The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About02-1 Engineers Report ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 (A V ALONIBELSERAlMONTARA/THE WOODS) AS FILED FOR FINAL APPROVAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1913 AND THE BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL CODE ASSESSMENT ENGINEER WILSON & ASSOCIATES 4221 W. Sierra Madre, Suite 201 Fresno, California 93722 (559) 275-5445 September 5, 2002 ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 (A V ALONIBELSERAlMONTARAlTHE WOODS) AS FILED FOR FINAL APPROVAL CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Mayor and City Council I 1 I J Harvey L. Hall, Mayor Irma Carson, Councilmember First Ward, Sue Benham, Councilmember Second Ward Mike Maggard, Councilmember Third Ward David Couch, Councilmember Fourth Ward Harold Hanson, Councilmember Fifth Ward Jacquie Sullivan, Councilmember Sixth Ward Mark Salvaggio, Vice Mayor, Councilmember Seventh Ward City Staff Alan Tandy, City Manager Bart Thiltgen, City Attorney Pamela A. McCarthy, City Clerk Raul M. Rojas, Public Works Director Gregory Klimko, Finance Director 'f BOND COUNSEL Samuel A. Sperry Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP San Francisco, California UNDERWRITER 'John H. Gibson UBS PaineWebber Inc. Newport Beach, California APPRAISER Michael L. Launer Launer & Associates Bakersfield, California DISCLOSURE COUNSEL Bruce J. Graham Pillsbury Winthrop LLP Los Angeles, California ASSESSMENT ENGINEER Ed Wilson Wilson & Associates Fresno, California ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 (A V ALONIBELSERAJMONT ARA/THE WOODS) CERTIFICATE OF FILING AND CONFIRMATION OF ASSESSMENT I, Pamela A. McCarthy, City Clerk of the City of Bakersfield, do hereby certify that the following "ENGINEER'S REPORT, CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1" including the Assessment and Assessment Roll in the amounts set forth therein as the "Preliminary Assessment," with the Assessment Diagram attached thereto, was filed with me on the 19th day of July, 2002, for preliminary approval on July 31,2002, by City Council Resolution No. 128-02. Pamela A. McCarthy, CMC, City Cler City of Bakersfield, California I have prepared this Engineer's Report for final approval and do hereby certify that the amount set forth herein as the "Confirmed Assessment" on Exhibit A, attached hereto, has been computed by me in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Bakersfield contained in a Resolution of Intention adopted as Resolution of Intention No. 1276 on May 22, 2002. ~:r.W~ Edward J. Wilson, R.C.E 23269 Assessment Engineer, Assessment District No. 02-1 I, Pamela A. McCarthy, City Clerk of the City of Bakersfield, do hereby certify that the following "ENGINEER'S REPORT, CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1" and the Con finned Assese~cr:t~in~ therein were approved by the City Council of the City of Bakersfield on the ~day of~ ,2002, by Council's adoption of Resolution No. IlLa-d;}.....l . ~Lt.rnc Pamela A. McCarthy, CMC, Cit)) lerk City of Bakersfield, California I, Raul M. Roj as, as Director of Public Works of the City of Bakersfield, do hereby certify that a certified copy of the following "ENGINEER' S REPORT, CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DIST~~O. 02-1," to\e!~ ~~t~ ~he Assessment Diagram attached thereto, was recorded in my office on the ay of ~ ,2002. /L.. ./"'\... ___- Raul M. R~as, Director of Public Works City of Bakersfield, California On L, 2002, the AssessIl}wt Diagram was file in Book c:!l / of Maps of Assessment and co. mmu ity Facijj.ties Dis~i9Hý}a~..3.Æ through L ¿, and a Notice of Assessment was recorded as Document No~';; /£:L-'1' Y Ä of Official Records in e office of th County Recorder of the County of Kern, California. James W. Maples, C nty Assessor-Recorder County of Kern, California 29600CER -ì- 8/28/02 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 (A V ALONIBELSERA/MONTARAffHE WOODS) DESCRIPTION PAGE Certificate of Filing Engineer's Report and Confirmation of Assessment .................. i Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 11 SECTIONS SECTION I ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PURPOSE, GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF BOUNDARIES AND ASSESSMENT AREAS, AND ENGINEER'S REPORT SUBMITTAL STATEMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. I-I Assessment District Purpose ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. I-I General Description of Boundaries and Assessment Areas .............. 1-2 Community Facilities District Special Tax Lien . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1-4 Environmental Review Status. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1-5 Engineer's Report Submittal Statement ............................. 1-5 Description of Engineer's Report Exhibits A, B, and C ................. 1-8 SECTION II GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK AND ACQUISITIONS ......... II-I Project Description ............................................. II-I Description of Project Improvements, Incidental Work, and Annual Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-I General Description of AD 02-1 Improvement Acquisitions ............. II-2 General Description of AD 02-1 Improvement and Assessment Proceeding Incidental Work and Expense ........................ II-4 General Description of Proposed Annual Assessment .................. II-5 SECTION ill PROPOSED ASSESSMENT OF ESTIMATED IMPROVEMENT ACQUISITION COSTS AND EXPENSES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ill~ 1 Report Requirements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ill-I Proposed Assessment of Estimated Improvement Acquisition Costs and Expenses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ill-2 Statement of Total Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ill-2 Statement of Maximum Annual Parcel Assessment for Recovery of Assessment District Administration Costs and Expenses ........... ill-4 Bond Declaration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., . . . . . . . . . ill-5 29600TOC -ii- 8/28/02 DESCRIPTION REPORT EXHIBITS PAGE EXHIBIT A Assessment Roll EXHIBIT B TABLE B-1 Engineer's Estimate of Total Cost and Assessment TABLE B-ll-B TABLE B-ll-C TABLE B-ll-D TABLE B-ll-E Engineer's Itemized Estimate of Improvement Acquisition Cost- Summary of Avalon Area, Belsera Area, Montara Area, and The Woods Area Improvements to Be Acquired Avalon Area (Tract No. 5968) Improvements to Be Acquired Belsera Area (Tract No. 5831 Unit No.4) Improvements to Be Acquired Montara Area (Tract No. 5829 Unit No.3) Improvements To Be Acquired The Woods Area (Tract No. 6066) Improvements to Be Acquired TABLES B-ll TABLE B-ll-A TABLE B-III Payoff Calculation for Assessment District No. 91-1 Assessment No. 66, Payoff Costs Assessed to The Woods Area of Assessment District No. 02-1 EXHIBIT C TABLE C-I Consolidated Tabulation of Parcel Assessment Data I j I \ TABLE C-ll-A Details of Avalon Area (Tract No. 5968) Estimated Assessment Reallocations for Proposed Development per City Code Section 13.08.070 TABLE C-n:·B Details of Belsera Area (Tract No. 5831 Unit No.4) Estimated Assessment Reallocations for Proposed Development per City Code Section 13.08.070 TABLE C-ll-C Details of Montara Area (Tract No. 5829 Unit No.3) Estimated Assessment Reallocations for Proposed Development per City Code Section 13.08.070 TABLE C-ll-D Details of The Woods Area (Tract No. 6066) Estimated Assessment Reallocations for Proposed Development per City Code Section 13.08.070 29600TOC -ììì- 8/28/02 DESCRIPTION PAGE , , i ! TABLE C-III-A Details of Avalon Area (Tract No. 5968) Estimated Benefit Assessment Allocations for Proposed Development TABLE C-III-B Details of Belsera Area (Tract No. 5831 Unit No.4) Estimated Benefit Assessment Allocations for Proposed Development TABLE C-III-C Details of Montara Area (Tract No. 5829 Unit No.3) Estimated Benefit Assessment Allocations for Proposed Development TABLE C-III-D Details of The Woods Area (Tract No. 6066) Estimated Benefit Assessment Allocations for Proposed Development TABLE C-IV-A Comparison of Avalon Area (Tract No. 5968) Benefit Assessment Allocation and Assessment Reallocation per City Code Section 13.08.070 TABLE C-IV-B Comparison of Belsera Area (Tract No. 5831 Unit No.4) Benefit Assessment Allocation and Assessment Reallocation per City Code Section 13.08.070 TABLE C-IV-C Comparison of Montara Area (Tract No. 5829 Unit No.3) Benefit Assessment Allocation and Assessment Reallocation per City Code Section 13.08.070 TABLE C-IV -D Comparison of The Woods Area (Tract No. 6066) Benefit Assessment Allocation and Assessment Reallocation per City Code Section 13.08.070 EXIllBIT D DESCRIPTION OF ASSESSMENT SPREAD METHOD. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. D-l Introduction ............................................................ D-l Assessment District Purpose ............................................... D-l Authorization for Assessment Reallocations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. D-2 Description of Assessment Reallocation Method ................................ D-3 Calculation of Reallocated Assessments ...................................... D-6 Description of Benefit/Cost Based Assessment Allocation Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. D-7 Comparison of Reallocation Method and Benefit/Cost Based Assessment Allocation Method; Assessment Spread Results .............. D-15 Assessment Engineer's Statement of Findings on the Assessment Spread Method. . .. D-15 Assessment Proceeding Incidental and Bond Issuance Cost Allocation. . . . . . . . . . . .. D-16 Assessment Apportionments to Future Subdivisions ........................... D-16 Assessment Engineer's Certification of the Assessment Spread Method ............ D-18 , I 29600TOC -iv- 8/28/02 DESCRIPTION PAGE EXIDBIT E Map No.1 Showing Avalon Area Improvements Map No.2 Showing Belsera Area Improvements Map No.3 Showing Montara Area Improvements Map No.4 Showing The Woods Area Improvements REPORT APPENDICES APPENDIX A Map of Proposed Boundaries (On file with the City Clerk of the City of Bakersfield; reduced, not to scale copy attached) APPENDIX B Assessment Diagram (On file with the City Clerk of the City of Bakersfield; reduced, not to scale copy attached) APPENDIX C Names and Addresses of Property Owners 29600TOC -v- 8/28/02 ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 (A V ALONIBELSERA/MONT ARAffHE WOODS) SECTION I ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PURPOSE, GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF BOUNDARIES AND ASSESSMENT AREAS, AND ENGINEER'S REPORT SUBMITTAL STATEMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PURPOSE Assessment District No. 02-1 (Avalon/Belsera/Montara/The Woods), hereafter referred to as "AD 02-1," has been formed by the City Council of the City of Bakersfield (the "City Council") in response to City of Bakersfield bond financing applications submitted by the developers of four single-family residential subdivisions in the City of Bakersfield (the "City"). The developers of the four subdivisions are: (1) Bakersfield Avalon, LLC, the subdivider/developer of City approved Vesting Tentative Tract No. 5968 (AD 02-1 "Avalon Area"); (2) Centex Homes, the subdivider/developer of Unit No.4 in City approved Vesting Tentative Tract No. 5831 (AD 02-1 "Belsera Area") and of Unit No.3 in City approved Vesting Tentative Tract No. 5829 (AD 02-1 "Montara Area"); and (3) FSI Developers, LLC, the subdivider/developer of City approved Vesting Tentative Tract No. 6066 (AD 02-1 "The Woods Area"). Bakersfield Avalon, LLC, Centex Homes, and FSI Developers, LLC, are hereafter collectively referred to as the "District Proponents." The applications submitted by the District Proponents requesting formation of AD 02-1 included petitions signed by the owners (H. Arthur Davis and Annette L. Davis, Trustees of the Davis Family Trust, and Vincent J. Hashim and Anita B. Hashim, Trustees of the Hashim Family Trust, for the Avalon, Belsera, and Montara Areas, and FSI Developers, LLC, for The Woods Area), on the date of application submittal of more than 60% of the property to be included in AD 02-1. The separate petitions filed with the district formation applications are hereafterreferred to as the "Petitions." The Petitions are on file with the City Clerk of the City of Bakersfield (the "City Clerk"), along with a certificate signed by the City Director of Public Works attesting that as of the date of filing of the Petitions with the City Clerk, the signatories to the Petitions were the owners of more than 60% of land area proposed to be assessed as part of the AD 02-1 proceedings and that the Petitions are sufficient pursuant to the requirements of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Streets and Highways Code"). The Petitions were accepted by the City Council on May 22, 2002, by City Council's adoption of its Resolution No. 078-02, Accepting Petition and Determining to Undertake Special Assessment Proceedings - City of Bakersfield Assessment District No. 02-1. AD 02-1 has been formed pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code (the "1913 Act") for the purpose of financing the cost of acquisition and/or construction by the City of certain street, water, sanitary sewer, storm water drainage, landscaping, and regulated public utility infrastructure improvements, and the cost to 29600FerI I-I 8/28/02 payoff an existing parcel assessment confirmed pursuant to City of Bakersfield Assessment District No. 91-1 (Hosking Trunk Sewer), herein referred to as "AD 91-1." Bonds are to be issued by the City pursuant to the Improvement Bond Act of 1915, being Division 10 ofthe Streets and Highways Code ("the 1915 Act") to provide funding for the AD 02-1 parcel assessments not paid in cash by the property owners during an assessment cash payment period that is to be determined by City Council resolution. A description of the AD 02-1 boundaries and of the properties to be apportioned a share of the total cost proposed to be assessed under the AD 02-1 proceedings is presented below., A detailed description of the improvements proposed to be acquired and of related incidental costs and expenses proposed to be funded by AD 02-1 is presented in Section IT of this report and a statement of the total assessment and of the amount proposed to be approved as an annual administrative assessment for AD 02-1 are presented in report Section III. A detailed description of the method developed for allocating the AD 02-1 costs among the assessed parcels is presented in the attached Exhibit D. All of the AD 02-1 properties are located within the existing Corporate Limits of the City of Bakersfield (the "City Limits"). The improvement acquisition and incidental costs to be financed by AD 02-1 will be spread to the assessed parcels pursuant to Bakersfield Municipal Code ("Municipal Code") Section 13.08.070-Benejit Spread, added to the Municipal Code on April 5, 1995, by City Council's adoption of Ordinance No. 3643. Section 13.08.070 provides for the use of ". . . an alternate method and rate of assessment reallocating assessments to alternate properties." GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF BOUNDARIES AND ASSESSMENT AREAS AD 02-1 is a collection of four separate community areas in northwest and south Bakersfield that are identified on the AD 02-1 Boundary Map and in this report and assessment as: 1. Avalon Area, generally located on both sides (north and south) of Olive Drive and east of Old Farm Road. The Avalon Area is also identified as Vesting Tentative Tract No. 5968 and covers Parcel 6 of Parcel Map No. 9826 and Parcel C of Lot Line Adjustment No. 51-00 (69 acres); 2. Belsera Area, generally located at the southwest corner of Olive Drive and Old Farm Road. The Belsera Area is also identified as Tract No. 5831 Unit No.4 (20 acres); 3. Montara Area, generally located at the southwest corner of Snow Road and Jewetta Avenue. The Montara Area is also identified as Tract No. 5829 Unit No.3 (23 acres); and 4. The Woods Area, generally located at the southwest corner of Berkshire Road and Akers Road. The Woods Area is also identified as Vesting Tentative Tract No. 6066 (40 acres); The four irregularly shaped community areas are located within a rectangular section of northwest and south Bakersfield that has a north-to-south dimension of about nine and three-quarters miles as measured from the north end of the Montara Area to the south end of The Woods Area and a west-to- east dimension of about five and one-quarter miles as measured from the westerly boundary of the 29600FerI 1-2 8/28/02 ¡ J Belsera Area to the easterly boundary.of The Woods Area. Each of the four district areas is involved in various stages of the land development entitlement and/or site development process. The Avalon Area has been approved for subdivision into a storm drain sump and a combined total of 251 single-family residential (R-1) lots pursuant to Vesting Tentative Tract No. 5968 ("Ten. TR 5968"). Units One and Two of Tract No. 5968 ("TR 5968") with a combined total of 73 R-1lots have been recorded with the Kern County Recorder. The Belsera Area has been approved for subdivision into a total of 73 R-1lots pursuant to Vesting Tentative Tract No. 5831 ("Ten. TR 5831 "). Unit No. 40f Tract No. 5831 ("TR5831") with a total of 73 R -1 lots has been recorded with the Kern County Recorder. The Montara Area has been approved for subdivision into a canal lot and a total of 57 R-1 lots pursuant to Vesting Tentative Tract No. 5829 ("Ten. TR 5829"). Unit No.3 of Tract No. 5829 ("TR 5829") with a total of 57 R-1lots has been recorded with the Kern County Recorder. The Woods Area has been approved for subdivision into four storm drain sump lots and a combined total of 175 R-1lots pursuant to Vesting Tentative Tract No. 6066 ("Ten. TR 6066"). Unit One of Tract No. 6066 ("TR 6066") with a total of 57 R-1lots has been recorded with the Kern County Recorder. As of the date of filing the Engineer's Report for AD 02-1 (hereinafter referred to as the "Engineer's Report") for final approval by the City Council, all of the parcels proposed to be assessed a share of the AD 02-1 improvement acquisition cost were owned by the District P~oponents. I j ! AD 02-1 will finance the acquisition of various "off-site" and/or "on-site" (in-tract) subdivision improvements and related incidental costs, where those improvements are either already required or are expected by the District Proponents to be required to be installed as conditions of final subdivision or site plan approvals within the four AD 02-1 community areas. Each of the four community areas is a separate assessment area within AD 02-1. The costs financed by AD 02-1 for the acquisition of infrastructure improvements located within or adjacent to one of the four community areas are assessed only to properties that are located within the community area wherein those improvements are also located. Therefore, all of the improvements proposed to be financed bear a rational nexus to the public infrastructure improvements needed for the subdivision of the property within each area that is proposed to be assessed a share of the AD 02-1 total cost. The assessments are apportioned according to the special benefits received by the lots, pieces, and parcels of land within the assessment district. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel is determined in relationship to the entirety of the capital cost of the improvements. No assessment is proposed to be apportioned on any parcel that exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. See the attached Exhibit D, Description of Assessment Spread Method for a description of the special benefit each assessed parcel will receive from the improvement acquisitions proposed to be financed by AD 02-1. 29600FerI 1-3 8/28/02 On July 19, 2002, the map entitled "PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 (A V ALON/BELSERA/MONTARAffHE WOODS) COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA" (the "AD 02-1 Boundary Map"), consisting of seven (7) sheets, was filed in the office of the City Clerk. On August 27, 2002, the AD 02-1 Boundary Map was filed for record in Book 21 of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts, at pages 123 through 129, in the office of the Kern County Recorder. Reference is made to the AD 02-1 Boundary Map for a detailed description of the AD 02-1 boundaries. Said AD 02-1 Boundary Map being too bulky to be bound with this Engineer's Report, a reduced and not to scale copy is attached as Engineer's Report Appendix A and incorporated herein by reference. The AD 02-1 Boundary Map shows and describes the exterior boundaries of the property proposed to be assessed pursuant to the AD 02-1 proceedings. The assessment district encompasses a composite and consolidated area of about 152 acres. COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT SPECIAL TAX LIEN As of the date of filing this Engineer's Report, it has been confirmed that properties within the Avalon Area, the Belsera Area, and the Montara Area of AD 02-1 are subject to an existing special tax lien created by the Community Facilities District No. 92-1 of the RNR School Financing Authority ("CFD No. 92-1") under the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (the "Mello-Roos Act"). CFD No. 92-1 includes territory from the Rosedale Union School District, the Norris School District, and the Rio Bravo-Greeley Union School District. CFD No. 92-1 special taxes will be used to finance, or used as security for bonds issued to finance, the construction of elementary, middle, and other authorized school facilities within CFD No. 92-1. The maximum bonded indebtedness for CFD No. 92-1 is $350,000,000. 1998 Series A Bonds were issued October 8, 1998, in the aggregate principal amount of $11,995,000. Those 1998 Series A Bonds had an outstanding principal balance effective September 2,2001, of $11,755,000. 2000 Series A Bonds were issued July 27,2000, in the aggregate principal amount of $5,990,000. The payment of principal will begin September 2002 for the 2000 Series A Bonds. 2001 Series A Bonds were issued December 12,2001, in the aggregate principal amount of $6,165,000. The payment of principal will begin September 2002 for the 2001 Series A Bonds. The 1998 Series A Bonds mature September 1, 2028, the 2000 Series A Bonds mature September 1, 2030, and the 2001 Series A Bonds mature September 1,2030. The combined total outstanding principal balance of the 1998 Series A Bonds, the 2000 Series A Bonds, and the 2001 Series A Bonds as of the date this Engineer's Report was filed with the City Clerk is $23,910,000. The CFD No. 92-1 special taxes are payable, however, regardless of whether any bonds are issued. The amount of special taxes, if any, to which property in CFD No. 92-1 is subject varies based upon the zoning, the entitlements, and the type and level of development of such property. As of the date of filing this Engineer's Report, the properties in AD 02-1 are subject to the following CFD No. 92-1 special taxes: No special taxes are collected from property for which no final tract map has been recorded. Upon recordation of a final tract map and if no building permit has been issued for a residential subdivision lot prior to March 1 of the prior fiscal year, a maximum annual special tax, which is currently $117.16 (which may be increased by 2% each fiscal year) per subdivision lot acre of subject property, is payable. Upon the issuance of a single-family residential 29600FerI 1-4 8/28/02 building permit for a lot or parcel prior to March 1 of the prior fiscal year, a one-time special tax, which is currently $1.25 (which may be increased each fiscal year based upon the percentage change in a designated construction cost index) per building square foot, is payable, and such residential lot or parcel is subject to an annual special tax payment, which is currently $459.31 (which may be increased by 2% each fiscal year) per unit. In the alternative, at the time of issuance of such residential building permit, the owner of such parcel may prepay a specified amount, in which case the one-time special tax and annual special tax described above will not be levied on such parcel. The prepayment amount is currently $7,980.98 (which may be increased each fiscal year based upon the percentage change in a designated construction cost index). All AD 02-1 assessed properties have a single-family residential land use designation and, accordingly, the CFD No. 92-1 special taxes for multi-family residential, commercial, and industrial land use designation parcels do not apply to the AD 02-1 assessed parcels, and those special tax rates are not presented in this Engineer's Report. It has also been confirmed that none of the properties in AD 02-1 are within the existing boundaries of the Lakeside Union Elementary School District Community Facilities District for which a special tax and maximum bonded indebtedness amounts were approved in June 1996. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATUS Pursuant to the Municipal Code, the formation of an assessment district is exempt from compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). Accordingly, a Notice of Exemption from CEQA was filed by the City for the AD 02-1 proceedings on July 11, 2002. Separate environmental review proceedings will be conducted for the improvement projects proposed to be financed by AD 02-1, as part of the CEQA compliance associated with the land use entitlement and subdivision approval process within each community area. ENGINEER'S REPORT SUBMITTAL STATEMENT I, Raul M. Rojas, Public Works Director and Superintendent of Streets of the City of Bakersfield, have been appointed the Engineer of Work for AD 02-1 (herein "Engineer of Work") by adoption of City Council Resolution of Intention No. 1276 to do and perform all services in making preliminary surveys, preparing plans, estimating costs, and preparing a diagram and assessment. Pursuant to the provisions of the 1913 Act, and to Section 10204 contained therein, and pursuant to the Municipal Code, including Section 13.08.070 of Chapter 13.08 thereof, and in accordance with Resolution of Intention No. 1276, adopted by the City Council on May 22,2002, being a Resolution of Intention to order the acquisition and/or construction of improvements in AD 02-1 (herein "Resolution of Intention No. 1276"), herewith submit the "Engineer's Report" for AD 02-1 consisting of six parts as follows: 29600FerI 1-5 8/28/02 1. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, MAPS AND DESCRIPTIONS OF IMPROVEMENTS AND LANDS TO BE ACQUIRED: A. Improvements to Be Acquired: At the time this Engineer's Report was being prepared for filing with the City Clerk and for final by the City Council, all of the plans and specifications for the improvement acquisitions to be funded by AD 02-1 had not been completed and/or finally approved by the City Engineer. Therefore, this assessment is based on the cost estimates prepared by SmithTech- USA, Inc., and Quad Knopf, Inc., the civil engineering consultants hired by the District Proponents to design the AD 02-1 improvements to be acquired and/or constructed within the four community areas. Civil engineering consultants SmithTech- USA, Inc., and Quad Knopf, Inc., are hereinafter referred to as the "AD 02-1 Design Engineers." The AD 02-1 Improvement Acquisition Costs are itemized in Engineer's Report Exhibit B, Tables B-II-A through B-II-E, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The improvements funded by AD 02-1 are to be constructed by the District Proponents and acquired by the City, pursuant to those certain City Agreements No. 02-244, No. 02-245, and No. 02-246, Acquisition and Disclosure Agreements, City of Bakersfield Assessment District No. 02-1, between the City and the District Proponents, approved as to form and substance by the City Council by Resolution No. 129-02 on July31, 2002 (the "AD 02-1 Acquisition Agreements"). B. Maps and Descriptions of Lands, Easements, and Rights-of-way to Be Acquired: As of the date of filing this Engineer's Report there were no land, easement, or rights-of-way acquisitions proposed to be financed by AD 02-1. Accordingly, no maps or descriptions have been prepared and filed with the City Engineer. 2. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK AND ACQUISITIONS: A General Description of Work and Acquisitions to be completed pursuant to the AD 02-1 proceedings is included as Section II of this Engineer's Report. The improvement acquisitions within each of the four community areas are also generally shown and described on four maps included in Engineer's Report Exhibit E. 3. ESTIMATE OF TOTAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT ACQUISITION AND INCIDENTAL COSTS: A "Statement of Total Assessment" is presented in Section ill of this report. An itemized breakdown of the estimated total improvement acquisition and incidental costs and expenses, including the estimated cost of preparing, printing, registering, servicing, and collecting bonds issued pursuant to these proceedings, is included in Exhibit B, Table B-1, "Engineer's Estimate of Total Cost and Assessment" ("Table B-I"), attached hereto. 4. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM: 29600FerI 1-6 8/28/02 4. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM: The diagram entitled "ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM OF CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 (A V ALON/BELSERA/MONTARA/THE WOODS), COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA" (the "AD 02-1 Assessment Diagram"), consisting of seven (7) sheets, is on file with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference. Said AD 02-1 Assessment Diagram being too bulky to be bound with this Engineer's Report, a reduced and not to scale copy is attached hereto as Engineer's Report Appendix Band incorporated herein by reference. The AD 02-1 Assessment Diagram shows all of the following: A. The exterior boundaries of AD 02-1; B. The boundaries of the four community areas within AD 02-1; C. The boundaries of existing AD 91-1 for those portions of AD 02-1 that are also located in AD 91-1; and D. By reference to the Maps of the Assessor of the County of Kern and to maps and deeds of record, the lines and dimensions are shown for each separate lot, parcel, and subdivision of land within AD 02-1 as they existed at the time this Engineer's Report was filed with the City Clerk, each lot, parcel, and subdivision of land having been assigned a separate assessment number upon the AD 02-1 Assessment Diagram, which corresponds with the number shown for each parcel on the AD 02-1 Assessment Roll (Exhibit A contained herein). 5. PROPOSED ASSESSMENT AND ASSESSMENT ROLL: A. A proposed assessment of the estimated total improvement acquisition cost and of the incidental expenses in connection with the AD 02-1 proceedings is presented in Section III of this Engineer's Report. B. Assessment Roll: An Assessment Roll for AD 02-1 is attached hereto as Exhibit A. The Assessment Roll shows the exact amount of the total estimated cost of the proposed improvement acquisitions, incidental work, and expense that is assessed upon each of the lots and parcels within AD 02-1. The assessment numbers that appear on the Assessment Roll correspond to the assessment numbers shown on the AD 02-1 Assessment Diagram. 29600FerI 1-7 8/28/02 , 1 I ] ] C. Maximum Annual Parcel Assessment for Recovery of Assessment District Administration Costs and Expenses: Pursuant to Paragraph 3 of Resolution of Intention No. 1276, Section ill of this Engineer's Report includes a statement of the proposed $50.00 maximum annual assessment upon each of the parcels in AD 02-1. The purpose of this separate annual assessment is to pay the costs incurred by the City of Bakersfield, and not otherwise reimbursed, which result from the administration and collection of assessments, from compliance with Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15c2-12 for continuing disclosure requirements, or from the administration and registration of any associated bonds and reserve or other related funds. This maximum annual assessment is proposed to be levied pursuant to Subdivision (f) of Section 10204 of the Streets and Highways Code. 6. ASSESSMENT SPREAD METHOD: A description of the assessment spread method used to apportion a share to each parcel in AD 02-1 of the total estimated cost proposed to be financed for the acquisition and/or construction of improvements and payment of incidental costs is attached hereto as Exhibit D and incorporated herein by reference. DESCRIPTION OF ENGINEER'S REPORT EXHIBITS A, B, AND C Exhibits A, B, and C that are attached to this Engineer's Report include a total of twenty-one (21) tables of AD 02-1 cost estimates and/or assessment spread cost allocations. A brief description of each of the three report exhibits and of the separate tables contained in each exhibit is presented below. Engineer's Report Exhibits A through C have been designed for the purpose of presenting a step-by-step breakdown of how the AD 02-1 total assessment has been spread to the individual parcels that are proposed to be assessed. The Exhibit C tables present separate breakdowns of parcel assessment data based on the Reallocation Method (per Municipal Code Section 13.08.070), and based on the 1913 Act benefit based Assessment Allocation Method (see Engineer's Report Exhibit D for a description of the Assessment Allocation Method and of the Reallocation Method). A third group of Exhibit C tables provides comparisons of the calculated assessment amounts derived in accordance with the Allocation and Reallocation Methods. The exhibits and their tables begin with: 1. A listing in Exhibit A, Assessment Roll, of the exact amount proposed to be assessed to every existing parcel in AD 02-1; then 2. The Exhibit B tables present the major items of total system costs and incidental expenses for all of AD 02-1 (Table B-1), the breakdown of those major items for each of the four community areas in Tables B-II- (A through E) with Table B-II-A summarizing the total improvement, 29600FerI 1-8 8/28/02 contingency, and incidental costs for each project within the separate communities, and Tables B-ll- (B through E) presenting the itemized quantity and cost estimates for the improvement acquisitions in each community area. The Table B-ll- (B through E) group also breaks each project into the separate improvement systems that are the focus of the Allocation Method of assessment spread that is described in Engineer's Report Exhibit D. Table B-ID in Exhibit B is a statement of the costs to payoff the remaining principal balance for one existing parcel assessment confirmed pursuant to AD 91-1 (AD 91-1 Assessment No. 66), including related bond call expenses. Both installments of the affected parcel's shares of the 2001/2002 tax year principal and interest have already been paid. 3. Exhibit Chas thirteen (13) tables that provide a detailed breakdown of individual parcel assessment data as follows: A. Details for parcel assessments calculated using the AD 02-1 Reallocation Method of assessment spread authorized by Municipal Code Section 13.08.070 are presented in Tables C-I and C-ll- (A through D); B. Details for parcel assessments calculated in accordance with the AD 02-1 Allocation Method of assessment spread that is a benefit/cost based assessment spread method are shown in Tables C-ID- (A through D); and C. Tables C-IV - (A through D) present a comparison by community area of the assessments calculated by each of the two spread methods referenced in 3.A and 3.B, above, and described in Exhibit D. 29600FerI 1-9 8/28/02 ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 (A V ALONIBELSERA/MONT ARAffHE WOODS) SECTION II GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK AND ACQUISITIONS PROJECT DESCRIPTION The separate improvement systems to be acquired and their related incidental work and costs eligible for financing pursuant to the AD 02-1 proceedings (hereinafter the "Improvement Acquisitions") are described below. The descriptions of the Improvement Acquisitions and of the termini of the proposed work do not necessarily extend for the full length of their description. The plans and profiles of the Improvement Acquisitions shall be controlling as to their correct and detailed description. I J The general scope of the Improvement Acquisitions includes the acquisition of public infrastructure improvements that will be owned, operated, and maintained by the City, and the payment of certain improvement, assessment proceeding and bond issuance incidental costs and expenses related to the AD 02-1 Improvement Acquisitions and to the assessment proceedings. All of the AD 02-1 Improvement Acquisitions are public infrastructure improvements that are either already required to be installed or are expected by the District Proponents to be required to be installed as conditions of tentative or final subdivision and parcel map approvals, or of land use entitlement approvals within the four AD 02-1 community areas. ¡ As stated in Section I, the AD 02-1 Improvement Acquisitions are proposed to be financed by the City in accordance with the terms and conditions of the AD 02-1 Acquisition Agreements. Those agreements define the specific scope of public infrastructure improvements to be constructed and installed by the District Proponents and, upon their completion, be acquired by the City using funds provided only through the AD 02-1 proceedings. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS, INCIDENTAL WORK, AND ANNUAL ASSESSMENT General descriptions are presented below of the Improvement Acquisitions and of any incidental work and expense to be financed by AD 02-1 that are related to those Improvement Acquisitions or to the AD 02-1 proceedings. A general description of the proposed annual assessment to be levied pursuant to Section 10204(f) of the Streets and Highways Code and to the AD 02-1 proceedings for the recovery of certain costs that may be incurred by the City in future years from the administration of the AD 02-1 bonds and reserve fund or from the administration and collection of annual assessment debt service installments or from compliance with bond issue continuing disclosure requirements is also presented in following portions of this Section II. 29600FerII II-I 8/28/02 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF AD 02-1 IMPROVEMENT ACQUISITIONS The AD 02-1 Improvement Acquisitions include the construction and installation as separate improvement systems of certain City-owned infrastructure improvements, of certain utility improve- ments to be owned and operated by regulated public utility companies, and incidental work described below. The Improvement Acquisitions are to be constructed in accordance with plans and specifica- tions prepared by the AD 02-1 Design Engineers and as approved by the City Engineer. As stated in Section I, the plans and specifications for all of the Improvement Acquisitions had not been completed and/or finally approved by the City Engineer at the time this Engineer's Report was prepared. Accordingly, the following description of work is based on schematic, preliminary, and/or approved plans, quantities, and estimates that have been prepared by the AD 02-1 Design Engineers. The Improvement Acquisitions to be made pursuant to the AD 02-1 proceedings are described below. In addition, the four maps in Engineer's Report Exhibit E, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, show and describe the general location of the several improvement projects, which together comprise the Improvement Acquisitions that are to be financed by AD 02-1. Avalon Area The Avalon Area boundaries encompass a 69-acre block of land that has been approved for subdivision into a storm drain sump and a combined total of 251 R-1lots pursuant to Ten. TR 5968. One of the District Proponents (Bakersfield Avalon, LLC) is the subdivider of Ten. TR 5968. Accordingly, all of the Improvement Acquisitions for the Avalon Area are improvements related to the development of that subdivision and are generally described as frontage improvements in and along Olive Drive and on-site and off-site storm drain improvements that are require~ to be constructed, or are expected by the District Proponent to be required to be constructed, as conditions of approval for that subdivision. The general location and extent of the planned Improvement Acquisitions in Olive Drive include completion from Old Farm Road on the west to the easterly boundary of Ten. TR 5968 of the entire street to its full design width, complete with street paving, curb and gutter, and full hard surface median, and sidewalk and subdivision block wall only on the north side of Olive Drive along the Tract No. 5968 Unit One ("TR 5968-1") frontage. The general location and extent ofthe planned on-site and off-site storm drain Improvement Acquisitions include the construction of 18-, 24-, and 30-inch diameter storm drain pipelines with manholes, a catch basin, an outlet structure, and a storm drain sump excavation with 6-foot high block wall and a 14-foot wide gate. Also included in the scope of the Avalon Area Improvement Acquisitions are District Proponent incidental costs for design engineering, construction staking, soils and materials analysis and testing, and general contractor supervision and overhead, all as itemized in Table B-ll-B in Engineer's Report Exhibit B and as generally shown on Map No. 1 in Engineer's Report Exhibit E, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 29600FerIl ll-2 8/28/02 Belsera Area The Belsera Area boundaries encompass a 20-acre block of land that has been approved for subdivision into a total of 73 R-1lots pursuant to Ten. TR 5831. One of the District Proponents (Centex Homes) is the subdivider of Ten. TR 5831. Accordingly, all of the Improvement Acquisitions in the Belsera Area are improvements related to the development of that subdivision and are generally described as improvements in and along Olive Drive that are required to be constructed, or are expected by the District Proponent to be required to be constructed, as conditions of approval for that subdivision. The general location and extent of the planned Improvement Acquisitions for Olive Drive include completion of the eastbound half of the street (south half of the street) to its full design width from Old Farm Road to the westerly boundary of the Belsera Area complete with street paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, handicap ramps, street signs, street lights, and traffic signal interconnection conduit. Not included in the scope of the Belsera Area Improvement Acquisitions are District Proponent incidental costs for design engineering, construction staking, soils and materials analysis and testing, plan check fees, construction inspection fees, and general contractor supervision and overhead. All Belsera Area Improvement Acquisitions are itemized in Table B-ll-C in Engineer's Report Exhibit B and are generally shown on Map No.2 in Engineer's Report Exhibit E, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Montara Area I I , J ì 1 1 J ¡ I ] The Montara Area boundaries encompass a 23-acre block of land that has been approved for subdivision into a canal lot and a total of 57 R-1lots pursuant to Ten. TR 5829. One of the District Proponents (Centex Homes) is the subdivider ofTen. TR 5829. Accordingly, all of the Improvement Acquisitions for the Montara Area are improvements related to the development of that subdivision and are generally described as improvements in and along Snow Road that are required to be constructed, or are expected by the District Proponent to be required to be constructed, as conditions of approval for that subdivision. The general location and extent of the planned Improvement Acquisitions for Snow Road include the construction of the eastbound half of the street (south half of the street) to its full design width from Jewetta A venue to the westerly boundary of the Montara Area, complete with street paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, handicap ramps, street signs, street lights, and traffic signal interconnection conduit. Not included in the scope of the Montara Area Improvement Acquisitions are District Proponent incidental costs for design engineering, construction staking, soils and materials analysis and testing, plan check fees, construction inspection fees, and general contractor supervision and overhead. All Montara Area Improvement Acquisitions are itemized in Table B-ll-D in Engineer's Report Exhibit B and are generally shown on Map No.3 in Engineer's Report Exhibit E, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The Woods Area The Woods Area boundaries encompass a 40-acre block of land that has been approved for subdivision into four storm drain sump lots and a combined total of 175 R-1lots pursuant to Ten. TR 6066. One of the District Proponents (pSI Developers, LLC) is the subdivider of Ten. TR 6066. 29600FerII ll-3 8/28/02 Þ' Accordingly, all of the Improvement Acquisitions for The Woods Area are improvements related to the development of that subdivision and are generally described as improvements in and along Akers Road and Berkshire Road and in-traction-site storm drain improvements that are required to be constructed, or are expected by the District Proponent to be required to be constructed, as conditions of approval for that subdivision. The general location and extent of the planned Improvement Acquisitions for Akers Road include completion of the southbound half of the street (west half of the street) to its full design width from Berkshire Road to the southerly boundary of The Woods Area, complete with street paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, and subdivision block wall (with retainer where required). The general location and extent of the planned Improvement Acquisitions for Berkshire Road include completion of the eastbound half of the street (south half of the street) to its full design width from Akers Road to the westerly boundary of The Woods Area, complete with street paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, and approximately 1,225 feet of 6-inch diameter sanitary sewer pipeline with manholes and a tie-in. The general location and extent of the planned in-traction-site Improvement Acquisitions include the construction of approximately 80 feet of 24-inch diameter storm drain pipeline with a manhole and an outlet structure, and chain link fence with redwood slats and 6-inch by 18-inch concrete footing and 14-foot wide gate for an on-site storm drain sump. Also included in the scope of The Woods Area Improvement Acquisitions are District Proponent incidental costs for design engineering, construction staking, and soils and materials analysis and testing, all as itemized in Table B-ll-E in Engineer's Report Exhibit B and as generally shown on Map No.4 in Engineer's Report Exhibit E, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF AD 02-1 IMPROVEMENT AND ASSESSMENT PROCEEDING INCIDENTAL WORK AND EXPENSE The total cost proposed to be financed by AD 02-1 includes work to be performed and fees or expenses to be paid that are incidental to the construction of the separate improvement system acquisitions. In addition, the cost and expense related to the conduct by the City of the AD 02-1 proceedings and to the issuance and sale of bonds to finance the total assessed cost not paid by the property owners and/or not paid by public agency contributions are also proposed to be financed by AD 02-1. The incidental costs and expenses proposed to be funded by AD 02-1 are described as follows: A. The acquisition of all rights of way, easements, franchises, licenses, and permits, and the construction of all auxiliary work, and the payment of all incidental expenses necessary and/or convenient to the accomplishment of the foregoing and for the conduct of special assessment proceedings and the issuance of special assessment bonds, as may be approved by the City, for the financing of all or a portion of the foregoing, including, but not limited to, the incidental expense to cover the estimated cost of preparing, printing, registering, servicing, and collecting the improvement bonds proposed to be issued to represent the assessments, and the incidental expense to cover the estimated cost during the first two years following issuance of any bonds for City compliance with Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15c2-12 for continuing disclosure requirements, as may be applied to any AD 02-1 bonds issued by the City; 29600Ferß ll-4 8/28/02 B. The payment and/or reimbursement to the City and to the District Proponents of 1) all eligible sums under the Streets and Highways Code advanced by the City, including all associated City incurred district formation and assessment proceeding administration costs and expenses, and 2) all eligible sums under the Streets and Highways Code and pursuant to the AD 02-1 Acquisition Agreements advanced by the District Proponents, including all costs advanced for the preparation of construction plans for the Improvement Acquisitions; and C. The funding of not to exceed one (1) year's capitalized interest on any bonds issued in the amount of the unpaid assessments, where said bonds are to be issued pursuant to the Municipal Code and to the 1915 Act. All of the foregoing improvement acquisitions, incidental work and expense shall be made and done pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code and the 1913 Act. i ~ ¡ GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ANNUAL ASSESSMENT Section ill of this Engineer's Report also includes a "Statement of Maximum Annual Parcel Assessment for Recovery of Assessment District Administration Cost and Expenses." The purpose of the proposed $50.00 annual assessment is to pay costs incurred by the City from the administration and collection of assessments, from compliance' with Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15c2-12 for continuing disclosure, or from the administration or registration of any associated bonds and reserve or other related funds, pursuant to Subdivision (f) of Section 10204 of the Streets and Highways Code. 29600FerII ll-5 8/28/02 I I ¡ I 1 ¡ I ¡ I 'j ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 (A V ALONIBELSERA/MONT ARAffHE WOODS) SECTION III PROPOSED ASSESSMENT OF ESTIMATED IMPROVEMENT ACQUISITION COSTS AND EXPENSES REPORT REQUIREMENTS On May 22, 2002, the City Council, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code and of the 1913 Act, adopted its Resolution ofIntention No. 1276 declaring its intention to order the acquisition and/or construction of the improvements described in the foregoing Engineer's Report Section IT, to levy a special assessment on each parcel of land benefited by the Improvement Acquisitions and to levy a maximum annual assessment pursuant to Subdivision (f) of Section 10204 of the Streets and Highways Code. The Subdivision (f) declaration provides for the levy of an annual assessment upon each of the parcels of land in AD 02-1 to recover costs incurred by the City and not otherwise reimbursed, resulting from the administration and collection of assessments and from the administration or registration of any associated reserve or other related funds. Resolution of Intention No. 1276 further declares that the lands within the exterior boundaries shown on the AD 02-1 Boundary Map shall be designated CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA (A V ALONIBELSERA/MONT ARAffHE WOODS) Resolution ofIntention No. 1276 appointed the City Public Works Director as the Engineer of Work for AD 02-1 and directed him to make and file the report ("Engineer's Report") required by Section 1 0204 of the Streets and Highways Code. The Engineer's Report requirements set forth in Section 10204 of the Streets and Highways Code are summarized in Section I of this report under the subsection entitled "Engineer's Report Submittal Statement." Reference is made to Resolution of Intention No. 1276 and to the general description of the improvements proposed to be acquired and/or constructed, as presented in Section IT of this Engineer's Report, for more detailed information on the declared intention of the City Council for conduct of the AD 02-1 assessment proceedings. 29600FerIII III-I 8/28/02 PROPOSED ASSESSMENT OF ESTIMATED IMPROVEMENT ACQUISITION COSTS AND EXPENSES { 1 NOW, THEREFORE, I, Raul M. Rojas, the duly appointed Engineer ofW ork for AD 02-1, by virtue of the power vested in me under the Municipal Code and under the 1913 Act and the order of the City Council, as set forth in Resolution ofIntention No. 1276, hereby make the following assessment to cover the portion of the estimated cost of the acquisition and/or construction of improvements and the costs and expenses incidental thereto to be paid by AD 02-1: 1 I [ 1 1 I ¡ I ¡ 1. :The amount to be paid by AD 02-1 for the acquisition and/or construction of improvements, and the expenses incidental thereto is generally as shown in the following Statement of Total Assessment: STATEMENT OF TOTAL ASSESSMENT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 (A V ALONIBELSERAJMONTARA/THE WOODS) Assessment Amount As Preliminarily ConfIrmed Approved 07/31/02 Assessment Amount A. Acquisition Cost of Improvements, Contingency and Incidental Expense by Community Area (Exhibit B, Table B-1, Items 1-4) 1. Avalon Area $ 708,555.80 $ 708,555.80 2. Belsera Area $ 192,035.75 $ 192,035.75 3. Montara Area $ 181,262.68 $ 181,262.68 4 The Woods Area $ 329.158.03 $ 329.158.03 5. Subtotal Acquisition Cost $ 1,411,012.26 $ 1,411,012.26 B. Payoff of Existing AD 91-1 Assessments (Table B-1, Item 6) $ 14.925.85 $ 14.925.00 C. Subtotal $ 1,425,938.11 $ 1,425,938.11 D. Assessment Proceeding Cost and Expense (Table B-1, Item 8) $ 228.543.14 $ 228.543.14 E. Subtotal $ 1,654,481.25 $ 1,654,481.25 Deduct Contributions and Cash Collections $ 0.00 $ 0.00 G. Subtotal Cost to 1915 Act Bond Financing $ 1,654,481.25 $ 1,654,481.25 29600FerID ill-2 8/28/02 Assessment Amount As Preliminarily A01?roved 07/31/02 H. 1915 Act Bond Issuance Cost and Reserve (Table B-1, Item 12) 1. Bond Discount $ 2. Capitalized Bond Issue Interest $ 3. Bond Reserve Fund $ 4. Subtotal 1915 Act Bond Issuance Cost & Reserve $ 25,125.00 129,393.75 201.000.00 355,518.75 I. Total Amount Assessed (Table B-1, Item 13) $ 2.010.000.00 $ 998,779.10 $ 270,693.27 $ 255,507.57 $ 485,020.06 1. Avalon Area 2. Belsera Area 3. Montara Area 4. The Woods Area Confirmed Assessment Amount $ 25,125.00 $ 129,393.75 $ 201.000.00 $ 355,518.75 $ 2.010.000.00 $ 998,779.10 $ 270,693.27 $ 255,507.57 $ 485,020.06 A detailed breakdown of the itemized costs for the acquisition and/or construction of improvements, and expenses incidental thereto is presented in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 2. Pursuant to the provisions of law and of Resolution of Intention No. 1276, I have assessed the total amount of the cost of the acquisition and/or construction of improvements and of the expenses incidental thereto upon the several parcels of land liable therefor and hereinafter numbered to correspond with the numbers shown on the attached AD 02-1 Assessment Diagram, all as is more particularly set forth in the Assessment Roll, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. The numbers on the Assessment Roll correspond with the numbers assigned to each respective parcel as shown on the AD 02-1 Assessment Diagram. Each subdivision of land assessed is described within the Assessment Roll by reference to its parcel number as shown on the Assessor's Maps of the County of Kern for the fiscal year 200112002, or by reference to maps and deeds of record on file in the office of the County Recorder of said County. I . j ¡ J I I ¡ j J For a more particular description of the manner in which the Estimated Total Improvement Acquisition Cost and Incidental Expenses have been assessed upon the several parcels of land in AD 02-1, reference is made to the Description of Assessment Spread Method, attached hereto as Exhibit D and incorporated herein by reference. 3. As required by the 1913 Act, the AD 02-1 Assessment Diagram is on file in the office of the City Clerk and is attached hereto in reduced, not to scale form, as Appendix B and incorporated herein by reference. For a more particular description of the AD 02-1 exterior boundaries, reference is made to the AD 02-1 Boundary Map on file in the office of the City Clerk, attached hereto in reduced and not to scale form as Appendix A and incorporated herein by reference. 29600Ferill ill-3 8/28/02 STATEMENT OF MAXIMUM ANNUAL PARCEL ASSESSMENT FOR RECOVERY OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION COSTS AND EXPENSES Pursuant to Subdivision (f) of Section 10204 of the Streets and Highways Code, I present the following statement of a proposed maximum annual assessment upon each parcel and subdivision of land in AD 02-1, in the amount of $50.00. Said annual assessment shall be levied by the City Council to pay various costs and expenses incurred from time to time by the City and not otherwise reimbursed, which result from the administration and collection of assessment installments, from compliance with Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15c2-12 for continuing disclosure requirements, or from the administration or registration of the improvement bonds and the various funds and accounts pertaining thereto. The City Council shall determine, by resolution, the amount of the annual assessment for this purpose, which shall not exceed the maximum assessment stated above and shall not exceed a reasonable estimate of costs actually incurred. The above stated maximum annual assessment amount shall be separate from and in addition to any fee charged to property owners in AD 02-1 by the City, pursuant to Sections 8682 and 8682.1 of the Streets and Highways Code. [Remainder of page intentionally left blank] 29600FerID III-4 8/28/02 BOND DECLARATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that pursuant to Resolution of Intention No. 1276 serial and/or term bonds representing the unpaid assessments, and bearing interest at a rate not to exceed twelve percent (12%) per annum, will be issued in the manner provided by the 1915 Act, and the last installment of the bonds shall mature in not to exceed twenty-four (24) years from the second day of September next succeeding twelve (12) months from their date. The provisions of Part 11.1 ofthe 1915 Act providing a procedure for the collection of assessments and advance retirement of bonds shall apply. 1 The total amount assessed pursuant to the AD 02-1 proceedings includes an incidental expense to ¡ cover the estimated cost of preparing, printing, registering, servicing, and collecting the improvement bonds proposed to be issued pursuant to the 1915 Act to represent any unpaid assessments. This AD 02-1 Engineer's Report was filed in the office of the City Clerk on July 19, 2002, for preliminary approval on July 31, 2002, pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 128-02. This Engineer's Report was filed with the City Clerk on September 6, 2002, for final consideration and approval by the City Council after the close of the hearing scheduled for September 18, 2002. The proposed AD 02-1 "final" assessment amount is shown in the preceding "Statement of Total Assessment" in Engineer's Report Section ill on pages ill-2 and ill-3, under the "Confirmed Assessment Amount" column, and the individual parcel proposed "final" assessment amounts are shown in Exhibit A, Assessment Roll, under the "Confirmed Assessment Amount" column. Pursuant to the finding of the AD 02-1 Assessment Engineer, as stated in Engineer's Report Exhibit D, Description of Assessment Spread Method, the proposed Assessment Reallocation Method is in general conformance with the requirements of Municipal Code Section 13.08.070. Therefore, the undersigned recommends that the AD 02-1 Engineer's Report be approved by the City Council as the Final Report, that the parcel assessments shown herein be levied, and the proposed improvements and/or acquisitions financed by AD 02-1 be ordered. h~__ Raul M. Rojas, Public Works Director and Engineer of Work, City of Bakersfield, Assessment District No. 02-1 29600Ferill ill-5 8/28/02 ,..~ ~~ ~ ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 (A V ALONIBELSERAlMONTARAlTHE WOODS) EXHIBIT A ASSESSMENT ROLL EXHIBIT A ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO, 02-1 COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT ROLL ASSESSOR'S TAX PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED NUMBER IATN) / ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PROPERTY OWNER AMOUNT AMOUNT H, Arthur Davis and Annette L. Davis, Trustees of PARCEL MAP NO, 9826; PARCE,L 6 the Davis Family Trust and Vincent J. Hashim and $557,087,94 $557,087,94 Anita B. Hashim, Trustees of the Hashim Family Trust 2 REMAINDER OF PARCEL C IN LLA 51-00 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $151,209.58 $151,209,58 3 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 1 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979.20 $3,979,20 4 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 2 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979.20 $3,979,20 5 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 3 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979.20 6 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 4 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979,20 7 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 5 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979.20 8 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 6 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979,20 9 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 7 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979,20 10 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 8 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979,20 11 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 9 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979.20 12 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 1 0 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979,20 13 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 11 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979.20 $3,979,20 14 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 12 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979,20 15 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 13 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979,20 16 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 14 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979.20 17 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 15 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979,20 18 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 16 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979,20 19 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 17 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979,20 20 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 18 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979,20 21 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT19 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979.20 22 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT20 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979.20 $3,979,20 23 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT21 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979.20 $3,979.20 24 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 22 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979,20 25 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT23 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979,20 26 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT24 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979,20 27 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 25 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979,20 28 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT26 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979.20 $3,979,20 29 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT27 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979.20 $3,979,20 30 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT28 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979.20 31 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT29 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979.20 32 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT30 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979.20 33 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT31 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979.20 $3,979.20 34 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT32 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979,20 35 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT33 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979.20 $3,979,20 36 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT34 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979,20 37 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 35 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979,20 38 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 36 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979.20 39 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 37 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,19 $3,979.19 40 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 1 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979,20 41 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 2 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979,20 42 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 3 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979.20 $3,979,20 43 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 4 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979.20 $3,979,20 44 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 5 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979.20 45 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 6 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979.20 $3,979.20 46 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 7 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979,20 47 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 8 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979,20 48 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 9 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979,20 49 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 10 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979,20 50 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 11 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979.20 51 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 12 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979,20 52 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 13 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979,20 53 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 14 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979.20 $3,979.20 54 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 15 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979,20 55 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 16 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979,20 56 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 17 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979.20 $3,979,20 57 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 18 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979.20 $3,979,20 58 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 19 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979.20 $3,979.20 59 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 20 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979,20 60 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 21 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979.20 $3,979.20 61 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 22 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979,20 62 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 23 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979.20 $3,979.20 63 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 24 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979,20 64 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 25 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979,20 65 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 26 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979,20 66 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 27 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979.20 67 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 28 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979.20 $3,979,20 68 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 29 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979.20 $3,979,20 69 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 30 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979.20 $3,979.20 70 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 31 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979,20 71 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 32 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979,20 72 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 33 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979.20 73 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 34 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979,20 74 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 35 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979,20 $3,979.20 75 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 36 BAKERSFIELD AVALON, LLC $3,979.19 $3,979,19 29600EXA A-1 08/28/2002 29600EXA EXHIBIT A ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO, 02-1 COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT ROLL ASSESSOR'S TAX NUMBER (A TN) / PROPERTY DESCRIPTION TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 1 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 2 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 3 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 4 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 5 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 6 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 7 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 8 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 9 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOnO TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 11 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 12 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 13 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 14 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 15 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 16 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 17 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 18 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOn9 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT20 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT21 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT22 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT23 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 24 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT25 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT26 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 27 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT28 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT29 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT30 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 31 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 32 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 33 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 34 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 35 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 36 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT37 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 38 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 39 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 40 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 41 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 42 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 43 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 44 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 45 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 46 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 47 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 48 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 49 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 50 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 51 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 52 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 53 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 54 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 55 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 56 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 57 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 58 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 59 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT60 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT61 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT62 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT63 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT64 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT65 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT66 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 67 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT68 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT69 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT70 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT71 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO.4; L0T72 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO.4; L0T73 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT 1 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 2 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 3 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT 4 PROPERTY OWNER CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES CENTEX HOMES A-2 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT AMOUNT $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708.13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708.13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708.13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708.13 $3,708.13 $3,708.13 $3,708.13 $3,708,13 $3,708.13 $3,708,13 $3,708.13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708.13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708.13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708.13 $3,708.13 $3,708.13 $3,708,13 $3,708.13 $3,708.13 $3,708.13 $3,708,13 $3,708.13 $3,708.13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708.13 $3,708.13 $3,708,13 $3,708.13 $3,708,13 $3,708.13 $3,708.13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708.13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708.13 $3,707.91 $4,482,59 $4,482.59 $4,482,59 $4,482,59 CONFIRMED ASSESSMENT AMOUNT $3,708.13 $3,708.13 $3,708.13 $3,708.13 $3,708,13 $3,708.13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708.13 $3,708.13 $3,706,13 $3,708,13 $3,708.13 $3,708,13 $3,708.13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708.13 $3,708.13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708.13 $3,708.13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708.13 $3,708.13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708.13 $3,708.13 $3,708,13 $3,708.13 $3,708,13 $3,708.13 $3,708.13 $3,708.13 $3,708.13 $3,708.13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708.13 $3,708.13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708.13 $3,708.13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708.13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708.13 $3,708,13 $3,708.13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708,13 $3,708.13 $3,707.91 $4,482,59 $4,482,59 $4,482,59 $4,482,59 08/28/2002 EXHIBIT A ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 , COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ! ASSESSMENT ROLL ASSESSOR'S TAX PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED ASSESSMENT NUMBER (ATN)/ ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT NUMBER PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PROPERTY OWNER AMOUNT AMOUNT 153 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 5 CENTEX HOMES $4,482,59 $4,482,59 154 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 6 CENTEX HOMES $4,482,59 $4,482,59 155 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT 7 CENTEX HOMES $4,482,59 $4,482.59 156 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 8 CENTEX HOMES $4,482,59 $4,482,59 157 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 9 CENTEX HOMES $4,482,59 $4,482,59 158 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 10 CENTEX HOMES $4,482,59 $4,482,59 159 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 11 CENTEX HOMES $4,482,59 $4,482.59 160 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 12 CENTEX HOMES $4,482,59 $4,482,59 161 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 13 CENTEX HOMES $4,482,59 $4,482,59 162 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT 14 CENTEX HOMES $4,482,59 $4,482.59 163 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 15 CENTEX HOMES $4,482,59 $4,482,59 164 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 16 CENTEX HOMES $4,482,59 $4,482.59 165 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 17 CENTEX HOMES $4,482,59 $4,482,59 166 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 18 CENTEX HOMES $4,482.59 $4,482,59 167 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 19 CENTEX HOMES $4,482,59 $4,482,59 168 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT20 CENTEX HOMES $4,482.59 $4,482.59 169 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT21 CENTEX HOMES $4,482.59 $4,482,59 170 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT22 CENTEX HOMES $4,482,59 $4,482.59 171 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT23 CENTEX HOMES $4,482,59 $4,482.59 172 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT24 CENTEX HOMES $4,482,59 $4,482.59 173 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT 25 CENTEX HOMES $4,482,59 $4,482,59 174 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT26 CENTEX HOMES $4,482,59 $4,482,59 175 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT27 CENTEX HOMES $4,482,59 $4,482,59 176 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT28 CENTEX HOMES $4,482.59 $4,482,59 177 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT29 CENTEX HOMES $4,482,59 $4,482,59 178 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT30 CENTEX HOMES $4,482,59 $4,482,59 179 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT 31 CENTEX HOMES $4,482,59 $4,482,59 180 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT32 CENTEX HOMES $4,482,59 $4,482,59 181 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT 33 CENTEX HOMES $4,482,59 $4,482,59 182 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT34 CENTEX HOMES $4,482.59 $4,482,59 183 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 35 CENTEX HOMES $4,482,59 $4,482,59 184 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT 36 CENTEX HOMES $4,482,59 $4,482,59 185 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT 37 CENTEX HOMES $4,482,59 $4,482,59 186 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 38 CENTEX HOMES $4,482.59 $4,482.59 187 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT 39 CENTEX HOMES $4,482,59 $4,482,59 188 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 40 CENTEX HOMES $4,482.59 $4,482,59 189 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 41 CENTEX HOMES $4,482,59 $4,482,59 190 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 42 CENTEX HOMES $4,482.59 $4,482,59 191 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT 43 CENTEX HOMES $4,482.59 $4,482,59 192 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 44 CENTEX HOMES $4,482.59 $4,482,59 193 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT 45 CENTEX HOMES $4,482,59 $4,482,59 194 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 46 CENTEX HOMES $4,482.59 $4,482,59 195 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 47 CENTEX HOMES $4,482,59 $4,482,59 196 TRACT ~. 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT 48 CENTEX HOMES $4,482.59 $4,482,59 197 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT 49 CENTEX HOMES $4,482.59 $4,482,59 198 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 50 CENTEX HOMES $4,482,59 $4,482,59 199 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 51 CENTEX HOMES $4,482,59 $4,482,59 200 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 52 CENTEX HOMES $4,482.59 $4,482,59 201 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 53 CENTEX HOMES $4,482,59 $4,482,59 202 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT 54 CENTEX HOMES $4,482,59 $4,482,59 203 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 55 CENTEX HOMES $4,482.59 $4,482,59 204 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT 56 CENTEX HOMES $4,482,59 $4,482,59 205 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 57 CENTEX HOMES $4,482,53 $4,482,53 206 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT A CENTEX HOMES $0,00 $0.00 207 REMAINDER OF 515-040-13 FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC $327,042,10 $327,042,10 208 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 1 FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC $2,771.54 $2,771.54 209 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 2 FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC $2,771.54 $2,771,54 210 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 3 FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC $2,771,54 $2,771.54 211 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 4 FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC $2,771,54 $2,771.54 212 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 5 FSI DEVELOPERS, LLC $2,771,54 $2,771,54 213 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 6 FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC $2,771,54 $2,771.54 214 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 7 FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC $2,771,54 $2,771,54 215 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 8 FSI DEVELOPERS, LLC $2,771,54 $2,771,54 216 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 9 FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC $2,771,54 $2,771,54 217 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 10 FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC $2,771,54 $2,771,54 218 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 11 FSI DEVELOPERS, LLC $2,771,54 $2,771,54 219 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 12 FSI DEVELOPERS, LLC $2,771,54 $2,771,54 220 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 13 FSI DEVELOPERS, LLC $2,771,54 $2,771.54 221 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 14 FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC $2,771,54 $2,771,54 222 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 15 FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC $2,771,54 $2,771,54 223 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 16 FSI DEVELOPERS, LLC $0.00 $0,00 224 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 17 FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC $0.00 $0.00 225 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 18 FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC $0,00 $0,00 226 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 19 FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC $0,00 $0,00 227 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT20 FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC $2,771,54 $2,771,54 228 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT21 FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC $2,771.54 $2,771,54 229 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT22 FSI DEVELOPERS, LLC $2,771,54 $2,771,54 29600EXA A-3 08/28/2002 r) EXHIBIT A ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO, 02-1 COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT ROLL [ASSESSOR'S TAX A, SSESSMENT NUMBER (ATN)/ NUMBER PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 230 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT23 231 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT24 232 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 25 233 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 26 234 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT27 235 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT28 236 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT29 237 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 30 238 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT31 239 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT32 240 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT33 241 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; L0T34 242 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 35 243 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT36 244 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT37 245 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 38 246 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 39 247 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 40 248 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 41 249 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 42 250 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 43 251 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 44 252 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 45 253 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 46 254 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 47 255 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 48 256 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 49 257 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 50 258 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 51 259 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 52 260 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 53 261 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 54 262 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 55 263 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 56 264 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 57 265 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 58 266 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 59 267 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT60 268 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT_O.N~T61 AVALON AREA TOTAL (Assessment Nos. 1 through 75); BELSERA AREA TOTAL (Assessment Nos, 76 through 148): MONTARAAREA TOTAL (Assessment Nos. 149 through 206): THE WOODS AREA TOT~ssment Nos, 207 _~hrough 268): TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: PROPERTY OWNER FSI DEVELOPERS, LLC FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC FStDEVELOPERS,LLC FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC FSI DEVELOPERS, LLC FSI DEVELOPERS, LLC FSI DEVELOPERS, LLC FSI DEVELOPERS, LLC FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC FSIDEVELOPERS,LLC FSIDEVELOP~~~~LC PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT AMOUNT $2,771,54 $2,771.54 $2,771.54 $2,771,54 $2,771.54 $2,771,54 $2,771,54 $2,771.54 $2,771,54 $2,771,54 $2,771,54 $2,771,54 $2,771,54 $2,771.54 $2,771.54 $2,771,54 $2,771,54 $2,771,54 $2,771,54 $2,771.54 $2,771,54 $2,771.54 $2,771.54 $2,771.54 $2,771,54 $2,771,54 $2,771,54 $2,771,54 $2,771.54 $2,771,54 $2,771.54 $2,771,54 $2,771.54 $2,771.54 $2,771,54 $2,771,54 $2,771,54 $2,771,54 $2,771,72 $998,779,10 $270,693,27 $255,507,57 $485,020.06 $2,010,000.00 CONFIRMED ASSESSMENT AMOUNT $2,771.54 $2,771.54 $2,771,54 $2,771.54 $2,771,54 $2,771,54 $2,771,54 $2,771.54 $2,771.54 $2,771,54 $2,771.54 $2,771,54 $2,771,54 $2,771,54 $2,771,54 $2,771,54 $2,771.54 $2,771.54 $2,771,54 $2,771,54 $2,771,54 $2,771.54 $2,771.54 $2,771.54 $2,771,54 $2,771.54 $2,771,54 $2,771,54 $2,771.54 $2,771.54 $2,771,54 $2,771,54 $2,771.54 $2,771,54 $2,771.54 $2,771.54 $2,771,54 $2,771,54 $2,771.72 $998,779,10 $270,693.27 $255,507,57 $485,020,06 $2,010,000.00 NOTES: 1. PARCEL MAP NO. 9826 WAS FILED AUGUST 16, 1992, IN BOOK 44 OF PARCEL MAPS, AT PAGES 131 THROUGH 132, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF KERN (KC,R), 2. CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO, 51-00 WAS RECORDED SEPTEMBER 27, 2000, AS DOCUMENT NO. 0200120365 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE KERN COUNTY RECORDER 3, TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO, 3 WAS RECORDED AUGUST 6,2002, IN BOOK 48 OF MAPS, AT PAGES 151 THROUGH 153, KC,R 4, TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO, 4 WAS RECORDED AUGUST 6,2002, IN BOOK 48 OF MAPS, AT PAGES 154 THROUGH 155, KC,R 5, TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT ONE WAS RECORDED ,2002, IN BOOK 48 OF MAPS, AT PAGES _ THROUGH _' KC,R 6. TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO WAS RECORDED ,2002, IN BOOK 48 OF MAPS, AT PAGES _ THROUGH _' KC,R, 7, TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE WAS RECORDED ,2002, IN BOOK 48 OF MAPS, AT PAGES _ THROUGH _, KC,R I· PREPARED BY: WILSON & ASSOCIATES FRESNO, CALIFORNIA <1 () APPROVED BY: l1- ~.:r. W~ EDWARD J, WILSON, RC.E. 23269 (EXPIRES 12-31-05) 29600EXA A-4 f1 _0:::._0L- DATE: '1. ~ 08/28/2002 tl 'l ENGINEER'S, REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 (A V ALONIBELSERÀlMONTARAlTHE WOODS) EXHIBIT B TABLE B-1 Ëngineer's Estimate of Total Cost and Assessment TABLES B-II Engineer's Itemized Estimate of Improvement Acquisition Cost-. TABLE B-II-A Summary of A valonArea,Belsera Area, Montara Area, and The Woods Area Improvements to Be Acquired TABLEB-II-B Avalon Area (Tract No. 5968) Improvements to Be Acquired TABLE B-II~C BelseraArea (Tract No. 5831Unit No.4) Improvements.to Be Acquired TABLE B..II-DMontara Area (TractNo. 5829 Unit No.3) Improvements To Be Acquired TABLE B-II..E The Woods'Area (Tract No. ,6066) · Improvements to Be Acquired TABLEB-III-A Payoff Calculation for Assessment District No. 91-1 Assessment ~o. 66, Payoff Costs Assessed to TheW oods Area 'of Assessment District No. 02-1 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-1 ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE OF TOTAL COST AND ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION (Note: See Tables 8-11 for improvement cost details) 1. AVALON AREA (TRACT NO. 5968) IMPROVEMENT COST A IMPROVEMENTS B. CONTINGENCY C.INCIDENTALS D. TOTAL AVALON AREA IMPROVEMENT COST 2. BELSERA AREA (TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4) IMPROVEMENT COST A. IMPROVEMENTS B. CONTINGENCY C.INCIDENTALS D. TOTAL BELSERA AREA IMPROVEMENT COST 3. MONTARA AREA (TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO.3) IMPROVEMENT COST A IMPROVEMENTS B. CONTINGENCY C.INCIDENTALS D. TOTAL MONT ARA AREA IMPROVEMENT COST 4. THE WOODS AREA (TRACT NO. 6066) IMPROVEMENT COST A IMPROVEMENTS B. CONTINGENCY C.INCIDENTALS D. TOTAL THE WOODS AREA IMPROVEMENT COST 5. TOTAL COST OF IMPROVEMENTS, CONTINGENCY, AND INCIDENTALS A IMPROVEMENTS B. CONTINGENCY C.INCIDENTALS D. TOTAL COST OF IMPROVEMENTS, CONTINGENCY, AND INCIDENTALS 6. PAYOFF OF EXISTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 91-1 ASSESSMENTS A AVALON AREA B. BELSERA AREA C. MONTARA AREA D. THE WOODS AREA E. TOTAL PAYOFF OF EXISTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 91 ~1 ASSESSMENTS 7. TOTAL COST OF IMPROVEMENT, CONTINGENCY, INCIDENTALS, AND ADDITIONAL FEES/COST (PAYOFFS) A AVALON AREA B. BELSERA AREA C. MONTARA AREA D. THE WOODS AREA E. TOTAL COST OF IMPROVEMENTS, CONTINGENCY, INCIDENTALS AND ADDITIONAL FEES/COST (PAYOFFS) 29600B1 B-I-1 $603,092.00 $0.00 $105,463.80 $708,555.80 $192,035.75 $0.00 $0.00 $192,035.75 $164,784.25 $16,478.43 $0.00 $181,262.68 $288,932.75 $0.00 $40,225.28 $329,158.03 $1,248,844.75 $16,478.43 $145,689.08 $1,411,012.26 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $14,925.85 $14,925.85 $708,555.80 $192,035.75 $181,262.68 $344,083.88 $1,425,938.11 $603,092.00 $0.00 $105,463.80 $708,555.80 $192,035.75 $0.00 $0.00 $192,035.75 $164,784.25 $16,478.43 $0.00 $181,262.68 $288,932.75 $0.00 $40,225.28 $329,158.03 ?~ $1,248,844.75 $16,478.43 $145,689.08 $1,411,012.26 .(Þ( $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $14,925.85 $14,925.85 $708,555.80 $192,035.75 $181,262.68 $344,083.88 $1,425,938.11 08/28/2002 . ~\. ç>! ,\\\. ~- \? .\ \'ì-:J i);'G\/ EXHIBIT B TABLE B-1 ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE OF TOTAL COST AND ASSESSMENT ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION (Note: See Tables 8-11 for improvement cost details) 8. ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT DISTRICT P~ _C,QST AND EXPENSE A. AS~SSMENT ENGINEER B. BOND COUNSEL C. APPRAISAL D. BOND ISSUANCE EXPENSES 1. Bond and Other Printing 2. Bond Administration and Registration 3, Legal Publications, Notices, Recording, and Mailing 4. Auditor's Record 5. CDAC, MSRB, PSA Fees 6. Disclosure Counsel 7. Continuing Disclosure Compliance (First Two Years After Issue) 8. TOTAL BOND ISSUANCE EXPENSE E. ENVIRONMENTAL APPROVAL PROCESSING F. CITY ASSESSMENT PROCEEDING COST AND PROJECT CONSTRUCTION AND ACQUISITION ADMINISTRATION 1. City Assessment Proceeding Cost 2. Project Construction and Acquisition Administration (1% of Improvement Cost and Contingency; Items 5.A and 5.B) 3, TOTAL CITY ASSESSMENT PROCEEDING COST AND PROJECT CONSTRUCTION & ACQUISITION ADMINISTRATION G. TOTAL ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PROCEEDING COST AND EXPENSE H. ALLOCATION OF TOTAL ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT PROCEEDING COST AND EXPENSE TO EACH DEVELOPMENT AREA 1. AVALON AREA 2, BELSERA AREA 3. MONTARA AREA 4. THE WOODS AREA 9. SUBTOTAL COST TO ASSESSMENT A. AVALON AREA B. BELSERA AREA C. MONTARA AREA D. THE WOODS AREA E. SUBTOTAL COST TO ASSESSMENT 10. DEDUCT CONTRIBUTIONS AND CASH COLLECTIONS TO REDUCE ASSESSMENT A. AVALON AREA B. BELSERA AREA C. MONTARA AREA D. THE WOODS AREA E. TOTAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND CASH COLLECTIONS TO REDUCE ASSESSMENT 29600B1 B-I-2 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT /$64,000.00 / $30,000.00 /' $30,000.00 )$15,000.00 Pj / $5,OOQ.00 10 -" $3,000.00 II /' $5,000.00 } J / $402.00 13 /' $27,000.00 I tl . ;;..-$15,000.00 ,~ $70,402.00 $0.00 /$21A88.14 /$12,653.00 $34,141.14 $228,543.14 $113,564.24 $30,778.65 $29,051.99 $55,148.26 $822,120.04 $222,814.40 $210,314.67 $399,232.14 $1,654,481.25 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 CONFIRMED ASSESSMENT $64,000.00 $30,000.00 ¡ ,".- $30,000.00 \..~ '?,~ $15,000.00 $5,000.00 $3,000.00 $5,000.00 "l $402.00 V'V $27,000.00 PwL~'2r rÁ $15,000.00 $70,402.00 $0.00 $21,488.14 $12,653.00 $34,141.14 ~ $228,543.14 $113,564.24 $30,778.65 $29,051.99 $55,148.26 $822,120.04 $222,814.40 $210,314.67 $399,232.14 $1,654,481.25 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 08/28/2002 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-1 ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE OF TOTAL COST AND ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION (Note: See Tables 8-11 for improvement cost details) 11. TOTAL COST ASSESSED TO 1915 ACT BOND ISSUANCE AFTER CONTRIBUTIONS AND CASH COLLECTIONS A. AVALON AREA B. BELSERA AREA C. MONT ARA AREA D. THE WOODS AREA E. TOTAL COST ASSESSED TO 1915 ACT BOND ISSUANCE AFTER CONTRIBUTIONS AND CASH COLLECTIONS 12.1915 ACT BOND ISSUANCE COST AND RESERVE A. BOND DISCOUNT B. CAPITALIZED INTEREST C. BOND RESERVE FUND D. TOTAL 1915 ACT BOND ISSUANCE COST AND RESERVE E. ALLOCATION OF TOTAL 1915 ACT BOND ISSUANCE COST AND RESERVE TO EACH DEVELOPMENT AREA 1. AVALON AREA 2. BELSERA AREA 3. MONT ARA AREA 4. THE WOODS AREA 13. TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED (Add Lines 11.E. and 12.0.) ALLOCATION OF TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED TO EACH DEVELOPMENT AREA 1. AVALON AREA 2. BELSERA AREA 3. MONTARA AREA 4. THE WOODS AREA 29600B1 B-I-3 $822,120.04 $222,814.40 $210,314.67 $399,232.14 $1,654,481.25 $25,125.00 $129,393.75 $201,000.00 $355,518.75 $176,659.06 $47,878.87 $45,192.90 $85,787.92 $2,010,000.00 $998,779.10 $270,693.27 $255,507.57 $485,020.06 CONFIRMED ASSESSMENT $822,120.04 $222,814.40 $210,314.67 $399,232.14 $1,654,481.25 $25,125.00 t:l $129,393.75 $201,000.00 "'" $355,518.75 $176,659.06 $47,878.87 $45,192.90 $85,787.92 $2,010,000.00 $998,779.10 $270,693.27 $255,507.57 $485,020.06 08/28/2002 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-A ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT ACQUISITION COST SUMMARY OF AVALON AREA, BELSERA AREA, MONTARA AREA, AND THE WOODS AREA IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED DESCRIPTION AMOUNTS 1. AVALON AREA (TRACT NO. 5968) (See Table B-II-B for Details) A. OLIVE DRIVE - BOTH SIDES (Between East and West Boundaries of Tract No, 5968) a. Improvements b. Contingency c. Incidentals d. Total Olive Drive - Both Sides (Between East and West Bndries otTr 5968) Improv. Cost B. TRACT NO. 5968 ON-SITE AND OFF-SITE STORM DRAIN a. Improvements b. Contingency c. Incidentals d. Total Tract No, 5968 On-site and Off-site Storm Drain Improvement Cost C. TOTAL AVALON AREA (TRACT NO. 5968) IMPROVEMENTS a. Total Avalon Area Improvements (Add Lines 1.A.a. and 1.B.a.) b. Total Avalon Area Contingency (Add Lines 1.A.b. and1.B,b.) c. Total Avalon Area Incidentals (Add Lines 1.A.c. and 1 ,B.c.) d. Total Avalon Area (Tract No. 5968) Improvement Cost 2. BELSERA AREA (TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4) (See Table B-II-C for Details) $486,922.00 $0.00 $85,149.30 $572,071.30 $116,170.00 $0.00 $20,314.50 $136,484.50 $603,092.00 $0.00 $105,463.80 $708,555.80 A. OLIVE DRIVE - SOUTH SIDE (Old Farm Road to West Boundary otTract No. 5831 Unit No.4) a. Improvements $192,035.75 b. Contingency $0.00 c. Incidentals $0.00 d. Total Olive Drive - South Side (Old Farm Road to West Bndry of Tr 5831-4) Improv. Cost $192,035.75 B. OLD FARM ROAD - WEST SIDE (Olive Drive to South Boundary otTract No. 5831 Unit No.4) a. Improvements b. Contingency c. Incidentals d. Total Old Farm Road - West Side (Olive Drive to South Bndry otTr 5831-4) Improv. Cost C. TOTAL BELSERAAREA (TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4) IMPROVEMENTS a. Total Belsera Area Improvements (Add Lines 2.A.a. and 2.B.a.) b. Total Belsera Area Contingency (Add Lines 2.A.b. and 2,B.b.) c. Total Belsera Area Incidentals (Add Lines 2.A.c. and 2.B,c.) d. Total Belsera Area (Tract No. 5831 Unit No.4) Improvement Cost $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $192,035.75 $0.00 $0.00 $192,035.75 29600B2A B-II-A-1 07/16/2002 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-A ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT ACQUISITION COST SUMMARY OF AVALON AREA, BELSERA AREA, MONTARA AREA, AND THE WOODS AREA IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED DESCRIPTION I AMOUNTS 3. MONTARA AREA (TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO.3) (See Table B-II-D for Details) A. SNOW ROAD - SOUTH SIDE (Jewetta Avenue to West Boundary of Tract No. 5829 Unit No.3) a. Improvements $164,784.25 b. Contingency $16,478.43 c. Incidentals $0.00 d. Total Snow Road - South Side (Jewetta Avenue to West Bndry otTr 5829-3) Impr. Cost $181,262.68 B. JEWETTA AVENUE - WEST SIDE (Snow Road to South Boundary otTract No. 5829 Unit No.3) a. Improvements b. Contingency c. Incidentals d. Total Jewetta Avenue - West Side (Snow Road to South Bndry otTr 5829-3) Impr. Cost C. TOTAL MONTARAAREA (TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO.3) IMPROVEMENTS a. Total Montara Area Improvements (Add Lines 3.A.a. and 3.B.a.) b, Total Montara Area Contingency (Add Lines 3Ab. and 3.B.b.) c, Total Montara Area Incidentals (Add Lines 3Ac. and 3.B,c.) d. Total Montara Area (Tract No. 5829 Unit No.3) Improvement Cost 4. THE WOODS AREA (TRACT NO. 6066) (See Table B-II-E for Details) A. AKERS ROAD - WEST SIDE (Berkshire Road to South Boundary of Tract No. 6066) a. Improvements b. Contingency c. Incidentals d. Total Akers Road - West Side (Berkshire Road to South Bndry of Tr 6066) Improv. Cost B. BERKSHIRE ROAD - SOUTH SIDE (Akers Road to West Boundary of Tract No. 6066) a. Improvements b. Contingency c. Incidentals d. Total Berkshire Road - South Side (Akers Road to West Bndry of Tr 6066) Improv. Cost C. TRACT NO. 6066 ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS: a. Improvements b. Contingency c. Incidentals d. Total Tract No. 6066 On-site Improvement Cost D. TOTAL THE WOODS AREA (TRACT NO. 6066) IMPROVEMENTS a. Total The Woods Area Improvements (Add Lines 4Aa., 4.B.a., and 4.C.a,) b. Total The Woods Area Contingency (Add Lines 4.A.b., 4.B.b" and 4.C.b.) c. Total The Woods Area Incidentals (Add Lines 4Ac., 4.B.c., and 4.C.c.) d. Total The Woods Area (Tract No. 6066) Improvement Cost 29600B2A B-II-A-2 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $164,784.25 $16,478.43 $0.00 $181,262.68 $167,507.75 $0.00 $23,320.53 $190,828.28 $93,755.00 $0.00 $13,052.85 $106,807.85 $27,670.00 $0.00 $3,851.90 $31,521.90 $288,932.75 $0.00 $40,225.28 $329,158.03 07/16/2002 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-A ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT ACQUISITION COST SUMMARY OF AVALON AREA, BELSERA AREA, MONTARA AREA, AND THE WOODS AREA IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED DESCRIPTION 5. TOTAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS A. IMPROVEMENTS (Add Lines 1.C.a., 2.C.a., 3.C.a., and 4.D.a.) B. CONTINGENCY (Add Lines 1.C.b., 2.C.b., 3.C.b., and 4.D.b.) C. INCIDENTALS (Add Lines 1 ,C.c., 2.C.c., 3.C.c., and 4.D.c.) D. TOTAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENT COST 1 I Note: AMOUNTS I $1,248,844.75 $16,478.43 $145,689.08 $1,411,012.26 All improvement, contingency, and incidental cost estimates shown in this table are based on the information provided by the District Proponents and their Subdivision Engineers. 29600B2A B-II-A-3 07/16/2002 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-B ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT ACQUISITION COST AVALON AREA (TRACT NO. 5968) IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED A. OLIVE DRIVE - BOTH SIDES (Between East and West Boundaries of Tract No. 5968) a. GRADING Roadway Excavation TOTAL GRADING b. STREET IMPROVEMENTS A.C. Paving Aggregate Base 611 Curb & Gutter 411 Sidewalk Median (full) TOTAL STREET IMPROVEMENTS c. MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS 6' Block Wall TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS d. SUBTOTAL IMPROVEMENT COST e. CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY f. SUBTOTAL IMPROVEMENT COST AND CONTINGENCY g. INCIDENTAL COST Design Engineering Improvement Bonds Construction Staking (3% of Item f) Soils and Materials Testing and Report (2% of Item f) Contractor Supervision and Overhead / Construction Administration (10% of Item f) Plan Check Fees Construction Inspection Fees TOTAL INCIDENTAL COST h. TOTAL OLIVE DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS, CONTINGENCY, AND INCIDENTALS B. TRACT NO. 5968 ON-SITE AND OFF-SITE STORM DRAIN a. GRADING Sump Excavation TOTAL GRADING b. STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS 1811 Storm Drain Pipe 2411 Storm Drain Pipe 3011 Storm Drain Pipe Catch Basin (3.5' opening) Manhole Outlet Structure TOTAL STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS c. MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS 6' Block Wall (around sump) Gates (14' opening with post lock) TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS DESCRIPTION QUANTITY 6292 4694 7058 2569 3754 1319 681 14000 1 1 ¡ I I 29600B2B 8-II-B-1 CY 2.00 TON CY LF SF LF 35.00 23.00 7.50 2.25 60.00 LF 60.00 CY 2.00 52 582 120 1 2 1 25.00 30.00 40.00 3000.00 2200.00 1500.00 LF LF LF EA EA EA 909 1 LF PAIR 60.00 1170.00 TOTAL $12,584.00 $12,584.00 164,290.00 162,334.00 19,267.50 8,446.50 79,140.00 433,478.00 $40,860.00 $40,860.00 $486,922.00 $0.00 $486,922.00 $12,111.00 $0.00 $14,607.66 $9,738.44 $48,692.20 $0.00 $0.00 $85,149.30 $572,071.30 $28,000.00 $28,000.00 1,300.00 17,460.00 4,800.00 3,000.00 4,400.00 1,500.00 32,460.00 54,540.00 1,170.00 $55,710.00 07/02/2002 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-B ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA " ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT ACQUISITION COST AVALON AREA (TRACT NO. 5968) IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED DESCRIPTION d. SUBTOTAL IMPROVEMENT COST e. CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY f. SUBTOTAL IMPROVEMENT COST AND CONTINGENCY g. INCIDENTAL COST Design Engineering Improvement Bonds Construction Staking (3% of Item f) Soils and Materials Testing and Report (2% of Item f) Contractor Supervision and Overhead I Construction Administration (10% of Item f) Plan Check Fees Construction Inspection Fees TOTAL INCIDENTAL COST h. TOTAL TRACT NO. 5968 ON-SITE AND OFF-SITE STORM DRÄIN IMPROVEMENTS, CONTINGENCY, AND INCIDENTALS C. TOTAL AVALON AREA (TRACT NO. 5968) IMPROVEMENT COST (Add Items A and B) a. IMPROVEMENTS b: CONTINGENCY c. INCIDENTALS d. TOTAL AVALON AREA (TRACT NO. 5968) IMPROVEMENT COST Note: TOTAL $116,170.00 $0.00 $116,170.00 $2,889.00 $0.00 $3,485.10 $2,323.40 $11,617.00 $0.00 $0.00 $20,314.50 $136,484.50 $603,092.00 $0.00 $105,463.80 $708,555.80 All improvement, contingency and incidental cost estimates shown in this table are based on the information provided by the District Proponents and their Subdivision Engineers, 29600B2B B-II-B-2 07102/2002 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-C ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT ACQUISITION COST BELSERA AREA (TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4) IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED DESCRIPTION A. OLIVE DRIVE - SOUTH SIDE {Old Farm Road to West Boundary of Tract No. 5831 Unit No.4) a, GRADING Roadway Excavation TOTAL GRADING b. STREET IMPROVEMENTS A.C. Paving Aggregate Base Subgrade Preparation 6" Curb & Gutter Sidewalk Standard Street Sign Street Light - Mast Arm 22000 Wheel Chair Ramp Pavement Striping TOTAL STREET IMPROVEMENTS c. UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS Traffic Interconnect TOTAL UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS d, SUBTOTAL IMPROVEMENT COST e. CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY f. SUBTOTAL IMPROVEMENT COST AND CONTINGENCY g. INCIDENTAL COST Design Engineering Improvement Bonds Construction Staking Soils and Materials Testing and Report Contractor Supervision and Overhead / Construction Administration Plan Check Fees Construction Inspection Fees TOTAL INCIDENTAL COST h. TOTAL OLIVE DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS, CONTINGENCY, AND INCIDENTALS 3190 2160 2126 6959 1093 5465 2 5 2 1363 1195 I ¡ I I I ¡ j CY TON CY SY LF SF EA EA EA LF LF 4.00 34,00 20,50 0.75 10.00 3.50 150.00 2200.00 500.00 2.00 10.00 TOTAL $12,760,00 $12,760.00 73,440.00 43,583.00 5,219.25 10,930,00 19,127.50 300.00 11,000.00 1,000,00 2,726.00 167,325.75 $11,950.00 $11,950.00 $192,035.75 $0.00 $192,035.75 $0.00 $0,00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $192,035.75 B. OLD FARM ROAD· WEST SIDE (Olive Drive to South Boundary of Tract No. 5831 Unit No.4) a, GRADING Roadway Excavation 0 CY 4.00 $0.00 TOTAL GRADING $0,00 b. STREET IMPROVEMENTS A.C, Paving 0 TON 34.00 0.00 Aggregate Base 0 CY 20.50 0.00 Subgrade Preparation 0 SY 0.75 0.00 6" Curb & Gutter 0 LF 10.00 0.00 Sidewalk 0 SF 3.50 0.00 Standard Street Sign 0 EA 150,00 0.00 Traffic Control Sign 0 EA 150.00 0.00 Street Light - Mast Arm 22000 0 EA 2200.00 0.00 Wheel Chair Ramp 0 EA 500.00 0.00 TOTAL STREET IMPROVEMENTS 0.00 29600B2C B-II-C-1 07/16/2002 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-C ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT ACQUISITION COST BELSERA AREA (TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4) IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED DESCRIPTION c. UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS Traffic Interconnect 0 LF Street Light Conduit 0 LF TOTAL UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS d, MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS 6' Block Wall 0 LF TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS e. LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS Frontage landscaping 0 SF TOTAL LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS f. SUBTOTAL IMPROVEMENT COST g. CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY (15%) h. SUBTOTAL IMPROVEMENT COST AND CONTINGENCY i. INCIDENTAL COST Design Engineering Improvement Bonds Construction Staking Soils and Materials Testing and Report Contractor Supervision and Overhead / Construction Administration Plan Check Fees Construction Inspection Fees TOTAL INCIDENTAL COST j. TOTAL OLD FARM ROAD IMPROVEMENTS, CONTINGENCY, AND INCIDENTALS C. TOTAL BELSERA AREA (TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4) IMPROVEMENT COST (Add Items A and B) a. IMPROVEMENTS b. CONTINGENCY c. INCIDENTALS d. TOTAL BELSERA AREA (TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4) IMPROVEMENT COST 10.00 2.00 40,00 3,25 Note: TOTAL $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 0,00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0,00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0,00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $192,035.75 $0.00 $0,00 $192,035.75 All improvement, contingency and incidental cost estimates shown in this table are based on the informatio provided by the District Proponents and their Subdivision Engineers. 29600B2C B-II-C-2 07/16/2002 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-D ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT ACQUISITION COST MONTARA AREA (TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO.3) IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED DESCRIPTION A. SNOW ROAD - SOUTH SIDE (Jewetta Avenue to West Boundary of Tract No. 5829 Unit No.3) a. GRADING Roadway Excavation TOTAL GRADING b, STREET IMPROVEMENTS A.C, Paving Aggregate Base Subgrade Preparation 6" Curb & Gutter Sidewalk Standard Street Sign Street Light - Mast Arm 22000 Sawcut Wheel Chair Ramp Pavement Striping TOTAL STREET IMPROVEMENTS c. UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS Traffic Interconnect TOTAL UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS d. SUBTOTAL IMPROVEMENT COST e. CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY (10%) t, SUBTOTAL IMPROVEMENT COST AND CONTINGENCY g. INCIDENTAL COST Design Engineering Improvement Bonds Construction Staking Soils and Materials Testing and Report Contractor Supervision and Overhead / Construction Administration Plan Check Fees Construction Inspection Fees TOTAL INCIDENTAL COST h. TOTAL SNOW ROAD IMPROVEMENTS, CONTINGENCY, AND INCIDENTALS 2477 1674 1651 5405 1250 6250 1 3 1240 1 3350 1250 CY TON CY SY LF SF EA EA LF EA LF LF 4.00 34,00 20.50 0,75 10.00 3.50 150.00 2200.00 1.40 500,00 2.00 8.00 TOTAL $9,908.00 $9,908,00 56,916,00 33,845.50 4,053.75 12,500.00 21,875.00 150.00 6,600.00 1,736.00 500.00 6,700.00 144,876.25 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $164,784.25 $16,478.43 $181,262.68 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0,00 $0.00 $0,00 $181,262.68 B. JEWETT A A VENUE - WEST SIDE (Snow Road to South Boundary of Tract No. 5829 Unit No.3) a, GRADING Roadway Excavation TOTAL GRADING b, STREET IMPROVEMENTS A.C, Paving Aggregate Base Subgrade Preparation 6" Curb & Gutter Sidewalk Traffic Control Sign Street Light - Mast Arm 22000 Pavement Striping TOTAL STREET IMPROVEMENTS 29600B2D B-1I-D-1 o CY o o o o o o o o TON CY SY LF SF EA EA LF 4,00 34.00 20.50 0.75 10.00 3.50 150,00 2200.00 2,00 $0,00 $0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 07/16/2002 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-D ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT ACQUISITION COST MONTARA AREA (TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO.3) IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED DESCRIPTION c. UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS Traffic Interconnect 0 LF TOTAL UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS d, MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS 6' Block Wall 0 LF TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS e. LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS Frontage landscaping 0 SF TOTAL LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS t, SUBTOTAL IMPROVEMENT COST g, CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY (15%) h. SUBTOTAL IMPROVEMENT COST AND CONTINGENCY i. INCIDENTAL COST Design Engineering Improvement Bonds Constructiön Staking Soils and Materials Testing and Report Contractor Supervision and Overhead / Construction Administration Plan Check Fees Construction Inspection Fees TOTAL INCIDENTAL COST j. TOTAL JEWETTA AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS, CONTINGENCY, AND INCIDENTALS C. TOTAL MONTARA AREA (TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO.3) IMPROVEMENT COST (Add Items A and B) a. IMPROVEMENTS b, CONTINGENCY c. INCIDENTALS d. TOTAL MONT ARA AREA (TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO.3) IMPROVEMENT COST TOTAL 8.00 $0.00 $0.00 40,00 0.00 $0.00 3.25 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0,00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $164,784,25 $16,478.43 $0.00 $181,262.68 Note: All improvement, contingency and incidental cost estimates shown in this table are based on the informatio provided by the District Proponents and their Subdivision Engineers. 29600B2D B-II-D-2 07/16/2002 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-E ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT ACQUISITION COST THE WOODS AREA (TRACT NO. 6066) IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED A. AKERS ROAD - WEST SIDE (Berkshire Road to South Boundary of Tract No. 6066) a. GRADING Roadway Excavation TOTAL GRADING b. STREET IMPROVEMENTS AC. Paving Aggregate Base 6" Curb & Gutter 4" Sidewalk TOTAL STREET IMPROVEMENTS c. MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS 6' Block Wall (with 0'-3' Ret.) TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS d. SUBTOTAL IMPROVEMENT COST e. CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY f. SUBTOTAL IMPROVEMENT COST AND CONTINGENCY g. INCIDENTAL COST Design Engineering Improvement Bonds Construction Staking (5% of Item f) Soils and Materials Testing and Report (2% of Item f) Contractor Supervision and Overhead / Construction Administration Plan Check Fees Construction Inspection Fees TOTAL INCIDENTAL COST h. TOTAL AKERS ROAD IMPROVEMENTS, CONTINGENCY, AND INCIDENTALS B. BERKSHIRE ROAD - SOUTH SIDE (Akers Road to West Boundary of Tract No. 6066) a. SEWER IMPROVEMENTS 6" Sewer Main Standard Manhole (9'-12' deep) Remove Plug & Tie In TOTAL SEWER IMPROVEMENTS b. STREET IMPROVEMENTS A.C. Paving Aggregate Base 6" Curb & Gutter 4" Sidewalk TOTAL STREET IMPROVEMENTS c. SUBTOTAL IMPROVEMENT COST DESCRIPTION QUANTITY 3500 865 684 1274 7007 1274 1225 6 1 812 641 1353 7442 29600B2E B-II-E-1 CY 2.00 TON CY LF SF 35.00 23.00 7.50 2.25 LF 70.00 LF EA EA 10.00 1850.00 350.00 TON CY LF SF 35.00 23.00 7.50 2.25 TOTAL $7,000.00 $7,000.00 30,275.00 15,732.00 9,555.00 15,765.75 71,327.75 $89,180.00 $89,180.00 $167,507.75 $0.00 $167,507.75 $11,595.00 $0.00 $8,375.38 $3,350.15 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $23,320.53 $190,828.28 $12,250.00 $11,100.00 $350.00 $23,700.00 28,420.00 14,743.00 10,147.50 16,744.50 70,055.00 $93,755.00 07/02/2002 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-E ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT ACQUISITION COST THE WOODS AREA (TRACT NO. 6066) IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED DESCRIPTION QUANTITY d. CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY e. SUBTOTAL IMPROVEMENT COST AND CONTINGENCY f. INCIDENTAL COST Design Engineering Improvement Bonds Construction Staking (5% of Item e) Soils and Materials Testing and Report (2% of Item e) Contractor Supervision and Overhead 1 Construction Administration Plan Check Fees Construction Inspection Fees TOTAL INCIDENTAL COST g. TOTAL BERKSHIRE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS, CONTINGENCY, AND INCIDENTALS C. TRACT NO. 6066 ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS a, GRADING Sump Excavation (cut) 0 CY Sump Excavation (import sand) 0 CY TOTAL GRADING b. STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS 24" Storm Drain Pipe 80 LF Manhole 1 EA Outlet Structure 1 EA TOTAL STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS c. MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS Chain Link Fence w/redwood slats and 6" x 18" concrete footing 850 LF Gates (14' opening with post lock) 1 PAIR TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS d. SUBTOTAL IMPROVEMENT COST e, CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY f. SUBTOTAL IMPROVEMENT COST AND CONTINGENCY g. INCIDENTAL COST Design Engineering Improvement Bonds Construction Staking (5% of Item f) Soils and Materials Testing and Report (2% of Item f) Contractor Supervision and Overhead 1 Construction Administration Plan Check Fees Construction Inspection Fees TOTAL INCIDENTAL COST h. TOTAL TRACT NO. 6066 ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS, CONTINGENCY, AND INCIDENTALS 2.00 10.00 30.00 2200.00 1500.00 24.00 1170,00 29600B2E B-II-E-2 TOTAL $0.00 $93,755.00 $6,490.00 $0.00 $4,687.75 $1,875.10 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $13,052.85 $106,807.85 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 2,400.00 2,200.00 1,500.00 6,100.00 20,400.00 1,170.00 $21,570.00 $27,670.00 $0.00 $27,670.00 $1,915.00 $0.00 $1,383.50 $553.40 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3,851.90 $31,521.90 07/02/2002 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-E ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT ACQUISITION COST THE WOODS AREA (TRACT NO. 6066) IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED DESCRIPTION QUANTITY D. TOTAL THE WOODS AREA (TRACT NO. 6066) IMPROVEMENT COST (Add Items A, B, and C) a. IMPROVEMENTS b. CONTINGENCY c. INCIDENTALS d. TOTAL THE WOODS AREA (TRACT NO. 6066) IMPROVEMENT COST Note: TOTAL $288,932.75 $0.00 $40,225.28 $329,158.03 All improvement, contingency and incidental cost estimates shown in this table are based on the information provided by the District Proponents and their Subdivision Engineers. 29600B2E B-II-£-3 07/02/2002 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-III ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA PAYOFF CALCULATION FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 91-1 ASSESSMENT NO. 66 PAYOFF COSTS ASSESSED TO THE WOODS AREA OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT PAYOFF DETAILS A. ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 91-1 ASSESSMENT NO. 66 PAYOFF CALCULATION 1, REMAINING ASSESSMENT PRINCIPAL AMOUNT (EFF. 01/01/2002): 2. PRINCIPAL AMOUNT FOR THE CURRENT TAX YEAR (2002/2003): 3, SUBTOTAL: 4. BOND CALL PREMIUM: 5. ESTIMATED ADMIN. COSTS FOR LIEN RELEASE: CITY TIME ( EMPLOYEE'S WAGE x TIME WORKED) 6. BOND CALL COSTS STANDARD FEE (500.00 x ITEM 1/50,000): COST PER BOND ( 3.00 x ITEM 1 /5,000 ): LIEN RELEASE: 7. CREDIT TO RESERVE: (a) (10.00% x ORIGINAL ASMT LESS PREVIOUS CREDIT): 8. ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT: 9. INTEREST DUE TO NEXT BOND CALL: 10. FINAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 91-1 ASSESSMENT NO. 66 PAYOFF COST B. TOTAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 91-1 ASSESSMENT NO. 66 PAYOFF COST 23,418.08 0.00 23,418.08 0.00 18.79 234.18 14.05 11.00 (9f604.52) 0.00 834.27 $14,925.85 $14,925.85 NOTES: (a) RESERVE FUND CREDIT BASED ON ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT: 96.045,19 x 0.1000 = $9,604.52 (b) PAYOFF CALCULATION DATA SHOWN IS AS PROVIDED BY THE CITY FINANCE DEPARTMENT. (c) THE AMOUNTS SHOWN IN THIS TABLE REPRESENT THE TOTAL AMOUNT NEEDED TO BE PAID IN ORDER TO CLEAR THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 91-1 ASSESSMENT NO, 66 LIEN. 29600B3 8-111-1 07/02/2002 :l -l l l l ~l l ] J J J J J 'J J ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 (A V ALONIBELSERAlMONTARAlTHE WOODS) TABLE C-I TABLE C-II-A TABLE C-II-B TABLE C-II-C TABLE C-II-D TABLE C-III-A TABLE C·III-B TABLEC-III-C TABLE C-III-D TABLE C-IV-A TABLE C-IV-B TABLE C-IV-C TABLE C-IV-D EXHIBIT C Consolidated Tabulation of Parcel Assessment Data Details of Avalon Area (Tract No. 5968) Estimated Assessment Reallocations for Proposed DevelopmentperCity Code Section 13.08.070 Details of Belsera Area (Tract No. 5831 Unit No.4) Estimated Assessment Reallocations for Proposed Development per City Code Section 13.08.070 Details of Montara Area (Tract No. 5829 Unit No.3) Estimated Assessment Reallocations for Proposed Development per City Code Section 13.08.070 ' Details of The Woods Area (Tract No. 6066) Estimated Assessment Reallocations for Proposed Development per City Code Section 13.08.070 Details of Avalon Area (Tract No. 5968) Estimated Benefit Assessment Allocations for Proposed Development Details of Belsera Area (Tract No. 5831 Unit No.4 Estimated Benefit Assessment Allocations for P~o-posed Development Details of Montara Area (Tract No. 5829 UnitNo. 3) Estimated Benefit Assessment Allocations for Proposed Develò{lment Details of The Woods Area (Tract No. 6066) Estimated Benefit Assessment Allocations for Proposed Development ComparIson of Avalon Area (Tract No.' 5968) Benefit Assessment Allocation and Assessment Reallocation per City Code Section 13.08.070 Comparison of Belsera Area (Tract No. 5831 Unit No.4) Benefit Assessment Allocation and Assessment Reallocation per City Code Section 13.08.070 Comparison of Montara Area (Tract No. 5829 Unit No.3) Benefit Assessment Allocation and Assessment Reallocation per City Code Section 13.08.070 Comparison of The Woods Area (Tract No. 6066) Benefit Assessment Allocation and Assessment Reallocation per City Code Section 13.08.070 EXHIBIT C TABLE C-t ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA CONSOLIDATED TABULATION OF PARCEL ASSESSMENT DATA ASSESSOR'S TAX I COST OF IMPROVEMENTS I PAYOFF 1 ASSESSMENT DEDUCT SUBTOTAL I BOND ISSUANCE ASSESSMENT NUMBER (ATN) I ACQUISITION IMPROVEMENT IMPROVEMENT TOTAL COST OF AD 91-1 DISTRICT CONTRIBUTIONS & AMOUNT TO COST TOTAL NUMBER PROPERTY DESCRIPTION IMPROVEMENTS I CONTINGENCY INCIDENTALS I IMPROVEMENTS ASSESSMENTS PROCEEDINGS CASH PAYMENTS BOND AND RESERVE ASSESSMENT 1. AVALON AREA 1 PARCEL MAP NO, 9826; PARCEL 6 336,385.98 0.00 58,824.42 395,210.40 0,00 63,342.60 0,00 458,553,00 98,534.94 557,087.94 2 REMAINDER OF PARCEL C IN LLA 51-00 91,304,76 0.00 15,966.63 107,271,39 0.00 17,192.99 0,00 124,464,38 26,745.20 151,209.58 3 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 1 2,402.76 0.00 420.17 2,822.93 0,00 452.45 0,00 3,275,38 703.82 3,979.20 4 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 2 2,402,76 0.00 420.17 2,822,93 0,00 452.45 0,00 3,275,38 703,82 3,979,20 5 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 3 2,402.76 0,00 420.17 2,822,93 0,00 452.45 0,00 3,275,38 703,82 3,979,20 6 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 4 2,402.76 0,00 420.17 2,822,93 0,00 452.45 0,00 3,275,38 703.82 3,979,20 7 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 5 2,402,76 0,00 420.17 2,822.93 0.00 452.45 0,00 3,275,38 703.82 3,979.20 8 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 6 2,402.76 0.00 420.17 2,822.93 0,00 452.45 0,00 3,275.38 703.82 3,979.20 9 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 7 2,402.76 0,00 420.17 2,822.93 0.00 452.45 0,00 3,275.38 703,82 3,979.20 10 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 8 2,402.76 0.00 420.17 2,822.93 0.00 452.45 0,00 3,275.38 703,82 3,979,20 11 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 9 2,402.76 0.00 420.17 2,822.93 0,00 452.45 0,00 3,275.38 703,82 3,979,20 12 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 10 2,402,76 0.00 420,17 2,822.93 0.00 452.45 0,00 3,275.38 703.82 3,979,20 13 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 11 2,402.76 0.00 420,17 2,822.93 0,00 452.45 0.00 3,275.38 703,82 3,979.20 14 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 12 2,402.76 0.00 420.17 2,822,93 0,00 452.45 0,00 3,275.38 703,82 3,979,20 15 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 13 2,402.76 0.00 420.17 2,822,93 0.00 452.45 0,00 3,275.38 703.82 3,979.20 16 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 14 2,402.76 0.00 420.17 2,822,93 0.00 452.45 0.00 3,275,38 703.82 3,979,20 17 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 15 2,402.76 0.00 420.17 2,822.93 0.00 452.45 0.00 3,275.38 703,82 3,979.20 18 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 16 2,402.76 0.00 420.17 2,822.93 0,00 452.45 0.00 3,275.38 703,82 3,979,20 19 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 17 2,402.76 0.00 420,17 2,822.93 0,00 452.45 0,00 3,275,38 703,82 3,979.20 20 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 18 2,402.76 0.00 420.17 2,822.93 0,00 452.45 0,00 3,275.38 703.82 3,979,20 21 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 19 2,402.76 0.00 420.17 2,822,93 0.00 452.45 0,00 3,275.38 703.82 3,979.20 22 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 20 2,402,76 0.00 420.17 2,822,93 0.00 452.45 0,00 3,275.38 703,82 3,979.20 23 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 21 2,402.76 0.00 420.17 2,822,93 0.00 452.45 0.00 3,275.38 703,82 3,979.20 24 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 22 2,402.76 0,00 420.17 2,822,93 0.00 452.45 0.00 3,275.38 703,82 3,979.20 25 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 23 2,402.76 0.00 420.17 2,822.93 0.00 452.45 0,00 3,275.38 703,82 3,979.20 26 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 24 2,402.76 0.00 420.17 2,822.93 0.00 452.45 0,00 3,275.38 703.82 3,979.20 27 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 25 2,402.76 0.00 420.17 2,822,93 0.00 452.45 0.00 3,275.38 703,82 3,979.20 28 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 26 2,402.76 0,00 420.17 2,822.93 0,00 452.45 0.00 3,275.38 703.82 3,979,20 29 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 27 2,402.76 0,00 420.17 2,822.93 0.00 452.45 0,00 3,275.38 703.82 3,979.20 30 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 28 2,402.76 0.00 420.17 2,822,93 0.00 452.45 0.00 3,275.38 703.82 3,979.20 31 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 29 2,402,76 0.00 420,17 2,822.93 0,00 452.45 0.00 3,275.38 703.82 3,979,20 32 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 30 2,402,76 0.00 420.17 2,822.93 0.00 452,45 0.00 3,275.38 703,82 3,979,20 33 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 31 2,402.76 0.00 420,17 2,822.93 0.00 452.45 0.00 3,275,38 703,82 3,979.20 34 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 32 2,402.76 0.00 420.17 2,822.93 0.00 452,45 0,00 3,275,38 703,82 3,979.20 35 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 33 2,402.76 0,00 420,17 2,822.93 0.00 452.45 0,00 3,275.38 703.82 3,979.20 36 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 34 2,402.76 0.00 420.17 2,822.93 0.00 452.45 0.00 3,275.38 703.82 3,979.20 37 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 35 2,402.76 0,00 420.17 2,822.93 0.00 452.45 0.00 3,275,38 703.82 3,979,20 38 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 36 2,402.76 0.00 420.17 2,822,93 0.00 452.45 0.00 3,275.38 703.82 3,979.20 39 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT ONE; LOT 37 2,402,65 0,00 420.34 2,822.99 0.00 452.35 0.00 3,275.34 703,85 3,979.19 40 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 1 2,402,76 0.00 420.17 2,822.93 0.00 452.45 0,00 3,275,38 703.82 3,979,20 41 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 2 2,402.76 0,00 420.17 2,822.93 0,00 452.45 0.00 3,275.38 703.82 3,979.20 42 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 3 2,402,76 0,00 420,17 2,822.93 0.00 452.45 0.00 3,275.38 703.82 3,979.20 29600C1 C-I-1 08/28/2002 ....".., .m_".,) EXHIBIT C TABLE C-I ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA CONSOLIDATED TABULATION OF PARCEL ASSESSMENT DATA ASSESSOR'S TAX I COST OF IMPROVEMENTS I PAYOFF I ASSESSMENT DEDUCT SUBTOTAL IBONDISSUANCE ASSESSMENT NUMBER (ATN) I ACQUISITION ,IMPROVEMENT IMPROVEMENT TOTAL COST OF AD 91-1 DISTRICT CONTRIBUTIONS & AMOUNT TO COST TOTAL NUMBER PROPERTY DESCRIPTION IMPROVEMENTS CONTINGENCY INCIDENTALS IMPROVEMENTS ASSESSMENTS PROCEEDINGS CASH PAYMENTS BOND AND RESERVE ASSESSMENT 43 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 4 2,402.76 0.00 420.17 2,822.93 0.00 452.45 0.00 3,275.38 703,82 3,979.20 44 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 5 2,402.76 0.00 420,17 2,822,93 0.00 452.45 0.00 3,275.38 703.82 3,979,20 45 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 6 2,402,76 0.00 420,17 2,822.93 0.00 452.45 0.00 3,275.38 703,82 3,979.20 46 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 7 2,402.76 0.00 420,17 2,822.93 0.00 452.45 0.00 3,275.38 703,82 3,979.20 47 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 8 2,402.76 0,00 420,17 2,822.93 0.00 452.45 0,00 3,275.38 703,82 3,979,20 48 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 9 2,402.76 0.00 420,17 2,822,93 0,00 452.45 0.00 3,275.38 703,82 3;979,20 49 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 10 2,402.76 0.00 420.17 2,822.93 0,00 452.45 0,00 3,275.38 703,82 3,979.20 50 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 11 2,402.76 0,00 420.17 2,822.93 0,00 452.45 0.00 3,275,38 703.82 3,979,20 51 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 12 2,402.76 0,00 420,17 2,822,93 0.00 452.45 0.00 3,275.38 703.82 3,979.20 52 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 13 2,402.76 0,00 420.17 2,822.93 0.00 452.45 0.00 3,275.38 703.82 3,979,20 53 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 14 2,402.76 0,00 420.17 2,822,93 0,00 452.45 0.00 3,275.38 703.82 3,979.20 54 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 15 2,402,76 0.00 420.17 2,822,93 0.00 452.45 0,00 3,275,38 703.82 3,979.20 55 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 16 2,402,76 0.00 420.17 2,822,93 0.00 452.45 0,00 3,275.38 703.82 3,979.20 56 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 17 2,402.76 0,00 420.17 2,822.93 0.00 452.45 0.00 3,275.38 703.82 3,979.20 57 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 18 2,402.76 0.00 420.17 2,822.93 0.00 452.45 0,00 3,275,38 703.82 3,979.20 58 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 19 2,402,76 0.00 420,17 2,822.93 0.00 452.45 0.00 3,275.38 703,82 3,979.20 59 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 20 2,402,76 0,00 420,17 2,822.93 0,00 452.45 0,00 3,275.38 703,82 3,979.20 60 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 21 2,402.76 0,00 420.17 2,822.93 0,00 452.45 0,00 3,275.38 703.82 3,979.20 61 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 22 2,402.76 0.00 420.17 2,822.93 0,00 452.45 0.00 3,275.38 703.82 3,979.20 62 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 23 2,402.76 0,00 420.17 2,822,93 0.00 452.45 0,00 3,275.38 703.82 '3,979,20 63 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 24 2,402.76 0,00 420,17 2,822,93 0.00 452.45 0.00 3,275.38 703.82 3,979,20 64 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 25 2,402,76 0,00 420,17 2,822.93 0.00 452.45 0.00 3,275,38 703,82 3,979.20 65 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 26 2,402.76 0.00 420.17 2,822.93 0,00 452.45 0,00 3,275.38 703.82 3,979,20 66 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 27 2,402.76 0,00 420.17 2,822.93 0.00 452.45 0,00 3,275.38 703.82 3,979.20 67 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 28 2,402,76 0.00 420.17 2,822.93 0,00 452.45 0.00 3,275.38 703.82 3,979.20 68 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 29 2,402.76 0,00 420.17 2,822.93 0.00 452.45 0,00 3,275.38 703.82 3,979,20 69 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 30 2,402.76 0.00 420,17 2,822,93 0,00 452.45 0.00 3,275,38 703,82 3,979.20 70 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 31 2,402.76 0,00 420.17 2,822.93 0,00 452.45 0,00 3,275.38 703,82 3,979.20 71 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 32 2,402.76 0,00 420,17 2,822,93 0,00 452.45 0,00 3,275.38 703,82 3,979.20 72 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 33 2,402.76 0,00 420.17 2,822.93 0.00 452.45 0.00 3,275.38 703.82 3,979.20 73 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 34 2,402,76 0.00 420.17 2,822.93 0.00 452.45 0,00 3,275.38 703.82 3,979,20 74 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 35 2,402.76 0.00 420.17 2,822,93 0,00 452.45 0.00 3,275,38 703.82 3,979.20 75 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO; LOT 36 2,402,65 0,00 420.34 2,822,99 0,00 452.35 0.00 3,275.34 703,85 3,979.19 AVALON AREA TOTALS 603,092.00 0.00 105,463.80 708,555.80 0.00 113,564.24 0.00 822,120.04 176,659.06 998,779.10 2. BELSERA AREA 76 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 1 2,630.63 0.00 0.00 2,630,63 0.00 421.63 0,00 3,052.26 655,87 3,708,13 77 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 2 2,630.63 0,00 0.00 2,630.63 0.00 421.63 0.00 3,052.26 655.87 3,708,13 78 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 3 2,630.63 0,00 0,00 2,630.63 0.00 421.63 0.00 3,052,26 655.87 3,708.13 79 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 4 2,630.63 0.00 0.00 2,630.63 0.00 421,63 0.00 3,052.26 655,87 3,708.13 80 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 5 2,630.63 0,00 0.00 2,630,63 0.00 421,63 0.00 3,052.26 655.87 3,708.13 81 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 6 2,630.63 0.00 0.00 2,630.63 0.00 421,63 0.00 3,052.26 655,87 3,708.13 82 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 7 2,630.63 0,00 0,00 2,630.63 0,00 421.63 0,00 3,052.26 655,87 3,708.13 29600C1 C-I-2 08/28/2002 _.~-~"".,-,j EXHIBIT C TABLE C-I ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA CONSOLIDATED TABULATION OF PARCEL ASSESSMENT DATA ASSESSOR'S TAX I COST OF IMPROVEMENTS I PAYOFF ASSESSMENT DEDUCT ~I SUBTOTAL BOND ISSUANCE ASSESSMENT I NUMBER (ATN) I ACQUISITION IMPROVEMENT IMPROVEMENT TOTAL COST OF AD 91-1 DISTRICT CONTRIBUTIONS & AMOUNT TO COST TOTAL NUMBER PROPERTY DESCRIPTION IMPROVEMENTS CONTINGENCY INCIDENTALS IMPROVEMENTS ASSESSMENTS PROCEEDINGS CASH PAYMENTS BOND AND RESERVE ASSESSMENT 83 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 8 2,630.63 0,00 0.00 2,630,63 0,00 421.63 0.00 3,052.26 655.87 3,708,13 84 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 9 2,630,63 0.00 0.00 2,630.63 0.00 421.63 0.00 3,052.26 655.87 3,708,13 85 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 10 2,630.63 0,00 0.00 2,630.63 0.00 421.63 0.00 3,052,26 655.87 3,708.13 86 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 11 2,630,63 0,00 0.00 2,630,63 0,00 421.63 0,00 3,052.26 655,87 3,708.13 -_. 87 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 12 2,630,63 0,00 0.00 2,630,63 0,00 421.63 0,00 3,052,26 655,87 3,708,13 88 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 13 2,630.63 0,00 0.00 2,630,63 0.00 421.63 0,00 3,052.26 655,87 3,708,13 89 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 14 2,630.63 0,00 0.00 2,630.63 0.00 421,63 0.00 3,052.26 655,87 3,708.13 90 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 15 2,630,63 0,00 0.00 2,630.63 0.00 421,63 0,00 3,052.26 655.87 3,708.13 91 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 16 2,630,63 0.00 0.00 2,630,63 0,00 421,63 0,00 3,052.26 655.87 3,708.13 92 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 17 2,630.63 0,00 0.00 2,630.63 0.00 421,63 0,00 3,052,26 655.87 3,708,13 93 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 18 2,630.63 0,00 0.00 2,630.63 0.00 421,63 0.00 3,052,26 655.87 3,708,13 94 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 19 2,630.63 0,00 0.00 2,630,63 0,00 421,63 0,00 3,052,26 655.87 3,708.13 95 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 20 2,630.63 0.00 0,00 2,630.63 0,00 421.63 0,00 3,052.26 655.87 3,708.13 96 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 21 2,630.63 0.00 0,00 2,630.63 0.00 421.63 0,00 3,052.26 655,87 3,708.13 97 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 22 2,630.63 0.00 0,00 2,630,63 0.00 421.63 0.00 3,052,26 655,87 3,708.13 98 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 23 2,630,63 0.00 0.00 2,630.63 0.00 421.63 0.00 3,052,26 655,87 3,708.13 99 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 24 2,630.63 0,00 0,00 2,630,63 0.00 421,63 0,00 3,052,26 655.87 3,708.13 100 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 25 2,630,63 0.00 0.00 2,630,63 0,00 421.63 0,00 3,052.26 655.87 3,708.13 101 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 26 2,630,63 0.00 0,00 2,630.63 0.00 421.63 0,00 3,052,26 655,87 3,708.13 102 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 27 2,630.63 0.00 0.00 2,630.63 0.00 421.63 0,00 3,052,26 655.87 3,708.13 103 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 28 2,630.63 0.00 0.00 2,630,63 0.00 421.63 0.00 3,052.26 655.87 3,708.13 104 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 29 2,630.63 0.00 0,00 2,630,63 0.00 421,63 0.00 3,052.26 655,87 3,708.13 105 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 30 2,630.63 0.00 0.00 2,630.63 0.00 421,63 0.00 3,052.26 655.87 3,708,13 106 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 31 2,630.63 0.00 0,00 2,630.63 0.00 421.63 0,00 3,052.26 655.87 3,708,13 107 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 32 2,630.63 0,00 0.00 2,630.63 0,00 421.63 0,00 3,052.26 655.87 3,708.13 108 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 33 2,630,63 0,00 0.00 2,630.63 0.00 421.63 0,00 3,052.26 655.87 3,708.13 109 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 34 2,630.63 0.00 0,00 2,630.63 0.00 421.63 0,00 3,052,26 655.87 3,708.13 110 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 35 2,630.63 0.00 0,00 2,630,63 0,00 421,63 0.00 3,052.26 655.87 3,708.13 111 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 36 2,630.63 0.00 0.00 2,630,63 0.00 421.63 0.00 3,052.26 655.87 3,708.13 112 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 37 2,630.63 0.00 0.00 2,630.63 0.00 421.63 0.00 3,052.26 655.87 3,708,13 113 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 38 2,630.63 0,00 0,00 2,630.63 0,00 421,63 0.00 3,052.26 655.87 3,708,13 114 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 39 2,630,63 0,00 0,00 2,630.63 0.00 421.63 0,00 3,052.26 655.87 3,708.13 115 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 40 2,630,63 0,00 0.00 2,630.63 0,00 421.63 0.00 3,052,26 655,87 3,708.13 116 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 41 2,630.63 0.00 0,00 2,630.63 0.00 421.63 0.00 3,052.26 655.87 3,708.13 117 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 42 2,630,63 0,00 0.00 2,630.63 0.00 421.63 0,00 3,052.26 655.87 3,708.13 118 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 43 2,630.63 0,00 0.00 2,630.63 0.00 421,63 0,00 3,052.26 655.87 3,708,13 119 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 44 2,630,63 0.00 0.00 2,630.63 0,00 421.63 0,00 3,052.26 655.87 3,708.13 120 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 45 2,630.63 0.00 0.00 2,630.63 0,00 421.63 0,00 3,052.26 655.87 3,708.13 121 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 46 2,630,63 0,00 0,00 2,630,63 0,00 421.63 0.00 3,052.26 655.87 3,708,13 122 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 47 2,630.63 0.00 0.00 2,630.63 0,00 421.63 0.00 3,052.26 655,87 3,708.13 123 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 48 2,630.63 0.00 0,00 2,630.63 0,00 421.63 0.00 3,052.26 655.87 3,708.13 29600C1 C-I-3 08/28/2002 EXHIBIT C TABLE C-I ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA CONSOLIDATED TABULATION OF PARCEL ASSESSMENT DATA ASSESSOR'S TAX I COST OF IMPROVEMENTS I PAYOFF ASSESSMENT DEDUCT SUBTOTAL BOND ISSUANCE ASSESSMENT NUMBER (ATN) I ACQUISITION IMPROVEMENT IMPROVEMENT TOTAL COST OF AD 91-1 DISTRICT CONTRIBUTIONS & AMOUNT TO COST TOTAL NUMBER PROPERTY DESCRIPTION IMPROVEMENTS CONTINGENCY INCIDENTALS IMPROVEMENTS ASSESSMENTS PROCEEDINGS CASH PAYMENTS BOND AND RESERVE ASSESSMENT 124 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 49 2,630.63 0.00 0.00 2,630,63 0.00 421,63 0.00 3,052,26 655.87 3,708,13 125 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 50 2,630.63 0,00 0.00 2,630,63 0,00 421.63 0,00 3,052.26 655,87 3,708,13 126 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 51 2,630,63 0.00 0,00 2,630,63 0,00 421.63 0.00 3,052.26 655,87 3,708,13 127 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 52 2,630,63 0.00 0,00 2,630.63 0,00 421.63 0,00 3,052.26 655.87 3,708,13 ~- TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 53 2,630.63 0,00 0,00 2,630.63 0.00 421.63 0,00 3,052.26 655,87 3,708,13 129 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 54 2,630.63 0,00 0.00 2,630.63 0.00 421.63 0.00 3,052.26 655.87 3,708,13 130 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 55 2,630,63 0.00 0.00 2,630.63 0,00 421.63 0,00 3,052,26 655.87 3,708,13 131 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 56 2,630.63 0.00 0,00 2,630.63 0.00 421.63 0.00 3,052.26 655.87 3,708,13 132 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 57 2,630.63 0.00 0.00 2,630,63 0.00 421,63 0.00 3,052.26 655,87 3,708,13 133 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 58 2,630.63 0.00 0.00 2,630.63 0.00 421,63 0.00 3,052,26 655,87 3,708.13 134 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 59 2,630.63 0.00 0.00 2,630.63 0.00 421,63 0.00 3,052.26 655.87 3,708.13 135 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 60 2,630.63 0.00 0.00 2,630,63 0.00 421.63 0.00 3,052.26 655.87 3,708.13 136 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 61 2,630,63 0,00 0,00 2,630.63 0.00 421.63 0.00 3,052.26 655.87 3,708,13 137 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 62 2,630,63 0.00 0,00 2,630,63 0.00 421,63 0.00 3,052,26 655.87 3,708.13 138 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 63 2,630.63 0.00 0.00 2,630,63 0.00 421,63 0.00 3,052.26 655.87 3,708.13 139 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 64 2,630,63 0.00 0,00 2,630.63 0.00 421.63 0,00 3,052,26 655.87 3,708.13 140 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 65 2,630,63 0.00 0,00 2,630.63 0.00 421,63 0,00 3,052.26 655.87 3,708.13 141 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 66 2,630,63 0.00 0.00 2,630,63 0,00 421.63 0,00 3,052.26 655.87 3,708,13 142 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 67 2,630.63 0.00 0.00 2,630,63 0,00 421.63 0,00 3,052.26 655,87 3,708.13 143 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 68 2,630,63 0,00 0.00 2,630,63 0,00 421.63 0,00 3,052.26 655.87 3,708.13 144 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 69 2,630.63 0,00 0.00 2,630.63 0,00 421.63 0,00 3,052,26 655,87 3,708.13 145 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 70 2,630.63 0,00 0.00 2,630.63 0,00 421.63 0.00 3,052.26 655,87 3,708,13 146 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 71 2,630,63 0.00 0.00 2,630.63 0.00 421,63 0,00 3,052,26 655.87 3,708,13 147 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO, 4; LOT 72 2,630.63 0.00 0.00 2,630.63 0.00 421,63 0.00 3,052,26 655,87 3,708,13 148 TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO.4; LOT 73 2,630,39 0,00 0.00 2,630.39 0.00 421.29 0.00 3,051,68 656.23 3,707.91 BELSERA AREA TOTALS 192,035.75 0.00 0.00 192,035.75 0.00 30,778.65 0.00 222,814.40 47,878.87 270,693.27 3. MONTARA AREA 149 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT 1 2,890,95 289.10 0,00 3,180.05 0.00 509,68 0.00 3,689.73 792,86 4,482.59 150 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 2 2,890.95 289.10 0,00 3,180,05 0.00 509,68 0.00 3,689.73 792.86 4,482,59 151 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT 3 2,890,95 289,10 0,00 3,180,05 0,00 509.68 0.00 3,689.73 792.86 4,482,59 152 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT 4 2,890,95 289.10 0.00 3,180,05 0,00 509.68 0.00 3,689.73 792.86 4,482.59 153 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT 5 2,890.95 289,10 0.00 3,180,05 0,00 509,68 0,00 3,689,73 792,86 4,482.59 154 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 6 2,890.95 289.10 0,00 3,180,05 0,00 509.68 0.00 3,689,73 792.86 4,482.59 155 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 7 2,890.95 289.10 0,00 3,180.05 0,00 509.68 0.00 3,689.73 792,86 4,482.59 156 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 8 2,890,95 289,10 0.00 3,180,05 0.00 509.68 0,00 3,689.73 792.86 4,482,59 157 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT 9 2,890.95 289.10 0,00 3,180,05 0.00 509.68 0.00 3,689,73 792,86 4,482.59 158 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT 10 2,890.95 289,10 0.00 3,180,05 0.00 509.68 0.00 3,689,73 792.86 4,482.59 159 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT 11 2,890,95 289.10 0,00 3,180,05 0.00 509.68 0.00 3,689.73 792,86 4,482.59 160 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 12 2,890,95 289.10 0.00 3,180,05 0,00 509,68 0.00 3,689,73 792,86 4,482,59 161 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT 13 2,890.95 289.10 0.00 3,180.05 0,00 509,68 0,00 3,689,73 792.86 4,482.59 29600C1 C-I-4 08/28/2002 EXHIBIT C TABLE C-I ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA CONSOLIDATED TABULATION OF PARCEL ASSESSMENT DATA ASSESSOR'S TAX COST OF IMPROVEMENTS I PAYOFF I ASSESSMENT DEDUCT.1 SUBTOTAL I BOND ISSUANCE I ASSESSMENT NUMBER (ATN) I ACQUISITION IMPROVEMENT IMPROVEMENT TOTAL COST OF AD 91-1 DISTRICT CONTRIBUTIONS & AMOUNT TO COST TOTAL NUMBER PROPERTY DESCRIPTION IMPROVEMENTS I CONTINGENCY INCIDENTAlS I IMPROVEMENTS ASSESSMENTS PROCEEDINGS CASH PAYMENTS BOND AND RESERVE ASSESSMENT 162 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 14 2,890,95 289.10 0,00 3,180.05 0,00 509.68 0.00 3,689.73 792.86 4,482.59 163 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 15 2,890.95 289,10 0.00 3,180.05 0.00 509.68 0.00 3,689,73 792.86 4,482,59 164 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT 16 2,890,95 289.10 0.00 3,180,05 0,00 509,68 0,00 3,689.73 792,86 4,482,59 165 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT 17 2,890,95 289.10 0.00 3,180.05 0.00 509,68 0.00 3,689.73 792.86 4,482,59 166 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT 18 2,890,95 289.10 0,00 3,180,05 0,00 509,68 0.00 3,689.73 792.86 4,482,59 167 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT 19 2,890.95 289.10 0.00 3,180.05 0.00 509.68 0,00 3,689.73 792.86 4,482.59 168 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 20 2,890.95 289.10 0,00 3,180.05 0.00 509.68 0,00 3,689,73 792,86 4,482,59 169 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 21 2,890.95 289.10 0,00 3,180,05 0,00 509.68 0.00 3,689,73 792.86 4,482.59 170 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT 22 2,890.95 289.10 0,00 3,180,05 0,00 509,68 0.00 3,689.73 792.86 4,482.59 171 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 23 2,890.95 289.10 0.00 3,180.05 0.00 509.68 0,00 3,689.73 792,86 4,482.59 172 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT 24 2,890.95 289,10 0.00 3,180.05 0.00 509.68 0,00 3,689.73 792,86 4,482.59 173 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT 25 2,890.95 289.10 0,00 3,180.05 0.00 509.68 0,00 3,689,73 792,86 4,482.59 174 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 26 2,890.95 289.10 0.00 3,180.05 0,00 509,68 0,00 3,689,73 792.86 4,482,59 175 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT 27 2,890.95 289.10 0.00 3,180,05 0,00 509,68 0,00 3,689.73 792,86 4,482.59 176 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT 28 2,890,95 289,10 0,00 3,180.05 0,00 509.68 0,00 3,689,73 792,86 4,482,59 177 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT 29 2,890,95 289.10 0,00 3,180.05 0.00 509.68 0.00 3,689,73 792.86 4,482.59 178 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT 30 2,890.95 289,10 0,00 3,180.05 0,00 509.68 0,00 3,689,73 792.86 4,482,59 179 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT 31 2,890.95 289,10 0.00 3,180.05 0,00 509.68 0.00 3,689,73 792.86 4,482.59 180 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 32 2,890.95 289.10 0,00 3,180,05 0,00 509,68 0.00 3,689.73 792.86 4,482,59 181 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT 33 2,890.95 289,10 0,00 3,180,05 0.00 509,68 0.00 3,689.73 792.86 4,482,59 182 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 34 2,890.95 289,10 0.00 3,180.05 0.00 509,68 0.00 3,689.73 792.86 4,482.59 183 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT 35 2,890.95 289.10 0.00 3,180.05 0.00 509.68 0.00 3,689.73 792,86 4,482.59 184 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 36 2,890,95 289,10 0.00 3,180,05 0.00 509.68 0,00 3,689.73 792.86 4,482.59 185 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 37 2,890.95 289,10 0.00 3,180.05 0.00 509.68 0.00 3,689.73 792.86 4,482.59 186 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT 38 2,890.95 289.10 0.00 3,180,05 0.00 509,68 0.00 3,689.73 792,86 4,482.59 187 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 39 2,890.95 289.10 0.00 3,180.05 0.00 509.68 0,00 3,689.73 792,86 4,482.59 188 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 40 2,890.95 289.10 0,00 3,180,05 0.00 509.68 0,00 3,689.73 792,86 4,482.59 189 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 41 2,890.95 289.10 0.00 3,180.05 0.00 509.68 0.00 3,689.73 792.86 4,482.59 190 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 42 2,890.95 289.10 0,00 3,180.05 0.00 509.68 0.00 3,689.73 792,86 4,482.59 191 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 43 2,890.95 289.10 0.00 3,180.05 0.00 509.68 0.00 3,689.73 792,86 4,482.59 192 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT 44 2,890,95 289.10 0.00 3,180.05 0,00 509.68 0,00 3,689.73 792,86 4,482.59 193 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 45 2,890,95 289.10 0.00 3,180.05 0,00 509,68 0.00 3,689,73 792.86 4,482,59 194 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 46 2,890,95 289.10 0,00 3,180.05 0.00 509.68 0,00 3,689.73 792,86 4,482.59 195 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 47 2,890.95 289.10 0.00 3,180.05 0.00 509,68 0,00 3,689,73 792.86 4,482.59 196 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT 48 2,890.95 289.10 0.00 3,180,05 0.00 509,68 0,00 3,689.73 792.86 4,482,59 197 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT 49 2,890.95 289.10 0,00 3,180,05 0,00 509,68 0,00 3,689.73 792.86 4,482.59 198 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT 50 2,890.95 289,10 0,00 3,180,05 0.00 509,68 0.00 3,689.73 792,86 4,482.59 199 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT 51 2,890.95 289.10 0.00 3,180,05 0.00 509,68 0.00 3,689.73 792.86 4,482,59 200 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 52 2,890.95 289.10 0.00 3,180,05 0.00 509.68 0.00 3,689.73 792.86 4,482.59 201 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT 53 2,890.95 289,10 0.00 3,180.05 0.00 509.68 0.00 3,689.73 792.86 4,482.59 202 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 54 2,890.95 289.10 0.00 3,180.05 0.00 509.68 0,00 3,689.73 792.86 4,482,59 29600Cl C-I-5 08/28/2002 EXHIBIT C TABLE C-I ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA CONSOLIDATED TABULATION OF PARCEL ASSESSMENT DATA ASSESSOR'S TAX I COST OF IMPROVEMENTS I PAYOFF ASSESSMENT DEDUCT SUBTOTAL BOND ISSUANCE ASSESSMENT NUMBER (ATN) I ACQUISITION IMPROVEMENT IMPROVEMENT TOTAL COST OF AD 91-1 DISTRICT CONTRIBUTIONS & AMOUNT TO COST TOTAL NUMBER PROPERTY DESCRIPTION IMPROVEMENTS CONTINGENCY INCIDENTALS IMPROVEMENTS ASSESSMENTS PROCEEDINGS CASH PAYMENTS BOND AND RESERVE ASSESSMENT 203 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT 55 2,890.95 289.10 0.00 3,180,05 0,00 509.68 0,00 3,689,73 792,86 4,482,59 204 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO.3; LOT 56 2,890.95 289.10 0,00 3,180.05 0.00 509,68 0.00 3,689.73 792,86 4,482.59 205 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT 57' 2,891,05 288,83 0.00 3,179.88 0.00 509.91 0,00 3,689.79 792,74 4,482,53 206 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO, 3; LOT A 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 MONTARA AREA TOTALS 164,784.25 - 16,478.43 0.00 181,262.68 0.00 29,051.99 0.00 210,314.67 45,192.90 255,507.57 4. THE WOODS AREA 207 REMAINDER OF 515'{40-13 194,823.23 0.00 27,123.33 221,946.56 10,064.29 37,185.68 0.00 269,196.53 57,845,57 327,042.10 208 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 1 1,651.04 0.00 229.86 1,880.90 85,29 315.13 0.00 2,281,32 490,22 2,771.54 209 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 2 1,651.04 0.00 229.86 1,880.90 85.29 315.13 0,00 2,281.32 490,22 2,771.54 210 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 3 1,651,04 0.00 229,86 1,880.90 85.29 315.13 0.00 2,281,32 490,22 2,771.54 211 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 4 1,651.04 0.00 229.86 1,880.90 85.29 315.13 0.00 2,281.32 490.22 2,771.54 212 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 5 1,651.04 0.00 229.86 1,880.90 85.29 315.13 0,00 2,281.32 490,22 2,771.54 213 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 6 1,651.04 0.00 229,86 1,880,90 85.29 315,13 0,00 2,281,32 490.22 2,771.54 214 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 7 1,651,04 0.00 229.86 1,880.90 85.29 315.13 0.00 2,281.32 490.22 2,771.54 215 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 8 1,651.04 0.00 229.86 1,880,90 85.29 315.13 0.00 2,281,32 490.22 2,771,54 216 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 9 1,651.04 0,00 229.86 1,880.90 85,29 315,13 0.00 2,281.32 490,22 2,771.54 217 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 10 1,651,04 0,00 229.86 1,880.90 85.29 315.13 0.00 2,281.32 490.22 2,771.54 218 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 11 1,651,04 0.00 229.86 1,880.90 85.29 315.13 0.00 2,281,32 490,22 2,771,54 219 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 12 1,651,04 0.00 229.86 1,880.90 85.29 315,13 0.00 2,281.32 490,22 2,771.54 220 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 13 1,651.04 0,00 229.86 1,880,90 85,29 315,13 0,00 2,281,32 490,22 2,771.54 221 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 14 1,651,04 0.00 229.86 1,880,90 85.29 315.13 0,00 2,281.32 490,22 2,771.54 222 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 15 1,651.04 0.00 229.86 1,880.90 85.29 315.13 0.00 2,281,32 490.22 2,771,54 223 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 224 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 17 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 225 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 18 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 226 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 19 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 227 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 20 1,651.04 0.00 229.86 1,880.90 85.29 315.13 0.00 2,281.32 490,22 2,771.54 228 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 21 1,651.04 0,00 229,86 1,880,90 85.29 315,13 0,00 2,281,32 490,22 2,771.54 229 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 22 1,651,04 0.00 229,86 1,880,90 85,29 315.13 0.00 2,281.32 490.22 2,771.54 230 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 23 1,651,04 0,00 229,86 1,880.90 85,29 315.13 0.00 2,281.32 490,22 2,771.54 231 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 24 1,651.04 0.00 229.86 1,880.90 85,29 315,13 0.00 2,281.32 490,22 2,771,54 232 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 25 1,651.04 0.00 229.86 1,880.90 85.29 315,13 0.00 2,281.32 490.22 2,771.54 233 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 26 1,651.04 0.00 229.86 1,880.90 85.29 315.13 0.00 2,281.32 490.22 2,771.54 234 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 27 1,651,04 0.00 229,86 1,880,90 85.29 315.13 0.00 2,281.32 490,22 2,771.54 235 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 28 1,651.04 0,00 229.86 1,880,90 85,29 315.13 0.00 2,281.32 490.22 2,771.54 236 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 29 1,651.04 0,00 229.86 1,880,90 85,29 315.13 0.00 2,281.32 490.22 2,771.54 237 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 30 1,651.04 0.00 229.86 1,880,90 85.29 315.13 0.00 2,281,32 490.22 2,771,54 238 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 31 1,651,04 0,00 229.86 1,880,90 85.29 315.13 0.00 2,281.32 490.22 2,771,54 239 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 32 1,651,04 0,00 229.86 1,880.90 85.29 315.13 0.00 2,281,32 490.22 2,771,54 240 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 33 1,651.04 0,00 229.86 1,880,90 85.29 315,13 0.00 2,281.32 490.22 2,771.54 29600C1 C-I-6 08/28/2002 EXHIBIT C TABLE C-I ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA CONSOLIDATED TABULATION OF PARCEL ASSESSMENT DATA ASSESSOR'S TAX I COST OF IMPROVEMENTS I PAYOFF ASSESSMENT DEDUCT SUBTOTAL BOND ISSUANCE ASSESSMENT NUMBER (ATN) I ACQUISITION IMPROVEMENT IMPROVEMENT TOTAL COST OF AD 91-1 DISTRICT CONTRIBUTIONS & AMOUNT TO COST TOTAL NUMBER PROPERTY DESCRIPTION IMPROVEMENTS CONTINGENCY INCIDENTALS IMPROVEMENTS ASSESSMENTS PROCEEDINGS CASH PAYMENTS BOND AND RESERVE ASSESSMENT 241 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 34 1,651.04 0,00 229.86 1,880.90 85.29 315,13 0,00 2,281,32 490.22 2,771.54 242 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 35 1,651.04 0.00 229.86 1,880,90 85,29 315.13 0.00 2,281.32 490.22 2,771.54 243 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 36 1,651,04 0,00 229,86 1,880.90 85,29 315,13 0.00 2,281,32 490.22 2,771.54 244 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 37 1,651,04 0.00 229.86 1,880.90 85.29 315.13 0.00 2,281.32 490.22 2,771,54 245 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 38 1,651,04 0.00 229,86 1,880.90 85,29 315,13 0.00 2,281,32 490,22 2,771.54 246 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 39 1,651.04 0.00 229,86 1,880.90 85,29 315,13 0,00 2,281.32 490,22 2,771,54 247 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 40 1,651.04 0.00 229,86 1,880.90 85.29 315.13 0,00 2,281.32 490.22 2,771.54 248 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 41 1,651.04 0.00 229.86 1,880.90 85.29 315.13 0.00 2,281.32 490.22 2,771.54 249 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 42 1,651.04 0,00 229.86 1,880.90 85.29 315.13 0,00 2,281,32 490.22 2,771.54 ' 250 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 43 1,651,04 0,00 229.86 1,880.90 85,29 315,13 0.00 2,281.32 490.22 2,771.54 251 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 44 1,651.04 0.00 229,86 1,880.90 85,29 315.13 0.00 2,281.32 490.22 2,771.54 252 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 45 1,651.04 0.00 229,86 1,880,90 85.29 315.13 0,00 2,281.32 490.22 2,771.54 253 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 46 1,651.04 0.00 229.86 1,880,90 85.29 315,13 0,00 2,281.32 490,22 2,771.54 254 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 47 1,651.04 0.00 229.86 1,880,90 85.29 315.13 0.00 2,281,32 490,22 2,771.54 255 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 48 1,651.04 0.00 229,86 1,880.90 85,29 315.13 0.00 2,281.32 490.22 2,771.54 256 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 49 1,651.04 0.00 229,86 1,880,90 85,29 315,13 0.00 2,281,32 490.22 2,771.54 257 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 50 1,651.04 0.00 229,86 1,880.90 85.29 315.13 0,00 2,281.32 490.22 2,771.54 258 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 51 1,651.04 0,00 229,86 1,880.90 85.29 315.13 0,00 2,281,32 490,22 2,771.54 259 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 52 1,651.04 0.00 229,86 1,880,90 85.29 315,13 0.00 2,281.32 490.22 2,771.54 260 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 53 1,651,04 0.00 229.86 1,880,90 85,29 315.13 0,00 2,281,32 490.22 2,771,54 261 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 54 1,651.04 0.00 229,86 1,880.90 85,29 315,13 0.00 2,281,32 490,22 2,771.54 262 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 55 1,651.04 0,00 229.86 1,880,90 85.29 315,13 0,00 2,281.32 490,22 2,771.54 263 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 56 1,651.04 0.00 229,86 1,880.90 85.29 315,13 0,00 2,281.32 490,22 2,771.54 264 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 57 1,651.04 0.00 229.86 1,880.90 85.29 315,13 0.00 2,281,32 490,22 2,771.54 265 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 58 1,651.04 0.00 229.86 1,880.90 85,29 315.13 0,00 2,281.32 490.22 2,771.54 266 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 59 1,651.04 0.00 229.86 1,880,90 85,29 315,13 0,00 2,281.32 490.22 2,771.54 267 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 60 1,651.04 0,00 229.86 1,880,90 85.29 315,13 0,00 2,281.32 490.22 2,771.54 268 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE; LOT 61 1,651.28 0,00 229.79 1,881.07 85,32 315.30 0.00 2,281,69 490.03 2,771,72 THE WOODS AREA TOTALS 288,932.75 0.00 40,225.28 329,158.03 14,925.85 55,148.26 0.00 399,232.14 85,787.92 485,020.06 5. DISTRICT TOTALS: 1 248844.75 16478.43 145 689.08 1 411 012.26 14 925.85 228543.14 0.00 I 1 654481.25 355518.75 2 010 000.00 NOTES; 1. 2. 3, 4. 5. 6. 7. PARCEL MAP NO. 9826 WAS FILED AUGUST 16, 1992, IN BOOK 44 OF PARCEL MAPS, AT PAGES 131 THROUGH 132, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF KERN (K.CR). CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO, 51-00 WAS RECORDED SEPTEMBER 27, 2000, AS DOCUMENT NO. 0200120365 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE KERN COUNTY RECORDER. TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO.3 WAS RECORDED AUGUST 6,2002, IN BOOK 48 OF MAPS, AT PAGES 151 THROUGH 153, K.CR TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4 WAS RECORDED AUGUST 6, 2002,IN BOOK 48 OF MAPS, AT PAGES 154 THROUGH 155, K,CR TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT ONE WAS RECORDED ,2002, IN BOOK 48 OF MAPS, AT PAGES _ THROUGH _, K.C.R. TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT lWO WAS RECORDED , 2002, IN BOOK 48 OF MAPS, AT PAGES _ THROUGH _' K.CR TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE WAS RECORDED , 2002, IN BOOK 48 OF MAPS, AT PAGES _ THROUGH _, K,CR 29600C 1 C-I-7 08/28/2002 EXHIBIT C TABLE C-II-A ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO, 02-1 COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA DETAILS OF AVALON AREA (TRACT NO. 5968) ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT REALLOCATIONS FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PER CITY CODE SECTION 13.08.070 OLIVE DRIVE TRACT NO. 5968 BOTH SIDES ON-SITE NET IMPROVEMENTS AND OFF-SITE ASSESSMENT ASMT ATNI DEVELOPMENT AREA LAND EDUI (Between East and West STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT AD 91-1 PROCEEDING 1 TOTAL AMOUNT AMOUNT NO. DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION . AREA EDU ACRE Boundaries of Tract No, 5968) IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL PAYOFF ISSUANCE COST ASSESSMENT PER ACRE PER EDU AVALON AREA 1 PARCEL 6 IN PARCEL MAP NO. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 5968 35.43 140 3,95 319,083.59 76,126.81 395,210.40 0.00 161,877.54 557,087,94 15,723,62 3,979.20 9826 (462-020-37) 2 REMAINDER OF PCL C IN LLA 51-00 TENTATIVE TRACT NO, 5968 9.37 38 4,06 86,608.40 20,662,99 107,271,39 0,00 43,938,19 151,209,58 16,137,63 3,979,20 (PORTION OF 462-020-75) 3-39 PORTIONS OF 462-020-75 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT ONE 9.22 37 4.01 84,329.24 20,119.23 104,448.47 0.00 42,781.92 147,230.39 15,968.59 3,979,20 (RESIDENTIAL LOTS) 40-75 PORTIONS OF 462-020-75 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO 9,17 36 3,93 82,050.07 19,575.47 101,625,54 0.00 41,625,65 143,251,19 15,621.72 3,979.20 (RESIDENTIAL LOTS) TOTALS I AVERAGES FOR AVALON AREA: 63.19 251 3.97 572,071.30 136,484.50 708,555.80 0.00 290,223.30 998,779.10 15,805.97 3,979.20 NOTE: 1, LAND AREA AND DWELLING UNITS CONFIRMED BY SMITHTECH-USA, INC" BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA. 29600C2A C-II-A-1 07/17/2002 EXHIBIT C TABLE C-II-B ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA DETAILS OF BELSERA AREA (TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4) ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT REALLOCATIONS FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PER CITY CODE SECTION 13.08.070 OLIVE DRIVE OLD FARM ROAD SOUTH SIDE WEST SIDE IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENTS NET (Old Farm Road to (Olive Drive to ASSESSMENT ASMT ATNI DEVELOPMENT AREA LAND EDU 1 West Boundary of South Boundary of IMPROVEMENT AD 91-1 PROCEEDING 1 TOTAL AMOUNT AMOUNT NO. DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION AREA EDU ACRE Tract No, 5831 Unit No. 41 Tract No, 5831 Unit No. 41 TOTAL PAYOFF ISSUANCE COST ASSESSMENT PER ACRE PER EDU BELSERA AREA 76-148 PORTIONS OF 462-020-68 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4 17.34 73 4.21 192,035,75 0.00 192,035.75 0,00 78,657,52 270,693,27 15,610,92 3,708,13 (RESIDENTIAL LOTS) TOTALS I AVERAGES FOR BELSERA AREA: 17.34 73 4.21 192,035.75 0.00 192,035.75 0.00 78,657.52 270,693.27 15,610.92 3,708.13 NOTE: 1, LAND AREA AND DWEWNG UNITS CONFIRMED BY QUAD KNOPF, INC., VISALlA, CALIFORNIA. 29600C2B C-II-B-1 07/17/2002 EXHIBIT C TABLE C·II·C ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA DETAILS OF MONTARA AREA (TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO.3) ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT REALLOCATIONS FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PER CITY CODE SECTION 13.08.070 SNOW ROAD JEWETT A AVENUE SOUTH SIDE WEST SIDE IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENTS NET (Jewetta Avenue to (Snow Road to ASSESSMENT ASMT ATNI DEVELOPMENT AREA LAND EDUI West Boundary of South Boundary of IMPROVEMENT AD 91-1 PROCEEDING 1 TOTAL AMOUNT AMOUNT NO. DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION AREA EDU ACRE Tract No. 5829 Unit No, 3) Tract No, 5829 Unit No, 3) TOTAL PAYOFF ISSUANCE COST ASSESSMENT PER ACRE PER EDU MONTARA AREA 149-205 PORTIONS OF 462-020-77 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO, 3 18.34 57 3.11 181,262,68 0.00 181,262,68 0,00 74,244.89 255,507,57 13,931,71 4,482,59 (RESIDENTIAL LOTS) 206 PORTION OF 462-020-77 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO, 3 N/A 0 N/A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A N/A (CANAL LOn TOTALS I AVERAGES FOR MONTARA AREA: 18.34 57 3.11 181,262.68 0.00 181,262.68 0.00 74,244.89 255,507.57 13,931.71 4,482.59 NOTE: 1. LAND AREA AND DWELLING UNITS CONFIRMED BY QUAD KNOPF, INC., VISALlA, CALIFORNIA. 296DOC2C C-II-C-1 07/17/2002 EXHIBIT C TABLE C-II-D ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO, 02-1 COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA DETAILS OF THE WOODS AREA (TRACT NO. 6066) ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT REALLOCATIONS FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PER CITY CODE SECTION 13.08.070 AKERS ROAD BERKSHIRE ROAD WEST SIDE SOUTH SIDE IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENTS NET (Berkshire Road to (Akers Road to TRACT NO. 6066 ASSESSMENT ASMT ATNI DEVELOPMENT AREA LAND EDUI South Boundary of West Boundary of ON-SITE IMPROVEMENT AD 91-1 PROCEEDING 1 TOTAL AMOUNT AMOUNT NO. DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION AREA EDU ACRE Tract No, 6066\ Tract No. 6066) IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL PAYOFF ISSUANCE COST ASSESSMENT PER ACRE PER EDU THE WOODS AREA 207 REMAINDER OF 515-040-13 TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 6066 20.OU Hi 4.63 72,Ul~:l.Ul 21,254,77 10,064.29 l:Io,U~1,20 327,042.10 2,771.54 208-222 & PORTIONS OF 515-040-13 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE 11.09 57 5.14 62,155.50 34,788.84 10,267.13 107,211.47 4,861.56 45,904.93 157,977.96 14,245.08 2,771,54 227-268 (RESIDENTIAL LOTS) 223-226 PORTIONS OF 515-040-13 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE N/A o N/A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 N/A N/A (SUMP LOTS) TOTALS I AVERAGES FOR THE WOODS AREA: 36.59 175 4.78 190,828.28 106,807.85 31,521.90 329,158.03 14,925.85 140,936.18 485,020.06 13,255.54 2,771.54 NOTE: 1. LAND AREA AND DWELLING UNITS CONFIRMED BY SMITHTECH-USA, INC., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA. 29600C2D C-II-D-1 07/17/2002 EXHIBIT C TABLE C-III-A ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA DETAILS OF AVALON AREA (TRACT NO. 5968) ESTIMATED BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ALLOCATIONS FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OLIVE DRIVE TRACT NO, 5968 BOTH SIDES ON-SITE NET IMPROVEMENTS AND OFF-SITE ASSESSMENT ASMT ATNI DEVELOPMENT AREA LAND EDUI (Between East and West STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT AD 91-1 PROCEEDING 1 TOTAL AMOUNT AMOUNT NO. DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION AREA EDU ACRE Boundaries of Tract No. 5968) IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL PAYOFF ISSUANCE COST ASSESSMENT PER ACRE PER EDU AVALON AREA 1 PARCEL 6 IN PARCEL MAP NO. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 5968 35.43 140 3,95 245,182,61 65,857,53 311,040.14 0.00 127,401,54 438,441.68 12,374.87 3,131.73 9826 (462-020-37) 2 REMAINDER OF PCL C IN LLA 51-00 TENTATIVE TRACT NO, 5968 9,37 38 4.06 66,549.57 17,875.61 84,425,18 0.00 34,580.42 119,005.60 12,700,70 3,131.73 (PORTION OF 462-020-75) 3-39 PORTIONS OF 462-020-75 TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT ONE 9.22 37 4.01 64,798.26 17,405.20 82,203,46 0,00 33,670.40 115,873,86 12,567,66 3,131,73 (RESIDENTIAL LOTS) 40-75 PORTIONS OF 462-020-75 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT TWO 9.17 36 3.93 63,046.96 16,934,79 79,981.75 0.00 32,760.39 112,742.14 12,294,67 3,131,73 (RESIDENTIAL LOTS) SUBTOTALS I AVERAGES FOR AVALON AREA: 63.19 251 3.97 439,577.40 118,073.13 557,650.53 0.00 228,412.75 786,063.28 12,439.68 3,131.73 N/A I NON AD 02-1 NIA N/A N/A N/A 132,493.90 18,411,37 150,905,27 0.00 61,810.55 212,715,82 N/A N/A SUBTOTALS I AVERAGES FOR NON AD 02-1: N/A N/A N/A 132,493.90 18,411.37 150,905.27 0.00 61,810.55 212,715.82 N1A N/A TOTALS I AVERAGES FOR AVALON AREA: N/A N/A N/A 572,071.30 136,484.50 708,555.80 0.00 290,223.30 998,779.10 N/A N/A NOTE: 1. LAND AREA AND DWELLING UNITS CONFIRMED BY SMITHTECH-USA, INC., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA. 29600C3A C-III·A-1 07/17/2002 EXHIBIT C TABLE C-III-B ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA DETAILS OF BELSERA AREA (TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4) ESTIMATED BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ALLOCATIONS FOR PROPOSED ,DEVELOPMENT OLIVE DRIVE OLD FARM ROAD SOUTH SIDE WEST SIDE IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENTS NET (Old Farm Road to (Olive Drive to ASSESSMENT ASMT ATNI DEVELOPMENT AREA LAND EDU 1 West Boundary of South Boundary of IMPROVEMENT AD 91-1 PROCEEDING 1 TOTAL AMOUNT AMOUNT NO, DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION AREA EDU ACRE Tract No. 5831 Unit NO.4) Tract No, 5831 Unit No.4) TOTAL PAYOFF ISSUANCE COST ASSESSMENT PER ACRE PER EDU BELSERA AREA 76-148 PORTIONS OF 462-020-68 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4 17,34 73 4,21 192,035.75 0,00 192,035.75 0.00 78,657,52 270,693,27 15,610,92 3,708,13 (RESIDENTIAL LOTS) TOTALS I AVERAGES FOR BELSERA AREA: 17.34 73 4.21 192,035.75 0.00 192,035.75 0.00 78,657.52 270,693.27 15,610.92 3,708.13 NOTE: 1. LAND AREA AND DWELLING UNITS CONFIRMED BY QUAD KNOPF, INC., VISALIA, CALIFORNIA. 29600C3B C-III-B-1 07/17/2002 EXHIBIT C TABLE C-III-C ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA DETAILS OF MONTARA AREA (TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO.3) ESTIMATED BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ALLOCATIONS FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SNOW ROAD JEWETT A AVENUE SOUTH SIDE WEST SIDE IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENTS NET (Jewetta Avenue to (Snow Road to ASSESSMENT ASMT ATNI DEVELOPMENT AREA LAND EDUI West Boundary of South Boundary of IMPROVEMENT AD 91-1 PROCEEDING 1 TOTAL AMOUNT AMOUNT NO. DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION AREA EDU ACRE Tract No. 5829 Unit No. 31 Tract No. 5829 Unit No. 31 TOTAL PAYOFF ISSUANCE COST ASSESSMENT PER ACRE PER EDU MONTARA AREA 149-205 PORTIONS OF 462-020-77 TRACT NO. 5629 UNIT NO.3 18.34 57 3,11 181,262,68 0.00 181,262.68 0,00 74,244.89 255,507.57 13,931.71 4,482,59 (RESIDENTIAL LOTS) 206 PORTION OF 462-020-77 TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO.3 N/A ° N/A 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 N/A N/A (CANAL LOT) TOTALS I AVERAGES FOR MONTARA AREA: 18.34 57 3.11 181,262.68 0.00 181,262.68 0.00 74,244.89 255,507.57 13,931.71 4,482.59 NOTE: 1. LAND AREA AND DWELLING UNITS CONFIRMED BY QUAD KNOPF, INC., VISALIA, CALIFORNIA. 29600C3C C-III-G-1 07/17/2002 EXHIBIT C TABLE C-III-D ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA DETAILS OF THE WOODS AREA (TRACT NO. 6066) ESTIMATED BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ALLOCATIONS FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AKERS ROAD BERKSHIRE ROAD WEST SIDE SOUTH SIDE IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENTS NET (Berkshire Road to (Akers Road to TRACT NO, 6066 ASSESSMENT ASMT ATNI DEVELOPMENT AREA LAND EDUI South Boundary of West Boundary of ON-SITE IMPROVEMENT AD 91-1 PROCEEDING 1 TOTAL AMOUNT AMOUNT NO. DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION AREA EDU ACRE Tract No. 6066) Tract No: 6066) IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL PAYOFF ISSUANCE COST ASSESSMENT PER ACRE PER EDU THE WOODS AREA 20f REMAINDER OF 515-040-13 TENTATIVE TRACT NO, 6066 ;¿:J.:JU 118 4~63 1;¿8,öf¿f8 f;¿,UHl.U1 ;¿1,25477 ;¿;¿1,S46.:JÖ S:J.U;;S1,2:J 32f.U42.1O 12.8;¿:J.18 ;¿. ,M 208-222 & PORTIONS OF 515-040-13 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE 11,09 57 5.14 62,155.50 34,7138,84 10.267,13 107,211,47 4,861.56 45,904,93 157,977.96 14,245,08 2,771.54 227-268 (RESIDENTIAL LOTS) 223-226 PORTIONS OF 515-040-13 TRACT NO, 6066 UNIT ONE N/A o N/A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00 N/A N/A (SUMP LOTS) TOTALS I AVERAGES FOR THE WOODS AREA: 36.59 175 4.78 190,828.28 106 807.85 31,521.90 329,158.03 14,925.85 140,936.18 485,020,06 13,255.54 2,771.54 NOTE: ,1. LAND AREA AND DWELLING UNITS CONFIRMED BY SMITHTECH-USA, INC" BAKERSFIELD. CALIFORNIA. 29600C3D C-III-D-1 07/17/2002 EXHIBIT C TABLE C-IV-A ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COMPARISON OF AVALON AREA (TRACT NO. 5968) BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ALLOCATION AND ASSESSMENT REALLOCATION PER CITY CODE SECTION 13.08.070 NET REALLOCATION REALLOCATION AVERAGE AVERAGE ASMT ATNI DEVELOPMENT AREA LAND EDUI PER CITY CODE BENEFIT MINUS DIFFERENCE DIFFERENCE NO. DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION AREA EDU ACRE SECTION 13.08.070 ALLOCATION BENEFIT ALLOCATION PER ACRE PER EDU AVALON AREA 1 PARCEL 6 IN PARCEL MAP NO. 9826 TENTATIVE TRACT NO, 5968 35.43 140 3.95 557,087.94 438,441.68 118,646.26 3,348,75 847.47 (462-020-37) 2 REMAINDER OF PCL C IN LLA 51-00 TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 5968 9.37 38 4.06 151,209.58 119,005,60 32,203.98 3,436.92 847.47 (PORTION OF 462-020-75) 3-39 PORTIONS OF 462-020-75 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT ONE 9.22 37 4.01 147,230.39 115,873.86 31,356.53 3,400,93 847.47 (RESIDENTIAL LOTS) 40-75 PORTIONS OF 462-020-75 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT TWO 9.17 36 3.93 143,251.19 112,742.14 30,509.05 3,327,05 847.47 (RESIDENTIAL LOTS) SUBTOTALS I AVERAGES FOR AVALON AREA: 63.19 251 3.97 998,779.10 786,063.28 212,715.82 3,366.29 847.47 NIA NON AD 02-1 NIA N/A N/A NIA 0.00 212,715,82 (212,715.82 NIA NIA SUBTOTALS I AVERAGES FOR NON AD 02-1: N/A N/A N/A 0.00 212,715.82 (212,715.82 N/A N/A TOTALS I AVERAGES FOR AVALON AREA: N/A N/A N/A 998,779.10 998,779.10 0.00 N/A N/A NOTE: 1. LAND AREA AND DWELLING UNITS CONFIRMED BY SMITHTECH-USA, INC" BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA. 29600C4A C-IV-A-1 07/17/2002 EXHIBIT C TABLE C-IV-B ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COMPARISON OF BELSERA AREA (TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4) BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ALLOCATION AND ASSESSMENT REALLOCATION PER CITY CODE SECTION 13.08.070 NET REALLOCATION REALLOCATION AVERAGE AVERAGE ASMT ATN/ DEVELOPMENT AREA LAND EDU/ PER CITY CODE BENEFIT MINUS DIFFERENCE DIFFERENCE NO. DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION AREA EDU ACRE SECTION 13.08.070 ALLOCATION BENEFIT ALLOCATION PER ACRE PER EDU BELSERA AREA 76-148 PORTIONS OF 462-020-68 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO, 4 17.34 73 4.21 270,693.27 270,693.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 (RESIDENTIAL lOTS) TOTALS I AVERAGES FOR BELSERAAREA: 17.34 73 4.21 270,693.27 270,693.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 NOTE: 1. LAND AREA AND DWELLING UNITS CONFIRMED BY QUAD KNOPF, INC., VISALlA, CALIFORNIA. 29600C4B C-IV-B-1 07/17/2002 EXHIBIT C TABLE C-IV-C ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COMPARISON OF MONTARA AREA (TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO.3) BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ALLOCATION AND ASSESSMENT REALLOCATION PER CITY CODE SECTION 13.08.070 NET REALLOCATION REALLOCATION AVERAGE AVERAGE ASMT ATN/ DEVELOPMENT AREA LAND EDU/ PER CITY CODE BENEFIT MINUS DIFFERENCE DIFFERENCE NO. DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION AREA EDU ACRE SECTION 13.08.070 ALLOCATION BENEFIT ALLOCATION PER ACRE PER EDU MONTARA AREA 149-205 PORTIONS OF 462-020-77 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO, 3 18,34 57 3.11 255,507.57 255,507.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 (RESIDENTIAL LOTS) 206 PORTION OF 462-020-77 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO.3 N/A ON/A 0.00 0,00 0.00 N/A N/A (CANAL LOT) TOTALS I AVERAGES FOR MONTARA AREA: 18.34 57 3.11 255,507.57 255,507.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 NOTE: 1. LAND AREA AND DWELLING UNITS CONFIRMED BY QUAD KNOPF, INC., VISALlA, CALIFORNIA. 29600C4C C-IV-C-1 07/17/2002 EXHIBIT C TABLE C-IV·D ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COMPARISON OF THE WOODS AREA (TRACT NO. 6066) BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ALLOCATION AND ASSESSMENT REALLOCATION PER CITY CODE SECTION 13.08.070 NET REALLOCATION REALLOCATION AVERAGE AVERAGE ASMT ATN/ DEVELOPMENT AREA LAND EDU/ PER CITY CODE BENEFIT MINUS DIFFERENCE DIFFERENCE NO. DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION AREA EDU ACRE SECTION 13,08,070 ALLOCATION BENEFIT ALLOCATION PER ACRE PER EDU THE WOODS AREA 207 REMAINDER OF 515-040-13 TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 6066 25.50 118 4.63 327,042.10 327,042.10 0,00 0.00 0.00 208-222 & PORTIONS OF 515-040-13 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE 11.09 57 5.14 157,977.96 157,977.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 227-268 (RESIDENTIAL LOTS) 223-226 PORTIONS OF 515-040-13 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE N/A ON/A 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A N/A (SUMP LOTS) TOTALS I AVERAGES FOR THE WOODS AREA: 36.59 175 4.78 485,020.06 485,020.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 NOTE: 1. LAND AREA AND DWELLING UNITS CONFIRMED BY SMITHTECH-USA, INC., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA. 29600C4D C-IV-D-1 07/17/2002 l l l l ~l l J ~l f ~1' In ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 (A V ALONIBELSERAlMONTARA/THEWOODS) EXHIBIT D DESCRIPTION OF ASSESSMENT SPREAD METHOD J EXHIBIT D ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 (A V ALONIBELSERA/MONTARAffHE WOODS) DESCRIPTION OF ASSESSMENT SPREAD METHOD INTRODUCTION The City Council appointed the Director of Public Works as the Engineer of Work for AD 02-1 by adoption of Resolution of Intention No. 1276 on May 22,2002. On April 24, 2002, the City Council approved Agreement No. 02-107 with Edward J. Wilson, a Registered Civil Engineer, appointing him as the Assessment Engineer for AD 02-1. The Assessment Engineer has been retained by the City to prepare an Engineer's Report on the proposed assessment that will include, in part, an analysis ofthe facts in AD 02-1 and the development of a method of apportioning the total amount of the costs and expenses of the proposed improvement acquisitions to the parcels and lots located within AD 02-1. The assessments are apportioned according to the special benefits received by the lots, pieces and parcels of land within AD 02-1. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel is determined in relationship to the entirety of the capital cost of the improvements. No assessment has been apportioned on any parcel that exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. Only special benefits are assessed and any general benefits have been separated from special benefits for purposes of this report. AD 02-1 has been formed pursuant to the Petitions described in Section I of the AD 02-1 Engineer's Report (the "Engineer's Report"), that were submitted by the owners of more than 60% of the AD 02-1 property proposed to be assessed, requesting the City Council to waive further proceedings under Division 4 of the Streets and Highways Code and to undertake proceedings pursuant to the 1913 Act and to the provisions of Municipal Code Section 13.08.070. The Petitions are on file with the City Clerk and were accepted on May 22, 2002, when the City Council adopted its Resolution No. 078-02, "Accepting Petition and Determining to Undertake Special Assessment Proceedings (AD 02-1)." The District Proponents, also as defined in Section I of the Engineer's Report have filed applications with the City requesting the formation of AD 02-1 pursuant to the 1913 Act and to Municipal Code Section 13.08.070, and these applications have been accepted by the City. ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PURPOSE AD 02-1 has been formed for the purpose of financing the estimated total cost for City acquisition of certain public improvements within four AD 02-1 community areas, which are described in Section I of the Engineer's Report. A detailed description of the proposed Improvement Acquisitions is presented in Engineer's Report Section n. The AD 02-1 proceedings will confirm an assessment for the estimated total cost of the improvements to be acquired pursuant to the 1913 29600ExhibitD D-1 8/28/02 Act and to the Municipal Code. The City proposes to issue bonds under the 1915 Act, secured by the unpaid assessments, to pay the cost to acquire the improvements and pay all incidental costs and expenses related thereto and authorized for funding by the 1913 Act. AUTHORIZA TION FOR ASSESSMENT REALLOCATIONS The Petitions request that the AD 02-1 assessment be spread to the assessed properties in the manner set forth in Municipal Code Section 13. 08. 070-Benefit Spread. The City Council has approved that request by the adoption of its referenced Resolution No. 078-02, and in accordance with that Resolution the AD 02-1 assessment will be spread pursuant to the 1913 Act and to the Municipal Code. Under the 1913 Act, parcel assessment shares are allocated among the benefited parcels of land in the assessment district in proportion to the estimated benefit each parcel can be expected to receive from the work and improvement covered by the assessment. Municipal Code Section 13.08.070 authorizes the "reallocation" to alternate properties of assessments initially allocated to parcels in proportion to their estimated benefit (Le., initial allocation made in accordance with the 1913 Act benefit/cost requirement and that benefit/cost share is reallocated to the other parcels that mayor may not be directly benefited by the improvements funded in the assessment). The AD 02-1 individual parcel assessment amounts shown on Engineer's Report Exhibit A, Assessment Roll, have been calculated ("spread") among the assessed parcels pursuant to Municipal Code Section 13.08.070. The Alternate Method used by the Assessment Engineer to reallocate the benefit based assessment shares initially allocated by the Assessment Engineer to each AD 02-1 assessed parcel has been provided to the Engineer of Work by the District Proponents and is hereafter referred to as the "Reallocation Method." In light of the fact that the AD 02-1 parcel assessments have been spread using a Reallocation Method proposed by the District Proponents, it is the intent of the AD 02-1 Assessment Engineer in preparing this Engineer's Report Exhibit D to present information and data on the Reallocation Method and on the Benefit/Cost Based Method for allocation of assessments. The objective of this effort is to present a comparative analysis of the Benefit/Cost Based Method to the Reallocation Method of assessment spread that will provide sufficient background information for the City Council to reference in making a determination on whether the proposed Assessment Reallocation Method is in conformance with Municipal Code Section 13.08.070, and for them to further determine whether the Assessment Reallocation Method will be implemented as the confirmed "Assessment Spread Method" for AD 02-1. Accordingly, descriptions and assessment spread calculations are presented in the following sections of this Exhibit D of the Reallocation Method of assessment spread proposed by the District Proponents and of the Benefit/Cost Assessment Spread Method developed by the Assessment Engineer. Those descriptions and assessment calculation results are followed by a comparison of the parcel assessments calculated using each method. A statement of findings as to whether the proposed Reallocation Method is in conformance with the criteria set forth in Municipal Code 29600ExhibitD D-2 8/28/02 Section 13.08.070 is then presented at the end of Exhibit D to complete the evaluation of that allocation procedure. The text of Municipal Code Section 13.08.070 is presented below for reference to facilitate the description of the proposed Reallocation Method. Municipal Code Section 13.08.070-Benejit Spread A. In special assessment proceedings conducted by the City of Bakersfield pursuant to the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 (Sections 10000 and following, California Streets and Highways Code), as amended from time to time (the "1913 Act"), and notwithstanding any provision of the 1913 Act to the contrary, the City may determine and implement an alternate method and rate of assessment reallocating assessments to alternate properties. B. Such reallocation may occur even though doing so will result in no assessment being levied upon property which is, in fact, benefited by improvements for which the assessments are levied and which is determined differently from a direct costlbenefit ratio. C. Such alternate methods and rates of assessment may only be determined and implemented by the City when so requested by the owner of all property to be assessed, and upon written and recorded consent of the owner of the property to which assessments are reallocated. D. Additionally, such alternate methods and rates of assessment may only be determined and implemented by the City to pay for improvements that bear a rational nexus to the property to be assessed. DESCRIPTION OF ASSESSMENT REALLOCATION METHOD In accordance with Subsection C of Municipal Code Section 13.08.070 ("Section 13.08.070 (C)"), the District Proponents have submitted a proposed "AD 02-1 Alternate Method and Rate of Assessment" (the "AD 02-1 Reallocation Method") to the Engineer of Work. Also in accordance with Section 13.080.070 (C), the District Proponents have submitted written requests to the Engineer of Work asking that the proposed AD 02-1 Reallocation Method be implemented for AD 02-1 and further stating that they are the owners of all of the property proposed to be reallocated a share of the AD 02-1 Assessment and that they consent to the reallocation. The Engineer of Work has accepted the proposed method and directed the Assessment Engineer to use the AD 02-1 Reallocation Method for calculating the AD 02-1 parcel assessments. 29600ExhibitD D-3 8/28/02 The AD 02-1 Reallocation Method is generally described as: Subject to certain exceptions described below, the total improvement acquisition cost wìthin each of the four (4) community areas (Avalon, Belsera, Montara, and The Woods) is spread among the developed and undeveloped parcels within each area as an equal per existing or planned residential lot cost share. The equal per existing or planned residential lot spread exceptions within each community area are as follows: 1. Avalon Area There are no exceptions in the Avalon Area to the equal cost share per existing or planned residential lot Reallocation Spread Method. All Avalon Area improvement acquisition costs are apportioned to Assessment Nos. 1 through 75, as described below. As stated in Engineer's Report Section I, the Avalon Area has been approved for subdivision into a storm drain sump and a combined total of 251 single-family residential (R-l) lots pursuant to Vesting Tentative Tract No. 5968 ("Ten. TR 5968"). Units One and Two of Tract No. 5968 ("TR 5968") with a combined total of 73 R-llots have been recorded with the Kern County Recorder. Each existing and planned R-llot is apportioned an equal share of the total cost assessed to the Avalon Area in the amounts shown on Engineer's Report Exhibit A, Assessment Roll. Table C-ll-A in Engineer's Report Exhibit C shows the total amount assessed to this area in the "Total Assessment" column, followed by the per acre and per R-llot or per Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") assessment amounts. Table C-I ìn Exhibit C shows the assessment calculation details for the total amounts allocated to Assessment Nos. 1 through 75, as calculated using the Reallocation Method. 2. Belsera Area There are no exceptions in the Belsera Area to the equal cost share per existing R-l lot Reallocation Spread Method. All Belsera Area improvement acquisition costs are apportioned to Assessment Nos. 76 through 148, as described below. As stated ìn Engineer's Report Section I, the Belsera Area has been approved for subdivision into a total of73 R-llots pursuant to Vesting Tentative Tract No. 5831 ("Ten. TR 5831"). Unit No.4 of Tract No. 5831 ("TR 5831") with a total of 73 R-llots has been recorded with the Kern County Recorder. Each existing R-llot is apportioned an equal share of the total cost assessed to the Belsera Area in the amounts shown on Engineer's Report Exhibit A, Assessment Roll. Table C-ll-B in Engineer's Report Exhibit C shows the total amount assessed to this area in the "Total Assessment" column, followed by the per acre and per R-l lot or per EDU 29600ExhibitD D-4 8/28/02 assessment amounts. Table C-I in Exhibit C shows the assessment calculation details for the total amounts allocated to Assessment Nos. 76 through 148, as calculated using the Reallocation Method. 3. Montara Area There are no exceptions in the Montara Area to the equal cost share per existing R-1lot Reallocation Spread Method. All Montara Area improvement acquisition costs are apportioned to Assessment Nos. 149 through 206, as described below. As stated in Engineer's Report Section I, the Montara Area has been approved for subdivision into a canal lot and a total of 57 R-1lots pursuant to Vesting Tentative Tract No. 5829 ("Ten. TR 5829"). Unit No.3 of Tract No. 5829 ("TR 5829") with a total of 57 R-1lots has been recorded with the Kern County Recorder. Each existing R-1lot is apportioned an equal share ofthe total cost assessed to the Montara Area in the amounts shown on Engineer's Report Exhibit A, Assessment Roll. Table C-II-C in Engineer's Report Exhibit C shows the total amount assessed to this area in the "Total Assessment" column, followed by the per acre and per R-1 lot or per EDU assessment amounts. Table C-I in Exhibit C shows the assessment calculation details for the total amounts allocated to Assessment Nos. 149 through 206, as calculated using the Reallocation Method. The canal lot is classified by the Reallocation Spread Method as non- benefited land use and is, accordingly, not allocated a share of the Total Assessment. 4. The Woods Area There are no exceptions in The Woods Area to the equal cost share per existing or planned R-1lot Reallocation Spread Method. All The Woods Area improvement acquisition costs are apportioned to Assessment Nos. 207 through 268, as described below. As stated in Engineer's Report Section I, The Woods Area has been approved for subdivision into four storm drain sump lots and a combined total of 175 R-1lots pursuant to Vesting Tentative Tract No. 6066 ("Ten. TR 6066"). Unit One of Tract No. 6066 ("TR 6066") with a total of 57 R-1lots has been recorded with the Kern County Recorder. Each existing and planned R -1 lot is apportioned an equal share of the total cost assessed to The Woods Area in the amounts shown on Engineer's Report Exhibit A, Assessment Roll. The Woods Area has an existing AD 91-1 assessment lien (identified as AD 91-1 Assessment No. 66), and the cost to payoff that existing assessment is shown in Exhibit B, Table B-ID. Table B-ID in Exhibit B is a statement of the costs to payoff the remaining principal balance, including related bond call expenses. Both installments of the affected parcel's shares of the 2001/2002 tax year principal and interest for the existing parcel 29600ExhibitD D-5 8/28/02 assessment confirmed pursuantto AD 91-1 (AD 91-1 Assessment No. 66) have already been paid. Table C-II-D in Engineer's Report Exhibit C shows the total amount assessed to this area in the "Total Assessment" column, followed by the per acre and per R-l lot or per EDU assessment amounts. Table C-I in Exhibit C shows the assessment calculation details for the total amounts allocated to Assessment Nos. 207 through 268, as calculated using the Reallocation Method. The storm drain sump lots are classified by the Reallocation Spread Method as non-benefited land uses and are, accordingly, not allocated a share of the total assessment. CALCULATION OF REALLOCATED ASSESSMENTS Engineer's Report Exhibit C includes a "C-II" group of four tables labeled C-II-A through C-II-D. Each table presents the results of the parcel reallocated assessment calculations for one of the four AD 02-1 community areas. The Tables C- II Reallocated Assessment spread data has been calculated in accordance with the Assessment Reallocation Method Description presented in the preceding section of this Exhibit D. The assessment reallocation data for the unsubdivided parcels presented in the four C-II Tables has been calculated based on the development planning, land use, and EDU information for each community area provided by the District Proponents and the AD 02-1 Design Engineers. The subdivision acreages and proposedEDU's orlots for the four community areas were obtained by reference to the approved subdivision tentative maps, and by reference to the AD 02-1 Assessment District studies and data prepared by the AD 02-1 Design Engineers. That subdivision acreage and lot data has been used to calculate the reallocated assessment shares for the existing and proposed subdivisions within the four AD 02-1 community areas. There is a separate C-II table for each community area, and each table shows the cost share reallocations for the separate improvement systems to be acquired that will be spread to each planned subdivision within a community area. Each C-II table also shows the AD 02-1 Assessment Proceeding and Bond Issuance Cost share reallocations under the "ProceedinglIssue Cost" column, and the total amount proposed to be assessed under the "Total Assessment" column. Following the Total Assessment column are two columns listing the amount assessed per assessable acre and the amount assessed per EDU. Table C-I in Engineer's Report Exhibit C consolidates all of the assessment reallocation data presented in the C-II group of tables and provides the assessment data by existing Kern County Assessor's Tax Number ("ATN") or by parcel description for every existing and proposed subdivision lot and/or parcel in AD 02-1. The improvement acquisition cost reallocations are suinmarized in a single column on Table C-I, because their details are presented in the C-II tables. However, Table C- I itemizes the improvement incidental, assessment proceeding, and bond issuance cost reallocation amounts in separate columns, while those costs are shown as a total amount in the "ProceedinglIssue Costs" column on the C-II Tables. Since the per acre and per EDU or per R-llot assessment data is shown on the C-II Tables for each land use area or ATN and for each proposed 29600ExhibitD D-6 8/28/02 subdivision, that data is not repeated on Table C-1. The "Confirmed Assessment Amount" shown on Exhibit A, Assessment Roll is the amount proposed to be assessed to each lot and parcel in AD 02-1 and is also the amount shown under the column entitled "Total Assessment" in Table C-1. DESCRIPTION OF BENEFIT/COST BASED ASSESSMENT ALLOCATION METHOD Municipal Code Section 13.08.070 sets forth several criteria under which the City may "determine and implement" an alternative method of assessment. This section of Exhibit D will present information and data for reference by the City Council in their deliberations to make a final determination on whether the proposed AD 02-1 Assessment Reallocation Method is in conformance with Municipal Code Section 13.08.070 and as to whether the proposed Assessment Reallocation Method will be implemented as the confirmed "Assessment Spread Method" for AD 02-1. The intended objective in developing the AD 02-1 Benefit/Cost Based Assessment Allocation Method (the "AD 02-1 Allocation Method") is to define a cost allocation method that apportions the AD 02-1 costs to each parcel in conformance with the requirements of the 1913 Act, which requires that the financed cost in a special assessment proceeding be allocated among the benefited parcels of land in proportion to the estimated benefit each parcel can be expected to receive from the financed work and improvements. It is further intended that the AD 02-1 Allocation Method be in general conformance with the benefit/cost methods used to spread costs in existing City assessment districts for which a Notice of Assessment was recorded prior to the April 1995 Council adoption of Ordinance No. 3643 adding Section 13.080.070 to the Municipal Code. In accordance with these intended objectives, the AD 02-1 Allocation Method is based on the following: o The Categories of Benefit each improvement system provides to the assessment district properties; o The Method of Apportioning the improvement system work items and cost to the various benefit categories; o The Criteria for Determining which parcels are benefited by the improvements assigned to each benefit category; and o The Method of Allocating the apportioned improvement system costs for each benefit category to the parcels benefited by that category of improvements, in proportion to the estimated level of benefit the parcels will receive from those improvements. 1. The Categories of Benefit that provide the foundation for the AD 02-1 Allocation Method are as follows: A. Development Entitlement/Arterial Class Improvement Benefit Category: This is the primary category of improvement benefit supporting the AD 02-1 Allocation Method developed for each of the four AD 02-1 community areas. As stated in Engineer's Report Section I, the AD 02-1 improvements are improvements that are either already 29600ExhibitD D-7 8/28/02 required to be constructed, or are expected by the District Proponents to be required to be constructed, as conditions of development entitlement approval for the properties in AD 02-1. Therefore, planning approval records have been researched to determine the scope of improvements that must be, or are expected to be required to be constructed as a condition of entitlement approval for the AD 02-1 properties. The Development Entitlement Benefit Category includes those improvement systems, or their component parts, that are required to be installed as a condition of development entitlement approval and which will provide a regional benefit to AD 02-1 parcels and to a much larger community area not included in AD 02-1. Arterial streets and transmission grid water mains, certain sanitary sewer and storm drain pipelines are examples of improvements that may be assigned to this benefit category. B. Direct Benefit/Fronting Improvement Benefit Category: All of the AD 02-1 improvements that provide a localized level of benefit are included in this benefit category. The general scope of improvements assigned to this benefit category includes the outside traffic and parking lane portions of arterial and major collector streets, all sidewalk, certain water, sanitary sewer, and storm drain pipelines. C. Non-benefited and Non-Assessed Parcels: All of the following described parcels in AD 02-1 are defined for the purpose of this Allocation Method as not being benefited by the AD 02-1 improvements and, accordingly, they are not apportioned a share of the AD 02-1 assessment by the Allocation Method or by the Reallocation Method: 1. All City-owned property; all landscape lots in existing and future subdivisions; street right-of-way; parks; water well or sewer lift station parcels; pipeline or canal easement lots; and 2. All existing and designated storm drain sump sites. n. The Method or Criteria Devised for Apportioning the improvement system work items and cost to the two primary improvement benefit categories are described below. A. Assignment of improvement system work items and cost to benefit categories: 1. Development Entitlement! Arterial Class Improvements a. Arterial and Major Collector Street Improvements: Olive Drive (Avalon Area and Belsera Area), Snow Road (Montara Area), and Akers Road and Berkshire Road (The Woods Area) are the AD 02-1 street improvements with component parts assigned to this category. For the purpose of the Allocation Method, the center traffic lanes for each of the above-listed streets are the specific portions of these streets classified as "Arterial" Improvements. b. Transmission Grid Water Mains: For the purpose of the AD 02-1 Allocation Method, this improvement category would include 16-inch diameter water mains 29600ExhibitD D-8 8/28/02 29600ExhibitD that are classified as "Grid Mains" needed to serve an area outside the boundaries of the AD 02-1 community in which they are being installed. According to the AD 02-1 Design Engineers, there are no such Transmission Grid Water Mains funded in AD 02-1. c. Sanitary Sewer Main Collector Pipelines: For the purpose of the AD 02-1 Allocation Method, this improvement category would include sewer pipelines needed to be installed as conditions of development entitlement approval that have been designed to serve an area outside the boundaries of the AD 02-1 community in which they are being installed. According to the AD 02-1 Design Engineers, there are no such Sanitary Sewer Main Collector Pipelines funded in AD 02-1. d. Storm Water Drainage Main Collector Pipelines: For the purpose of the AD 02-1 Allocation Method, this improvement category would include storm water drainage pipelines and appurtenances being installed as conditions of development entitlement approval that have been designed to serve an area outside the boundaries of the AD 02-1 community in which they are being installed. According to the AD 02-1 Design Engineers, such "Main Collector" pipelines and appurtenances are located in the Avalon Area. 2. Direct Benefit/Fronting Improvements: a. Streets/Landscaping/Street Lights/Traffic Signals: The outside traffic lane, bicycle lane, and parking lane, curb and gutter, deceleration lane and busbay portion of all streets, including arterial and major collector level streets, provide direct and localized benefit to the fronting property areas. In the case of a new subdivision development, all fronting street, sidewalks, street lights, and' landscaping improvements along its perimeter are generally required to be installed as a condition of the tract development entitlement approval. Accordingly, in the Allocation Method street frontage improvements are assessed back to the fronting subdivision area. In the case of AD 02-1, the fronting area may encompass a block of property that the District Proponents have identified as an area planned for subdivision in phases, such as Ten. TR 5968 in the Avalon Area and Ten. TR 6066 in The Woods Area. b. Local Service Pipeline: 8- and 12-inch diameter water, 8- and lO-inch diameter sewer mains, and 36-, 30-, 24-, and 18-inch diameter storm drain pipelines are classified as fronting benefit improvements and their cost is allocated back to the fronting property areas that will be served by these pipelines. Short sections of pipeline stub-outs into future subdivision development areas are also allocated as direct benefit improvements. D-9 8/28/02 B. Apportionment of improvement system cost shares to the benefit categories: . . 1. Apportionment of Street Costs: a. For the arterial and major collector streets that have portions assigned to both the Entitlement Benefit and Fronting Benefit Categories, the improvement item quantities and costs for street construction work are apportioned to these categories in direct proportion to street surface area for the portion of the street assigned to each benefit category. The Fronting Street cost is estimated based on a 15-foot pavement width, with the balance of the street surface area classified as the "Arterial" Street section. If both of the center traffic lanes of a four lane arterial street are included in the scope of financed improvements, the parcels fronting on each side of the street right-of-way are each apportioned the cost of one center (arterial) traffic lane. This Arterial Street Section cost represents each fronting parcel's Entitlement Benefit Cost, based on the requirement to construct one-half of the Arterial Street as a condition of entitlement approval for each parcel. For Arterial Street improvements constructed along the boundary of an AD 02-1 community area, any improvements to the half of the street adjacent to the AD 02-1 assessed property are classified as the Entitlement/Fronting Street Improvements benefiting the AD 02-1 property, while the opposite side traffic lane improvements are classified as the Arterial Street Improvements benefiting property not in AD 02-1. The composite street area totals for the Entitlement/Fronting and Non AD 02-1 Arterial Improvement Categories were used to calculate improvement system work item quantity and cost percentage factors, and those area-based factors were used to allocate project work item cost shares to these two benefit categories. b. The non-street work items of curb and gutter, sidewalk, and subdivision block wall were assigned a 100% Fronting Benefit factor to allocate their costs to the "Direct Benefit/Fronting Improvement Category." 2. Apportionment of Water Mains: a. There are no Water Mains funded in AD 02-1 that have been classified as "Fronting Benefit" improvements. b. There are no Local Service Water Main costs funded in AD 02-1. 3. Apportionment of Sanitary Sewer Mains: Sanitary Sewer Mains in AD 02-1 have all been classified as "Fronting Benefit" improvements, and these work items and costs are allocated accordingly. Those pipeline costs are spread to their benefited service area properties as described in the following Paragraph III. 29600ExhibitD D-lO 8/28/02 4. Apportionment of Storm Drain Pipelines: According to the AD 02-1 Design Engineer (SmithTech-USA, Inc.), the Storm Water Drainage Main Collector Pipelines located in and along Olive Drive and the storm drain sump with appurtenances located on the south side of Olive Drive in the Avalon Area will also collect storm drain water from the property located on the north side of Olive Drive (identified as Parcel D of Lot Line Adjustment No. 51-00) located outside AD 02-1. The total cost of the storm drainage collection system (pipelines, basin, and appurtenances) is apportioned to the benefited propertied (within and outside the AD 02-1 boundaries) in proportion to each parcel's contribution to the estimated quantities of the storm water runoff. All other Storm Drain Pipelines in AD 02-1 have been classified as "Fronting Benefit" improvements, and these work items and costs are allocated accordingly. Those pipeline costs are spread to their benefited service area properties as described in the following Paragraph ID. ID. The Criteria for Determining which parcels are benefited by the improvements allocated to each benefit category are as follows: A. Avalon Area: The Avalon Area Improvements are generally shown and described on Map No.1 in Exhibit E. The improvements to be installed in and along Olive Drive include both Development Entitlement! Arterial Class Improvement Benefit Category and Direct Benefit/Fronting Improvement Benefit Category improvements required for the development of the Avalon Area. Accordingly, after removing the cost of certain improvement exceptions described below, their total cost is allocated to the Avalon Area parcels (Assessment Nos. 1 through 75) as Development Entitlement and Direct Benefit/Fronting Improvements. The referenced exceptions are: the storm water drainage collection system (pipelines, basin, and appurtenances) located in and south of Olive Drive, which is apportioned to the benefiting Avalon Area properties and to Parcel D of Lot Line Adjustment No. 51-00 (located north of Olive Drive, outside AD 02-1) in proportion to each parcel's contribution to the estimated quantities of the storm water runoff; and the street improvements (excluding the sidewalk and the subdivision block wall) on the north side of Olive Drive, which are allocated to the Avalon Area properties on the north side of Olive Drive and to said Parcel D of Lot Line Adjustment No. 51-00 in direct proportion to the length of their frontages on the north side of Olive Drive, as described below. The Olive Drive arterial street improvements include the construction of the entire street to its full design width from Old Farm Road on the west to the easterly boundary ofTen. TR 5968. In accordance with the preceding paragraph II.B.1.a, if both of the center traffic lanes for a four lane arterial street are included in the scope of financed improvements, the parcels fronting on each side of the street right-of-way are each apportioned the cost of one center (arterial) traffic lane. This Arterial Street Section cost represents each fronting parcel's Entitlement Benefit Cost, based on the requirement to 29600ExhibitD D-ll 8/28/02 construct one-half of the Arterial Street as a condition of entitlement approval for each parcel. The entire 14-foot wide eastbound center (arterial) traffic lane will be installed along the Ten. TR 5968 frontage, and the cost of that portion of the traffic lane is apportioned to the Avalon Area as a Development Entitlement Benefit Improvement. A portion of the 14- foot wide westbound center (arterial) traffic lane will be installed along the Ten. TR 5968 frontage, and the cost of that portion of the westbound traffic lane is apportioned to the Avalon Area as a Development Entitlement Benefit Improvement. The remainder of the westbound center traffic lane in Olive Drive will provide a Development Entitlement Benefit to the Non AD 02-1 property fronting the north side of Olive Drive (identified as Parcel D of Lot Line Adjustment No. 51-00), and accordingly, the cost of that center traffic lane is apportioned as a Non AD 02-1 beneficial cost. All other Olive Drive Improvements are assessed in the same manner: as Direct Benefit Improvements to the Avalon Area for the Ten. TR 5968 frontage on Olive Drive, and as Direct Benefit Improvements to the Non AD 02-1 property for the remainder of the Olive Drive improvement cost. B. Belsera Area: The Belsera Area Improvements are generally shown and described on Map No.2 in Exhibit E. The improvements to be installed in and along Olive Drive include both Development Entitlement! Arterial Class Improvement Benefit Category and Direct Benefit/Fronting Improvement Benefit Category improvements required for the development of the Belsera Area. Accordingly, their cost is allocated to the Belsera Area parcels (Assessment Nos. 76 through 148) as Development Entitlement and Direct Benefit/Fronting Improvements. The Olive Drive arterial street improvements include the construction of the south half of the street (eastbound side of the street) to its full design width adjacent to the Belsera Area. In accordance with the preceding paragraph II.B.1.a, if both of the center traffic lanes for a four lane arterial street are included in the scope of financed improvements, the parcels fronting on each side of the street right-of-way are each apportioned the cost of one center (arterial) traffic lane. This Arterial Street Section cost represents each fronting parcel's Entitlement Benefit Cost, based on the requirement to construct one- half of the Arterial Street as a condition of entitlement approval for each parcel. The 14-foot wide center (arterial) traffic lane will be installed along the north boundary of the Belsera Area, and the cost of that portion of the traffic lane is apportioned to the Belsera Area as a Development Entitlement Benefit Improvement. All other Belsera Area Improvements are assessed as Direct BenefitlFronting Improvements to Assessment Nos. 76 through 148. C. Montara Area: The Montara Area Improvements are generally shown and described on Map No.3 in Exhibit E. The improvements to be installed in and along Snow Road include both Development Entitlement! Arterial Class Improvement Benefit Category and Direct Benefit/Fronting Improvement Benefit Category improvements required for the development of the Montara Area. Accordingly, their total cost is allocated to the Montara Area parcels (Assessment Nos. 149 through 206) as Development Entitlement and Direct Benefit/Fronting Improvements. 29600ExhibitD D-12 8/28/02 The Snow Road arterial street improvements include the construction of the south half ofthe street (eastbound side ofthe street) to its full design width adjacent to the Montara Area. In accordance with the preceding paragraph II.B.1.a, if both of the center traffic lanes for a four lane arterial street are included in the scope of financed improvements, the parcels fronting on each side of the street right-of-way are each apportioned the cost of one center (arterial) traffic lane. This Arterial Street Section cost represents each fronting parcel's Entitlement Benefit Cost, based on the requirement to construct one- half of the Arterial Street as a condition of entitlement approval for each parcel. The 14-foot wide center (arterial) traffic lane will be installed along the north boundary of the Montara Area, and the cost of that portion of the traffic lane is apportioned to the Montara Area as a Development Entitlement Benefit Improvement. All other Montara Area Improvements are assessed as Direct Benefit Improvements to Assessment Nos. 149 through 206. D. The Woods Area: The Woods Area Improvements are generally shown and described on Map No.4 in Exhibit E. The improvements to be installed in and along Akers Road and Berkshire Road include both Development Entitlement! Arterial Class Improvement Benefit Category and Direct Benefit/Fronting Improvement Benefit Category improvements required for the development of The Woods Area. Accordingly, their cost is allocated to The Woods Area parcels (Assessment Nos. 207 through 268) as Development Entitlement and Direct Benefit/Fronting Improvements. The Akers Road and Berkshire Road arterial street improvements include the construction, respectively, of the east half of the street (southbound side of the street) and of the south half of the street (eastbound side of the street) to their full design width adjacent to The Woods Area. In accordance with the preceding paragraph II.B.1.a, if both of the center traffic lanes for a four lane arterial street are included in the scope of financed improvements, the parcels fronting on each side of the street right-of-way are each apportioned the cost of one center (arterial) traffic lane. This Arterial Street Section cost represents each fronting parcel's Entitlement Benefit Cost, based on the requirement to construct one-half of the Arterial Street as a condition of entitlement approval for each parcel. The 14-foot wide center (arterial) traffic lanes will be installed along the east and north boundaries of The Woods Area, and the cost of those portions of the traffic lanes is apportioned to The Woods Area as a Development Entitlement Benefit Improvement. All other The Woods Area Improvements (including the TR 6066 on-site storm drainage improvements) are assessed as Direct Benefit/Fronting Improvements to Assessment Nos. 207 through 268. IV. The Method of Allocating the apportioned system costs for each benefit category to the benefited parcels within each of the four AD 02-1 community areas, in proportion to the estimated level of benefit the parcels in each area will receive from the various improvements included in each benefit category is described below: 29600ExhibitD D-13 8/28/02 A. Avalon Area Assessment Allocation Method Table C-ID-A, "Details of Avalon Area (Tract No. 5968) Estimated Benefit Assessment Allocations for Proposed Development," in Engineer's Report Exhibit C (hereafter "Exhibit C") shows how the Avalon Area Improvement Acquisitions costs have been allocated based on the aforesaid benefit/cost criteria. Reference to Table C-ID-A shows how the total assessment amount for the Avalon Area has been apportioned to the Avalon Area and the BenefitedIN on- Assessed (Non AD 02-1) share allocated to benefited property outside AD 02-1. All of the Avalon Area improvements are required to be installed as conditions of approval for Ten. TR 5968. B. Belsera Area Assessment Allocation Method Table C-ID-B in Exhibit C, "Details of Belsera Area (Tract No. 5831 Unit No.4) Estimated Benefit Assessment Allocations for Proposed Development," shows how the Belsera Area Improvement Acquisitions costs have been spread in accordance with the AD 02-1 Allocation Method. Reference to Table C-ID-B shows the total Belsera Area benefit/cost share apportioned to the BelseraArea (TR 5831 Unit No. 4). TableC-ID-B also shows that there is no BenefitedINon-Assessed AD 02-1 share and that there is no BenefitedINon- Assessed (Non AD 02-1) share allocated to benefited property outside AD 02-1. All ofthe Belsera Area improvements are required to be installed as conditions of approval for TR 5831 Unit No.4. C. Montara Area Assessment Allocation Method Table C-ID-C in Exhibit C, "Details of Montara Area (Tract No. 5829 Unit No.3) Estimated Benefit Assessment Allocations for Proposed Development," shows how the Montara Area Improvement Acquisitions costs have been spread in accordance with the AD 02-1 Allocation Method. Reference to Table C-ID-C shows the total Montara Area benefit/cost share apportioned to the Montara Area (TR 5829 Unit No.3). Table C-ID-C also shows that there is no BenefitedINon-Assessed AD 02-1 share and that there is no BenefitedIN on-Assessed (Non AD 02-1) share allocated to benefited property outside AD 02-1. All of the Montara Area improvements are required to be installed as conditions of approval for TR 5829 Unit No.3. D. The Woods Area Assessment Allocation Method Table C-ID-D in Exhibit C, "Details of The Woods Area (Tract No. 6066) Estimated Benefit Assessment Allocations for Proposed Development," shows how The Woods Area Improvement Acquisitions costs have been spread in a~cordance with the AD 02-1 Allocation Method. Reference to Table C-ID-D shows the total The Woods Area benefit/cost share apportioned to The Woods Area. Table C-ID-D also shows that there is no BenefitedINon-Assessed AD 02-1 share and that there is no BenefitedINon-Assessed 29600ExhibitD D-14 8/28/02 (Non AD 02-1) share allocated to benefited property outside AD 02-1. All of The Woods Area improvements are required to be installed as conditions of approval forTen. TR 6066. r ";'\ , E. Contingency and Improvement Incidental Costs for each improvement system within each community area are included in the total allocated cost share in the C-III group of tables. These costs are allocated within each community area in direct proportion to the beneficial improvement cost share allocations. COMPARISON OF REALLOCATION METHOD AND BENEFIT/COST BASED ASSESSMENT ALLOCATION METHOD; ASSESSMENT SPREAD RESULTS The four "C-IV" tables in Engineer's Report Exhibit C (Tables C-IV-A through C-IV-D) present separate comparisons by community area of the cost assessed to individual parcels or land use areas when the AD 02-1 cost is spread in accordance with the Reallocation Method proposed by the District Proponents, to the parcel cost shares when the spread is calculated in accordance with the Benefit/Cost Based Assessment Allocation Method developed by the AD 02-1 Assessment Engineer. In each case, the Reallocation Method results are shown in the "Reallocation Per City Code 13.08.070" column and the Allocation Method results in the "Estimated Benefit Allocation" column of the C-IV tables group. The Reallocation Amount minus the Allocation Amount is shown in the "Reallocation Minus Benefit Allocation" column. These tables show that, as permitted by Municipal Code Section 13.08.070, the Reallocation Method does not apportion an assessment amount to the Non AD 02-1 parcels that are shown in the Benefit Allocation column to have a beneficial cost share for certain improvements. In accordance with the District Proponents' Reallocation Method and as shown on the C-IV group of tables, the full costs of the improvements in each community area are assessed by the Reallocation Method to the respective community areas, including the portions of those improvements that are required to be installed as a development entitlement approval condition for properties located outside AD 02-1. Further review of the C-IV group of tables will show that improvement costs for work within or adjacent to a community area have been assessed only to properties in that area, and in their last two columns adjacent to the right margin, they show, respectively, the per acre and per EDU differences between the parcel assessments calculated using the AD 02-1 Reallocation Method and the AD 02-1 Allocation Method. ASSESSMENT ENGINEER'S STATEMENT OF FINDINGS ON THE ASSESSMENT SPREAD METHOD Based on the descriptions and data presented above and further illustrated in the referenced Exhibit C Tables on the proposed AD 02-1 Reallocation Method, the following findings on the AD 02-1 Assessment Spread Method are presented: A. The improvement acquisitions proposed to be financed by AD 02-1 are improvements that will be installed within or adjacent to the community area that is assessed the cost of those 29600ExhibitD D-15 8/28/02 improvement acquisitions and, accordingly, the AD 02-1 Improvement Acquisitions bear a rational nexus to the properties proposed to be assessed a share of their cost; and B. The District Proponents have submitted written requests to the Engineer of Work that the Reallocation Method of assessment spread be implemented, and they have further represented that said requests were approved by all AD 02-1 property owners at the time they were filed. Therefore, it is the finding of the Assessment Engineer that the proposed Reallocation Method is in conformance with the requirements of Municipal Code Section 13.08.070. ASSESSMENT PROCEEDING INCIDENTAL AND BOND ISSUANCE COST ALLOCATION The total AD 02-1 assessment proceeding and bond issuance costs are spread in direct proportion to the total improvement cost reallocated to each parcel. ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENTS TO FUTURE SUBDIVISIONS When a parcel with an AD 02-1 confirmed assessment is subdivided in the future by the recording of a subdivision or parcel map, a certificate of compliance for lot line adjustment or parcel map waiver, or upon the sale of all or a portion of an assessed parcel to a public agency, the 1915 Act requires that the amount remaining unpaid on the original, bond-funded assessment principal be apportioned to each of the new lots and parcels created by the parcel division. In the case of AD 02-1, the Reallocation Method has spread the AD 02-1 cost within each community area in direct proportion to parcel acreage and existing or planned R-1 Lot. Therefore, as AD 02-1 assessed parcels are subdivided, the remaining principal amount of the original bond funded parcel assessment will be apportioned to the new lots and parcels as follows: 1. Avalon Area: This portion of AD 02-1 has been approved for development into a storm drain sump and a total of 251 R-1lots pursuant to Ten. TR 5968. As stated above, Units One and Two of TR 5968 with a combined total of 73 R-1lots have been recorded with the Kern County Recorder. Pursuant to Ten. TR 5968, Assessment No. 1 is planned for development into 140 R-1 lots and a storm drain sump and Assessment No.2 is planned for development into 38 R-1Iots. Therefore, the total assessment amount for the Avalon Area is already apportioned as an equal per existing or planned R-1lot assessment. In accordance with the above-described proposed development and if the development proceeds as proposed, the original Assessment Nos. 1 and 2 total confirmed assessment amounts will be apportioned as an equal per R-1lot assessment. Accordingly, the first tract phase recorded by the District Proponent will be allocated a total assessment share equal to the number of R-1lots in the phase multiplied by the calculated equal per R-1lot cost share factor for the Avalon Area. The remaining balance will be apportioned to the unsubdivided remainder for apportionments to future subdivision phases in accordance with the process described above. However, if the development plan for Assessment Nos. 1 and 2 is revised, then the plan for segregation of the original assessment will be revised to apportion 29600ExhibitD D-16 8/28/02 a cost share to the first subdivision or subdivision phase and its remainder parcel in direct proportion to their total acreages. The total assessment share apportioned to the recorded subdivision or subdivision phase would then be reapportioned to its lots as an equal assessment share per R-1Iot. Storm water retention sumps, water well sites, and parks will be excluded from the tract acreage and the calculated net acreages used to apportion the original total assessment. Landscape lots and in-tract street areas will not be excluded from the tract acreage totals. 2. Belsera Area: This portion of AD 02-1 has been approved for development into a total of 73 R-1 lots pursuant to Ten. TR 5831. As stated above, Unit No.4 of TR 5831 with a total of 73 R-1 lots has been recorded with the Kern County Recorder. Therefore, the total assessment amount for the Belsera Area is already apportioned as an equal per existing R-1lot assessment. 3. Montara Area: This portion of AD 02-1 has been approved for development into a canal lot and a total of 57 R-1lots pursuant to Ten. TR 5829. As stated above, Unit No.3 of TR 5829 with a total of 57 R-1 lots has been recorded with the Kern County Recorder. Therefore, the total assessment amount for the Montara Area is already apportioned as an equal per existing R-1lot assessment. The canal lot is not assessed. 4. The Woods Area: This portion of AD 02-1 has been approved for development into four storm drain sump lots and a combined total of 175 R-1lots pursuant to Ten. TR 6066. As stated above, Unit One of TR 6066 with a total of 57 R-1 lots has been recorded with the Kern County Recorder. Pursuant to Ten. TR 6066, Assessment No. 207 is planned for development into 118 R-1Iots. Therefore, the total assessment amount for The Woods Area is already apportioned as an equal per existing or planned R-1lot assessment. The storm drain sump lots are not assessed. In accordance with the above-described proposed development and if the development proceeds as proposed, the original Assessment No. 207 total confirmed assessment amount will be apportioned as an equal per R-1lot assessment. Accordingly, the first tract phase recorded by the District Proponent will be allocated a total assessment share equal to the number of R -1 lots in the phase multiplied by the calculated equal per R-1lot cost share factor for Assessment No. 207. The remaining balance will be apportioned to the unsubdivided remainder for apportionments to future subdivision phases in accordance with the process described above. However, if the development plan for Assessment No. 207 is revised, then the plan for segregation of the original assessment will be revised to apportion a cost share to the first subdivision or subdivision phase and its remainder parcel in direct proportion to their total acreages. The total assessment share apportioned to the recorded subdivision or subdivision phase would then be reapportioned to its lots as an equal assessment share per R-1Iot. Storm water retention sumps, water well sites, and parks will be excluded from the tract acreage and the calculated net acreages used to apportion the original total assessment. Landscape lots and in-tract street areas will not be excluded from the tract acreage totals. 29600ExhibitD D-17 8/28/02 ASSESSMENT ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION OF THE ASSESSMENT SPREAD METHOD This Engineer's Report has been prepared to present the following: 1. An estimate of the total cost of the improvements to be acquired and the incidental costs proposed to be funded pursuant to this assessment proceeding; and 2. An analysis and description of the Reallocation Method proposed by the District Proponent as the method used to spread the estimated improvement acquisition costs and incidental expenses to the AD 02-1 properties. However, this Engineer's Report makes no recommendation as to the economic feasibility for the assessment of the estimated cost of the proposed improvement acquisition and incidental costs on the AD 02-1 properties, nor on the financial feasibility for the issuance of 1915 Act Bonds to represent any unpaid amount of the AD 02-1 Assessment. The AD 02-1 Assessment may exceed the amount for which bonds can be issued pursuant to recommendation of the City's financial advisor, as to the minimum acceptable property value to assessment lien ratio for bonds issued and secured by AD 02-1 unpaid assessments. Additional property value in excess of the estimated current value of the assessed property with the improvements completed and installed may need to be confirmed by MAl appraisal, before the City can issue 1915 Act Bonds in the full amount of the AD 02-1 Assessment. In conclusion, it is my opinion that the Estimated Total Cost of the proposed improvement acquisitions, including all incidental costs, has been spread in conformance with the requirements of Municipal Code Section 13.08.070. Submitted to the Engineer of Work on July 11, 2002, for "preliminary" approval by the City Council on July 31,2002, and submitted on September 6,2002, in this "Final" Engineer's Report form by: ~:1.W~ Edward J. Wilson R.C.E. 23269 (Expires 12/31/05) Assessment Engineer City of Bakersfield Assessment District No. 02-1 29600ExhibitD D-18 8/28/02 J J J J J J ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 (A V ALONIBELSERAlMONTARAlTHE WOODS) EXHIBIT E Map No.1 Showing Avalon Area Improvements Map No. 2 Showing BelseraArea Improvements Map No.3, Showing Montara Area Improvements Map No~ 4 Showing The Woods Area Improvements m REMAINDER OF PARCEL C IN LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 51-00 [ill THROUGH [2[] IN TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT TWO : I: 'I' , , PARCEL 0 IN LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO, 51-DO MAP NO. 1 SHOWING AVALON AREA IMPROVEMENTS NOT A PART m THROUGH 00 IN TRACT NO, 5988 UNIT ONE 'I' : 6,0·: {; OLIVE DRIVE "" ~ Q: ~ 10; § <ll'l IT] PARCEL 6 IN PARCEL MAP NO. 9826 ® ó ~ Z I- <3 Z (L =>vi 0> (L N « ~ ¿ lL. ci 0 Z L!) I- .... 0 « .,¿ Q:: CO I- LEGEND OJ ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO, 02-1 EXISTING BOUNDARY - - - SECTION LINE NEW ASSESSMENT NUMBER, ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 CEN, SEC 12 T29S,R26E K.C,R, DR, MOB & M £ AVALON A1ŒA IMPROVEMENTS REFERENCE TO SECTION OR FRACTIONAL SECTION CORNER REFERENCE TO TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, MOUNT DIABLO BASE AND MERIDIAN KERN COUNTY RECOROS OFFICIAL RECORDS REFERENCES MOUNT DIABLO BASE AND MERIDIAN CENTER LINE OF ROAD RIGHT -OF -WAY OLIVE DRIVE STREET AND FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN OLD FARM ROAD AND EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF TRACT NO, 5968, INCLUDING STREET PAVING, CURB AND GUTTER, AND FULL HARD SURFACE MEDIAN. AND SUBDIVISION BLOCK WALL AND SIDEWALK ONLY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF OLIVE DRIVE ALONG TRACT NO, 596B UNIT ONE FRONTAGE, 13' TRACT NO, 5968 ON-SITE AND OFF-SITE STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS, INCLUDING 1B-, 24-, AND 3D-INCH DIAMETER STORM DRAIN \81 PIPELINES WITH MANHOLES, A CATCH BASIN, AN OUTLET STRUCTURE, AND A STORM DRAIN SUMP EXCAVATION WITH 6-FooT HIGH BLOCK WALL, AND A 14-FOOT WIDE GATE. ® WILSON &: ASSOCIATES 4221 W, SIERRA MADRE, SUITE 201 FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 93722 EXHIBIT E MAP NO. 1 ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO, 02-1 EXHIBIT E MAP NO. 2 SHOWING BELSERA AREA IMPROVEMENTS ® g I , , , ' , , , , , , , , ','.. : >I'~ ~ H ~ H ~ H ~ H ~ j' ", . . . H;" A'i>.v. _ ~.. ~ ~..._ ' ""H~;~~'~~ 1-,~-H:Øi',QH:-H:--. 'H' -10 '--"', I '5\ . . .. - " . . .. . H , : ,0' fIJ : . _ H . H .. H'" H H' ' I~ð: "<"'<"'<"'" . ,. . . . ,. . . . ,. . . .~. . . . ~·<$>:\~I ~ :... ~ .. . ~ . : ' ---.---'--. . : . "". .:. __'H_~ : · · :. #. ;~I .':H:~~J'<,~_ . & '';'';' ~I ,,;;,,. ~ " C,.: _ ':.:.:..:.-.:.' ~',:,:,,:,-,:, _~:_ ~ _ .:_ _ _ _,_ _ _ _:_ _ _ _._ _ __, --:g ...,..., '§I f -'''.,...,..., , : :~ :,.., 'C :b ,~ ,:.: :Ïl! ,:., :~ I, , 30'130" . 58.09' I 30°: 4 IMPROVEMENTS J WTT ~nAT æ- ~ AND FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN OLD FARM ROAD AND WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF TRACT NO, 5831 UNIT NO.4, PAVING, CURB AND GUTTER, SIDEWALK, HANDICAP RAMPS, STREET SIGNS, STREET LIGHTS, AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL I]Ð CEN, SEC 12 T29S,R26E K.C.R. OR. MOB & M î LEGEND ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 EXISTING BOUNDARY SECTION LINE NEW ASSESSMENT NUMBER, ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 REFERENCE TO SECTION OR FRACTIONAL SECTION CORNER REFERENCE TO TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, MOUNT DIABLO BASE AND MERIDIAN KERN COUNTY RECORDS OFFICIAL RECORDS REFERENCES MOUNT DIABLO BASE AND MERIDIAN CENTER LINE OF ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY EXHIBIT E MAP NO.2 T7111. T,... T1I.TT7lT.lT\ 'n T'\T.lT\,AT'\m EXHIBIT E MAP NO. 3 SHOWING MONTARA AREA IMPROVEMENTS ® L . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . -í-~ ß!fI?W ROAD NE COR, SEe 12 _ _ _ _ _ ---Ì- _ ~................................... -..: .2~ ~,..R.2.6.E.. ----...:.-----...3F.'- CANAL LOT - . -,- - - . . r - - - - - - - - - ",. _ _ . _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _.. _ _ _ ~ -'. - - - - .. - - - " - ~ - _ - _ .' _ _ _ _ _:. _ _ _ . ~ . _ . _ .1 _ _ _ _ _ '- _ _ _ _ J . _ _ _ _;. . _ _ _ .: '" g BOCEUI STREET g " , ~·g..,~..~·~-v-·~·~,..;o..-'3.,....~'~,.~-~ .'~......~ ,'- ....: : : : ~ ( : \J~\~ : : : ' ""'. ' . , , , , : 30' 30< '0,1.9, , , , : . : , , , , , , !Jv , , , , , , ' , , , , ,I, ~O·' , . , , , , , "'" ~... .:...:....:... ~ .:... ":~ "~~\~I~~"'" .¡...... ~.....¡..... .:.. ... ~.. .. i··· ......:>.... i , , , ~G1(. , , , , , , , ' .- ' : : ' "i1(.~O: :¡¡¡¡: : : : : : : .' : -: -} :.:: ~ -~- - ~ ::! ::~> -~::: X> :'_> - - - - -- , , , , , :~ , 30'130" TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO, 2 BK. 47 OF MAPS, PG. 38 IMPROVEMENTS ~ \NO FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN JEWETTA AVENUE AND WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO.3, VING. CURB AND GUTTER, SIDEWALK, HANDICAP RAMPS, STREET SIGNS, STREET UGHTS. AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL <DUIT. g LEGEND f"- ~ ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO, 02-1 EXISTING BOUNDARY <5 ---- SECTION LINE lõ f"- a.. _.._.._.._.._n_n_ BAKERSFIELD CIlY LIMIT § 0 vi' ~ W INDICATES WHERE BAKERSFlELD CIlY LIMITS COINCIDE WITH ~ a.. BOUNDARIES OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 ci « z ::::;; 12001 <ll NEW ASSESSMENT NUMBER, ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 -' ~ a.. w « u NE COR, SEC 12 REFERENCE TO SECTION OR FRACTIONAL SECTION CORNER & ::::;; 0:: -' « T29S,R26E REFERENCE TO TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, w a.. MOUNT DIABLO BASE AND MERIDIAN "'" U lL. K.C.R. KERN COUNTY RECORDS 0:: 0 « O,R. OFFICIAL RECORDS a.. lõ MOB & M REFERENCES MOUNT DIABLO BASE AND MERIDIAN ~ ï: CENTER LINE OF ROAD RIGHT -OF -WAY CD 55' WILSON & A'<:I,~nrTATR8 EXHIBIT E MAP NO.3 ENGINEER'S REPORT ~ . ;::j '¡:I f '"" >., , , , , , , , : : ~ ~t: 1~481 T~ROU:H ~ ~ TRA: N~ 606~ U~ ON~ , - - w', - - .. - - . "30' 3Õ," - - . ~ - - -.. - - -'0 - - "0 - - -- - - ..- - - w'o _ _.1 _ _ _ J _ _ _ J _ _ _ L _ _ _ 1. _ _ _ SERENE OAK .j "- DRIVE :g :.-: 12071 REMAINDER PARCEL - - .: - - - ': - . - : . . . : - - - ~ - - . ~ 30' 'Õ':- - - - , - - - ,- - . - ,- , 'f ' " "it: f;..' - - -,- - - -,- .. . . . . . .~I~ . . . . .::.:. '- - - , ' :.; I "", ' ' ' ~. _ Rro' . . ;:;.¡,; ., . . .:. , ' ~ I ~, ,. · : .."ui """ · · _~~_. _,~_. _ __1!..RIVE --,----';.¡.~d:6Q6t--;.--,:: , _ _ ,_ _ _ -.- _ "ct '" - J - - . , . - - L ./- , ", ._,_..,_._,_ "",-1 I"~ "= -~ . , " " f1" -,- - - - _ . . .~,..O!'G I'ß ~~~I~(,·..':=,~, _, " " ~IS'!' ' " , , , : ' , : :"'1"=' ' , : ' , 'ROVEMENTS ' "= : 130' 30' !ONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN BERKSHIRE ROAD AND SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE. INCLUDING lUTTER, SIDEWAlK, AND SUBDIVISION BLOCK WAlL (WITH RETAINER WHERE REOUIRED), MAP NO. 4 SHOWING THE WOODS AREA IMPROVEMENTS r - { '<t '<t Ol W (/) . <>: Cl :r: (L (L vi Ol (L co <>: ~ ~ u.. ci 0 z Ol t- ...., () <>: :,¿ Cl::: co t- , ". - ASINO A VENUE r -- '" , èš "= - Ol t w ...., (/) , <>: Cl :r: (L "" ' (L vi Ol (L <Xl <>: ~ ~ . u.. o 0 z Ol t- ...., () <>: ' ~ 16 , '- - - r - - , NORTH SCALE: ¡- = 100' 45' 45'· o· SO' 100' 20f)' WILSON & ASSOCIATES 4221 W. S1ERRA MADRE. SUITE 201 FRESN~~.,~I:~~~. :;722 'ïl 12221 CEN. SEC 26 T 30 S. R 27 E K.C.R, O,R. MOB & M ï: LEGEND ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO, 02- 1 EXISTING BOUNDARY SECTION LINE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 91- 1 EXISTING BOUNDARY INDICATES WHERE BOUNDARIES OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO, 91-1 COINCIDE WITH THE BOUNDARIES OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 NEW ASSESSMENT NUMBER, ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 REFERENCE TO SECTION OR FRACTIONAl SECTION CORNER REFERENCE TO TOWNSHIP 3D SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, MOUNT DIABLO BASE AND MERIDIAN KERN COUNTY RECORDS OFFICiAl RECORDS REFERENCES MOUNT DIABLO BASE AND MERIDIAN CENTER LINE OF ROAD RIGHT -OF -WAY EXHIBIT E MAP NO.4 ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 ~l ~l l l '1 l ] '1············ ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 (A V ALONIBELSERAlMONTARAlTHE WOODS) APPENDIX A MAP OF PROPOSED BOUNDARIES (On file with the City Clerk of the City of Bakersfield; reduced, not to scale copy attached) J ;j INDEX ~~ 1 Assessment District lOCGtion Mop. Vicinity Map, and Mop Certificates Location Map of Proposed Boundaries of Assessment District No. 02-1 and lnde( Mop of Sheets 3 Through 6 Mop of Proposed Boundaries for the Avalon Iveo of Assessment District No. 02-1 Mop of Proposed Boundaries for the 8elsero Area of Assessment District No. 02-1 Mop of Proposed Boundaries for the Montoro Area of Assessment DIstrict No. 02-1 Mop of Proposed Boundaries for The Woods Area of Assessment District No. 02-1 Description of Proposed Boundaries of Assessment District No. 02-1 PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF 02-1 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. (AVALON / BELSERA / MONTARA / THE WOODS) County of Kern. State of California VICINITY MAP NO SCALE PREPARED BY: WILSON & ASSOCIATES Fresno, California APPROVED BY: ~T,~bATE: _ î.-ll.-<>,"\...- Edward J. Wilson R,C.E. 23269 (Expires 12-31-05) Assessment Engineer ~lf~ '~F T~U~~~~ ~~,J"~ CciA~KOFO~ TH~<õt~ BA~'Ei8ò2~OUNTY OF KERN, '6 BY: ______ PAMELA McCARTHY, CMC CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD. CALIFORNIA I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE WITHIN MAP SHOWING PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO, 02-', COUNTY OF KERN. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, W!>S APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD AT A REGULAR MEETING THEREOF, HELD ON THE 22ND DAY OF MAY. 2002, BY ITS RESOLUTION NO. 079-02, BELSERA AREA OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02--,1 BY: _____________ PAMELA McCARTHY, CMC CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF BAKERSfiELD. CALIFORNIA 58 PACHECO ROAD ,/ PANAMA l.ANE AiMFMEO/SON CJ.NJJ.. HOSKING AVENue FILED THIS !:!_". DAY OF _~U G-\J!. T _, 2002, AT THE HOUR OF __ O·CLOCK, PÃG~S '~IlíD~~H °æSIN°~f~F'}'¡~f'g'F 'fJE C¿>Jt~I~E~~~~~E~?'~'CJðu~h OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. RECORDED AT THE REQUEST OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD. DOCUMENT NO. 01.1>"l.~':..~~ BY: __ JAMES W, MAPLES COUNTY ASSESSOR-RECORDER COUNTY OF KERN, CALlfORNlA ~ BAKERSF1ELD THE WOODS AREA OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO, 02-1 WILSON &- ASSOCIATES 4221 W.SIERRA WDR£. SUiTt 201 FRESNO. CAlIFORNIA 93722 (559) 275 5445 DR. B'f.!2E-- OAlE 06-24-02 PROJECT.2SJi!l!L RE\'ISION .l22..- nlE =œL APPROVED ~ PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 (AVALON / BELSERA / MONTARA / THE WOODS) County of Kern. State of California SHEET _...1- OF -L- SHEETS NORTH NO SCALE LOCATION MAP OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 SEE SHEET 3 FOR MAP OF PROPOSED BOUNDARIES FOR AVALON AREA OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 LOCATION MAP OF PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 AND INDEX MAP OF SHEETS· 3 THROUGH 6 LEGEND SEE SHEET 4 FOR MAP OF PROPOSED BOUNDARIES FOR BELSERA AREA OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 % ~ ì i ~ RL,-,..,.~ 2 ,,~.. ~ '1 ~ ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 ~RO~OSED BOUNDARY -:- - - - - - - - ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 91-1 EXISTING BOUNDARY -..-..-..-..-.- BAKERSfiELD CITY LIMITS - - - - SECTION LINE T 30 S. R 26 E REFERENCE TO TOWNSHI~ 30 SOUTH. RANGE 26 EAST. MOUNT DIABLO BASE AND MERIDIAN ¡(.CR. KERN COUNTY RECORDS Q,R. MOB 8< M OFFICIAL RECOROS REFERENCES MOUNT DIABLO BASE AND MERIDIAN ~ INDICATES lAND AREAS WITHIN ~RO~OSED BOUNDARIES OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO, 02-1 ,-- NOTES: " THE ~RO~OSED BOUNDARIES OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-' AP~ROVEO BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAl<ERSflELD AT A REGUlAR MEETING THEREOF ON THE 22ND DAY OF MAY. 2002. BY ITS RESOLUTION NO. 079-02 WERE SHOWN ON THE EXHIBIT MAP ATTACHED TO SAID RESOLUTION ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, NO FORMAl BOUNDARY MAP SHOWING THE BOUNDARIES OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO, 02-1 HAS BEEN FILED IN THE FORM AND CONTAINING MATTERS ~RESCRIBED BY SECTION 3110 OF CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE. 2. SEE SHEET 7 FOR THE DESCRI~TION OF THE ~RO~OSED BOUNDARIES OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1. LOCATED WiTHIN THE EXISTING CORPORATE BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY OF BAKERSfiELD, ~ I~ I -~f-f;' ~--\t----- -:----- -!- - --~ ;/. --- ~ ~ - -I I I -"i'. I --'I IT I II II 16 ~ I~ I : : : ____~. __ I _ I I I I '-~"""'-I'~ - --I'------,-......-...--~--l-: I I I I 1 .. : . :~ . !~ . !~ ,,:~ !~ -----.-J--.-.-J- ----i!~~ - __i~_-!!~i : I I +- I ! I I'l' I r _-L_ L.._._.,_.._.. I-""'--I--+m~~ I I CROSS INDEX TO ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 91-1: 1. THE BOUNDARY MAP OF CITY OF BAkERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 91-1 PRIOR RECORDED AUGUST 7. 1992, IN BOOK 9 OF MAPS OF ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNITY FACIUTIES DISTRICTS AT ~AGES 87 THROUGH 89, IN THE OmCE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 2. THE ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM OF THE CITY OF BAl<ERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 91-1 ~RIOR RECORDED OCTOBER 1. 1992, IN BOOK 9 OF MAPS OF ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS AT PAGES 100 THROUGH 109. IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. NOIml 6 "',"'" #ø' SEE SHEET 6 FOR MAP OF PROPOSED BOUNDARIES FOR mE WOODS ARRA OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 __L -, WILSON &: ASSOCIATES 4221 W. SIERRA MADRE. SUITE 201 FRESNO. CAliFORNIA 93722 (SS9) 275 5445 DR. BY ~ DATE ~ =~ ::::0 ~ PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 (AVALON / BELSERA / MONTARA / THE WOODS) County of Kern. State of California SHEET -2-- OF ~ SHEETS CEN. SEe 12 T29S.R26E :R ,5. ® : I: 'I' , , 'I' : 6p': ® (A8) PARCEL C IN LOT UNE ADJUSTMENT NO. 51-00 462-020- 17"5: ,.- (A6) PARCEL D IN LOT LlN! AOJUSTM£Nr NO. 51-00 462-020- (t~ì g NOT A PART - - - - - - - . - (Ã4) - - - - - . - £ OLIVE DRIVE Ìð . - - ,_ - - - - - - - - I. _ _._ _ _ _ _ . . _ . _ _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ® ~ <>: ~ ~ "" :g ® PARCEL 6 IN PARCEL MAP NO. 9826 462-020- rJ.t (A2) ® MAP OF PROPOSED BOUNDARIES FOR THE AVALON AREA OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 - - - - - . - . - - Ó ;J ! z >-- 0 Z (L :::> - (f) '" (L N « IX) :::E to u.. Ó 0 Z to >-- '<I' U « ,¿ ~ co 5 ® POB FOR AVALON AREA BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION ~ 0'--- tOO' 2Of)' 400' NOKl11 SCALE: 1" . 200' LEGEND ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-' PROPOSED BOUNDARY - - - - SECTION LINE ~ CEN. SEC 12 T29S,R26E K.C.R. O.R. MOB & M ~ ® (A3) POB KERN COUNTY ASSESSOR'S TAX NUMBER (ATN) PARCEL NUMBER PAGE/BLOCK NUMBER BOOK NUMBER REFERENCE TO SECTION OR FRACTIONAL SECTION CORNER REFERENCE TO TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH. RANGE 26 EAST, MOUNT DIABLO BASE AND MERIDIAN KERN COUNTY RECORDS OF1'lCIAl RECORDS REFERENCES MOUNT DIABLO BASE AND MERIDIAN CENTER LINE OF ROAD RIGHT -OF-WAY NUMBER OF ADJACENT MAP SHEET MAP REFERENCE TO PROPOSED BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-', AS SHOWN ON SHEET 7 POINT OF BEGINNING NOTE: 1. THE AVALON AREA OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-' IS LOCATED IN PORTIONS OF SECTION 12, T 29 S, R 26 E, MOB & M. WITHIN THE CORPORATE BOUNDARIES OF THE CflY OF BAKERSFIELD. MAP AND DOCUMENT REFERENCES: 1. PARCEL MAP NO. 9826 FILED OCTOBER 16. 1992. IN BOOK 44 OF PARCEL MAPS. AT PAGES 131THRQUGH 132. K.C.R. 2. CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 51-00 RECORDED SEPTEMBER 27, 2000. AS DOCUMENT NO, 0200120365, O,R. 3. KERN COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP FILED IN ASSESSOR'S MAP BOOK 462 AT PAGE 02. WILSON &: ASSOCIATES 4221 W. SIERRA MADRE. SUITE 201 FRESNO, CAUFORNIA 93722 (559) Z75 5+45 DR. IJ'( ~ DATE f!.l=:Q1.=Q£ PROJECT.2S.6!J!L REVISION ..20- FlE 2H£I!}BL APPRO'IED PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 (AVALON / BELSERA / 1I0NTARA / THE WOODS) County of Kern. State of California SHEET ~_ OF ~__ SHEETS MAP OF PROPOSED BOUNDARIES FOR THE BELSERA AREA OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 ® - - -J;:- - -- -- --- - - - - - - - -'- CEN, SEe 12 : 30'130': T29S.R26E J;: J;: 1ll H H H H¡r >;HH' H'H H, H: H, H' }:f CH' t, :.,i :i:' H, ( "'C'H"'H"""........, 1,_ _ o--'----"~ 'íÕ -;..-----1--- xt~-,.---,-.-~,.._~ e g .. _ , _ _ . , _ _ , I ~ - - ,- - - . ,- - \)~ , , , . . _ , -,..-,---,..., ., / '11' "', ", , , ,. " f/òv>" , : : ~ò' ' : : : : : - :- .. .;.. ..: ~~~_.; - .. ; . . - ; . - - ~ .. . ~ - . - ~ - - - ~ . .. ~ - :,. ~ - . - - ~ (83) I _ _ . . ,- _ . _ ,- . _ _ ,- _ . _ ,- _ . _ 1_ _ _ ''''S '~I' , , , , , , , , , , . ""':: "" , , : : , , , , : : ' . "" .,c.~>'" "" , ' "'" 'ov, , , , , , , , , , , , , " "": ~t\~ , 'I' , : : , , , , : : } "'. . ~ : : :$:\ : ;.. > I < ..:.. ..:_.. .:.. ..:_ __ _:.. _.-:... _:....... ..,... J .', .---v01"---'--'~E ~___ ""'\ --7J=~:=~j r'~=:~=C~"":'H':"':'" ® ¡-... Ó ;:: Z f- ci _ £l.. Z ;:)ui n 2i <Xl ::::; It) u.. Ó 0 Z It) f- '<t () . « '" ~ 0:: 00 N f- e ~ e 'JO" 30" (B1) ® j NORTH SCALE: l' - 100' O' so' '00' 2(J()' NOTE: 1. THE 8ELSERA AREA OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 IS LOCATED IN PORTIONS OF SECTION 12. T 29 S. R 26 E,. MOB & M, WITHIN THE CORPORATE BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIElD, MAP AND OOCUMENT REFERENCES: 1. TRACT NO. 5B31 UNIT NO.4 RECORDEO AuGuST ~ 2002, IN BOOK 4B OF MAPS, AT PAGES \9\0 THROUGH IS~ K,C,R, ~ ~ ~Ir r.; 0, !:l §,: <:> , "" ' Q) WILSON & ASSOCIATES 4221 W. SIERRA MADRE, SUITE 20t FRESNO, CAlIFORNIA 9:5722 (.59) 27. '44' OR. ~.!2E...-- DATE 07-01-02 PROJECT..2ß.6tJ!L REVISION ~ ~LE ~ APPROVED ' CEN, SEC 12 T29S,R26E K.C.R. O.R, MOB 8< M ~ ® (B3) POB POB FOR BEI.SERA AREA BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION LEGEND ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 PROPOSED BOUNDARY SECTION LINE REFERENCE TO SECTION OR FRACTIONAl SECTION CORNER REFERENCE TO TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, MOUNT DIABLO BASE AND MERIDIAN KERN COUNTY RECORDS OFFICIAL RECORDS REFERENCES MOUNT DIABLO BASE AND MERIDIAN CENTER LINE OF ROAD RIGHT -OF-WAY NUMBER OF ADJACENT MAP SHEET MAP REFERENCE TO PROPOSED BOUNDARY OESCRIPTION FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1. /JS SHOWN ON SHEET 7 POINT OF BEGINNING PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 (AVALON / BELSERA / MONTARA / THE WOODS) County of Kern. State of California SHEET _-1....- OF SHEETS MAP OF PROPOSED BOUNDARIES FOR THE MONTARA AREA OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 ® ~.~ '~~~e~~~~-.~'~'~-' ~,~.~.~.~ -1-~~~·RPAI?..~.~.~.~ _~ _~.~ _~... ~~2~O~:_~~~':€._ ~.- ® (C6) M' 2- N 2- "-"-"-"-"-"-"-"-"-"-"-"-"-" . - (Ç~). _. - - . . - . - . . . - - . - . . . . CANAL LOT - .. - .. .. .. .. - - .. .. - ""'\. , ....... -1--·' --..,-- .,,--,"____, _.. __,._ ___.__.___._____¡" . , , .. - - - r .. - .. .. -I - - .. .. "j_ _ . .. _ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. g I 1- - '" ~ :. .. .. _ _ .:.. .. .. _ _ ~ _ _ .. _ _: _ _ .. .. _ :. .. .. . .. ~ _ _ _ _ .1 _ .. .. .. _ 1_ .. _ .. .. J _ _ .. _ ..:. .. .. .. _ .: '" . : Íl BOCEW STREET II ',: - . . . . "',>. ~- ~-:~. ~- -: . . ~: G·~ : . . - ~~~ -~~': ~ - -~: - ~ - - -:-~ -~ _ '::- - . . . - ~ : ' , , , : 30,1 3/ 'e'?9, , , , : " : .. ':H ·f:·:··.·; ... J'~ ~ to< ~O.... H.... ...... H.............. .u,...: : : : ~1tO: :~I: ' , , , , : . : .. - -~. -. __; ~._. -~u~s~. ~Ì/~I ''A~E=-__-=- __;.~.. .:. __- ~-<.~ _ ___ _ j II C i;: , . . - - : - . - - : -. -. ':- - . - :. - . ': - - - ':' - - ": i~ (~- - -: - . . - :' . . - -:- -. . .: - . - - ~ - - . '; '. - ., '30'130" (C1) TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO, 2 BK, 47 OF MAPS, PG. 38 ® j NORTH SCALE, l' - 100' o' 50' 100' 20t)' NOTE: 1. THE MONTARA AREA or ASSESSMENT OISTRICT NO. 02-1 1$ LOCATED IN PORTIONS OF SECTION 12. T 29 S. R 26 E. MOB &: hot, WITHIN THE CORPORATE BOUNDARIES OF THE CllY OF BAKERSFIELD, MAP AND DOCUMENT REFERENCES, 1. TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO, 3 RECOROED AU GUST C; 2002, IN BOOK 48 OF MAPS, AT PAGES IS \ THROUGH l~ K,C,R. r-.. :£ - 0 Ll) a. r-.. o - (f) I - a. ...: ~ ::;; -' "'l a. w I ..: () ::;; 0::: ..: ¡j a. u u.. c;¡; 0 a. _ Ll) ,,¿ £D ® I 55' WILSON &: ASSOCIATES 4221 W. SIERRA MADRE. SUITE 201 FRESNO, CALIF'ORNIA' 93722 (5S9) 275 5445; OR. 8Y.1tE...- DATE 07-01-02 PROJECT.2SBD!L REVISION JJfL- mE~ "'PROVED'M II w NE COR, SEC 12 T29S.R26E K.C,R, OR, MDB & M ï: ® M' (C3) 2- POB POB FOR MONTARA AREA BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION LEGEND ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 PROPOSED BOUNDARY SECTION LINE BAKERSFIELD CITY UMIT INDICATES WHERE BAKERSFIELD CllY LIMITS COINCIDE WITH PRDPOSED BOUNDARIES OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 REFERENCE TO SECTION OR FRACTIONAL SECTION CORNER REfERENCE TO TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST. MOUNT DIABLO BASE AND MERIDIAN KERN COUNlY RECORDS OFFICIAL RECORDS REFERENCES MOUNT DIABLO SASE AND MERIDIAN CENTER LINE OF ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY NUMBER OF ADJACENT MAP SHEET MAP REFERENCE TO PROPOSED BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1, AS SHOWN ON SHEET 7 POINT OF BEGINNING PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO, 02-1 (AVALON / BELSERA / 1oI0NTARA / TIlE WOODS) County of Kern, State of California SHEET OF SHEETS , ® TRACT NO, 5433 PHASE 2 ) ..... - ~ . . - - - . - - - - - - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . . - - - . - - - . - - - - - - ../ ~ II (04) I I I Þ/ g 515-040- @: I I I I I I I J I I, I (02) ® NOTES: ~ BERKSHIRE ROAD l BK. 43 OF MAPS, PG, 167 '" -. - - - - - - - - - - - -. - - - - - - - - _./ eEN. SEe 26 T30S.R27E MAP OF PROPOSED BOUNDARIES FOR THE WOODS AREA OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 POB FOR THE 'WOODS AREA BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION 1. THE WOODS AREA OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 [5 lOCATED IN PORTIONS OF SEcrlON 26. T 30 S. R 27 E. MOB & M. WlTHIN THE CORPORATE BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFlELD, 2. THE WOODS AREA OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO, 02-1 IS SITUATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 91-1. 3. SEE SHEET 2 FOR CROSS INDEXES TO BOUNDARY MAP AND ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 91-1. ~I -q- -q- w O'l .Vl ' ;« 0 I 0... 0.. " O'l Vl <Xl ,0.. ,.., « It) :::; ci ~ LEGENO z I- ~ ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 PROPOSED BOUNDARY U « :,¿ - - - - SECTION UNE a::: () I- - - - _ ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 91-1 EXISTING BOUNDARY 'V INDICATES WHERE BOUNDARIES OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 91-1 COINCIDE WITH THE PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF ~ ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 o ......... -® 515-040- Q}: KERN COUNT'( ASSESSOR'S TþJ( NUMBER (ATN) T T ~ PARCEL NUMBER ASlNO PAGE/BLOCK NUMBER !il : A~ BOOK NUMBER C, , 0: , CEN, SEC 26 REFERENCE TO SECTION OR FRACTIONAL SECTION CORNER ~: T 30 S. R 27 REFERENCE TO TOWNSHI~ 30 SOUTH. RANGE 27 EAST. ~ : : ~ MOUNT DIABLO BASE AND MERIDIAN , Vl , K,C.R, KERN COUNTY RECORDS "" , ~ ~ O.R. OFFICIAL RECORDS 0... _ MOB & M REFERENCES MOUNT DIABLO BASE AND MERIDIAN ~ ~ î CENTER LINE OF ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY :ri :::; ® NUMBER OF ADJACENT MAP SHEET ci ~ (03) MAP REFERENCE TO PROPOSED BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION FOR Z ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO, 02-1, AS SHOWN ON SHEET 7 O'l t> ,.., POB POINT OF BEGINNING « . ~ 55 ~ MAP AND DOCUMENT REFERENCES: NOIml SCALE: 1" = 100' '~I 45': o· so' 100' 20f)' 1. KERN COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP FILED IN ASSESSOR'S MAP BOOK 5' 5 AT PAGE 04, WILSON &: ASSOCIATES 4221 W. SIERRA UAORE. SUITE 201 FRESNO, CAUFORNIA 93722 (559) 275 5+45 DR, BY ~ DAlt QZ.=Q!::!g PROJECT..2SJl!2!L RE;\IlS10N ~ ALE 2ß§.D!)J1L APPROVED PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 (AVALON I BELSERA I NONTARA I THE WOODS) County of Kern. State of California SHEET _JL.. OF SHEETS THE PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF ASSESSI.lENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1, CONSISTING OF' SEVERAl. LOTS AND PARCELS OF L.Þ.ND IN FOUR COMPOSITE AND CONSOUDATEO AREAS, DESCRIBED HEREIN IS AVALON, 1.l0NTARA. AND OF' KERN. STATE OF CAUFORNIA. AND LOCATED: AVAlON AR&.. BÐ.S£RA AREA. AND MONTARA AR£A IN PORTIONS OF' SECTION 12. TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANCE 26 EÞST (T 29 S. R 26 E), MOUNT DIABLO BASE AND MERIDIAN (MOB&M), AND THE WOODS AREA IN PORTIONS OF' S£CTlON 26, TOWNSHIP 30 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST (r 30 S, R 27 E). MOÐ.5tM. ACCORDING TO THE omC!AL COVERNMEm' PlATS THEREOF'. ARE MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: OESCRIPIlON OF THE AVALON AREA. PROPOSED BOUNDARIES: THE PROPOSED BOUNDARIES 01' THt AVAlON AA£A IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1, CONSISTING OF' TWO PARCELS OF L.Þ.NO SITUATED WQHIN SAID CORPORATE BOUNDARIES OF THE CItY OF BAKERSFIELD AND LOCATED IN PORTIONS OF THE EAST HAlF OF SAID SECTION 12, T 29 S. R 26 E. MDB&M. ARE MORE PARTICULARLY OESCRrBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHrAST CORNER OF PARCEL 6 OF PARCEL loW> NO. 9826 (PM 9826) FILED OCTOBER 16. 1992. IN BOOK 44 OF PARCEL MÞPS. AT PAGES 131 AND 132. IN THE OrnCE OF THE KERN COUNTY RECORDER (K.C.R.): TWENCE ALONG THE PROPERlY UNES OF SAID PM 9B26 PARCEL 6 THE FOLLOWING roUR (4) COURSES: (AI) S 00' 49' 16" W, 1,322.18 FEET; (A2) N 89" 17' 29" W, 1,319.90 FEET; (M) N 00" 49' 33" E. 1,321.82 f'ŒT: (M) S B9" lB' 22' E. 680.20 FEET TO THE MOST SOUTHERLY SOUTHWEST CORNER or PARCa' C OF lOT LINE .ðDJUSTMEm' NO. 51-00 (llA 51-00), ÞS SAlD llA 51-00 PARCEL C IS SHOWN ON THE EXHIBIT MAP TO THE CE~1E OF COI.lPlW<lCE FOR LlA 51-00 RECORDED SEPTEMBER 27. 2000, AS DOCUMENT NO. 0200120365 OF OFFICIAl. RECORDS IN THE Off1CE or THE KERN COUNTY RECORDER (O.R.): THENCE. DEPARTING SAID PM 9826 PARCEl. 5 PROPERTY UNES. AlONG THE PROPERlY UNES OF ~D UA 51-00 PARCEL C THE f'OllOWlNG F1VE (5) COURSES: (AS) N 00' 41' 38~ E, 692.50 fEET: (M) N 89" 1S' 22~ W, 678.61 FEEl': (A7) N 00" 49' 33" E. 630.10 FŒI'; (AB) S B9" 18' 07~ Eo 1,.316.75 FEET: (A9) S 00' 41' 3S~ W. 1,322.50 FEEl' TO THE ~EAST CORNER OF SAJD UA 51-00 PARCEl. C AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING FOR THE DESCRIPTION OF' THE PROPOSED eoUNDAAlES OF THE AVAlON AREA IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1. THE AVAlON AREA PROPOSED BOUNOARlES ENCOMPASS AN AREA OF 89 ACRES, MORE OR \.ESS. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 DESCRIPTION OF THE BELSERA. AREA PROPOSED BOUNDARIES: THE PROPOSED BOUNDARIES Of THE BELSERA AIWI IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1, CONSISTING OF SMRAl PAACELS OF LAND SITUATED WITHIN SfJD CORPORATE BOUNDARIES. OF THE crrv OF BAKtRSFI£t.D AND lOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QU'R1'£A OF SAID SECTION 12. T 29 S. R 26 E. MDB&M. ARE MORE PARTICUlAAlY DESCRIBED AS FOllOWS: B£GlNNING AT THE SOUTHtASTM~l3rOf'4:TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO.4 .w p~~_rsg~~~EfkA K.C.R.: 2002. IN BOOK 45 OF J.W>S. THENCE AlONG lHt PROPERTY lINES OF SAID TR 5831-4 THE FOLLOWING TEN (10) COURSES: (81) N sgo 18' 22~ W. 1.322.74 FEET: (B2) N 00" 41' 35~ E. 310.00 FEET: (93) S 89' 18' 22" E. 83.00 FEET: (84) N 00' 41' 38~ E. 85.36 FErr: (B5) N 44' 35' 18- E, 48.83 FEET TO THE BEGINNING Of A NON-TANGENT CUM CONCAVE EASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET AND TO WHICH BEGINNING A RADIAl LINE BEARS S 44' 35' 18" w: (86) NORTHWESTERLY AND NORTHE:ASTERlY AlONG ~D CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 92" 12' 40" AN ARC OlSTANCE OF· 80.47 FEET: (B7) N 43" 12' 02- W, 46.63 FEET: (B8) N 00" 41' 38" E, 145.36 FEEl': (89) S 89" 18' 22- E. 1.241.31 FEET: (Bl0) S 00' 49' 33" W TO THE SOUTH£AST CORNER Of SAID TR 5631 -4 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING FOR THE DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF THE BElS£RA AREA IN ASSESSMENT OISI'RICT NO. 02-1. THE BELSERA AREA PROPOSED BOUNDARIES ENCOMPASS AN AREA OF 20 ACRES, MORE OR lESS. DESCRIPTION OF' THE MONTARA ARfA PROPOSED BOUNDARIES: THE PROPOSED BOUNDARfES OF' 11-IE MONTARA AREA IN ASSESSMENT OISTRICT NO. 02-1, CONSISTING OF SEVERAl PARC£LS OF' lAND SmiATEO WITHIN SAID CORPORATE BOUNDARIES Of THE CITY or BAKERSfItLD AND lOCATED IN THE NDlrniEAST QUARTER or SAID SECTION 12, T 29 S. R 26 E. MD8&M. ARE MORE PARTICUlARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING (1R 582lI-, AT PAGES . A POTNTON THENCE DEPARTING: SAID EAST SECTION LINE OF SECTlON 12 Þ1.0NG THE PROPERlY UNES. OF SAID TR 5829-3 THE FOlLOWING SEVEN (7) COURSES: (el) (C2) ¡~l (05) (C8) (e7) N 89' 18' 22" W. 1,324.17 fEET; N ocr 41' 38" E, 119.94 fEET: N 00" 39' 17" E, &0.00 FEET; S 89'" 20' 43" E, 31.'39 FEET; N ocr 41' 38" E, 130.03 FttT: S 89" 1S' 22" E;. 8.06 fEET: N 00" 41' 38~ E TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION WßH Tl4E SOUTH ONE OF' THE NORtH 30.00 FEET OF THE NOIr/'H HAlF OF SAID SECTION 12. SAIO sotJ'JH LINE AlSO B£INC THE CITY lINßS LINE OF' THE CITY OF BAKERSfIELD; THENCE (C8) DEPARTING SAID TR 5829-3 PROPERTY LINES. EASTERLY AlONG SAID SOUTH UNE OF THE NOR1H 30.00 !"Err OF' THE NORTH fW.F' OF SAID SECTION 12 AND ALONG SAID 'BAKERSFIELD CITY UMrfS UNE TO A POINT ON SAID EÞST SECI10N lINE OF SECTION 12, SAID POINT ALSO ElElNG: A POINT ON 'THE D.STERl..Y PROPERTY UNE OF' SAID lR 5829-3: THENCE(œ) DEPARTING SAID CITY UMITS LINE AND CONTINUING WITHIN THE INCORPORATED TERRITORY OF THE CITY OF lWŒRSf1£LD, SOl1THERlY AlONG SAID EAST SECTlON UNE OF' SECTlON 12 AND AlONG SAID £ASTER1.V PROPERlY UNE or TR 5829-3 TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID lR 5829-3 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING FOR THE DESCRIPTION OF' THE PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF' Tl4E NONTARA AREA IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1. THE MONTMA AR£A PROPOSED BOUNDARIES ENCOMPASS AN MEA OF 23 ÞCRES, MORE OR LESS. DESCRIPTION OF THE WOODS AREA PROPOSED BOUNDARIES: THE PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF THE WOOOS AREA IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1, CONSISTING: OF A SINGLE PARCEl OF' lAND SITUATED WITHIN SAID CORPORATE BOUNDARIES OF' THE CITY Of BAl<ERSAElD AND lOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAm SECTION 26, T 30 S. R 27 E. "OMM. ARE MORE: PARTlCULARL Y Q£SCRlBED ÞS FOllOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NOR'THEASl' CORNER OF' THE NORTHrAST QUARTER Of' THE SOI.mfWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 26: ~~(W~~WE~Ng~~E~YD L~~Ns::'ióOf(fHFJtSr THE S9'JTHEAST CORNER OF SAl0 NORTHEAST QUARTER: THENCE (02) WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID. NORl'HEAST QUARTER OF' THE SOUTHWESr QlJAR1'ER OF' SAID SECTION 26 TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAlD NORTHEAST OUARI'£R: THENCE (03) NORTHERlY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF' SA.lD NORTHEAST OUARTER OF' THE SOUl'HWEST QUARTER Of' SAID SECTION 26 TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER or SAID NORTHEAST OUARTER; THENCE (04) EASTERLY AlONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAJD NORTHEAST QUARTER OF' THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF $lJD SECTION 26 TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER Of' SECTION 26 AND THE POINT OF' BEGINNING FOR THE DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED BOUNDARIES Of' THE WOODS AREA IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1. THE WOODS MEA PROPOSED BOUNDAAIES ENCOMPASS AN ARE'A OF 40 ACRES. I.fORt OR lESS. niE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 PROPOSED BOUNDARIES ENCOMPASS A COMPOSITE AND CONSOUOATED AREA OF 152 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. NOTE: AU. OAT'" SHOWN ON THIS SHttT 7 OF' 7 SHEETS WAS COMPlLEO FROM RECORD DATA. PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 (AVALON / BEl.'SERA / MONTARA / THE WOODS) County of Kern, State of California SHEET OF SHEETS ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 (A V ALONIBELSERAlMONTARAlTHE WOODS) APPENDIX B ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM (On file with the City Clerk of the City of Bakersfield; reduced, not to scale copy attached) VICINITY MAP NO SCALE ~ BAKERSFIELD NOTE: ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM OF CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 (AVALON / BElSERA / MONTARA / THE WOODS) County of Kern, State of California For 0 detailed description of the lines ond dimensions of the lots. pieces. parcels and subdivisions of lands shown on this Assessment Diagram. reference is mode to the (ollowlng listed Book and Page Numbers of Mops of the Assessor, on file in the Office of the County Assessor of the County of Kern. 1115 Truxtun Avenue. Bakersfield. Californio: 462-02 and 515-04 ~~~OWNJ~~H~f~~:1/~~Y C¿'7 C~IJC{.:¡'E CITY O~ ro~~RSFIELD, STATE OF ~ ~~ 1 Assessment District location Mop, Vicinity Mop. cnd Diagram Certificates Index Map of Assessment Diagram Sheets 3 through 7 Assessment Oiogrom of Assessment 1 os Parcel 6 in Parcel Mop No. 9826 ond Assessment 2 os the Remainder of Pareel·C in Lot Une Adjustment No. 51-00 in the Avolon Area and Index Map of Assessment Oiogrom Sheet 4 =s~~n~9~9tfnR grneAs:~S=s~e~~~o~t t~;oJ~h 75 in Tract No. 5968 Unit Two in the Avalon Area Assessment, Diagram of Assessments 76 through 148 in Tract No. 5831 Unit No.4 In the Belsero keo ÁSSe9sment Diagram of Assessments 149 through 206 in Tract No. 5829 Unit No. J in the Montoro Area ~:e~~~7~d~:Of:r~lo~n'¡¡s':::~~e;t~7 2; through 268 In Tract No. 6066 Unit One in The Woods Area BY, ____________ PAMELA A. McCARTHY, CMC CITY CLERK OF THE CllY OF BAKERSFIELD. CAUFORNlA 6. RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS OF THE CllY OF BAKERSFIELD, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. THIS __ DAY OF _______, 2002, BY, _________ RAUL M, ROJAS SUPERINTENOENT OF STREETS OF THE CllY OF BAKERSFIELD. CALIFORNIA AN ASSESSMENT WAS L£VIED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ON THE LOTS, PIECES, AND PARCELS OF LAND SHOWN ON THIS ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM, THE ASSESSMENT WAS LEVIED ON THE __ DAY OF , 2002, BY SAID COUNCIL'S ADOPTION OF ITS RESOLUTION NO, ___, THE ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM AND THE ASSESSMENT ROLL WERE RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS OF THAT CITY ON THE _ DAY OF ,2002. REFERENCE IS MADE TO THE ASSESSMENT ROLL RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS FOR THE EXACT AMOUNT OF EACH ASSESSMENT LEVIEO AGAINST EACH PARCEL OF LAND SHOWN ON THIS ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM. BY, _________ PAMELA A. McCARTHY, CMC CllY CLERK OF THE CllY OF BAKERSFIELD. CAliFORNIA FILED THIS ___ DAY OF ____, 2002, AT THE HOUR OF ___ O'CLOCK. _,M, IN BOOK _ OF MAPS OF ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNITY FACILmES DISTRICTS AT PAGES __ THROUGH _. IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE CDUNlY OF KERN. STATE OF CALIFORNIA. RECORDED AT THE REOUEST or THE CITY OF 8AKERSFIELD. OOCUMENT NO. _______ BY, __-'_______ JAMES W. MAPLES COUNTY ASSESSOR-RECORDER COUNTY OF KERN. CALIFORNIA PREPARED BY, WILSON '" ASSOCIATES Fresno. 'Californio APPROVED BY, _~~ DATE, __:!.::.!.}~ Edward J. Wilson R.C.E. 2J269 (Expires 12-31-05) Assessment Engineer CROSS INDEX TO BOUNOARY MAP, ON THE~'~ DAY OF _A-IJl!.lJ~'" ,2002, THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD DID FILE ITS MAP ~~RJ~SEgE B~i'A6'~E¡S~~S~~N~F ~K~~~5Wrr¢Sfl¿;E~I~~T D~~~~ ~~' p%Ë~ fu ~Rg;;B~1IN THE OFflCE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNlY OF KERN, ,STATE THE WOODS AREA OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 BY, ________ JAMES W. MAPLES COUNTY ASSESSOR-RECORDER COUNTY OF KERN, CAUFORNIA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM OF CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 (AVALON I BELSERA I IIONTARA I THE WOODS) County of Kern. State of California NORTH NO SCALE LOCATION MAP OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 WILSON &: ASSOCIATES 4221 W. SIERRA w,oRE. SUITE 201 FRESNO. CAI..IFORNlA 93722 (559) 275 5445 DR. BY 1l!!-- DATE QZ::Q1:=Qg ~~~:::o ~ SHEET --L- OF _2- SHEETS SEE SHEETS 3 AND 4 FOR THE AVALON AREA OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 SEE SHEET 6 FOR , THE MONT. AREA II OF ASSESSM NT 'DISTRICT NO. 02-1 SEE SHEET 5 FOR THE BELSERA AREA OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 à ~ $ ~I~ ;1; l i ~ r ,,~.. 1 I I~ - ·j~-f~-+C~---+-u-+---~ :: i I I I I .. I I I . ~ CMRG'IIMKIIM' I IIHJ1" WIt --;'1 ----¡!l J7 I 10 10 I' Iii I I I I i I I I --¡-....... ;o,;¡,.,-,:; ----I:--u-+--..,.--+-l-~ I I I 1 1 .. : . :~ . !~ a !~ Ð:~ !! -_.._-_._.J_,--_.J-- - - -i!.--~- - -i~ _ -!! ~i ; I I +- I , I D I r _...J-_ L.._.._.._.._.. ,I -~ - -1- --b,m!-l I I .uL SEE SHEET 7 FOR THE WOODS AREA OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 .., ~- INDEX MAP OF ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM SHEETS 3 THROUGH 7 LEGEND ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 EXISTING BOUNDARY ~------- ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 91-1 EXISTING BOUNDARY -..-..-..---..- BAKERSFIELD CI1Y LIMITS - - - - SECTION LINE T 30 S, R 26 E REFERENCE TO TOWNSHIP 3D SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST. MOUNT DIABLO BASE AND MERIDIAN K.C.R, KERN COUNTY RECORDS O.R. MDB&M OFFICIAL RECORDS REFERENCES MOUNT DIABLO BASE AND MERIDIAN ~ INDICATES LAND AREAS WITHIN EXISTING BOUNDARIES OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-' NOTE, 1. ALL PROPERTIES IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO, 02-1 ARE LOCATED WFTHIN THE EXISTING CORPORATE BOUNDARIES OF THE erN OF BAKERSFIELD. CROSS INDEX TO ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO.9' -" 1, THE BOUNDARY MAP OF CITY OFBAKERSFtELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 9'-' PRIOR RECORDED AUGUST 7. 1992. IN BOOK 9 OF MAPS OF ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNITY FACILmES DISTRICTS AT PAGES 67 THROUGH 69, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF KERN. STATE OF CALIFORNIA. 2. THE ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 91-1 PRIOR RECORDED OCTOBER " 1992. IN BOOK 9 OF MAPS OF ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNITY FACILFTlES DISTRICTS AT PAGES 100 THROUGH 109. IN THE OFFtCE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF KERN. STATE OF CALIFORNIA. NORm "" WILSON &- ASSOCIATES 4221 W. SIERRA MADRE. SUITE 201 FRESNO. CIolIFORNIA 93722 (559) 275 5445 DR. BY llE..-.- DATE ~ PROJECT.2Sß!JQ. REVISION .JJ!:L--.. FILE ~ APPROVED...Ý!:::L ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM OF CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 (AVALON / BELSERA / MONTARA / THE WOODS) County of Kern, State of California SHEET -1- OF _2-_ SHEETS ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM OF ASSESSMENT 1 AS PARCEL 6 IN PARCEL MAP NO. 9826 AND ASSESSMENT 2 AS THE REMAINDER OF PARCEL C IN LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 51-00 IN THE AVALON AREA AND INDEX MAP OF ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM SHEET 4 ® IT:! REMAINDER OF PARCEL C IN WT liNE ADJUSTMENT NO, 51-00 REMAIND£R OF 462-020- @; SEE SHEET 4 FOR ASSESSMENTS 40 THROUGH 75 IN TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT TWO llilliQ NOT A PART SEE SHEET 4 FOR ASSESSMENTS 3 THROUGH 39 IN TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT ONE ó '" Z .... f-- <5 Z 0- ~vi 0'>0- N « ffl ::;; u.. Ó 0 Z Ll) f-- .... ü . « y Il:: OJ f-- ~ ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 EXISTING BOUNDARY SECTION LINE KERN COUNlY ASSESSOR'S TAX NUMBER (ATN) ® PARCEL NUMBER PAGE/BLOCK NUMBER BOOK NUMBER : I: 'I' , , PARCEL D· IN LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO, 51-00 IT! NEW ASSESSMENT NUMBER, ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. D2-1 REFERENCE TO SECTION OR FRACTIONAL SECTION CORNER REFERENCE TO TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, MOUNT DIABLO BASE AND MERIDIAN KERN COUNlY RECOROS OFFlCIAL RECORDS REFERENCES MOUNT DIABLO BASE AND MERIDIAN CENTER LINE OF ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY NUMBER OF ADJACENT DIAGRAM SHEET '''- 462-020- {~~, CEN, SEC 12 T29S.R26E 'I' : SP'; eEN, SEe 12 T29S.R26E ..... -. - -- -. - - -. - _ _. __I.. _ _. __ _ _... _ __ ® K.C,R. OR, MOB & M f: ® ® ~ 0: ~ ~ "" m PARCEL 6 IN PARCEL MAP NO. 9826 462-020- \;!~ NOTE, " THE AVAlON AREA OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO, 02-1 IS LOCATED IN PORTIONS OF SECTION 12, T 29 S, R 26 E, MOB & M, WITHIN THE CORPORATE BOUNDARIES OF' THE CITY OF' BAKERSFIELD. ® ,I, I j NOtmi ® SCAlE: r = 200' o' '00' 200' 4Cf)' MAP AND DOCUMENT REFERENCES: ,. PARCEL MAP NO, 9826 FlLED OCTOBER 16, 1992. IN BOOK 44 OF PARCEL MAPS, AT PAGES 131 THROUGH 132. K,C,R, 2. CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR LOT UNE ADJUSTMENT NO. 51-00 RECORDED SEPTEMBER 27, 2000. AS DOCUMENT NO. 0200120365. O,R. 3, TRACT NO, 5968 UNrr ONE RECORDED ____, 2002, IN BOOK 48 OF MAPS. AT PAGES _ THROUGH __, K,C.R. 4. TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT TWO RECORDED , 2002, IN BOOK 48 OF MAPS, AT PAGES _ THROUGH _, K.C.R. 5. KERN COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP FilED IN ASSESSOR'S MAP 800K 462 AT PAGE 02. WILSON & ASSOCIATES 4221 W. SIERRA UADRE. SUITE 201 FRESNO. CALIF'ORNlA 93722 (559) 275 5445 DR. EI'f.QE- DATE ~ P1lOJEar.2S5JiD.. REVISION .l1CL- F1LE ~ APPROVEO ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM OF CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 (AVALON / BELSERA / YONTAHA / TIlE WOODS) County of Kern. State of California SHEET _...L OF ~_ SHEETS ----- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM OF ASSESSMENTS 3 THROUGH 39 IN TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT ONE AND ASSESSMENTS 40 THROUGH 75 IN TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT TWO IN THE AVALON AREA Q) ® TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT TWO 301 30' 10 [ill 9 }[) 30'130' ......__......-......-....-....._.....--~--_..-..-.._--.._-........ ilmlmlcblmlcblmlml, ~~';r:'1~~lili I I I ,"" 'è§ 'll: 1 :~ I :~ '0 ;"" 1--:" , 30,1,°" , , MANTOVA AVENUE ~, 20 /19118/17 16115114 13 ~,[ID lliJ 00 [jj] [jj] [ill m1[jj]ldblill 81 21 I 22 I 23 I 24 I 25 I 26 Iii [ill illJ [ill [ill [ill m:J PARCEL 0 IN LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 51-00 462"';'020- (!.~) NOT A PART g APPIE g 37 I 36 I 35 I 34 I 33 32 I 31 I 30 00 00 æJ ŒJ QÐ æJ rnJ [ill - - . . - , ~ . . . . . . . . . . . (~.O~ .D~. _ _ . _ _ . . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . . 'CËN: ~Eè '12 - - - . . - - - - - ~ . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . - - - - - - - - . - - - - - - . - - - - T29S,R26E Q) ® NOTE: ,. THE AVAlON AREA OF ASSESSMENT OISTRICT NO. 02-' IS LOCATEO IN PORTIONS OF SECTION 12, T 29 S, R 26 E, MOB & M. WITHIN THE CORPORATE BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD. ® II ~ g ~ >- <3 Z CL => vi (J') CL N « ;g ::;¡ u.. Ó 0 Z I/) >- '<I' U « ,¿ Cl:: CD >- MAP ANO OOCUMENT REFERENCES, 1. TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT ONE RECORDED . 2002. IN BOOK 48 OF MAPS. AT PAGES _ THROUGH __. K.C.R. 2, TRACT NO, 596a UNIT TWO RECOROEO , 2002. IN 800K 4a OF MAPS, AT PAGES __ THROUGH __, K,C,R, 3. KERN COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP FILED IN ASSESSOR'S MAP BOOK 462 AT PAGE 02. WILSON & ASSOCIATES 4221 W. SIERRA MADRE. SUITE 201 FRESNO, CAliFORNIA 93722 (559) 275 5445 DR. BY 2.E!-- DATE 9.Z.=.1§:=.Qg PROJECT = .ÐIl~ON ~ FILE ~ .4PPROVED 4..-. 1:l- . - - . - . - - LEGEND ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02- 1 EXISTING BOUNDARY - - - - SECTION LINE __..__.._...._....._ BOUNOARY BETWEEN UNITS ONE ANO TWO OF TRACT NO, 596a 462-020- 57: KERN COUNTY ASSESSOR'S TAX NUMBER (ATN) T T L PARCEL NUMBER PAGE/BLOCK NUMBER BOOK NUMBER 00 13 NEW ASSESSMENT NUMBER, ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 LOT NUMBER FOR TRACT NO. 596a UNITS ONE ANO TWO CEN, SEC 12 T29S,R26E REFERENCE TO SECTION OR FRACTIONAL SECTION CORNER REFERENCE TO TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, MOUNT OIABLO BASE AND MERIOIAN KERN COUNTY RECORDS OFFICIAL RECORDS REFERENCES MOUNT OIABLO BASE ANO MERIOIAN CENTER LINE OF ROAD RIGHT-Of-WAY NUMBER OF AOJACENT DIAGRAM SHEET K.C,R. O.R. MOa & M ~ ® TRACT NO, 5968 UNIT ONE ~ NORTH SCALE: r ~ 200' o' 100' W' 400' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM OF CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 (AVALON / BELSERA / 1l0NTARA / THE WOODS) County of Kern. State of California SHEET _..L. OF _2- SHEETS ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM OF ASSESSMENTS 76 THROUGH 148 IN TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO. 4 IN THE BELSERA AREA ® _ _. _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ -;s¡- -- -. - - - -- - - - -- - - - --. - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - _F. ~.o.L!V~_D.~_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ ?~~~:~~'~6.._~30'130': ill g g ® ..... Ó ::: z I- <.:$ z CL ::> vi ~ CL n <{ :?l ::ö u... Ó 0 Z If) I- ~ Ü <{ ,¿ 0:: <D I- 73 1 72 I 71 I 70 I 69 I 68 1 67 I 66 I I I 65 I 64 I 63 I 62 I 61 I 60 I 59 1 58 ITNI U£l114~11145111441~1142IlTII130'I30,!EQ] 11391~ff37l11361~ITEI~ :;¡ VERDEIHO A VENUE :;¡ -:g-----I------~- 39 140 141 142143144145146 1~1147 148149150 I 51 1521531 54 ~~~~~~11201~~1~11231112411125111261~~~ °1 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 § 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 oolcmlŒJl0011100 IIITQTI[@JI:;J š¡ ~11 0511110611l!QZJ1~1110911lTIQ]1[ill]1[ill]1 [ill] -~---~~----~--- ----... r-í I ~ ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 EXISTING BOUNDARY SECTION LINE NEW ASSESSMENT NUMBER. ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO, 02-1 ® 00 13 LOT NUMBER FOR TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO. 4 REFERENCE TO SECTION OR FRACTIONAL SECTION CORNER REFERENCE TO TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 26 OOT, MOUNT DIABLO BASE AND MERIDIAN KERN COUNTY RECORDS OFFICIAL RECORDS REFERENCES MOUNT DIABLO BASE AND MERIDIAN CENTER LINE OF ROAD RIGHT -OF-WAY NUMBER OF ADJACENT DIAGRAM SHEET CEN, SEC 12 T 29 S, R 26 E 18 117116115114113 112111 00 1]Ð[]]J[]QJ[IDOOæJ 00 10 I 9 I 8 I 7 I 6 I 5 1 4 I 3 I 2 I 1 mHEI @] [ill ŒJ 00 00 [2[] [ill ŒÐ K,C,R. O,R_ MOB &: M í ® 30'130' 58.09' 130': ® MAP AND DOCUMENT REFERENCES: 1. TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO, 4 RECORDED AV GU~!..~2002. IN BOOK 48 OF MAPS. AT PAGES I~~ THROUGH rs~ K,C.R. ~ NORTH SCALI!, r - 100' O' - SO' 100' 200' NOTE: 1, THE BELSERA AREA OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 IS LOCATED IN PORTIONS OF SECTION 12. T 29 S, R 26 E. MOB & M. WITHIN THE CORPORATE BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY OF BAKERSF1ELD, WILSON &: ASSOCIATES 4221 W. SIERRA MADRE, SUITE 201 FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 93722 (559) 275 5445 OR. BY.!1E..-. DATE 07-01-02 PROJECT = R(\IISION Æ1- RE ~ APPROVED..k ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM OF CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO, 02-1 (A V AWN / BELSERA / 1l0NTARA / TIlE WOODS) County of Kern. State of California SHEET _L OF .2-_ SHEETS ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM OF ASSESSMENTS 149 THROUGH 206 IN TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO. 3 IN THE MONTARA AREA ® -~ ~ - - - - - , - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ '1- - - ~ ß!fl}'! _R.0~D. _ _ _ _ NE COR, SEe 12 . ¡¡¡ '" _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, _ _ _ _, _ ~ _2~ ~,_R 26 E:>-. :~~_..- __-1-____.. - .. .. - .. .., ., - .. .. _ .~-.~ - " _ .. ,:i..~_~ - , ® TRACT NO, 5829 UNIT NO, 2 BK, 47 OF MAPS. PG, 38 ® NOTE: ,. THE MONTARA AREA or ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 IS LOCATED IN PORTIONS or SECTION 12, T 29 S, R 26 E, MDS '" M, WITHIN THE CORPORATE BOUNDARIES or THE CllY OF BAKERSFIELD. MAP AND DOCUMENT RErERENCES: 1. TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO, 3 RECORDEDIrUGU$T b, 2002, IN SOOK 48 or MAPS, AT PAGES ISI THROUGH JS~ K.C,R, j NORTH =:1"-100' O' SO' 100' 2O(J' -------'¡¡¡-- r-- CD - 0 «) 0.. r-- o .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :::E i~ ~ g :::E a:: « ¡;:j 0.. U u.. "" ~ 0 0.. _ «) ,¿ CD ® I 55' 'i7 12001 13 NE COR, SEC 12 T29S,R26E K.C.R. O,R. MDS & M f ® LEGEND ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 EXISTING BOUNDARY SECTION LINE BAKERSFIELD CllY LIMIT INDICATES WHERE 8Al<ERSrrELD CITY LIMITS COINCIDE WITH SOUNDARIES or ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO, 02-1 NEW ASSESSMENT NUMSER, ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 LOT NUMBER roR TRACT NO, 5B29 UNIT NO. 3 REFERENCE TO SECTION OR FRACTIONAL SECTION CORNER RErERENCE TO TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, MOUNT DIABLO BASE AND MERIDIAN KERN COUIolTY RECORDS orrlCIAL RECORDS RErERENCES MOUNT DIABLO BASE AND MERIDIAN CENTER LINE or ROAD RIGHT -OF-WAY NUMBER OF ADJACENT DIAGRAM SHEET WILSON & ASSOCIATES 4221 W. SIERRA MADRE. SUITE 201 FRESNO. CÞLIF'ORNIA· 93722 (S59) 275 5445 DR. BY ~ DATE QZ::Q1:;Qg PROJECT.2HfJIL REVISION .QQ.......: F1LE~AI'PROII£O ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM OF CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO, 02-1 (AVALON / BELSERA / 1I0NTARA / THE WOODS) County of Kern. State of California SHEET _Jl_ or -L_ SHEETS I '161 111268 II Þ/ I I I I J I I. I .... .... w (j (f) « 0 I 0.. 0.. (j l/Í a) 0.. SERENE OAK H r') « <l) :::; DRIVE .~ . "- LEGEND o 0 z (j ,... r') ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO, 02-' EXISTING BOUNDARY () « . ---- SECTION LINE a:: '" ,... CD ---- ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 91-1 EXISTING BOUNDARY 'ïl INDICATES WHERE eOUNDARIES OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO, 9'-1 COINCIDE WITH THE BOUNDARIES OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 @ 5' 5-040- rí3': KERN COUNTY ASSESSOR'S TAX NUMBER (ATN) '..' ~ PARCEL NUMBER ASlNO PAGE/BLOCK NUMBER T~ BOOK NUMBER I>; f 12221 I : ~ (j NEW ASSESSMENT NUMBER, ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 GÐ EXISTING ASSESSMENT NUMBER. ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 91-1 ~ : b=l ~ 13 LOT NUMBER FOR TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT. ONE ' « Cl I 0.. CEN, SEC 26 REFERENCE TO SECTION OR FRACTIONAl SECTION CORNER a. (jl/Í T30S.R27E REFERENCE TO TOWNSHIP 30 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST. a) a. MOUNT DIABLO BASE AND MERIDIAN r') « <l) :::; K,C.R. KERN COUNTY RECORDS ci "- Q,R. OFFICIAL RECORDS 0 Z MOB &: M REFERENCES MOUNT DIABLO BASE AND MERIDIAN (j ~ ,... r') CENTER LINE OF ROAO RIGHT-Of-WAY () ~ ~ @ NUMBER OF ADJACENT DIAGRAM SHEET ,... CD .~ '- - - - - - - . - - - - - - -~. _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ .TR!I~! _ ~<?'_ ?~~~ ?H;"·~S.E. ? J) ~ ~ BK, 43 OF MAPS. PG, 167 '-.. - - -. - - - - - - -. -. -. - - -.. _./ ~ BERKSHiRE ROAD 60 I 59 I 58 I 57 I 56 I 55 267lß266i265Iffi4lffi31l262 12071 REMAINDER PARCEL R£MAlNDER OF' 515-040- @ R£MAlNOER OF GÐ @ NOTES: 1. THE WOODS AREA or ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 1$ LOCATED IN PORTIONS OF SECTION 26. T 30 S. R 27 E. MOB &: M. WITHIN THE CORPORATE BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD. 2. THE WOODS AREA OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 IS SITUATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 91-1. 3. SEE SHEET 2 FOR CROSS INDEXES TO BOUNDARY MAP AND ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 91-1. eEN, SEe 26 T30S.R27E 45' r-- f NOTrrH =1'=100' "'5' I 45'. o' !j()' '00' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM OF ASSESSMENT 207 AS THE REMAINDER PARCEL AND ASSESSMENTS 208 THROUGH 268 IN TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE IN THE WOODS AREA ~ MAP AND DOCUMENT REFERENCES: 1. lRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE RECORDED ______. 2002. IN BOOK 48 OF MAPS. AT PAGES __ THROUGH __. K.C.R. 2. KERN COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP FILED IN ASSESSOR'S MAP BOOK 515 AT PAGE 04. 200' WILSON &: ASSOCIATES 4221 W. SIERRA MADRE, SUIT£. 201 FRESNO. CALIFORNIA 93722 (559) 275 54'5 OR. BY!2E...- DATE 07-01-02 PROJECT ~ """gON l2!1..- FILE ~ APPROVED fv-/ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM OF CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO, 02-1 (AVALON / BELSERA / 1oI0NTARA / THE WOODS) County of Kern, State of California SHEET ~_ OF ~__ SHEETS l l l l l :-1 ] ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 (A V ALONIBELSERAlMONTARAlTHEWOODS) APPENDIX C J J J J J J J NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF PROPERTY OWNERS APPENDIX C ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 02-1 COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF PROPERTY OWNERS ASSESSOR'S TAX ASSESSMENT NUMBER (A TN) / "- PROPERTY OWNER'S NUMBER PROPERTY DESCRIPTION NAME AND ADDRESS PARCEL MAP NO. 9826; PARCEL 6 2 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 51-00; REMAINDER OF PARCEL C 3 through 39 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT ONE 40 through 75 TRACT NO. 5968 UNIT TWO 76 through 148 TRACT NO. 5831 UNIT NO, 4 149 through 206 TRACT NO. 5829 UNIT NO, 3 207 REMAINDER OF 515-040-13 208 through 268 TRACT NO. 6066 UNIT ONE H. Arthur Davis and Annette L. Davis, Trustees of the Davis Family Trust and Vincent J. Hashim and Anita B. Hashim, Trustees of the Hashim Family Trust 1200 Truxtun Avenue, Suite 130, Bakersfield, CA 93301 Bakersfield Avalon, LLC 1500 Haggin Oaks Boulevard, Suite 101 Bakersfield, CA 93311 Bakersfield Avalon, LLC 1500 Haggin Oaks Boulevard, Suite 101 Bakersfield, CA 93311 Bakersfield Avalon, LLC 1500 Haggin Oaks Boulevard, Suite 101 Bakersfield, CA 93311 Centex Homes 1840 S. Central Street, Visalia, CA 93277 Centex Homes 1840 S. Central Street, Visalia, CA 93277 FSI Developers, LLC 1401 Taft Highway, Bakersfield, CA 93307 FSI Developers, LLC 1401 Taft Highway, Bakersfield, CA 93307 NOTE: SEE EXHIBIT A (ASSESSMENT ROLL) FOR RECORDATION DATA FOR THE ABOVE-REFERENCED SUBDIVISIONS. 29600APC 1 07/01/2002 l l l 1 .l ] J ' r] '- ~".] ,. '1 ,. J ] ] J j J ,J ,J ~ J '0 '>\-!-"