HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/22/99 BAKERSFIELD
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
MEMORANDUM
January 22, 1999
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: GENERAL INFORMATION
1. The "Grand Canal" developers indicate they will be doing foundation work as early
as February. '-
2. The committee meetings are all getting geared up again, and most will be scheduled
within the next few weeks.
3. Representatives from EDCD recently attended an exploratory meeting, along with
several other local organizations, to discuss the possibility of initiating a First Night
celebration in Bakersfield on December 31, 1999. First Night is an alcohol-free,
family focused public celebration that was started in Boston as an alternative to the
traditional New Year's revelry. A memo is attached which further explains the First
Night concept.
4. Enclosed is some additional information relating to recent concerns about the local
hospitals' emergency department capacity and the ambulance delay issue:
1) background information and update from the County EMS Director;
2) a copy of a letter we received that was sent to the president of Bakersfield
Memorial Hospital from Golden Empire Ambulance Company.
5. Responses to Council requests are enclosed, as follows: · Provide time line for repairs of damage to Panorama Drive and River Boulevard
caused by erosion;
· Contact constituent regarding road improvements on Wilson Road between Akers
and Stine Roads;
· Status of road repairs on Bernard Street, from Union Avenue east;
· Provide update on road improvements on Calcutta Drive between Monitor Street
and South H Street;
· Provide information on the repaving of Center Court (the entrance to Tamarack
Pines, Laurelglen area).
AT:rs
cc: Department Heads
Pamela McCarthy, City Clerk
Trudy Slater, Administrative Analyst
BAKERSFIELD
Economic and Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
January 21, 1999
TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager ///~//~N}
FROM: Jake Wager, Economic Developmdrft Director[~ [ '-~
SUBJECT: City's Participation in "First Night" Event
On January 12 a meeting was held with representatives from this department, Centennial
Garden, the Arts Council, Convention and Visitors Bureau, and DBA in attendance. Jim Foss,
Centennial Garden, originally exposed to First Night while working in Hartford, Connecticut
(a First Night city) initiated the meeting. The purpose of the meting was to discuss the First
Night concept, Jim's experience, and Bakersfield's possible participation on December 31,
1999 in a First Night Celebration.
First Night came into existence in Boston in 1976 by a group of civic-minded artists as a
meaningful alternative to the traditional New Year's revelry. It was a finale to the city's
Bicentennial events and started a new tradition. Since 1980 this unique and bourgeoning
concept has inspired many communities to start their own First Night.
First Night is an alcohol-free, family-focused public celebration that revives the ancient
tradition of marking the passage of time with art, ritual and festivity in a present day setting.
Through First Night celebrations, a sense of community is cultivated, bringing together the
family, energizing the downtown and decreasing alcohol consumption on New Year's Eve in a
safe environment. By providing a high quality alternative way of ushering in the New Year,
participating communities have transformed a holiday marked by excessive drinking and
casualties into a time of wholesome celebrations for all its citizens.
First Night International (FNI) is the 18-year old umbrella organization whose mission is to:
"broaden and deepen the public's appreciation of the visual and performing arts through
an innovative, diverse and high quality New Year's Eve program which offers the
community a shared cultural experience that is accessible and affordabte-to~l."
ECE \ ED
JAN
I
C~TY ,'I~NAGcm S OFFIC
January 21,999
Alan Tandy, City Manager
City's Participation in "First Night" Event
Page 2
According to FNI, over 200 cities throughout the United Sates and beyond draw singles,
couples, families of all ages, and ethnicities from throughout the community to a series of
events scheduled from afternoon through the midnight countdown. The celebrations typically
take place in both indoor and outdoor locations in the center of town. Access is derived from
the purchase of a First Night button, providing for general admission to all events. The cost of
the button is usually under $10 (with a minimal charge or free admission for children).
FNI is the coordinating organization which fosters the concept and assists all interested
communities in establishing their celebrations. It provides education, through an annual
conference, technical assistance and consultancy. It also offers on-going services to strengthen
each First Night organization. Additional information can be found at their website:
www.firstnightintl.org. Several California communities are First Night participants, including
Escondido, San Diego, San Luis Obispo, Stockton, Santa Barbara and Santa Cruz.
While still in its formative stages, those in attendance expressed an interest in pursuing the
planning for Bakersfield's First Night. We will continue to advise you as the group moves
forward in its exploratory efforts.
P:\Special Events\l st Night mem at.wpd
B A K E R S F I E L D
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
MEMORANDUM
January 22, 1999
TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager
FROM: John W. Stinso~,~ssistant City Manager
SUBJECT: Ambulance Delay Issue Update
I have attached an E-mail I received yesterday afternoon from Fred Drew, County EMS Director
which provides some background information and a current update on the ambulance delay issue.
After a meeting with EMS participants last week, it appears that County EMS will be modifying
the rotation procedure used during Emergency room saturation effective January 27th to make it
more flexible, allowing the paramedic to make the decision on transport destination, with patient
care needs as the primary consideration. The implementation date was selected to provide
ambulance companies time to assure their staff is fully aware of the policy.
County EMS is continuing to work on this problem, and has indicated they will keep us informed
of any developments.
From: "Fred Drew" <drewf@co.kern.ca.us>
To: CITYDOM.citypol(Jwstinson)
Date: 1/21/99 2:24PM
Subject: HOSPITAL ER CRISIS UPDATE
This communication provides you with an explanation of 'where we were at', 'where we are at now'; the
decision made by the medical director and myself on modifications to our hospital patient destination
procedures; and some comments as to the reasons (not blame) why I believe the situation has reached
the level we believe to be a 'crisis level at this time.
For many years the EMS Department has had a 'diversion policy'. In 1991 we changed the name of the
policy to 'Hospital Emergency Department Status Policy', to get away from the word 'diversion', because it
gave the impression that hospitals could divert ambulances, which is against state law (if not in
accordance with local EMS policy) when a hospital hangs an emergency sign outside their hospital. The
important part of both of these policies was an explanation of 'hospital saturation', the criteria for a hospital
ER to go on saturation, and the method of notification, etc. Our EMS System, not unlike all systems in the
United States, will simply have times when one or more hospital ER in a system will be 'more full' than
others. When a hospital ER is on 'saturation' (ER Sat), they do not receive ambulance traffic. The
rationale for this, is of course patient care priority. That is, a patient has the best chance for. quicker
patient care in a hospital emergency room that is not saturated. This causes a situation where patients,
will at times, end up at a hospital that they do not want to go to; or a patient's insurance plan is not
contracted with, or their physician does not want to go to that hospital. All hospital ER's in Bakersfield are
designated "basic emergency-physician on duty", so they were all treated pretty much the same (our rural
hospitals, except DRMC, are all designated "standby ER's").
In 1994, we modified our Policy to include an appendix which provided guidelines to field personnel during
Closest Hospital Status (CHS). CHS is brought on when all four hospitals are on ER Sat. Essentially,
CHS reopens all four hospitals (while this sounds bizarre at first, the logic is that if all four hospitals are
saturated, the ambulances need somewhere to go, and since they are all full, their capability to handle an
emergency patient, while not optimum, is the same). In this modification (in 1994), we also included, for
the first time, a listing of"preferred hospitals" for certain types of injuries. The designated preferences
were only for: pediatric, OB, Neuro and psych patients. It was the first time the EMS Department had
"designated" certain hospitals, for certain kinds of patients. Incidently, we made these modifications
because we were beginning to see the stats on ER Sat rise. Coincidently, the hospitals were in the
process of, or already, downsizing their operations, closing floors, changing beds to long term care beds,
reducing staff, etc. (Ironically, there was also construction going on, but mostly for speciality care, such as
the cancer center at Mercy). It is important to note that the base policy dealing with ER Saturation
remained the same.
In December 97, Jan 98 and Feb 98 we saw the ER Sat percentages go higher than ever before.
Northern California had a crisis with ER Sat, and coupled with a threatened nurse strike at Kaiser, there
were a couple counties that actually declared 'medical disasters'. We struggled through that period, but
began planning for what we thought would be worse, this year.
In July 1998, the EMS Department finalized and distributed a 'Position Paper' entitled "Crisis Level
Hospital Resource Patient Overload". The overview section of this document reads in part: ". ..... this
document defines specific recommendations related to crisis level hospital patient overload which occurs
during December through January of each year....over the past three years this crisis has progressively
worsened....". Some of the recommendations included: hospitals issue public information statements
regarding emergency room waiting periods; hospitals develop 'fast track' triage procedures; hospitals
cancel elective surgeries during crisis periods; and hospital administrators conduct coordinated planning in
June each year to facilitate exchange of ideas in preparation for peak demand periods. This document
was sent to all hospital administrators and discussed several times at the Medical Society with little
feedback or comment from the hospital administrators. We had hoped to get more feedback and
comments from the hospitals.
In November 1998, when the ER Sat percentages started to increase, we reviewed our data and
determined that when the system was on CHS, Mercy Hospital and KMC got hit the hardest because of
their physical location. We met with EMS participants, and modified the patient destination procedures
during CHS by implementing a rotation system. This was a very simple (but fairly inflexible) system, with
the two metro ambulance companies rotating between all four hospitals in a sequential basis. It did even
the load somewhat, and would probably work adequately with the Closest Hospital Status percentages
staying in the 5 or 6 percent range. However, when we got to 23.9% CHS in Dec and 56.9% CHS in Jan
(1-14), the result was that many patients were ending up at hospitals that did not contract with their health
care provider; or not the hospital of patient choice; or (and most importantly) the hospital ER, after
stabilizing the patient, needed to transfer the patient to another hospital for some type of speciality care.
In addition, we were getting feedback that managed care organizations and physicians were trying to
usurp the procedure by calling ambulance companies and trying to determine which hospital was up next
on rotation, before they would try to have a patient transported. All of this information, and much more,
was discussed at a four hour meeting on Friday, January 15 at the EMS Department. All EMS participant
organizations were in attendance. The comments and suggestions from that meeting by the participants
have been discussed and considered in detail by Dr. Barnes, myself and my staff, and a decision was
· ,.'~ made on Wednesday, January 20 to,modify the:procedure during Closest Hospital Status (CHS). , ,',".'.~.
Effective Wednesday, January 27, the procedure used by ambulances to transport patients during CHS
will be more flexible, allowing the paramedic to make the decision (not unlike it has been for years) on
transport destination, with patient care needs as the primary consideration. The document reads in part:
"....ambulance services shall transport patients based on patient care needs and facility license care
capability. Incident location, patient payer source and patient choice are secondary determinants....the
only exception will be patients in "extremis criteria" which will be transported to the closest hospital
.... based on shortest travel time ..... ". The policy also keeps the rotation practice as an option the EMS
Department can implement if necessary. The policy also has other alternatives for the department to
direct ambulances under certain circumstances and includes an expanded list of certain patient injuries or
circumstances being directed to certain hospitals that can best deal with those circumstances. We believe
the policy will both meet the medical needs of the patient (and their desires as best as possible), and still
provide mechanisms for the EMS Department to manage patient destination loads at the four hospitals.
The implementation date was selected in order to provide the ambulance companies time to ensure their
staff is fully aware of the policy. Please recall, that this procedure is used only during closest hospital
status, when all four hospital are on ER Sat. During times when, for instance, two hospital ER's are open,
and two are on ER Sat, all ambulances will transport patients to the two open hospitals. This is in
accordance with our 'base policy', which is still in effect, and of course gets a patient to an ER which is
'open' and capable of caring for the patient (even though it may not be the hospital of patient choice).
I will be distributing a PSA to all the news media either today or Friday, with an explanation of the most
recent modification.
The positive side of this whole issue coming to the public forefront is that it may make the public more
aware of the problems associated with medical 911 system (e.g. don't call 911 unless you have a real
emergency; don't think that going by ambulance to an ER will get you treated quicker, etc). We are
working on a major public information program and have been meeting for over two years, and are now
completing actions in our System Design Plan. The ER Sat situation getting in the media has also gotten
the attention of the hospital administrators, and I hope this will keep them "at the table with me" to jointly
solve, or at least work on these problems, which are essentially theirs to solve. In my view, the bottom
line is that the hospitals have downsized over the years (for I am sure some very sound reasons) and
because of this, the staffed hospital beds (in the hospital, not the ER), are not capable of handling the
surge we see now in the ER, so in effect the ER becomes a holding area for those who need admission,
and the ambulances are having trouble off loading patients and returning to another call.
The EMS Department will continue to pursue other issues that have been mentioned in conjunction with
this situation, such as clinic hours, urgent care center's acceptance of ambulances, etc. All indications are
that the major flu season has not yet begun and so we expect this crisis situation to last at least through
February.
Fred Drew, Director, Kern County EMS Department.
GOLDEN EMPIRE AMBUI,ANCE
2700 F. STREET - 93301. P. O. BOX 918 - 93302 · BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
BUSINESS (805) 325-9011 · ADMINISTRATION (805) 325-9141
FAX (805) 325-1820 FAX (805) 325-1524
January 15, 1999
.~ ~';. -".; ,"'Z~'* ~'-"~ --',, .'-7
Larry Carr, President '~-:.~'-"-.~ ,<.-_:.., ~.~ ~
CHW - Bakersfield Memorial Hospital
420 - 34th Street
Bakersfield, CA 933003
Dear Mr. Carr:
There has recently been a good deal of public comment thru the media and at political
venues regarding matters related to Hospital Emergency Department capacity to meet the
patient care needs of our community. We to, are concerned in regard to all aspects of EMS
system performance and any constraints effecting the ability of Golden Empire Ambulance to
timely respond to 9-1-1 Emergency transportation requests from the community.
I, however, want to assure you that Golden Empire Ambulance and the Mosesian
family are committed to working with you and the EMS Department as a part of the solution to
these issues and have no interest, nor will participate, in publicly exacerbating the problem.
Working together, recognizing the needs, concerns and capacities of our respective agencies,
and in close cooperation with the EMS Department, I know will result in a positive outcome
wherein we will all be able to maintain the high level of patient care we desire and our
community deserves.
Please feel free to contact me in rega~~ area.you believe Golden
Empire
Ambulance can more efficiently and effectively wo/k together with you and your staff. I look
forward to talking with you. / ~ /
~ 1~ EM~i~~AMB~CE
John ?. Pe~'ose .
i resi lent
JFP:eg ~ ~,7_. i ::
"WE SERVE SO OTHERS MAY LIVE"
Distribution:
cc: Larry Carr - CHW-Bakersfield Memorial Hospital
Douglas Lafferty - San Joaquin Comunity Hospital
Peter Bryant - Kern Medical Center
Bernie Herman - CHW-Mercy Hospital Bakersfield
Debbie Touchstone - CHW-Bakersfield Memorial Hospital ER
Carolyn Edwards - Kern Medical Center ER
Kim Hashim - CHW-Mercy Hospital Bakersfield
Laurel Grisback - CHW-Mercy Hospital Bakersfield ER
Jackie Seaton - San Joaquin Hospital ER
bcc: Fred Drew, Director, EMS Dept
John Stinson~Assistant City Manager
William Mosesian
Tony Bohn
Patsy Carpenter
Bakersfield Californian -with cover letter
City Council Members - with cover letter
Board of Supervisors - with cover letter
B A K E R S F I E l, D
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER
FROM: ~,RAUL ROJAS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
DATE: ~J ~"JANUARY 15, 1999
SUBJECT: PANORAMA DRIVE EROSION PROBLEM
Council Referral WFO018031 / O01, Maggard
Councilmember Maggard requested staff to provide him with a time line for repairs of I
damage to Panorama Drive and River Boulevard caused by erosion.
I
STORM DAMAGE REPAIR OF ROADWAY, CURB & GUTTER AND EMBANKMENT - PANORAMA DRIVE
The preconstruction conference was held on January 8, 1999. The contractor has
indicated that he will begin work on or about January 20, 1999.
G:\GROUPDAT~Referrals\WF0018031-001 .wpd
City of Bakersfield *REPRINT*
· WORK REQUEST PAGE 1
~REQ/JOB: WF0018031 / 001 PROJECT: DATE PRINTED: 1~14~99
REQUEST DATE: 1/13/99
CREW: TIME PRINTED: 17:12:24
SCHEDULE DATES
LOCATION: ~'1'~4/~'1': 1~13~99
COMPLETION: 1/25/99
GEN. LOC: WARD3 FACILITY NODES
FROM:
FACILITY ID: TO:
REF NBR: COUNCIL
REQ DEPT: CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL PRIORITY: HIGH
REQUESTOR: REFERRAL - MAGGARD ORIGIN: CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL
USER ID: PLAWRENCE WORK TYPE: REFERRAL
DESCRIPTION: PANORAMA DRIVE EROSION PROBLEM
REQUEST COMMENTS
***REFERRAL TO PUBLIC WORKS***
MAGGARD REQUESTED STAFF PROVIDE HIM WITH A TIME-
LINE FOR REPAIRS OF DAMAGE TO PANORAMA DRIVE AND
RIVER BOULEVARD CAUSED BY EROSION.
JOb Order Description: PANORAMA DRIVE EROSION PROBLEM
at~gory: PUBLIC WORKS
asK: RESPONSE TO REFERRAL
Assigned Department: PUBLIC WORKS
START DATE / / COMPLETION DATE / /
BAKERSFIELD
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: ~ ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER
FROM: ~f~J~,UL ROJAS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
DATE:~)~" JANUARY 15,. 1999
SUBJECT: WILSON ROAD REPAIRS
Council Referral WF0018030 / 001, Sullivan
Councilmember Sullivan requested staff contact Mr. Buckner regarding road improvements
on Wilson Road between Akers and Stine Roads and provide her with the information
given to Mr. Buckner.
WILSON ROAD STORM DRAIN ORIOLE STREET TO AKERS ROAD
On January 14, 1999 Mr. Buckner's residence was contacted, a {amily member was
informed that paving would commence along Wilson Road on January 15, 1999 and would
be finished that day if weather permitted.
On January 15, 1999 we contacted Mr. Buckner's residence and left a message on the
answering machine that paving would be completed on this date, weather permitting.
C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\WF0018~1 .WPD
City of Bakersfield *REPRINT*
--~'~ WORK REQUEST PAGE 1
REQ/JOB: WF0018030 / 001 PROJECT: DATE PRINTED: 1~14~99
REQUEST DATE: 1/13/99
CREW: TIME PRINTED: 17:12:25
SCHEDULE DATES
LOCATION: $'l'Al~'l': 1~13~99
COMPLETION: 1/25/99
GEN. LOC: WARD6 FACILITY NODES
FROM:
FACILITY ID: TO:
REF NBR: COUNCIL S'i'MT~
REQ DEPT: CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL PRIORITY: HIGH
REQUESTOR: REFERRAL - SULLIVAN ORIGIN: CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL
USER ID: PLAWRENCE WORK TYPE: REFERRAL
DESCRIPTION: WILSON ROAD REPAIRS
CONTACT
DAVID BUCKNER Phone 1 805 - 3986166 ( )
Phone 2 -
(
)
REQUEST COMMENTS
***REFERRAL TO PUBLIC WORKS***
SULLIVAN REQUESTED STAFF CONTACT MR. BUCKNER
REGARDING ROAD IMPROVEMENTS ON WILSON ROAD BETWEEN
AKERS AND STINE ROADS AND PROVIDE HER WITH THE
INFORMATION GIVEN TO MR. BUCKNER.
Job Order Description: WILSON ROAD REPAIRS
at~gory: PUBLIC WORKS
as~: RESPONSE TO REFERRAL
Assigned Department: PUBLIC WORKS
START DATE / / COMPLETION DATE / /
BAKERSFIELD
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER
FROM: RAUL ROJAS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR~j
DATE: JANUARY 20, 1999
SUBJECT: BERNARD STREET REPAIRS
Council Referral WF0018028 / 001
ICouncilmember DeMond referred to staff the issue of road repairs on Bernard Street, from
Union Avenue east.
The pavement on Bernard Street, from Union Avenue east to Goodman Street will be
crack-sealed and patched. Patch work will be performed the week of January 25, 1999.
We will schedule the crack-sealing work for the week of February 8, 1999.
G:\GROUPDAT~STREETS\BernardRepairs.wpd
City of Bakersfield *REPRINT*
WORK REQUEST PAGE 1
REQ/JOB: WF0018028 / 001 PROJECT: DATE PRINTED: 1~14~99
REQUEST DATE: 1/13/99
CREW: TIME PRINTED: 17:12:27
SCHEDULE DATES
LOCATION: S'i'A~T: 1~13~9
COMPLETION: 1/25/9~
GEN. LOC: WARD2 FACILITY NODES
FROM:
FACILITY ID: TO:
REF NBR: COUNCIL ~'I'M'I'~
REQ DEPT: CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL PRIORITY: HIGH
REQUESTOR: REFERRAL - DEMOND ORIGIN: CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL
USER ID: PLAWRENCE WORK TYPE: REFERRAL
DESCRIPTION: BERNARD STREET REPAIRS
REQUEST COMMENTS
***REFERRAL TO PUBLIC WORKS***
DEMOND REFERRED TO STAFF THE ISSUE OF ROAD REPAIRS
ON BERNARD STREET, FROM UNION AVENUE EAST.
Job Order Description: BERNARD STREET REPAIRS Catpgory: PUBLIC WORKS
TasK: RESPONSE TO REFERRAL
Assigned Department: PUBLIC WORKS
START DATE / / COMPLETION DATE / /
BAKERSFIELD
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER
FROM: RAUL ROJAS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR~
DATE: JANUARY 20, 1999
SUBJECT: CALCUTTA DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS
Council Referral WF0018026 / 001
Councilmember Salvaggio requested staff provide him with an update regarding road
improvements (crack seal) on Calcutta Drive between Monitor Street & South "H" Street.
In December 1998 Street Maintenance crews patched the
large cracks on Calcutta Drive between So."H" Street and
Monitor Street. A cold-mix material was used to fill the large
cracks. The remaining cracks are to be filled with a regular
crack filler material. We have scheduled work to commence
the week of February 15, 1999.
G:\GROU PDAT~STREETS\CalcuttaDrivelmprovements.wpd
City of Bakersfield *REPRINT*
~ WORK REQUEST PAGE 1
REQUEST DATE: 1/ 13/99
CREW: TIME PRINTED: 17:12:28
SCHEDULE DATES
LOCATION: ~'r~T: 1~13~99
COMPLETION: 1/25/99
GEN. LOC: WARD7 FACILITY NODES
FROM:
FACILITY ID: TO:
REF NBR: COUNCIL
REQ DEPT: CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL PRIORITY: HIGH
REQUESTOR: REFERRAL - SALVAGGIO ORIGIN: CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL
USER ID: PLAWRENCE WORK TYPE: REFERRAL
DESCRIPTION: CALCUTTA DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS
REQUEST COMMENTS
***REFERRAL TO PUBLIC WORKS***
SALVAGGIO REQUESTED STAFF PROVIDE HIM WITH AN
UPDATE REGARDING ROAD IMPROVEMENTS (CRACK SEAL) ON
CALCUTTA DRIVE BETWEEN MONITOR & SOUTH H STREETS.
Job Order Description: CALCUTTA DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS Category: PUBLIC WORKS
Task: .RESPONSE TO REFERRAL
Assigned Department: PUBLIC WORKS
START DATE / / COMPLETION DATE / /
BAKERSFIELD
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER
FROM: RAUL ROJAS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR ~
DATE: JANUARY 22, 1999
SUBJECT: CENTER COURT IMPROVEMENTS
Council Referral WF0018033 / 001
Councilmember Rowles referred, to staff the issue of rePaving Center Court (entrance to Tamarack
Pines, in the Laurelglen area).
Additional time is needed for staff to seek and obtain further information on this referral.
An update on this referral will be submitted at a later date.
G:\GROUPDA'lASTREETS\CenterCourtlmprovements,wpd
.~.~ ~ City of Bakersfield *REPRINT*
WORK REQUEST PAGE 1
REQ/JOB: WF0018033 / 001 PROJECT: DATE PRINTED: 1~22~99
REQUEST DATE: 1/13/99
CREW: TIME PRINTED: 9:23:08
SCHEDULE DATES
LOCATION: ST~'r: 1~13~99
COMPLETION: 1/25/99
GEN. LOC: WARD5 FACILITY NODES
FROM:
FACILITY ID: TO:
REF NBR: COUNCIL ~'i'~'i'~
REQ DEPT: CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL PRIORITY: HIGH
REQUESTOR: REFERRAL - ROWLES ORIGIN: CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL
USER ID: PLAWRENCE WORK TYPE: REFERRAL
DESCRIPTION: CENTER COURT IMPROVEMENTS
REQUEST COMMENTS
***REFERRAL TO PUBLIC WORKS***
ROWLES REFERRED TO STAFF THE ISSUE OF REPAVING
CENTER COURT (ENTRANCE TO TAMARACK PINES, IN THE
LAURELGLEN AREA).
Job Order Description: CENTER COURT IMPROVEMENTS
at~gory: PUBLIC WORKS
asK: RESPONSE TO REFERRAL
Assigned Department: PUBLIC WORKS
START DATE / / COMPLETION DATE / /