in ~ccordance with all local, state and federal laws; 3. The operation of such business will not present any substantial hazard to. vehicular 'or pedestrian traffic; 4. The applicant, has obtained insurance as required.under subsection B of this section; · 5. A valid business tax certificate has been issued for this business; 6. A valid health department Permit has been issued for this business; 7. The applicant has not had a permit, issued under this Section, 'revoked, unless the city manager finds that .the reasons for such revocation are unrelated to this application. D. All permits issued under this chapter shall remain in effect until the following June 30th, unless earlier revoked. ' E. The applicant'shall pay a fee no~ to exCeed the cos't of processing any such application and inspecting such business as.set forth in section 3.70.040. F. permits may be issued with conditions to ensure the vending of food from such vehicle will be operated in a safe and legal manner, will not disturb the peace and quiet of any neighborhood and will not constitute an undue burden on city resources. 5.48.040 Requlations. A. Except as permitted by section 10.5'6.080(B) and chapter 5.45,, the business~ of selling consumables on a city roadway, street, highway or right-of-way shall be made solely from vehicles as defined in section 5.48.010(B). B. · Meat and fish peddlers shall also comply with the provisions of chapter 8.12. C' Except as.otherwise proVided by ordinance, no person(s) shall park any vehicle from which any consumables are sold, or offered for sale, except at the request of a.bona fide purchaser and for a period of time not to exceed ten (10) minutes at'any one place on a city roadway, street, highway or other righ=-of-way. The provisions of this subsection shall not apply · to persons' delivering foodstuffs or merchandise upon order of, or by agreement with a customer, and-when'delivery is made from a store or other fixed place of business or distribution. D. The operator of a vehicle regulated by this ordinance shall have' in' his/her possession at all .times during operation of the business a valid California driver's license which permits operation of the vehicle used to'. sell consumables. E. The vehicle as regulated by this Chapter shall be kep~ in a clean and sanitary condition at all times during the' sale of food and/Or drinks to the public. F. All vehicles shall be self-contained and no tables, chairs, .boxes or objec=s other than the permitted vehicle shall be permitted on the city.street, roadway, highway or right- of-way. f G. Any permit issued pursuant ~o this chapter shall .be non-transferrable, and shall be valid only as to the applicant provided on the applicatiOn for such permit. H. The permit-holder shall maintain the required insurance throughout the term of the permit. I.' The vehicles regulated by this chapter shall not .' be operated on any city Street designated as a parade.route during a parade~ J. No vendor regulated by this chapter shall impede or obstruct the safe and orderly flow of vehicle and pedestrian traffic. K. The sale of food and/or drink items from Vehicles as regulated by this chapter shall take place at a curbside location. No sales activities shall be permitted with customers standing in the street, roadway, highway or other area traversed by vehicular traffic. Standing, stopping and parking regulations shall be observed at all times. L. The permit-holder shall acquire and maintain a valid county health permit throughout the term of this permit and comply with all applicable health requirements. M. It is unlawful for any person to sell, Vend or peddle consumables from any vehicle in the city within three hundred feet from the exterior boundary of property used and occupied by a public 'building as defined in section 5.48.010(E) or any public playground or park conducted, maintained and opera~ed by the city, or other municipal agency; ~provided, however, that sales, vending and peddling permitted by section 12.56.240 of this code are not prohibited hereby. N. All permits required by this article shall be prominently displayed at all times on each vehicle or shall be kept on the person of. the vendor a~ all times during which he/she is vending.. Vendors'must produce for examination all required permits upon request by a peace officer or any officer or· employee of the city who is acting~in his/her official capacity. 5.48.050 Revocation. Any permit issued pursuant to this chapter may~be immediately revoked by the city manager whenever he finds: A Fraud, misrepresentation or false statement contained in the application for the permit or made in the course of carrying on the business regulated by this chapter; or B. The applicant.has been convicted of a crime substantially related to the qualifications, functions or duties of the business for which application is made, unless he has obtained a certificate of rehabilitation; or C. Any of the terms or conditions of this chapter have been violated, or that the business, has been operated in violation of loCal, state or federal law. 5 5.48.0~0 ~ppea[. A. Should any applicant be dissatisfied with the decision"of the city manager or his designee not to grant a permit or for the revocation of a permit, then said applicant may, no later than ten days after .notice of such decision is deposited in the United States mail, addressed to the'applicant or permittee at the address provided on the application,' make written objection ta the city council setting forth the grounds for dissatisfaction, whereupon the council shall hear said objections at a regular meeting no later than three weeks following the filing of the objection with the city clerk. The applicant shall be given written notice.no less than three days. prior to said hearing. The council may, upon said hearing, sus~ain,. Suspend or overrule the decision'of the'city manager, which decision shall be final and conclusive. B. Pending the hearing before the council, the decision of.the city manager or his designee shall remain in full force and effect and any reversal thereof, by the city council .shall not be retroactive but shall take effect as of the date of the council's decision'. SECTION 3. This Ordinance shall be posted in accordance with'the Bakersfield Municipal Code and shall become effective thirty .(.30') days from and after, the date of its passage. o0o I ~Y CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance was passed and adopted by the council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on , by the following vote:. CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of the Council of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED BOB PRICE MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED as to form: LAWRENCE M. LUNARDINI CITY ATTORNEY of the, City of Bakersfield M~A:qp ORDINANCE\FOODVNDR$ .. 6/3/93 7 · ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 10.32.140 OF THE BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO PARKING OF COMMERCIAL VEHICLES IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS. BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City. of Bakersfield as follows: SECTION 1. Section 10.32.140 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows: 10.32.140 Parking of commercial vehicles prohibited in residential districts. A. It shall be unlawful, except as provided in Subsection B of this section, for any person to park, store, or leave standing on any street or parcel in a residential district, any commercial vehicle having a manufacturer's gross vehicle weight rating.(GVWR) of twelve thousand (12,000) pounds or more. B. The prohibition· set forth in Subsection A of this section shall not apply to any commercial vehicle making pickups or deliveries of services, goods, wares and merchandise from or to any building, structure or site located in a residential · district. C. For the purposes of this section, the following definitions apply: I. "Residential district" means any property located in the R-1 (One Family Dwelling), R-2 (Limited Multiple Family Dwelling), .R-3 ~e_ M_w.u. ltiPle~. Family Dwelling), R-4 (Limited Multiple Family Dwelling), E (Estate)~l ~) and PUD (Planned Unit Development) zone districts, in accordance with Title 17 of this code. "Residential district" also includes streets adjacent to property, within any of the aforementioned zone districts. "Commercial vehicle" means a vehicle which is required ~o 'be registered under the California Vehicle Code and is used or maintained for the transportation of persons for hire, compensation, or profit; or designated, used .or maintained primarily for the transportation of property.. This definition does not include passenger vehicles which are used for the transportation of persons for hire, compensation, or profiti housecars; recreation vehicles; or vanpool vehicles. J D. Any person violating the provisions Of this section shall be punished as: set forth in General Penalty. Provision Section 1.40.010. of this code SECTION 2. 'This ordinance shall be posted in accordance with the Bakersfield Municipal Code and shall become effective not less than thirty (30) days tom and after the date of its passage. .......... o00 ........ ~ I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on · by the following vote: CITY CLERK and Ex Officio ,Clerk of the Council of the City. of Bakersfield APPROVED BOB PRICE. MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED as to form: LAWRENCE M. LUNARDINI CITY ATTORNEY of the City of Bakersfield JE:pjt May 4, 1993 res\ocv.cc ]8~/1957 O~t.-2 ...... Regular-Cab S~or~s~Je Shor~-8ox . ~ :=" O[~t..-2 "!~. ':: i~';: ........ "-' Regular-Cab Fleetsioe Short-Box !500 212.6 i~1.5 2>,,'D ~C~ 5.~0016100 1641/22~i (~/'z-mn) 4x4 (K) 6100 1291/1828 -, 2500 212.6 ~31.5 2WD (C) 7200/8600 2662/4178 /,$/4-ton) 4x4 (K) 7200/8600'2302/3811 3500 21_2;__6=~!.3!.5 2'.,,¥D ICl 9000/10,0001 4018/5053 ~ 4x4 (K) 9200/10,000 3826/4670 Regular-Cab Fleetside Long-Box .... .... ~.-.-...~.~ .~~~ ~ ..:~......,..~.~.. ~.~.:~._~..2~. ~..:¢..:. ....... ~ ......... . ..... Std.-6 i_iJ I,__:..j . f(,~[on/ ~x4 (K) 5200/6600 i575/2082 Opt:>5 !!~ ..... ~en~ed-Cab S~]ons~de -::~:"' ' ~ .: ii ii_,t '~:~n £::LO '.:: _'.',,.D !Cl .... ' , ..... _ .... t,/~~~~:~,_.~,,~.:~~ Std.-6 !!_~' !'!W. om .::.'A(K) ~200/6600 i '~9712105 ?:t-: !~E :"-' ..- ,,'-, -::~ ~xtenoe[J-Cab Fleets~[ie Short-aox ~~q~q~M~~_-~,'.-:f?::;, '~'~_.¢t? ~I ' ~ . ..~ ' :~'2 ?~0q ! : ' .......... ~';~"~':' ........ "-~ i! !!t ~8,:o _::,.o:: :,'.'o lc::; :,:o Opt,-3 [ ,r~ ~',,~-[on~ -'x4lK/! 7200/B600 i 201013514 ._'~,lno . ~aries L~n~,n Wheelbase E,r:rve . '~',;~NR. tbs. · ~ - ,~- I · ~ , ;aw-Cab Fleetside Lon~-~ox : : :: ~ ~:?:.';:x~,. ~~~~_'~¢,r~:~;~;;:~ 5 2500 :~¢~'~'::~:~'~?~~ I~~ Std.-3 (~/4 toni ~:, 3500 :23.2 '3!.5 '2WD IC~ [ ~000/10.000 4385~5476 'eqmar-Cab Chassis-Cab ~ Taperea radi ":.,. ......... i~~__,_....,.~._. :.. ~'~.. -.. : _.S'" ,:~.. 35,[1.,n) 221.5 135.5 2WD (C)10.000/11,00, 5032,6335 4x4 (K) 10,00011~ ~5/6904 m~ : ': '::":':" 3~0 245.5 159.5 2WD (C) -10,000/11,00C 4963/6267 Opt.-~ ~ (l.ton) 4x4 (K) 10,000/1~ 4394/6852 Regular-Cab Chassis-Cab 35~ (Straight rail) ' ' ' Ii :'? :: s-... :c~O HD' ~::.; 'E5.5 _,-' "~,'u (Cf ' 7 ~00 9360/9559 .~:-"-' .~~ _. :.~ Std.-3~ ~',-ton) " :~0 hO 245.~ :'2.5 _,,~ ~',,, ::...~.~ (i-toni .. :3500HD ~z~.O :S3.5 ?.,VD (C) ]5.000 9140/9439 ?-tom ~su~ar-Cab Chsss~s-Cab ~cnn H~ /?,'~,'ont ~::te~ae~-Cab Chassis-Cab (Taoereo SELECT YOUR MOVING VAN* RIGH'F EQUIPMENT FOR MOVING AT THE LOWEST COST' · Lowest Deck.,,, 24" 26' SUPER MOVER' · Air-Rk~e ~ic)f~ VAN SPEC~: 22'3" x 7'7' x 8'5" f-. - . . '! DOOR: 7'3' x 7'2" · Cloth Sests for 3 Adults /-~,~ .... ~ MOM'S ATTIC~: 3'3" ~ 7'7' x 3'1' · Air-Conaitioned ~d~ .... ~r.~ Up To 1538 CU. FT. · Disc 8rake~ · Widest aha Shortest Ramo . · Low Oeckm 31" · 24' HOUSEHOLD MOVERs" VAN SPECS: 19'4" x 7'7" x · Air-Ride Sus,a~namn,,, ]~-,~ - ~ ~: DOOR: 7'3" x 6'4· · Air-Conclition~3 ; ~-~/-~ . . ~'..-T'--, Up To 1167 CU. FT. · Clol~ Seats tot 3 Adutts · Disc ~rakes · · Low Oeck-, 32' · een.e-e'~e S~s~em.o.-- 1 7' EASY LOADING MOVER= · Wl4elt and Shortest Ram~ VAN SPECS: 14'1' x 7'7' x 7'2" · AJr-Cond~ [~.. ~.. : DOOR: 7'3' x 6'5" · Aut~ttat~ T~ MOM,S AT'RC~: 2,5- x 7,7- x 2'7' · Cloth Seats for 3 ~~ Up To 849 CU. FT. · Crose-C, ountry Cab-- .. · Low Oeck. a. · Ge~e-Rl~ ~_,_?~.~-- 1 4' THRIFTY MOVER" · oie~et-~ Towin~ A/~ltty , VAN SPECS: 11'4' x 7'5" x 6~9' · Automa1~ 1Yan~mts~on ( · DOOR: 7'1' x 6'1' Lc,. Oeek,,, 27 · GemSe-Rl~e Su~ensm,~, 1 0~ MINI MOVER~ · Automatic l'ranamiaaion VAN SPECS: g'10" x 5'8" x 5'10" · AJr-CoeMitioned DOOR: 5'5' x 5'1' · ClOth 8eat~ fo~ 3 .... " MOM,S ATTIC~. 1'6. x 5,8' x 2'6' · Hok~ Queen-Size Bed ~ RAILERS-STILLTHEMOST ECONOMICALWAY · Lower Deck-- 6' X 12' TRAILER & · soft~ ntde- ~ CAR-TOP CARRIER ~..~., · ~VAN SPE~ 11'9" x 5'7' x 5'1' · 'P~Easy TowingRUb Rail, "~ '~',~ UpDOOR:'ro 3~74'8" x 4'6"CU. FT. ' · Low~St Deck.= 5~ X 8' TRAILER , Padded Rub Rails DOOR: 4' x 4'10' · ~owem oecd- 4' x 8' TRAILER · S~ftest Ride~ ~ VAN SPECS: 8'1' x 4'1' x · Paddy] Rub Rafts- ~ DOOR: 3'1' x 3'5' · ~ Towing Up To 142 CU. · Lowest Oeck-, 4' ~ 6' TRAILER ~oftes! Ride-- ~--.:' ' __ /AN SPECS; 5~9" x 4'1" x 4'3' ~ Padded Rub Rails ~~.~ DOOR: 3'1" x 3'10" · Easy Towing UP To 103 CU. FT. !.. AuTo . ._~:~ CAR-TOP ~: TRANSPORT . .~__:~-T~ CARRIER EASY LOADING .- UD TO 18 CU. FT. AND UNLOADING ~"~--~ ~ TOW DOLLY TOW BAR Tow dolly available for ; ~- ~--- [ ~ .... 'l REGULAR DUTY .~-~ HEAVY <.,~ UNDERCAR i ~_~.~__~':~ ~'-,~--. DUTY ",~,~ .~ RECEIVER -'i · Secure & Cle~n ' .~x ' con.~ Ae =UAL. AS 'Subiect to avaHabiiit¥. Note: Truck an(] traiier measurements are approximate ar)c] MOVING VANS HAVE LOW DECKS~M AND GENTLE-RIDE SU$