Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout97-1 Engineers Reportr ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 (Spring Meadows IUStockdale Highway Commercial) AS FILED FOR FINAL APPROVAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MUNICIPAL IlMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1913 AND THE BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL CODE ASSESSMENT ENGINEER WILSON & ASSOCIATES 4221 W. Sierra Madre, Suite 201 Fresno, California 93722 (209) 275-5445 February 27,1998 ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0.97-1 (Spring Meadows II/Stockdale Highway Commercial) AS FILED FOR FINAL APPROVAL CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Mavor and Citv Council Bob Price, Mayor Irma Carson, Councilmember First Ward Patricia DeMond, Councilmember Second Ward I` Patricia M. Smith, Councilmember Third Ward Kevin McDermott, Councilmember Fourth Ward Randy Rowles, Vice Mayor, Councilmember Fifth Ward Jackie Sullivan, Councilmember Sixth Ward Mark Salvaggio, Councilmember Seventh Ward Citv Staff Alan Tandy, City Manager Judy Skousen, City Attorney Pamela A. McCarthy, City Clerk Raul M. Rojas, Public Works Director Gregory Klimko, Finance Director BOND COUNSEL Samuel A. Sperry Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe San Francisco, California ASSESSMENT ENGINEER Ed Wilson Wilson & Associates Fresno, California Q~pFESSrpyq! APPRAISER Michael L. Launer ~~o'~'~ Launer & Associates Bakersfield, California N0.232a9 ~ l~,-~l-c~ ~ UNDERWRITER Robert L. Williams, Jr., Vice President Sutro & Company San Francisco, California DISCLOSURE COUNSEL Bruce Graham Arter & Hadden Los Angeles, California ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 (SPRING MEADOWS II/STOCKDALE HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL) CERTIFICATE OF FILING AND CONFIRMATION OF ASSESSMENT I, Pamela A. McCarthy, Ciry Clerk of the City of Bakersfield, do hereby certify that the following "ENGINEER'S REPORT, CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1," including the Assessment and Assessment Roll in the amounts set forth therein as the "Preliminary Assessment," with the Assessment Diagram attached thereto, was filed with me on the 29th day of August, 1997, for preliminary approval on September 10, 1997, by City Council Resolution No. 133-97. ~~.~~ Pamela A. McCarthy, City Clerk City of Bakersfield, California I have prepared this Engineer's Report for final approval and do hereby certify that the amount set forth herein as the "Confirmed Assessment" on Exhibit A, attached hereto, has been computed by me in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Bakersfield contained in a Resolution of Intention adopted as Resolution of Intention No. 1159 on June 25, 1997. Edward J. Wilson, R.C.E 23269 Assessment Engineer, Assessment District No. 97-1 I, Pamela A. McCarthy, City Clerk of the City of Bakersfield, do hereby certify that the following "ENGINEER'S REPORT, CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1" and the Confirmed Assessment contained therein were approved by the City Council of the City of Bakersfield on the I 1 d't- day of f ~~ , 1998, by Cou il's adoption of Resolution No. ~'~- yS Pamela A. McCarthy, City Clerk City of Bakersfield, California I, Raul M. Rojas, as Director of Public Works of the City of Bakersfield, do hereby certify that a certified copy of the following "ENGINEER'S REPORT, CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1," together with the Assessment Diagram attached thereto, was recorded in my office on the ~~day of ~~~-. , 1998. Raul M. Roja ,Director of blic Works City of Bakersfield, California On /}P~ , 1998, the Assessment Diagram was filed in Book ~ 6 of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts at Pages ~ through J~_, and a Notice of Assessment was recorded as Document No. ~q,~- ~j?~~.~-~, ~ , of Official Records in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Kern, California. ~~~ ,D u James W. M 1 , County A essor-Reco der County of Kern, California 29260CER -i- 2/ 19/98 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 (SPRING MEADOWS II/STOCKDALE HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL) DESCRIPTION PAGE Certificate of Filing Engineer's Report and Confirmation of Assessment .............. i Table of Contents ................................................. ii SECTIONS SECTION I ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PURPOSE, GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF BOUNDARIES AND ASSESSMENT AREAS, AND ENGINEER' REPORT SUBMITTAL STATEMENT ........... I-1 Assessment District Purpose ............................... I-1 General Description of Boundaries and Assessment Areas ........... I-2 Special Community Facilities District Tax Lien .................. I-4 Environmental Review Status .............................. I-5 Engineer's Report Submittal Statement ........................ I-5 Description of Engineer's Report Exhibits A, B, and C ............. I-8 SECTION II GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK AND ACQUISITIONS ...... II-1 Project Description .................................... II-1 Description of Project Improvements, Incidental Work, and Annual Assessment ...................................... II-1 General Description of AD 97-1 Improvement Acquisitions ......... II-2 General Description of AD 97-1 Improvement and Assessment Proceeding Incidental Work and Expense ................... II-3 General Description of Proposed Annual Assessment .............. II-4 SECTION III PROPOSED ASSESSMENT OF ESTIMATED IMPROVEMENT ACQUISITION COSTS AND EXPENSES ................ III-1 Report Requirements .................................. III-1 Proposed Assessment of Estimated Improvement Acquisition Costs and Expenses ........................ III-2 Statement of Total Assessment ........................... III-2 Statement of Maximum Annual Parcel Assessment for Recovery of Assessment District Administration Costs and Expenses ........ III-4 Bond Declaration .................................... III-5 29260TOC -ii- 02/20/98 DESCRIPTION PAGE ~tEPORT EXHIBITS EXHIBIT A Assessment Roll EXHIBIT B TABLE B-I Engineer's Estimate of Total Cost and Assessment TABLES B-II Engineer's Itemized Estimate of Improvement Acquisition Cost- TABLE B-II-A Summary of Spring Meadows II-A Area and Spring Meadows II-B Area Improvements to Be Acquired TABLE B-II-B Spring Meadows II-A Area Improvements to Be Acquired (Tentative Tract No. 5827 Off-site Improvements) TABLE B-II-C Spring Meadows II-B Area Improvements to Be Acquired (Tentative Tract No. 5869 Off-site and On-site Improvements) TABLE B-III Payoff Calculation for Assessment District No. 82-1 Assessment Nos. 5553 and 5554 (Payoff Cost Paid by Property Owners Prior to Confirmation of Assessment District No. 97-1 and Not Refinanced by Assessment District No. 97-1) EXHIBIT C TABLE C-I Consolidated Tabulation of Parcel Assessment Data TABLE C-II-A Details of Spring Meadows II-A Area Estimated Assessment Reallocations for Proposed Development per City Code Section 13.08.070 TABLE C-II-B Details of Spring Meadows II-B Area Estimated Assessment Reallocations for Proposed Development per City Code 'Section 13.08.070 TABLE C-III-A Details of Spring Meadows II-A Area Estimated Benefit Assessment Allocations for Proposed Development TABLE C-III-B Details of Spring Meadows II-B Area Estimated Benefit Assessment Allocations for Proposed Development TABLE C-IV-A Comparison of Spring Meadows II-A Area Benefit Assessment Allocation and Assessment Reallocation per City Code Section 13.08.070 TABLE C-IV-B Comparison of Spring Meadows II-B Area Benefit Assessment Allocation and Assessment Reallocation per City Code Section 13.08.070 29260TOC -iii- 02/20/98 DESCRIPTION PAGE EXHIBIT D DESCRIPTION OF ASSESSMENT SPREAD METHOD .................. D-1 Introduction ................................................ D-1 Assessment District Purpose ..................................... D-1 Authorization for Assessment Reallocations ........................... D-2 Description of Assessment Reallocation Method ......................... D-3 Calculation of Reallocated Assessments .............................. D-5 Description of Benefit/Cost Based Assessment Allocation Method ............. D-6 Comparison of Reallocation Method and Benefit/Cost Based Assessment Allocation Method; Assessment Spread Results ........... D-13 Assessment Engineer's Statement of Findings on the Assessment Spread Method .. D-14 Assessment Proceeding Incidental and Bond Issuance Cost Allocation ......... D-14 Assessment Apportionments to Future Subdivisions ..................... D-14 Assessment Engineer's Certification of the Assessment Spread Method ......... D-16 EXHIBIT E Showing Spring Meadows II-A Area Improvements and Spring Meadows II-B Area Improvements REPORT APPENDICES APPENDIX A Map of Amended Boundaries (On file with the City Clerk of the City of Bakersfield; reduced, not to scale copy attached) APPENDIX B Assessment Diagram (On file with the City Clerk of the City of Bakersfield; reduced, not to scale copy attached) APPENDIX C Names and Addresses of Property Owners 29260TOC -iv- 02/20/98 ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0.97-1 (SPRING MEADOWS II/STOCKDALE HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL) SECTION I ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PURPOSE, GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF BOUNDARIES AND ASSESSMENT AREAS, AND ENGINEER'S REPORT SUBMITTAL STATEMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PURPOSE Assessment District No. 97-1 (Spring Meadows II/Stockdale Highway Commercial), hereafter referred to as "AD 97-1," has been formed by the City Council of the City of Bakersfield (the "City Council") in response to Petitions submitted by Castle & Cooke California, Inc., Castle & Cooke Commercial-CA, Inc., and BHA Properties, LLC, (hereafter collectively referred to as the "District Proponents") who, at the time the Petitions were filed, were the owners of more than 60% of the land area proposed to be assessed as part of the AD 97-1 proceedings. The Petitions are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Bakersfield (herein "City Clerk") along with a Certificate signed by the City Director of Public Works attesting to their sufficiency under the requirements of the California Streets & Highways Code. The Petitions were accepted by the City Council on June 25, 1997, by Council's adoption of its Resolution No. 100-97, Accepting Petition and Determining to Undertake Special Assessment Proceedings -City of Bakersfield Assessment District No. 97-1. AD 97-1 has been formed for the purpose of financing the cost of acquisition and/or construction by the City of Bakersfield (the "City") of certain street, water, sanitary sewer, and storm water drainage infrastructure improvements and the cost to pay off several existing parcel assessments confirmed pursuant to City of Bakersfield Assessment District No. 94-3 (Silver Creek/Brimhall North/Seven Oaks/South Laurelglen), herein referred to as "AD 94-3." The cost to pay off several existing AD 94-3 parcel assessments was later eliminated from AD 97-1, as described below. A description of the AD 97-1 boundaries and of the properties to be apportioned a share of the total cost proposed to be assessed under the AD 97-1 proceedings is presented below. A detailed description of the improvements proposed to be acquired and of related incidental costs and expenses proposed to be funded by AD 97-1 is presented in Section II of this report and a statement of the total assessment and of the amount proposed to be approved as an annual administrative assessment for AD 97-1 are presented in report Section III. A detailed description of the method developed for allocating the AD 97-1 costs among the assessed parcels is presented in the attached Exhibit D. All of the AD 97-1 properties are located within the existing Corporate Limits of the City of Bakersfield (the "City Limits"). 29260FER.I I-1 02/27/98 The improvement acquisition and incidental costs to be financed by AD 97-1 will be spread to the assessed pazcels pursuant to Bakersfield Municipal Code ("Municipal Code") Section 13.08.070 Benefit Spread, added to the Municipal Code on April 5, 1995, by City Council's adoption of Ordinance No. 3643. Section 13.08.070 provides for the use of "... an alternate method and rate of assessment reallocating assessments to alternate properties." GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF BOUNDARIES AND ASSESSMENT AREAS As presented in the Preliminary Engineer's Report for AD 97-1, AD 97-1 was a collection of three separate community azeas in southwest Bakersfield that were identified on the AD 97-1 Boundary Map and in this report and assessment as: 1. Spring Meadows II-A Area, generally bounded by Brimhall Road on the north, Jewetta Avenue on the west, the right-of--way for the proposed Kern River Freeway on the south, and Verdugo Lane on the east. The Spring Meadows II-A Area is also identified as Pazcel A of Lot Line Adjustment No. P96-1000 (75.75 acres); 2. Spring Meadows II-B Area, generally bounded by Brimhall Road on the north, Verdugo Lane on the west, the right-of--way for the proposed Kern River Freeway on the south, and the realigned Calloway Drive on the east. The Spring Meadows II-B Area is also identified as Parcel B of Lot Line Adjustment No. P96-1000 (76.85 acres); 3. Stockdale Highway Commercial Area, generally bounded by the Kern River on the north, Buena Vista Road on the west, the realigned Stockdale Highway on the south, and the Kern River Canal on the east (119.15 acres). Subsequent to the September 10, 1997 City Council adoption of its Resolution No. 133-97 approving the AD 97-1 Preliminary Engineer's Report, the owner of all of the Stockdale Highway Commercial Area property (Castle & Cooke Commercial-CA, Inc.) requested the removal of their property from AD 97-1. In accordance with that request, the then existing boundaries of AD 97-1 were amended by removing the Stockdale Highway Commercial Area from AD 97-1; as described below. The Spring Meadows II-A Area and the Spring Meadows II-B Area of AD 97-1 were not affected by that boundary amendment. The original and amended boundazies of AD 97-1 aze described below. All references to the Stockdale Highway Commercial Area are removed from this Final Engineer's Report, except in Section III, Exhibit A, and Exhibit B, Table B-I, where comparisons between the preliminary and confirmed assessment amounts aze shown. For other information related to the preliminary assessments of the Stockdale Highway Commercial Area see the Preliminary Engineer's Report for AD 97-1 on file with the City Clerk. The district spans a distance of about 0.5 miles, from the northerly to the southerly limits of the Spring Meadows II-A and Spring Meadows II-B Areas and about 0.75 miles between the westerly and easterly boundaries of the District. Each of the two district areas is involved in various stages of the land development process. The Spring Meadows II-A Area has been approved for subdivision into 261 R-1 subdivision lots and one storm drain sump pursuant to Vesting Tentative Tract No. 5827. 29260FER.I I-2 02/27/98 The Spring Meadows II-B Area has been approved for subdivision into 241 R-1 subdivision lots, two well sites, one storm drain sump, and a school parcel, pursuant to Tentative Tract No. 5869. The first phase of Tentative Tract No. 5869 (designated as Tract No. 5869-Unit One) has been recorded, creating 94 R-1 lots, one well site, and one storm drain sump within Tract No. 5869-Unit One, and a remainder parcel ready for subdivision into 147 R-1 lots, one well site, and a school parcel, as future phases of Tentative Tract No. 5869. As of the date of filing this Engineer's Report for AD 97-1 (hereinafter referred to as the "Engineer's Report") for final approval by the City Council, all of the parcels proposed to be assessed a share of the AD 97-1 improvement acquisition cost were owned by the two remaining District Proponents (Castle & Cooke California, Inc., and BHA Properties, LLC). AD 97-1 will finance the acquisition of various "off-site" and/or "on-site" (in-tract) subdivision improvements and related incidental costs, where those improvements are either already required or are expected by the District Proponents to be required to be installed as conditions of final subdivision or site plan approvals within the two AD 97-1 community areas. Each of the two community areas is a separate assessment area within AD 97-1. The costs financed by AD 97-1 for the acquisition of infrastructure improvements located within or adjacent to one of the two community areas are assessed only to properties that are located within the community area wherein those improvements are also located. Therefore, all of the improvements proposed to be financed bear a rational nexus to the public infrastructure improvements needed for the subdivision of the property within each area that is proposed to be assessed a share of the AD 97-1 total cost. The proposed boundaries of Assessment District No. 97-1 were approved by the City Council on June 25, 1997, by Council's adoption of its Resolution No. 101-97. The extent of the territory at that time proposed to be assessed in AD 97-1 is generally shown by a hatched pattern on the map attached as Exhibit A to Resolution No. 101-97, which further directed the AD 97-1 Assessment Engineer to prepare a formal boundary map on the basis of the Exhibit A Boundary Map in the form and containing the matters prescribed by Section 3110 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the "Streets and Highways Code"). On August 20, 1997, the map entitled "PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 (SPRING MEADOWS II/STOCKDALE HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL), COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA" (the "AD 97-1 Boundary Map"), consisting of five (5) sheets, was filed in the office of the City Clerk. On August 22, 1997, the AD 97-1 Boundary Map was filed for record in Book 15 of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts, at pages 186 through 190, in the office of the Kern County Recorder. As described above, pursuant to a request by one of the District Proponents, the Stockdale Highway Commercial Area was removed from AD 97-1. On January 15, 1998, the map entitled "AMENDMENT TO PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 (SPRING MEADOWS II/STOCKDALE HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL), COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA (BOUNDARY AMENDMENT NO. 1)" (the "AD 97-1 Amended Boundary Map"), consisting of eight (8) sheets, was filed in the office of the City Clerk, and it was approved by the City Council on January 28, 1998, by its Resolution No. 10-98. On January 30, 1998, the AD 97-1 Amended Boundary Map was filed for record in Book 16 of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts, at pages 82 through 89, in the office of the Kern County Recorder. Reference is made to the AD 97-1 Amended 29260FER.I I-3 02/27/98 Boundary Map for a detailed description of the existing AD 97-1 boundaries. A reduced and not-to- scale copy is attached as Engineer's Report Appendix A and incorporated herein by reference. The AD 97-1 Amended Boundary Map shows and describes the exterior boundaries of the two community areas still remaining in AD 97-1, and those two areas collectively constitute the property proposed to be assessed pursuant to the AD 97-1 proceedings. The assessment district encompasses a composite and consolidated area of about 153 acres. SPECIAL COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT TAX LIEN As of the date of filing this Engineer's Report, it has been confirmed that the properties within the Spring Meadows II-A Area and the Spring Meadows II-B Area of AD 97-1 are subject to an existing special tax lien created by the Community Facilities District No. 92-1 of the RNR School Financing Authority ("CFD No. 92-1") under the Mello-Roos Act. CFD No. 92-1 includes territories from the Rosedale Union School District, the Norris School District, and the Rio Bravo-Greeley School District. CFD No. 92-1 special taxes will be used to finance, or used as security for bonds issued to finance, the construction of elementary, middle and other authorized school facilities within CFD No. 92-1. The maximum bonded indebtedness for CFD No. 92-1 is $350,000,000 and, to date, $4,500,000 in principal amount of bonds have been issued. However, the CFD No. 92-1 special taxes are payable regardless of whether any bonds are issued. The amount of special taxes, if any, to which property within CFD No. 92-1 is subject varies based upon the zoning, the entitlements, and the type and level of development of such property. The properties in the Spring Meadows II-A and Spring Meadows II-B Areas are generally subject to the following CFD No. 92-1 special taxes: No special taxes are collected from property for which no final tract map has been recorded. Upon recordation of a final tract map, an annual special tax of approximately $100 (which may be increased by 2% each fiscal year) per acre of subject property is payable. Upon the issuance of a residential building permit for aparcel, aone-time special tax of $1.25 (which may be increased each fiscal year based upon the percentage change in a designated construction cost index) per building square foot is payable and such parcel is subject to an annual special tax payment of approximately $424 (which may be increased by 2% each fiscal year). In the alternative, at the time of issuance of such residential building permit, the owner of such parcel may prepay a specified amount, in which case the one-time special tax and annual special tax described above will not be levied on such parcel. The prepayment amount is currently approximately $6,637 (which may be increased each fiscal year based upon the percentage change in a designated construction cost index). It has also been confirmed that none of the properties in AD 97-1 are within the existing boundaries of the Lakeside Union Elementary School District Community Facilities District for which a special tax and maximum bonded indebtedness amounts were approved in June 1996. 29260FER.I I-4 02/27/98 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATUS Pursuant to the Municipal Code, the formation of an assessment district is exempt from compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). Accordingly, a Notice of Exemption from CEQA was filed by the City for the AD 97-1 proceedings on August 20, 1997. Separate environmental review proceedings will be conducted for the improvement projects proposed to be financed by AD 97-1, as part of the CEQA compliance associated with the land use entitlement and subdivision approval process within each community area. ENGINEER'S REPORT SUBMITTAL STATEMENT I, Raul M. Rojas, Public Works Director and Superintendent of Streets of the City of Bakersfield, have been appointed the Engineer of Work for AD 97-1 (herein "Engineer of Work") by adoption of City Council Resolution of Intention No. 1159 to do and perform all services in making preliminary surveys, preparing plans, estimating costs, and preparing a diagram and assessment. Pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code (the "1913. Act") and to Section 10204, contained therein, and pursuant to the Municipal Code, including Section 13.08.070 of Chapter 13.08 thereof, and in accordance with Resolution of Intention No. 1159, adopted by the City Council on June 25, 1997, being a Resolution of Intention to order the acquisition and/or construction of improvements in AD 97-1 (herein "Resolution of Intention No. 1159"), I herewith submit the "Engineer's Report" for AD 97-1 consisting of six parts as follows: 1. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, MAPS AND DESCRIPTIONS OF IMPROVEMENTS AND LANDS TO BE ACQUIRED: A. Improvements to Be Acquired: At the time this Engineer's Report was being prepared for filing with the City Clerk and for final approval by the City Council, all of the plans and specifications for the improvement acquisitions to be funded by AD 97-1 had not been completed and/or finally approved by the City Engineer. Therefore, this assessment is based on the cost estimates prepared by Martin- McIntosh Engineering, the civil engineering consultant hired by the Spring Meadows II-A Area District Proponent to design the AD 97-1 improvements to be acquired and/or constructed within that community area, and on the cost estimates prepared by former Sequoia Engineering (now Smithtech/LTSA), the civil engineering consultant hired by the Spring Meadows II-B Area District Proponent to design the AD 97-1 improvements to be acquired and/or constructed within that community area. Both civil engineering consultants are hereinafter referred to as the "AD 97-1 Design Engineers." The AD 97-1 Improvement Acquisition Costs are itemized in Engineer's Report Exhibit B, Tables B-II-A through B-II-C, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The improvements funded by AD 97-1 are to be constructed by the District Proponents and acquired by the City, pursuant to those certain City Agreements No. 97-247 and No. 97-248, Acquisition and Disclosure Agreements, 29260FER.I I-5 02/27/98 City of Bakersfield Assessment District No. 97-1, between the City and the District Proponents, approved as to form and substance by the City Council on September 10, 1997, by its Resolution No. 132-97. B. Maps and Descriptions of Lands, Easements, and Rights-of--way and Existing Facilities Capacity and Use Rights to Be Acquired: As of the date of filing this Engineer's Report there were no land, easement, or rights-of--way acquisitions proposed to be financed by AD 97-1. Accordingly, no maps or descriptions have been prepared and filed with the City Engineer. 2. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK AND ACQUISITIONS: A General Description of Work and Acquisitions to be completed pursuant to the AD 97-1 proceedings is included as Section II of this Engineer's Report. The improvement acquisitions within each of the two community areas are also generally shown and described on the map included in Engineer's Report Exhibit E. ESTIMATE OF TOTAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT ACQUISITION AND INCIDENTAL COSTS: A "Statement of Total Assessment" is presented in Section III of this report. An itemized breakdown of the estimated total improvement acquisition and incidental costs and expenses including the estimated cost of preparing, printing, registering, servicing, and collecting bonds issued pursuant to these proceedings is included in Exhibit B, Table B-I, "Engineer's Estimate of Total Cost and Assessment" ("Table B-I"), attached hereto. 4. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM: The diagram entitled "ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM OF CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 (SPRING MEADOWS II/STOCKDALE HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL), COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA" (the "AD 97-1 Assessment Diagram"), consisting of four (4) sheets, is on file with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference. A reduced and not-to-scale copy is attached hereto as Engineer's Report Appendix B and incorporated herein by reference. The AD 97-1 Assessment Diagram shows all of the following: A. The exterior boundaries of AD 97-1; B. The boundaries of the two community areas within AD 97-1; 29260FER.I I-6 02/27/98 C. The boundaries of existing City of Bakersfield Assessment District No. 82-1 (Stockdale Sewer Trunkline), herein referred to as "AD 82-1"; and D. By reference to the Maps of the Assessor of the County of Kern and to maps and deeds of record, the lines and dimensions are shown for each separate lot, parcel, and subdivision of land within AD 97-1 as they existed at the time this Engineer's Report was filed with the City Clerk, each lot, parcel, and subdivision of land having been assigned a separate assessment number upon the AD 97-1 Assessment Diagram, which corresponds with the number shown for each parcel on the AD 97-1 Assessment Roll (Exhibit A contained herein). 5. PROPOSED ASSESSMENT AND ASSESSMENT ROLL: A. A proposed assessment of the estimated total improvement acquisition cost and of the incidental expenses in connection with the AD 97-1 proceedings is presented in Section III of this Engineer's Report. B. Assessment Roll: An Assessment Roll for AD 97-1 is attached hereto as Exhibit A. The Assessment Roll shows the exact amount of the total estimated cost of the proposed improvement acquisitions, incidental work, and expense that is assessed upon each of the lots and parcels within AD 97-1. The assessment numbers that appear on the Assessment Roll correspond to the assessment numbers shown on the AD 97-1 Assessment Diagram. C. Maximum Annual Parcel Assessment for Recovery of Assessment District Administration Costs and Expenses: Pursuant to Paragraph 3 of Resolution of Intention No. 1159, Section III of this Engineer's Report includes a statement of the proposed $50.00 maximum annual assessment upon each of the parcels in AD 97-1. The purpose of this separate annual assessment is to pay the costs incurred by the City of Bakersfield, and not otherwise reimbursed, which result from the administration and collection of assessments, from compliance with Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15c2-12 for continuing disclosure requirements, or from the administration and registration of any associated bonds and reserve or other related funds. This maximum annual assessment is proposed to be levied pursuant to Subdivision (f) of Section 10204 of the Streets and Highways Code. 6. ASSESSMENT SPREAD METHOD: A description of the assessment spread method used to apportion a share to each parcel in AD 97-1 of the total estimated cost proposed to be financed for the acquisition and/or construction of improvements and payment of incidental costs is attached hereto as Exhibit D and incorporated herein by reference. 29260FER.I I-7 02/27/98 DESCRIPTION OF ENGINEER'S REPORT EXHIBITS A, B, AND C Exhibits A, B, and C that are attached to this Engineer's Report include a total of thirteen (13) tables of AD 97-1 cost estimates and/or assessment spread cost allocations. A brief description of each of the three report exhibits and of the sepazate tables contained in each exhibit is presented below. Engineer's Report Exhibits A through C have been designed for the purpose of presenting a step-by- step breakdown of how the AD 97-1 total assessment has been spread to the individual pazcels that are proposed to be assessed. The Exhibit C tables present sepazate breakdowns of parcel assessment data based on the Reallocation Method (per Municipal Code Section 13.08.070), and based on the 1913 Act benefit based Assessment Allocation Method (see Engineer's Report Exhibit. D for a description of the Assessment Allocation Method and of the Reallocation Method). A third group of Exhibit C tables provides comparisons of the calculated assessment amounts derived in accordance with the Allocation and Reallocation Methods. The exhibits and their tables begin with: 1. A listing in Exhibit A, Assessment Roll, of the exact amount proposed to be assessed to every existing parcel in AD 97-1; then 2. The Exhibit B tables present the major items of total system costs and incidental expenses for all of AD 97-1 (Table B-I), the breakdown of those major items for each of the two community areas in Tables B-II- (A through C) with Table B-II-A summarizing the total improvement, contingency, and incidental costs for each project within the sepazate communities, and Tables B- II- (B and C) presenting the itemized quantity and cost estimates for the improvement acquisitions in each community area. The Table B-II- (B and C) group also breaks each project into the separate improvement systems that are the focus of the Allocation Method of assessment spread that is described in Engineer's Report Exhibit D. Table B-III in Exhibit B is a statement of the cost to pay off the remaining principal balance not billed with the 1997/98 Kern County Property Taxes for several existing pazcel assessments confirmed pursuant to AD 82-1. However, prior to filing this Engineer's Report for AD 97-1, the City Finance Department informed the Engineer of Work for AD 97-1 that the total amount of the AD 82-1 existing assessment payoff cost (see Engineer's Report Exhibit B, Table B-III) had been paid. The City Finance Director released the AD 82-1 lien for the affected parcels on October 22, 1997. 3. Exhibit C has seven (7) tables that provide a detailed breakdown of individual parcel assessment data as follows: A. Details for parcel assessments calculated using the AD 97-1 Reallocation Method of assessment spread authorized by Municipal Code Section 13.08.070 are presented in Tables C-I and C-II- (A and B); 29260FER.1 I-8 02/27/98 B. Details for parcel assessments calculated in accordance with the AD 97-1 Allocation Method of assessment spread that is a benefit/cost based assessment spread method are shown in Tables C-III- (A and B); and C. Tables C-IV- (A and B) present a comparison by community area of the assessments calculated by each of the two spread methods referenced in 3.A and 3.B, above, and described in Exhibit D. 29260FER.I I-9 02/27/98 ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0.97-1 (SPRING MEADOWS IUSTOCKDALE HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL) SECTION II GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK AND ACQUISITIONS PROJECT DESCRIPTION The separate improvement systems to be acquired and their related incidental work and costs eligible for fmancing pursuant to the AD 97-1 proceedings (hereinafter the "Improvement Acquisitions") are described below. The descriptions of the Improvement Acquisitions and of the termini of the proposed work do not necessarily extend for the full length of their description. The plans and profiles of the Improvement Acquisitions shall be controlling as to their correct and detailed description. The general scope of the Improvement Acquisitions includes the acquisition of public infrastructure improvements that will be owned, operated, and maintained by the City, and the payment of certain improvement, assessment proceeding and bond issuance incidental costs and expenses related to the AD 97-1 Improvement Acquisitions and to the assessment proceedings. All of the AD 97-1 Improvement Acquisitions are public infrastructure improvements that are either already required to be installed or are expected by the District Proponents to be required to be installed as conditions of tentative or final subdivision map approval, or of land use entitlement approvals within the two AD 97-1 community areas. As stated in Section I, the AD 97-1 Improvement Acquisitions are proposed to be financed by the City in accordance with the terms and conditions of the AD 97-1 Acquisition Agreements. Those agreements define the specific- scope of public infrastructure improvements to be constructed and installed by the District Proponents and, upon their completion, be acquired by the City using funds provided only through the AD 97-1 proceedings. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS, INCIDENTAL WORK, AND ANNUAL ASSESSMENT General descriptions are presented below of the Improvement Acquisitions and of any incidental work and expense to be financed by AD 97-1 that are related to those Improvement Acquisitions or to the AD 97-1 proceedings. A general description of the proposed annual assessment to be levied pursuant to the AD 97-1 proceedings for the recovery of certain costs that may be incurred by the City in future years from the administration of the AD 97-1 bonds and reserve fund or from the administration and collection of annual assessment debt service installments or from compliance with bond issue continuing disclosure requirements is also presented in following portions of this Section II. 29260FER.II II-1 2/20/98 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF AD 97-1 IMPROVEMENT ACQUISITIONS The AD 97-1 Improvement Acquisitions include the construction and installation as separate improvement systems of the public improvements, the payment of certain City facilities capacity charges or fees, and incidental work described below. The Improvement Acquisitions are to be constructed in accordance with plans and specifications prepared by the AD 97-1 Design Engineers and as approved by the City Engineer. As stated in Section I, the plans and specifications for all of the Improvement Acquisitions had not been completed and/or fmally approved by the City Engineer at the time this Engineer's Report was prepared. Accordingly, the following description of work is based on schematic, preliminary, and/or approved plans, quantities, and estimates that have been prepared by the AD 97-1 Design Engineers. The Improvement Acquisitions to be made pursuant to the AD 97-1 proceedings are described below. In addition, the map in Engineer's Report Exhibit E, ~ attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, shows and describes the general location of the several improvement projects, which together comprise the Improvement Acquisitions that are to be financed by AD 97-1. Spring Meadows II-A Area The Spring Meadows II-A Area boundaries encompass a 75.75 acre block of land that is approved for subdivision into 261 R-1 lots pursuant to Vesting Tentative Tract No. 5827 ("Ten. TR 5827"). One of the District Proponents (Castle & Cooke California, Inc.) is the owner/subdivider of Ten. TR 5827. Accordingly, all of the improvement Acquisitions in the Spring Meadows II-A Area are improvements along the westerly (Jewetta Avenue), northerly (Brimhall Road), and easterly (Verdugo Lane) frontages of the Spring Meadows II-A Area that are required or expected by the District Proponent to be required to be constructed as conditions of approval for this subdivision. The general location and extent of the planned Improvement Acquisitions along the Jewetta Avenue frontage of the referenced subdivision include construction of the northbound traffic lanes to their full design width (the entire east half of the street) from the southerly terminus of Jewetta Avenue in Ten. TR 5827 northerly to the proposed park, complete with street grading and paving, curb and gutter, storm drain pipeline and catch basins, water main with valves, sidewalk, street lights, signs, pavement striping, subdivision block wall, and right-of--way landscaping with irrigation, and the Ten. TR 5827 storm drain sump, including outlet structure and 6-foot high fencing with redwood slats and curb. The scope of Improvement Acquisitions along the Brimhall Road frontage of Ten. TR 5827 from the above-referenced proposed park on the west to the westerly boundary of adjacent Tract No. 5544- Phase Aincludes construction of the westbound inside traffic lane, the eastbound half of the street to its full design width, complete with street grading and paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, subdivision block wall, street lights, signs, pavement striping, right-of--way landscaping with irrigation, and a City Median Deposit. The general location and extent of the planned Improvement Acquisitions along the Verdugo Lane frontage of Ten. TR 5827 include construction of the southbound traffic lanes to their full design width (the entire west half of the street) from the southern boundary of Tract No. 5544- Phase Dsoutherly to the southerly terminus of Verdugo Lane in Ten. TR 5827, complete with street grading and paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, signs, pavement striping, subdivision 29260FER.II II-2 2/20/98 block wall, and right-of--way landscaping with irrigation. Also included in the scope of Spring Meadows II-A Area Improvement Acquisitions are City of Bakersfield Plan Check and Inspection Fees, design engineering, City Landscape Fees, and District Proponent incidental costs for contract administration, soils analysis and testing, construction staking and general contractor overhead, all as itemized in Table B-II-B in Engineer's Report Exhibit B and as generally shown on the map in Engineer's Report Exhibit E, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Siring Meadows II-B Area The general location and extent of the planned Improvement Acquisitions in this area are also shown on the map in Exhibit E. The Spring Meadows II-B Area boundaries encompass a 76.85 acre block of land that is approved for subdivision into 241 R-1 lots, two well sites, one storm drain sump, and a school site pursuant to Tentative Tract No. 5869 ("Ten. TR 5869"). A portion of the Spring Meadows II-B Area has been subdivided by Tract No. 5869-Unit One ("TR 5869-1 "), creating 94 R-1 lots, one well site, one storm drain sump, and one remainder parcel, which is approved for subdivision into 147 R-1 lots, one well site, and a school site, pursuant to Ten. TR 5869. One of the District Proponents (BHA Properties, LLC) is the owner/subdivider of Ten. TR 5869. All of the Spring Meadows II-B Area Improvement Acquisitions along the eastern (Calloway Drive) frontage of Ten. TR 5869 and on-site storm drain pipelines and the storm drain sump are required to be constructed by the District Proponent as conditions of approval for that subdivision. The general location and extent of the planned Spring Meadows II-B Area Off-site Improvement Acquisitions include: a) the construction of the southbound, outside traffic lane for Calloway Drive along the eastern boundary of Ten. TR 5869, and southerly to the mid section line of Section 31, Township 29 South, Range 27 East ("T 29 S, R 27 E"), Mount Diablo Base & Meridian ("MDB&M"), complete with grading, paving, signs, and striping, with a complete four-way traffic signal at the intersection of Calloway Drive and Marby Grange Way; and b) along only the Ten. TR 5869 frontage on Calloway Drive, the acquisition of curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, and subdivision block wall. The scope of Spring Meadows II-B Area On-site (In-tract) Improvement Acquisitions includes the construction of storm drain pipelines within Ten. TR 5869 and block wall around the future Ten. TR 5869 storm drain sump. The scope of acquisitions in this area also includes certain project incidental costs, expenses, and fees as itemized in Table B-II-C of Report Exhibit B. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF AD 97-1 IMPROVEMENT AND ASSESSMENT PROCEEDING INCIDENTAL WORK AND EXPENSE The total cost proposed to be financed by AD 97-1 includes work to be performed and fees or expenses to be paid that are incidental to the construction of the separate improvement system acquisitions. In addition, the cost and expense related to the conduct by the City of the AD 97-1 proceedings and to the issuance and sale of bonds to finance the total assessed cost not paid by the property owners and/or not paid by public agency contributions are also proposed to be financed by AD 97-1. The incidental costs and expenses proposed to be funded by AD 97-1 are described as follows: 29260FER.II II-3 2/20/98 A. The acquisition of all rights of way, easements, franchises, licenses, and permits, and the construction of all auxiliary work, and the payment of all incidental expenses necessary and/or convenient to the accomplishment of the foregoing and for the conduct of special assessment proceedings and the issuance of special assessment bonds, as may be approved by the City, for the fmancing of all or a portion of the foregoing, including, but not limited to, the incidental expense to cover the estimated cost of preparing, printing, registering, servicing, and collecting .the improvement bonds proposed to be issued to represent the assessments, and the incidental expense to cover the estimated cost during the first two years following issuance of any bonds for City compliance with Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15c2-12 for continuing disclosure requirements, as may be applied to any AD 97-1 bonds issued by the City; B. The payment and/or reimbursement to the City and to the District Proponents of 1) all eligible sums under the Streets and Highways Code advanced by the City, including all associated City incurred district formation and assessment proceeding administration costs and expenses, and 2) all eligible sums under the Streets and Highways Code and pursuant to the AD 97-1 Acquisition Agreements advanced by the District Proponents, including all costs advanced for the preparation of construction plans for the Improvement Acquisitions; and C. The funding of not to exceed one (1) year's capitalized interest on any bonds issued in the amount of the unpaid assessments, where said bonds are to be issued pursuant to the Municipal Code and to the Improvement Bond Act of 1915, being Division 10 of the Streets and Highways Code ("the 1915 Act"). All of the foregoing improvement acquisitions, incidental work and expense shall be made and done pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code and the 1913 Act. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ANNUAL ASSESSMENT Section III of this Engineer's Report also includes a "Statement of Maximum Annual Parcel Assessment for Recovery of Assessment District Administration Cost and Expenses." The purpose of the proposed $50.00 annual assessment is to pay costs incurred by the City from the administration and collection of assessments, from compliance with Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15c2-12 for continuing disclosure, or from the administration or registration of any associated bonds and reserve or other related funds, pursuant to Subdivision (f) of Section 10204 of the Streets and Highways Code. 29260FER.II II-4 2/20/98 ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0.97-1 (SPRING MEADOWS IUSTOCKDALE HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL) SECTION III PROPOSED ASSESSMENT OF ESTIMATED IMPROVEMENT ACQUISITION COSTS AND EXPENSES REPORT REQUIREMENTS On June 25, 1997, the City Council, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code and of the 1913 Act, adopted its Resolution of Intention No. 1159 declaring its intention to order the acquisition and/or construction of the improvements described in the foregoing Engineer's Report Section II, to levy a special assessment on each parcel of land benefited by the Improvement Acquisitions and to levy a maximum annual assessment pursuant to Subdivision (f) of Section 10204 of the Streets and Highways Code. The Subdivision (fj declaration provides for the levy of an annual assessment upon each of the parcels of land in AD 97-1 to recover costs incurred by the City and not otherwise reimbursed, resulting from the administration and collection of assessments and from the administration or registration of any associated reserve or other related funds. Resolution of Intention No. 1159 further declares that the lands within the exterior boundaries shown on the AD 97-1 Amended Boundary Map shall be designated CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0.97-1 COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA (SPRING MEADOWS IUSTOCKDALE HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL) (herein "AD 97-1 "); Resolution of Intention No. 1159 appointed the City Public Works Director as the Engineer of Work for AD 97-1 and directed him to make and file the report ("Engineer's Report") required by Section 10204 of the Streets and Highways Code. The Engineer's Report requirements set forth in Section 10204 of the Streets and Highways Code are summarized in Section I of this report under the subsection entitled "Engineer's Report Submittal Statement." Reference is made to Resolution of Intention No. 1159 and to the general description of the improvements proposed to be acquired and/or constructed, as presented in Section II of this Engineer's Report, for more detailed information on the declared intention of the City Council for conduct of the AD 97-1 assessment proceedings. 29260FER.II1 III-1 o2i2oi9a " PROPOSED ASSESSMENT OF ESTIMATED IMPROVEMENT ACQUISITION COSTS AND EXPENSES " NOW, THEREFORE, I, Raul M. Rojas, the duly appointed Engineer of Work for AD 97-1, by virtue of the power vested in me under the Municipal Code and under the 1913 Act and the order of the City Council, as set forth in Resolution of Intention No. 1159, hereby make the following assessment to cover the portion of the estimated cost of the acquisition and/or construction of improvements and the costs and expenses incidental thereto to be paid by AD 97-1: 1. The amount to be paid by AD 97-1 for the acquisition and/or construction of improvements, and the expenses incidental thereto is generally as shown in the following Statement of Total Assessment: STATEMENT OF TOTAL; ASSESSMENT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0.97-1 (SPRING MEADOWS II/STOCKDALE HIGHWAY CONA~RCIAL) A. Acquisition Cost of Improvements, Contingency and Incidental Expense by Community Area (Exhibit B, Table B-I, Items 1-4) 1. Spring Meadows II-A Area 2. Spring Meadows II-B Area 3. Stockdale Highway Commercial Area ' 4. Subtotal Acquisition Cost B. Payoff of Existing AD 82-1 Assessments (Table B-I, Item 5) C. Payoff of Existing AD 94-3 Assessments . (Table B-I, Item 6) D. Subtotal E. Assessment Proceeding Cost and Expense (Table B-I, Item 8) F. Subtotal G. Deduct Contributions and Cash Collections (for Assessment Engineering Costs to first add and then remove the Stockdale Highway Commercial Area from AD 97-1) H. Subtotal Cost to 1915 Act Bond Financing Assessment Amount As Preliminarily Annroved 9/ 10/97 $ 618,299.00 $ 554,008.00 $ 1.013.585.00 $ 2,185,892.00 Assessment Amount As Confirmed 3/11/98 $ 618,299.00 $ $ 554,008.00 0 00 $ . 1,172,307.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 388.357.46 $ 0.00 $ 2,574,249.46 $ 1,172,307.00 $ 202.868.99 $ 175.925.00 $ 2,777,118.45 $ 1,348,232.00 $ 0.00 $ (12,000.00) $ 2,777,118.45 $ 1,336,232.00 29260FER.III III-2 02/20/98 Assessment Amount As Preliminarily Approved 9/10/97 1915 Act Bond Issuance Cost and Reserve (Table B-I, Item 12) 1. Bond Discount 2. Capitalized Bond Issue Interest 3. Bond Reserve Fund 4. Subtotal 1915 Act Bond Issuance Cost & Reserve $ 48,960.30 $ 181,721.25 $ 334.200.00 $ 564,881.55 Assessment Amount As Confirmed 3/11/98 $ 22,268.00 $ 39,900.00 121.600.00 $ 183,768.00 J. Total Amount Assessed (Table B-I, Item 13) $ 3,342,000.00 $ 1,520,000.00 1. Spring Meadows II-A Area $ 802,702.03 $ 801,679.49 2. Spring Meadows II-B Area $ 719,236.72 $ 718,320.51 3. Stockdale Highway Commercial Area $ 1,820,061.25 $ 0.00 A detailed breakdown of the itemized costs for the acquisition and/or construction of improvements, and expenses incidental thereto is presented in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 2. Pursuant to the provisions of law and of Resolution of Intention No. 1159, I have assessed the total amount of the cost of the acquisition and/or construction of improvements and of the expenses incidental thereto upon the several parcels of land liable therefor and hereinafter numbered to correspond with the numbers shown on the attached AD 97-1 Assessment Diagram, all as is more particularly set forth in the Assessment Roll, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference: The numbers on the Assessment Roll correspond with the numbers assigned to each respective parcel as shown on the AD 97-1 Assessment Diagram. Each subdivision of land assessed is described within the Assessment Roll by reference to its parcel number as shown on the Assessor's Maps of the County of Kern for the fiscal year 1998/1999, or by reference to maps and deeds of record on file in the office of the County Recorder of said County. For a more particular description of the manner in which the Estimated Total Improvement Acquisition Cost and Incidental Expenses have been assessed upon the several parcels of land in AD 97-1, reference is made to the Description of Assessment Spread Method, attached hereto as Exhibit D and incorporated herein by reference. 3. As required by the 1913 Act, the AD 97-1 Assessment Diagram is on file in the office of the City Clerk and is attached hereto in reduced, not to scale form, as Appendix B and incorporated herein by reference. For a more particular description of the AD 97-1 exterior boundaries, reference is made to the AD 97-1 Amended Boundary Map on file in the office of the City Clerk, attached hereto in reduced and not to scale form as Appendix A and incorporated herein by reference. 29260FER.III III-3 02/20/98 STATEMENT OF MAXIMUM ANNUAL PARCEL ASSESSMENT FOR RECOVERY OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION COSTS AND EXPENSES Pursuant to Subdivision (f) of Section 10204 of the Streets and Highways Code, I present the following statement of a proposed maximum annual assessment upon each parcel and subdivision of land in AD 97-1, in the amount of $50.00. Said annual assessment shall be levied by the City Council to pay various costs and expenses incurred from time to time by the City and not otherwise reimbursed, which result from the administration and collection of assessment installments, from compliance with Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15c2-12 for continuing disclosure requirements, or from the administration or registration of the improvement bonds and the various funds and accounts pertaining thereto. The City Council shall determine, by resolution, the amount of the annual assessment for this purpose, which shall not exceed the maximum assessment stated above and shall not exceed a reasonable estimate of costs actually incurred. The above stated maximum annual assessment amount shall be separate from and in addition to any fee charged to property owners in AD 97-1 by the City, pursuant to Sections 8682 and 8682.1 of the Streets and Highways Code. 29260FER.III III-4 02/20/98 BOND DECLARATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that pursuant to Resolution of Intention No. 1159 serial and/or term bonds representing the unpaid assessments, and bearing interest at a rate not to exceed twelve percent (12%) per annum, will be issued in the manner provided by the 1915 Act, and the last installment of the bonds shall mature in not to exceed twenty-four (24) years from the second day of September next succeeding twelve (12) months from their date. The provisions of Part 11.1 of the 1915 Act providing a procedure for the collection of assessments and advance retirement of bonds shall apply. The total amount assessed pursuant to the AD 97-1 proceedings includes an incidental expense to cover the estimated cost of preparing, printing, registering, servicing, and collecting the improvement bonds proposed to be issued pursuant to the 1915 Act to represent any unpaid assessments. This AD 97-1 Engineer's Report was filed in the office of the City Clerk on August 29, 1997, and preliminarily approved on September 10, 1997, pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 133-97. Subsequent to the preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report, the District Proponents requested certain changes be made to remove the Stockdale Highway Commercial Area from AD 97-1 and add recorded Tract No. 5869-Unit One to the Spring Meadows II-B Area shown in the "Preliminary" Engineer's Report. Those requested changes in work have been made and the AD 97-1 Assessment has been respread to the assessed parcels as shown and described in this Engineer's Report that was filed with the City Clerk on February 27, 1998, for final consideration and approval by the City Council on March 11, 1998. The proposed AD 97-1 "final" assessment amount is shown in the preceding "Statement of Total Assessment" in Engineer's Report Section III on pages III-2 and III-3, under the "Assessment Amount as Confirmed 3/11/98" column, and the individual parcel proposed "final" assessment amounts are shown in Exhibit A, Assessment Roll, under the "Confirmed Assessment Amount" column. Pursuant to the finding of the AD 97-1 Assessment Engineer, as stated in Engineer's Report Exhibit D, Description of Assessment Spread Method, the proposed Assessment Reallocation Method is in general conformance with the requirements of Municipal Code Section 13.08.070. Therefore, the undersigned recommends that the AD 97-1 Engineer's Report be approved by the City Council as the Final Report, that the parcel assessments shown herein be levied, and the proposed improvements and/or acquisitions be ordered. Raul M. Rojas, Publ' r s Director and Engineer of Work, City of Bakersfield, Assessment District No. 97-1 29260FER.III III-5 02/20/98 EXHIBIT A ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 COUNTY OF KERN, CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT ROLL ASSESSMENT ASSESSOR'S TAX PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED NUMBER NUMBER(ATN)/ ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT (1] _ PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PROPERTY OWNER___ __ AMOUNT ~ AMOUNT 1 500-010-30-00-5 (LLA P96-1000; PCL A) CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA, INC $802,702.03 $801,679.49 2 REMAINDER OF 500-010-31-00-8 (REMAINDER OF LLA P96-1000; PCL B) BHA PROPERTIES, LLP $719,236.72 $438,145.99 3 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 1 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 4 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 2 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 5 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 3 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 6 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 4 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 7 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 5 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 8 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 6 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 9 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 7 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 10 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 8 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 11 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 9 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 12 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 10 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 13 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 11 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 14 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 12 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 15 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 13 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 16 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 14 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N!A $2,980.58 17 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 15 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 18 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 16 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 19 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 17 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 20 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 18 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 21 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 19 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 22 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 20 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 23 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 21 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 --24-- TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 22 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD N/A $0.00 25 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 23 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 26 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 24 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 27 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 25 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 28 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 26 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 29 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 27 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 30 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 28 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 31 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 29 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 32 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 30 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 33 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 31 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 34 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 32 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 35 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 33 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 36 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 34 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 37 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 35 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 38 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 36 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 39 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 37 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 40 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 38 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 41 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 39 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 42 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 40 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 43 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 41 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 44 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 42 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N!A $2,980.58 45 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 43 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 46 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 44 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 47 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 45 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 48 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 46 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 49 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 47 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 50 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 48 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 51 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 49 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 52 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 50 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 53 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 51 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 54 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 52 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 55 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 53 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 56 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 54 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 29260EXA A-1 02/27/98 EXHIBIT A ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 COUNTY OF KERN, CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT ROLL ASSESSMENT ASSESSOR'S TAX PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED NUMBER NUMBER(ATN)/ ~ ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT 1 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PROPERTY OWNER AMOUNT AMOUNT 57 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 55 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 58 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 56 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 59 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 57 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N!A $2,980.58 60 TRACT N0. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 58 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 61 TRACT N0.5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 59 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 62 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 60 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 63 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 61 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 64 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 62 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 65 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 63 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 66 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 64 ~ BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 67 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 65 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 68 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 66 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 69 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 67 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 --79- TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 68 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $0.00 71 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 69 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 72 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 70 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 73 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 71 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 74 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 72 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 75 TRACT N0. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 73 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 76 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 74 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 77 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 75 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 78 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 76 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 79 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 77 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 80 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 78 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 81 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 79 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 82 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 80 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 83 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 81 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 84 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 82 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 85 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT - 83 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 86 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 84 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 87 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 85 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 88 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 86 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 89 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 87 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 90 TRACT NO: 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 88 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 91 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 89 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 92 TRACT N0. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 90 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 93 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 91 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 94 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 92 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 95 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 93 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 96 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 94 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 97 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 95 BHA.PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 98 TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE; LOT 96 BHA PROPERTIES, LLP N/A $2,980.58 SPRING MEADOWS I I-A AREA TOTAL (Assessment No. 1): $802,702.03 $801,679.49 [1] SPRING MEADOWS II-B AREA: Remainder of Lot Line Adjustment No. P96-1000 Parcel B (Assessment No. 2): $719,236.72 $438,145.99 Total Tract No. 5869 Unit One (Assessment Nos. 3 Through 98): N/A $280,174.52 SPRING MEADOWS II-B AREA TOTAL (Assessment Nos. 2 Through 98): $719,236.72 $718,320.51 111 STOCKDALE HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL AREA TOTAL: $1,820,061.25 $0.00 TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: $3,342,000.00 $1,520,000.00 29260EXA A-2 02/27/98 EXHIBIT A ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 COUNTY OF KERN, CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT ROLL ASSESSMENT ASSESSOR'S TAX PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED NUMBER NUMBER(ATN)/ ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT 1 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PROPERTY OWNER AMOUNT AMOUNT NOTES: (1] STOCKDALE HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL AREA WAS INCLUDED IN THE ORIGINAL BOUNDARIES OF AD 97-1 AND IN THE PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK ON AUGUST 29, 1997. THE STOCKDALE HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL AREA WAS REMOVED FROM AD 97-1 BY AMENDED BOUNDARY MAP (BOUNDARY AMENDMENT NO. 1) RECORDED JANUARY 30, 1998. THE FIVE PARCELS IN THE STOCKDALE HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL AREA WERE pRIGINALLY ASSIGNED ASSESSMENT NUMBERS 3 THROUGH 7, AS SHOWN IN THE PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR AD 97-1. THE TOTAL AMOUNT PRELIMINARILY ASSESSED TO THOSE FIVE PARCELS IS SHOWN ABOVE, IN THE LINE ENTITLED "STOCKDALE HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL AREA TOTAL." AS ALSO SHOWN ABOVE, THOSE FIVE PARCELS ARE NOT ALLOCATED A SHARE OF THE CONFIRMED ASSESSMENT AMOUNT, SINCE THEY ARE NO LONGER WITHIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1. IN THE PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR AD 97-1 THE PARCEL IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSMENT NO. 2 COVERED THE ENTIRE AREA OF PARCEL B IN LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. P96-1000. AFTER THE PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT WAS FILED, TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE WAS RECORDED, SUBDIVIDING LLA P96-1000 PARCEL B INTO A REMAINDER PARCEL AND 96 SUBDIVISION LOTS IN TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE. THE REMAINDER PARCEL RETAINED ASSESSMENT NUMBER 2 AND LOTS 1 THROUGH 96 IN TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE ARE ASSIGNED ASSESSMENT NUMBERS 3 THROUGH 98, RESPECTIVELY. THE TOTAL PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT AMOUNT ALLOCATED TO ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT NO. 2 IS SHOWN IN THE "PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT AMOUNT" COLUMN IN THE SUMMARY PORTION OF THIS EXHIBIT, AND THE PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT AMOUNTS FOR LOTS 1 THROUGH 96 IN TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE ARE SHOWN AS "N/A". THE CONFIRMED ASSESSMENT AMOUNT SHOWN FOR ASSESSMENT NO. 2 IS THE TOTAL ASSESSMENT SHARE ALLOCATED TO THE REMAINDER PARCEL CREATED BY TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE. TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE WAS RECORDED FEBRUARY 27, 1998, IN BOOK 43 OF MAPS, AT PAGES 155 THROUGH 158, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF KERN. CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. P96-1000 (LLA P96-1000) WAS RECORDED FEBRUARY 7, 1997, AS DOCUMENT NO. 0197016133 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF KERN. PREPARED BY: WILSON & ASSOCIATES FRESNO, CALIFORNIA `n~ / ~. APPROVED: ~ y v ~ DATE: ~ r EDWARD J. WILSON, R.C.E. 23269 (EXPIRES 12-31-01) ~. EXi! (2-~1-t~l CIY]1. ~~ ~~ CAItiF~ 29260EXA A-3 02/27/98 'I 1 ~~ ',r ~l ' r~ ENGINEER' S REPORT l R FIELD-ASSESSMENT- DISTRICT N0.97-1 F BAKE S CITY O .l (SPRING MEADOWS IUSTOCKDALE HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL). 1 ~I l I EXHIBIT B . , TABLE B-I ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE OF TOTAL COST-AND ASSESSMENT.... TABLES B-II ENGINEER S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT l ~1 ~~ AC UISITION COST-' Q ~' TABLE B-II-A SUMMARY OF SPRING MEADOWS II-A AREA AND 'I , SPRING MEADOWS II-B AREA IMPROVEMENTS i TO BE ACQUIRED. . l TABLE B-II-B SPRING MEADOWS II-A AREA IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ;J i _ AT TRA T O. 27 FF SITE AC UIRED TENT IVE C N 58 O Q ( IMPROVEMENTS) l J - B II-C -TABLE - T E SPRING MEADOWS II B AREA IMPROVEMENTS O B ACQUIRED (TENTATIVE TRACT N0.5869 OFF-SITE 'I ; l AND ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS) ,J ~,' TABLE- B-IIT PAYOFF CALCULATION FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ~'~~ '`~ N0.82-1 ASSESSMENT--NOS. -5553- AND 5554. 'I _ (PAYOFF COST PAID BY PROPERTY OWNERS PRIOR TO .CONFIRMATION OF ASSESSMENT ~ ' 1 ~ DISTRICT NO.97-1 AND. NOT REFINANCED BY \ J ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO.97=1) `J ~~ _ ,~~ i l) l ~. l EXHIBIT B TABLE B-I ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 COUNTY OF KERN, CALIFORNIA ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE OF TOTAL COST AND ASSESSMENT ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT 1. SPRING MEADOWS II-A AREA IMPROVEMENT COST 1, A5'(W ~; ~~~ A. IMPROVEMENTS B. CONTINGENCY C.. INCIDENTALS D. TOTAL SPRING MEADOWS II-A AREA IMPROVEMENT COST 2. SPRING MEADOWS II-B AREA IMPROVEMENT COST ~ Id es A. IMPROVEMENTS B. CONTINGENCY C. INCIDENTALS D. TOTAL SPRING MEADOWS II-B AREA IMPROVEMENT COST $427,819.00 $427,819.00 '~~~ pti $42,783.00 $42,783.00 ~ a~ $147,697.00 $147,697.00 , ,~ ~~~ $618,299.00 $618,299.00 $383,351.00 $383,351.00 / ~ $38,335.00 $38,335.00 / D~ $132,322.00 $132,322.00 ~y() ~~~ $554,008.00 $554,008.00 ~ ~r: ~ 3. STOCKDALE HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL AREA IMPROVEMENT COST ~~ ~1 A. IMPROVEMENTS $716,636.00 $0.00 ~~ j ~ B. CONTINGENCY $71,664.00 $0.00 ~ ~ ~ C. INCIDENTALS $225,285.00 $0.00 ~ ,! D. TOTAL STOCKDALE HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL AREA $1,013,585.00 $0.0~ IMPROVEMENT COST 4. TOTAL COST OF IMPROVEMENTS, CONTINGENCY, AND INCIDENTALS A. SPRING MEADOWS II-A AREA B. SPRING MEADOWS II-B AREA C. STOCKDALE HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL AREA D. TOTAL COST OF IMPROVEMENTS, CONTINGENCY, AND INCIDENTALS 5. PAYOFF OF EXISTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO, 82-1 ASSESSMENTS A. SPRING MEADOWS II-A AREA B. SPRING MEADOWS II-B AREA C. STOCKDALE HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL AREA D. TOTAL PAYOFF OF EXISTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0.82-1 ASSESSMENT 6. PAYOFF OF EXISTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO.94-3 ASSESSMENTS A. SPRING MEADOWS II-A AREA B. SPRING MEADOWS II-B AREA C. STOCKDALE HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL AREA D. TOTAL PAYOFF OF EXISTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO.94-3 ASSESSMENT $618,299.00 $618,299.00 $554,008.00 $554,008.00 $1,013,585.00 $0.00 $2,185,892.00 $1,172,307.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $388,357.46 $0.00 $388,357.46 $0.00 2926061 B-I-1 02/18/98 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-I ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 COUNTY OF KERN, CALIFORNIA ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE OF TOTAL COST AND ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT 7.TOTAL COST OF IMPROVEMENT, CONTINGENCY, INCIDENTALS, AND ADDITIONAL FEES/COST (PAYOFFS) A. SPRING MEADOWS tl-A AREA $618,299.00 B. SPRING MEADOWS 11-B AREA $554,008.00 C. STOCKDALE HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL AREA $1,401,942.46 D. TOTAL COST OF IMPROVEMENTS, CONTINGENCY, ' $2,574,249.46 INCIDENTALS AND ADDITIONAL FEES/COST (PAYOFFS) 8. ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PROCEEDING COST AND EXPENSE A. ASSESSMENT ENGINEER $39,000.00 B. BOND COUNSEL 1. Legal Services $43,420.00 2. Expenses $5,000.00 3. TOTAL BOND COUNSEL $48,420.00 C. APPRAISAL $12,000.00 D. BOND ISSUANCE EXPENSES ~. Bond and Other Printing $10,000.00 2. Bond Administration and Registration $5,000.00 3. Legal Publications, Notices, Recording, and Mailing $3,000.00 a. Auditor's Record $5,000.00 5. CDAC, MSRB, PSA Fees $1,169.70 6. Disclosure Counsel $26,500.00 7. Continuing Disclosure Compliance (First Two Years after Issue) $15,000.00 s. TOTAL BOND ISSUANCE EXPENSE $65,669.70 E. ENVIRONMENTAL APPROVAL PROCESSING $0.00 F. CITY ASSESSMENT PROCEEDING COST AND PROJECT CONSTRUCTION AND ACQUISITION ADMINISTRATION ~. City Assessment Proceeding Cost $20,973.29 2. Project Construction and Acquisition Administration $16,806.00 (1 % of Improvement Cost and Contingency) 3. TOTAL CITY ASSESSMENT PROCEEDING COST AND $37,779.29 PROJECT CONSTRUCTION & ACQUISITION ADMINISTRATION G. TOTAL ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT DISTRICT $202,868.99 PROCEEDING COST AND EXPENSE H. ALLOCATION OF TOTAL ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT PROCEEDING COST AND EXPENSE TO EACH COMMUNITY AREA ~. SPRING MEADOWS II-A AREA $48,726.32 2. SPRING MEADOWS II-B AREA $43,659.73 3. STOCKDALE HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL AREA $110,482.94 (for Assessment Engineering Costs to first add and then remove Stockdale Highway Commercial Area from AD 97-1) ASSESSMENT $618,299.00 $554,008.00 $0.00 $1,172,307.00 $39,000.00 $25,200.00 $5,000.00 $30,200.00 $18,000.00 $10,000.00 $5,000.00 $3,000.00 $5,000.00 $380.00 $26,500.00 $13,500.00 $63,380.00 $0.00 $16,422.00 $8,923.00 $25,345.00 $175,925.00 $86,457.44 $77,467.56 $12,000.00 29260B1 B-I-2 02/18/98 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-I ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 COUNTY OF KERN, CALIFORNIA ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE OF TOTAL COST AND ASSESSMENT ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION (Note: See Tables B-II for improvement cost 9. SUBTOTAL COST TO ASSESSMENT A. SPRING MEADOWS II-A AREA B. SPRING MEADOWS II-B AREA C. STOCKDALE HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL AREA D. SUBTOTAL COST TO ASSESSMENT 10. DEDUCT CONTRIBUTIONS AND CASH COLLECTIONS TO REDUCE ASSESSMENT A. SPRING MEADOWS II-A AREA B. SPRING MEADOWS II-B AREA C. STOCKDALE HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL AREA (for Assessment Engineering Costs to first add and then remove Stockdale Highway Commercial Area from AD 97-1) D. TOTAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND CASH COLLECTIONS TO REDUCE ASSESSMENT 11. TOTAL COST ASSESSED TO 1915 ACT BOND ISSUANCE AFTER CONTRIBUTIONS AND CASH COLLECTIONS A. SPRING MEADOWS II-A AREA B. SPRING MEADOWS. II-B AREA C. STOCKDALE HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL AREA D. TOTAL COST ASSESSED TO 1915 ACT BOND ISSUANCE AFTER CONTRIBUTIONS AND CASH COLLECTIONS 12.1915. ACT BOND ISSUANCE COST AND RESERVE A. BOND DISCOUNT B. CAPITALIZED INTEREST C. BOND RESERVE FUND D. TOTAL 1915 ACT BOND ISSUANCE COST AND RESERVE E. ALLOCATION OF TOTAL 1915 ACT BOND ISSUANCE COST AND RESERVE TO EACH COMMUNITY AREA 1. SPRING MEADOWS II-A AREA 2. SPRING MEADOWS II-B AREA 3. STOCKDALE HIGHWAY. COMMERCIAL AREA 13. TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED (Add Lines 11.D. and 12.D.) ALLOCATION OF TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED TO EACH COMMUNITY AREA 1. SPRING MEADOWS II-A AREA 2. SPRING MEADOWS II-B AREA 3. STOCKDALE HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL AREA ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT $667,025.32 $597,667.73 $1,512,425.40 $2,777,118.45 $704,756.44 $631,475.56 $12,000.00 $1,348,232.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 ($12,000.00) $0.00 ($12,000.00) $667,025.32 $597,667.73 $1,512,425.40 $2,777,118.45 $48,960.30 $181,721.25 $334,200.00 $564,881.55 $135,676.71 $121,568.99 $307,635.85 $3,342,000.00 $802,702.03 $719,236.72 $1,820,061.25 $704,756.44 $631,475.56 $0.00 $1,336,232.00 $22,268.00 $39,900.00 $121,600.00 $183,768.00 $96,923.05 $86,844.95 $0.00 $1,520,000.00 $801,679.49 $718,320.51 $0.00 Note: The District Proponent paid the total amount of the AD 82-1 existing assessment payoff cost (see Engineer's Report Exhibit 8, Table 8-lll) and the City Finance Director released the AD 82-1 lien for the affected parcels on October 22, 1997. 2926081 B-I-3 02/18/98 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-A ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 COUNTY OF KERN, CALIFORNIA ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT ACQUISITION COST SUMMARY OF SPRING MEADOWS II-A AREA AND SPRING MEADOWS II-B AREA IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED DESCRIPTION AMOUNTS 1. SPRING MEADOWS II-A AREA (Tentative Tract No. 5827 Off-Site Improvements) (See Table B-II-B for Details) A. JEWETTA AVENUE FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS a. Improvements $219,808.00 b. Contingency $21,981.00 c. Incidentals $76,228.00 d. Total Jewetta Avenue Frontage Improvement Cost $318,017.00 B. BRIMHALL ROAD FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS a. Improvements $116,195.00 b. Contingency $11,620.00 c. Incidentals $39,253.00 d. Total Brimhall Road Frontage Improvement Cost $167,068.00 C. VERDUGO LANE FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS a. Improvements $91,816.00 b. Contingency $9,182.00 c. Incidentals $32,216.00 d. Total Verdugo Lane Frontage Improvement Cost $133,214.00 D. TOTAL SPRING MEADOWS II-A AREA IMPROVEMENTS a. Total Spring Meadows II-A Area Improvements (Add Lines 1.A.a., 1.B.a., and 1.C.a.) $427,819.00 b. Total Spring Meadows II-A Area Contingency (Add Lines 1.A.b., 1.B.b., and 1.C.b.) $42,783.00 c. Total Spring Meadows II-A Area Incidentals (Add Lines 1.A.c., 1.B.c., and 1.C.c.) $147,697.00 d. Total Spring Meadows II-A Area Improvement Cost $618,299.00 2. SPRING MEADOWS II-B AREA (Tentative Tract No. 5869 Off-Site and On-Site Improvements) (See Table B-II-C for Details) A. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 5869 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS a. Improvements $284,527.00 b. Contingency $28,453.00 c. Incidentals $97,990.00 d. Total Tentative Tract No. 5869 Off-Site Improvement Cost $410,970.00 B. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 5869 ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS a. Improvements $98,824.00 b. Contingency $9,882.00 c. Incidentals $34,332.00 d. Total Tentative Tract No. 5869 On-Site Improvement Cost $143,038.00 29260B2A B-I I-A-1 02/18/98 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-A ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 COUNTY OF KERN, CALIFORNIA ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT ACQUISITION COST SUMMARY OF SPRING MEADOWS II-A AREA AND SPRING MEADOWS 11-B AREA IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED DESCRIPTION AMOUNTS C. TOTAL SPRING MEADOWS II-B AREA IMPROVEMENTS a. Total Spring Meadows II-B Area Improvements (Add Lines 2.A.a. and 2.B.a.) $383,351.00 b. Total Spring Meadows II-B Area Contingency (Add Lines 2.A.b. and 2.B.b.) $38,335.00 c. Total Spring Meadows II-B Area Incidentals (Add Lines 2.A.c. and 2.B.c.) $132,322.00 d. Total Spring Meadows II-B Area Improvement Cost $554,008.00 3. TOTAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS A. IMPROVEMENTS (Add Lines 1.D.a. and 2.C.a.) $811,170.00 B. CONTINGENCY (Add Lines 1.D.b. and 2.C.b.) $81,118.00 C. INCIDENTALS (Add Lines 1.D.c. and 2.C.c.) $280,019.00 D. TOTAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENT COST $1,172,307.00 Notes: 1. All improvement, contingency, and incidental cost estimates for the Spring Meadows ll-A Area shown in this table are based on the information provided by Martin-McIntosh Engineering, Bakersfield, Califomia. 2. All improvement, contingency, and incidental cost estimates for the Spring Meadows ll-8 Area shown in this table are based on the information provided by former Sequoia Engineering, now Smithtech/USA, Bakersfield, Califomia. 29260B2A B-I I-A-2 02/18/98 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-B ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 COUNTY OF KERN, CALIFORNIA ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT ACQUISITION COST SPRING MEADOWS II-A AREA IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED (TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 5827 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS) UNIT DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNITS COST TOTAL A. JEWETTA AVENUE FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS I. JEWETTA AVENUE FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS -OTHER THAN LANDSCAPING a. GRADING Roadway Excavation 1763 CY 1.20 $2,116.00 TOTAL GRADING $2,116.00 b. STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS 24" Storm Drain Pipe 600 LF 22.00 $13,200.00 36" Storm Drain Pipe 200 LF 45.00 $9,000.00 Type A Catch Basin 4 EA 1500.00 $6,000.00 Manhole 3 EA 1400.00 $4,200.00 Outlet Structure 1 EA 1500.00 $1,500.00 6' Fencing with Redwood Slats and Curb 1900 LF 20.00 $38,000.00 Tract No. 5827 Sump 10500 CY 2.00 $21,000.00 TOTAL STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS $92,900.00 c. WATER IMPROVEMENTS 16" Water Main 700 LF 21.00 $14,700.00 8" Water Main 30 LF 9.00 $270.00 16" Gate Valve 1 EA 2100.00 $2,100.00 8" Gate Valve 1 EA 425.00 $425.00 TOTAL WATER IMPROVEMENTS $17,495.00 d. STREET IMPROVEMENTS AC Paving 568 TN 23.50 $13,348.00 Aggregate Base 332 CY 22.00 $7,304.00 Subgrade Preparation 2489. SY 0.90 $2,240.00 6" Curb & Gutter 700 LF 5.25 $3,675.00 Sidewalk 3850 SF 1.30 $5,005.00 Metro Street Signs 1 EA 300.00 $300.00 No Parking Signs 4 EA 150.00 $600.00 Street Lights -Mast Arm 9500 Lumen 2 EA 1900.00 $3,800.00 Street Light Conduit and Conductor 800 LF 2.00 $1,600.00 Street Light Pull Boxes 6 EA 150.00 $900.00 Interconnect Conduit 700 LF 4.00 $2,800.00 Landscape Meter Pedestal 1 EA 1000.00 $1,000.00 Striping with Markers 2100 LF 0.75 $1,575.00 Raise Manholes 2 EA 400.00 $800.00 Monument Encasements 3 EA 250.00 $750.00 TOTAL STREET IMPROVEMENTS $45,697.00 e. MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS Block Wall 700 LF 66.00 $46,200.00 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS $46,200.00 29260826 B-I I-B-1 02118/98 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-B ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 COUNTY OF KERN, CALIFORNIA ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT ACQUISITION COST SPRING MEADOWS II-A AREA IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED (TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 5827 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS) UNIT DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNITS COST TOTAL f. SUBTOTAL FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENT COST $204,408.00 g. CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY (10%) $20,441.00 h. SUBTOTAL FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENT COST AND CONTINGENCY $224,849.00 INCIDENTAL COST Design Engineering $18,554.00 Improvement Bonds $3,035.00 Construction Staking (4.0% of Item h) $8,994.00 Soils and Materials Testing and Report (3.0% of Item h) $6,745.00 Contractor Overhead (10.0% of Item h) $22,485.00 Plan Check $4,482.00 Site Inspection (3.0% of Item h) $6,745.00 Water Inspection Fee (4.0% of Item c, increased for Contingency) $770.00 TOTAL INCIDENTAL COST $71,810.00 j. SUBTOTAL FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS, CONTINGENCY, $296,659.00 AND INCIDENTALS -OTHER THAN LANDSCAPING II. JEWETTA AVENUE FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS -LANDSCAPING a. LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS Landscaping 5600 SF 2.75 $15,400.00 TOTAL LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS $15,400.00 b. SUBTOTAL LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENT COST $15,400.00 c. CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY (10%) $1,540.00 d. SUBTOTAL LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENT COST AND CONTINGENCY $16,940.00 e. INCIDENTAL COST Design Engineering $1,372.00 Improvement Bonds $229.00 Construction Staking (4.0% of Item d) $0.00 Soils and Materials Testing and Report (3.0% of Item d) $0.00 Contractor Overhead (10.0% of Item d) $1,694.00 Plan Check $615.00 Site Inspection (3.0% of Item d) $508.00 Water Inspection Fee $0.00 TOTAL INCIDENTAL COST $4,418.00 f. SUBTOTAL FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS, CONTINGENCY, AND INCIDENTALS -LANDSCAPING $21,358.00 29260B2B B-I I-B-2 02/18/98 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-B ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 COUNTY OF KERN, CALIFORNIA ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT ACQUISITION COST SPRING MEADOWS II-A AREA IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED (TENTATIVE TRACT N0.5827 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS) UNIT DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNITS COST TOTAL III. TOTAL JEWETTA AVENUE FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS $219,808.00 IV. TOTAL JEWETTA AVENUE FRONTAGE CONTINGENCY $21,981.00 V. TOTAL JEWETTA AVENUE FRONTAGE INCIDENTALS $76,228.00 VI. TOTAL JEWETTA AVENUE FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS, $318,017.00 CONTINGENCY, AND INCIDENTALS B. BRIMHALL ROAD FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS I. BRIMHALL ROAD FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS -OTHER THAN LANDSCAPING a. GRADING Roadway Excavation 2204 CY 1.20 $2,645.00 TOTAL GRADING $2,645.00 b. WATER IMPROVEMENTS 2" Irrigation Service 1 EA 750.00 $750.00 TOTAL WATER IMPROVEMENTS $750.00 c. STREET IMPROVEMENTS AC Paving 940 TN 23.50 $22,090.00 Aggregate Base 427 CY 22.00 $9,394.00 Subgrade Preparation 3200 SY 0.90 $2,880.00 6" Curb & Gutter 480 LF 5.25 $2,520.00 Sidewalk 2640 SF 1.30 $3,432.00 Metro Street Signs 1 EA 300.00 $300.00 No Parking Signs 2 EA 150.00 $300.00 Street Lights -Mast Arm 9500 Lumen 2 EA 1900.00 $3,800.00 Street Light Conduit and Conductor 800 LF 2.00 $1,600.00 Street Light Pull Boxes 6 EA 150.00 $900.00 Interconnect Conduit 480 LF 4.00 $1,920.00 Landscape Meter Pedestal 1 EA 1000.00 $1,000.00 Striping with Markers 1440 LF 0.75 $1,080.00 Pavement removal 11520 SF 0.20 $2,304.00 Monument Encasements 0 EA 250.00 $0.00 TOTAL STREET IMPROVEMENTS $53,520.00 d. MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS Median Deposit 480 LF 30.00 $14,400.00 Block Wall 480 LF 66.00 $31,680.00 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS $46,080.00 e. SUBTOTAL FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENT COST $102,995.00 f. CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY (10%) $10,300.00 29260B2B B-I I-B-3 02/18/98 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-B ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 COUNTY OF KERN, CALIFORNIA ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT ACQUISITION COST SPRING MEADOWS II-A AREA IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED (TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 5827 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS) UNIT DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNITS COST TOTAL g. SUBTOTAL FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENT COST AND CONTINGENCY $113,295.00 INCIDENTAL COST Design Engineering $8,344.00 Improvement Bonds $1,529.00 Construction Staking (4.0% of Item g) $4,532.00 Soils and Materials Testing and Report (3.0% of Item g) $3,399.00 Contractor Overhead (10.0% of Item g) $11,330.00 Plan Check $2,407.00 Site Inspection (3.0% of Item g) $3,399.00 Water Inspection Fee (4.0% of Item b, increased for Contingency) $33.00 TOTAL INCIDENTAL COST $34,973.00 i. SUBTOTAL FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS, CONTINGENCY, $148,268.00 AND INCIDENTALS -OTHER THAN LANDSCAPING II. BRIMHALL ROAD FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS -LANDSCAPING a. LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS Landscaping 4800 SF 2.75 $13,200.00 TOTAL LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS $13,200.00 b. SUBTOTAL LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENT COST $13,200.00 c. CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY (10%) $1,320.00 d. SUBTOTAL LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENT COST AND CONTINGENCY $14,520.00 e. INCIDENTAL COST Design Engineering $1,626.00 Improvement Bonds $196.00 Construction Staking (4.0% of Item d) $0.00 Soils and Materials Testing and Report (3.0% of Item d) $0.00 Contractor Overhead (10.0% of Item d) $1,452.00 Plan Check $570.00 Site Inspection (3.0% of Item d) $436.00 Water Inspection Fee $0.00 TOTAL INCIDENTAL COST $4,280.00 f. SUBTOTAL FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS, CONTINGENCY, AND INCIDENTALS -LANDSCAPING III. TOTAL BRIMHALL ROAD FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS IV. TOTAL BRIMHALL ROAD FRONTAGE CONTINGENCY $18,800.00 $116,195.00 $11,620.00 29260B2B B-I I-B-4 02/18/98 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-B ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 COUNTY OF KERN, CALIFORNIA ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT ACQUISITION COST SPRING MEADOWS II-A AREA IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED (TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 5827 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS) UNIT DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNITS COST TOTAL V. TOTAL BRIMHALL ROAD FRONTAGE INCIDENTALS $39,253.00 VI. TOTAL BRIMHALL ROAD FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS, $167,068.00 CONTINGENCY, AND INCIDENTALS C. VERDUGO LANE FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS I. VERDUGO LANE FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS - OTHER THAN LANDSCAPING a. GRADING Roadway Excavation 1511 CY 1.20 $1,813.00 TOTAL GRADING $1,813.00 b. STREET IMPROVEMENTS AC Paving 487 TN 23.50 $11,445.00 Aggregate Base 284 CY 22.00 $6,248.00 Subgrade Preparation 2133 SY 0.90 $1,920.00 6" Curb & Gutter 600 LF 5.25 $3,150.00 Sidewalk 3300 SF 1.30 $4,290.00 Metro Street Signs 1 EA 300.00 $300.00 No Parking Signs 3 EA 150.00 $450.00 Street Lights -Mast Arm 9500 Lumen 2 EA 1900.00 $3,800.00 Street Light Conduit and Conductor 800 LF 2.00 $1,600.00 Street Light Pull Boxes 6 EA 150.00 $900.00 Interconnect Conduit 0 LF 4.00 $0.00 Landscape Meter Pedestal 1 EA 1000.00 $1,000.00 Striping with Markers 1800 LF 0.75 $1,350.00 Pavement removal 0 SF 0.20 $0.00 Monument Encasements 3 EA 250.00 $750.00 TOTAL STREET IMPROVEMENTS $37,203.00 c. MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS Block Wall 600 LF 66.00 $39,600.00 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS $39,600.00 d. SUBTOTAL FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENT COST $78,616.00 e. CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY (10%) $7,862.00 f. SUBTOTAL FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENT COST AND CONT INGENCY $86,478.00 29260628 B-I I-B-5 02/18/98 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-B ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 COUNTY OF KERN, CALIFORNIA ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT ACQUISITION COST SPRING MEADOWS II-A AREA IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED (TENTATIVE TRACT N0.5827 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS) UNIT DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNITS COST TOTAL INCIDENTAL COST Design Engineering $7,566.00 Improvement Bonds $1,167.00 Construction Staking (4.0% of Item f) $3,459.00 Soils and Materials Testing and Report (3.0% of Item f) $2,594.00 Contractor Overhead (10.0% of Item f) $8,648.00 Plan Check $1,908.00 Site Inspection (3.0% of Item f) $2,594.00 Water Inspection Fee $0.00 TOTAL INCIDENTAL COST $27,936.00 h. SUBTOTAL FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS, CONTINGENCY, $114,414.00 AND INCIDENTALS -OTHER THAN LANDSCAPING II. VERDUGO LANE FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS -LANDSCAPING a. LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS Landscaping 4800 SF 2.75 $13,200.00 TOTAL LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS $13,200.00 b. SUBTOTAL LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENT COST $13,200.00 c. CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY (10%) $1,320.00 d. SUBTOTAL LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENT COST AND CONTINGENCY $14,520.00 e. INCIDENTAL COST Design Engineering $1,626.00 Improvement Bonds $196.00 Construction Staking (4.0% of Item d) $0.00 Soils and Materials Testing and Report (3.0% of Item d) $0.00 Contractor Overhead (10.0% of Item d) $1,452.00 Plan Check $570.00 Site Inspection (3.0% of Item d) $436.00 Water Inspection Fee $0.00 TOTAL INCIDENTAL COST $4,280.00 f. SUBTOTAL FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS, CONTINGENCY, AND INCIDENTALS -LANDSCAPING $18,800.00 III. TOTAL VERDUGO LANE FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS $91,816.00 IV. TOTAL VERDUGO LANE FRONTAGE CONTINGENCY $9,182.00 V. TOTAL VERDUGO LANE FRONTAGE INCIDENTALS $32,216.00 29260626 B-I I-B-6 02/18/98 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-B ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 COUNTY OF KERN, CALIFORNIA ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT ACQUISITION COST SPRING MEADOWS 11-A AREA IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED (TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 5827 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS) UNIT DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNITS COST TOTAL VI. TOTAL VERDUGO LANE FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS, $133,214.00 CONTINGENCY, AND INCIDENTALS D. TOTAL SPRING MEADOWS II-A AREA IMPROVEMENT COST (Add Items A, B, and C) a. IMPROVEMENTS $427,819.00 b. CONTINGENCY $42,783.00 c. INCIDENTALS $147,697.00 d. TOTAL SPRING MEADOWS II-A AREA IMPROVEMENT COST $618,299.00 Note: All improvement, contingency and incidental cost estimates shown in this table are based on the information provided by Martin-McIntosh Engineering, Bakersfield, California. 29260628 B-I I-B-7 02/18/98 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-C ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 COUNTY OF KERN, CALIFORNIA ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT ACQUISITION COST SPRING MEADOWS II-B AREA IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED (TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 5869 OFF-SITE AND ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS) UNIT DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNITS COST TOTAL A. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 5869 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS I. GALLOWAY DRIVE FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS a. GRADING Roadway Excavation 2205 CY 1.20 $2,646.00 TOTAL GRADING $2,646.00 b. TRAFFIC SIGNAL Traffic Signal - 1 LS 122894.00 $122,894.00 TOTAL TRAFFIC SIGNAL $122,894.00 c. STREET IMPROVEMENTS AC Paving 915 TN 23.50 $21,503.00 Aggregate Base 415 CY 22.00 $9,130.00 Subgrade Preparation 3116 SY 0.90 $2,804.00 6" Curb & Gutter 2290 LF 5.25 $12,023.00 Sidewalk 12595 SF 1.30 $16,374.00 Metro Street Signs 1 EA 300.00 $300.00 No Parking Signs 11 EA 150.00 $1,650.00 Street Lights -Mast Arm 9500 Lumen 5 EA 1900.00 $9,500.00 Street Light Conduit and Conductor 2000 LF 2.00 $4,000.00 Street Light Pull Boxes 15 EA 150.00 $2,250.00 Interconnect Conduit 2290 LF 4.00 $9,160.00 Landscape Meter Pedestal 2 EA 1000.00 $2,000.00 Striping with Markers 4580 LF 0.75 $3,435.00 Median Curb 2290 LF 5.00 $11,450.00 Monument Encasements 3 EA 250.00 $750.00 Pavement Removal 2290 SF 0.20 $458.00 TOTAL STREET IMPROVEMENTS $106,787.00 d. MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS Block Wall on Calloway Drive 1450 LF 36.00 $52,200.00 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS $52,200.00 e. SUBTOTAL FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENT COST f. CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY (10%) $284, 527.00 $28,453.00 g. SUBTOTAL FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENT COST AND CONTINGENCY $312,980.00 h. INCIDENTAL COST Design Engineering $25,049.00 Improvement Bonds $4,225.00 Construction Staking (4.0% of Item g) $12,519.00 Soils and Materials Testing and Report (3.0% of Item g) $9,389.00 Contractor Overhead (10.0% of Item g) $31,298.00 Plan Check $6,121.00 Site Inspection (3.0% of Item g) $9,389.00 Water Inspection Fee $0.00 TOTAL INCIDENTAL COST $97,990.00 29260B2C B-I I-C-1 02/18!98 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-C ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 COUNTY OF KERN, CALIFORNIA ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT ACQUISITION COST SPRING MEADOWS II-B AREA IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED (TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 5869 OFF-SITE AND ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS) UNIT DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNITS COST TOTAL i. SUBTOTAL FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS, CONTINGENCY, $410,970.00 AND INCIDENTALS 11. TOTAL TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 5869 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS $284,527.00 III. TOTAL TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 5869 OFF-SITE CONTINGENCY $28,453.00 IV. TOTAL TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 5869 OFF-SITE INCIDENTALS $97,990.00 V. TOTAL TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 5869 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS, $410,970.00 CONTINGENCY, AND INCIDENTALS B. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 5869 ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS I. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 5869 ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS a. IMPROVEMENTS 36" Storm Drain Pipeline 1279 LF 36.00 $46,044.00 18" Storm Drain Pipeline 1019 LF 20.00 $20,380.00 Block Wall Around Storm Drain Sump 900 LF 36.00 $32,400.00 TOTAL IMPROVEMENTS $98,824.00 b. SUBTOTAL ON-SITE IMPROVEMENT COST $98,824.00 c. CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY (10%) $9,882.00 d. SUBTOTAL ON-SITE IMPROVEMENT COST AND CONTINGENCY $108,706.00 e. INCIDENTAL COST Design Engineering $8,801.00 Improvement Bonds $1,468.00 Construction Staking (4.0% of Item d) $4,348.00 Soils and Materials Testing and Report (3.0% of Item d) $3,261.00 Contractor Overhead (10.0% of Item d) $10,871.00 Plan Check. $2,322.00 Site Inspection (3.0% of Item d) $3,261.00 Water Inspection Fee $0.00 TOTAL INCIDENTAL COST $34,332.00 f. SUBTOTAL ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS, CONTINGENCY, $143,038.00 AND INCIDENTALS II. TOTAL TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 5869 ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS $98,824.00 111. TOTAL TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 5869 ON-SITE CONTINGENCY $9,882.00 ~ IV. TOTAL TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 5869 ON-SITE INCIDENTALS $34,332.00 V. TOTAL TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 5869 ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS, $143,038.00 I CONTINGENCY, AND INCIDENTALS 29260B2C B-I I-C-2 02/18/98 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-C ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 COUNTY OF KERN, CALIFORNIA ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT ACQUISITION COST SPRING MEADOWS II-B AREA IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED (TENTATIVE TRACT N0. 5869 OFF-SITE AND ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS) UNIT DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNITS COST TOTAL C. TOTAL SPRING MEADOWS II-B AREA IMPROVEMENT COST (Add Items A and B) a. IMPROVEMENTS $383,351.00 b. CONTINGENCY $38,335.00 c. INCIDENTALS $132,322.00 d. TOTAL SPRING MEADOWS II-B AREA IMPROVEMENT COST $554,008.00 Note: All improvement, contingency and incidental cost estimates shown in this table are based on the information provided by former Sequoia Engineering, now Smithtech/USA, Bakersfield, California. 29260B2C B-I I-C-3 02/18/98 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-III ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 COUNTY OF KERN, CALIFORNIA PAYOFF CALCULATION FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0.82-1 ASSESSMENT NOS. 5553 AND 5554 (PAYOFF COST PAID BY PROPERTY OWNERS PRIOR TO CONFIRMATION OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0.97-1 AND NOT REFINANCED BY ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0.97-1) ASSESSMENT DESCRIPTION PAYOFF DETAILS a) 1. TOTAL AD 82-1 ASSESSMENT NO. 5553 PAYOFF AMOUNT $1,800.86 2. TOTAL AD 82-1 ASSESSMENT NO. 5554 PAYOFF AMOUNT .$4,498.92 3. TOTAL PAYOFF AMOUNT FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0.82-1 $8,299.78 ASSESSMENT NOS. 5553 AND 5554 NOTES: (a) THE AMOUNTS SHOWN /N THIS TABLE REPRESENT THE TOTAL AMOUNTS PAID IN ORDER TO CLEAR THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82-1 LIENS. (b) PAYOFF CALCULATION DATA SHOWN IS AS PROVIDED BY THE CITY FINANCE DEPARTMENT. (c) THE TOTAL REMAINING PRINCIPAL HAS BEEN PAID OFF BY PROPERTY OWNERS, AND THE CITY FINANCE DIRECTOR RELEASED THE AD 82-1 LIEN FOR THE AFFECTED PARCELS ON OCTOBER 22, 1997. 2926063 B-III-1 02/18/98 r `l ~ , l ~~ ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0.97-1 ,~ (SPRING IVIEADOWS IUSTOCKDALE HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL). EXHIBIT C TABLE C-I CONSOLIDATED' TABULATION OF PARCEL ASSESSMENT DATA 1 TABLE C-II-A DETAILS OF SPRING MEADOWS II-A AREA ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT REALLOCATIONS FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, PER CITY CODE SECTION 13.08.070 TABLE C-II-B DETAILS OF SPRING MEADOWS II-B AREA ESTIMATED ~ ASSESSMENT REALLOCATIONS FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT _ PER CITY. CODE SECTION 13.08.070 . ~ TABLE C-III-A DETAILS OF SPRING.MEADOWS II-A AREA ESTIMATED BENEFIT . ASSESSMENT ALLOCATIONS FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TABLE GIII-B DETAILS OF SPRING MEADOWS II-B AREA ESTIMATED BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ALLOCATIONS FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ~ ` ~ TABLE C-IV-A COMPARISON OF SPRING MEADOWS II-A AREA BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ALLOCATION AND ASSESSMENT REALLOCATION PER CITY CODE SECTION 13.08.070 '- ~ TABLE C-IV-B COMPARISON OF SPRING MEADOWS II-B AREA BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ALLOCATION AND ASSESSMENT REALLOCATION '`~ PER CITY CODE SECTION 13.08.070 :~ ,~ V r m W = m W H rn O Z H U yZ HBO d'~-LL OZ~ ~~U z ZQY X00 ZW~ W~= WO Y U m LL U H rn ~ of V rn 01 o IA ao N ao In ao N ao N aD N 0o N ao N aD N ro N ao N ao N o N ao N ao Ili 0o N ao lli ao IA aD IA ao IA ao IA o O a0 IA 0o N ao N au N au N ao N 0 Yi 00 IL7 ro Ill o to 0 If1 Z J W ¢ y CA r QI n In ~ C OO G 00 O OO C OD C 00 O OD C M O 00 C OD O 00 0 00 0 00 0 M 0 00 C 00 C 00 C N C OO O 00 O N C OD C O 00 C OO O W 0 00 0 00 G 00 C OD G N O N G 00 C OD (O OD ~ 0i W O) M O) O O O O) W O) T OI O 01 T O M M O O N O) M O) W O M O 0 0) O ~ W O O M N N N N N N N N N N fV N (V N N N N N N (V N N fV N N N N N N N N N N N OD 00 d ¢ i W Cw N N N N N N Ili N N) N If1 In N In In N N N N N N N N N O Ui Yi lA In lA lli IA 1A N N N . Z K O O O M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M O M M M M M M M M M M M M Nf N O O O O C O C O O O O O O O C C C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C C j F- W uJ N N N O N O P 0/ f0 M t0 M N M N M f0 M N M (O M (O M N M N M N M (O M f0 M tD M f0 M N M N M f0 M f0 M t0 M OD M N M N M N M N M N M N M (~ M N M N M f0 M N M M O W U Q 01 10 Oa N I() O Z m ¢ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~f ~ Of M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N O O M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N Q (O OD M O O O C C C O O C O O O O O O C C O C O O O O O O O O O C O 0 0 0 F- O ~ In f~ N 1~ h ~ N 10 N f0 N (O N (O N f0 N <O N (O N N N N N N N f0 N (O N N N <O N 10 N f0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N (O N rD N tD N N N f0 N (O N l0 N tD N N N (D ~ O O m `ct o a to N N N N N N N N N N f V N N N N N N N N N N N N N f V N N N N N f V f V N Q ~ M °°cn z z o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o c o o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p ~ Q D ~ = Z Q O U U 2 ~ ~ aa tT N '~V ~ ~ ~ ss~~ R ~ ~ R ~ ~ V V '~V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~V ' ~ O R ~ ~ `~V a ~ V ~ ~ ~ 'gy ~ U ~ tf 1 n1 N , . , O , p, ~ f ~~ '~T I N N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M W y (W,) ONO OND R i m~ ' a ¢ o_ ~; ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rn W O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LL a 0e0 O ( a N y Q Q I ly ~ O O o O o sT r T r O) n O r O1 r~ O) r M r~ Of r 0) n 0) n 0) n M r O) n W n O) r~ O) r O~ r M n CA r- 0) n O> r O) r O o O r~ m r Of n O) r O) n O r O> r O) r O) r 01 n O) r~ F z W of rn ai m t~ oo m ao m ao rn ao rn ao rn eo rn ao rn ati rn ed rn ao m 0o rn ao rn ad rn ao rn aD m ad rn ao m 0o rn eo rn ao rn ao rn o Oo rn aD rn aD ao 0o ao 0o eo 0o ro au ~~ N N M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m N rn N rn N m N rn N rn N rn N rn N rn N U~ M O h N N N N N N N N N fV N N fV N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Q O ~ f0 OD M ~ a O ~ I- Z J O O O O O M IA 0 1n 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 Ui 0 In 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 Ili 0 N 0 O 0 IJ7 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 Vi 0 to 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N W ¢ ~ n °' l~i °' ~ ai oi ai oi oi oi oi oi ai rn oi oi oi oi ai oi oi ai oi oi oi o oi ai oi oi oi oi oi oi oi oi oi Z ~ Z ~ c ~ ~ v N v N v N v N v N v N v N v N v N v N ~ ~ v N v N v ui v v> v In v In ~ v In v In v In v In ~ ~ v In v In v In v u> v In W ~ ~ ~ ~ > ~ U ~ ~ M i a ~ ? ~ j ~ F} O O I ~ N h h I~ f~ r n r n r n n' n n r r n r r r n h O h 1~ n n r r r r r N I~ Z 2 O O ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p I 11 M M N O1 N O) N T N Oi N 01 Ili 0> IL7 Oi N O Ui » In M N Oi N M N O N 0) N O) N Oi N ~ N O) Yi m Ui m If7 M In O O) In Oi N ~ l<7 Cli In Oi IA M IA T It) Oi In 01 In O> N ~ N F ~ U' r n M ~ ~ h U O Z ~Z ~ V N I ~ U I i I N z Z o o o o I N o n ~o r ro r~ ~o r m r ~o r m r~ m n co n o n ~o n co n co n ~o n ro r lv n co r~ m r co n co n o r~ co o o r ~o r m r~ m r co r co r~ ~o n lo t~ <o r <o r m t~ m p W oi oi ao 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H~ ~ 00 r r OO n I N 00 O N ~ 0) N O N O) N O N O N O N O) N W N ~ O) N ~ W N ~ M N ~ O N O N 01 Ili 01 In W In Of IA 0 In 0) N Q) It) Q) If1 O) In W In O) N O) N T N O N M Yi Of N Oi In m lfj O 'N ' a I M N I I I d V Q ~ ~ i ~ I ~ ¢ ~~ I m i O ~ N M R 1f1 O f` O 01 O N M V In W n !b O) O N M J U ~ I J ~p ~ ~ N l- f`i ~ O r N ~ (O ~ t` ~ W ~ W ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ " ~ N N N N N N N N N N M M M M „ R o J J J J J J J J J O J O1 J 0 J O J O J O J O J O J O J O J O J O J O J O J O J O J O J O J O J O J O J O J O J O J ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~~ j j M g o .- W z W z W z W z W z W z W zi W z W Z W Z W Z W Z W Z W Z W Z W Z W Z W Z W Z W Z W Z W Z W Z W Z. W Z W z W z W z W z W z W z W Zi W 2~ ~ ~ 2 ~i yQ O l QQ W a J' W _ 4~ 0 H 0 f- 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ Oj F O ~ O F O Fi O f- I O F O ~ 0 F 0 ~ 0 F_ 0 H 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 I- 0 ~ 0 F- 0 ~ OI F-I 0 ~ 0 f- 0 ~ 0 ~- 0 ~ 0 f- 0 ~ 0 ~ OI f- v i ~ Wi ~ ~ Q; ~ $ > > j > j ~ j; j j Z 2 I Z 2 Z Z Z Z Z ZI ' Z Z Z Z~ Z~ 2 Z Z Z 2 2 2 2 Z yWOI N m I w ~ a a g ... o' H~ a m LLg OLL ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ c$ ~ c$ ~~ ~ i ~ ~ ml ~I rn ~ » mi ~ m ~ » ~ ao > m ~ m ~ » m ~ m ~ » rn ~ > rn~ ~ ~ ~ m » m ~ ~ m rn ~ » rn > m ~ » ~ cO1o > ~ ~ > ~ > ~ ~ ~ » ~ > °' g N = Q' ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ W O 1A h I V1 N u1 N i In I N ~ 1n I N ; In N 1A 117 t() In In 1A In lf1 ~ In m In ao In i Yi m In m In N m N I N ~ a z a O y q o ~ ¢ ~ y 0~ Zp o z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 z o z di ZI d Z 0 Z 0 Z 0' Z~ 0 Zj 0 Z~ 0 Z 0 Z 0 Z 0 Z 0 Z 01 Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 d ol 0 0 0 ' ~I 3 M o ¢, 3 aZ l- ~ F- r ~ ~ r-~ ~ I- I- F-; ~i ~ ~ r r r ~ ~ Z l- Z ~- Z I- Z H z h z I- z I- z I- z H z F z F z F z H z H O. ~ O _ O ~ Q QU Q U U U U O O D U U U i ! U U U U U U O O U U U U U U U O O O U U U a Ro N':. 3 Q KW F F ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i ~i ~ Q R F Q Ki F! Q R~ F ~ H ~ f Q K 1- Q C F- Q R' F- Q R F- a R H Q C H ~ F Q R F Q 2 Q O: ~ ¢ K Q C ~ H ~ I ~ 1 ~ f Q R F F- 0 i ~ ~ v i ; ~ I - H F H F- F - - - - F- O I i h m~ N ~~ ~ d ~ (J; ~ Z ~ a N M '7 InI N~ n W i0 O; ~ `", I N I ~, MI<filn ~ ~ I~• (O i ~ h ~ 00 0) v O N N N N M N 'Q N N' N N N r NI a0 N M~ N O M M N M M M ~I M U~~, M N Z ~ K I j M I i '. i ~ '~, , I j j I ~ I ~ I ¢ r y' I N ~ ~ i I i , i ~ i ' j I _ ~ ~ I i I UV H W m J W F O Z U ~ 2 I-o0 ~~w Oz~ aw¢ GNU Z ZQY ~~O Zw~ w~? W ~ Y m 0 U F ao op ao 0o ao ao ao ao ao 00 0o ao ao 0o ao eo ao 00 0o ao ao 00 0o ao ao ao op oo ao ao op ao 0o eo 0 0o ao 00 0o ro Z 1A N Y7 N N N N N N N N N7 N N In l/) to lA N N N N N N N N N N N N N U7 1A N O N N. to lA N J w O O O O O O 0 O D O OD O OD O 00 O GO O f0 O OD O OD O OD O 00 O W O Op O 00 O OD O 00 O 00 O 00 O OD O OD O OD O W O OD O OO O GO O 00 O 00 O 00 O OD O O 00 O 00 O 00 O GO O N Q N ~ OD T EO W OD O 00 M GO Of 0 O O 07 O W Of W N M W O O D m m 0 0 M O O D 01 O O W M O O T O O O O O W O W (V fV N fV fV fV N fV N N N fV fV fV N (V fV N N N (V (V fV N (V (V (V (V N N (V N fV (V (V fV (V (V (V F- h h W U N Y7 1n N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M N O N N N N N Z R' M O M O M O M O M C M C M O M O M O M O M O M C M C M O M O M C M C M O M C M O M O M O M C M O M O M O M C M O M O M O M O M O O M C O O M 0 M 0 M 0 M 0 M 0 j F- W (O t0 (O (O (O <O f0 (O t0 (D (O t0 (O t0 f0 (O (O f0 f0 (O f0 (O !O 10 (O f0 f0 !O f0 f0 (O t0 t0 f0 f0 t0 - t0 (O (O N W M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M ~ O K " o o z z I m M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M O M M M M M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O N N N N N ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O Z 2 (O f0 ~O (O (O f0 t0 (O f0 t0 (O (O f0 (O (O (O f0 (O t0 f0 f0 tD (O f0 f0 f0 f0 f0 f0 (O (O (O (O (O f0 t0 f0 t0 t0 m fV (V (V N N fV fV fV N (V N (V fV (V (V N fV N fV fV fV N N N N N fV N N N (V (V (V (V N fV fV fV fV j O !n ~ _ °a fn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N f- Z Z F O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 G 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 G 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 G 0 O 0 O 0 C 0 C 0 O 0 C ~ omQa o ~x zQ O U ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ R ~ 'Q ~ ~ 'V' ~ ~ ~ '~V '~7 ~ V V ~V ~ ~ ~ R ~ ~ V~' `~d' ~ V ~ a v ~ v O V ~ v v v C7 , O ~ U 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M W W y 0 ~ N a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LL O W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O ~ ti h a N ~ rn ° a Q rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn m rn rn rn rn rn m rn m rn rn rn rn rn rn rn m rn rn rn rn m rn m rn o rn rn rn rn rn O F n n n r r r r r n r n t~ n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n r r r o r~ r r n r ~ z ao ac ao ao oC oo a0 00 0o ao ao oD ao ao ao oD eo aD oo eD eo ao eo aD ac ac ao ao aG o0 00 00 op ap o ao aD oD aG oD W MO ~ O N O N N N O N Of N O N O N 01 N W N O N W N O N M N M N T N M N O N M N Q/ N M N m N 01 N Of N Of N m N m N T N M N T N W N O N W N 01 N O N N N m N T N 0 N m N U~ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N (V (V N (V N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Q O ~ ~ o~ Z J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 ~ W Q ~ pj s} pj s1' pj a~ pj pj Oi O ~ O ~ O) R O ~ O ~ O ~ O V 01 R T V Of V 01 V M ~ O C M ~ Qi ~ T ~ 01 V W d' M V O V T a T ~ T ~ W V T V O ~ e~ ~ ' O ~ ' ~ m ~ ' ' ~ ' F- In N N N ~ ~ N N N N N N N N 117 N LL7 N N LL7 LL] N N Y7 Y7 N N 1f1 N 1n In ~ 1A ~t 1C) Q In ~ In V In V In ~ In O O I W ~U I ~~ ~ ~? ~ i a I ~ ~y r~ n n n n n n r~ n n r r n n r r n r n n n r~ r r n r r n n n n r- n r o n r r r r w z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p of N of N ai N of N of N ai N ai N ai N of N of N of N ai N of L17 of N of N of N of N of N of N of N ai N of N of 117 of In of 47 of Y7 of 1fJ of In of Y7 of lA of In ai N of 1A ai 1A c of In of lA of lA ai lA of lC) F' W~ ~ ~ O pF i ~ ~o ~ I I ~+ ~" r~ n n r~ n n o r~ m r m r m r m r m r~ o n m n co n m n co r co n 0 n o n m r~ m n ca r~ so n co n co n co n co r~ co r- so n m n <o n m n m r co o o r cD r co r m r co r o z g W cn o co 0 m 0 co 0 cn o c c o c o 0 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 ~~ rn rn m rn rn rn rn rn rn m rn m rn rn rn rn m rn rn m rn m rn rn rn rn m m m m m m m rn m m rn m m In N N i 117 1A N 1C) lA lA N N N N N 1n 1n 1n 1A N N N 11J N N 117 N N 1f1 lA In In N 1n 1n lt) 1() to N N •- te r- ~ •- •- ~ '- ~ ~ ~ ~ I Q ~ ~ I I ~ I I I ~ I l`a7 M P~7 i M M Prn7 V V < 7 R ? R O O V N IN N N S M ~ N In to ~ N (~O f0 fN0 (~O f0 (~O (O (n0 (rnD (rnD ~ I~ n n z ~ o ~ o ~ 0 Ir- ~0 ~ 0 r 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 r- 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 r 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0~ ~ o ~ O ~ o ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 O I J J J ~ J J J J J J J J J J ~ J J J J J J ' J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J _ F W W W W ~ W W W W W W W W W W W W W I W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W a F- z~ z 0 z 0 z O z 10 z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 z, 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 o ~ ~ ¢ ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w o ~ ~ l z > z > z > ;z > z > z > z > z > z > z > z > z > z > z > ~z > z > z > z > z > z > z > z > z > z > z > z > z > z~ > z > z~ > z >I z > zl z z z z zi z z rn w rn °i m ~m rn m m m rn m rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rnl rn rn rn~ rn rn rn rn~ rn rn w g ~ I 1$ 7 m I W ' ~ ~ ~ `~ `$ `$ `$ `$ ~$ `ag `au° ~ ~ `$ `eQ ~ 1$ `~ ~ 1$ ~ ~ ~ `~ ~ `$ `b `cS m ro ~ 1$ 1$ ~ `~ (n =~ Q Z a In O 1 i O h O In 0 u i O O 1A O Ln O N O N O N O N O N O ~ln O N ~O In O N O In O lA O N O h O In O O h O Ln O N O N O N O !n O In O In O In O In O to O N O N O N O N O N O In O; 0 i Z Z Z Z 2 2 2 Z Z Z Z Z 2 2 ~ Z Z Z I Z Z Z Z Z 2 2 2 Z Z Z Z Z Z 2 , 2 Z Z Z I 2 Z ZI Z I ~ . ~ n. ~ c~ c~ o ;v c~ c> c~ c> c~ c~ c~ c~ c~ o U C~ c~ ~c> ~c~ c~ c~ c~ U C> c> c~ o c~ c~ c~ c~ o o c~ c~ o o ~ c~ c~ c>I ~I ~ ~ ~ I~ ga a4 ~ ~ 4a ~ ga ~ ~ ~ ~ a4 4a ~~ ~ag '~ ~¢ ~ a4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ga ga ~ ag ga ~ ga ~ ga ~ ga ga~ aq F , ~ ~ i ~ ~ ! ~ i ! ~ ~ I ~ ~ I ~ j ~ y ~ i ~ ~ N IM r M N m M~M 0 A R N V M ~ i~ '7 ~11) I'P (O V It~ V o0'Oi0 V~V 1n N NIM ~N u7 I~ I1n 1t) N f0 N 1~ N W N 0) N O N N ~N N 'M N I V' N i 1l1I(D NIN I h N IW N lO c0 I O~ 1~ , ~iN M n n~n ~I n 1!) n W ti Z I ~ ' ~ ; '. i ~ I , ~ ~ ~, I ~' ! a i i I ! ! j • , i i , ~ ~ ~ I i VU H m W J WF r rn O Z U ~¢ ~, z O~ CFO Oz~ GNU Z WAY Z Q LL ~p0 2 W WLL.Z Q' ~ W ~ YV m U ~ o0 N 00 N 00 N 00 N 00 N 00 N 0o N co N 00 N 00 N 00 N 0o N w N o0 N 0 N 0 N o N ro N o N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N ~ N o O J W y O OD O OD O OD O a0 O OD O 00 O 00 O f0 0 OD 0 GO 0 OD 0 OD 0 OD 0 00 0 c0 0 00 0 Op 0 00 0 GO 0 00 0 00 0 OD 0 OO 0 N O O ~ m N 0 OI O T 01 N DI 01 m m W 07 O O W O O O O Of O M O O W (V (V fV N N fV (V (V (V CV fV fV N N fV CV N fV fV (V fV (V N 00 N Q I n h W U N M N M N M N M N M N M N P7 N M N M N M N M N M N M N C7 N M N M N lh N M N M N M N M N M N M N O1 O O Z ~ j W G (O O t0 O f0 O t0 C f0 C t0 O (O O (O O (O C f0 C (O O f~ O (O O (O O f0 O (O C (O O f0 O f0 C (O C (O G f0 O f0 ~ OD i0 F- y y fd M M M M M M M fO M M M M M M M M M M c'7 c'~ M M M 00 P m O W U oD p O Z Z ~ °m a O M N M N M N M N M N M N M N f~7 N M N fh N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N ('~ N M N ('7 N M N M N M N tD N O O Q O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N C N G N O N O N O N O N O N O N C N O N O N H h N M O Z Z (O f0 (O (O (O f0 (D (O t0 f0 t0 t0 (O f0 f0 (O (O (O (O (O (O f0 t0 < N f- ~ O O m N N N (V N N N N N N N fV N N N fV (V (V N N N N N ~ M iD ~ y i 0 M °~ m Z Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 01 0 C O O 0 0 0 0 C O O O O O O O O C C O O O ??~ o m a o H x z a O U U Z ~ ~ ~ '~V. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V ~ ~ R ~ ~ ~ ~ R ~~pp R V '~V N O ~ U ~ N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N ('~ N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M . N M t~^pp C N OI tNq ~ W W h U h -~ M f0 ~ O ~ r a a M ~ F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LL O W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o~N I ~~ a m ti j Qa rn rn rn' m rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn m rn m rn o 0 o f n r n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n o 0 y w ac rn ao rn ao rn 00 rn 0o rn ao rn ae rn ao rn ao rn 0o rn ao rn op rn o0 rn 0o rn ac rn eo rn 0o m ao rn ao rn 0o rn ao rn 00 rn 00 rn od o ti 0 O~ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O M U j N N N N N N N N N N N (V N N N N N N N N N N N 'Q N Q O H ~ oa ~ ~ Z N N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 O 0 O O !n Z W W Q ~~ ~ W 01 ~ N 01 ~ O ~ N V~ ~ s~~ N s~~ N ~ ~ s Oat~ N Qi tt N 01 a N W a N O a N 01 a N T ~ N O ~ N E ~ N T ~ N m e7 N m '~T N W ~ N W 'V N O 'ct N 01 ~ N N M 01 r O {y~ OO d U r N O ? R' a ~ ~ ~y ~.- y Z U n 0 n 0 n 0 n 0 n 0 n 0 n 0 n 0 n 0 n 0 n 0 n 0 n 0 n 0 n 0 n 0 n 0 n 0 n 0 n 0 n 0 n 0 n 0 o 0 0 O O W z ; of N of N of N ~ of N ~ ai N of N of N of N of N of N of N of N of N of NI of ^ of N of N ai N of N of N of N of N of N - ui M o0 ~ O Z ~ r ~ . U z I M arD a ~ ~ I o zo z n co o n co 0 n so 0 n cc 0 n m 0 n m 0 n <o 0 n m 0 n m 0 n m 0 n co 0 n ~o 0 n in 0 n co 0 n <n 0 n co 0 n so 0 n co 0 n co 0 n co 0 n m 0 n m 0 n m 0 o 0 = 0 0 o W ~ rn rn m rn rn rn m rn rn m rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn m rn . N n N W N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M ~ al I M O Q ~ i I I V n 1A n m ~! h ~ l n m n W n 0 m ao N m M m ~ tq m m l 1~ m m m m O~ m O m rn N rn M m ~i N m ~i ~ z O o J 0 J 0 0 J j J 0 J 0 J 0 J 0 J 0 J 0 J 0 J 0 J 0 0 J I J 0~ J 0 J I 0 J 01 J 0 J 0 J 0 J 0 J 0 J I F- a' W z W z WIW zjz W z W z W z W z W z W z W z W z W~W z z W' zz W~ z W~ z W z WI zl W z W z W z W z t- z~ N Q U O 1_ O H OI 0 H!H 0 H 0 H 0 H 0 ~ 0 F 0 F 0 F 0 H O O FF_ O! F 0 H 0 H 0 H OI H 0 H 0 F_ 0 H 0 C J a' WI N W ~ Z > Z > ZiZ >i7 Z O Z 7 Z O Z 7 2 > Z > Z 7 2 > ZZ >,> ZI >' Zi O' Z O~ ZI ~ Z O 2 7 2 > 2 > 2 > a F y m m rn rn ml : rn m rn m m m m m mlm m m~ ml rn l m m m m rn 0 w ~~ `~ `~ m m m~ml `~ `~ `$ `$ `$ m m `~ `a8 `S~`$ m m m m~ `S~ m m m m m m `S `~ `$ h (q N N N N N N to N N N Y]I NI N N N N N q a z al d 0 Oi01 l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, ~ 0 0 ~ 0 l 01 0' l 0 ~ o d d ~ a Li of a z z z z i z z z z z z z z z z~ i zi z z I z~ z z z z z Q i U q U U U 4 4 U g U U U U 4 U ~ U g U g U U 4 l UI g U U UI U U ~ U U U 4 _ a ~ aj a; a ~ ~ ~ ~ a a a a ai~ ai ~ ~ ~~ ~ a ~ ~ a y O t- F- F- I F- ~ F- F- F- f- F- H F- H H I I- F H F H H N F H F O ~ ~j ~ j i i' l i ~ ~ U ml N n CiWI O N M '7 N~ (O n i aO~mi Oi ~' N~ (OI V! N (O n oo ( ~ ~ , w ~I n n n~.n ro ro aol ao m ro~ ap .~ ro'aol rn~ m rn rni m~ rn rn m rn , z N z~ I ! i ~ I I i G I y N N O 2 ti W O O a M U Y 0 O ti p w 0 ~ U O N o 2 ~ N a 0 N Z O F V On JR O ~~ ~ ~ Z Z ~ O U W N Q Nw Vl~ QO E'~O OZ~ DV F~ a U awQ w~U Q_ ~U _ FU UyZ yW W ~ ~Q z ~2 oo ~w Q (' J }} Z ILF Q wN~ _ , O w N YV pw D m aw O ~p Z 0 ~ ~a a ~~ ~ o fn J F w 0 ~~ .n- M V ~f N 07 o n n ~ N 10 n V' OD ~ O r ~ ~ aao, coo, j V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 °o °0 0 0 0l0 H O °v c~ ~w WZ ~2i w Q 7~ w¢ 0 w ~ Q Z tWu ga Z. ~, ~,~ o "' "', $ =I' a a al' ~ ~ ^i. ~ ~ ~'; W~ ~ ~ ~~: p t- ~r R z z,; Q ~ ~~' _ I; h II I O da ~a ; O O ,o~ ~~II U U!. ~a W ~a ga~i VI ~ r°~g c°ng~' I pl R o~ o~ I d o 0 N ~ I ~ ;~,, O ~ '- Z' tn0 O n 0 0 M N N M V ri n iu 2 z g Q U U N N Vm ~ H m w cn W W ~ 2 z W Q Z O LL U z Y LL }O Z U y Z O Q v O~ J ~ O ~~ zz O ~ V w tWn N W Q ~ wv F ~V Qwa W ~ W as ma = J N W DO Q~ W W ~~ O zo ~~ as fA ~ O~ J a W p I- ~ Z p ao N ao N 00 N ~ W o c Q Q o ~ W rn N Z Z y N Q d N N ~ W 10 ~ U Q Q Q Q: a Q O Z Z I Z ~ Z'; ~ ~`! o: Q W a _~ Z ~ N O Oi! N', J W 1A ~ O O" O Q~ ~ ~ r ° i M ° ° O F_ ~ M ~ o o N r nI Q i ~ ~ fA N N O O N Z O N GyD 0 0 ~ W N O M W Z O e ~ t0 Q ~ ~ a~ LL LL o °o °o °o °o m~ ¢ 0 0 0 0 0 a ~ LL N LL O O 0 0 0 oD 0 O C O C o Qa Z r N O O O J N ~ O O O O O O j ~ 0 ~ n M m N v 117 a , a c°'o ~ a°DO °o °o °o F ~ 0 0 o ao Q' (n N r O F- Z n y ui N r~" W O ~ H ~" 3 ~ M O O ° O W ~ ~ ° ~ (O N O1 ~ ~ Q N a U ~~ a a ¢ g ~ ° Q z z z z '"~ w ~ v ~, ~ ° a W r N °z~ ¢ a a a ~ ' g Q z z z z ,~, ~ ° ~ ) Q Z ~ z 0 ? y a j O Z H 0 z~ ~ ~ F y 2 Q wa ~ ~ U w yw ~~~ ~, ~ y ~ W rc a 1U1 J ~ X~ w 2 p S a' W ~ ~ y m 27 ~ y p 8 O ~ N LL ~ O ~ Z ~ LLGQ Jm yNZ~ N pppp (D Z ~ W 0a w ~c~~G7 ~ ~ ~ _ ai Z d ~ ~ ~ p~Wp oo i ~ ~~=p O ~ I ~ I K O Q N Z ~o¢~ ~~OF ~ ~ ~ ~ y ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ `O ~ i ~ ~ I ~ ... ~ ~ qa I ~ I rj L W ~ ~ ~ I W I> I a ~~ ~ Z N Ir v.c ~j~C 01 L f6 ~ I V N ~ O ! n i, y ; J IQ . . O.. ~ ~ I Q 0 Z F U yZ ~~o a n~.wQ v= ~~c> z mW NWT K m W y Y WF ZpO (7 J w Wes? R' Y U m LL U Z O a J a 2 W N W N Q H F m °' O W ~w p F p y W W ~ ~a ~ ~ Qa Q~ ~~ N LL Qp W Z K a N LL N J F W p ~ W 0) fV Of (V Q Q Oi W ~ °~ ~ ~ Z Z ~ a M N N N N Z d' N M N N ~U OQ o N ao N M N Q Z Q Z Q ~Z M N W O O O O Q ~ ~ '" a Z g rn ~ ~ ~ ~ v J W a o O O N M 7Ci ~ se O of ^ ~ ~ e O~ N OD 1 O' O W n ~ M o o y ~ n ~ Q !/~ f0 h ~ N N r M p Z V 07 N r ~0 h N D) r ~ h ~ C M W f U Z °v a7 n M n ~ :-° Q O a ~ M LL O 0 0 0 0 0 0 rn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 aa ~w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~- N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O D D ¢ O O O C C O O a Z N 0V h N O N O w J N st M ~ vi ~ f0 O f~ n M 00 Oi 07 r O n O O N N Q Q M MV n ~ N N M r ~ ~ ~ N t0 a O n o a ~ °o ~ °o W rMi ~ ~ oo ri o ~ v W M OOi M N N M J O OOi I O ~ O O^7 O S Q ro ro lam. a < ~ ~ ~ O N N 7l7 n O ~ M ~ N M ~ ~ t^0 m ~ ~ ~ Qw a N a M eo ~ O o h n 0 o Z N 0 0 M O N 000 r W o o v_ ~n a~ o ~j ~ I~ N 007 0 N ~ ~ -7 Q N N M p W2' ~ ~ N ~ Q Q N p U fV fM I+M ~ Z Z M W Q ' O ¢ Q ° ~ N N z z N w ~ Z~ ~ ~ N jv v, Q Q 07 ga u ~~ ~ z z ' ~ r ~ h Q Qi ~ O Z ' .I ~ J Q Z W W i H ~ O N (q ' Q Y v Z f rc I w d er a a ' a ji y ' i o ? 4 p , U j- N N s - V) ~ I I O N ~ W Q ~ ~ I ! ~ ~ Q W p C~ Q W F- W ~ j~i S' l' c7 F- z p y Q ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ f jy ~ G 'Z O < .rQ :: a ~ .- ~ K yi ~ I O v7~ ~~ :. N ~ ~ O K! I~ F I Q Oa Oa ii. W 01 Q1 Q LL , V 4 Q O p z F- a' i~ MO f~')O i'~ K I Q Q Z W~ Q ~ ~ Or O~ ', ~ Z Z I Q. ¢~i I~ I r IF N' ~o Z ~ ~ ^ ;,m ~a Z a Z ~m ;~! Q j, y j ~ N OF m V c rv m W W m F rn O Z U ~Z moo aW~ ~~U z N W ~ WAY W Q LL ?00 J W w~? ~O Y U Q fd LL O U 2 O a O J J Q H Z W f W N Q F Z W a >O W 0 D W O a r~ a fY LL r- ~ zo ~ ~ ~ ~ ~w o o Q Q o Q o rn rn Z Z m Z m d W (V N N N Z ~ r r Q O Q Q Q Q ~ N Q N Z Z Z Z o Z 0 Qa Z ~ ~ O O N O Irf1 J W Q~ ~(i ~ ~ ~ O O O M O O M F N O W N ~ N n n Q fn N N O O N O ~i Z O v N ao O C G 1V M O N M wV U Z °o r ~ ~ r m r Q ~_ a~ M~ O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 rn~ 0 0 0 0 o c o ¢a r tL N W O O O O O O O OD ~ O O O O O O O ¢a Z r N O O O O O w cc o o a 0 o ro ° W Q rn o o~ > F- ~ ~ M co a N v N ~ N a m ~ ao°o o °o °o °o °o ,roF ~ o c o a t o0 ~ (n N r O O t- Z' ~ ~ ~ a W O O ~ r r H } (NO M O O O O O ~Q t0 ~ N O/ o 01 0 N ~ r rV a U 7~ Q Q Q Q ~? Q W Q Z Z Z Z M Z th . ~ rn ° ° v ~r ~ W r N Q Z N QQ Z W Q Q Q Q r Q Z `' gQ Z Z Z Z ~ ~ ~p Q Z z 0 z o. ~ i z~ 0z r-F F ~ ~ N a I I w a W ooW ~~~ a JO' `~ z ~ m Q a~ ~ ~ d () Q AF~L-!!7F 2~ ~tJ~t11 O N Z ~ m l ~ W fY L~ ~ O S S G y ~ Q m a~ N ° ~ 3i o z~ ~ v, ~ ; o, O N ~LL i ~ ~ Qi Z ~f~ Z ~ rq LL~-m NNZ~ N ~ y I Z O pOLLJ h_-a F- F- d. r ~ y'~ ~ d W WQ~a ~N ^ U ~ ~ LL O i y' Z - 2r O~WO i p :=~20 r r y 0 ~ K~ F C Q V, Zopoo ~ d,0~~ F- ~ ~ ~ ~ O~ ~ QU' Q Z OI i W pI ~ WS~ ~1n ~ K~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O Z w': N ~ v ~ ~ I ~ a Qi w H I Mt ao L mr O ~ = ~ J' Q ! >~ ~ Q O10 ' O a i N' IQ Z N i0L"~O N ~ Z ~ Qi ~ ~_" N (00 t.. ~ O ~ ~ p i M N F Q Uj H V m W W m ti rn O Z h- U ~jZ H O~ aw¢ ~~U ~ Z ~ W ~ W ~ Y Way boo w w~~ W ~ Y U m 0 U Z O H 0 ~ J oD Q O H M r W Z ~O ty/) ~ W U y W N N Q W ~~ LL~ W V W mV W W ~a aZ QQ 3~ O GJ W W ~~ ~ f- zz ~w a~ N ON ZQ NZ ~Q a O U W W ~ ~ ti M r t^D r ~ r C7 W W N ~ ~ Q Q Q r WWI Z Z Z ua Q 0 W ~ N ~ of ~WU ~~Q ~ c00o ~ Q Q Q c~o W W I Z Z Z Q ~ ~ ZF- OLLZ O M tA M ~ 10 r ~+"~ ~ ~ u~ AD 0 O T W O O N N 0 ~ N ~ 00 N 0 O UwQ ~ (fl QUO r r pp M O ll! ~O ~- M M O Vf J ~ J Q ~ ~ ~ 00 ~ O ~ r t1~ d' r 11Y t0 01 of 0 WH~ r O O tn N t(> tA r r r tp N Q~ l~ F- ~ H W O (O <O N o0 0 ° ~0 U ~ ~ ~ ~i ~r° cYi > u o ~mO r tA P oD J W Q ~p ~ M ~ o o o ~ ~Oo ct tl') O> 0 0 0 01 Q U O ~ N U O - ° r~ ° ° v ~ ° ° J U M ~ a o a o J WWr~ ~a o o o ~ ~ ~I ~~ oU o °~ N ~ M M V~ Q Z Q Z MI W Q 0 w 'd' r ~0 0 Q Q lO IC N N Z Z N W N ZW ~ ~ N v v Q Q ~l Q ~ ~ ` ° n r Z Z ~ JQ ~ , • 0 N N r ~ Q W ° U Q Y ~ ~ i ~ i , Q Z Q W W Q W O ~ ~ ~O e i to tn Q Y Z a! Zf- W d c v a a a _ ~ o ~I a U ~ N N a ~ a l O cn Q ! . o O ~ a O ~ o N ~ -! J W wo I U ; d' ~ d' ~ p Q ao ~ p Q M I ;~ W ~, ~~ w w ~ ~ o G~ D F F- ~- ~ z z ~ v> ~ a w' I ~ a ~ ~ ~ c9~ ~ Z'' Z Qq Q g~] ~ Q S ~ ~ ° I Q r ~' . ~i a', ~' ~ W ~ ~ J ln~ a NJ fA r 1~ r ~ Q 1 D ~~. a I Q l Q U ga U oa W ~ p~ p~ Q O a, F' ~ ~fA Mp c7O ~ Q IQ Z Z W~, ' Q U ~ ~. `$ 'O Or (O Or 0 j Q Z O Z O ~ O . QU Q. ~ ! a O jaa 0 ooa IZ Z ~ > B ' z I H ; ' F IV1 ~ p I Z ' ~a ' I r I r ~ ~ Q IZ ~Q Z A ~ la O Q ,y ~ • IN I fA Ii ,F a O J U h O ~ N Z 00 0 0 n O W W O U rn w O r Q U v U 0 O N O N H m d V ~ ~ F.. mV ~ W ~ W m W ~ z C7 Z W 0 Z U ~_ O H Z W W Q O W W Q 00 0 Q Z O LL Q U z W Y w O Z O U U Z O V O ~ C J o0 Q O H M r ~~_ ~ ~ W V Nw ~~ Q W H ~ LLO W V W m V ~a QZ m Q ~V 0 ~a ~~ ~~ ZZ ~ W a~ ~y Oy za Nz ~ Q a O V w I o o °o o° °o °o, ~Z~! 0 0 0 0 0 0 ¢Ww ww Q z ~~ >u.wl a'~ al o w °o °o °o °o °o °o ~WU 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~~a Q W W ~ Z LL Q ~ d p Z F- O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O W E O 0 0 0 0 0 0 UWQ m U O ~ ~ ~ = J Q ~ ~ Q O Z ~ ~ ~ O O O O N C O O N C W H O ~ 1- ~ f- ~ ~ M M ~ZU N m 0 ~' ti 1` w Q ~p rn ~ °o °o n °o N F- ~ O V~ ~ ~ O O N O N Q U } ~ H ~ ~ c'7 ~ o M ao r> ao O V c+i o V N ti ti gw~ u ~a ~ o Q ~~ ~ ~ ~ a a a Q a W Q H N Z Z Z Z M Z M ~ y a ~ ~ O O N Q N W ~ m Z N~ N Z W ~ ~ Q Q Q Q ~' ~ ' Q `' ~ ' g Q ~ z z z z , . z , , Q o m op °~ ~ ~ ~ Z _ u i Q Z d Q Q ~ ~' Z t- ; U _ p0 ?~ w ~ ~ ~ p z ~ i ai a C G ~I m m ~~~ Z= ~ a(~O Fco J J lL p m - a Z ~ O cn v F w~H w~ X11 5 ~ N I m ~ J wi j ~I ~ ~ F~ a~ p w ~ ~ O ° i - ~ 3 w ~ ~ z~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ o p j d h WLL ~ v °' ~ G w I O Z ' u'a0~m ~ V)NZ N ~ Z ~. ~ ~' , Q ~oOU d Q i Ocrr'~ ~ O; I O ~ I rn 2 a Z a H ~ w i ~ W ~ ~ pMwo ZoO - co ~==p » ~ ~ ~ ~ j p Q . I m ' R QU (n Ia i m o Qo?O ~OQ~ d O co p= °a'OF c~i co N m ~ N y ~ W (~ ! IZ O I O LL p i N ~~~a ~F=~ I~ ~ i ~ ~ Z i Q ~ w N LB ~ ~ J i ~ Q C ~ O ~ I L r ~ O ' i a' I I (A U', N 7O ~ I ~ F ; N ~ ~a y l M N i ~ ' N ' I 'i ~ O w w r m U ti 3 Z ~o ow W ~ Z W Q Y p OQO ~ O Q U 2 OO W ~ 2 a° ~ U !Q- O W k ? W a we O O 2 Q O p W ti ~ ~ O U Q w¢ ~ _m Z O ? ~o W o~ 2 vUi O ~ z o° U O O -~ J Q ~ ~o aW O m U Z W ~ m z aw F- m OO 0 0 ri O ti w O rn rn 0 ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0.97-1 (SPRING MEADOWS IUSTOCKDALE HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL) EXHIBIT D DESCRIPTION OF ASSESSMENT SPREAD METHOD EXHIBIT D ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0.97-1 (SPRING MEADOWS II/STOCKDALE HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL) DESCRIPTION OF ASSESSMENT SPREAD METHOD INTRODUCTION The City Council appointed the Director of Public Works as the Engineer of Work for AD 97-1 by adoption of Resolution of Intention No. 1159 on June 25, 1997. Also on June 25, 1997, the City Council approved Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 97-98 (originally approved by the City Council on April 23, 1997) with Edward J. Wilson, a Registered Civil Engineer, appointing him as the Assessment Engineer for AD 97-1. The Assessment Engineer has been retained by the City to prepare an Engineer's Report on the proposed assessment that will include, in part, an analysis of the facts in AD 97-1 and the development of a method of apportioning the total amount of the costs and expenses of the proposed improvement acquisitions to the parcels and lots located within AD 97- I. AD 97-1 has been formed pursuant to petitions signed by the District Proponents and owners of all of the AD 97-1 property proposed to be assessed, requesting the City Council to waive further proceedings under Division 4 of the Streets and Highways Code and to undertake proceedings pursuant to the 1913 Act and to the provisions of Municipal Code Section 13.08.070. The petition is on file with the City Clerk and was accepted on June 25, 1997, when the City Council adopted its Resolution No. 100-97, "Accepting Petition and Determining to Undertake Special Assessment Proceedings (AD 97-1)." ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PURPOSE AD 97-1 was originally formed for the purpose of financing the estimated total cost for City acquisition of certain public improvements within three AD 97-1 community areas. As stated in Section I of the AD 97-1 Engineer's Report, pursuant to a request by one of the District Proponents, one of the three Community areas in AD 97-1 (the Stockdale Highway Commercial Area) was removed from AD 97-1. The total estimated cost for City acquisition within the remaining two AD 97-1 community areas (Spring Meadows II-A Area and Spring Meadows II-B Area) are described in Section II of the AD 97-1 Engineer's Report. A detailed description of the proposed Improvement Acquisitions is also presented in Section II. The AD 97-1 proceedings will confirm an assessment for the estimated total cost of the improvements to be acquired pursuant to the 1913 Act and to the Municipal Code. The City proposes to issue bonds under the 1915 Act, secured by the unpaid assessments, to pay the cost to acquire the improvements and pay all incidental costs and expenses related thereto and authorized for funding by the 1913 Act. 29260PER.EXD D-1 2/27/98 AUTHORIZATION FOR ASSESSMENT REALLOCATIONS As stated above, the Petition filed by the District Proponents requested that the AD 97-1 assessment be spread to the assessed properties in the manner set forth in Municipal Code Section 13.08.070 Benefit Spread, which was added to the Municipal Code on April 5, 1995, by City Council adoption of Ordinance No. 3643. The City Council has approved that request by its adoption of its referenced Resolution No. 100-97, and the AD 97-1 assessment will be spread pursuant to the 1913 Act and to the Municipal Code. Under the 1913 Act, parcel assessment shares are allocated among the benefited parcels of land in the assessment district in proportion to the estimated benefit each parcel can be expected to receive from the work and improvement covered by the assessment. Municipal Code Section 13.08.070 authorizes the "reallocation" to alternate properties of assessments initially allocated to parcels in proportion to their estimated benefit (i.e., initial allocation made in accordance with the 1913 Act benefit/cost requirement and that benefit/cost share is reallocated to the other parcels that may or may not be directly benefited by the improvements funded in the assessment). The AD 97-1 individual parcel assessment amounts shown on Engineer's Report Exhibit A, Assessment Roll, have been calculated ("spread") among the assessed parcels pursuant to Municipal Code Section 13.08.070. The Alternate Method used by the Assessment Engineer to reallocate the benefit based assessment shares initially allocated by the Assessment Engineer to each AD 97-1 assessed parcel has been provided to the Engineer of Work by the District Proponents and is hereafter referred to as the "Reallocation Method." In light of the fact that the AD 97-1 parcel assessments have been spread using a Reallocation Method proposed by the District Proponents, it is the intent of the AD 97-1 Assessment Engineer in preparing this Engineer's Report Exhibit D to present information and data on the Reallocation Method and on the BenefidCost Based Method for allocation of assessments. The objective of this effort is to present a comparative analysis of the Benefit/Cost Based Method and the Reallocation Method of assessment spread that will provide sufficient background information for the City Council to reference in making a determination on whether the proposed Assessment Reallocation Method is in conformance with Municipal Code Section 13.08.070, and for them to further determine whether the Assessment Reallocation Method will be implemented as the confirmed "Assessment Spread Method" for AD 97-1. Accordingly, descriptions and assessment spread calculations are presented in the following sections of this Exhibit D of the Reallocation Method of assessment spread proposed by the District Proponents, and of the Benefit/Cost Assessment Spread Method developed by the Assessment Engineer. Those descriptions and assessment calculation results are followed by a comparison of the parcel assessments calculated using each method. A statement of findings as to whether the proposed Reallocation Method is in conformance with the criteria _set forth in Municipal Code Section 13.08.070 is then presented at the end of Exhibit D to complete the evaluation of that allocation procedure. The text of Municipal Code Section 13.08.070 is presented below for reference to facilitate the description of the proposed Reallocation Method. 29260PER.EXD D-2 2/27/98 Municipal Code Section 13.08.070-Benefit Spread. A. In special assessment proceedings conducted by the City of Bakersfield pursuant to the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 (Sections 10000 and following, California Streets and Highways Code), as amended from time to time (the "1913 Act"), and notwithstanding any provision of the 1913 Act to the contrary, the City may determine and implement an alternate method and rate of assessment reallocating assessments to alternate properties. B. Such reallocation may occur even though doing so will result in no assessment being levied upon property which is, in fact, benefited by improvements for which the assessments are levied and which is determined differently from a direct cost benefit ratio. C. Such alternate methods and rates of assessment may only be determined and implemented by the City when so requested by the owner of all property to be assessed, and upon written and recorded consent of the owner of the property to which assessments are reallocated. D. Additionally, such alternate methods and rates of assessment may only be determined and implemented by the City to pay for improvements that bear a rational nexus to the property to be assessed. DESCRIPTION OF ASSESSMENT REALLOCATION METHOD In accordance with Subsection C of Municipal Code Section 13.08.070 ("Section 13.08.070 (C)"), the District Proponent has submitted a proposed "AD 97-1 Alternate Method and Rate of Assessment" (the "AD 97-1 Reallocation Method") to the Engineer of Work. Also in accordance with Section 13.080.070 (C), the District Proponents have submitted written requests to the Engineer of Work asking that the proposed AD 97-1 Reallocation Method be implemented for AD 97-1 and further stating that they are the owners of all of the .property proposed to be reallocated a share of the AD 97-1 Assessment and that they consent to the reallocation. The Engineer of Work has accepted the proposed method and directed the Assessment Engineer to use the AD 97-1 Reallocation Method for calculating the AD 97-1 parcel assessments. The AD 97-1 Reallocation Method is described as: Subject to certain exceptions described below, the total improvement acquisition cost within each of the two (2) community areas shown on the AD 97-1 Amended Boundary Map and on the AD 97-1 Assessment Diagram is spread among the developed and undeveloped parcels within each area in direct proportion to parcel acreage and to each planned or existing lot within those undeveloped parcels as an equal per lot cost share. The acreage spread exceptions within each community area are as follows: 29260PER.EXD D-3 2/27/98 1. Spring Meadows II-A Area There are no exceptions in the Spring Meadows II-A Area to the equal cost share per acre and equal cost per planned lot reallocation spread method. All Spring Meadows II-A Area improvement acquisition costs are apportioned to Assessment No. 1, which is the only parcel within the Spring Meadows II-A Area boundaries shown on the AD 97-1 Amended Boundary Map. As stated in Engineer's Report Section II, the Spring Meadows II-A Area is planned for subdivision into 261 R-1 lots pursuant to Tentative Tract No. 5827 ("Ten. TR 5827"). As those tract phases are recorded, each new residential lot will be apportioned an equal share of each development area's share of the total cost assessed to Assessment No. 1 in the amount shown on Engineer's Report Exhibit A, Assessment Roll. Ten. TR 5827 Phases A through C comprise the parcel's northern development area of similar size lots, and Ten. TR 5827 Phases D through K comprise the southern development area of a second grouping of similar size lots. . When the Preliminary Engineer's Report was filed with the City Clerk, the Spring Meadows II-A Area parcel had an existing AD 82-1 assessment (identified as AD 82-1 Assessment No. 5553), and the cost to pay off that existing assessment is shown in Exhibit B, Table B-III. That "payoff' cost was paid by one of the District Proponents (Castle & Cooke California, Inc.), and the AD 82-1 lien on this parcel was released by the City Finance Director on October 22, 1997. Table C-II-A in Engineer's Report Exhibit C shows the total amount assessed to this area in the "Total Assessment" column, followed by the per acre and per R-1 lot or per Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") assessment amounts. Table C-I in Exhibit C shows the assessment calculation details for the total amount allocated to Assessment No. 1, as calculated using the Reallocation Method. 2. Spring Meadows II-B Area Except for the future school parcel, the two future well sites, and the future storm drain sump not being assessed as described below, there are no exceptions in the Spring Meadows II-B Area to the equal cost share per acre and equal cost per planned R-1 lot Reallocation Spread Method. All Spring Meadows II-B Area improvement acquisition costs are apportioned to Assessment No. 2 and the 94 R-1 lots in Tract No. 5869-Unit One ("TR 5869-1 "),which are all within the Spring Meadows II-B Area boundaries shown on the AD 97-1 Amended Boundary Map. Reference to the description of this community in Engineer's Report Section II will confirm that the Spring Meadows II-B Area is approved for subdivision into 241 R-1 lots, two well sites, one storm drain sump, and a school site pursuant to Tentative Tract No. 5869 ("Ten. TR 5869") and will also confirm that the recorded TR 5869-1 consists of 94 R-1 lots, one well site, and one storm drain sump. The Section II reference will further confirm that the AD 97-1 Improvement Acquisitions planned for this community are all required as conditions of approval for Ten. TR 5869. As those tract phases are recorded, each new residential lot will be apportioned an equal share of the total cost assessed to Assessment No. 2. See Engineer's Report Exhibit A, Assessment Roll, for the total amount assessed to 29260PER.EXD D-4 2/27/98 Assessment No. 2 (the remainder parcel), and the 94 R-1 lots in TR 5869-1. As stated, above, and per confirmation from the property owner of the parcel in the Spring Meadows II-B Area, the future school site and the future well site within Ten. TR 5869 will not be apportioned a share of the total cost assessed to Assessment No. 2. Exhibit A also shows that the well site within TR 5869-1 (Assessment No. 24), and the storm drain sump (Assessment No. 70) are not apportioned a share of the total cost for the Spring Meadows II-B Area. When the Preliminary Engineer's Report was filed with the City Clerk, the Spring Meadows II-B Area parcels had an existing AD 82-1 assessment (identified as AD 82-1 Assessment No. 5554), and the cost to pay off that existing assessment is shown in Exhibit B, Table B-III. That "payoff'' cost was paid by one of the District Proponents (BHA Properties, LLC) and the AD 82-1 lien on this parcel was released by the City Finance Director on October 22, 1997. Table C-II-B in Engineer's Report Exhibit C shows the total amount assessed to the Spring Meadows II-B Area in the "Total Assessment" column, followed by the area's total assessment per acre and per R-1 lot or per EDU~assessment amounts. Table C-I in Exhibit C presents a breakdown of the existing lot assessment details for Assessment Nos. 2 through 98, as calculated using the AD 97-1 Reallocation Method. CALCULATION OF REALLOCATED ASSESSMENTS Engineer's Report Exhibit C includes a "C-II" group of two tables labeled C-II-A and C-II-B. Each table presents the results of the parcel reallocated assessment calculations for one of the two AD 97-1 community areas. The Tables C-II Reallocated Assessment spread data has been calculated in accordance with the Assessment Reallocation Method Description presented in the preceding section of this Exhibit D. The assessment reallocation data for the unsubdivided parcels presented in the two C-II Tables has been calculated based on the development planning, land use, and EDU information for each community area provided by the District Proponents and the AD 97-1 Design Engineers. The subdivision acreages and proposed EDU's or lots for the two community areas were obtained by reference to the approved subdivision tentative maps and by reference to the AD 97-1 Assessment District Studies prepared by Martin-McIntosh Engineering. That subdivision acreage and lot data has been used to calculate the reallocated assessment shares for the existing and proposed subdivisions within the two AD 97-1 community areas. There is a separate C-II table for each community area, which shows the cost share reallocations for the separate improvement systems to be acquired that will be spread to each planned subdivision within a community area. Each C-II Table also shows the AD 97-1 Assessment Proceeding and Bond Issuance Cost share reallocations under the "Proceeding/Issue Cost" column, and the total amount proposed to be assessed under the "Total Assessment" column. Following the Total Assessment column are two columns listing the amount assessed per assessable acre and the amount assessed per EDU. Table C-I in Engineer's Report Exhibit C consolidates all of the assessment reallocation data presented in the C-II group of tables and provides the assessment data by existing ATN or by parcel 29260PER.EXD D-5 2/27/98 description for every existing and proposed subdivision lot and/or parcel in AD 97-1. The improvement acquisition cost reallocations are summarized in a single column on Table C-I, because their details are presented in the C-II tables. However, Table C-I itemizes the improvement incidental, assessment proceeding, and bond issuance cost reallocation amounts in separate columns, while those costs are shown as a total amount in the "Proceeding/Issue Costs" column on the C-II Tables. Since the per acre and per EDU or per lot assessment data is shown on the C-II Tables for each land use area or ATN and for each proposed subdivision, that data is not repeated on Table C-I. The "Confirmed Assessment Amount" shown on Exhibit A, Assessment Roll is the amount proposed to be assessed to each lot and parcel in AD 97-1 and is also the amount shown under the column entitled "Total Assessment" in Table C-I. DESCRIPTION OF BENEFIT/COST BASED ASSESSMENT ALLOCATION METHOD Municipal Code Section 13.08.070 sets forth several criteria under which the City may "determine and implement" an alternative method of assessment. This section of Exhibit D will present information and data for reference by the City Council in their deliberations to make a final determination on whether the proposed AD 97-1 Assessment Reallocation Method is in conformance with Municipal Code Section 13.08.070 and as to whether the proposed Assessment Reallocation Method will be implemented as the confirmed "Assessment Spread Method" for AD 97-1. The intended objective in developing the AD 97-1 Benefit/Cost Based Assessment Allocation Method (the "AD 97-1 Allocation Method") is to define a cost allocation method that apportions the AD 97-1 costs to each parcel in conformance with the requirements of the 1913 Act, which requires that the financed cost in a special assessment proceeding be allocated among the benefited parcels of land in proportion to the estimated benefit each parcel can be expected to receive from the financed work and improvements. It is further intended that the AD 97-1 Allocation Method be in general conformance with the benefit/cost methods used to spread costs in existing City assessment districts for which a Notice of Assessment was recorded prior to the effective date of Municipal Code Section 13.080.070. In accordance with these intended objectives, the AD 97-1 Allocation Method is based on the following: o The Categories of Benefit each improvement system provides to the assessment district properties; o The Method of Apportioning the improvement system work items and cost to the various benefit categories; o The Criteria for Determining which parcels are benefited by the improvements in each benefit category; and o The Method of Allocating the apportioned improvement system costs for each benefit category to the parcels benefited by that category of improvements, in proportion to the estimated level of benefit the parcels will receive from those improvements. 29260PER.EXD D-6 2/27/98 I. The Categories of Benefit that provide the foundation for the AD 97-1 Allocation Method are as follows: A. Development Entitlement/Arterial Class Improvement Benefit Category: This is the primary category of improvement benefit supporting the AD 97-1 Allocation Method developed for each of the two AD 97-1 community areas. As stated in Engineer's Report Section I, the AD 97-1 improvements are improvements that are either already required or are expected by the District Proponents to be required to be constructed as conditions of entitlement approval for certain properties in AD 97-1. Therefore, planning approval records have been researched to determine the scope of improvements that must be, or are expected to be required to be constructed as a condition of entitlement approval for the AD 97-1 properties. The Development Entitlement Benefit Category includes those improvement systems, or their component parts, that provide a regional benefit to AD 97-1 parcels and to a much larger community area not included in AD 97-1. Arterial streets, transmission grid water mains, certain sanitary sewer and storm drain pipelines are examples of improvements assigned to this benefit category. B. Direct Benefit/Fronting Improvement Benefit Category: All of the AD 97-1 improvements that provide a localized level of benefit are included in this benefit category. The general scope of improvements assigned to this benefit category includes the outside traffic and parking lane portions of arterial and major collector streets, all sidewalk, right-of--way landscaping and walls for the AD 97-1 streets, certain 8-inch and 10-inch diameter water and sanitary sewer pipelines, and certain storm drain pipelines. C. Non-benefited and Non-assessed Parcels: All of the following described parcels in AD 97-1 are defined for the purpose of this Allocation Method as not being benefited by the AD 97-1 Improvements and, accordingly, they are not apportioned a share of the AD 97-1 assessment by the Allocation Method or by the Reallocation Method: 1. All City-owned property; all landscape, well site, and storm drain sump lots in existing subdivisions; street right of way; and 2. All existing and designated school and park sites. II. The Method or Criteria Devised for Apportioning the improvement system work items and cost to the two primary improvement benefit categories are described below. A. Assignment of improvement system work items and cost to benefit categories: 1. Development Entitlement/Arterial Class Improvements a. Arterial Street Improvements: Jewetta Avenue, Brimhall Road, and Verdugo Lane (Spring Meadows II-A Area), and Calloway Drive (Spring Meadows II-B 29260PER.EXD D-7 2/27/98 Area) are the only AD 97-1 street improvements with component parts apportioned to this category. For the purpose of the Allocation Method, the northbound center traffic lane for Jewetta Avenue, the southbound center traffic lane for Verdugo Lane, and the eastbound and westbound center traffic lanes and median improvements for Brimhall Road in the Spring Meadows II-A Area and the median curb in Calloway Drive in the Spring Meadows II-B Area are the specific portions of these streets classified as "Arterial" Improvements. b. Transmission Grid Water Mains: The 16-inch diameter water mains funded in AD 97-1 are classified as "Grid Mains." The only AD 97-1 "Grid Main" improvements are located in the Jewetta Avenue portion of the Spring Meadows II-A Area Project. c. Sanitary Sewer Main Collector Pipelines: For the purpose of the AD 97-1 Allocation Method, this improvement category would include sewer pipelines required to be installed as conditions of development entitlement approval that have been designed to serve an area outside the boundaries of the AD 97-1 community. There are no such Sanitary Sewer Main Collector Pipelines funded in AD 97-1. d. Storm Water Drainage Main Collector Pipelines: For the purpose of the AD 97-1 Allocation Method, this improvement category includes Storm Water Drainage Pipelines being installed as conditions of development entitlement approval that have been designed to serve an area outside the boundaries of the AD 97-1 community in which they are being installed. There are no such Storm Water Drainage Main Collector Pipelines funded in AD 97-1. 2. Direct Benefit/Fronting Improvements: a. Streets/Landscaping/Walls/Street Lights/Traffic Signals: The outside traffic lane and parking lane, curb and gutter, deceleration lane and busbay portion of all streets, including arterial and major collector level streets, provide direct and localized benefit to the fronting property areas. In the case of a new subdivision development, all fronting street, sidewalks, walls, street lights, and landscaping improvements along its perimeter are generally required to be installed as a condition of the tract development entitlement approval. Accordingly, in the Allocation Method street frontage improvements are assessed back to the fronting subdivision area. In the case of AD 97-1, the fronting area may encompass a block of property that the District Proponents have identified as an area planned for subdivision in phases, such as Ten. TR 5827 in the Spring Meadows II-A Area and the existing and planned phases of Ten. TR 5869 in the Spring Meadows II-B Area. Because the proposed traffic signal improvements planned for the eastern entrance to the Spring Meadows II-B Area from Calloway Drive 29260PER.EXD D-8 2/27/98 are being installed to facilitate access to and from the Spring Meadows II-B Area as one of the conditions for approval for Ten. TR 5869, they are classified for the purpose of the AD 97-1 Allocation Method as benefiting only Ten. TR 5869. Accordingly, the full cost of the referenced signal improvements is assessed only to the Spring Meadows II-B Area. b. Local Service Pipeline: 8-inch diameter water and 8-inch and 10-inch diameter sewer mains are classified as fronting benefit improvements and their cost is allocated back to the fronting property areas. Short sections of pipeline stubouts into future subdivision development areas are also allocated as direct benefit improvements. In the Spring Meadows II-A Area the 24-inch and 36-inch diameter storm drain pipeline to be installed in Jewetta Avenue and the "Tract No. 5827 Sump" to be installed in future Tract No. 5827 are, at this preliminary stage of subdivision planning, classified by the AD 97-1 Design Engineer (Martin-McIntosh Engineering) as most probably tributary only to Ten. TR 5827 area. Accordingly, these pipeline and storm drain sump acquisitions are classified as "Local Service Pipelines," and their cost is allocated only to the Spring Meadows II-A Area property. Similarly, the storm drain pipelines and the block wall around the storm drain sump included in the scope of improvement acquisitions planned for the Spring Meadows II-B Area will be installed within the boundaries of Ten. TR 5869 as on-site subdivision improvements and are also classified as "Local Service Pipeline" benefiting only the Spring Meadows II-B Area. Therefore, in accordance with that direct benefit classification, the AD 97-1 Allocation Method spreads the full cost of that pipeline and block wall work to the Spring Meadows II-B Area. B. Apportionment of improvement system cost shares to the benefit categories: 1. Apportionment of Street Costs: a. For the arterial and major collector streets that have portions allocated to both the Entitlement Benefit and Fronting Benefit Categories, the improvement item quantities and costs for street construction work are apportioned in direct proportion to street surface area occupied by each improvement benefit category. The Fronting Street cost is apportioned based on an 18-foot pavement width with the balance of the street surface area classified as the "Arterial" Street section. However, if the full design half-width of an arterial. street is being installed along with the inside travel lane for the opposite side of the street, the full half street area is classified as the Fronting Street area and the opposite side travel lane as the Arterial area. The composite area totals for the two categories were used to calculate improvement system work item quantity and cost percentage factors, and those area-based factors were used to allocate project work item cost shares to the benefit categories. 29260PER.EXD D-9 2/27/98 b. The non-street work items of curb and gutter, sidewalk, right-of--way walls and landscaping were assigned a 100% Fronting factor to allocate their costs to the "Direct Benefit/Fronting Improvement Category." 2. Apportionment of Water Mains: a. Transmission Grid Main pipelines included in the scope of AD 97-1 Improvement Acquisitions are located only along the western (Jewetta Avenue) frontage of the Spring Meadows II-A Area. These pipeline segments would also be required to be installed as a condition of development entitlement approval for the currently undeveloped parcel fronting on the west side of Jewetta Avenue. Therefore, the cost of these pipelines is allocated as a directlfronting development requirement benefiting the properties fronting on either side of Jewetta Avenue, with each site allocated a 50% cost Share. b. Local Service Water Main costs are split 50/50 between the parcels or development areas fronting on each side of the street. 3. Apportionment of Sanitary Sewer Mains: Sanitary Sewer Mains in AD 97-1 have all been classified as "Fronting Benefit" improvements, and these work items and costs are allocated accordingly. Those pipeline costs are spread to their benefited service area properties as described in a following paragraph. 4. Apportionment of Storm Drain Pipeline: As stated above and based on the preliminary storm drain study available at this time, all of the AD 97-1 storm drain pipeline improvements in the Spring Meadows II-A Area will most probably serve only the Ten. TR 5827 area. Accordingly, their costs are spread in the AD 97-1 Allocation Method as a direct benefit/fronting cost of only the Spring Meadows II-A Area, except for the cost share of lots. l through 6 in Ten. TR 5827 Phase K, which are located outside the AD 97-1 boundaries, as described below. III. The Criteria for Determining which parcels are benefited by the improvements allocated to each benefit category are as follows: A. Wiring Meadows II-A: The Spring Meadows II-A Area Improvements are generally shown and described on the map in Engineer's Report Exhibit E. The improvements to be installed on and along Jewetta Avenue, except the above-described water main improvements, are frontage improvements required for the development of Ten. TR 5827. Accordingly, 100% of their cost is allocated to the area covered by Ten TR 5827. 29260PER.EXD D-10 2/27/98 The 16-inch diameter water main and associated 16-inch diameter valves are allocated 50% as benefiting the area covered by Ten TR 5827 and 50% is allocated as benefiting the property fronting on the west side of Jewetta Avenue that is not in AD 97-1 and not in Ten. TR 5827. Except for the westbound inside traffic lane improvements, all of the Brimhall Road improvements are classified as Direct Benefit/Fronting Improvements along the northern frontage of the Spring Meadows II-A Area properties, and their total cost is allocated to Ten. TR 5827. The property on the south side of Brimhall Road (the Spring Meadows II-A Area) is required, as a condition of subdivision approval, either to pay the City median fee or to construct one-half of the median. In the AD 97-1 proceedings the required "Median Deposit" for one-half of the median is funded, and its total cost is allocated to Ten. TR 5827. The full cost (100%) of the Brimhall Road westbound, inside traffic lane cost is allocated as benefiting the property fronting on the north side of Brimhall Road that is not in AD 97-1. This cost share allocation is calculated as 26.92% of the total cost of the AC paving, aggregate base, subgrade preparation, and the street sign cost for Brimhall Road improvements. All of the Verdugo Lane improvements are classified as Direct Benefit/Fronting Improvements along the eastern frontage of Ten. TR 5827. Ten. TR 5827 has been approved as a phased subdivision of portions of Section 31, T 29 S, R 27 E, MDB&M and Section 36, T 29 S, R 26 E, MDB&M. Eleven (11) subdivision phases (Phases A through K) are shown on the Ten. TR 5827 map, with a combined total of 267 R-1 lots. Reference to the approved map of Ten. TR 5827 on file in the office of the City Planning Director, shows that two (2) blocks of similar size lots are approved for development as follows: Ten. TR 5827 Phases A through C in the northern portion of the planned subdivision with a net area of about 17.17 acres approved for subdivision into 48 R-1 lots (2.8 lots/acre density); and Ten. TR 5827 Phases D through K in the southern portion of the planned subdivision with a net area of about 57.74 acres approved for subdivision into 219 lots (3.81ots/acre density). Six (6) lots in Phase K of Ten. TR 5827 are approved for development in Section 36, to the west of the alignment of Jewetta. Avenue and outside of AD 97-1 (see the Engineer's Report Exhibit E map for reference as to the Jewetta Avenue and Spring Meadows II-A Area locations). Therefore, that portion of the Ten. TR 5827 combined total beneficial share of the AD 97-1 improvement acquisitions cost that would be apportioned to the six Phase K lots that are not in AD 97-1 is a cost that does not benefit the 261 Ten. TR 5827 lots that, when recorded as Ten. TR 5827 future subdivision phases, will become new subdivision lots within AD 97-1. The total beneficial cost share for the six Phase K lots not in AD 97-1 (the "Non AD 97-1 Ten. TR 5827 Lots") has been calculated in accordance with the procedure set forth in the following section of this Exhibit D Assessment Spread Method, entitled "Assessment Apportionments to Future Subdivisions." Accordingly, the Non AD 97-1 Ten. TR 5827 Lots' cost share has been computed as follows: the total cost share allocated to the Ten. TR 5827 was first apportioned between the aforesaid Phases A through C northern and Phases D through K southern areas of similar lot sizes in direct proportion to their net acreages. The Phases D through K southern area's total cost share 29260PER.EXD D-11 2/27/98 is apportioned as an equal per lot allocation to each of the 219 future lots in Phases D through K. The allocated cost per lot was used to compute the total cost allocated on the Non AD 97-1 Ten. TR 5827 Lots, as shown on Engineer's Report Exhibit C, Table C-III-A. Reference to Table C-III-A will show that the same "Amount Per EDU" has been allocated to the Assessment No. 1 Ten. TR 5827 Phases D through K portion of the Spring Meadows II-A Area and to the "Non AD 97-1 Ten. TR 5827 Phase K Lots 1-6" area. spring Meadows II-B Area: The map in Exhibit E also shows and describes the general locations and extent of the Spring Meadows II-B Area improvements. The scope of work includes construction along the eastern frontage of Ten. TR 5869 of the southbound, outside traffic lane for Calloway Drive between the eastern boundaries of Ten. TR 5869 and said mid section line of Section 31, plus curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lights, the Ten. TR 5869 wall and right-of--way landscaping, and the traffic signal at the intersection of Calloway Drive and Marby~ Grange Way. All of the Calloway Drive improvements are classified herein as Direct Benefit/Fronting Improvements for Ten. TR 5869 and, accordingly, their total cost is allocated 100% to Ten. TR 5869. IV. The Method of Allocating the apportioned system costs for each benefit category to the benefited parcels within each of the two AD 97-1 community areas, in proportion to the estimated level of benefit the parcels in each area will receive from the various improvements included in each benefit category is described below: A. Spring Meadows II-A Area Assessment Allocation Method Table C-III-A, "Details of Spring Meadows II-A Area Estimated Benefit Assessment Allocations for Proposed Development," in Engineer's Report Exhibit C (hereafter "Exhibit C") shows how the Spring Meadows II-A Area Improvement Acquisitions costs have been allocated based on the aforesaid benefit/cost criteria. Reference to Table C-III-A shows the beneficiaUcost share apportioned to Ten. TR 5827 and the share allocated to the "Benefited/Non-assessed" ("Non AD 97-1") property fronting on the west side of Jewetta Avenue and on the north side of Brimhall Road, including the six (6) Non AD 97-1 Ten. TR 5827 Lots located outside AD 97-1. The Non AD 97-1 property is not assessed when the assessment spread is calculated in accordance with the Reallocation Method, but would be assessed the improvement cost share shown in Table C-III-A if the assessments were calculated in accordance with the benefit/cost based AD 97-1 Allocation Method. B. Spring Meadows II-B Area Assessment Allocation Method Exhibit C, Table C-III-B "Details of Spring Meadows II-B Area Estimated Benefit Assessment Allocations for Proposed Development," shows how the Spring Meadows II-B Area improvement acquisition costs have been allocated in accordance with the 29260PER.EXD D-12 2/27/98 benefit/cost based AD 97-1 Allocation Method. Reference to Table C-III-B shows the total Spring Meadows II-B Area improvement cost share apportioned to parcels in the existing and future phases of Ten. TR 5869 and also shows that there is no Non AD 97-1 share allocated to any property outside AD 97-1. All of the Spring Meadows II-B Area improvements are required to be installed as conditions of approval for Ten. TR 5869, and they are not subject to oversize reimbursement. Accordingly, the proposed school site parcel in this AD 97-1 community area has been classified as a Non-benefited/Non- assessed parcel. That future parcel's proportionate cost share of existing City infrastructure will be paid through the City utility connection and applicable site development fees charged to the property at the time of development. Also, as stated above, the well site (Assessment No. 24) and the storm drain sump (Assessment No. 70) within TR 5869-1 are classified as Non-benefited/Non-assessed parcels. C. Contingency and Improvement Incidental Costs for each improvement system within each community area are included in the total allocated cost share in the C-III group of tables. Therefore, these costs are allocated within each community area in direct proportion to the beneficial improvement cost share allocations. COMPARISON OF REALLOCATION METHOD AND BENEFIT/COST BASED ASSESSMENT ALLOCATION METHOD; ASSESSMENT SPREAD RESULTS The group of two "C-IV" tables in Engineer's Report Exhibit C (Tables C-IV-A and C-IV-B) present separate comparisons by community area of the cost assessed to individual parcels or land use areas when the AD 97-1 cost is spread in accordance with the Reallocation Method proposed by the District Proponents, to the parcel cost shares when the spread is calculated in accordance with the Benefit/Cost Based Assessment Allocation Method developed by the AD 97-1 Assessment Engineer. In each case, the Reallocation Method results are shown in the "Reallocation Per City Code 13.08.070" column and the Allocation Method results in the "Estimated Benefit Allocation" column of the C-IV tables group. The Reallocation Amount minus the Allocation Amount is shown in the "Reallocation Minus Benefit Allocation" column. These tables show that, as permitted by Municipal Code Section 13.08.070, the Reallocation Method does not apportion an assessment amount to the Non AD 97-1 parcels that are shown in the Benefit Allocation column to have a beneficial cost share for certain improvements. These parcels represent the benefited properties that have been excluded from AD 97-1 at the request of the District Proponents. Further review of the C-IV group of tables shows that improvement costs for work within or adjacent to a community area have been assessed only to properties in that area, and in their last two columns adjacent to the right margin, they show, respectively, the per acre and per EDU differences between the parcel assessments calculated using the AD 97-1 Reallocation Method and the AD 97-1 Allocation Method. 29260PER.EXD D-13 2/27/98 ASSESSMENT ENGINEER'S STATEMENT OF FINDINGS ON THE ASSESSMENT SPREAD METHOD Based on the descriptions and data presented above and further illustrated in the referenced Exhibit C Tables on the proposed AD 97-1 Reallocation Method, the following findings on the AD 97-1 Assessment Spread Method are presented: A. The improvement acquisitions proposed to be financed by AD 97-1 are improvements that will be installed within or adjacent to the community area that is assessed the cost of those improvement acquisitions and, accordingly, the AD 97-1 Improvement Acquisitions bear a rational nexus to the properties proposed to be assessed a share of their cost; and B. The District Proponents have submitted written requests to the Engineer of Work that the Reallocation Method of assessment spread be implemented, and they have further represented that said requests were approved by all AD 97-1 property owners at the time they were filed. Therefore, it is the finding of the Assessment Engineer that the proposed Reallocation Method is in conformance with the requirements of Municipal Code Section 13.08.070. ASSESSMENT PROCEEDING INCIDENTAL AND BOND ISSUANCE COST ALLOCATION The AD 97-1 assessment proceeding and bond issuance costs are spread in direct proportion to the total improvement cost reallocated to each parcel. ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENTS TO FUTURE SUBDIVISIONS When a parcel with an AD 97-1 confirmed assessment is subdivided in the future by the recording of a subdivision or parcel map, a certificate of compliance for lot line adjustment or parcel map waiver, or upon the sale of all or a portion of an assessed parcel to a public agency, the 1915 Act requires that the amount remaining unpaid on the original, bond-funded assessment principal be apportioned to each of the new lots and parcels created by the parcel division. In the case of AD 97-1, the Reallocation Method has spread the AD 97-1 cost within each community area in direct proportion to parcel acreage. Therefore, as AD 97-1 assessed parcels are subdivided, the remaining principal amount of the original bond. funded parcel assessment will be apportioned to the new lots and parcels as follows: 1. Spring Meadows II-A Area: This portion of AD 97-1 is planned for development into 261 R-1 lots pursuant to Ten. TR 5827. In accordance with the AD 97-1 Assessment District Study prepared by Martin-McIntosh Engineering, which is on file with the Engineer of Work, and additional information obtained from them, if the development proceeds as proposed, the original Spring Meadows II-A Area (Assessment No. 1) total confirmed assessment amount will be apportioned first on a net area basis between the two development areas within Ten. TR 5827 29260PER.EXD D-14 2/27/98 (identified as Phases A through C and Phases D through K), and then each subarea's share will be apportioned as an equal per lot cost share. Accordingly, the first tract phase recorded by the District Proponent will be allocated a total assessment share equal to the number of lots in the phase multiplied by the calculated equal per lot cost share factor for that subarea of Assessment No. 1. The remaining balance would be apportioned to the unsubdivided remainder for apportionments to future subdivision phases in accordance with the process described above. However, if the development plan for Assessment No. 1 is revised, then the plan for segregation of the original assessment will be revised to apportion a cost share to the first subdivision or subdivision phase and its remainder parcel within the area covered by the new or revised tentative tract in direct proportion to their total acreages. The total assessment share apportioned to the recorded subdivision or subdivision phase would then be reapportioned to its lots as an equal cost share per lot. Storm water retention sumps, schools, parks, or other public use sites will be excluded from the tract and remainder parcel acreages used to apportion the original total assessment. Landscape lots and streets areas will not be excluded from the acreage totals. 2. Spring Meadows II-B Area: This portion of AD 97-1 has been approved for development into 241 R-1 lots, two well sites, a storm drain sump, and a school site pursuant to Ten. TR 5869. As stated above, the first phase of Ten. TR 5869 (identified as TR 5869-1) has been recorded, containing 94 R-1 lots, one well site, and one storm drain sump. In accordance with said assessment apportionment procedure, the Spring Meadows II-B Area total confirmed assessment amount is apportioned as an equal per residential lot cost share between the remainder parcel and the 94 R-1 lots in TR 5869-1, with the future school parcel and the future well site not to be apportioned a share of the original Assessment No. 2 amount. Accordingly, the first tract phase recorded by the District Proponent is allocated a total assessment share equal to the number of lots in the phase multiplied by the calculated equal per lot cost share factor for Ten. TR 5869. The remaining balance is apportioned to the unsubdivided remainder (Assessment No. 2) for apportionment to future subdivision phases in accordance with the process described above. However, if the development plan for Assessment No. 2 is revised, then the plan for segregation of the original assessment will be revised to apportion a cost share to the first subdivision or subdivision phase and its remainder parcel within the area covered by the new or revised tentative tract in direct proportion to their total acreages. The total assessment share apportioned to the recorded subdivision or subdivision phase would then be reapportioned to its lots as an equal cost share per lot. Storm water retention sumps, schools, parks, or other public use sites will be excluded from the tract and remainder parcel acreages used to apportion the original total assessment. Landscape lots and streets areas will not be excluded from the acreage totals. 29260PER.EXD D-15 2/27/98 ASSESSMENT ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION OF THE ASSESSMENT SPREAD METHOD This Engineer's Report has been prepared to present the following: 1. An estimate of the total cost of the improvements to be acquired and the incidental costs proposed to be funded pursuant to this assessment proceeding; and 2. An analysis and description of the Reallocation Method proposed by the District Proponents as the method used to spread the estimated improvement acquisition costs and incidental expenses to the AD 97-1 properties. However, this Engineer's Report makes no recommendation as to the economic feasibility for the assessment of the estimated cost of the proposed improvement acquisition and incidental costs on the AD 97-1 properties, nor on the financial feasibility for the issuance of 1915 Act Bonds to represent any unpaid amount of the AD 97-1 Assessment. The AD 97-1 Assessment may exceed the amount for which bonds can be issued pursuant to recommendation of the City's financial advisor, as to the minimum acceptable property value to assessment lien ratio for bonds issued and secured by AD 97-1 unpaid assessments. Additional property value in excess of the estimated current value of. the assessed property with the improvements completed and installed may need to be confirmed by MAI appraisal, before the City can issue 1915 Act Bonds in the full amount of the AD 97-1 Assessment. In conclusion, it is my opinion that the Estimated Total Cost of the proposed improvement acquisitions, including all incidental costs, has been spread in conformance with the requirements of Municipal-Code Section 13.08.070. Submitted to the Engineer of Work on August 29, 1997, for "preliminary" approval by the City Council on September 10, 1997, and submitted February 27, 1998 in this "Final" Engineer's Report form by: QRpEESSIpNq~ L, ~. ~I ~~ o c~~o ~ ~'~(JO~~'~ Edward J. Wilson W ~ R.C.E. 23269 (Expires 12/31/01) ~• 2~ lrL-31.o1 ,F ptp Assessment Engineer ~ . City of Bakersfield Assessment District No. 97-1 ~~ CAUE~ 29260PER.EXD D-16 2/27/98 ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0.97-1 (SPRING MEADOWS IUSTOCKDALE HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL) EXHIBIT E SHOWING SPRING MEADOWS II-A AREA IMPROVEMENTS AND SPRING MEADOWS II-B AREA IMPROVEMENTS 133X5 -j 10 1- 133NS ~-OYOaadl 7K'Dl ~73Z 3Lf OODt-96d 'ON lN3Wlinftltl 3Nfl lOl 53JN3a3d3a 0001-88d Y77 ESLI10 I @ O 2 S 'II30 O ~( lIilO ~~ N~wtl -pyytZ'ta3road Atl M-d0-1HJItl OvOa d0 3NIl b3lIt3J I I .~ I ~ ZS N ; Z ~ - I-Lp'oN 1alsNl Ld3nss3sstl do S31WOanoa Hlw, 30umDD ~ I-96 ' N 1JM15H1 1N3W55355tl 30 531wONn08 3tl3HM 53ItlJI0Nl m . B6-LI-ZO 3fN d0 ~ ~ ('IM~B8flW00 AtlA1HJIN 8'Nm1~OJ.S / II SkOQtlBYi DNIBdS) ns sLt (dDtl 133X5 ntlaDhD 1N3wrw do a3ennN l-L6 'ON J,OI2IZSI0 J,N3VISS$SStl 07313S2I~ItlH 30 x,LIO Z[[C6+tttlDIKJ OM3b1 "I-L6 'ON 1DIa19101N3W5535SY 30 531wONn08 HIVA 300NIOJ IOL 3a05 ttlNW tltltll6 'M IZiI Ntlgla3n Ow 35Y8 OlaNO 1NnOn 53JN3a3l3tl I33NI` d W A DDW [-t6 'ON 3JItlISHI IN3W55355tl 30 531tltl0ND08 3tl3HM 531tlJN1Nl 0 d,?IOd~2I S.2 JN ss.~Y~~ossY DaDJ3a lnJUdo LIHIHX~ ~NOS7lM S ~ a'o _ 1-ZBL"ON 101a15~lOSIlN3nS935w dOd531HtlONn0003tl3HM 931YJIONI , sotloJ3a AwnoJ Na3N 'a'J>r NNOItl3n Ow 3Stl6 O1w10 1NNOn llWO AIIJ 0131lSb3N08 - ----- - 15`/3 LZ 30NStl 'H1n05 62 dIHSNM01 O1 30N3tl3d3tl 'dnn5 NnaO Wa015 3 LZ tl '6 6Z 1 3N0 N011035 © ONnOtltl TtlM MOOl9 Ow 53N03d1d NItlaO ntl019 DNIOnIJNI 'SlN3n3n0adnl 3L5-NO 6985 'ON 1Jtla1 a3NtlOD NOLL039 TMONObad a0 NObD35 O1 3JH3tl3d3a If J35 'tlOJ MN 30tl1NObd 6995 "ON 1Jbtl1 DNON ONIdtlJSONtlI AtlM-dO-IHOItl Ow 'lltlM bJOt9 '5X100 Lt3b16 AwONn00 I-96 'ON 1JItl1510 1N3H55355tl ')ITYM3015 Snld 'AtlM 30NW0 ABatln ONV 3Ntl0 AtlMOtNJ 30 NOLLJ3Sa30d ltl 1tlN015 JOdtlal 'IC NOH035 I-Za 'ON 1JItl1510 1N3WS5355tl 'tl38NDN 1N3W553S5tl 0N051%3 £555 Aatl0Nnp8 f-h6 'ON 101tlIS10 1N3n5S355Y ~• •~••~••~ 30 3N0 N011035 OIW O1 Alb3Hlnp5 Ow 6985 "ON 1Jtla1 10 AbtlONfgB Ntl315tld ONOItl 3Ntll 13L.W1 30151n0 ONnO8N91D5 30 N003ldnOJ ONIOnIONI 'S1N3n3MtldWl 3DY1NDtld ONtl 133tl16 3Ntl0 AtlAM1llYJ O l-L6 ON 1JItl1510 1N3n55355Y 'a38WON 1N3W55355tl M3N © AatlONn09 I-ZB 'ON 1JItl1910 llOn55395v SLN3N9AOBdN1 YBBY B-N Sfl00Y9/t DNIBdS 51N3W3/IOtldW1 AWONI108 I-[6 "ON 101alSNl 3N3n5S355tl V3W 8-tl $MDw3W ONlbdi 'S3N03d1d NNtlO ntlDli ••••••••••••••• "ONIddOSONtlI AtlM-i0-1H0at ONtl 'TTIM NJOlB 'S9p0 133a15 'NriM3015 ^ ON3031 '133tl15 30 3NH 153M d0 NOa3ldnOD ONIOn1JN1 'S1N3W3AOadnl 3w1N0a3 ONtl 133a15 3NVI 00n0a3A O I 1 ' ' "ONWtlDSONVi AtlM-d0-1H01a Ow lltlM NJOlB 91X00 133tl16 )IlYM3015 Ow tr 9 '3N0tl31N30 30 H1tlON 3NHl 13nW1 301M .f l ONn08153M 6nld '133tl15 d0 3015 H1n05 tl03 950d30 NM03n 1'rYYa VOYYt d0 r9'Nt Nib Ylp tYa 110YYY 'J33tl16 JO 3015 X9105 a0 NOIL3tdnOJ ONIOn1DNl 'S1N3n3A0tldnl 3w1N0aa ONtl 133a19 w0a lltlNnlYB ® I I l 110YYd 3 LZ b 'S 62 1 tl l3Jwd NIH9M dnn5 NDaO ntl015 ONtl '93NIl3dld NItlNO Wa015 _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ li J35 a0~ 0/t ~ ~~ . ~ 'SNMV a31tlM 'ONIdtlJSONJI AtlM-30-1H01tl 0Ntl t1tlM ND9la '51X011 133tl1S 'NltlM3015 '133a16 30 S1YH _ ~ / 15Va 30 N003ldWOJ ONIOnIDNI 'SIN3W3AOtldnl 3w1NOad Ow NNtlO ntlOli 'b31tlM '133N15 3nN3Atl tl113M3f O S,LN8ri9A0BdN1 Y9BY Y-- Stl00Y9N ON1BdS ' //~ H.INI+ ~93LON ~ I/-II SMO~V,~S12 `JI1I2fdS ~~ ..._....•. ~ I . .•• ~ £sss l .OOE _ .! 97Y.OS •°•~© - O 0001-98d Y'I7 a Hy BON w •N'NYa w iY'q Y 73JBYd Y AYNNtr9'ON lOlq ~ © O N'Ot'OdYa N td `q / N'M'NYa d0 ii'llt t trYNMOtM'Ofl lOYq I d ftYNY•Blrr'Oa 10YY1 ~~ ~ C~ f •• ~..... ~~ •., I 9N01lN ! i ' ~ N[ ad ~ EBBS ON i0YB1 Nf O L I ~ Q 88 H NOBH. i ~ ~ O ~ f _ ----~ + 7 rtYNtAtM ON 10YYA e ~lrr, ANIIYROY Qtfll / ANYgpO ®t11 ? ~yl++roL~ I AlYd1YJ MqY d0 Z I ttYV1 do YYa rnYr I bSS ~ I ALYIOY MqN d0 s0YY1 to Mw tms [aryg2'm • i [ 101 0001-98d Y77 m'ot ~ t lot C I ~~ B 78JBYd 8 € ~• 'Nola w N'Yr I ~ ~~~ (8985 'ON 10YBd vA[[YdNB1) I +~+ I t t Y/YN•iiYr'0M 10YYd ® . . I tot 3 Lz a 's ez 1 ~ ~ I V~~V I •ea •ura do or •q 5 li J35 a0J 3N / I 8-II SMOQi+~W ~NltfdS if ~35ZtlOJ 0/1 N YrtrNYArtt'ON U1q .• ~.. ~. Qdf)N TTdHY71E~ (7tlI~B3Wit0~ .1tl1W01N fl7tlOH00J.S / II SAOQtlfiW ONItIdS) 3CL~35 ao~ iArld ~ I-L6 'ON ,LOIHJ.SIQ ,LN9WSSNSStl O'I3I3S8H}Itl6 30 JLLIO SSN3N13A02IdWI tl32N 8-II SMOOtl~Yi JNItIdS ONtl SZN3W3A02IdPII tl3lltl tl-II SMOOtl3N1 ONI21d5 ONIMOHS d ,LIHIHX3 ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0.97-1 (SPRING MEADOWS IUSTOCKDALE HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL) APPENDIX A MAP OF AMENDED BOUNDARIES (On file with the City Clerk of the City of Bakersfield; reduced, not to scale copy attached) -, l o a ~9 off ^ "~ ~i W J m mwamW .--, t` rn ~ O Q~ ~' ~--f Z I ~ U W WOKN °Ym I II Y ~9 JpZW J( ~ f w ° 2~WOF p<Q U OK° ~ G~ O I o ~a ~y a '~ ~! Y I W W m ~~ j I ~ i j- D~UW Y ~ ~FUQ °F°¢ I j H Z ~ ~ C ~ ~ pz~ 1 ~° I Wo I Wi I=.'~ IN O I ws , &~ VW ~ Y W°~~~ Qg ~ i 2 I ~o W a U F r m r, W E.y ~ .~ uw !=z ~ ~ ~ oQF I ow I u~ C O vWfAiK ~LL~~ I wo ~ ~ ~ Zwa~o N~=°~ j wW O 1~1 i ~S E-I C!~ Q (~ •- A ~ w, o ~ O ~i W ~ s-- ~ ~" ~ - ~~ V„1 y W ~ °ao I F i ~W~ Jo o vi SmW s I Joz I VIK z~W aJO~o OW__ w ~ ~°nrc ~ A ° ~ Z vti Z ~ ~ E"i ~ ^ C%] ~ ,= ~ w i° °~z p I ~~9 F rco I ~NLL LLp aW dwz W ~ z Q ~ ~ ~ ~ WU~ J f0o0 I Wi>¢ ¢Opw I 3~~ °1do ZO I 3~~ W ~ l/] Z m ~/] `~ r ~ t"~I E."' ~'"" y"' Z O > ~~~ ' ~ m acs zm~° .1 ~~~ 'm au ~ I°a ¢ rn rl moo ~ ~a~io r m ' NJOO ~ /yO~ ~oo A . i rW oU ~ o ' a ] E ~ ~.y O V- w r-a W U 1 ~ ~ ~ W I ZmFi ~ IF UOf m clo w~.. orc OarcpW ~ ~ !~~ W h !~-1 -~ F V I Qi ~ ~ K ^I W~ i ~ i~~~I ~~ o ozm I U F Ia~Q ~x~t W ° w A ~ W Q~ x o W r"'i N ~ O V] W ,~ Z o ~ W m IoW F ~o Z ' j Q~ ~ o ~ a ° ~ m ~ ~ Q ~o ~ =og9 ~ =m ~~~ __~ JWO ~ "~ ° °~ a ~1 ~ ~ ~ V ~ ~Q~ ~ l 333 1 WN~ WO ~ UFNg ILLUC W p~_ ~ WOO N VIU O ~ c4 ~ ~ r W Q Q m IH W i--~ ,,., ~ or ~ ~ ~~oiz aa~~ ( O°i azz~o ~1 a ~..~ ~ O. O W [ry (/l O O uz _s f/] 7r m ~o p ~wc~iiz ~ W ~ °- O ( WW I I~° I I FO os~? r- F° ~~z ... ~~..r. F W Q ~ v =~ v iW ~ WWa~w ~W I°om'a`~ i z ~ZpO°m U O ~ 1i ZO ~ Y K WIimJ N SZZZ ~ F W W QZZSZ p -OK 1 ~I I~ i U ~N TO _U VI SI-W~~ > JW WZfY ~ U N ~ mJW1~0~ ~mK~ 4 0 ~ ~~ I r_ ~ _UYQm OW G. IUO O O u 1 ~m¢~~U S ~wNO1~ ~o O O ~ OU~n ~~~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ W ~ ~ F y o ~y~ $ n F"'1 ~ t~ ~ ~zW~ ~ io R~ ~ ^ ~~~0 U pd ~ ~ ~ Pt I ~ i " : ~ ~ ti OU~F U ~x~ ~y I~ i = 8 _ m ~ ~ ~~' F ~fj'j ~O~ ~f i a.. ~. °~ ~ w - ~~ - a o ~ M ~a vlQ ~~ ~qW j '~ ac. ~ ~e ~ ~ ~ r ~a ~ _ ~ ° ~ !.~ '~~ °w ~z~Wrno ~ ~' ~. ~ ~ y ~„ ~$ s _ 2 ga ~Q O ~~ ~~ xwoo ~~WZ~ ~ W ~o 3 oa F ; w ~ o -= ... ~_ W chi W ti - 3 f a ~O Ffx ~ti ~ v .^~ m~ °~ m°d - o " o ~~ ~ ' vlO~q °w °~ V a_ ° v ~ ° o o o~ a~ a° °2 ~~ ~~ 2~ '-~ ~ ~ No m °d . m U ~ i ~ ~z ~ w ~ n~ o of ~cm oc o~ ~~ ~o ° uE ° n ° ° a°O$ $` $v Sz° $5 ~5 8 n ° a ~~ a34. o ~ ~ 5 ~I zl p ~ .- w n a .n ~n n m 31Y ApYYI S ^' 'Nl NNIN ~"1 I Aql ~1 O as O Z °a ~ ~oa oa~+3a F ,~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Oq ~ ~ $~ E~ Q 9 C1. ~W (~ i ' ~ m~ ~ W J ~ Fi ISM U ~~ H i ~ W z ~n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~y O ~O L 41 ° a U~ J'~Z~ W ' W ~ ° m~NZ°'a U 3~~WZ ' ~ m o ?F~ ~o NF°os~o w3o c°~aw rn U ~ ~ Z ~ ~ ¢ oy I~ P'. o z z ~'ovgmwra-a~.i Z.~orO rcYi~~ w=3~ ~ z ^~ m z ~ m° °a p ~pOm O o C O ~ w w °- Nzz g~=~ow~u°~~ o~n~OZ °_~ E. ¢ grr ~' ~ U w QOUm ~WW°~¢w KOm yip~J Zw U U it 'Z' o ~ Z ~ Z ~ ~ o ~ r my~mo~o~3oowowmi ~~mw mo~z ~ ~ a U W o' o' 'o 'o °- F 'a N ~ °~ _a'~'^ ~w_v~ _~ i~$o`a4 zo~rc O ~ ~ ~G tai m m m m 5~ uu11 a Ezw.x-_wy Feu ozz a H q O ~"'~ Z "~ °° am s O m>~n°U wiz K¢ Oma O°. _th~o U' Z N ^+ N I r i 1 ~ Inrc a inzw ~C~ z°Yx°ooti mU~ w F 'y' O G ~FE/.yY y "~m~ rn m m m ~ mii o cm.+ ~ o~'ozi~~z am=¢~^° z ~ NC°i w~="'="W~ [yam Q~j z a~ W VJ V' Q o 0 o O y~ ° LLi ~ o K aVl~'OWwZ riiowU ~~w JC3OZ ~Z~v~iO f-1 F ~ `~ t6 ~ A o{z..z z z ~ ~ iW ~ w g JrzOm~F°w~F-~orc~=~ p<W~ oo~wZ W `~ ~ .Q. vl z A > V U_ U U ~ U 3 ° ° Z aN-Y 41W wWFxx- Z~m~rG ,.~ O W !„) W ~. ~~jj, K K aa K W O w ~% i U K z°F,wzQ UUWd yl F~~W w 'aw ~ ~ ~ [~ '7 ~ G G to ~ ~ rn r~ rc ~ p o wo w ~m°ao~°~Sw~mzw'a uww Sd~o o A ~ V] F r' Z a4i ~ ° S o S ° 0 0~m0p ~ W ~ a ~ ~~o>w°dwrc°~ ~N ozrnr ~mF1Z--a<<w ~i d N a~i > r m w Z w w w? Q O tt w p 2 Z O~v°igKy ~~Ow~=YZO Z~¢Z p•-UW~ W A S ~~' Q= ~ Z z ai ~ ~ ~ z w w° ~ 3 w w W z omrcoQVwia~c~ov",oog°~ o`"zt ~N~ar ~ W ~ G wp Z ~ (/] (/] w ~ w w w w w° w wz z Y m m ° ¢ °4~`2i°_w~oz~3` &c~$Wd w °mo ~ ~ o W .-. E" ~ w 'N2 `~~ ¢ `mod ~ v°wi rc ai x o s z u ~ WzaW~~mN~m~o~W~ °a~d w o°z~z i=~ a C0.~'7, ~~ m ~j ~'mao ~ow~-"mz oa~orc w~iN3°m O ~` ~ 7 ~~ ^i x! I 1~ ~ w ~~=mOw~;OOZ~~~' m ~J'W` `~w°" a¢ V I7y ~-a .-asw °m ~~WW >,Nrn~'x W ~i w N 2 opw°.=-w°anoa°w ofrc~ ~Svd~r - Qy [-r V1 ~ ~ ~ am pz ~a ~~yy ~ I I m. ~ u ~ ~ ~ .-a wwa~ooayoa"amW~ ~~° o =W~zm O Z O ~5 W ' ~ l o m Y d~ O ~ w w~~=~i~douwr'^~~o Nz;~~ mN~yG ~ a W Q ~ ttt ~ 3 ~ .- ya~~~w~'"~m~°~~ w~=° ~~w~' c>" ~ ~ ' i 1 z ~ °z ti`a aoz~°,.am mw°zxzo~ in u~'i irahr rz~ar=-~d d ~ _ ~ .; ~ o ~~I ,. A ~ °o ~ha'~ s €~ ~ A x'I os~~ ~~s µ1 ~ ~ ^ ~ ti~ ~ MINI ~~ ~~~~ °~ ~- ~ ~~ ~~~ 0 0 a 0 a a -- -- - ~ ~ mna oaa~sa~ o ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~ q~8 sly + o ~ U ~ m ~ ~ ~ o~ ~ CyO ~ ~ cpx~ ~ w z~ w~F I xqq~y it Ul 1/1 ~C ~ p W W~kr7 ~~~ ~~~ O ~l :. - .. ........ ~ ~i' ~ O ~~~ ~ z M ~ ~ ~ ~ aroa a~va mo ti ~rNr~ r1sU ra3ne ~ I ~! ~ 1 ~~ m ~ 4 1 ~g~ ~,,~~~ . _ . , \ 3nN3Ar Y113M_3f a cz a 's ez i _ _ ^ ~ cz a 's oc i ~~ ~ S 3t"P'4 ez i OrOa r1SN YN3nB 3 sz u 's a t ~ y1° (~ ~ ~ ~ nw ~p ° ~~ W q z~ h-I d l--I 'c. `~ a I `" " S °~ A '~'^ ~ H ~ Z f. z~o~~-~ A -~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ zx ti ~ ~ W V! a°a~a~~~i I ~ aa~~~~ M ~ ¢ ~~ _ O O W E" I~ G ~ G a ~Ha~ W ~z I a k fx °" ~ ~ ~ I a ~ a a . f A .. G U ! . O nr 7 Y~ ~ O M 4 O ~~ 3 ~ ~ x II },d5$ z ~'~ ~~~ ~ 3~~pgd J r ~f]N~AV V,L,L,~k~f ~ f Q Y = n ¢ ~ ° .y m Y ~ ~ W w LL "I w rc i ~ m r r ._- Z Z Z = S ~ ; 3 3 ° ° VI K W ~~ ;, o ° ~ w W U FJ- ~ ¢ s ~, ~ ~ ~ < ~ ~ ~ °- w a a °d ~d m m m ~ w o ~n 3 3 3 ~ ~ U > ~ ~ ~ ~ Z ~ Z 0 2 Z N 3 w ¢3 z9 am Z J N w N W N O z j o~ ~ O oZ^ _~ Z Q N Q W Q U o n ~ a N ~ G ~ , w rc ~ ~ a ° ox ¢°~ a`" 1~ aw =f - -~ ~~ 5~ °~ O 4 Z p~ ~<a~ < W O ~ W ~ N p~ F~ f 0 ~ Z ~¢ Q Z U N (~ W U Z Z~ Z m O a a a O a O N W a LL W W w ¢ O r il V l ~. ~ < y~~ y Z N G U Q N r Z r m r O ~i a ~ 1 ~ ~ OS ~ O U ~ UO ~ zz _O 3 I 0o H i ~ ¢ QN J ¢ ~ i ~ ZOZ Y O 0 N O Z Q m ~ ~ U 2 F- ~ Q = 3 F- UI O Z W I ~ ~ f /J ~ F~ N Zm ~ N~ O U ~ J WZ Z 20 !n O I mq 3 O ~ OK O yUj r VI ` 3w U O~ O W ~ Z U K 7 Z Q A F ~ m ~ ~ Z ~ ~ O ~ m v ZO w~ O Y OO F m Z 55 U W W W N m Z w O 7 ~ Wg Z 20 O Z J Z . S tl aN ~~ IWr K y~ ~~ ~ KI Y y~ I~-- U la ? f W ~ O K 6 Z U K OI Z ~ w ' .I I~ • v f g ~ ^ ~ ~ W w, ~ ~ ci ~ ~ 'a O O GN G ! d ~ '^ Y O o IY < i 3 ~ tia' J ~ ~ 2 N ~ J ~ J ~ ~' • ~ I I I m m ' 1 Z Z Z U V U I FFZ ~W ~W ~~ Z OV~1 Oh ON O V ~ rm wVl wV I w~ y 'Y ¢ Y Q Y ~ N N~ ~¢ N~ N N O Z Q Z Z W W W W ~O NO NO W o' m 'o m o m ~w ~w aw_ ~ ~ I o~d o~d o~d W~ Wj VIZ p~~ I y w Vyl m a O N O q O Qm Qm ~m O O O w~W "' rc rc ~ rc 7 omvFi^ ° mz ~~ ~~ O Q '~" N h N Z O J ~ O U O W Wr Wwn W Wr. S~m 2r~ 2fm O ~ V~ O m w w j ~L w w 33z 33z 33Z r^ Uzi `^~~ ' ^~ o aN Z Or W Z VZI w N w N Z VI W O yW w '^w ww wOV F-~U w0 ~_ VZ~ U2~ U2~ W 41r~ 3'F•• J V ~ W Q y l Q Q V l Q N 0 ~~O ~U~ ?UD i ' .. -. ~ ~ I I i ~ I ~ I 0 v 0 0 z z s~ 0 U ~ U tj I f I I ~I I ~I 0 I I I ,lo ~I~ A U ~ / l ~~~~' q v I m U ~~ ~i !~-~. ~ p ~ yp~ ~pp V.~~ Q I a. a~ ~~ I f U ~' ~ ~~a ~ I ~_ I g ~ ,. ~ U I 1 ~• W I _ ~ Uzi ~ w ~. ~ ~ ~ '~-+ U 0 ~ ~ pUa~x~ ~d'Zxti W ~~ r^ ~ v 1 rn~w~SC axdFw 0 \ v 1 a ~ ~ ~ ~, n~Q o Q' V, may ~W.', ° a a~~ ~~ O W J hZ KZ KZ 2w ~ °v~i °u~l 0~ ~Z z47J zz (>~ yN U ~j O O H 3 Q ~ y¢ N¢ NQ X30 w ZqU ~ Z z NO WO WO ~N U `~ ~ m m aw ~w ~w zQ ~ ~zz3 ~ r o I I OQ 0o Op m! O OO ~ ~ p mc' m w~ w~ _wj ca^ ~ tiW m ¢4 ~ -O O O Z~ K N~ O Q~ Z 0 o am ~dm ~dm ~d ° ao ~ ? ~ d z z r jZ j2 ~Z ~z O Na ~ O S U~ ~ 0~~ mv~i~ m~ U W ZW O U W O ~ G"i G ~ w~ x i ~ i oa m a~ ~ o ~ i~ ~d U W ^ W W I W n N > C U Z O O O O [] ==m =FN =tom Zm O OO F U ~ W Q d i W J 330 330 330 rci ~ m in 1yy~ y~ z m j 1~/1 Val Z V~1 w O U (1Q~- p ~_ (QW~ ° V_ W N W W p O ¢ W ° d W 1 WWJ UI y ~ W 0?y ~?~ Q?~ ~N tWi W~ W W IWi ~ ~ Z 4 ~ in ~ ?°uo ?°UO ?cpio ~~ rc rc~ x o rc n z a rc t ~ ~ n I I ! w "' ~ i I ~ D ® B ~ ~~ ~ o m~ 0~ ~ ~ Vi Y p n' 1 I I v ~ 'g~g: '~" W I I ( I ~ F ""1 GR ~~ t,'°^ ~ i ~~ - (/` ~ A I ~ I b o N v. I 0 W ~~ ~ , `` I H I • \ 1 ~ raj M F O ~~ ' _ M U ~~a ~a1l1LQ ~Q - ~ irrra rasa rryw - '~\ ~~~ a U ~ U a N U F ~~~ ~ v a N ` V i ,\\ ~ i ~ '1 \ ~: \~~~ ~~: ~e ~~ ~P t I ~ ~ = I ~ N ~ I v ~ g5 1 V I w • u W n ~ s ~1 J l N w ~i ~ v ~~~ h Hof ~ V ~+ 1 I I ~! G ' Y) 1 U i i l 1 U 1 1 ~1 .U. I I ' ~z hr 1 Ul i g« I 'R vai G~ 3 L2 b's OS1 ~` 3 sc u's ai ~\ \ \ \ \ ~~ ~ lu ~ •!s i I L I M ~ `` i ~ QE~02I d~LS O \ ~, 0 t S ii-~ d~ ; !~ fe e~ F + ~~ ~b si~ ~_ •~ O E, Q vi Z Z. 4 N. <~ i- ~ N ~ O ~ N F~i N O W O W W~ z ¢ o ,~ a z w M O Q U • i ~ m z w ~ °J ~Q O ~ W m K mU U N ~ K ~ O W U ~ _ d O i ~ F u ~ r 3t < ~ N ti O d C ¢ x Z n ~' t 0 o m w`- W N~ . <e a - 0 z ~_ ~°a o m ~zm U f a~0 ui m n <Q- ce K Z W Udr W 4 Qo ~ ~¢ ~~ ~z 4 o~S U ] U ~ O U U Q K G Y ° f 0 Z Q~ w d f 3N2 U wp ~ °vz v ~tOw 4~ ~ U Z A O~ V~ U W Y K O Z~ yQ W' S ~ O D W T ~ H K 6 Y~ YO KwZ W U U y w m G w Ud W IU ~ N Z a ¢ 1=- K F=- 1=- F=-~ < 1=- N ~i v Y ~~ V ~ „ '~. ~~ ~ 8 r 3(Si9ay F O 0 ~x ~ u F O ~' 4] $ ° n€a~mG ~ ~~~~~g$3 ~~~ ~m_~aW WWWWW2WW ~~ ~~ ~ new m~J~ ~~~ W ~ ~~, ~ Vie;, WWW~°'" ~o~ soW oagnU~~~~~"°~. ~„~ W~~:~~e ~$ ~ oho o~So~€€~'°~ "~ °~ooQW~ k ~~€ ~~~ s~ ~~06~~3 ~"fix gtla F m ~~~ ptiD~3s~~= ~~~~ ~84LL9'~Job ~~mW i~~ o~~i8 ~+ ~°t °"~ °~ ~~ h Wig" G~6 00~ '" ~ _~~ ~~~ ~~d~ ~~ o o ~a W s ors" °~ s~o s °s=~ ~~ ~~ ~so~ ~~ ~<~~~ m; 3~ mmA ~~ao ~~ o~~~~ ~m ~LL i°6 ~~R: "°'~ ~EGe~ S~ o~ 8~~ ~r~~ ~_ ~~W~~ y~~ °8 W~~ W=off ~ ~~s ~ do G~ ~~ Aso ~~~~ ~~ ~"€~~ ~n ~< ~€ ~ _ 5 ~~~8 ~ b a€~ ~ 8~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~o ~ ° o ~. 0 ~ o ~ ~_ ~8W ~W~° >~ ms 8~~ mg =S MW ~i O W 0 a ^0 W GT•1 z 0 a U W A -off"' 'x & ~' ~~~a ~ 8 ° ~~ o~~ g .-~ ~ ~° Wg ~°bo~ W~~~«r~p ~g~ ° ~~WGWG ~~~ °C1GGGtiR'°°1 ~ W~~~C~i ~ o= ~aa~ oo<go~s~° E~~ ;.. '° soa~'a~..~~"m~~,o _..,ssa; ra=~ _ ~~~ ~= a„ ear°ae^~W ~-~ 3 ~-,' sd U ~ .°-'^~ 3~ ° _$ ~ ~~ iiYWi33sy8$ y~tsWi°~ °~ ississ; O a ~ bp~ ~ Rs g8 8~` L3~i~ ~~~ ~' i~ oo~i°-'n nn ~ b ht.''°G' ;~° ~ b:ivb' U ~ ~ ~~~9~E~~ ~O°€Bo ~~~<~t~g7€ C~8 „~ oocooooo~~~~80°5'.~~~ ~~ oh'b°'o~o~ H r ~~ ss~~~~~~ ~gs~~~ °~z~~~om° ~a~ ~n »~~~"°H~„<~~a^^ „a~ Nis N=~s~~! ca ~ ~ ~ ~»~o ~~~ ~W~W~~ ~~~~~SWx €~ Ws~ °°a° 3 "~a° a~~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ r~, ~~ W g ~ . ~ ~ ~ .`y. ~ ~ °s Cif ~"3 8 in~i ~" $~ u V ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~m ~ ~ °~_ a N~W~ sop~~s ~~° ~ is o ; ~o=~v°~ mas~~~m~za ~N ~ ~~e=. 3~LL~ ~ o~~g ~mos ors°~z«;~s ~~ ,. ~titi~€~~ m~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ o ~ € a~=n ~~W"° ~~ soooo ~ ~ 's~~~~ $~~~~ ~Wy~ ~3 oafs= °~~~~s~°°°°~oz$~ ~~ ~ a~~~" €o~$~~g ~~ ~s ~~~g ss~~~ ~~a~~Ng ~smsessWa~ ~~ W ~~~ ^ ~a•. •. ~ W~aa M a m smmm~_~mm ~~ ~~k~~ ~~=~~~s~~~ €~~ ~ ~ ~g S" ~~~~a~ s~3 ~~< ei g 5~ ~.:~sx~ ~~¢~s_° ~8~ n~~W~~W~~~W~~pc~5~5o=~ ~o a~°~~ ~~ °'~ 5 spa ~~ am s^~a"8~s~s:~sss~" ~~ d~°~ ~<~~~~ g~~x~ N~~a WWWW3i.iiuii W3 W3 WWW3223yuG ~^33 ] `3g '7$l~oron~dnohotio~~«$o~o~ ~h °`W~=dg~gW ~~ ~ ~°~~~ €~m~~a~~ '~~ ~~~~s:o~aaaasaaasaso~aa°a~ ~= ~ ~°=~W agg~ouo~~$~ 's > €~ oaooo~oooooooo~ooooa~~~ g~~ 8 a~~~~ `~~~ ~g~Wa:o ~~ N N8N8N888N8N8N8«~~~~ ;~ "~ ~. ^ r~ ; W 8 7 ~7~~r~ m~h3o°ff°0:~~~° ~8~i~ ~5 W~ &s o~ jb ~a ~Y ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ 4~ H SM~ + ° G _ Z J _ °QK°OZO O W 2~p Z Z Z F Z Z I O Z 5 y~ Z x Z Q O N F~° F W O ~°r0 LLw m N°O = O r Q~ u~ W~ N= ~ T F ~ f N ~ rc mw > Y O O Z W N w ~ N 1 '- N ~OUm CO =W O~~~ Om ;1 ~ ~q ¢? Inz3 Y•1 l-. ' N 0 U OU 4 0 Iz ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ G ~ ~ ~ 3J t3 8 ~ N W wfxilW °'2~~~'~~°°W ~ w °~~Z m W~° o E d" " E.y r °F- ¢'S> ? > > - Z 0 0 0 o m m m m ~~ aY mo. O ~ z Ci ~ZZ ¢ S 3 mrr ml`ala 3~O=°~i ~$JOm ¢Z N=ciJ4U~ S V ~" ~ yzV 20RK oar jm~ ~ - -~ 0 h~~-s ""' ~• U O Q U W = ~ qo n ~ F $ I I I I w Z V ~k ng X I 06 ~ u°i° `~ S ° ~ ~ OI'-r 2fnQZr O"' • K vwizanr~°c~°w3°oo~i W ° ~? Y U ~rn fair xww° W Om I J °fnW ° C7 Z yy E QI F S: p G E J QN flpl m ~ T f d 15 • yNj Z° O W ay N3 O a ~_ o 1_w d3 ~ w o ~N~'~KmF ~ip~~jf 2 N x FU~~^ 3 d I O U Z z ~ w ~ ~ A W ~ ~~ ~/~ V1 ^ < W~ Z Z 2 Z Ff/1- ~> ° ml- 3 ~1~ Z V < ~ ° F m S°zz Q ° ~ Q ~ ° ° N C W Q 2 F - R OWwZWOwU j~W ~OZmZS°w QWlnw~ ~IZOW-f-U~ °~Kih U Z Z~NZ ./1> y °O~WF m Q Q ~WW Qua ¢O ~ U 0 ~ N ~ !n ~(/] Z W i. 0 (~ ~I U~ V V J v tz~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 w ~~ fn W O O 3y o z 0¢ °l rc o ° ¢ w ° Y JN ¢rnz xzza NUC>Wa ~ O z o~~W i ~~.°W ~ m W~m Z w w a~)~)o~o C> F_zaw Avg rn U g uII Ay ~ V~j E~-~ d ¢ E"1 0 0 ^ 0 0 O U Z m =w w w w w J mO O ~m U Z f 00 Z O N U~ O fC U° ~ Z ~ (qg °aN aO~Z3~W~ YNO r _~ Zw rl ai ~mV°¢W OIfYW~ °°UY z ~ I fY A ~X Q G ~ D i W ~d A W ~~ 2 Z ~. ~ W a o ° z ¢ ° w° ° z ~ w m w o rcZ w n mnfeWawK~~~ 04g°~ oz~oZ rcm ° Zn ~yy ~°1amO ¢ 0 3 a~Wpo W .+ Z x ~ W~° O ~r ~I r~r/^1 •wrn^ VJ c w° w w w p w ~ oG ~n of vi '" QxQ ,~°„ Q m N ~ ~>> LL ~0 K z LLo' x ° i z w K~ O K U fn ~ °~Jaz w°z aw~+,,, o°~i~$°o~f°nr i- ZSm ~ ~°z rc ~~ O voi ~d JZ U a a 0 q m (~ W VI J ¢ G Q Q Q ~ I I n w c~=~ ~~°~~U~ rri °°w ~3a~icQi=°o ~ W~~om ~&'~^9N o"= LLln I `" O.Yi o l ~ U a C ~ 0 I I ~ w ~ '" s fe K .--I m o~WO~wo~MOao~u za~~°?~ ~~zo ¢„go~g~ "-~ V~ o°'o m~°.^ . QI ~ Z a ' 1 ~ ~ I 1 I 11, ~ p a b O ci 4ii N Y O m ~ ° WW a °o ro ~~~°~ ~W fY W~FOIV1W00 i~ zwp? m~KK° W w z~ f a ya ~ Q O ~ AA I ~ ~ ~ I I ° Z m s ~ w w~wp~o~azfwil~°izoc~.rw ¢LLdm O~ZYKO~ Z ~Q w N1w1yy = ~Q~ '^3rc°z a 0m W ~ U..i W 1/ ~y~ I O F .- 1 - Q N 1 f f/ /1 /j Fti hrl ' I~ ~ I A z ~'~~~~ , ~ ~ A ti u ~~~n a~g O ~ o" - N~~ ~ ~el , q y a~ r a A z - ~ ~ ovoa oao.~sos -- - a• J ~ ~ ~ - .~ F ~p W p ~ [sj U~~ ~ m ~~~ w~ ~~ p~q O~ ~ < ~. _ _ .G ~~W ~QG zl I ~ qq I W ~ W ~ xFx c, bl O~F 1 Wg~ I ~~~ ~ vFiq~ w~ ~ q ~ ~ ovoa a~va oio ~ F ~ ~y ~ nm a~ vlsU vN3 na A ~~~ ~4 --- 1 I W~ 1 \ `O I v~ ~ ~! ~ ~ ~ `~ R ~~, I 3nN3AY V113M31' S a n 's et i __ ^ 3 cz n 's a i ' ~ i siaa 's ec i I owa V151A YN3nH ~ a at d 's a >. ~ ~ yto y :~ z ~. :>, aw~,° m Y~ ti ~+ W ; 3 3 ° w r. i. S 6 F+ ~I ~ ° o w W q IA ~]~~]±± ~ ~~ nw ~ ~ ° ~" ° u ~ F q~¢q~W ~~ii wN '~1 ~ ¢ `4 W W~ M F, oN ~ y 9 n °o a a a ~~O _J ~ U O i ~/7 A ~+ ~ FC ~ N o m m m @~A~W Z VI Q'~'i I y z = = _ ~~~o 10. ~ (~ Q tx7 a N Z O O a'i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w o 0 o c7zxh CA~W:~w ~ ~ ~z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i •~ ° b I 4~~° ~ z g ~m i iN [`~~>~y W ~ ~ W ~~ g z vaiw N9 (ano ~W W A Z v~~ ~ ^$~~ ` Z Z E,~yo~ z ~ ~ ~~ ~ , ~~~ I =R ~ oo ~~ =w Q~ aowx~ a, ~ ~ ~~ x~ o~ ~N ~o ~~ "zwoo am~~ ~ ~dd o a W ~ r ~ Z ° u- ar a aW ~C~~~ O U ~ O ~ r~ o m i° 3, i 3 w 3 W ~ w H C^x~aC^~x.~~~ I ~~ m ~m $~ ~~ ~o a~ s~ o~ ~ ~~~ H a' 6~ ~O ~ ar "o o'er" o~ s~ ~o ~z U~i.~C O ~Ch I' ~ ~ \~$ € ~ it ww c>w iw " Z~~,' G4 Q OP' i) WOA \lo oy ~ ~` w w~ ~o ai° vain vairc ~~ py ~`~ WO ?,~ (~ \ cbi n ~~ i v~~ c~a r=-~i ~°m ~o ~~OOVyj tt~~ ~ ¢ U ~~ 4~¢ .~ \\~~r,. ~~ ~ N n Y vi F~ZF .-. J O hW WN ~~ ON Um I N Zf- 3 •$ ~ C O~~ J ~O r ~nnr~ev vr.~~~r ~ rc Om ~ Z W ~ ~ ~~ ° O sz ° ° 4 N ~ o i , ~ °3 ~ ~ w a >= H 3 7 ~~ ~ a~ ° w ; z ~ V z 5 ~ 1 Z O 1 ~ 5 NK u¢W~ m N O I. j O WOE N2 O ~ V 2 J wo ° ao ~ o ~ °a QSF o v2i~ ~ ° ~ O r~-- ° W j Z w K J K y j p W ~ yl 1 V ~ O O =o O ~ O p V W~ U } Z U J ~ t n yl m ° j w U ~N Z Q O W ° V W w O K W W g ~ 3~ rc rc2 z o rc a z ~ ,~ w w ~ 3 ~ rc K ci z "~ O O C97 p ut Y O ~ Q U 3 N ~ j J ~ O 2 F Z _ 1 U~ 1 1 I Om m N m E °o 0 0 0 .z z z z F A~ G w ~ W N W ZO OVW~ VOW ON Fw > ~ ~ 3¢ S6 Z4 p~ ~ Z Z NO ~N/~ NO W~ m m m ~ w N N Q W ~ LL ~ W< V10 ~ M .- 00 OO O° W> 1 m 1 wZ NZ NZ N~ m w J O WJ ~° ¢°m ~°m ~°m ~ z z z ~ i°w =w ~w °m 2 0° o° o0 T U ~ U )C7 mw mw~ mw~ ~~ O O O ~+ ~aA W~0' ~~A OmW Z ~ ? 9 33z 3;°z 33i W ~ W w ~ yW 4WD y~~ o y~S ~~rc ~~rc ~~'~ J ~3 6 a a ~ ~+ QUO QUO ?U~ _ ~~~ I ~ i ~ o ~ ~ I~ III I o U ~y O W (6 EZ+ O ~ r~ 'U" U w W ~ d ~ U F, ~ O z h ZZ~~ °~Z ~~~~~om~ Ow~`~~~ A~~F ~~' ~`~I WAQ~xo~ _Z aa~~m ~i~ vi o ~ ~ N o~~~ ~~~~ G1, o a ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~~ AFC ;iW ~~ e° ~a~ w ~w~ o g _~~a° °=~~€~s~~~~~~ ~~W W~~ oa=~° ~~ Wpm ~ _~ ~~~an o ~ ~ ~,:q ~ ~~~ € ~~~ -x~" €°~Sgs ~gm W4 ° ~o~=oo;~ 5~~ 5~~°~.: m - ~o~ z...~ o ~ 3&W ~om5:~ E°m 5m a CLL~~Cpo W'o y~ ~« O) ~ o true e~ ~~d z n 3°. ~° ~ a~Glw v ff ~~ ~o:fin ~°a8~«:mg- c Nogg ~ ~~~x ~ s S r3rs °~.~~ ~ a^s~$~~o„= ~~ ~ o O s 3~ 3~ ES is~ i~~g£' t,awwWWWWWC~ `~° g z ~ m ~ ,a8~g °3o~E~3 ~ ~~~g Wm~~ o ~ ~~` ary°~u3^o88E~"nr~~~«~``~~ gff og Z ~ o ~ ~ ~~ y & n$~@~ ~~me~~~°# ~=s~ s~=g ii~~~~~rWk"aoemea~avE°~ m~ ~o ff ~ s oW°° ~ c~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~-sW = ~o~m~~~°~€~ '" ~3 ooWg~W'o~"~~°"°°~WsW~~~ ga ~s °~QQ BsWOW_ O ~ ~CS g €& ~.. g 88~n,~~ E~ ~~ ^°8808" ~~ $~ d v e 8 ~s 8°>°€:~ m"~zz~~8u H:"~::0mS7 w w ~ y~~ ~~q~ ~ yrt s 's '~ V] O ~~o ~ ~o d ~ ~~; `'x ~ ~ ~ 2 i ~ ~ ~~ _ ~° W ~ O t- o~' c~ ~ E ~ ~ p~ ~7 0 O ~ o ~ l: a ~ ~ ga s o~;~go~~~m jam g° ~ C'-". x~ ~ ~ c~ ~°~2"~ ~ ~~€~~ asp=~<~>o°~ -'g3 ~~_~ n w ~ g ~~rW ,33 pan ~.... ~ a~ ~ p 4 ~ z °7~ g ~~~~~ a~W~~~ ~~=~8 ~tl~ ~~~~ t G~ ~E~et~~~W~ ~ S~a° ° ggW~ ~ ~~"WSeW,. vi o a ~ ~ •~OG ~~~ ~~~~ _„ ~'" ~ • ~~~m~°~ sa° ax°s^^s s"s°s ss~~d°~ o~ W a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~6 ~ „ ~~~ ~m ~s ~n ~nnYao~s~sas~g~tae~ ~''' V q ~7 ~' ~ e oa o$ LL 3 ~3~.~ - _a..~^aaR^~~"^^s°~g= ~o A ~ ~~ k:~~~Q ~~"g~"S~ €~g€°t u3~m~'~"=8R~8 8~~8 WWwW s~,rzWiWi~tsWdwsiisw€~ ~ U °a " ~ ° °^ 3• W °`~~"°~~6w ~~~~ ?..„ego ono~o7ton~r$o~~~ g: ~~ m~ ~ & €~~~ ~~°~"~~a;~~ ~~~v "s:aaoaa~o"asasrae~ia~~~ =~ ~ ~~ ~~~~ ~ ~~~~W $~~~d;a~€ ,: ~ o oo~ooooo~sooao~aoo~~ ~ s ~~~~~ ~=~~o~~W~~~a ~~o msmaosesssmamsmsc~oWa~ ~ ~~~~~a~ ~ ~~3~~s m~~3s~~'€~~~~~ ~~z~ ~~ ENGINEER' S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0.97-1 (SPRING MEADOWS IUSTOCKDALE HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL) APPENDIX B ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM (On file with the City Clerk of the City of Bakersfield; reduced, not to scale copy attached) O U ~ .--~ >K ~ ~ _ I a W° I VWOU~''i jN~ ~ r ~. ~ I ~z oom~ow W¢ j °Nwx ~ am J~~.a z¢ r 0 PU.. ;~ ~•i~ O~ U o a °u~aiaZ~Wa ~ o INr=-~ I of ~~~oar E~ ~ oz F+i ,'~ W~ G' O O W ~ ~Z ~ ~~ ~s~Z°zm~cxi i zi I~~° I ~~ ~m~i~o V~ ~ ~° O U O ,0 .`T. '~" iwo w 9 x~ Iv~i?Om.-'wa~ ~ iw° ¢ma~u ~ ~~ 4°z~°~x.z°zd~ j rc~ 0.' U ~ I- z I ~ O<°W woi °~' W°- of O ft! w m in Irna i a I ~~° xsw~ vl~ Sao°o~wo' I ~u.~ .~. d U E--1 •N ri ~W~ Ia.W ~ZK VIJ IWJ' y1W K K 41w >> U ~ VI O ON WW OW aw xa O K Y U 2V1 U Y ~ Q ~ IA `/ w ~ 9 ° I IF- I 2 0 I ~w wN ° ~ I ~w w H1 j..l m Y ~Wm ZN °w IWO f° ° I U4 O°°~°VNIt N4 ~ E,y ~ O (Yi ~' O ~q `W~ ~~ i °w I~~ IoW ~ a~w ~r i 3~O ~n~amazt^~ aaO z ~ VI ~-W W I N Q W 1 2 W N [~ ~' ~.w-I w Si~rc s wo FI^ I 4o Ii» I 3~w. IOJ N~Z „m,w~r=-~`~'" I,n~Z ~ W N r^ ~ ° SqW} Wy ~ > jd~ ~ I ~ 1 ~}GYQ m ~UW I JJ `~$y W~2WL° I ~JJ ~' ~ C~s~] ~ rF'~ I--i ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~UQ O m ~(JiIU ON j V_ I°W m dV0 f, I~m m ~OUV "'WNU f/IOU m'00 A ~ qa~i ~ pI V Q C7 U V I m ~r ~ ~=N .x4S o~in=~~Ngg3O W U~ o Z x O i z I pza I o-~ ¢~a ~woozSOF Zi d~ 6~. ^I W o i °o I ~zQ°wx~ `x'4w ~NyW~~~? w ~ O ~{'/~~'J1 ,~-. ~ N i rr I ~N o°°~~°go I°s° w~4¢>w¢~o< ~ x C, ~I ~ rQ~ ~ W I j I °° I~° jOLLO I IxV mYd~opmo?rc r~~//~~ p i W +J ° ( NO x~ 100 I~OF I IzK I ~'mO 7"mx~ V! W f/] W N W U ~ cZ-io rx-¢ > x~~ I~z~ Iv~~n I ~ r°~o~m~3o~ ~~1 ~ Qqq O ~ ~ F'a o° °~zwa'x'~~w Iaro ( > ~cZYZ °qi~ W a ~ «~ ~' ~ Fr ~°j v i ~J'rcwo~°~~'2 'a io~ ~ ~ ~o$xout^mw ~ ~ O OW J~-~ VI W Q~~ w i o ~ <a~zoZwV~~~ ° ~w,~ i m 3Q~~~~F- ~~ .~Z-. U t-a '-. .~ Ur 3° oKV(n I ;JO I >~~¢ °41 C'li Fv' W ""' W ~^ ~rx- wa,3Ow~a~o ' Vr ~ ~ °zoFp»aw ~ 0. I"'~ = z °~ °rcz to "a'a z w xoz"' mart ~/'~ C/~ r~+ O ra °°~ ran WZauNio'Q^°'- am G ° om zm<W °ao F V 1 ~i ~ ,N ~o °mrc `no-`"~`~`~°~`^`n '-~Jw i ~n °wZ~~"'^°~i U T~~/~ W (~ ~.. ow <Nwz"~ti w° O~~Y ° rz°OZai°aorcz V 1 ~ W~ o~ ~~ a°a°~~~~~ 4 ~c°~o o v od~GaYdrco° r I .--I F-+ ~ I ~~~W ~< i `l U rn U~Q~ ~ ai $ B~ to c,~ W~ F VFG~j~ c 8 `cg° ~e41~t 8S `~ i1 y>, rn ~~~yjj ti~~i ~ ~ n cPya c ~~~ ~ ~T~ o ~ h OZ ti~0 .. ~om~ 20 ~~~ DoE°'a' FE'S ti„' a,'.yw, 'Z"'W~>' ~2 E o° I e co` `d~w~g~`'`--'~~ ~~oa~ H ~~ U't/l CW/l ^'~ oYE o cisE °umi 8°ao~$~~"1~ ~ ~ ~ o, ~'oa~~ ~d$ ~w tl.~ CO•~i~0 ~ ~~ ~ Eo'n2 oz°o I ;mss°~x ~ ~w ~~ ~O v~o..~ o ao a~so ~.= _°Emc m vE ~O zl w ~ « n 'T ~ k' ~ $ A W ~ vxil B~N~U° ~ °w$ ~ ~° _ Sgt= $'~ a a -O.o.¢~ ¢¢Rl ci w "i ~`m0 aZC O ~ «3«toop WO a ~ 31Y /g4WIT °zl wom..o~m .°n a3s as - 'N7 NJlIH r-i 0 N ~ AY ~ wo oz s a ~, H U ~. ,~ •-, S h ~ ~ ~ ~ Ea-~ x z~ ~ ~ Oq ~ ~ d ~ ~~ ~ p W ~ a~ ~ z~ ~ ~4 U_ Q, a" xz a Z S ., ~'- ? Z U m nO ~O O O WUh _Q ~ V Z w U W JQ Z 3~ U ~ Z w _ i a~ ~~ ° ¢° i" Paz ~ii0 ~ ~ ~ ~ °ao ~°z~ uaO W ~ °m Q F ~ H zz z azln m o ~ 3 ~ ~u.a- mzo xuiN [QZs~ ovN~i in iei U U w z ~i °~ z ~ cN`~ ~v~i c°~ zsz y 'w `w^~ wo H?-~Rf ~d ~ ~ °d ~? -`~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ o°w mvwr~ aoic C' ~¢o aF ~ C/7 d U ° ° ° ° ~ ~ 0 3o N rn ~wY In~ I ?. z~~ ° Q rn J O j J N Z ~ Y O to a_w p Q Nw EY. J O ~ ,F~ W om om om om ° ° F a N 3 s aL In ° z wo Jo fq _ ° O °m LL ~ N v'vei F., ~ O ,.~ a ~" ~ o~ ud o <W Z ~ ' a~ ~'vi° °zuz x ~~m ~r° ~ ,'~" Gx] N 1 ° N I m SO Nw CO ~ I Y °.I ap4J `^~= u.° O ¢- O Z I//-~~I ~ ~ +a I a m ao m w z O r 3 0 3 ~ m r~ U l m °~ ~ o ¢~° ~ w Q 3 ~ ~~ F-1 f/1 qq ~ °I °z °z °z i i ~" ~~ z =a $ ~ ° a zo ~ °d6 zii Woo o~x ~ wrc°o °mw ~ #i Ul s ° G i ~ ° z ~ ~ ~ mz For ~~u ~w s` Qi~z °w `a W U o F ~ V V ow ~ 03w ° N z U K C?U Q ~ U lnUO In Y°fi woo Of pOZ ,n ~J~, ~ O ~yi I to o N U 4~ al rc ° J -ai w ~ '¢ oo Noo ~°z °zw ao r^, d ~ S-~ ~'I o ° o o w> ° of pJ ~ v ~ ¢ ° ~ or ~ qqo Zzdo 'a zF wQrc ~ iavari al_ W Ll \_ O I a w W w w w w ~ ~i v u~ o ~ v ° ~ z w° ~ 17Z ~wc°> ~ z aiw ~ w~=a oo ~ W .. w = ~ f E ~ ~ w z w w ~ ~w ~w wrn wrc /•/~~ ° Z Vl N N N N 2 wpJ W U Q K Z g41 ~ K ° 2x~'~ Z V1 ~ w W y w o o w wi z Y~ m w o ylw W c6N in vl in^~ aiZ F z~° <' ~ f/1 0 0 (/~ t/w~ ~n vNi n yd w ¢m w ""o w ~ w ~ w w aro y ¢w ~i(/n~i icon (nN~ ~y. ~j¢~d~ ~m W [OL:~ (d~. ~ Q Q ¢ Q 4 S VI Q m ~ K 1 Y O ¢ Z U Ul ~ j ~ ~ N 9 Q O m U W Q U Q ` Y Q J p w //1 1/ [y] ZO O ~ w U -'J Y F. °p W m QN VI W~Ji ' ' i t ~ I ~ w m F, FLLO 1`° oar moF Z ~~~° <a ~ ~ i ~ w N ~Q k w:n= >a~ v.° W zwa~ pO~ w~ ~ c5 O ' ~ '^ ~ ~ ~ it "' ¢o Q ¢ K m~w0 Uw°p ° Q ° ~~1/1 mF > Do ls` ' ~ I ~ m Y ~ ° ~~~ xO ~ ~~ °o~ awwz °EO4 ~ 1>OW ~z O ~ ( 1 ~ 3 ~ ~ w ao ~ ~m BYO i~ao °no ~ rn~~W ~z F z .- °z '¢~ U ~ r °°mF ~d~aa ~°oF F, z>z'a` sz U .n ° °d ° ¢mz ~ msr ~sd 3z zz z~~i ~ ao ~ _ 'jI QQ K °rx F W p°'-U° ° Z ti l NZ O^ ~ 3 ¢rS }mm mOKw WNj O^ ~ QmF~ ~°O ~N I °W O ~ ~Z~N NmU Vj ZO 3 ^QF y3yin^'n I ? G~ Z < J Z ~ w ' J ~ Z ~ ^ ¢¢Y' p C U J O W WyNj2 N° O ~ 11 W I w ~w ~~ z~ W N mUF ~ Z~Y Q J~ V a 410~W ~ V ~ O 2 ~~ ~ ~w Fao w~od wd~ X10 q pq W ~a sn ~ o am jazz ~nza ~y~ F `,Wy1 ~ ~~v ~~ - - ~ ovoa aaojsos ~~ ~ ~~ o E A FZ F ~~w o~~w Z ~'~`~~~ ~~ 1 ai W rc°u °m `y'~~ W w ; ~~~ 1 o ~ ~ V~ g~ ~i WI Q7 y., ~ q ~ ~yccti r ~° xo~.'~ ~~ zl rt8 w [rw ~ ~qti QI w~ ~ ~ ~~~ Z 01 ~ a ~ ~z ~ E tiwo wa ~Qz z ~ ~ - ... ~'~, 1 ~, ~ o C , ovoa aanla aio ~~ ~ ~ivNro vtsin inv3na F w i. p ~~~ x~ I 4 1 ~ 1 W~ F 1 \ ~ I vwi ~ -_ 0 3rnr oa3n ~ 1 ~~ p 1 m` ~~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ v113nt3r 3 CE tl '6 6L 1 3 92 a 'S 6Z 1 ~ ~ M _v 9CL a'sai ~._ OYOa V15L1 VN3liH 3 9L a '6 of 1 .--1 O O x II F ~ .. z r ~ U 0 W n wN NK H z r~~n^ ~ ~ H VJ i ~ W O ~~~A ~ p~y ~ F ~ wcna~ .I OO~ W ~ Q +I A~zw ~~ ~ a `~ o ~~z~ I~ UW Wx~~ i~ " '/~ F ;^ ~ ~ I• UK d ~ A i( J N dl` ZH O I• __J O ~W nn WN I N~ s~ om N ZF Q _ s a = o o _ f z ~ m z ~ .y m ~ ~ N K ~~ y ~ I ti = a W m ~~ r~ er ~~ 2 ~ p 3 3 3 p °W °w w s N w ~ rc I • R ~ ~ ~ ~ V o U ~ o N - < rc ~ ~ f o 0 O ~Q ° d id z o a e a Q W W W N Z ~ Q ~ ~ ~ 0 m N i i i a ~ 01 w a m o z ~..~..~..~.... .... o °oq q0 o a. i a s ~3 ~ ~ ~ i o ~ J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z p Z Z N a ~ gym= ~ U O ~ a ~ Q~~ p ~ ~ N~ N S N Z ~ y J F 8 ~+6~ I N ~ < s <~ aw a~ ~ yy ~ °o ~ • ~~ ¢¢ aa W y 0 ~~ W N w U W O4 ~ •~ ` a a 4U a N Z W y K ~' ~ ~ <N a az U ~ ~ OSC ~ ~ N f O W o 3 q Y K ea ~ '~ o~ o= o~ °~ ~ 0 w zm ~o 5~ oz \~ ~ ~ ~e ~~ 0 ~o ~ O ~ N p ~ 6 ~ ~ Z N ~ U ~ W O D ^~ F. ~ ~ Z N Z W Z m W Z O Q a U V ~ S~ ~ ~ a ~ a W~ ~ O tl ¢ z r2' =-m ro vWio w i V~t~ U~ Q mo \ .. ~ ~ r ~'~, ~ N .; ~ N ~~~~ M ~IlN~ild d,L,L~dI,?I' ~ U OO Z~ oN ~ a ; ° W (? N z ~ W Obi ~ a a y d a O FZ _ ~ = 3 ~ J~ W N ~ t n Q 4 m NK Q 0 ~ O ~ ~ N ~ O U ~ O x Z m q F ~ 0 ZQ 0 p F O 0~" ~ N `°-~ Nz w ~ m o o a W a ~ O o W~ m 2 W O 00 0 ~ ~ U W N W u1 m W a w 2 0 j U UQ Z W J Q ~ U O U y~~ y ~a W m Z 6 C Z Z U W m FWF-- K w w j U O W LL~ ~ ~~ m~ K K LL ~ w 4. K Y O ¢ Z f U U ~ W O © W N O ~ ~ N rc O ~ C y m U K O ~ p~ O U m Y O o C 1 8 Z '- ~ r d N ~ W ~ 'O .- m~ m~ mi g z R~ z z UZ VZ UZ ~ ~~ NU N~ ~~ ~ ~N O~ ON ' ` 2 0 WD O ~ Y ~ F-- F ~w Z~ sZ N W N W ~~ ~ Z OZ 2 y ~N N N N m m m m y ~ V 1 NN NN aVN1 ON Oa Oa ' ONO m m WO NO ~O w_ a W ~ W Z Z Z Z ~ ¢ C Z~ ZQ ~Z~ Jp ~p 70 j U U U _U ~ ~ 1~il ~ ~ O O O O OZ 02 02 m~ m7 0> m ~m ~ ~m U ~ ~ w w w w x i= F S= ~ w 3~ 33 3; z ~~~~ =~wowowo w w w ~ w w ~ z ~ _ ~ z ° ~ ( 1 y 1 V 1 V J N a ¢ ¢ ] [ N o+ ~U ?U ~U ' I ( I D ® 9 ~ ~ I ~ 1 ~ ~ -•~.. -••_.._ W --__ Z 0 __ ~~ TWT V, V 0 r~i H W ~~//~~ z V! O H ~~ VJ '^ r~ Y, O W O oz U ~~ F Az [+ W W ~~ m ~ m l a l ip i im zW F VZ m UZ U Z Z YY -- N V N V N~ Z O ~ °~ °N °~ U Z W io Zo zo ¢ ~ N z o 0 gg qq ~ VI VI ~ a z ~ W (/1 u Z < ~ ~ z J ' ~ 3 3 ~ h w W N N W ` ` ¢ ~ ° b o 2y o 0 o a~ 2 N N o ~z a= 3~ m N 4 N1 Oa 0¢ Oa U OD W M N ° Np ~ ° ~ NW ( iJ ~ ~ O ° Z T 0 w ~ m a w 0 0 0 0~' 0"-1 aw w o ao ~ g rc z z z z ~o ~~ ~o x o = ~ o ~° r ~¢?¢ m~ m~ m~ ~ v v i 3w v i v ~ a N D N 1A N Km Wm Wm W D O O N O OF~ O K O O a O~ [d. Z 0 0 z iH xx xr ~ i z z 33 ;3 33 w pJ m ~ w w O Z Z ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ W W W W N N ~ Z S Z° O ° K Z ~ ~ N ~ W w ~ Q QQ W w W VZ UZ VZ ~ ~ ~ ?v ?~ ?v ~z' I ' I w ~ ~~ z~ ~ s U W ~ O z z !- ~ v ~ I ' D ~ ~ ONi n w _ N R O U cni ¢ 1/1 V Y F ~ ~ OO O O •- r~ W ~ i rn _ "1 w ? o w o rI ~ ~ O o ~ U W N° ama W a 33 U ~ O ~ ~ ° O a r ~ r fr ai lO 1'il w ' F~ G o~ ~ o o m ? °o o a N O i. V O O (1', U ~ S x o Q i ~ w T ~ a so Q U o w z~ m ~ o t` I i c'1 z~ °m a N ,wl~ H~ ~~ v .~ x N rZ 1x- Z ¢ ~ ~O ~ ~ W ~ I ~ x m x ~ ~~ J n ° ~ vl A~ q oaq O ~ LLI <° O N w U o L ' ~ °O U NF F N UI O 0 O ~ O~ O O VU K Z Z W I -I Q ' W ~ ~°) A .~ w .rJ Z ~ ~ 1 w .- I W ~ Y O W U~ ~ ~ qg F,/^~y Hw yy = v~ Vl ~ O d 3 m Nro Z~ ~ 3 NI i u < 2 ~ O ~ ~ I i a t o z N O o z U O ~ Z x °° a~ ~ ~ o r , W Q+ ~~ ~ ;r.~7~ C ~ ' 3 o<s 3~i 44rc ~ V ~rc ~~ Z¢ U w Jx r ~ m~ 0 O~ w vat ¢ r~ CI~ Q, O ~ W .~,. U w.y W I 1 ~ z r a w a ai x~ ~ z a ~~ U w Nn ~'w Nw 3g va wrc zj' z ~ a ~ ~ m ~ 3 ~ a a ~ is ttU--++ 3 ri ~ N ~i F- w° \ ®L '•o9M~~'S~6?pGi~ .r10t~a~9~R'~4v9a~np ~ f N 3 N N \ ® iI@ V W~°0®i~~ •®W JLV OBId h`~ 1 II SMdBXJ _...__ ~~ ' Yl~A1y \ _ __ _. __ __ _.. ~~ I M N N \ ~ ® ' g~ ~ ~. TN ~ a ~P\ ~~ "~® a N Na N~ ~o~\ O a Q N N N N n J (' b f ® M O N N N~ \ ~ SCE / Q ~~ ~' b W R .LXnO~ o N H r ~ .zaY, snutoa ~ 7rss,~ao Ma •' a ~ J~ I n na ~ n a •~r'~c '* a u n m M~ m ° N ~~ ~~1 _,~ °a a m~ ~~~Q d'ls?~~\ ma n~ ~~ a m .n n "' ~ 1 ^a N~ .oc a R _ ~ II O " ~ x $ ' y ~ '~w ~p 1 t~ r O~ ~ Mn a ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ i _ _ o~ aNp O°I ON > ~ \ a N ` ~` ~m \~ N NM \ `` fOV O ~ m of\~P N ~ \ ` ^~ m a m~ ~bO' v'~i vii ~ O r, r ro ^Y ~~ mm° m °p a0 N N ~ W ~ !~ Nn r~ M N N ~ v mm ~~ m~N~ mm ~4i u`Dih ~~el YM~ (~~ mm mm wm \ no, P~ ~ N ~~ f1 P 7 2{oTT H~07 R N u ~~~~u~ \ „' ~ ~Q~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ goo io ~~A L-i O nn °~ ~~ mm O u n a ~° ~~ ~ N ~rrv'r o~naa,~e ~ ~~ •~~ `s~~ca ~® L~ •~® ~ •~'o 'ES6~60L~60 'OCe '90® ®31S~89~-46'59 '01~ A0~!&R ~ 0006°S~~ '0~ RPd31lkIASQ99'®'~ ~Qdl1 A0~ d 999l6A'~ m~ nnn 1I mm ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0.97-1 (SPRING MEADOWS IUSTOCKDALE HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL) APPENDIX C NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF PROPERTY OWNERS a APPENDIX C ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 COUNTY OF KERN, CALIFORNIA NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF PROPERTY OWNERS ASSESSOR'S TAX ASSESSMENT NUMBER (ATN) / PROPERTY OWNER'S NUMBER PROPERTY .DESCRIPTION NAME AND ADDRESS 1 500-010-30-00-5 (LLA P96-1000; PARCEL A) 2 REMAINDER OF 500-010-31-00-8 (REMAINDER OF LLA P96-1000; PARCEL B) 3 through 23 LOTS 1 THROUGH 21 AND 23 and THROUGH 96, RESPECTIVELY, 25 through 98 IN TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE 24 LOT 22 IN TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE NOTES: Castle & Cooke California, Inc. P. O. Box 11165 Bakersfield, CA 93389 BHA Properties, LLC 6851 McDivitt Drive, Suite B Bakersfield, CA 93313 BHA Properties, LLC 6851 McDivitt Drive, Suite B Bakersfield, CA 93313 City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 1. CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. P96-1000 (LLA P96-1000) WAS RECORDED FEBRUARY 7, 1997, AS DOCUMENT NO. 0197016133 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF KERN. 2. TRACT NO. 5869 UNIT ONE WAS RECORDED FEBRUARY 27, 1998, IN BOOK 43 OF MAPS, AT PAGES 155 THROUGH 158, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF KERN. 29260APC 1 02/27/98 J 1