The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About12/30/94�_ ,�. �_. , '' � B A K E R S F I E L D MEMORANDUM T0: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: GENERAL INFORMATION December 30, 1994 1. Good News! The second quarter sales tax distribution is up. It is at about the same 59'o increase above last year's level, which the first quarter was. That exceeds, considerably, our budgetary estimates. 2. There is always bad news to offset good news. The information from a second engineering analysis we had done relative to the Convention Center HUAC system is that it will be a very expensive project. We had initially budgeted $500,000 for it. It appears now that the true cost will range from $2 -$3 million. We are continuing to refine engineering work to see if this could be minimized. We are in a positive position relative to one- time capital improvements, as a result of a PERS rebate, and several items which resulted in monies being accrued over and above budget estimates. However, this is a very substantial expense and we will scrutinize it before bringing forward a detailed proposal. 3. Questions were raised by Councilmembers relative to the issue of when we redistrict boundaries, or change ward boundaries. A memo addressing some of those questions is enclosed. Most of that relates to how it was done last time. With respect to a question raised on whether a ward must have all of its parts contiguous to one another, the answer seems to be that this is a factor you should consider, as described in the Charter, but is not an exclusive condition. A legal opinion done in 1991 is enclosed. 4. Our Water people tell me that the local rains have not been nearly as positive in the South Sierra Water Shed, which is what forms the basis of our water supply. 5. We got lucky and "landed" a business for our airpark which operates seven airplanes in the pipeline inspection field. It is a relocation from a coastal operation and from Meadows Field. We have them, at �east temporarily, and are working on long-term arrangements. 6. A status report on the Coffee Road Bridge project is enclosed. Now that we `� have overcome the first hurdle, it articuiates where we are on the next set of steps. Also, on this same subject, enclosed is a copy of a thank you letter I sent to Texaco for their assistance with the State Water Quality Control Board. 7. I have attempted to call ali of you this week with respect to the major industrial prospect for which we are submitting a proposal. We have been gi�en an extension until Tuesday to submii. A draft copy of the proposal �' • ---'- HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL December 30, 1994 Page -2- is enclosed. It is, of course, subject to future Council consideration and approval. We are trying to be aggressive to land a major employer for the Incentive Area without overdoing it or exposing you to public criticism. It is 1,000 employees, we are told. 8. I have also tried to contact you, this week, on the status of the problem we have encountered relative to the refinanced debt. An underwriter error threatened our good name in the bond market with only a couple of days to develop a plan and resolve the dispute. A copy of the letter sent to the bond underwriter is enclosed. The disposition of that, as of noon on Friday, is the underwriter refused to cover their error. We are protecting our bond rating by advancing payment. We will ask you for authority to sue at the next meeting. 9. We received the enclosed notice from the Governor's Office regarding a seminar in Sacramento in March. This Executive Academy is designed to give insight into the Wilson Administration, and allow you to develop relationships with key people at the state level. They are asking for the number of people who may be interested in attending this seminar. 10. An Executive Summary of a Wastewater Master Plan Milestone Report is enclosed. 11. Enclosed is a detailed memo from the Police Chief on the COPS AHEAD Program Grant. This will be on your next agenda for approval. 12. Cox Cable has informed us of an increase in their rates. A letter from them on this subject is enclosed. 13. A nice letter from a local electrical firm commending our Building Department is enclosed. 14. Enclosed, from Public Works, is a status report on Capital Improvement Projects for Fiscal Year 1994-95. 15. Bakersfield Oiler Hockey Fans - best news of the week! We are actively working on booking four more dates for this season. It may require moving other events around, but we are trying hard! This reminds me that, with the new Holiday Inn ballroom, our booking policies need to be changed to have the Convention Center doing conventions, theater and sports as top priority - historic dinners that the private sector (Red Lion or Holiday Inn) can handle need to go there, with us only doing open date, late bookings for those kinds of things. We are preparing a new policy for your consideration. AT.alb Enclosures cc: Department Heads Carol Williams . Trudy Slater r. I''"��i�i/' � iii...�� , IJ."�o ��i��,�:; � :�,.. ��1 = ,�� = ;,. ,,.: � _ �� -: _,�„' �N��uu,,,� ' `�. _ ,; _ _�,1 ` �`,\�; ��=-:�-;.,�� TO: IOIIEMOR/1NDUM December 28, 1994 ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER FROM: PAMELA McCARTHY, ASSISTANT SUBJECT: 1991 WARD BOUNDARY CHANGES - ---=-�--� � ��-ii�� -U 1�'`,� � � v � � � -- - - - ___ - ; � DEC 2 � � j; �..�i �t; r � t.__ � ITY CLER� In response to your request, this date, regarding the formula and/or criteria used in establishing the new Ward �oundary lines in June, 1991, I found the following information: 2/ 13 / 91 - Council Meeting Motion approved. Council to meet as a whole to deliberate the reapportionment issue in public. 4/ 10 / 91 - Council Workshop 1. Presentation by Jack Hardisty introducing staff and demonstration of new computer equipment. A copy of a statement, (assumed to be that of Mr. Hardisty) in Clerk's file indicates new populations totals would be used and "we are shooting for 24,988 people in each ward or about 14.3$ each." ( Attached ) 2. � Council discussed the recommendations given by staff in Planning Director Hardisty's memorandum dated April 5, 1991. ( Attached ) Item No . 1. Motion approved . Precinct in which Councilmembers reside should remain in their respective Wards . 4. Item No. 2. Motion approved. Ward boundary adjustments will be based upon whole precincts, entirely within a Ward pursuant to City Charter an� County will work with City where precinct lines need to be adjusted. 5. Item No. 3. Motion approved, as follows: "Populations of each ward should be as equal as possible, though variati�ns may occur. due to geographic, topographic or population diiference between �ir�cincts . Neighborhoozl cohesiveness may also be a iac tor in some instances . r � � MEMO TO ALAN TANDY RE: 1991 Ward Boundary Changes December 28 , 1994 Page -2- 6. Item No. 4. Motion approved. Wards may have noncontiguous precincts, with intent to be as compact as possible. 7. Item No. 5. Motion approved. Boundary adjustments should affect as few people as possible, gerrymandering for political purposes should be mixiimized, and incorporating the concept that communities of interest be kept together whenever possible . 8. Item No. 6. Motion approved. All Councilmembers should participate in the reapportionment effort. 9. Motion approved. Setting hearing date for April 24, 1991. 4/ 24 / 91 - Council Meeting Public hearing was held. Preliminary boundary lines were drawn and ordinance to be brought back and given First Reading on May 8, 1991. 5/ 8/ 91 - Council Meeting Motion Approved . To eliminate ( emphasis added ) the criteria adopted at the last Council meeting regarding incumbency. 5/ 22 / 91 - Council Meeting Ordinance given First Reading, with changes . 6/ 5/ 91 - Council Meeting Ordinance No. 3370 regarding Ward Boundaries was adopted. Also, the Clerk's Ward Reapportionment file contains all draft Ethnic Population by Ward Reapportionment maps, charts and precinct information. I hope this answers your question. Please let me know if you need additional information, or want copies of the minutes on the above actions. :pam Attachment ( 2 ) cc: Gail Waiters, Assistant City Manager Carol Williams, City Clerk TANI7Y\1991WRD . MEM � � Honorabl� Mayor and City Council This evening I�aould like to take about ten minutes to intro- duce you to the starz and �quipment available to assist you in ward reapportionment, give you a quick damonstration of their capability and thzn discuss the issues and policies which you want to use in your reapportionment. Staff working on this project are Bruc� D�eter, Civil Engineer III of Public Works, Dave Dow, Associat� Planner and �im Eggert, Principal Planner. The computer equipment we will be using is comprised of HARDWARE: Compac 386-33 Memory �'�B RAM/320 MB Hard Drive; Mitsubishi 19" Color Monitor; CalComp Digitizer. SOFTWARE: Generation 5(GIS Interface); Oracle (Attribute Data Tables); Autocad (Graphics). PROJECTOR: In Focus Systems 480 cx PC Viewer; BACKUP: Laptop: Toshiba 3200 20 MB Hard drive with a lotus spread sh2et. It was iunded this year to evaluate the usefulness of a geographic information system (G.I.S.). This is our first opportunity to apply it to an actual city-wide project and demonstrate it to the City Council. Even though a complete GIS is several years away this program is easily adapted to solve problems like this. As a back-up we will also use a Lotus �pread sheet in a separate lap top computer. We will also supply you with additional paper :naps for your personal use and any other support within our ability to provid�. Without this equipment it used to take two planners seven weeks working full time to put the data together and another two weeks for a drafter to prepare the map. Even with the problems we had sorting out the census information this team working alternately on the computer compiled the data in three weeks and printed the map in three hours. At this point we are able to restructure all the wards with some discussion in about one hour. As you can see we are able to focus on all or any part of the city as we work on it. The changes are indicated by bac�cground color and the tabulation in the legend is automatically done showing the new population totals, the amount over or un3er th� av�rag� and percent ot total population. We are sracao,�Ag�..LOr 2�,8 peoolz in each warc�g�,.,aabq,ut 14�.�;�cn. With that 3s an introducti�n we stand ready to an�wer any questions you may have and look forwar3 to ��orking with you. (.��m� %-� C , U��,�c.o' 1-'�L;J u� ' l�Jo��o - y�lo /� I � ��tr�'t- t�1.�Jr� �rL(�� ll 0 ~ ` �. 1�� ' '' �.`��'+��::,.{y� - ,:; : ,, : =�„• ��,,,� , � ,�; ..,;�:.��'' MEMORANDUM APRIL 5, 1991 T0: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILI FROM: JACK HARDISTY, PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP -- WARD RE The Council requested a summary of various items regarding reapportionment. The major points I recall that the Council may wish to consider are: 1: The precinct in which Councilmembers reside should remain in their respective wards. 2. Ward boundary adjustments will be based upon whole precincts. Precincts shall be entirely within a ward pursuant to City Charter. However, the County has agreed to work with us where a precinct line may need to be adjusted. 3. Populations of each ward should be as equal as possible, though variations may occur due to geographic, topographic or population C differences between precincts. Neighborhood cohesiveness may also be a factor in some instances. It has been suggested that ward populations differ no more than 200 persons (approximately 1/10 of 1%). Precincts tend to have 700 - 800 people in them. 4. A ward may have noncontiguous precincts; however, how the areas may be related (ie. common geography, neighborhood cohesiveness, etc.) should be noted. It is the intent that wards be as compact as possible. 5. Boundary adjustments should affect as few people as possible. Gerrymandering for political purposes should be minimized. 6. All Councilmembers should participate in the reapportionment effort. The Council is reminded that a final decision for reapportionment is needed by May 22, 1991 in order for the changes to be completed by the County Elections Department for the next election. Planning Department staff has completed compilation of the 1990 Federal census data and has calculated populations of all voter precincts within the City. These precinct populations have been combined to provide the Council with current figures of each ward population. A map depicting these numbers with ward boundaries highlighted in color, is enclosed in each Councilmember's packet. Please let me know if my department can provide you with any additional ��' information for your review. i ., _ � ' ` I' Decembe �; 1994 TO: LARRY M. LUNARDINI, City Attorney FROM: LAURA C. MARINO, Deputy City Attorney LOUISE T. CLOSS, Assistant City Attorney SUBJECT: REQUIREMENT OF CONTIGUOUS BOUNDARIES�FOR COUNCIL WARDS ISSUE: Is there any requirement that council ward boundaries be contiguous? CONCLUSION: There is no requirement that council ward boundaries be contiguous. ANALYSIS: The Constitution of the State of California contains only one reference to district boundaries. Article XXI, Section 1, of the Constitution states: "§ l. Reapportionment In the year following the year in which the national census is taken under the direction of Congress at the beginning of each decade, the Legislature shall adjust the boundary lines of the Senatorial, Assembly, Congressional, and Board of Equalization districts in conformance with the following standards: �� (c) Every district shall be contiguous." This requirement, however, applies only to boundary lines of the "Senatorial, Assembly, Congressional, and Board of Equalization districts." It does not apply to local council wards. Memo to Larry Lunardini Re Requirement of Contiguous Ward Boundaries February 12, 1991 Page 2 Reapportionment of city districts is covered by Elections Code § 35100 et seq. Section 35101, which specifically applies only to general law cities, states in part: "...In establishing the boundaries of the districts the council may give consideration to the following factors: (a) topography, (b) geography, . (c) cohesiveness, contiguity, integrity, and compactness of territory, and (d) community of interests of the districts" Based on this section, general law cities have discretion to make their wards or districts contiguous. Such language is in contrast with the language of � 35103, which requires that the legislative body of a general law city annexing territory or consolidating with another city adjust boundaries "so that the districts shall be as nearly equal in population as may be ..." (emphasis added). The only Elections Code section which specifically addresses charter cities does not mention contiguity at all. Section 35150 requires that districts in charter cities be nearly equal in population. The Elections Code contains nothing concerning contiguous boundary requirements for charter cities. Finally, neither the Government Code nor the Federal Voting Rights Act were found to include requirements for contiguous boundaries at the local level. CONCLUSION: Neither the State Constitution nor the Elections Code, which addresses requirements for local election districts, requires that local election districts be contiguous. The Constitution mandates contiguity for districts for state elections. On the other hand, the discretionary language contained in the Elections Code for general law cities, and the absence of any reference to contiguous boundaries for charter cities for local elections indicates an intent to not impose such requirements on cities for local elections. LCM�meg OPINION� CONTIGWD.MEM �a ^ e B A K E R S F I E L D PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUNI � il ( � .-, - �{ � ; i� �,' DEG '' [__ �� ,ro -- P.�� ;, DATE: December 21, 1994 ' TO: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER , FROM: RAUL M. ROJAS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SUBJECT: COFFEE ROAD GRADE SEPARATION PROJECT STATUS ? � Iqg4 Immediately after the positive decision by the State Water Quality Control Board, we began moving forward with the project. The three basic elements of the project are as follows: 1. Environmental work. 2. Right of way acquisition. 3. Design (development of plans, specifications and estunate, P.S.&E.). The first two elements required Sunland Refining supply a"Right of Entry" to enter their property and perform the necessary work. That "Right of Entry" has been obtained. The only stipulation is that each sub-consultant must contact Sunland 48 hours prior to doing work. ENVIRONMENTAL WORK The environmental consultant (Kennedy/Jenks) has been retained by the district and will be proceeding with the work shortly. RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION Right of way acquisition will involve two separate appraisers. The first is a specialized appraiser that is thoroughly knowledgeable in refinery operations. They will also work closely with the en�ironmental consultant to determine what effects the contamination will have on property value. The appraiser has been chosen (Steven Klien) and will have an executed contract after the January 5, 1995 District meeting. The two remaining parcels, P.G.&E. and Bartell, will be appraised by the District's usual appraisal, Jerry Fisher. The appraisals should be complete by May 1, 1995. DESIGN Preliminary design is complete. Prior to final design going forward, a design agreement must be entered into. This agreement has been drafted and we should receive a copy for our review within a week or so. In this agreement, we could stipulate our involvement in the project with respect to design. Since the City is paying the lion's share of the project, it would seem to be appropriate for us to have whatever degree of involvement that we feel necessary. SCHEDULE We are about five (5) months behind schedule due to delays caused by the contamination issue. Based on this delay, the project should begin construction in early April, 1996 and take approximately one (1) year to complete. � ! s B A K E R S F I E L D Alan Tandy • City Manager December 27, 1994 Mr. Armand Abay General Manager Texaco Refiner�,� 6451 Rosedale Highway Bakersfield, CA 93308 Dear Mr. Abay: I just wanted to drop you a line to thank you greatly for allowing Anita Burke to help us out of a difficult situation recently. As you know, she volunteered some time to help us with the circumstance of an environmental problem which was hindering our ability to improve access to the Rosedale area, including to the Texaco Refinery itself. Her assistance allowed us to resolve the first phase of the problem. Please accept the grateful thanks of the City of Bakersfield for your dedicated community spirit. Our thanks to Anita Burke, also, for the excellent quality of her assistance and enthusiasm. Sincerely, i —� � an Tand� City Manager AT. al b cc: Ms. Anita Burke Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Bakersfield � City Manager's Office • 1501 Truxtun Avenue -Baker.sfield-�-C-al:ifornia� �-93301 �Qn�t �� . G�., iQn�� n � Qcn � B A K E R S F I E L D Alan Tandy • City Manager December 29, 1994 Ms. Virginia L. Horler Rauscher Pierce Refsnes, Inc. One Market Plaza 1100 Steuart Street Tower San Francisco, CA 94105 Dear Ms. Horler: Yo�ar firm serve� as underwriter in conjunction with the City of Bakersfield 198s Certificates of Participation. The majority of the certificate proceeds were used in the refunding of the City's 1985 Leasehold Mortgage Revenue Bonds. The refunding calculation which was prepared by your firm as underwriter, which is customary in the business, was in error as it related to the bond call premium required to be placed in escrow in order to facilitate the bond call. Our decision to move forward with refunding the $15 million outstanding was based upon the savings realization after taking into account the undetwriter's discount paid to your firm. Had we known the true savings was other than presented by your firm, the City might have chosen other options such as negotiating a different fee, contacting other underwriters or canceling the proposed refunding all together. Your firm's failure to perform on what is a fairly routine calculation has placed the City's ability to issue debt in the future and the City's standing in the municipal finance arena at great risk. The City cannot accept your proposal of December 28 to advance the $126,812.50 in the City's behalf since all contracts above $20,000 require Ciry Council approval. Additionally, the e�enditure of City funds also require City Council approval. Due to the short time frame in which some action is required, noticing and holding a legal City Council meeting during this holiday season is not practical. If your firm is not willing to pay the shortfall, I will authorize the City to do so and I will immediately seek authority to sue your firm for malfeasance to recover damages and to rectify this wrong. If I authorize payment of these funds, I must notify the City Council in writing at which time the purpose and circumstances surrounding the payment will become public information. I would prefer that you make the payment now, keeping open the potential for negotiation, arbitration or litigation of this matter when the time pressure for a potential payment problem is removed. Please advise me no later than 10:00 a.m. on Friday, December 30, 1994 as to your intentions regarding this matter. Since el --" i" � Alan Tandy City Manager AT/GJK/krc LGJK.20 City of Bakersfield � City Manager's Office • 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakecsfield _! California! _9_3301 IRFI�:I��Z7�-:1�m7-�1;:.s�-C%c�=-�'�`klC��:�='1A -1�Q�[-•`n= DEC-30-94 FRI 8�53 RAUSCHER PIERCE REFSNES FAK N0, 4158960205 �;; - ,:!-,s. ':j RAUSCHER PIERCE RE�Sr1�5, INC. December 29, 1994 Mr. Alan Tandy GYty Man�er C,ity of BskersSeld ISQI Tncxcnn Ave. Hake[Sfield, CA 9330L R�: Ciiy oP Hakerstield Public Facilitiee Corporatioa 1985 Leuschold Mort�ago Rovonue Bands Dear Mr. Taudy: P, 02 Yru P'Qastmlle Na (80S} 3i3-3780 ia respunso ta paur le�ter of Docember Z9 regerding iha above capdon�d bomis (t1w °Bonds'�. we advise Y� �� will n� w1� any fun8a to Hf�nk af Amerlae (�scrorv Agent'y to satis� the Cib''s redem9�n Paymertt oBllgadous comin� dus on Febnw�y 2, 1995. In order to avoid a patential def8utt, wC sUgge� that the Chy bArior it6legdl obligation �nd, jYdy wt�stever amrnnus tbe F.sc�aw Agem determi�s the City owes. Wtile we appreciate xour concern re�rding the ultimata sou�e of money to �y ihe City's debt, and wiWe we wlt! eontinue W di9cuss Wat marier with You next week, Qur:eview of the docutnents relating to We 1988 COP issue and our com�ersations with tha City's boad counsel (Frl�z 5tradlinp� all eonFum to us tLat the legal obIIgstion m pay the Bonds rests anty with tt�e City and tl�at a psyment ftom an}r uthar soarce would uNustly �rich the Cily. I will oontacx yon next wcck to di�cuss tbis issu� further and to evaluate acYy posslble manetary damag,es suffered by t}►e Cily as a resuit of We six year deferlal afpour payment obllgation. Sit�cerely, RAUS p1IItCE RE�SNES, WC. � � �� irginia .� Setliv�' Vice P'residenllManaging Director 'VI,H:acnm One Ma�icet Plaza, 1104 Steuart S�ree� Tower •$an kraaoiaw. Califomia 94105 •(d I S) 979-0380 • FAX (415) 596-0210 Membar New York SfOek EzC11rt1IgC, fn�- � __1�21/94 14:29:36 -> Bahersfield Page BB2 DEC-21-'94 WED 12:26 ID:INTER GOV AFFAIRS TEL N0:916 323-3749 C3�V�1tNOFt'S OFi�ICE December 24,19�4 To: cow�y Supavisare, M�Yo and City Cous�il Mamber's Prom: ��rol Whi r of Lrtargovermnental Afl�ir� R�: �XXECtl�TT1�E 11�ADEMX �503 P02 � The Gavemor's Office o�Ir�ergavBrmnental A�ire i� planning s aeminac in Sar�ramento for boEh nawly e�cted a:►d vatoran lacal officiala 'i'hts aam�rence w�1 enable you ta gtX an in�de look in#o the 1�V'il�pn Ad�doA and h�lp you de�velop beneRcial relationship� witb loey people at the steL� level. The Aoademy wiU also allow us the oppartunitY to Set to imaw you batter a� we work to�eth+e�' � the txurrin$ manths to f�ce tha ch�ll�� von$anting etatn and lo�l S�v�ameat. The Sxa�tive A�ademy w�ll have pres+�te�s 8ram variou� atate agendea ae�d departmentsk includi� �al EPA, Housing and Community Deveiopmart, �nci Trede �d Commerca�e, ta speak sbout thmr respeotive ,areas of ir�uence and how thCy work with cit[e� aad anunties acxo� the atate. The progem will aisa include digcusaians about the Governor's budget �nd poticy priocities for 1993. Since thi� ia a�rst-of-its-kind �vent, I am e�kin8 you to camplete the �trv�cy belaa► aad raturn i# by 7�►uary 5, 1993 so w� cann get sn eatimate of the numbar of p�ple who pl�n to at�en�d� �d id�tify �peciflc topics or ieauea whioh ar� a pdority fbr you and y�nuf cvbst�tuants. Tent�dve dat,�s Rar the two-day oonfe�nnce at� Wedn�sday, March 29 and T�c$day, Nlamh 30, 1995. The �veat shouid ooat about 5150 P�' P�o4 Plua hot�l and tcavd caet�. Yaur cooge�ion will c�suro th�t this event is a eua�a. I look �orward to �earing �om yau soon. Pleue c�t or tr,� � ----.--�..........�.____��_......_....---�-�—__��---��..r..e...�.,._� Please m�il or fax this farm by 7anuary 5, 1995 to: (3ov�rnor' � O�ce of Imeigt�vernmentst Affiirs� 14QO lOth Stro�t, Rown l09, SaGramento, CA 95814; Fax; 91G!'323-3749 Attemtion:llQ'ilae Placxntias !� ��e Tit1e _ - C�ty or County ' Phone Number 2) Are you i�erested ia this aeminar7 Ye� Na . Ifyeo� would you attand: ala�� e��'� 9) Are tlbere ar�y sp�al topica or issuas whic� s�re oFiuterest in y�ut juri�diction? Thi� t� not a tormai re�istrQtion; it u onty an indtcatiou a�' intersat� �V&RNOR FBT� WILSON • SacxnNtsrrrv. C�.FOxrr� 9: 814 •(91b) 445 2841 �--- _. � � EXECUI'IVE SUMMARY This executive suinmary presents the re�ommended improvement program and tinancial plan/revenue pro`�ram for the City of Bakersfield, through the Year 2O40. Details of this suminary are pre�ented in this milestone report. Backgr��und Brown and Caldwell was retained by the City of Bakersfield in August of 1�)��3 to develop a�vastewater master plan and supporting tinancial plan to guide the wastewater �ollertion, treatinent, and disposal improveinent5 well beyond the turn of the century, and to prepare the reyuired environmental impact report (EIR) in a��ordanc:e with California Environmental Quality A�t (CEQA) ��uidelines. This project has been conducted in pha�es, and periodic milestone reportti have been submitted to the City. Initially, a progress report, submitted in November of 1y93, set forth the fundamental elements needed to develop the master plan, such as population projection5, waste dis�harge reyuirements, proje�ted wastewater c:haracteristics, study area boundaries, and an evaluation of the exi�tin�� City Plants 2 and 3. Milestone Report No. 1 summarized the various alternatives considered and evaluated for the City on a cursory level, and re�ommended three re��ional wastewater alternative� for detailed evaluation. Milestone 2 pre�ented the detailed evaluation of three regional alternatives, and the recommended of the proposed regional wastewater alternative for detailed plannin`�. Milestone Report Nos. 3 and 4, combined into this sin�Tle report, su►nmarize the detailed plan and the supporting financial plan/revenue pro��ram. Recummended Impruvement Program By evaluatin�� variou5 e�onomic and non-economic e;riteria, ei`�ht re`�ional wa�tewater a(ternative� were evaluated; three of �vhich were evaluated in turther detail. From this detailed �valuation, Browil and Caldwell ha5 recommended a regional wastewater alternative to best tierve the �ommunity through the Year 2040. This overall plan proposes to: • Keep and upgrade existing Plant 2, which serves the east portion of the City; • Maintain operations at Plant 3 through the Year 2021, and subsec�uently decommission the plant to allow further development in this fast growing area of the City; • Develop and implement a new Plant 4 in the southwest Bakersfield area, to ,erve the growing Western Rosedale area, west Bakersfield and southwest areas of the community. Plant 4 is proposed to be constructed by the turn of the century; • Construct new trunk sewer� which will support the proje�ted wastewater tlows, and convey the wastewater to the new Plant 4 in the most economic manner (maximize gravity tlows). I =-='�1`.HPdtqKkSFLU`AtILG�TU\l\11L@ST(IN.NUc HPL:�ssrlll �/ , � Fr • Develop a long-term effluent disposal/reuse plan, with built-in tlexibility to -accommodate future changes. Plant 2. Plant 2 will be upgraded in Year 1997, to accoTnmodate future growth in the eastern Bakersfield area, particularly from the northeast area of the City. Additional flows are anticipated from the Northeast Trunk Sewer construction project. The prior design for the Plant 2 upgrade should be iinplemented, with modifications, as follows: construct new headworks, modify the grit re�noval system, upgrade the septage station, add one primary clarifier, two new trickling filters, one new sludge digester, and upgrade the sludge drying beds. The construction cost for these improvements i5 estimated at approximately $17 million. This recommended upgrade will be flexible enough to accommodate future flows up to 28.5 mgd, the rated capacity of the original Plant 2 upgrade package. Plant 3. Plant 3, due to the continued development of the City in the southwest, will continue operation at present capacity until the Year 2021. In the meantime, the City should consider purchase of developrr►ent rights along the north and east plant site boundaries, to restrii;t residential development i�nmediately adjacent to the plant site. No expansion of Plant 3 is recommended due to the rapid City growth surrounding the plant site. The Gist-brocades yeast plant waste should be re-considered for treatment at Plant 3, if feasible. When the new Plant 4 opens by the turn of the century, this yeast waste should be treated at Plant 4. Plant 4. A new Plant 4 is recommended to serve the west and southwe�t area of Bakersfield. With the anticipated growth in Western Rosedale, hook-up to the sewer system and abandonment of septic systems, and rapid development in the southwest area of the City, Plant 3 will reach its present capacity by Year 1999. In addition, the rural southwest is expected to grow substantially during the planning period. With this in mind, a new Plant 4 is recommended i�1 the extreirie southwest area of Bakersfield, west of I-5 on Bear Mountain Boulevard. This location allows the best use of gravity flow to the plant, is in close proximity to potential reclaimed water users, and is remotely located away from present ar future urban development. Approxiinately 45 miles of new trwlk sewers, phased in as needed, will be required to convey sewage to the new plant. Effluent Disposal/Reclamation Plan We recommend that the City continue to reuse secondary effluent to the extent fea5ible through the planning period. The City should also pursue a long-range plan for groundwater recharge in the southwest Bakersfield area. Details of the plan, including phasing in storage ponds, identified reclamarion sites, and discussion of future groundwater recharge are included in this report. Projected Cunnection and User Fees It is essential to for�nulate a viable financial plan to ensure implementability in the future. We prepared a detailed financial plan as part of the detailed analysis of this recotnmended improvement program. 1 ?/^_?/9NiAEiAKRSFLD\�11LESTON��7ILESTON.NO3 HPLascrlll V�1 . :• ��' ^ � Information in this report is a forecast of user charges and connection fees, at cun-ent dollar levels, over the neYt 46 years, until the year 2040. The suinmary table below list5 the estimated user charge and connection fee levels over this period, as a percent of the curreiit fee level (for service charges), and in dollars at current 1994 cost levels for connection fees. The forecast set forth below is sensitive to assuinptions, and the recominendation concerning how connection fees are established is important. It is estiinated that the probable sewer service fees and the new connection fees through the year 2040 at 1994 cost levels: Year 1995 1996 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 Percent of current Sewer Service Fee 100 100 100 70 60 40 35 Connection Fee $ y00 1,200 1,800 3,000 2,000 1,300 1,000 Over the next five years, it is forecast the weighted average construction and operational intlation rate which will apply to the economic forecasts set forth in the tables in Appendix C will be 4.5 percent annually. Therefore the estimated fees are expected to be as follows, in current dollars: Year 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Percent of current Sewer Service Fee 1 U4.5 109.2 114.1 119.3 124.6 Connection Fee $1,254 1,420 1,600 1,900 2,250 Connection fee levels are recommended to increase in 1994 dollars from the current level per equivalent service unit of $900 to in FY 1995-96; to $1,800 in FY 19)9-2000; to `1�3,000 in FY 2009-10, decrease to $2,000 in FY 2019-20; and then decrease to $1,000 in 2037. 1:J??191W :�EtAK RS FL DV.11 LE STOMM I L ESTON. NO3 HVLascrlll V 11 -. i_ w,� i� ;,• � _�„�y '� �FERSII('�D . C�'� � ��n�_.�#' .�'f�, �ULI��" . '� \ .�� ,1 j� �, • .� MEMORANDUM Honorable Mayor Price and Council Members S. E. Brummer, Chief of Police December 28, 1994 SU BJECT C.O.P.S. AHEAD Police Supplemental Hiring Grant On November 1, 1994, the Bakersfield Police Department submitted a letter of intent to participate in a program entitled, C.O.P.S: AHEAD (Accelerated Hiring, Education and Deployment) under the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994. C.O.P.S. AHEAD provides $225 million for cities over 50,000 population in their efforts to hire and fund sworn police officers. The attached "Fact Sheet" outlines the requirements and funding provision of the grant program. On December 22, 1994, our department received correspondence from the U.S. Department of Justice authorizing our agency to hire six officers under provisions established by the grant. We received a Grant Application Kit to complete and return by March 3, 1995. A copy of the application kit is attached for your information. Police department staff have begun the application process, however an important element of the application is an assurance that the police department is legally and officially authorized by the governing body, City Council, to apply for the grant. The grant application states that, "If a C.O.P.S. AHEAD application is submitted and approved, funding will begin once the new officers have been sworn." The program authorizes eligible agencies to initiate officer,recruitment and hiring efforts now, prior to submission and approval of the Grant Application Kit. However, all obligations that may be incurred should an application be denied are the sole responsibility of the applicant. I am sure you have read news reports suggesting that our department has been "awarded" this grant funding. In fact, we have been designated only as an eligible agency and must complete the application process. Originally, the C.O.P.S. AHEAD Grant Program allowed eligible departments to increase their sworn complement by 3$. The Bakersfield Police Department, then, was authorized to add 7 sworn positions under the grant. Due to an extraordinary response, jurisdictions are being authorized to hire a maximum of 2.5 percent, reducing the number to be added by our department to six positions. In monetary tenns, the grant provides $450,000 over three years to augment the salaries of the six additional positions. One of the significant aspects of the grant is the funding requirement and funding level. Grant funding provides up to 75% of each officer's salary and benefits over three years, up to $75,000 total. The remainder to be paid by state and local sources. Page 1 of 4 COPS AHEAD Grant Program Honorable Mayor and Council Members December 28, 1994 - continued ... The following graph illustrates how grant funds are applied to officers' salaries and how we recommend allocation of the funds. Crime Prevention Bill, Three Year Grant Salary Holiday Pay Fringe Benefit Subtotal Federai Grant * Equipment Vehicle (Rent Payments) Total Cost to City by Year Per Officer 36,674 2,690 14,297 53,660 40,245) 4, 950 7, 008 $25, 373 38,487 2, 825 14, 728 56,040 (34,755) 7, 008 $28, 293 40, 395 2,968 15,182 58,545 0 7, 008 $65,553 *The Federal Grant provides $75,000 per officer for salaries and fringe benefits for a three year period but only 75% of the cost of salaries and benefits may be charged to the grant in any one year. The city must fund equipment and vehicle expenses. Page 2 of 4 COPS AHEAD Grant Program Honorable Mayor and Council Members December 28, 1994 - continued ... Because the grant application process does not coincide with our fiscal year budgeting cycle, funding for the grant program can reasonably be calculated for the period between actual grant funding and the end of fiscal year. Given February 1, 1995 as the earliest date of hire for officers under the grant, funding for the five month period ending June 30, 1995 would be as follows: The $100,620 represents the amount reimbursed to the City's General Fund as a result of the 75� maximum funding in the grant. Based on the funding formula for the C.O.P.S. AHEAD Grant, after three years, the cost to the City for the 6 sworn positions will be $715,314, while the total funding provided by the grant will be $450,000. Page 3 of 4 COPS AHEAD Grant Program Honora6le Mayor and Council Mem6ers December 28, 1994 - continued ... Should the grant program materialize, the additional six (6) sworn positions will bring the police department's funded sworn complement to 258, including five authorized overhire positions resulting in a total sworn complement of 263. Based on current estimates provided by the City Planning Department, Bakersfield's population is 211,000. The additional six officers will bring police staffing per capita to 1.24 officers per 1,000 population, comparable to our 1993 level. In the very near future, police department grant application process, at which time I Council authorization to participate in the Program. SEB/vrf attachments staff will complete the will formally request C.O.P.S. AHEAD Grant Page 4 of 4 U.S. Department of Justice U. S. Department of Justice F act S eet Community Oriented Policing Services � Accelerated Hiring, Education and Depioyr�ent (COPS AHEAD) for Populations of 50,000 anc� Over Program Information COPS AHEAD is one of several approaches developed by the Department of Justice under the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 to speed the deployment of new officers devoted to community polic- ing on the streeu and rural routes of this nation. COPS ANEAD permits interested agencies to begin recruiting and hiring ne�� officers now in anticipation of later COPS grant funding, without compromising the qualiry and thoroughness of officer training and the cateful design of communiry policing programs. COPS AfIEAD wiil ben- �efit jurisdictions with populations of 50,000 and over, while COPS FAST will be used to expedite the applica- tions of aeencies serving smaller populations. Funding Provisions ❑ Law enforcement agencies intendine to participate in COPS AHEAD ma�� select and train new officers now, prior to submission and approval of a formal erant appli- cation. Fundin= �vill besin once the new officers have been sworn and a satisfactory grant application has been submitted and approved. Grants will be made for up to 75 percent of the total salary and benefits of each officer over three years, up to a maximum of $75,000 per officer, with the remainder to be paid by state or local funds. ❑ Grant funds mav be used to enable each agency to hire new officers to increase its actual sworn force up to a maximum of 3 percent over actual October 1, 1994 force level. 0 Up to S2?5 million in grants will be made under COPS AHEAD to state, locai and other public law en- forcement aeencies which serve populations of 50,000 and over. If requests exceed the funds available, the amounc or starting date of grants may be adjusted to ac- commodate demand. 0 COPS grant funds must not be used to replace funds that eligible agencies otherwise worild have devoted to future officer hiring. In other words, any hiring under the COPS AHEAD program must be �uA addition to, and not in lieu of, officers that otherwise would have been hired. 0 In hiring new officen, agencies may not reduce the scope of their customary screening and rraining proce- dures, and must include communiry policing principies and methods in the'v training curricula. In addition, to the extent practicable, COPS AHEAD grant funds should be used to increase the representation of women and racial and ethnic minorities within the ranks of sworn officers. ❑ All agencies serving a population of 50,000 and over will receive an invitation to participate in COPS AHEAD. In response, an intecested agency must send a letter of intent to the COPS Office, to be received no later than November 10, 1994. The COPS Office expects to con- firm the eligibility of applicants and proposed funding levels no later than November 21, 1994. Officers pro- posed to be funded under COPS AHEAD must be hired no later than the agency's first class staning in 1995. 0 At the time that proposed funding leve(s are con- ftrmed, a formal grant application will be sent requesting information conceming the agency's strategic communiry policing plan for the use of the o�cers that have been approved to be hired, budget plans and projections, and other information to enable the COPS Office to confirm compliance with grant conditions. 0 An award under COPS AHEAD will not affect the consideration of an agency's application for a grant under any other COPS program. An agency that received fund- ing under COPS Phase I. is eligible to receive additionai funding under COPS AHEAD if the combined hiring un- der both programs does not exceed 3 percent of the actual October 1, 1994 force level. October 15, 1994 : _ : i� � U.S Deparr�nenr oJJusrrcc Offtce ojComnnmiry Orienred Poficing Scrvrcea COPS AHEAD: Accelerated Hiring, Education and Deployment Overview The Attorney General has established the -Office of Community Oriented Policing Services ("COPS") within the United States Department of Justice to implement the "Cops On the Beat" grant provisions of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, signed into law by Pcesi- dent Clinton on September 13, 1994. Under this law, the COPS Office wiil provide grants and tech- nical assistance to law enforcement agencies and members of their communities to develop new and innovative approaches to solve their community crime probtems. A wide variety of policing pro- grams will be supported under this law through the year 2000. This application kit is only jor jurisdictions that have received a Go AHEAD letter from the COPS Ojfice authorizing them to hire a specific num- ber ojojficers under COPS AHEAD. COPS AHEAD will make grants to the law en- forcement agencies of state, local and Indian tribal jurisdictions to hire and/or rehire additional swom law enforcement officers as part of an overall plan to address crime and related problems through communiry policing. Grants will be made under COPS AHEAD to jurisdictions which serve popu- lations of 50,000 and over. This program allows eligible jurisdictions to initiate their officer recruit- ment and hiring efforts now, prior to submission and approval of this application. If a COPS AHEAD Appiication is submitted and approved, funding will begin once the new officers have been swom. All obligations that may be incurred should an application be denied are the sole responsibil- ity of the applicant. A further description of COPS AHEAD require- ments is contained in the COPS Program Guide- lines, which will be Qublished shortly in the Fed-� eral Register and are available from the COPS Office. Community Policing Community policing is an integrai part of achiev- ing the goals of combatting crime and improving the quality of life in the nation's cities, towns and rural areas. Community policing stresses the importance of police-citizen cooperation to con- trol crime, maintain order and improve the qual- ity of life in America. The community is an ac- tive partner with law enforcement in defining the problemsto be addressed, the tactics to be used, and the measurements of success. Community poiicing brings the police and the community into a closer working relationship. It calls for greater citizen responsibility, and the op- portunity for citizens to contribute individually and collectively to public safety. At the same time, it enhances police professionalism by giv- ing officers the skills, technology, authority and motivation to act innovatively to solve commu- nity problems. Community policing in many cases also calls for a restructuring of law enforce- ment agencies and the refinement of their man- agement techniques to allow the fullest use of de- partment and community resources. This approach is dependent on an effective flow of information, from sources both inside and out- side of the law enforcement agency. To be suc- cessful at community policing, the law enforce- ment agency should use this feedback to become more effective and equitable in its service deliv- ery. This informed flexibility should allow law en- forcement agencies to become more responsive to members of the community and their represen- tatives, and to officers and their representatives. Community policing can change the way crime control is accomplished. The ultimate goal is to maintain public safety in communities through better police work, while increasing the public's interaction and satisfaction with police services. - - 1 Eligibiiity Requirements Only those jurisdictions that have received a Go AHEAD [etter from the COPS Office authorit- ing them to hire a specific number of officers under COPS AHEAD should submit this appli- cation. 2 Failure to forward a letter of intent by the Novem- ber 10, 1994 deadline, a decision not to complete this application orto participate in COPS AHEAD does not preclude departments from applying for grants under other COPS programs. In addition, those departments which complete a satisfactory COPS AHEAD Application and are funded under COPS AI-IEAD still will be eligible for other COPS programs. T'hese other programs will be announced in the late fall of 1994. Permissible Uses for Funds Grants funds may be used by each agency to hire new officers to increase its actual sworn force up to a maximum of 3 percent over actual October l, 1994 force level. A jurisdiction's force level for these purposes is based upon the actual number of officers sworn, and not an agency's authorized strength level. The actual number of officers should include only those personnel performing law enforcement functions at the line or supervi- sory levels. For example, sheriff s departments should exclude deputies assigned to court secu- rity and jailing duties. The exact number for which an agency may receive a COPS AHEAD grant is set forth in the Go AHEAD letter. For those agencies who received COPS Phase I funding, the combined total number of officers awarded under Phase I and AHEAD may not ex- ceed three percent of sworn personnel. For ex- ample, if an agency received 20 new officers un- der Phase I, and three percent of the agency's sworn force on October 1, 1994 was 25, the agency may receive funding for an additional 5 officers under COPS AHEAD. COPS AHEAD grants are restricted to the hiring or rehiring of additional sworn career law enforce- ment officers for deployment in community pa licing. "Career law enforcement officers" are de- fined as those persons hired on a permanent basis who aze authorized by law or by a State or local public law enforcement agency to engage in or supervise the prevention, detection, or investiga- tion of violations of criminal laws. Funds may be used to support officers hired after October 1, 1994, but funds may only be spent for obligations incurred on or after the date of award and may not be used retroactive[y for any salary paid prior to the grant award. In addition, grantees may not draw any grant funds until a hired officer is actu- ally sworn. Rehired officers must have been sepa- rated from the force prior to October 1, 1994 due to budget reduction. COPS AHEAD grant funds may- not be used for any purpose other than ojficers'salaries and ben- efits COPS AHEAD funds may not be used to purchase equipment, support systems, or for the payment of overtime costs, but applications for these purposes may be made under juture COPS programs. Officers hired under COPS AHEAD must begin their training no later than the first available train- ing class beginning in 1995. In hiring and ttain- ing new officers, agencies may not reduce the scope of their customary screening and training procedures. In addition, all officers hired in an- ticipation of COPS AHEAD funds must receive training in communiry policing. The officers hired with COPS AHEAD funds may be assigned to training and probationary assign- ments, if this is the customary practice of the agency, provided that there is an equal and.con- temporaneous transfer of current officers to com- munity policing. For example, new officers hired under COPS AHEAD may be given control du- ties, so long as an equivalent number of experi- enced officers are deployed in community polic- ing. COPS grant funds may not be used to replace funds that eligible agencies otherwise would have de- voted to law enforcement. The supplanting of non- federal law enforcement funding is strictly pro- hibited by law. That is, any hiring by a depart- ment under COPS AHEAD must be in addition to, and not in lieu of, a department's other hiring plans and must serve to increase the total number of funded officer positions on a law enforcement agency's force above the sworn leve( on October 1, 1994. For example, if a jurisdiction has com- mitted to fund 5 officers for this year, COPS AHEAD funds may be used to fund officers above this level only. A more complete discussion of supplanting is found at page S. In addition, law enforcement agencies may hire former members of the Armed Forces that have been involuntarily separated, particularly in the cases of communities that have been adversely af- fected by recent military base c(osings. Length of Award, Grant Amounts and Local Mafich The duration of COPS AHEAD grants is three years. The federal share of an officer's salary and ben- efits may not exceed 75% of the costs of a new or rehired officer's salary and benefits over the three year period of the grant. Also, a maximum of $75,000 per new or rehired officer is available over the three year period of the grant. In addition, the amount of the federal match must decrease each year, looking towards the complete assumption of funding by the applicant following the completion of the COPS AHEAD grant. The amount of this yearly decrease in the federal per- centage, and the reciprocal yearly increase in the local share, should be proposed by the app(icant. At the end of the grant period, the applicant is wholly responsible for funding of the.officers hired under the grant. There will be no waivers of the minimum ZS% local match or the maximum federal share of $7S, 000 per oJftcer hired under COPS AHEAD. Departments are encouraged to contribute local shares in excessofthe minimum amounts required. States and local units of government may use as matching funds assets received through the As- sets Forfeiture Equitable Sharing Program, the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, the Appalachian Regional Development Act, and other funds contributed from state, local or private sources or otherwise authorized by (aw. Funds appropriated by Congress for the activities of any agency of an Indian Tribal government or the Bureau of Indian Affairs performing law en- forcement functions on Indian lands may be used as matching funds. Federal grant monies received from other federal agencies may only be used as local matching funds if specifically authorized by the other federal grant program. �n�,a��_ -. ;�r:�_..� ._ .. �. . . .. "�: How to Apply Departments with Go AHEAD (etters wishing to formally apply to COPS AHEAD need to follow the instructions contained in this kit and submit a jully executed application to the COPS O„�'ice post- inarked no later than February 1 S, 1995. A sum- mary of the steps to foilow in filing a complete application can be found at the beginning of this application kit. An original application and two copies are required. Copies of the standard re- quired forms.and assurances are included in Ap- pendix A and B of this application kit, and the required certifications are included in Appendix C. If an application is submitted on behalf of more than one agency, the relationships between agen- cies must be fully described in the application. In addition, one agency must be designated as the payee to receive and disburse funds, and to be re- sponsible for the supervision and coordination of grant activities. A fully executed application should be prepared in the following manner: all applications must be submitted on 8 trz x 11 paper; all of the required materials should be stapled together and not oth- erwise bound, and should be printed on one side of the paper, all applications must be typed and double-spaced where applicable. Video presen- tations are not permitted. 3 4 U.S Dcparrnrent ojJusrice Officr ojComn�w�iry Orienred Pollcing Servicu . , THE COPS AHEAD AP�PLICATION � A complete application should contain the fol- lowing: ❑ Standard Application Form — All appli- cations for federal assistance must include a Standard Form 424, provided in Appendix A. An example of a completed SF424 is also in- cluded in Appendix A. If an application is submitted on behalf of more than one juris- diction, each co-applicant must sign the SF424. 0 Assurances — Follow:ng the Standard Form is a page of assurances which seek the applicant's commitment to abide by several provisions of federal law applicable to this grant program. Read and sign the Assurances. _ , � Legal Certitications — Applicants must o provide the appropriate legal certifications which are contained in Appendix B. Read and sign the Certification form. ❑ Application Summary — A brief summary of the application should immediately follow the Standard Form, Assurances and Certifi- cations. Please submit three paragraphs in the following format: � 1) "The City/County/Municipality of (legal name and state of app(icant jurisdiction), proposes to hire/rehire (number of pro- posed hires) law enforcement officers un- der COPS AHEAD. The geographic lo- cation of this department is (describe). The current size of the department is (give department strength, listing num- ber of officers sworn and number of of- ficers budgeted), and it provides the fol- lowing services (list major police ser- vices)." 2) "The total federal funds requested under this proposal are $ for three years. These officers will be hired no later than the first available training ses- sion after January 1, 1995, which is cur- rently scheduled for (date). Actual de- ployment of these officers is scheduled for (date)." 3) "The jurisdiction's five year community policing plan includes (list major ele- ments of the plan). These new officers, and/or others assigned to community policing will contribute to this plan by engaging in the following activities (list major activities). This plan was devel- oped in consultation with (list other pub- lic or private agencies or groups within the community). The major public safety needs. that will be addressed through the hiring of these new officers are (list ma- jor public safety needs of area)." Budget Summary — A two to three-page description of the appiicant's proposed bud- get should follow the Application Summary. The budget summary should describe clearly: • The proposed amount of federal expen- ditures over the three year grant period. • 1fie proposed amount of non-federal (in- cluding state and local) expenditures over the three year grant period, including how the applicant's local match will be made. • An explanation of the sources of the applicant's local match. • An exptanation of how the federal shaze will decrease each year. • A list of specific budget items, includ- ing: salary for the officers expected to be funded (including entry level or re- hired officers salary if applicable), fringe benefits (including health, FICA, social security, vacation, sick leave, retirement, and worker's compensation; excluding cost of equipment, uniforms, vehicles, overtime), and any expected cost of liv- ing increases. An explanation of how the amounts of these specific budget items amounts were determined. • If and by how much the local share will exceed the minimum required. • The starting date of the applicant's fiscal year. ❑ Community Policing Strategy — Follow- ing the Budget Narrative, applicants should provide an overview of their community po- licing strategy, addressing the following top- ics in order. Please number and begin each section on a new page, and limit the length of the entire strategy to 18 pages. 1. Describe your agency's long term commu- niry pol rcing sirateg� and its implementation plan. • Does your agency currently have a com- muniry policing plan? [f so, describe this plan, and your expectations for iis con- tinuation and expansion in the future. Describe the steps that you have taken to consult with community members and groups (e.g., schools, civic, neighborhood and tenants' associations, current em- ployees and organizations of employees of your agency) in the development of your long-term plan. You may attach any Ietters of support for your plan from these groups. [f there is an organization which acts as the legally authorized bargaining repre- sentative of the law enforcement offic- ers employed by your agency, describe the steps that you have taken to consult with that organization in the formulation of this application and attach any corre- spondence or other documentation re- flecting that consultation. • How does your plan fit in with state-wide and local crime prevention and control plans, including any state-wide Byrne Grant strategy? • When do you intend to hire, train and deploy officers funded under this pro- �� • What will be the community policing activites of these and/or other officers in your department, in both the short term and over the next five years? • What are your projections of additional officers to be added in the next five yeazs to support this community policing plan? • Explain how the grant will be utilized to reorient the affected law enforcement agency's mission toward community-ori- ented policing or enhance its involvement in or commitment to_ community-oriented policing. � 2. Describe how hiring new o�cers will serve a local level public safety need. • What unique public safety needs do you LL have that require hiring of new officers? • Are there any unusual public safery prob- lems that your agency has experienced? • How will these new officers contribute to filling the needs that you have? 3. Ezplain why your department has been un- able to address the public safety need, de- scribed rn section 2 above, without federal assistance: • Describe any fiscal, budgetary or other limitation on your department's ability to hire additional officers without federal assistance. What has been the average change in your force strength over the past three years? 5 6 If there has been an increase, do you in- tend to maintain the same average annual increase over the next three years (ex- cluding officers funded under COPS AHEAD)? 4. Identify related governmental and community initiatives which complement or will be co- ordinated with the proposal. • What other governmental crime control programs exist in your jurisdiction? • What other community crime prevention and control programs exist in your com- munity? • How will the hiring of new officers for community policing complement these other programs? � S. Describe initial and anticipated levels of community suppor.t, including ftnancial and other tangible contributions to commurriry po- licing efforts. , _ • What programmatic, financial or other support do you currently have for com- munity prob(em solving and crime con- trol? • What will be the specific levels and types of communiry support that your agency is lihely to receive over the next five years? • Have you sought and/or obtained any sources of private fnancial support? 6. Describe how you plan to retain the new of- ficers jollowing the end oJfederal grant sup- port. • How do you plan to assume a progres- sively larger share of hired officers' sala- ries over the course of the grant, leading to full-time retention ofthe officers at the conclusion of the grant? • What assurances do you have from�your local government that these officers wiil be retained? • What specific plans do you have for the retention of these officers at the conclu- sion of federal support? 7. Describe the impact that increasing the num- ber of offrcers in your department will have on other criminal justice agencies in the ju- risdiction. � • Whaf will be the impact of, and your re- sponse to, increasing the number of of- ficers in your department on the prosecu- tor? Public defense? Courts? Local and state corrections? Other public and pri- vate criminal justice agencies? 8. Describe cmy additional factors for consid- eration. • Does your agency intend to recruit and hire members of the military involun- tarily separated? If so, how? • Is your agency proposing yearly cash matches in excess of the minimum re- quired? If so, how much is being matched per officer? Monitoring and Reporting Requiremenfs All successfui grantees will be required to participate in grant monitoring by the COPS Office. "I'he monitoring process may include the submission of written reports, and telephone and/ or on-site reviews concerning the financial administration of the grant and the progress towards achieving the application's community policing plan. Evaluation Requirements A national evaluation, as well as a number of lo- cal level evaluations, will be conducted of the COPS AHEAD program. The purposes of these evaluations will be to assess the process of imple- menting this program, as well as examining the possible impacts of hiring new officers. Evalua- tors may visit grantee sites to collect data for these evaluations. All selected applicants must be will- ing to cooperate in such evaluations and partici- pate in providing the necessary information that may be requested. In addition, grantees are en- couraged to coilect information regarding the achievements and successes of community ori- ented policing in their area, as well as responses from members ofthe public to the grantee's plan. Paperwork Re.duction Act Notice The public reporting burden forthis collection of information is estimated at 22 hours per response, including the time for reviewing'instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspects of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to the Office of Community Oriented Policing Ser- vices, U.S. Department of Justice, P.O. Box 14440, Washington, DC 20044; and to the Pub- lic Use Reports Project, 1103-0015, Office of In- formation and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Man- agement and Budget, Washington, DC 20503. Technical Assistance Technical assistance is available to applicants at no cost. Assistance on completing the necessary application documents may be obtained from the Department of Justice Response Center at: 1-800- 421-6770. Assistance regarding the formulation of community policing plans and practices may be obtained from the COPS Office at: 1-202- 514-2058. Written inquiries may be sent to: COPS Office, U.S. Department of Justice, P.O. Box 14440, Washington, DC 20044. Guidance regarding financial and administrative aspects of the grant process also may be obtained by consulting the Office of Justice Programs' Fi- nancial and Administrative Guide for Grants (M7100.1), which is availabie at no cost from the Department of Justice Response Center. 7 8 U.S Depmnnent ojJusrice , Offce ojComnnmity Orienred Polieing Serviee.r ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS FOR APPLICANTS Grant Funds Must Supplement and Not Supplant Grant funds may not be used to replace state or local funds (or where applicable, provided by the Bureau of Indian Affairs) that would, in the ab- sence of Federal aid, be available or forthcoming for law enforcement. Instead, COPS AHEAD grant funds must be used to increase the total amount of such other funds used for law enforce- ment. A grant recipient may not use federal grant funds to pay salaries of police officers that the recipi- ent already is obligated to pay. For example, if a grantee, prior to submitting a Letter of Intent to participate in COPS AHEAD, had committed to hire ten new officers, then the grantee must hire those officers in addition to those requested un- der COPS AHEAD. Funds currently allocated to pay law enforcement officers may not be reallo- cated to other purposes or refunded should a COPS A.HEAD grant be made. Non-federal funds for police hiring must remain available for and devoted to that purpose, with COPS AHEAD funds serving as a supplement to those non-fed- eral funds. In addition, without including officers hired un- der a COPS grant, all grantees will be expected to proceed with new hiring at a level consistent with historical practice, and to take positive steps to fill all vacancies resulting from attrition. Fail- ure to do so may be considered to be evidence of supplanting. Finally, the non-federal funds used as matching funds for a COPS grant must be in addition to funds that would otherwise be available for law enforcement. For example, funds previously bud- geted for the hiring of one new officer may not be reallocated to provide local matching funds for the hiring of COPS AHEAD o�cers. The possibility of supplanting will be the subject of careful application review, and possible pre- award review, post-award monitoring and audit. Any supplanting of non-federal funds by COPS grant funds is a ground for potential suspension or termination of grant funding, recovery of funds already provided, and other civil or criminal sanc- tions. As part of this application, an agency must sign a certification that no supplanting of non-federal funds will take place should a grant award be made. This certification shall be treated as a material representation of fact upon which reli- ance will be placed in the Departrnent of Justice's determination whether to award this grant. Single Point of Contact Review Executive Order 12372 requires applicants from State and local units of government, or other or- ganizations providing services within a State, to submit a copy of the application to the State S ingle Point of Contact (SPOC), if one exists, and if this program has been selected for review by the State. (Indian tribal governments are exempt from this review.) The State Single Points of Contact aze listed in Appendix D of this application kit. Ap- plicants must contact their State SPOC to deter- mine if the program has been selected for State review. If the SPOC requires a copy of the COPS AHEAI� Application, the applicant should still send the original application and two copies to the COPS Office. Audit Requirement The Single Audit Act of 1984, issued in OMB Circular A-128, "Audits of State and Local Gov- ernments," establishes the requirements for or- ganizationat audits that apply to COPS grantees. The required audits aze to be on an organization- wide, rather than a grant-by-grant basis, and must be arranged for by the grantee in accordance with the requirements of the circular. Certification Regarding Lobbying; Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility I�latters; Drug- Free Workplace Requirements; Coordination and Non- Supplanting Requirements Applicants should refer to the certification form in Appendix C to determine the certification(s) to which they are required to attest. Applicants also should review the instructions for certifica- tion included in the regulations refecred to in the certification form. Signature of this form pro- vides for compliance with certification require- ments under 28 CFR Part 69, "New Restrictions on Lobbying," and 28 CFR Part 67, "Govemment- wide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocure- ment) and Government-wide Requirements for Drug-Free Workplace (Grants)," and with the co- ordination and non-supplanting requirement of the Public Safery Partnership and Community Po- licing Act of 1994. Tne certifications will be treated as a material representation of fact upon which reliance will be placed by the Department of Justice in awarding grants. Civil Rights All recipients of federal grant funds are required to comply with nondiscrimination requirements contained in various federal laws. All applicants should consult the assurances to understand the applicable legal and administrative requirements. Suspension or Termination of Funding The COPS Office may suspend, in whole or in part, or terminate funding for, or impose other sanction on, a grantee for the following reasons: Failure to substantially comply with the requirements or statutory objectives of the Public Safety Partnership and Com- munity Policing Act of 1994, program guidelines issued thereunder, or other provisions of federal law; or • Failure to make satisfactory progress to- ward the goals or strategies set forth in this application; or • Failure to adhere to grant agreement re- quirements or special conditions; or • Proposing substantiai plan changes to the extent that, if originally submitted, would have resulted in the application not be- ing selected for funding; or • Failure to submit reports; or • Filing a false certification in this appli- cation or other report or document; or • Other good cause shown. Prior to the imposition of sanctions, the COPS Office will provide reasonable notice to the grantee of its intent to impose sanctions and �vill attempt informally to resolve the problem. Hear- ing and appeal procedures will follow those in Department of Justice regulations in 28 CFR Part 18. 9 . . + � °'� U.S. Depantmenr ojJustrce OBee oJCommunity Oriexted Polreing Suvices ASSURANCES � Several provisions of federal law and policy apply to all grant programs. We (the Office of �� Community Oriented Policing Services) need to secure yo� assurance that you (the applicant) _w_ will comply with these provisions. If you would like further information about any of the matters on which we seek your assurance, please contact us.. By your authorized representative's signature, you assure us and certify to us that, if the grant is awazded, you will comply with all legal and administrative requirements that govern the acceptance and use of federal grant funds. In particular, you assure us that: 1. You have been legally and officially authorized by the appropriate goveming body (for example, mayor or city coun- cit) to apply for this grant and that the persons signing the application and these assurances on your behalf are autho- rized to do so and to act on your behalf with respect to any issues that may anse during processing of this apPiication. 2. You will comply with the provisions of federal law which Iimit certain political adivities of your employees whose prin- cipal employment is in connection with an activity financed in whole or in part with this grant: These restrictions are set forth in 5 U.S.C. § 1501, et sea. 3. You will coF�ply with the minimum wage and maximum hours provisions of the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act, if they apply to you. 4. You will establish safeguards, if you have not done so already, to prohibit employees ftom using their positions for a purpose that is, or gives the appearance of being, moti- vated by a desire for private gain for themselves or others, particularly those with whom they have family, business, or other ties. 5. You will give the Dapartment of Justice or the Comptrol- ler General access to and the right to examine records and documents related to the grant. 6. You will comply with all requirements imposed by the Oepartment of Justice as a condition or administrative re- quirement of the grant, with the program guidelines, with the requirements of OMB Circul2rs A-87 (goveming cost cal- culations) and A-128 (goveming audits), with the applicable provisions of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as amended, with 28 CFR Part 66 (Unifortn Administrative Requirements), with the provisions of the current edition of the Office of Justice Programs Financial and Administrative Guide for Grants, and with all other ap- plicable laws, orders, regulations, or circutars. 8. You wiil not, on the ground of race, color, rel'�gion, na- tional origin, gender; disability or age, unlawfully exdude any person from participation in, deny the benefits of or em- ployment to any person, or subject any person to discrimi- nation in connection with any programs or acbvities funded in whole or in pa�t with federal funds. These civil rights re- quirements are found in the nondiscrimination provisions of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Ad of 1968, as amended (42 U.S.C. § 3789(d)); TiUe VI of the Civil Rights Ad of 1964, as amended (42 U.S.C. § 2000d); the Indian Civil Rights Ad (25 U.S.C. §§ 1301-1303); Section 504 of the Rehabil'�tation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. § 794); TiUe II, Subtitle A of the Ameriqns with Disabil'�ties Act (ADA) (42 U.S.C. § 12101, ��.); the Age Discrimina- tion Ad of 1975 (42 U.S.C. § 6101, �,gq.); and Depart- ment of Justice Non-0iscrimination Reguiations coMained in Title 28. Parts 35 and 42 (subparts C, 0, E and G) of the Code of Federal Regulations. A. In the event that any court or administrative agency makes a finding of discrimination on grounds of race, color, religion, national origin, gender, disabilit�r or age against you after a due process hearing, you agree to forvvard a copy of the finding to the Office of Generat Counsel, C�PS, P.O. Box 14440, Washington, OC 2D044. B. If you are applying for a grant of 5500,000 or more and Department regulations (28 CFR 42.301 SLS�.q.) require you to submit an Equal Opportunity Employment Plan, you will do.so at the time of this application, if you have not done so in the past. 9. You will insure that the facilities under your ownership, lease or supervision which shall be utilized in the aocom- plishment af the project are not listed on the Environmental Protec�ion Agency's (EPA) list of Yolating Faalities and that you will notify us if you are advised by the EPA indicating that a faality to be used in this grant is under consideration for listing by EPA. 7. You will, to the extent practicable and consistent with 10. If your state has established a review and comment applicable law, seek, recruit, and hire members of reaal and procedure under Executive Order 12372 and has seleated ethnic minoriry groups and women in order to further effec- this program for review, you have made this appliption avait- tive law enforcement by increasing their ranks within the able for review by the State Single Point of Contact swom positions in your agency. ! hereby certify compliance with the above assurances that govern the application qnd use oJFederal fu»ds. Signature D�b Appendix B• Legal Assurences Cox Cable Bakersfield 820 22nd Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 �� , Cox Cable Bakersfield December 23, 1994 Mr. Alan Tandy City Manager 1501 Truxtun Avenue , - - - --- - - -6aker�iield; Ca6i#'cer:9a 933^�'! --- - Dear Alan: A Subsidiary of Cox Communications, Inc. �-_— _. -- - - _ _ : �;�'��' ti .~i C , �' �. ; :�' �, � _.-_.__ _. __ - _ f ! � ��C Z 7199� I—.—_:= - -- — �a°� ��°� ' I'm writing to inform you about changes in our prices. Effective with our February, 1995, billing cycle, the rate for Broadcast Basic Cable will increase from $6.95 to $8.75, and Complete Basic Cable will increase from $21.45 to $22.95. In addition, there wiil be a small increase on our premium channel packages and Music Choice service .(new rates enclosed). s- .�_ .�. As.,`yo,u m;ay..i;ecall, last January we lowered our rates $1.00 on Basic. In addition, we eliminated all additional outlet charges of $4.75, reduced the price of remote controls by $1.00 and siashed the cost of Music Choice by $6.00. The average cabie bill actually decreased by more than $2.A0. Although� we have done a good job holding down our controllable costs through improved operating efficiencies and reductions in expenses, other uncontrollable costs such as programming; insurance and utilities continue to climb. For example, our basic programming costs (the fee we pay to programmers such as ESPN and CNN) has increased 87% in the past 2 years. However, our rates for Basic Cable Service have only increased 2% in the same time frame. We wilf continue to look for w�ays to further reduce our costs without sacrificing - `fne Kind' of s"e�ve� ou� cusiomers deserve and expeci: -" � - � � � ��-- - � � � We are notifying our customers of this increase in their January billing statements. I wanted to give you advanced notice shou�d you get any questions from your constituents, our customers. As always, please feel free to call me at 327-3463 should you have any questions. Sincerely, ' � . . . . .. . . . • '' • ,.. _ .� _., . , .. ,�... ..�.� , , . _ .. . �:._ . , J�iil C'a,mpbell �' r . _, , � Vice �Presidentl � ' . . . . . ` � ` General Manager . _ .' . ., .-_..._� ... . • ...�. . ___-_ � � d � � � �, . ��:� COX CABLE BAKERSFIELD February 1, 1995 Monthly Rate� Changes (Prices Do Not Include Applicable Taxes & Fees) 2/1/95 Current Rate Rate 2/1/95 Rate Chan e Basic Cable Services: , Basic Broadcast $ 8.75 $ 6.95 $ 1.80 Limited Basic 7.95 8.00 (0.05) - - --- -E�anded.Basic _ _ _ __ - `_ .625 _ - - - . 6.50 - , _ - (0.25) _ - - _ - - Complete Basic (Residential) 22.95 21.45 1.50 (Business) 26.95 24.95 1.70 0 Music Choice HBO, Showtime, Cinemax & The Movie Channel: First Premium Channel Second Premium Channel Third Premiutn Channel Fourth Premium Channel Multiplexing (HB02 & Showtime2) will be introduced 2/1/95 in certain areas and will be available to all subscribers by the end � of 1996 Equipment Maintenance Service Contract (new service) 6.25 10.50 9.50 8.00 7.00 4.95 10.50 8.50 7.50 6.50 0.99 N/A 1.30 1.00 0.50 0.50 N/A December 27, 1994 � t � �7esign/�uild • Residential o Commercial C=Z'Y BUILD=NG =NSPECT=ON 8r. PER.MITS DEPAR'I'NIENT 1715 Chester A�enue Bakersfield, C� 93301 , Att�ntion : Mr. Fiddler, D�nnis Fi.ddler I just wanted to take a moment to alert you to •a situation -7at happened recently, and let you know that the efforis of -our department was appreciated. This past week, on a Friday morning,.we were called b�� Creekside Apartments on an emergency call. They had suffered a fire rhe night before, and power was down in twelve of their units. -hey asked us to do whatever we had to do, in order for the power tL be back up that day. Not only would the tenants need to �ove elsewhere for the weekend if we could not get the power up, ��ut Creekside was also afraid that they might lose their tenants for good. � :�lthough we had five men on the ,job that day, we couldn't fii-:ish pulling all of the necessary wiring before our goal of :ive o'clock. Had `1r. Highfield not been willing to work late himself, we would not ha�-e been able to have power back in these units u�til sometime Monda3 morning, which we all felt would have been too �_ate to meet the needs of the tenants. We c:ant to extend our appreciation to Mr. Highfield and -our. inspection depart,ment for all of your hard work, and willingness to go the extra mile when it was truly needed�. We believe 'hat through this extra effort, we saved Creekside Apartment tc:elve tenants, and the loss of potentially thousands.of dollars. T':ank you for your commitment to the community. Sincerely, C-��-� ��-�� ftand� W. Rankin � _Y �-� ' . '` _ _ -`��,; �bl�� y''� � .i � i - � i �� • u i � ; DEC 2 9 1994 ; � � � _� ��'Y �A6�{�.��'� �":=��r�� _. _ __ .�-. ��_m.� ' �30 2�?th �:reei. Suite A� Bakersfield, California 93301 a(805) 325-8658 — FAX 32�-�042 ��_ _:nse n40��75 � B A K E R S F I E L D PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUIvi December 21, 1994 TO: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER FROM: RAUL M. ROJAS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SUBJECT: 1994-95 CIP STATLTS Attached are two versions of the 1994-95 CIP program. Both schedules are intended to be executive summaries. The first schedule shows all projects by order of design schedule within the fiscal year. The second is grouped by project engineer with each engineer's schedule in order of design schedule. Also enclosed is a construction inspection status report of CIP projects as well as the detailed financial monthly CIP status report. If you have any questions, I am available at your convenience. � ;,- - -- � ��' DEC 2 2 i�q� � � �� ; � ,� c;�-,r .:�.: � �� , cc: G. Waiters T. Slater � I: � � � �� TRAFFIC ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM To: RAUL M. ROJAS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR From: STEPHEN L. WALKER, TRAFFIC ENGINEER ��• ,��J Date: December 20, 1994 Subject: 1994-95 CIP STA1'LTS Attached are two variations of the 1994-95 CIP schedule. The first shows all projects by order of design schedule within the fiscal year. The second is grouped by project engineer with each engineer's schedule in order of design schedule. As shown all projects are either ahead of schedule or on schedule. Following are projects of special interest: PROJECTS BEHIND SCHEDULE No projects are behind schedule. PROJECTS AHEAD OF SCHEDULE 1. New Signal - Ashe Road at South Halfmoon Drive. This project was scheduled for approval of plans and specfications in January. They were actually approved on December 14,1994. Bids will be opened January 11, 1995 with contract award anticipated for the January 25, 1995 Council meeting. 2. New Signal - 4th Street at Chester Avenue. This project was scheduled for approval of plans and specfications in January. They were actually approved on December 14, 1994. Bids will be opened January 11, 1995 with contract award anticipated for the January 25, 1995 Council meeting. 3. New Signal - Gosford Road at North Laurelglen. This project is scheduled for completion of plans and specifications in April but design is proceeding ahead of schedule. Expected completion will be no later than February and possibly late January. PROJECTS ON SCHEDULE All other projects are on schedule. � B A K E R S F I E L D PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: December 20, 1994 TO: RAUL M. ROJAS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR FROM: JACQUES R LaROCHELLE, CIVIL ENGINEER IV-DESIGN SUBJECT: 199495 CIP STATUS Attached are two variations of the 1994-95 CIP schedule. The first shows all projects by order of design schedule within the fiscal year. The second is sorted by project engineer. As shown the majority of projects are on schedule. Following are projects of special interest: PROJECTS BEHIND SCHEDULE 1. �el Tank Replacement at corporation yard and Project behind schedule approximately 1 month. the January 25, 1995 Council meeting. 2. Westchester sewer rehabilitation. Project behind schedule approximately 1 month. the January 25, 1995 Council meeting. 3. Rosedale Hwy median landscaping. police station. This project should be awarded at This project should be awarded at Project delayed due to our Landscape Architect overseeing Rosedale interchange tree planting project. We are currently developing an RFP for landscape work and will include this project in the scope to insure its timely completion. PROJECTS AHEAD OF SCHEDULE 1. Stockdale Hwy at Cross Valley Canal sewer reconstruction. Project completed early due to emergency need for construction. 2. Convention Center reseal of arena fioor. Research and specifications done early to accommodate hockey. Convention Center however requested postponement due to scheduling �conflicts. We are currently working on scheduling this work in late spring or early summer depending on Convention Center bookings. 3. Group picnic area playground equipmen� Plans completed early. Parks will install by force account. 4. Iand fencing in Section 4. Project ahead of schedule. Currently applying for state grant to clean site of trash. PRO.iECTS ON SCHEDULE All other projects are on schedule. CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION PROJECT STATUS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS � 2/os�sa START EST. COMP % PROJECTS TYPE CONTRACTOR WSPECTOR DATE DATE COMP ASHE RD. @ SOUTH HALFMOON pR. TRAFFIC SIGNAL BRADFORD ELECTRIC � BA}�RSFIELD AIfiPARK TAXIWAY,APRON & FENCE GRIFFITH COMPANY BOLAiVOS 10/17/94 11 J29/94 7096 BROWN ST: �u EASTSIDE CANAL BOX CULVERT GRiFFITH CO. BOLANOS 11/15/94 01/18/95 5°k BUENR VISTA ROAD @ STOCKDALE HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SIGNAL — INSTALL A—C ELECTRIC �°� CAl1FORNIAAVE — STOCKDALE/REAL MEDIANS & RESURFACING GFiIFFITH COMPANY ALLEN 09I06/�4 Q4/14/95 45°�6 CALJFORNIA AVENUE @ H. STREET SIGNAL MODIFICATION McI�E ELECTRIC MAHAFFEY 01/03/95 02/23/95 � 0°� CALLOWAY DRIVE MEDIAN i.ANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION GRIFFITH COMPANY FICK 11/3/94 . 12/16/94 60°% FIRE STATtON #2 STRUCTURAL REHAB. GEfdERAL DEV. & CONST. CHOATE �°� KERN RIVER PARKWAY LANDSCAPE & IRRIC�ATION KERN SPRINK�ER FlCK 10/26/94 12J30/94 90% MONTEREY STREET Q HALEY STREET TRAFFIC SlGNAL — INSTALL CRAFTON ELECTRIC �°'o NORTHEAST BAKERSFIELD SEWER TRUNK LJNE SPIESS COtVSTRUCTION MILLWEE 10/10/94 06/29/95 8°�6 PANAMA LANE Q STINE ROAD TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALL. BRADFORD ELEC7RIC �°� PARK STOCKDALE RESURFAGNG GRANITE CONST. SHAMSHOIAN Sl1SPEND 0°,6 TRUXTIiN AVE. — QAK TO "A" ST. SIGNAL INTERCONNECT BRADF�RD ELECTRIC 0% VARIOUS MAJOR STREETS PAVEMENT MARKERS IPS SERVICES � �% I VARIOUS STREETS CURB & GUTTER GRIF�ITH COMPANY I_McNEILL ; 10/17/94 , 01/27/95 't 10% j VARIOUS STREETS — PHASE II RESURFACING SULLY — MILLER I MAHAFFEY . � 10/19/94 SUSPEND 1, 20% WIBLE RD: — PANAMA TO HARRIS LANDSCAPE MEDlAN ALPHA OMEGA BUILDERS 0°� � f I � , I ,. � �, � ' I � I i 1 I I f i � ► � CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION PROJECT STATUS SUBDIVISION 19/05/94 P.M. OR DEVELOPER/ % TRACT #'S LOCATION CONTRACTOR INSPECTOR COMP. TR 4957-3 S/O HARRIS RD. — E/O ASHE RD. JUDKINS CHOATE 20% 7R 5084-3 RENFRO — N/O STOCKDALE MURPHY LESH 50% TR 5292 MOUNTAIN VISTA & GRAND LAKES CASTLE & COOKE CHOATE 0% TR 5372-2 VERDUGO & REINA CENTEX REAL ESi'ATE LESH 55% TR 5464 MING & HAGGIN OAKS CHOATE 95% TR 5489—B ALLEN RD & BRIMHALL RD CASTLE & COOKE LESH 90% TR 5552—A,B RENFRO RD. & STOCKDALE FiWY. WEST KERN DEVELOPMENT LESH 30% TR 5594—B HAGEMAN RD. — E/O ALLEN RD. HARDT DEVELOPMENT LESH 70% TR 5600 McKEE RD. & AKERS RD. DANDY & ASSOCIATES CHOATE 85% TR 5644-1 CAMPUS PARK DR. — E/O BUENA VISTA LESH 60% TR 5646-2 FAIRFAX RD @ VALLEYVIEW DR W.D.J. CORPORATION PIERCE 50% TR 5666-2 CAMPUS PARK & OLD RIVER RD. COMMUNITY CONSTRUCTION LESH 40% TR 5670-3&4 STINE RD. 8� SEASONS DR. STINE ROAD DEVELOPERS CHOATE 80% TR 5675-3 MEACHAM RD. & MAIN PLAZA DR. DeWALT CORP LESH 95% TR 5678—A WHITE LN. & GOSFORD RD. CASTLE & COOKE CHOATE 95% TR 5688—A HARRIS RD — E/O ASHE RD BOB MAHAN CHOATE 90°% TR 5688—C HARRIS RD. — E/O ASHE RD. EPCO VENTURES CHOATE 50% TR 5686—E&F HARRIS RD, — E/O ASHE RD. KYLE CARTER CHOATE 35% TR 5702 W/O STINE RD. — S/O HARRIS RD. KAUFMAN & BROAD CHOATE 95% TR 5767 MOUNTAIN VISTA & CAMPUS PARK CRT INVESTMENT LESH 55% TR 5775 COFFEE RD. & OLIVE DR. LESH 10% 17/05/94 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION PROJECT STATUS SUBDIVISION P.M. OR DEVELOPER/ % TRACT #'S LOCATION CONTRAGTOR INSPECTOR COMP. CESAR E. CHAVEZ SCHOOL NICKELS DEV. PIERCE 99% EARL WARREN JR. HIGH SCHOOL B.V—PANAMA SCH. DIST. LESFi 99% GREENF�ELD JUNIOR HIGH S.C. ANDERSON CHOATE 85% KERN HI#3 STINE & McKEE COLOMBO CHOATE 85% HAGEMAN RD EXT. —E/O MAIN PLAZA RIVERLAKES RANCH LESH 100°� PM 8337 COFFEE RD. & DOWNING RD. SOUTHWEST CONT. LESH � 75% � ----- GENERAL GOVERNM ENT 40101 Building, Remodel — Remodel Risk Mgmt upon TrafGc move to Annex ' � 40201 Building, Remodel — Remodel Mnex, Second Floor 40202 Building, Remodel — City Hall Mnex, Rule 9001 Compliance, Rideshare 40302 Fuel Fazm, Construction — Under�gound Fuel System, 15,000 Gallons 40401 Signal, Modification — Opticom Traffic Signal Emergency Vehicle Preempting Devic�s 40402 Building, Remodel — Architectural Barrier Removal Program 40403 Computer System, G. 1. System — Street & Utility Mapping Project 40404 Building, Remodel — Architectural Barrier Removal System, Cfty Hall 90101 Computer System, Replacement — Prime Central Computer and Applications Software 90101 Computer System Replacement _.. ........._ ..................__..... - - :::::::::::::::::::::. : :.:.: ��NEE31!�:: ��FiI�iE�1�1'�:'!'#lT�AL:::::::>::»>::>::::::> :::::::::::::::>::::>::::>::>:;:::;;?:: : ............:...................:.............................................. . � i � ClPsummary 21—Dec-94 i , � $26,000 $8,186 JAMISON $27,000 $5,005 SADOWSKY 6-30-94 $20,000 $19,918 SADOWSKY 9-16-94 $200,000 $200,000 MORENO 10-28-94 $50,000 $50,000 CAPRELLI $100,000 $100,000 STARNES ON=GOING $100,000 $100,000 DEETER $75,000 $75,000 STARNES ON—GOING $154,W0 $154,000 KENNEDY YES $558,000 $558,000 KENNEDY ;;:.: ; ;;- - ; :.: :..::,;;...;..; :: :.... ::: ........ >::: �:;:�1�i �tl� >::; :#> >�:�: <:.... _�......... �.. � _ ...�::.•.- :.::::.•..:..... _ ............. _............ 1 11/94 H WORK PERFORMED BY CITY FORCES 10-31-94 H PROJECT COMPLETED 10-31-94. H DESIGN COMPLETE, BIDS RECENED. PROJ�T SHOULD BE AWARDED BY 12-14-94 M DESIGN COMPLETE. APPROVALOF P.S.&E. 12-14-94 FIRE DEPARTMENT LEAD AGENCY; TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ASSISTING NOTHING FURTHEA TO REP�RT THIS HEPORTING PERIOD. M CONSULTANT PROCURED. BEGINNING SURVEY PROCESS OF CITY HALL BUILDING. SURVEY SHOULD BE COMPLETE BY 12-1-94 M JOINT P�JECT WITH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARIMENT M CONSULTANT PROCURED. BEGINNING SURVEY PF�CESS OF CITY HALL BUILDING. SURVEY SHOULD BE COMPLETE BY 12-1-94 H DATA PROCESSING DIVISION IS THE LEADCITYAGENCY H DATA PROCESSING DNISION IS THE LEADCITYAGENCY � POLICE DEPARTMENT 40501 Building, Up�ade — Install new carpet, Police Building Basement 40502 Computer System, New — Install Mobile Data Terminals In Police Vehicles 40503 Building, Expansion — Construct Wing on Police Building 90501 Police Cooling Tower Replacement 90502 Police Recorcis Management System ........, ..........:............................_.............. .._.......... P� E3�E::E�PA�7�fEEAk�': �TA�:::;:: :=::>:;:<:;:;>;;::: <:::::«:::> <:>::::::>::;::::>:< <:::::::» ....... . : . FIRE DEPARTMENT 40601 Buiiding, Design andConstruction — New Fre Station — 6915 Stine Road 40602 Parking Lot, Hesurtacing — Paving — Olive Drive Training Facility 40603 Fre Equipment, Hose Tower — Hose Towers—Station 2 40604 Professional and Consulting — CitylCounty Fire Study 40605 Automated Electronic Weather S�tion — Haz Mat Van 90601 Building, Upgade — Seismic Retrofit S�tion #2 — 718 E. 21 st St. 90802 Building, Upgrade — Diesel Exhaust Removal System—Stations 2, 4, 6, 11, 13' I � Rerooi of Tower Building at Fire Station #1 ; ClPsummary 21—Dec-94 i $13,000 $13,000 JAMISON $1,700,000 $1,694,962 COMM. $1,300,000 $1,203,813 ARNOLD 1-31-94 YES $13,633 $13,633 ARNOLD COMPLETE YES $92,958 $92,958 POLICE ><:;: : .;:: :: -: . :; .... : .............................. ;::<: 3<:1 f�>�t::<:>: �:{�`ti�� > ::.:. .�...i........h..........?/Y�........�......... $650,000 $850,000 DeWAYNE 1-15-95 536�000 $15,000 550�000 $36,000 PACHECO $15,000 DeWAYNE 1-15-95 $50,000 PACHECO $11,000 $11,000 PE4CHEC0 11-16-94 $440,000 $439,970 DeWAYNE 9-1-94 $40,500 $40,500 PEVCHECO $4,500 $4,500 JAMISON � H CONSULTANT PROCURED. PROJECT INVOLVES PARI4NG LOT RECONSTRUCTION AND COMMUNICATIONS TOWER REPLACEMENT. PLANS PROGRESSING ON SCHEDULE CONSTRUCTION COMPLETED IN F.Y. 1993-94. H PLANS FOR STATION ARE COMPLEfE. CONSULTANT MUST BE PROCURED TO DEVELOP SITE PLAN. CURRENTLY REVISING COST ESTPVIATES AND SECURING PROPERTY. WORK BY FIRE DEPARIMENT. INVOLVES COU NTY PARTICIPATION. M TO BE COORDINATED WITH SEISMIC RETROFIT PFiOJECT H PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND CONTRAGT DOCUMENTS ARE COMPLETE. PROJECT AWARDED i t-4-94. WORK BY GENERAL SERVICES. i _ ......:...........: :.:. ..:. ::::::::::::::::::.: :::::. :::::::. ::::::.:: FlAE::�E#>JkE3`i�EE7�tT;TL�'E�iL::«::::<:::»::>:::;:::>::::>::::>::::>:<:>::::::>::::::>::::>::>:::>::>::::>::>: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 7084 15,000 Gallon Under�gound Fuel System ? 30 Street Light Acquisition 18715 Purchase 500 Street Light Photo Cells 30201 Baker Street Landscaping 1 41001 Signal, New — East &undage Lane at Oswell Street 4 41002 Signal, New — Gosford Road at North Laurelglen Blvd 4 41003 Signal, New — Jenkins Road at Stodcdale Highway 1 41004 Signal, Up�gade — 4th Street at Chester Avenue 5 41005 Signal, Up�ade — Mohawk Street at Tru�dun Avenue 4 41006 Signal, New — Calloway Drive at Meacham Road 8 8 7 41007 Signal, New — Akers Road at Panama Lane ALL 41008 Channelization, Signing & Marking — Various ClPsummary 21—Dec-94 1 YES YES YES YES $95,000 $18.000 $5,000 $9,378 $95,000 CONCHITA 10-28-84 $18,000 JAMISON N/A $5,000 JAMISON $9,378 FABBRI N/A $154,000 $147,019 DEETEF;/ CONSLTNT $123,000 $68,813 GILLBURG $114,000 $107,083 TABUT $101,000 $101,000 TABLIT $45,000 $102�000 $45,000 TABLIT/ GILLBURG $95,019 DEETEW CONSLTNT $109,000 $102,083 TABl1T $60,000 $58,100 BRAD ONGOING 3 M DESIGN COMPLETE. APPROVAL OF P.S.&E. 12-14-94 WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY PARKS DEPARTMENT M ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS DONE AS SCHEDULED. CONSULTANT SELECTED. CONTRACTS BEING PROCESSED M ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS DONE AS SCHEDULED. BASE MAP COMPLETE, UTILITY INFORMATION STILL BEING RECENED 8 INCORPORATED INTO ONGOING DESIGN. M ENVIRONMENTALREVIEWSDONEASSCHEDULED.SURVEYRECV'D 11-7-94. NOTHING FURTHER SCHEDULED THIS REPORTING PERIOD. H SURVEY AND ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS DONE AS SCHEDULED, DESIGN 95%COMPLETE, AWAITING UTILITY INFORMATION. PS8�E TO CITYCOUNCIL PLANNED FOR 12-14-94. H ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS DONE AS SCHEDULED. NOTHING FURTHER SCHEDULED THIS REPORTING PERIOD. M ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS DONE AS SCHEDULED. CONSULTANT SELECTED. CONTRACTS BEING PROCESSED M ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS DONE AS SCHEDULED. SURVEYS RECEIVED. NOTHING FURTHEA SCHEDULED THIS REPORTING PERIOD. M ONGOING AS NEEDED FOR OPERATIONAL PURPOSES. 4 41009 Signal, New — Coffee Road at Hageman Road 4& 5 41010 Signal, Interconnect — TOC Arterial Inirastructure Conduk — 5 Locations (MING AVE, NEW STINE — CASTRO; COFFEE RD, STOCKDALE — TRUXTUN; WHITE LANE, WILSON — WIBLE; STINE/NEW STINE RD, WHITE — STOCKDALE; STOCKDALE HWY, GOSFORD — CALIF. ALL 41011 Signal, Upgade — Traffic Count Detector Insfallation, Vario�a Locations ALL 41012 Channelization, Signing & Marking — Speed Control Features, Vazious Locations 4& 6 41013 Signal, New — Ashe Road at District Blvd 5 41014 Channelization, Median Construction — Ming Avenue at Fwy 99, Southbound On—Ramp 2 41015 Street, Guardrail — Chester Ave. at AT&SF G�ade Seperation. 4 41016 Signal, New — Flashing Beacon on Pin Oak Park Bivd at Tevis ,k. High ALL 41017 Channelization, Signing & Mazking — Bike lane Installation on Stree� City Wide 41301 Street Reconstruction — Stodcdaie Hwy.— 1400' E/O ClPsummary 21—Dec-94 $128,000 $73,749 DEETER/ CONSLTNT $562�300 5562�300 BRAD $25,000 $25,000 BRAD ONGOING 550�000 $50�000 BRAD $101,000 $93,802 GILLBURG 11-28-94 $10,000 $10,�0 BRAD $25,W0 $25,000 BRAD/ CONSLTNT $22,000 $22,000 BRAD/ GILLBURG $155,000 $155,000 DEETER $421,300 $421,300 4 M ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS DONE AS SCHEDULED. CONSULTANT SELECTED. CONTRACTS BEING PF90CESSED M FIELD REVIEWS COMPLETED WITH CALTRANS OFFICIALS. VERBALAUTHORIZATION BYCALTRANS GIVEN TO BEGIN DESIGN. SURVEY REQUESTED & BEING PROCESSED BY SURVEYOR. M DESIGN TO BE INCLUDED WITH NEW SIGNALATCALLAWAY DRIVE AND MEACHAM ROAD SIGNAL DESIGN BYCONSULTANT. H ONGOING AS NEEDED FOR OPERATIONAL PURPOSES. WORK BY ANNUAL CONTRACTOR AND CITY CREWS. H SURVEYS AND ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS DONE AS SCHEDULED. DESIGN COMPLETE. PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL, ON 12-14-94 AGENDA. H INSTALLATION OF RAISED PAVHuIENT MARKERS BY GENERAL SERVICES COMPLEfED. M ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS DONE AS SCHEDULED. NOTHING FURTHEA SCHEDULED THIS REPORTING PERIOD. TO BE DESIGNED AND INCORPORATED INTO ENGINEERING DIVISION'S SEISMIC RETROFIT PF�JECT. H ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS DONE AS SCHEDULED. BASE MAP COMPLETE, PROJECT UNDER DESIGN. LOCATION CONFIRMED BY SCHOOL DISTRICT 12/1/94. DESIGN BEING PROCESSED PER RBC�UESTED LOCATION. UTILJN INFORMATION R6QUESTED. M FIELD REVIEWS COMPLETED WITH CALTRANS OFFIC IALS. VEFiBAL AUTHORIZATION BYCALTRANS TO BEGIN DESIGN. BASE MAPS 2096 COMPLETE. Old River Road to Coffee Road 41302 Street, Resurfa�ing — 21 st Street —'F" To Chester 41303 Street Resurtacing —'N° to Golden STate 41304 Street, Resurfacing — Akers Road — Panama to Harris 41305 Street, Resurfacing — Fairview Road — Gwendolyn to Monitor 41306 &idge, Construction — South H Street at Arvin Edison Canal 41307 Street, Resurtacing — South HaH Moon Drive — Olympia to Ashe 41308 Street, Resurfacing — Kaibab Avenue — Pasadena to Harvard 41309 Street, Resurtacing — Monterey Street — ARa Vista to Beale 41310 Street, Resurtacing — P Street —&undage to 4th 41311 Street, Resurtacing — P Street — 8th to California 41312 Street, Resurfacing — Pacheco Road — Wible to Hughes 41313 Street, Resurfacing — Q Street — California to Truxtun 41314 Street, Resurfacing — Wible Road — Planz to Ming 41315 Street, Resurfacing — Wible Road — 600' N/O Belie Terrace to &undage ClPsummary 21—Dec-94 $69,000 $69,000 JARRETT 2-15-95 $51,700 $0 TECH I 2-28-95 $79,400 $79,400 LEAL N/A $178,400 $178,400 JARRETT 2-15-95 $247,500 $247,500 ARNOLD 4-15-95 $56�400 $37,600 $82,100 $93,000 $51,000 $0 TECH I 4-15-95 $0 TECH I 2-28-95 $82,100 JARRETT 2-15-95 $93,000 JARRETT 2-15-95 $51,000 JARRETT 2-15-95 $118,000 $118,000 JARRETT 2-15-95 $84,000 $84,000 JARRETT 2-15-95 $309,300 $309,300 JARRETT 2-15-95 $171,800 $171,800 JARRETT 2-15-95 5 PROJECT COMBINED WITH OTHER S.T.P. PROJECTS FOR ECONOMY OF SCALE. PROJECT COMBINED WITH OTHER GROUP 1 PROJECTS FOR ECONOMY OF SCALE. DEFERRED TO R�ONCILE GAS TAX FUND PROJECT TO BE DONE BY STREETS DNISION. PROJECT COMBINED WITH OTHER S.T.P. PROJECTS FOR ECONOMY OF SCALE. L COMBINED WITH OTHER A.E. CANALCROSSINGS. PROJECTCOMBINED WITH OTHERGROUP2 PROJECTS FOR ECONOMY OF SCALE. DEFERRED TO R�ONCILE GAS TAX FUND PROJECT COMBINED WITH OTHER GROU P 1 PROJECTS FOR ECONOMY OF SCALE. DEFERRED TO RECONCILE GAS TAX FUND PROJECT COMBINED WITH OTHER S.T.P. PROJECTS FOR ECONOMY OF SCALF. PROJECT COMBINED WITH OTHER S.T.P. PROJECTS FOR ECONOMY OF SCALE. PROJECT COMBINED WITH OTHER S.T.P. PROJECTS FOR ECONOMY OF SCALE. PROJECT COMBINED WITH OTHER S.T.P. PROJECTS FOR ECONOMY OF SCALE. PROJECT COMBINED WITH OTHER S.T.P. PROJECTS FOR ECONOMY OF SCALE. PROJECT COMBINED WITH OTHER S.T.P. PROJECTS FOR ECONOMY OF SCALE. PROJECT COMBINED WITH OTHER S.T.P. PROJECTS FOR ECONOMY OF SCALE. 41316 Street, Resurfmcing — White Lane — Madison to Cottonwood $65,800 $0 TECH I 2-28-95 PROJECT COMBINED WITH OTHER GROU P 1 PROJECTS FOR ECONOMY OF SCALE. DEFERRED TO RECONCILE GAS TAX FUND 41317 Street, Resurtacing — University Ave. — Wenatchee $89,600 $89,600 JARRETT 2-15-95 PFiOJECT COMBINED WITH OTHER S.T.P. PROJECTS FOR ECONOMY to Columbus OF SCALE. 41318 &idge Construction — Akers Road Widening at Arvin Edison Canal � 41319 &idge, Construction — Panama Lane Widening at Arvin Edison Canal 41320 Bridge, Construction — Panama Lane Widening at Fazmer's Canal 41321 Bridge, Construction — Stine Road Widening at Arvin Edison Canal 41322 &idge, Construction — Wible Road Widening at Arvin Edison Canal 41323 Bridge, Construcdon — Panama Lane at Freoway 99 Interchange 41324 Land, Acquisition — Freeway 178—Mesa Mazin to Rancheria Road 41325 Bike Path, Construction — Freeway 99 to 2400' West 41328 Channelization, Median Narrowing — White Lane — Wible Road to South H Street ClPsummary 21—Dec-94 $184,500 $184,500 ARNOLD $247,500 $247,421 ARNOLD 4-15-95 $90,000 $90,000 ARNOLD 4-15-95 $247,500 $247,500 ARNOLD 4-15-95 $247,500 $247,500 ARNOLD 4-15-95 $250,000 $250,000 DeWAYNE ON—GOING $50,000 $50,000 MARIAN ON—GOING $54�000 $54�000 DON N/A $186,000 $188,000 CONCHITA 2-15-95 8 DESIGN BYCONSUI.TANT L COMBINED WITH OTHER A.E. CANAL CROSSINGS — CONSULTANT L COMBINED WITH OTHER A.E. CANAL CROSSINGS — CONSULTANT L COMBINED WITH OTHERA.E. CANALCROSSINGS — CONSULTANT L COMBINED WITH OTHER A.E. CANAL CROSSINGS — CONSULTANT M AWAITING DECISION ON CONSULTANT SELECTION BY MID DECEMBER, 1994. M CURRENTLY IN THE PROCESS OF OBTAINING AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY DETERMINATION OF HORIZONTALAND VERTICALCONTROL L AWAITING DECISION ON LOCATION AND POSSIBLE FUNDING SOUFiCE FOR GRADE SEPARATED CROSSING OF PARKING LAT ACCESS. L PROJECT TO BE COMBINED WITH WIDENING OF WHITE LANE (a� WIBLE ROAD. 41327 Street, Curbs & Gutters — Miscelianeois Improvemenls at Various Locations 41328 Channelization, Widening — Intersection—Tru�dun Ave at Oak St (Right ot way only) 41329 Channelization, Widening — Intersection—White Lane at Wible Road 41330 Channelization, Widening — CaliforniaAvenue—Oak St to A St (Right of way only) 4133t Channelization, Widening — Calloway Drive—Rosedale Plaza to Meacham Road 41332 Channelization, Widening — Hageman Road—Otd Fazm Road to Jewetta Avenue 41333 Channelization, Widening — Stodcdale Highway— Jenkins Road to Allen Road 41334 Street, Resurtacing — Ashe Road — S.P.RR. to White Lane 41335 Street, Resurf�cing — Auburn Street — Redlancis to Oswell 41336 Street, Resurtacing — Blade Avenue — Pasadena to Boise 41337 Street, Resurtacing — Boise Street — Redlands to University ClPsummary 21—Dec-94 $100,000 $99,513 CONCHITA ON—GOING $100,000 $100,000 CONCHITA 6-30-95 $115,000 $115,000 CONCHITA 2-15-95 $100,000 $100,000 CONCHITA 6-30-95 $152,200 $152,197 CONCHITA 3-15-95 $74,000 $74,000 CONCHITA 4-15-95 $184,000 $184,000 CONCHITA 5-15-95 $126,900 $40�400 $16,900 $32,000 $0 TECH I 4-15-95 $0 TECH I 2-28-95 $0 TECH I 2-28-95 $0 TECH I 2-28-95 7 M CURRENTLY WORKING ON CONTRACT TO PEFiFORM AERIAL OF INTERS�TION/ROADWAY FOR RIGHTOF WAY DETERMINATION. L PROJECT TO BECOMBINED WITH MEDIAN NARROWING PF�JECT ON WHITE LANE BETWEEN WIBLF ROAD AND SOUTH H STREEf. M CURRENTLY WORKING ON CONTRACT TO PERWRM AERIAL OF INTEHSECTION/ROADWAY FOR RIGHTOF WAY DETERMINATION. L REQUIRES DEDICATION OF RIGHTOF WAY AND RELACATION OF POWER POLES. PROJECT COMBINED WITH OTHER GROUP 2 PROJECTS FOR ECONOMY OF SCALE. DEFERRED TO RECONCILE GAS TAX FUND PROJ�T COMBINED WITH OTHER GROUP 1 PROJECTS FOH ECONOMY OF SCALE. DEFERRED TO RECONCILE GAS TAX FUND PROJ6CT COMBINED WITH OTHER GROUP 1 PROJECTS FOR ECONOMY OF SCALE. DEFERRED TO RECONC ILE GAS TAX FUND PROJECT COMBINED WITH OTHER GROUP 1 PROJECTS FOR ECONOMY OF SCALE. DEFERRED TO RECONC ILE GAS TAX FUND 41338 Street, Resurtacing - Colgate Lane - Bo'se to Kaibab 41399 Street, Resurtacing - Gosford Road - Pacheco to District 41340 Street, Resurtacing - Harvard Drive - Pasadenato Kaibab 41341 Street, Resurfacing - Manning Street - Mingto Outingdale 41342 Street, Resurtacing - North Half Moon Drive - Scenic to Ashe 41343 Street, Resurtacing - Oswell Street - Auburn to Redlands 41344 Street, Resurfacing - Panama Lane - 400' East of Colony to South H 41345 Street, Resurtacing - Vazio� Streets in Pazk Stodcdale 41346 Street, Resurtacing - Pasadena Street - Renegade to Kaibab 41347 Street, Resurfacing - Purdue Drive - Pasadena to Oswell 41348 Street, Resurfacing - Redlands Drive - Wenatchee to University 41349 Street, Resurtacing - Renegade Avenue - Wenatchee to Boee ClPsummary 21-Dec-94 $51,700 $52,900 $59�200 $57,300 $84�900 $55�500 $0 T6CH1 4-15-95 $0 TECH I 2-28-95 $0 TECHI 4-15-95 $0 T�H I 4-15-95 $0 TECHI 2-28-95 $0 TECHI 4-15-95 $405,300 $83296 JARRETT 9-16-94 $13,200 534�800 $57,300 $26,300 $0 TECHI 2-28-95 $0 TECH I 2-28-95 $0 TECH I 2-28-95 $0 TECHI 2-28-95 8 PROJECT COMBINED WITH OTHER GROUP 1 PROJECTS FOH ECONOMYOF SCALE. DEFERRED TO RECONCILE GAS TAX FUND PROJ�T COMBINED WITH OTHER GROUP 2 PROJECTS FOR ECONOMY OF SCALE. DEFERRED TO RECONCILE GAS TAX FUND PROJECT COMBINED WITH OTHER GROUP 1 PROJECTS FOR ECONOMYOF SCALE. DEFERRED TO RECONCILE GAS TAX FUND PROJBCT COMBINED WITH OTHER GROUP 2 PROJECTS FOR ECONOMY OF SCALE. DEFERRED TO RECONCILE GAS TAX FUND PROJBCT COMBINED WITH OTHER GROUP 2 PROJECTS FOR ECONOMY OF SCALE. DEFERRED TO RECONCILE GAS TAX FUND PROJ�T COMBINED WITH OTHER GROUP 1 PROJECTS FOR ECONOMY OF SCALE. DEFERRED TO RECONCILE GAS TAX FUND PROJECT COMBINED WITH OTHER GROU P 2 PROJECTS FOR ECONOMY OF SCALE. DEFERRED TO RECONCILE GAS TAX FUND PF�J�T CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION, SUSPENDED DUE TO COLD WEATHER CONDITIONS PROJECT COMBINED WITH OTHER GROUP 1 PF�JECTS FOR ECONOMYOF SCALE. DEFERRED TO RECONCILE GAS TAX FUND PHOJBCT COMBINED WITH OTHER GROU P 1 PROJECTS FOR ECONOMY OF SCALE. DEFERRED TO RECONCILE GAS TAX FUND PROJECT COMBINED WITH OTHER GROU P 1 PROJECTS FOR ECONOMY OF SCALE. DEFERRED TO RECONCILE GAS TAX FUND PF�JECT COMBINED WITH OTHER Gf�UP 1 PF�JECTS FOR ECONOMY OF SCALE. DEFERRED TO R�ONCILE GAS TAX FUND 41350 Street, Resurtacing — South Hatf Moon Drive — Ashe to Scenic 41351 Street, Resurtacing — Stine Road — Harr's to Pacheco 41352 Street, Resurtacing — Truxtun Avenue — Oak to'Q° 41353 Street, Resurtacing — Wible Road — Panamato Harr's 41354 Street, Resurtacing — Oak Street — Tru�dun to 24th 41501 Land, Acquisition — Off Street Parking 41601 WTP, Improvements — Glass Vned Pipe for Sludge Lines, Plant 2 41602 WTP, Expansion — Metro Bakersfield 1NW�P Construcdon 41701 Land, Fencing — Fencing of Ciiy Property Neaz Cottonwood Road and Panama Road 41702 Sewer, Construction — Abandon Old McCutchen TruNc—Ashe Rd to Stine Rd 41703 Sewer, Rehabilitate — Upfyade Lift Station—Sandra at Falcon 41704 Sewer, Rehabilitate — Modily Lift Station—Monitor S/O White 41705 Sewer, Rehabilitate — Modity Gosford Road L�it Station ClPsummary 21—Dec-94 $51,700 $0 T�H I 4-15-95 $94,000 $0 TECH I 4-15=95 $141,000 ($905) TECH I 2-28-95 $58,300 $0 TECH I 4-15-95 $125,000 $0 TECH I 2-28-95 $550,000 $305,837 ANDERSON $60,000 $60,000 DeWAYNE 4-15-95 $3,200,000 $3,200,000 KLOEPPER $50,000 $50,000 KLOEPPER $40,000 $40,000 TECH I 1-31-95 $72,000 572,000 $80,000 $72,OOOCONCHITA 12-15-94 $72,OOOCONCHITA 12-15-94 $50,737 AHNOLD ON—GOING 9 PROJECT COMBINED WITH OTHER GROU P 2 PROJECTS FOR ECONOMYOF SCALE. DEFERRED TO RECONCILE GAS TAX FUND PROJECT COMBINED WITH OTHER GROU P 2 PROJECTS FOR ECONOMY OF SCALE. DEFERRED TO RECONCILE GAS TAX FUND PROJBCT COMBINED WITH OTHER GROUP 1 PROJECTS FOR ECONOMY OF SCALE. DEFERRED TO RECONCILE GAS TAX FUND PROJECT COMBINED WITH OTHEfi GROUP 2 PROJECTS FOR ECONOMY OF SCALE. DEFERRED TO RECONCILE GAS TAX FUND PROJECT COMBINED WITH OTHER GROUP 1 PF�JECTS FOR ECONOMY OF SCALE. DEFERRED TO RECONCILE GAS TAX FUND PROPERTY MANAGEMENT L M L M COMBINED WITH OTHER UFT STATION MODIFICATION M COMBINED WITH OTHEH UFT STATION MODIFICATION H PHASE I MEASURES HAVE BEEN IMPLEMENTED. PHASE II IMPROVBuIENTS ARE CURRENTLY BEING INVESTIGATED BY CONSULTANT 41706 Sewer, Construction — Eliminate Kern Island Canal Sewer Crossings 41707 Sewer, Construction — Stodcdale Hwy Force Main at C. V. Canal 41802 Fuel Farm, Construction — Fuel Fazm and Removal of Existing Tanks 41804 Building, Construction — Construct restroom facility @ Bakersfield Municipal Airport 41805 Land, Development — Airport Improvmen�, Undergound Utilties, Perimeter Fencing 42003 Building, Up�pade — Install new carpet at Refuse 42203 Landscaping, Medians — Rosedale Highway—Oak Street to Camino Del Rio 42205 Landscaping, Medians — North and Northeast Medians — Stamped Concrete 42206 Pazk, Improvement — Saunders Pazk (Area2)—Picnic Nooks 42207 Landscaping, Medians — Stodcdale Hwy—Gosford Road to 1400' E/O EI Rio 42209 Building, Remodel — Construct Women's Shower Facilities 42210 Park, improvement — Patrio� Park—Pump Inatallation in Basin Area 42401 Building, Repair — Chiller Replacement atthe Convention Center $54,000 $54,000 JARRETT 4-15-95 $36,800 $0 TECH I N/A 9/94 10/94 $200,000 $200,000 MORENO PENDING $35,000 $34,000 TECH I 3-15-95 $30,000 $19,065 JAMISON $13,500 $13,500 $25,000 $25,000 DON 1-15-95 $150,000 $150,000 DON 1-31-95 $20,000 $20,000 FABBRI $59,800 $59,800 DON 2-28-95 $21,000 $21,OW TECH I 3-31-95 $60,000 $60,000 JARRETT 12-1-94 $500,000 $500,000 DeWAYNE 2-28-95 ClPsummary 21—Dec-94 ip L POSTPDNED PERCANAL DISTRICT RC-0UEST L PROJECT COMPLETED UNDER EMERGENCYCONDITIONS IN SEPTBNBER 1994. M AWAITING AIRPORT DECISION ON LOCATION OF FUEL FARM L M M PARKS DNISION IS THE LEAD AGENCY M COORDINATE WITH STOCKDALE HIGHWAY RECONSTRUCTION ALONG CAL STATE FRONTAGE. M APPRDVALOFP.S.&E.AT12-14-94COUNCILMTG H FEASIBILJTYSTUDYCOMPLETE. CONSULTANTTOBEPROCURED. 4c�n,z esuuamg, nepair - convention Center-Reseal Arena Concxete Floor 42403 Building, Remodel - Convention Center-Replace Arena Acoustic Ceiling 42404 Building, Repair - Repair Arena Floor Expansion Gasket 42405 Land, Acquisition - Convention Center Parking 42601 Street, Curbs & Gutte►s - Oleander-Sunset Area Project - Part A 42602 Sewer, Construction - Panama #10 Project 42603 Building, Remodel - Architectural Barrier Removal Program 42604 Street Lights, Upgrades - Census Tract 20 Llght Improvement 42605 Building, Remodel - Roof replacement, 515 Tru�Qun 42606 Building, Up�gade - InsffiII new carpet, 515 Tru�Run 42607 Street, Curbs & Gutters - Oleander-Sunset Nea Project - Part B 42608 Street, Curb§ 8� Gutters - Oleander-Sunset Area Ro ject - Part C 50505 Acq. Property 8 Paving / Fence (Betw PD & RR) ClPsummary 21-Dec-94 110,000 $110,000 DeWAYNE 11- $25,000 $25,000 DeWAYNE 2-28-95 $20,�0 $20,000 DeWAYNE 11-1-94 $206,000 $206,000 ANDERSON 590,000 $90,000 JARRETT 12-31-94 $150,000 $150,000 JARRETT 6-30-95 $78,000 $78,000 DeWAYNE ON-GOING $37,000 $37,000 KUEHN N/A $16,000 $16,000 JAMISON N/A $30,000 $30,000 JAMISON N/A $26,W0 $26,000 JARRETT 12-31-94 $74,500 $74,500 JARRETT 12-31-94 YES $186,000 $186,000 ANDERSON it RESEARCH COMPLETE. AWAITING APPROPRIATE WINDOW TO PERFORM WORK. COORDINATING WITH CONVENTION CENTER STAFF. RESEARCH COMPLETE. AWAITING APPR�PRIATE WINDOW TO PERFORM WORK. COORDINATING WITH CONVENTION CENTER STAFF. PHOJECT HANDLED BY REAL PROPERTY AGENT M L CONSTRUCTION POSTPONED UNTIL REMAINING FUNDS ARE FOR CONSTRUCTION IN FY 1995-96 BUDGET. H COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS AVAILABLE PROJ6CT MATERIALS TO BE PURCHASED WITH UNION NO.10 ANNIXATION. 11/94 1/95 CONTRAGTAWARDEDTO SANJOAQUIN ROOFING. CONSTRCTION TO BEGIN IN LATE NOVEMBER. CARPET TO BE INSTALLED AFTER ROOF IS COMPI.ETE. BIDS ARE CURRENTLY BEING OBTAINED. M M 5ts5o3 Kern River Parkway — Bikepath/Pazking Con"structi� 86701 Plant #2 Expansion, Phase I& II Design 68306 Land, Fencing — Fencing at Landfill 68303 Landfill, Improvements — Methane Gas Project at Landfill 88503 Kern Hiver Landscaping 8. Development 68503 Kern River Landscaping & Development — Phase 11 71004 Medians on New Stine at Sazazen 73007 Coffee Road &idge Q Kern River 8 Rd Widening 73009 Coffee Road Widening Fl/W — Brimhall to Rosedale 77201 F Street Storm Drain — Tr�ctun to 21 st Street 78502 Kern River Landscaping and Development 78505 Bike Path, Construction — Manor Street to City Umits i 80501 K Street Parking Mall and Parking L,ot 4 81005 Medians on White Lane,Cernan Way to Arvin Edison Canal YES $73,656 $73,656 DON ON YES $160,080 $138,800 KLOEPPER $25,000 $25,000 SHAW $50,000 $50,000 SHAW YES YES YES YES YES YES YES $73,686 $40�460 $20,000 $73,686 HOGGATT $0 HOGGATT $20,000 N/A N/A $100,000 $100,000 STARNES 1-31-95 $50,800 $20,800 ARNOLD 8-7-94 $12,154 $12,154 GEORGE 10-1-94 $98,619 $47,245 HOGGATT PARKS DIVISION IS THE LEAD AGENCY ON THIS PROJECT PARKS DNISION IS THE LEAD AGENCY ON THIS PROJECT COMPLETE. M PROJECT COMBINED WITH STOCKDALE WIDENING AND MEDIAN CONSTRUCTION IN FRONT OF CAL STATE. H AGREBuIENT FOR RIGHT OF WAY HAS BEEN IX6CUTED AND DOCUMENTS DEWERED TO CITY. PROCESSING PAYMENTS PER H FUNDS TO BE USED TO FACILITATE WIDENING OF F STREET BETWEEN TRUXTUN AND 17th AND MISCELLANEOUS DRAINAGE IMPROV9NENTS. $234,800 $234,800 DeWAYNE 5-18-94 H AWAITING RIGHTOF WAY FROM PROPERTYOWNERS. CURRENTLY WORKING WITH PROPERTYMANAGEMENTTO NEGOTIATE NECESSARY RIGHTOF WAY. YES $39,385 $39,385 MARIAN 5-18-94 7-2-94 11-2-94 H PROJBCT COMPLETE YES $10,000 ($106) DEETER 8-14-94 10-19-94 11-2-94 ClPsummary 21—Dec-94 � 2 PROJECT COMPLETE, NOC 11 /18/94 BY CITY COU NCIL � 6 810t6 Upgrade Signal — 2 81018 Upgrade Signal — F Street and Truxtun Avenue 2& 5 81019 Upgrade Signal — Oak Street and Chester Lane 6& 7 81020 Upgrade Signal — Ptanz Road and Wible Road 83011 &idge, Replacemerit —&own Street at Eastside Canal 83013 California Avenue Median Modfication and Street Resurtacing between Stodcdale Highway and Real Raod 83014 California Avenue Resurfacing — Stodcdale to Oak 83016 Median Narrowing Stodcdale — Gosford to E. City Limit 83017 &idge, Replacemerrt — China Grade Loop at Bearckley Canal 83019 Coffee Road Widening —&imhall to Rosedale 83025 Land, Acquisition — Freeway Right of Way 83032 Lakeview Avenue Resurfacing —�rginia to Wilkins 83033 Lansing Drive Resurfacing — So. Montclair to Hurrter YES $31,000 $31,000 TABLJT 10-3-94 YES $52,729 $52,664 GILLBURG 10-12-94 YES $91,000 $90,822 TABUT 11-7-94 YES $85,870 $85,624 TABLIT 10-3-94 $140,000 $6,638 ARNOLD 10-31-94 $264,681 $0 STARNES $310,000 ($61) STARNES YES $20,586 $20,586 STARNES 2-28-95 $410,W0 $410,000 STARNES 12-15-94 YES $349,781 $278,760 ARNOLD 3-31-95 $250,000 $250,000 MARIAN ON—GOING YES $51,988 $890 ARNOLD 5-18-94 YES $13,302 $13,302 STARNES ClPsummary 21—Dec-94 13 TO BE AWARDED 12-14-94. CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULED TO BE DETERMINED BYCONSTRUCTION DIVISION SUBJECT TO POLE DEIJVERY; 35CONTRACT WORKING DAYS. COMBINED WITH PLAN2 ROAD AT WIBLE F90AD SIGNAL PROJECT #81020 H DESIGN COMPLEfE, ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE EXCEEDS AVAILABLE FUNDS. PROJECT BEING REEVALUATED BY TRAFFIC ENGINEER TO BREAK UP PROJECT INTO PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. H BIDS OPEN 11-30-94. ACTION ON BIDS SCHEDULEO FOR 12-14-94. H TO BE AWARDED 12-14-94. CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULED TO BE DETERMINED BYCONSTRUCTION DNISION SUBJECT TO POLE DEWERY; 35CONTRNCT WORKING DAYS. COMBINED WITH PLANZ ROAD AT WIBLE ROAD SIGNAL PROJECT #81020 H PROJECTCURRENTLYUNDERCONSTRUCTION H PROJECT CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION PROJECT CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION M TO BE INCLUDING WITH STOCKDALE HIGHWAY LANDSCAPING. DESIGN UNDER WAY BYCONSULTANT H AWAITING RIGHT OF WAY FROM SUNLAND REFINING COMPANY. SUNLAND HAS GNEN TENTATIVE APPROVAL FOR TRADING RIGHTOF WAY FOR IMPROV9IAENTS BUT HAS NOT FOLLOWED THROUGH YET. M PROJECT CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION PROJ�T COMPLETE I 83043 Planz Road Overcrossing — Drainage Improvemerds 83049 Stodcdale Hwy Reconst — Old River Road to A—E Canal 83058 Channelization, Widening — Intersection — Stockdale 8 Cal'rfornia 83058 Widen Intersection — Sbockdale at Cal'rf (Phase 2 8� 3) 85001 K Street Pazking Mall & Parking Lot � 87001 Northeast Sewerline 87002 Stine Road Sewer Repiacement Pacheco to Harr's 88501 Park, Improvement — Beach Park—Improvements 88502 Wible Road Lan�caping 90503 Call Boxes on Kern River Bike Path 1,2,3 91001 Reflectorize Major Streets Citywide 5,6,7 4 91002 New Signai — Ashe Road at South Hal} Moon Drive 4 91003 New Signal — Buena �sffi Road at Stodcdale Hlghway 6 91004 New Signal — Panama L.ane at Stine Road ClPsummary 21—Dec-94 ifQi'.��L� YES $60,000 $60,000 STARNES YES $20,100 $20,100 STARNES 1-31-95 YES $422,000 $421,335 ARNOLD 1-31-95 DESIGN COMPLETE. COORDINATE WITH DEVELOPMENT PROJECT. H CURRENTLY NEGOTIATING RIGHTOF WAYAC�UISITION WITH PROPERTY OW NERS. YES $85,275 $55,009 ARNOLD 1-31-95 H CURRENTLY NEGOTIATING RIGHTOF WAY ACQUISITION WITH PROPERTY OW NERS. YES $211,200 ($6,172) MARIAN COMPLETE YES $3,717,290 $3,717,290 STARNES 6-30-94 H CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION. YES $67,829 ($27,04�LaROCHELLE PROJECT COMPLETE YES $150,000 $147,210 FABBRI BY PARKS. YES $74,955 $74,936 DON 8-24-94 M TO BE AWARDED 11-16-94 YES $22,250 $22,250 ARNOLD N/A 10-1-94 10-31-94 H CONTRPGTS FOR SERVICE AND INSTALLATION BEING PROCESSED. YES $45,000 $45,000 BRAD 9-14-94 M AWARDEDI1-16-94.CONSTRUCTIONSCHEDULETOBE DETEFMAINED BY CONSTRUCTION DIVISION. 15 CONTRACT WORKING DAYS. YES $102,129 $5,504 TABLIT 5-25-94 H AWARDED 7-13-94. CONSTHUCTION SCHEDULED TO BE DETER— MINED BYCONSTRUCTION DIVISION SUBJECTTO POLE DEUVERY. 35CONTRAiCT WORKING DAYS. YES $56,450 $0 YES $54,000 ($15,679) TABLJT 6-15-94 14 H AWARDED 8-10-94. CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULED TO BE DETER— MINED BYCONSTRUCTION DNISION SUBJECTTO POLE DELIVERY. 1& 2 91005 Upgrade Signal — Cal'rfornia Avenue at H Street , VAR. 91006 Channelization Vario� Locations ALL 9t007 Upgrade Signal — Various Locations 4,5,&6 9t008 Signal Interconnect — Southw�t Arterial (STOCKDALE, MONTCLAIR to REAL; MING, GOSFORD to NEW STIN� 3 91010 Guarctail — China Grade, City Limits to Panorama Drive ALL 91011 Signal, Operations — Traffic Operations Center 6 9t 012 Upgrade Signal — Akers Road at Wilson Road 2& 5 91013 Signal Interconnect — Truxtun Avenue, Oak to A Street 2 91014 New Signal — Haley at Monterey Street 92001 Convention Center Baliroom 92002 Convention Center Meeting Rooms 93002 Channelization Median Nazrowing — Calitornia Avenue ClPsummary 21—Dec-94 YES $72,985 ($11,810) TABLIT 7-15-94 1-3-95 2-23-95 YES $47,436 $45,860 ALL 10-12-94 YES YES YES $8,807 $6,603 BRAD ONGOING $201,000 $201,000 BRAD/ 1-3-95 GILLBURG $9,000 $80�000 YES $81,635 $9,000 DEETEH/ COUNTY $79,989 BRAD/ CONSLTNT $25,606 TABLJT 2-11-94 7-18-94 9-2-94 YES $27,000 $26,958 BRAD/ 9-14-94 DEEfER YES $91,859 ($308) TABLJT 3-25-94 YES $1,863,000 $1,719,714 R. ROJAS YES $537,000 $498,441 R. ROJAS YES $209,858 ($998) 15 35CONTHA�CT WORKING DAYS. H AWARDED 8-24-94. PRE—CONSTRUCTION MTG. HELD ON 12-2-94, CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULED TO BEGIN 1-3-95. M USED FOR MINOR CHANNELIZATION, REMAINDER BEING COMBINED WITH F STREET AT TRUXTUN AVENUE SIGNAL UPGRADE PROJECT # 81018. H WORK PERFI�RMED ON AS NEEDED BASIS H ALL3SEGMENTS85%COMPLETEPLANCOMPLETIONEXPECTED IN DECEMBER FOR SUBMITTALS TO CALTRANS FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE. UTILITYMAPPING NEARLYCOMPLETE. M CITY SHARE OF COUNTY DESIGNED PROJECT. DCPECTED SPRING OF 1995. M RFP/RFQ TO BE COMPLETED BY END OF DECEMBER. OUTLINE COMPLETE, UNDER REVIEW. H AWARDED 4-6-94. NOTICE OF COMPLETION 9-28-94. H AWARDED 11-16-94. CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULED TO BE DETER— MINED BYCONSTRUCTION DNISION.2000NTRACT WORKING DAYS. H AWARDED 06-15-94. CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULED TO BE DETER— MINED BYCONSTRUCTION DNISION.35CONTHAICT WORKING DAYS. H PROJBCT CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION; SCHEDULED FOR COMPLETION BYMAY 1995. H PI�JBCT CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION; SCHEDULED FOR COMPLETION BYMAY 1995. Pi�J6CT CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION I _ . _ !l�u3 SII88i, F18SURdCl�9 - r SV662 - 14V1 SO G4V1 93�04 Rancheria Avenue at Kern River &idge Repairs 93005 Bike Path, Widening — Beach Park to SPRR 93007 Lakeview Avenue Resurtacing — California to Virginia 93008 Panarama Drive Resurfacing — Monte vsta to River 93009 4th Street Resurfacing — Chester to P Street 93010 8th Street Resurfacing — Chester to P Street 93013 Cal'rfornia Avenue Resurtacing — Baker to Lakeview 93014 Cal'rfornia Avenue Resurtacing — Stodcdale to Mohawk 93015 Street, Widening — California Ave. — Oak to Real 93015 California Avenue Widening — Oak to Real Road 93018 Chester Aven� R�urfacing — 34th to Gazces Circle 93018 H Street Resurfacing — Tru�dun to 18th Street 93019 Monitor Street Resurfacing — White Lane to Pacheco 93024 Tru�dun Avenue Resurtacing — Mohawk to AT 8� SF Railroad ClPsummary 21—Dec-94 $177,000 $177,000 JARRETT 2-15-95 YES $45,000 $45,000 CONCHITA 1-31-95 $85,000 $85,000 DON 6-30-95 YES $109,666 $29,962 ARNOLD 5-18-94 YES $276,605 $253,525 ARNOLD 5-18-94 YES $95,677 $88,813 ARNOLD 5-18-94 YES $79,682 $16,834 ARNOLD 5-18-94 YES $254,669 $230,987 ARNOLD 5-18-94 $127,580 $0 YES $285,000 $285,000 STARNES 11-15-94 3-1-95 8-31-95 YES $1,385,609 $1,209,414 STARNES 11-15-943-1-95 8-31-95 YES $70,682 $84,623 ARNOLD 5-18-94 YES $18,882 $7,903 ARNOLD 5-18-94 � YES $108,682 $101,068 ARNOLD 5-18-94 YES $187,882 $113,910 ARNOLD 5-18-94 16 PROJECT COMBINED WITH OTHER S.T.P. PROJECTS FoR EcoNOnn� OF SCALE. M WILL AWO INCLUDE BRIDGE RAILINGS. L R6CEIVED PARTIAL FUNDING APPROVALTHROUGH 9-9-94 LETTER FROM KERNCOG. REMAINING FUNDING WILL BE GRANTED IN THE 1995-96 FUNDING CYCLE. PLANS READY BY 6-30-95. PROJECT CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION PROJ�T CURRENT�Y UNDER CONSTRUbTION PROJECT CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION PROJECT CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION PROJECT CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION PROJECT CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION H DESIGN 9996 COMPLETE AWAITING CALTRANS APPROVAL H DESIGN 9996 COMPLETE. AWAITING CALTFlANS APPROVAL PROJECT CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION PROJECT CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION PROJ�T CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTf�JCTION PROJ�T CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION I - 93026 District Boulevazd Resurtacing — Grissom to Stine 93027 Ming Avenue Resurfacing — Wible to Hughes 93029 Bike Path, Construction — Truxtun Avenue Tunnel at Quailwood 93030 &idge Construction — Coffee Road at AT 8 SF i 93031 Chester Aven� Underpass &idge Seismic Retrofd 93033 Median Construction — Vazious Locations 93035 Equestrian Trail Along Kern River @ Route 178 94001 Calloway &idge Construction 83015 Calloway Bridge Construction — New Signal — Calloway at Cross Valley Canal, &imhall Rd. Modfication Q Stodcdale 95001 Coffee Road Overcrossing Construction 96701 Design of Metro Wastewater Treatrnerrt Plant 96702 Sandblast & Repaint Clazifiers, Plant #2 967p4 RehabiliTate &undage Lane — Real to Oak 9g7p5 Sewer Construction — GuB Street ClPsummary 21—Dec-94 YES $117,682 $53,248 ARNOLD 5-18-94 PF�JECTCURRENTLYUNDERCONSTRUGTION YES $67,570 $20,027 ARNOLD 5-18-94 PROJ�T CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION YES $230,619 $230,619 ARNOLD 5-18-94 PROJECT CURFiENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION $50,000 $50,000 HOGGATT 4-15-95 L R�EIVED FUNDING APPROVAL THROUGH 9-9-94 LETTER FROM KEHNCOG. YES $100,000 $39,618 ARNOLD 8-3-95 10-15-95 10-18-96 H PROJECT THROUGH GRADE SEPARATION DISTRICT. YES $32,000 $31,780 MARIAN 12-15-94 H STRATEGYPLANCOMPLETEBYCONSULTANT.ONCEAPPROVED BYCALTRANS, FINAL DESIGN WILL BEGIN. PROJECTON SCHEDULE. YES $367,801 $177,801 HOGGATT 5-15-95 M WILLCONSTRUCT WHITE LANE MEDIANS BETWEEN BUENA VISTA ROAD AND MT. VISTA ROAD THIS F.Y. YES $38,693 $1,615 BRAD 7-15-94 L PROJECTCOMPLETE $B4O00,000 $5,807,680 STARNES/ 12—t —94 2-1-95 12-31-95 H APPROVAL OF P.S.&E. AT 12-14-94 COUNCIL MTG TABLIT PS &E COMPLETE FOR BRDuIHALL & CANAI SITES, AWAITING SOME UTILJTY SERVICE INFORMATION. AWAITING DATA FROM MARTIN—MCINTOSH FOR STOCKDALE INTERSECTION TO BE INCORPORATED INTO OUR PLANS. YES YES YES $8,250,000 $8,250,000 ARNOLD 8-3-95 10-15-95 10-18-96 H PROJECT THROUGH GRADE SEPARATION DISTRICT. $2,057,500 $1,900,000 KLOEPPER H AWAtTING COMPLETION OF MASTERPLAN � $40,000 $40,000 STARNES 4-15-95 L $99,200 $99,200 MORENO 11-30-94 M DESIGN COMPLETE. WILL HAVE P.S.&E. APPROVED AT 12-14-94 COU NC IL MTG. $89,980 $89,980 MARIAN 9-16-94 H DESIGN COMPLFTE. CURRENTLY BIDDING. WILL AWARD AT 17 / __ _ _ 97001 Sewer, Rehabili�te — Westchester Area Easements & Alleys � 97001 Rehabilitate Westchester Area Easemen� & Alleys 97003 Rehabilitate &andon Lift Station Modification 97004 Sewer Rehabilitate —&undage Lane — Real to Oak �� 97005 Sewer Construction — Gulf Street 97202 &edceruidge Drainage Basin I 97203 Storm Drain Construction — Akers Road — Thoreson 97402 Land Developmerrt — Apron Construction and Perimeter Fencing 97403 InsffiII Sewer Line and Electrical Conduit 98101 Land, Development — Wood Recycling Faciliiy — Asphaft Paving 98504 Pazk, Improvement — Kern River Pazkway—Play�ound Equipment 98508 Rosedale Hwy lanc�caping & Irrigation Improvementa 97010 Stine / Hazris Assessment District �A�'�Ai:;::��'AU1��NT::i+F�A�iR1�::'��i�A3:::<:>: >::>::>:::<:>::::::::::> ClPsummary 21—Dec-94 YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES $276,000 $276,000 MORENO 11-30-94 $252,653 $252,653 MORENO 11-30-94 $99,877 $44,887 LaROCHELLE5-18-94 $99,200 $99,200 MORENO $69,980 $69,866 MAFiIAN $90,000 $90,000 STARNES 5-15-95 $8,860 $703 LEAL 9-7-94 $147,135 ($28) �OLANOS 10-17-9411-29-94 $8,512 $8,512 B�LANOS 10-17-9411-29-94 $250,000 $250,000 ARNOLD 12-15-94 YES $21,500 $21,495 HOGGATT 2-1-95 I YES $40,000 $22,174 FIOGGATT 5-18-94 YES $975,730 $975,730 MARIAN 18 M DESIGN COMPLETE. WILL HAVE P.S.B�E. APPROVEDAT 12-14-94 COUNC IL MTG. M DESIGN COMPLETE. WILL HAVE P.S.&E. APPROVEDAT 12-14-94 COUNCIL MTG. L PROJECT COMPLETE M DESIGN COMPLETE. WILL HAVE P.S.B�E. APPROVED AT 12-14-94 COUNCIL MTG. H DESIGN COMPLETE. CURRENTLY BIDDING. WILLAWARD AT 12-14-94COUNCIL MTG. L PHOJECT COMPLETE M PROJECT CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION 70°6 COMPLETE M PROJ�TCURRENTLYUNDERCONSTRUCTION70%COMPLEfE H CONSULTANTCURRENTLY DESiGNING FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS. PROJECT ON HOLD PENDING LONG RANGE PLANNING H M PROJECT CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION