The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About94-3 Modified Engineers Report 1 of 2MODIFIED ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-3 (SILVER CREEK/BRIMHALL NORTH/SEVEN OAKS/SOUTH LAURELGLEN) CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Mavor and City Council Bob Price, Mayor Irma Carson, Councilmember First Ward Patricia DeMond, Vice Mayor, Councilmember Second Ward Patricia M. Smith, Councilmember Third Ward Kevin McDermott, Councilmember Fourth Ward Randall L. Rowles, Councilmember Fifth Ward Jacquie Sullivan, Councilmember Sixth Ward Mark C. Salvaggio, Councilmember Seventh Ward i S Alan Tandy, City Manager Judy Skousen, City Attorney Pamela A. McCai°thy, Ciry Clerk Raul M. Rojas, Public Works Director Gregory Klimko, Finance Director BOND COUNSEL Samuel A. Sperry Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe San Francisco, California ASSESSMENT ENGINEER Ed Wilson Wilson & Associates Fresno, California UNDERWRITER Robert L. Williams, Jr., Vice President Sutro & Company San Francisco, California MODIFIED ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-3 (SILVER CREEK/BRIMHALL NORTH/SEVEN OAKS/SOUTH LAURELGLEN) CERTIFICATE OF FILING AND CONFIRMATION OF AMENDED ASSESSMENT I, Pamela A. McCarthy, City Clerk of the City of Bakersfield, do hereby certify that the following "MODIFIED ENGINEER'S REPORT, CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-3," including the Assessment and Amended Assessment Roll in the amounts set forth therein as the "Amended Assessment Principal eff. 1/1/97 After Change and Modification No. 1," with the Amended Assessment Diagram attached thereto, was filed with me on the day of April, 1997. City Clerk City of Bakersfield, California I have prepared this Modified Engineer's Report and do hereby certify that the amounts set forth herein as the "Amended Assessment Principal eff. 1/1/97 After Change and Modification No. 1" on Exhibit A, Table A-I, and as the "Second Amended Notice of Assessment Amount as Modified per Change and Modification No. 1," on Exhibit A, Table A-II, attached hereto, have been computed by me in accordance with the order of the City of Bakersfield. ~~ W ~.~~ Edward J. Wilson, R.C.E 23269 Assessment Engineer, Assessment District No. 94-3 I, Pamela A. McCarthy, City Clerk of the City of Bakersfield, do hereby certify that the following "MODIFIED ENGINEER'S REPORT, CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-3" and the Amended Assessment Principal eff. 1/1/97 After Change and Modification No. 1 and Modified Assessment Amount contained therein were approved by the City Council of the City of Bakersfield on the ~~ day of ~ I , 1997, by Council's adoption of Resolution No. ~ `~- p7 . ~~+ City Clerk City of Bakersfield, California I, Raul M. Rojas, as Director of Public Works of the City of Bakersfield, do hereby certify that a certia:l~d copy of the following "MODIFIED ENGINEER'S REPORT, CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMEI'IT DISTRICT NO. 94-3," together with the Amended Assessment Diagralri attached thereto, was recorded ~~.4 my office on the~~'day of ~~i f , 1997. Direct of Public Works City of Bakersfield, California On ~~ 1997, the Certificate Re Release of Lien was recorded as Document No. l9~-OS6Coo9 of Official Records, the Amended Assessment Diagram was filed in Book ~~ of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts at Pages ~ through I2Z , and a Notice of Amended Assessment was recorded as Document No. O Official Re rds in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Kern, Calif 'a. County Reco County of Kern, California 29182C&M.CER -1- 4/9/97 MODIFIED ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-3 (SILVER CREEK/BRIMHALL NORTH/SEVEN OAKS/SOUTH LAURELGLEN) CERTIFICATE OF FILING AND CONFIRMATION OF AMENDED ASSESSMENT I, Pamela A. McCarthy, City Clerk of the City of Bakersfield, do hereby certify that, the following "MODIFIED ENGINEER'S REPORT, CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-3," including the Assessment and Amended Assessment Roll in the amounts set forth therein as the "Amended Assessment Principal eff. 1/1/97 After Change and Modification No. l," with the Amended Assessment Diagram attached thereto, was filed with me on the day of April, 1997. City Clerk City of Bakersfield, California I have prepared this Modified Engineer's Report and do hereby certify that the amounts set forth herein as the "Amended Assessment Principal eff. 1/1/97 After Change and Modification No. 1" on Exhibit A, Table A-I, and as the "Second Amended Notice of Assessment Amount as Modified per Change and Modification No. 1," on Exhibit A, Table A-II, attached hereto, have been computed by me in accordance with the order of the City of Bakersfield. .~~ W ~- Edward J. Wilson, R.C.E 23269 Assessment Engineer, Assessment District No. 94-3 I, Pamela A. McCarthy, City Clerk of the City of Bakersfield, do hereby certify that the following "MODIFIED ENGINEER'S REPORT, CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-3" and the Amended Assessment Principal eff. 1/1/97 After Change and Modification No. 1 and Modified Assessment Amount contained therein were approved by the City Council of the City of Bakersfield on the day of , 1997, by Council's adoption of Resolution No. City Clerk City of Bakersfield, California I, Raul M. Rojas, as Director of Public Works of the .City of Bakersfield, do hereby certify that a certified copy of the following "MODIFIED ENGINEER'S REPORT, CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-3," together with the Amended Assessment Diagram attached thereto, was recorded in my office on the day of , 1997. Director of Public Works City of Bakersfield, California On 1997, the Certificate Re Release of Lien was recorded as Document No. of Official Records, the Amended Assessment Diagram was filed in Book of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts at Pages through , and a Notice of Amended Assessment was recorded as Document No. , of Official Records in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Kern, California. County Recorder County of Kern, California 29182C&M.CER -1- 4/9/97 TABLE OF CONTENTS MODIFIED ENGINEER'S REPORT DESCRIBING CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS TO THE ENGINEER'S REPORT, ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM, AND ASSESSMENT FOR CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-3 (SILVER CREEK/BRINIHALL NORTH/SEVEN OAKS/SOUTH LAURELGLEN) DESCRIPTION PAGE CERTIFICATE OF FILING AND CONFIRMATION OF AMENDED ASSESSMENT ... i TABLE OF CONTENTS ...........................................ii MODIFIED ENGINEER'S REPORT DESCRIBING CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS TO THE ENGINEER'S REPORT, ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM, AND ASSESSMENT FOR CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-3 (SILVER CREEK/BRIMHALL NORTH/SEVEN OAKS/SOUTH LAURELGLEN) ..... 1 SECTIONS I. Background ............................................. 1 II. Proposed Changes and Modifications to the Scope of Work and Assessment ....... 3 a. Changes and Modifications to the Scope of Work ...................... 3 b. Changes and Modifications to the Assessment ........................ 4 III. Amended Assessment Diagram-Assessment and Diagram Amendment No. 22 ..... 5 IV. Reduction of Seven Oaks Area (South) Assessments ...................... 5 V. Increase of Seven Oaks Area (North) Assessments ....................... 6 a. Original Spread Method ...................................... 6 b. Revised Spread Method ...................................... 7 VI. Pay-off of Calculated Transferred Park Assessment Shares for Parcels Not Owned by the District Proponent .................. ...........:....... 8 VII. Seven Oaks Area (South) Parcels Receiving aOne-time Credit on the 1.997-1998 Tax Roll ...................:........................... 8 VIII. Modified Statement of Total Assessment, (Table on page 10) ................ 9 IX. Modified Exhibit B, Tables B-I, B-II-A, B-II-C, and B-II-D ................. 9 X. As Confirmed Final Engineer's Report .............................. 9 XI. Assessment Engineer's Certification of the Changed and Modified Assessment and Assessment Spread Method ............................... 11 29182TOC.C&M -11- 4/9/97 DESCRIPTION PA E REPORT EXHIBITS EXHIBIT A TABLE A-I AMENDED ASSESSMENT ROLL TABLE A-II SUMMARY TABLE OF ORIGINAL AND MODIFIED ASSESSMENT AMOUNTS FOR INDIVIDUAL PARCELS TABLE A-III A. LIST OF AFFECTED PARCELS IN SEVEN OAKS AREA (NORTH) NOT OWNED BY THE DISTRICT PROPONENT AND FOR WHICH THE CALCULATED INCREASES IN ASSESSMENT ARE PAID BY THE DISTRICT PROPONENT B. RECONCILIATION OF ORIGINAL, AMENDED, AND UNPAID ASSESSMENT PRINCIPALS FOR AMENDED ASSESSMENTS IN SEVEN OAKS AREAS (NORTH) AND SEVEN OAKS AREA (SOUTH) EXHIBIT B TABLE B-I ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE OF TOTAL COST AND (AS MODIFIED) ASSESSMENT TABLES B-II ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT (AD MODIFIED) COST- TABLE B-II-A SUMMARY OF SOTJTH LAURELGLEN, SEVEN OAKS, (AS MODIFIED) SILVER CREEK AND BRIMHALL IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED TABLE B-II-C SEVEN OAKS NORTH (SECTION 6) IMPROVEMENTS TO BE (AS MODIFIED) ACQUIRED TABLE B-II-D SEVEN OAKS SOUTH (SECTION 7) IMPROVEMENTS TO BE (AS MODIFIED) ACQUIRED EXHIBIT C SUMMARY TABLE OF EXISTING ASSESSMENTS AND MODIFICATIONS TO AFFECTED ASSESSMENTS IN SEVEN OAKS AREA (NORTH) 29182TOC.C&M -111- 4/9/97 DESCRIPTION PA E EXHIBIT D LIST OF PARCELS IN SEVEN OAKS AREA (SOUTH) NOT OWNED BY THE DISTRICT PROPONENT RECEIVING A ONE-TIME CREDIT ON THE 1997-1998 TAX ROLL FOR THE PARK ASSESSMENT SHARE BILLED TO THEM ON THE 1996-1997 TAX ROLL REPORT APPE NDICES _ APPENDIX A AMENDED ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM, ASSESSMENT AND DIAGRAM AMENDMENT NO. 22, CHANGE AND MODIFICATION NO. 1 APPENDIX B COPY OF REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN ("PRODUCT DESCRIPTION") FOR SEVEN OAKS AREA (NORTH) APPENDIX C COPY OF FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-3 AS CONFIRMED SEPTEMBER 27, 1995 29182TOC.C&M -1V- 4/9/97 MODIFIED ENGINEER'S REPORT DESCRIBING CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS TO THE ENGINEER'S REPORT, ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM, AND ASSESSMENT FOR CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0.94-3 (SILVER CREEK/BRIMHALL NORTH/SEVEN OAKS/SOUTH LAURELGLEN) I. Background This report presents a description of the changes and modifications proposed to be made to the Engineer's Report for the above-captioned" assessment district (hereinafter "AD 94-3"). The Engineer's Report for AD 94-3 and the assessment contained therein were approved by the City Council of the City of Bakersfield (the "City. Council") on September 27, 1995, by the adoption of its Resolution No. 151-95. The Engineer's Report and the Assessment Diagram for AD 94-3 were recorded in the office of the Superintendent of Streets of the City of Bakersfield on September 28, 1995, and the Assessment Diagram and Notice of Assessment for AD 94-3 were filed and recorded, respectively, on September 29, 1995, in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Kern. A copy of the "As Confirmed Final. Engineer's Report" is attached to this Modified Engineer's Report as Appendix C and incorporated herein by reference. Signed copies of the As Confirmed Final Engineer's Report are on file in the office of the City Clerk and in the office of the City Director of Public Works. On December 14, 1995, bonds were sold for AD 94-3, and based on the actual amount of "1915 Act Bond Issuance Cost and Reserve," the assessment liens on parcels that were not- paid in full during the 30-day cash payment period were recalculated and recorded with the Second Amended Notice of Assessment on February 8, 1996. Since confirmation of the Final Engineer's Report for AD 94-3, several subdivisions were recorded both in the Seven Oaks Area (South) and the Seven Oaks Area (North), and subsequently the original AD 94-3 assessment numbers affected by those subdivisions were deleted from the assessment roll for AD 94-3, and new assessment numbers were assigned to the, new subdivision lots and remainder parcels. Tract No. 5292 was recorded in the Seven Oaks Area (South) and Tract No. 5425-Phases A, B, C, and D and Tract No. 5426-Phase A were recorded in the Seven Oaks Area (North) during this period. All exhibit tables in this Modified Engineer's Report make reference to the original, existing, and amended assessment numbers for the parcels affected by Change and Modification No. 1. Prior to recording any of the subdivisions in the Seven Oaks Area (North) the development plan related to the structure and phasing of several future development areas in this portion of AD 94-3 has been modified to reflect a new phasing plan proposed for this area, and it is further described below: 29182RPT.C&M -1- 4/9!97 As shown in the AD 94-3 Final Engineer's Report Exhibit C tables, Seven Oaks Area (North) was planned for development into several future development areas identified as follows: Windsor Park, Estates, Regency, and North PUD (all located east of Kern River Canal), and future commercial and multi-family developments (located west of Kern River Canal). The portion of Seven Oaks Area (North) located west of the Kern River Canal (future commercial and multi-family developments) is not affected by these changes, and its originally allocated shares of AD 94-3 assessment remain with that portion of the unsubdivided portions of Section 6 in AD 94-3. The Design Engineer (Martin-McIntosh Engineering) retained by Castle & Cooke California, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as the "District Proponent") has provided the City Public Works Department and Assessment Engineer for AD 94-3 with the revised plan for phased development of Seven Oaks Are (North) east of the Kern River Canal. Development Areas listed above (Windsor Park, Estates, Regency, and North PUD) are reconfigured into the following new Development Areas based on the typical future lot sizes and lot product types (not corresponding to each other in the order listed): Windsor Park III, Windsor Park I & II, Lexington I & II, and Regency I & II. Three Vesting Tentative Tract Maps (No. 5425, No. 5426, and No. 5427) covering this portion of Section 6 are on file with the City Public Works Department. Reference is made to the enclosed "Product Description" table, incorporated herein as Modified Engineer's Report Appendix B, which was prepared based on the information obtained from the Design Engineer, and which corresponds to the total number of future single-family residential lots shown on the above-referenced Vesting Tentative Tract Maps Nos. 5425, 5426, and 5427. As phases of future Tracts 5425, 5426, and 5427 are recorded, each lot within one of the referenced Development Areas will be allocated an equal-per-lot share of the total existing assessment remaining principal balance for that Development Area, based on the number of proposed single-family residential lots for that Development Area, as shown on the enclosed Product Description table and Vesting Tentative Tract Maps Nos. 5425, 5426, and 5427. This Modified Engineer's Report describes proposed changes to the As Confirmed Final Engineer's Report. Upon adoption of a City Council Resolution approving the proposed change and modification to the scope of work and assessment described herein, and upon acceptance of this "Modified Report" for filing in the office of the City Director of Public Works, the amounts in the column entitled "Amended Assessment Principal eff. 1/1/97 After Change and Modification No. 1," shown on the attached "Exhibit A, Table A-I, Amended Assessment Roll" will be the amounts of the. amended unpaid assessments (and of the amended lien) for affected parcels, and the "Second Amended Notice of Assessment Amount as Modified per Change and Modification No. 1" amounts shown on the attached "Exhibit A, Table A-II, Summary Table of Original and Modified Assessment Amounts for Individual Parcels" will be the amended original assessments for those parcels.- The amended original assessments are the amounts that should be used to calculate bond reserve fiend credits that .the parcels would receive if the parcel owner elects to prepay the total remaining principal balance for any of the amended assessments. 29182RPT.C&M -2- 4/9/97 II. Proposed Changes and Modifications to the Scope of Work and Assessment a. Changes and Modifications to the Scope of .Work The original AD 94-3 scope of Improvement Acquisitions for the Seven Oaks Area (North) included the following park project, described as follows in the As Confirmed Final Engineer's Report: Section 6 Park Project: The scope of planned acquisitions for this project includes construction of rest room facilities and complete landscaping of an as yet to be designed 6.0 acre community park within the Seven Oaks Area (North). This portion of the Seven Oaks Area is situated in Section 6, T 30 S, R 27 E, which is the basis for the reference to the project as the "Section 6 Park." The original AD 94-3 scope of Improvement Acquisitions for the Seven Oaks Area (South) included the following park project, described as follows in the As Confirmed Final Engineer's Report: Section 7 Park Project: The scope of planned acquisitions includes construction of rest room facilities and complete landscaping for an as yet to be designed 2.38 acre community park approved for construction adjacent to or in the vicinity of Tentative Tract No. 5290 and the existing Stockdale High School, between Buena Vista Road and Grand Lakes Boulevard. Since the original AD 94-3 assessments were confirmed, one 12.0 acre community park parcel within Section 6 has been deeded back to the District Proponent in exchange for two 6.0 acre park parcels that were deeded to the ~ City of Bakersfield. The District Proponent has completed park improvements on one of the two 6.0 acre parks in the Seven Oaks Area (North), described above and in the Final Engineer's Report as "Section 6 Park Project," and the City has used all available funds provided for that project by the AD 94-3 proceedings to acquire the completed park. Based on development trends in the Seven Oaks Areas (North and South), the District Proponent has requested that the assessment district funds originally allocated for Section 7 Park Project improvement acquisitions be used for improvements on the second park in Section 6. The District Proponent will construct improvements for required Section 7 parks from funds other than AD 94-3 proceeding funds at the time those parks are improved. 29182RPT.C&M -3- 4/9/97 Therefore, in accordance with the above-described request, the Description of Work for Assessment District No. 94-3 has been changed and modified as follows: The name of the Section 6 Park Project described in the Final Engineer's Report is changed to "Section 6 Park No. 1 Project. " The improvements planned for acquisition as the Section 6 Park No. 1 Project are unchanged from the improvements described as the "Section 6 Park Project" in the Final Engineer's Report and as restated in the preceding page of this report. The assessment district funds originally allocated for the 2.38 acre Section 7 Park Project, as described on the preceding page, are to be used for acquiring a portion of the improvements for the second 6.0 acre park in Section 6. The second Section 6 park project is hereafter referred to as the "Section 6 Park No. 2 Project. " The scope of planned acquisitions includes construction of rest room facilities and landscaping. If necessary, the District Proponent will provide additional funds (not from the AD 94-3 proceedings) for completing this 6.0 acre Section 6 Park No. 2 Project. b. Changes and Modifications to the Assessment In order to complete this Change and Modification No. 1, the District Proponent has proposed and has agreed to the following: 1. Assessments on parcels originally assessed for the Section 7 park improvements are to be reduced by their proportionate shares of that park cost, except for parcels on which the assessment was either fully or partially cash paid by the District Proponent during the original 30-day cash payment period. For this partially cash paid assessment, the cash paid assessment portion has been found to be greater in every case than the Section 7 park cost assessed to the parcel. 2. The original Section 7 park assessment is to be spread to the Section 6, Seven Oaks Area (North) parcels in the same manner as the original Section 6 park assessment, except for the exceptions described below. 3. -The transferred park assessment shares of Tract No. 5244 and the "multi-family" designated part of the still unsubdivided portion of Section 6 are to be respread back to the "single-family" designated part (subdivided and unsubdivided) of Section 6 located east and south of the Kern River Canal and east of Grand Lakes Avenue (hereafter referred to as the "Section 6 Park No. 2 Assessment Area"). 4. Assessments on recorded tract lots located in the Section 6 Park No. 2 Assessment Area that have been sold and are no longer owned by the District Proponent and for which no written acceptance of assessment increase and waiver of hearing has been obtained by the City, are not to have their existing assessment amount increased by 29182RPT.C&M -4- 4/9/97 this Change and Modification No. 1. The District Proponent has deposited funds with the City Finance Department sufficient to cover the calculated Section 6 Park No. 2 cost shares for these parcels, adjusted for the Bond Reserve Fund credits and applicable bond call expenses. Parcels in the Seven Oaks Area (South) that were originally assessed for Section 7 park improvements, that were not fully or partially cash paid, and that are currently not owned by the District Proponent are to receive cone-time credit of principal and interest on the amount of their 1997-1998 assessment debt service installment. This credit will reimburse the affected properties for the Section 7 park assessment debt service installment they paid in their 1996-1997 property taxes. The above-listed five points are described further in the following sections of this report. III. Amended Assessment Diagram-Assessment and Diagram Amendment No. 22 The original Assessment Diagram for AD 94-3 was recorded on September 29, 1995, in the office of the Kern County Recorder. Since then, twenty-one (21) Assessment and Diagram Amendments were completed for several recorded land subdivisions affecting properties in AD 94-3. Properties affected by this Change and Modification No. 1 are shown on the Amended Assessment Diagram-Assessment and Diagram Amendment No. 22. On April 11, 1997, the map entitled "AMENDED ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM OF CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO 94-3, COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ASSESSMENT AND DIAGRAM AMENDMENT NO. 22, CHANGE AND MODIFICATION NO. 1" (the "Amended Diagram"), consisting of nine (9) sheets, was filed in the office of the City Clerk. A reduced and not to scale copy is attached as Modified Engineer's Report Appendix A and incorporated herein by reference. IV. Reduction of Seven Oaks Area (South) Assessments All parcels in the Seven Oaks Area (South), except non-buildable landscape lots, were originally assessed for Section 7 park improvements and related incidental costs. Several parcels in the Seven Oaks Area (South), identified as Original Assessment Numbers 84, 85, 86, 87, 109, 11.1, and 112 (Amended Assessments 1126, 1127, 1128, 1129, 1151, 1153, and 1154, respectively), were cash paid (in full or partially) by the District Proponent during the 30-day cash payment period. The amounts paid on the partially cash paid assessments were more than sufficient to cover the Section 7 park assessment shares for the referenced parcels. Therefore, the above-listed seven parcel assessments in the Seven Oaks Area (South) are not being reduced by this Change and Modification No. 1, and their existing assessment liens and remaining assessment principal amounts are not changed. 29182RPT.C&M -Jr- 4/9/97 See Exhibit A, Table A-I for the existing remaining assessment principal effective 1/1/97 (at the beginning of the 1997-98 tax year), the amounts of reduction in principal, and the modified remaining assessment principal effective 1/1/97 for Amended Assessments 1118 through 1184 in the Seven Oaks Area (South). Exhibit A, Table A-II shows the assessment amounts before the above-described reductions, the reductions, and the modified assessment amounts of all Seven Oaks Area (South) parcels, for both the original assessment (as confirmed) and the assessment amount based on the Second Amended Notice of Assessment (as adjusted for the 12/14/95 bond sale). The amounts- shown in the far right column of that table (entitled "Second Amended Notice of AssessmentAmount as Modified per Change and Modification No.1'~ are the parcels' amended original assessment shares, and are the amounts that should be used to calculate Bond Reserve Fund credits that the parcels would receive if the parcel owners elect to prepay the total remaining principal balance for any of Amended Assessments 1118 through 1.184. V. Increase of Seven Oaks Area (North) Assessments Exhibit C, "Summary Table of Existing Assessments and Modifications to Affected Assessments in Seven Oaks Area (North)"presents a detailed calculation, in a step-by-step process, of how the original assessments (as confirmed) and the assessments based on the Second Amended Notice of Assessment for the Seven Oaks Area (North) parcels were amended by this Change and Modification No. 1. The total amount of increase per Change and Modification No. 1, based on the Second Amended Notice of Assessment ($392,679.84), represents the net total Section 7 park improvement and associated assessment proceeding and bond issuance costs after subtracting the park assessment shares for the above-described seven fully or partially cash paid parcels in the Seven Oaks Area (South). The cash paid park costs for those seven parcels have been placed in the AD 94-3 Improvement Fund and are available for payment to acquire the Section 6 Park No. 2 improvements after they have been completed. The reapportionment of the referenced park assessment amounts to Seven Oaks Area (North) parcels has been done in a two-step process. a. Original Spread Method In the first step of the Change and Modification No. 1 two-step assessment allocation and reallocation process, the total park assessment amount being transferred to Seven Oaks Area (North) parcels is spread to all Seven Oaks Area (North) residential land use areas within Section 6 in AD 94-3 in direct proportion to development area and/or recorded tract acreages. This conforms with the original assessment spread method for AD 94-3 and represents the direct benefit allocation of the Section 6 Park No. 2 cost. Exhibit C, Tables A through D, provide a breakdown of this portion of the modified assessment spread, as described below: 29182RPT.C&M -6- 4/9/97 Tables A and B show the originally confirmed assessment amounts, the assessment amounts per the Second Amended Notice of Assessment by land use area in Section 6 (Table A), and each land use area's modified assessment amount after adding the transferred park cost (Table B). If there had been no land use changes and no subdivision maps recorded since the September 1995 approval of the AD 94-3 assessment, then the as modified assessments would be as shown on Table B. 2. Tables C and D on page 2 of Exhibit C show in Table C how the original assessment amounts have been reapportioned to the new land plan areas approved as Vesting Tentative Tracts 5425, 5426, 5427, and 5838, and in Table D show the current status of original parcel assessments as apportioned to the recorded subdivision phases and their remainders. 3. Tables E and F on page 3 of Exhibit C show the modified assessment amount for each of the Section 6 parcels that were originally allocated a share of the Section 6 park cost. Table E shows the modified parcel assessments based on the revised land plan but prior to recording the new subdivision phases. Table F shows the modified assessments after reapportionment to the new subdivision phases.- Table E is Table C plus the transferred park cost, and Table F is Table D plus the transferred park cost. b. Revised Spread Method Upon request by the District Proponent, the transferred park assessment shares allocated based on the above-described original spread method to Tract No. 5244 ($39,396.41) and to the "multi-family" (R-3) designated part of the still unsubdivided portion of Section 6 located northwest of the Kern River Canal ($27,219.16) have been reallocated to the "single-family" land use area (subdivided and unsubdivided) within the Section 6 Park No. 2 Assessment Area. The reallocated amount has been spread to the referenced areas in the same manner as the originally assessed park improvements. Tables G, H, I, and J on page 4 of Exhibit C show the reallocation of the transferred park costs that were allocated by the original spread method to Tract No. 5244 and to the R-3 area northwest of the canal to the Section 6 Park No. 2 Assessment Area bounded by Ming Avenue on the south, Grand Lakes Avenue of the west, the Kern River Canal on the north, and Old River Road on the east. See Table A-I of Exhibit A for the existing remaining assessment principal effective 1/1/97 (at the beginning of the 1997-98 tax year), the amounts of increase in principal, and the modified remaining assessment principal effective 1/1/97 for Amended Assessments 1002 through 1117 in the Seven Oaks Area (North). Table A-II of Exhibit A shows the assessment amounts before the above-described increases, the amount of the increases, and the modified assessment amounts of all Seven Oaks Area (North) parcels for both the original assessment 29182RPT.C&M -7- 4/9/97 (as confirmed) and for the assessment amount based on the Second Amended Notice of Assessment (as adjusted for the 12/14/95 bond sale). The ariiounts shown in the far right column of that table (entitled "Second Amended Notice of Assessment Amount as Modif ed per Change and Modification No. 1 ") are the parcels' amended original assessment shares and are the amounts that should be used to calculate Bond Reserve Fund credits that the parcels would receive if the parcel owners elect to prepay the total remaining principal balance for Amended Assessments 1002 through 1117, except for Amended Assessment 1040. That parcel is not owned by the District Proponent and no written acceptance by the current property owner of the proposed assessment increase and waiver of notice and hearing on the proposed increase has been received by the City. Accordingly, the District Proponent has paid the City the Section 6 Park No. 2 cost share spread to Amended Assessment 1040, plus estimated bond call expenses in advance of approval by the City Council of Change and Modification No. 1. For Amended Assessment No. 1040 the amended original assessment share (used to calculate Bond Reserve Fund credits) remains unchanged and is as shown on Exhibit A to the AD 94-3 Second Amended Notice of Assessment. VI. Pay-off of Calculated Transferred Park Assessment Shares for Parcels Not Owned by the District Proponent Pursuant to directive of the City Finance Officer, assessments on recorded tract lots in the Section 6 Park No. 2 Assessment Area that have been sold and are no longer owned by the District Proponent, and for which no written acceptance of assessment increase and waiver of hearing has been obtained by the City, are not to be increased by this Change and Modification No. 1 (the "non- modified assessment parcels"). The District Proponent has deposited funds with-the City Finance Department sufficient to cover calculated Section 6 Park No. 2 cost shares apportioned to those non-modified assessment parcels, adjusted for the Bond Reserve Fund credits and applicable bond call expenses. . See Item A of Table A-III in Exhibit A for a list of parcels in Section 6 that are affected by this Change & Modification No. 1 and that are no longer owned by the District Proponent, and for which the District Proponent has paid sufficient funds to offset the calculated increases in assessment principal adjusted for the Bond Reserve Fund credits and Bond -Call expenses. VII. Seven Oaks Area (South) Parcels Receiving aOne-time Credit on the 1997-1998 Taz Roll By transferring Section 7 park improvement fund and related expenses to AD 94-3 Section 6 parcels, originally assessed Section 7 parcels will no longer receive park benefiis from AD 94-3 proceedings. However, all parcels in the Seven Oaks Area (South) originally assessed a share of the Section 7 park assessment were billed on the 1996-1997 tax roll for the full amount of original assessment based on the Second Amended Notice of Assessment. Based on the finding that those parcels will no longer benefit from park improvements funded by AD 94-3, the District Proponent has deposited funds with the City to cover the expense of a one-time credit of principal and interest on the 1997-1998 tax roll for the Section 7 park debt service share paid with their 1996-1997 AD 29182RPT.C&M -8- 4/9/97 94-3 assessment debt service installment. Originally assessed parcels that are fully or partially cash paid are not allocated a share of this debt service credit. See Exhibit D, "List of Parcels in Seven Oaks Area (South) Not Owned by the District Proponent Receiving aOne-time Credit on the 1997- 1998 Tax Roll for the Park Assessment Share Billed to Them on the 1996-1997 Tax Roll," for the exact amount of credit for principal and interest each eligible parcel will receive. VIII. Modified Statement of Total Assessment All of the updated costs described above, including the actual "1915 Act Bond Issuance Cost and Reserve" amounts on which the Second Amended Notice of Assessment was based, have been incorporated into the table on the following page entitled "Modified Statement of Total Assessment." This "Modified" table shows the changes to each item of the cost and contributions that are shown in the table on page III-2 of the Final Engineer's Report for AD 94-3 that is entitled "Statement of Total Assessment, City of Bakersfield Assessment District No. 94-3." IX. Modified :Exhibit B, Tables B-I, B-II-A, B-II-C and B-II-D Tables B-I, B-II-A, B-II-C, and B-II-D in Exhibit B of the As Confirmed Final Engineer's Report have been updated to incorporate the above-described park assessment transfer from the Seven Oaks Area (South) to the Seven Oaks Area (North) and to show the actual "1915 Act Bond Issuance Cost and Reserve" amounts based on the December 14, 1995 Bond Sale and are presented as Exhibit B of this Modified Engineer's Report. X. As Confirmed Final Engineer's Report A copy of the As Confirmed Final Engineer's Report, which is on file with the City Public Works Director and the City Clerk, is attached as Modified Engineer's Report Appendix C and incorporated herein by reference. 29182RPT.C&M -9- 4/9/97 MODIFIED STATEMENT OF TOTAL ASSESSMENT ' CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0. 94-3 (SILVER CREEK/BRIMHALL NORTH/SEVEN OAKS/SOUTH LAURELGLEN) Assessment Amount per Second Amended Modified . Assessment Notice of Assessment Assessment Amount (Adjusted for Amount (as Confirmed 12/14/95 Bond Sale (As confirmed 09/27/95) Amount) 04/23/97) ' A. Acquisition Cost of Improvements, Contingency, and Incidental Expense (Exhibit B, Table B-I, Items 1-6) 1. South Laurelglen $ 194,785.00 $ 194,785.00 $ 194,785.00 2. Seven Oaks (North) $ 1,489,245.65 $ 1,489,245.65 $ 1,806,123.65 3. Seven Oaks (South) $ 1,574,501.35 $ 1,574,501.35 $ 1,257,623.35 4. Silver Creek $ 2,688,137.00 $ 2,688,137.00 $ 2,688,137.00 5. Brimhall North (East) $ 632,862.00 $ 632,862.00 $ 632,862.00 6. Brimhall North (West) $ 244.456.00 $ 244.456.00 ~ 244.456.00 7. Subtotal Acquisition Cost $ 6,823,987.00 $ 6,823,987.00 $ 6,823,987.00 B. Additional Cost/Fees: (Table B-I, Item 7) 1. Pay Off Existing AD 82-1 Assessments $ 678,809.43 $ 678,809.43 $ 678,809.43 2. Pay Off Existing AD 86-2 Assessments $ 64.035.54 ~ 64.035.54 ~ 64.035.54 3. Subtotal Additional Cost/Fees $ 742,844.97 $ 742,844.97 $ 742,844.97 C. Subtotal $ 7,566,831.97 $ 7,566,831.97 $ 7,566,831.97 D. Assessment Proceeding Cost and Expense (Table B-I, Item 9) $ 480.825.20 $ 480.825.20 $ 480.825.20 E. Subtotal $ 8,047,657.17 $ 8,047,657.17 $ 8,047,657.17 F. Deduct Contributions and Cash Collections $ 0.00 $ (46,584.82) $ (46,584.82) G. Total Cost to 1915 Act Bond Financing $ 8,047,657.17 $ 8,001,072.35 $ 8,001,072.35 H. 1915. Act Bond Issuance Cost. and Reserve (Table B-I, Item 13) 1. Bond Discount $ 144,009.50 $ 139,101.75 $ 139,101.75 2. Capitalized Bond Issue Interest $ 655,333.33 $ 447,510.90 $ 447,510.90 3. Bond Reserve Fun $ 983.000.00 $ 907.315.00 $ 907.315.00 4. Subtotal $ 1.782.342.83 $ 1,493,927.65 $ 1.493.927.65 I. Total Amount Assessed (Table B-I, Item 14) $ 9,830,000.00 $ 9,495,000.00 $ 9,495,000.00 29182RPT.C&M -lO- 4/9/97 XI. Assessment Engineer's Certification of the Changed and Modified Assessment and Assessment Spread Method Based on the descriptions and data presented above and further illustrated in the attached exhibits, the following findings on the proposed AD 94-3 Change and Modification No. 1 are presented: A. The Section 6 Park No. 2 improvements. will be installed within the Section 6 Park No. 2 Assessment Area described herein and, accordingly, those improvements bear a rational nexus to the properties proposed to be assessed a share of their cost; and B. The District Proponent has submitted a written request to the Engineer of Work that the modified reallocation method of assessment spread for the Section 6 Park No. 2 improvement costs be implemented and has further represented that said request was approved by all Section 6 Park No. 2 Assessment Area property owners that have been allocated a share of the- Section 6 Park No. 2 cost. Therefore, it is the finding of the Assessment Engineer for AD 94-3 that the changed and modified assessments and assessment spread method described herein are in conformance with the requirement of City of Bakersfield Municipal Code Section 13.08.070-Benefit Spread. tit0 23268 ° Edward J. Wilson, R.C.E. (Expires 12/31/97) ~ ~p l2-~(~'! ,~. Assessment Engineer s,~Tf of ivy UEO~a~~ City of Bakersfield Assessment District No. 94-3 CA Filed in the office of the City Clerk on April 11, 1997, for approval and confirmation of modified assessments by the City Council on Apri123, 1997, by: Raul M. Rojas, Public Works Director and Engineer of Work City of Bakersfield Assessment District No. 94-3 29182RPT.C&M -11- 4/9/97 EXHIBIT A TABLE A-I MODIFIED ENGINEER'S REPORT CHANGE AND MODIFICATION NO. 1 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-3 AMENDED ASSESSMENT ROLL REMAINING INCREASE/ AMENDED ASSESSMENT REDUCTION ASSESSMENT PRINCIPAL IN PRINCIPAL EFF.1/1/97 ASSESSMENT EFF.1/1/97 CREATED FROM BEFORE PRINCIPAL PER AFTER AMENDED EXISTING ORIGINAL ASSESSOR'S CHANGE AND CHANGE AND CHANGE AND ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT TAX NUMBER MODIFICATION MODIFICATION MODIFICATION NUMBER NUMBER NUMBER (ATN) PROPERTY OWNER NAME NO. 1 NO. 1 NO 1 1002 (1) 902 5 390-010-31-00-7 CASTLE & COOKS CALIFORNIA INC 1002 (1) 902 5 390-010-55-00-7 CASTLE & COOKS CALIFORNIA INC Remainder of 1002 (1) 902 5 390-010-77-00-1 CASTLE & COOKS CALIFORNIA INC 1,596,344.34 283,232.37 1,879,576.71 1003 772 5 390-101-01-00-3 KYLE CARTER HOMES INC 2,434.71 634.28 .3,068.99 1004 773 5 390-101-02-00-6 KYLE CARTER HOMES INC 2,434.71 634.28 3,068.99 1005 774 5 390-101-03-00-9 KYLE CARTER HOMES INC 2,434.71 634.28 3,068.99 1006 775 5 390-101-04-00-2 CASTLE & COOKS CALIFORNIA INC 65,451.79 17,185.06 82,636.85 1007 739 5 390-101-05-00-5 KYLE CARTER HOMES INC 2,434.61 634.19 3,068.80 1008 740 5 390-101-06-00-8 KYLE CARTER HOMES INC 2,434.71 634.28 3,068.99 1009 741 5 390-101-07-00-1 KYLE CARTER HOMES INC 2,434.71 634.28 3,068.99 1010 742 5 390-101-OS-00-4 KYLE CARTER HOMES INC 2,434.71 634.28 3,068.99 1011 743 5 390-101-09.00-7 KYLE CARTER HOMES INC 2,434.71 634.28 3,068.99 1012 744 5 390-101-10-00-9 KYLE CARTER HOMES INC 2,434.71 634.28 3,068.99 1013 745 5 390-101-11-00-2 KYLE CARTER HOMES INC 2,434.71 634.28 3,068.99 1014 746 5 390-102-01-00-0 KYLE CARTER HOMES INC 2,434.71 634.28 3,068.99 1015 747 5 390-103-01-00-7 KYLE CARTER HOMES INC - 2,434.71 634.28 3,068.99 1016 748 5 390-103-02-00-0 KYLE CARTER HOMES INC 2,434.71 634.28 3,068.99 1017 749 5 390-103-03-00-3 KYLE CARTER HOMES INC 2,434.71 634.28 3,068.99 1018 750 5 390-103-04-00-6 KYLE CARTER HOMES INC 2,434.71 634.28 3,068.99 1019 751 5 390-103-05-00-9 KYLE CARTER HOMES INC - 2,434.71 634.28 3,068.99 1020 752 5 390-103-06-00-2 KYLE CARTER HOMES INC 2,434.71 634.28 3,068.99 1021 753 5 390-103-07-00-5 KYLE CARTER HOMES INC 2,434.71 634.28 3,068.99 1022 754 5 390-103-08-00-8 KYLE CARTER HOMES INC 2,434.71 634.28 3,068.99 1023 755 5 390-103-09-00-1 KYLE CARTER HOMES INC 2,434.71 634.28 3,068.99 1024 756 5 390-103-10-00-3 KYLE CARTER HOMES INC 2,434.71 634.28 3,068.99 1025 757 5 390-103-11-00-6 KYLE CARTER HOMES INC 2,434.71 634.28 3,068.99 1026 758 5 390-103-12-00-9 KYLE CARTER HOMES INC 2,434.71 634.28 3,068.99 1027 759 5 390-103-13-00-2 KYLE CARTER HOMES INC 2,434.71 634.28 3,068.99 1028 760 5 390-103-14-00-5 KYLE CARTER HOMES INC 2,434.71 634.28 3,066.99 1029 761 5 390-103-15-00-8 KYLE CARTER HOMES INC 2,434.71 634.28 3,066.99 1030 762 5 390-104-01-00-4 KYLE CARTER HOMES INC 2,434.71 634.28 3,068.99 1031 763 5 390-104-02-00-7 KYLE CARTER HOMES INC 2,434.71 634.28 3,068.99 1032 764 5 390-104-03-00-0 KYLE CARTER HOMES INC 2,434.71 634.28 3;068.99 1033 765 5 390-104-04-00-3 KYLE CARTER HOMES INC 2,434.71 634.28 3,068.99 1034 766 5 390-104-05-00-6 KYLE CARTER HOMES INC 2,434.71 634.28 3,068.99 1035. 767 5 390-104-06-00-9 KYLE CARTER HOMES INC 2,434.71. 834.28 3,068.99 1036 768 5 390-104-07-00-2 KYLE CARTER HOMES INC 2,434.71 634.28 3,068.99 1037 769 5 390-104-08-00-5 KYLE CARTER HOMES INC 2,434.71 634.2&. 3,068.99 1038 770 5 390-104-09-00-8 KYLE CARTER HOMES INC 2,434.71 634.28 3,068.99 1039 771 5 390-104-10-00-0 KYLE CARTER HOMES INC 2,434.71 634.28 3,068.99 1040 778 5 ~ 390-111-01-00-6 KRAIG J. GRADOWITZ 2,984.06 ~ 2,984.06 1041 779 5 390-111-02-00-9 CASTLE & COOKS CALIFORNIA INC 2,984.06 777.40 3,761.46 1042 780 5 390-111-03-00-2 CASTLE & COOKS CALIFORNIA INC 2,984.06 ~ 777.40 3,761.46 1043 781 5 390-111-04-00-5 CASTLE & COOKS CALIFORNIA INC 2,984.06 777.40 3,761.46 1044 782 5 390-111-05-00-8 CASTLE & COOKS CALIFORNIA INC 2,984.06 777.40 3,761.46 1045 783 5 390-111-O6-n0-1 CASTLE & COOKS CALIFORNIA INC 2,984.06 777.40 3,761.48 1046 784 5 390-111-07-00-4 CASTLE & COOKS CALIFORNIA INC 2,984.06 777.40 3,781.46 1047 785 5 390-112-01-00-3 CASTLE & COOKS CALIFORNIA INC 2,984.06 777.40 3,761.46 1048 786 5 390-112-02-00-6 CASTLE & COOKS CALIFORNIA INC 2,984.06 777.40 3,761.46 1049 787 5 390-113-01-00-0 CASTLE & COOKS CALIFORNIA INC 2,984.06 777.40 3,761.46 1050 788 5 390-113-02-00-3 CASTLE & COOKS CALIFORNIA INC 2,984.06 777.40 3,781.46 1051 789 5 390-113-03-00-6 CASTLE & COOKS CALIFORNIA INC 2;984.06 777.40 3,761.46 1052 790 5 390-113-04-00-9 CASTLE & COOKS CALIFORNIA INC 2,984.06 777.40 3,761.46 1053 791 5 390-113-05-00-2 CASTLE & COOKS CALIFORNIA INC 2,984.06 777.40 3,761.46 1054 792 5 390-114-01-00-7 CASTLE & COOKS CALIFORNIA INC 2,984.06 777.40 3,761.46 1055 793 5 390-115-01-00-4 CASTLE & COOKS CALIFORNIA INC 2,984.06 777.40 3,761.46 1056 794 5 390-115-02-00-7 CASTLE & COOKS CALIFORNIA INC 2,984.08 777.40 3,761.46 1057 795 5 390-115-03-00-0 CASTLE & COOKS CALIFORNIA INC 2,984.06 777.40 3,761.46 1058 796 5 390-115-04-00-3 CASTLE & COOKS CALIFORNIA INC 2,984.06 777.40 3,761.46 1059 797 5 390-115-05-00-6 CASTLE & COOKS CALIFORNIA INC 2,984.06 777.40 3,761.48 1060 798 5 390-115-06-00-9 CASTLE & COOKS CALIFORNIA INC 2,984.06 777.40 3,761.46 1081 799 5 390-115.07-00-2 J. R. CANADAY CORP. 2,984.06 777.40 3,761.46 1062 800 5 390-115-08-00-5 CASTLE & COOKS CALIFORNIA INC 2,984.06 777.40 3,761.46 1063 801 5 390-115-09-00-8 CASTLE & COOKS CALIFORNIA INC 2,984.06 777.40 3,761.46 1064 802 5 390-115-10-00-0 CASTLE & COOKS CALIFORNIA INC 2,984.06 777.40 3,761.46 1065 803 5 390-115-11-00-3 CASTLE & COOKS CALIFORNIA INC 2,984.06 777.40 3,761.46 1066 , 804 5 390-115-12-00-6 CASTLE & COOKS CALIFORNIA INC 2,984.06 777.40 3,761.46 29182MA1 A-I-1 04/02/97 EXHIBIT A TABLE A-I MODIFIED ENGINEER'S REPORT CHANGE AND MODIFICATION NO. 1 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-3 AMENDED ASSESSMENT ROLL REMAINING INCREASE/ AMENDED ASSESSMENT REDUCTION ASSESSMENT PRINCIPAL IN PRINCIPAL EFF.1/1/97 ASSESSMENT EFF.1/1/97 CREATED FROM BEFORE PRINCIPAL PER AFTER AMENDED EXISTING ORIGINAL ASSESSOR'S CHANGE AND CHANGE AND CHANGE AND ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT TAX NUMBER MODIFICATION MODIFICATION MODIFICATION NUMBER NUMBER NUMBER (ATN) PROPERTY OWNER NAME NO. 1 NO. 1 NO. 1 ~06~ - `81' `99ff-1~9~i3®0-9-CAF-BAIEERSFI~B 9-99• 9.ee 900 1068--~-~a •-~-°89~R-~-~ -Oa-OOa- -61#-AF-B^„KERF-,F-,'E6B - B.BB 0-66 0:00 1069 805 5 390-116-02-00-4 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC .2,984.06 777.40 3,761.46 1070 806 5 390-116-03-00-7 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 2,984.06 777.40 3,761.46 1071 807 5 390-116-04-00-0 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 2,984.06 777.40 3,761.46 1072 808 5 390-116-05-00-3 J. R. CANADAY CORP. 2,984.06 777.40 3,761.46 1073 809 5 390-116-06-00-6 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 2,984.06 777.40 3,761.46 1074 810 5 390-116-07-00-9 J 1. DANDY & CO. 2,984.06 777.40 3,761.46 1075 811 5 390-116-08-00 2 J. R. CANADAY CORK 2,984.06 777.40 3,761.46 1076 818 5 390-121-0100-9 J L. DANDY & CO. 2,984.06 777.39 3,761.45 1077 819 5 390-121-02-00-2 CASTLE 8 COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 2,984.06 777.40 3,761.46 1078 820 5 390-121-03-00-5 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 2,984.06 777.40 3,761.48 1079 821 5 390-121-04-00-8 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 2,984.06 777.40 3,761.46 1080 822 5 390-121-05-00-1 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 2,984.06 777.40 3,761.46 1081 823 5 390-122-01-00-6 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 2,984.06 777.40 3,761.46 1082 824 5 390-122-02-00-9 PHILLIP GASKILL INC. 2,984.06 777.40 3,761.46 1083 825 5 390-122-03.00-2 PHILLIP GASKILL INC. 2,984.06 777.40 3,761.46 1084 826 5 390-122-04-00-5 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 2,984.06 777.40 3,761.48 1085 827 5 390-122-05-00-8 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 2,984.06 777.40 3,761.46 1086 829 5 390-131-01-00-2 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 3,209.85 836.13 4,045.98 1087 830 5 390-131-02-00-5 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 3,209.83 836.22 4,046.05 1088 831 5 390-131-03-00-8 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 3,209.83 836.22 4,046.05 1089 832 5 390-131-04-00-1 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 3,209.83 836.22 4,046.05 1090 833 5 390-131-05-00-4 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 3,209.83 836.22 4,046.05 1091 834 5 390-132-01-00-9 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 3,209.83 836.22 4,046.05 1092 835 5 390-132-02-00-2 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 3,209.83 836.22 4,046.05 1093 836 5 390-132-03-00-5 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 3,209.83 836.22 4,046.05 1094 837 5 390-132-04-00-8 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 3,209.83 836.22 4,046.05 1095 838 5 390-132-05-00-1 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 3,209.83 836.22- 4,046.05 .1096 839 5 390-132-06-00-4 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 3,209.83 836.22 4,046.05 1097 840 5 390-132-07-00-7 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 3,209.83 836.22 4,046.05 1098 841 5 390-132-08.00-0 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 3,209.83 836.22 4,046.05 1099 842 5 390-132-09-00-3 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 3,209.83 836.22 4,046.05 1100 843 5 390-133-01-00-6 FROEHLICH CONSTRUCTION 3,209.83 836.22 4,046.05 1101 844 5 390-134-01-00-3 FROEHLICH CONSTRUCTION 3,209.83 836.22 4,U46.05 1102 845 5 390-134-02-00-6 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 3,209.83 836.22 4,046.05 1103 846 5 390-134-03-00-9 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 3,209.83 836.22 4,046.05 1104 847 5 390-134-04-00-2 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 3,209.83 836.22 4,046.05 1105 848 5 390-134-05-00-5 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 3,209.83 836.22 4,046.05 1106 849 5 390-134-06-00-8 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 3,209.83 836.22 4,046.05 1107 850 5 390-134-07-00-1 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 3,209.83 836.22 4,046.05 1108 851 5 390-134-08-00-4 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 3,209.83 836.22 4,048.05 1109 852 5 390-134-09-00-7 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 3,209.83 836.22 4,046.05 1110 853 5 390-135-01-00-0 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 3,209.83 836.22 4,046.05 14-1-1 864-~ ----k--~---- -~o9-43a-O6-90-~-6FPFA~ D~A."~~FIE68 O:S9 0-99 9-90 11]~ RFS. 5 ~~A-135-02 OD.3--C1a~616-BA- I~FaRS>=1B~;; 9.99 --- . 0 1113 903 5 TR 5426-A; LOT 1 KYLE CARTER HOMES INC 2,434.71 634.27 3,068.98 1114 904 5 1~ TR 5426-A; LOT 2 KYLE CARTER HOMES INC 2,434.71 634.26 3,068.97 1115 905 5 'F TR 5426-A; LOT 3 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 2,434.71 634.26 3,068.97 1116 ~ ~ ~T 908 (fl17 5 A~ C ~ S TR 5428-A; LOT 4 TD CA~fC A•~1 AT A CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC DI IGI.IA \/IOTA /`A ~IAI 2,434.71 AAA 634.26 AAA.. 3,068.97 . _ _ _. _..__A!1!1 1118 77 77 393-010-22-00-2 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 71,064.95 (13,388.18) 57,696.77 1119 (2) 816 76 393-010-15-00-2 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 259,596.55 (36,955.77) 222,640.78 1119 (2) 816 76 393-010-29-00-3 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 1,172,961.11 (220,565.43) 952,395.68 1119 (2) 816 76 393-010-31-00-8 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 305,431.99 (55,338.37) 250,092.62 1120 78 78 393-121-01-00-0 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 5,132.75 (1,005.95) 4,126.80 1121 79 79 393-121-02-00-3 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 5,132.80 (1,005.97) 4,126.83 1122 80 80 393-121-03-0.0-6 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 5,132.80 (1,005.97) 4,126.83 1123 81 81 393-121-04-00-9 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 5,132.80 (1,005.97) 4,126.63 1124 82 82 393-121-05-00-2 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 5,132.80 (1,005.97) 4,126.83 1125 83 83 393-121-06-00-5 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 5,132.80 (1,005.97) 4,128.83 146------ -------°-84---. ~--------84---- ----~----383-9-2~-97-00-8- -S~A#~D9NAl,9-l~-~-DANITA-0 3;4860 8:00- --3,467.60 1i 0 1`128--- " •86 - - ----88~~•-~s39a~12i1~09608~4--MCr6fN2~Y-ROB .61 1189 87 - Nf3-d-I . 0 1130 88 88 393-121-11-00-9 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 5,132.80 (1,005.97) 4,126.83 1131 89 89 393-121-12-00-2 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 5,132.80 (1,005.97) 4,126.83 1132 90 90 393-121-13-00-5 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 5,132.80 (1,005.97) 4,126.83 29182MA1 A-I-2 04/02/97 EXHIBIT A TABLE A-I MODIFIED ENGINEER'S REPORT CHANGE AND MODIFICATION NO. 1 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-3 AMENDED ASSESSMENT ROLL REMAINING INCREASE/ AMENDED ASSESSMENT - REDUCTION ASSESSMENT PRINCIPAL IN PRINCIPAL EFF.1/1/97 ASSESSMENT EFF.1/1/97 CREATED FROM BEFORE PRINCIPAL PER AFTER AMENDED .EXISTING ORIGINAL ASSESSOR'S CHANGE AND CHANGE AND CHANGE AND ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT TAX NUMBER MODIFICATION MODIFICATION MODIFICATION NUMBER NUMBER NUMBER (ATN) PROPERTY OWNER NAME NO. 1 NO. 1 NO: 1 1133 91 91 393-121-14-00-8 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 5,132.80 (1,005.97) 4,126.83 1134 92 92 393-121-15-00-1 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 5,132.80 (1,005.97) 4,126.83 1135 93 93 393-121-16-00-4 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 5,132.80 (1,005.97) 4,126.83 1136 94 94 393-121-17-00-7 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 5,132.80 (1,005.97) 4,126.83 1137 95 95 393-121-18-00-0 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 5,132.80 (1,005.97) 4,128.83 1138 96 96 393-121-19-00-3 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 5,132.80 (1,005.97) 4,126.83 1139 97 97 393-121-20-00-5 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 5,132.80 (1,005.97) 4,126.83 1140 98 98 393-121-21-00-8 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 5,132.80 (1,005.97) 4,126.83 1141 99 99 393-121-22-00-1 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 5,132.80 (1,005.97) 4,126.83 1142 100 100 393-121-23-00-4 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 5,132.80 (1,005.97) 4,126.83 11+49 °---°~-^°""I'01 - -"`°"°°~1"0'I'°°`°'° "'°°"3 - - AI4ER5FIEL=C~ -~,9~ y-----rr0o 9-00 1.1~~°" '°"'~°""'t02 ~°`"°""'""°I02m°°°'®X599°i'295=0t1~0®CsIT1=©F-BAKER.sFaELD •---wy9 -- 0-09 --9.00 1145 .m-.4.03 - 193 - -- ----~~~.~-n+ nc nn ~_ ci~Y-QF-BAIG~kSGIEL-® -- -- - - -- - - ..~-o^r.0 @. x'...0.00 1~-.~ -464 1~,4 393-9~'L4-27-OE)-6 - ^' "'~-r-~.-^r °°„<EiISfIE6B - - 9.99 8.66 @v^0 1jF~4~- 196- ~--.•9b-- --eo^o-424-i n n '•~•.•v nr oAI cERSf~4E~9 - - - - :.-9 .00 1148 106 106 393-122-01-00-7 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 5,132.80 (1,005.97) 4,126.83 1149 107 107 393-122-02-00-0 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 5,132.80 (1,005.97) 4,126.83 1150 108 108 393-122-03-00-3 GILBERT BACA 5,132.80 (1,005.97) 4,126.83 1151 109 109- 393-122-04-00-6 STARK LAWRENCE W & CATHERINE R 3,467.61 0.00 3,467.61 1152 110 110 393-122-05-00-9 CANADY KENT L 5,132.80 (1,005.97) 4,126.83 11 0 -Iti•su--- ~-°°°-°-r~--°~ -°--~-°-rl~-°~ ---sus-»~e, ~eas PEES-~~r~~,-;,-a-;:~..,~~-Y-NN e.eo e-se a.-0o 1155 113 113 393-122-08-00-8 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 5,132.80 (1,005.97) 4,126.83 1156 114 114 393-122-09-00-1 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 5,132.80 (1,005.97) 4,126.83 1157 115 115 393-122-10-00-3 JOSEPH PFEIFLE 5,132.80 (1,005.97) 4,128.83 1158 116 116 393-122-11-00-6 BHA PROPERTIES LLC 5,132.80 (1,005.97) 4,126.83 1169 - --=~~~ •--•~1~ ~ -398-~-2-~-2-00-9--GN~Af-BA~C~FIC~D ~.~ 0 1160 514 76 393-131-01-00-3 ARMED MUSHTAO & REHMAT S 7,230.28 (1,309.92) 5,920.36 1161 515 76 393-131-02-00-B CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 7,230.06 (1,309.98) 5,920.08 1162 516 76 393-131-03-00-9 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 7,230.06 (1,309.98) 5,920.08 1163 517 76 393-131-04-00-2 RATLIFF CHARLES F & A DAWN 7,230.06 (1,309.98) 5,920.08 1164 518 76 393-131-05-00-5 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 7,230.06 (1,309.98) 5,920.08 1165 519 76 393-131-06-00-8 COLEMAN THOMAS M & POLLY A 7,230.06 (1,309.98) 5,920.08 1166 520 76 393-131-07-00-1 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 7,230.06 (1,309.98) 5,920.08 1167 521 76 393-131-OB-00-4 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 7,230.06 (1,309.98) 5,920.08 1168 522 76 393-131-09-00-7 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 7,230.06 (1,309.98) 5,920.08 1169 523 76 393-131-10-00-9 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 7,230.06 - (1,309.98) 5,920.08 1170 524 76 393-131-11-00-2 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 7,230.06 (1,309.98) 5,920.08 3~~1 53b--- ---70 39e~'r1z^^-~ ^F~iFN_nAK S,$N 6:99 0.99- 0:00 1+~° 637 7.6 vna +a+ +w nn + cevru neve urn p 't473 . 538 76 4Q4 141 15 f10-d SFVFN nAKSia[1M~AINERS.ASSN ~..^^.^..~ ----9-99 9.v^D 1174 525 76 393-132-01-00-0 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 7,230.06 (1,309.98) 5,920.08 1175 526 76 393-132-02-00-3 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 7,230.06 (9,309.98) 5,920.08 1176 527 76 393-132-03-00-6 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 7,230.06 (1,309.98) 5,920.08 1177 528 76 393-132-04-00-9 JAMES VARNER 7,230.06 (1,309.98) 5,920.08 1178 529 76 393-132-05-00-2 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 7,230.06 (1,309.98) 5,920.08 1179 530 76 393-132-06-00-5 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 7,230.06 (1,309.98) 5,920.08 1180 531 76 393-132-07-00-8 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 7,230.06 (1,309.98). 5,920.08 1181 532 76 393-132-08-00-1 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 7,230.06 (1,309.98) 5,920.08 1182 533 76 393-132-09-00-4 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 7,230.06 (1,309.98) 5,920.08 1'LSL~ 54R ~6 ~-+.32.30-00 0 1184 534 76 393-132-11-00-9 CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA INC 7,230.06 (1.,309.98) 5,920.08 TnTAI AI1An111JT ASSCSSCn Tn AMFNf1FIl ASCFCSMFNT Nn 1 M9• P1 FAR add 3d A9A3 939 37 $1 R79 57R 71 TOTAL AMENDED ASSESSMENT AMOUNT: E4,084,070.89 (5777.37) 54,083,293.52 THE NOTED PARCELS ARE THE 3 ATNs COMPRISING AMENDED ASSESSMENT N0. 1002 AND EACH ATN PROVIDES A PORTION OF THE SECURITY FOR THE TOTAL AMENDED ASSESSMENT NO. 1002 REMAINING AMENDED ASSESSMENTAMOUNTOF $1,879,578.71. (2) THE NOTED PARCELS ARE THE 3 ATNS COMPRISING AMENDED ASSESSMENT N0. 1119 AND EACH ATN PROVIDES A PORTION OF THE SECURITY FOR THE TOTAL AMENDED ASSESSMENT N0. 1119 REMAINING AMENDED ASSESSMENT AMOUNT OF $1,425,129.08. PREPARED BY: r ~ ~' WILSON & ASSOCIATES ~~ o`;•~~ F'''~)~Nq~ FRESNO, CALIFORNIA T 1 , , , ~, ,~ ,,,~ ^ ~2 ~U ~~ :• Fes, . ~ 1 APPROVED BY: w "_ ~'`~ " - /~%~ /fir IJQ;~;'~`"CZ\~ DATE: ~ - 2 r~ ~ AfO. 232&9 :,-~ ~ Exp. t1,-~t-~1 29182MA1 A-1-3 ~ ~!,9~,;Cf Vl~ C~a\~ ~ 04/02/97 Q H Q m J W F O Z ~U ~O~ Z W Z D ~O2 ~UW W LL y Z ~ W Z ~ ~ Q °a° W LLWLL pZN ~=W UY }O F- U J W U Q a a o_ 0 Z 0 F 2 Q 2 W y W N a 0 w LL O G a Q Z_ O K O LL J m F 7 N UZ zZ I n it-~ ~ 00 I ao M m i ~ 00 N 0 ooro 0 fD 0 occo 00 r~ 00 ro N~f1 V1M ~f1 rnrna~r~n Y) ~ lfi Nln mrnrnrnrn~ 0 LnN rnrnrn it FWCn QOv ' aQ O '~ a :° 'i M ~v ~ ui I ~ I ' oo~o F»f»o fn ovo w~w ~ ~ ririmriri ~o<ororn <o riririoiri~ %m cncoo ririri ~v<o<o w QO~ ZZfnFW (~Q O pfnZLL Z - 1L1 ~:I Cli ~ N a0 ~ o Q j M 1~ r r ~ _ fMMMNth www~w _ _ MC1MMM wtAwwfn CMMM w69w W UWW~QQ-~ ~ N w 'I w p p ~ w; ~ .- ~Z .~~V Q~ i M Q O Z a W ~ a ap Q O ~ O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z Z O ~ O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O) O) ON x0 00000 000 ZQO WOwF G 0 w '~', w O w G w OOOO E9 to to to OOO x9 M w C w N 0 m MMMOM h N~ ~ 0 mmonco MtM x+i xo xM N N In u)-N coxommo MMM A N N ooo N~pQ~ ( wwwrw wwwww F»wr» ~Q~LL Z ~ U) O d D 2'Z W I-a. U 0f 0 h r 00 a0 M 0 OONO OOI~O Ol00 Ox00 00 M xO /D N~f5 ~0hM 000~0 0M ViNO 00000 hN~ 000 ZO Q~-- ~--OO W ~ WO~u'O~ O O a0- '1~' M ~O ~ N Y1 N o ~ OG(GC tAw00 w O ~O w0~ fN0 ~ fV ~ N C 001 Oi N~~~~ C C 000 N u)NN11) NN C OC Y)N1n N ~W NZNQmO ~ Q U W x0 i 0 I ~ a ~ M w 1 ~ NNNI~N w w w~ w NN N w w w w w N N w w w ~ ~ H u a N I W W ~ ~ wZO~ ~a I w is a° W~° aw ~~ ~ a g~ QmQO"' p Z Z N ~ 7 i Op I O 0 0 OI ~ O O I~ O O O M O O N 0 O `7 O 0 f~ ~ O O O N a O fD f0 (O 01 O O O O O O f0 f0 f0 (O f0 O O O f0 (O (O W O W Q ~ I ~ 000 O n ~~000 b09 w~~ O xOD NN IO aOD N N hN~ N N LLO)10f5 Q W q N W Uf R O N V' NNNfON NNNNN NNN ~~?OZUO N I I h 0~7 1e+f h ~ ~ 0~0 ~ ~Mw ~~H H~~~~ ~~~ ~ Z N p w w w w ~ 0~~~ O as w~ i . a Q Z Z O ~ O ~ I O ) O O O O O 0000 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 O M lA t1'1NRN 0 0 0 0 N to W NN 0 0 0 0 0 NtON 0 0 0 ~ZQO c w ~ 0 w 0 w o w cooo vswww cco www o w v v ririaiu>ri nrrMr ririric+ic+i rrr~rn ririri nrr OWF. I ~ ~ mooNm mmxoxom mmco ~F•OQ~ C www~f9 wwwww www ~Q=~Z ~ ~ ~ U Q Z W - d' ~ I W a Q Q N i H 00 ~ 0010 0 N0 0 R U) In {1).-f0 Y7 ll)Y)lA lfJ In In In 2 ~ ~ , M ~ OD O 0 M O OOMO 0 0 0 0 O?O 0 M O 1~ N O N ION 1010 0 M M M M V 10 ~0 ~O 101O M M M M M NNU) M M M O~ Z ~ J W 'O xo ao o n to w w w w ~ w o v ao xo o ~ 00 eo ao ao co ao ao ao ao r Z Q Q~ OD I N 00 N R O N 0 111 tn~tO Nl!)t1)1n 10 ~lO to Z 2 NZ~ -- Z m IN a ~ n ~ ~ rn N ~N ~~ ~~~~N ~Nw~ ~ U'yO ~ ~ w m w w w w ~wgONmpW Q w ~ p .j w w w F» ~ i» yocnWh p~ ,' Q Q QFQ ~ . ~. i ' o i N1~ ~ (O M 01f) I~I~~ MxfjONN 00'-~1~0 N OIL N~ ~ ~ O O N O O C!J O O O n O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ m O ~ 0 0 10 0 0) aD xD 0 0 0 i~O) 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 NM N 0 0 0 0 0 (O 1~ 00 O)O 0 0 0 r (n~Z Nv Ou) 10 toN ~ MIn0 000~0 0400~ ~00 U Q~••• i ' O O Z O O O O O 0 0 p N M y Z a ' G C O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N~ ~ ~ ~ e- .-• O O V O 0 0 0 rn 0 O .O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 p O •` M O O rn m o _ O~ O O O rn rn rn m rn O Ci 4 0 0 rn rn rn rn rn 0 0 0 rn rn rn Q F-' Z Z Z Z 0 rn MMF..M MMM ~ MM MMMMM MMMMM MMM C O C O C O C O Z C !F ~ ~ ~ ~ Z ' J ' O O '~- i C O d W a V O ~ O ~ ' ~ 0 l p ~. - Z ~ W 2 O ~ 0) 07 WC~W N f0 e0~Ifi NNN p ~u)N ~ONN~ NIONNN NNN j Q c6 W f0 C L pfnZ 0) N 0) N N U ~ U Q t O N L W t c a m ~" ¢ U . C U ~ U ~ U F' U ~ Z d'a Q v a Qa W v QQa W v ~ T O a ti ~ t F-!n (~ Z~ W ~ QQ l ~ N a~ ~~ Q ? ~ n(p c0 a0 xD l~x0 f0 xDMN ~-' C T a NNN OOO NM~In0 hi~I~1~M 0.~NM~ R~f •f RR 10 x0 I~ ~a•t fn (n~ W 7 N J~ Il ~~ 2~ y 2~ Q W U o~ m xo r N .o rn rn rn r r n r r r r r n-n r r~ r Q W °c ~ c O °c O °c Q ~ ~ Q W Z Z Y c ~ N .•, F' Q Q d' U J J J J Q~ rn O w N __ Qom F i W ~ 2 Z l0 QQQQ QQQ p W NNN M Nx01~ O00'-N M V'10 J W Z Z Z Z Z Z Z ? O O O O O O O O - - O O O O O - - O O O - ~W 7 Q~ Z O j N i i N ~ m ~ m Q N N ~ ~ .- . . . . ~ ~ Q ~ N P'f ~ N Q = F Q Xm J LLl Q M T O Z .- U ~~~ OZfA WZO ~ O Z ~UW w "-- ~ Z ~ W Z ~ ~ wpQ p ZQ ~ W_ u-WlL p Z ~ IVY m l1 O U J W a a p_ ~_ p Z O LL F Z O Q W F., Q N N N N N M N N N N N M M M O M N N N N N M M M M M N N N N N O M O M M N N N N M O M M ~~~ V 7 M N O M M 0 R ~ d' er M M ~ 7 ~~ er O M M M M M ~ t0 M W M M ~ 1= W fn p Q p~ Q M M M M M co coEO~N M M M M M CO<ocococo M M M M M tncococoE0 M M M M M 00OC`om M M M M ~comN ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ rrrrn ~ r r ~ ~ rrrnr ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ rnrrr pO~ w W F ' ~~•- ~ ~~ •-~ ~~~•-~ ~~ •-•- ~~ t>Dt>D00turo t>Dtoeoaoao aooaoaoao ZZf/~I---U Q O W j Q Q () c+jc~jMM(M Vi fA fA E9 fH ('1MM(h('~ E9 f9 fA E9 E9 p)c'~MMai E9 EA fA E9 fA MC7chMM t9 Vi f!i Eri vi MMMM EA EA E9 ui MMMMM Vi f9 fH Eri Yi M('~fOl+)fM vi EA to f9 Vi MMC~)MM Vi to E» FA Eri W I ~ LL ~ Wp OOS- h fA Q ~ p Z ~ 0 W Q ~ u- W ~ Q~ a p 00000 M 00000 MMMMM 00000 MMMMM 00000 MMMMM 0000' 07MMM v vv ~v ~ vvv ~v v v ~ vv ~~~ ZZ MMMM M M M vv , , , , a V; ~ Z Q p '~ O W ~ <`'~ M M M M N N N N N (0 t0 N (O (0 M M M M M N N N N N t0 (O (0 N (0 M M M M M N N N N N (0 t0 t0 (0 f0 M M M M N N N N N t0 N (0 (0 EO M M N N N N t0 t0 c0 EO O O O O O M M M t0 a0 O O O O O a0 W M W to O O O O O a0 M M a0 a0 ~ F (~ Q ,_ Z i ~ EA Ki E9 fA vi to Ki vi vi EN fA vi Eli EA Ni EA vi Eri EA EA EN EA Vi Eri = Vi Vi di Vi EA EA EA vi E9 EA EN EA E9 E9 E9 U U U LLZ p= p Z ~ ~ ~ W a ~ p N N N N N N. N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q'Z W~-~ 00000 00000 00000 00000 0000 V'd"Q V'd' V'~RR~ 7~RR V' U Z O Q Z OO O O O O O O C C C O C C O C O O O O O O G O O O t - f0 t0 f0 t0 f0 f0 f0 tD cC EG (f) cf) (G (0 t0 Fw ( . IW ~ W O~ LL Z Z _ _ _ N N N N N _ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Ni rrr~r~n 0 0 0 0 0 nnrnr 0 0 0 0 0 rnnnn 0 0 0 0 0 ~~ W (n Z y p m ~ yd pyLLJN~ fV N (V fV N En EnE»Eaui N fV (V N (V tot9tototo fV (V cV N N toEnt»E~svi N N N N fV Eriuivivivi fV N N N ViViNiYi M M M M M vi Vi vi vi vi M M M M M viNiEritovi MM M M M t»tovivivi W Z O p U ~ Q ; j ~~ W Q a t Q LL N Qm¢p" p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Z Z (0 (0 t0 N (0 (0 t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 N t0 t0 t0 t0 (0 t0 t0 f0 t0 tD (0 (0 a R ~ O 7 R ~ 7 R 7 R R ~' 7 V: JZ~pQO tG (0 EO t0 (C NNNNN (C tC (G (0 tG NNNNN t0 tf) (O tG (D NNNNN fG tC t0 (0 (0 NNNNN (G tC t0 t0 NNNN MMMMM 01010101M tnQ1MMM Q W Q w W F. N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M Z~I"'-Ut Q ~ !n Z ~- Z (~ C9cn~pQ~O ~ Z MCM (MM M Vi FA fA E9 fA MMMf7 M ui ui EH E9 E9 C7 M MMM fA t9 vi EA E9 MM fM M C7 E9 EA ui E9 ui f+1 tM E7M W Vi M EA C7 (~) (M f`7 t7 fA ui E9 f9 fA C'7 C7 (h C7 f+) Efi to t9 EA EH MN7 C7MM Eri f!i to rA ui ONp~ Q ~ O Q ~ W ~ a p N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Z Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M M M M Q) M M M M M ~ M M M M M Z Q O MfMMMM MMfMEMM MMMMM MMMMM fMtdMM ~~f V' V'~ ~ V' V'~ V' ~vvvv ~ O w- r r r r n Eo m co to N n n r r r m m m Eo co r r n n n to o N N m r n r r r m co Eo m m r .r r r~ m m m m N N N N N to t>o ao ao ao N N N N N ao ao ao ao ao N N N N N ao ro o o to A EA o i Q )~ UZ(Q Vi Vi E9tA f9 EA EA bi f9 E9 f9 fA HEA Ui EH Eri EA FA Vi MfH t9M HfA to fA t9 Mfg fA fAH E9 t Er E , W Up2~Z p Z ~ ~ ~ W a p p ~ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ~~O~Z J MM~~~ ao ao op to ao ~~~MM ao ao tD ao ao MMM~~ ao ao ro ao ao ~~~~M ao ao ao co ao MMMM ao to to ao f0 t0 t0 EO t0 m m <o Ec to Nt0 t0 t0N m m m <n ro Nf0 t0 EO t0 m tc to m m QW 1- ~ O p S W Z N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ z~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ H H ~ ~ ~ H ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ H ~ ~ vi E9 E9 Z M (n Z (/) ~ ~ ~ f9 N ~f9 f9 H Vi Vi E9 E9 W pnQO g U pt~QUrnm ~ Q Q~ Q 2 Q ~. H O MtO~N ~tD .-Mt(? MNN tOv hOMtOM NNa00 MNNaD .- ~Mf(~ O M (OM N1~ ~~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O d 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~m O 00000 NM N 0 00000 ~ OT0 ~ 00000 M ~N 00000 NM N c0 0000 h00010 00000 NM ~NtO 00000 1~ N N 00000 M< (q ~ Z t O O~ O O a 1 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O O O~ O O O O O ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 E ~7F~ W Z Q ~ MM MM M 0 0 0 0 0 M MMC~ M 0 0 0 0 0 M MM M ~ 0 0 0 0 0 ~~ aa.e}~ 0 0 ~ 0 0 ee~~ ~~ 0 ~N~ MM MMM e~'-N ~ Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O _ O O d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q ~--. M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M ' d QWO.' ll.Z~m ' N N N W C7 ~~ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Q~fAZ d' Q U F- C7W ~ ' F(~m ~ y~ aOMO~N 'V' V' N N N M N EO t~ N~ N N N a0 MO ~N N N t0 tp tp M V N t0 I~ c0 c0 f0 (0 f0 a0M O.- (0 f0 h n M O.-NM r W OO a0 a0 ~ N t0 htO a0 N M ap M MO.-NM M M M M M nnr~rr rrrr~n rnnrr rnrrr r~nrn; rrr~t~r nr~rrn rrrrn X W ~ Z ~ Q W W S p~ W ~m Nf~aOM O N NM'CN NNNNN lO f~aOM O NNNNM NM <tN MMMMM t01~a0M MMMM NM d'N ~~ V'd' Nf~tO M O N d' V V' NM N NNN~N Z w V1 '2 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ O O 0 0 ~ O 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~~Z e-~~~ r r ~ ~ ~-~~ ~~ ^ r ~- ' ~~ ~ ~ ~-e-i Q Q= HQ Xm W Wa F- ~z wz a, O ~U W V.. Z p 00 wQ p Z W Q ~ W 00 z ~~ J W a a o_ ~_ 0 2 O LL F Z O a z W N W N Q D w IL O 2 a a z 0 LL Q W J a F Q M i w~ O vvvva aD M aD 00 M vv$vv W a0 W a0 voovv W O O W 00 vvvvv a0 M M a0 M MVVVV a0 W W W a0 VV~~v a0 M W rvvvv ~ N N N N vvvvv N N N N N HWtnpQpy~ Q rr~n~r nnnr~n r~~~~~ rnnrr r~oc~~ nlnF»t~r r~~~r r~rrnn r~~rr~ rrrrn ~~~~r nrnrr ' nn~~~ t~~~nn p O ~ W W H z z y F- (7 Q ao co ao ao ao M M M M M ao ao o a ao M M M M M ao U ao M M M ro ao ao ao m M M M M M a ro w oo ao M M M M M ao a eD eo ao M M M M M .- .- ~ .- sf v a v a a a a O Wjo U e»f»u-enfa uir»vivsv~ vs 1»(a 1n1»1»1n1» us/n1»viu~ viF»v-u-vs vi»fsav~~ ~e»u-viu> Q ~ W wp~00=u. cn ~ ~ O z w Q ¢ O ~ Q a Q vvvvv ~vvvv v°o °o vv vvvv~ vvvvv v~vvv rnoooo o0000 Z ~ZQO OOOOO OOOOO oo OUl (A00 00000 00000 00000 NN/V N fD t0 c0 (O (0 NN1V 1V 1V (0 (0O (O (0 O W F ~ .-. W M O o0 M ui to (A (A to a0 W W a0 00 to Vi to M 1H OD a0 a0 (A 1H (A aD aD a0 aD M (A M (A to 1H 00 aO Op M 0D 1H Ni fA vi fH 00 00 OD aD M /9 di 19 to 19 aD M 00 a0 00 Vi (A vi (A 1n 00 00 00 W M f9 (A fn vi vi ~ U Z V Up2~'Z O Z ~ ~ ~ W a D ~ZWF~ ~ o0000 vvv-v v 00000 vvvvv 00000 voovv 000oo vvvvv oooao v,vv v, v, ooooo v, v, v,~vv 0ommloa ~~'-~~ cooaroro ~~~~~ F O O ? Z O p ZZ c6 m (o <c 1d rrnrn co (o <ri co co r~r~rrn /ti o c co cc rv~f»rr <c ~ (o cm cd nnnrn a ~ co co co nrnrr co m co cc co nrrrn of of of of of ooooo of of of ai of 00000 Iw~WO~~- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M M M M M M M M M M ~W(n Z(npmO N d p ~ W t!) ~ MPIMMM M fA t»tN M MMMMM HD•F9 f9 (A 19 M ('MM to (A f9 MM1M C+)M to (A Ki 19 to MM MfM M to Ul fA fA f9 IMMMMM t9 f9 fA f9 to MMMMM f919 fH E9 (A MMMMM l9 fA (A to fA 1 ~ Q W 2 0 ~ n ~ w ~o° a ww oaQ aQm~oQ~~ Q ZZ N N N N N V' V ~ V ~ N N N N N R~~~~ N O O N N ~00sf ~ N N N N N ~f a~~? O N N N N 7~?7R N N N N N '~f V:~ V'~ N 0 0 0 0 fOC~<V; 0 0 0 0 0 V: '7 d'tt `7 J Z~ p a 0 rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn O O rn f»r» rn m rn rn rn rn rn rn m rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn M M 1 M M M rn rn rn rn rn M M M M M rn rn rn rn rn W Q W W H 07 M 07 M D1 M 01 Of TO) 01 MM Of M W O) D7 TT W MO) 4)Q7 a700) N NN NN NNN NN fq Z W Z U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ H H ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ H ~ ~ H ~ ~ H ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C~yppQ~O O z O~ ~UQ Q$Q" ~O w~ a p ZZ MMm01 O) O) W O)O)O) O O Of 000)~ - Of ~O)O)O) s} 010f O)O)O) W Ofd W OI N M M M M NMMMM M M M M M MMMMM ~ZQO O vvvvv N N N N N vsrvvv N N N N N vcovv N (A /fl N N vvvvv N N N N N vvvvv N N N N N vvvvv N N N N N ~r~~r~ M M a0 a0 00 ~~rrr ap aD a0 00 00 W H Q U Z V ~ w o0 00 ao ro vi (» ui to en ao ao co eD ao to to E9 ts1 vi ao ao 0o fH fn 1n m w ao co ao 1n 1» /n vi ui ao a0 aD a0 ap 19 (A t9 to to eo eo aD co ro (A Vi M tfi to ao ao ao ao co t9 to u9 vi to ao ao ao ro a0 H~ Y! tH t» 1H lyJ . U p 2 ~ Z D Z ~ ~ ~ w a p p ~ ~ N h~ N N N N M1 N N oo N O O N M 00 N N N N V 7 co ' V' N N N N N l n t o~ orrrn ~ 0 0 0 0 nr~rrr 0 0 0 0 0 O ~Z J ~ ~w ~O t0 Mt0M(0 MO(0Ot0 ~~~r~ O(Of0O M O<O t0 t0 O ~~~~~ f0 O(O (O f9 fA 1D t0 ~ ~~ OOOfOM Ol0 t0 t0 O ~~~~~ OMtO (00 (O t0 (000 ~~.-~.- 000 f0 t0 (0 10 (O (0 (O (0 .- .- f0 t0 c0 (O (O 00000 vvv vv M(0 (O 1D f0 00000 vv vv v p Z~z QIL~ W LL~ MMMMM MMMMM M MM M/'MMMM MMMMM /'MMMMM _ MMMMM _ _ MMMMM y ~ Q O ~ O V) E9 (A V! (A Y! (A /9 M f9 19 fA (A fH 69 (A (A Y! M (A (A (A f9 (A fH (A f9 f9 f9 19 19 19 f9 f9 f9 19 19 1H 0 ~ W Q m U V) o a aoQ=Q ~- r ~~ h O M10 W 0 0 0 0 0 NNa00 M 0 0 0 0 0 1001 ~~'I~ 0 0 0 O M (00) N 0 0 0 0 0 O)NN 00 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 (Q 01 NN 00 0 0 0 NMaD a-~ 0 0 0 0 Of N~ W.- 0 0 0 0 W Q.' m 0 0 0 O. O O O O O O 0 0 O O O O O ~ Q O O O O O O O O O 0 0 O O O O O 0 O O O O O 0 O O O O U O (n~Z QF N 17 ~1A T 00000 ' OO CnO ~ 0G~O r.- ' ~ f7 NM ~OOO RN ~r a0 OOOOO Nlh stn OOOOO Ncn e~ln OOOOO NM N OOO ~ 0 NM~}N 00000 ~ W Z Q 1nN N~ tl 9 N1A YY 1n ll i 1A ~(O tO <D tO tO uj (O f0 ~ N N N N N NNNNN N N N N N M M M M M NNNNN M M M M M ~ a~ r r ~~~ oaaaa ~ ~~~~ oaaaa r ~~ ~~ aaaaa r~~~ ~ aaaaa ~~~~~ aaaaa ~~r ~~ aaoaa r r r'- aaaaa ~'-~ ~~ aaoao rnmrnrnrn M M M M M rnrnrnmrn M M M M M rnrnrnrnrn M M M M M rnrnrnrnm M M M M M mrnrnrnrn M M M M M rnrnrnrnrn M M M M M rnrnrnrnrn M M M M M rnrnrnrnrn M M M M M F W ~ ~ Q W Z ~ m W C) ~ ~ In N N 1n N 111 l(7 N N t{) lA N lt) l17 t() N lf1 N N N V1 11) lfJ In lf1 N YY U7 4) Y~ N N ~fl In In to 1A lt1 lA In ~ !n Z N Q' Q U F- Z w W p F m U] N~ l17 fO f~aD ~ O f M O) W W 0 NM T 0 0 0 0 ~MNU~(0 0 O O o o n W O)O ~ O O O o o aD Q)O N N N N o o M Rln Or N N N N N m O N M N M M M M ~U7 MnM M M M M M r n r r n r ao ao ao co eo a 0 ao eo ao ao ao ( O O a co ao co co ao ao ao ao ao eD ao ao ao a0 aD ao ao ao wiz F- i°w~ p~m Z!/J MI~a00f O ~NNN O ~NM d' N fOM f0 (0O 10 f~ 00010 O M t0 tO I~ ~NM V'N I~I~I~ r n (0 f~00 W O rrnr 00 ~ NMS{~fY 001000 W 00 (0 ha000 0000 W 000) .-NM ~N O)mM MT - W W 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ .- r .- e-.e- ~- .~- '- '- ~- ~- ~- r '- r '- ~ ~ r Q Z N Q M rn O Z U ~0~ Z V~ O wZp ~OZ ~ Q= Q W ~Ug F-Q m W~~ p J 2m Z W C7~~ W F W p Q p ZQ ~ W _ LL W LL pZ~ IVY m LL O F U W~ p 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 d' 8 7 7 7 7 7.7 0 0 7 M M M o 0 r O O 0 7 7 r N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r N O O 7 0 r 10 N 10 1 A F W N a 0 7 pO~Qp W F- ~~r~r~~ ~~~rr nnnn~ r.-~.-r r~r~~t~~ rr~r~ O O M M M v-»~oro~ .--.- M O cvvi .- N rn M M r O O en O u~ N O O N 7 aoMrM~n 7~aoaoN 7 7 ~nu~ NN ZZ(nI-~wOQ O (~ W ? Q 77 ~~ tflN (A HVl 77777 to f9 f9 f9 fA 77777 (fl d-f9 fA to MMM E9 fA f9 M M ~ ~ N 0 al0rih7 N ~ N H 0 77 HV- I ~ W lJ .- t 0 H 9 to A .. W p (n O O N N f to N Q ~ O Z EA w Q ~ ~ ¢o a p a0 a0 eD N t0 a0 e0 00 a0 ap a0 a0 aD a0 N O O 0 e0 c0 eD O ~ 7 O O M M .-. O 0 a0 ao 00000 00000 00000 00 a0 c0 aO aD O OO CO 0 0 cor N00 00 ~Za~ O W ~ fV NCV fV fV f0 t0 cD c0 tD a0 oO Op 00 CO NNNNN 10 10 (O fD f0 OD aD aD a0 a0 NNNNN t0 l0 (O (0 (O a0 OD aD a0 ap COMMCM f9 E9 N l0 N f0 (0 f0 MC 10 f9 (0 T r (0 07 r i0 C (A C f9 op l~Ct~ ro 0 t0 10 M r O M O O l~l~ M M O O ~ F, (~ Q .- EA EA Ui (A H! to fA to fA fH M EA b9 fA (A fA fA fA fA N N M c0 n r U ZUD M eO'f 9tA f9~N 6N MtA UO=~Z p ~ " uv ZW ~ ~, ~ W n. d'Z W F 00c0 (0 (0 (O c0 (O f0 (O <O t0 c0 t0 (0 r 0011'11010 OOOOO t00 OO N M M h O 0 O 0 M r10r 00 O(007N M M (O t0 ~OO~ W Qp 0Q1Q) 01 Q) 000 O 0 01 O)Q)Qf 0> 0 000 0 Q> TOf Of 0 0 00 O O 00000 f9 (fl .-.-.- 00 ~f9 ` M M 0 M 0 M ~ O) I~fM (O N N a0 0 41 O W ~ W O'2 LLOj M MMM M M MMM M MMM M M 101n 117 10 r M NtON aON N N W V1 ZtgpmO ~ d p (n W 0 (h tM (h c7 fO FA FA fA f9 (A MMMMfh di fA f9 (A f9 MMMMM M to b9 fA EA NNfV fA EA fA N fA O 0 N MhOi7Vj ~ N N M f9 ui 10 f9 f9 W~~ ~ N ~~ ~ ~ W ZO ~ to N . E9 fOppZ~'~~ ? ~ Q~VjgILQ Q m Q U .... p O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O (O t 0 O O r N f 0 .- M N N ZZ 77777 7 ~ 777 7 ~ V ~~ 00(O f0 t0 fOO M r 0 0 10 tO r N N ~ ~ JZ~pQO fMM fM M M 000010 fg) M('~f7 M 00000 (7 MMMM 00000 00 (G f0 (O fAEA10NN (00 10f9 0 0 M O 0 tA 0 lfl R CM x0701 N 47N aor O0 rr QWQW WF.. N(VNNN NNNNN NNNNN NNN N ~ 0 NN(OMM MM Z~H-OQr (n Z V- Z U 777~7 fA (» fA f9 to 77~7~ f9 (9 f9 to ~777'Q f9 f9 (A fA (`~('~(`~ E9 f9 f9 (M f9 in 0 O 00 f001n7 (O M r (0 f9 7~ f9 f9 (~~~~Q~O ~ 1D fANON ~ ~ Z N . OU~~Up ~y `fl Q ~ Q W a - p M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M O O 10 N 10 V 1 0 0 O O O a 0 0 f M 1 n M (O ( O Z M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O N N ~- a0 M 7~ ~ZQ~ O W F:. r1~~r~ co eo oo ao eo N e0 00 00 00 rrrr`~ ro ao ao ao ao 00 00 00 d0 00 ~~rr~l~ ao ao roao ao GO 00 00 CO 00 ooririci v)»rrr (O (O c0 rio rui f0 ao r r a0 r o tH o V! uivr r ao 7NtO r N O r O rr tO tO O O ~ Q ~,- (7 Q s fA fA E9 /9 M Vi 4f Ui N V! EA V) !fl K! M V- to Vi t9 ~ ~ Oi V a0 LLIUZU Vp=~Z O ~ MM~0f9 v~~sv~s f9f9 p Z ~ ~ ~ W a p p rrrrr rrrrr rrrrr oov11n 1n 1n o ~0 N o o t070cO CO r~ ~ ~ 00000 0 c0 (G tG tG 00000 tG 0) /0 fD t0 00000 t0 t0 t0 tG f0 00101010 O O ~ri ri ri Y10 t+i~ G M Oi r N 0 G 0 C a0 N GOON Oi o u 0 ~ <O (O U (O O ~ Z J ~ O O O O O O O O OOO O O OOO f9 f9 a0 EO 00 00 f9 r N fA fA a 1 f f O t0 r 07 f 77 p~W ~Z d' ~~~7'R 77~F77 77st 7'? 10N10 10 - N h 7 ~f0 .-S CR Z (~u OZ ~fn Z(n ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~MM~~ ~~~ ~ W ~ r r ~ N ~ ~NN o~ O~QO~ mU ~ N ~~~~ Q Q°Q~Q N W f~ OM(Q O O O <3 0 Mll~0 N10 0 0 0 0 0 a0 r ~rO 0 0 0 0 0 rM~N M 0 0 7Q v O NNMCO.O 0 0 0 0 0 M ((t 0 0 Q.' m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O J J J O O J O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Z (O f~ao dl G 0 0 0 0 NM 1n 0 0 0~ O (O ha001 O O O O O fON O O J O r NNO1 N M O N Nt+7 O O y~ l -' 2 N N N M 1 ~ V' V `V' d' ~ V' N Q Q a ~ Q Q O r 0 0 0 0 W Z Q N M M M M M R M M M M (h M M M M M 1 p~ 0~ p M M 1 p f O r M Z N N N V1 r r rr r O O O O O r rrr O O O O O r r a-rr O O O O O N N N rr~ O O O~~ N N ~~ Z O M C OOOO r M M M M M rr M M Q Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0~~~ ~ . ~ 0 ~ '-' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M F F~ Q ~ C O = 0 M ~ M M M M M M M H Z ~,.-__ ~ C p ~ O ~ Z ~ F, ~ O Z Q ~ 'O ~ O 4'JQw~ lL g , v ° m 2~m W Oln~ 1010101A N 10 (010 tO N 1010 N10 t0 101011i 1010 1010 c ~ R Q ~ ~ y ~ 'D ~ fr0 tr0 (rO arO ~OM Q~ W 7 Y ~ t ~O O Z m Q U a K Q t O ~ m U Z c a F Z a ~ W H L ~ x~ ~1 c L Z W W t ; ~A >, O a m F- (n m 0 0 .- aN aM M W ~ 7N f0 r OO ~ ~~ s0~ O r N M 0 O ~~ 11'1 M 710 O O ~~ ~ f0 r ~~ y `~ J v ~r 0 r ~ U ~. r (0 f0 <0 pp n r 0 O rro x~W ~ a 0 OOOD aON 0a cOa D a DO f H O ~ y a l e - y ~ aoaow W ~ Z y~ f.. a w tt 1 Q L' ~ ~ ~ N O Q N ~ N .N-..N,. v W W D: `. Q ~ r- p~m U 0ro000 NMC10 (O rc000 rN M~N COr ~ 0 Z l0 W Q ~ O f0 co0000 N Z W W7 0 0 0 0 0 0000r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r r d Z Q. r N N N r r r rrr rr.- a - 7 W Q 7 m •-•-•- Q~Z to N N Q to r 0 O 0 Q ro N Q = F Q op w J W H O Z ~U ~O~ 2 WZp ~OZ ~UW W LL N Z Q W Z ~ y Q ~Q~ W_ LL w LL pZ~ ~ = W UQ m w O U J W a J p_ ~_ O Z LL F Z O Q H z W N W (A Q O W LL D Q Q Z O LL W J Q H ~ Z N N N O O ~ O N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O N N N ~ N O O N N N N O a0 0 0 ~ U N N N N 07 01 O N N N N N N N N N N N N. N O O O O O N N N O N O O N N N N O N M M _ I F-Wfn QOM ' ~'ctvvv N Nt~ 1~ vOVV v hf9NN N vv~d'd' NN NN vvvv V NN NN N 00000 EA E9 f9 E9 (fl vsf V' V'~ N I~N OO~~~ f9 (A N aOMMM In tA000 p O 2 a W W F N NNNN N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N NNN N N N N N ~ .-r ZZfnH-(7Q tpZLL ~vvriri »E»v-vi ri vvv uf ~ ~ vvvvv vvvvv vvvriv ~ vv v cncoco pp ZU U x~Q f v v tn tntnf»u-u- v~f»t»»t» t»vft»t»e f » u> tn use»v~ Wy LL~ ~ W ¢ Q ~ O Z ~ ~ ¢~ a p ~ 00 a0 O O O O o0 a0 aD a0 eD aD a0 aO ap ap op o0 00 O O O O O o0 oD oD O e0 O O oD oO a0 00 O M ~ O Z Z ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O v 'tT ~ I L~L ZaO r ~ ~ C G MMMfA f9 G C r r~ ~ to tAMMM r~ ~ ~ n r M M MMM ~ r r ~ ~ MMMM M C C C G G fA di f9 fA lA r~ ~ ~ G r M MME9M G G ~ ~ ~ f9MM M M ~ G G o 0 MfAN NN U O W F.. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O M M M Q lJJ U Z U O I Up2QZ Z ~ ~ ~ W a ~~~ ~~fA tA~~~fA I E9~~~(fl fA~~ fA ~HfA (9 ~MyH p 0' Z w F- ~ V M M M O O f0 t0 t0 01 Of O M M M N O (O t0 t0 M M M M M ~O f0 (O (O t0 M M M M M f0 (O CO f0 (O O O O O O O O O O O M M M M (O (O fD Of (O O O M M M O O f0 c0 t0 M O M N (O O O f~ I~ FOO ZppF- ZZ vv rnrnrnnr vC nvirnrnrn rnrnrnrnrn rnrnrnrnO~ GCCCO fH f9 vi vi t9 <! 01~~hT CC t»virnrnT ORMri rnf9NNN W~ W O~~y, N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N V of v ~ W l g Z N p m O ~ d p W ~ N ~ N N N N M U~ E9 fA f9 fA M N N t f 1 (A f9 fA fA N N N N N f9 f9 f9 fA f9 N N N N N f9 (A E9 fA f9 N N N N N fA fA fA to EA N N N fA fA f9 N h f~ l~ to EA f9,fN Z a I wzOpf~~~ a~ W a aN y U .Q Qm~o.~ p N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N O M I~ n Q Z Z _ Oi Oi Oi Oi Oi _ _ Oi Oi Oi Oi Oi _ ~ Oi Oi G G .- G Of Oi Oi Oi 00,000 C O G C O .-~.-e-.- G Oi Oi Oi Oi ~ ~ ~.-e- Oi Oi ~ i i ~ O ~ 00 i C V N ~ p Q J a rnr~rr nnrnn rr~nnn nnrrr u-u-En»u- r~rrrr O O rnnnr O N ( nv>coaoao W W~ Q W M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M N N N ZUZWZU^ aa ~~~Ui~ a a ~~~4i~ ~~H~~ ~~~~~ ~~H~~ a ffl~~~~ ~ ~H~ C9lnxpQ~O p Z ON ~Up O ~ ~ Q a~ p co co co co ro vvv v v co ~ co co o vvv v v co ~ co co co vv vvv is co co co co vvvvv 0 0 0 0 0 ooooo m co ~c co ~n avvvv co co cn co <u va vv co o m voo~c`3 ZZ ~za0 O , , , n~~rn ~~~~~ , , rn~rr ~~~~~ , nr~rr~~ ~~~~~ ~~r~~n ~~~~~ GGGGG ~~~~~ ~t~~n~ ~~~~~ v ~r~n~r~ ~~~~~ ~GGGG ~~~~~ ~ wF 2U 00000 i f i t 00000 f t i 00000 i i 00000 i < i 00000 .00000 0 MC~M ~U % » » » n u n v% i a % s%~ p a a%~st ~ i»%uvvsvs in%%%in us iHiAfn ~ U Z v ~ p x ~ Z ~ ~ ~ W d p p ~ ~ (O t0 f0 f0 (O C C (G C G ~ (O (O (O t0 fC fC C G (G f0 t0 t0 f0 ~O G O (O U G (O (O (O f0 (D C C G G C O O O O o G C C C O ~ (O f0 (O (O O 0 G C C (O t0 !O t0 ~ C C 0 C 0 `' f0 O ~ 0 C V V V O ~ Z J ~ Z ~W ~~ f ( vvv v vvv ~v ( ( vvvvv v v f ( t f vvvv vvvv~ t t ( ( ( v ~ ~~~ u~»v-enu> ( f f t f vv vv~~~ l ~ ( t f ~~~~~ t ( ( f v>nnr ~ ~o~o<o p Z~Z _ _ ~~~~~ _vvv ~~~N ~ ~N ~ v N N N r ` » » ~~ ~~ »~~ ~~ »~~ ~ »~~~ »~ ~ v~ ~W~O QO~ N ONQUrnmV~ Q Q°Q=Q F- UQ, O~ NN 00 ~ 0 0 0 0 sr c00f NN 0 0 0 aO ~~ h O 0 0 0 0 Mt/~a0 .-v 0 0 0 TOM ~00) 0 0 0 0 0 i~ OMfO~ 0 0 0 0 NNaO ~ M 0 0 fOTM((r O1 Q' m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O (n ~ Z ~~cO I~aD O O O O O O)OrNM O ~ - ~~(O I~a0 . 0)O NM .- N N N N V ~c0 I~00 N N N N N NM7ui O O O O O f0 I~o001O O O O ~N NM 0 0 0 ~ ~ r ~ N N N N N Q ~ N N N N ~ ~ N N ~. Z Q ~ N~ N N ~ N N N N ~ N N N N N N N N N N N N N~ ~ N~ N N N N N N N ^ NNNN N X QQ (7 C7 C7 M M W MOTM M MMf7 M 0ITTTOf f7 (7M fh M MOMM01 MMMM M 01 01 0 01 W MC7MMt7 OfOT00 1+7 MfhMM 0fT 0101 O1 M M MM M W MM W N M M M MM OO W 07N M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M H W ~ Q W ? ~ p ( [O w ~Wj N M N aoaoao~ao (O I~ o00f 0 maoaoaorn NMVN mrnrnmrn O (O i~ NN rnrnrnrno NMStN ooooo (OI~cOMO oooo~ ~NM ~N - - (Ot~ t0 (O f0 =nnn I - ~. . ¢ ¢~ N Z t i~ U Q zWw F.Nm N Ms{N W NNV W C01~ ap O)O NNNOM NMVN M O MOf Of O (O 1~ NO0 T NM st'N 000 0 IO I~oONO 0000 ~NM ~N fOh ~N (O X W 7 MTO) ~ .-.-.- .- ~ err NNNN W y Z Q H MM MM ('7 ~7M p~m My N ~p r N N N pp Q~ O N M M M M Nf0 f~ M ~ M M M 00M O N M M M V'N fD h ~ OD 01 O N N N M.y~N tOh OONO N W~~ ^ ^ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~^ N ~ ~ N N N NN N N f O f O f 0 Z ~~ ~ e r r ~~ r .-~-~ ~~~ r ~- e r r ~~~ Q~ Q Q= H Q m J W Ia- M rn O z .- U OZID W Z p ~ O Z ~UW W LL !~ Z p W 2 ~ N Q °a° W LL C7 QZa' IVY m LL O U ~'W~ O o0000 M M M M M 00000 M M M O O 00000 O M M M M ~00ooo M M M M M oo O M r (O n f0 o O I- W f q Q O ~ pO~QpW ~ M M M M M O_O_O_O_O_ MM M 0 0 O_O_O_fAVi 0 M M M M wO_O_O_O_ M M M M M O_O_O_O_O_ O M f90 a 0 0 0 0 O O O Z Z f/1 F W (~ Q O p V7 Z LL Z C ) t0 (O (O t0 t0 (A M• d! w (fl (O (O t0 w w fA (O (O ~D c0 EA tH (fl f9 t0 (O fD c0 (D w fA fA (fl (A (O w (O OD t0 00 Q Q Y1 Of . z lL ~ W ~ O - r ~ z Z O O In ~ t» w W ¢a ~QZ g LL w~ O a Q p Q rnmrnrnrn v,?vvv rnmrnoo vvvoo ornrnrnrn ov,vvv rnrnrnrnrn vvvav, orn ov v ro v oo v ao o 0 u7Z ~ O o000o NNNNN ooooc NNNf9 fA ooooo tANNNN 0oooo N NNNN oc f9N oi r of n of n o w ~ ~ ~F. ~ Q'- MMMMM MMM MMMM MMMMM M (O tD t0 `-' <ainuvuiifl d9%% %%%vl u~%%%u9 i9 rn m M Q oNi U ~= LL 2 p ~ Z p ?~~O W ~ a p i ~ZVF~ rn m rn rn rn rrrrr rn rn rn o 0 r~roo o rn rn rn rn orrrr rn rn rn rn rn nnrrr o rn or~ ~ N .- vs o o ZQQU~WQ2Z S ~ LL' riciric+ici NNNNN ¢`t V V' V riMrioo NN NEA fA d 'O V cririciri f9NN NN RV a~t riric•iairi NNNNN a V aRa oM fAN y ad M r ad M o O W W 0 2 O7 p W : r ~~~r : : : rrr ~~r~ : rr~~~ D n O i fn Zln ~ ~p0 ZpWF ~ ~ . tnf»r»wu> F»»r» t»t»tntn wwufwta n tn a r_ ao ~ a R v ~ ~ F- WZOWfn fA~Q cV w N z Z ai w J NOwwaOc~ aQ OQ~~ mQ p Z Z rrrrr O O O O O nnroo O O O O O orrrr O O O O O rrrrr O O O O O or O O o G f o O f N N o O Jz~pQO Q N N N N N eororooo N N N O O rooowfn O N N N N wroaowao N N N N f V rorooroo O N t»o N 0 M 1 o { V n O o W W ~.:. Q W Z ~ I- - C7 Q ~ Z LL N N N N N co co co ~ ~c t9 t» t» w to N N N co cc cc fA w w N N N N co to <c m NN N N N co cc m cri -<c N cc M M v a n O o !n Z U U~~pQLLO is fH M w w tH u9 ua vi w N ao ~n 0o Q z M ao ~W002-z ~ ~ w O~~~Up as w~ p Q V ~~R O O O O O ~7`700 O O O O O 0 V C V~ O O O O O V V' d'~ O O~ O O OR O O N N N N N N O O O O -Z QQ O F. C G O C C Qf W Q1N T M M M M M CCO00 01O MfA w MM M 000 GC fHM M TN M MMM C OOOO m MM01 M M MMM M OC wN M C7 N f 0 !'7 N I D N n ~ ~ 00 ~ G N ~ Q~ n WUZU~ i»i»%iflin ifliflur toi»i»ia is%%ifliH in ~, ° ~ U ~ 2 LL Z w p Z ~ ~ ~ W d p p ' ~ ~~ ~~.-- V .-.-.^-00 V V C C 0 ~~~.`- C V .~-.~-.~-~ ~ V V O~ O .N- ~ _~ f O C O 2 Z J Z ~ O ~ w ~ N ( NNN rrrnr <c co co co <c N f f rnrr»vi co cn ~n N N N f wrrrr ~c co co ro f N f N N nrrnr ro o o m co N wn co N rn O vs w O o o p Z ~ Z r ~~~~H ~~ w ~~~~ ~~~H~ ~ N N M ~W~ONQ O.W N Z O O OQa~o =~ w w Q Q ~ Q ~ NN00~~ 0000 nmNN r 00000 vOMC(~Of 00 0 NNaO~sr 0 t007 W ~ m 0 00 00 O c R~ O C? O O 00 O N 0 0 00000 ~ N % 0000 00000 ~ 00 00 = ~p ` N Z i. O ~ I y ( O O O O r W ~ O c 7~ . O O O O NC0 f ao Of O O O O O O' e-.- V d ~ y H Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N N N N N N N N N N C ~ Z 2 Q W M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M '- d N A x NQ cnr~r~cncb cncnc%~c%~cb o5c%>c%~cAr~ oir~r'> i~ r~ n ° E v ~ QF- N W MMO W W MOM M W MMOf o MOMMO c N01 z 10 Q M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M =O d N .Y L O u ~ C N ,J 'JW ~ O p d1 ~ ~ d ~Z W c a ~ « O ~ m W Ufq~ F-~W7 (O (O (O t0 f0 rrrnr (O t0 t0 f0 (O nrrrr c0 f0 c0 (O (O nnrrr !O t0 t0 c0 t0 nrrrn (O t0 nr f0 y 2 F. a . 9 ~Q Z 0 Q t O A ;! U U N C a ~' ~ - L ~ J V` ' W d' l q W 4 F.ym ro~00.- NM~N r a0 N tOr o0 M0 ~ N M f0 ~ ~ y C ~ c E W O ~ N N N N N M M M N N N N N M M M M M~ `~ ~[ A ' W~ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ~ ' ~ a L N WIZ y U O ~ w y Z pZ ~ VWl '~ A p~m Z~ M VN(O r <emcc co ~o a0M0 N mcor~r M V NtO r rrrnr coW O N rrao ao ao M co~ ~ o J Q ~ V a ~"" W ~~ F- O Q o wti O~i~2 a~~0 ¢ C 20Q0 ~1. ~`~ ¢ WU' ¢ V ~ O Z U a a~ UaO~ yiTy Cy,~2 ¢U~'p "`9oV0 >x~~dogo,°3 o>c'i>~3z°~ 2y O - Mxl-O ~Wy2C ~~O¢aUrnaZ 2~2dU~~yy~° C~Oy2LLyyC~W ~?OW pWa2tn w~Om~~WUx =~=OO22.yQ ~. C9YOLL~Q0~~0 KOZ.QOV Q¢y¢ wvwiy~zLLaaa OO2~WWW°f9 > > a~w~o~~xx vwi vwi U~o~goxg~~ ~ W y m ` y ti ~ 0~~22~~W2 O O ~2~Jp;~~~ O O }myU aJN h ~ ~ e~ZQ`'c~gx, 0 o aW~au~oZ~Zo,~ ¢ ¢ 2g2WN~WyU tnW,~tn ~O y y ¢~OWWWN4~ O O UO-~yviOW~O O O ~~~OLL~vyiWLL a a ~Y2~°9o~~ W W ¢~¢~ a W~LL OaiW4~ U¢^ U¢oiO~wy Z~~y2 Wm Wv~~~v~iWT~pZ° p,;p.;~0y00y~C2W Qtl Q~l W ~~2 ~2 W?~ $2 ~2 gvxi¢ W OOZLLt01 > >~ OW2~~OaJa 00.OOcy2UOVWa04Ci 2~2~•-~OgW~~t~i0 W 2 W 2 2 y~~ `O W 4 a ~ ~w~w¢wc~2~Qi~a, ygvlti _y2W Wvyi Wuj~¢Wai~2.4WW yWyW Wmy2a x ¢¢¢¢~~2yt~uWZxi WOW~m¢W¢cJcppCZayay~~Utn WZ WO.~~¢¢~yty~2 ern CCW ¢ ~ ¢ ~ ~ ? 2 ~ ~ W Q ~ ai 2oZ~°p°2~2LLN02y yoy.-tiWvyi02W~FQ 4p ap W QtwilU ~y pZp2~U¢?va>22 1- h M_. h O.1 pp U2U2rnUrnW 2a a hW yWw J2U~44 ¢y¢y¢Z~w~0~40 ~wMw~w¢~apo~u~ Tvyi=~Z~WLLCp~U22O22 ti ¢ ~ ¢ ~ y a W WOWO~v~T~yLLj?Uy awKW 01-hulxxW O ¢ Z¢ Z .. 2 h F~ W i W ~ W ~ W OU' g i~¢~nn~~J U¢U¢UQ2W~J~mW ¢¢¢¢¢~OOOUOCU pOpOp404aj~~W~ F' ti W =(Uj~ ~4U~1. w way wxoa ¢ ~' 2~2tiZU,:~,~4p~ W~W~WW ¢O WZCpp °~~titi2v=i~~H~iL MODIFIED ENGINEER'S REPORT CHANGE AND MODIFICATION NO. 1 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-3 LIST OF AFFECTED PARCELS IN SEVEN OAKS AREA (NORTH) NOT OWNED BY THE DISTRICT PROPONENT AND FOR WHICH THE CALCULATED INCREASES IN ASSESSMENT ARE PAID BY THE DISTRICT PROPONENT AS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR CHANGE AND MODIFICATION NO. 1, THE DISTRICT PROPONENT HAS AGREED TO PAY, PRIOR TO THE COUNCIL APPROVAL OF CHANGE AND MODIFICATION NO. 1, THE CALCULATED AMOUNTS OF ASSESSMENT INCREASE FOR PARCELS IN SEVEN OAKS AREA (NORTH) NOT OWNED BY THE DISTRICT PROPONENT AND FOR WHICH NO WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE OF INCREASE IN ASSESSMENT AND WAIVER OF HEARING HAS BEEN RECEIVED BY THE CITY CALCULATED INCREASE IN REMAINING ASSESSMENT CREATED FROM PRINCIPAL PER AMENDED EXISTING ORIGINAL ASSESSOR'S CHANGE AND ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT TAX NUMBER MODIFICATION NUMBER NUMBER NUMBER (ATN) PROPERTY OWNER NAME NO. 1 1040 778 5 390-111-01-00-6 KRAIG J. GRADOWITZ 777.37 TOTAL REDUCTION IN THE PRINCIPAL ASSESSMENT AMOUNT: $777.37 (The actual amounts paid by the District Proponent are calculated by the City of Bakarsfleid Finance Department based on this Total Reduction in Assessment Principal Amount to allow for adjustments for the Bond Reserve Fund credits and applicable bond call expenses) RECONCILIATION OF ORIGINAL, AMENDED, AND UNPAID ASSESSMENT PRINCIPALS FOR AMENDED ASSESSMENTS IN SEVEN OAKS AREA (NORTH) AND SEVEN OAKS AREA (SOUTH) SEVEN OAKS AREA NORTH SEVEN OAKS AREA SOUTH TOTAL 1. ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT AMOUNT PER SECOND AMENDED NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT $2,031,712.35 $2,178,738.51 $4,210,450.86 2. AMOUNT BILLED ON THE 1996-1997 TAX ROLL CURRENTLY AFFECTED PROPERTIES ONLY $60,983.51 $65,396.46 $126,379.97 3. REMAINING ASSESSMENT PRINCIPAL EFF. 1/1/97 BEFORE CHANGE & MOD. NO. 1 $1,970,728.84 $2,113,342.05 $4,084,070.89 4. INCREASE/REDUCTION IN REMAINING ASSESSMENT PRINCIPAL PER CHANGE & MOD. NO. 1 $380,122.07 $380,899.44 $777.37 5. INCREASE IN REMAINING ASSESSMENT PRINCIPAL FOR SEVEN OAKS AREA (NORTH) PARCELS NOT OWNED AND PAID BY THE DISTRICT PROPONENT PRIOR TO APPROVAL FOR CHANGE ANp MODIFICATION NO. 1 AS DESCRIBED ABOVE IN ITEM A. $777.37 N/A $777.37 6. TOTAL INCREASE/REDUCTION IN REMAINING ASSESSMENT PRINCIPAL PER CHANGE AND MODIFICATION NO. 1 $380,899.44 ($380,899.44) $0.00 7. REMAINING ASSESSMENT PRINCIPAL EFF. 1/1/97 AFTER CHANGE & MOD. NO. 1 see Exhibit A, Table A-I for arcel individual assessment amounts $2,351,628.28 $1,732,442.61 $4,084,070.89 NOTES: OWNERSHIP INFORMATION /S AS PROVIDED BY THE OFFICE OF THE KERN COUNTY ASSESSOR ON 02/1897 AND UPDATED BASED ON THE MOST RECENT SALES AS PROVIDED BY CASTLE 8 COOKE ON 04/01197. THE REMAINING ASSESSMENT PRINCIPAL AMOUNTS AND AMOUNTS BILLED ON THE 1998-1997 TAX ROLL ARE BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF BAKERSF/EI.D FINANCE DEPARTMENT. 29182MA3 A-III-1 04/02/97 EXHIBIT B TABLE 6-1 (AS MODIFIED) MODIFIED ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-3 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE OF TOTAL COST AND ASSESSMENT .ASSESSMENT AMOUNT PER SECOND AMENDED NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT MODIFIED ASSESSMENT (ADJUSTED FOR ASSESSMENT AMOUNT 12/14/95 AMOUNT ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION (AS CONFIRMED BOND SALE (AS CONFIRMED (Note: See Tables B-II for improvement cost details) 09/27/95) (1) AMOUN (2) 04/23/97 3 1.SOUTHLAURELGLENIMPROVEMENTS ( ) A. IMPROVEMENTS B. CONTINGENCY C.INCIDENTALS D. TOTAL SOUTH LAURELGLEN IMPROVEMENT COST 2. SEVEN OAKS IMPROVEMENTS A. SECTION 6 IMPROVEMENTS (1) ~. Improvements 2. Contingency 3. Incidentals 4. Section 6 Total B. SECTION 7 IMPROVEMENTS (1) 1. Improvements z. Contingency s. Incidentals a. Section 7 Total (:. TOTAL SEVEN OAKS IMPROVEMENT COST 3.~ILVE(tCREEKIMPROVEMENTS A. IMPROVEMENTS B. CO~'TINGENCY (:. INCIDENTALS D. TOTAL SILVER CREEK IMPROVEMENT COST 4. BI•tIMHALL NORTH EAST (Calloway Dr.) IMPROVEMENTS A.IMFROVEMENTS B..^,ONTINGENCY C.INClDENTALS D. T01'AL BRIMHALL NORTH EAST IMPROVEMENT COST 5. BRIMHALL NORTH WEST (Old-Farm Rd.) IMPROVEMENTS A. IINPIZ,OVEMENTS B. (:ONTINGENCY C. INCIDENTALS D. TOTAL BRIMHALL NORTH WEST IMPROVEMENT COST 6. TO7'.4L COST OF IMPROVEMENTS, CONTINGENCY AND INCIDENTALS A. SOUTH LAURELGLEN B.:~FVEN OAKS NORTH (Section 6) C. SEVEN OAKS SOUTH (Section 7) D. SILVER CREEK E. BRIMHALL NORTH EAST F. Bi~IMHALL NORTH WEST G. TOTAL. COST OF IMPROVEMENTS, CONTINGENCY AND INCIDENTALS $134,377.00 $134,377.00 $134,377.00 $13,438.00 $13,438.00 $13,438.00 $46,970.00 $46,970.00 $46,970.00 $194,785.00 $194,785.00 $194,785.00 $1,071,470.04 $1,071,470.04 $1,301,870.04 $107,147.83 $107,147.83 $130,187.83 $310,627.78 $310,627.78 .$374,065.78 $1,489,245.65 $1,489,245.65 $1,806,123.65 $1,125,909.96 $1,125,909.96 $895,509.96 $112,591.17 $112,591.17 $89,551.17 $336,000.22 $336,000.22 $272,562.22 $1,574,501.35 $1,574,501.35 $1,257,623.35 $3,063,747.00 $3,063,747.00 $3,063,747.OC~ $1,854,185.00 $1,854,185.00 $1,854,185.00 $185,421.00 $185,421.00 $185,421.00 $648,531.00 $648,531.00 $648,531.00 $2,688,137.00 $2,688,137:00 $2,688,137.00 $441,826.00 $441,826.00 $441,826.00 $44,183.00 $44,183.00 $44,183.00 $146,853.00 $146,853.00 $146,853.00 $632,862.00 $632,862.00 $632,862.00 $146,546.00 $146,546.00 $146,546.00 $14,655.00 $14,655.00 $14,655.00 $83,255.00 $83,255.00 $83,255.00 $244,456.00 $244,456.00 $244,456.00 $194,785.00 $194,785.00 $194,785.00 $1,489,245.65 $1,489,245.65 $1,806,123.65 $1,574,501.35 $1,574,501.35 $1,257,623.35 $2,688,137.00 $2,688,137.00 $2,688,137.00 $632,862.00 $632,862.00 $632,862.00 $244,456.00 $244,456.00 $244,456.00 $6,823,987.00 $6,823,987.00 $6,823,987.00 Da ia~gy~ i 29182MB 1 B-I-1 04/09/97 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-I (AS MODIFIED) MODIFIED ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-3 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE OF TOTAL COST AND ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT AMOUNT PER SECOND AMENDED NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT MODIFIED ASSESSMENT (ADJUSTED FOR ASSESSMENT AMOUNT 12/14/95 AMOUNT (AS CONFIRMED BOND SALE (AS CONFIRMED ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION 09/27/95) AMOUNT) 04/23/97) (Note: See Tables B-II for improvement cost details) (1) (2) (3) 7. ADDITIONAL FEES/COST A. PAYOFF OF EXISTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82-1 ASSESSMENT t. South Laurelglen z. Seven Oaks North (Section 6) 3. Seven Oaks South (Section 7) a. Silver Creek 5. Brimhall North East s. Brimhall North West 7. Total payoff of existing Assessment District No. 82-1 Assessment B. PAYOFF OF EXISTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 86-2 ASSESSMENT t. South Laurelglen 2. Seven Oaks North (Section 6) 3. Seven Oaks South (Section 7) a. Siiver Creek 5. Brimhall North East s. Brimhall North West 7. Total payoff of existing Assessment District No. 86-2 Assessment 8. TOTAL COST OF IMPROVEMENT, CONTINGENCY, INCIDENTALS AND ADDITIONAL FEES/COST A. SOUTHLAURELGLEN B. SEVEN OAKS NORTH (Section 6) C. SEVEN OAKS SOUTH (Section 7) D. SILVER CREEK E. BRIMHALL NORTH EAST F. BRIMHALL NORTH WEST G. TOTAL COST OF IMPROVEMENTS, CONTINGENCY, INCIDENTALS AND ADDITIONAL FEES/COST 9. ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PROCEEDING COST 8 EXPENSE A. ASSESSMENT ENGINEER B. BOND COUNSEL ~. Legal services per Agreement No. 94-152 2. Additional legal services. 3. Expenses 4. TOTAL BOND COUNSEL C. APPRAISAL D. BOND ISSUANCE EXPENSES ~. Bond and other printing 2. Bond administration & registration a. Legal publications, notices, recording and mailing 4. Auditor's Record 5. CDAC, MSRB, PSA fees s. Disclosure Counsel ~. Continuing Disclosure a. TOTAL BOND ISSUANCE EXPENSE E. ENVIRONMENTAL APPROVAL PROCESSING F. CITY PROCEEDING AND ACQUISITION ADMINISTRATION G. TOTAL ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PROCEEDING COST & EXPENSE (See following sheet for Allocation of Total Estimated Assessment District Proceeding Cost 8< Expense to each Project Area) $8,175.00 $8,175.00 $8,175.00 $263,305.11 $263,305.11 $263,305.11 $169,764.36 $169,764.36 $169,764:36 $203,332.58 $203,332.58 $203,332.58 $34,232.38 $34,232.38 $34,232.38 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $678,809.43 $678,809.43 $678,809.43 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $64,035.54 $64,035.54 $64,035.54 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $64,035.54 $64,035.54 $64,035.54 $202,960.00 $202,960.00 $202,960.00 $1,752,550.76 $1,752,550.76 $2,069,428.76 $1,744,265.71 $1,744,265.71 $1,427,387.71 $2,891,469.58 $2,891,469.58 $2,891,469.58 $731,129.92 $731,129.92 $731,129.92 $244,456.00 $244,456.00 $244,456.00 $7,568,831.97 $7,566,831.97 $7,566,831.97 $180,000.00 $180,000.00 $180,000.00 $118,300.00 $118,300.00 $118,300.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $10,000.00 $10;000.00 $10,000.00 $128,300.00 $128,300.00 $128,300.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $1,818.55 $1,818.55 $1,818.55 $33,000.00 $33,000.00 $33,000.00 •$10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $74,818.55 $74,818.55 $74,818.55 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $82 706.65 $82 706.65 82 706.65 $480,825.20 5480,825.20 5480,825.20 29182MB1 B-I-2 04/09/97 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-I (AS MODIFIED) F i MODIFIED ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-3 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE OF TOTAL COST AND ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT AMOUNT PER SECOND AMENDED NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT MODIFIED ASSESSMENT (ADJUSTED FOR ASSESSMENT AMOUNT 12H4/95 AMOUNT (AS CONFIRMED BOND SALE (AS CONFIRMED ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION 09/27/95) AMOUNT) 04/23/97) (Note: See Tables B-II for improvement cost details) (1) (2) (3) G. (Con't) ALLOCATION OF TOTAL ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT PROCEEDING ~ COST & EXPENSE TO EACH PROJECT AREA , ~. South Laurelglen share $12,896.85 $12,896.85 ~1Y$12 896.8 ' ~~ 2. Seven Oaks North Section 6 share , . ;~'~ ~t x$ 1 s. Seven Oaks South Section 7 share ( ) $110,837.26 $110,837.26 ~ , $90,70 .63 a. Silver Creek share $183,734.94 $183,734.94 $183,734.94 5. Brimhall North East share $46,458.77 $46,458.77 ~~„ ,x46,458.77 ' s. Brimhall North West share $15,533.66 $15,533.66 W,' \$15,533. 10. SUBTOTAL COST TO ASSESSMENT A. SOUTH LAURELGLEN $215,856.85 $215,856.85 $215,856.85 B. SEVEN OAKS NORTH (Section 6) $1,863,914.48 $1,863,914.48 $2,200,928.11 C. SEVEN OAKS SOUTH (Section 7) $1,855,102.97 $1,855,102.97 $1,518,089.34 D. SILVER CREEK $3,075,204.52 $3,075,204.52. $3,075,204.52 E: BRIMHALL NORTH EAST $777,588.69 $777,588.69 $777,588.69 F. BRIMHALL NORTH WEST $259,989.66 $259,989.66 $259,989.66 G. SUBTOTAL COST TO ASSESSMENT $8,047,657.17 x8,047,657.17 $8,047,857.17 11. DEDUCT CONTRIBUTIONS AND CASH COLLECTIONS A. SOUTH LAURELGLEN $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 B. SEVEN OAKS NORTH (Section 6) (2) $0.00 ($2,193.68) ($8,311.07) C. SEVEN OAKS SOUTH (Section 7) (2) $0.00 ($19,163.59) ($13,046.20) D. SILVER CREEK $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 ! E. BRIMHALL NORTH EAST $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 F. BRIMHALL NORTH WEST $0.00 $25, 27.55 $25,227.55 , G. TOTAL CONTRIBUTIONS & CASH COLLECTIONS x0.00 46,584.82) (x46,584.82) i \ 12. TOTAL COST TO 1915 ACT BOND ISSUANCE AFTER CONTRIBUTIONS AND CASH COLLECTIONS A. SOUTH LAURELGLEN $215,856.85 $215,856.85 $215,856.85 8. SEVEN OAKS NORTH (Section 6) $1,863,914.48 $1,861,720.80 $2,192,617.04 C. SEVEN OAKS SOUTH (Section 7) $1,855,102.97 $1,835,939.38 $1,505,043.14 D. SILVER CREEK $3,075,204.52 $3,075,204.52 $3,075,204.52 E. BRIMHALL NORTH EAST $777,588.69 $777,588.69 $777,588.69 F. BRIMHALL NORTH WEST $259,989.66 $234,762.11 $234,762.11 G. TOTAL COST TO 1915 ACT BOND ISSUANCE x8,047,657.17 E8,001,072.35 x8,001,072.35 AFTER CONTRIBUTIONS AND CASH COLLECTIONS 13.1915 ACT BOND ISSUANCE COST AND RESERVE A. BOND DISCOUNT $144,009.50 .$139,101.75 $139,101.75 B. CAPITALIZED INTEREST $655,333.3y $447,510.90 $447,510.90 C. BOND RESERVE FUND $983,000.00 $907,315.00 $907,315.00 D. TOTAL BOND ISSUANCE COST AND RESERVE x1,782,342.83 x1,493,927.65 x1,493,927.65 ALLOCATION OF TOTAL BOND ISSUANCE COST AND RESERVE FUND TO EACH PROJECT AREA 1. South Laurelglen share $47,806.57 $40,303.91 $40,303.91 2. Seven Oaks North (Section 6) share $412,807.67 $347,612.93 $409,396.53 ~ (~=~o,'~I` °~' 3. Seven Oaks South (Section 7) share $410,856.15 $342,799.13 $281,015.53 i 4. Silve~Creekshare $681,076.33 $574,189.67 $574,189.67 ` ' ~~ ~ s. Brimhall North East share $172,215.29 $145,188.19 ~~ i - $145,188.19 s. Brimhall North West share $57,580.82 $43,833.82 ~ ~ $43,833.82 29182M61 B-I-3 04/09/97 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-I (AS MODIFIED) MODIFIED ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-3 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE OF TOTAL COST AND ASSESSMENT 1 ASSESSMENT AMOUNT PER SECOND AMENDED NOTICE I OF ASSESSMENT MODIFIED ASSESSMENT (ADJUSTED FOR ASSESSMENT AMOUNT 12/14/95 ~ AMOUNT (AS CONFIRMED BOND SALE (AS CONFIRMED ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION 09/27/95) AMOUNT) 04/23/97) (Note: See Tables B-II for improvement cost details) (1) (2) (3) 14. TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED TO BONDS $9,830,000.00 $9,495,000.00 $9,495,000.00 TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED TO BONDS FOR EACH PROJECT AREA i. South Laurelglen share $263,663.42 $256,160.76 $256 160.76 2. Seven Oaks North (Section 6) share $2,276,722.15 $2,209,333.73 , 52,602,013.57 a. Seven Oaks South (Section 7) share $2,265,959.12 $2,178,738.51 $1,786,058.67 a. Silver Creek share $3,756,280.85 $3,649,394.19 $3,649,394.19 ~, 5. Brimhall North East share $949,803.98 $922,776.88 $922,776.88 s. Brimhall North West share $317,570.48 $278,595.93 ,$278,595.93 $9,830,000.00 $9,495,000.00 $9,496,000.00 (1) THE BUENA VISTA ROAD IMPROVEMENT COSTS FOR SECTIONS 6 AND 7 HAVE BEEN COMBINED AND ALLOCATED ~ TO BOTH SECTIONS 6 AND 7. THE COST SHOWN IN THIS TABLE ARE THE ALLOCATED TOTAL COSTS FOR EACH s SECTION AND DO NOT MATCH THE ENGINEER'S ESTIMATED COST OF IMPROVEMENTS ACQUIRED WITHIN EACH SECTION. SEE TABLES B-II-C AND B-11-D FOR THE ENGINEER'S ESTIMATED COST OF IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED WITHIN SECTION 6 AND WITHIN SECTION 7. ' t I (2) IN ORDER TO BALANCE THE AMOUNTS BEING TRANSFERRED TO SEVEN OAKS AREA (NORTH) THE CASH COLLECTION AMOUNTS FOR SEVEN OAKS AREAS (NORTH AND SOUTH) HAVE BEEN ADJUSTED TO ALLO W FOR PROPER ALLOCA TION OF CASH PAID AMOUNTS FOR ORIGINAL ASSESSMENTS 84, 85, 86, 87, 109, 111, AND 112. ORIGINAL ASSESSMENTS 84, 85, 86, 87, 109, 111, AND 112 WERE FULLY OR PARTIALLY CASH PAID BY THE DISTRICT PROPONENT DURING THE ORIGINAL 30-DA Y CASH PAYMENT PERIOD. THE CASH PAID AMOUNTS WERE IN EACH CASE HIGHER THAN THE ASSESSMENT SHARE FOR THE PARK IMPROVEMENTS BEING TRANSFERRED TO SEVEN OAKS AREA (NORTH) BY THIS CHANGE AND MODIFICATION NO. 1. THE NET AMOUNT TRANSFERRED TO SEVEN OAKS AREA (NORTH) DOES NOT INCLUDE THE PARK ASSESSMENT SHARE (IMPROVEMENTS, IMPROVEMENT INCIDENTALS, AND ASSESSMENT PROCEEDING COSTS) FOR THOSE SEVEN PARCELS SINCE THOSE FUNDS HAVE ALREADY '. ~ BEEN PAID BY THE DISTRICT PROPONENT. THE CASH COLLECTION AMOUNT THAT HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED FROM SEVEN OAKS AREA (SOUTH) TO SEVEN OAKS AREA (NORTH) IS $8,1 17.39„ AND IT COVERS THE TOTAL ASSESSMENT SHARE FOR THE ORIGINALLY ASSESSED SECTION 7 PARK (INCLUDING IMPROVEMENT COST, IMPROVEMENT INCIDENTALS, AND RELATED ASSESSMENT PROCEEDING COSTS) FOR THE SEVEN ABOVE-REFERENCED ORIGINAL ASSESSMENTS. THIS AMOUNT DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY OF THE BOND ISSUANCE RELATED COSTS SINCE THE PARK ASSESSMENT SHARE (INCLUDING ALL INCIDENTALS) WAS FULLY PAID IN CASH BY THE DISTRICT PROPONENT. 29182M61 B-I-4 04/09/97 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-A (AS MODIFIED) MODIFIED ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-3 ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT COST SUMMARY OF SOUTH LAURELGLEN, SEVEN OAKS, SILVER C~tEEK AND BRIMHALL IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED DESCRIPTION AMOUNTS 1. SOUTH LAURELGLEN (Tentative Tract No 5879 Off-Site Improvements) (See Table B-II-B For Details) A. IMPROVEMENTS $134,-377 B. CONTINGENCY $13,438 C. INCIDENTALS $46,970 D. TOTAL SOUTH LAURELGLEN IMPROVEMENT COST $194,785 2. SEVEN OAKS NORTH 8 SOUTH (Buena Vista Rd., Grand Lakes Ave. and Park I mprovements) (See Tables B-II-C & B-II-D For Details) A. BUENA VISTA RD. STREET & UNDERGROUND IMPROVEMENTS (Ming to Stockdale Hwy.) a.lmprovements $379,377 b. Contingency $37,938 c. Incidentals $100,103 d. Total Buena Vista Rd. Street & Underground Improvement Cost $517,418 B. TRACT 5244 BUENA VISTA RD. FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS a. Improvements $39,676 b. Contingency $3,968 c. Incidentals $11,758 d. Total Tract 5244 Buena Vista Rd. Frontage Improvement Cost $55,402 C. BUENA VISTA RD. STREET & UNDERGROUND IMPROVEMENTS (White Lane to Ming Avenue) a. Improvements $620,948 b. Contingency $62,095 c. Incidentals $202,600 d. Total Buena Vista Rd. Street & Underground Improvement Cost $885,643 D. TENTATIVE TRACT 5290 BUENA VISTA RD. FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS _ a. Improvements $92,585 b. Contingency $9,259 c. Incidentals $27,438 d. Total Tentative Tract 5290 Grand Lakes Ave. Frontage Improvement Cost $129,282 E. TOTAL BUENA VISTA ROAD IMPROVEMENTS (Add Lines 2A through. 2D) a. Improvements b. Contingency c. Incidentals $1,132,586 $113,260 $341,899 d: Total Buena Vista Road Improvement Cost $1,587,745 F. TENTATIVE TRACT 5290 GRAND LAKES AVE. OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS a. Improvements $244,720 b. Contingency $24,472 c. Incidentals $73,287 { d. Total Tentative Tract 5290 Grand Lakes Ave. Off-Site Improvement Cost $342,479 29182mcs;SH A B-II-A-1 03/25/97 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-A (AS MODIFIED) MODIFIED ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-3 ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT COST SUMMARY OF SOUTH LAURELGLEN, SEVEN OAKS, SILVER CREEK AND BRIMHALL IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED DESCRIPTION AMOUNTS G. TENTATIVE TRACT 5292 GRAND LAKES AVENUE FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS a. Improvements $160,664 b. Contingency $16,066 c. Incidentals $51,025 d. Total Tentative Tract 5292 Grand Lakes Ave. Frontage Improvement Cost $227,755 H. PERMANENT SUMP GRAND LAKES AVENUE FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS a. Improvements $29,010 b. Contingency $2,901 c. Incidentals $9,051 d: Total Premanent Sump Grand Lakes Ave. Frontage Improvement Cost $40,962 I. TOTAL GRAND LAKES AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS (Add Lines 2F through 21) a. Improvements $434,394 b. Contingency $43,439 c. Incidentals $133,363 d. Total Grand Lakes Avenue Improvement Cost $611,196 J. SECTION 6 PARK 1 LANDSCAPE & MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS a. Improvements $400,000 b. Contingency $40,000 c. Incidentals $107,928 d. Total Section 6 Park Landscape & Miscellaneous Improvement Cost $547,928 K. SECTION 6 PARK 2 LANDSCAPE & MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS a. Improvements . b. Contingency c. Incidentals $230,400 $23,040 $63,438 d. Total Section 6 Park Landscape & Miscellaneous Improvement Cost $316,878 L. SECTION 7 PARK LANDSCAPE & MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS a. Improvements $0 b. Contingency $0 c. Incidentals $0 d. Total Section 7 Park Landscape & Miscellaneous Improvement Cost ~ $0 M. TOTAL SEVEN OAKS PARK IMPROVEMENTS (Add Lines 2J, 2K and 2L) a. Improvements $630,400 b. Contingency $63,040 c. Incidentals $171,366 d. Total Seven Oaks Park Improvement Cost $864,806 N. TOTAL SEVEN OAKS IMPROVEMENT COST a. Total Seven Oaks South Improvements b. Total Seven Oaks South Contingency c. Total Seven Oaks South Incidentals d. Total Seven Oaks South Improvement Cost $2,197,380 $219,739 $646,628 $3,063,747 29182mcs;SH A B-II-A-2 03/25/97 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-A (AS MODIFIED) MODIFIED ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-3 ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT COST SUMMARY OF SOUTH LAURELGLEN, SEVEN 'OAKS, SILVER CREEK AND BRIMHALL IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED DESCRIPTION AMOUNTS 3. SILVER CREEK (Panama Lane, Harris Rd., and Reliance Dr. Landscape Improvements) A. PANAMA LANE STREET, WALL & LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS a. Improvements $1,244,385 b. Contingency $124,439 c. Incidentals $430,527 d. Total Panama Lane Street, Wall & Landscape Improvement Cost $1,799,351 B. HARRIS ROAD STREET & UNDERGROUND IMPROVEMENTS a. Improvements $418,375 b. Contingency $41,838 c. Incidentals $152,862 d. Total Harris Road Street & Underground Improvement Cost $613,075 C. HARRIS RD. WALL IMPROVEMENTS a. Improvements $74;100 b. Contingency $7,410 c. Incidentals $25,566 d. Total Harris Rd. Walf .Improvement Cost $107,076 D. RELIANCE Dlab'E LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS a. Improvements $117,325 b. Contingency - $11,734 c. Incidentals $39,576 d. Total Reliance Drive Landscape Improvement Cost $168,635 E. TOTAL SILVER CREEK IMPROVEMENT.COST a. Total Silver Creek Improvements $1,854,185 b. Tota; Silver Creek Contingency ~ $185,421 c. Total Silver Creek Incidentals $648,531 d.-Total Silver Creek Improvement Cost $2,688,137 4. BRIMHALL NORTH EAST (Calloway Dr. Improvements) (See Table B-II-F For Details) A. IMPROVEMENTS $441,826 B. CONTINGENCY $44,183 C. INCIDENTALS $146,853 D. TOTAL BRIMHALL NORTH EAST IMPROVEMENT COSY $632,862 5. BRIMHALL NORTH WEST (Tract 5489 Phase B Old Farm Rd. Improvements) (See Table B-II-G For Details) A. IMPROVEMENTS $146,546 B. CONTINGENCY $14,655 C. INCIDENTALS $83,255 D. TOTAL BRIMHALL NORTH WEST IMPROVEMENT COST $244,456 29182mcs;SH A B-II-A-3 03/25/97 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-A (AS MODIFIED) MODIFIED ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-3 ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT COST SUMMARY OF SOUTH LAURELGLEN, SEVEN OAKS, SILVER CREEK AND BRIMHALL IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED DESCRIPTION AMOUNTS 6. TOTAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS A. IMPROVEMENTS $4,774,314 B. CONTINGENCY $477,436 C. INCIDENTALS $1,572,237 D. TOTAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENT COST $6,823,987 Note: All improvement, contingency and incidental cost estimates shown in this table are based on the Final Engineers Reporf forAD 94-3, as they were provided at that time by Martin - McIntosh Engineering, Bakersfield California. r r 29182mcs;SH A B-II-A-4 03/25/97 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-C (AS MODIFIED) MODIFIED ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-3 ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT COST SEVEN OAKS NORTH (SECTION. 6) IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED (BUENA VISTA RD. AND PARK IMPROVEMENTS) DESCRIPTION QUANTITY I UNITS I COST TOTAL 1. BUENA VISTA RD. AREA WIDE IMPROVEMENTS (Ming Avenue to Stockdale Hwy.) A. GRADING 2483 CY 1.20 $2,980 B. SEWER IMPROVEMENTS 15" Sewer Main 80 LF 30.00 $2,400 Raise Manhole 6 EA 300.00 $1,800 TOTAL SEWER IMPROVEMENTS $4,200 C. WATER IMPROVEMENTS 16" Water Main 697 LF 21.00 $14,637 16" Gate Valve 1 EA 2100.00 $2,100 Remove Wharf Hydrant 1 EA 250.00 $250 2" Landscape Services 2 EA 250.00 $500 TOTAL WATER IMPROVEMENTS $17,487 D. STREET IMPROVEMENTS AC Paving 6905 TN 23.50 $162,268 Ag Base 1704 CY 22.00 $37,488 Subgrade Prep 20442 SY 0.90 $18,398 Remove Paving 106010. SF 0.20 $21,202 6" Curb & Gutter 955 LF 5.25 $5,014 Sidewalk 12961 SF 1.30 $16,849 Handicap Ramp 800 SF 1.30 $1,040 Metro Street Signs 1 EA 300.00 $300 No Parking Signs 12 EA 200.00 $2,400 Striping 9403 LF 0.50 $4,702 Remove Striping 922 LF 1.50 $1,383 Pavement Markers 305 SF 3.00 $915 Street Lights 3 EA 1900.00 $5,700 Monument Encasements 3 LS 250.00 $750 Median Curb 4562 LF 5.00 $22,810 Sawcut 791 LF 1.00 $791 TOTAL STREET IMPROVEMENTS $302,010 E. CANAL CROSSING Canal Xing -Remove Lining 600 SF 1.50 $900 Canal Xing -Remove Headwells 90 CY 50.00 $4,500 Canal Xing -Lining Repair 600 SF 4.00 $2,400 Canal Xing -.Remove Fence 140 LF 25.00 $3,500 Canal Xing -Structure 60 CY 500.00 $30,000 Canal Xing -Reinforcing Steel 10000 LB .0.60 $6,000 Canal Xing -Earthwork 300 CY 18.00 $5,400 TOTAL CANAL CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS $52,700 F. SUBTOTAL BUENA VISTA RD. IMPROVEMENT COST $379,377 G. CONST. CONTINGENCY (10%) $37,938 1 29182mcs;SH C B-II-C-1 03/25/97 l EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-C (AS MODIFIED) MODIFIED ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-3 ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT COST SEVEN OAKS NORTH (SECTION 6) IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED (BUENA VISTA RD. AND PARK IMPROVEMENTS) UNIT DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNITS COST TOTAL H. INCIDENTAL COST Plan Check Fees $7,360 Water Inspection Fees $804 Performance Bond $16,901 Design Engineering $27,061 City Reimbursement ($26,350 Contractor Overhead $41,732 Inspection $12,667 Contract Documents $863 Soils Testing & Report $7,588 Construction Staking $11,477 TOTAL INCIDENTAL COST $100,103 I. TOTAL BUENA VISTA RD. AREA WIDE IMPROVEMENTS $517,418 2. TR 5244 BUENA VISTA RD. FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS A. LANDSCAPING/MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS Landscaping -ROW 4713 SF 4.00 $18,852 Median Hardscape .2192 8F 5.50 $12,056 Landscape -Median 2192 SF 4.00 $8,768 TOTAL LANDSCAPING/MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS $39,676 B. CONST. CONTINGENCY (10%) $3,968 I C. INCIDENTAL COST Plan Check Fees $944 Performance Bond $1,768 Design Engineering $0 Landscape Design $2,579 Contractor Overhead $4,364 Inspection $1,309 Soils Testing & Report $794 TOTAL INCIDENTAL COST $11,758 1 D. TOTAL TR 5244 BUENA VISTA RD. FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENT COST $55,402 3. TOTAL BUENA VISTA RD. IMPROVEMENT COST (Add Items 1 8~ 2) A. IMPROVEMENTS $419,053 B. CONTINGENCY $41,906 C. INCIDENTALS $111,861 D. TOTAL BUENA VISTA RD. IMPROVEMENT COST $572,820 ~. 4. SECTION 6 PARK 1 LANDSCAPE 8~ MISCELLANEOUS A. LANDSCAPE & MISCELLANEOUS Restrooms 1 LS 40000 $40,000 i Landscaping 4.5 AC 80000 $360,000 TOTAL LANDSCAPING & MISCELLANEOUS $400,000 B. CONST. CONTINGENCY (10%) $40,000 i 29182mcs;SH C B-II-C-2 03/25/97 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-C (AS MODIFIED) MODIFIED ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-3 ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT COST SEVEN OAKS NORTH (SECTION 6) IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED (BUENA VISTA RD. AND PARK IMPROVEMENTS) DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNITS UNIT COST TOTAL C. INCIDENTAL COST Plan Check Fees $9,308 Performance Bond $17,820 Design Engineering $2,600 Landscape Design $23,400 Contractor Overhead (10%) $44,000 Inspection- $1,200 Soils Testing & Report (2%) $8,000 Construction Staking $1,600 TOTAL INCIDENTAL COST $107,928 D. TOTAL SECTION 6 PARK 1 LANDSCAPING 8~ MISCELLANEOUS $547,928 5. SECTION 6 PARK 2 LANDSCAPE 8~ MISCELLANEOUS A. LANDSCAPE & MISCELLANEOUS Restrooms 1 LS 40000 $40,000 Landscaping 2.38 AC 80000 $190,400 TOTAL LANDSCAPING & MISCELLANEOUS $230,400 B. CONST. CONTINGENCY (10%) $23,040 C. INCIDENTAL COST Plan Check Fees $5,446 Performance Bond $10,264 Design Engineering $2;600 Landscape Design $12,376 Contractor Overhead (10%) $25,344 Inspection $1,200 Soils Testing & Report (2%) $4,608 Construction Staking $1,600 TOTAL INCIDENTAL COST $63,438 D. TOTAL SECTION 6 PARK 2 LANDSCAPING & MISCELLANEOUS $316,878 6. TOTAL SEVEN OAKS NORTH IMPROVEMENTS $1,437,626 Note: All improvement, contingency and incidental cost estimates shown in this table are based on the Final Engineer's Report for AD 94-3, as they were provided at that time by Martin - McIntosh Engineering, Bakersfield California. ~ 29182mcs;SH C B-II-C-3 03/25/97 I EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-D (AS MODIFIED) MODIFIED ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-3 ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT COST SEVEN OAKS SOUTH (SECTION 7) IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED (BUENA VISTA RD. ,GRAND LAKES AVE., AND PARK IMPROVEMENTS) ~ .UNIT ~ DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNITS COST TOTAL 1. BUENA VISTA RD. STREET 8 UNDERGROUND IMPROVEMENTS (White lane to Ming Avenue) A. GRADING 6177 CY 1.20 $7,412 B. STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS 18" SD Pipe 260 LF 20.00 $5,200 24" SD Pipe 1941 LF 22.00 $42,702 Type A Catch Basins 2 EA 1500.00 $3,000 Temp. Catch Basins 3 EA 1000.00 $3,000 Standard Manhole _ , ;, , - 5 EA 1400.00 $7,000 Raise Manholes 1 EA 500.00 $500 Outlet Structure 1 EA 1500.00 $1,500 TOTAL STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS $62,902 C. SEWER IMPROVEMENTS 15" Sewer Main 121 LF 30.00 $3,630 Raise Manhole 10 EA 500.00 $5,000 TOTAL SEWER IMPROVEMENTS $8,630 D: WATER IMPROVEMENTS 8" Water Main 18 LF 9.00 $162 16" Water Main 2140 LF 21.00 $44,940 8" Gate Valve 2 EA 400.00 $800 16" Gate Valve 2 EA 2100.00 $4,200 Remove Wharf Hydrant 2 EA 250.00 $500 2" Landscape. Services 3 EA 250.00 $750 TOTAL WATER IMPROVEMENTS $51,352 E. STREET IMPROVEMENTS AC Paving 1.0757 TN 23.50 $252,790 Ag Base 2639 CY 22.00 $58,058 Subgrade Prep 31847 SY 0.90 $28,662 Remove Paving 145603 SF 0.20 $29,121 6" Curb & Gutter 4187 LF 5.25 $21,982 Sidewalk 22202 SF 1.30 $28,863 .Handicap Ramp 1200 SF 1:30 $1,560 Metro Street Signs 2 EA 300.00 $600 No Parking Signs 20 EA 200.00 $4,000 Striping 14649 LF 0.50. $7,325 Remove Striping 1436 LF 1.50 $2,154 Pavement Markers 475 SF 3.00 $1,425 Street Lights 6 EA 1900.00 $11,400 Monument Encasements 3 LS 250.00 $750 Median Curb 8146 LF 5.00 $40,730 Sawcut 1232 LF 1.00 $1,232 TOTAL STREET IMPROVEMENTS $490,652 29182mcs;SH D B-II-D-1 03/25/97 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-D (AS MODIFIED) MODIFIED ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-3 ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT COST SEVEN OAKS SOUTH (SECTION 7) IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED (BUENA VISTA RD. ,GRAND LAKES AVE., AND PARK IMPROVEMENTS) DESCRIPTION QUANTITY I UNITS COST I TOTAL F. SUBTOTAL IMPROVEMENT COST G. CONST. CONTINGENCY (10%) $620, 948 $62,095 H. INCIDENTAL COST Plan Check Fees $13,759.00 Water Inspection Fees $2,362.00 Performance Bond $27,663.00 Design Engineering $40,577.00 Contractor Overhead $68,304.00 Inspection $18,993.00 Contract Documents $1,295.00 Soils Testing & Report $12,419.00 Construction Staking $17,228.00 TOTAL INCIDENTAL COST $202,600.00 I. TOTAL BUENA VISTA RD. STREET 8~ UNDERGROUND IMPROVEMENTS (White Lane to Ming Avenue) $885,643 2. TENT. TR. 5290 BUENA VISTA RD. FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS A. LANDSCAPING/MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS Landscaping -ROW 10523 SF 4.00 $42,092 Median Hardscape 5315 SF 5.50 $29,233 Landscape -Median 5315 SF 4.00 $21,260 TOTAL LANDSCAPING/MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS $92,585 B. CONST. CONTINGENCY (10%) C. INCIDENTAL COST $9,259 Plan Check Fees $2,204 Performance Bond $4,125 Design Engineering $0 Landscape Design $6,018 Contractor Overhead $10,184 Inspection $3,055 Soils Testing & Report $1,852 TOTAL INCIDENTAL COST $27,438 D. TOTAL TENT. TR. 5290 BUENA VISTA RD. FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS $129,282 3. TOTAL BUENA VISTA RD. IMPROVEMENT COST (Add Items 1 8~ 2) A. IMPROVEMENTS $713,533 B. CONTINGENCY $71,354 C. INCIDENTALS $230,038 D. TOTAL BUENA VISTA RD. IMPROVEMENT COST $1,014,925 29182mcs;SH D B-II-D-2 03/25/97 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-D (AS MODIFIED) MODIFIED ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-3 ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT COST SEVEN OAKS SOUTH (SECTION 7) IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED (BUENA VISTA RD. ,GRAND LAKES AVE., AND PARK IMPROVEMENTS) UNIT DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNITS COST TOTAL 4. TENT. TR. 5290 GRAND LAKES AVE. OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS A. STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS 24" SD Pipe 60 LF 9.60 $576 24" Bore 60 LF 42.00 $2,520 St. Manhole 1 EA 1400.00 $1,400 TOTAL STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS $4,496 B. SEWER IMPROVEMENTS 6" Main 50 LF 22.00 $1,100 6" Bore 50 LF 100.00. $5,000 St. Manhole 1 EA 1400.00 $1,400 TOTAL SEWER IMPROVEMENTS $7,500 C. STREET IMPROVEMENTS Monument Enclosure 1 EA 280.00 $280 Stop Sign 1 EA 200.00 $200 Metro Street Slgn 2 EA 300.00 $600 Sidewalk 11040 SF 1.30 $14,352 Street Lights 1 EA 1900.00 $1,900 TOTAL STREET IMPROVEMENTS $17,332 D. BLOCK WALL 11747 SF 10.00 $117,470 E. LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS Landscaping 24418 SF 4.00 $97,672 2" Landscape Services 1 EA 250.00 $250 TOTAL LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS $97,922 F. SUBTOTAL IMPROVEMENT COST G. CONST. CONTINGENCY (10%) $244,720 $24,472 H. INCIDENTAL COST Plan Check Fees $5,772 Water Inspection Fees (4%) $11 Performance Bond $10,902 Design Engineering $14,316 Landscape Design $1,919 Contractor Overhead (10%) $26,919 Inspection $3,666 Soils Testing & Report (2%) ~ $4,894 Construction Staking $4,888 TOTAL INCIDENTAL COST $73,287 I. TOTAL TENT. TR. 5290 GRAND LAKES AVENUE OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS $342,479 29182mcs;SH D B-II-D-3 03/25/97 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-D (AS MODIFIED) MODIFIED ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-3 ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT COST SEVEN OAKS SOUTH (SECTION 7) IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED (BUENA VISTA RD. ,GRAND LAKES AVE., AND PARK IMPROVEMENTS) UNIT DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNITS COST TOTAL 5. TENT. TR. 5292 GRAND LAKES AVENUE FRONTING IMPROVEMENTS A. STREET IMPROVEMENTS Monument Enclosure 2 ~ EA 280.00 $560 Remove Curb & Gutter 100 LF .2.00 $200 Metro Street Slgn 2 EA 300.00 $600 Sidewalk 9239 SF 1.30 $12,011 Street Lights 3 EA 1900.00 $5,700 Street Light Conduit (1-1/2") 105 LF 2.10 $221 TOTAL STREET IMPROVEMENTS $19,292 B: BLOCK WALL C. LANDSCAPING D. SUBTOTAL IMPROVEMENT COST E. CONST. CONTINGENCY (10%) 10472 SF 10.00 $104,720 9163 SF 4.00 $36,652. $160,664 $16,066 F. INCIDENTAL COST Plan Check Fees $3,858 Performance Bond $7,158 Design Engineering $8,061 Landscape Design $2,382 Contractor Overhead (10%) $17,673 Inspection, _ $3,720 Soils Testing & Report (2%) $3,213 Construction Staking $4,960 TOTAL INCIDENTAL COST $51,025 G. TOTAL TENT. TR. 5292 GRAND LAKES AVENUE FRONTING $227,755.00 IMPROVEMENTS 6. PERMANENT SUMP GRAND LAKES AVENUE FRONTING IMPROVEMENTS A. WALL IMPROVEMENTS Iron Gate 1 LS 880.00 $880 Block Wall 1413 SF 10.00 $14,130 TOTAL WALL IMPROVEMENTS $15,010 B. LANDSCAPING C. SUBTOTAL IMPROVEMENTS D. CONST. CONTINGENCY (10%) 29182mcs;SH D B-I I-D-4 3500 SF 4.00 $14.,000 $29,010 $2,901 03/25/97 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-11-D (AS MODIFIED) MODIFIED ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-3 ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT COST SEVEN OAKS SOUTH (SECTION 7) IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED (BUENA VISTA RD. ,GRAND LAKES AVE., AND PARK IMPROVEMENTS) I UNIT DESCRIPTION !QUANTITY UNITS COST TOTAL E. INCIDENTAL COST Plan Check Fees $661 .Performance Bond $1,292 Design Engineering $1,164 Landscape Design $910 Contractor Overhead (10%) $3,191 Inspection $537 Soils Testing & Report (2%) ~ $580 Construction Staking $716 TOTAL INCIDENTAL COST $9,051 F. TOTAL PERMANENT SUMP GRAND LAKES AVENUE FRONTING $40,962 IMPROVEMENTS 7. SECTION 7 PARK LANDSCAPE & MISCELLANEOUS A. LANDSCAPING & MISCELLANEOUS Restrooms 0 LS 40000 $0 Landscaping 0 AC 80000 $0 TOTAL LANDSCAPING & MISCELLANEOUS $0 B. CONST. CONTINGENCY (10%) $0 C. INCIDENTAL COST Plan Check Fees $0 Performance Bond $0 Design Engineering $0 Landscape Design $0 Contractor Overhead (10%) $0 Inspection $0 Soils Testing & Report (2%) $0 Construction Staking $0 TOTAL INCIDENTAL COST $0 D. TOTAL SECTION 7 PARK IMPROVEMENTS $0 8. TOTAL SEVEN OAKS SOUTH (Section 7) IMPROVEMENTS $1,626,121 (Lines3D, 41, 5G, 6F and 7D) Note: All improvement, contingency and incidental cost estimates shown in this table are based on the Final Engineers Report forAD 94-3, as they were provided at that time by Martin - McIntosh Engineering, Bakersfield California. 1 29182mcs;SH D B-II-D-5 03/25/97 . EXHIBIT C MODIFIED ENGINEER'S REPORT CHANGE AND MODIFICATION NO. 1 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 9d-3 SDMMARY TABLE OF EXI571NG ASSESSMENTS AND MODIFICATIONS TO AFFECTED ASSESSMENTS IN SEVEN OAKS AREA (NORTH) AONIavuL wssESSUExTAUwMSf03 ONauul _ Nl xuY3 xELOFYC E I _,____ ___ ___OIIIGLVAL ASSf85YENTAMWNIS(AS CONFWYfOe31iT93J --~ ' ~ A93ESSMENTAMOUNiS YEN SECOND ANENOEDNOIICEOF ASSESSNENTIADJUSTEUfOR1LIN3OOND SALE) I gED W nsui 1/:q Owl •REA t NiFA F mikN xsE NO ln[ s) 1 ei - w3i ENT [oNEO^~VE w9i~~ Eoi ~u~ e] ~ ou I M FAV Soxo u 1 PArOF io aF IFxOCEEONOS OEIECTgxS ~SSONY.E 5[m F NO 1 ~ _ EoE ~SSIUNC caLE*x I o[EFCWCS __.. x ,._._, _ . . ,; .. 13e~ NI e~~l ~l sl I 5eµi ee ~~ m .. _ 01~ ro~ 5~>,Si2E01 1 F}~ ~ ~ , w SSI ~I SIi 56 . ]ESNf ]ri J 1 e A9ii[ofFitF r FueLN VU~x e Un NEU3EE 015 135ns _.... __._.___lcsel -. - lorN3- .. _. _.. __ ummnn~mwsuuu nxuuwu imaumumm~nwxFauwnuwaunumwnxueum ]~I N xSSI N aro~ ]~ Wi SNl Oro sm eM- 0. ro m om am e, eeFi wTES SF o iwEl fsisl xS,Jm_ I eo~Llu, I_ _ yr~l-. s.el .. aaSll,eµo T~e~ ' ]xi I. Foo,~ xmx vuew9 rmn auxwwmmrw wuxnuxmmwmnneux~en~xuimwnwxnurmm~ nrv l I N .l ss~JSLJOS I_ I.~,...: _I ... rdrv epx9um I ~Mroio~ ~I ool m ~ FRbI ~ 1 e~ ro wx ~ a3 w3 A e. m wx ell_ I _. _`_. 1~1 R_ .... _~I aol ~mmirv e uoor ESAS AuoUxle oxbx,x .wuY3 ~ELOFYLxI...E.~ErwLO exos3- oxk - - - ,W.IT ND. oEUae.oN D1AM0Sf E FI~a I x I _ OU9'If00BkWNL ASSfSSYf T S(ASOONFIPMEO0319931 - oxwxl,i- e:, -~eo-l ~e„S,oi.L -.suswEw3w*o.k-w.,lxw, SwmTxE lolxL N~SEASE -~ I _ _ - BO1iO . w E ' ~_. III °" .I_ I I L x.91 >»~a ~o~s~ . II E 9YT AMOUNT PfRSE ONO n:- vxox~`uENI ~: -°x r sDnroT.L . AS _ _. mu swwir99uur ENOEO NOTICEOF AS ENT IADJUS FO0.ININSBOND S USEND,E ~ xwlolxE - coxE39~T 1 w3ioiu lor.. . I9 _.. I l 9wnmmunenxi TILE) - uuf.,Yxr -_--llw s coxuExcui 9 s ScxooE lFEx/SPOR wA I I I e FI.eLNDfficE wA 1 Ft13LD VNIx wA e cn...EU SnE rieeA F,z 1xeJl. - m xf FS o o o 0 Na ,., l i ~~ I a.a 1 e ~; ul ~ ui ~ ml ~ , I,,~ S,orz~ ,n.o,, , ,Epm, ei. 'il 0 I Ii , ~ at w z. -~I io iei.« I ;~,~ ~ , , es u Fe°0Fj i~° of I l »es l ~ , ~ ~ ~ xa° . 1 1 x~TA s~.~~fu ~3~~~ ~cWiYw3u+0E*gW/N~mioxl ~~MExupNrs iwJlssuwEO. wasxwal I , . . _ ~~~~~P ~~~31~,olfxD:~~D~~ ~~3~:~.oL~EDxDEKL~~EµExT=F9~,~w~oo~ _ /.e WEnEFExFHCEn3a0Yxs. oo n4rwCEWEUn OF ixE Onkrxu YCtavl>uix K5F55uENi&wrtSOE TxosE SEVVI nuvcxEEis lwct"Oprk ~ ,~ ~,~A.IfFA~~E33L~Ek~E30BI~L iuanoHU Mu~wxov~[S~xExwc~ F4~s.~ Nu --_,., ~_, _ . _- ..3~3~D.oE~Si.~FxT3ae,kEf.,~1,1~1,:. ~sE ~rrt~snOtE[Mw3asTSL SU~cE ~IpSE ~fuxos~iuV~ENxvar EXHIBIT C MODIFIED ENGINEER'S REPORT CHgNGE AND MODIFICATION NO. 1 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 99-3 SUMMARY TABLE OF EXISTING ASSESSMENTS AND MODIFICATIONS TO AFFECTED ASSESSMENTS IN SEVEN OAKS AREA (NORTH( 0,N RES00 O0.IOINAL ASSESSMENTAMOVN 3(AS COHFIRMEDON])9!j ~- Sf ANOUN19 EE0.5ELOND AMEWED NOTICE Of ASSESSMENT(ADJUSTfOiO LNSBONO SALE] OROAIION fAN)e1C1 s_ LwoL - fA cNO - o er.l 'wermu-NSSLSSULNr' rSmOr 'sosroru SOw roru ta r r s ov[u ~ro sLe l~u ror ~oEr - O - Nvr ru oNrA t [ cr ' ) eA xEr w N,Dfs<.P~~, ~._. _ _1 N~, NNLA LW ww xt aNroer v s x Aa rE ns K i~o<Ef~) ,LarELro~ ~ e=lm Noa, ~ Exr vAroe oL ~., r ~ i usx M E ~LLr LEL, )r,.NTE, ~, , .MOAN;. 9~ I~.~N..~~AI wN e ~N~r,elf, .~a~ ; ): ~~ ~~ r I.,e,le ew ew ew ew ew ew ew ; ; eN; wl r sel ew ~ ;~ ee, ew ew .N e ~M~~rKL e KP.AN wN .,I~~e..m~N.~ wLUM,E ,~r .~.e..~ .. wA e . o~ ew ew ew Ow w. ew ew ew: ow . e o~ w ow a~ ~~ ; w: , rw~- _I~,~N.~_~---))~ r)~:' a„~N,e~,,,Ne,~N~~,,w~,,.N,.rle~,,,~ , ,))w.,e rw r...,=~!~,>o: ~ Ir)u,sore~ IIL>e)r)!. ul.eel ew,les,e,..e~ . ~ rnr)! .,~~p.,Mw,„~w,~..w.NN.,~.N.N~,~~,~„N,~MA,,,,,.,~„~,N~,~„,N~~,~ ,~~,m .~I ~ ;~ ~ ew,),sw i ~.,~, ,~. ,,,,,,a,N, r ), e,we,) ,ul r ~~ I). p ~ ~„)~ ew: M„,,,,,~~a,~NN,Nee~, ~,N.,,,~.M,~.N,~ N~w ~, ssNENi NMOONrsroxew aRUO ORIGWAL ASSESSMENTAMOVNi3(ASCONFtaMEDfOM)9!j _ - ~ ! 8 ESSMENT AMOUN ER ECOND AMENOEDNOTN:E OF /155ESSMENr (ADJUS(f--O ONO SALE] IO Eu5r- ,. _ fFASAII.fxuO xRUwSOLOSU~OmswNS roru ror r iaw)oru' ror 5oB ~ ror ror oru ~ t- 1 Lou e5~ '. -- - ..- -.. ~ uOxr vNroe NaAOV I s0 I wstAKr vxacEfOwcs~ er 1 ~~I >S ) _ _ ELr~iavs ssrw~itE m 0wel wl r e sOSxcEI ssl IW WI )9)We )i oo. AN EF _ l _ e - ,_ o.x O wH iA SS)sNLa )>1 R MN IN ~rNS.)e.AarR )sw0 wN.050 w No LESWGrtNlsllryra rS N)ssetl iial rr o~ ne.:e s.)I . e))))o. . i r4eesia- ..~ _ _ AEOExcrlNnjNU rA M0sn1 r»rre rasjx).Arors r.-vlwA:.am rN - .._-?a.. s SuNros 1 r - -I- - I ~ -I- m I ream)) m I I_ _ es )r as. ))• w. i L s _ _ . I K ° ANr~ 1 0 qm Nem NI --uh NM - -- - tv ~ es u t - I E ~ T ,en~e,ywl vEA ePwn m I~ImN scxow I l y a ill .~u~s aw ro.x ~µw~wn au~i.ll0 WA 0I 0.M 0w! o~~ ow! owl 0.W 0w! 000 I O.w~ WA I Ow .al o wl aw Oro ow o.wl Oro ao O.w WA ~~HS~~_~wf0 _~:___e~seise0 1 aol w - f9.Ef.ie __ _ ___ -_ ___ .~. -_~_.9ii eio_i0 - _ _~- 0)e.w 1~1~ ~O~Oi~~ u!~ b]).~~.e~w11..1 ~~:~~I~~ A~~~ 0031 EXNIDITC MODIFIED ENGINEER'S REPORT CHANGE AND MODIFICATION NO. 1 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 99J SUMMARY TABLE OF EXISTING ASSESSMENTS AND MODIFICATIONS TO AFFECTED ASSESSMENTS IN SEVEN OAKS AREA (NORTH) F Rfam[/.D MOMMOASS[ssu[rrt AMOUNraro oRO sxwo[v[toeuexr uttA31'1. e[rox[S[co3osrpxor x[w sueorns oxs moss _ - ~ :-- ' - - ox MOdfIE00p INAL ASSES MEN A OUN13 sU3roru - xr ' SuB ASCONFU[ E })jas 1 - 1- ~ - rROU Soro tore MODIFIED ASMT AMOUNTS PER SECOND " ~ AMENDED NOTICE Oi ASSESSMENT ADJUSTED FOR 1MIt9s BOND SALE) ~wwr INm Zoxt MF.t Ar U[sCV.vTgx y_s[._ IA<RES) Fw wN..Mrwrw.+ineal W wowrwrb "•Miwrl puuPMrwrNmnNl w _ __ wFxa.3 - vrKr __._ i _.... towcs.I _ I ' rol ~ • x]ro [ rc_ ps asUUCE.I.~~[' F[n~x, xnE • , ~ au ra r i e N ]~ I ~ .ts w Broru vm[uExr F~rat su r I _~. . mo I - M x o stssutxr suotm Ot wt c e0xo r u uMxESS[ psrxict ~rfrA,.sMw E rosr [ , eERauxOE iCOtttcrwx two ~ ~~ cttaucs,_ Ia MOO. xo r ar~ P M R~pIYgnYrprMMlMfI waNwtwtMnMxfl eM rprNmmwt I~~w~w 0 I It Fx wgnMwrNmtMMt Mtk oFrc[ ~:~ wn r nwKVUt w.s sE Fx wgw~wwswM~*tl s cnr MLU 1 _ a9^~. _twmxr.Ml soi-a awnnxw roimuvomurauernmmimwvarvrmmierurvrwnravamvewlxuuummmnoeunmvilwvumuna I s}atL 1 zr ao. loser ro o- o ~ - _I-xiwsr I. nuuamrmruuzmmnmailwrxwnm+umau I }KNS W 1 ^°°wI o lore aes r.ao~, MI } om o oao 0 0o aol I _ I sere I 4. ~eer> K oiil _.. upauwxxeruxnxmmmvnxrvxn~Mrraeixgiuxumm~vluuw I ~ ~I SH~ h x mI >~ al.sSl N~ tLV I I a m ou ...._. I wI-F e I wI ... amvmmruuuenumrgnxmmmlrmwnmmmnumivnurxmnxlrnxxuvumw rr~ e s i ee~ oll r} tl I n rr asl t)I t . ,sl x>,ws rr l.- ml wnmreamrmmnimn~rmmrnnnnnmrvni mmnlnrmnuu 0lsl 1 ]I~ »zti u i e l W I r Wj~I au I n i ~?iaf mwwvmaam~}nnrvrxmuxolxvmnmminr~munxlnwxxrvlurl puru~ppx~~uawwruv w' xoiuwrura n FERORawAt 0.TsaE ~iAFw- nrvEG ~1w~E0 ~x[Mp }He s 0.Mrr ~ ,?!~ ~ ~ ~~)~L~?3%3 ~ T i ) Tl }Ir 1KVl ~_~5)}oS~i~N~}~ ).60r~~ mnnutlmrvmumuwmrMUwxovmm/mlwMntlnimmbnavuurnmwmMAfbNN.YUmlBmtvlnueuemMxNllppiMpxnamprH'mlmgluMmuvM/xuMUMNUNrvuwwNlnMtlM/m/umMmnxv/u/wmrWnYMltla/MMNPoUnmMiMmpNnmMmm~ulmm/MnurmlMNnaaunmPUNNiIMmnunwmplatl.9a~raimrerYlM/m/mmlrrvrilm4Nwnetsmu/glnlnxms/N.YmnMmmnivniunufMMVminmuiu/eMVmMmMVpIUVM4»wMmlwmlmrvmm~lulurvMxpNM EXHIBIT C MODIFIED ENGINEER'S REPORT CHANGE AND MODIFICATION NO. t CITY OF SAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 9d-3 SUMMARY TABLE OF E%ISTiNG ASSESSMENTS AND MODIFIDA710N3 TO AFFECTED ASSESSMENTS IN SEVEN OAKS AREA (NORTH) xMFA3E0u5E35NFASAMONw uc 3foRTn»NAxD µrtnfAMK)TOSE AFav3FAD ~M»~w AND SMI rNF __._ __ - _, ____ MODIF EOOiiIGWAL ASSESS ENi AMO11NT3(15 f:OM_FIPMEDOL}MSj _~ _ pNa sls f -~ MOp IEO ~~ Y SEG T NDE OF A9 TEF BONDS E( _... ~ D D _ N l _ wtp TONE uu 1 1 E ._ a ~ .r ~ MF ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ I IUE~EI j r I I I I ~ wagOVE ~ ~ l )oTwa _.- - - my .. --. .. - »Oa -__ +xxYiµlm~mN M/mrwmv3HNUUOWmUNNµN ~ Sµ ? ml >.) » Omi r;)_ 4 , e) se;T» ~ apI_ ) M.n _ .. _.. muNr I A f F U Mse)MI_.ea )ael~ nMrwuu + 0 _s),)ep ~ ! _o ),)wos~_._ N, M,uE. ~ aD.: s4 n; »o~s3 .,.. 511._. w u3 FO Uln AND NNENiAM3r I ___ - YOp FIEp ORX:WA ASSESSMENT AMO M 3( CONFDOMEDOL) !j . _ munppu OOIFIEO SMT AMOVNi3 FfR BECON[I AMENOf NOTICE OF ASSF SM NT jADSD TEO FOR} ~SISS BOND SELE) ' ... 1a _ ~ ..~ »,w --w11[xOEti moss ~ wwN s 'OSw f u sti0roT - Mrt. TaN0. - eam 1 ~ E Il r) _ o ASSE f oT I'w4 w ( ~, , ~ ( E ~ ) w 3mt EoxE uur uEe xET rp N+f3 N F u FS wv3ovFUfx Ovoff v4r f• Fw ~ psT3K) v3ocEEdRG3 co tT O - ~EC ~ E rER O w ~ uF v s r vAOVE Ar00 v5 a Boew sSV wvcE ' p ) vER cIMROF _, xt0EU wx .ES .. -- _. l n l S » 3. --------_ - _ w IS IM H sr n~ z " µ ~ __,_ 4 , (H xS tlE I ~l SSwxCE O s+ I A MOp xo t a ~ ~ ~ i ~ I ~moc3[Dacs~ ~ caFEC)wns; ~ ssuuKE I ~ f cos) ~ BEM _ O.t u TD,AFS Y, S r , oN ~ » )) . K _ - _ _._ ._ __ , .nppl ~' 4 ~ - ) 5 ,>:w »p, _ ~. _ _ -Tp_.Sp.K _ _ . ST NNK EDNE A5N) .AEF, ~) iw~RD,RMEA, ) RtoSswiviwx - --us[.... _._. .w__. INxESL.inu Foul ._..-- a1E YE NO gf1EDdU io 0NALA88E39 MEMAMOU o Nri AS CON RRMEOOM 1M51 YsUNICE ~ NOOF EOASMTAYOUM SPERSEDONDAMENOEOMOTN:E OFASSEESYENTMOJUSTEO FOR )N)NS8O)A e O) TO l1L~_ ~ In In YOd _ .w~Nl WO) ~aOM+iAM»At Iq HIDA 9 l tMOD.µ 10.pµ ~t µ tM»).)E M0. 0eo ) M.%.» 5 nOS3N t u . f4Oµ)I ;M0.+) t M O M~f muNl fO lw0 )3 WSSa c1 I++w _ i ~ ~ N rtD+w+~Omx~t AVV~ w to ~ i OO e 5 ..)) 1µ.66t1! ~ i » 5) t) ~t5M1¢M t ]4fO i.„ t;000. £r ~ p MM MO.IµS µ aO1vFA t)11~ar YOD/ FFVJ3. »I I++M~IIODM nOwNl _ »IPFAAVVOR tsl lnp.SI001f nOm~roel O s,N ]) 4µ.U 4 34 tM.On. i0.!µ.µ M 0.µ5.5p MOOD tO ~~A>a.» 1 ) M 4 ) 4 o MSW SXn. M ip`)ON.O I » x0.0 ~µ 1 ~~ ryFR /~vv0a 011.1 I a~YOOFIFD~ Nm+uNl EO 4 )~0 µ 1 t M0µ 0. Otq~j p ~ ~x O613 2 .~0 ~b' ) vl»LK OOfKE Us OnuO0sIFO+pnOmuN1 Na»rYOdiYD+p+N~new01 ~ 0ro ~ µ . 000 4 E U+W IrogEEp+p+Nnwroel To3us M) s , 0 aM6m ro µ Nm4,: . ~ ~ -- ra Rn[3 ~µt.x Z Torras. 3M.e5 t. 00;0 ae0 I N ) su1t6 )M1 t'~aaml:m s:mM t' » : 5.a. . I t, ~eozlNnl c wise pN ~3wN.~ .n~,..M r~.,.n... .,,.,,,.,. EXHIBIT D MODIFIED ENGINEER'S REPORT CHANGE AND MODIFICATION NO. 1 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-3 LIST OF PARCELS IN SEVEN OAKS AREA (SOUTH) NOT OWNED BY THE DISTRICT PROPONENT RECEIVING AONE-TIME CREDIT ON THE 1997-1998 TAX ROLL FOR THE PARK ASSESSMENT SHARE BILLED TO THEM ON THE 1996-1997 TAX ROLL PARK PARK ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT SHARE OF SHARE OF PRINCIPAL INTEREST BILLED ON BILLED ON THE ROLL THE ROLL FOR 1996-1997 FOR 1996-1997 TOTAL TAX YEAR TAX YEAR PRINCIPAL TO BE APPLIED TO BE APPLIED AND INTEREST CREATED FROM AS A CREDIT AS A CREDIT TO BE APPLIED AMENDED EXISTING ORIGINAL ASSESSOR'S IN PRINCIPAL IN INTEREST AS A CREDIT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT TAX NUMBER FOR 1997-1996 FOR 1997-1998 FOR 1997-1998 NUMBER NUMBER NUMBER (ATN) PROPERTY OWNER NAME TAX YEAR TAX YEAR TAX YEAR 1150 108 108 393-122-03-00-3 GILBERT BACA 28.63 62.46 91.11 1152 110 110 393-122-05-00-9 CANADY KENT L 28.63 62.48 91.11 1157 115 11'5 393-122-10-00-3 JOSEPH PFEIFLE 28.63 62.48 91.11 1158 -116 116 393-122-11-00-6 BHA PROPERTIES LLC 28.63 62.48 91.11 1160 514 76 393-131-01-00-3 AHMED MUSHTAO & REHMAT S 40.32 88.01 128.33 1163 517 76 393-131-04-00-2 RATLIFF CHARLES F & A DAWN 40.32 88.01 128.33 1165 519 76 393-131-06-00-8 COLEMAN THOMAS M & POLLY A 40.32 88.01 126.33 1177 528 7,6 393-132-04-00-9 TOMAS VARNER 40.32 88.01 128.33 TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE CREDITED: ;275.80 ;601.96 ;877.76 AS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR CHANGE AND MODIFICATION NO. 1, THE DISTRICT PROPONENT HAS AGREED TO PAY, PRIOR TO THE COUNCIL APPROVAL OF CHANGE AND MODIFICATION NO. 1, THE CALCULATED AMOUNTS OF ASSESSMENT PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST CREDITS FOR PARCELS IN SEVEN OAKS AREA (SOUTH) NOT OWNED BY THE DISTRICT PROPONENT, THAT WERE BILLED FOR PARK IMPROVEMENTS ON 1996-1997 TAX ROLL. AS DESCRIBED EARLIER IN THIS REPORT, PARCELS IDENTIFIED AS ORIGINAL ASSESSMENTS 84, 85, 88, 87, 109,111, AND 112 WERE FULLY OR PARTIALLY CASH PAID BY THE DISTRICT PROPONENT IN THE AMOUNTS SUFFICIENT TO COVER THEIR ORIGINAL SHARE OF SEVEN OAKS AREA (SOUTH) PARK, AND ACCORDINGLY WILL NOT RECEIVE CREDITS FOR PARK ASSESSMENT SHARES BILLED ON THE 1998-1997 TAX ROLL. 29182MD D-1 04/02/97 x ° yi v. O "' ~Ow O ~ (~ ~ mo n ~ Z ~ Z O ~ p 3 ~ z o O ~~~ ~~~ U '~ ~~ Y ~ fy ~ O W z ~ s `~^ t ~~ . ~ , ^ w p ~ ;~ D I ^ ~-j L O ~ 6~ A U p-1 1~j-1 I Fr ~ ~ e ~ y C H z ~ W r , W Q~ ~~ I-r °~~ 2 W O ~ Q ~f W A ~ ~ ~ ~ x o ~~ W ~„~~ )> O C > Wa ~ ~ ~ O„ LL W r/ ~ W v= Ft / 1 ~ Q ~V ~~ n U N=~ ~~ O¢ UOVPi OOO~Z U ~` ~ W ~ u1 p F SJ4! A^W ~ O 2 F N 9 W ~NRa Zm02 20~j y~ p W < U ~ ~~pZ Z >> U~ I I~, ~ h ~ ` F W Y~ N Z~ W""Wyl^K ~ Z~ ~ ~ Z D 3 ~ V W 60 A ~WW I ~ 1 y ~OONZ~OI^° 9~W7F~°~~ U~~ ~_~ Y~ ~<~~ ~ ~ ~ `76 ~ ~~U2~INmy i~00 ~ Z O~~ ~LL ~WUtY ~ O 4Z`l KNU ~O ~~N}y jZO W Y~Y 1-• Oy ~ ~ UO YI m Z ~ << ZZ ~ZOZ<~A Ob ~a ~~ ~ ~o~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~z°~~ I ~ z~~ ~~ 2~~~~ '€ ~°q~ ~~~~WC~ G 3 ~ O I ~ I Wp W`v`3(s3(~~ tn8~W C0 = O?W W Y 7 K ~0 O ¢ O, - w (r/m~ 20 d Z N^W O W O W W m 2 < 1 N W 7 <Z 1Y 2~ 23 wW I~ WY°o3 Ws IJ NON^K I °rc OO~N 207 VI°i UVYIJm N~ C~ pOW W<WOZw rc =~~~rj.riiW WN¢ Z~ m l i'Y ~qNNY ~~02 A~<LLW IZN aNU ~=m~-~Z I;Z~ ^ymy~~O V1ti3KJ IWJ ?<W SV~fO ItO~ O~F~1 yN0 I~OV ~< K~WOW~ I= OWyJO ~0 <<N~~~ UuWu112T~pp C <aw'IZO °o ~x9F=S Io~~s o~a ~<wYSc°Z°Z~ 10<~m UrO Im -U I..K t IZsW°~=4 /~/~ x '~V~I F-Y ~ WOOF N~~Y O~ ~= ZWOO~NO yw~1~~~!!~;!{ ~ VIW~ZZ~ 2WONQ'y"j'Jj YI~1K-~~CW° F U11~U6mW yJ ~'YiU Q~ 4~ Vl wHf ,v ~~ 0 W I °~ ~ W ~ W ~ ~ O [~] ' ~ G-- ~sss ~ ~ ~ 0 Ol~a~ 2 Z bzd O Olr hLLN~Q yI O(W~ G6' W G N[Z W[ w€f O~ ~°WWW~W ~ P °IOJ OZ~ ~ZZ DYW~ ° C~JO:~O ~ OJ~OO~a`N O U (7y' ~~r !ll~~~ [[[ ~~,,, ~^ y.i , , , ccc ~~~ y `_, ~y Z ~h<U G~ j ` Cm N2~ZO~~K ~OK~~~ KG~K~~Z? Y W `w Yl `n f i ~ ~y (n ~ ~ s a a a a s E i U ~ s n < I~em U N+eO qi< mi ~ hi~P 1`~• n~e mZe m<• < r= N~ O ~ ~~~ r C Q~ P C o o ?: C C i L C i C C i a ~; ?~ z~ ~ za za zo °a E z Z M x p ~ F+1 p W ; - w w w . w : ~ o8^~ om 'o`n n .c'^ a e`m `o O1 ~ e n ~ om Z om a •O om em ~ EN 2 oN ~i ' I1G ~ O.-, x i5 p ~V ° ~ ~ C ~ ~ o~ ~ iEs Eon S~ o°g o. 6 od o ° Sa6 : i ~ -oZ ; OA oN ~ c c z ~ -7 v~ 2 ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ U ~ n Q } ~ v vZ ~ Zoo V v ~ f`o~ W<~E Wg~ WiQ WS~ WO~ WOF 4SO~ W•F Q W y ~ ~ 1 e!: ~n c?~zo~ IQ n e°~~ ~ c oa „ n o'~ ~ ~O~' O P O~~o«: A N n n CQ ~~CY CI N ~Eigoo i vi «g+~~asn~ ~`: coo.e~c -n °c U a ~ h =PLOO$OpC N ~~ n V ;- aQaa s e~ °Le~ ctr °g i W° rOOee ~n °~ Cil~ •c°^o°300 0 IW- '`'uE~2son ~~5 it Iii o:!`e c°>~~n a~i: I I J ~~ ~'` -- ~1 ~ I ~ m 1 ~j' PO W dW < ~ O~ ~p `O e~ O~EEf pfi~ SAC OF~C pFF~C OE~C ciip E~g30 E~a EZa Ei+~ E~N EZ~ F~Zw EZ~ ° P ~ ~ __ w --~ ~? ~ IOW ° 6 aS ~~o ~,« oa_ _ :a~ Eo o~ae £ 9 = So' o°~ o 00 ~'~ a°Pe^ o°c W 1 u j< Z ~~ F ocg °a EOSn~ °na ~.?1i °ma ° °~ °^° °mo ~ ~~e e p'p =ao ~„~ E E~ E~ E~ €~ E ~ o° E E~Z a' I f~ I ~. W N am ~ o,F . ~ at' o W ~ w 1 i i w e : O Y ~ O pp-i p QO . o~ • O^I O QN Q~ a QO . W ~ W I ~- I F O ii GG •• L F GG + L + ® W Z ~ N m n O~ n + N m a z 1 I I I I ~~ t . I ~ ~ A A d~ ~ wl i I 1 I I N WW' z_ a~w~uaa m A Q ~ ________ I}- ~ C~ zAO; ,~.~ ¢ ; ~zA ~""~ 1 I rs , ~ ~ o I ~' ~ ~'~w y I N >II ~ LL' ~ 9 I I' z¢w ~ -- -~ -- -- -- I 1 U ~ d ap .. 0: P, ~ i it E"~W ~ ~ A ~ , ., A I ~ W I O W ~ ~ ' E~~~ W ~ 6 I 1 ch 1 a I N I I ,I ~v~ AOi bA1 1Kir ^~~ serrsaa 3 !Z r s a ! __ ~ I I W H ~ I ~ Zi I 1 ~ I I 1 Q 1 ~ I x E, fY ~ ~^ ~ ° ~ I r r` i ,.. oz ~ ~ N ~~ ~ 1 ~,7 ~'S I ~~-- o o I ~* ~g a `` e I ~ ~ `•• ~ a . yl/SIOi! i S -- __ __~1 0 ~ E., M ~ p ~ A z Ch m~ o ~ ~ ~ CD by ~ p U yJ ~j == ~ ~ ~ p ~ y~~ ~ ` N Z ~ W •• ~^ ti ~ ~z ~! 1~1 [~] /ice w W ~ ~ y < 1 i W Og < ~ ~ ~ Z ~ V <1 W < Z Z 3 6 m z d ~ Fy IG 1~WW1~}~~II A m Y ~ m y < ¢ W KFZ- ``OW W 3 LL pp mp ~~ y. ( m O N N W v] ~ W g~ 3 Z JZ m Z ~ ¢ ~ ~ O ~ O ¢Z ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ z ~ ~ '~^ p ~a wg ~ !^ h~ ¢ g m ~ U ~ _ ¢ 3 c4 °~ ¢ ~~ o Z ~ W ¢ ~ A ~ p ~ U ~ N Z ~Z-' Ily m Z ~ O OO ~ ~ (Oj 3 O ~ ~1 ~ Z ~y ~ 1 ~ t!t~/nn1 ~ N = ~ Z W m J ~ 2 W = m ZU ~ + Z W ~ ~ q~ ~ W Q W / ~ W A Cfl N O ~ ~ W ~ Z ~ 00 ? ¢ Ox~x a p < S a m WW p 4 "WO W Y ~ o y + O y . ~ r J Z W 2 U ¢ J F.~ A ~ m N O UW ¢ ¢Z ¢ ' j ~ W~ z I I ©~ ~ tl W R = O V]~~ ~ ' ~ ~ ( l i ~ N m° D 1 o' i N o u ¢ ~ m Y ~ o b m ° ~ h Orb ~ O ( ~ I ~ i ~- Fem. ~ d ~ A W A z w ye w ~` w A ~ ay ~ 4 ~ ~ ' M W n ~ A ~ F. h N C/~ p d ~„ W ,~ R ~ ~ I i w ~. ° 0 o~i Q ~ 1 h I 1 ~ O ~ r y l rn ~ t p ~1~ ~~~ 3~za 3sza W Q ' N~ ~ a 1~ ON uR q n 1~ ~~ ~a O w~ ~~ ~! ~i ~ ~y~+ [~~ v W v A W r~ o~ r°~,~ ~0.cp~ b FN hc~ W.f W~ Wy 1 1~W1G (W~ Pi QV07! ~ ~~ F F~ ~ xi ~' b 1 ~ +• Ir w ~, ~ ~ ~/7 U ~ ~ N n~~ ~~~ W 0 ~ p ~. p m ~ ¢ U p i4W.. ~ ~.i W = ` ~ l = ° ~ ~o rc ¢ u '^ ~ ui ~_~ ~ °n~] aa° W &_~ g~~ ~ ~~ <O p yl Z V Z ~ ~ ~ p G~ Q p N W r U ~ p ~ p S3 ~~3 Wa ~~~~ ~ ~g~ ar-N °a pS Z W 3 < 2 Z ~ p Z 5q~~ ~ ~~ 3o~b o `~ °~ZZ~~ F^F-e zo F <Z W Z p W ~(~ O ~ y~OU Q; yN~ {yY~~', i ~ ~ ~ A < O ~ °' h m F C WZ hV Q d~l~ O ~~ ~~ W 00 a a i n n Y 0 m ~~ 1°/1 h NW NW < < z z w W ~~p U ~ < W ~ ¢ 1n (n W ¢ ¢ ¢ O O w ~.Ni ~ 7~ J U O ~ J J yp U U W W 5 Y Y 0 m r a ~. x 1W ~~ ~ m o ffo `` ~ m'~ ~~ ~ o ~. W~ ~n ~ v 8y W ~R O ~~ ~F ~~ ~ ~ ~: ~ 1 ~, _ ~~ ~ • ~~~~~ `v~h ~ 0 q ~ir)w • ` ~ oN ^W ON UR A ~ Un W 0. 1<~ ~ ~~ ~ I Z n n ~ h d'~ v v °wF ~ ~' 0 ~ m a N3u ~ W O _ ~ °333333 $ N p a r-~ /~/~ ~ j G~ i~ W 'm Wo ~ r z5 ttl ~Qy 1E~"~ _ °~ 3 ° w i~ ~ ~ F o ,F~1.y~1~M ~j ~y o~ Z o2~N rc Z i a ~C/~f~/! ~N W W O N ~ y~ N O W W y~j ^ J N ~ 0 n A w z z ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~_ ~~ ~ o ~ oz° " sw" z x CJ F'~~~zs W ~ Wt W ~ W a ~°~ ~ z ° Q~~ ~ ~ o oa~ o € 'a = 3 i n.z 7 '^z u ~ A~iWZ~z~N C~ W~ ., y~~ ~ N~ N r o°~ n W m W ~-. ., ~ ~I ~~//~~ ,/1 ~ J~ J Z W N K i'13 O U ~ Z O O y N~ O '~ O C !LI W ~~ ~ O O VI ~ Z 2 y~ t 2 m mN 0~ ~ KW Z NZC N ~ 30 K ~ZZ< I~i• O J N W ~~x S~~ E I _U U y7 W Z r N H a Z W W U 3 NW O ~ ~ ~ °< p ° N ~ yN ~ Q ~ Z° Z ~j ~ ~ C N ~ ~ W~ O N~ N OF< W O J ~ ~ °t3W3lN O ~ Z O ` ~ WW-1 ~Q] zu `<rr ~W~11W ~ ° o c J j y H =3 =3 m ~~ W rc m o 000 ~ v ~ ~ ° a „13wk ~ Wo ¢ ~ ~a W~= )F/~+~ ~ ~ rz ~~i 3N 3N in ~a Z ~ ~ ~ c w o Z W °°~ ~ <~ $ ~ ~w ON~N V J ~ Z N~~~ ~ 2 O W~ W ~ O O~ J Z J Z 2~ U 2 d. = 3 ~ H .. tN~nn ^ U- (jj C ri ~4 W U ~,/^~ r WI u N W F OF C2 ~ 4c N UJ Z -~ W C 7 W n ~O - U K ~CNI~ `~ '~N VlW W N W~ Y W VI Q2 Q2 W KC U O ° 4 IWiJ S ri IWi Z W Z O°ZN = UIJ W 3V ~ WFwy~~< ~~0 ~ J 7 `~' $ ~ N ~` i ?v ?v `2 xa a` °m ~ ¢ rci x o rc z "°~ ° 509 0 ~~ ~ <" ~ ~w~ ~ 1 i~W ri ~o ao H a, Q'Q'F I I ~ I h o D ,~ ffff © W N ~ of o~~~ nP oc°' ~ Ng ~ WU ~a a ~ i ~ oa ~ o0 o N ~ x o o pua~ ~ =~o~ _~ ~ x ~ ~ ~~ z Q~~ a 1 ~ ~ ui s in ° ~ ~d ~ a° r c o'er ~ '~'+ .-7 LL"<.. --i E1 ~ 1 I I~ M ~ n iN~-~i c o 3 W~ °2 i ~ z~ ° rF-~ A i~ Z r~Z~v=i 7 0 ~ 3 ~ ~~ x U W Z~ ~ r h o~ ~~ R„ i ~~ W N ~ ~a ~~ ~ O ~ ~ w ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ rl m .oe .oc O Z ~• ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ x ~~~° ~ ~ pI~ /~ V~/1 1~-~ O On I n ~~~ 1~ N~® .~Z .~ n N~O ~ q ~~ ~~ q~ W A ' l ~ ON ~ r I~~O~ ^ °~ © ^ N n O ' n N ® ~ ,* g G AE's M w~ ~~ ® ~N~Q> nN ~ ~ _` O ~ V I n® n ~~~ !~I n H~® 0 (~~~~~ i Y~ A IJ 0 ~ "G .'~I VJ ~ r ~~® OI n ~ ~ n ma~ ~I ^ N~®O ~~ n ~~Q O~~ ~ On~ ~ O N p ~ 01 \ ~no~ ~ r^ ~ o v1 n /^1V 0 ~ n ~~ ~ n f~l ~~ ?ss O ~~ w ~vyg~ ~ o~ ~ s~Nz ,~aJpe~d~a N ~M..~6~ ~~~e 8 \ BgA~<~ \ C7 6 i~J~p~O aO~~~ ~~^\~~ ~~a~ / ~ ~Mw 6 / ~~/ J-y ~ / / ~ ~ ~~ o ^ ~ ~ ~ 33~ ~ H n yi. i ~ U$ '~w~ r Z D t6 N ~ (j~ ~ W ~ W G ~ Va<l µy rM~ MwV~ Y<I N ~_ C2~ ~ ~ IypJj m ~~wyJ 4 3 3 ~ O ~ ~. fy O ~ ~ ~N ~ ~ N S ~n <O C 3 Y ` Cn t/1 BOO N 7] Nm N W~ ~ m Wi~ y~r+j n p p ~A~UZO npo Q O A m ~ m J ~ ~ 2 ~ K r0f 3 O (2 ~ O_ `O G "" py2 ep O tV VI 1~y ~ ~~ ~ O O 0 0 Z yN~ J W OS mF '~ KW O 4_ZO N msJ Sp K CS~ 4 O>Y ~ 1~ W ~~[~ p~ E r~ Z ~ C Z ~ mW ~ = OU S` O C ~-' Y ~ ~ W = ~'^ .Wi.°a Z Wrc ~ ;W o t- ~ $ ~ 203 ~W ~ 7 ~+zdzy o O W W 7 =~ _~ m ~ rc W m O 00 O (W= II O a ~ W qO p ~n ~jw W A S ~~ WW~W7 <W 3YI NWK J~2~Z VUS=~UO~m ¢`ij~~ L~~ ~V 8 -v/•~w~0~=fin r^ W ~y'~ 2 V~1 N ~ H ,{ (f vN~ WO 1-p O O _J = J W Wp U = ~ ~ <6N~ ~ O W IL Vl ~ rte{ ~ U V, W W O W~` <V U N UJ w K~ ~ K m~ Z O p m ~ Z < ~Cy.~1 ~I~ '~r^"' C1 yN~ (NN/~ _ ~<[ Fi o f o f yN~ ~ ~jV 8x V ~ = KZ V LL 7 ~ p O z v<_~ p, 3 ~ ~ W ([Q~.]'7 ~ 1~-9 V l W J << m m N W ~ z U ~s U < Y y d m~ C K 3 Y O C 2 U J ~ ~ p ~ W 1 mJ ~ W~ p ~ Q '~i "~ W ~ ~~W ~ ~F ~ UI ~ wv W ~ I ~ I .,~ 5~~~ n~ o ~ ~~ ~, dux jj ~ ^ ' i ; ~ Q D - ~ O O H ~ Y a0 o N O~oZ N u ~U ~ „' t)J O Ci V I ~1 FY O K Q 'W ~D ~ F 2 ~ ZZ ~ ~. y W p C W I ~' i ~ C h 3 NUS`O 2~ ~€ O ZW O '"~a V~2`rr In i ~ ~ I M .° ~ ~°~~ ~a gf ~ ~° ~ Uv d(s] C~2 ~ °z ~~~~ ~a ~a ~ < x z~ w" ~ ~ ~ ~~ an a Z ~ ~v~ n ~ ~ ~o ,,, ?~ d H c ~~ ~ .~ ~~ W ~ V - ~~ ~ m 'oa `L~ 'xa ~~'~ w0 ~ ~ ~ 4~ 0 ~S9~Hd-9L99 'OW 1~~i8A ? _ ~~ A d. A ~ 0 ~ E, z a W 0 ~ ~ o® ,~.o~ d~ M N ~ nuNi 1 ~ X00 ~ ~i a-i ~ Q ~ ° ~ ~ ® e AW a' °n ~ O E-~ C/~ 5 x a, ~L.S QNOB ~ ~ P xI ~ '° in o ~A ~' ~ O^~ ge z O .oz a (T~ ~ ~ o .OC oc n O.Q O ~ ~ o a 0 n =~~ aI n © 0-14 O A ~© ~n m rn Q n U ~ V !9 ~ N ~ ~~ _ _ HOUNSLOW SQUARE d Q ~ o~ ~ O\ ~ tO O ~ O O ~ Q ~ Z C ~~ \ ^ © ~ z O ~ n ~~® ql W ~~ ~ ~ ~ coi o nN 0.~ N8~ 6 `~ !! ~ 8 '. 0 80~ ` ~~' /~O ON~© S ~SS , OM~ W / ~ OM n N /,~ P ~ O~ yp M ~ 1 ES / ~P ~ m N • 6t C~vV_ C H A P ^ ! ~( m N P~~r ~ o ® ~ n o ~ ~ _ - ~BEC ~lUM't\7 ~ N ~~ S PtVV~V~' ~~r~!!1 \\ a ON (o d~®p. ~~ ~ °n iO~ O„ 0 0 ~S o M~ ~~ O ~ ~ M ~ N COO N / ~e^I O _ O 4j l V~V ~ pa~O ~ ~+{.~L _ _ ~~ m ~x L~A6 ~ ~ aO p~ " O o P. L~ fld ~~ '~ 99L9 'OYd 1~1itl1 W A x° 4 4 L O C~ j H~ U i ao~~ GD pZ ~ ~a C ~' ' ~ ~ n ~ w E ' 2 Z y ~ ~ ~ WWC~ ~~a ~ 2 W W C u~i vii r y 1+ W WOOS W W ~ ~~~ ~ z i, ~ ~ ~ z ~ ' ~ i E A E., z w z ~ W w ~ ~ o Q Wx ~~~ A WE H z ~" z W w~ vi A Wz ~~ ~ ~ n ~WW i a 0 z Y a 0 z N3~ r~c ~ W C~ ~ W n m W W < ~ 3 m Z D ~ ~ G r ~ g O U Q ~ Z O O LL WW2 ~ > 0 K Jl 1 O ~ O ~~ y WC !! ~ W~ N U ~ W aa K^~ ~ n 8 m VN l = ~ ~ {y 1 ~ OC ~~ ~ Z` Z a S 3 .~ ^Q -~~ ~ LL to Ny . 0 y q ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° N W ~ y< 0 < W N ~ ~ ~ [ ~S ~ m H % ~.~i ~3 m 'o ~~' m 3 '^ ~W ~ ao m ~ 5 K 0 Z f Z FZ~ O LL X00 Z S Z m j W Z y W W H y W O ~ 6 Z tOi12 W W O Z (Sil <~ Z O < p W p O< < K ~ O T ~ J ~ o V V U H W m ` W< 2 i ~ W Z~ U m uV 1I W aW W ~ ~ W ~ Or W ~ O ~ ¢ O ~ O ~ U i ~ ~' ~ O W d i O W p~p J2GK SZ ~ ~~SS N ? W 1 ~ rc m ~ Q D ~ y ~ CC O ' W N ZO = ~ a 2 4tC Z N N O Z z Z U Z Z OU ~ S U ? -~ ~ j Z aN n O W U <~ Y W ul N ~i z o O ?U U ZO U V WI ~ ZU V Q ¢ W~ a 0 < Ya m a W rc ~i1j W O K3 Y " ~ O 4 W ¢ ~ Z J W z U ~ ZZZy y << Z< 2 O Vl> K 3]L O I I srz0 .°' OO"m W ~ ~ ~~ ~ H W ~ j i ' m n O ~ D ~ ~ O ~ w ~ W N rc ~ O ~ oWO3 ~~W 40 ~ ~g ~o ~ U~ 0 ~ ae ^I h i ~ ~ ~ Y O G ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i /I ~~ rc W 0 i T M O U N ° ~ ~ ~ W W wonz ~ ~ u~Y p a~ $z G zd y ZW ~ i n ~ i r~~nf ~~ ~3 g y 3 ~< 0 -n. ~ p ~~ O ~ 6 _Z ~ - - " 1 p , ~I ~__ _- 8 ~ gg 1 _. U i ~ ~ „ -_~F+ O\ ~' U 6 ~ .; \, ~. \ \. ~, _ ,j / ' N O ~, ~\ 0 ~~ o~ - x~ ~C~ Y E .~ *%~~ s r~~ . w "~ LM~1 "'~~ ~ 69 O ~ P ~~ r^ ~~ ® ~ 8 ~~ a twt^^ v, •'~ 0'n 0 V ~~ ~~ A~~ ~~ P P O A ~i ~! ~ Y S s b ^' n `~ I ' ~y. a O r~ Z = 4 rl v ~ ~ N F ~x aa~ W W N ~ C ~H ~ ~ a~ m [~ ~ ~ 1 ~~ ~ H °0 z ~~ A V] ~W ~ ~ ~' a wd i ~W~ z~ c~ Eoo z ~~U C7 d oAH azz xW c~ av H~ ~~ ~I A W A dw 7 N Q WoW ~g "~ ~ 2 Z S 1-~ V y ~ l y V 1 Y A V< K O U R w p W 0 O m ~ ~ n < K 3 O Z NJ a ~ ~ b ~ O U U<1 j ~ H O $~LL LL`< O ~ O a Z N ~ Z O W I~ H 2 $ O t~n W>Z N<O L ~ O p O N Ulp H VI N W (! ~ C O W ~ ~ S m N ` oi~ rc9 z W I~I1 O ~ O ~' i U ~ Z o ~ W ~, V=1 3 xa N a Y a F ~ W ,Z pN ~¢y a yN < } ~ ~$ ~ ! ~W < N~ ~ ~ p h N ~ ~ ~ H~ ~ C p Z m J~ m1y~I~1 J= W K j N K oU Z n~ SO ~ ~ O ~ O ~ O py Z ~ ZZ p 0 F ~ ~ m 0 Z C C O 3 Z J Z Z r(/N~ { ? i-~a' Y < U WK U 41 W N O 3 O~ W N O ~ S ~ O ~ ~ ~ K Z ( ~ Z ZG<~ O W O~ ~ WO N~ O QQ l~ 2 1NA W W 3 O x w F m 3 W w y~ W W m O ~ )~ 0 m0m F U ~ W W O LL ~ O ttttt11111 p CY' ~O ~ 2 FZ O O K 2 ~ 1y p J J H Z < W 2 N !A f O 1A K W D N 1~ J W J U~ Z Z ~ W S J W O U K g W O Z W W J WW v~W ~Ip/1 ~ N < ~ ~n yy<_~l ~ V `Y` U m N xNx ; W 2 . V2 ZU < < U2 yN 1 < x(0 CO 0 0 R ~ Y d 4 m 6 K W7 2 Ki Y W O 4 K W ~ ~ 2 O Z ~ V 0 ~ p OZ y O 6 N~ Y ~. y ~;n U < O . oWsy' G ~ ~~ ~ ty v1 I /y ~ ~7~ Sib ~ < C F ~ ~ 113 a0 I I I oa D 9 "~ o ~ D y ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ C a W- ~~~= 11 ~ a y O L ~~ 5~~ ~~ . ~ m p ~ N Y O ~ e-7 O t0 ~O F~~ C yj i rc W S ~ °n o W ~S~u; SS -- ~ °tS ~ za i =~~~ ~a ~; ~ ~< -- ~, _ ?~,- ~ y I 4 . ~~ , y g ~~ ~~ :~/ ~ _ • c.,i . 'g~.;o O a~ ~ ~-- ~~:~ N ~:. ea .t ~~ ~~ e h __ - .~ ~i Q .a _- Ro -1 .'. _\~ 0 N '. ',\`. d ~ , ~,\ ~ ~ . •~ ~ 0 ~u o" x~ o ~ V y \~ U~ o V~ ® ~ S A ~w aS ~ Nr ,'~9 ca G ~ rp v <~ ~~ is r °~+ s> ~~ • ~ W o~ z~ 0 ~~ O ~ W W ~ ~ ~7 n n ~ i a a ~~~ zW w a n ~ 1~ ~--1 H i i ~ W _ V '~ uy~ • ~'~ ~ ~ w {np~ ~ as ` A ~ = W m ~j K Z Z ~OJ ~E~j ~ ~~ U~ ~°zi o y o ~ 1+yF ~1 o ,^, Z ~~O & 7 ~ ~ E+ ~ d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U 3~ q}` F ~ ~ W ~ g /~f ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ kQkQ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ °~y ~ ~~ h ~ ~ w o m z ~7 ~iZ o ~ C 00~ 3 m~. ul Z E ' a~yl ~_ ~ ~ ~ rN ~ Z W~,W~j ~ _~ (j O ~ ~ f C~~ W W ~ H F~/r~ Zi ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ `~ ~ ~N ~~ ~ .~1~ ~ m = u u~ ~ U uW ~ i ~,rc, `U"~~ C~ '9' y $ "~J ~V~ /I~ O W yyN~ N ~ K O 2 ~ twt 0 <<C (/~N~ fOJ .~ Z Z W Z F- V ~ W W z O ~~ yy~ P ~~ U C 4_ VI W VI W Z W F UZ U= W 2U W Y (W,1 ~ WZ 2 U K~~ Z OZy U~j W 3U Z WOO J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ __~ ~ ;c~ Y 8 a ~ ~~ ~ o ~ Z V s ~ Z ~ m ~ <Y (/J z ~ ~ ~ 3~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ [~. i ~ zri~ n WO ~ aZG uy~ z~ ~ ' i i ' p~ D 9 00 ~ y ~ x o g ~~ a ~~~~ s~ g~ ~ o~ E"~ A z - Z yy~ ~j < ri ~ r~ z ~ W ~z ~ o ~,~~ x„ o~ ^, ~:. a~~ ~. ~~o Af~jx EzH wW ~~ U)_ A Wz I~~ ° N O ~' ~' ~~ o ~ o n ao N O m o^ A 3A1?IQ ~Yd ?IOSQMAL A w ~ o= ~~ e o~ s es o e ~s x ci `~ avow x~n,z~ a7o ~ ?vivo vastn vx~na ~ ~ s .~`° ? ,~~ ~~ ~ a ~. °~ ' s> x .._ o ~~ O O ~, O a~ w w 0 r-IO ~ r~~ W P A -~1 ri N d d_ • Y~ ~ rc AJ 1~1 3 N ~ g r S F~'I 1111~~ O N Z W ~/~ pp 1~ KKKQ 3 A m ~ W O o~ ~ O W ~ n I ~ ~ ~ ~ H °-~ ~ ~ o h E ~ J W 3 ~ Sm 4NN1 W~ NU 0 N~ O ~ O ~ Z~ Z SW ~ yw~~ ZW O i.=i C~ W ~ ~_ ~ _ ~ ~Nn Z K~ ~~ O <W K N O~ m O O eZ ~ W W O O 1 O- ~ U W W S S~ ~ 0 K Z K m ~ DO O ~ Z O LL z z 0 ~ Z a ~ Z N W uu3ff 1;y ~3 1n ~ m m~ ~ w 1~ Z W Z V~1 N N 2 U N W~ WD O O~ O= J W Z~ V J~ 2 W 3 7 O <U N U~ Z < W W O W ~ ~ WI NN yH~Q ~ ~ x~ ~ pp ~~ yN W~ < O ~ ~ IWi~ W 1~ ~ ~ y=j Q TA O~ J <` m ~ ~n W z ?U =U ` Xa d m a rc KZ X o K 2 G J ' ' I ~ ~ [~ ~ 1 ~ " W g z~z ~ ; ~ ooD ~o~ oo ~ x o 0 0~~ ~N ~.~ ~ ~ 1 ~ M ~ °n F-~1 ~-`1 wz ~ w o~~ ~ ~ o KI x ~ ~ N a ul~~ ~ rya u o ~o~ 2 a M ~~zo o C m i g 3 ~~~ ~- ~ yZj n O ~ Z~ N ~~ 3 o Z O ~ ~ oNo ~ ~ 8 m ~ < ~ 0 W 1 n ~ 3 0 ~ ~' & W o Z ( ~ ~iW<0 ~~ ~ N oo U UNy ~ ~ 2 Y . o O ~ ~ O=Y1 Nj ~y% S~c3 psi ~ '7 ~dS ~° rc W ~^ a OJ ~~W Qw 2p 7 o m~ ~~~o ~= s~ ~ ~~ ~~o~= °z ~~~~ W~ ~o r ~_ ~3 .i g 4 z2;~ Fi a ~ ~ ° ~ ~'"'" , A W A E--., ~ o, ~~ a S, , ~ zw ~ o g p ~ W ~ di ~ ~ ^ Qi ~ . M .,,~~~', 0 xl ~~ At '0~ 1V LNf 7M bfi 'ON li®C1t11Pdr if7 101 i/ 'ti~llM~ w a. w~ w 6fC 'OW li~liNM'0~ i!1 101 0 1~'JYr~ ~ W w N ~ ~/~ ~ W YJ ,.O^ O ~ h NwF 2 W Z ° u Z<~ W Y N< O N p 2 r S ~ N n Z~ O u n w rc3 Y ~ m"z'W ~ gg : a O Eby - ° ~ ~ ~ °~ W °'~~` ~ ~ 3 U ~ YZI a z ~ ~ ~~ ~ o r ~ ~<~ ~ _ ~ x w H~ ~ ~ W W W Y W tf W ^~ yy N W ^ ~ Y E I'~ 0 z 3 aZ~ ~ N~ Z ~/~ _ y~ N ~ S (sW~ ~ M K 4 O W YJ V/ V+ A ~/~~1 V+ O `` m Jy~ ZZ W VyI C nZ3 O ~ Z <~QNW ~ ri~ VJ~ ~ 2 Z W ~ ~ Z my ~~ j OtWj ZG ~< p- p O ~ y 'O> ~ ~~ N F~7 ~ ~3 ~ ~ }}7 Yz Z ~ VNI TF, (UzJ //y/N~~~ ZW ~ ~ ~ ~ K8 ri z12 ~ U 2 S C N W< W~ O <~ K N ~~ C O O ~ C W U fWZf N O ~ Z~ W W O ~ ~~ ~€ } y a < ~ '`/ Fy~ y }rraS W m f 1-~ pppU W JS~ 00 ~~~/~~ ICY O W ~ O W ~ < ~ 3~ ;N Vl '3 m = j tW,t W41 ~ W W 0 2 y~j ~~~W ~ ~¢N N TVT^/ Z ~ y~ j/1 Z O N N~<.1 W<Q ff//O~~ UW Z Z 2 W WSO V 2 = Z ZLLN N 4 O Y<1 ~ C V[~ ~ ~I N H j W U~~ UZ Ua ;j 2U W Y W W ~~ 2 Y W~~ Z <ZZ1Nl1 n Nj ~ U W ~ V ~ `2 ~ m~ a ,~i z ? cS ? v J1~( x a a g~ ~ Ill~rrr i 'fix o rc i c"'i ~ ~~ o <o o ~ og ~ ~/~ ~ Z ~ ~ C 3 ~ ~ O W~-p K ~VV~//~JII1 ' -/~ Y c `V /~J ~ ' I I !'J O W ~ ~W~~ r H ~a W UC ~V W 1 I ^ r~ 1 ~ 0~ ( U N K ~ OJ ~~ W N P Z U c~J T Y Zi~ Z ' 1 i ' n D ~ O~ O c N Y ~ = O~ ~ ~s~o z~ ~~ ° o"' W ~~. ~ O ^ ~ ., ~ Q o~© o rW o O Vf ~ Q U~ ~ n J ~ O '~ :, ~~ J x~ a ~ x ¢ y IZ •~ «. c~ ~ E" ~ _ c~~~ . ~ d Hz w ~ •i ~ sw ~ F ~ ~ ~ / ~\ ~. ~ F 6 ~ `~ A ~ " ~ _ \ ~. ~ N~O \ Vj ~~ ~- ~~ 0 ~ ~j ~ N~ ® 1 ~ ~' ••''~ g1'A d o~~ ~ ~ o'~ g ~ a~s ~~ J ~" 0 J 0 .~ ~~ ~ 4 ~3773~ "~I O ~ ~ ti Qi a~ w 861E ~ lr L611 711 3111 ~lII1 918 'br 1V LO6/ "X1 3L1 100N01 1d0 D~VI •r . J~ m i oI J ~ 1p ~ _J ~ ~ $~. w PRODUCT DESCRIPTION SEVEN OAKS AREA (NORTH) (EAST OF KERN RIVER CANAL) CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-3 DEVELOPMENT TYPICAL NUMBER ASSESSABLE AREA LOT SIZE OF LOTS .AREA (AC) WINDSOR PARK I & II 65' X 120' 194 60.54 WINDSOR PARK III 55' X 110' 85 19.22 LEXINGTON I & II 80' X 130' 190 72.67 REGENCY I & II 90' X 135' 85 34.97 NOTES: 1. ASSESSABLE AREAS EXCLUDE PARK SITES, DRAINAGE SUMPS, BUENA-VISTA CANAL, KERN RIVER CANAL, AND PIPELINE EASEMENT ALONG KERN RIVER CANAL. 2. DATA IN THIS TABLE IS BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY MARTIN-McINTOSH ENGINEERING ON SEPTEMBER 6, 1996, AND UPDATED SEPTEMBER 11, 1996. ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-3 (SILVER CREEK/BRIMHALL NORTH/SEVEN OAKS/SOUTH LAURELGLEN) AS FILED FOR FINAL APPROVAL CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Mayor and City Council Bob Price, Mayor Irma Carson, Councilmember First Ward Patricia DeMond, Vice Mayor, Councilmember Second Ward Patricia M. Smith, Councilmember Third Ward Kevin McDermott, Councilmember Fourth Ward Randall L. Rowles, Councilmember Fifth Ward Jacquie Sullivan, Councilmember Sixth Ward Mark Salvaggio, Councilmember Seventh Ward Cit Alan Tandy, City Manager Judy Skousen, City Attorney Carol Williams, City Clerk Raul M. Rojas, Public Works Director Gregory Klimko, Finance Director BOND COUNSEL Samuel A. Sperry Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe San Francisco, California ASSESSMENT ENGINEER Ed Wilson Wilson & Associates Fresno, California UNDERWRITER Robert L. Williams, Jr., Vice President Sutro & Company San Francisco, California ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-3 (SILVER CREEK/BRIMHALL NORTH/SEVEN OAKS/SOUTH LAURELGLEN) CERTIFICATE OF FILING AND CONFIRMATION OF ASSESSMENT I, Carol Williams, City Clerk of the City of Bakersfield, do hereby certify that the following "ENGINEER'S REPORT, CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-3," including the Assessment and Assessment Roll in the amounts set forth therein as the "Preliminary Assessment," with the Assessment Diagram attached thereto, was filed with~/~/m~ on the 28t(h~day Hof: July, 1995 City Clerk City of Bakersfield, California I have prepared this Engineer's Report and do hereby certify that the amount set forth herein as the "Confirmed Assessment" on Exhibit A, attached hereto, has been computed by me in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Bakersfield contained in a Resolution of Intention adopted as Resolution of Intention No. 1126 on December 14, 1994. ~ ~~ Edward J. Wilson, R.C.E 23269 Assessment. Engineer, Assessment District No. 94-3 I, Carol Williams, City Clerk of the City of Bakersfield, do hereby certify that the following "ENGINEER'S REPORT, CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-3" and the Confirmed Assessment contained therein were approved by the City Council of the City of Bakersfield on theme day of ~5~, 1995, by Council's adopt' rf Resolution o. /.,j /-~5.~' City Clerk City of Bakersfield, California I, Raul M. Rojas, as Director of Public Works of the City of Bakersfield, do hereby certify that a certified copy of the following "ENGINEER'S REPORT, CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-3," togethe with the Assessment Diagram attached thereto, was recorded in my office on the ~.~' day of ~ - ~ , 1995. Director of Public Works c City of Bakersfield, California On , 1995, the Assessment Diagram was fi din Book ~_ of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts at Pages ~ through , and a Notice of Assessment was recorded as Document No. [ ~~ %,2 f 013 , of Official ecords in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Kern, California. 4 County Rec r County of Kern, Califo 29182CER -i- 9/13/95 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-3 (SILVER CREEK/BRIMHALL NORTH/SEVEN OAKS/SOUTH LAURELGLEN) DESCRIPTION PA E CERTIFICATE OF FILING ENGINEER'S REPORT AND CONFIRMATION OF ASSESSMENT .................................:......... TABLE OF CONTENTS ..... ..................................... ii SECTIONS SECTION I ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PURPOSE, GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF BOUNDARIES AND BENEFIT ZONES, AND ENGINEER'S REPORT SUBMITTAL STATEMENT .....:.... I-1 Assessment District Purpose .............................. I-1 General Description of Boundaries and Benefit Zones .............. I-2 Environmental Review Status ....................... . ..... I-3 Engineer's Report Submittal Statement ....................... I-3 SECTION II GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK AND ACQUISITIONS ...... II-1 SECTION III PROPOSED ASSESSMENT OF ESTIMATED IMPROVEMENT ACQUISITION COSTS AND EXPENSES .................III-1 Report Requirements . ...............................III-1 Proposed Assessment of Estimated Improvement Acquisition Costs and Expenses ................ "........III-2 Statement of Total Assessment .............. .......... ..III-2 Statement of Maximum Annual Parcel Assessment for Recovery of Assessment District Administration Costs and Expenses .........III-4 Bond Declaration .............. . .....................III-5 29182TOC -ii- 09/ 12/95 REPORT EXHIBITS EXHIBIT A ASSESSMENT ROLL EXHIBIT B TABLE B-I ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE OF TOTAL COST AND ASSESSMENT TABLES B-II ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT COST- TABLE B-II-A SUMMARY OF SOUTH LAURELGLEN, SEVEN OAKS, SILVER CREEK AND BRIMHALL IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED TABLE B-II-B SOUTH LAURELGLEN IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED TABLE B-II-C .SEVEN OAKS NORTH (SECTION 6) IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED TABLE B-II-D SEVEN- OAKS SOUTH (SECTION 7) IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED TABLE- B-II-E SILVER CREEK IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED TABLE B-II-F BRIMHALL NORTH EAST IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED TABLE B-II-G BRIMHALL NORTH WEST IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED TABLE B-III-A SUMMARY OF REMAINING PRINCIPAL AND BOND CALL EXPENSES FOR PAYOFF TOTALS OF EXISTING ASSESSMENTS BY ASSESSMENT DISTRICT TABLE B-III-B REMAINING PRINCIPAL AND BOND CALL EXPENSES FOR PAYOFF OF EXISTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82-1 ASSESSMENTS TABLE B-III-C REMAINING PRINCIPAL AND BOND CALL EXPENSES FOR PAYOFF OF EXISTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 86-2 AND 94-2 ASSESSMENTS 29182TOC -iii- 09/ 12/95 TABLE B-III-D REALLOCATION OF REMAINING PRINCIPAL AND BOND CALL EXPENSES FOR PAYOFF OF EXISTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82-1 ASSESSMENTS IN THE BRIMHALL NORTH AREA (EAST) TABLE B-III-E REALLOCATION OF REMAINING PRINCIPAL AND BOND CALL EXPENSES FOR PAYOFF OF EXISTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 86-2 ASSESSMENTS IN THE BRIMHALL NORTH AREA (EAST) EXHIBIT C TABLE C-I CONSOLIDATED TABULATION OF PARCEL ASSESSMENT DATA TABLE C-II-A DETAILS OF SOUTH LAURELGLEN ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT REALLOCATIONS FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AREAS PER CITY CODE SECTION 13.08.070 TABLE C-II-B DETAILS OF SEVEN OAKS ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT REALLOCATIONS FOR PROPOSED. DEVELOPMENT AREAS PER CITY CODE SECTION 13.08.070 TABLE C-II-C DETAILS OF SILVER CREEK ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT REALLOCATIONS FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AREAS PER CITY CODE SECTION 13.08.070 TABLE C-II-D DETAILS OF BRIMHALL NORTH ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT REALLOCATIONS FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AREAS PER CITY CODE SECTION 13.08.070 TABLE C-III-A DETAILS OF SOUTH LAURELGLEN ESTIMATED BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ALLOCATIONS FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AREAS TABLE C-III-B DETAILS. OF SEVEN OAKS ESTIMATED BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ALLOCATIONS FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AREAS TABLE C-III-C DETAILS OF SILVER CREED ESTIMATED BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ALLOCATIONS FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AREAS TABLE C-III-D DETAILS OF BRIMHALL NORTH ESTIMATED BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ALLOCATIONS FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AREAS 29182TOC -iv- 09/12/95 TABLE C-IV-A COMPARISON OF SOUTH LAURELGLEN BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ALLOCATION AND AND ASSESSMENT REALLOCATION PER CITY CODE SECTION 13.08.070 TABLE C-IV-B COMPARISON OF SEVEN OAKS BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ALLOCATION AND ASSESSMENT REALLOCATION PER CITY CODE SECTION 13.08.070 TABLE C-IV-C COMPARISON OF SILVER CREEK BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ALLOCATION AND ASSESSMENT REALLOCATION PER CITY CODE SECTION 13.08.070 TABLE C-IV-D COMPARISON OF BRIMHALL NORTH BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ALLOCATION AND ASSESSMENT REALLOCATION PER CITY CODE SECTION 13.08.070 EXHIBIT D DESCRIPTION OF ASSESSMENT SPREAD METHOD EXHIBIT E MAP NO. 1 SHOWING BRIMHALL NORTH (EAST AND WEST) IMPROVEMENTS MAP NO. 2 SHOWING SEVEN -OAKS NORTH IMPROVEMENTS MAP NO. 3 SHOWING SEVEN OAKS SOUTH IMPROVEMENTS MAP NO. 4 SHOWING LAURELGLEN IMPROVEMENTS MAP NO. 5 SHOWING SILVER CREEK IMPROVEMENTS REPORT APPENDICES APPENDIX A AMENDMENT TO PROPOSED BOUNDARIES (On file with the City Clerk of the City of Bakersfield; reduced, not to scale, copy attached) APPENDIX B ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM (On file with the City Clerk of the City of Bakersfield; reduced, not to scale, copy attached) APPENDIX C LIST OF NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF PROPERTY OWNERS 29182TOC -v- ~ 09/12/95 APPENDIX D SUMMARY OF CHANGES MADE TO THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICTNO. 94-3 ENGINEER'S REPORT "PRELIMINARILY APPROVED" BY CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 130-95 ON AUGUST 9, 1995 29182TOC -vi- 09/12/95 ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-3 (SILVER CREEK/BRIMHALL NORTH/SEVEN OAKS/SOUTH LAURELGLEN) SECTION I ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PURPOSE, GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF BOUNDARIES AND ASSESSMENT AREAS AND ENGINEER'S REPORT SUBMITTAL STATEMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PURPOSE Assessment District No. 94-3 (Silver Creek/Brimhall North/Seven Oaks/South Laurelglen), hereafter referred to as "AD 94-3," has been formed by the Ciry Council of the City of Bakersfield (the "City Council") in response to a Petition submitted by Castle & Cooke Homes, Inc. and Castle & Cooke Communities, Inc. (hereafter collectively referred to as the "District Proponent") who, at the time the Petition was filed, were the owners of more than 60% of the land area proposed to be assessed as part of the AD 94-3 proceedings. The Petition is on file with the City Clerk of the Ciry of Bakersfield (herein "City Clerk") along with a Certificate signed by the City Director of Public Works attesting to its sufficiency under the requirements of the California Streets & Highways Code. The Petition, was accepted by the City Council on April 19, 1995, by Council's adoption of its Resolution No. 66-95, Accepting Petition and Determining- to Undertake Special Assessment Proceedings -Assessment District 94-3. AD 94-3 has been formed for the purpose of financing the cost. of acquisition by the City of Bakersfield (the "Ciry") of certain street, water, sanitary sewer, and- storm water drainage infrastructure improvements, and the cost to pay off and refinance several existing improvement assessments financed pursuant to City of Bakersfield Assessment District No. 82-1 (Stockdale Sewer Tru_ nkline), herein referred to as "AD 82-1," and to City of Bakersfield Assessment- District No. 86-2 Reassessment and Refunding, herein referred to as "AD 86-2." A description of the AD 94-3 boundaries and of the properties to be apportioned a share of the total cost proposed to be assessed under the AD 94-3 proceedings is presented below. A detailed description of the improvements proposed to be acquired and of related incidental costs and expenses proposed to be funded by AD 94-3 is presented in Section II of this report and a statement of the total assessment and of the amount proposed to be approved as an annual administrative assessment for AD 94-3 are presented in report Section III. A detailed description of the method developed for allocating the AD 94-3 costs among the assessed parcels is presented in the attached Exhibit D. All of the AD 94-3 properties are located within the existing Corporate. Limits. of the City of Bakersfield (the "City Limits"). This assessment district is the first district for which the financed costs will be spread to the assessed parcels pursuant to Bakersfield Municipal Code Section 13.08.070 Benefit Spread, added 29182EER.I I-1 09/11/95 to the Code on Apri15, 1995, by Council's adoption of Ordinance No. 3643. Section 13.08.070 provides for the use of "...an alternate method and rate of assessment reallocating assessments to alternate properties." GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF BOUNDARIES AND ASSESSMENT AREA4 AD 94-3 is a collection of six separate community areas in southwest Bakersfield that are identified on the AD 94-3 Boundary Map and in this report and assessment as: Brimhall North Area (West), located north of Brimhall Road, west of Old Farm Road and about one-quarter mile east of Allen Road (37.6 acres); 2. Brimhall North Area (East), located south of Brimhall Road, east of the new Calloway Drive Extension to Stockdale Highway, west of Mondavi Way, and north of the Kern River (103.9 acres); 3. Seven Oaks Area (North), located south of the Kern River, east of Buena Vista Road, north of Ming Avenue and west of Old River Road (391.0 acres); 4. Seven Oaks Area (South), located south of Ming Avenue, east of Buena Vista Road, north of White Lane and west of Old River Road (262.3 acres); 5. South Laurelglen Area, located west of Gosford Road, north of the Arvin-Edison Canal, and south of South Laurelglen Boulevard (16.1 acres); and 6. Silver Creek Area, that is generally bounded on the east by the Arvin-Edison Canal, on the north by the Stine Canal, on the west by Gosford Road, and on the south by Panama Lane (354.3 acres). The district spans a distance of about 6.5 miles, from the Brimhall North Area (West) located at its northwest limits to the Silver Creek Area in the southeast. Each of the six district areas is involved in various stages of the land development process ranging from parcels where no specific action has been taken to obtain site development entitlement beyond the parcel's designated land use shown on the Land Use Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan (the "2010 Plan"), to lots in recorded subdivisions that have been fully developed with an owner occupied home. In the case of owner occupied homes proposed to be assessed a share of the AD 94-3 total cost, the District Proponent has disclosed -the maximum amount of the proposed AD 94-3 assessment to their lot buyers and obtained the buyer's written consent to the recording of an AD 94-3 assessment lien of anot-to-exceed amount. AD 94-3 will finance the acquisition of "off-site" subdivision improvements and related incidental costs, where those improvements are either already required or are expected by the District Proponent to be required to be installed as conditions of fmal subdivision or site plan approvals 29182FER.I I-2 09/11/95 within the six AD 94-3 community areas. Each of the six community areas is a separate assessment area within AD 94-3. The costs financed by AD 94-3 for the acquisition of infrastructure improvements located within one of the six community areas are assessed only to properties that are located within the community area served by those financed improvements. Therefore, all of the improvements proposed to be financed bear a rational nexus to the public infrastructure improvements needed for the subdivision of the property within each area that is proposed to be assessed a share of the AD 94-3 total cost. The original boundaries of Assessment District No. 94-3 were approved by the City Council on December 14, 1994, by Council's adoption of its Resolution No. 199-94. Those original boundaries were shown on three exhibit maps attached to Resolution No. 199-94 and on file in the office of the City Clerk. No formal AD 94-3 Boundary Map showing the originally approved boundaries was ever filed in the form and containing the matters prescribed by Section 3110 of the California Streets and Highways Code ("Streets and Highways Code"). Since the December 1994 adoption of Resolution No. 199-94, the District Proponent has requested that the South Laurelglen Area be added to the AD 94-3 boundaries and that certain other minor adjustments be made to the Brimhall North Area (East) and to the Seven Oaks Area (North) and (South) community area boundaries. On July 28, 1995, the map entitled "AMENDMENT TO PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-3 (SILVER CREEK/BRIMHALL NORTH/SEVEN OAKS/SOUTH LAURELGLEN), COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA" (the "AD 94-3 Boundary Map"), consisting of twelve (12) sheets, was filed in the. office of the City Clerk. Reference is made to the AD 94-3 Boundary Map for a detailed .description of the AD 94-3 boundaries. A reduced and not to scale copy is attached as Engineer's Report Appendix A and incorporated herein by reference. The AD 94-3 Boundary Map incorporates all of the additions and deletions to the originally approved boundaries of the district that are referred to above. As stated on the AD 94-3 Boundary Map, the assessment district encompasses a composite and consolidated area of about 1,165 total acres. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATUS Pursuant to the Charter and Municipal Code of the City of Bakersfield (herein "Municipal Code"), the formation of an assessment district is exempt from compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). Accordingly, a Notice of Exemption from CEQA will be filed by the City for the AD 94-3 proceedings prior to confirmation of the AD 94-3 assessment by the City Council. ENGINEER'S REPORT SUBMITTAL STATEMENT I, Raul M. Rojas, Public Works Director and Superintendent of Streets of the City of Bakersfield, have been appointed the Engineer of Work for AD 94-3 (herein "Engineer of Work") by adoption of City Council Resolution of Intention No. 1126 to do and perform all services in making preliminary surveys, preparing plans, estimates of costs, and diagram and assessment. Pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, being Division 12 of the Streets and 29182FER.I I-3 09/11/95 Highways Code (the " 1913 Act") and to Section 10204, contained therein, and pursuant to the Municipal Code, including .Section 13.08.070 of Chapter 13.08 thereof, and in accordance with Resolution of Intention No. 1126, being a Resolution of Intention to Order the Acquisition of Improvements, City of Bakersfield. Assessment District No. 94-3 (herein "Resolution of Intention No. 1126"), herewith submit the "Engineer's Report" for AD 94-3 consisting of six parts as follows: 1. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, MAPS AND DESCRIPTIONS OF IMPROVEMENTS AND LANDS TO BE ACQUIRED: A. Improvements to Be Acquired: At the time this Engineer's Report was being prepared for filing with the City Clerk and for preliminary approval by the City Council, all of the plans and specifications for the improvement acquisitions to be funded by AD 94-3 had not been completed and/or finally approved by the City Engineer. Therefore, this assessment is based on the cost estimates prepared by Martin-McIntosh Engineering, the civil engineering consultant hired by the District Proponent to design the AD 94-3 improvements to be acquired, and hereinafter referred to as the "AD 94-3 Design Engineer." The AD 94-3 Improvement Acquisition Costs are itemized in Engineer's Report Exhibit B, Tables B-II-A through B-II-G, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The improvements funded by AD 94-3 are to be constructed by the District Proponent and acquired by the City, pursuant to that certain City Agreement No. 95-112, Acquisition and Disclosure Agreement, City of Bakersfield Assessment District No. 94-3, between the City and the District Proponent and' dated April 19, 1995 (the "AD 94-3 Acquisition Agreement"). B. Maps and Descriptions of Lands, Easements, and Rights-of--way and Existing Facilities Capacity and Use Rights to Be Acquired: As of the date of filing this Engineer's Report there were no land, easement, or rights- of-way acquisitions proposed to be financed by AD 94-3. Accordingly, no maps or descriptions have been prepared and filed with the City Engineer. 2. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK AND ACQUISITIONS: A General Description of Work and Acquisitions to be completed pursuant to the AD 94-3 proceedings is included as Section II of this Engineer's Report. The improvement acquisitions within each of the six community areas are also shown on five maps included in Engineer's Report Exhibit E. 29182FER.I I-4 09/11/95 3. ESTIMATE OF TOTAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT ACQUISITION AND INCIDENTAL COSTS: A "Statement of Total Assessment" is presented in Section III of this report. An itemized breakdown of the estimated total improvement acquisition and incidental costs and expenses including the estimated cost of preparing, printing, registering, servicing, and collecting bonds issued pursuant to these proceedings is included in Exhibit B, Table B-I, "Engineer's Estimate of Total Cost and Assessment" ("Table B-I"), attached hereto. 4. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM: The diagram entitled "ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM OF CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-3 (SILVER CREEK/BRIMHALL NORTH/SEVEN OAKS/SOUTH LAURELGLEN), COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA" (the "AD 94-3 Assessment Diagram"), consisting of fifteen (15) sheets, is on file with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference. The AD 94-3 Assessment Diagram being too bulky to be bound with this Engineer's Report, a reduced and not to scale copy is attached hereto as Engineer's Report Appendix B. The AD 94-3 Assessment Diagram shows all of the following: A. The exterior boundaries of AD 94-3; B. The boundaries of the six community areas within AD 94-3; and C. By reference to the Maps of the Assessor of the County of Kern and to maps and deeds of record, the lines and dimensions are shown for each separate lot, parcel, and subdivision of land within AD 94-3 as they existed at the time this Engineer's- Report was filed with the City Clerk, each lot, parcel, and subdivision of land having been assigned a separate .assessment number upon the AD 94-3 Assessment Diagram, which corresponds with the number shown for each parcel on the AD 94-3 Assessment Roll (Exhibit A contained herein). 5. PROPOSED ASSESSMENT AND ASSESSMENT ROLL: A. A proposed assessment of the estimated total improvement acquisition cost and of the incidental expenses in connection with the AD 94-3 proceedings is presented in Section III of this Engineer's Report. B. Assessment Roll: An Assessment Roll for AD 94-3 is attached hereto as Exhibit A. The Assessment Roll shows the exact amount of the total estimated cost of the proposed improvement 29182FER.I I-5 09/11/95 acquisitions, incidental work, and expense that is assessed upon each of the lots and parcels within AD 94-3. The assessment numbers that appear on the Assessment Roll correspond to the diagram numbers shown on the AD 94-3 Assessment Diagram. C. Maximum Annual Parcel Assessment for Recovery of Assessment District Administration Costs and Expenses: Section III of this Engineer's Report includes a statement of the proposed $50.00 maximum annual assessment upon each of the parcels in AD 94-3. The purpose of this separate annual assessment is to pay the costs incurred by the City of Bakersfield, and not otherwise reimbursed, which result from the administration and collection of assessments, from compliance with Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15c2-12 for continuing disclosure requirements, or from the administration and registration of any associated bonds and reserve or other related funds. This maximum annual assessment is proposed to be levied pursuant to Subdivision (f) of Section 10204 of the "Streets and Highways Code." 6. ASSESSMENT SPREAD METHOD: A description of the assessment spread method used to apportion a share to each parcel in AD 94-3 of the total estimated cost proposed to be financed for the acquisition of improvements and payment of incidental costs to each parcel in AD 94-3, is attached hereto as Exhibit D and incorporated herein by reference. DESCRIPTION OF ENGINEER'S REPORT EXHIBITS A, B, AND C Exhibits A, B, and C that are attached to this Engineer's Report include a total of twenty-seven (27) tables of AD 94-3 cost estimates and/or assessment spread cost allocations. A brief description of each of the three report exhibits and of the separate tables contained in each exhibit is presented below. Engineer's Report Exhibits A through C have been designed for the purpose of presenting astep- by-step breakdown of how the AD 94-3 total assessment has been spread to the individual lots and parcels that are proposed to be assessed. The Exhibit C tables also present separate breakouts of parcel assessment data based on the Reallocation Method (per Code Section 13.08.070), and based on the 1913 Act benefit based Assessment Allocation Method (see Engineer's Report Exhibit D for a description of the Assessment Allocation Method and of the .Reallocation Method). A third group of Exhibit C tables provides comparisons of the calculated assessment amounts derived in accordance with the Allocation and Reallocation Methods. The exhibits and their tables begin with: 1. A listing in Exhibit A, Assessment Roll, of the exact amount proposed to be assessed to every existing parcel or lot in AD 94-3; then, 29182FER.I I-6 09/12/95 2. The Exhibit B tables present the major items of total system costs and incidental expenses for all of AD 94-3 (Table B-I), the breakdown of those major items for each of the six community areas in Tables B-II- (A through G) with Table B-II-A summarizing the total improvement, contingency, and incidental costs for each project within the separate communities, and Tables B-II- (B through G) presenting the itemized quantity and cost estimates for each project. The Table B-II- (B through G) -group also. breaks each project into the separate cost/benefit categories that are the focus of the Allocation Method of assessment spread that is described in Engineer's Report Exhibit D. The Exhibit B, Table B-III group includes five tables (A through E). Table B-III is a statement by existing assessment district (AD 82-1 and AD 86-2) of the total bond call expense to be financed by AD 94-3. ,Tables B-III-B and -C itemize the bond call expense by parcel, based on the unpaid assessment principal shown on the City Finance Department's Auditor's Payment Record for each district. Table B-III-C also lists the four parcels in the South Laurelglen Area as parcels in existing AD 94-2, with all having a zero remaining assessment principal balance. None of those parcels were assessed a share of the AD 94-2 cost but they are situated within the adopted boundaries of that assessment district. Tables B-III-D and B-III-E show the reapportioned shares for the AD 82-1 and AD 86-2, respectively, existing assessments on parcels in the Brimhall .North Area (East) that are allocated to those parcels as part of the AD 94-3 proceedings. 3. Exhibit C has thirteen (13) tables that provide a detailed breakdown of individual parcel assessment data. A. Details-for parcel assessments calculated using the AD 94-3 Reallocation Method of assessment spread authorized by Municipal Code Section 13.08.070 are presented in Tables C-I and C-II- (A through D); B. Details for parcel assessments calculated in accordance with the AD 94-3 Allocation Method of assessment spread that is a cost/benefit based assessment spread method are shown in Tables C-III- (A through D); and C. Tables C-IV- (A through D) present a comparison by community area of the assessments calculated by each of .the two spread methods referenced in 3.A and 3.B, above, and described in Exhibit D. 29182FER.I I-7 09/11/95 ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-3 (SILVER CREEK/BRIMHALL NORTH/SEVEN OAKS/SOUTH LAURELGLEN) SECTION II GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK AND ACQUISITIONS PROJECT DESCRIPTION The separate improvement systems to be acquired and their related incidental work and costs eligible for financing pursuant to the AD 94-3 proceedings (hereinafter the "Improvements") are described below. The descriptions of the Improvements and the termini of the proposed work do not necessarily extend for the full length of their description. The plans and profiles of the Improvements shall be controlling as to their correct and detailed description. The general scope of the Improvements includes the acquisition of public infrastructure improvements that will be owned, operated, and maintained by the City, fmancing of the cost to pay off existing AD 82-1 and AD 86-2 Assessments, and the payment of certain improvement, assessment proceeding and bond issuance incidental costs. and expenses related to the AD 94-3 Improvement Acquisitions and assessment proceedings. All of the AD 94-3 Improvement Acquisitions involve work and expense that are either already required or are expected by the District Proponent to be required to be installed as conditions of final map or site plan approvals within the six AD 94-3 community areas. As stated in Section I, the AD 94-3 Improvements are proposed to be acquired by the City in accordance with the terms and conditions of the AD 94-3 Acquisition Agreement. That agreement defines the specific scope of Improvements to be constructed and installed by the District Proponent and, upon their completion, be acquired by the City using funds provided only through the AD 94-3 proceedings. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS, INCIDENTAL WORK AND ANNUAL ASSESSMENT General descriptions are presented below of the proposed Improvement Acquisitions and of any incidental work and expense to be financed by AD 94-3 that are related to those Improvement Acquisitions or to the AD 94-3 proceedings. General descriptions of the existing AD 82-1 and AD 86-2 assessments to be refinanced by AD 94-3, and of the proposed annual assessment to be levied pursuant to the AD 94-3 proceedings for the recovery of certain costs that may be incurred by the City in future years .from the administration of the AD 94-3 bonds and reserve fund or from the administration and collection of annual assessment debt service installments or from compliance 29182FER.II II-1 9/11/95 with bond issue continuing disclosure requirements are also presented in following portions of this Section II. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF AD 94-3 IMPROVEMENT ACQUISITIONS The AD 94-3 Improvements proposed to be acquired include the construction and installation as separate improvement systems of the public improvements, Ciry facilities capacity charges or fees, and incidental work described below. The Improvements are to be constructed in accordance with plans and specifications prepared by the AD 94-3 Design Engineer and as approved by the City Engineer. As stated in Section I, the plans and specifications for all of the Improvements had not been completed and/or finally approved by the City Engineer at the time this Engineer's Report was prepared. Accordingly, the following description of work is based on schematic, preliminary, and/or approved plans, quantities, and estimates that have been prepared by the AD 94-3 Design Engineer. The Improvements. to be acquired pursuant to the AD 94-3 proceedings are described below. In addition, the- five maps in Engineer's Report Exhibit E, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, show the general location of the several improvement projects that are to be financed by AD 94-3. Brimhall North Area (,West1 Improvement Acquisitions in this area are limited to the full-width construction of Old Farm Road adjacent to existing Tract 5489-Phase B, complete with grading, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk along the west frontage, water mains, sanitary sewer pipeline, storm drains and catch basins, street lights, miscellaneous traffic signal conduits for future traffic signal facilities at the -Old Farm Road and Brimhall Road intersection, City plan check and inspection fees, design engineering and construction administration incidental costs, all as itemized in Table B-II-G in Engineer's Report Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference and depicted on Map No. 1 in the attached Exhibit E. Brimhall North Area (,East) The general location and extent of the planned Improvement Acquisitions in this area are also shown on Map No. 1. The Brimhall (East) Improvements include construction of the northbound, outside ~ travel lane along the new alignment of Calloway Drive, from the future Kern River Freeway northerly to the east boundary of the Brimhall North Area (East) parcel identified on the AD 94-3 Assessment Diagram as Assessment 486. The improvements to be acquired include the referenced street construction complete with grading, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk along the easterly right-of--way for new Calloway Drive, street lights, median island construction, median landscaping and hardscape and wall with landscaping along the frontage of approved Tentative Tract 5680. The scope of acquisitions in this area also includes City plan check and inspection 29182FER.II II-2 9/11/95 fees, design engineering and construction administration costs as itemized in Engineer's Report Exhibit B, Table B-II-F, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Seven Oaks Area lNorthY and (South Improvement Acquisitions in the Seven Oaks Area (North) and Seven Oaks Area (South) communities include the widening of Buena Vista Road from Stockdale Highway in the north to the north boundary of Stockdale High School at White Lane, the construction of a new community park in the Seven Oaks Area (North), the construction of a new community park in Seven Oaks Area (South), and frontage sidewalk, wall, and landscaping improvements in various locations along the east frontage of Buena Vista Road and along existing Grand Lakes Boulevard in the Seven Oaks Area (South). -The portions of those four projects to be constructed within or along the Seven Oaks Area (North) boundaries and those portions to be constructed within or along the Seven Oaks Area (South) boundaries are described below and shown on Exhibit E Maps lvo. 2 and No. 3, respectively. 1. Seven Oaks Area (North) Improvement Acquisitions Engineer's Report Exhibit B, Table B-II-C presents an itemized description and estimate of the separate improvement system quantities and costs for the improvements to be installed either within or along the Seven Oaks Area (North) boundaries as part of the Buena Vista Road and Section 6 Park projects. These improvements are generally described as follows: A. Buena Vista Road Street and Underground Utility Improvements (Stockdale Highway to Ming Avenue): The .scope of Improvement Acquisitions for this project includes street grading, paving, curb and gutter, median construction, sidewalks, and street lights in various locations as shown on the Buena Vista Road Improvement Plans, and Kern River Canal Crossing Modifications to widen the existing crossing to the full planned width of Buena Vista Road. This project also includes the installation of approximately 700 feet of 16-inch diameter water main and sanitary sewer pipeline crossings at intersections. The scope of street work includes the reconstruction of Buena Vista Road to its full planned width on the east side with two northbound traffic lanes, .parking lane, and bike lane, full width median, and one southbound traffic lane on the west side of the street. In addition to the above street and pipeline improvements, the Buena Vista Road Project includes the installation of median hazdscape and landscaping along the entire street section and the installation of right-of--way landscaping along the existing Tract 5244 frontage from Deer Peak Drive to the Kern River Canal. 29182FER.II II-3 9/11/95 B. Section 6 Park Project: The scope of planned acquisitions for this project includes construction of rest room facilities and complete landscaping of an as yet to be designed 6.0 acre community park within the Seven Oaks Area (North). This portion of the Seven Oaks Area is situated in Section 6,, T 30 S, R 27 E, which is the basis for the reference to the project as the "Section 6 Park:" Both of the Seven Oaks Area (North) projects include the same scope of City plan check fees, design engineering, and miscellaneous improvement incidental costs that are included with all other previously described AD 94-3 acquisitions. 2. Seven Oaks Area (South) Improvement Acquisitions: Engineer's Report Exhibit B, Table B-II-D presents an itemized estimate of the separate improvement system quantities and costs for the improvements to be installed either within or along the Seven Oaks Area (South) boundaries as part of the Buena Vista Road, Grand Lakes Avenue, and Section 7 Park Projects. These improvements are generally described as follows: A. Buena Vista Road Street and Underground Utility Improvements (Ming Avenue to the north boundary of Stockdale High School at White Lane) This project. will construct the east half of Buena Vista Road to its full planned width of two northbound traffic lanes with a bike lane, complete median, and one southbound travel lane on the west side. The scope of improvement acquisitions includes street grading, paving, curb and gutter, median construction, sidewalks, and street lights in various locations as shown on the Buena .Vista Road Improvement Plans. This project also includes the installation of 2,140 feet of 16-inch diameter water main and 2,200 feet of 24-inch and 18- inch diameter storm drain -pipeline complete with manholes, catch basins and an outlet structure to a retention basin, median hardscape and landscaping, and the installation of right-of--way landscaping along the Buena Vista Road frontage for approved Tentative Tract No. 5290. B. Grand Lakes Avenue Street Frontage Improvements and Underground Utilities Project Acquisition As Shown on Exhibit B, Table B-II-D, the Grand Lakes Avenue Project has been split into three parts that delineate the separate Grand Lakes Avenue frontage improvements along Tentative Tract 5290, along Tentative Tract 5292, and along the existing City storm drainage sump adjacent to the east boundary of Stockdale High School. i. Tentative Tract No. 5290 and Tract No. 5292 Grand Lakes Avenue Frontage Improvements scope of work includes the construction and installation of sidewalks, 29182FER.II II-4 9/11/95 block wall, right-of--way landscaping, street lights, miscellaneous street improvements and striping, and the bored jacked installation of 6-inch diameter sanitary sewer pipeline stubouts and a 24-inch diameter storm drain pipeline crossing of Grand Lakes Avenue. ii. City Storm Drain Sump Grand Lakes Avenue Frontage Improvements scope of work includes the installation of a block wall and landscaping along the sump frontage. C. Section 7 Park Project The scope of planned acquisitions includes construction of rest room facilities and complete landscaping for an as yet to be designed 2.38 acre community park approved for construction adjacent. to or in the vicinity of Tentative Tract No. 5290 and the existing Stockdale High School, between Buena Vista Road and Grand Lakes Boulevard. The Section 7 Park general location is shown on Map No. 3. Reference to Exhibit B, Table B-II-D will show that all three of the Seven Oaks Area (South) Projects described above include the same scope of City plan check fees, design engineering, and miscellaneous improvement incidental costs that are included as part of all of the previously described AD 94-3 acquisition projects. South Laurelglen Area Engineer's Report Exhibit B, Table B-II-B presents an itemized description and estimate of the separate improvement system quantities and costs for the South Laurelglen Area ,improvement acquisitions. The scope of Improvement Acquisitions for this area includes the construction and installation of frontage street improvements in Gosford Road and South Laurelglen Boulevard along the frontage of approved Vesting Tentative Tract No. 5679. Street improvements will involve the construction of right turn deceleration and median island left turn pockets, where required, from Gosford Road and South Laurelglen Boulevard into Vesting Tentative Tract 5679. In addition, the scope of improvement acquisitions for Gosford Road and South Laurelglen Boulevard includes sidewalks,-curb and gutter, street lights, street grading and paving, block walls, and the installation of water, sewer, and storm drain connections to existing pipelines in Gosford Road and South Laurelglen Boulevard where shown on the schematic plans for Tentative Tract No. 5679. No landscape improvements are planned for the South Laurelglen Avenue acquisition scope of work. The standard scope of previously described incidental costs and fees is included as part of this area's total scope of acquisitions, as shown on Table B-II-B and on Map No. 4 in Exhibit E. Silver .Creek Area Four projects are planned for acquisition in the Silver Creek Area of AD 94-3. Itemized descriptions, quantity estimates, and costs for each project are presented in Engineer's Report 29182FER.II II-5 9/12/95 Exhibit B, Table B-II-E and the general location of those improvement installations within Silver Creek is shown on Map No. 5 in Exhibit E. The four Silver Creek Area Projects are generally described as follows: 1. Panama Lane Street and Landscape Project: The scope of improvement acquisitions for this project includes the reconstruction of Panama Lane from Gosford Road in the west, easterly to the southeast corner of the Silver Creek Area approximately 1,300 feet east of the future Panama Lane and Ashe Road intersection. The specific scope of work includes construction of two westbound traffic lanes with parking and bike lanes along the north side and one eastbound traffic lane along the south side including grading and paving, with curb-gutter, and sidewalk only along the north side. Also along the north side of Panama Lane from the southeast corner of existing Tract 4901-Unit C easterly to Reliance Drive, install block wall with landscaping, and from the southwest corner of Tract 4901-Unit D to the southeast corner of Tract 4901-Unit C install right-of--way landscaping and street lights. Continuing along the north side of Panama Lane from Reliance Drive .east to future Ashe Road install block wall with no landscaping, and street lights. This project also includes the installation of 6,500 feet of 16-inch diameter water main from Gosford Road to 1300 feet east of future Ashe Road, .along with stubouts for future 10-inch diameter water main extensions at intersections. No median will be constructed, in Panama Lane. AD 94-3 will finance payment of the in-lieu median deposit for Panama Lane, as itemized in Table B-II-E. 2. Harris Road Street and Underground Improvements Project: The scope of planned acquisitions for this project includes, the construction of Harris Road to its .full planned major collector street width within the Silver Creek Area, from the Reliance Drive/Spring. Creek Loop intersection in the west, easterly to existing Ashe Road. Along the north right-of--way the scope of work includes landscaping with no wall, and along the. south right-of--way the scope of work includes landscaping with no walla The specific scope of project acquisitions, as shown on Table B-II-E, includes street grading, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalks, street lighting, walls, and landscaping as described above. This project also includes the acquisition of 1,237 feet of 8-inch diameter sanitary sewer pipeline with manholes, 659 feet of 24-inch diameter and 109 feet of 18-inch diameter storm drain pipeline complete with catch basins and manholes, and 1,517 feet of 12-inch diameter and 130 feet of 8-inch diameter water main. 3. Reliance Drive Landscape Project: This project includes the planned acquisition of right-of--way landscape improvements to be installed along the east side of Reliance Drive -from Harris Road in the north to Panama Lane in the South, and along the west right-of--way of Reliance Drive between Wilderness Drive in the north and Panama Lane in the south. 29182FER.II II-6 9/12/95 The scope of incidental costs and fees previously described for the other AD 94-3 community area acquisitions are also included as a part of the Silver Creek Area's total acquisition scope, as shown on Table B-II-E. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF AD 94-3 IMPROVEMENT AND ASSESSMENT PROCEEDING INCIDENTAL WORK AND EXPENSE The total cost proposed to be financed by AD 94-3 includes work to be performed and fees to be paid that are incidental to the construction of the separate improvement system acquisitions. In addition, the cost and expense related to the conducting by the City of the AD 94-3 proceedings and to the issuance and sale of bonds to finance the total assessed cost not paid by the property owners and/or not paid by public agency contributions are also proposed to be financed by AD 94-3. The incidental costs and expenses proposed to be funded by AD 94-3 are described as follows: A. The acquisition of all rights-of--way, easements, franchises, licenses, and permits, and the construction of all auxiliary work, and the payment of all incidental expenses necessary and/or convenient to the accomplishment of the foregoing and for the conduct of special assessment proceedings and. the issuance of special assessment bonds, as may be approved by the City, for the financing of all or a portion of the foregoing, including, but not limited to, the incidental expense to .cover the estimated cost of preparing, printing, registering, servicing, and collecting the improvement bonds proposed to be issued to represent the. assessments, and the incidental expense to cover the estimated cost during the first two years following issuance of any bonds for City compliance with Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15c2-12 for continuing disclosure requirements, as may be applied to assessment district bond issues; B. The payment and/or reimbursement to the City and to the District Proponent of all eligible sums under the Streets and Highways Code advanced by the City, including all associated City incurred district formation and assessment proceeding administration costs and expenses, and all eligible sums under the Streets and Highways Code and pursuant to the AD 94-3 Acquisition Agreement advanced by the District Proponent; and C. The funding of not to exceed one (1) year's capitalized interest on any bonds issued in the amount of the unpaid assessments, where said bonds are to be issued pursuant to the Municipal Code and to the Improvement Bond Act of 1915, being Division 10 of the Streets and Highways Code ("the 1915 Act"). All of the foregoing improvement acquisitions, incidental work and "expense shall be made and done pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code and the 1913 Act. 29182FER.II II-7 9/12195 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ANNUAL ASSESSMENT Section III of this Engineer's Report also includes a "Statement of Maximum Annual Parcel Assessment for Recovery of Assessment District Administration Cost and Expenses.'' The purpose of the proposed $50.00 annual assessment is to pay costs incurred by the City from the administration and collection of assessments, from compliance with Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15c2-12 for continuing disclosure, or from the administration or registration of any associated bonds and reserve or other related funds, pursuant to Subdivision (f) of Section 10204 of the Streets and Highways Code. 29182FER.II II-8 9/12/95 ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-3 (SILVER CREEK/BRIMHALL NORTH/SEVEN OAKS/SOUTH LAURELGLEN) SECTION III PROPOSED ASSESSMENT OF ESTIMATED IMPROVEMENT ACQUISITION COSTS AND EXPENSES REPORT REQUIREMENTS On December 14, 1994, the City Council, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code and of the 1913 Act, adopted its Resolution of Intention No. 1126 declaring its intention to order the acquisition of improvements and to levy a maximum annual assessment pursuant to Subdivision (f) of Section 10204 of the Streets and Highways Code. The Subdivision (f) declaration provides for the levy of an annual assessment upon each of the parcels of land in AD 94-3 to recover costs incurred by the City and not otherwise reimbursed, resulting. from the administration and collection of assessments and from the administration or registration of any associated reserve or other .related funds. Resolution of Intention No. 1126 further declares that the lands within the exterior boundaries shown on the AD 94-3 Boundary Map shall be designated CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-3 COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA (herein "AD 94-3"); Resolution of Intention No. 1126 appointed the City Public Works Director as the Engineer of Work for AD 94-3 and directed him to make and file the report ("Engineer's Report") required by Section 10204 of the Streets and Highways Code. The Engineer's Report requirements set forth in Section 10204 of the Streets and Highways Code are summarized in Section I of this report under the subsection entitled "Engineer's Report. Submittal Statement." Reference is made to Resolution of Intention No. 1126 and to the general description of the improvements proposed to be acquired and/or constructed for more detailed information on the declared .intention of the City. Council for conduct of the AD 94-3 assessment proceedings. 29182FER.III III-1 09/11/95 PROPOSED ASSESSMENT OF ESTIMATED IMPROVEMENT ACQUISITION COSTS AND EXPENSES NOW, THEREFORE, I, Raul M. Rojas, the duly appointed Engineer of Work for AD 94-3, by virtue of the power vested in me under the Municipal Code and under the 1913 Act and the order of the City Council, as set forth in Resolution of Intention No. 1126, hereby make the following assessment to cover the portion of the estimated cost of the acquisition of improvements and the costs and expenses incidental thereto to be paid by AD 94-3: 1. The amount to be paid by AD 94-3 for the acquisition of improvements, and the expenses incidental thereto is generally as shown in the following Statement of Total Assessment: STATEMENT OF TOTAL ASSESSMENT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-3 (SILVER CREEK/BRIMHALL NORTH/SEVEN OAKS/SOUTH LAURELGLEN) As Preliminarily Approved A. Acquisition Cost of Improvements, Contingency and Incidental Expense (Exhibit B, Table B-I, Items 1-6) 1. South Laurelglen 2. Seven Oaks (North) 3. Seven Oaks (South) 4. Silver Creek 5. Brimhall North (East) 6. Brimhall North (West) 7. Subtotal Acquisitiori Cost B. Additional Cost/Fees: (Table B-I, Item 8) 1. Refinance Existing AD 82-1 Assessments 2. Refinance Existing AD 86-2 Assessments 3. Subtotal Additional Cost/Fees C. Subtotal D. Assessment Proceeding Cost and Expense (Table B-1, Item 9) E. Subtotal F. Deduct Contributions and Cash Collections G. Total Cost to 1915 Act Bond Financing Confirmed Assessment Amount $ 194,785.00 $ 194,785.00 $ 1,489;245.65 $ 1,489,245.65 $ 1,574,501.35 $ 1,574,501.35 $ 2,688,137.00 $ 2,688,137.00 $ 632,862.00 $ 632,862.00 $ 244.456.00 $ 244,456.00 $ 6,823,987.00 $ 6,823,987.00 $ 678,809.43 $ 678,809.43 $ 64.035.54 $ 64.035.54 $ 742.844.97 $ 742,844.97 $ 7,566,831.97 $ 7,566,831.97 $ 514.703.45 $ 480.825.20 $ 8,081,535.42 $ 8,047,657.17 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 8,081,535.42 $ 8,047,657.17 29182FER.III III-2 09/11/95 As Preliminarily Confirmed Approved Assessment Amount H. 1915 Act Bond Issuance Cost and Reserve (Table B-1, Item 13) 1. Bond Discount $ 147,631.25 $ 144,009.50 2. Capitalized Bond Issue Interest $ 658,333.33 $ .655,333.33 3. Bond Reserve Fund $ 987.500.00 $ 983.000.00 4. Subtotal $ 1.793.464.58 $ 1.782.342.83 I. Total Amount Assessed (Table B-1, Item 14) $ 9,875,000.00 $ 9,830,000.00 A detailed breakdown of the itemized costs of the acquisition of improvements, and expenses incidental thereto is presented in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 2. Pursuant to the provisions of law and of Resolution of Intention No. 1126, I have assessed the total amount of the cost of the acquisition of improvements and of the expenses incidental thereto upon the several parcels of land liable therefor and hereinafter numbered to correspond with the numbers shown on the attached AD 94-3 Assessment Diagram, all as is more particularly set forth in the Assessment Roll, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. The numbers on the Assessment Roll correspond with the numbers assigned to each respective parcel as shown on the AD 94-3 Assessment Diagram. Each subdivision of land assessed is described within the Assessment Roll by reference to its parcel number as shown on the Assessor's Maps of the County of Kern for the fiscal year 1995/1996 or by reference to maps and deeds of record on file in the office of the County Recorder of said County. For a more particular description. of the manner in which the Estimated Total Improvement Acquisition Cost and Incidental Expenses have been assessed upon the several parcels of land in AD 94-3, reference is made to -the Description of Assessment Spread Method, attached hereto as Exhibit D and incorporated herein by reference. 3. As required by the 1913 Act, the assessment diagram entitled "ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM OF CITY OE BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-3 (SILVER CREEK/ BRIMHALL NORTH/SEVEN OAKS/SOUTH LAURELGLEN), COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA," consisting of fifteen (15) sheets, is on file in the office of the City Clerk. The AD 94-3 Assessment Diagram being too bulky to be bound with this Engineer's Report, a reduced and not to scale copy is attached hereto as Appendix B -and incorporated herein by reference. For a more particular description of the AD 94-3 exterior boundaries, reference is made to the AD 94-3 Boundary Map on file in the office of the City Clerk, attached hereto in reduced and not to scale form as Appendix A and incorporated herein by reference. 29182FER.III III-3 09/11/95 STATEMENT OF MAXIMUM ANNUAL PARCEL ASSESSMENT FOR RECOVERY OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION COSTS AND EXPENSES Pursuant to Subdivision (f) of Section 10204 of the Streets and Highways Code, I present the following statement of a proposed maximum annual assessment upon each parcel and subdivision of land in AD 94-3, in the amount of $50.00. Said annual assessment shall be levied by the City Council to pay various costs and expenses incurred from time to time by the City and not otherwise reimbursed, which result from the administration and collection of assessment installments, from compliance with Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15c2-12 for continuing disclosure requirements, or from the administration or registration of the improvement bonds and the various funds and accounts pertaining thereto. The City Council shall determine, by resolution, the amount of the annual assessment for this purpose, which shall not exceed the maximum assessment stated above and shall not exceed a reasonable estimate of costs actually incurred. The above stated maximum annual assessment amount shall be separate from and in addition to any fee charged to property owners in AD 94-3 by the City, pursuant to Sections 8682 and 8682.1 of the Streets and Highways Code. 29182FER.III III-4 09/11/95 BOND DECLARATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that serial and/or term bonds representing the unpaid assessments, and bearing interest at a rate not to exceed twelve percent (12%) per annum, will be issued in the manner provided by the 1915 Act, and the last installment of the bonds shall in mature not to exceed twenty-four (24) years from the second day of September next succeeding twelve (12) months from their date.. The provisions of Part 11.1 of the 1915 Act providing a procedure for the collection of assessments and advance retirement of bonds shall apply. The total amount assessed pursuant to the AD 94-3 proceedings includes an incidental expense to cover the estimated cost of preparing, printing, registering, servicing, and collecting the improvement bonds proposed to be issued pursuant to the 1915 Act to represent any unpaid assessments. This AD 94-3 Engineer's Report was filed in the office of the City Clerk on the 28th day of July, 1995, for preliminary approval by the City Council. On September 15, 1995, this fmal form version of the Engineer's Report was filed with the City Clerk for final approval and confirmation of the assessment by the City Council on September 27, 1995, following close of the AD 94-3 Protest Hearing: Pursuant to the fording of the AD 94-3 Assessment Engineer, as stated in Engineer's Report Exhibit D, Description of Assessment Method, that the proposed Assessment Reallocation Method is in general conformance with the requirements of Municipal Code Section 13,08.070, the undersigned recommends that the AD 94-3 Engineer's Report be fmally approved and the assessments as shown on Exhibit A, Assessment Roll, be confirmed by the City Council, as required by the Streets and Highways Code. Raul M: Rojas, Public Works Director and Engineer of Work, City of Bakersfield, Assessment District No. 94-3 29182FER.III III-5 09/ 12/95