HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/12/99 BAKERSFIELD
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
MEMORANDUM
March 12, 1999
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUN,/~~-~
FROM: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: GENERAL INFORMATION
1. We are placing the reapportionment issue on the next agenda. Please get your
comments/suggestions to Jack Hardisty before the meeting, if possible, so that we
can make some progress.
2. Demolition is actively underway at the Amtrak station site. Both the old corporation
yard parking lot and buildings are soon to be history. We broke ground on the Grade
Separation today.
3. On the Amtrak station, we continue to get occasional negative comments about the
design. Those came from The Californian twice running pictures that were of the
baggage handling area, with the implication it was the front of the building. They have
been provided a rendering of the front, which is very attractive. That has yet to
appear in print, however.
4. A memo from the Finance Director is enclosed. While we are not in a fiscal situation
like Kern County's, the memo points out that our resources are not unlimited. It is a
time for stability.
5. The story that ran on the alleged freeze imposed on the Kern River Freeway needs
some explanation. An evaluation of the value of $175,000,000 from EDCD is
enclosed, so the reasons for the political actions can more clearly be seen. It is a
huge impact on job creation and for turnover of much of the money within the local
economy. The issue of potential damage to water recharge basins is a false one.
The state can not take property without 100% mitigation. Thus, the agricultural district
must wind up whole. Freeways cross municipal water supplies in thousands of cities
across he country; in my own experience, the Yellowstone and Mississippi Rivers, for
example.
The "freeze" will not take effect until, and unless, the full legislature would approve the
language proposed.
6. The March 13th Condors game will be live on the Internet. See the press release
enclosed.
Honorable Mayor and City Council
March 12, 1999
Page 2
7. A letter of appreciation is enclosed from Clinica Sierra Vista for the assistance City
staff provided in removing the blighted buildings across from the health center on
Lakeview Avenue.
8. The installation of asphalt capped medians on White Lane, between Wible and Road
to just west of Akers Road will begin on March 15th. While there will be no lane
closures before 8:30 a.m. or after 4:30 p.m., some traffic congestion and delays are
expected, because White Lane has a high volume of traffic throughout the entire day.
The contractor has a six week time period to complete the project.
9. Updates on the Project Area Committee (PAC) meetings held on February 22nd and
March 4th are enclosed for your information.
Also, on March 11th, the Southeast Bakersfield Project Area Committee took a
significant step forward in the adoption process of a redevelopment project area. At
its March 4th meeting, the Southeast Bakersfield Project Area Committee suggested
additional language be added to the Draft Redevelopment Plan. These suggestions
were reviewed by staff to assure they were workable and in compliance with
California Redevelopment Law. At its March 11th meeting, the PAC reviewed staff's
recommendations and approved each one. Following this action, the PAC made a
favorable recommendation to the City Council and the Agency to adopt the Draft
Redevelopment Plan with these additions. A more detailed memo of the March 11th
PAC meeting is being prepared and will be forwarded shortly.
10. The CIP Status Report for March is enclosed.
11. A memo is enclosed from EDCD regarding the First Night Bakersfield Committee's
general interest meeting that was held on March 11th.
12. A response is enclosed to a Council request for a status report and verification of the
hearing date for the appeal on vesting Tentative Tract #5934.
AT:rs
cc: Department Heads
Pamela McCarthy, City Clerk
Trudy Slater, Administrative Analyst
MEMORANDUM
TO: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER ~/'//f/ .z /.
FROM: GREGORY J. KLIMKO, FINANCE T
DATE: MARCH 8, 1999
SUBJECT: REVENUE vs EXPENDITURE GROWTH.
The General Fund resources estimated for the 1999-00 budget total $90,335,000 as
shown below.
Recurring Revenue $82,125,000
Individual Revenues 1,250,000
Total Revenue 83,375,000
Transfers in 1,900,000
Beginning Balance from:
Prior Year Saving (1998-99) 2,840,000
Unanticipated Resources (1998-99) 2,220,000
Total Resources $90,335.000
The beginning balance is comprised of two basic components. The first is projected
saving from 1998-99. This amount averages around 3% of appropriations. The
second includes unanticipated resources from additional Elk Hills Supplemental
Property Tax ($580K), Transient Occupancy Tax resulting from a change in
accounting from Cash to Accrual Revenue recognition ($460K), Sales and other Taxes
($195K), Motor Vehicle in lieu, storm damage and other grants ($425K),
Development Fees ($100K), other Revenue ($93K) and unappropriated 06/30/98
ending balance ($367K).
I believe it is important to understand the City's General Fund Resources which are
summarized below.
Recurring Total
Revenue Resources
Sales Tax 43.0 % 39.1%
Property Tax 22.4 % 21.4 %
Other Taxes 8.0 % 7.3 %
Total Taxes 73.4 % 66.8 %
Motor Vehicle 11.8 % 10.7 %
Other Revenue 14.8 % 14.8 %
Transfers N/A 2.1%
Beginning Balances N/A 5.6 %
Totals 100.0 % 100.0 %
Sales Tax, the General Funds's single largest revenue source increased 5.7% in 1996-
97 and 8.4% in 1997-98 which accounted for our ability to add additional personnel in
both those years. The Sales Tax is projected to increased 4% this year and 3% next
year. Sales Tax actual revenues increased 4.7% through December 1998 when
compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year. The projected decrease from 4%
to 3% takes into account recent local economy events to include the elimination of
jobs in the oil industry and potential effects of the crop freeze.
The department request are as follows:
Basic Requests $91,570,766
Additional Positions (34+) 2,354,178
Computer Upgrades 860,297
Capital Improvements 2,75Z562
Department Requests $97,537,803
The basic department requests exceed the estimated resources by $1,235,766. This is
the result of many factors affecting both revenues and expenditures. The City's
recurring revenues are projected to increase 1.25% in 1998-99 and 2.24% in 1999-00.
Expenditures for salaries and wages, excluding fringe benefits, are projected to
increase 5.58% for 1998-99 and 4.63% for 1999-00. Expenditure increases are
primarily due to negotiated cost of living adjustments (COLAS), step increases and
additional positions, some of which were funded by start up grants. Generally the City
Council approved COLAS of 2.5% effective January 1998 and January 1999 while the
consumer price index (CPI) increased 1.83% during 1997 and 1.43% during 1998.
I'm available to discuss this information at your convenience.
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
GENERAL FUND SOURCES
1995-96 - 1999-00
Revised 1999-00
Actual Estimates Proposed
1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 Estimates
Recurring Revenues 71,852,139 75,150,637 79,334,527 80,329,515 82,125,000
Individual Revenues:
T.O.T. 3,773,750 4,210,303 4,307,716 460,000
Convention Center Charges 799,822 749,187 743,102
Federal Grants 179,268 276,279 685,906 460,000 60,000.
State Grants 126,015
School Grants 116,625 165,000
Reimbursements:
PERS 2,871,236 727,311
Blue Cross 1,683,062
CDDA 430,000 645,000 1,025,000
FEMNOES 9,015 110,845
Sale of Property 114,543 255,000
Elk Hills Supplemental 2,320,000
Revenue Tota~ 79,485,230 81,228,260 87,439,313 84,568,000 83,375,000
Transfers In:
Traffic Safety 221,000 168,000 200,000 500,000 900,000
Suppl. Law Enforcement 268,426 548,493 550,000 500,000
T.O.T. 2,060,000 500,000
Other Funds 275,631
Transfers In Total 496,631 436,426 748,493 3,110,000 1,900,000
Beginning Balances:
Encumbrance Reserve 233,976 343,769 612,052 337,544
Carryover Reserve 285,366 189,200 152,950 470,900
Uncommitted Appropriations 2,464,579 3,656,200 2,845,072 2,316,723 2,840,000
Sub Total 2,983,921 4,189,169 3,610,074 3,125,167 2,840,000
Unbudgeted Sources:
Taxes 645,598 663,527 1,178,326 595,512 1,235,000
Intergovernmental 215,214 566,548 239,209 303,665 425,360
Charges for Services 93,214 87,165 232,224 705,792
Development Fees/Permits 365,294 128,872 154,225 1,044,837 100,000
PERS Reimbursement 2,785,152 2,071,236
Miscellaneous 468,076 203,394 (385,334) 161,342 92,476
Transfers In (18,437) (9,496) (77,935) (368,507)
Prior Year Balance 885,981 1,217,672 118 13,102 367,164
Beginning Balance Total 8,424,013 9,118,087 4,950,907 5,580,910 5,060,000
Total Sources 88,405,874 90,782,773 93,138,713 93,258,910 90,335,000
C.PERKINS
S:\CHERYL\GREG\GENERAL FUND SOURCES
03-Mar-99
BAKERSFIELD
Economic and Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
March 12, 1999
TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager/~
FROM: Jake Wager, Economic Development Director[c:~ ~x-~
SUBJECT: Economic Impact Evaluation
Pursuant to your request, I directed GRC Associates to work up an evaluation of the economic
impact of the expenditure of the $175 million dollars for freeway construction.
As you will note in the attached evaluation from GRC Associates the economic impact is substantial.
In terms of direct job creation it is estimated that a total of 360 construction jobs will be created and
that of this total 270 jobs will go to local residents. The Bakersfield jobs translates to an infusion
of $13.2 million in annual salaries into our local economy. When a multiplier is applied to the total
local annual salaries, we see an additional generation of $4.4 million in local salaries for a total of
$17.6 million annually. The $4.4 million in added salaries occurs through the creation of 194 non-
construction jobs of which 146 will go to local residents. With respect to business activity, it is
estimated that the project will generate $300 million in statewide activity. Of this amount $180
million will be captured by Bakersfield. This captured amount is based on the construction portion
of the project ($120 million) that is most likely to be spent within the local economy.
Based on the attached report, the expenditure of the $175 million would have a real and discernible
positive impact on our economy. Conversely, given our higher than state average unemployment
rate, the loss of the funds would dampen our continuing efforts to fully energize our local economy.
I RECEIVED_
dlk:P:\JWS\econ impact evaluation.mem ~'~TY ~£~NAGER'$ OF~[C?"
Memorandum
- To: John F. Wager, Jr., Economic Development Director
From: Stephen Copenhaver, GRC
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Date: March 11, 1999
REDEVELOPMENT
Subject: Estimated Impacts of Infrastructure Construction
I~EAL ESTATE: CONSULTING
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
Pursuant to your request, GRC has reviewed on a preliminary basis the
impacts of the proposed freeway construction project over the next four
years. Information on the project is limited to the timeframe of the
project, the budget for construction and construction services; however, we
can apply industry standards to the construction and service contract
amounts and generate a reasonable estimate of the economic impacts of
the project. Assumptions for the project include:
the total budget for the proposed project is $175 million;
project expenditures are spread evenly over a 4-year schedule;
$100 million of the proposed expenditures will be for construction of
the proposed improvements;
$30 million of the project will be for the acquisition of right-of-way;
$20 millio'n" of the total expenditures will be for direct services
supporting the construction such as management and engineering
services;
$25 million of the expenditures will be used for environmental
mitigation measures;
Bakersfield is home to a number of the larger construction companies
that'specialize in this type of work and it is estimated that at least
75% of the workforce will live and work in Bakersfield; and
u the 4-year timeframe of the project indicates that the jobs should be
,340 V^L~-Ev v~^ OR,vE considered as new permanent jobs in the local economy.
SUITE: 120
T: (909) 396-7714
F: (909) 396-7913 :~
H:~PROJ ECTS\BAI4.~ SFIX.~R-HOI ISlXmultiplier. doc 1
E: g[ca$$cc@earthlink, net
Employment
With respect to the heavy construction jobs, the U.S. Bureau of Labor'
Statistics indicates that the statewide average weekly pay for heavy
construction workers is $961.33 which results in annual earnings based
on a 50-week year of $48,067 per employee. This figure represents a
statewide earnings average which is probably slightly high for the greater
Bakersfield area, but we have used it in this analysis to be cautious.
Although the actual breakdown of materials versus labor is unknown, a
reasonable assumption is that 50% of the contract construction price will
be devoted to labor.
Given the above data, the number of new jobs directly generated by the
proposed expenditures in heavy construction will be the annual
construction expenditure of $25.0 million multiplied by the percent
devoted to labor divided by the average wage in the industry. This results
in 260 new jobs.
In addition to the direct construction jobs, the proposed project will have
average annual expenditures of $5.0 million in engineering, right-of-way
acquisition consultants, accounts and other services directly supporting
the construction expenditures (20% of the construction amount). Jobs
generated from these expenditures would fall within several categories of
employment; however, it is estimated that the average annual wage
would be similar at approximately $50,000. These categories of
expenditures would involve the creation of approximately 100 new
positions.
Right-of-way acquisition or the purchases of rese~'~es for habitat
preservation are assumed to not involve the creation of any jobs.
The total number of direct jobs supported by the proposed freeway
construction is estimated at 360 jobs. Based on the fact that the major
contractors are located within the City and prior experience indicates that
only specialized workers would be imported into the area from outside the
county, it is assumed that 75%' of the positions or 270 jobs would be
created for residents of the City. This is important for two reasons: i) the
newly created jobs are relatively high paid positions, and ii) those that
work and live in the community will predominantly spend the consumer
portion of their wages in the community, purchase new homes and
directly participate in the Bakersfield economy. In contrast to the
resident workers, those commuting into the area can be expected to spend
only 5% to 7% of their wages in proximity to work.
The total anticipated payroll for the positions held by residents of the
City, based on the average earnings noted above, is approximately $13.2
million per year.
H:~PROJ ECTS~B A !( ERS FlOR - HOUS [~,nu Ilipii=r,doc ~
California Department of Commerce Multipliers
The California Department of Commerce publishes multipliers for the
state to reflect the industry spending and consumer spending that result
_ from the creation of new jobs. The Department of Commerce estimates
that the number of new jobs created by heavy construction is 1.49
industry jobs for each construction job and 1.68 industry and consumer
jobs for each construction job. These multipliers project statewide
impacts. The Department of Commerce also projects countywide
multipliers that are slightly less. Kern County was not readily available
but Fresno County's multiplier of 1.54 for building construction should be
an approximate estimation of the Kern County multiplier. As expected,
this multiplier is and should be less than the statewide impact of creating
ne~v jobs.
Applying the county level multiplier to Bakersfield, the total employment
resulting from the freeway construction effort is estimated to be 554 jobs
of which an estimated 416 positions would be captured by Bakersfield
residents. The Bakersfield total annual payroll is estimated at $13.2
million from the relatively high paying direct jobs plus an additional $4.4
million from the positions utilizing the multiplier, for a total Bakersfield
payroll of $17.6 million per year.
Although GRC believes the Department of Commerce to be the most
plausible, other sources calculate different multipliers. For instance, the
U.S. Chamber of Commerce Research Division estimates that 2.86
positions are created for each new construction job. This is approximately
74% above the county multiplier determined by the California
Department of Commerce. Another approach is that utilized by the
Construction Industry Research Board (CIRB) which is based on federal
data for the state. It generates estimates of job creation statewide based
on each $1.0 million in construction activity. CIRB estimates that
approximately 21 jobs are created for each $1.0 million in streets and
highway construction expenditures. Using this methodology, the
proposed freeway project would generate 525 new jobs statewide. This is
very similar to the results utilizing the Department of Commerce job
multipliers (525 versus 554 jobs).
Economic Output
The federal Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes value multipliers by
type of construction project for the State of California. For heavy
construction projects, the total business activity generated is equal to the
value of the construction contract multiplied by a factor of 2.5. Applying
this standard to the Bakersfield contract of $30.0 million in annual
construction expenditures wou~d result in $75.0 million in total business
activity.
H:\P ROI ECTS\B A K ERS FI\SR- HOUS l~rm dtipli,~r.doc 3
Over the 4-year construction period, the business activity would result in
$300 million in statewide business activity and $99.6 million in total
earnings to employees. The data must be viewed carefully because this
impact is a statewide impact and does not directly relate to local impact.
Bakersfield will capture a significant share of the business activity
because it is a freestanding City that supplies and captures much of the
business activity as opposed to a smaller geographic area in the Los
Angeles basin whose boundaries blend seamlessly with surrounding cities.
Our estimate of the total business activity captured would be on the order
of $180 million based on construction related activity of $120 million.
This does account for the funds directed to right-of-way acquisition and
mitigation measures which may be reinvested in the loca! economy.
Summary
Employment. GRC's preliminary estimate of employment resulting
directly from the proposed 4-year expenditure of $175 million for freeway
design, mitigation and construction is 360 jobs with approximately 270
jobs held by those living in the community. These jobs will cause the
creation of an additional 194 jobs of which approximately 146 will be
community residents. Total employment is projected at 554 jobs.
Business activity. Total business activity resulting from the freeway
construction project is estimated at $300 million with the Bakersfield area
capturing approximately $180 million of the total. This amount excludes
the $55 million for right-of-way acquisition and mitigation measures,
which may eventually be reinvested in the community.
H: ,P ROJ ECTS\~ AK ER $1:[~ R- HOU$ I\rnu~tipl~er,d~-~c ~
BAKERSFIELD CENTENNIAL GARDEN
......
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Today's Date: March 8, 1999
Contacl:s: Ogden Entmtainment: Shawn Brandon (661) 852-730;'
City of Bakersfield: Bob Trammell (661) 32li-3144
Bakersfield Condom: Matt Riley (661) 324-7825
Ogden Entertainment and The Bakersfield Condors announce first 'LIVE' Internet
broadcast of a Condor's hockey game
Bakersfield, CA - The next Condor hockey }amc at Centennial Garden will be broadcast '%TV~" over the lotemet. The Broadcast
will take place on Saturday, March 13 at 7:00 PM and will be available on the Centennial Garden web site at
www.cente~nialgarden.com. The Bakersfield Condors will be the first team tn the West Coast Hockey. League to have their games
broadcast, both audio and video, over the Interact.
The broadcast will use Real Networks Real Video teclmoiog~ to transmit the March ! 3 game from the Centennial Garden Web Page.
All that is required to watch the broadcasts are a web browser and Real Networks Real 02 ~ewer, which is available free at
www.real.com. The City of Bakersfield is providing 40 connections with another 100 being provided by Lightspeed Net. This will
enable 140 visitors to simultaneously watch the game live.
This broadcast is made possible because of prior planning, by the City of Bakersfield, which provided Cezztennial Garden with the
resources to meet the technological demands of tomorrow. Scott Norton, director ofmarketing~ slated "We are very excited about this
broadcast. It reaffirms out missio~ to be on the cutting edge of' technology in both promottng our e~ents and provld~g better service
to our customers."
Managed By Ogden Ented'alnment
1001 Truxtun Avenue * Bakersfield, CA 93301 · 805.327.7553 · Fax 805.861.9904
MAR-08-1999 10:19 CSV ADMIN 661 845 4511 P.0~/0~
CLINICA SIERRA VISTA
March 6, 1999
He~ Cen~er
~ ,o,.,4,.,,~ City Community Development Depadment
~.~.o,~ Baker~eld, CA 9330~
.~,,hC.... I ~nt to express my appreciation to you and the City ~ Bakersfield
~..~, c~ ~o~ for your help in removing the blighted buildings across Eom our East
'~"'~"'~'~ Bakor,~eld Community Health Center on Lakeview Avenue. These
~m th~ prope~i~ that I had spoken to the City Coundl ,~out ~om~
"'~"~~..~,~ c..,., months ago. It is clear that City depadments and st~ have ~rked
-~ ~,.*~.-~ diligently to prepare the necessa~ permits and releases to allow this
MeF~l~d~ ~A 93350
~- ,o~.~zaoa~ abatement to occur.
.o=.,...~ c.. If you have been out to the Lakeview Avenue, you will notice that this
~"' pa~cular podion of the street looks so much better and a signifimnt
.~-,~,~. ~,~0~ nuisance has been eliminated. I am hopeful that this action ~11 also
~,~.e"~'a"'*o.o~.~=.~.z reduce some of the potential for criminal activity thet had previously
~,,.~.~...~.~ appropriate members of the City staff res~nsible for this impo~ant
..,,~ c~ improvement.
~enfleld, ~ 933~
~.o. ~.... Chief Executive O~
SWS;ers
~ssO~n.~d.'Q' s~e* ~s"='~o~O4 CC: Irma Carson
~ 809,324.~720
TOTRL P.
BAKERSFIELD
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: ALAN TANDY, City Manager
FROM: RAUL ROJAS, Public Works Director
DATE: March 5, 1999
SUBJECT: White Lane Median Project (T8K040)
The installation of asphalt capped median islands in White Lane between Wible Road to just west
of Akers Road (to just beyond the Walgreen's Drug Store) is scheduled to begin March 15th. The
project specifications allows the contractor to close (where he is actively working) one lane
eastbound after 8:30 in the morning, and reopen the lane before 4:30 in the afternoon. For
westbound traffic, the contractor is allowed to close one lane after 7:00 in the morning, and reopen
the lane again before 4:30 in the afternoon. The contractor has 6 weeks to complete the work.
White Lane has high volumes of traffic throughout the day, so some traffic delays and congestion
dudng construction cannot be avoided. However, morning and evening peak periods should not
be affected. Our Construction Division will be notifying Mack Wimbish so that these closures can
be publicized in his morning traffic reports.
tdw:S:[TED[1999 Memos[030599at. wpd
..... ,~a
BAKERSFIELD
Economic and Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
March 2, 1999
TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager
FROM: Jake Wager, Economic Development Directo~c::-~
SUBJECT: Update of Old Town Kern-Pioneer and Sofl~LB~ersfield PAC meetings
the week of February 22
Two Project Area Committee (PAC) meetings were held during the week of February 22. A
summary of each of the meetings is outlined below.
The third meeting of the Project Area Committee (PAC) for Old Town Kern-Pioneer was
held on Tuesday, February 23. The agenda covered the following item:
Review of the Preliminary Report and the Draft Redevelopment Plan.
PAC chair Jerry Randall called the meeting to order at 6:35PM. All but one member of the PAC
were present. One member of the public was in attendance.
Paul Schowalter of GRC Redevelopment Consultants, Inc., led a review of the preliminary report
and the draft redevelopment plan. PAC members discussed the blighted conditions of the area.
Members also noted the lack of commercial facilities necessary to support residential uses.
Mr. Burch asked if statistics were available regarding the number of loans secured by real
property that had been issued in the project area. He commented that low loan ratios is
sometimes an indicator of lenders' unwillingness to invest in area - another indicator of blight.
Mr. Schowalter indicated that such information would be potentially useful but they did not have
the resources to obtain such detail.
Mr. Randall questioned why Wastewater Treatment Plant//4 was mentioned in both documents
due to its remote proximity to the project area. Since that listing indicates that the Agency is
authorized to use funds on this project, the members recommended that Treatment Plant #4 be
eliminated from the listing of Public Improvements.
S:\REDVAREA\PAC meetings week2-22 memo.wpd
Update of PAC Meetings, Week of February 22
March 1, 1999
Page 2
Ms. Warren wanted to know how to find out the names of various sub-divisions as documented
on Tract Maps. She said that it was difficult to identify the names of old neighborhoods.
Ms. Morales wondered what percentage of the area was dedicated to schools.
During a discussion on eminent domain Mr. Schowalter asked the members if they had any
concerns regarding the potential use of this tool. PAC members indicated that it should be
included in the plan.
A discussion followed regarding the significant number of historic buildings in the Old Town
Kern - Pioneer area. PAC members expressed an interest in retaining and preserving the historic
buildings in the area. Suggestions were made regarding future development proposals which
might impact historic properties and the possibility of Agency review of such proposals to
mitigate such impacts where practicable. Mr. Randall asked for information about the City's
Historic Designation ordinance which staff indicated they would provide.
Discussion also centered around the number of Single Room Occupancy (SRO) hotels in the
Baker Street area and its negative impact on the commercial businesses. Some reminisced about
the vibrancy that once was present in the area and how at one time people used to take their
wives to lunch in International Square.
During PAC statements Ms. Morales expressed some curiosity about the potential of the
Metropolitan Recreation area (i.e. Sam Lynn Ball Park, and adjacent area.).
Mr. Randall thanked PAC members and staff for all their hard work and dedication. He
encouraged everyone to keep focused on the pertinent tasks to ensure a successful process
resulting in the adoption of the project area.
The Meeting was adjourned at 8:35 P.M.
The fourth meeting of the Project Area Committee (PAC) for Southeast Bakersfield was
held on Thursday, February 25.
The Southeast PAC agenda covered the following items:
1. Review of the Preliminary Report and the Draft Redevelopment Plan.
2. Determination of subcommittees to be formed and PAC members selected to
S:\REDVAREA\PAC meetings week2-22 memo.wpd
Update of PAC Meetings, Week of February 22
March 1, 1999
Page 3
serve on each subcommittee.
3. Request to discuss an operational budget for the PAC.
4. Adoption of Additional PAC meetings until January 2000.
PAC chair Art Powell called the meeting to order at 6:35PM. One member of the public was in
attendance.
Paul Schowalter of GRC Redevelopment Consultants, Inc., led a review of the preliminary report
and the draft redevelopment plan. The PAC voted to schedule a special meeting on Thursday,
March 4 to give the members more time to review the documents and then discuss their
recommendations for possible changes to the documents. There was discussion about whether
staff should be invited to this meeting, however, PAC members were advised that any such
meeting would have to be publicly noticed and would be open to the public, thus staff would be
in attendance.
Stephanie Campbell mentioned that the PAC is restricted in what it can do, and unless the PAC
can get more power, its efforts may be meaningless. She mentioned she disagreed with the
methods used for determining the assessed valuations and wanted these methods to be changed.
However, staff advised that the assessed valuations are determined by the Kern County Assessor
and that information is what state law requires to be used.
Ms. Campbell stated she wishes to review the estimated project costs and estimated project
revenues in the preliminary report.
In addition, Ms. Campbell said she is concemed that everything in the documents refers to the
"power of the Agency" and there is no mention of any power of the PAC. She wants to
understand what the role of the PAC is after the plan is adopted. She mentioned that she wants
more power for the PAC and that the PAC needs to include language in the plan to be
empowered.
Jonathan Webster stated that members should remember that the PAC was formed as an advisory
group. He mentioned that since the PAC was formed as advisory group, how can the PAC now
ask for more power when it was understood that its role was only advisory.
Ms. Campbell stated that if you go into the redevelopment agency office, you won't see people
working there who live and have businesses in the southeast and are committed to the area. She
added that she wants to go to the City Council to "put some bite into our bark."
S:\REDVAREA\PAC meetings week2-22 memo.wpd
Update of PAC Meetings, Week of February 22
March 1, 1999
Page 4
Mr. Powell stated he wants to make sure the PAC is strong and represents the community.
Gil Anthony suggested that an alternative may be for members to aspire to being appointed to the
CDDA.
Mr. Anthony asked Mr. Schowalter to share his suggestions to maximize the impact of the
redevelopment plan.
Marvin Dean asked what if the PAC wanted to recommend a revolving loan program for
entrepreneurs with the PAC in an oversight role?
Mr. Schowalter responded that the authority is included in the plan for creating a revolving loan
program but not for the PAC to have oversight.
Ms. Campbell mentioned that San Bernardino uses an incubator as part of its redevelopment
plan.
Ricky Peterson made a motion, seconded by Isaiah Crompton, to add a fire station at the center
of the project area or in close proximity. The motion was approved.
Mr. Crompton asked why schools were not included in the list of public improvements in the
draft redevelopment plan.
Mr. Schowalter responded that there is a presumption that schools will fund their own
improvements.
Ms. Campbell requested staff to provide copies of redevelopment plans from other cities so she
can see how much PAC input from the preliminary plans gets into final plans.
Mr. Dean asked Mr. Schowalter is he was familiar with PACs that stay around and are aggressive
after the redevelopment project is adopted.
Mr. Schowalter responded that most fade away after the plan is adopted, but he can provide the
names of PACs who have stayed around.
In discussing the possibility of subcommittees, Mr. Dean passed out the attached memo
requesting the formation of a business subcommittee with himself as the chair. He mentioned
that the PAC may need to get the community mobilized to attend furore City Council and
S:\REDVAREA~PAC meetings week2-22 memo.wpd
Update of PAC Meetings, Week of February 22
March 1, 1999
Page 5
Agency meetings and that he wants to have meetings with the business community and may need
to request staff support to accomplish his meetings.
Mr. Anthony mentioned he is concerned with the roles of subcommittees. He does not want to
be associated with anyflaing negative, He is concerned that there are hidden agendas and that
they may get in the way of the greater good. He also mentioned he was upset about the way the
last PAC meeting was eonductedi and that he had considered resigning after that meeting. He
does not want this PAC to be an embarrassment to the City or the community.
Mr. Webster asked ifPAC members cannot do individually what is being proposed with
subcommittees.
Mr. Powell responded, yes.
Mr. Dean mentioned he feels that the subcommittee structure helps to gather support.
On a motion by Mr. Peterson, seconded by Mr. Crompton, the PAC voted to lbrm three
subcommittees: business, community organization, and media (which was later changed to
community relations).
Discussion ensued about the purpose ora media committee, and who would be responsible for
contacting the press, writing news releases, etc.
Mr. Dean then nominated Mr. Peterson to be chair of the community relations committee, and
Mr. Crompton as chair of the community organization committee.
Mr. Crompton nominated Mr. Dean as chair of the business subcommittee.
These thre~ nominations were approved.
Mr. Dean requested Janice Scanlan to develop guidelines for the operation of subcommittees.
The issue of an operational budget was tabled until the March I I meeting.
Regarding setting meeting dates through January 2000, Mr. Peterson said he believed that setting
such dates would insure the continued existence of the PAC after the plan was adopted. This
issue was tabled until the March 11 meeting.
S:~,REDVAREA\PAC m~lir}g.~ we.:.lcl-22 me.~ao.,,vpd
Update of PAC Meetings, Week of February 22
March 1, 1999
Page 6
Under PAC member statements, the following items were discussed:
Mr. Dean mentioned he enjoys working with everyone and appreciates everyone working
together.
Mr. Webster wants more structure in the meetings and suggests the attorney advise the chair of
what is needed and what is required. Ms. Scanlan mentioned she has been pretty loose regarding
Robert's Rules of Order and the PAC needs to let her know if she needs to be more strict.
Ms. Campbell asked how the public will know about the March 4 meeting. Staff responded that
it will be publicly noticed as required by law. She said there is a section in the newspaper that
lists public meetings and the PAC meetings should be included there. Staff responded that
meeting notices are sent to all local newspapers, radio stations, and television stations. Ms.
Campbell mentioned someone should call the newspaper.
Mr. Crompton said that staff should be providing refreshments, but if they will not, can PAC
members contribute money for refreshments at PAC meetings?
Mr. Peterson wanted to know what Mr. Webster said in his last statement. Mr. Webster repeated
his statement. Mr. Peterson then asked Mr. Lyman to read what he had written in his records.
Mr. Peterson asked for a copy of the administrative report that was sent to City Council
regarding the request for a PAC office.
Mr. Powell said he welcomes all assistance to run meetings better. He knows PAC members
have the community at heart and are working as a team to make sure the City does not pull the
wool over the PAC's eyes.
Mr. Dean suggested the chair and vice chair go to the next CDDA meeting to introduce
themselves under the public statements section.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:48PM.
Staff will continue to provide these updates as the PAC meetings progress.
attachment
S:\REDVAREA~PAC meetings week2-22 memo.wpd
MEMORANDUM
Date: 2/25/99
To: Southeast Bakersfield Project Area Committee (PAC) Members
From: Marvin Dean
RE: Request to Form Business Ad-Hoc Sub Committee and Appointment of Chairperson
I am requesting that the PAC form a business Ad-hoc Subcommittee and appoint me as the
Chairperson. The purposes and goals of the Subcommittee would be to:
(1) Organize and conduct outreach meetings with business and property owners in
the Southeast Redevelopment Project area,
(2) Provide educational information and speakers on the benefits and goals of
redevelopment.
(3) Develop support and recommendations and get input from business owners to
be included in the final Redevelopment Plan.
2/4/99 Confidential 1
i,
B A K E R S F I E L D ,,
!C~TY MANAG~:WS OFF~Ci~'
Economic and Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
March 8, 1999
TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager
FROM: Jake Wager, Economic Development Director
SUBJECT: Update of March 4 Southeast Bakersfield PAC"~eet~g
The Southeast Bakersfield Project Area Committee (PAC) held a special meeting on March 4 to
continue discussions regarding the Preliminary Report and Draft Redevelopment Plan. PAC
chair Art Powell called the meeting to order at 6:37PM. Nine of eleven PAC members were
present, as well as two of the three alternate members. Two members of the public also were
present.
Emie Glover of GRC Redevelopment Consultants, Inc., provided an overview of the two
documents, and mentioned that 90% of the language is required by law.
Marvin Dean mentioned he has no problem with what he has seen in the plan and asked
questions about the debt limit projections. He stated the city and CDDA will be requested to
loan a couple of million dollars to the area to "jump start" and get things moving until a bond is
feasible.
Mr. Powell said he would like the plan to include strict code enforcement as well as efforts to
make the area more attractive.
Mr. Dean presented a memo (attached) outlining seven areas he would like addressed in the plan.
Henry Shipes mentioned that he is concemed that"guarantees" in Mr. Dean's proposal may alarm
the City Council and may cause them to kill the project.
Mr. Dean responded that the city will approve redevelopment because they have their own
reasons for doing so. He asked what the PAC wanted as a tradeoff for redevelopment.
Jonathan Webster stated he is concerned that Mr. Dean's proposal alienate the PAC from the city
and asked if there was a way the PAC can insert itself into the process, rather than creating
S:\REDVAREA\PAC meeting 3-4 SE memo.wpd
Update of March 4 Southeast Bakersfield PAC meeting
March 8, 1999
Page 2
another layer.
Stephanie Campbell mentioned that Councilmember Irma Carson could not attend this meeting
but hoped to attend the March 11 PAC meeting.
Mr. Dean made a motion that his proposal be referred to staffto clarify each item proposed and
to indicate where each item would fit into the plan. The motion was approved.
Mr. Webster presented a written proposal (attached) for his suggestions for inclusion in the plan
and made a motion that his proposal be referred to staff to clarify each item proposed and to
indicate where each item would fit into the plan. The motion was approved.
Gil Anthony presented a written proposal (attached) for his suggestions for inclusion in the plan
and made a motion that his proposal be referred to staff to clarify each item proposed and to
indicate where each item would fit into the plan. The motion was approved.
Under PAC member statements,
oStephanie Campbell requested that at the March 11 meeting the PAC consider a resolution be
submitted to the City Council that would add two new members to the Central District
Development Agency, and that the chairperson of each PAC would be added as voting members
of the CDDA (see attached).
°Rev. Richardson said he looks forward to the next meeting.
°Mr. Webster stated he is excited about the progress made tonight and thanked members for
being focused.
°Mr. Dean said he is looking forward to the beginning of subcommittees because this is a way to
get the public involved.
Adjournment followed at 8:24PM.
Staff will continue to provide these updates as the PAC meetings progress.
attachments
S:\REDVAREA\PAC meeting 34 SE memo.wpd
MEMORANDUM
Date: 3/4/99
To: Soulheast Bakersfield Redevelopment PAC
From: Marvin Dean, Southeast Redevelopment PAC Business Ad-Hoc Sub Committee Chairperson
RE: Recommendations to be Included in the Draft Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Bakersfield
Redevelopment Project
(1) Create a small business/M/WBE economic development revolving loan fund directed by the
Southeast PAC to assist small businesses/M/WBE persons with economic development projects within
the project area. (new business start up and business expansion). Detail of economic development
fund guidelines to be agreed to by the CDDA, City Council, PAC and PAC consultant. Economic
development revolving loan fund, funding to include tax increments, CDBG, CDDA and or any other
source as determined by the City Council.
(2) Create a small business/MNVBE business incubator inside the SE Redevelopment Project area
directed by the Southeast PAC to assist with new business start up and expansion. Funding source to
include tax increment, CDBG, CDDA, and any other source as determined by City Council. Details of
small business/M/VVBE incubator guidelines and program to be agreed to by the CDDA, City Council,
PAC, and PAC consultant.
(3) Create a Southeast Bakersfield Housing Fund funded by downtown redevelopment 20% tax
increment funds and other sources as determined by the city Council. The Southeast Bakersfield
Housing fund will be available to assist with on going City housing programs inside the project area i.e.
housing rehab, new construction of affordable housing and assist property owners with code
enforcement / demolition of substandard residential and multi-family units.
(4) Include language into the plan that requires any developer receiving redevelopment assistance
must hire 30 % minimum Iow-income Section 3 residents from the project area including construction
jobs and business staffing jobs. The PAC can assist firms with locating personnel or provide firms with
a waiver of conditions.
(5) PAC to create a Southeast Bakersfield Labor Pool-Job Bank to assist employers to meet project
employment goal of 30%.
(6) Include language into the Plan that requires any developer getting redevelopment assistance must
contract with or joint venture with small disadvantaged business M/WBF_JSection 3 businesses within
the Southeast Bakersfield project area for 30% of the contract dollar amount. PAC can assist the
developer with locating targeted groups or provide a waiver of condition.
(7) Include language into the plan that requires persons and business within the project area to have a
preference for redevelopment assistance over persons from outside the project area. Any firm or
person tumed down for assistance can appeal for reconsideration to the PAC. The PAC may provide
input and assist with recommendation to get the project approved, if the PAC determines the project to
be a community priority.
2/4/99 Confidential 1
TO: Art Powell
FROM: Jo[athan Webster
RE: Recommendations for the Proposed Redevelopment Plan
The following items are submitted as recommendations to the Pac Committee for
discussion at the
March 4, 199.9 meeting.
Housing:
A. No high density building
B. Community Code Enforcement
C. In fill housing-single family homes
D. Absentee Landlords and Property Owners Code Enforcement
Pac Committee:
Define the role of the PAC Committee:
A. Serve as a part of the Evaluation Committee process on projects submitted and
approved for Southeast Redevelopment Project.
Southeast Bakersfield Project Area Committee Redevelopment
Recommendations:
1. In the Areas Major Gateways:
California Avenue
Union Avenue
"P" Street
Brundage Lane
Lakeview Avenue
Cottonwood Road
Chester Avenue
"H' Street
We suggest New and More Stringent Code Enforcement: Building Demolition,
Planting Trees, Grass, Ridding Crime, Drugs, Prostitution,
We suggest Capitol Injection into these Major Gateways to Begin the
Redevelopment Process,
2. Capitol Injection into the Housing Rehabilitation Process for Comprehensive
Housing Rehabilitation,
3. Provide opportunities and empowerment to area residents in business
development and other enterprises,
4. While properties are setting vacant waiting for development, properties to be well
· maintained with grass and trees.
5. Any employment opportunities to be created from redevelopment to go to area
residents first.
6. Entrepreneurial empowerment rather than just jobs should be a priority.
7. Strict crime enforcement with police satellite offices should be considered along
with foot patrols and hirees from local communities.
NEW BUSINESS TO BE ADDED'ON AGENDA FOR VOTE. IF APPROVED BY
PAC's; SUBMISSION TO CITY COUNCIL FOR VOTE AS A NEW
RESOLUTION.
TO: TO'EACH MEMBER OF THE PAC - OLD TOWN KERN - PIONEER
AND SOUTHEAST REDEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE, STAFF &
JAKE WAGER.
FROM: STEPHANIE CAMPBELL - VICE CHAIR SOUTHEAST PAC
DATE: MARCH 4,1999
SUBJECT: NEW RESOLUTION TO BE ADOPTED
To request that a new resolution be submitted to the City
Council that would add two new members to the Central
District Development Agency (CDDA). That the Chairperson
of each PAC (Old Town Kern - Pioneer and Southeast)
would~be added as voting members of CDDA.
BAKERSFIELD
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager
FROM: Theodore D. Wright, Civil Engineer ~
THROUGH: Raul M. Rojas, Public Works Director
DATE: March 10, 1999
SUBJECT: CIP STATUS REPORT - MARCH 1999
Attached is the status report for the Capital Improvement Program. The CIP status report is comprised
of the following sections:
1. Notices of Completion filed;
2. Status of pre-FY 1998-99 and FY 1998-99 CIP projects; and
3. Construction Inspection Status Report.
The following Notices of Completion were filed since the last status report:
T8K039 Traffic Signal, Lighting System, White Lane at Park View
E8K039 Wilson Road Storm Drain, between Oriole St. and Akers Rd.
P7H002 Repaving of Fire Station No. 8
E6K012 Bank Street Sewer Lift Station Modification
E9K007 Storm Drain Construction, A Street ~ Sunset Ave. To California Ave.
T8K004 Traffic Signal, Lighting System Installation on California Ave. at N St.
P8K006/ Construction of Two Kern Island Canal Culverts
T7K025
G:\GROUPDAT~,Memo\CIP\march99
PRE 1998/1999
City of Bakersfield Public Works Department
Pre 1998-99 Capital Improvement Program Schedule - Wed 3/10/99
Ward Proj. No. Description Sep '98 Oct '98 Nov '98 Dec--Mar '99 Apr '99 May '99 Jun '99 Jul '99 Aug '99
7 E8K027 SEWER REHAB., PUMP STA. - PLANZ/BENTON
Deign
Bi~ Request/Award
Construction Not :eed ~ ~ ^ ~ Notice o~ Completion
7 T8K002 BRIDGE IMPROV. - WHITE LANE/99 (PSR)
Consultant Procurement ~ A ward of Contra~ct
I
Study I I I ~ Study Approval
ALL E6K008 SEWER CONSTRUCTION, TELEMETRY - PH II
Design
Bid Request/Award
I
Construction Notice to Proceed ~ ~ Notice of Completion
3 P7H002 REPAVlNG FIRESTATIONS
Design _
B d Request/Award
~ Award of Bid
Construction otice to ~roceed ~ ~ Notice c f Completion
4 TSK057 I SIGNAL, NEW - WHITE/MOUNTAIN VISTA
Design
Bid Request/Award
Construction Notice to Proceed O ~ Notice of Completion
2,3 T8K055 SIGNAL, NEW- PANORAMA/RIVER
Design
Bid Request/Award
Construction Notice to Proceed ~ ~ I~ otice of Completion
1,2 T8K004 SIGNAL, NEW - CALIFORNIA/N
Design
Bid Request/Award
Construction Notice to Proceed ~ I Notice of :omplet?on
rnarcl~ 3re 98 99 Page 1 of Design 1
City of Bakersfield Public Works Department
Pre 1998-99 Capital Improvement Program Schedule - Wed 3/10/99
Ward Proj. No. De__scr pt on Sep '98 Oct '98 Nov '98 Dec '98 Jan '99 Feb '99 Mar '99 Apr '99 May '99 Jun '99 Jul '99 Aug '99
6,7 T8K035 STREET IMPROVEMENTS - PANAMA LANE
Design ~ Ph ~n Approval
Bid Request/Award Advertise for Bids ~. Award f Bid
Construction Not ce ['o Proceed ~ ~ Notice of ~ ~ompletio
2 PSD001 REPAIR PARKING GARAGE
Design 0 Plan Approval
Bid Request/Award Adrvertisefor~ids ~11~ A~ardofBi~
Notice toI Proceed ~ I~ otice of Completion
Construction
6 T8K040 SIG. MOD. (CHANNELIZATION)-WHITE/AKERS
Design
Bid Request/Award Award of Bid
Construction Notice to ~roceed ~ Notice of Completion
3 TSK065 SIGNAL, NEW - COLLEGE/FAIRFAX
Design Plan Approval
Bid Request/Award Advertise
Construction Notice to pr loce~ '~d ~ ~ Notice of Completion
1 T8K056 SIGNAL, NEW- EB SR 58/MT VERNON
Design
Bid Request/Award
Construction Notice to Proceed ~ ~ Notice of Completion
4 TSK050 sIGNAL, NEW - WHITE/BUENA VISTA j Project delayed due to Cast e an( Cooke construction o uena
~ Vista Road and due to Allen Road Trunk Sewer Project
Design
Bid Request/Award Award of L~id I
Construction Notice to Proceed ~ ~ Notice of Comp etlon
4 TSK052 SIGNAL, NEW - BUENA VISTA/MING ~ Projec delayed due to (.;astle an0 Cooke
Design/ construct on of Buena Vista Road.
Bid Request/Award Award of
Construction Notice to Proceed~ Noticle of Comp ~etion
marct3 pre 98 99 Page 2 of Design 1
City of Bakersfield Public Works Department
Pre 1998-99 Capital Improvement Program Schedule - Wed 3/10/99
Ward Proj. No.De.~scription Sap'98 ! Oct'98 ! Nov'98 ! Dec'98 ! Jan'99 I Feb'99 ! Mar '99 ! Apr'99 ! May'99 ! Jun'99 ! Jul '99 I Aug'99
6 TSK046 STREETIMPROVEMENTS-ASHE/HARRIS : ~
Design i 0 i ~ Plan A~proval
5 E6K012 sewer Reh'abi'l'it~ti0n ~ Lift stat'i'0'~'('B~nkstl) ............ i ............. i ........... i ......... i ...... ii i i
Bid Request/Award ~ ~ ~ :
onstruct on ..... ~ NotiCe ¢ f ComPletion
4 E6K017 Sewer Rahab. - Manholes (Hageman Rd) : i i !
Design ~ Plan ApProval
Bid Request/Award :~ Advertise for Bids ~ i ~ Award of Bi, t i
Construction i Notice to Pn ~ceed ~ ~ Notice of Completi
7 E8K040 Sewer Const. - Panama No. 12 Annex. Area ~ : i ~
Design g Plan APProval i i
Bid Request/Award e forBids a. i @ Award of Bid i
Construction : Notice to Proceed ~ ~ Notice of CompletiOn
4 E7K001 Sewer Construction - Main (Allen Road) i i i
Design
Bid Request/Award of Bid : i ~ :
Construction i Notice to Proceed ~
1 E6K~04'" '~ Plant 3'upgradeiExpar~sio'n ' ii ....... :! ......... i ................
Bid Request/Award i i i
.... ~ Notice of Completion ::
Bi~-Request/Award i i i i i i
Construction : ~ Notice o
marc/3 pre 98 9g Page 3 of Design 1
1998/1999
City of Bakersfield Public Works Department
1998-99 Capital Improvement Program Schedule -Wed 3/10/99
.Ward Proj. No. Description Sep '98 Oct'98 Nov '98 I Dec'98 Jan '99 Feb '99 Mar'99 Apr'99 May'99 Jun '99 Jul '99 Aug '99
2 P8K006 AMTRAK STATION
Design ~ Plan Approval
Bid R~equest/Award Advertise for ~ Iid: ~1~ Award of Bid
Construction Notice to ;roceed
2 E9K007 STORM DRAIN CONST -CALIF AVE/A ST
I
Design 0 Plan Approval
Bid Request/Award Advertise forBids t~ ;war~of Bid
Construction Noti ~ce ~ Notice c f Completion
5,6 P?H002 REPAVING FIRE STATIONS
Design ~ Plan ipproval
Bid Request/Award $ I ~ Award of B~d
Construction
Notice to Proceed ~ ~ Notice of Completion
5 E9K008 STORM DRAIN CONST- DESERT HILLS /
Design
BidRequest/Award f~ BI ' Pla Appr°val
Advertise or ids ~ [~· Award of Bid _
Construction Notice t Proceec @ ~ Notice of ompletion
4 T9K003 SIGNAL NEW, PARK VIEW DRIVE
Design ~ Plan ~ ~proval
Bid Request/Award
e forBids . A AwardofBi~
Const~ruction Notice' I to Procee~d ~ · Notice of Completion
3 KEN616 STORMDesign DAMAGE REPAIRS-PANORAMA DRIVE ~ ~ Plan Approval
/
Bid Request/Award Advertise for Bi~s ~ Award of Bid
Construction
Notice to Proceed I ~ ¥otice of Completion
4 P8K006 SIGNAL NEW, S STREET AT TRUXTUN AVENUE
Desig--~ ~ A ~lan I i
Approval
Bid Request/Award IAdvertiselorBid~~Awardo, Bi,,
Construction Notice to ~Proceed ~ II ~ Notice of, Completio,n
march Page 1 of Design 3
City of Bakersfield Public Works Department
1998-99 Capital Improvement Program Schedule - Wed 3/10/99
Ward ProB. No. Des~_cription Sap '98 Oct '98 Nov '98 Dec '98 Jan '99 Feb '99 Mar '99 Apr '99 May '99 Jun '99 Jul '99 Aug '99
2 P8K006 SIGNAL NEW, CALIFORNIA AVE. AT A AND G ST
Design ~. A Plan Approval
Bid Request/Award Advertise for ids ~ A~ ~ard of, 3id I _
Construction Notice~ -to Proceed I~ Notice of Completion
4 T8K059 SIGNAL, NEW - BRIMHALL RD/JEWETTA AVE Agreement with Nortl3 rSakerstield
Parks District and Castle and Cooke
Design Plan Appr~ val approved at CC meeting of 2/24/99.
/
Bid Request/Award Advertis le for Bids ~ Award of Bid
Construction ' i~ Proceed ~ ~ Notice of Completion
VAR T9K008 SIDEWALK RECONSTRUCTION~ I ~
Project bang bid as pa of annual DB(~ --
Design ~ Plan Approval contract for street materials and curb and
Bid Request/Award I gutter. Contract award at CC meeting of --
Advertise forBids ~ ~ Al lrdof.3id 3/17/99.
2 T7K025 BRIDGE CONST., Q STREET GR. SEPARATION
Design ~ Plan Approval
Bid Request/Award Advertise for Bids ~.I · Al ard of 3id
I
Construction N ~otice to Proc, ed ~
5 E8K028 SEWER REHABILITATION, STOCKDALE e I
Design e I ~lan Approval
Advertis le! for Bids ~ I . ~ Award of
Bid
Request/Award
Bid
- Construction Notice tolProceed ~ i ~ Notice of
k
4 P9K006 COFFEE ROAD SOUND WALL
Design ~ t lan Approval
Bi~ Request/Award Advertise for Bids ~ ~ Award of Bid
Construction Notice !o Proceed ~ ~ Notice of Completion
1,7 P9K005 S~REETIMPROVEMENTS- SOUTHGATE
Design I Project d 91ayed pending completion ot annexation.
Bid Request/Award
Construction
march Page 2 of Design 3
City of Bakersfield Public Works Department
1998-99 Capital Improvement Program Schedule - Wed 3/10/99
Ward Proj. No. Des.cription Sep '98 Oct '98 Nov '98 Dec '98 Jan '99 Feb '99 Mar '99 Apr '99 May '99 Jun '99 Jul '99 Aug '99
2 T9K053 TOC INTERCONNECT (TRUXTUN, N TO BEALE)
Design g ~ Plan Appr~ val
Bi~-Request/Award Advertis!forBids~ II ~ AwardofBid
Construction Notice to Proc ;ed ~ I ~ Notice of Completion
1,7 T9K053 TOC INTERCONNECT (H, WHITE TO BRUNDAGE)
DeSign ' Plan Approva~
Bid Request/Award Advertise for Bids Award of Bid
Construction Not~ce' to Proceed ~ [ ~ Notice of Completi
2 P9K009 RECYCLE FACILITY, SVC PAD
Design ~ ~ Plan Approva~
Bid Request/Award Advertise for Bids Award of L~id
Construction . ~ I ~ Notice of Completion
2 E9K004 SEWER REHABILITATION, B STREET / /
Design ~ ~~lan Approlval
Bid Request/Award AdvertiseIflor , ids ~1~ Award of Bid
Construction Notice to Proceed ~' ~ Notic
VAR. T9K005 STREET RESURFACING
Design ~ ~ F lan Appro~val
Bid Request/Award A~vertisefo!B~ls~AwardotBid
Construction Notice to Proceed ~ I ~ Notice of Co
5 P91001 POLICE PISTOL RANGE CLASSROOM
Design
I
Bid Request/Award dvertise fo Bids rd o; ~ Bid
ConstructionNoti I ~ Notice of Co~
- 4 E9K013 SE~'VER CONSTRUCTION - PALM /
DeSign ~ ~ Plan Approval
Bid--Request/Award %dvertise for ~ids ~. ~ Award of Bid
Construction Noticel to Proceed ~ ~ Not,ce of Corn
marct~ Page 3 of Design 3
City of Bakersfield Public Works Department .
1998-99 Capital Improvement Program Schedule -Wed 3/10/99
WardProj. No. Descripti____~
3 T9K012NORTHEAST BIKE PATH :
Design ~ iPlan Approval
Bid Request/Award ap~ now requ~nng additional 1
................. ~r~st~-uci studies prior to allowing City to proceed with final plans and specs. These add'l studies are currently on-going.
7 E9KO0$ STORM DRAIN CONST. BENTON/MING
Design
Plan ,Approval ::
Bid Request/Award Advertise for Bids Award of Bid
Construct Notice to Proceed ~ ~ Notice
2,5 T8K081 24TH STF SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS
Plan ApProval
Bid
Request/Award
Advertise for Bids ~ Award of
Construct Notice to Proceed
1 E7K005 SEWER REHAB MAIN. SO. CHESTER AVENUE
Design
Plan Approval
Bid Request/Award ~ i
i ~ Award of Bid
Constructi Notice t~ Proceedi
2 QgK003 NATURAl S FUELING STATION
Design
Plan Approval
Bid Request/Award i A~ ~ i ~ Award of Bid
Notice to Proceed
~ E9K009 STORM DRAIN CONST., MYRTLE/BANK
Design :
Plan' Approval
................... Bid R~quest/Award ; i
for Bids ~ ! ~ Award of Bid '
ConstructJ NotiCe to Proceed ~ i ~ :.Notice of
I T8K079 STREET IMPROVEMENTS -CASA LOMA ~
Design Plan ApproVal
Bid Request/Award for Bids ~ Award of Bid
Constructi i :
Notice to Proceed
rnarc~ Page 4 of Design 3
City of Bakersfield Public Works Department
1998-99 Capital Improvement Program Schedule -Wed 3/10/99
Ward Proj. No. Description Sep '98 Oct '98 Nov '98 Dec '98 Jan '99 Feb '99 Mar '99 Apr '99 May '99 Jun '99 Jul '99 Aug '99
3 T9K01$ SIGNAL, NEW- COMMANCHE RD/SR 178
De~-gn ~
Bid Request/Award Adv!rtise for ~ids ~ Awa!d of Bid
Const---ruction ~Notice to P~oceed
4 E9K010 SEWER LIFT STATION IMP. - BOCA
Design ~ ~ Plan Approval
I ~m~ AwardofBid
Bid Request/Award Advertise for B~ds
Construction Notice to Proceed
2 T8K080 VVTR SYSTEM UPGRADE - CHESTER AVENUE
Design 0
~ I I
Bid Request/Award I~roject Plans and Specifications Advertise for Bids
be ng prepared by Cai-Water
Construction N
ALL T9K053 TOC INTERCONNECT A I
Design ~ ~ Plan pprova
Bid Request/Award Advertise for Bids
Construction N ~otice to Pr ~oceed
I E9K014 SEWER TRUNK LINE STUDY
Study/Design ~ ~ Study A;proval
Bid Request/Award
ConstrUction ~'Notice to ;roceed <~ I
2 T4K055 STREET IMPROVEMENTS - LAKE ST. AREA
Design 0 ~ ~ 'lan Approval
Bid Request/Award A~vertise fo; Bids ~ Alward of Bi
Construction ~ I ^
Notice to Proceed
2 P9K007 DOWNTOWN FLEET FACILITY
Design ~ ~ Plan Approval
Bid Request/Award Ac vertise for Bids ~ ~ A
Construction Notice to, Proceed
marcl~ Page 5 of Design 3
City of Bakersfield Public Works Department
1998-99 Capital Improvement Program Schedule - Wed 3/10/99
Ward Proj. No. D scription Sop '98 Oct '98 Nov '98 Dec '98 Jan '99 Feb '99 Mar '99 Apr '99 May '99 Jun '99 Jul '99 Aug '99 '?-~.~.~:.
4,5 E9K001 Si ~ER CONSTRUCTION, MOHAWK
D, sign /~ Plan Approval
Alignrfient being ~evised to a~:ldress concerns expressed by I I ;~-~...
B~ I Reques~Award Kern Water Agency regarding Cross Valley Canal. Revision to
~ n~truction environmental document currently being prepared. I
~ I ~ I I I I Notice t? Proceed
- ¢.:., :'.
marc~ Page 6 of Design 3
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION
PROJECT STATUS
SUBDIVISION
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION
PROJECT STATUS -- SUBDIVISION
~3/01/99
:=.M. OR DEVELOPER/ %
TRACT ~S LOCATION CONTRACTOR INSPECTOR COMP.
BUENA VISTA RD. RECONSTRUCTION CASTLE & COOKE LESH 75%
STOCKDALE HWY. RECONSTRUCTION CASTLE & COOKE LESH 100%
VALLEY PLAZA STORM DRAIN COLOMBO CHOATE 100%
PM 9329 STOCKDALE HWY, CSUB - OLD RIVER CASTLE & COOKE LESH 100%
PM 10054 COFFEE RD. & OLIVE DR. LESH 0%
PM 10368-1 COFFEE RD. & HAGEMAN LESH 10%
PM 10406 CALLOWAY DR. N/OF STOCK, DALE GLENWOOD GARDENS LESH 80%
PM 10426 GOSFORD & MCNAIR CASTLE & COOKE MITCHELL 0%
PM 10456 COFFEE RD {~ ROSEDALE HWY HOPPER PROPERTIES PIERCE 100%
TR 5362-1&2 WIBLE & HOSKING MITCHELL 0%
TR 5369 I MONITOR & PACHECO AMERICAN HOME ALLIANCE MITCHELL 30%
TR 5426-B & C S/O STOCKDALE, W/O OLD RIVER CASTLE & COOKE LESH 99%
TR 5426-D STOCKDALE & OLD RIVER CASTLE & COOKE LESH 95%
TR 5426-E STOCKDALE & OLD RIVER CASTLE & COOKE LESH 50%
TR 542~F STOCKDALE & OLD RIVER CASTLE & COOKE LESH 45%
TR 5426-G S/OF STOCKDALE & W/OF OLD RIVER CASTLE & COOKE LESH 100%
TR 5427 OLD RIVER & MING AVE. CASTLE & COOKE LESH 10%
TR 5429-A - F WHITE LANE & OLD RIVER -- PRIVATE TRACT CASTLE & COOKE-PRIVATE MITCHELL 95%
TR 5433-3 AKERS N/OF BERKSHIRE ENNIS DEVELOPMENT MITCHELL 10%
TR 5433-4 AKERS N/OF BERKSHIRE ENNIS DEVELOPMENT MITCHELL 80%
TR 5478-2 COFFEE RD S/O OLIVE DRIVE HINESLEY LESH 100%
TR 5478-3 COFFEE RD S/O OLIVE DRIVE HINESLEY LESH 30%
TR 5489-C BRIMHALL & OLD FARM CASTLE & COOKE LESH 100%
TR 5552-A & B RENFRO RD. & STOCKDALE HWY. WEST KERN DEVELOPMENT LESH 30%
TR 5594-C HAGEMAN & OLD FARM ROAD TURMAN LESH 95%
TR 5600-C AKERS & HOSKING TURMAN MITCHELL 99%
TR 5646-2 FAIRFAX RD ~ VALLEYVIEW DR W.D.J. CORPORATION MITCHELL 75%
TR 5650-D HARRIS & RELIANCE CASTLE & COOKE MITCHELL 99%
TR 5680-C E/OF CALLOWAY S/OF BRIMHALL CASTLE & COOKE LESH 95%
TR 568~E E/OF CALLOWAY S/OF BRIMHALL CASTLE & COOKE LESH 35%
TR 5680-F E/OF CALLOWAY S/OF BRIMHALL CASTLE & COOKE LESH 70%
TR 5684-1 E/OF JEWETTA ~ SHELLABARGER CARRIAGE HOMES LESH 30%
TR 5684-2 E/OF JEWETTA {~ PALM CARRIAGE HOMES LESH 30%
TR 568~L HARRIS & SUMMER SPRING KYLE CARTER MITCHELL 50%
TR 5716-5 MEACHAM & MAIN PLAZA DEWALT LESH 90%
TR 5716-7 MEACHAM & MAIN PLAZA DEWALT LESH 30%
TR 5716-8 MEACHAM & MAIN PLAZA DEWALT LESH 30%
TR 5728-3 JEWETTA & HAGEMAN DEWALT LESH 40%
TR 5804-2 MESA MARIN & CAMINO LA PAZ PIERCE 90%
TR 5809-C PANAMA LN. & UNION WATTENBARGER MITCHELL 90%
TR 5827-A,EI&C BRIMHALL ROAD E/OF JEWETTA CASTLE & COOKE LESH 50%
TR 5835-C HARRIS & ASHE CASTLE & COOKE MITCHELL 99%
TR 5836-A CALLOWAY S/O BRIMHALL CASTLE & COOKE LESH 85%
i TR 5844 A,D PANAMA LN. & RELIANCE CASTLE & COOKE MITCHELL 95%
13/01/99 PAGE 2
P.M. OR DEVELOPER/ %
TRACT ~S LOCATION CONTRACTOR INSPECTOR COMP.
TR 5844-B,C PANAMA LN. & RELIANCE CASTLE & COOKE MITCHELL 50%
TR 5845 A&B PANAMA LN. & RELIANCE CASTLE & COOKE MITCHELL 95%
TR 5845-C PANAMA LN, & RELIANCE CASTLE & COOKE MITCHELL 60%
TR 5845-D 'PANAMA LN. & RELIANCE CASTLE & COOKE MITCHELL 60%
TR 5845 -E&F PANAMA LN. & RELIANCE CASTLE & COOKE MITCHELL
TR 5846-A HARRIS & ASHE CASTLE & COOKE MITCHELL 40%
TR 5846-B - D I HARRIS & ASHE CASTLE & COOKE MITCHELL 096
TR 5848A,B&C CAMPUS PARK/OLD RIVER CASTLE & COOKE MITCHELL 99%
TR 5853 PANAMA LN. & RINGSDALE CT. CASTLE & COOKE MITCHELL 10%
TR 5859 NW CORNER PANAMA & UNION CARRIAGE HOMES MITCHELL 95%
TR 5861 AKERS & HOSKING TURMAN MITCHELL 40%
TR 5861-C AKERS & HOSKING TURMAN MITCHELL 99%
TR 5869-2 CALLOWAY S/O BRIMHALL BURLINGTON LESH 70%
TR 5872-1 WHITE LN. & MOUNTAIN VISTA MIKE SOPER MITCHELL 99%
TR 5872-2 WHITE LN. & MOUNTAIN VISTA MIKE SOPER MITCHELL 90%
TR 5873-2 PANAMA' LN. & MONITOR ST. ALMOND TREE DEVELOPMENT MITCHELL 99%
TR 5873-3 PANAMA LN. & MONITOR ST. ALMOND TREE DEVELOPMENT MITCHELL 99%
TR 5876-A MING & OLD RIVER CASTLE & COOKE LESH 90%
TR 5876-B MING & OLD RIVER CASTLE & COOKE LESH 100%
TR 5876-C MING & OLD RIVER CASTLE & COOKE LESH 90%
TR 5876-D MING & OLD RIVER CASTLE & COOKE LESH 40%
TR 5876-E MING & OLD RIVER CASTLE & COOKE LESH 60%
TR 587~F MING & OLD RIVER CASTLE & COOKE LESH 50%
TR 5876-G MING & OLD RIVER CASTLE & COOKE LESH 40%
TR 5877-B MING & OLD RIVER -- PRIVATE CASTLE & COOKE LESH 100%
TR 5887 PANAMA LN. & MONITOR ST. ALMOND TREE DEVELOPMENT MITCHELL 99%
TR 5892 VERDUGO & NORIEGA BRIAN BATEY LESH 95%
TR 5895-1&2 S. "H" S/OF WHITE LANE CEMLAND DEVELOPMENT MITCHELL 50%
TR 5907-A&B FARMERS CANAL & SEASONS DRIVE MITCHELL 50%
TR 5921-1 CALLOWAY DR. & NORRIS RD. KYLE CARTER LESH 20%
TR 5924 E. BRUNDAGE LN. & OSWELL ST. MITCHELL 10%
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION
PROJECT STATUS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
03/01/99
START EST. COM %
PROJECTS TYPE CONTRACTOR INSPECTOR DATE DATE COMP
ALLEN RD-BUENA VISTA TO PALM CONSTRUCT TRUNK SEWER UTAH PACIFIC CONST. HUDIBERG 12/15/98 08/26/99 7%
AMTRAK SITE --"Q" ST UNDERPASS DEMOLITION JOHN BECK CONST. MILLWEE 02/16/99 03131/99 20%
BRIMHALL & JEWETTA MANHOLE/PIPE CONSTRUCT. HPS PLUMBING SERVICES 0%
BUENA VISTA ROAD REPLACE TRUNK SEWER UTAH PACIFIC CONST. BOLANOS 12117/97 03/15/99 92%
BUENA VISTA RD & MING AVENUE TRAFFIC SIGNAL A C ELECTRIC 03/15/99 0%
BUENA VISTA RD & WHITE LANE TRAFFIC SIGNAL A C ELECTRIC 03115/99 0%
CALIFORNIA AVE (~ "A" ST. & "G" ST. TRAFFIC SIGNAL A C ELECTRIC MILLWEE 03101/99 05/01/99 0%
DESERT HILLS DRIVE STORM DRAIN BACKHOE SERVICE WEAVER 03/15/99 0%
FAIRFAX ~ COLLEGE TRAFFIC SIGNAL GRANITE CONSTRUCTION 05101/99 0%
FIRE STATION NO. 11 SITE IMPROVEMENTS E & U CONSTRUCTORS CHOATE 10/19/98 02/12/99 100%
HAGEMAN RD--COFFEE TO FRUITVALE RECONST.SEWER MANHOLES HPS PLUMBING SERVICES 03115199 0%
MT. VERNON AVE. & STATE HWY 58 TRAFFIC SIGNAL LOOP ELECTRIC MAHAFFEY 01125/99 03/18/99 90%
PANAMA NO. 12 INSTALL SEWERS E & M CONSTRUCTORS CHOATE '03/08/99 04/29/99 0%
PANORAMA DRIVE (~ RIVER BLVD. REPAIRROADWAY STURGEON & SON WEAVER 01120/99 03/16/99 100%
PANORAMA DRIVE @ RIVER BLVD. TRAFFIC SIGNAL A C ELECTRIC WEAVER 01119/99 03/16/99 100%
PLANZ ROAD (~ BENTON CONSTRUCT LIFT STATION W.M. LYLES ALLEN 03129/99 0%
SEWER PLANT NO. 2 PLANT UPGRADE/EXPANSION KIEWIT PACIFIC BLACKNEATCH 01/03/98 08101/99 83%
SEWER PLANT NO. 3 LAB EXPANSION JTS CONSTRUCTION ~KLOEPPER 10/07/98 03/15/99 65%
SEWER PLANT NO. 3 PLANT UPGRADE/EXPANSION KAWEAH CONSTRUCTION SVENDRUP 07101/97 04/01/99 93%
TRUXTUN (~ "S" STREET TRAFFIC SIGNAL GRANITE CONSTRUCTION MILLWEE 02/01199 03/15/99 85%
,UNION AVE. NO 10 AREA WATER MAINS WEST VALLEY CONST. MAHAFFEY 01/19/99 04/01/99 98%
i VARIOUS STREETS LIFT STATION TELEMETRY TESCO CONTROLS ALLEN 03/01199 04/23/99 0%
~VARIOUS STREETS -- 1996/97 FY RESURFAClNG GRIFFITH COMPANY BOLANOS ~08/18/97 03/10/99 99%
VARIOUS STREETS -- 1997/98 FY RESURFACING GRIFFITH COMPANY BOLANOS 09114/98 03/10/99 98%
WHITE LANE - AKERS TO WIBLE CONSTRUCT MEDIAN E & M CONSTRUCTORS MAHAFFEY 03/15/99 0%
WHITE LANE (~ MOUNTAIN VISTA TRAFFIC SIGNAL MCKEE ELECTRIC ALLEN 01/11/99 03/12/99 99%
BAKERSFIELD
Economic and Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
March 12, 1999
TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager
FROM: Jake Wager, Economic Development Direct(~[~
SUBJECT: First Night® BakersfieM Update
The First Night® Bakersfield committee held a general interest meeting on Thursday, March 11
at the Bakersfield Convention Center. The committee invited individuals, members of non-
profits, government agencies, business and the arts for an overview of First Night® and planning
session. Over 35 people attended the session during which at least 20 signed up to assist on the
various sub-committees being formed to coordinate the event.
Those attending expressed enthusiastic support for such a family-focused, alcohol-free event
coming to Bakersfield. They also expressed confidence that the time-line to bring all the
elements together could be accomplished and that Bakersfield would embrace the event.
MEMORANDUM
March 9, 1999
TO: ALAN TANDY, CITY MANAGER R~
FROM: JACK HARDISTY, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DI
SUBJECT: REFERRAL #WF0018062 OF APPEAL ON VESTING'T, ENTATIVE
TRACT 5934 FROM COUNCIL MEMBER COUCH
/
This referral requested verification of the hearing date for the appeal and a status report.
Tentative Tract 5934 (located south of Stockdale Highway, west of Buena Vista
Road) appeal hearing is scheduled for March 31. StafFs position is that for
several reasons, the location of the collector street designed as part of a
subdivision overrides the driveway entrance to vacant land referenced in the
Castle and Cooke letter.
The Public Works Department is in the process of researching the specific details and reviewing
letters provided by the appellant and the developer of the subdivision. The Administrative Report
will contain details on staff's position.
JM:pjt
cc: City Council Members
Trudy Slater, Administrative Analyst
s:mcc3-9