HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/17/94
\ ----
,
I ~~" ~. -
BAKERSFIELD
MEMORANDUM
June 17, 1994
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY C#:7
FROM: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER / /
SUBJECT: GENERAL INFORMATION -
1. Please note that the formal budget presentations are now finished. You have two
sets of public hearings remaining on the 22nd and 29th, with action on the budget
items being scheduled on the 29th. The hearings on the 22nd are for the fee and
cost recovery system, park development fees (documents enclosed) and the
regional transportation improvement plan (documents enclosed). We hope to
deliver documents to you on the cost recovery system on Monday. Work is now
being completed on it. -
Enclosed, for your information, is a schedule showing the status of responses to
Budget Workshop questions.
We will have time after the public hearings on the 22nd for general discussion and
questions by Council. You could also instruct staff to prepare budget amendments
on specific items, such as adding back the Police Detective, should you wish. We
would suggest that it is in everyone's best interest to make such decisions and
inquiries on the 22nd, rather than waiting for the 29th. Surprises can be difficult
to deal with; often times we need some time to think through where to find money,
or in what form to deal with an issue you may raise. By waiting until the last
minute, it can complicate the situation and make it more difficult. We will get you
the two additional sets of responses to questions as soon as we are able to
assemble them. Again, you are encouraged to bring forward issues, questions,
concerns and suggestions at the meeting of June 22nd.
We just got our new official PERS rates for the year and we are analyzing the
difference between the actual rates and our estimates contained in the proposed
budget. We will advise you next week of the amount involved - we do know it is
favorable!
2. You will find enclosed a copy of a Recycling Performance Evaluation for the last
six months.
'I ---- /
"". -"- "'"
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
June 17, 1994
Page -2-
3. There is an update enclosed on the Union Avenue Median Street Lighting Project.
4. You will find enclosed a memo from the Police Department dealing with Calls for
Service in the downtown area.
5. At your next regular meeting, you will have a protest on the California/Oak special
assessment district from Taco Bell. They visited us this week. The basis of their
protest relates primarily to the fact that they allege they did not have full knowledge
of the assessment district when they bought the property. The owner of record
was CalOak Corporation. When the notices were sent out and, prior to the close
of the assessment, which occurs at your next meeting, Taco Bell purchased the
property. This is an issue between buyer and seller of the property, not between
Taco Bell and the City, as is likely to be the basis of protest.
6. A question you might give some consideration to: Has the City Council ever
considered a team building exercise? Conducted by a skilled facilitator, it might
be useful. It is fairly obvious that there has recently been a pattern of meetings
getting longer and more emotional. Perhaps such a team building exercise would
moderate that trend.
7. We think we are at resolve on the Fire Fund issue. I hope to know by next week.
If so, we can place it on an Agenda either late in June, or early in July, for Council
action.
8. The Claims Activity Report from Risk Management for the month of May is
enclosed, for your information.
9. A letter of concern, and our response, on the proposed changes to the Fair
Housing Program is included for your information.
AT.alb
Enclosures
cc: Department Heads
City Clerk
~
"
'" I
¡ AD MINISTRA TIVE REPORT
MEETING DAlE: June 22, 1994 AGENDA SECI'ION: Hearings ITEM NO:
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council APPROVED
II FROM: Raul M. Rojas, DEPARTMENT DEAD Æ
, Public Works Director
I on A~~
DATE: May 27, 1994
Cl1Y MANAGER
SUBJECf: Hearing for the purpose of considering a resolution approving and adopting an
adjusted fee for the development and improvement of parks within the City of
Bakersfield. (All Wards)
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of Resolution.
BACKGROUND: This resolution is in accordance with City Ordinance No. 3327, approved by the
City Council on November 7, 1990, which requires the Public Works Director to submit an annual
report to the City Council with updated, new or additional information, including the inflation rate
regarding the fee amount to be collected for development of parks within the City.
The park development and improvement fee proposed for fiscal year 1994-95 is adjusted in
accordance with the inflation rate of 3.4% as indicated in the March 1994 Consumer Price Index
attached hereto.
Existing Fee Proposed Fees
Single Family Dwelling Unit $670 per unit $690 per unit
Duplex Dwelling Unit $545 per unit $560 per unit
Multi-Family Dwelling Unit $505 per unit $520 per unit
Mobile Home $475 per unit $490 per unit
DE\lFEES2.HAGI
JE.mro
May 27, 1994, 9:07am
-----
¡,
April 27, 1994
PARK DEVELOPMENT FEE WORKSHEET
Method Used to Calculate the Fee:
1. Based on the 2010 General Plan standard of providing park land at a rate of 2.5 acres per 1,000
population, ;, 6-acre park serves 2.-WO people. 1
., Cost of developing a 6-acre park is divided by 2,400 people to obtain a cost per person.
3. Cost per person is multiplied by the persons per unit for each type of dwelling unit. The persons
per unit is determined hy the most recent Federal Census. :
-f. Figure A: Proposed Revised fee calculation based on 1990 Federal Census data and the cost to
develop a 6-acre park adjusted for intlation. 3
Figure A: Proposed Fee
a) $530,746 + 3.4% = $548,791
March 1993 Inflation3 March 1994 cost
;! cost to develop rate. March to develop
6-acre park. 1993 to March 1994. 6-acre park.
b) $548,791 2.400 = $228.66
March 1994 cost # Pop. served Cost per person
to develop 6-acre. by 6-acre park. to develop park.
e)
Type of 1990 Federal Census Cost per Fee Per
Unit Persons Per Unit X Person = Unit *
Single Family 3.02 X $228.66 = $690
Duplex 2,46 X $228.66 = $560
Multiple Family 2.28 X $228.66 = $520
Mobilehome 2.13 X $228.66 == $490
* Rounded to multiple of five.
1 A 6-acre park is the smallest size neighborhood park. TIle cost to develop a 6-acre park is the cost if the city
were to build the park \vith only minimum construction activity and amenities. The park would be on
relatively flat hnd. with landscaping, irrigation. tDt lot and playground equipment. sidewalks. security lighting.
picnic tables and barbecues. hard court surface. and utility building. Restrooms and parking lots may be
included when conditions allow them.
: [990 Federa] Census data regarding the number of persons per unit was released in early 1992.
J Consumer Price Index for West Coast Class "C' cities. March 1994.
p:pdt94.cpi !
"
... IMPORTANT NOTICE ...
.
'l1I.. "'.1: COII..- Prlc. 111.4- ~or Ul Odl8D Con._.. All It-. D.o. 1977 . 100 for ,etmauy 19" -- J
.rrcm_.J.y r.~8cS 111. the ,~ 19'. 18.11. o~ raolU.c Clt1.', Th. acl:lIU 111.48& ... 231.1. fl- 88M
~ .
-
B A K E R 5 F I E L 0
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: ALAN TANDY, CIlY MANAGER
FROM: RAUL ROJAS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECI'OR
DATE: MAY 26, 1994
SUBJECT: ANNUAL REPORT FOR PARK DEVELOPMENT FEES (FY 1994/95)
In accordance with Ordinance 3327 (BMC Chapter 15.82), which was adopted by the City
Council on November 7, 1990, this is the Public Works Director's annual report to the City
Council providing any update~ new or additional information which may cause an adjustment to
the fee amount collected for park development.
A change to the fee requires a public hearing. This hearing should be combined with the budget
hearings on June 22, 1994. The proposed fees are to be adopted by City Council resolution.
The Consumer Price Index (CPI) for March 1994 shows a 3.4% increase from March 1993 for
this region. 1 I recommend that the park development fees be adjusted for inflation as indicated
below:
PARK DEVELOPMENT FEE COMPARISON
TYPE OF EXISTING PROPOSED FEE 1
DWELLING PARK DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTED FOR
UNIT FEE CPI (Inflation)
Single Family $670 $690
Duplex $545 $560
Multi-Family $505 $520
Mobile Home $475 $490
1 Consumers Price Index for West Coast "Class C' cities, March 1994.
2 Fees rounded to nearest multiple of five.
c: Leland Andersen, Community Services Manager
Frank Fabbri, Parks Superintendent
Jack Hardisty, Planning Director
JE:
\"dPFEE-2..94
~
'>:: I
1
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING AND ADOPTING AN ADJUSTED
FEE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND IMPROVEMENT OF
PARKS WITHIN THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD.
WHEREAS, the requirements of Section 54992 of the
, California Government Code have been satisfied as they relate to
revision of planning, zoning,- development and related processing
!
] fees; and
I WHEREAS, Chapter 15.82 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code
requires the Public Works Director to submit an annual report to
the City Council with updated, new or additional information
regarding the fee amount to be collected for each new dwelling
unit, and that a public hearing shall be conducted if the City
Council determines that the fee schedule should be adjusted; and
WHEREAS, on JUNE 22, 1994, said Public Works Director's
report was submitted to the City Council to consider adjustment of
a fee for the purposes of developing and improving parks and
recreational facilities within the City of Bakersfield; and
WHEREAS, on JUNE 22,1994, the City Council held a public
hearing to receive public comment regarding the proposed adjusted
park development and improvement fee schedule; and
WHEREAS, the law and regulations relating to the
preparation and adoption of Negative Declarations as set forth in
CEQA and the City of Bakersfield Resolution No. 212-92 have been
duly followed by the City staff; and
WHEREAS, for the above described resolution, City Council
approved a Negative Declaration on October 17, 1990; and
WHEREAS, new residential development generates a need for
improved public parks and recreational facilities; and
WHEREAS, the fee addresses the City of Bakersfield's
particular needs for the provision of improved local public parks
for new residential development; and
WHEREAS, Policy Three of the Parks Element of the
Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan requires new residential
development to provide improvements and/or in-lieu fees for parks;
and
- 1 -
.
"
WHEREAS, the requirements of Section 66000 of the
Government Code have been met; and
WHEREAS, the Consumer Price Index indicates an
inflationary increase of 3.4 percent for the year ending
I March 1994; and
I
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to adjust the fee for
inflation in accordance with the Consumer Price Index; and
WHEREAS, the amount of the fee shall be levied as
tollows, except as specified as exempt in Ordinance No. 3327.
One Family Dwelling $690.00 per unit
Duplex $560.00 per unit
, Multiple Family $520.00 per unit
I Mobile Home $490.00 per unit
I
:'
WHEREAS, the City Council, from time to time, may
consider adjustment to the fee schedule to reflect new information
effecting the fee, as specified in Ordinance No. 3327; and
WHEREAS, a park and recreation plan is expected to be
prepared and considered by the City Council within the next year.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY FOUND AND RESOLVED AS
FOLLOWS:
1. The above recitals, incorporated herein, are true
and correct.
2. All required public notices have been given.
3. The provision of CEQA have been followed.
4. The Negative Declaration approved and adopted on
October 17, 1990 is adequate for the proposed adjustment in the
amount of park fee.
5. The fee is in the public interest and is necessary
for public convenience, health, welfare and safety.
6. The fee established by this resolution is for the
purposes of developing, improving and/or enhancing public parks and
recreation facilities within the City of Bakersfield.
- 2 -
I
-----
.
,
I
'";
7. The fee shall be used to defray all or a portion of
the cost of developing, improving or enhancing of public parks and
recreation facilities serving new residential developments. These
parks and recreation facilities shall be identified in the capital
improvement plan, the Parks Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield
2010 General Plan or other comprehensive plan concerning parks.
8. There is a reasonable relationship between the fee' s
use and the type of development project on which the fee will be
imposed because the fee is calculated in relationship to the number
of people residing in the development and the current estimated
cost of developing, improving or enhancing of public parks and
recreation facilities.
9. There is a reasonable relationship between the
amount of the fee and the cost of parks and recreational facilities
or portion thereof attributable to the residential development on
which the fee is imposed.
10. There is a reasonable relationship between the need
for parks and recreational facilities and the type of development
project on which the fee is imposed because new residential
dwel~ing unit development creates or contributes an additional
demand for parks and recreational facilities. It is necessary to
provide for developed parks to satisfy the additional demand for
developed parks and recreational facilities at the level of service
(standard rate) required by the General Plan.
11. The requirements of Section 66000 of the Government
Code have been met.
12. Such fee may be reconsidered pending the approval of
the park and recreation plan.
13. The requirements of Bakersfield Municipal Code
Chapter 15.82 have been met.
14. Such fee as stated above is hereby approved and
adopted, effective sixty (60) days upon adoption of this
resolution.
-----~----oOo----------
- 3 -
",
I
I
,I
I <
! I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed
I
and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular
meeting thereof held on , by the
following vote:
CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED:
BOB PRICE
MAYOR of the City of Bakersfi~ld
APPROVED as to form:
JUDY 5KOU5EN, Acting CITY ATTORNEY
of the City of Bakersfield
C1 DE\IFEEIM.RES
JE-no
0<I,'2Z/'N
- 4 -
..
I ~ AD MINISTRA TIVE REPORT
,.
MEETING DATE: June 22, 1994 AGENDA SECfION: Hearings ITEM NO: J, ,t.
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council APPROVED
DEPARtMENT BEAD ft
FROM:" Raul M. Rojas, Public Works Director
DATE: May 26, 1994 a~ ATOORNEY ~
Cl1Y ~ /'Ì
/
I SUBJECI': Hearing to receive public comment on the proposed 1994-2013 Regional
I Transportation Capital Improvement Plan and a resolution adopting the 1994-2013
Regional Transportation Capital Improvement Plan. (All Wards)
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of Resolution.
BACKGROUND: The Bakersfield Municipal Code requires that the Regional Transportation
Capital Improvement Plan be adopted annually at a noticed public hearing.
The proposed 1994-2013 Regional Transportation Capital Improvement Plan has been revised from
the 1993-2012 CIP to conform to the 1994-1999 City Capital Improvement Program. The City's
five year Capital Improvement Program is the staff's best estimate as to an improvement schedule
and available funding and the Regional Transportation CIP should be consistent with this program.
JN22PWl.HRG
MPS.mro
May 26. 994. 3:2$1XII
"
-
¡
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION ADOYI'ING THE 1994-2013
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PLAN.
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 3513 implemented a Transportation Impact Fee
program for new development in order for new development to bear a proportionate share
of the cost of the new or expanded transportation facilities required by such development;
and
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 3513 requires that the City Council annually adopt
a proposed capital improvement plan for road construction funded by the impact fee
program; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing before the City Council was advertised and held
JUNE 22, 1994.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of
Bakersfield that the plan set forth as Exhibit "A" is hereby approved and adopted.
--------- -- 000-----------
-1-
§
£
'"
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted
by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on
. by the following vote:
CI'IY CLERK and Ex omclo Clerk of the
council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED
BOB PRICE
MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED as to form:
JUDY K. SKOUSEN
Acting City Attorney
By:
ROBERT M. SHERFY
Assistant City Attorney
for the City of Bakersfield
CIP...NQ4.RES
FU<.rrro -2-
---
i
-,
0' <0, :«1, 0; II> 1/)'lnltOl 1/)1 ,0)1
..... '8: -"',-,'.,' ~' ~",<OI, 'VI-'v VI ¡'<')
:::-1 ' ,'-' , , ~, ~ C\ ' - , ~ I/') I
Oi.SI I,~,', ",<: 'Õi.f I : . '~:"" (" ;~I
:; ~I.' . , ':; ~I : "
A I: 1 ~ " ; A I: , I I I' ,I'
::JI ~ , ::J' I ,
u., u.¡ I I I : I I I'
, I , ; I ,
tOl,<')I,I/)¡,~:II)'N'~¡,~,; I~;_:Oi,O:O'O',-', ,,°10 o 0'8'~'0'0'0',O',OI010101,012121~¡
: g'~I~:~I~'~'~!~: 'õi~I"'I~i~"":~¡""~i~I""II>IMI~I"""'~~I"""I~'" ~,~ ~~,
1M',....""",;""" ",!",.,..,I,.,...I ...,...1 "II', 'I""'!"'"
1-:,V""I~I"""-""'tO..,.",. -',",!NI'-'-' tOil, 'I'" I', N¡
J~,"':~.:!:S:'~I~I;;.¡¡ :~¡~I"', """"~I : , ¡ I Ii: ¡ ¡I"',
' I, <04 I ... I ~, 'I' . ' I I , I , , !!", 'i 1
: 011 : '.,', "'; I ' , : I I I ; ,
, 01 " "', I ' i ' I , , , ' ,
' I I' ¡ i '!!! ¡
. 'I ','
"O¡ :I~:~;, ~:~I 1111' Ii
:011 ,8, "'! I-,""'.' i v' <T' I I , I I ! I '
,!OI. -, 0)11'"'1'""1 I' ....,,<041 'III: III
'.-..1, ,~I -II'~I"'" I' I' I I
"'I (I)" on, ~ " , ,
'-g~; -g~~:! Ii, 1'1111,,!1
::J . ::J: ' I , I , , ,! I
,u. 01 ':4' ¡u.: 'tOle' 0' '01 I i': I ,;
':31 It) ,~::u.':;I/)I~i <oI<OI! ,I! i .:1
'I-,~I~: ,~ft i~;~1 :::-;¡¡;; ",,<04' I" I ,I! E
-, I ,« 1« «, "" 1« !;,;:".,; , -, I: ' ~ i I I I i I I , G¡
Z Ollnl "..,I;,IOIIt), I" ,,'I ~
<t: on, "" ',"-I';;; ,on I "', , I I I I I .-
~ '8 ~::"'" 'g: I I' ¡ , ¡
;- -- 00)' i'="~' J')' I(), <011>1 ¡()II/)'N,:'¡(), ,1: ~
-' 11>1- "41:1-, ,0, .... ""'0 """11>1"""""", ,G¡
~ _,~i~: N'~' '.¡J',; ""'~: "', N ~I"" N:~I-' 'N' I " E 1!en
~",,-' ,,"'" "',-' ,"" <H' <HI """" ,..., 'I:
:::E'-'~I""«'«' "'«!"""~' "1"'10
ð..J'J:~: i..:,~;;';' , ,III! :i[~ ~
c::, 0'00:§8'0:01':~"'; 0:0:0101°'1""°; o"o"""'O'OlOi,Ol""O'IOI'§""I"";O'§I§§I~ 0'" -
Cl.v "'. 'I,. " "'01'00"""0'0'0 +-, +-+-1' ~ "
:::E "', 8,18,'8,1, ,'8,18Ji '8.18,i8J8.!8_§:o"o,!~§ §0_o,;o,18,158,18" .1515,8,1 ,!, ,I: øi CI -
- u..' t;itOl"'lo:~I.""OI""'..'I"'". tJ'8'<O18'O,o'.0'<O1 1°',°, 0 0.°1..°'.11>',°1 O'OIOiO, 01. olol.ol~ II'II~ G .S ~'
...J 1:: 0 In 8:0>-'<')<0:'.-: Q' 'NI ,NI_'U,II>I I<DIN'UUO'O'OO:U'NI.....'NIUIUIN O -, -" -
<t: 2'1 O'~,'<O,' ,""",IC>,IN,'-,;' , ,o,:~, 11'1,1 C>,! <0,1 '<0,' """'" 'If'):O"N 11>, ""'N!"" , <') In ":!t; III c:
:= -, U ""~I(I) tOl- ""tOt:I,.,,> UI("')'<OI""-'-' ,<0, ,"""" <H,_,<h'~1 ~I~I~I : """"'~.In'ns.!: ia
::..-e'., -J<04I<OIC>O"""_'-:.'N,.' ...J"""""""~""'I. -" "'" "'I "I""t):;;;
<t:o'<t:'__,-""""",_, <t:1 ,"" ",,~ G¡ .!!
U Q.' 1-; ...'....'....' : ~.;¡ 1-, i: ',$2 ¡¡; ¡g
~~I~, ::.. ~ !1'Ù ° ¡¡
- ~I , III 0 :::
~ ¡.'::. ' : I'~ s ns
'- ":J I, G¡ tIS I:
G "ê' - , : ~:; ns
~O' , ,</). , ¡"I 0 G
c.u .-' 1 ... , ,"" , : I ," '" 0, ~
:.;; CJ: , ¡"~,I ,m i I 'I ' I ~ tIS tIS ¡¡; ~
<t: OJ ! I , I " !1 ! ' 1 I 1 I I :a I. :>. G¡:: ~
c::¡a:, ". !eD! ! :il,Æ!tIS 01)
- ,.. ,~, , 'I-'~ e:; J!J
0 .., ""I ! :' ,nslõ 0
:: !., ,~¡ illiðlZ1 -gg 't
,-- \." 1:' 1:I,j ,.c: c:~ a-
U '", ~¡ l:i:I,:I.g>!-¡ ¡¡
11'1:';;, l'iIJQ Õ £>-
.' I ~ I : I , I I ,,0 ~
>'1 ':',; ':'J'.z.¡,_: 1 Sc: G¡E"
-I '¡;'I '~"~"'" 1..00 -1)-
.. '..', ~'~1'...' '::J/Ø en..-
~'C>' :,': O>"::J'Z'\IOi. I 11\(/)10 .;;l,I)..o
_I'C); ;,1, 0>1,°11:,'-: : I I.!! "..0 I)
"""'0>' ""' ,ð:UI:JI.Q, ¡, OtIS_en
cnl:r:,O ~I' 0>, :~o: ,J5, I ':' Iii c:::: °
:5:'.°J:' "I-"" '..01 "-IU, , '~, I'E'III¡ G¡J:;
::J'tOi(/)l~ _:!'3:::: :>1 U:~ '~I I G¡ I ~ G¡ >- ..
(/)1 ,o:"""o:~~! 0",.",. :¡J¡' 1:'-[ '" i!1 I I 1.2 ..01) .2
t5 (/)¡ - -, g;, a:,:"': I ~I =; U'3 I'E"~! ! : I .!! I),s >-
w OIa::'~0J:lv~;.0æ." '-g','I:'li '_I "I..,I-I! ,..0 ii-ö ë
..., -',' 'U '0 0"': '0 ,Q. I . -, I_, :"1>-1 íí;i ¡.!!I.c: CI °
0 "",(/),:r:: '": I~, 0: '. 'a:'. ,~'~I "", -, ,I:; .;; G " ~'I .::; -
'~ 0' ,-- ," , ,-,~, OJ, C -, '~I ';> -, w W CI I:
a: ""£¡.!!_i~:'I~'..' -':.!.!~.! "~I ",1:: I' -"II-""I'¡!11 ,> fI- ~
a. "I ",>,,-,:til:¡I::2. ~'I,-I ,1,-,"0:"': >, >.. -'II:I'E "'I ItIs.,Q. 0
1:.001~ft i<t:";,O"....Q: ~'~I. ".,I:.,.'..I:"-',!1' "-:~'.',:!:I,onsll:lG, I) '-E.c:
'.!'J'O>I-"'~:Ol(/)I::::u:: ;¡¡;4;I~:-~ -o"'I~';:I ='I:'=:' '-, "'O>O~I "eo..
' (/)1 ',0 £'-'OIO,Ø;;: ,:::.;::,._,~ 0> I ,,!!!'-g,:;:-,-, ""c: : 0: «I¡¡¡¡¡c:' '5CC.!!! 5 tIS Q.u '"
". a:'O,IIII.-'-'U,.,.,..,'. (/) ,a:'.a:a:I",I> ,'t I~'.""-'II".;""'.;"."'IOI Iw""",OIi E IE ,,'-
::;iu)!V5CCI~:~!O¡~:1- Oii 1:'1:; E:¡i:ä: WI-:o>!:q~;~!'5:~:i)I~i~I:'<:!Jw't; >J~ G .so¡ CI
!~!~¡~:~~¡~!~¡;¡~ .ffi'æ,~:~;~:~j~¡~¡ ; "~i~¡~~~.8¡~i8ið¡~~~'~lê '~I~I~li 'Is ~ fI ~
U (/)1~:,"':~',l\ i,«!~:w,'::= \!J'd;I@J'@J!@)i:';;I;'; ':::'_',~I,~'~i@!è:@!!@J¡è:lal@Jl~ « 1:\'i9I'1! en 8 ,iI. .2
W'I ",,~,II~'C><-',a:; WQ,:.;; 'OJI@J"-=" U)~.I:..Q,..QU,<t:! <t:1@J1 «@J\«ULL. I~ -~ ~
Ó,""'u.~~!~.,'Ô;~¡2¡,;u.;,."I.""",./ ðg¡@J:~;ïiê;_:,~I, ~ ~!,f88:@J,~:,@Ji.ii,i!@>I,~I',ïi,~låí\@J @I@>I æ ~ ~ ~
C:' «I, u., ~ ,""~,,,,¡'" c:: ';:1 ~I OJ'--, u : ~'". ~.;:I '~';:I-I '" " ~ « a
o..::>-,c: ~",,:, "':P:,' "a: ,,'O'ø'>"":o~' 0 <U""-':'è,,@,,1J o'""'V5'ø:,,,G¡(/),g: ~ ns'G¡I.. I"
':;: OJlõi,O)"'" -w >, <t:,.t:;', iI-.J"'-'~,-"">o "".t:;".c:'-O:~i,>' ,
>""'~";::'CDI'" C>;tOi,;¡¡!.1 ::¡';' g'«l'-"';~:(/)i",! 'CDi!!l;a>:,O)',a>, ° ""a:'-""-":,d!ø!J:!U!~ a:!'~IC:\ 1- (;)
«CD:-'a:' -""/1/):"", --,a:,~ ~ ~/~,I:, t:,If')""'""a:.;:,;: :!:,a:'~1 ' 1-'1 00 ,'>::
,-,'" :5""", ,a:-o«l:åi,O:ï:! -"'O ¡',"I:O'~!III'ns!G ,O::;1 G¡.!!!4!I"I'3: >-
~:~:2~i5:J::t¡:t,S5z~':¡¡¡;i5:~iæ¡o'~;~J:,J:J:~:~¡~'i5i5I'§iæ¡5i~ ~ ~I~ ~ \.9- >
:w:3,U::';;;(/)I(/)i(/)I(/)!,=,; ;¿,ff]«,U,:::EiU¡:::Ei:::E1 :<t:Ia.,cnløtø'<t:;UI<t:i:EI:::EIØ¡:::E!(/)lzlðl§\o¡o !~ ~
! a:, ",', "Q, :';;; I, ,UI ,,' ! ! i I I 111'1 ....
U,., " ,0, ,::¡, - ' , , ' I, " '" N
-
.!
~
i
'I
!~I~' :glgl~;. I ,~: .,: ¡;;),' ,
~ g'! :...,...1 "" ...,...' 1 1 I '"" ,~, I'" i
! '-I I ' ' : ' I' ..., 1 I"
", ' " I' I'
8 §¡ I I "I i 1 I ¡ I'
, I I ' I, I'
11. III ':, II L
' " ill , "
, 'o'o'OIOI~IO'ololoolo'o'O'OIO'OIOIOOiOO 0:00'o'8'010i~' 10 0 ~1010
j ¡ ...! ... !. ...1 ~,~ I ~ I... ....'" "" ~ I. ~ i ... I ~ I.. "'! ...: ... I. ~ ~ ¡ ~ : ..., ~: ~ i. ...' ~: _! .... ... 1 ~ ¡ ... ',: ~ ¡;r¡ ... ~ ,
;"'1 I I"" 1 1 ' ""1. 1...1 I 1 ¡ I ..., ,"""'1 "",...1 1 '...-; ,... Ñ IÑ'
i Õ I I i ¡I' 1 :, ii, : ' , : I 1 ... 1 ! I' ... ...
IN " ,I , , I 'I i ì ' ' I ' i, I 1
:~I ¡ . i !,,:! ,: 'i i , :; j
,I ICD ill' I I " I :
" ' , 'I '
I ! I ii, 1
!. 1 01 '0:
, 1 I I 'N IN, I
, 1011 " I"',"" , :
'Iœ , , I : 1
i Qì cb I I I I! 1
; -gl œ: 1 \" I
'æl : 11'-1 I . I " 1 1 IN' I I '
! 11., '-' II! I 1 -, !' I
.O'COII"'!IIII" I II' ,...1 I II
='~I ' ' ! I I I i I i I I : ! I I
Z Olli>! '" i Iii , ! 1 I
« , ." I œ I ': I ' I 1 I' 1 ! ,
ëC ~I 1 Ii, , ! I ! !
>- ð., ,I'-' 1 '01, ~
z -, Ill! ! . -, 1 '-, I! I I-, I I I
w -,"""', ""' 1 '~I : , 1"'1 I:'
¿ ,!aI~II: I , I! I I '
W ,..J, «.,.' , I ' , I,
> "'WI."'I I Iii 1 I I 1
0 ~:>- i , 1 I ' ,I, , , ,
g:;:1 '~'0IO'O'~ ~IOi!<I!<!~'~I~'~'81~~I~'0;8iO:O,O OI~,O'OI~~OI !<101!<1~Sò!1 J
~ ~i ;§i8.i,8.i8.i,õ.õ.f8.'õ.'õ.i,,§;õ.,õ.!§:0.§!§:§i8.!,O.:8. 8.'8. 8.1§ 8. 8.1 §\, §I,8'1 õ.8.ð. slõ., . ¿;
- 11., ~loI010'o;~1010!810'OI0101 0101 0' 01 00:0'000010'0 01' O,O:~I m10 8 elm! ~
;j §; O!U!~!3:~I~i:¡::¡:-~:UI~!:¡IU;~,UiU!U'~I:¡:~¡;¡~ ~u ~:~U¡Ui~: ~,~ C') UI~
f- '=, Ui :~I"""" I ' '~i ' I~' ; ,"'1 " ,~, ~'~I ~'~I I -': ¡"'IÑ Ñ'
ã:-EI~:,' ,¡ ¡, '" ' ,..., ,...!...I
« 0' «I , , ' , ,
U 0..: f-: ! 1 , I '
::J~' ~: ! i
~ "", 1 I'
~ ~" 1 1
~~, t:I, I ' ' , ': !,', , " ,'i:! .
,-:; 0' ' ' ", ',' , 'I' , I '" ' " . i ': " ' ,'.', I '" 101, II I I II.!!!I
~ ,- ", 1 I :' ". " i ' '1:1 0
~ ~: : i : I I 'i::!:' ': ':" ' :.~, 1:- 1.t!.1
:D a:: I I,' I I I II !, I' i" i', ¡ i., I , " ' , " i" ' " " I' I' 8 i I I !, 55 I &: ¡
- ',I I j I ' "" " -I I "E 1
.:J I!" : I I ii",' I',' II CI 1 c: ' -0
' " "'" I ' , c' w
>-' i:'! Iii ì ! i : : : : ~ ,:' ': : I a i ,!= 1;;1
= 1 ¡I, !:, i I : ' I ,: I' I' : :u, I I I;¡ ,I;,
U " 1 ¡ : I ¡I! , ! I . , i : : , : ' ! 'I i I I : ~ ja::l
' I: I 'I 'I : i' ¡, 1 ' : , i _I 1 I" ;;;¡'
i. I: ! I: i, i : I ", : : , 1 S I I!! c:
" I: 'i Iii: ! ¡ I : : ' : :'£1, !:! ð
! I,! !! ,! " '! I 'I '" 'I' ~I I_II '
: :, i I I I'; Iii ! i ,en I C:, I
, " 'I I ' "I,'" , , iDl !,-
' I I' I I I " ", " ' , " ¡ ',' I I E¡"- '$
'1,:,'1-- ,I,C:' ",i,'I",:',' ,', I I c,E 0
_¡.I:I 1'4> ,', "" I œS-
:,c ,° i" :" ! ,'~, 1 ,-.c
'en,¡I~III~¡ 11,.-1 I": :', fie-' I : "ilsl~
1-"'31 !,g'¡"¿'¡ I!I, : -i5'4>,~' 1 ~Iœlen
1rl1:-!ê!!,ïã!~II?'~ II;,! "i!~¡:Q.:Q¡~:,', ",I "'\;:11
~ '~I{¡'-J.þ!:Q ê'1~_!~1 I,' '_I :': ;;'.!.'.!.'"2', I, I~ a:
a, 4>,-C,c: 4>'-CCl' 'I <I "", -, _'" ,
a:1 ¡:3:lwIQjI,~~3:WI.þ1 : :.",cl' ", :,' g-.;"~!""!".!.:,C::,-¡:iê'.! 111,001 I
0..1 I::-"'I~ ,- ,-oC:1 "c:'lj' ,Ii o'-'C:'".,"'..!II': c:=i,
i tZISlj"'I~!3: " 'j¡lI, _I :.!!1!~ : i_I :, :, ¡¡:¡i>!B!~;:Q!:QI:Qllê: I 01"[1
..,.::;.¡,- C:_U"""., I, 1",3:' 4)1 en ..,C:
I @!15¡,"'~i:::!.~I~I"I'" c:11 :c:,~1 i ; ~IßI ïãi~!~: ~i'E;:-.'.!.1-;:E! ,ljl¡_111 '5¡~ I
',~ ..4)-C:,C:' ~' ,'" "'>"~"~",~ - ,
' : -1a:JI,4>I.!!!Ic:IE '.. ~1"'lljl"'I'4>Ia:I;¡:.¡, ,1\11,-, C,<:I,~"-,"',c:,~:,,,~, 'W 4) WI I I
C> C' " C:I.... _I" ,"" ",U'>I "",~,tD'a:: '" ,-, "',,- -, '-, 1 "
I ,:::~!ê!,~¡~I;;¡IQj!,.!!!!.!!!liii~iEi;;,'@!I-õ!rãii~Ig¡;<;::~:@)@)'£D'U'j',iI!Jj¡I{¡1 iO¡!~I~i~l~i i,
I "'tDl,tZ:~ltDlu.l~'E'E'~:~:OSI\9¡I""'~'I"'I.2I4>iE'4>:O '@::@i:GI",¡'¡¡¡: :,a:I£~I~';;;, "
I CJ)¡ a:: 1 """1,,",1"""14>1"'¡ a:,-"..,[1 I;¡....,a::~ '>'0"'" w'WI"",0.. 1:>\1""
1-'(J)I@¡I""'I@!I~I"""""',~~;WII:>'II:>'I>i~~11 :,tDf!:1iii:\:)iÕ" '" 4>1'0', . ,"'I :,ol@I@)I"""" I'
, '-, 'O::J ""tIl'" @JI~ ~ '::,.I:,~ @¡I@), ' " 0 ~ ",";:"'@Jla : ' _I a
'ffil>-:~'~I~'glg gi@!I@)I",4>i4>IO:,g>!@JI't7I,,@JI@)I@!f@J¡a::a:,~,£:;:!,,:WI :I:!:!!~!~I=:,W i
~: ~Ij!j~j!a::a::la::i~!~! SI ê: ê: ~:;' ~' g, 8 """":"'~ ~:¿, 4>\~: a:@)¡ !~!jlj!~I@!1 ;
¡:;¡U:-g,¡ 1111 I!II 1111818 8,I".5lj¡a::l~i~!0',:¡;¡I'::Ia:ia:: 8:,8¡3:3¡,>,,>'~§U'jia::l~! ~1g¡1g¡II'~' 'I ¿;
"'-iC/C'C:"'""" ~«,«I,..JI"'O'o,o,a:,a::la:,a:"",:"",n:'enl '~'-: ICt: -I
'I¡""""""L::.I:.I:,..!!',!I..!!!""CII"'I-"'4>I-<='-<=:C::c:c;c:,c,c: >-: I, <11= .. >-
,~I=I c;e' c'¡o 0 Ol-'~I'~' C' c:11"" 81.2'C:'IC:' 4)i 4>1 "" 4>' 1I!4>:~ 3:1~,- II ~I~ c: ~ II '"
II CtlI"'CtlCtI"'CtI' ~~,,-,,- '_-4>4)I=,='='::::'~~,::::4>"'" " <11<11 ' ~
~1~lo..io..\o..lo..\o.. o..:§\~I~:~I~lðlenloia:ia:::«I«I«,«¡tD;tD,~,z J:itZlenl ~i~ 0..1~ enl ,
!UI ' , ' ill ¡ )' Ii' 1 ill' ", i" UI I I ,
! :! " I, I' "I , ~
--u._~.._- ---- .
.
{
r-
-~
Ii', ,°, ""I Ii"')
: I : i I: ~I i ,I') :, ,I')
,,' , , ',' 01 , 01
I ~ '~- 'i I I I I I: I ¡, ' , I I I ÑI I : I ¡ Ñ
':;? 1:1 I I 'I' 'I 'I "'" 'i: ,....
,a § , I I, I r I I' I I ILilJ ; i I
u.1 ' ! 1 i 'i ii, 'I I I I I
I I I " 1 ,
, 'O'OOIOI~ OIO'OIOI§'~' lo:~I§'OI00'O'0'08'8'8 0 10101001NI~IO'O'ONI
' I' I....,....I....I,NIN,<O colco N I,co, ,,""1, 1""""'1....1""""","'" 'I. II 1,...1 1,""""',""1""1-, """""""1-
I 'I'II"III')'~""I~I')"<,)II' 0" 011"1""<')1 _I "1<0
IMI "~I""¡"" """"1" i'" ., ' , , , " " ',,' I. . I I, '
1- ,- : -,<')1,,-'-1 11"11 <0'-'-""',1' IN,... 011
'01 ,¡ ill I"""""ì'~""" ,"" """';""'_',11"......./,,:..
I I C;-I ' . ' i, i, I 'I I I' ' , I !: . I , '~I: :, I ! II I I' i ! i I
' g: I' 'i I 1 I ' , : Ii, , I
; ¡ i : ; : 1 I J I I I, ; ¡ 1 I I ' I ¡ I I
' ',:' I , I ii' I, "
,I" , I "^I I' I
¡,I 1- i 1
ij~' Ii! II i III ¡ ; ~ì [ i i
-g 81 I I I I, ! I I I I ' I I
::I , ! 1 I '
U. I I It I I
LL I I I I I i I ~ I
~i æl: ¡: I I I I 'I!! ~I ¡ II I I
_I 1 I ' I I I I 1..1 1 '
Z 0 ~ , 1 1 , , , , I I
~ !lIi 0) "I I ¡ ; ii, I II ; : I
...J ,§! ' , t , , , , I I 1 "
a.. , , ' 1 ' , , ,
t- :.. ! , I, I , , ' : 01 I: 1
Z -'~I 1 " I i I I '11"1 I' :
'.1J _,"'" 0) " , , 1 NI
- ",,-' II; I I I', j ; I ,"" I'
d5 ::;: ~¡ .,.1, I I ! I I, : 'I : I 'I' I . I i
>' 10)1 I' !' I ! I , I I
0 I' , ! I ! ii" '
a:a.. - :ÞIÞ/Þiglg'1010101018:0I, 1,'::-1°1°1"::-:'::-: >-<°I'::-I'::-lo:O,OlO¡ '::-:Þ'IÞI.::-I§I§I.::-Iš!:"IÞi§ (")
<.. 'c'c'c'¡ o,oO,O"cIO c'c1:IOc'c'oo,o,o, cccc' cC'c' -
I ¿ æ! 1-1::11::1:::110,10,,8,10,10.10,10,:0.: '::110,8, ::1'::11::110,1::1,::11,°,:°,,0,10,1 ::11::11::11::11' ..::11::11::1'1'
¡ -' 0 010 0 ~10'010 0 °'11"1' 10O 0' 0'0/010 OIOO,OiO'O, 0:0 010 ~I 0 0 0 ~
' ~ c'l (/)olului,U'NIINI<oICOlcoINlo¡,co, Iulolo:ulululo!,ulu,o'ioo 0, Ulululu NI21uluiu N ~
~,o ,"II"IM,II"II""Il>(')o,<'),:"Il>"O,II"O,1 '°..11"1,"..",1 ,¡-,'Ìi'Í, ,,<0,
= <=I: UI,' """"""" ,"" ""'_,<'), I 1_',_' , "<01 <01- -'....' I, I"'!"', 1 1<01
CLE, ~I ',il':""""""!""I"",,' ""1,<7>1"""""- 1:,1""""//,-'
«O!~I 'I"¡" ..., 'I ,,"'"
() 0..1 1-' I I ' i' I I' 'i
a "" 01 I . ' ,I, I
...J ~ i I-I! ' I' I I: :
' UJ ~, I, " , ", 1
- 1-' .: 1 ¡ , ,i I :'
I ¡jj -: a I ' " 1 " ::
a: 2: ' : ' ' : ' , , , : <I\' ""', "" "" ',I I ' I I I.. I
w 0, ' 1 ' . : ; I '" ~' I; i ' ,t ' , : I ¡ 'C
! ::.:: ï:;,: I' " i, '" I', '" " I : ' I .r., , ¡ " I' " ' "", ' : '" ' " " 011 ¡'I, ! I I! ¡ 01
t , "I II I U " "C' I ' :¡:¡
;;; a:1 1 " II! I' , ! '0"::" i ¡ ,," :, n I I e
~ , , , " 1 ' ' , '.r.-
lJ.. , , I I , I' .-¡ I 1 \ ! - I' ',: : " " " " :, 0 ¡ ! II I I I !!II
A ' t', 1:111 "I v " , "~I' , -
" " " :, c, i' " " , ~' " ~
>- 11,'0 -<-',<::1'1 I ,1":1:: I' '(I)
;- I I I i" a: I = I' I' = I " II> " 1 I " " ',i" I : " , .." I I! I I III
- I,', ¡ !! I!! I ,~, ,I I " ¡ 1/>' I [ I I 1:1
() 1:,cl~I~I~,""1 I :' ,~!, 'e
,II ,!2J!,-'!I,"õi;"" "," "011,, ,E
'" I IIC'I:I:II'~'¡:',il I",' I,',:E!! II' CI
' I!I<\I! ""I""I~!CDI!I ,i,l: 'å5i " 1:1
, ,Iu -~ ~:I:;'I¡' ::::.S!1,2I",,: 8 c
" i!I,cl=!coL:!1121".:,¡q':1 1,",191,31:, >-11" l:æ e~
"III~!li""ICOI"_,::<'~11 ,I ({)I'..,,(/)\, ~I tt C 1:1,-
I cnl!!':C:::--:¡""I~!~:-S;:' 11:-IC1:~¡!:I:i: Q;,:::J -il!
¡WI""',IOI-,, a:'":,I¡a:-',U'I' II,!'£¡'C",¡ "'I" Ql8 ..:-1'1
: 1."-' '-,I <riia: ,'CO,', 1 " UI ,21"" , 191: I I 19 - ...
! ~,8.!~li";I"':II(/)I,(/)IIl>'~I! I;! 1,-,0111-;(/);. ,I (ij~ - a::ti
'~io¡.ðJ;~ 'IC;!<,-~O I =-illa::gl.'(/)I I I i., : -~¡~¡"'i~;, :"i :.', I I -Ua:'a::cL!2
"" ~':;! 01 'êll/>I(/)¡-- , :-1 ~"':c'-"':' I ! 'I '.c
'-"0'-"', ""-0 - C', c <UIWI' I, C, C>I'-,,-' v~,-: -, I U 'a:'.
wi'" ',~, ,t , ,~,-,c,~ nl'-I ", (/)::1
,,-:?I~'I~I_I.§I¡I:;jlï¡¡¡,gI..,g,I,.OI.(.! z!! : ::E!I ~ì.-'.""..2;,-: '°1. '.~I! :a:¡,.a:a:I)¡-,.!(/)
'OI""~'O"-I't:'u.tt '_Itt I""'I'-I"~¡ .r.""~J'O\,'-(/) 1"-'Q..¡~u.
a::cniU!:::':~¡!ï;¡l- °jCl!SIU c:.:.~ ?'I~ -' :-'?:!:!í~!I:!:!¡o\"'I-g:z::E!1 a: a: ~ a: '!!i<ri
:Q..:~!~I~!~í~'I~!~~! ~~I~:~;~¡~,jl ~lrlg:I~I~I~I~!f::I:'i:(/):g:~¡ :a:!~,æ ~ ~!~ICl!SI
' ~:~¡~I~t ~I..2:1::!!l 'O'15iW!~:--,:E!:2,I;~¿'¡=: iCOIU)lui, ,~:_I Q..I(/)~(/) '<ri"':
'~-3.',3'.""..2: ~I::I G>11~1-""I-'CII"'I~~I'COI~:!,f,....,Iò.;:!)!. ' ~Ia:I. -I. '¡CI!SlcnCl!S(/)CI!S -
. - IU: ~ai3 ~ ~I:::'I ~ ~I(/)I~I", CI'CJ>ICI (/)IIl>I_' ¡~I~' "",@J! !l.:~¡a:,cn ¡-:'CI!S"': Cl!SI ,,~
, _~.::;)I XI:E!: xiU °u ~31~: ({)III.II",:"".@¡II!.:i:.~I:!::I:. S_, 01', .W'<riIa:J@I< "':I<¡-:¡'":I¡@J1
. :.:"I~icõiCDolxola¡xl:cUO11 ~:(/)-'I'(/)I:I:1:I1'1..:!=I~'(/)I~:'~: :(/)ICI!SlcLI1:I , <~!I
" OCXI",..., '({)({)I«I, , ,~ -
~:£I~:~: G>jCDi ~!CDICDlgIIÆ¡ 9:@Ji@Jl<riiui'£:"""':O"""I@J,@J1 §~: ~:¡-:iuil£ ~ ""'I~I@I@I ii'
"..j I, 1"G>IIG>GlI 'a:¡ '11)1' """""""""'I~,~~ ,~I" >""'QI_tI>!>
. i~! E"I i: i¡ ¡¡1.'¡:!lil-i:f-¡:11:I 1:I! 'III' ¡;-1 cl@J!.@/'Ei1:l11:l1."i¡::¡:! ~' ~ a::~I@)I'E 't:!1:1 l: "\,¡;!~
:u i<I<1 >'0: 1::'0:0; 8:g: ~'~Ij: ~i ~I~: a18: 80:0 0::> ~ @J! ~I~ OIS\(/) 1: 0151
~¡2'GJtGJ.!~:01~ICliC) a:¡æl 'SI-g,!miji'¡:icI.a:¡a::la:::.o>lC>l.c"o,. 9:co,"I:IC tt a:.x(/)\CIIC ¿
i'-'¡"'IClc,m¡,S¡ _SI_SiCiC¡ I:--I/:: 'Ol,¡glx;::\ )('5:,5,,5"" ~ ~,OIS ~ GI" =I.EI'~
';~:~I!!l.!'!'~~I-gE:E:glg, ,WI:I:""'~!"'I({),.gI'i:!:~;==,~i~' ~I,Q lcn£!.!;E:>, :..
"-- 11--I~OOI'-'-' 1-,=cl ',:::.c'-'----'O,OO",I '...J' ',:: -00 0... '.
i ¡~¡~!~I£i8!~I< ~!~I~!~:gj~1~¡~!Õ'":~:~!~I~'~lr~!~!0iÕ!~ ð 0 ~ ð~I~1 ~ '
---------
.
I ",
I " I
.'
0> I )!!I :¡:.
~ C' ,'Wi 'N,'.'
: ~ ], ::i', ¡I
:010'010:0 010'010'0,0 0:010 0101010: C") o C");~':
" <o91010l<091<091<091<09/<09I<09I<09'<09'<09'OI010i<09,<09'01 "" N CO::,,:
'~, ,;¡:;¡¡' I : ¡ ,;¡i;¡:;¡i~: ¡~~~'L~
101" I ': ,,', ' """"H~:
i~1 I : .. I i :~
, . , ,
; I !' ..
i ' I
=1 I
: ì CI I I' ,
' I ,
'meo! I I ' I
-g; œ!, i I
:::>1 ' ,
, ~ : COI .i.:':':'
01 " '" .':':':':
I I- 1 :g I <09 II:
z :õl,'¡'¡' i I I {i:;;;
ct ; ,"'; = : \t
~ I§ , ....
0... ' , , .....
I ,i,:,:,:'
~~I~~! I,,: :'1, ~:i :::':::
a5...J;~!.i, i I !i I, I?t
6~:~iC71r,1 I :< II «:
a: ~¡ 'i!:"§iO'i!:'1i!:'Ii!:' ;:o.,z:.,i!:'Ii!:'1i!:':i!:':81818!i!:':i!:':01:0 o,oi,,'§' "'" CI'81§ 81§ '" §f§I§::¡:':':: ""
0...0, ,I,O"~I",,, ,',10,000. NIN' "" " 1)
:::: (! l 1-,5' .1,0.!,5',§I§!5'§:5;§i5I,,§10.!O.lO.!5:5',O,ì !o. °. °-""",', IO""."",,~ ,0, - .1 -~: 01
-"-I enlo:81010'0,0101011010lOOI81°10IoloI8' :I'-Ol'-",~ MII'-'1l>1811'-¡<')<')Si1Si!I$1ID á:.
~ §i O:Ui_:~,U,UIUIU,U uUiuIU:_!~:~:UIUIIl>I ig~I~:~ g:~!~!"",~,~ ~ ~ ~ ~)8:
6: ~¡ ~: :<091<09' , ' ' , ' :...:<09:<091 :"'1 '~~~¡~,~,I ~::;ii~i~:,~¡~¡~ ;tl~¡"'::;i,i'i:~
(J 8..1 1-' ' I L~I' ...~...\ i I II lai
a "'I 0: 'I I~: I 1 I, ¡:Iit
U: I I:i¡~¡"¡': Ii! !iil
::<: .,1 I, r i I. I \'-1: ' c::? I I
<{ 1 " <II I ,2'1i'i" ,
:Da:, II I !II~: 'en! i I
LC. i ' I I I u' ,Oi::: i I:
; I : ' : : '8! ,', ¡ ! i .,: i~¡~ ¡I!
'-"~II! 'UI I' 111"Utl '~¡¡:II:=:: I I'
Ü , ' ¡ f ! \j¡ :.: ¡ j I ~¡ ; , i.:.V i
" ' 1 I I-I " 'I," 'UI , .III'"",,",:"',, '
" I: ° ! ;::: 1111 ¡ o~¡<:::1
, I I,: ~/J> :.' I: " I 0\ ',', -'i",i"i,i,,::,',:i,
,i 'I: . I ., ,', ¡ : 'I ~ I: .Q :'>;::,¡:
' ,-' I " 'I <a' "-ii',"
'~:i--éil:lðl ;' Iii I ~i¡ ent:
'-'a:i,a:"I,I+>1 :',I'J:!lo:' '',:,',',',':
enLL:'a::..,I;~, ,'¡rig! wi ,
{l)1,"enla:;Ia:!"-li.c¡CI ":.",1:;1 E'; IW,":,
1-..., I....,OC 'J:I"',ii -' .¡,.-
U~OI I~¡~:enl-£!cIOI '!gl ICDlen! I! ,1%
~{I)I-I .,enl,"'!C,] ,U : " ,"'¡ Icrla:'¡'.c-, i, I~,:,
'oen.,{I),::.;..I.,«II...... """"1 uS! '4;-
a: a ~1:;;:-fiII-!cDicria:1 ¡ :g.ciCD! Ia:ia:'¡:¡¡ Si .;~
0... a:u .c1(Jicl~a:;' .¡'a:I, ~¡~I<aiocla:'..c:I~'I" ~.gl :íiì; : ,,0',:
o,I:",,! 'a:. c.'a.:~""O Il-ICD I ,CI ' ;,'
I~: giÆ:cDi-£Ia:I~I~: (J)ienllXl'Æia:r a¡<ril<riicr¡en, £1' : ¡tEl
, ¡ctlmlQ¡lãíl f§¡~¡trii~!OI !cr!a:ia::cr\o...!m\@>I@Jlcri Si '21
'~¡,.EI"I ~!lXIi<ri¡""'Iu.:I-I,crla:;:,a:; .en'cri <II1"1~'i 2 íiì, ,,""1
""""ê:,c::>r\"'=I'cti",'a:,¡;;,,¡.I::>,::> I <DC'itl:.
' :aicti~¡enl'~ @J1>-lenlll-¡ll-,o...'Cl:O""'a::a'i'<riI!£.£1:.0
,~;@J!@I@J ctlr1,:I~:U;itriien,<ri;]:~i~!~i@ì :3: ~ 3 I:lJ
, ,C¡;:,'U~!Q I~'I@Jiõi,.2'I'-,'al,,@JI@JI@'¡;;,,;a:ltriIQ¡IQ¡'I',~I ,,«z!£12 :,2""",1
- c'o I_,' 'U',,",' ¡;;,'I-""~' , "', ,1'"
'~I, :",: "U,'!!I' r;:¡,a:,'U!'U'III"U,ni""UI!UlI,C'1 '(.?-"-' "",','
a:'a:'...J,a:':rl:,.,!"",lc,g:3'0 ,UI: "':""., !--;;;'" :""i
w: m; m/B!a:! o:iõ col mia:ia::a: 8:>1 ~¡G!6i~1 !~:~~, .'~:,I ~
' ::>!I::I:;G>I~:~;],I/')'~I.!!!I.!!!'o a:'21ã:1..c:' lei ,-,S ~' ,>-'
O:~i:gi-£l~i::¡¡OI Iie>::::I:::,'E'~i"'1 ,:;1:E1.21 :tt:~ Q: ,01 >-
I ,a:, "'I "'101 ::J¡O ,,£ .i..sIOIO,.,,=,::> :!2¡ololc '«',.,.c.: ;,~, i,' ~
, :~i~¡a..!~,::E u,en en!IIZiz¡a::«IIXIIOen,Z!:;)1 !a:;Z::¡ 'S",I ""
I ,:_! I : I I ' I ' i ' , , " ¡ I \I-,w ~
-. .
II
II
I
'I STATUS OF RESPONSES TO
I
1
QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL
BUDGET WORKSHOPS/HEARINGS
I WORKSHOP
I
I NO. DATE SUBJECT RESPONSES
I
I
I
1 May 18 Budget Overview Sent June 3
2 May 23 Gen. Govt., Finance, etc. Sent June 3
3 May 25 Fire, Sanitation Enclosed
4 June 1 Development Services NO QUESTIONS
5 June 6 Police, ED/CD Enclosed
6 June 13 Public Works Staff preparing
responses
7 June 15 Community Services Staff preparing
responses
HEARINGS
1 June 8 Maintenance Districts Staff preparing
responses
----
~
. \
MEMORANDUM
DEPARTMENT OF WATER & SANITATION
SANITATION DIVISION
June 15, 1994
TO: ALAN TANDY
CITY MANAGER
1
FROM: GENE BOGART
WATER & SANITATION MANAGER
BY: MIKE SIDES
SANITATION SUPERINTENDENT
SUBJECT: FY 1994-95 PROPOSED BUDGET WORKSHOP RESPONSES; WORKSHOP #3 -
WATER & SANITATION DEPARTMENT
Question #16 (McDermott) Automated refuse service - What percent of residential
refuse service is automated? Projected completion of cart placement in
1993-94 will bring municipal (City Services) automated totals to 60%; city-
wide totals (including contractor services) are anticipated to be 31 %.
Additional carts and trucks provided in the 1994-95 budget bring municipal
(City Services) automated totals to 88%; city-wide totals (including
contractor services) are expected to be 45%. City-wide increases in 1993-
94 include pilot programs with Kern Refuse, Inc.; 1994-95 city-wide
incrèase is due to continued automation of municipal services.
Question #17 (McDermott) Revenues from recycling - Why do revenues go to non-
profits? The only recycling revenues currently going to non-profits involve
the City drop-off recycling centers. These centers are serviced by City
trucks and an hourly haul rate is charged by the City for this service. The
recycling revenues generated from operations are minimal as the value of
these materials remains low. In some cases, additional costs are borne by
the participating non-profit group due to the acquisition/use of land, which
may not be compensated for through generated revenues. In addition,
participation in site maintenance and promotion of facility operations by
non-profit groups is essential in making the centers successful;
comments/questions raised by the public indicate that many people would
not bring recyclables to a facility which benefitted government in any way.
All other recycling revenues go back into the refuse fund, and are properly
documented and accounted for in annual budgets.
0
"0
" Page 2
Budget Workshop #3 Response
Question #18 (Edwards) Refuse containers in the old Carnation Tract - Why are there
containers in the alleys and in front of homes also? A few large 300
gallon barrels are in the alleys to service the apartments in this area (this
program is currently being eliminated as multi-residential units are being
notified to change to front-loading bins); the toters are placed on .'frontsll
to handle residential single family homes.
I.
, ,"
Question #19 (Edwards) Refuse containers - When will my area receive containers
like those in newer developments? The City has contracted with a
private consultant to develop a comprehensive automation plan;
implementation schedules will be provided to the Manager's Office as they
become available during the plan development process in fiscal 1994-95.
It is the goal of the Division to expedite automated service to areas
serviced by City staff, which tend to be the older areas of Bakersfield.
Question #20 (Edwards) Southeast recycling center @ Lowell Park - When will this
be opened? Before school is out? Staff has actively worked with Council
member Edwards on this issue for the past several months. As a result,
the site was lIopenedll on Friday, June 10, 1994. Per Council member
Edwards request, fencing is being provided for the facility to improve
security; actual installation is scheduled for the week of June 13th.
Question #21 (McDermott) Page 168 of proposed budget is almost $1.7 million for
waste diversion, or $720,00 higher than FY 1993-94 amended budget.
Why?
Up until FY 1994-95, many of the costs for waste diversion were reflected
in the budget for municipal services (subprogram 531). This year, to
properly identify the costs associated with recycling; staff, materials,
supplies, and equipment have been shifted to waste diversion services
(subprogram 533). These items account for almost $700,000 of the
increase, with the remainder associated with additional expenses for
Christmas Tree Grinding, compost testing by outside firms, and water for
the wood waste/green waste facility. See attached for details.
I
I
.i .,
, Page 3
Budget Workshop #3 Response
Question #22 (McDermott) If recycling mandate for 1995 is 25%, why are we going
to 30%? What are the costs for the last few percentage points? The
recycling mandate is 25% by 1995 and 50% by the Year 2000. The 30%
figure is an estimate of what our existing programs are accomplishing
within the current parameters provided in State regulations. Since these
regulations are modified each year through additional legislation, the 30%
estimated figure could go up or down depending upon waste stream
requirements and what is allowed to count for diversion. As a result, staff
estimates that there would not be significant savings by cutting back to
25% as the City has implemented the most successful, cost effective
programs possible in the early stages; the same equipment and staff levels
would be necessary to meet 25% only, and it could be detrimental (from
a program and cost standpoint) to halt programs at 25% and then attempt
to gear up again at a later date to meet the 50% requirement. In terms of
the Year 2000 50% mandate, it is only reasonable to assume that costs will
go up as more expensive, labor intensive, and unattractive recycling
alternatives are implemented to gain the last few percentage points. It is
possible that the 50% mandate could be modified in future years, and Staff
will gear programs to only meet mandated percentages.
Question #23 (McDermott) According to page 242 of the proposed budget, expenses
are up over 10%. Is there a plan to lower proposed rate increase?
Concerned about future rate increases. There is currently no plan to
lower the proposed increase, as this budget reflects normal operations,
state mandated recycling activities, and some short-term costs associated
with the implementation of automation. Costs for the latter should come
down over the long-term, as automation will reduce labor costs as the
program is implemented.
In general, increases in the refuse fund are due to shifting staff into street
sweeping and waste diversion. In addition, increases in worker's
compensation and overtime in subprogram 531 are offset by lower
unemployment insurance costs. The cost of automated carts, not
previously budgeted in subprogram 533, also contribute to budgetary
increases. Please refer to attached Refuse Fund Analysis.
It needs to be kept in mind that inflation continues to rise and our refuse
rates remain the lowest in the area and among the lowest in the State.
Future rate increases (if they occur) will most likely be caused by factors
external to daily refuse operations Le. closure and post-closure
maintenance costs for the old Bakersfield Landfill, or additional recycling
program costs to meet AB939 mandates.
0
.
. ,.
.' Page 4
Budget Workshop #3 Response
Question #24 (McDermott) If dropoff recycling stations are on/near City property, can
benefits be used to make improvements?
Future placement of drop-off centers on City property could be explored
where citizens might be convinced that items such as park equipment could
be purchased through revenues derived from recyclables. Staff will
investigate this possibility, however current public opinion indicates that
residents are unwilling to donate anything to benefit government and any
such effort would require an extensive public relations campaign. The most
-', recent drop-off recycling center is located in Lowell Park, with the
sponsoring non-profit being the Bakersfield Senior Center and McKinley
Elementary School.
BUDGET\COUNCIL3.R94 I
-------~--
, "
I '. , ,
I:
I ,"
~ u.
0 I- a
00 000
cr: CJw 0
LL Z!:: Cl. fEo
(/) :J(/) ~ LLO
I-
~ -I OZ 0 (/)3: \
(')0 0 Z
0 <C <cW "
0 a::r: ',->
W z Wa: r
en cr:f2 z 1-1-
I-- Q « -
~I-- ~<
O(/) 00 61-- Ow " (-<,
a:0 ~86 01-- Z «w '!-
0-
LLU zò5f ~(/) 0 (/)(/) tc
æ~ uj z W:J \:
W WOa: cr:8 <cr:
w w W~o f2~ cr: ~
->- ð a: u. <.!J cr:0
LL ~ ("
g(/) "0 W -I(/)
-I cow "W W ~~
" a.. 0 a.. o~w ~I cr: .... ~
..~W ~ ~f5Z ~I- I-- Z<C .~-
W~ W CD~W 1--1- 00 wcr: --'~
'LL LL LLXI cr:<c <C cr:<.!J ~ ;'A
-,:OW 0 O(/)I-- Wcr: ~ zO ,/
I-- -cr: ' ':\
,- cr: cr: cr: cr:1--0 >w Wa.. - '--
Wa: W ~~I-- ~:::! (/) , --
WI -....)
--LL W u. 0<C cr: <Cm ~V
(/)I (/) (/)ow I
ZI-- Z Z05 ~~ 0 W:J
:- <C 0 <C cr:(/)
<Co' cr: Ocr:
-cr: cr: cr: (/)c/) 0-1
1-0 I- 1-°---1 m« 0 ~w
wZ W w~8~ -IZ LL wI
- - . I « I I. a cr: -10 W I I-- .
, I-- -.- I- 1---.- -w mE (/) I--O~
- C') 0 o~~< 00 Z
-- 0 In W O~:J
----':1-- I-- I--~-I~ I--~ Cl. 1--0-
Z ~ wcr:~
-o~ « W w««-I W X
i :J :Jcr:z« :J o. W :JLLu.:
,- cr: ozcr:
! -1-0 <.!J 0 0,,9z -I 01--"
I (3wo W WO!::O w«o « wzz
00 -(/) Z,
I _ena: en C/)a:0- «~5 0<.!J ww-
LJ..<Ca.. « «a..~< «~...J
I z w-cr: -z wa..O
I ¡:::w W W 0 !::¡:::
0 cn5m cr: CI:mw:J cr::::!w cr:->-
Cij 0 °:JIO 000.. OC/) 0::>0
:Jz:J Z z«:J ~~ zow
a: -:I-C/) ~c/)I--W _u.en _wcr:
UJ
~
0 w
UJ en
~o a a ° ° a ~
I- '0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
en ,a:"':
~ In 8 In a co .-~.
Or! v C\J a -.-
Z - 0> a -.- In 0> (\
I -co CD C\J co v co It)
u;co ~ ° -.- -.- a
C') o~ ~ ~ ~ N ...
~ ~ ,...
'" ...
It) -¡;..,
~ z
:E -::)
« 0
a: ':~.
ø
0
a:
a.
ID en
:J I-- C/)
en C/) ~
0
a: 0 (/) 00 0
0 W W I
I- :J (/) 0
LL Z W
a.. ~ :> >
en W a..
UJ ~ :J cr: a: ...J
C/) u: W «
en -w W 00 00
« g; W z
UJ w~ ¡;.., oð 0 W cr:
a: W uj ü) 0 LU
:E« I--
U CI: -I I-- en z
Z icn cL I-- 3 I-- -
- « :J I
I- t5~ ::2 ::2 -I 0 ...J
UJ UJ cr: <C cr: « ..J
ø UJ:J (j W I-- W I-- -<
0 -ta. f3 C/) I Z I Z I-
:J I-- W I-- LU 0
ID Ocr: ::2 0 cr: 0 cr: I-
iit ~-
Uln I-
-CD
!:!::I o 0
UJo a a a 0
Zv ta~ a 0 0 0 0
I ~g¡ In 0> CD to N
og a -.- C') v co
I en... ,... ,... ,... ,... I'-
---,-- ----
-------~-----~--
:. ,fi
~ -
!II ( Q)
~ ~ 0>
IU ~ ~ a3
Q .~ 0) .- Cl.
""w I
'I U .E C') 1'"'\
' .£ Q. 0) ~...J.- (\,'
~E > ~~
c: Q U. .~ l
02 § oS ~ .~
!II .... "tJ 0::- ~ .....-
Q¡ Q Q ¿>- '---
.~ ~ (¡j ~ (-.,
o..Q c: 0) ...s;: . v
~ ~.~ -g ~ ,..c
IU"" .... ..0 . .. /"'.
:>Q)Q)~ ~-- v
>~.~ = ~
~ õ 0 'õ . -:5
C) Q)IU .~
c:?"' .... ..... c--f" or .-
.- C') ~ Q ~ ",--,I
Q.IJ) :> ....
Q c::> !II
01'- IU
¡ ~Q)O ~ CJ)
I wE- r:: ~
I '.õ::I !II 01 "-
, êi5 ... 't: Q 0 c: c: c: c:
01 IU"" :>000 0
0 0> U ~ :> -- -- .- '-
£; ~"tJ orororo ro
~"tJ"tJ g := .'t: .'t: ~ .'t:
IUS"tJ ~ ..cc:c:c: c
tí ", IU ::: :J a3 a3 a3 CU
0) ~ 0 £ .2 c.. en en en en
c: ~ c:c:c:c: c
~8 ~ fa UUUU U
!IIf!!~ ~ Q)Q)Q)Q) Q)
Q ---- -
~~ .!!l ~ Q) Q) Q) Q) Q)
"tJ"" u ..c 0> 0> 0> 0> 0>
:J g ~ .s l:I l:I l:I l:I l:I
õ> - .... :J :J :J :J :J
£: . £ £ /l en en en en en
'#. '#. '#. '#. '#. '#. '#. '#. '#. '#. '#. '#. '#.
<0 '<:t '<:t LO (j) '<:t <0 C\I C\I <0 LO 0) '<:t
CD (j) (j) ('t) (j) a - - LO <0 ('t) 0') a
LO C\I C\I ('t) t-- ('t) ~ C\Ì a LÓ ('t) t-- ('t)
('t) I I t-- I
I
a t-- Õ t-- a t-- a (0 CD LO t--
-... - <0 C\I LO a LO ('t) '<:t '<:t C\I LO
..... LO t-- CD '<:t LO (j) t-- a '<:t ('t) '<:t
& LO <0 '<:t t-- t-- (j) <0- <0- t--- 0')- t--
"0 - CD ('t) <0 ('t) C\I - 0') C\I - <0
::J C\I ('t) -- LO LO ~ t-- LO
CI:l
"Q CD CD a <0 a <0 <0 '<:t 0) ,.... <0 a <0
Q) (j) t-- 0 t-- 0 t-- C\I t-- <0 a t-- a t--
(f¡ a - 0')- 0- t--C\l0-- 0-
~ C\I- CD 6 ~ C\I- ('t) -:t- 0')- r' 6 -- C\Î ('t)
~ 0') LO t-- C\I ('t) LO LO '<:t '<:t t-- C\I ('t) LO
E CD LO LO '<:t 0> B' "": 0- ('t)- <0- LO '<:t 0>
a:: ('t) ('t) t-- t-- c:: - 0') LO - ,.... t--
- - - -::J --
~ CD -00> 00> u:: <OO-C\lO> 00')
C\ CD - C\I- 0- Q) O>C\lC\lCD- 0-
LO '<:t t-- t-- LO C\I CI) 0') ('t) <0 t-- t-- LO C\I
- ~ <0 - It) ('I) 0> ('I) ~ r-: LO - 0> 6 ('I) 0') ('I)
0> ~ t-- t-- a LO <0 C\I ( ) ('t) '<:t - LO LO <0 C\I
0> c.. <0 "": - 0> '<:t '<:t a: '<:t- "!.. ('t)- (j) 0> '<:t '<:t
"C t- ('t) ('t) <D t-- ( ),... 0) LO <D,.... ,...
:J c: - - -.J::: ,... - .:::t:.
~ ~ ~ ~
"C J,\ ,^- '- 0>
0> (/)1\.' ~ CI) CJ)
CJ) '¡j) ..j @ IJ) E: CJ) :J
0 >,.::J ë m ë ã>
a. - -:-::;.~ Q) >.:: Q) ::=-
0 cu-,,"O E Q) CJ) CJ) E CJ)
"-c:-::::. c:: a ..-.-Q)Q) -
c.. < n, Q) ~ ~I () c: Q) c..
"" > c.. c: '- .() 0 > Q)
LO "C :.. P.. CJ) >. 0 -'õ.. ~ ~ .- 0 l:I
...... C -.. ,K Q) ~ "- a Q) Q) Q) ~ "- LO
.'" - ;c! ~ "- ..... a. en Q) a.
I æJ..J -.a Q) 0>:J E è CJ) ~ - en > E ~
-:t.f' a:a c: oS 0 ~ E ð5 n1 Ü i5 - -g
~O>':\; 9.. cc: ~........ E: a3 a.cu a3 1"\
VI CJ) - ~ 0 \U \U \U ~ "- - () "- Q) ......
,... :J ,~ () 0> CJ) "-.'t: o't: c: 0> Q) 'ë - û) ~ LO
- ~ -: ' ( ) a. "- Q)a. a. a. ::J 0 Q) .... c: a3 a. (j)
>0> Ct XQ) cu cu <t) ,,-,þ....o a3 -
u.. a:'j -....;. W Il.. 0 () () '- Cl. en ~ () ~ () ()
~---
.. ,.
C\I
. c 'E Q)
~ ~.- Q) 0
a..,? c c E ~ ca
C') c .Q 0 0. 0) Il..
Ç'! :] Õ :;:; ':5 .....:.. I
~""') :] 0 c-(/) C')
0 I "'C (/) -5 Q).!!! 0)
I!) ~ Q) Q) ... :!: (r
T"" ~ (/) ... O:S;
as ~ - 0 c
~ ~ C') .s as .-
~ 0 '<t (/)... "'C
- c ~ 8Q) Q)
",'- >-.c ãí
>- ~ ..c :-- C)
..c as - :ü° "'C
Qj ëii 5: "'C E :]
(/) (/) :¡:: as e ..c
:¡::"'C 0 "'C- ~
0 Q) - C"'C :....
Q) êií ~ as Q) 'õ
E:;:; ~ -~ as
.- 0 (0 ~ .c -
c t:= C) ...... C\I (/) Q)
.Q ~ !!! (/) ~ ~ 0. ûí
- ... Q) ~ .- as
IS 0 ~ êií c I!! -5- ==
ï: ~ T"" -= .Q..!!! T"" Q) C
as a. C') S (/):] ~oð Q)
C) E I!) - Q)... as Q)
... ... .c Eo. ...
0 OQ) E Q) > _.!!I .- C)
Q) ....- co:] --
... ug e ...0 ~:] ~c- "'C
-(/)as - !J.!Q)"'0.....Q) 0
0J2"'"'C >ûí 'Eo '-' 0
t:=:>~ Q) ..Qas 0«0 ~~ ==
as:>c!t;; :> 0 . C ...
0. c.-.c .9:> ... Q) .c 0
.- - 0 0 (/) (/) -
(/)Q)c (/) Q)-_::ë!llQ) Q)
as (/) Q) ~ ~"'C Q) as 1:"'C (ij
"'CasE - '-'Q)<I>õas:] 0
Q)~>- (/) c!t;;asQ)o.5,! (/)
:e; 0..Q (/) .Q:C !:I! = (/) = Q)
.c Co. Q) -o(/) 000 Q)~ -..c
(/) '-"'C C "'C -
I ::: ~ E:] :] (/) .- C :] S as
as I!) Q) - "'C 't: -:) - C t:=
-roc g Q)as a..c gQ) 0
(j) ~:] - a: U U.- -... a..
'#. '#. '#. '#. '#. '#. '#. '#. '#. '#. '#. '#. '#. '#. '#. '#. '#.
~('t) ('t)~(Q 0>000..... ~ OOOOO~ O>~
LOt-- ot--OO LOO>(Q (Q 0> O(QOC\lO> 0>0
0> C\I a C\I LO ~ ('t) a C\I C\I a r= a M C\Í t-- ('t)
1 C\I 1 1 ~ a ('t) C')
..... ..... I I
1
C\I ~ Lõ 0> a NO ('t) (Q t--
(Q C\I ('t) LO ..... ('t) C\I 0> C\I (Q
00 0> -t--LO ..... 00 C\I ~ t--
LOO> O>LO O>LO~ a (Q
LO (Q 00 ..... ('t) (Q ('t) (Q 00
C\I - C\I (Q ('t)
-
t--C\I .....0000 O>C\IOO 0> 00 00000
O>(Q t--(QO> C\I.....o> ('t) t-- a 00
.....C\I .....~O LOC\IOO LO ..... GO.....O>
..... ~ C\I ~ C\I ('t) (0 ~ ('t) 0::'- 00 C\I a
~ ('t) ('t) 00 C) ..... 0..... C\J LO (Q t--
(Q (Q 'r- ~ 00 00 ~ C\I ..... LO
C\I ('t) (Q Lñ ~ ('t)
E ....."",
~ LOOO (QO>OO .,....C\lLO ('t)..... 00000 am
;:;.. ('t) ('t) a a 00 (Q ('t) a ..... ..... LO .,.... (Q C\I a .....
'oJ , ('t) ('t) C\I t-- LO (Q a (Q ..... ~ C) 00 C) t-- LO C\J
- e LO ~ C\I ~ (Q C\I C\I ('t) c:rf ..... 00- ('t)- C\Î Lñ 0> ('t)
Q) Cl 00 (Q ('t) 0> t-- LO t-- 00 (Q t-- 0> a (Q C\J
0 ~ LOLO .,....('t)(Q 00(0.,....- ~ ""'- ..... ~~
"'C :::, C\I ('t) (0 LO ('t) t--.,....
:J CI) ....."", ~
~ ~ ~
"'C ~ 0 c:: 0 c:: 0 c:: C/) m
Q) .~ CI).£; C/) C/) 0 .S C/) C/) 0 .S C/) C/) 0 - .....
C/)C/) ~ Q.o (i) Q.o (i) Q.o ïñ C ~
0:-. § Q» ~L. Q»~ L. Q»~L. Q) Q)
c. (ã .- Q) en en ~ Q) en en ~ Q) en en ~ E ;:.
e c is ~ ~ ca .....'- ~ ca"'" .- ~ ca ..... .- Q) ~
Il.. « ( ) C/) en Q. 0 0 en Q. 0 0 en Q. 0 0 > c.
,.... 0""'0 ~Q) ""'o~ Q) ca""'o~Q) 0 Q)
LO "'C )(' U Q).- - t) Q).-.......... - Q) .- - t) ... "'C
m§ ( ) @ § § cu @§ § ~ '5@§§ca ~
~ u. c:: ~ û3 ~ 0 ~ ~ 1û3 ~ 0 ~ ~ a û3 ~ 0 ~ ~ 'Õ
~Q) ~ C 1 IB '~II 1 IB (ãIIIIB .c:J
.... C/) '- O.c .c - .c
..... ..... ... C/) - - - - L. - - - - .- - - - - ..... LO
.... '.. C\I.,.... C\I ('t):J Q) C\I .,.... C\I ('t):J C\I .,.... C\I ('t) .... 0>
[r Q) ID (¡) ('t) ('t) ('t) ('t) en ('t) C') ('t) ('t) en ca ('t) C') C') ('t) en ca -
c: ,..... c.. ~ LO LO LO A ~ LO LO LO ", ~ LO LO LO ",
~ -- -- --- - ----- - 0 'I
---
¡ ~,
,I ;0. -"
I' ¡
~
j
..... - (/) (/) a. Q)"O ( ) or-
aa~<\3}g 0> E( ) .c ( )
+Jõo.õo. (/) .~ a 1\1 - Q) 0>
C (/) <\3 .- - +J ID"O(/)(/) c"'" <\3
.- ( ) ......~ 0> ( ) '- <\3 a..
+JCC:C "O+J
+Ju+J"Uc"U C<\3-( )
C.- C "0 .- . ( ) C
( ) ~ a « .t: 3: ~ ( ) . a. u a
E ( ) u ~.?:- L{) u<\3~E <\3~
( ) (j) 0> ~ == .- -.::t a.E<\3o. a.cuj
u co 3: u a .- a. u .- ( )
..... C.-
<\3 .?:-. - r- "U.9 "0 .- u a ~(/)E
- .- "0 ('I) L{) C
a. 0 ..:! ( ) ~ <\3 Uì Et(/) ~ ID 0.
O)( )CtS<\3
æog.Qd!;~~ .S ..... a. en "(üõ.c
U <\3 a .- +J +J >.
u - ::=.. a G:: 00 .- C . - ==
_.!!!en+J oo~ >'en-"O 0. en E
u ( ) (/) C
0.<\3 <\3-gca (/) ~ :J.~~ u"E<\3
+J+J +J C( )-
c.9a1\1~en"'" c-( ) aE( )
0. +Ja.( )( )o. E( )o.
> ci£ uj -t-
+:; 0> ( ).- en u Ü <\3<\30>
( ) C u'- e( ) '-( )
- .- "0 .- 0. ~ <\3 0> a..5
a. ..... .- +J a."'" -a:c:0.:J
(/) E.Q3:æo.~"E en .a( )C 0<\3C/)
I +J ( ) (/) c: (/) ( ). 0.....7
c - ~ ..... a
Q) a == .- Q) a..?:- u :J.~ C/):J > ('I) a'~
E u 3: u ..... +J'- ffië~( )~ ( )-ë
"0 <\3 cO 0) O)Q)( )
E Q)-.::t"O(/)Q).....c > a.<\3.c """"""0
+J Q) C Q) E 0.'- Q)'.....-( ) <\3 <\3.-
0. u ('l) <\3 u a.'+- -g ..... C :J (/)-.c 3:(/)~
0 Q) Q) .- (/) >.0.0.Q)-
!' '- ~ c= 'S <\3 <3 -Co(/) ( ) >. .....
, eG::o Q) O"+J C ðaC<\3>' -Q).....
I a.. <.OenQ).9:.::::- +JQ)U.Q «<\3,E
,I -
Q)
en
'ell) +J - +J
C C C
::J Q) Q) ( ) Q)
mil) O> "U (/) -0 (/) -0
'eC C ~ C C Q) c: C Q)CC
Q) 0 "U -oa~ "Uo.~ -oa~
II)Q. c .-.- C .- .- C .-.- C
0 II) 0. (j) ro.t: (j) ro't: (j) ro.t:
Q.Q) a.>. Q) .~ ( ) Q).~ Q) ( ).~ Q)
ou: ent ~c:a. ~co. ~ca.
-Q. Q) <\3 .- ro :J .- <\3 :J .- <\3:J
a.o a:a.. ~(j)(j) ~(j)(j) ~(j)(j)
LOJ:
0)11)
.~
0::1'-
0)0
~3: C'-.
~ I-"C C
Q)'~ ~ '
0> ( ) ~-
uë<\3 .S a ( )
.- Q) E .c Q)a
C="C a u+J..x: +J I .S"E
Q).- +J >.0.= .5 ..x: ~ a
(/) (/):J u 0)-0
Q)~<\3 Q)(/)- (/)uc~
+J ..... ~ 0. C
u (/) - (/) a:( ):J
Q) :J 0..- E:J~¿ ( ) I- () .-
:.a å5-Q) c:
0. C 0. .- C ( ) "0
:J ..... c: U ..... Q) ~ a ID C C'-'
(j) Q)'- '+- > C'-. - c: '+=Õ £ <\3 0.
"Ouc= (/)~2ïij aro-(/).!!!
- ( ) "- ( )
-.::t c: roQ)en Q);¡::ã5 u c: ( ) >. <\3
0. :Jo.o."O Q) (ij (ij Q) (/)
Q) +J Eo.Q) c"CCi
Q) eno -Q)
en 0. ro en Q».,Q) :J >.<\3E
or- Q)
:J +J.c:J >.cCo å5"O~( )o.
:J~'+- æ~gE
L{) a « ~ a:o. £.c
C\J
>.
<\3
c~ ~ ~
a. 0.
, 0. - .....' E E (/)
('I) - '- ~ == Q) "C
c- U.Q "'" ..... .....
'Q)~"O C E ( ) Q) <\3
0. E'- en 0 0 3:
Ztæ~ :J Q) () u "0
a.<\3(j)-o 8~ ~ ~ W
0. o.cð ( )
..c:: Q) ~
en 0 ..... en
..x: Q)
"-Q)_O Q).
0......<\30 :J a <.0 ,.... 00
~Ü:~LÖ oz or- or- or-
I - - ~---- -
I,
" ~
;
0 '-Q) >d:: -::>. .::s:. C\I
- - U +.-- Q)
CJ) ã..- .- . (])
\J . - ItS ..I:: () V Q) CJ)
11 Q)ccE~Q) m~ ~.9°0.c ItS
I -1tS1tS°..l:: m ~ u ~
U~~~(/)- ~Q) Q)(/)°1tS
~ .::: ~ ~ - - £; E Q) co- (])
-C-:""OQ)O 0 ~U
I 1 C 0 .~- - '- (/) ~ \J 0- oS; _0 0
1 0 .- () - u -e Q) ::J L LO
'1 U ro ItS '- ItS Q)= C-Q) C~
I E(])O::J~ cg Q)(/)O-
, c ..I::CJ)O ::J(/) ---ItS
Q) 0 - Q)'- ...., ,.... 0 ItS (/)
Q)- '- ~ ~::J(/)
.Q :J 0 :J >- \J >- CJ).- - -e
ItS - 0 .Q 0 ItS (]) c o~ g ItS
(/) Q) \J (/) \J Q) \J ..c 0- c .- U
ItS > Q) 0- Q) ~ .~ 0 ~::J (])
..I::~~~~- ~- ..I::E..I::i
C> LQ) \J (/)--
ëQ)eID~..c iQ) Q)E\J1tS
-S-ã5~..c 1tS.9 c:; 0 £; e c E
::J,-Q)~Q)\J Q)\J..I:: (/)_ItS.9
(/)~..c~,-C ~(])~ -(/)C:J
~ C~=>ItSQ) 0..1:: UQ)oro
C 0 Õ oS; ItS Q) - (/) ~ ~ ~ ~"(i) (])
Q) UU>(/)..I::..I:: ItS Q)O'-Q)-
E (/)-_U >(/) '- (/)
Q) ItS \u.- >.- Q) - > ItS
E - Q) (]) ..I:: C (]) ~ 0- :>
0 1tSQ):;§~~ ~g:J (/)E\J>
() o~ \J \J 0 \J (/) "(i) .- ...., ItS Q) Q) C
,-0- Q) Q):> U Q)-
~~..I::(/)~> Q)C '-\J(/)æ
'-U(/)X~ ..I::Q)- UCItS,-
~~(/)ItSQ)U ~~O 51tS~CJ)
-
Q)
C)
~en - --
::sQ) C C C
Q) Q) Q)
m en CJ) \J \J \J
~g C ~CC ~CC ~CC
Q)~ \J \JO~ \JO~ \JO~
en ,.. C 0- 0- C 0- 0- C .- .- C
O~ 0 OO~~ OO~~ OO~~
~ a: ~ >- Q)."!:: Q) Q)."!:: Q) Q) o"!:: Q)
0 (/)'t: .::s:.C~ .::s:.C~ .::s:.C~
... ~ Q) ItS 0- ItS :J 0- ItS :J "- ItS :J
~O ~~ ~OOOO ~OOOO ~OOOO
LOJ:
men \J
,~ Q)
~~ I - \J
mo - (/)
m~ Q)ŒOOC
- g~Eo~
> Q) ~ ~ ::JultSq~
I.L. > - \J rn >o(/)o
°ã) C Q) LU U 0- C\I V
U oS C'- Q) C \J Q) - ,.... m
Q)Q)~ U Q)~ Q)~Q)~I
'- - ~- (/) 0) ('I)
I (/)C CJ) 0:J ooð\J~m
- ~æ°Q) ~ 0 ~ ::Jom
U Q)'-£E UI~(/) o§C)E~
.~ C co Q) ~ >- .::s:. 0- ~ .- - > ('0
..c ~>-.::s:.o u,-~o ~~\JQ)ItSI.L.~
:J - E .- - Q) ItS ~ 0 - Q) - U
W C -Q) '-~-..I:: o>(/)occ::J
- 0 - (/) > - - - U ,.,.. 0- 0 co E
C u== ~ Q) (/)-==..vo Q.=~
V 0 ~,....\J 1tSQ)~(/) ~ 0==-0
m Q) ~ Q)~ Q) ~Q)'-E~
m ~ (/)Cëtj~ ~OC'- -~ Q)(/)
~ Q) :JQ)~:> ~~Q)o ~~Q)""'..I::>-
:J -- ~ ~ > ~ -- ....., :::> . CJ) ~
LO a Q) :::> 0 Q) 0 @):::> Q) ItS > ..I:: ~ 0 - :::>
C\I ~>uc ø >C) ~-~~..I::>
~
c~ ~
'0- '- (/) (/) 0
('I) - .- ~ := Q) \J "'0 E
c~\u u~ '- '- '-
.Q)~\J c~ ItS co Q)
0 E"c (/) ::J E ~ ~ 0
Z coQ) OQ) "'0 "'0 U
~æoo~ ()~ w w ~
0 ~ _>t Q)
..I::Q)"V:::>
(/)0'->
~ 20 ~
0~1tS0 :JO
s~s~ az ~ ~ N I
ii
I .
!: 'Co
. 0'
r
'"' 00 - 0) 0) .::.::: (\')
as -0 00 c '-,-
E .r: en 0) 0.- - Q) ~ - Q)
e: - - 0 "'C E ° ..c ..c a. 0:; 0)
OQ»- oo"'CQ) Q»- O)~Q» ~
~£..c !E3a=£~ ~"'CE~ ~
ooE~ Q),-0Q)~ '- Co-~
0) 0-- '- 0) ..c..c - as
CIDO U~OO~OO~ as oo(/)
os: - LD e: -e 00 Q) m 3: -g £ Ë ã5 cD
~-e0 ~OOOoo~"'Cas >~æ..c
00 0 - 0 .r: 0 .- 0) 0) 1:: Q) 0-
-.r:- ~OO()C'-- Q) ,-0 00
CooQ) ~Q) og~= a.OO-en
as æ """ Eo o.¡::¡ 0- 0 ï:; 0 þ 0
~Q)o c~Q)oe: ,-Q)=a.
~£- üo~E'-OO~ ü~~Q)
c,-c ~OO~o~en- ~c~..c
æ 0 .- .r: \U - ~ +.-" Q) -
.- ~ Q) E - ~ .- > -
00- æ ,-.~ ~- en"'C () Q) Q).r:
Q)~as as3:B~>-ooo '-.r:æ
..c~ oooo~ooCo c~-~
_C\l~ Q)c~~<O oQ)Q)E
I 0 '-0..c0) .0Q) Q)e:enoo
I 00 C 0 '- ~ .- >-.r: '- ~ .-
I - -~ ~ro~EQ)-- Q)m_.r:
I e: ~.::.:::O) ~~~~e:0) ~..c-
o Q) -uæ CQ) o~- Eæ~
E ~~ d Q)ü"'CIDE"'Co~ e:o~c,
E °..c°o üoQ» Q) o'-EQ)~
3: - x - Q) .- -
0 ææo Q)~~oQ)..cQ)ro ro~Q)EQ)
() Q)e: C\I °c> '-"'C ---a.o
'- .- .~ '- as Eo> ~ >- ~ C 00 Q) a..- -
Q)~>~ -,-oo>OOIDO~ ~co~a.
..c:~asQ) 000000'::':::- O)Q)~x
~o..c:>- ~e:as"'C_=oE ~..cüQ)Q)
-
Q)
C'I
~VJ - - -
::J Q) e: e: C
Q) Q) Q)
mVJ æ"'C ~ "'C
~§ C ~e:c ~e:c ~e:c
Q)~ "'C "'Co2 "002 "'Co2
VJ ... e:.-.- c .-.- c .- .- c
o~ 0 (/)ro~ (/)ro~ (/)ro~
~a: ü >- O).~ 0) Q) .~ Q) Q) ~ Q)
0 001:: .::.:::e:ü .::.:::e:ü .::.:::e:ü
'- ~ 0) as 0- ~ ~ .- ~ ~ .- as ~
~,o ~~ ~Cf)Cf) ~Cf)Cf) ~(/)(/)
I.t).t:
cnVJ
I .::.:::
v~ ,~ 5
~~ I ~ ã5~.!Q~0 ~
,.. > Q) > 0) 0) E 00 ..c 00
- Q) .r: "T'<' 0 ~o
> ~,--Q) vE~ ~
u. "'C ~ Q) æ ~ 0 a."'C þQ)
C_'-~ ~(/)~~eQ) ~..c~
~~~- a.c en
E.r: e: "0 '- '- '-en-
~roQ) Q)"'CQ)~Q)~ ~-c
c.r:U ooe:>O)°Q) IQ)~Q)
00-:>05 o~o~coo en-E.cE
- .- ~ :> a. ü LL a. 0 0 ~ c c Q) Q)
~ ~LD eQ)~-()Q) Oo..c>
'-' Q) C\I ('00 ~ c.. u o. '- "¡::¡ 0
..c > 00 ~ Q) 's Q) - 'ID ° ~ Q) e: '-
~ =u .- å - õ [., (¡; c 00 .~ - (¡; ~ a.
Cf) -Q)~- Q) ~~ 00 oE
- æ - ,-~ 00 C\I (/) en - Q) 2 æ en - 0-
v e: e:~o~ v Q)a.,-~ cC>Q)
Q') 0 =~- ~ C\lQ)oo~U,- =01::.::.:::
~ - U e: Q) 00 00 e: e: Q) U'- Q)-
~ 00 >-asO)..c:- Q)~O)Q)~,- >-ro ~
~ 0) ° E .~ - .~ 0) ill ü '- Q) ~ u - a.o E
~ 0) o~o as xQ)-- Q)OO,-
æ a ~~ O),E ü ~~w£~.2 ~~ a.B
>-
~ ~
c~ ~ ~ 0
I 0 - 0 0 E
C") - .- ~ == ID E E '-
e:ro~ °..c '- '- Q)
oQ)_"'C e:E 0) 0) 0
z E 'c 000) ~ 0 0 °
as 00) U U ~
ü~(/) e: ()~ ~ ~ ~
0 "'C
I .r: á} oð 0)
I ~ow~ 00
0'- Q)~O Q).
'- \U 0 ~ 0 C\I ~ ....
:>.-:>.. az ,.~ ....
:>LL:>LD C\I C\I C\I
I
I
I
t':ir, ..< " "'.." ...,>
I .
)
II ;~
,I Q).c ~ Q) c:-1\1
' ~I L..en 1\10 cD ~
,I .c.~ .c o.c- c3 * -5 8 .> Q)
- 3: Q) "'C :¡:; - .- ~ 0)
~ 0.- = Q) Q) ctI .~ ena-=~ ctI
oUO:JO~C: mQ) O>_~Q)(O,S
- Q) ~ 0 .- ~t:: C:C:Ctl1\1~CJ)ã) a.
ene>0.0E5-9~ - <tS OQ)c:o_.O
~Q)"'Cen~Q)og CO"'C ctI E'-'- en c: Q)
:JEQ)u~~... ~Q) en ~.s -g 8 .2 £;
- C:c:ouQ)Q) >-1\1
oQ)o:J--C:"'C ctI Q) Q) "¡:¡ Q) .- .'!: "'C
:J .c U - =:J'(ñ ~o. EQ)~enuenc:
~ C:<.!JuooQ) 0 L..a..æS 0,2
(j) ffi ctI ~ 3: en ~ Q)
c: L.. oCJ) .Ctloo.
O)£~~ æ ê ~ Q) 0 Q) a:enL.. Q)o
~w.æCtl3:>-
c:- o-o:J.c L..aJ a..<tS:J~:¡:;~
':;' == "'C c: .- - ctI
Q)3:ffi ':Jroo- .EE E E- OL..
"¡:¡ c: o. Q):J
~ 0>0-2<tS -ggJ Q)o:¡:;tU;ã)o
~_C:.>:J_~
:J ctI C:15- o>en= .'!:.c Een~Q)enuen
en"C ctI- ~Q) Q).c OQ) .cQ) en
0'- L.. ctI 0 L.. - , - L.. Q) .-
en C:enCtl:J o°.c en Q) en CtI_C:-.c£;
Q) '- II) Q) ctI Q)
- Q)..c: > 0.:J- . ctI c: Q)E<tSo==-en
c: I- - c: 0. L.. "C 3: 3:. c::¡:;..c:c:3:Q)u
Q) .c. en .- e I Q) >- Q) :Jen-Oen-c
E en en :J Q) 0. - L.. =..c: Q) 0 ~ t Q) û5 :¡:; O).s Q)
E tU..c:oenL..æþCtlen L..~a. .E-:JtUc:enE
- ~ ctI 0 '-'- .aQ)E
0 ..c:C:Q).o->ÕEo "C Q).- E '5 .S E
0 =oO>ctlU~ Q)E 0 0. 0 OO>Q)~CtlQ)§
CtlEffi-Q) Q)- 200 o-gQ).Een~
- CtlenO OQ) -L..o
CJ) ('I) "C "C :J ..c: -5 0. "C CJ)a..- <.!J .0 3: .S tu - L..
-
( ) 0> - - L..
en c L.. c: L.. c: Q)
"'CC/) "C Q) Q) Q) Q) >- 0>
::J ( ) c: g>.2 E g>.2 E Uctl
CDC/) 0 c c:
~Ea.L.. ~Eo.L.. ctI ctI
"'Cc: @-~ 00.9 ooB I-~
( ) a Q)C:Q)O Q)C:Q)O
C/)c.. Q) ctI æÈ'
a:a. ~O>Q) ~O>Q)
a C/) ctI 0 Q).~ ctI 0 Q).~
c.( ) -,woo -,woo <X: 0
aCE:
L..c.. en
Q.a ctI -
(t ..c: 0
LO,c' - - ..c: c:-
CJ)C/) 0 Q) :J ('.
I .¥ 0 en 0'-
VL.. :J.co1\1 c: .- - .- >-
CJ) a "C .o..c: 0 ..c: . - -(t
~;: cu(t -o:¡:; 3:.!!! ~ 3:
O:J-en-== °ro "C>-
OO(t Q)enO
~ o°..c:L..L..E CtI.c uC:
--~:JQ)Q) E 3: Q) ctI
, ctI -c: ' 0 en Q)
- Q)..c: °3:u - - . -
- - ('.:J -enoen 0 L..
~.c-c~oo Q) a. L.. 0.Q)
g .~ ~ .Q en >- - 0 ctI ' o..c:
c c Q) en L.. - ('-.
ctI ctI ~.~ 0) t >- ctlO>- - 0.U)"'C
CJ)~.aocQ)t Q) -Q)
- .!!! Q) co >-
- 0 '- 0 E ~ a. Q) Q):Jaj1\1
c: Q) :Jen:J 00. :Jen~ - 0 > -
Q) E z .... Q) "¡:¡ L.. 0 z:J.E o>.c :¡:; en
u-uc:a......
E :J ~§~L..Q)3:0. Q)o- c:ctloc:
0. CJ) >.cc: '- Q)"(D
0 - :¡:;-o.E:Qo'L .- ctI ctI :æ-gâ)'-
c: 0 Q) >-"C E= Q) - 0
Q) v 0 °enCtl -c:OQ)
ctI æ Q) ctI Q) ~ .- > ('. enL...c
> m - ~..c:~*~uë þ~ëu
Q) m en :t:: Q) en
0 ..- Q) ctI - 0)- :J ctI '- C:J Q)c:tU-
:J C:Q):JO>o:J- C:Q)Q)1\1 'Eo°:J
>- <D a :J"" en........ 0 0 :J.cQ)- CJ)o~8
.'!: = <X: CtI'so.3:? = I-.c en
c Q)
:J c:
E :J :t::
lEE -, en en 0
.... E
l!)0Q):>; =Q) u "C
'oEca °.c .... .... ,-,
§ E ctI ctI Q)
0 t::-a 3: 3: 0
ZoðctlC:
0.0 0 Q) U U 0
0.0Q)~ o~ W W ~
0'-
.cEO,
enoQ)a en
~c:o
.... 0'- a Q).
0 -.. :J 0
~OOC\l l!) <D I'--
wa....- az C\I C\I C\I
'i ~1l c.,
",
}
:¡;
I OO"'Q) caþO) cD C\I
- c: +-' .- c: E Q)
Q) Q) ca a. 0 .¡: 0)
> E"'" ~.- +-'
Q) ... ..c: ca
-Q)""'Q) Q)..... e..
0> - Q) 0> 00 ..c: Q) .~
a.> +-,+-'>"";
e O"'CQ) Q) J::
'- E ~ - 0 c: +-'
1ijoE.aOOQ5 e +-'00
t)CJ~e+-'O)Q)o «S:E
+-' c: "'C 00
_"'Cca:EQ):JJ::..... +-'
caQ) +-' +-'Q) Q) .....
:J N :J'- E .a a. CJ 0
+-' .¡: e ~ t ca-
CJOe caQ)Q)e -00
ca J:: C\1 0) a. J:: «S a a.c:
.....+-' C:Q)+-'+-' 0
o:J E'- ..... 00 ~
- C\1 a."'C 0 e 00 c::¡::¡
0 Q).- .- a.
00 Q)..... Q) Q)'-=: Q) Q) 00 O.
Q)J::-~J::C:""'>
"'C+-'Q) +-'0 ¡¡= .- Q) E
00 'S 0 0) a E -..... J::C\1
+-' o+-'ca-oo =0 E+-"""
c: ..... Q) a.+-, C\1 0 3: - C\1Q)0)
I Q) a. 00 a. c: +-' Q) ..... ..... 0
! E '- Q) e 0)00.
Q) 0 00'- 00 ()
E .....- CJO""'C: 0 a.-
1: CJ ~:E 0 ~ Q) C\1 ..... x 0
0 CðQ)ca~OOCJg3: a.Q)
0 -Q)
>.a C\1 00 000 caO ~~~
a .9 w .~ « 0. ~ ca
..... .....
- Q) Q)
Q) 0) E- E-
C) c:
'Ocn "'C EÆ EÆ
::s Q) c: ~..c: :JJ::
[Dcn 0 w() w()
'Ot: ~È'
Q) 0 Q) Q) Q) Q)
cnc.. Q) C\1 >.~ >.~
0 cn a:e.. Q)- Q)-
+-' 0 +-' 0
c..Q) we.. we..
01:1:
""'c..
Q.o
Lt)"c .....
aI ( ) 0
":": -
"=:t... Q) E
alO .c .9 Q)
~~ ca
00 ..... E£
èr 00 0)
0 0 ca e ('0.
a. ..... ......--
a. O)Q)e
.-=: 0> a>+-'
00 ('0. .~ ......- C\1
.- >- a.-a.
- CJ +-' Q).9>-
v= c:
I a> 0 Q) .~ ( ) ~
..... >-M a. () ..........
..... CJ c: C:Q)+-'
e 0> () a> 00 .- 0> ()
Q) :c ::~:E u CJ .- CJ)
E :J 0..... 0 c:~"'C
a. w a. Q) 0 .- 0 g
0 - =Q) .S «S J:: c: Q) ..c
c: a'caO).....
Q) V .Q .= "'C t) .aoo~~E
> a> ..... J::Q)C:
Q) a> 00 ..... +-,,- -5>Q)Q)g..c:
0 T""" Q) Q) 0> Q) .- CJ ..c: CJ 0)
:J >-..... Q) .-..... .-
>- CD a aQ)o Z~CJ)C:Q)
.-=: = 0..... o-Q)e
c: Q)
:J c:
E:J t::
, E"E"J 0 CJ)
..... E
l{)0Q)~ =Q) u
'oEca ().a ..... .....
c: E 0> ca
0 t"'C 0 3:
Zcðcae :J 0> CJ
8~ "'C
a.CJ a.o ~ W
0 .- Q) ~
J::EO,
0000>0 00
~C:CJ
DO::'? Q).
~CJOC\l :J 0 co a>
we..T""" az C\I C\I
. . .,
1.:'~ -.....,-.,
\ RECEiVED
- ~ 8 IE
I
-
B A K E R S F I E L D :CITY MANAGER S '. .. .
! -_..
Economic and Community Development Department
M E M 0 R A N D U M
June 15, 1994
TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager ~
FROM: Jake Wager, Economic Development DireCI"b
\~
I SUBJECT: FY 1994-95 Budget Workshop Questions
!
Questions 25 -- Unattractive Nuisance:
The request by Councilmember Edwards that staff consider surveying structures that could be
targeted for demolition has been underway for the past three months utilizing existing staff
resources from both Building and Safety and Economic and Community Development
Departments. The data will then be merged with the existing Building Department database of
dangerous, vacant and abandoned properties. This effort will require approximately 100-150 staff
hours to complete. The data will provide both deparnnents with a versatile means by which to
track and maintain the status of these units. This program will also allow other departments like
Fire, Police and the City Attorney to access this information. The City Attorney can then assist
in insuring that property owners comply with the Building Department's order to abate the
unattractive nuisance. Currently, the City does not maintain a system to monitor the status or
disposition of cited properties.
Because of the VISTA resttictions on the duties and responsibilities of "volunteers", the
compilation of the demolition date could not be assigned to a VISTA participant. (See attached
memo)
In regards to developing a "volunteer" demolition option, property owners wishing to voluntarily
demolish their vacant substandard structure could be assisted within existing CDBG funds
reserved for demolition. If a residential structure is a "rehabitable" single-family or multi-family
dwelling, according to HUD regulations (Barney/Frank) the City would be obligated to replace
the unit with a comparable affordable unit for a term of ten years. In this instance, we sttongly
recommend that CDBG not be utilized because the prohibitive cost associated with that
replacement. The City would be required to replace on a one to one basis any residential unit
demolished and insure that it remains available for a minimum of ten years.
. 1F
Que s-bovP 2..:0. Z-~
]
I
. . . .,
I ?' - ~
QuesTions 26 n Unattractive Nuisance:
The structure of 1201 Potomac Avenue has been cited for "Repair and Rehabilitation Substandard
Building" on May 18, 1992. To date, the owner has made repeated attempts to comply with the
Building Department's order to secure the structure against entry.
Im:GGlOffA:-'TIYl.MEM
MEMORANDUM
I
I
!
I
I
!
;
I June 13, 1994
I
To: George Gonzales, Community Development Coordinator
From: ~Fulton, Associate Planner
Subject: Role of VISTAs in Demolition Program
As you requested, I have evaluated the possibilities of utilizing VISTAs in the development of
a more aggressive demolition program. As you know, the function of VISTAs are to develop
resources (material, financial and human) and to enhance or create programs for their assigned
agency. These programs must directly impact persons in poverty. Although demolition of unsafe
structures in our low income neighborhoods would have an impact on the relative safety of the
low income residents of the surrounding area, this "service" does not meet the criteria for VISTA
involvement:
* The demolition program is a staff function;
* It is not the intent of the program to form an active community group that would
carryon the activities; and
* The program is already "institutionalized" within the structure of government-
based ordinances and procedures (a VISTA goal).
VISTAs could organize community groups to assist the city in developjng programs to mitigate
the unsafe structure problems, but this already appears to be the direction of Council - no
"coI11I11unity action" seems warranted or appropriate. Although clearly the enhancement of the
demolition program is desirable in enhancing our revitalization efforts in targeted neighborhoods,
VISTAs cannot be used in its implementation.
demolsh2JDem/V~ta 2Jjf
II ---- ~--
, '" , '. '"
I
I PO 64-2759
MEMORANDUM
June 8, 1994
TO Alan Tandy, City Manager
FROM Steve Brummer, Chief of Police
SUBJECT Recommendation for Reinstatement of Police Over Hire
The following information is provided in response to Councilmember
McDermott's request. (Question #28 of Proposed Budget Workshop)
Prior to budget year 1992-93, the police department utilized an over
hire policy to ensure maintenance of a full authorized complement of
sworn officers. Five over hire positions were available to
accommodate retirements, resignations and other separations. Rarely,
did we exceed authorized staffing levels since we realized an annual
turn over rate of 10 to 12 officer positions. The over hire however,
allowed us to keep actual staffing levels in closer alignment with
authorized complement.
Currently, our actual sworn complement is 237, with at least two
pending separations, while our authorized complement is 244. Since
January, 1994, four officers have separated and I anticipate at least
3 more in the near future. The recruitment, testing, hiring and
training of police officérs is a lengthy process and can often take
six to eight months to complete. Therefore with no over hire
provision, it is unlikely we can maintain full complement.
Theoretically, the over hire of five officers would cost
approximately $300,000 a year, if we kept five officers over
authorized complement for a year. Based on past experience, our
annual turn over rate of 3% to 4%, though, low in a comparative
sense, is sufficient to allow us to manage staffing in line with our
salary accounts. I am confident that through careful monitoring of
salary accounts, we will keep staffing levels within authorized
limits and within budget.
I recommend that we re-institute the five over hire policy for sworn
police officers.
SEB/vrf
copy to: Melanie Dunwoody II RECEIVED; I
Verne Jung
I ì 981; j
¡ ¡ ¡
I J
¡ CITY MANAGER'S OFFiCE
. .
f\ ¡,' t '1 't
1'/).' (",.A-i..".
~ .. . "'.
PO 64-2759
MEMORANDUM
June 8, 1994
TO Alan Tandy, City Manager
FROM . Steve Brummer, Chief of Police ~~
SUBJECT Neighborhood Incentive Program for Officers
The following information is provided in response to Councilmember
Edwardfs request. (Question #29 of Proposed Budget Workshop)
The Bakersfield Police Department does not have an incentive program
to encourage or entice officers to live in the neighborhoods they
patrol. However, we will explore the options for this type of
program.
SEB/vrf
copy to: Melanie Dunwoody
Verne Jung
-'
\, . ~ i.--. '-", -rf- -, I~;!
I \ I ...":-" '- i \"-,'v I -+-, t-- ¡
-, ',;-
,. -- -,
.¡
-~ MEMORANDUM
June 14, 1994
TO: Gene Bogart
Water & Sanitation Manager
FROM: Mike Sides ø
Sanitation Superintendent
BY: Mary Beth Garrison ~
Recycling Supervisor
SUBJECT: Recycling Performance Evaluation
Attached please find the biannual performance record showcasing The City of Bakersfield's
Wood Waste/Green Waste Recycling Program and Residential Drop-off Recycling Program,
for six months ending December 31, 1993. The evaluation is derived from complete
cost/revenue figures for that same time period.
This analysis helps city staff measure the effectiveness of recycling programs in terms of cost
and diversion levels. For example; 18,023 tons of recyclable wood material were collected,
processed, or sold at the facility from July through December of 1993 at a cost of $8.85 per
ton. A recycling program that diverts 3000 tons per month at a cost of $8.85 per ton
remains one of the most cost-effective in the state. Likewise, the Residential Drop-off
Recycling Program carries with it the same message as we collect and recycle almost 2200
tons of that waste stream at a cost of $19.41 per ton.
Both recycling programs have diverted a greater amount of material more cost-effectively
than in the six months preceding this analysis. The wood waste/green waste program shaved
expenses $4.25, while the residential program cut costs $10.39.
------
'I. "
- ,- . . , \ I
. '-'~' -. ,
( , -, / -
\.
, " "I /. /
I, ; \
J: ,';-- -- '.
-.... \
\
- r
, I ," '. ~
I \
I, ,\ ' ,
~, /
/ I J
, , '
r :
-- ¡The ,'Cityo! Bakersfield
-'
, \ //
f * P1Jrformcmce Evaluation *
' /
í
" . " / ,', '-/
" , .'
\
Y \ , - /--
" ,
\ ;. . / ,
~
f ,J '/
-WoodWèIste/Gre,e~ Waste -
\.
I,
/. ,-, Recyclipg ProgranJ. . <'
/' ('
/
" . I,' Re!~ideJltiaJ fJrop-off -....
"
r \ ~-1. B.ecycling Pi:o grain \
,-. (
\ ['
. \ ~ ( -- I ' '- "
'I ~
,\
~ BA-KE'RS FI E LD
/
\ ' . '/
I
, I " I
'\ I "
" / (
: /
I
I
1-'
') \ \ ) \
/
.., " ,!
I ' Y
I
, /
¡-
, ~ c-'
Six mon~s' ending December 31;1,993 / "
-"~I ", )
-.... ~ \
-. \ r- I
/ ( ,
é " , \
~
, ~,
--- -- -
\. I é ,
, /1' . ( \.- ' , -, , .
, WOQD W ASTEIGREEN Vir ASTE '
, J " , ~' RECYCLING PROGRAM
I ' -
, Analysis: July - December 1993 ---
/
, \
RESULTS: , <: \ \
-, ~
, 1;-- ,
, A tota(oì 18,1023 tons',ofrecyclable wood materials were' collected, proc~~sed; 1
, or sold at the facility from July through-December of 1993. 6754 tons of material
~ was processed as compost, 6069 tons was proces$ed into co-geneI:ation fuel, and 5200
tons was processed and stored on-site: An additionài 12,000 tons of material ,Was "In-'
, , 1
1,( processll at year's end. (Reference Table Al) ,
.' \ /' I
" I" Total revenues of$101,947 was generated from the.sale òfmaterjals. $ 29,541;90-
was produc~dfrom the sale'of compost, 'and $ 72,404.56 was gimeratedfrom the sale
'- olco-generation fuel. (Refe;ence_Table Æ2) .' - .
, ) , , . "
- ,,' "
\,' é
A total\of $ 261',793 was expendedjor site operations. ' City personnel expenses,
, totalled $ 80,565. City equipment expenses, totalled $ 78,228. Additional grinding'
I charges, resulting from repairs to City-owned'equipment, yielding an extra $ 23,000_,
I .. I
/' éxpenditure. County funding totalle"d approxÍIpately 80:000 for this time period. ' '- / I
, The cost to operate the Wood Waste/Green Waste Recycling Facility is $ 8.85 per ton. I \
I ThM figure wqs generated'by: total expenses, less revenue, divided by the tons of
I m'àteriçLis collected/processed. (Referenpe Table A.1) I
I. . -.. , ( \ ' ,
-, ')
DISCUSSION: / \ \
I , . ,
An 'average of 300Q tons of material was collected/recyCled op a ~gnthly bq.sis. The
volume of the material collected andprocessed each month varies greatlydepending
on the. sßasoIJ, as does revenue generated each mopth.. This is clearly illustrated" ,-'
when' comparing co-generation power fuel-reven ue between November and DecelÌÍber.
While tonnage increased, revenue decreased due to the high, water content found in .
the/fuel. This high. water content is indicative of the rainy, winter season. {We are'
" paid by the bone dry ton.} I I
\, . . I
. \ é ~ .
:Approximately 71% of the revenue generãted at this facility comes'from the sale of co- \
generation power fuel, a figure which is down from the previous six months due to an
increase in' compóst sales.," " , "', '
\ ,
\ ' \ \'
SUMMARY:
, : "
4i~cycling program, that diverts 3000 tons of material pe~rmonth,at(an average cost
01$ -.,8.85 per ton, remains one of the most cost effective wáste diversion projects in the ìl
st~te. As anticipated, the çombination of increased cpmpost sa~es and eliminated - :1
one-time county costs, has decrea$ed the cost per ton from previous evaluation ~I
periods. likewise, as more businesses and residents have' become aware of the
facility, ~aterials collected have equally increased.
~ " I
,
I
i
I ,I ,I
, '¡ 'i)' \ ,.' :
" ,~ ' ' .' " . ',: , I ' ; "
)' ~ \ 'I)
. ," \" ,/ '- ,
,'~eferenceITable A.I" \ ~ (/ f
I / \.. ,
'\ ¡WOOD' WASTE/GREEN WASTE FACILITY I 'I, J
. r I \.. ('PERFOIÍMANCE RECORD,
('\, , fU£Y,.TO DEOEMBER 1,993 ,I' , '
I" , J ' (
,\, ,1,/, J
, " , , '. I '
\ '. ' I COMPOST/GREEN WASTE PROCESSED s/Jw:. / i )2823 TONS ;-
~ ',(' , " 'INVENTORY: 5200 TONS
. ',' J ' " (
, ) . .
, 1 \ -- " " ' ,/
\ " TOTAL: 18023 TONS.
"'1 "\
i
/ ' , ' , \ ,
\ ~- ! ' " INPlJOCESS; 12POQTONS
,
, / r I - , I \f
- " TOT4L REVENUf;S (COMPOS,T/GREEN'WASTEj $101,947' / I
',\ '.J / . /' , " ' " ¡ , ,
, ' . r \ . ~ \ \ : ,/'
\.. , ' ,I"
I '\~. ~ '-'" /' ,I
'-
, ~ ( I -,
ì \
( , \ " \, / "
,/ ~~~: /
,j
\ \' \ I I \
, , 1 . " I ,
,/" 'I
\ ~" CITY PERSONNEL: $ 80,,565 '- ,
, " I ' , ,
',CIIT EQillPMENT: $ 7~,228 / ,f. 1- )
I ; ,ÀDDITIONAL GRINDING EXPENSES:, $ 23.000 ,
, \, ", \ l
,. - ( \ / I. f' / , \
\ I ' ,. " I ....
'TO,TAL 'CITY EXPENSES: 'I / $181,'793'. /
I ' I 'ì '
',' '.1, + I, \;-
'- \ \ I \
.... ; COUNTY. EXPENSES:, $ BO.OOQ. , ' \ '
'- '",' , -) l-
" /. '\
" 'rOTALOPERATING EXPENSES: ' $261,793 I
- '- \ \< ~ ,
LESSTOTALREVENÙE: 'I ; .~ - 1\ /,
, ( ; í I
, ' ' '
. )'. I NET COST: , '/, $159,846 ) I \'
. I' I ~ )
( @COST.PER,TON: I' j, / / I $ 8. 85/,rON /, .... : 'I
< \, /
, '( "
,/ ,
1'\\ 'I \ ,,:,
"
" \ : / ,
~ I I
/
I ,/
I '
I I I
' --- " ) I
'., I " ( , '../ I J
, . 'v' I, ., "
., ) ~ ,- I
I ./ "Reference Table ,A..2 ~ ,I
j ., .1 )
'f " WOÒD I WASTE/GREEN W A~TE FAGILITY ',; \ ,/ ~ "
\ ,I I PERFORMANCE RECORD' ,\
I I ^ A ) If JULY TO DECEMBER 1993" I
" , \ "-
, "" '-, (
,COMPOST: ,~ '-
I' \
I' ì ~ -
I , ( 'J
Month Tons Processed J Revenue,
I
I I , /,
k July '- I', 1225 \ $ 3897.22, ^,
. , I
\'
I \. f ) \ I
August 1:)-' I 1225 $ 4352.92
. I \' ) \
j, 'I ( , "
September ~ \ 3q4 $1334.56 '-
u ' \ ( I
'. ' /... \ \ I' ,
,October Ii 320 $ 2640.40 \
/ I I
I' No;e~bet 840 ' \' $ 4937.48 - J! . I
'- b I "
Decem er 284q ;$12379.32 ',' ( I
, , \, /
Totw$: ... 6754 ) $29541.90,
" I
,( -
) -, Có-generati()n Power Fu)el: :
/ ", : ) - \ '
I ( , \ Mònlh" ," Tons ¡Processed J, . " Revenue ,
. ./
I"
( , ,
/ July. \',. 580 }'$I 9158.01
\ - "
'{ I ,/ ....
\ ' I'
I \ . /( I
August 468 $ 5319.50
I
\ ,
, / - ...
\ ,September 760'$10970.81/, r \
0\ '
\ '- ( (,
( I Gctober ,1272 (\ \' $1'5781.93, : I '
... )
, I
November 1475 \ , , $176(11.81 I, 7
, , "
\
I , / "I
December, 1524 $13562.60 (,
I;¡ \
, I ITotals: Y 6069~ '$72404.66) \ \ '
I '\ , ," '- I \ :
" ' , ! ~' -,
Total R~ven~e C~mp'ost¡éo-gen: $101,946.56'" J\ "I
'- ,\'
'Additionàl,Stored/Unprocessed Material:\ '5200 tons )
>-
, "
- I ' ,
, ,
~I .-" '~"'ìì (
, \ , ' : . í
I , -, . '" ,- , I - I " 'J , ,I
< 'RESIDENTIAL DROP-OFF / ./
- \ RECYCLING PROGRAM \
, " : " ' I
) , " '
I '/ / . ( Anfllysis: July - Decemþe~ 199~
,.. \.., \' ',\
\ \ I'
-, ) (\ ( /..
'- \ I RESUL TS: ,\ ,-' '
. , ,,' \ .
... " , ' I / / ,(' \ (
\ > .... ,I "
4 total ,of 217~.9 'to~s: of rei;yclcible conußodities were collected in the '.
Reside~tial Drop-off Recycling Program from July through December 1of 1993. /
,¡ These, com¡nodities included newspaper" cardboard; junk mall, tin food cans,
/ '- aluminum beverage containers, plastics, and gJ~ss, ," 1((
,(\, ",/"" / \ '(':,.J"
, , \ " I, \
A total revenue 0/$15,550 .;vas generated from the hauling ofre~yclabl~ mateHals.\ ' '\ '
, '-. " ,'I .
; " This revenue covers the cost of hauling materials only' and does not include the,-
I' \revenue gen~rated from the sale òf éommodities at each of the four locatiøns; (The , ,
¡I , " '- ( '" sale of the c:o{1lmpdit¡es is not i~cluded due to th~ fact that the -City 'of. Bake'rsfield I
/ . / does not receive these profits) Reference 1;ableA.3 " /' I
/'" ' " i
", ..'
I Beginning September 1993, Soúthside Sanitation, began, 'as a publiciservic:e tathe,
I' /'npn-profit refipient at Th~ ValJey Plaza, hauling thoseirecycling bins~/' This explains
, the absf]nce, of revenue at The Válley Plaza site for the last four months, of 1993. This I ,
... is a very- positive step bf¿cause it 'allQw~ for the expánsion of the drop-bff progrJlm to
¡ othe~locations. without additioI!alp~rso'nnel. ~.I , \ ,'" / , , ' ,
¡ , '", , ' , (
, IAn independent agreement with The' ,Ijakersfield Californian difects newspaper
\ collection be billed separately from each of the drop-off sites :' \ '), /
, .' ':' ( \ .
( , Alotal of $57,781 wasJ~xpelided on personnel and equipment ~osts, .The pfJr,sónnel
, '~ c~sts app¡ear to be.Jow; resulting from our extensive use of the County Work Re~ease,
~! \ Program. fA valuqble labor force af limited cost) ( , " ," '
/ ,; , I', ,",' ,
" " 'Y
Thecost to operate#~èResidential Drop-off Recycling Program is $19.41 per ton. This /
, figur~ is significantly les~ than preVious reports due to increased,'hauling revenu~s
( \ ' from better publiê participation. In fact, thé first six months of1993 net 1392 tons
, , r ,", " ,
I \/ I ,'of ma.teridl at a cost of $30.~O perton, as compar~d to the sepondl;wlfof the Yrat i
1\ ,¡ whiç,h cleared 2;174.9 ton,s of recy¡qla'þle material at the; $19.41 cost. ({Cost figure, 'I
" generate,d by: total expenses, less revenue, diVided by thè tons of materials received.) -.
\ ',' ", ., , \
Reference Table A.4 ! \ ~ , . " ,I', \
~'\.,' , ' '::-'
/ i . \
, " '\ '"', / /
S,UMMAHY: . ~ ,\
'- . ' , . " ", ' / \ ) I'
, /)"! ' , --..-.
'i A resid~ntial recycling progralI!. that, diverts materials for $,19.41Iper ton remains a , i
very'cost effective-.rnea9s of doing business. "Staffestimates1that)th~se pro¡p-ams will, .. ~ !
/ divert 3% of the waste stream when fully implemented. A new location) at Tevis Jr. :
, " (High, School came on board in January 011994, In June,¡a similar sit~ will be located. I, I
, \ . in' Lowell Park in Southeast Bakersfield. Future locations iÌléludeneighborhoods' in', '
Rosedale and Sunset/Oleander. ,'.~ : , /' . ,', [
','T;-"(~ -r' -,--"",-"~-_u_'\--¡--="'-'--~'-'-~'u",, '-
,
",'\,~" ',,' ',-' -II. \.J 0
- ,. - /
, ,I Reference Table A.3 ' 1\ ( )' ,
;, - ' , ...' \
~ I
,I - - ""'RESIDENTIÅLDROP-OFF ' ,
II' I \ RECYCLING PROGRAM' ,~
I: ') *'Sìx mo~thsÎending 1993 *, , I '.
\.
\ "-- '\ :'
, TONNAGE " COLLECTED: \. ' \
" ' '\ ' "I' /
I ' 0
,. '( ( ,
(M th' rr \ ,
- on ," ~ ann age. , '- J:' ,I , 'I
i "
I " '- -/"
!ùly \ -. 3.66.6 tons1 ' ) "
" ,\ '\ ~ / ,
August", I' 355.,9 tQns I ,/ 0'
r I , September ' 320~5' tons / ' "
ill ' ,October ~, , 361.1 tons ,
/ ) ! \
,November' 355.0, tons \ 1";< I
, ' - 'I
, December / 415.8 tons I \ I,)' '
, , ,¡ , / '
" '\ \ ) /
I' , , ( ,) /
I I, Total: '( \ 2174:9 tons
" , ì ' \. .' \
/\ \~,' I ' \
\.' , , \. , I
, '1 ' " , "
.. , ) ) :
, ( i, ,,\ ' /,
I REVENUE GENERATED HAULING CÒMMODITIES, ) I
" '/ - i
, ---, ' , ' ; " ,/ , ..1
¡ 't, , MONTH CSUB BC : VP '\ WEST I, CALIF
...."......,.. - /, '- '\ "J
, \ \ / "-
( '-
" July' / ',1,04Ó /q1 0 370 , 420 675 '\
,August '(, 980 '52Q' ,j '410, "420,' -- 725~ )
, , ) \ " , ,
,Sèptember ' 870 560, 0 42'0 ',' ,350 '\
Octobèr 880 I '520. 0 ' '345' , 600, : :
ì .' ' I ' '
\. ,.November '720 570 \ ¡;O' 345 ! 525
j ,\, ;' " r " "
"December' 1.130 "5:00 ---1l, 4~o." I 625
-, ì - ',/
r ( \ 'i
, ) \\ / (, ) , :
Total$ " 5,620 I 3,280 78(} 2,370 3,500
,,\ I v ,,0 \. ( I
, \i
, ' " I " I .. i,
/ TOTAL REVENUE GENERA TED: $ 15,550 I '
'( "
" \
,. L
! r
(
. . . , " . ~
" . ~./ .j \
\ !,
1 )
, '
I,
I \ ~ /
" '
, Refèrence 'Cable A.4
I - /
I,' r. <:
, f:' RESIDENTIAL DROP-OFF' ì/--
.' ~ - HECÝCLJNG PROGRÂM I - \
\' \ ì * Sbcmopths endip.g 199~ * .
; I \ .!.
\ '
(¡ c ( . r
.L
EXPENSES: I ,> ' / J. I
/ . I \ \ I >, í I.
I , I ' I
\
'/ I I "Personnel:' $ 33 477 I \
I" , ¡"
I (" ~r ,Equipri)en't: $ 24.3~(J4
, : r" ( '. {
/ 1--( 1 $ \,
Totu: v ,,57,781 \ A 'f
./ "
/ . ' / "
( \, /'"
I, EXPEivsÊ~vs. REVÈNUÈ( I \
, \
), r I
. Expenses; ,$ 57,781 I
. I
/ ì Revenue: $ 15.550 ( 'J ~/
I . . .1'
I / /.
. ., \"", , \
, ,I 'r' ' /
I, ' I $ 42( 231
, , /
!
^
I' : 'COST PER TON: ~ ' .
\ ' , , '.
, /. ~
" ." . \, . , ¡' ./
. . $ 42,231 /2174.9'-= $ 19.41 p~r ton \, \ r
"-. f \ '-
I l.. .-
/ ' .
I r,
"
, I
, ~ . /
\ . "
I ... ' .... ," c
'/ I,:
I , . ;
/ // . '. '
I
( ,
). J ,j , ,>'" , ---;
/
I, . .... ,;1
' ., ~ '- I
""
\, .
"
:1 I
" '-
...,
- ,..
MEMORANDUM
June 9, 1994
TO: John F. Wager, JI., Economic Development Director
FROM: George Gonzales, Community Development Coordin
SUBJECT: Union Avenue Median Street Lighting Project
Recently, Councilmember Salvaggio requested infonnation on the scope of the street lighting
project currently underway on Union Avenue Median. The CDBG funded lighting project
will install a total of 14 new light standards along the Union Avenue Median between First
(one block north of Brundage Lane) to East 11th Street (one block south of California
Avenue).
According to City General Services, the City crew will be installing the light standards the
week of June 6, 1994. All work should be completed by June 17, 1994. The proposed
standards can also accommodate the lighting of the proposed Union Avenue #10 annexation
area when it is completed.
i ~-~-'"'~~'ßO.- "
RECEIVED
! I~- .~~~~
i
I II ',¡ 0 1994
I
'i . " I >. ~
I~~,=._,~c ,"~~ '."
~
'_. :. ""'["",,,f :~ "'j
'd., ,
Attachment: Project Map . -~~, ",
Im:GGIOIUNION,MEM
--J II "L L .J I (' ~ I I / L ~ ~ I I ~ L "-"'.....; ':::::--J ~
, . :G~~.. CJ' - ---.J ~ fl. ::,.. ----1.~ r---::::. '---.J
. .~ rn CJ CJ [ l .......... ....
¡D~rJ 00 D. " .
[] COOL: r'" N_U m'o<
- . 10.00 0 ¡"-
;].. aTII'
.
'0' COUII'T
~ II.'.. fllllr""
.- '" n, PROJ/lC'l' SIT\ I
11101011
1t:N( ( ' ..
-- ---n
, - - -~ _U
- rn !
nm
\.¿~-II J ~ 7nr lOD[
J I
IUTI lOUTI II I J
I I
TO~ 1101111 0.. n
'" .' n I DU"t~~ Ave. ~
Baa.d on the 1880 c.naU8
Th... bound.,I.. w.,. checked and updated AUIU.t. 1888
BORGWARDT, MILHAM ACRES
ACTIVITY 6.92.1 Union Avenue Median Improvements
County Jurisdiction
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
-----~~------ -
1"'"" ~ -þ
PO 64-2759
MEMORANDUM
June 9, 1994
TO The Honorable Mayor Price and Councilmembers
FROM Steve Brummer, Chief of Police ~
SUBJECT Police Calls for Service in Downtown Area
Councilmember DeMond requested a revised calls-for-service report
that excluded "walk-in" reports received at the Police Station.
Since these reports include incidents that occurred outside the
downtown area, the report does not accurately reflect the number of
incidents that occurred in downtown, or more specifically, Police
District 1.
The attached memorandums provide revisions to reflect only the number
of actual incidents which occurred in District 1.
cc: Councilmember Brunni RECEiVED
Councilmember DeMond ,I II
,I
Councilmember Edwards JUN I 0 1991 Ii :1
Councilmember McDermott \i
~
Councilmember Rowles CITY MANAGER'S OFFIC~
Councilmember Salvaggio
Councilmember Smith
I
I
"n - ......
.'
PO 64-2759
MEMORANDUM
May 31, 1994
TO S. E. BRUMMER, CHIEF OF POLICE
FROM A. E. BROWN, LIEUTENANT
SUBJECT POLICE DEPARTMENT CALLS FOR SERVICE STATISTICS
Per your request a study was conducted on the calls for sevice in the
District 1 area for the month of March 1994 and for specified weekly
time periods identified below. The data collected excludes all calls
for service at the Police Department.
In a memo dated April 7, 1994, submitted by Sgt. D. Martin, the
number of calls for sevice in the District 1 area for the month of
March 1994 was listed as 1,259. The actual number of calls received
during that time period, excluding those handled at the Police
Department, is 824.
The number of calls received in District 1 during requested specified
time periods are as follows:
04/12/93 - 04/18/93 08/16/93 - 08/22/93 01/24/94 - 01/30/94
Data Not Available 196 162
I: ---
~'..~ -, -- "'-,¡,
" ,"
I:
:¡
"
1
1 CALLS FOR SERVICE BY DISTRICT
I
II 5/1/93 - 4/30/94
I,
II
Ii
DISTRICT TOTAL
1 ................ 9,638*
2 ................ 9,838 .
-
3 ................ 8,074
4 ................ 3,556
5 ................ 10,495
6 ................ 12,060
7 ................ 639
8 ................ ' 10,211-
9 ................ 8,730
10 ................ 12,208
11 ................ 11,720
12 ................ 10,394
13 ................ 6,760
14 ................ 12,187
15 ................ 3,135
16 ................ 2,579
UNSPECIFIED ........... 44,786
(ON SITE, TRAFFIC STOPS,
COUNTY)
TOTAL CALLS ........... 177,010
*DISTRICT 1 TOTAL EXCLUDES ALL CALLS SHOWING A LOCATION
OF "10-19", AS THOSE INCIDENTS INCLUDE SUCH CALLS AS
SEARCH WARRANTS, NSF CHECKS, FORGERY REPORTS, ETC.
---- -~--~-- ~---~- -
,¡,A',c, ,~
I
1/24/94-1/30/94
DISTRICT CALLS FOR SERVICE % OF TOTAL
BK01 162 6.8
BK02 198 8.3
BK03 137 5.8
BK04 69 2.8
BK05 201 8.5
BK06 208 8.8
BK07 11 0.5
BK08 152 6.4
BK09 137 5.8
BK10 221 9.4
BK11 202 8.5
BK12 213 9
BK13 115 4.8
BK14 223 9.4
BK15 54 2.2
BK16 55 2.3
TOTAL 2358
,I
I
,
I'
I
I:
-~-
~-- --~-
¡ :'J
I ~ .
-
B A' K E R 5 F I E L D
MEMORANDUM
June 10, 1994
TO: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER
FROM: OFFICE OF RISK MANAGEMENT~ M
SUBJECT: CLAIMS ACTIVITY REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF MAY 1994
The claims activity during the month of May 1994 was a ,result of actions in the, following City Departments/Divisions:
NEW
DEPARTMENT/DIVISION CLAIMS FILED FILES CLOSED COMPLAINTS FILED
Police 3 4 1
Streets 3 0 0
Sanitation 1 1 0
Engineering 2 0 0
Other 1 0 0
10 5 1
The new claims filed during the month of May 1994 resulted in the following types of damages:
CITY THIRD PARTY DAMAGES
DEPARTMENT /DIVISION VEHICLE INVOLVED VEHICLE DAMAGE OTHER PROPERTY INJURIES
Police 1 1 1 2
Streets 2 2 0 2
Sanitation' 0 0 1 0
Engineering 1 2 0 1
4 5 2 5
~ ~
As a result of the claims activity in May, the year to date (fiscal) totals are as follows:
Filed Filed
Department/Division Filed in Filed in Year to Date Year to Date # Open # Open
5/94 5/93 5/31/94 5/31/93 @ 5/31/94 @ 5/31/93
Police 3 5 50 47 49 50
Streets 4 1 30 29 22 26
Parks 0 0 12 4 10 3
Sanitation 1 0 17 8 7 3
Engineering 2 0 5 5 7 6
Fire 0 0 3 9 4 2
Convention Center 0 1 3 0 3 0
Building 0 0 3 3 2 3
City Attorney 0 0 2 0 2 0
Executive 0 0 1 0 1 0
Construction 0 0 2 1 1 1
General Services 0 0 2 5 0 2
Recreation 0 0 1 3 0 1
Water 0 0 0 1 0 1
10 7 121 122 108 98
\
II
'" '.
f I
Claims Activity Report - May 1994
Page 3
I
"
I, POLICE
,i Bobby Alexander, 923 Collins Avenue, DOL: 12/30/93;
, Claimant alleges Police Department officers used excessive force during the arrest process.
Artemio Chavez Ortega, c/o P.O. Box 5500, Wasco, DOL: 2/25/94;
Claimant alleges Police Department officers illegally seized claimant's property at 7404 East Panama Lane.
Patricia Rascoe, 13913 San Lazaro Avenue, DOL: 3/30/94;
I Claim is for damages allegedly caused when a Police Department vehicle struck claimant's vehicle at 24th and Oak Streets.
I
,i
ENGINEERING
I
" Joy Hancock, 1580 Chabot Court, Hay, CA, DOL: 3/30/94;
, Claim is for damages allegedly caused when a Traffic Engineering Division vehicle collided with the claimant's vehicle at Planz
Road and Leonard Street.
Marla Menchaca, 2112 Lynwood Street, DOL: 11/2/93;
Claim is for damages allegedly caused by a City street design at Monterey and Niles Streets.
¡
! SANITATION
Mary Jane Salazar, 736 10th Street, DOL: 5/3/94;
, Claim is for damages allegedly caused when Sanitation Division trucks driving onto claimant's driveway at 1618 3rd Street.
I .!
I!
OTHER
C.S. Gearhart Company, 4100 East Drive, DOL: 11/23/93;
Claim is for damages allegedly caused when a City vehicle damaged claimant's vehicle on Glenn Street.
STREETS
Katherlna Bader, 3101 Harrogate Lane, DOL: 3/9/94;
Claim is for damages allegedly caused by a defective City sidewalk on White Lane and Lilly Street.
, - - ---
>' <.
II
Claims Activity Report - May 1994
Page 4
Sherry Tidwell, 613 Crawford Street, DOL: 5/22/94;
, Claim is for damages allegedly caused when the truck tires of a Streets Division vehicle caused stones to fly up and break
, claimant's windshield on Highway 99.
I ~
I'
I Sharon Oastler, 6709 Sly Lane, DOL: 4/10/94;
, Claim is for damages allegedly caused when the claimant tripped and fell on a City sidewalk at 2620 19th Street.
i CLAIMS CLOSED/SETTLED DURING THE MONTH OF MAY
POLICE
Diana Freeling/Willie Rufus, Jr., DOL: 3/13/94;
Claimants allege a Police Department officer lost property owned by the claimant. City settled case for $55.
I Transamerlca Insurance for John and Robyn Rochelle Campbell, DOL: 8/25/93;
I Claim is for damages allegedly caused by the negligent operation of Police Department vehicle. City settled case for $4,555.
Bertha Rojas Robles, DOL: 1/22/94;
Claim is for damages allegedly caused when a Police Department vehicle hit the rear of the claimant's vehicle. City settled case
for $217.
Carmelita Cornejo, DOL: 3/12/93;
Claimant alleges damages were caused by a Police Department officer at an accident scene. Closed - no court filings.
SANITATION
Pacific Gas and Electric, DOL: 6/28/93;
Claim is for damages allegedly caused by a Sanitation Division vehicle. City settled case for $11,164.
- - .,
..
" ". "'",
Ii
I
I
Claims Activity Report - May 1994
Page 5
I:
, CLAIMS WITH RESULTING COMPLAINT AND/OR SUMMONS FilED DURING THE MONTH OF MAY
POLICE
! Gloria Ahmaya, DOL: 10/8/93;
I Claim is for damages allegedly caused when a Police Department vehicle was involved in an accident with the claimant's vehicle.
I,
i
,I
cc: City Council
Judy Skousen, Acting City Attorney
City Clerk's Office - Natalie Welty
Newsmedia File
I
I n- ~ -
I
't - s ~ .
-
B A K E R 5 F I E L D
I
June 16, 1994
David Burciaga
United Communities Coalition
Post Office Box 6332
Bakersfield, CA 93386
Dear Mr. Burciaga,
This letter will seek to address some of the issues raised in a letter from the United Communities
Coalition, dated June 10, 1994. I will be addressing the concerns in the same order contained
in the June 10th correspondence.
I 1) The date of my memorandum discussing an alternative proposal to provide Fair Housing
[ Services is May 14, 1994. Subsequent to this date a certain amount of time slippage did I
occur as a result of various levels of discussion between City and County officials. Both I
I,
City and County staff had agreed early on that it would be of the utmost importance to I
involve the Fair Housing Advisory Committee (FHAC) in ensuring a smooth transition
to the new format. In regards to the expiration date, both Alan Tandy and Joe Drew felt
the Fair Housing Agreement should be extended thirty days to allow for additional phase-
out and phase-in time. The extension of time is to be presented to the City Council for
action on Wednesday, June 29, 1994.
2) Since this is a County personnel issue the City is not able to respond to this matter. The
Coalition should address this question to the County of Kern.
3) The Fair Housing Division of the Department of Weights and Measures is responsible for
selecting the location of the meetings. As a public agency they are responsible for
complying with all aspects of the Brown Act Again this is a matter that should be raised
with the County of Kern.
In regards to the Advisory Council asking for an clarification on staff changes at the May
18, 1994 meeting, the County of Kern would be best equipped to address this matter.
4) As indicated in the fust response given, both City and County staff will be recommending
a thirty day extension to the existing Agreement.
I
City of Bakersfield. Economic and Community Development Department
515 Truxtun Avenue. Bakersfield. California 93301
(805) 326-3765 . Fax (805) 328-1548 . TOO (805) 324-3631
¡ , ¡
I
I
!
Mr. David Burciaga
June 16, 1994
Page -2-
In regard to the rationale for the proposed change, both City and County staff are of the
I [mn opinion that not only will the changes proposed result in a more cost effective
I program, but that certain elements of the program will be enhanced and strengthened.
Both City and County staff are in absolute agreement. . . "that particularly over the past
two years, both interest (housing industry and consumer members) of the FHAC have
worked harmoniously in a cooperative effort." No substantive changes in the area of the
FHAC role is envisioned.
Ii
I 5) Both City and County staff are proposing that membership in the FHAC be expanded by
i two. 1 do not agree with the Coalitions view that the proposal would add a representative
I
from the housing industry, but none from the consumer side. Both City and County staff
agree that by adding a representative from the Superintendent of Schools both the City
and County Program can benefit by giving us greater access to the educational system and
thus enhance our ability to promote fair housing opportunities commencing at the earliest
possible age on through high school. City and County staff also agree that by including
a representative from the lending community (I am assuming this would be the member
that is viewed as representing the housing industry) we would be able to begin discussing
lending criteria as well as gaining access to an essential component in the provision of
housing, heretofore ignored. City and County staff do not believe that the group
dynamics will be drastically impacted by the addition of two new members.
6) Staff is not recommending to change or limit the role of the Fair Housing Advisory
Committee in advising the Board and City Council on how to best coordinate areas in
common and to issue an annual report This has been the role of the Advisory Council
and as such it has had no programmatic oversight responsibility. It is anticipated that this
advisory role remain unchanged.
7) In rereading my memorandum I can see where someone might be led to believe that staff
is recommending that the Community Housing Resources Board (CHRB) carry out the
poster/essay contest. By way of clarification my intent and my hope would be that the
FHAC would continue its lead role in planning and organizing this program in
conjunction with the active support of the CHRB. 1 did not intend to suggest that the
FHAC role be in any way diminished. My apologies for any confusion I may have
created.
8) City and County staff again agree with the assessment of the Coalition that the contest
has developed into an important event. As indicated above it is not the intent to "give"
this program to the CHRB. I would then suggest that both City and County have indeed
funded this event in the past as indeed they have funded all Fair Housing activities. To
the extent the City and County have funded this in the past, this practice would remain
unchanged.
-----~---
II
'I
,;
Mr. David Burciaga
June 16, 1994
. Page -3-
9) As mentioned earlier (see item #4) I indicated that certain elements of each program
would be enhanced. The development of industry specific training workshops is certainly
an area that could and should be strengthened. City and County staff believe that the
II development of such workshops can help alleviate difficulties prior to their actual
,I occurrence. This suggestion is akin to preventative medicine or a wellness program. As
a component of the Fair Housing Program it is appropriate that Fair Housing resources
be utilized in developing this program. My memorandum clearly states the Fair Housing
Program being proposed, by the City and County, would include the development and
maintenance of a qualified tester pool. Both City and County staff are of the opinion that
sufficient funds will be available to enhance efforts in both of the above described areas.
10) Although my memorandum was brief in its description of program format, mediation,
complaints, investigation, and litigation it is my intent to avoid wholesale changes in the
approach presently used. Initial complaints would be taken by phone or in person.
Mediation services would be available. Establishing the factual basis of any complaint
would be done by City staff and through testing as may be required. Litigation would
remain as an option as well as referrals to appropriate County, State, and Federal
agencies.
It is unfortunate, but understood, how an internal memorandum, taken by itself without any
knowledge of additional discussions that were also taking place, would be viewed as offensive
and demeaning to yourself. It is equally unfortunate that you did not contact me directly to fully
explore the issues raised in your letter. I would have gladly discussed this with you and other
members of the Coalition subject to the reaching of a conceptual agreement between City and
County staff. As you heard at the Fair Housing Advisory Council held on June 15, 1994, City
and County staff acted with speed and deliberation once the direction had been received. I hope
this response has addressed your concerns. I am confident that given the opportunity to
implement the program that is being proposed, you will find an enhanced delivery of services
to the residents of Bakersfield and that the program will affinnatively further Fair Housing
opportunities for all. A=--J
Yours truly,
John F. Wager, Jr.
Economic Development Director
cc: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Alan Tandy, City Manager
dJt:jw4
coaltion./tr
----------- - -n /
'I " '-" . \J --v
: L J
c: ~
I ¡ Z ~
I ~ 0
I, ì J:'- \:)
': ,- ~
I :~ J
i United Communities Coalition ~ ¡
Post Office Box 6332
Bakersfield, California 93386
(805) 366-6194
I:
"
June 10, 1994
Mayor Robert Price and
Bakersfield City Council Members
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Dear Representatives:
This letter is written to express our extreme concern about the
procedures used by the Community Development Departments. We just
received information concerning Community Development Departments'
proposed changes to the present Fair Housing Program which was adopted
and funded by the County of Kern and the City of Bakersfield with
Community Development Block Grant funds.
We respectfully request a response to our concerns which are as follows:
1. The Memorandum of Understanding between the County and City
expires on June 30. We cannot express strongly enough our
concern over learning so close to the expiration date of staff
recommendations to change the program. This results in limited
opportunity for input from the public. The information was
obtained from sources other than your office. If it had not been
for that there would not have been any time to provide the
following input.
2. Members of the Fair Housing Advisory Committee (FHAC) were not
notified of staff changes in the' Fair Housing Program (FHP),
other than a brief memo simply stating that Manual Villacana
would be acting as Program Administrator. While it is
understandable that specifics concerning personnel matters need
not be disclosed, the FHAC deserved a general explanation as a
courtesy. Why not?
3. Several hours prior to the May' 18 meeting of the Fair Housirtg
Advisory Committee, members were contacted by telephone informing
them of a change of meeting location for the 11:30 meeting. No
explanation was offered when members were called. We question
the propriety of the change and do not believe it was considerate
to the members. Although staff was asked for à report on staff
change at the meeting, none was offered. Why?
I
II "
"
(
r;
.1
, Mayor Robert Price and Page 2
, I Bakesfield City Council
I June 10, 1994
i , 4. It appears that the City staff believe Kern County Board of
, Supervisors or staff wish to allow the Fair Housing Agreement to
:
Ii
I. lapse through inaction. The County of Kern and City of
Bakersfield would then undertake independent Fair Housing
: programs as of July 1. We would like to know the rationale for
this change.
The signers of this letter consider themselves to be
representatives of the "consumer" population. Many have worked
very hard for a Fair Housing Program since 1983, attending
numerous meetings of the FHAC and functions. We believe that
particularly over the past two years both interests (housing
industry and consumer members) of the FHAC have ' worked
harmoniously in a cooperative effort. What is the reason for
doing away with the present Fair Housing structure?
5. As stated above, the present FHAC has been working well together.
Why is there a desire to change the FHAC structure composition
by adding two new members, one from the housing industry but none
from the consumer point of view? In addition, based on human
dynamics, the larger a group becomes the more difficult it is
for a group to work together.
6. Why is there a staff recommendation to change and limit the role
of the Fair Housing Advisory Committee to advising the Board and
City Council on how to best coordinate areas in common and to
issue an annual report with no programmatic oversight
responsibility?
7. We question the recommended modification to the program which
would have the Community Housing Resources Board (CHRB) carry out
the Ann~al Fair Housing Poster/Essay Contest with the assistance
of the new, separate programs. The contest and awards event is
currently sponsored by the Fair Housing Advisory Committee,
assisted by staff with help from the community members and
organizations, ~ncluding CHRB.
8. The Fair Housing Poster/Essay Contest has developed into an
important event involving school age children throughout the
county and parent participation. We believe it serves as a good
Fair Housing education program for the community. Since staff
plans to recommend that this aspect of the program be given to
CHRB, why is staff now recommending to fund this program which
was not funded in the past?
.
I
-
.
II '. .
t.
I",
i
,
: Mayor Robert Price and Page 3
! Bakersfield City Council
June 10, 1994
II
9. Who is going to pay for the staff recommended development of
industry specific training workshops for lenders, realtors,
apartment managers, etc. Are Fair Housing funds to be used? If
i so, shouldn't the funds instead be used for the development and
maintenance of a qualified tester pool. Is there enough funding
for both?
I'
10. Surprisingly, not much is said about program format, mediation,
complaints, investigation and litigation. Instead, it is
suggested that it will be left to the County and City Community
Development Departments to establish and administer the most
important components of the Fair Housing Program.
If we may be permitted to provide a bit of background information, an
. interim Fair Housing Task Force was initiated by both County and City
agencies which met for several months.' In February, 1984 both the City
of Bakersfield and County of Kern approved the joint City/County interim
Fair Housing Program and formation of a 21 member Fair Housing Task Force
mad~ up of representatives of all segments of the community.
Some of the signers of this letter attended Fair Housing meetings for
approximately two years before the Task Force recommendation vote was
taken. The overwhelming majority of the Task Force members voted in
favor of the recornrnndation which is basically what was adopted by, th.e
present Fair Housing Program. (With the exception of the Board of
Realtors who 'had resigned and were therefore not present, the Building
Industry Association of Kern County and the Kern County Apartment
Association were the only members voting against the recommendation).
The staff recommendation is offensive and demeaning to those who worked
for approximately two years on a Fair Housing Task Force recommendation
that for all practical purposes has worked. Essentially the recommended
changes would result in the implementation of the Task Force Minority
Report and Recommendation, that:
"The City and County Community Development Departments
continue to administer local fair housing p~ograms."
The Minority Report was submitted by the Building Industry Association
of Kern County and the Kern County Apartment Association, Inc.
We respectfully request a response to our questions as soon as possible,
preferably within 10 days. Our concern with timeliness is that the
Memorandum of Understanding expires on June 30.
------ -
..
.
I ' ' .., ,,' "
.'
,
Mayor Robert Price and Page 4
Bakersfi~ld City Council
June 10, 1994
I
11
Please direct any questions or comments to David P. Burciaga at the
letterhead address or by calling him at 366-6194.
Sincerely,
Q~~ß~
David P. Burciag~, Chair
United Communities Coalition
aJ£ d~
Art pow~, Concerned Citizen
t¿=~£~~~~izen .
)J~ ~~~Ô'
Nancy B ciaga,
League of Women Voters Rep on FHAC NAACP Representative
.£ ~~irector .~~
Eddie Carter,
Friendship House NAACP Rep on FHAC
cc: Alan Tandy, Bakersfield City Manager
Jake Wager, Bakersfield Economic Development Dept. Dir.
Monty Hopper, Dir Weights & Measures
Human Relations Commission:
Kay Maddon
Richard Prado
H.U.D. Regional & National Offices
.
-
~- .
~ ."..\'" "
I 'f~ '. . ,. ........:..h,-
I.f -': "-,,,-
I ..
In t erfun d Transfers: A Credit Perspective.
Policies and practices concerning transfers from a ml1nicipally owned
enterprise fund to the general fund give credit analysts important insights
into a city's fiscal and political environment.
By William J. Cox, Jr.
I n times of economic or financial stress, to capture revenues from otherwise tax- portion of a general fund budget and if
policy makers often look to outside exempt properties such as state, federal or some events weaken the enterprise's ability
sources to fill the revenue gap between university facilities that require city services to continue raising the level of transfer, this
what the public demands in services and but do not pay city taxes. can weaken the credit quality of the
what it may be willing to accept in the In the age of downsizing, belt-tightening community's general obligation debt.
form of new taxes. Transferring cash from and reinvention of government, however, The absolute dollar amount of a transfer
enterprise funds to general governmental there is growing public sentiment towards can be less important than the method or
funds is frequently a tempting option to delivering services at the least cost possible. policy from which it is derived. High levels
satisfy such revenue requirements. Trans- Services delivered by municipal enterprises of transfers do not necessarily preclude
fers do not come free of costs or risk, ate isolated relatively easily from other city high ratings; more important is whether the
however. Before choosing the transfer services and can be identified clearly with transferred amount is based on a cons is-
option, policy makers should fully explore the cost and benefits of delivery. tently applied and well-thought-out policy.
the long-term implications for all of the In a least-cost environment, transfers are Transfers will have the most deleterious
affected funds and enterprises. Typically, less likely to be viewed as a reasonable idea impact on credit quality when there is no
some form of well-researched, flexible, and more likely to be viewed as an indirect policy from which they are derived.
consistent and well-communicated transfer way of taxation. This perspective is found Conversely, a well-defined and predictable
policy will enhance credit quality. Alterna- especially among large users of the use of transfers can enhance credit quality.
tively, having no specific policy will likely enterprise services, such as airlines or The worst policy regarding interfund
lead to difficulty. energy-intensive industries. The mounting transfers can be no policy. Without a '
Transfers usually take the form of funds regulatory costs associated with operating policy, a city determines how much to
moving from an enterprise to a general water or sewer enterprises, as well as the transfer each year according to the needs of
fund account. Large dollar amounts are increasingly competitive nature of the the general fund budget. The problem with
involved in some instances, as in transfers electric, port and airport industries, have this methodology is that a city's general
from cities' airport, port and electric-system combined to shine a spotlight on municipal fund requirements and budget vary from
enterprises; but the issues and concerns enterprise rates and fees that may have year to year, making it inordinately difficult
apply similarly to cities that own only been taken for granted in the past. With for the enterprise manager to plan his/her
water or sewer enterprises, where transfers few exceptions, therefore, a city that own operating and capital budgets.
may be on a smaller scale. depends heavily on transfers reduces its Compounding the problem of annual
political and financial flexibility and risks adjustments in transfers for the enterprise is
incurring the ire of its customers. From the the need to adopt multiyear budgets for'
perspective of the financial community, capital- and rate-planning purposes. If
Impact of Transfers reduced financial or revenue-raising multiyear projections are grossly inaccu-
Transfers from enterprise funds to flexibility ultimately evolves into weakened rate, the enterprise may suffer reductions in
general government funds typically allow a credit quality. reliability and/or dissatisfy important
city to enjoy a higher level of spending and/ customers. The bottom line is that for an
or a lower rate of taxation than it would enterprise to be "run like a business" it
otherwise be able to afford, given its tax must be able to reasonably project its
base and political enviromrient. In many The Worst Policy Is No Policy costs-including transfers.
I communities, the primary reason for How much is too much? The answer
owning some types of enterprises histori- depends on the particular circumstances in
cally was to transfer profits and subsidize each community. For example, if a transfer Policy Alternatives
tax rates-a reasonable idea, given the cost is made regardless of the impact on an
savings that can be achieved by financing enterprise's competitive position or in lieu There are numerous types of transfer
enterprise infrastructure on a tax-exempt of needed capital investment, this can policies, ranging from sophisticated,
basis. An additional benefit of owning and weaken the enterprise's credit worthiness. independent-consultant study-driven
transferring from an enterprise is the ability Likewise, if a transfer comprises too large a formulas to simple, fixed-dollar amounts. ,
24 JUNE 1994 . GOVERNMENT FINANCE REVIEW
.----.--------
- --
I ~.- I
iF"'" " .2~ r--.... I
' ,/ O:.
I
,
Their cornman beneficial feature is that remain successful if it is returning a profit obligation debt. These policies are not
they provide predictability. Established margin to its shareholders based on analyzed arbitrarily or in isolation of other
transfer policies help enterprise managers revenues regardless of other factors that factors; rather, transfers are viewed within
address long-term capital needs and design affect its profitability, such as operating the context of each city's fiscal, economic
their competitive strategies. In addition, the costs, competitors' costs, sales projections, and operating performance over time.
general government managers and policy performance relative to budgetary expecta- Although typically not a crucial factor,
makers will have less room for disagree- tions, etc. A municipally owned utility, transfer policies can lend important insight
ment and debate if a well-established and likewise, will not likely retain its long-term into a city's political and fiscal environ-
maintained transfer policy is in place and credit quality if it is expected to grant ment. At times, transfers alone can be
contributing to overall efficiency. returns to its owner without regard to critical factors affecting a rating.
A transfer policy does not require performance. Secondly, something as A few basic questions can be asked to
rigidity; rather, a well-formulated policy seemingly benign as a cool summer can help determine if a transfer policy will
has features that allow special circum- substantially reduce an electric system's negatively or positively impact credit
stances to increase or decrease the level of sales and revenues. If it is transferring an quality.
transfer-provided certain public policy amount during one fiscal year that is based 1) Does the policy balance the needs and
goals or criteria are achieved. Some states on a prior fiscal year's gross revenues, then requirements of both the giver and
and some city charters prohibit transfers the impact of the cool weather will be receiver of the transfer by providing
between a local government's .enterprise compounded. Similarly, the city's general reasonable and defensible flexibility in
and general funds other than amounts fund will have to budget for lost revenues 6 times of special circumstances?
deemed reimbursable to the city. The result in the following year's budget cycle. Some 2) Is the transfer policy consistently
in those communities is that the city cities manage this risk by transferring a applied and does it result in predictabil-
transfers only an amount that represents a percentage of a three- to five-year rolling ity for both the enterprise and general
net reimbursement for services that its average of gross revenues. This helps fund?
personnel provide to the enterprise. These insulate the short-term effects of an 3) Is there long-term competitive pressure
types of transfers are viewed as having the unusual event to both the city and its on the enterprise that can be alleviated
least impact on credit quality, so long as the enterprise. Other ways to avoid the above by reduced transfers?
calculation of reimbursable cost is not subject problem include basing transfers on a 4) Does the transfer policy result in legal or
to unreasonable fluctuations that happen to percentage of current-year monthly political challenges by other cities or
coincide with general-fund budget pressures. margins rather than revenues. customers served by an enterprise?
Credit analysts recognize that a transfer from There are many varieties of the three 5) Is the transfer policy reasonably and
an enterprise to another fund made on a basic transfer policies described above, comfortably communicated and
consistent basis is a legitimate cost of doing including transfers based on value of plant disclosed to customers, analysts and
business for the enterprise. These and other in service, returns on equity investment and investors?
forms of transfers, therefore, are calculated as combinations of all of the above. They all 6) Does the transfer represent a significant
operating expenses regardless of their of have costs and benefits. concentration in expense or revenues of
technical position in the enterprise's funds There are also many ways to establish the enterprise and the general fund
flow. transfer policies, all offering degrees of respectively?
Another commonly accepted type of tradeoff between flexibility and predictabil- The issue of transfers will continue to
transfer is based on the fact that, by ity. Amending a city charter or state laws is receive greater scrutiny during the coming
owning an enterprise, a city foregoes some the most difficult to change. As an alterna- years as demand on municipal budgets
tax and franchise revenues that it would tive, many cities contractually promise in grows along with sensitivity to rates, fees
otherwise receive from a for-profit utility or their indentures with revenue bondholders and taxes. The recent U.S. Supreme Court I
transportation company. Such transfers are to make only specified types of transfers; decision allowing a Michigan city to raise !
meant to mimic the cost and revenue these covenants can be changed with new its landing fees at its airport was a major
impact of an enterprise paying its equiva- indentures but at some economic cost. legal victory for local governments' ability
lent share of taxes and fees, in addition to Other communities adopt formal policies to determine the size and use of its fees but
reimbursement of overhead costs. This type after long internal and independent studies; did not eliminate the political and fiscal
of transfer also is clearly defensible and these are viewed somewhat cautiously by pressures that stiJI can result from the use
typically has little impact on credit quality, some credit analysts until they have been of transfers from airport and other
unless it could otherwise be foregone and adhered to consistently over multiple years enterprises. Cities can avoid those pressures
thus contribute to a better competitive and multiple administrations. The least through a sensible, well-communicated
position for the enterprise. predictable but most flexible policy is a transfer policy. 0
An equivalent return of profit to the simple city council resolution or internal
owner of the enterprise is the basis for management policy. WILLlA~t J. Cox, JR., is a director in the municipal
another type of fixed-transfer policy. For finance department, Standard & Poor's Ratings Group.
example, a city may decide to transfer 10 The rating practices and criteria discussed in this
pereent of the annual gross revenues of its article are representative of S&P's Municipal Ratings
electric utility to the general fund as a Transfer Policy and Credit Quality Group. For more information, readers may call the
author at 415/765-5007.
rightful return of ownership. This type of A transfer policy is only one among
transfer can be effective but is subject to many factors examined as part of a rating
certain flaws. First, a corporation does not agency's analysis of revenue and general
JUNE 1994 . GOVERNMENT FINANCE REVIEW 25
I!
'1
j ~
oZ' . ~
MEMORANDUM
June 13, 1994
TO: CENTRAL DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT AGENCY ~
FROM: JAKE WAGER, ECON OM I C D EVELO PMENT DIRECTO
RE: CONVENTION CENTER HOTEL - ESCROW CLOSURE
The much anticipated construction of the Convention Center Hotel by John Q.
HammonsIHoliday Inn continues to move forward. On Friday, June 10th at
approximately I :30 p.m. escrow was closed on the hotel property. The property has
officially transferred ownership to John Q. Hammons Hotels - Bakersfield, LP. with'
John Q. Hammons Hotels, Inc. as the General Partner.
Construction activity in the form of setting up a supervisor's trailer and organization of
materials on site is expected to commence this week.
Thank you again for the time and effort you have spent in seeing this project through. If
you have any questions please call me.
cc: Alan Tandy, City Manager
RECfE~V\ED \
cwDw I
I "! , 4 t994 ;
CI~ MANAGER'S OF,,!C~
I
I
-
I[ 4i .
I.
-
B A K E R 5 F I E L D
I Alan Tandy. City Manager
II
June 15, 1994
!
The Honorable Curt Pringle
The State Assembly
4208 Capitol Building
The Honorable Phil Isenberg
The State Assembly
6005 Capitol Building
Sacramento, CA 95814
Dear Assemblyman Isenberg:
In response to your letter of May 24, the City of Bakersfield submits to you state mandate impacts in
the areas below. It has been indicated to us that the League of California Cities has been in touch with
you regarding this matter as well.
The State's mandates are often piggybacked on top of federal mandates. Therefore, the following list
captures state and federal mandates which impact the City of Bakersfield.
Inspection and Enforcement of Privately Owned Tanks
Repair and Replacement of City Owned Tanks
Removal/Cleanup of Abandoned Tanks
Lead and Copper Regulations/Water Regulations
Solid Waste, Recycling, and Landfill Closure Regulations
Sludge, Sewer, and Pretreatment Programs
Environmental Impact and Negative Declaration Requirements
Rule 9001 (San Joaquin Unified Air Pollution Control Board)
Brown Act Noticing and Duplicating Requirements
The above list is not all-inclusive. I believe the City of Sunnyvale has done a more exhaustive study.
AT:jp
cc: Honorable Mayor and Bakersfield City Council
League of California Cities
Local Legislators
Trudy Slater, Administrative Analyst
City of Bakersfield. City Manager's Office. 1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield. California. 93301
(RO~) 1?h-':P~1 . F;:¡)( (R()~) lJA.-1R~()
nn____n__--- -- -- - --
---
~ . ~
,"'c -~'~
"
Pacific Gas and Electric Company Kern Division
1918 H Street RECE~VED
Bakersfield, CA 93301 ~
805/321-4400
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
Ii June 10, 1994
Alan Tandy, City Manager
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Ave.
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Dear Mr. Tandy:
As a follow-up to previous communications with you regarding our proposed utility
infrastructure projects, attached for your reference is a letter and enclosure which
was mailed to residents of Northwest Bakersfield whose property/home is within an
approximate 1/2 mile radius of Pacific Gas & Electric's (PG&E's) proposed Renfro
Substation.
Please note the enclosur~ which depicts the artist's rendering of the proposed facility.
I will continue to keep you informed of our progress as we move forward.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact ,me at (805) 321-
4407.
Sincerely,
"- -q
Lind Quiñones- ~ ughan
Public Affairs
Community Governmental Relations
LQV:k1c
enclosure
I
-- ",,>..
." _-_.0',
Pacific Gas and Electric Company Kern Division
1918 H Street
II Bakersfield, CA 93301
805/321-4400
May 31, 1994
Resident
1918 "H" Street
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Dear Resident:
As you may know, northwest Bakersfield is one of the fastest growing areas in our
community. New homes and businesses are being built over a wide area. PG&E is
part of this community and is committed to meeting the area's ever-changing and
growing needs.
In order to meet the new and existing electric demand, a new substation is planned
for the Rosedale area. It will be located on the west side of Renfro Road about one
quarter mile north of Rosedale Highway. The substation will be located north and
adjacent to the existing transmission lines paralleling Rosedale Highway. No new
transmission lines will be required. (please see the attached photo and map.)
\The substation wjll-be a low profile substatioÌL The design of this new facility will
'include a brick wall exterior and landscaping. Completiðñ .~àte of this substation is .,
cúfrently planned for the summer of 1997. - -- - - - -- --
Should you like further info~ation on this project, please contact Walt Weir at
805-321-4597 between the hours of 8:00 and 5:00 p.m.
Sincerely,
~~
John W. Raggio
Division Manager
JWR:eb
Ene!.
-.. .
À
I ~.-'C~.".'.;;J.,~
, I ' '.' ' 'r'
'I ,-
i J
i
I
II
I
i
! -
I
':
r -
",'
- .' . - -" ',.r> ",
~
i. NOTE - PHOTO IS AN ARTIST RENDITION,. VARIATION"
I /
MAY EXIST AFTER FINAL CONSTRUCTION OF,FACILITY
~,- --- ,,---,
REN FRO ROAD
/1
MAUSBACH RD
SUBSTATION SITE
10 ACRES
PHOTO DIRECTION
EXISTING
TRANSMISSION LINES
HWY 58
I I
/