HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/21/94. � . �� •
B A K E R S F I E L D
M E IVI O R A N D dJ ilA
October 21, 1994
T0: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ALA�d TANDY, CITY MANAGER �'Q,�3`
SUBJECT: GENERAL INFORMATION
1. A letter is enclosed ��vhi�h went to two County S;�pervis�rs on the problems
we are having with LAFCO. LAF�O's administrator simply will not let us
change our Sphere of Influence without excessive cost.
2. Unfortunately, I must report to you that our property tax receipts were
$500,000 below the estimate in the budget. This was more than offset by
sales tax. Unfortunately, we also have the County's proposal to capture
over $300,000 in additional revenues through the booking fees. So, much of
the good news on the sales tax is moderated.
3. The Asset Forfeiture Program has been restored. You will recall that it
was interrupted for some months due to bungling of the legislature.
4. When you approved the conversion of the Fair Housing Prdgram to being in-
house, it converted from a contract to a personnel servi�e. We are in the
process of listing a Development Associate position with a specialty in
fair housing to permanently fill that role.
5. The Mayor, some department heads and I met with the new management at
Texaco this week. They are brand new and annexation is not around the
corner. As they move forward with wastewater treatment plans during the
next couple of years, it might be resurrected; or as they increase their
familiarity with aur community, ;t might be resurrected, but 5t wi�l not be
immediately.
6. What is the meaning of the County's �roposa� on tFe tax splits to take 50
of our gross sales tax receipts? 4Je11, the answer is that �t would take
40,000 homes' property tax �eneration to equal the �% of our gross sales
tax. You could als� look at it, tlepending upon pay c�assifica�ian, as
something over 2D police officers.
7. The press conference on the hockey team went very well. ihey seem
enthusias�i� about coming to town and working wiih the community. Based
upon my conversaticns with Coun�ilmembers, cemmunity members, etc., I think
this will go extremely well. In fact, Lee Andersen reports that over 50G
reservations for season ti�kets rvere called i� the first day - a�azing!
Too bad that the day after a pramoter :vho wanted to do roller blade hockey
called a press conference. He had postponed twice - we didn't know whether
he was real or not, and the Convent�on Cente� dates are a�ways firmed-up.
�
�,
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
October 21, 1994
Page -2-
8. We are having our annual (although we have not done it for two years)
Department Head Retreat next Thursday and Friday. While Andrea will be
able to contact me in the event of an emergency, most of our shops will be
run by the assistant department heads. Trudy Slater will be in our office.
We will be going to Tehachapi for a two day, one night away from town
planning and brainstorming session.
9. I need some guidance from Council about how hard we fight the booking fee
proposal from the County. I do not know whether it should go to committee
or take some other form. On November 8th, there will be a public hearing
before the County Board of Supe�v�s��s. The problem, of cours2, is that we
cannot aff�rd the $300,000+ that they want tc charge us retroactively. A
meeti ng ��ri �h the Court;� Admi ni strati ve Off ; �er sha,�ed that, wh i� e 28% af i t
is due to increased bookin�s, the majority of this proposed 72% increase is
�ue to a change in their methodology of doing calculations ivhich, surprise,
surprise, disadvantages us.
1C. I am having Raul Rojas and Lee Andersen work through many of the open
issues and questions on the baseball stadium proposal. One significant
piece of information I need to make you aware of is, after more contact
with �he Fair Board, that idea may not be as lucrative a proposition as we
initially thought. The Fair Director spoke with our �taff about the $3
m�llion only as a loan and some unspecified amount of cash. The loan
cr�teria has not yet bee� established by the state. There may be
additional complications with that prcposal which is, as yet, not fully
undeirstood and articuiated.
11. Enc�osed is ar article from Susiness Week regarding the Business and
Finance Conference held last Saturday.
12. An articlz from The 8akersf�eld California� is �nc�osed regarding Delano's
rejection of the County's new tax split p�iicy. So far, the major cities
are hol�ir� aut, but �o si�ns cf �r�a'�;nr the ;mpasse are vis;��e.
13. The water Dzpartment will condu�� a neighborhood meeting regardiny the
Pal adi no Area Water S@T'V'i CE on Wedne��ay, �C �052i 25 ��1 . n Sd�i�p i E i i0t i Cc l S
enclosed.
14 . A 1 etter to the 8akersf i el d hiuseum of A��t i s encl osed foi� you i� i r i�rmati on .
Til i S i 2 �t21" answers SOiT12 GF tiic i�uS2Uiii � S C�ju2S � i�f iS 'vYi �ii i 2 jdi � �� �ii2 i i
12ase agreement.
i�. A mzmo is enclosed fi^om the Police Chief i�egarding staffing levels f�r the
U�ion #10 anrexation.
16. E��losed is ad�itic^al ;nfc�ma���� �r�� ;,r���;d�u �� ��;s Ne�ry c�" T�a
8akersFi el d �a� � torn � ar� rar,a�di ng d� sab �� i ty reti rerre� �t� . T� � s�r � 11 c�me
out as a lengthy series of articl�s at an unKnown tii�e i�� the futu►�e.
! _ __
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
October 21, 1994
Page -3-
17. A memo is enclosed from the .Economic/Community Development Department
regarding revenues which were obtained by that department through grants,
etc. Congratulations and thanks to them for obtaining $119,000 that goes
to other departments and operations!
18. An update from the Planning Department on the General Plan Cycle
applications is enclosed for your information.
19. Information is enclosed regarding Mesa Marin's Concert Permit. Included is
a letter to Mr. Collins from the City Attorney, and a written statement on
a conversation between Mr. Collins and a member of our Planning staff.
20. Responses to numerous Council Referrals are enclosed regarding senior
citizen zoning in Kern City, the site assessment report on the Co-Gen
facility, Union Avenue billboards, street resurfacing of various streets,
correspondence received from the State Reclamation Board regarding a
request from William Alexander to allow subdivision of his property, a
request for a crosswalk at Occidental and University intersection, and
miscellaneous traffic matters.
21. Correspondence is enclosed from Time Warner Cable regarding a very small
increase in their fees due to regulatory fees they must pay to the FCC.
22. Enclosed is a memo from the Water and Sanitation Manager giving an update
on the newly restructured Solid Waste Management Advisory Committee.
AT.alb
Enclosures
cc: Department Heads
City Clerk
� . ��,
- �-�
�
B A K E R S F I E L D
Alan Tandy • City Manager
October 20, 1994
Supervisor Ben Austin
Supenrisor Ken Peterson
County of Kern
1115 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Gentlemen:
At the recent meeting with Mr. Turpin, I indicated to you that I would be appealing if Mr.
Turpin's mechanisms for changing our Sphere of Influence were extraordinarily costly
and time consuming in comparison to those which took place in this County prior to
Mr. Turpin, or those which take place in other counties in the State of California.
Enclosed you will find Mr. Turpin's letter to me indicating how we can go about changing
our Sphere of Influence. While it sounds cooperative on the surface, it requires General
Plan Amendments and associated environmental work. You will also find an analysis
from Jack Hardisty indicating that the General Plan Amendments and environmental
work is expected to take one and one-half to two years, at a cost of $200,000 to
$300, 000.
Sphere modifications involving agricultural land that took place without General Plan
Amendments, zoning and EIRs have recently been completed in Porterville in 1991,
Chino Hills in 1991, Chino in 1994 and Ontario in 1994.
Changes in process elsewhere in the State, under these same conditions, include
Oakdale, Hanford, Lemoore and Reedley. Prior to Mr. Turpin, Sphere changes could be
done without excessive bureaucracy, time consumption and cost in Kern County.
Mr. Turpin's policies, if not modified, will also interfere with, if not stop, the land
exchange and related benefits between Castle & Cooke and the Kern County Water
Agency in the western part of the Bakersfield metropolitan area. While there is separate
consideration being given to that specific issue, it represents only a small part of the
Sphere change that we desire to initiate.
I wish to formally appeal Mr. Turpin's decision and would appreciate your advice about
how we go about making such an appeal to the LAFCO Board.
City of Bakersfield • City Manager's Office • 1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield • California • 93301
T
n, .1!
Supervisor Ben Austin
Supenrisor Ken Peterson
October 20, 1994
Page •2-
It has been my impression that both of you traditionally supported minimization of
unnecessary studies and bureaucratic time consumption in an effort to create positive
accomplishments. In this instance, I would appeal to you for your support in modifying
these unreasonable policies on the part of LAFCO.
Sin rely, �_
an Tand
City Manager
AT.alb
Enclosures
„^�, -_ r
`1^_
��^�.f
E. '
�,
�
�
,
o�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
8
�
0
0 • • � ”
CoNVENT1oN5 owns three Mexican restaurants in town.
, "Tears were just running down people's
cheeks."
�iHAT HA� THREE ASTRO�AUTS� None of this comes cheap. This year,
the "hard costs" of the day—everything
P�UL A�KA,, A�D COLtN P0�'ELL? �harges, a d,o herSC s�ts the firmhab-
sorbs—come to $3 mitlion. Of that,
A Bakersfield law firm—staging its annual promotional bash $2�0,000 goes ta landscaping—which this
year will feature a"moonscape near the
o most Californians, Bakersfield up. On Oc� 15, Colin Powell is scheduled beer garden" and a 7-foot-tall model of
isn't much more than an exit off to stop by, fresh from his Haitian diplo- the lunar capsute sitting in a 100-foot-
State Highway 99. Arid even in matic sortie, and Larry King is du� to long reflecting pond. Another $2.2 mil-
spring, it's a town of oil wells, tract bring his suspender-snapping shtick. The lion or so goes to paying for tents and
houses, and miles of straight, dusty law firm aiso plans ta reunite the thr�e audiovisual services.
roads connecting cotton and fruit fields. Apollo 11 astronauts for the 25th �nni- H�cxswit,E uw►GE. Martin says the con- I
But every October for the past 10 versary of the moon landing—only the ference usualty breaks even, though last
years, just as the hands take to the second time all year that Neil Arm- year, when he decided to give away a
fields, California's 14th-largest city— strong, Bt�z Aldrin, and Michael Col- car at the last minute, it lost $23,000. '
poputation 202,000—transforms itself lins wi11 appear together. In aU, Martin There are no plans for a car giveawAy ,
into a Woodstock for business and polit- plans to spend 3600,0{H1 this year for this ;y ear—but t?�e: e wil? be a Ferris I
icai groupies. speakers and entertainment—including wheei. j
Clustered in a canvas tent large
enough to contain a pair of football fields
plus seven basketball courts, 24,000 peo-
ple gather to listen to the likes of
George Bush, Shirley MacLaine, and T.
Boone Pickens Jr. wax eloquent for 30
minutes apiece. The topics range from
NAFTA t0 women's roles in the work-
place. "We suggest [speakersJ have a
tot of jokes," says George F. Martin, a
oneiime rock pramoter who organizes
the dayiong talkathon. "It's a long day."
tASH FOR tME CHiEFS. It's atso o►ie heck
of a promotional event. Martin is manag-
ing general partner of the local law firm
Borton, Petrini & Conron, with 125 at-
torneys in 16 offices. "Our firm doesn't
advertise on Tv or radio or stand on its
head and eat a bug to get business,"
says Martin. Ittstead, it stages the annu-
al Bakersfield Business Conference.
The powerfui virtualty line up to ad-
dress attendees—most of whom pay 3295
a head. In previous years, Martin has at-
Lracted the likes of Donald 2i�ump and
Lee A. Iacocca—with honoraria of up to
$60;000 apiece: In 1992, Ronald Reagan
came. Last year, three former Presi-
dents—Ford, Carter, and Bush—showed
SO BUSINESS WEEK/OCT08ER 10, 1
fireworks, Jay Leno, and Paul Anka.
If all the hoopla means added busi-
ness, Martin wan't quantify it. But his
firm, which sgecializes in business litiga-
tion and insurance defense, attracts an
enviable audience to its shindig. Among
attendees this year: MCA, Paramount
Pictures, DHL Air Express, and H�alth-
Ne� State Farm Insurance alone has 80
tickets for its executives.
To Iiay Meek, a fun�-raiser at Ba-
kersfield College who has attended 10
conferences, the confab has become a
on�day escape W a c�
tebrity-studded firma-
ment. A few years
back, she ran into for-
mer British Prime Min-
ister Sir Harold Wilson
on the way to the re-
freshment tent. Then
there was General
Norman Schwarzkopfs
appearance, six months
after Operation Desert
Storm. "People gave
him a five-minute
standing ovation," says
Rachel Gamez, who
About half of ihe conference s attend-
ees come from Bakersfield, Uut enough
spend the night ta filt Bakersfield's 3,000
hotel and motel rooms. The convention
Uureau figures every overnight visitor
brings in $12L Perhaps more import�znt,
say officials, the event also counters the
image of the city as Hicksville. "We
could r.ot have gone out and bougl�t this
kind of respect," says Chris T. Frank,
executive vice-presideni of the local
Chamber of Commerce.
So it's not surprising that Lhe Bakers-
field gatherin�; is
spawning cum�,cliLion:
San Diego will host its
own one-day cavalcade
of� bigwigs only a
month atter I3aikers-
field's. Other cities are
mulling similar extrav- i
a�anzas. �fter all, any
evenL that can turn a�+
dusty little California � I
town into a mecca for �,','
the rich and famous in- I'
vites imitation.
By Nanette Byrnes
in Bakersfield, Ccclif. �
�� � ,
al
;J
��
Thursday, October 20,1994 * B
, ,;., `;�I�1$�D6 .�. �� ;� .� r�, �; .�
; �4.: �.. r :, s�+. � r9 , ;. � ;•:
►FUNERALS B2 : $lg CTOWCI
► EDITORIALS B4 � antici ated for
►VIEWPOINT 85 ; p
► WEATHER B6 c Edwards show. B3
�. . � �t .�. �: _.. �:. , �. ,: � • � � s � _ - .---�-��-�-; ,
ai � "1� • , , _ -:i >i . .°a s, . ._ . , , ... , n�; . , . .? `��?, . .,��.�.� J�r. .';k :; �y, • , #;.
�
e a�no re u� a��-s ro os
► Stand against
county brings
relief to area city
officials fearing
loss of funds.
By RALPH BAILEY JR.
Calilomian correspondent
Locks on the sales tag bins in
Kern County cities remain firmly
Clt
�
ices
hocke
�
deal
► Bakersfield
secured., much to the chagrin of the
county and to the o eat relief of
area city officials.
The Delano City Conncil on Mon-
day rejected a county proposalthat
would have redistributed its take of
property tas revenue and would
have, for the first time in Kern
County history, forced the city to
give up a percentage of their month-
ly sales tau revenue.
City officials in Bakersfield and
Delano say they believe the prece-
dent would certainly have spread
throughout the county.
"Had the city of Delano relented,
this would have meant a loss of
millions of dollars throughout Kern
County," said Bakersfield Assistant
City Manager John Stinson, who
specWated Bakersfield could have
lost more than a1.3 million annually.
As part of an annexation agree-
ment with the city of Delano, the
county was seeking to renegotiate a
property tag split that historically
provided Delano 49 percent of the
tages generated by city property.
When Delano officials sought to
annex the 160-acre Almond Tree
Village property more than a year
ago, they were informeci the county
wanted an 80i20 split favoring the
county or a 60i40 arrangement tied
to the county receiving 5 percent of
the 1 percent sales tag cities receive
monthly.
"It is completely unprecedented
in Kern County and will not stop
here," said Delano City Manager
Arturo de la Cerda. "This is a cheap
money grab that should not and
cannot be tolerated."
Yet, County Administrative Offi•
cer Joe Drew, scheduled to meel
with Delano Mayor Arthur Armen•
dariz today, said the county ha:
negotiated in good faith and has
tendered reasonable offers to Kern
cities.
"We have demonstrated conclu-
sively that there is an inequity in
the current situation," Drew said,
adding he believed a change in the
tag split is inevitable.
►Please turn to SALES TAX 1 B2
Schools
Cille� 1S
u for
p
new 'ob
�
► Local trustee
e it �t can maKe some cnanges rronc auor. -- — -- -- --
�xploratory' SALES .TAX: Kern's chief officer defends plan on dis tribution
tt'S my
r�derstanding he
7�jares) is their
o. 1 cundidate,
►�d they want an
zportunit� to r►teet
ith local people. "
BCSD tNStee Peter Parra
�lacement.
"Dr. Mijares is a very talented
m, and iYs normal that people
uld be making inquIries about
n," Maggard said. "It's really no
prise. If it were to happen, it's a
nderful oppoctunity for him and I
uldn't want to stand in his way.
"He's the Itind of guy that is
ng to have these things happen to
n all the time," Maggard said.
e is really a remarkable man."
►Contlnued from 61
"Take Bakersfield, for egample.
They are currenUy bringing in mil-
lions of dollars of sales tax from
residents. Almost half don't reside
in the city," Drew said. "Some of
the unincorporated areas are nearly
as large as Bakersfield itself. Those
areas, along with Lamont and
Arvin, make up more than half their
annual sales tag revenue."
Of the 7.5 percent sales taa
levied on commercial goods by the
state, each city receives 1 percent
collected within the city:
Drew said he believes the basis
by which ciUes receive these funds
should be altered by the statc.
•,Sales taa should be establlshed
based on population," he said.
Stinson addressed the Delano
City Council Monday. Armed with a
detailed financial report, which cit-
ed the potential financial loss, Stin-
son strongly urged the council to
balk at the new proposal, which it
did.
"Over the neat 20 years this
could cost the city of Delano more
than =3 million," Stinson said. "This
kind of thing could completely dev-
astate city budgets throughout the
county. If we allow the county to set
this precedent, you can count on the
state following not too far behind."
Annually, Stinson estimated the
new county proposal would have
cost Delano more than 5190,000 in
sales taa revenue and #1.4 million in
property taa.
Only a handfui of communities,
such as California City, allow the
state to share its sales tax revenue,
which is normally a financial boon
due to its ability to keep pace with
inflation.
"Clearly, we are a unique situa-
tion," said California City Finance
D'uector Terry tiicks. "Our reve-
nues are priTnarIly generated by
pmperty taaes, so the idea of shar-
Ing sales taa is not that big an issue
here."
California GYty generates about
�840,000 a year in property taa and
=120;000 in sales tas.
Yet the county, which has al-
lowed California City to enjoy a
55i45 majority of property taa in-
come, is now seeking to renegotiate
to the tune of 80i20 in the county's
favor.
"Again, we are in a unique
situation," Hicks insisted. "We
might be able to live with an 80i20
split, because any type of land we
annea would be raw desert area ...
we'd be talking about a split of
about �5,000, so it's really not that
great an issue."
Other cities whlch depend on
sales tag and a large chunk of their
property taa to provide public safe-
ty service and parh and recreation
funding say they will forgo annea-
ation to preserve their current tax
allotment.
"We have no intention of sharing
our sales taa," said Taft City Man-
ager Eric Zeigler. "This is essen-
tially state theft of city revenues,
and the cities of Kern County raust
come together on this issue.
"We have to make people under-
stand that if state government dis-
appeared, their lives would not
drastically change. They still would
know where to send their kids to
school, or where to call for help in
case of crime or who to call to get
their roads paved.
"ICs just ridicWous that the level
of government that taaes the most
and seeks the most amount of mon-
ey from lower level government
entities provldes the least amount of
services," Zeigler said.
Fresno and Ventura are two
counties that have relented.
"I don't know if I would hold up
Fresno County as an eaample of
what this type of sharing would
create," Stinson said. "If you've
seen Fresno lately you know that
they are esperiencing a terrlble
time coming up with public safety
money and funds for their infra-
structure."
Drew said the County Board of
Supervisors will continue to negoti-
ate with Delano and other cities
contemplating annexation.
FuNERa �s �a � 3,; � A �;,��8
{w rales or in�ormarion
395•7287
Jemina Dolly Richard Ernesto Duarte William H. Stoller �M �on� �oRr
Services: Thurs., October 20, 7 p.m. Services: Fri., Oci. 21, 10:30 a.m. Services: Friday, Oct. 21, 1:30 p.m.
F�., � Services will be held in the Harmony South- Recitation of the Rosary will be held for Services for William H. Stoller, 90 years of K r i st i n e L u m
ern Baptist Church, 8300 Wharton Ave., Lamont, Ernesto Duarte, 46, of Bakersfield on Thursday age, will be held at Grace Reformed Church,
�er this evening, October 20 at 7 p.m. for Jemina at 7 p.m. at Hillcrest Mortuary Chapel. the 420 Columbus Ave., Bakersfield, on Fridav. AAar�h 1� 1971-n�fnh�r �n ioo�
�
�-�� .
MEMORANDUM
$A
O dcomw �
ti � ��
�
U
� �..,.�
�IFO
TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager
FROM: Gene Bogart, Water and Sani tion Manager
October 18, 1994
SUBJECT: NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING - PALADINO WATER SERVICE AREA
Attached is a sample copy of the letters being sent out this week notifying property
owners""in ° the Paladino Water Main Assessment District of the neighborhood meeting
scheduled for Wednesday, October 26, 1994 in the City Council chambers. The meeting will
open with a brief history of the service area and will include a slide presentation. Staff will
then review the current status of water supply and water main extensions with the audience
and open the discussion to questions and answers.
If you have any questions or need any further information at this time, please contact
either myself or Florn Core.
GB:sr
Attachment
cc: Raul Rojas, Public Works Director
Mike Kelly, Fire Chief
Jack Hardisty, Planning Director
Gail Waiters, Assistant City Manager
'�� 3 �"� ���� ��.``:9� �-. �
i - - --
;
% �''
, OCT I 9 I�qfl
„ �---� __-�__-- ...�-,
' `�.�°f ��; C�:�.�� ;�`='� - �
y � _. .
�� � l � .�
„"CITY OF
����������� CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND SANTTATION
GENE BOGART, Manager
FLORN CORE, Water Resources Director
MIKE SIDES, Solid Waste Superintendent
�
s�
i �
October 18, 1994
Carl W. & Lila L. Williams
10991 Pitts Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93306
APN: 386-220-22-00-1
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Willianas:
r
:.��:/;,, , �—�
'' —
_�''�� _
, --
�. _��•� -=
� �
���
��
MEETING NOTICE
A meeting has been schednled to review the current status of a water supply for the
residents and owners of property in the area north of Highway 178 and east of the Morning
Drive extension, also known as the Paladino Water Main Assessment District N� 90-2. City
staff and water service representatives will be available to discuss recent inforffia�tion relative
to the extension of water pipelines. G�rrent cost estimates of the construction of the water
system to serve your properties will also be discussed.
The meeting will be held --
Date: WEDNESDAiY, OCTOBER 26, 1994
Time: �:OOpm
Where: CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1501 TRUXTUN AVENUE
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301
If you are unable to attend this informational meeting or need additional details, you may
contact the City Water Resources Department at 1000 Buena Vista Rd., Bakersfield, CA
93311 or telephone at (805) 326-3715.
Very truly yours,
Gene Bogart
Water and Sanitation Manager
By �/�G
Florn Core .
Water Resources Director
1000 BUENA VISTA ROAD
�
• BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93311 . (805) 326-3715
� 4
"}.�.. ^ :. �
� C
r�
•
B A K E R S F I E L D
October 1 S, 1994
Mrs. Sherry Di�lard, Director
Bakersfield Museum of Art
1930 R Street
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Dear Sherry:
Alan Tandy • City Manager
In response to questions you raised in your memo to me of August 9, I am glad to be able to
respond in a manner which is more favorable than at first thought.
The property underlying the museum is owned in fee by the City without restriction. It is
conceivable, therefore, to deed such property, including the building thereon, to the Bakersfield
Art Foundation upon its agreeing that the land and any building(s) thereon would be used solely
as a municipal art gallsry/museum. If the Foundation were to breach this restriction, the land,
buildings, and any improvements would revert to the City's ownership for use as it so wished.
Upon acceptance of title by the Bakersfield Art Foundation, the City would no longer be
responsible for care or maintenance of either the land or building(s). Obviously, the legal
ramifications/intricacies of this possible action would need to be fully explored before being given
serious consideration.
It is unlikely that the property could be given outright to the Foundation, as that would be
considered a gift of public funds. The City would have to be assured that the land and buildings
would be used for the greater good of the community, such as use as a municipal art
gallery/museum, before any such possibility could be advanced.
Many of the answers to questions you have raised are tied directly to the current lease the
Bakersfield Art Foundation has with the City. Specifically, reorienting the building to 19th Street
would require the approval by the City of all plans for improvement and costs of such
reorientation would have to be born by the Foundation and maintained at no cost to the City.
Expansion of the museum grounds would also call for changes in the present lease agreement.
The restriction on the charging of fees for admission and events in your current lease (Paragraph
3.B) is based on Municipal Code Chapter 2.56.030. Section C specifically mentions that policies
governing the management, operation, maintenance or regulation of the gallery or museum shall
be consistent with the lease agreement approved by the council. Changes in the Municipal
Code can be promulgated by Council approval.
Per our City Attorney's Office, Section 12.56.240 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code addresses
sales in public parks. It prohibits any sales by other than a charitable or nonprofit entity. If the
Foundation is to receive the proceeds of the sales, then it may be permitted to sell items in the
Museum. It must, however, obtain an exclusive use permit and a city business license. If it is
to be a fundraising event, the Foundation must also obtain the approval of the City Manager.
City of Bakersfield • City Manager's Office • 1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield • California • 93301
�an�� ��� ��[i . G.,., iQn�� ��n 'IQC(1
��- - �
,. 3J-
: Mrs. Sherry Dillard, Director
Bakersfield Museum of Art
October 18, 1994
Page 2
You suggested rewriting the ordinance affecting the providing of free food to transients in the
parks. In order to change an ordinance, specific steps are taken, including the holding of public
hearings on matters of citywide concern. Before recommending changes in ordinances, an
assessment of the impacts of those changes upon the entire community must be made in order
to avoid unintended consequences. It is my understanding that Trudy Slater has been working
with you to find acceptable solutions to the problem of transients negatively affecting Museum
activities.
At your request, on March 23t 1994 the City Council extended the lease with the Foundation until
July 17, 1995 to allow the board to determine future growth directions. To open negotiations for
lease renewal at this time, you will need to provide the City with your specific requests, for
consideration during the negotiation process. �
The City has been pleased with the Bakersfield Art Foundation's stewardship of the Bakersfield
Museum of Art both in attaining national accreditation and in holding several outstanding
exhibits. It is clear that the Foundation has demonstrated a continuing ability to utilize the
building and grounds at 1930 "R" Street as a viable municipal art gallery.
Please feel free to contact Trudy or me should you have any questions.
Sinc ly,
an Tandy
City Manager
cc: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Judy Skousen, City Attorney
Trudy Slater, Administrative Analyst II
.�
i= w �
,,.,.; � .�..,
'� �hER.Sf/f�D ��
C" �: '� �
��n� .��� � �i
, � •� �.,,
�oi:�C� �,
� \ � -.,� ,
�`Ii,�,
..�,
•
.�
.
MEMORANDUM
Alan Tandy, City Manager
Steve Brummer, Chie£ of Police
October 12, 1994
Police Staffing for Union Avenue #10 Annexation
In review of police staffing needs for the anticipated annexation of
Union Avenue #10, a matter of concern has arisen relative to the
impact service demands in this area will have on other areas of the
City. I cannot, with any certainty, ensure that no adverse effects
will occur, particularly in light of continued increases in calls for
service throughout the City.
As you are probably aware, the request for four sworn officer
positions for Union Avenue #10 was based, in part, on research
conducted in October, 1992, proposing 4.1 sworn positions for that
area. The area studied did not, however, include any properties
south of Brundage Lane. In addition, the rate of reported serious
crime in the annexation area continues to increase, and will have a
certain short term impact on staffing designated for the area.
In order to provide more acceptable service levels, while mitigating
the adverse impacts on other areas of the City, I am recommending the
addition of two (2) sworn positions to accommodate the area south of
Brundage Lane.
The additional positions will reduce the likelihood that police
services elsewhere in the City will be adversely affected by the
annexation, particularly during the period of transition of the area
from county to city jurisdiction.
SEB/vrf
�---,-�,�v;;-
� i� . _ �= �= �__ � �: .
_. �7i,
�
�_.__
�,_,� ,,� ,, ,� , ---_-
d � �-- -
;�% -
T0:
FROM:.
SUBJECT:
�
B A K E R S F I E L D
MEMORANDUiIA
LOIS HENRY, THE BAKERSFIELD CALIFORNIAN
JOHN W. STINSON;��ISTANT CITY MANAGER
DISABILITY RETIREMENTS
Q�__
October 18, 1994
Attached is the information you requested regarding Disability Retirements for
the City of Bakersfield for the fiscal year 1978-79 to the fiscal year 1985-86
and the first three months of the fiscal year 1994-95.
If you should have any questions regarding this material or any additional
questions, please call me at 326-3775.
JWS/kec
Attachment
cc: Alan Tandy, City Manager
�
MEMO\HENRY
,�
� .. . --
To:
From:
�
B A K E R S F I E L D
MEMORANDUM
October 14, 1994
John W. Stinson, Assistant City Manager
Scott Manzer; Risk Manager
Subject: Request for Records from The Bakersfield Californian
In response to a request for records from the Bakersfield
Californian, retiree information has been compiled for the fiscal
years 1978-79 through fiscal year 1985-86 and for the first 3
months of fiscal year 1994-95. Previously, information had been
supplied for the fiscal years.1986-87 through fiscal year 1993-94.
The information provided includes a compilation of data on the
employees who retired from the City of Bakersfield during the
period. The compilation includes the following retiree
information:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Sex
Date of Birth
Retirement Date
Unit where employed
P - Police Unit
F - Fire Unit
M - Miscellaneous Unit
Years of Service
Type of Retirement
I- INDUSTRIAL DISABILITY RETIREMENT, available to safety
officers (sworn police and fire personnel) only. It is a
retirement due to a work-related injury.
D- DISABILITY RETIREMENT, a retirement due to an injury.. For
non-safety personnel, it is irrelevant whether the injury is
work related or not. For safety employees, this type of
retirement is for off the job injuries only.
S- SERVICE Retirement, based on the number of years of service
only. No injury is involved.
Type of Disability (if applicable).
Department of the Retiree. - �
Please note that the data provided is based on information
currently available in Personnel and Risk Management and may not
reflect changes made subsequent to the retirement date. Also note
that, with the exception of employees who worked for Police or
Fire, the Department in which the employee worked is not readily
available on the City's computer system.
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD RETIf�EMENTS
Sex Birthdate
M 01/14/21
M 06/17/49
M 01/27/18
M 07/31/13
M 08/04/18
M 08/17/20
M 03/02/42
M 06/27/24
M 10/10/23
M 09/12/35
M 07/14/21
M 04/03/18
M 06/15/22
F 08/22/16
M 06/25/13
M 07/21 /25
F 03/08/18
M 09/08/16
Retirement Years Ret.
Date Unit Service Type Disabili
7 5 78 M 7 S
7 3 78 F I Foot
7 5 78 P 28 I Mult. Parts
7 31 78 M S
8 4 78 M 28 S
9 1 78 M 28 S
2 13 79 M 1� D Back
2 1 79 ? I
4 28 79 P 29 S
4 1 79 F 22 I Back
4 29 79 P 30 S
4 3 79 M 29 S
4 5 79 ? S
5 22 79 M 16 S
5 1 79 M 23 S
5 14 79 M 27 D Knee
6 8 79 M 25 S
6 8 79 M 28 S
— -- _ — — -=- -. -
_ .. _ _ . _ �
.�
J ���
'�
,�.i E
�
E
�
Dept•
Fire
Police
Police
Fire
Police
Monthly Workers' � �
., ;
Pension `Coma•
�.
$246.35 $0 �
r
$807.58 $5,185 s
�
$1,228.52 $16,644 �
$540.46 $0 �
$683.78 $0 `
$586.34 $0
$414.85 $6,711
$0.13 $0 � � �
$1,834.59 $0
$1,230J6 $17,264
$1,823.23 $0
$1,043.39 $0
$92.02 $0
$544.58 $0 '
$741.10 $0
$558.33 $24,740
$762.51 $0 '
$800.42 $0
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD RETIREMENTS
Retirement Years Ret.
Sex Birthdate Date Unit Service TYne Disabili
M 09/24/1 S 9 24 79 M 27 S
M 11/22/32 9 1 79 F 11 I Mult. Parts
M 10/30/18 10 30 79 M 27 S
F 10/21 /23 11 8 79 M D
M 12/05/20 12 29 79 F 31 S
M 09/25/18 12 29 79 P 32 S
M 10/30/24 t 2 31 79 F 23 S
M 03/11/24 12 29 79 P 30 I Heart
M 10/11/20 12 29 79 P 22 S
M 04/28/21 12 29 79 F 28 S
M 12/01/12 12 29 79 M 7 S
M 05/08/44 1 23 80 M 11 D No Claim
M 01/30/34 2 1 80 F 15 I Heart
M 10/27/16 3 22 80 M 13 S
F 03/01/21 3 1 80 M S
M 11/14/19 5 17 80 M 13 S
M 12/02J26 6 13 80 F 32 S
Monthly Workers'
Dept• Pension Comp•
$828.90 $0
Fire $1,001.67 $17,414
$831.85 $0
$312.06 $0
Fire $1,552.79 $17,264,
Police $1,820.79 $0
Fire $1,405.94 $0
Police $2,203.31 $15,070
Police $1,732.12 $0
Fire $1,393.54 $0
$306.30 $0
$599.29 $0
Fire $533.60 $4,904
$521.15 $0
$116.48 $0
$639.80 $0
Fire $1,521.64 $0
�S �
;
� t,
�
f � i
a.
� � 4 �,
'
i
, �
�,
;'
CITY OF BAKERSFiELD RETIREMENTS
Retirement Years Ret.
Sex Birthdate Date Unit Service Type Disabili
M 03/20/16 7 5 80 M 12 S
M 07/19/23 7 19 80 F 32 S
M 06/03/22 7 26 80 M 34 S
M 02/22/46 7 1 80 M 6 D Back
M 01/12/25 7 75 80 F 27 S
M 01/07/19 8 2 80 M 35 S
M 02/03/24 8 3 80 F 28 S
M 05/02/27 8 13 80 M S
M 02/18/28 8 1 80 M S
M 09/05/17 9 6 80 M 23 S
M 10/22/22 10 1 80 M S
M 03/O6/34 11 8 80 F 17 ! Back
M 10/25/18 11 29 80 M 9 D Knee
M 05/24/25 12 27 80 P 18 S
M 12/01/27 12 15 80 F 16 I Respiratory
M 10/17/25 12 28 80 F 25 S
M 07/20/25 12 29 80 F 33 S
M 05J20/27 12 27 80 P 23 S
M f0/17/16 i2 39 80 M S
M 10/30/31 12 13 80 F 24 I Neck
M 07/08/25 12 20 80 F 27 S
M 05/10/22 1 1 81 M 28 0 No claim
M OS/03/14 1 17 81 M 11 S
M 02/05/21 2 28 81 M 19 S
M 02/18/27 2 28 81 F 28 S
M 01 /29/26 2 6 81 F ' 30 S
M 09/04/35 2 10 81 P 15 I Neck
M 11/19/28 4 1 81 M 28 S
M 12/22/24 6 27 81 M 7 S
F 11/3Q/17 6 27 81 M 6 S
Monthly Workers'
Deat• Pension Comp•
$759.04 $0
Fire $1,999.91 $0
$770.73 $0
$173.36 $139
Fire $1,405.94 $0
$1,203.89 $0
Fire $1,516.77 $0
$430.46 $0
$271.55 $0
$3,212.09 $0
$45Q.21 $0
Fire $1,344.33 $8,652
$432.20 $25,086
Police $1,184.46 $0
Fire $1,415.97 $108.630
Fire $1,132.46 $0
Fire $1,639.55 $0
Poiice $973.24 $0
$16.16 $0
Fire $1,058.53 $656
Fire $1,282.66 ffi0
$722.84 $0
$439.18 $0
$950.87 $0
Fire $1,58i'.87 $0
Fire $1,684.49 $0
PoliCe $1,242.42 $27,665
$584.17 $0
$381.35 $0
$272.04 $0
., �
:, � ;;
_,
�
t
i
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD RETIREMENTS
Retirement Years Ret.
Sex Birthdate Date Unit Service Type Disabili
F 10/27/39 7 1 81 M 18 D No claim
F 03/15/16 7 1 81 M S
M 10/19/45 8 1 81 P 25 I Hearing
M 04/07/36 8 1 81 F 29 D Back
M 08/22/26 S 24 81 F 26 S
M 08/11/31 8 28 8f ? D No claim
M 08/13/32 9 8 81 P 16 I Heart
M 10/07/28 9 9 81 F 26 I Respiratory
M 05/15/26 9 8 81 F 25 I Heart
M 02/04/34 10 7 81 P 20 D tJo Claim
M OS/05/25 10 6 81 M S
F 05/05/27 11 1 81 M S
M OS/0?J24 12 31 81 F 16 1 Neart
M Ot/01/19 12 31 81 M 29 S
M 09/29/22 12 30 81 F S
F 09/13/19 1 16 82 M S
M 02/16/39 1 21 82 M 19 D Back
M 01/10/27 2 18 82 F 27 S
M 01/30/37 2 1 82 F 15 I Back
M 11/19/30 2 16 82 F 28 I Heart
M 11/18/24 3 1 82 M 22 S
M 06/13/45 4 6 82 F 24 I Heart
M 10/10/40 6 1 82 P 17 I Heart
M OS/29/54 6 18 82 P 3 I Mult. Parts
r'
: �
Monthly Workers'
Dept• Pension Comp•
$573.24 $0
$7.32 $0
Police $1,040.15 $1,843
Fire $1,083.84 $3,773
Fire $1.349.45 $0
$176.44 $0
Police $1,590.44 $48,057
Fire $1,471.04 $16,390
Fire $1,479.95 $58,015
Police $960.62 $0
$173.26 $0
$23:94 $0
Fire $756.37 $25,446
$675.33 $0
Fire $953.28 $0
$1,112.77 $0
$931.44 $18,276
Fire $1,606.78 $0
Fire $1,739.42 $59,762
Fire $1,493.60 $93,251
$1,008.97 $0
Fire $963.55 $65,124
Police $1,648.46 $94,410
Police $1,303.90 $74,352
;..
�:
i
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD RETIREMENTS
Retirement Years Ret.
Sex Birthdate Date Unit Service Tvae Disabili
M 10/20/18 7 12 82 M S
F 05/12/13 7 1 82 M S
M 04/11/31 7 12 82 M 12 S
M 11/24/20 8 1 82 M D No Claim
F 01/17/17 9 1 82 M 16 S
M 03/06/26 9 7 82 M S
M 07/04/27 11 1 82 M S
M 01l25/26 12 31 82 M 6 S
M 03/31/23 12 31 82 M 29 S
M 08/03/32 12 31 82 F 14 I Heart
F 06/08/19 12 31 82 M 12 S
M 04/14/33 4 1 83 P 24 I Heart
M 06/10/23 4 1 83 M S
M 09/15/28 6 1 83 M 10 S
Dept•
Fire
Police
Monthly Workers'
Pension Com .
$276.64 $0
$256.51 $0
$413.54 $0
$215.77 $0
$384.04 $0
$5.12 $0
$102.00 $0
$589.16 $0
$1,071.09 $0
$1,624.63 $16,076
$590.90 $0
$1,905.81 $33,251
$27.88 $0
$350.51 $0
,
,
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD REfIREMENTS
Sex
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
F
M
M
M
M
M
F
M
M
M
F
M
Birthdate
08/17/18
06/17/33
OS/18/32
01 /12/40
11 /29/23
10/07/33
12/25/28
03/18/28
03/21 /28
08/03/24
08/11 /25
04/21/26
12/01/25
08/23f26
10/14/29
08/10/30
11/11/30
04/04/22
02/02127
10/22/28
06/08/33
01 /26/29
11 /04/32
0 t /21 /33
02J15/19
12/02/23
Retirement
Date
7 7 83
7 1 83
8 20 83
9 21 83
9 17 83
10 8 83
10 4 83
10 4 83
12 24 83
12 23 83
12 31 83
12 22 83
12 31 83
12 23 83
12 30 83
12 31 83
12 3 83
12 31 83
12 26 83
12 31 83
12 31 83
12 31 83
1 21 84
1 21 84
4 28 84
6 9 84
Years Ret.
Unit Service ,T��e Disabili
M 26 S
F 19 1 Back
M 7 S
M 13 D Back
M 22 S
F 22 S
F 30 1 Heart
F 30 I Heart
F 32 S
F 31 S
P 33 I Heart
F 29 S
P 31 I Heart
F 24 I Heart
P 23 1 Heart
F 31 S
F 32 I Heart
M 17 S
F S
M 27 S
P 18 S
F 32 S
M 21 D No Claim
M 7 S
M S
? S
Dept•
Fire
Fire
Fire
Fire
Fire
Fire
Police
Fire
Police
Fire
Police
Fire
Fire
Public Wks
Fire
Police
Fire
Dev/Serv
Monthly Workers'
Pension Comp•
$1,314.85 $0
$1,841.77 $65,033
$286.27 $0
$740.40 $10,050
$1,341.02 $0
$1,316.74 $0
$3,454.26 $26,901
$3,125.42 $69,924
$2,387.97 $0
$2,979.37 $0
$1,720.92 $152,116
$2,692.15 $0
$2,646.24 $8,267
$2,409.30 $17,051
$1,940.22 $14,437
$2,688.72 $0
$3,410.13 $47,549
$2,138.86 $0
$2,386.95 $0
$940.79 $0
$922.54 $0
$3,212.30 $0
$1,346.84 $0
$217.47 $0
$857.96 $0
$238.26 $0
_... ..___— . .:_...... .___: ..._ _..I
77 �
}
�' i
' a �
��
�
!
i
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD RETIREMENTS
Sex Birthdate
M 06/21 /34
F 07/15/22
F 10/03/29
M 12/25/21
M 07/28/28
F 06/01 /22
M 04/17/20
M 03/24/31
M 08/27/23
M 10/23/31
F 07/19/29
M 07/27/40
M 06/09/26
M 03/02/29
M 10/06/22
Retirement Years Ret.
Date Unit Service Type Disabili Deat•
7 14 84 P 26 I Back Police
8 1 84 M 15 S
10 4 84 M 17 S Police
12 29 84 M 35 S
12 29 84 M S
12 31 84 M S
12 29 84 M 36 S
1 19 85 F 29 S Fire
3 1 85 P 32 1 Heart Police
3 30 85 P 17 I Heart Police
4 1 85 M S
5 15 85 M 13 D No Claim
6 29 85 M 25 S Public Wks
6 29 85 M 30 S
6 29 85 M S
Monthly Workers'
Pension Coma•
$t,635.49 $20,788
$599.50 $0
$6.66 $0
$971.59 $0
$1.16 $0
$248.16 $0
$2,708.01 $0
$2,256.86 $0
$2,944.87 $64.519
$1,219.07 $30,225
$39.63 $0
$1,346.31 $0
$2,468.99 $0
$1,529.47 $0
$1,116.49 , $0
�
i
�
1�
i
f
�
f .
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD RETIREMENTS
Sex Birthdate
F 12/06/31
M 02/16/25
M 05/31/34
M 09/28/22
M 06/36/32
F 09/09/25
M 04/30/29
M 09/27/23
M 11 /13/23
M 09/29119
M 11/09/24
M 12/31 /22
M 05/17/31
M 11/25/25
M 10/25/26
M 02/12/36
M 01 /22/24
M 04/13/24
F 06/07/37
M 08/16/27
M 08/27/47
M 02/02/33
F 06/09/31
M 09/16/33
Retirement Years ReL
Date Unit Service TYpe Disabili Deat•
8 3 85 M 9 S Comm.Serv
8 31 85 M 36 S Water/San
S 6 85 7 I No Claim
9 29 85 F 5 S Fire
12 28 85 F 30 S Fire
12 31 85 M S
12 29 85 F 23 S Fire
12 28 85 M 30 S Public Wks
12 31 85 M 7 S Public Wks
12 31 85 M 18 S Public Wks
12 28 85 M 32 S Dev.Serv
12 31 85 M 19 S Public Wks
12 31 85 F 33 I Knee Fire
2 1 86 M S
2 1 86 M 36 S Public Wks
2 13 86 M 25 S Gen. Govt
2 1 86 ? S
4 13 86 M S
4 2 86 M D No C(aim
5 22 86 M 13 S Public Wks
6 1 86 M 14 D No Claim Water/San
6 28 86 ? S
6 20 86 M S
6 13 86 F 19 I Back Fire
Monthly Workers'
Pension Comp•
$182.23 $0
$2,370.10 $0
$635.47 $0
$212.12 $0
$3,147.00 $0
$34.39 $0
$2,341.70 $0
$1,545.73 $0
$404.95 $0
$1,094.72 $0
$2,888.60 $0
$964.67 $0
$3,219.15 $79,012
$448.72 $0
$2,140.58 $0
$1,514.83 $0
$506.84 $0
$697.05 $0
$175.11 $0
$536.17 $0
$691.03 $0
$21.97 $0
$3.42 $0
$1,794.37 $42,237
�}
��� i �
�, ?
r
,
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD RETIREMENTS
Sex Birthdate
M 01/15/51
F 07/17/32
M 02/11/36
M 10/20/45
M 12/02/45
Retirement
Date
7 18 94
10 1 94
9 1 94
9 1 94
9 1 94
Years Ret.
Unit Seroice Ty�e Disabili
2 22 I Heart
1 21 S
2 23 I Back
2 27 I Back
2 25 D
Dept•
Police
Police
Fire
Fire
Fire
�, .
;�
,'r' •
�
Monthly Workers' ,, ;
Pension Comp•
$2,913.75 $2,457
$2.279.23 $0
$2,492.51 $28,178
$2,376.27 $100,112
$2,137.65 $0
m
.a..J--�-'J -0
i
B A K E R S F I E L D
Economic and Community Development Department
M E M O R A N D U M
October 14, 1994
-_ _,
TO: Jak�ge , Eco omic evelopment Director
FROM: Maurice Randall, Busine s Manager
SUBJECT: Revenue Sources Obtained by this Department
� .. _ -
!
1 ; „v � j � �Q.`.�l=F
} ''
,,
i „
� C��� �,; :''�`.'.. . . .
As you know over the past year this department has obtained grants, reimbursements,
and other revenue sources for the City of Bakersfield. However, based on our current
budget practices with respect to revenues within the general fund that effort is not
noted.
Some examples of grants or other revenue sources obtained by staff is as follows:
1) $ 3, 500 grant
2) $2,500 grant
3)
4)
$90,000 grant
$13,125 yrant
(General Fund) from Walmart to fund a marketing plan at
the Bakersfield Municipal Airpark.
(General Fund) from Pacific, Gas and Electric to fund the
Mayor's Employer/Retention Survey.
(CDBG Fund) for improvements at the Homeless Center.
(CDBG Fund) for transportation and supervision of the
VISTA program.
5) 52500 (General Fund) from Cal State Bakersfield for staff time in
partial reimbursement support of roll in the 1993 Basic Economic Development
Course.
6) 5845 reimbursement (General Fund) from Klein Wegis for payment of filing fees
for the Tree Foundation.
,
.. `�
.� ,
.. _.�-, �-; .
Page 2
7) 52,438 (CDBG Fund) from the County of Kern due to the
dissolution of the joint Fair Housing Program. (The City
also received a laser jet printer valued at S1400).
8) 53,500 (General Fund) from Wal-Mart to implement marketing plan
for Bakersfield Business Port.
9) 5525 reimbursement (General Fund) from CAEZ for an intern and materials for
production of newsletter.
Total: S 1 19,005
Since many of these items are funded out of the General Fund and the revenue or
reimbursement is put back in the General Fund there is no way for the City to
recognize this department's efforts with regard to its ability to obtain revenue to fund
a portion of our operations.
Im:MR5/edcdfund.mem
= �)1111ir�.�
�
�
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
�,, 4
.
,�-
MEMORANDUM
October 4, 1994
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CI'I
JACK HARDISTY, PLANIVING D
GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 4-94
Applications for General Plan Amendment C�cle 4-94 have been filed and are now under review
for completeness. These projects will be considered by the Planning Commission on December
15, 1994.
SEGMENT I: Martin-McIntosh for Castle & Cooke: From service industrial site to multi-family
residential on 309 ± acres adjacent to Silvercreek and Campus Park between Pacheco Road.,
Panama Lane, Gosford Road and Progress Road.
SEGMENT II: Milazzo and Associates: From multi-family residential to general commercial on
15.43 ± acres at the northwest corner of Stine Road and Panama Lane.
SEGMENT III: Martin-McIntosh for Castle & Cooke: Request to reduce residential lot sizes
from 18,000 square feet to 12,500 square feet on 58 acres, northeast corner of Brimhali Road
and Old Farm Road.
SEGMENT IV: Martin-McIntos6 for Castle & Cooke: A request from Estate Residential and
Open Space to Low Densiry Residential on 167 acres west of Calloway Drive, south of Kern
River Freeway alignment, adjacent to the Kern River.
SEGMENT V: City of Bakersfield: Rescinding the Downtown Redevelopment Element and
deleting several land use designations specific only to downtown and replacing them with a single
designation MUC. This idea will enable a wider variery of uses without having to go through
GPA's or zone changes. Project covers 405 acres.
5EGMENT VI: City of Bakersfield: Changing 16.4 acres from HMR to LI between Casa Loma
Drive and Watts Avenue. Subject project relocation.
SEGMENT VII: City of Bakersfield: Rescind the Baker Street Corridor Specific Plan. Deleting
a specific plan whose programs have all been completed rendering the document obsolete.
Development standards are more restrictive than the remainder of city.
SEGMENT VIII: City of Bakersfield: Morning Drive Specific Plan Line, determining the exact
alignment between Panorama Drive and Alfred Harrell Highway. (Approx. 2-1/4 miles)
MG:pjt
cc: Alan Tandy, City Manager
�-z � : - =�
!�
� __ ,
�: '�
j�,, �; �^ � < < ( �3 �99£� :i
�; �
�� i'_: _ _ - ,`
- - , . - -���
�=_ _ . .-- - .,
:,
�
^�::; ���::�,
CITY ATTORNEI'
JUDY K.SKOUSEN
ASSISTANT CITt' :�TTORNEYS
ROBERT M.SHERFY
ALAN D. DANIEL
JOtiN D. CLOSS
LAURA C MARINO
A1;LEN M. SHAW
Mr.
Mesa
1100
Marioni�ollins
'' d:� :-., :�
� �i; . ,
,���`/r ' �
("" '�.';le� :`' t
�'r'.` ,l,;�
t:: /
�Vti�.... . �~'��
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
OFFICE OF THE C(TY' ATTOR:YEY
I501 TRUXTUN AVENUE
BAIkERSFIELD. CA 93301
October 14, 1994
M��in Raceway
QiKern Canyon Road
rsfield, California 93306
Re: Concert Permits
Dear Mr. Collins:
DEPUTY CITY ATTORtiEYS
WALTER H. PORR, lR.
MICHAEL G. ALLPORD
JANICE SCANLAN
ADb11NISTRATOR
FRANCES E. THOMPSON
TELEPHONE: 805-326-3 72 I
FACSIM(LE: 805-3?S-9 ! 62
Thank you for taking the time to talk with me on the
telephone last week. This letter is to confirm our telephone
discussion and document the understanding we reached. You
advised me that you were recently misinformed in regard to the
need for permits for holding concerts at Mesa Marin. You
indicated that although you had been told by Jim Eggert that you
were required to have a new permit prior to holding any concerts
at your Mesa Marin facility, when you attempted to pick izp the
application for such new permit, someone at the desk mistakenly
advised you that you did not need the permit. For that reason
you failed to obtain the proper permit prior to holding a concert
at the Mesa Marin facility.
You informed me that you now understood that you were, in
fact, required to apply for and obtain a Conditional Use Permit
prior to conducting any concerts at your Mesa Marin facility and
further that you were presently in the process of applying for
and working to obtain the necessary concert permits as well as
workirig with Jack Hardesty, Planning Director, to come into
compliance with your current Conditional Use Permit for raeing
operations.
Please understand that you will need to continue to work
with Mr. Hardesty and that the hearing on your current
Conditional Use Permit remains scheduled for December 14, 1994.
I hope you will be able to resolve those issues priar to that
date. If there is anything I can do to assist you in bringing
your facility into compliance before that date, please do not
hesitate to telephone. ' ___
G%� ,� � ' '4�' `° ='�
,�..�C� � ��,�-,
�_s _ _ �..__��� -- '.
� .. � ; I 7 1994 ��
s�
�c�r' ��������°� ���
,
�
;._ _ :`-` �:
Mr. Marion Collins
RE: Concert Permits
October 14, 1994
Page.Two
Thank you for your courtesy and cooperation in this regard,
should you have any questions, or if we may be of any additional
assistance to you, please do riot hesitate to contact me.
Very truly yours,
d ,
V`-" - `� �—____ �--.,..
UDY SKOU EN,
ITY ATTO EY,
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
JKS:ks
cc: lack Hardesty /
Alan Tandy
Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers
�7cs\corr:\mesa.itr
�—�; -�-= .�
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
October 14, 1994
ALAN TANDY, CITY MANA�F,R
JACK HARDISTY, PLANNING DIRECT R
CIT'Y COUNCIL REF. 14031
At the October 12, 1994, Council meeting Councilwoman Brunni asked for a written statement
on the conversation between city staff and Marion Collins about his last concert. Jim Eggert's
statement is attached.
JH:pjt
Attachment
m�mat10.14
� t ,� ;,__ ;�,,;, _�: -��.�m.'it
�i L!� ;::�,i= \� ... '
� �+
_ '"-=-° - -- . .
� ��
� :;�; , 7 l9Q4 ; �
�-- --- - , ., �
�/J /�, ('' ��
.,
11 �VLU�4�.;���,.� I11; C _- a�
�-�-" _ �
MEMORANDUM
October 13, 1994
TO: Jack Hardisty, Planning Director
FROM: Jun Eggert, Principal Plan
SUBJECT: Conversation with Marion �ollins regarding the last concert held at
Mesa Marin in conjunction with a race.
Mr. Collins called me appro�rimately three weeks before his last concert and wanted
to know if he could hold a concert in conjunction with a racing event. He had indicated
that he was going to have a band play at the conclusion of the race for about 45 minutes
sunilar to when they do barbecues or fireworks shows as part of a racing event. He stated
that there would not be separate sales of tickets for the concert or additionaI seating
provided in the infield. I was not informed of who was going to perform.
I stated that the conditional use permit reiating to concerts had eacpired; however,
it was noted that the permit did not address instances where an event would be incidental
to the race where it was held either after or in-between races. The CUP only looked at
separate events not part of a race. I directed hun to the Business License department
regarding an outdoor festival permit since it seemed that was an option available for anyone
wanting to hold an outdoor concert and did not hear from him again on this issue. I found
out about a week prior to the concert that the Business License departrnent determined a
permit was not required since the concert was less than four hours in duration and there
was fixed seating.
TO:
�i�
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
October 17, 1994
Alan Tandy, City Manager
Jack Hardisty, Planning
Ordinance regarding change�•fo the senior citizen zoning in Kern City
The Kern City Homeowners Association submitted a letter to the City Council at
their meeting held June 15, 1994, regarding their desire to amend the senior citizen (SC)
zoning that applies to most of the Kern City area. The item was referred to the Planning
Commission who formed a Zoning Ordinance Committee to examine the proposed changes
and to forward a recommendation back to the Council.
After three meetings with the Zoning Ordinance Committee which included one
meeting at Kern City to hear resident's concerns, the Committee found that many of the
residents were not familiar with the changes being proposed by their homeowners
association and therefore, suggested that the association board first gain a general consensus
from the residents and then bring back a unified proposal to the Planning Commission. At
that time, ihe Planning Commission would reconvene the Zoning Committee and have
them, including the City Attorney, meet with the homeowners association board before
formally bringing a proposal before the full Commission and City Council to ensure any
changes comply with state and federal laws concerning senior citizens.
A copy of the minutes of the Zoning Ordinance Committee are attached for your
information.
�j v��� r�;��
� i�
41 �'� OCi I 9 IRq4
�; ��
+, ��-�_- : -. _ - -
,
I,
������ ��F��.��f��� =�
��._ -,..-- - =
MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING
ZONING ORDINANCE COMMITTEE
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
Held Thursday, August 18, 1994, 12:00 p.m., Development Services Building, 1715
Chester Avenue, Bakersfield, California.
1. ROLL CALL
COMMISSIONERS: Present: KEN HERSH, Chairperson
JIl1ri MARINO
MATHEW BRADY
STAFF: Present: JACK HARDISTY, Planning
Director
LAURA MARINO, Assistant
City Attorney
JIM EGGERT, Principal Planner
The meeting was called to order at 12:16 p.m.
2. ADOPTION OF RULES OF ORDER AND SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS
Mr. Hardisty informed the committee members that they need to set a regular
meeting schedule and conduct a workshop at Kern City for residents to attend.
Commissioner Marino moved and Commissioner Brady seconded to meet every
second and fourth Wednesday at 12:00 p.m. in the second floor conference room
of the Development Services Building until they referred a recommendation to
the full commission concerning the issue before them. The motion also included
adoption of Robert's Rules of Order for the meetings. The motion carried by a
unanimous vote. ;;
After further consideration of the meeting schedule due to conflicts with other
meetings, Commissioner Marino moved and it was seconded by Commissioner
Brady to amend the schedule and meet on August 31, 1994, September 21, 1994
and October �, 1994 and then every first Wednesday thereafter, same time and
place.. The motion carried by a unanimous vote.
3. PUBLIC STATEMENTS
Mr. Joe Bybee identified himself as a representative of the Kern City
Homeowner's Association. He stated he would help City staff with coordinating
meetings at Kern City.
Minutes, Zoning Ordinance Committee, 8/18/94
4. NEW BUSINESS - REFERRAL BY COUNCIL OF SENIOR CITTZEN
ZONING ISSUE -
Pag,e 2
Mr. Hardisty briefed the committee on the issue brought before the City Council
regarding age restrictions and residency at Kern City.
The committee discussed the differences of the City's Senior Citizen (SC) zone
and the conditions, covenants and restrictions (C.C:&R.'s) recorded for tracts in
Kern City. It was noted that C.C.&R.'s are different for each tract or non-
existent in some cases. It was thought that many of the C.C.&R.'s will or have
also expired.
Ms. Marino explained that the city's ordinance is not enforced due to the
difficulty in confirming actual residents verses visitors which would result in much
paperwork due to having proper docamentation. Concern was also noted
�regarding privacy laws. The homeowner's association was encouraged to pursue
changes to the C.C.&R.'s so that they were consistent throughout Kern City and
residents would then enforce through the association.
Commissioner Brady requested a selection of typical C.C.&R.'s from Kern City.
Mr. Hardisty stated that a workshop should be held in Kem City to. help define
the issues and get input from residents. Notice of this meering would be noted in
the Kern City newsletter through Mr. Bybee in addition to normal procedure.
Commissioner Marino moved with second by Commissioner Brady to adopt Mr.
Hardisty's workshop idea to be held at the August 31, 1994 meeting. This -
meeting would also be held at the Kern City Community Center at 4:00 p.m., with.
staff to coordinate making arrangements for use of the center. The motion
passed by a unanimous vote.
5. A.DJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 12:48 p.m.
mn8.18
Planning Director
6
MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING
ZONING ORDINANCE COMMITTEE
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
Held Thursday, August 22, 1994, 12:00 p.m., Development Services Building, 1715
Chester Avenue, Bakersfield, California.
1. ROLL CALL
COMMISSIONERS:
STAFF:
Present: KEN HERSH, Chairperson
JIM MARINO
�IATHEW BRADY
Present: JIM EC'iGERT, Principal Planner
The meeting was called to order by Ghairman Hersh at 12:15 p.m.
�
3.
�.
PUBLIC STATEMENTS
There were no public statements.
NEW BUSINESS - RESCHEDULING OF MEETING AT KERN CITY
Mr. Eggert informed the committee members that the special meeting was called
in order to change the August 31, 1994 workshop to be held at Kern City. Mr.
Joe Bybee, who had been assisting staff with coordinating this workshop, informed
staff ihat the town hall building wouid not be avaiiable for the scheduled date and
asked if it could be changed.
Mr. Eggert provided the committee members alternative dates of when the town
hall would be available from Mr. Bybee. Mr. Brady moved�and it was seconded
by Mr. Marino to reschedule the workshop from August 31, 1994 to August 29,.
1994, at 4:00 p.m. at the Kern City Town Hall located at 1003 Pebble Beach
Drive.
ADJOURNIVIENT
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 12:18 p.m.
mn8.22.
.
MINUTES �
ZONING ORDINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
Held Thursday, August 29, 1994, Kern City Town Hall (1003 Pebble Beach Drive),
Bakersfield, California.
l. ROLL CALL
COMMISSIONERS:
STAFF:
Present:
Present:
KEN HERSH, Chairperson
JIM MARINO
MATHEW BRADY (Arrived at
4:43 p.m.)
LAURA MARINO, Assistant
City Attorney
JIM EGGERT, Principal Planner
Chairman Hersh called the meeting to order at 4:05 p.m. He briefly explained
that the purpose of the meeting was to collect. information/opinion from residents
in the Kern City area regarding changes to the SC (Senior Citizen) zone district
proposed by the Kern City Homeowner's Association. The homeowner's
association had sent a letter to the City Council requesting changes be made to
the ordinance regarding the length of stay of house guests.
Chairman Hersh opened discussion to the residents. There was some initiaI
confusion that the meeting was to discuss the status of the Kem County
Superintendent of Schools building. Staff clarified that this was not part of the
discussion. Questions/comments continued, with the following issues identified:
Is change necessary or should existing rules be better enforced?
GC.&R.'s of some areas of Kern City are more restrictive than the
city. Should C.C.&R.'s be amended to be consistent throughout all
tracts in Kem City and let association and residents enforce instead
of rely on the City?
City has had no complaints of violations to existing ordinance since
the SC zone became effective; therefore, what pxompted the
homeowner's association to request a change to the ordinance?
Minutes, Zoning Ordinance Committee, 8/29/94
a e2
The existing house guest provisions were originally proposed by
Kern City representatives so that a non-senior citizen could house-
sit in the event the resident took an extended leave. The proposed
amendment could eluninate this option, plus it may adversely affect
visits by resident's children, situations where care is needed (i.e., -
disability, etc.) to a non-senior citizen, or other such circumstances
where a non-senior citizen must stay at the residence for an
extended period of tune.
Chauman Hersh noted that based on the comments heard, residents may need to
become better informed of what was being proposed. Therefore, it was suggested
that the Kern City Homeowner's Association propose their changes to the
residents and gain a general consensus from them, then bring back the fi.nal to the
committee. At that ti.me the committee and City Attorney's Office may wish to
meet with the association board before formally bringing a proposal before the
full commission to ensure any changes comply with State and Federal laws.
2. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 5:10 p.m.
mn8.29
� � /' /
// i '
_�- . ,,. . �
/ � .�� �: � - .
, <:„�.���:,� -- ---
._� s ,�.r : � ..
.a.'ti17 � �:
� '%�"K'p' . . , .
I
MEETING OF: 06/15/94
CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL
REFERRED T0: PLANNING COMM J HARDISTY
. � � �' ��'.� '� �
�
�
JUN 2 � 19�94-
CiTY OF BAKERSFIBI.D
�'tA�N��1G DEPARTMENT
ITEM: RECORG# ?3471
Ordi nance amendi ng Ct�,apter 1 7. 51 of the
Bakersfield MuniciNal Code relating ta senior
citizen zoning.
ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL:
f�OTION TO P,EFEP, TC �! ANr�_��G COMMISSION. APPRO.VED ✓
AA. ROWLES RE�UESiEG S��FF ORGANIZE A PUSLIC
INF{JRMAL MEETiNG �=?L'� �0 THE FULL RLANNING
COMMISSION HEARING. INGL!�DE HIM IN THE INFORMAL
MEETING AND PR�JVIC,E !�IM ',�IITH ANY FOLLOW-UP
CORRESPONDENCE.
BACKUP MP.TERIAL ATTACNED: ''E�
DATE FGR�IARDED BY CITY C�ERK : G6 %�?; 94
"�OTE: STATUS L'-i.4�JGE� .y��� -C� 8E ENTERED FOR EAGN REFERRAL
AT �.EAST ONCE A M�R?-� _',/�^� �� NO ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN!
=Y ..
-- °;;W �,�~'���,�
,
•;. �
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
October 17, 1994
Alan Tandy, City Manager
Jack Hardisty, Planning Director '
Bear Mountain Cogeneration facility
Transmittal of Site Assessment Report (methane migration)
At fhe City Council meeting of August 8, 1994, when the Bear Mountain
Cogeneration facility was approved, Councilman Rowles requested that staff forward hun
a copy of the site assessment study of which included reference to migration of inethane gas
from the old China Grade landfill site. This referral was originally sent to the Public Works
Department.
I recently received a corrected referral requesting that document from . our
department and am forwarding you the copy of the site assessment study that was submitted
as part of the conditional use application for the cogeneration facility. The report does not
mention specifically methane migration occurring on the cogen site. Mary Jane Wilson of
W.Z.I. Inc. had stated that if inethane had been found, it would have been mentioned in
the study. However, as part of their research, they did reference the documents relied upon
as indicated on page 14 (Water Quality Solid Waste Assessment Test (SWAT), China Grade
Landfill) that included studies on methane migration. This report available to the public
from Kern County.
cc: Councilman Randy Rowles
_ _ _ . _. L
__ . __�._�--,
I.. � .... . q _.
'I� _ ��_ J,
�i�. L �
,�
` OCT 1 91994
�
� � ,
�. _;, . , � : .: �
u_�_._ . . . __�_�
r . . . ' ' '�I'2"r: . -..
. �.,
CITY COUN�IL REFERRA� ''�
EETING 0�: U�/10/94
EFERRED T0: �UBLIC WORKS R RQJAS
TEM: REvOpJ� 1372�
R2SO�iution u�holding the Board of Zor.ing
AdJ��tment decision approving a C�nditioral Use
Perrr��� to construct a 48 megawatt natural gas �
fire:� cogeneration facility on a 10.67- acre
DOrt��n of a 78.45 acre parce' located at 7001
Cam��� Grande Dr.ive, approximately cne mile
sou-.-east of the intersection of Alfred Harre'1
H i gr�.,3y. and Fai rf ax Road , i n Northeast
Ba4,e-sfield. (CUP No. 5548)
ACTION TAk:EN �� COUNCI L:
MOT:',�; ip ADOFT RESOLUTIt�N UPHCLDING THE BZA
C�EC:;:ON APRROVING THE PROJECT. APPROVED. NS:
Ps• �.3S: CB. ***ROWLES REQUESiED PROVIDE HIM
Wi�r �. COPY OF THE MIGP,ATING METHANE REPORT.***
BACKUP MATER::_ ATTACHED: N0
DATE FGRWARG:"_ BY CITY CLEP,K: 08/15/94
�s�
; ,..��:;
. ��=y�,; ;
' `, :��,:.._ �
t:s�
� � � . r.,�:.:
�
,�+��",��, -. #<.
r ��,
�� ;.
• .�, tt� *>d1: '
�s.
. . ' . .�� ^. -�.
��'�E ;. �
;, �
�' CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL � �
MEETING OF: 08/1Q/94
�� ,
������
REFERRED TO: PLANNING DEPT J HARDISTY � �
OCi 5 1994
I T EM : R ECOR D# 1 3 7 2 3 CtTY OF BAKEFiSF1ELD
Resolution upholding �he aoard of Zonin�ANNtNGOEPARTMENT
Adjustment decision approving a Conditional Use
°ermit to construct a 48 megawatt natural gas
fired cogenerat;on faciii�y on a 10.67 acre
partion af a 78.4� ��cr� parce� located at 7001
Camino Grande �-�i�,�e, a�c�roximately one mi?e
southeast of thA ir,ters�ction of Alfred Harrell
�ighway ar,d Fairfax �oad, in Northeast
Bakersf i e i d . ( �:,UP `Jc . � �48 )
A�T?0�.+ TAK�N B�f COUNCIL:
��10TIGN TO ADOP? RE�rL��.!Ti�JN UPHOLDING THE BZA
��CISZON APPROVI�lG �HE PRQJECT. APPROVED. NS:
°S. ABS: ��8. =��.�R{�!^IL_S REGrUESTED PROVIDE HIM
tAIITH A CQPY �F i HE "�!IGRATING METFiANE REPORT. **�K
8.4CKUP MATERI;�L ATTACHEC: �.G
DA � E �nF4JARDE� HY ��IT`( .,�=a^.. ':iu,%1 5!94
d
�
�'
��-�------s::,
APPENDIX XIII-1
SITE ASSESSMENT
V1/�I I N �
�
, ,_ ��;
WZI INC.
16010071.008
Bakersfield
4700 Stockdale Highway, Suite 120
Post Office Box 9217
Bakersfield, California 93389
805/326-1112 805/326-0191. FAX
Fresno
470 East Herndon Ayenue, Suite 203
Fresno, California 93720
209/261-9160
209/261-9171 FAX
BEAR MOUNTAIN LIMITED
COGENERATION PROJECT
PHASE I/PHASE II
SITE ASSESSMENT
Bakersfield, California
December, 1993
Prepared for:
Bear Mountain Limited
2500 CityWest Boulevard, Suite 150
Houston, Texas 77042
Prepared by:
WZI Inc.
47Q0 Stockdale Highway, Suite 120
..,.,�=°�::.. _
�,a��ce`r.sf�:�d;;,California 93309
�� ..
, . �, ���- y �-r� . : �
�.. .`� �s a �
:�: � �. � ��
,,a,�,r '�.� � : — � � �
� ��' �0. I224 . ��� �,�.. �, �..`
�_.
Stephen G. Muir
`,L�`� lY .
;, e� �.,,.. Certified Engmeenng Geologist
�,� �', °�-� � State of California No. 1224
���`��'° ,_ � Expiration Date: 06/30/94
and
Registered Geophysicist
°"" State of California No. 945
E� G�
R� '°�G�r, Expiration Date: 06/30/94
=_�� j 1 �
-�`=�� � _
�:.,,3�� E
43�0 ,`' � Laur M. B eley
i - `� •-p Registered Geologist
,.��:_ ��;'� State of California No. 4340
� G��.'��'-�': � � Expiration Date: 06/30/94
� . _ . __i
�
IV.
TABLE Of CONTENTS
Introduction
Summary and Conclusions
Phase 1 Site Assessment
Site Ownership and Location
Site History/Aerial Photograph Review
Current Site Description
Regulatory Compliance
Geology/Hydrology
Phase II Site Assessment
Electromagnetic Survey
Exploratory Trenches
Soil Sample Analysis
V. References
\IVZI I N C
Paae
1
3
4
4
4
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
14
,
.� ` •
�
Exhibit 1
Exhibit 2
Exhibit 3
Exhibit 4
Exhibit 5
Exhibit 6
Exhibit 7
E�chibit 8
Exhibit 9
Table 1
Table 2
EXHIBITS
Location Map - Oxy USA Zimmer-McGregor Fee
Site Location Map - Proposed Bear Mountain Limited Parcei
Topographic Map
Previously Disturbed Area Map
Ground Water Elevation Map
Ground Water Surtace Contour Map, China Grade Landfill
Ground Water Quality Map
Electromagnetic Anomaly Map
Trench Locations
Trench Summary
Analytical Summary
TABLES
APPENDICES
Appendix I Environmental Records
Appendix II Exploratory Trench Logs
Appendix III Laboratory Analyses
�Z� irvc
�
; ,. .
I. INTRODUCTION
'��LI INC
WZI Inc. (WZI) has conducted a Phase I/Phase II environmental site assessment for Bear
Mountain Limited on an approximate 10.67 acre parcel within the apProximate eighty (80)
acre parcel which constitutes the Oxy USA Zimmer-McGregor Fee property located in the
northern half of the southwest corner of Section 12, Township 29 South, Range 28 East,
M.D. B. & M., Kern County, California (Exhibits 1 and 2). The eighty acre parcel is
identified by Kern County Assessor's Block and Lot Number 436-0620-11.
The purpose of this study was to identify obvious potential environmental related liabilities
that may be evident on or immediatety adjacent to the Project Construction Boundary and
the Construction Laydown Area (Exhibit 3). The Phase I Site Assessment addressed
surface features observed during field investigation, an aerial photograph review, and an
analysis of the environmental records search. The Phase II investigation focused on the
Project Construction Boundary with only a cursory investigation of the Construction
Laydown Area. An electromagnetic survey and exploratory trenches were used to
investigate potential subsurface environmental related liabilities in the Project Construction
Boundary within the limits of the tools, techniques, and time constraints involved. An
analysis of geologic hazards and ground water sampling were beyond the scope of this
investigation. A full regulatory audit of all permits and practices regarding the property
and conditions regarding the adjacent properties was not conducted and was beyond
the scope of the project.
This report is prepared for the sole use and benefit of Bear Mountain Limited and is
based, in part, upon documents, writings, and information owned and possessed by Bear
Mountain Limited. Neither this report, nor any of the information contained herein shall
be used or relied upon for any purpose by any person or entity other than Bear Mountain
Limited.
In this examination, WZI has assumed the legal capacity of all legal persons, the
genuineness of all signatures, the authenticity of all documents submitted to WZI as
originals, the conforming to original documents of all documents submitted to WZI as
16010070.071 Page 1
�
��LI INC
certified, photostatic copies, or telecopies, and the authenticity of ali the originals. in
examination of documents, WZI has assumed that al! parties had the power,
governmental or otherwise, to enter into and perform all obligations under such
documents, has further assumed the due authorization by all� requisite action,
governmental or otherwise, of the execution and delivery by all parties of such
documents, and have further assumed the validity and binding effect of such documents
against all parties in accordance with the terms thereof. As to any facts material to the
opinions expressed herein which were not independently established or verified by WZI,
oral or written statements and representations of Bear Mountain Limited and its officers,
agents or representatives were relied upon. Unless otherwise stated, WZI has not made
independent investigation or inquiry into the accuracy or completeness of the documents
and information supplied to them by any governmental agency or information supplied
to them at the request of Bear Mountain Limited.
The members of WZI are State of California Registered Environmental Assessors,
Registered Engineers and Registered Geologists. WZI expresses no opinions as to
disciplines, subject and practice areas outside those specifically enumerated in the first
sentence of this paragraph. Further, WZI expresses no opinion herein as to matters of
California law or federal.law, including California oil and gas law and those governing the
transfer of real property.
16010070.071
Page 2
.
a
�Z� iNc
II. SUMMARY AND CO.NCLUSIONS
Based on the Phase I/Phase II investigation of the Project Construction Boundary and the
Construction Laydown Area identified by Bear Mountain Limited, the foilowing conclusions
are set forth.
• Low level hydrocarbon contamination is present in the eastern
portion of the area identified as the Project Construction Boundary.
• Trenching of geophysical anomalies icientified some buried metal
objects and buried pipelines.
• Potentia! sources of ground water contamination include naturally
occurring crude oil, China Grade Landfill, and surrounding oil field
activity such as sumps and tanks containing crude oil and produced
water. Ground water sampling was outside the scope of this project.
• Depth to ground water is approximately 500 feet below ground
surface.
• Naturally occurring crude oil is present in the Kern River Formation,
the ground water aquifer in this area.
• Surficial trash is abundant.
• According to California Division of Oii and Gas records, the Oxy USA
Zimmer-McGregor Fee Well No. 6, located in the Construction
Laydown Area, was abandoned properly in October, 1992.
• Typical oil field activity is present on the surrounding properties.
16010070.071
Page 3
�
�
WZ� �rvc
� ill. PHASE I SITE ASSESSMENT
Site Ownership and Location
The approximate 10.67 acre site, consisting of the Project Construction Boundary and the
Construction Laydown Area, is located within parcel 436-0620-11, an apprvximate eighty
(80) acre parcel (Exhibit 2). The mineral rights are owned by Oxy USA and Bear
Mountain Limited owns the surface rights as of December 17, 1993.
Regionally, the site is located in the northeast area of the City of Bakersfield within the
Kern Bluff Oil Field and is directly south of the inactive Kern County sanitary landfill
referred to as China Grade Landfill.
Peter Zimmer obtained the surface and mineral ownership of the parcel in a patent from
the United States of America recorded July 6, 1914. The properry was deeded to Robert
MacGregor from Peter and Margaret Zimmer on July 19, 1926. Shell Oil Company of
California obtained the property March 29, 1930. A deed was recorded November 5,
1975 transferring the property from Shell Oil Company to Crestmont Oil and Gas which
was later acquired by Oxy USA. A name change from Cities Service to Oxy USA was
recorded April 24, 1988.
Site History/Aerial Photograph Review
A search of title records, California Division of Oil and Gas (CDOG) records, and review
of historical aerial photographs were utilized to establish the historical use of the property.
Aerial photographs from August 1937, July 1957, May 1975, May 1981, and June 1989
were utilized to determine historical site usage of the eighty (80) acre parcel. Aerial
photographs for the time period between 1957 and 1975 are not available. The aerial
photographs which were inspected spanned a time period before, during, and after oil
field operations were initiated and abandoned on the property.
1937 The property is undeveloped except for:
16010070.071
Page 4
�
�
rrLl INC
• One north-south unpaved road which goes through the
middle of the property.
• Power lines and associated roads at the east edge of the
properiy.
1957 Oil field development is present:
• Four oil wells are present to the south and east of the
Construction Laydown Area and one oil well is located
in the northern half of the Construction Laydown Area.
• Typical surface improvements associated with an
operating oil field are present south and east of the
Project Construction Boundary and the Construction
Laydown Area. �
� The north-south road through the middle of the
property is no longer visible.
• Roads servicing power lines in the 1937 photo are no
longer visible. One road, located east of the previous
roads, services the power lines.
• A new road (northwest-southeast trending) from the
middle north edge of the property is visible
1975 Oil field development:
16010070.071
• The five oil wells present in the 1957 photograph are
still visible.
• Typical oil field improvements remain visible.
• Roads are in similar locations.
• The northwest corner of the Project Construction Boundary
shows disturbances due to a suspected gravel quarry.
• Various surface disturbances to the south of the
Project Construction Boundary appear to be
Page 5
motorcycle trails and areas where soil was disturbed.
• China Grade Landfill north of the parcel shows
extensive disturbance.
WZI INC
1981 A radio transmission tower is located south of the Project Construction
Boundary.
• Oil field surface activities show little change since 1975.
1989 No significant changes in appearance.
Current Site Description
The approximate 10.67 acre parcel was inspected November 13 and 15, 1993. The area
identified as the Project Construction Boundary on Exhibit 3 was inspected in detail for
indications of surface contamination. The northwest portion of the parcel had been
excavated at one time. It is speculated the area was a gravel quarry. Portions of this
area are covered with a layer of gravel.
Surficial trash is abundant on the Project Construction Boundary including scrap metal,
cans, plastic, mattresses, sofas, carpet, refrigerators, household trash, scattered paper
debris, broken concrete, and tree trimmings.
�
Non-native grassland covers most of the site, except the area in the northwest corner
which has been excavated. The property slopes to the northeast from the southwest
corner to in the northeast corner as shown on Exhibit 3.
A surface map of the Project Construction Boundary delineating the areas which have
been previously disturbed by sand and gravel mining and oilfield activity is shown in
Exhibit 4. Areas within these activity boundaries have been previously excavated for
roads, pipelines, water disposal holding areas, sand and gravel removal, etc.
Requlatory Compliance
16010070.071 Page 6
�
WZ� irvc
Environmentai Data Resources, Inc. conducted a computerized search to identify sites
with potential or existing environmental liabilities within one mile of the site. The report
is included in Appendix I. Federal and state data bases are researched. Within a one
mile radius of the site, no sites of concern were identified in the search.
China Grade Landfill operated by Kern County is located approximately 500 feet north of
the Project Construction Boundary. The landfill is inactive and Kern County Waste
Management is in the process of developing a closure plan. According to Kern County
Waste Management Department, closure may begin by 1996.
An abandoned oil well, Zimmer-McGregor Fee No. 6, is located east of the Project
Construction Boundary in the Construction Laydown Area. The California Division of Oil
and Gas (CDOG) records were reviewed to determine if the abandonment is in
accordance with regulatory requirements.
The oil well Zimmer-McGregor Fee No. 6 was abandoned on September 29, 1992. The
abandonment was apparently done in accordance with CDOG regulations because the
CDOG approved the abandonment on November 4, 1992 with the comment "...we have
determined that all of the requirements of this Division have been fulfilled."
One of the CDOG requirements is that all casings must be removed from at least 5 feet
below ground level and a plate welded on top. The abandonment history dated October
19, 1992 does not make mention of cutting and removing the casing or welding a pfate,
but in view of the CDOG approval referred to above, it �is reasonable to assume that this
was performed but not documented. The only way to be certain is to excavate the area
to view the casing below ground surface. No evidence of the well is apparent on the
surface at this time. All other requirements for abandonment were documented and
reported in the abandonment history.
16010070.071 Page 7
�
�Z� �Nc
Geolo_gv/Hydroloqy
Undifferentiated Kern River and Chanac geologic units outcrop at the surface of the
proposed site. Plio-Pleistocene in age, the Kern River and Chanac consist primarily of
continental deposits of unconsolidated gravels, sands and clays (Corwin, 1950).
The properry is located within the Kern Bluff Oil Field. The structure of the Kern Bluff field
is a faulted homocline dipping about six degrees southwesterly. Oil is trapped updip by �
a network of normal faults and is produced from the Transition Zone and Santa Margarita
Formation at an average depth of 1000 feet below ground surface. The produced oil is
considered "heavy oil" at 14 API gravity.
Ground water occurs in unconfined, semiconfined, and confined aquifers beneath the
property in the Kern River Formation. Extrapolation of Kern County Water Agency (1992)
data of the unconfined ground water elevations indicate the ground water elevation at the
site is approximately 350 feet above sea level (Exhibit 5). This is consistent with
measurements in monitoring wells at China Grade Landfill approximately 500 feet
northwest of the site (Kaman, 1989). The ground water gradient at the landfill is to the
southwest (Exhibit 6). Surface elevations at the site average 850 feet above sea level,
therefore the depth to ground water is about 500 feet below the surface. Depth to ground
water in this region may fluctuate over time with varying precipitation and ground water
withdrawal.
Ground water quality is approximately 500 parts per million total dissolved solids
according to Kern County Water Agency data (1992) as shown on the map of water
quality (Exhibit 7). The Solid Waste Assessment Test (SWA� reported crude oil was
recovered from a monitoring well (CG2-01) located in the southwest corner of China
Grade Landfill (Kaman, 1989). The monitoring well is completed in the Kern River
Formation at depths of 505 to 521 feet. The recovered crude oil may be naturally
occurring. Oil is produced from the same zone in the adjacent Kern River Oil Field and
oil stained sands were reported in well histories of the wells drilled in the Kern Bluff Oil
Field. Oil stained sand was reported in the CDOG oil well drilling history of the Vedder-
16010070.071 Page 8
�
lNZI INC
Parkford US Lease #22 at a depth of 470 feet, equivalent to the Kern River Formation.
This weli is located approximately 500 feet east of the Zimmer-McGregor Fee in Section
12, T.29S, R.28E.
Ground water monitoring wells located within China Grade Landfill were sampled and
tested for aromatic volatile organic compounds, halogenated volatile organics, industrial
solvents, orgonochlorine pesticides, polychlorinate biphenyls, total organic carbon, and
metals. With the exception of total organic carbon and metals, the constituents tested
were not detected. Total organic carbon was detected in low concentrations. The
following metals were detected in the monitoring wells and in the background monitoring
well above the Maximum Contaminant Level specified for drinking water: cadmium, iron,
lead, manganese, mercury, selenium, and silver. Soil samples from depths of 50 to 130
feet in different landfill focations had concentrations of toluene of 19 to 51 Ng/kg (parts
per billion). Halogenated volatile organics wEre not detected.
Potential sources of ground water contamination, other than the landfill and naturally
occurring crude oil, include upgradient oil field operations.
IV. PHASE 11 SITE ASSESSMENT
A Phase II site assessment of the area designated as the Project Construction Boundary
(Exhibit 3) was conducted November 10 through November 17, 1993. At the request of
Bear Mountain Limited, the subsurface investigation was concentrated within the Project
Construction Boundary shown on Exhibit 3. An electromagnetic (EM) survey was
conducted to identify possible buried metal-containing material such as drums and
pipelines. The potential for buried matecial was a concern due to the proximity to China
Grade Landfill, evidence of previous excavation activity, proximity to oil field activity and
the abundance of surficial trash. An exploratory trenching program was developed based
on EM anomalies, historical aerial photograph review, and a surface site inspection.
16010070.071
Page 9
�
a
rrLl INC
ElectromaQnetic Survey
WZI conducted a ground electromagnetic (EM) survey of the Project Construction
Boundary area during November 10-13, 1993. The purpose of the survey was to
determine the presence and location of any buried metallic or conductive objects that
may be present in the shallow subsurface. A 10 x 10 foot grid of stations were laid out
using field survey tapes and a theodolite and electronic distance measurement
instrument. Values for this coordinate system increase northward and eastward. Select
points on the ground were identified with fluorescent spray paint and/or survey
monuments.
Ground conductivity was measured on the 10 foot grid with a Geonics Ltd. EM-31 DL
ground conductivity instrument. This instrument induces an electromagnetic current into
the ground which interacts with objects buried approximately 10 to 12 feet, such as
underground fuel storage tanks. The data were recorded in the �eld using an Omnidata
Polycorder which is an electronic notebook.
The conductivity phase is used to identify underground metallic objects as it is more
sensitive than the inphase component. These data were gridded and contoured using
Golden Software's Surfer program and plotted at a scale of 1 inch equals 50 feet.
Contour values represent ground conductivity (mho) units contoured at 0.5 mho units.
Exhibit 8 depicts the identi�ed efectromagnetic anomalies of significance. These
anomalies may represent buried objects of interest. Fourteen electromagnetic anomalies
were identified during the survey. Seven anomalies could be directly correlated with
surficial trash or metallic objects and therefore these anomalies were not investigated.
Anomalies not clearly associated with surface trash or metallic objects were investigated
by exploratory trenching.
Numerous other anomalies were mapped but not considered signifieant. These
anomalies are generally of low-amplitude and do not appear to represent significant
buried objects or were associated with known surface metallic or ferrous objects.
16010070.071
Page 10
WZ� irvc
Although the objects sought are buried metallic objects and usually detectable with the
type and configuration of the survey provided, the results of the survey are interpretative
and should be regarded as such. The data collected and instruments used were
operated within the normal conditions commonly accepted by the geophysical industry.
Exploratorv Trenches
Bear Mountain Limited requested investigation of the EM anomalies shown on Exhibit 8
that were not related to surface trash or metal objects. Prior to direct investigation
Underground Service Alert was contacted. Excavation was conducted November 13 and
17, 1993.
Eighteen exploratory trenches investigated the shallow subsurface within the Project
Construction Boundary from depths ranging from 3 to 20 feet deep. The locations and
numbers of the trenches are depicted on Exhibit 9. Individual trench logs are depicted
in Appendix II. A summary of results from each of the trenches is tabulated in Table 1.
An FMC excavator with a four yard bucket was utilized to dig exploratory trenches to a
depth of 20 feet. In addition, a John Deer backhoe was utilized to help backfill the
excavated trenches. The trenches were logged by WZI geologists using standard
exploratory trenching mapping procedures using 10 square grid field paper. No
personnel entered the trenches to map them. All observations were made from the edge
of the excavations.
The exploratory trenches were placed to investigate electromagnetic anomalies from the
geophysical survey, topographic lows that could be related to possible former sumps,
and areas of recent excavation that may have been landfill activity. Trenches 1, 2, 4, 5,
6, 7, 8 and 18 were placed to investigate topographic low features on the property.
These topographic lows were believed to be potential former sump areas where disposal
of produced water may have occurred. Analytical results in trenches 1, 2 and 6 indicate
the presence of oil and grease, totaf petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel, and toluene in
levels that are above background levels. None of these Values exceed California Leaking
16010070.071 Page 11
lJVZI � N C
Underground Fuel Tank (LUF� Manual guidelines for action levels. However, it is most
likely that there is wide spread occurrence of low grade hydrocarbon contamination
present on the eastern portion of the Project Construction Boundary.
Trenches 3, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16 all investigated EM anomalies mapped by the
geophysical survey. None of these excavated anomalies were identified as having
significant environmental concern. All causative bodies were related to surface,
subsurface metallic trash and/or lithology.
Trenches 9, 10, 11 and 17 investigated areas of surficial ground disturbance. There was
a concern that previous sand and gravel quarrying activities left areas where trash may
have been dumped and backfilled. None of these trenches encountered trash that posed
an environmental concern. �
n
Soil Sample Analysis
Soil samples were analyzed from three trenches, numbered 1, 2 and 6. Grab samples
were obtained from the upper brown silty sand layer described in the trench logs
(Appendix II). The soil samples selected for analysis were collected from trenches
located in an area of suspected produced water sumps, although the soil samples did
not appear to be stained or have an odor.
Samples were analyzed for the following:
Constituents
Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene,
total xylene
Total petroleum hydrocarbons-diesel
Oil and grease
Methodoloav
EPA Method 8020
Modif+ed EPA Method 8015
EPA Method 413.1
16010070.071 Page 12
�
> rrLl INC
The analyses were selected to determine if fractions of crude oil were present in the soil
as a result of surface activities. Aromatic hydrocarbons, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene,
and total xylene were not expected in high concentration due to the low gravity crude oil
� produced from this oil field. The total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel method detects
hydrocarbons with carbon numbers C11 to C28. The oil and grease method detects
organic components heavier than the diesel range of organics.
The sample analytical results are summarized in Table 2 and laboratory analyses are
included in Appendix III. Low levels of toluene (0.028 - 0.15 parts per million) were
detected as well as oil and grease (290 - 460 ppm). One sample contained 62 ppm
diesel range organics. These concentrations are not considered a threat to ground water
left in place following guidance in the LUFT Manual with a depth to ground water of 500
feet or greater.
16010070.071
Page 13
,
�
� .
WZ� irvc
V. REFERENCES
Kern County Water Agency, 1992, Water Supply Report 1991.
Kaman, 1989, Water Quality Solid Waste Assessment Test (SWA� China Grade Landfill.
Corvvin, C.H., 1950, Kern Bluff Oil Field: California Division of Oil and Gas, Summary of
Operations California Oilfields; V. 36, No. 1.
16010070.071
Page 14
I��
I •
I .
yc xy= : j T�RM "-' ii (p��� y:� :r x� , z� bT: 7,.. n ��.�1,y -x� K�: M. IS� ,����.� �i7 •--
' � c AESEAFCN =� � 1 ` I : 26 2S �Y
'
resur _ > Are. : 1 nob Hili )0 j L i
__- i ` .Q CEwiER'..� ._-- ,�, ' -i a R0. 5077 .. ''_': s ._-,__._ _ _ . —.- : '-111 ' ___ e�.
" �., � 1- ��' 8
JKk ■ Avf. '.`. >� C._ �'� 78 I3 JS`
'� : ■ '�Meme� s o�i \ _ ., �� Avenut . f 1;r:..� �o Nq as � �a/ �, r� y �� . .,�m H �
MaOera AMES C. � °� ,
� �' 1 : � _ MAGGERTY � � 3 : 7 r ' � f - � ir •. . . � �
� • F Y ' ... : � ^ • 5 ` ¢ RA. w Q 5039 ' ° NOR�M RERN GOIF COURSE 1 1 • ` . �o�er Su�un �' > ��S.�'.�'?E. .\ �
y-�-iNAFTER �� ' - - -- SHL534 �` -
� m o < '�+ Ave : AIHVORT � 'a .� S � 2 6 '--1 , "_-/ f ? 1 t/ -```. •C '\ .
Hia�wav ti Q ` v S. tC +�!, �.. � c�e ,' . s ■ouwD ..tr. � P N�
Q ! Q '� •'�� . Le�do Y � G HiahwsY � . _�_ ( . P a • ' __ , '_ . . � � i . P. umlC flill
ve.� • MINTEH C` � �is .oso_ T.ZBS. r° ,a-_ . � � _�. �� � � 1ied- 1��
,s SHAF1ER .� . w ,3= = N ,.: i:'��'� �s , '- � . ,. , .. .,,
�� ViILAGE: a� t; ea. R.27E a • � i � ��` '^ont
' Riren4e' Siree � e • o
—o �..': " J i_ d�_ M�' '_- � ::. f'" ' R..uid \I�n. ti oi��ric�o� R6: `�' 1
Ornwt=' A•e. W��O u� �i.^45'� ��+i1ta � -.ciC-: � ;!.` ^` /.'___.:`.*.:85.A..5ciale' .::Q� �+ �
, .kn .� ,> ,. \Y1 . .. . . , . ,
° SS .. � �' p < n'Fo` t ° ` � "� i d� i` � � �- , 2, /�.?) � � 1 � r � � : � �
S�n'.peg 5�' Y,. J.o'1�q�'!� BurCanr _. _¢.$treet,�. ��v. :: ��� .BU V c ._..Shu�TuuWHiU._� .. . a ,. t '_
: t 'R[O • V[P 3 . 2. Q•
periil $t' •' � ' .5 Q"<5 �r��' 9, '. 37 ^6�\.-9� �L " 9' I� G qa � 5'� � o�� fi[lD .6 :'M y^ NARAFI AFR\ RI�'F�K ¢ � a v
- - _ r. _ . .. 6. imx�oi C. " 9 ' 1 � tiTUT- '�
7�� . - 7a y .`Y � : 1 . - X-�. 3a N �� : )e • tFe:ro� . Iia. _ t7p a; ': �m o� RF:C. ARF.A..� Q a� '� :x ' -
;: a ' ` ' 6 7�h Sunda.d '' N � Ro.d �. �X J ' � •, ° _ M P ~ :�
� ir '� U�.Me<r. � l.��.•:. 1� t�
a � . Bske� i . . � 1� c • MEAOOWS �� ' N/n«- ',L �.' .p :I:ne // f-E pP
o ¢ �5 ¢' t - � � � : 1 � � � 5 � �Nt .w, � � P � �t�. �dela
¢ ' FIE�D t '' . � CAIIFl r . • �a
.^_� Srww Y , Ro. _'� ____' i_ _�..o S�ww � Rd. " �7 $_ ' Cfiin�GodeL000� 4* UYiNO - ; �� 7'� i����'___._.Z�OY
;,.� n.re��w�6�ew. � •' K.atzmever _ " RA. ¢ i ... O FO55�- �
a � Norris Rd. Nar' 1� � KERN RIVEN f ,
. . e� i S �- �n i � - a ¢t: ( �. ; ' � Rd. ����� o c _ GOLi COUR� � _.1=.. �_' 9 `
m � � 9 ` eina Rd o�n P �� � D .�: e ' �
__ Q I"r n -�q ¢__ . R _ ire _"' ' _
�-Y ��� - . .s �'- �%8-
' i7 iG � � ° `c > Nori � ml NA.i6 • �5 • , �� - ��f :?� �la aq� ..
�; i�y �>�W o�[[itv o��Q < y t�1� � tE a { � in' � i 1� ,s g,�ir.� . 76
� " m�d d = � s ° No. ROSEDAL � • ,$ T.2� . R. c � Y �a > `^ a " � _._ � __ p .
v�U��C ,2 • 7: :� nc� e t7 � _ �' ¢ Mt�h x ne GREEN DowmrgY' : rn i0 ¢ _' _ . . . � — �.J �_] ..- :�''� ; f C°�1 f
o : �u Saa��3 RE. Ro:Male 58 • a sa z < �.A N S�� N+ n..,v � � c -= ; g = `� _ y � ' � .-..-� .t.297
�T.z95. R sc. s — ` �
a � � � y � � •yS. : P i : Ncle. o- ' Sc i ; �s
Q . 2A .^' C ¢ '• ir 2°_ �� �� Gre � . w :Y 7L �`pt� i5 i 2: 70 !:7
n �9( �o a.�m yi ae. ?� 3 e n o � d::_ �'� 2w .e,� :. v�o�... D'. �
Y '-- �,(� - �0 3 � -�'c i c -- 8rimn�ll Ra. �7 - c . .- ---- -- °-.__."
C BrKken ge O
� 33 7i . i1i'� 7i �: Johnwn.Rd. ..� 'TI¢ .--y� 3 �• .,. T t. ���� , alm iro A� . JV 76 y1 _ :5 .. 17 � 1�
m Niqhw�y ° Swekdale = H�g�wa4' � ��kd+le= �n•ay d' - ::�i BrUra �n. �bn� E�� N
✓
'6t �_ • ' ' ' . � � �� _�� C T�*� � � • '
4� a �: _ i u:iq�� ' �. - � ('�nal•.., � . ' , � LLEGE a � Bire . ,.rrKi w�. . � ! + ' � 5 . S �
1 ¢ Min Aven Red Y .
¢ �oma MAYFAIfl:
_. `�; ..-... _. q ,_ � �- -__ �BAK . � BAKERSFIELD i • _ -7 _. �. ,
� ; L 4 � Yi sGn Av • O : 3 �. , iiyn . � . •
'e '4 '�� � 7 3 ., oiA1R01PN - :. fi � �' 1:
` .Munxer RE. ' e � � Ian: ' a � � ¢ '
q C� BAKERSFIELO � Ir -RO '
:K ' '� ►E , _'stv aKS-- . "s• _- V +,�^, _ > .. . �`
ta RI �� 5 y Wh 4 ln. E MUNICIPAL ¢ `)
i! 1r i �4 � �' 6 )+ d1! �., � �c u : . i�{ �: d FpRM � e� o'6 i, i � i �'S.
!E ��'" �i 43 �9. T JNTNYCWB^ p R0. ��� 'e O+c�eco a'4 e Ne.nnu Rd =
•� J P.'•nE
� i Q�� �s eqv R4. d °IE 9 H is �irv'ew �=a C y Fu Ic !. a . %• �� ( � :1
305. R 25c. . /• r— _ven i > F F � R i e. >
�� ��.. .y t Psnam ��� Lani .y 19 ¢ 7 a � � 21 ¢ ri�m �•� � L�rr +. 4 7!''� '3 a Un� �= G _.. i � �-_--
?MAN � �a �1 � ' as � • ` � �km�re Ss ; T ?OS. F.28E. � X°^•2r � xe
; � �,E% .� �c ! z9 � ..Ia ; z, ti o.,. W.,, �� � s ,",y,c : 'x� � � xe gq � r ; �^ ` p a:.
/ � � M 1 _ Q _ Q o Ncski q A 3 1 17 1 I6 � g Mou mview RC. '_ __ ¢'_
o' f.__' �._ '- _� e_.'_— ^ c � c�
/ ic i� �,t �: :a �:w .: E< _6 ° - � M:. . n MeKee 7i RM. 3: V 77 � 3� l�j t 3J 3� 75 � 1a '¢ 32 JJ
90 •• ]1�
�b ��9 3 -
.• �. Q � � . =��.
^ Itl't:\A! JDAf ? { � _Q � � E ._.
�-< ' \'1�'l'i' .
�• ` s� :AUCAfIC � 1� E � ' � /IOA[. � � �� Z9
`O po� .NF:('IiF.A'1' Z 41900�C Qs , 67.OIK'. c B�.a.
/f�;. L i3,�Z. � � .315. ie
IiRIIN :•`; AREAS�ip' �,L �1 4'? �
OOLF�COURSE'�:'�=� ��P . 6 ; �� ,^
Induet�u i�`i� I 2A p T�••�_`rJ , _-______ `G -��rAJ
��� T.3tS. R.2_ fPE _Q
�� Q I �a i ao.�. x.
e � ��
:NA VlSTA LAKE 9 e
2c+6.v�r�4: `�i � ' � . '
lnrcnnirrrwi . �r .
��, ��"
- - - - - - - -1-�--- � . _ ^ ���-, - s � �,.
�_� � �^R RVtN GOLF �(
: �„ T.32s. ZIMMER-McGREGOR ��� �"'
� C����v. �R /I y�A� : T.
.°a�� 5^i � . LEASE .. �e.�s.d: p � � � '�-�ri
�� :0 : .. 2: ' I . LfSAG
4e qoW 1 J`�2D' tt
,e �. :4 i 27 ' ' � � li �
�i". .
,
-_ ---... ._� `� o. �-- - � T. 29 S. R.28 E. r� . ��z`� � ' ' `�� � � �c„ w
- � . ,�-.' `�
�s .;- .. __r, � � � "'�cs
_ � `:� ;:
, �....
� m MatiCOpa I � 6 Mighway. . ,� TANK A 1 . _ _ 9 � , � '. � ¢ � 1 ,.
�66 t _ _ALriems.t__._Nio6wn'.._ �IIETTLE1i. � ' ._HO'e[
¢p ri �> s s y, � � � � y i`F�er�?�v+�n sx�:g�; � �a 'in - STATION o o '"
{]� � 1rl � Sebfst an Pwd l~�
�S - .• 1 :d 1 � E ` 5 '' 1• . t?\� � a � .5 'Cii[//' ht 1! ' 17 ' �_ ��P S �. �< 1!1 �� ¢ .. "S J \ a\ � r�
��_� �--__ t U F.;Z�h -- �s � _SN R.2'Woe� iH �T.ttN. . _ � L '�S : _. � _
.�—. — — 'a '�Ro�E \ ` � �' .
F.Oa . E � —�:R`.:�:, ' •.1'N R.19W . �� ° � y . �--
jT t] ; 2� �9 � 30 �. . :f i2 � 7! 3a 7�•� �7 �. a � � � � 7� �f Y/MEEIER F�DGE_: '� � �Z� �e
�j PUMi1NG S AiION � r�o��rr� uo -Wlw qb, t3 '� �E� �p
2T '. 25 i�1 . ��i--".}'--..• '.x � .—� T "jwM[tLtAJI�Oat OI� /�[LO I�I� ZS '1 N�' _EIC%ICID��'�1 ZS G J\ ♦�``
75 }� :29 TG . 76 �. :9 zai ,¢i . ie '. I y, 3 i /M; F�rsc''�c � z�+ .'F'si, ..� r,..�
- � : � / � ..•~f= I . � ;. I . . �� I WHFFIER' &IU(:�:1 � ^ ulucnco o�ricc :.I �`.� _ / . ..r
WZI INC.
KERN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA BAKERSFIELD CALIFORNIA
I4. Mles im� am� 6mi.
BEAR MOUNTAIN LIMITED
ZIMMER-McGREGOR FEE
LOCATION MAP
)ATE,�3 �601.0071A �HIBIT 1
:r
I�
-N-
•
�� ? 4
O�
�,L�
�P —
� ► .t� P�p
+�f Q
�x9�C
.� ' _ � � � ' �'
'
�
�
ioi '
� I
E so cu �rs�
PcL[ts+E [�sELtE�ri FSt
9C IJ� PG M
� 78.A5 Acres
� 2�' MIOE
�wyc ��+srr
�c {aw. rc T�o
�
�
�
I •
��
T.29 S. R.28 E.
_� ,
�.o..c. �,oK.
o�a
. ..�� _�, -------
ut
-'�- O
f7/6.0
. � � r • .- �
�
i Oian n
71�SK
css �c
/lJ� u
'y�`, /7A .
�
PROJECT �(CONSTAUCTION
CONSTRUCTION LAYDOWN /
� BOUNDARY AREA �
5.93 Acres 4.74 Acres
�
Dakerstlelcf
Cellular
1.55 Ac
. ��,
Q P.G k E. POlII1ME
EASf)+DIi �Et
0( 60i3� PO 1l12
�
1
1
1
��.
��n I �.
r �
.� i �,►
-----�---°---
WZI INC.
BAKERSFIELD. CALIFORNIA
BEAR MOUNTAIN UMITED
SITE LOCATION MAP
PROPOSED BEAR MOUNTAIN
LIMITED PARCEL '
E 12/93 1601.0071A EXHIBIT 2
�
��_
T�
_?�.f,--.
J� �
_lf
�r'��
--- �--
�
���,.
,\�•
`� � ' � ��
� ����-
� +��� \
r``�'` �.\\ � \
`. . -��=- � — : �
; �.. ; ��\ � -- �,�, \ .
N/2 OF SW/4 SEC. 12-T29S/R28E
-N-
�
. .�.;...
f�
. ,.....
i
�i: ��- -�
0' 100'
� ,
WZI INC.
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
BEAR MOUNTAIN LIMITED
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
12/93 1 �sot.00�in � --•..._.. 3
9 �.
s J__T ,,..
��-_ :
�,�, _�'-,
% ;
� ;
���
�,� ; '��������
�
SAND & GRAVEL DISTURBANCE
� OIL FIELD ACTIVITY �
o too' 200'
�
APPROX. SCALE IN FEET
m
,U
��
�I
WZI INC.
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA .
BEAR MOUNTAIN LIMITED
PREVIOUSLY DISTURBED
AREAS
- DATE�.�3 1601.0071A EXHIBIT 4
�.
�
�, -i �1'' .. x, �..°x x' � x. xlX ; _ ... �. . _ .. _ _.�.... _ . ... I
+ �li a � =� ' ,n: z . � . ; .. . . . � .
x • �> '—{
, N �,3_�_"'_. 'r �_� _Y_ . ' t- � . . .
X x � k . . � . - / . . . . .. . . . �
y�I�, � Z��, X. _. u X._ . . . . I ' . . . . . . . . .
• zqn xl `�.,xX . X � � .. r� . z '; . . . . . . . . . .
; I� �_�.,� X Y X = �. � � . . -N_
�,� � x ��,� �, . . . . . : . . . � .
{ �f.Ye� Z.�:;�f...7YF.� Q �-�.�:,:F .�aF�. ��.14.c�cE+ '.�:c._Lr I _
xrt x `\X In�� ~ �
s�..�_ (� x x .t.� r�ys�..f ^...i''.' . � .. .. .. .. � .. , . . . . �.
r �
� u • p� id� • ��a I � ... . _. : i . � ) � .. . .. , .. .. _ .. . .. �
y. q� yt� .. X �: } -- -�----- : .
a � ' Y�� Y % :IC ' x .. ` . . . . . . .
aau *,% x � +c I • \ (�
��3 " � �•�,\�x�,�. x � x , x I ,. .` . J , . , j
v.-. • X ' ' i � 1 ' I .. � � . . I.
-�l �� �� �l�.� � � . . ., . .. ... .� .:
.i ..
'�1�. �f� e.� y � ±N���,�,� "e SITE LOCATION ,., . . .. --.._,:.f .. - -, �a�.r , _.
�� i —+•, ,�, � . . ."... _ . : :_. -. .�. _
, ' �.�� ��,�„+' js$ . ' .� � ; ;�,: ; ... � �} . � .. . . . . . . ; .
_ - .� �� �� K�� f+ .�'�.. � ---I -- �`=�--�Rr–� I •–r-"__--•—
�a . �'�+� .+ +' � ��t, Y�M \1 � _ � � ` �: =7 n �'`
� ` . w�,l\x •�� ��!� `'��� ^ i - t�•i.: . � ... ,_ �\� . . .. ..
• „�� � • �r � ♦ , �� , . � _ ..
, � � •4� 'yN � .j S �•�(i'�.��•�� • . • •• ��L � . � '"_' ' � ..:^. � .0 � 4.� . .
'+� .M21 ^�. 4� j O \ T-� ) � i�• ' - , 7;°S P:�?'E. . \ .
us N � )6 + ^•� . �' \ •�'R�f '�I (� , �� , � ��I. =
.. •1 ♦ � � � ` . _ ��� i.- I.!. . \ ` � . ., . .: ,�� • • / `' . . I
. � � � :I� � a:j ne� ._".� ..`. . � � � � !
��� ♦� `�. _ • � I rr� �'Yn � � . �j�� ���� .. ( I
� .'` . •� . .. ,� ,� -- �� : /� I Fi'i.1� G . E�L • r':X xao --�----- ------
. . � ,, � ..,' �"'�c rt (��OQ.
Au.. tn �–'. . • • . ' I I
:�'r�o�� .,-: Y�=+ r� � � . �
y.. �. �-�I" < ♦ : o, . ,�� i ` i1 . I . _ . i+ ; . + + , �� ..s x ...X \. _ � .�((�+ ,
: , ' �• Ao.:ia+� ' A� . t � 1 I... ' � - ���'- � �'
� i � •' • !)�• � f . , ,� �� �a.� , �i 1 � �~ � \ ,
� ��,j� � � � �i ,� , . . . ♦ . ( I �w�� ' \.. ).�� �� . . . . �
�A•°� �+1. +..�g �.u1 �i �e �, ' , ��'„ ,t�� , . .. I �sM � x . .a oyX �.� �,
` •
;� •
S �'� � m � ,� �.; _ _ - -_ ..�� � ,p' �
� • O ` ,� ♦ i4 ..:• !�. `- . t ',� _._ .. _.- . �� � x �Q«ti:��r r -
,f) i I ^ 6 � • i • . �' ' �.� �� ` .. . , • , x � ''•�: - - -
� ♦ �� I. ' V' ' •; ♦ • � � ` ' fi�: ' �bf i.nCCS1;11LLD .��. .. _ .i_r� +—`.t ' ,— .j 2� / •..•'�' -
fi �bo ' } ♦ � . • u � � . . . _ , � .
• . � ' . + , :'� ` � i�' � ' �► !" ' �y . , ,1�•{ti,vT.��._._�` R�._ +s /S - `�\ -� —
. y � � 150 ° � _�,' '
• \ R �`
� � D ��: � � �� i ` . '�!E . �� � �:, _ .. . , 3s
\iraJ j . � • ro' ,�; P`���r:i � � �_'� o3�iE y� . :. . _
` ,�.`j+,�ti�� ��� ��c��o,F.. , �" � `�-��+ +�+_�'�s- `, i� y�.r
� � � I —
1 � � ,
. ` _\ " } r1 .+ �a a� �s7 lx�r � N • : 1 i� -- -N'. ^ . . � _ •'� I .
» �i � + � �'!�� . �� � ��uo •� ' A ' � � � • �'' / :.
,��� . ,�,.. : '� �_� � . • � "�_ _ - � �� � i . (• �.1 --
/j - - - - - ���a ---- . ii.-�-'---- -- t; j/
. . . e : t,� ,�, .+ ha_�. a_ I : .{ / . � . .
♦ ,� ,� - � �i t. ' !�� \
_ ,_'i5�d '��� i .� � � e s � � .
,, ;�pp ��-- ,� . . ' ' � �.I • � .
, ,' 1���� � . a.; . �. • -' 2� ' ��' + •• �_ . ,: ... � � _... ..--
,� -.a....�o.._ I� ' . ,� .. i ...�0' al- �rr/- : , ,
� . � n . . ♦ i �' _ . .
t9C
`v ' '» • •, � � �• a :A � b. 4. e' ' .� � o-/ . . . .
. � . .. (� o �, . . .� � _1 ��� � � . . . .
. ,
_ �. ,h »• � ..
. .. ,_ � � �; . . . . . x � . � _ _ .
2 ' ,�G ��. .� ' ' � , �
t ♦ u i . w:: - -� /_ "��..1. —" i _ • i X ,�j ' :. \ ,. ., 1
�� � ��� r� � � .. � m� �3� � � `\ �' • -p ~ � ��es�c . ,.�� ;N % _,�. ' ' � , .. -_
� -- -- �° ; • ' rfa--r�x. J/' v � ------!
� �• J 4 r , �. w � � �sl / + ; l` ' j r� � �;�� . . X � x `��� / � .
• �y . --� i � � Y ;� . z . x yx 1 J
� t � °� �i� . xy� � K�Ii x �.i r r I
I'i • . I.0 K x Y , z... _: X_.._ j 1
, , . ��,. . . . . .� es e� . `1�r�11( 11�� �!� % Xy� ,x � _'". .. ,• �• / .
. ,r+�u u - � . . ..� , . � . „ . � �..ir� . '� l d �(1�..'"91. X..r x v • /
REF: KCWA, 1992
: o : .
sae _ . _ . . �n�n
WZI INC.
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
BEAR MOUNTAIN
COGENERATION FACIUTY
GROUNDWATER SURFACE
ELEVATION MAP
12/93 1601.00T1 EXHIBIT 5
�
. ' �
�
�
J�
>a
��
1(
I�
.�������:
T29S 7 R28E
� 1000' 2000'
SCALE IN FEET
\ ,
� WZI INC.
BAKERSFIEID, CALIFORNIA
BEAR MOUNTAIN UMITED
GROUNDWATER SURFACE CONTOUR
MAP - CHINA GRADE LANDFILL
12/93 � tsot.00�tA �"..."'.. 6
:\
�
REF: KCWA, 1992
o = ,
� �....
-N-
WZI INC.
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
BEAR MOUNTAIN
COGENERATION FACIUTY
GROUNDWATER (1UALITY MAP
UNCONFINED A�UIFIER
(DATA THROUGH 12/13/90)
!2/93 I �s0�.00�t � ---..._.. 7
�
.—.��
�
P
� OQ.0
�
650.0 /I
��o.o
�,
SSO.0 ,\
II
SOO.0 -
450.0 �
400.0
350.0
300.0
250.0
2D0,0
1 50,0
1 D0.0 �—
10U.0
�
—N—
�
DESTEC BEAR MOUNTAIN REVISED QP .S CI.
iso.o zoo.o zso.o �ao.o sso.o aoo.o �so.o soo.o sso.o eeo.o
�`� / � . � � �.-� , , j i / � � � � �n , � � � � I `—� �
�,�1 � ��I ��-' ^ � I � � ..j� �'•� �, � ��;� �`��
-� �S a � ��, '
,� /' { / 1' �,; J � , ,�f , _ eso.o
; u� 1 �= �
.. � '. ,, 1 i� I t �1 `� )
�^ �� � � \ �.��!/��� �J �I U\ ��2. ��
) `I' I �l inl � ry'�. /' i � �� �i �l /., 5 � .
i �,
.I !i �, 1 1 t l�u��- ., +� , � � ��> '-1 (J,
'� � �� . � � `',•� v l � t
� o �,� eoo.o
I 'L' , � 'j _ !
� < < , � ` � , (^
1IC� � t� , '� � � ° `,
I I \ �\ \•�`�' \��� �\ � � (� I 1
�� � �> � %�-� ''r9 1.� � \ �V� \ �'' ` -`�:'� SJ�.�i
�:. Z,�. � , ^ �, ' l ,\ i
j hy � J' % �r---� � � i;;jJ� ( i�v% �._-.\ , � �' � n `S' ��' ' I
l ' ' �• ����.� � ,r j � 1 �, . PROJECT ` �� ``��—. ��;•ti `�� _�
�'' �� 1 1� j 1 �(� r'�i \ , 500.0
� N 1 , ����°,, CONSTRUCTION
�l J �/: `- \ ��.>)r°�4�L .u'� Q \V BOUNDARY �; , '� l r�(r��� ` �r 3, _ i
� �,� ' �%'.J� A �� � ���(��`�-- � � �'�'\ �`� �' / � � �1,� � 1 , '�f ��
��; �-� 1cn�� � `� " �; ` � �- l:� I �;,.,,,�` , '� .,I
��� `�i^ / �.Li•w J i \}`�; � ,� !`�%i `1 �', �-{ �so.o
�� ��; . _ m�` ✓;�° S � ' b �-� c ,-� ; � 1 �` ° F c� '; ��'� �
h\ \ � p 5 ��' r / I ..
� J +��,��f ..\�.�� �l y' l � � �� � �, _ l_i �) u ,
.� � ` �`����' `-_'' � �. S � � � `�� ^ ' ' , ` � <._ a ".. �
c� w .--� `��l �"`--" ' ' ,3�=,� coo.o
�� �-- 3.s ( k ...t .—��
�1 \ �) , %,.�, �Z' ,�� ( 1 :�'��,?',i�=��,, �� ,1
�\ `—`�"� s _�� r,' ��J �=' ( �' ;' 1 f'�+ii+ %;==T i : �
l ��- �; ' �;> ' , ; � ' �
__� Ys �� J , � ° �� � ` � � � i \i i ��„� � ' l � � ' asao
•' � � P `\ ) / ��� ` �• `, r ,
` \ '�� . _ 4 .�' 4S � � .T i� i�. ( � 'd.�rre�' f I / \� `� ; �. ..
1 ? f�\ s L � t '�= �
� ,' \ (/ j l �: � \�` �. � �� \l I '. (,�
� "' �� � \ 's \\ r \\ f a Y�\' � ) 1\ `7`� % I ; v ) (, 3Q0.0
� x 11.� 1 ° � `
(.�� �` � � � .� ��. .� � 1 \ I � �� l'� `. , �
�-, 1 �3? � ' \--�,; �' '� s ) � ` � � � r`�,� ; �', %
'` �''i � > � ;'l� (,-� `) �� `����' � `' s,__ '', j `,�
�� � � ��� � �. , ;- � � �,�. — �� I �
`,� �- � � - > 0 �? �- .
� i ( .:' , /^..� � !;. � zso.o
. I �^`�,, /^1\V l _� (. ` 4 -
150.0 2U0.0 25p.Q
� 60' t 2p•
SCALEIN FEET
i00.0 350.0 d00.0 45q.0 500.0 550.0 ti00.0
SCA�E 1 inch = 50 feel
i
200.D
150.0
100.0
WZI INC.
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
BEAR MOUNTAIN
COGENERATION FACILITY
ELECTROMAGNETIC
AMOMALY MAP
DATE 1�3 1601.0071A �HIBIT 6
DESTEC BEAP MOU�JTAIf�i REVISED QP .5 CI
100.0 150.0 200A 25U.0 .i00.0 PAVED ROAD AOOA � ASU,O 500.f1 55C.0 6W.0
650.0
600.0
SS0.0
500.0
4 50.0
400.0
350.0
300.0
2'S0.0
zoo.o
tso.o
������ � � �� i � � % � I % ' �A, � � I o � �- � � 1 � '
/(t �i�;��. `,- - � � �
� � s r /� I .� ; ` P �r �
, -� � ` �� '' ' , � �� �1 J ' `� � '�� ', -` ``' =� �' '
� � '+ 1 , � ; � ( � I ,,�.�. '
'; �. TRENCH f117 . ,� � ' � ry,'� / - � 1 ,. �� '. � 1.5 . .,
, I.! I ��I ,��„' l l v � � � `-' = 1
i `�' 1,\ ` '� 1 ll �� `II � �I ii (^ (
�' t' I i . �,�, I I � � � � � 60 �
n i , ( � � I � � ._ \ ,�, � I I 'i 1 � '
I + 'C
i{` 1 I _ � I i �` � G I� TRENCH A8 �� i
\ � ���`�� ;� � - �� � � '
,, � ,
�, ,, :;� I �; ,� ,,:.�� �,`� � �; r - . � . .\� 5�
� ,-----� � � i �> � ) ' `. �
t. ' � ' i , _ i , �--d,' -� � ro � i . r „' _,
.� 1 '�q \`�� -' , i% / n 1('� /
� ---� �'� ' �/' ( , ,, \�/ /' . l q _ ��` `5 � .
y, � � �s .rp„ ,� � ��. o. PROJECT �, � ��l��' � ` so
J j �- �\�� TRENCHk1E ��_--CONSTRUCTION \ ��41'�^�. \'� `\ `..•T ,\ I
i J
� ' � TRENCN#13 �n �(�a��j ,\ ! �. BOUNDARY ' �I�� TRENCHM7 i _�
!' . ` 1 ,�e�ra ��'I � ��' ! � � � � � ( �',`f y� � � ( `\��.. TRENC„ ��'�,, '1% 1 � d�
� �TRENCH S12 _ � ____ " a
I , \ -� � � "' 1 ' � 1 .'�i�� � � /�� � TOLUENE A28 pPm +
� ��, � �--, ' � � ` ` I i � � �l� `` ` l ! � O 3 Q 290 ppm
� ` c� ` � � l Jn 'o-' I I o- � `RENCH NS I I
1 m p ���. TRENCM N18
I �y; i ���;�� �.,`; � ; °�`���� �� 1 '� S� � ,.�� u, '�i' � ! � \ �_ A^� �
�,,\ - �� -` , 7 1 '' � ----'
__� 4 �:.,�i ) h �--\ ,�� 4( J
�,-...` � 1 _�/ �l`\.�^� �.� �-�-3.G� TRENC p�)Il�` �'
' .. ^ j /' � \i ,' � �� t' ( I , i
-5-� � � � �= ��_) ����'� �.,
,-� t � `
,, � . .- (,�J N \1 +� o � _ Il (� ,1'�a � + �'`, ; �, ; t o
—� �_� _`_,� _ _ i J 1 ,,, �' , d
i. P 1
. _ � � � �� �� �
..� �1��'.. r ">:q �'�- 1 , ` fi.�Y.<_�"� TRENCHA4� � ' �
� _ _ _ _ 4` � �S �_ , �_ � � 1��-.\�.\ VzSf � � 1 �
_ ` _ �- '` '� s { , � � . r1 \ �sJ � I� 1
� �' \� '\.,i I� , �` 7FENCHMiI� '.K �! �'i) �. \ ���.� TRENCHA15\ . '^ ' 3 0
,` S �J , a �� ` � �— `� � 1 � \ I
-—�� � ; �,, �;;t� �', y c�, � �
'.. 1� : n : ' � �� � ( �i / . ir : TRENCH E2 .- �t .i �
_. . - � , TRENCH 7110 � •\ ��,_. - . I � .r , �� /
), i v , i � ��I TRENCHMI6 I�TPH(D) 62ppm \/ TRENCHOtf � , �
' `O S G 420 ppm � �
� -; � �_ , {�� .c, �� j�`j V � �,•L.�� .'(:. �.S �. U � TOLUENE .f5pPm ,' .50
�`� ,- .. �y,� 1 `J . ( -.. �� � � O d G 460 ppm �
_ TRENCH i19� T-j � . / /
, r
r I �. �') �" � '�.���1 �c���������v����a�`��1����w��
� -- { ��� (
� l _ - ( i �i �� ;�,<. / �
IOOA �_-. -- ---�-
100.0 152R
�
-�-
�
2DOA 250.0 ,i00.0 350.0 4U0.
� 60' 120'
. SCALEIN FEET
0
a
0
�
0
�
�
' i r��i
PO
QO
--�----- O�Q� --' —�� 1 U
4 iO.0 ' " O.0 550.0 60D.D
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
BEAR MOUNTAIN
COGENERATION FACILITY
TRENCH LOCATION MAP
12/93 � �eot.00�u
I
C
� � ��_� � ��
SAK
� ��os�oar� �
�
U
cA � �
TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager �
FROM: Gene Bogart, Water and Sanita 'on Manager
SUBJECT: Council Referral - UNION AVENUE BILLBOARDS
(Record No. 13964)
October 19, 1994
This memo is in response to the inquiry made by Councilmember Pat DeMond
regarding the status of the old wooden billboard signs located on the bank of the Eastside
,,, _. _.. .,.canal.jus�,narth of the Crosstown Freeway 178 on the west side of Union Avenue.
In reviewing this with Kern Delta Water District (the owner of the Eastside canal),
they agreed to contact the owner of the billboard sign (3-M Company) and arrange to have
it removed when the canal was shut down for winter maintenance. In our follow-up contact
with Kern Delta this week, both sections of the "V" shaped billboard and support structure
will be removed by 3-M Company during November (ne� month), prior to Thanksgiving
Holiday. It turns out that this old billboard was constructed sometune prior to World
War II.
If you need any further information on this item, please call.
GB:sr
cc: Florn Core, Water Resources Director
Maurice Randall, Business Manager
Trudy Slater, Administrative Analyst
G��C�'������� �
. - ----� �
,
�T # � !� '; �i
_� �
�(�1( �iAbil�C�i��'�� �� ���� -.';
:�; ��.
�
B A K E R S F I E L D
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUIVI
TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager
FROM: Raul Rojas, Public Works Director �(�
�
DATE: October 12, 1994
SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO COUNCIL REFERRAL
Record #13961
Attached is update on street resurfacing of various streets as
requested by Councilmember Rowles at a recent Council
meeting.
Attach.
REF13961
— -- _ __
Li`_. _`.' ,. �; ._
� -_--=---- -
�
� � � ! 7 1994 .
. - _ _�.__ _-'�
il6�d,�Ei��,G'������ �'�`��E��_��
�
�
i -
��,n��'� �'��--��_
,�,,�� � � �%�=_
,_
.�` � w'�
� r� r:
�� _��w� �INlllu,,�. M:
� ` \Y\c
�_ , � t� �+�
_i�J',,�., ��`,1j111�
►� ���1�
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORI�NDUM
�
RAUL'ROJAS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
NlARK LEAL, STREET SUPERINTENDENT
OCTOBER 11, 1994
UPDATE ON RESURFACING VARIOUS STAEETS.
��������
OCT 121994
PU��IC bVO,RKS DEPARTMEItlT
RECORD #13961
Resurfacing of Candy, Joseph, North McDonald and La Mirada
south of Centennial Park is scheduled for the latter part of the
1994-95 Fiscal Year. Also Susan which is in the same
neighborhood, is also scheduled at the same time. Dunlap does,not
. �.
need resurfacing, however, there are some cracks that can be
repaired by the crack sealing process. This work should be
completed during the Winter of 1995.
ML:2h
D2:M-101194
��t�t _'� � _. . ._...._ ._.. _. . _ _. ._.__ .. . .. �.
� i1a i k.e� � '-� , . � . . , , � .': �.
'�iM�^a�3f��. 't`� `�$' ,t'�n i a 1 .,�Wsi4# � � u
"�� r �a.�ir �� �'� .ti . , . . . . - . , ,. � �
i . , � �� ti � F�. �� , � ��t j �., � : � . �.. . � � . . .
, ;�a � .. , . ., � � . . . , .
y N ,.r i �. � ..
! : ;:'�'., . :'` .. , .:'CITY' COUNCIL REFERRAL : i
� � � , ��.e�i.���%�} i
� ,MEETING OF: 09/28/94 J�j' I
� . .
. , SEP �3 0 1994
. , .
REFERRED TO:, PUBLTC� WORKS�. R ROJAS PUBUCWORKS OEPARTMENT
,
ITEM: RECORD# 13961 ,
Update on resurfacing of various streets. I
(Rowles)
ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL: �
ROWLES REQUESTED STAFF PROVIDE HIM WITH AN UPDATE
.OF STREET.RESURFACING ON CANDY/JOSEPH/DENLAP/N. ,
MCDONALD WAY AND LA MIRADA SOUTH OF CENTENNIAL ;
� PARK.
i
BACKUP MATERIAL ATTACHED: NO
-
� DATE FORWARDED BY CITY CLERK: 09/30/94
NOTE: STATUS CHANGES ARE TO BE ENTERED FOR EACH REFERRAL
AT LEAST ONCE A MONTH EVEN IF NO ACTTON HAS BEEN TAKEN!
�-...� , _ _.
_ . ._ , '�r��
.� l
STATE OF CALIFORNIA—THE RESOURCES AGENCY PETE WILSON. Governor
THE RECLAMATION BOARD
�`': Oi �X\
1416 Ninth Street, Room 1148 •
Sacramento, CA 95814-5509 ° �,
(916) 653-5434 FAX: (916) 653-9745 ��� ��
Permits: (9i6) 653-5726 FAX: (916) 653-5805 �q � �4 � � �� F ���oR�,�
�
OCT 1 3 1994
Mr. Jack Hardisty
Planning Director
Development Services
City of Bakersfield
1715 Chester Avenue
Bakersfield, Caliiornia 93301
Dear Mr: Hardisty:
OCT 17 1994
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
PbANNING g�pAQTM�NT
We have reviewed your September 7, 1994 letter and attach-
ments regarding amendment to Agreement No. 78-152 between the
City of Bakersfield and The Reclamation Board.
As proposed, the amended agreement would exempt only
Mr. William Alexander, Jr., from the agreed-upon requirements.
There appears to be little justification for this exemption as
written. Consequently, the amended agreement would establish an
unjustified precedent which would lead to similar requests for
exemption from other property owners within the Kern River
Designated Floodway. We believe that, at a minimum, the City
should perform a hydraulic analysis to justify amendment of the
original agreement. Also it should be recognized that the Baard,
as a general policy, does not permit structures for human
habitation within designated floodways.
We therefore cannot support the request for amendment.
If you still wish to take your request to the Board you should
consider preparing a hydraulic study to show a reason why the
original decision of the Board and City should be changed to
allow additional development within this section of the Kern
River Designated Floodway.
Please inform us if and when you wish your request to be.
considered by the Board so that we can arrange for the date of
the public meeting.
For further information, you may contact�Donald Jackson at
the above address or telephone (916) 653-0402.
Sincerely,
���
Raymond E. Barsch
General Manager
:� > ^�.
�
B A K E R S F I E L D
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
October 19, 1994
TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager
FROM: Raul M. Rojas, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Council Referral #14033
Attached please find Council Referral number #14033 Request for Crosswalk at Occidental
and University Intersection.
I= � � � � '' [� -- �=��,
i '
� OCT I 9199�
' ;
;,, ;,
i��»:;�____ _ .. . _, ,
-- --��
, ;:�"
,
MEMORANDUM
Traf[ic. Engineering
DATE: .October 18, 1994
TO: RAUL M. ROJAS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
FROM: STEPHEN L. WALKER, TRAFFIC ENGINEER ✓�� L�
�
SUBJECT: COUNCIL REFERRAL # 14033, REQUEST FOR CROSSWALK AT
OCCIDENTAL AND UNIVERSTI'Y INTERSEC'I'ION. Received 10/18/94
Council Referral:
"Smith referred to Public Works the issue of street resurfacing that was done near the
Occidental/University area which eliminated the crosswalk; Pedestiian crossircg from the
college needs a crosswall� there is no street light and it is darl� ****This i.ssue is urgent
and needs to taken care of immediately****"
The issue of the crosswalk has already been resolved. A resident of the area had already
contacted the Traffic Engineering division, prior to our receipt of the Council referral, to
request a crosswalk. The resident's request was investigated and a work order was
processed. The crosswalk and related marldngs and signs will be installed by the General
Services division. In compliance with the Council's request, General Services will be asked
to schedule it as soon as possible.
The request for street lighting will be forwarded to the General Services division for their
response since requests for non-safety street lighting does not involve Traffic Engineering.
No additional action/response to the crosswalk request referral is required.
Background Information:
University Avenue was repaved a few years ago. At that time, the crosswalk that had
been at the Occidental intersection was not repainted since the Public Works
Department practice was to not repaint crosswalks at uncontrolled intersections
unless there was a need for the crosswalk. Most all of the pedestrian usage occurred
at the signalized intersection of University and Mt. Vernon and there was not a need
to repaint the crosswalk until now.
cc: Fred Kloepper, Assistant Public Works Director
Traffic Engineering F'ile - City Council Referral #14033, Occidental/University x-walk
.� ae.�r.a►��.ma.�
a.,'.a�,..�wiZ,r�io-"�ti-� �c;.`.-�'� �:��?..�?��� ..��.n�yi;' .r •"'.. • � �- - � ..,';.- � � .
_ � . . � .. . � e.. .. . . . . . , . , .
.. .. _ :�. � . . � . . . .
- ` M - CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL
� . • . -
MEETTNG OF: 10/12/94
REFERRED TO: PUBLIC WORKS R ROJAS
ITEM: RECORD# 14033
Crosswalk at Occidental and Universitv. !Smith?
ACTION TAKEN__BY COUNCIL: ___ _.._ _ _ __. _ . _
� SMITH REFERRED TO PUBLTC WORKS THE ISS!!E OF �
,STREET RESURFACING THAT WAS DONE NEAR THE _?_ __
,OCCIDENTAL/UNIVERSITY AREA WHICH ELIMINATED THE :.
� �CROSSWALK;. PEDESTRIAN CROSSING FROM THE COLLEGE;
NEEDS A CROSSWALK, THERE IS NO STREET �IGHT AND
` IT�-I�S DARK. �****THIS ISSUE IS URGENT .ANG NEEDS
TO BE TAKEN CARE OF IMMEDIATELY****
BACKUP MATERIAL ATTACHED: NO
DATE FORWARDED BY CITY CLERK: 10/14/94
���� I�l���
0£i i � i�94
�4"�FFI� Fq�{.I!�'�E+'f�:G
�� � l� � '� l��r
OCT 14 i994
PUBLIC WORKS QEPARTMENT
..
i: w�
� ,.�«..y
i �,��;F:RSIIE�(0 J
r��.� �
��F� �. ..�#� .�'tt,
���.��� �.
�:����;�
..,
TO
FROM
MEMORANDUM
Honorable Mayor Price and Council Members
_ . . ---
S. E. Brummer, Chief of Police
SU BJECT C� #13963 - REGARDING TR.AFFIC MATTERS
October 18, 1994
The attached memorandum explains the department's response to
requests by Council Member Salvaggio and Council Member Rowles.
Council Member Salvaggio requested investigation of a possible
hazardous hot tar trailer near day care homes. Council Member Rowles
requested additional traffic enforcement on Bernnuda Street.
SEB/vrf
attachment
copy to:
Memorandum 10/17/94 - CR - Hot Tar Trailer/Traf. Enf.
Verne Jung
Trudy Slater
..
/�: .w,�
���.w..,. �;.
/ �K�'E'�"RS\F�/£(D �,
�/S�[' i� �'- l� l�^
�� ..y���:r�,
`AOLICE �'
�\��'� i J
y `� /
�n� -/
�
.�
MEMORANDUM
OCTOBER 17, 1994
S. E. BRUMMER, CHIEF OF POLICE
A. L. SCOTT, SERGEANT, TRAFFIC SUPERVISOR
SUBJECT COUNCIL REFERRALS REGARDING TRAFFIC MATTERS
On September 28, 1994, City Council Member M. Salvaggio requested city staff to
investigate a possible hazardous situation of a(hot tar) trailer being parked in front
of 6205 Castlepoint, near daycare homes .
Department action/response: The Traffic Section, after several unsuccessful
attempts to locate the hot tar trailer on Castlepoint, made contact with the owner of
the trailer on October 12, 1994. He is identified as James Irwin, 6205 Castlepoint,
836-1774. Mr. Irwin indicated that he had been parking his trailer on the street for
several years , vvithout any complaints from his neighbors . He v►tas advised that his
trailer would require a special construction license before he could transport i.t on
t�e roadway. He was further advised that the trailer could not legally be parked on
the roadway because it was not registered. Mr. Irwin was informed that the parking
of the trailer on the roadway with hot tar in it would constitute a public hazard and
criminal prosecution was possible . Mr . Irwin agreed to move the trailer out of the
neighborhood as soon as possible. District traffic officers will continue to monitor
the parking in front of the residence and will handle any violations accordingly.
On September 28, 1994, City Council Member Randy Rowles requested city staff to
provide additional traffic enforcement on Bermuda Street and Camino Del Qeste.
Department action/ response: The Traffic Section utilized the S. M. A. R. T. trailer
on October 10, 1994, at 0800 hours, until appro�ately 1900 hours, in response to
a speeding inquiry.on Bermuda Street. 2he traffic volume on Bermuda increases in
the morning and evening hours by commuters who do not reside in the neighborhood .
Traffic officers were notified to monitor the area as much as possible and to strictly
enforce the posted speed limits . The city traffic engineers office was contacted and
a speed survey will be conducted on Bermuda, as soon as possible.
In response to the speeding problem on Camino Del Oeste, the street is a 25 m.p.h.
residential street. The street is bordered by Stockdale School on the east side. The
S. M. A. R. T. trailer was utilized in the 700 block of Camino Del Oeste on October 13 ,
1994. The traffic volume on Camino De1 Oeste is very light until parents drop off
and pick up their children for school. District officers have been notified of the
complaints, and radar enforcement will be conducted as calls for service permit.
..... ��. . . ....................
A. L. Scott, Sergeant
Traffic Supervisor
ALS / ik
traffic\councom.als
y_ \_--_t
•
B A K E R S F I E L D
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
October 19, 1994
TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager
FROM: Raul M. Rojas, Public Works Director/G�� �
SUBJECT: Councilmember DeMond's Request
Attached please find the memorandum from Stephen Walker regarding various traffic
issues.
�
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT':
�;,,�
�
B A K E R S F I E L D
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
Stephen L. Walker,l�raffic Engineer
Ranl Rojas, Public Works Dir�ctor
October 4, 1994
COUNCILMEMBER DeMOND's REQUEST
t
1. Flower Street between Alta Vista Drive & Baker Street
Requested Speed Survey be done at above locations.
2. Inyo Street & Jefferson Street
Requested Stop Sign Study.
3. 19th Street & "L" Street
Update regarding warranxs for sigrials.
MEMORANDUM
Traffic Engineering
DATE: October 11, 1994
TO: RAUL M. ROJAS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
FROM: STEPHEN L. WALKER, TRAFFIC ENGINEER J�I�
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR NEW SPEED LIMIT STUDY ON FLOWER STREET
BETWEEN ALTA VISTA DRIVE AND BAKER STREET.
A speed limit study has been placed on our work schedule for this location and data should
be collected within the next week to 10 days. Once data on the speeds of this street are
collected, we will analyze them and make a recommendation.
For your information and use, the last speed study covering this segment of roadway was
made about 3 years ago in June, 1991. Per the California Vehicle Code, we are required
to perform a new study every five years in order to enforce the speed limit with radar. In
the previous 1991 study, the speed was determined to be 35 MPH based on the 85th
percentile speed of 37.50 MPH. The law allows the calculated speed to be lowered 5 MPH
if adequate engineering justification is documented. In this case, the speed was further
lowered to 30 MPH on the justification that it is a residential area. The cunent posted
speed for Flower, between Alta Vista Drive and Baker Street is 30 MPH.
cc: Fred HIoepper, Assistant Public Works Director
Bruce Deeter, CE III, Tr�c Engineering
Brad Underwood, CE III, Tr�c Engineering
PW Memo Files
Tr�c Engineering File - Flower Street Speed Study
slw+: p:\wp\1994\FlwrSped.Mem
- �-
� . �
w
�
�
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
City of Bakersfield Department of Public Works
ROADWAY: FLOWER STREET
LIMITS OF SPEED SURVEY: BEALE TO ALTA VISTA
DATE: 6/12/91 TIME BEGIN: 1605 TIME END: 1646 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 30
OBSERVER: EM, ENGINEERING AIDE I
PREVAILING SPEEDS
MEAN SPEED
85TH PERCENTILE SPEED
PACE
WEATHER: SUNNY AND CLEAR
31.80
�3 � �� �
27-37
TWO YEAR HISTORY OF ACCIDENT RECORDS: NOT A FACTOR
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS NOT READILY APPARENT: RESIDENTIAL AREA
In accordance with methods determined by Section 8-03.3B, sub-sections
2.a through 2.c, of the California Department of Transportation Traffic
Manual and as required by Section 627 of the California Vehicle Code,
I recommend the following to be the safe enforceable speed limit for the
above section of roadway:
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT,I 3
��p�rESSlp�yq�
��Q��N l. Wq���` y�.
�� � m
No.32300 m
�
EXP. �Z - !' 9Z *
T CIV��- ���
��9
U� CA��i
BY : — � Zo 9/
St en L. Walker Date
oQPpFESS/pN Traffic Engineer
�Q�, Q��N L. Wq�q`�•'L ' T. E. 11900
� �'�� �`�9 cy
�w` fvo. 1191 �
EXP. J2 -3/ -9/
�r *
`��' TRAFF��' ���
9�OF CAUF�Q,
MEMORANDUM
Traffic Engineering
DATE: October 12, 1994
TO: RAUL M. ROJAS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
FROM: STEPHEN L. WALKER, TRAFFIC ENGINEER �����'Gv
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR STOP SIGN STUDY AT THE INTERSECTION OF
INYO STREET AND JEFFERSON STREET.
We have scheduled the requested stop sign study into our workload. I elcpect to have traffic
volume data collected within about three weeks and a recommendation shortly afterwards.
We will also be reviewing any accidents reported to the Bakersfield Police Department. This
intersection does not appear to have been investigated in the past and no previous studies
were found.
cc: Fred Kloepper, Assistant Public Works Director
Bruce Deeter, CE III, Traffic Engineering
Brad Underwood, CE III, Traffic Engineering
PW Memo Files
Tr�c Engineering File - Inyo Street at Jefferson Street
st�r. d:\wp\1994\In}roJeff.Mem
J ..�
MEMORANDUM
Traffic Engineering
DA'I'E: October 10, 1994
TO: RAUL M. ROJAS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
FROM: STEPHEN L. WALKER, TRAFFIC ENGINEER ��
SUBJEC"T: RESPONSE TO COUNCILMEMBER DeMOND'S REQUEST FOR
UPDATE TO TRAFFIC CONTROLS STUDY ON L AT 19TH ST.
The intersection was studied for possible added traffic controls and operational
improvements. The intersection does not meet any of the warrants for a multi-way stop.
Only two accidents reported to the Bakersfield Police Department during the last 12 months
were in the intersection and of a type that might not have occuned with stop signs.
The intersection does meet one out of eleven traffic wanants for traffic signals. The
wanant is based on traffic volumes during the four peak hours of a day. This was due, in
part, to the recent opening of the new Superintendent of Schools office one block south at
18th and L Street. None of the other ten traffic signal warrants for volume, delay or
accidents were met.
Since at least one wanant for a traffic signal was met, the location was added to our priority
list of future traffic signal projects for consideration in the next available Capital
Improvements Projects budget (1995-96 fiscal year).
cc: Fred Kloepper, Assistant Public Works Director
Bruce Deeter, CE III, Traffic Engineering
Brad Underwood, CE III, Traffic Engineering
PW Memo Files
Tr�c Engineering File - 19th and L Streets
slw: d:\wp\1994U @19Updt.Mun
_ — Time Warner Cable
Bakersfield Division
4 o Ga � c� a Q a� Q
¢ a a a �
October 17, 1994
Mr. Alan Tandy, City Manager
City of Bakersfield
- - - - 1-501 Tr-uxtu-n Ave�u�e� -=_-: ._. -:.,_ _.�„�_.� . � �..,-� �...,�,_ , _ ..,
Bakersfield, CA 93:301
Dear Mr. Tandy:
� u��� \A�L�% —�
_�..��.�-- - _-_ �,i
,
i;� � i � �99Q. � �
---� ;I
�9� 6�41i��rl�.���°� ����(��'�I
Section 9° of`the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, requires
the Federal Communications Commission to collect fees from cable
television systems on an annual basis. The purpose of requiring
cable systems to pay regulatory fees to the Commission is to permit
the Commission to recover the annual cost of its various regulatory
activities.
The fee, which amounts to $.37 per subscriber per year, will be
passed on to subscribers as allowed by the Federal Communications
Commission. It will appear on the bills as a new line item,
similar to the existing line for franchise fees,
Subscribers will be billed as follows:
December 1994 -- February 1995: $0.03 per month
March 1995 - September 1995: $0.04 per month
--t�Te -wil-1.- be--no�ifying--subscribers of this new charge on tlieir
upcoming bills, and the fee will first appear on the December 1
bills.
Please give me a call if you have any questions.
Ve y truly yours,
,��--� �
Ja es E. Munoz
b';rector, Human Resources,
Community & Government Relations
JEM:lh
fcc.1
Time Warner Cable Bakersfield Division
3600 lVorth Sillect Avenue Bakersfield CA 93308 Tel 805.327.9935 Fax 805.327.4074
A Division of Time [T�¢rner Entertainment Comyany, L.P.
;\
MEMORANDUM
$AKE
� 0�4�0,�...��,�,�
�
� r
d
� �
�AL� ♦
TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager
FROM: Gene Bogart, Water and Sanit tion Manager
October 20, 1994
SUBJECT: UPDATE - Solid Waste Management Advisory Committee
The new members of the downsized Solid Waste Management Advisory Committee
(SWMAC) were seated at the regularly scheduled meeting last Friday, October 14th at
. 9:OOa,m.� As you are aware, state law mandates that counties and cities in Califomia appoint
a Local Task Force (LTF) to ensure a coordinated and cost-effective regional recycling
system. The SWMAC has served in this dual-role for many years and will continue to do
so under the new membership. �
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
10)
The membership of the SWMAC and LTF is now as follows:
Membership
Industry - Metropolitan Bakersfield Hauler
Industry - Non-Metropolitan Bakersfield Hauler
Industry - Metropolitan Bakersfield Recycler
Industry - Non-Metropolitan Bakersfield Recycler
Industry - Large Volume Waste Generator
Industry - Small Volume Waste Generator
Bakersfield City Council
Association of Cities Representative
Kem Co. Supvr. (not serving on Int. Gov. Comm.)
Kem Co. Supvr. (serving on Int. Gov. Comm.)
AUpointee
Bob Bovee (Chairman)
Mike Thomas (Kernville area)
Dennis Lynch (Granite Const.)
Paul Benz (Tehachapi area)
Ron Chambers (Shell Oil-Vice Chair)
Brian Hobin (Niagara Car Wash)
Pat DeMond
Cathy Prout (ShaBer)
Ken Peterson
Mary K Shell
Also attached for your review and information is a summary of the major legislative
mandates (since 1984) that are currently driving our solid waste activities in California.
These summaries were made available to the committee members and give a good, quick
look at the legislative requirements we are now having to deal with.
Also, for information, Councilmember Pat DeMond (with full consent of the
committee) re-established the "Metropolitan Subcommittee" to discuss on-going City-County
solid waste and recycling issues. As before, the subcommittee membership will consist of
City Councilmember Pat DeMond, the two County Supervisors and Robert Bovee
UPDATE - Solid Waste Management Advisory Committee October 20, 1994
representing Kern Refuse Inc. (the contract haulers). The subcommittee will continue to
meet at noon on alternate months at City Hall and the County Public Services Building.
I will let you know as soon as the date and location is set for the ne�rt Metro Subcommittee
meeting.
If you have any questions or need further information regarding these items, please call
me.
GB:sr
Attachment
cc: Gai1 Waiters, Assistant City Manager
Mike Sides, Solid Waste Superintendent
Maurice Randall, Business Manager
2
, -
.
� .
AB 3525 (1984)
• Established Solid Waste Assessment Test (SWAT) Program
• Prompted revisions to State Water �oard Regulations concerning
groundwater monitoring and remediation requirements (Chapter 15
of Title 23 of California Code of Regulations)
IMPACTS:
• 21 SWAT reports completed.
• 5 Burn Dump assessments in progress and many more in line.
• 88 monitoring wells installed and sampled quarterly.
• 45 lysirneters installed and sampled quarterly.
• Additional evaluation monitoring ongoing at 5 landfiils, remediation
imminent at 1 (Kern Valiey).
I'
AB 2448 (1987)
• Established requirements for Closure
Funds
• Established State Cleanup Fund (abolished 1993)
• Prompted revisions to State Waste Board Regulations concerning
Closure and Post Closure Maintenance Plans. (Title 14 of California
Code of Reg�lations)
IMPACTS:
• Creation of closure fund for each landfill and annual deposits until
closure.
• 15 Preliminary Closure and Post Closure Maintenance Pians
submitted to State.
• 4 Final Closure and Post Closure plans submitted to the State.
• Currently preparing construction pians for ciosure of two landfilis
(Glennviile and McFarland/Delano).
' � ::: ':'
`_`r."�- - �
• Required development of Household Hazardous UUaste
Programs
�-----�. _ _ _,
• Prompted development of regulations for hazardous waste
loadchecking programs at landfilis
IMPACTS:
• Annual Household Hazardous Waste Coliection Events.
• Public awareness program
• Periodic loadchecking by County staff at a{i facilities.
0
0
� � / �
�
(1989)
• Established the Integrated Waste Management Board
• Established fee/ton of waste disposed to fund the new Board
(currently $1.34Jton)
• Mandated each jurisdiction to reduce its waste disposai 25% by
1995 and 50% by 2000
• Required each jurisdiction to prepare an Integrated Waste
Management Plan, having the following Elements:
• Source Reduction and Recycling (SRRE)
� Household Hazardous Waste (HHWE)
• Non-Disposal Facility (NDFE)
• Siting
• Summary Plan
• Required each jurisdiction to perform a Waste Characterization
Study
IMPACTS:
• Pay quarterly fee of $1.34/ton on ail waste disposed at landfills.
• Completed a comprehensive study of waste quantity generated,
disposed and diverted in Kern County and determination of
�urisdiction of origin.
• Completed and adopted SRRE and HHWE (currentty revising).
• In process of preparing NDFE and Siting Element.
• � implemented gate fees.
• Estabiished source reduction and recycling awareness programs.
• Established waste diversion programs.
CEQA UPGR/�DE (1990)
• California lntegrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB) and
Attomey General request that Kern Counfiy prepare Environmental
Impact Reports (EIRs) for most solid waste projects instead of
Negative Deciarations (ND)
�
IMPACTS:
• 4 Staff inembers added to prepare environmental impact reports
and permit documents.
• 5 EIRs certified by Board �f Supervisors.
• 4 more EIRs in progress; many more expected in the future.
• 2 NDs certified by Board of Supervisors; one in progress.
• 1 new landfifi� permitted.
• 1 landfill repermitted.
• 1 transfer station repermitted.
• Many more landfill/transfer station repermits in progress.
AB 1843 (1991 j
• Prompted regulations which ban the
disposal of whole tires at municip�
landfills
IMPACT:
• Tire diversion program" at most County landfills and a tire ban at
other County Waste Management facilities.
* Self-funding program. $1.00 per passenger tire charged to recover
cost of program.
�
AB 1760 & CLEAN AIR ACT (1992)
• Effectively bans the disposal of large
appliances "white goods" (such as ,
refrigerators, air conditioners, etc.) at landfills
IMPACT:
C��
��
• White Goods diversion program" at all County Waste Management
facilities.
� Program costs included under general $29/ton disposal fee per
SWMAC recommendation.
- -� _
____
� c
SUBTITLE D
STATE IMPLEMENTATION (1993)
0 ���
• Federal rules, governing solid waste management
• Major areas addressed:
• Siting issues
• Liner Requirements
• Groundwater Monitoring
• Gas Monitoring
• Closure Requirements
IMPACTS:
• Prescriptive composite liners:
• 22-acre project out to bid for Shafter/Wasco Landfill
• 20�acre project under design for Bena Landfill
• 4liner projecis in next 4 years
• Modifying groundwater testing program for compliance.
• Adding gas monitoring component to landfill monitoring and
reporting program.
* Kem County has embarked upon a major effort, requesting that the State
Water Resources Contro/ Board revise a policy fhat requires a on�size-fits-
all, prescriptive liner policy instead of following the lead of Subtit/e D,
a/lowing site-specific, performance-based design, which is estimated to
cost mone than $138 million for the remaining 1,100 undeveloped acres at
Bena Lan�ll.
\
._..:?a.���s�— •".a.:
�.:
�/���
CALIFORNIA
PUBLIC �.ITILlTIES COMMISSION
ON ELEGTRIC COMPETITION
The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) wants your
comments on its proposa( to allow competition in the electric
services industry and to change how it regulates electric utilities.
This is expected to lower eiectric rates. The CPUC hearing in
your area will be:
Tuesday - November 1- 7 p.m., Bakersfieid
City Council Chambers - 1501 Truxtun Avenue
The CPUC proposes to allow customers to buy electricity from
any supplier including local utilities starting with large industrial
ciastomers in 1996. AI! customers including residential would
have this choice by 2002.
Anyone who does not speak English and would like to speak at
the hearing should call the CPUC Public Advisor at 415-703-
2074 by Qctober 25 to request an interpreter.
Anyone wanting to coment who cannot attend the hearing may
writy to the CPUC Public Advisor, 107 S. Broadway, Rm. 5109,
Los Angeles, CA 90012. Y<<_= -. --
..
�
,�_�` :a `�
CAL��O�I�1�� �'�J�LIC �ILI'�'IES COI�I�I��ION
1'ropo�al to Change Electric
Utility IZegulation
'The electric indus�y
is undergoing great
change in response to
new federal law a�d
ne�v technology. Al�o,
California's electric
rates �re much higher
than ihe national
average.
In response to this, the
California Public Utilities
Commission (CPUC) has
issued a proposai to chan�e
t�� way it re�ulates the
elecfi.ric industry in
CaliFornia.
The goals are to lowes�
electr�ic rates and provide
consusners with a choice of
electr�icity suppliers. The
Comrnission believes that
lower rates and competition
among many electricity
suppliers will create more
jobs and improve
California's economic
strength, and ability to
compete with other states
and countries.
��� �s �.f��c��c��
If implemented, the
proposal woulci affect all
industrial, agricultural,
commercial, and residential
electricity consumers and
Pacific Gas & Electric, San
Diego Gas & Electric,
Southern California Edison,
Sierra Pacific, and Pacific
Power and Light.
Under the proposal,
consumers would be able to
purchase electricity from
any supplier including their
local electric utility so they
could choose the best price
and services to meet their
needs. This should callow
businesses to lower theip
costs by using less
electricity or usang it at a
tame of day whett it costs
less, r�nd indaviduals to
�°�duce tl�ear sraor�thIy el�ctt°ic
bill.
Target Dates
The largest industrial
customers would have this
"direct access" to electricity
suppliers beginning in 1996,
and all commercial
customers in 1999. By 2002,
all consumers, including
residential consumexs,
would have direct access.
Concerns have been
expressed regarding direct
access. Sorne people have
argued that direct access
would compromise the
state's environmental goals
by reducing government
encouragement of electric
generation that is
environmentally sensitive
and by reducing the
incentives for customers to
�-
conserve energy. Others are
concerned that the quality of
service may not continue to
be as high as it is now.
Comments Welcome
To address these
concerns, the CPUC is
asking for comments and
proposals from consumer
groups, environmental
groups, utilities and other
industry participants. The
Commission intenc�s to
continue to assure utility
eleciric service is saf�,
reliable, reasonably priced
and responsive to
environmental concerns
under any regulatory
program.
1lTew Rate��lcin� Syst�m
In addition to proposing
direct access, the
Commassion has proposed a
neza� za�ay of setting utility
rates called "performance-
' based ratemaking." This
would eliminate long,
cornplex and costly rate
cases to determine rates
based on the reasonableness
of utility operating expenses.
Instead, utility rates
would change using a
formula that would reflect
inflation, how efficient a
utility is in producing and
providing electric service,
�
�
and other factors affecting
u�.i��� ��st�.
The Commission believes
that under performance-
based regulation, a utilify
has more incentive to be
efficient and make good
business decisions and
invest»aents because it is
responsible for recovering
the costs of its decisions and
investrnents—it can't look to
the CPUC to authorize
recovery of those costs in
rates. However, the
Commission would oversee
utility activity to assure
ut�afi��� c�alfinue fa p��vide
high quality service. The
CPUC already uses this kind
of regulation to set Pacific
Bell and GTEC phone rates,
and believes it has been
successful in keeping rates
low.
Pacific Gas & Electric,
Southern Califomia Edison,
and San Diego Gas &
Electric have responded to
the Commission's interest in
performance-based
ratemaking by submitting
�
i::,�,:���
proposals which the
CC3IT'tlYiiS51�i11� CL1�3['�i1�Y
reviewing.
The CPUC is holding
public participation
hearings in November to
hear what you think about
direct access and
performance-based
ratemaking. Your
pariicipation in these
hearings will help the CPUC
evaluate and refine its
proposal.
CPLJC Public Participaiion Hearing Scheclule
BAKEItSFIEL.D I�Tove�ber 1 7 p.nn. Ci�y Council Ckea�bers
1501 Tstaxfun Ave�aue
VENTLIRA RTo�eunb�r 2 i p.ub. Co�a�cal C�a�bea�, Gaty �iall
501 Poli Siree�
GA�RDEN GROVE November 2 7 p.m. Garde� Grove Community Center
11300 Stanford Aeenue
CARSON Noeember 3 7 p.m. Carson Community Center
3 Civic Plaza
SAN BERNARDINO Noeember 9 7 p.m. State Building Auditorium
303 dVest Thir� Stgeei
HiJN'TING'TOI� PARK November 10 7 p.m. City Council Ch�mbers
65591Q1�il�s �ve�iu�
The hearing rooms are accessible to participants in wheelchairs. Anyone who wishes to comment on
the CPUC electric proposal but cannot attend a public participation hearin�; may send written
comrr�ents to the Public Advisor, California Public Utilities Commission, l0i 5outh Broadway, Room
5109, Los Angeles, CA 90012.
Anyone who does not speak English and would like to speak at a hearing should contact the CPUC
Public Advisor at 415-703-2074 at least five days before the hearing to request an interpreter.0
Inform�tion on Internet
To provide the widest possible access to proceeding documents, the Commission posts them on the
Internet. Access is through a software program called "Gopher:" Use either "gopher.cpuc.ca.gov" or
anonymous FTP at "ftp.cpuc.ca.god'. Questions about the program can be directed to Kale Williams at
415-703-3251, or by electronic mail to klw�cpuc.ca.gov. Questions about the gopher server should be
directed to "gopher- admin@cpuc.ca.gov".
October 2,1994
................... ....................................................................
.,
II --- _ �'
STATE CAPITOL
SACRAMENTO, CA 94249-0001
�� (916)445-8498
DISTRICT OFFICES:
❑ 100 W. COLUMBUS STREET
SUITE 201
BAKEF;SFIELD, CA 93301
�805) 324-3300
❑ 821 WEST MORTON AVENUE, ttC
PORTERVILLE, CA 93257
(209) 783$152
October 6, 1994
��Xt#�arxtttt `�i�e�YS.l�x#ixr�
. 5TA T�
`Q. .
� �
Oi �
O Rj
ar�r� • ����
TRICE HARVEY
ASSEMBLYMAN, THIRTY-SECONO DISTRICT
The Honorable Alan Tandy
City Manager
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Dear Mr. Tandy:
COMMITTEES:
AGRICULTURE
RULES
WATER, PARKS, AND WILDLIFE
HEALTH
,..,.�..�.... ._,... � �.. _�_.._.._...
Y - .: . .
i ..
� �-:...,<_-..
�:,,..,,, , - , . . .
�_.�� ; .�..-_�.. ..,..
Thank you for your letter expressing support for the State
Enterprise Zone program and your concerns regarding any attempt
to negatively alter the current state incentives.
You will be pleased to know that SB 344 and SB 1438, relating to
this issue, were amended during the final days of the legislative
session to authorize the Trade and Commerce Agency to designate
two additional enterprise zones that meet specified criteria,
leaving the current incentives intact. These bills were passed
as amended and signed into law by the Governor on September 22nd
(Chapter 750 and 754, respectively). Enclosed are copies of the
chaptered versions of the bills for your perusal.
Again, thank you for your communicatian. I hope you will
continue to keep me informed on state issues of interest to you.
Sincerely,
TRTCE HARVEY
Assemblyman, Thirty-second District
TH:cl
Enclosures
- — - __ _
-
��
Senate Bill No. 344 �
CHAPTER 750
An act to add Sections 7073.2 and 7085.5 to the Government Code,
relating ta enterprise zones, and declaring the urgency thereof, to
take effect immediately.
[Approved by Govemor September 22, 1994. Filed with
Secretary of State September 23, 1994.)
LEGiSLATIVE COUI�iSEL'S DIGFST
SB 344, Greene. Enterprise zones.
Under the Employment and Economic Incentive Act, targeted
economic development and neighborhood economic development
program areas are designated and receive tax incentives, special
assistance, startup, capital, and other incentives for private
investment and employment.
This 6ill would provide that a program area or part of a program
area may be redesignated as an enterprise zone by the lacal
governing body if the affected area is designated as surplus under
specified federal base closure statutes. The bill would specify tax
implications resulting from such a redesignation.
The bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an
urgency statute.
The people of the State of CaliFornia do enact as follows:
SECTION 1. Section 70732 is added to the Government Code, to
read:
70732. Any program area or part of a program area that is
redesignated as an enterprise zone pursuant to Section 7085.5 shall
be deemed designated by the agency pursuant to Section 7073 and
sha11 be excluded from the computation of the allowable number of
enterprise zones as set forth in paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of
Section 7073. For purposes of applying any provision of the Revenue
and Taxation Code, any enterprise zone designated pursuant to
Section 7085.5 shall be deemed designated by Section 7073.
SEC. 2. Section 7085.5 is added to the Government Code, to read:
7085.5. (a) A program area or part of a program area may be
redesignated as an enterprise zone by the enactment of an ordinance
or resolution by the governing body of the local jurisdiction. The
redesignarion shall be deemed made by the agency pursuant to
paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 7073.
(b) The redesignation shall take effect upon the date the
ordinance or resolution is passed, adopted, or otherwise enacted and,
for purposes of the Revenue and Taxarion Code, each of the
following shall apply:
ss iio
_ _
_ �
f
Ch. 750 _ 2 _
(1) The redesignation shall be applied to taxable or income years
beginning on or after January 1 of the calendaz yeaz in which the
ordinance or resolution is passed, adopted, or otherwise enacted.
(2) For taxable or income years described in paragraph (1), a
taxpayer shall be treated as conducting business activities in an
enterprise zone (not a program area), except that the carryover of
any unused credits or deductions attributable to the program area
from prior taxable or income years shall continae to be allowed and
any limitation based upon program azea income. (or tax attributable
to that income) shall be computed using the current income
attributable to the enterprise zone.
(c) This section is only applicable to property designated as
surplus under the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1988
(P.L. 100-526) or the Defense Base Closure and Realigrunent Act of
1990 (10 U.S.C. Sec. 2687 et seq. ) and is scheduled to be transferred
to a city within a county with over one million persons and the
transfer takes place pursuant to a base reuse plan adopted by the city
council prior to December 1994.
SEC. 2. This act is an urgency statute necessary for the
immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety within
the meaning of Article N of the Constitution and shall go into
immediate effect. The facts constituting the necessity are:
In order for the economic benefits of this act to be achieved as soon
as possible, it is necessary that this act take effect immediately.
❑�
95 120.
- --��' �
Senate Bill No. 1438
CHAPTER 754 �
An act to amend Section 7073 of, and to add Section 7073.7 to, the
Government Code, relating to economic development.
S
[Approved by Governor September 22,_1994. Filed with
Secretary of State 5eptember 23, 1994.]
{
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGFST
SB 1438, Mello. Enterprise zones.
Existing law authorizes the governing body of a city or county to
propose the designation of areas within its respective jurisdiction as
enterprise zones based upon specified findings that those areas aze
depressed areas and in need of private sector investment. The Trade
and Commerce Agency is authorized to designate by DecembPr 1991
not more than 25 enterprise zones within the state based on its
determination that the zones propose the most effective, innovative,
and comprehensive regulatory tax program, and other incentives in
attracting private sector investment in the zones proposed. The
agency is also authorized 'to designate 2 enterprise zones from
applications by cities with a population less than 25,000. The existing
Personal Income Tax Law and the Bank and Corporation Tax Law
authorize various credits against the taxes imposed by those laws,
including wages paid or incuned by an employer to a qualified
disadvantaged individual who meets specified criteria. The criteria
include being hired by the employer after the designation of the azea
in which services were performed as an enterprise zone.
This bill would require the agency to designate 2 additional
enterprise zones that meet prescribed criteria. 'This bill would
extend the existing tax credits to the 2 additional enterprise zones
designated by the agency pursuant to these provisions. The bill
would also . require the agency to review the progress and
effectiveness of each enterprise zone, as specified, and report its
findings to the Legislature.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
SECTION 1. Section 7073 of the Government Code is amended
to read:
7073. (a) The governing body of any city or county may, either
by ordinance or resolution, propose an eligible area plus one
commercial or industrial area or both wiChin its respective
jurisdicrion as the geographic area for an enterprise zone. A county
may propose an area within the unincorporated area as the
geographic area for an enterprise zone, but shall not propose an area
within an incorporated area. This proposed geographic area shall be
92 110
Ch. 754 — 2 —
__�
based upon findings by the governing body that the area is a
depressed area and that the designation as an enterprise zone is
necessary in order to assist in attracting private sector investment in
the area. The city or county shall establish definitive boundaries for
the area to be included in the application for designation and, if
designated by the agency, the designation shall be binding for a
period of 15 years. • �
(b) Following the application for designation of an enterprise
zone by a city or county, the goveming body shall apply to the
agency for designation. The agency shall adopt regulations and
� guidelines concerning the necessary contents of each application for
designation.
(c) Any city, county, or city and county with an eligible area
within its jurisdiction may complete a greluninary application. A
ma�mum of 20 applications may be chosen each year ta complete
a final application. � , , � � - - . �
(d) (1) From the applications received, the agency may
designate not more than 27 enterprise zones withiu the state, one of
which may be designated an airport enterprise zone and not more
than three of which may be designated high technology enterprise
zones.
(2) In the case of any existing enterprise zone or area established
pursuant to Chapter 12.9 (commencing witti Sectian.7080), or any
new enterprise zone or area established pursuant to Chapter 12.9
(commencing with Section 7080) designated on or after the effective
date of the act adding this paragraph, a city or county may propose
that the enterprise zone or area established pursuant to Chapter 12.9
(commencing with Section 7080) within the incorporated area be
expanded by 15 percent to include definitive boundaries that aze
contiguous to the enterprise zone or area established pursuant to
Chapter 12.9 (commencing with Section 7080) . The agency may
approve that expansion for enterprise zones based upon the criterion
specified in subdivision (g), and for expansion of areas established
pursuant to Chapter 12.9 (commencing with Section 7080), the
criterion specified in Section 7082.
(3) Notwithstanding any other provision to the contrary, the two
additional enterprise zones authorized by the: act adding this
pazagraph shall be designated by the agency pursuant to Section
7073.7. For the purposes of applying any provision of the Revenue
and Taxation Code, the two additional enterprise zones designated
pursuant to Section 7073.7 shall be deemed designated by this
section.
(e) The agency shall review the progress and effectiveness of each
enterprise zone within five years of the date of designation, or by
December 31,1999, for zones designated prior to January 1,1994, and
every five years thereafter, and report the findings to the
Legislature.
( fl In designating enterprise zones, the agency shall select from
s2 i3o
r -
— 3 -- Ch. ?54
the applications submitted those proposed enterprise zones which,
based on those applications, meet, to the extent possible, the
following criterion: ai :-. � � � .. . .
Those proposed enterprise zones which, upon a comparison of all
of the applications submitted, indicate that�they propose the most
effective, innovative, and comprehensive regulatory, tax, program,
and other incentives in attracting private sector irivestrnent. in the
zone proposed. �r � � � f , : � . . : f '
For purposes of this subdivision, regulatorx incentives include, but
are not limited to, all of the following: the suspension or relaxation
of locally originated or modified building cc�des, zoning laws, general
development plans, or rent controls; the elimination or reductioa of
fees for applications, pemnits, and local government services; and the
establishment of a streamlined pernut process. .
Tax incentives include, but are not limited to, the eliinination or
reduction of construction taxes or business.license taxes��;.r> .�; °��
Program and other incentives may include, but are not limited to,
all of the following: the provision or expansion of inirastructure; the
targeting of federal . block grant moneys, including small cities,
education, and health and welfare block grants; the targeting of
economic development grants and loan moneys, including grant and
loan moneys provided by the federal Urban Development Action
Grant program and the federal Economic Development
Administration; the targeting of state and federal job disadvantaged
and vocational education grant moneys, including moneys provided
by the federal Job Partnership Training Act of 1982; the targeting of
federal or state transportation grant moneys; and the targeting of
federal or state low-income housing and rental assistance moneys.
In the process of designating new zones, the agency shall take into
consideration the location of existing zones and make every effort to
locate new zones in a manner that will not adversely affect any
existing zones.
(g) In evaluating applications for designation, the agency shall
ensure that applications are not disqualified solely because of
technical de�iciencies and shall provide applicants with an
opportunity to correct the deficiencies. Applications shall be
di.squalified if the deficiencies are not corrected within two weeks.
(h) For purposes of this section, "high technology enterprise
zone" means an enterprise zone which is intended to attract private
sector investment in high technology industries and is proposed to
be located in an area which would permit the association of those
industries with an urban university or college.
(i} The applications and selection criteria for designation adopted
pursuant to Section 7076 prior to the effective date of the act adding
this subdivision shall apply to this section, as amended by the act
adding this subdivision.
(j } Section 7076 sha11 not apply to the extent it conflicts with the
provisions of the act adding this subdivision.
92 160
_ _`-�-� � '_�-._ --- -�� ' `
,� ,
Ch. 754 — 4 —
(k) For purposes of this section, "airport enterprise zone" means
an enterprise zone intended to attract private sector investment in
aviation-dependent industries, commercial aviation, and other
commercial and industrial activity and which includes a rural airport
located within unincorporated territory. -
SEC. 2. Section 70T3.7 is added to the Government Code, to read:
7073.7. The agency shall designate two enterprise zones each of
which shall meet at least two of the following three criteria:
(a) The unemployment rate in the area has been twice the state
average for each of the. preceding five yeazs.
(b) The. median household income for the area is less than 90
percent of the median household income for the county in which the
area is located.
(c) The designated area has grown at least 8 percent in population
per year for each of the prececling two years but has not had a
corresponding percentage growth in area employment
..,:: .
C
�.-.
s2 i7o