The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About94-2 Engineers Report- ~ ~ ~~ ~ '~ ~ ~ ~.. ~5~ sus ~ f 5~~ ~~ ~~'pp~~' .~i ~ f ~'~ ~ ~~i~°. ~ 8 . dL ,~'b ~~oax~ r .+~ G1 ;, !'~nec~ ,t ,#~Y 4 - a. ..w~_ ~ ~~- 6 i h ~~ 444 ~ *~ ,~'. {~i••g~ ~ -~~ °B ~~.,~ ~~ p"~ ~i r'fir ~ a `~~ ~~' ~. ~. ~-r~ ~ ~ ;~ ~~~~~~ ~ ~~~ . ~~e~~:~ ,fie ~. ~~, ~~ ~~ ~ _ ~~ ~. ~, - - ~ - .~.w..~.~.~._~o, ~~. ,.~~ ~.~.. h,~,__~u.. ~ ,t~~_~ ENGINEER'S REPORT - CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-2 (GOSFORDIWHITE) AS FILED FOR FINAL APPROVAL CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Mayor and Ciry Council Bob Price, Mayor Irma Carson, Councilmember First Ward Patricia DeMond, Councilmember Second Ward Patricia M. Smith, Councilmember Third Ward Kevin McDermott, Councilmember Fourth Ward Randall L. Rowles, Councilmember Fifth Ward Vice Mayor, Councilmember Sixth Ward -Vacant Mark Salvaggio, Councilmember Seventh Ward Ciry Staff Alan Tandy, City Manager Judy Skousen, Ciry Attorney a Carol Williams, City Clerk Raul M. Rojas, Public Works Director Gregory Klimko, Finance Director BOND COUNSEL Samuel A. Sperry Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe San Francisco, California ASSESSMENT ENGINEER Ed Wilson Wilson & Associates Fresno, California UNDERWRITER Robert L. Williams, Jr., Vice President Sutro & Company San Francisco, California ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-2 (GOSFORD/WHITE) CERTIFICATE OF FILING AND CONFIRMATION OF ASSESSMENT I, Carol Williams, City Clerk of the City of Bakersfield, do hereby certify that the following "ENGINEER'S REPORT, CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-2," including the Assessment and Assessment Roll in the amounts set forth therein as the "Preliminary Assessment," with the Assessment Diagram attached thereto, was filed with me on the 30th day of September, 1994. o Iw.o ~ r !A 1 (~ Z`rty er City of Bakersfield, California I have prepared this Engineer's Report and do hereby certify that the amount set forth herein as the "Confirmed Assessment" on Exhibit A, attached hereto, has been computed by me in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Bakersfield contained in a Resolution of Intention adopted as Resolution of Intention No. 1123 on September 7, 1994. war i son, Assessment Engineer, Assessment District No. 94-2 I, Carol Williams, City Clerk of the City of Bakersfield, do hereby certify that the following "ENGINEER'S REPORT, CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-2" and the Confirmed Assessment contained therein were approved by the City Council of the City .Bakersfield on the day of ~ , 1994, by Council's ado ' : on of Reso ution No. a`~ ®a :~ ity er City of Bakersfield, California I, Raul M. Rojas, as Director of Public Works of the City of Bakersfield, do hereby certify that a certified copy of the following "ENGINEER'S REPORT, CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-2," together with the Assessment Diagram attached thereto, was recorded in my office on the day of , 1994. irecto o is City of Bakersfield, alifornia On ~C. - ~ ~ , 1994, the Assessment Diagram was filed in Book ~_ of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts at Pages ~~ through 7.5, and a Notice of Assessment was recorded in Book --' at Page '~ ,Document No._ ~ 0 , of Official Records in the office o]f~the CQounty Recorder of the County of Kern, C 'forma. -1l~ "' 1 ~ ~ j~ ~'~ ~~ ounty ec er ~~'a~/~ ~ ~ l g~ ~ 0 ~i County of Kern, Californla 29177CER -i- 12/1/94 TABLE OF CONTENTS - ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-2 (GOSFORD/WHITE) DESCRIPTION PAGE CERTIFICATE OF FILING ENGINEER'S REPORT AND CONFIRMATION OF ASSESSMENT ....................................... i TABLE OF CONTENTS .......... ............................. ii SECTION I ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PURPOSE, GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF BOUNDARIES AND BENEFIT ZONES, AND ENGINEER'S REPORT SUBMITTAL STATEMENT ..... I-1 Assessment District Purpose ........................... I-1 General Description of Boundaries and Benefit Zones ............ I-1 Environmental Review Status .......................... I-2 ~ Engineer's Report Submittal Statement ..................... I-2 Description of Engineer's Report Exhibits A, B, and C ........... I-5 SECTION II GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK AND ACQUISITIONS ..... II-1 SECTION III .PROPOSED ASSESSMENT OF ESTIMATED IMPROVEMENT ACQUISITION COSTS AND EXPENSES ............... III-1 Report Requirements ............................... III-1 Proposed Assessment of Estimated Improvement ` Acquisition Costs and Expenses ...................... III-1 Statement of Total Assessment ......................... III-2 Statement of Maximum Annual Parcel Assessment for Recovery of Assessment District Administration Costs and Expenses ....... III-4 Bond Declaration ................................. III-5 ( 29177TOC -ii- 11/21/94 DESCRIPTION PAGE REPORT EXHIBITS EXHIBIT A Assessment Roll .................................. A-1 EXHIBIT B Table B-I: Engineer's Estimate of Total Cost and Assessment ... B-I-1 ,Table B-II-A: Engineer's Itemized Estimate of Improvement Cost - Tract No. 5678 Off-site Improvements to be Acquired ...... B-II-A-1 Table B-II-B: Engineer's Itemized Estimate of Improvement Cost - Tract No. 5679 Off-site Improvements to be Acquired ...... B-II-B-1 Table B-II-A: Deleted: Payoff cost for Assessment District No. 82-1 Assessment 2166 (APN 389-010-17) is not to be financed by Assessment District No. 94-2 proceedings^ Table B-III-B: Payoff Calculation for Assessment District No. 82-1 Assessment 3083 (APN 391-010-34): Payoff Cost Assessed to Assessment District No. 94-2 Assessments 5 Through 136 .. B-III-B-1 EXHIBIT C Engineer's Summary of Individual Assessments ............... C-1 EXHIBIT D Description of Assessment Spread Method ................... D-1 EXHIBIT E Sketch Map of Proposed Tract No. 5679 and of Proposed Tract No. 5678 Phases A Through E (Showing Total Number of Residential Lots Per Tract or Tract Phase) ...................E-1 REPORT APPENDICES APPENDIX A Map of Assessment District Boundaries (On file with the City Clerk of the City of Bakersfield; reduced, not to scale, copy attached) APPENDIX B Assessment Diagram (On file with the City Clerk of the City of Bakersfield; reduced, not to scale, copy attached) APPENDIX C List of Names and Addresses of Property Owners APPENDIX D Exhibit B, Tables B-II-A, B-II-B, B-III-A, and B-III-B; Exhibit C; Exhibit D; and Appendix A from the Preliminary Engineer's Report Presented for Reference to Show the Basis for the Spread of the "Preliminary Assessment" R 29177TOC -iii- 11/21/94 ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-2 (GOSFORD/WHITE) SECTION I ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PURPOSE, GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF BOUNDARIES AND BENEFIT ZONES ENGINEER'S REPORT SUBMITTAL STATEMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PURPOSE Assessment District No. 94-2 (Gosford/White), herein referred to as "AD 94-2," has been formed by the City Council of the City of Bakersfield (the "City Council") pursuant to a property owner Petition on file with the City Clerk of the City of Bakersfield (herein "City Clerk"), for the purpose of financing the cost of acquisition by the City of Bakersfield (the "City") of certain street, water, sanitary sewer, storm water drainage, and private utility improvements, and the cost- to payoff and refinance several existing improvement assessments originally financed pursuant to City of Bakersfield Assessment District No. 82-1 (Stockdale Trunk Sewer), herein referred to as "AD 82-1. " A description of -the AD 94-2 boundaries and of the properties benefited by the improvements to be acquired is presented below. A detailed description of the improvements proposed to be acquired and of related incidental costs and expenses proposed to be funded by AD 94-2 are presented in Section II of this report. All of the AD 94-2 properties are located within the existing Corporate Limits of the City of Bakersfield (the "City Limits"). GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF BOUNDARIES AND BENEFIT ZONES AD 94-2 is located in the City's southwest area adjacent to the "Campus Park" and the "Oaks" residential community areas. The district site is two miles south of the Stockdale Highway and is generally bounded on the east by Gosford Road, on the south by White Lane, on the west by Pin Oak Park Boulevard, and on the north by South Laurelglen Boulevard. The Arvin-Edison Canal runs diagonally across AD 94-2 from South Laurelglen Boulevard, .southeasterly to Gosford Road and splits the district into two areas that are planned for subdivision into a total of 373 single-family dwelling lots ("R-1 lots"). The AD 94-2 property located southwest of the Arvin- Edison Canal is owned by Castle & Cooke Homes, Inc. ("Castle & Cooke"), an AD 94-2 proponent, and has been approved for subdivision into 290 R-i lots by Tentative Tract No. 5678 ("Ten TR 5678"). According to Castle & Cooke, the 131 R-1 lot initial phase of that sub- division, Tract No. 5678-Phase B ("TR 5678-B"), is to be given final approval by the City Council on December 14, 1994, and pursuant to Castle & Cooke's request, those 131 lots are included in AD 94-2 as separate lot assessments. Castle & Cooke is also the owner of the parcel located northeast of the Arvin-Edison Canal. That parcel is planned for development into 83 R-1 lots, as shown on their proposed Tentative Tract No. 5679 subdivision map ("Ten. TR 5679"), 29177FER.I I-1 11/21/94 which has, as of the date of filing this Engineer's Report, not been approved by the City Planning Commission. The scope of improvements planned to be financed by AD 94-2 and shown in the form of this AD 94-2 Engineer's Report (the "Engineer's Report") preliminarily approved on October 12, 1994, by City Council adoption of its Resolution No. 164-94, included the acquisition of "off- site" improvements and incidental costs that are either already required or that are expected by Castle & Cooke to be required to be installed as conditions of final map approval for Ten TR 5678 and Ten TR 5679. However, after adoption of Resolution No. 164-94 but prior to the December 14, 1994 Protesting Hearing on AD 94-2 set by Resolution No. 164-94, Castle & Cooke requested that the Ten TR 5679 "off-site" improvement acquisitions and existing AD 82-1 assessment refinancing for the Ten TR 5679 property be removed from the scope of the AD 94-2 final assessment. In accordance with the Castle & Cooke request, the AD 94-2 assessment contained in the Engineer's Report apportions no cost and assessment to the Ten TR 5679 property. In addition, the TR 5678-B R-1 lots have been added to the AD 94-2 assessment since the adoption of Resolution No. 164-94. AD 94-2 is located in the northeast quarter of Section 17 ("T 30 S, R 27 E"), Mount Diablo Base & Meridian ("MDB&M") and encompasses a land area of about 84 acres. There are no special benefit zones within AD 94-2, wherein a separate scope of improvements would be acquired that would benefit only the parcels located within the designated zone. On September 7, 1994, the City Council adopted its Resolution No. 154-94, Resolution Approving Boundary Map, Assessment District No. 94-2. The AD 94-2 boundaries are shown and described on the map entitled "PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-2 (GOSFORD/WHITE), COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA" (herein "AD 94-2 Boundary Map") consisting of three (3) sheets, on file in the office of the City Clerk. Reference is made to the AD 94-2 Boundary Map for a detailed description of the AD 94-2 boundaries. A reduced and not to scale copy is attached hereto as Engineer's Report Appendix A and incorporated herein by reference. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATUS Pursuant to the Charter and Municipal Code of the City of Bakersfield (herein "Municipal Code"), the formation of an assessment district is exempt from compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). Accordingly, a Notice of Exemption from CEQA will be filed by the City for the AD 94-2 proceedings prior to confirmation of the AD 94-2 assess- ment by the City Council. ENGINEER'S REPORT SUBMITTAL STATEMENT I, Raul M. Rojas, Public Works Director and Superintendent of Streets of the City of Bakers- field, have been appointed the Engineer of Work for AD 94-2 (herein "Engineer of Work") by adoption of City Council Resolution of Intention No. 1123 to do and perform all services in 29177FER.I I-2 11/21/94 making preliminary surveys, preparing plans, estimates of costs, and diagram and assessment. Pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, (herein "1913 Act"), being Division 12 of the California Streets and Highways Code, and to Section 10204 contained therein, and pursuant to the Municipal Code and in accordance with Resolution of Intention No. 1123, being a Resolution of Intention to order the acquisition of improvements, City of Bakersfield Assessment District No. 94-2 (Gosford/White) (herein "Resolution of Intention No. 1123"), I herewith submit the "Engineer's Report" for AD 94-2 consisting of six parts as follows: 1. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, MAPS AND DESCRIPTIONS OF IlVIPROVEMENTS AND LANDS TO BE ACQUIRED: A. Improvements to Be Acquired: At the time -this Engineer's Report was being prepared for filing with the City Clerk and for final approval by the City Council, all of the plans and specifications for the improve- ment acquisitions to be funded by AD 94-2 had not been completed and/or finally approved by the City Engineer. Therefore, this assessment is based on the cost estimates prepared from the approved improvement plans for Ten TR 5678 Phases A through D, and from schematic improvement plans for Ten TR 5678 Phase E. The acquisition cost estimates have been reviewed and approved by Martin-McIntosh Engineering, the subdivision design engineer hired by Castle & Cooke, that is hereinafter referred to as the "AD 94-2 Subdivision Engineer. " The ilprovements funded by AD 94-2 are to be constructed by Castle & Cooke and acquired by the City, pursuant to a proposed acquisition agreement between the City and Castle & Cooke (the "Castle & Cooke Acquisition Agreement"). B. Maps and Descriptions of Lands, Easements, and Rights-of--way and Existing Facilities Capacity and Use Rights to Be Acquired: As of the date of filing this Engineer's Report there were no land, easement, or rights- of-way acquisitions proposed to be financed by AD 94-2. Accordingly, no maps or descriptions have been prepared and filed with the City Engineer. 2. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK AND ACQUISITIONS: A General Description of Work and Acquisitions to be completed pursuant to the AD 94-2 proceedings is included as Section II of this Engineer's Report. 3. ESTIMATE OF TOTAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT ACQUISITION, AND INCIDENTAL COSTS: A "Statement of Total Assessment" is presented in Section III of this report. An itemized breakdown of the estimated total ilnprovement acquisition and incidental costs and expenses 29177FER.I I-3 11/21/94 including the estimated cost of preparing, printing, registering, servicing, and collecting bonds issued pursuant to these proceedings is included in Exhibit B, Table B-I, "Engineer's Estimate of Total Cost and Assessment" ("Table B-I"), attached hereto. 4. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM: The diagram entitled "ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM OF CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-2 (GOSFORD/WHITE), COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA" (herein "AD 94-2 Assessment Diagram"), consisting of three (3) sheets, is on file with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference. The AD 94-2 Assessment Diagram being too bulky to be bound with this Engineer's Report, a reduced and not to scale copy is attached hereto as Engineer's Report Appendix B. The AD 94-2 Assessment Diagram shows all of the following: A. The exterior boundaries of AD 94-2; B. The boundaries of any special benefit zones within AD 94-2, there being none; C. By reference to the Maps of the Assessor of the County of Kern and to maps and deeds of record and to the approved, unrecorded Tract No. 5678-Phase B (TR 5678-B) map, the lines and dimensions of each separate lot, parcel, and subdivision of land within AD 94-2 as they existed at the time of Approval of this Engineer's Report by the City Council, each lot, parcel, and subdivision of land having been assigned a separate assessment number upon the AD 94-2 Assessment Diagram; and D. The assessment numbers assigned to each separate lot, parcel, and subdivision of land as shown on the AD 94-2 Assessment Diagram correspond with the numbers shown on the AD 94-2 Assessment Roll (Exhibit A contained herein). 5. PROPOSED ASSESSMENT AND ASSESSMENT ROLL: A. A proposed assessment of the estimated total improvement acquisition cost and incidental expenses in connection with the AD 94-2 proceedings is presented in Section III of this Engineer's Report. B. Assessment Roll: An Assessment Roll for AD 94-2 is attached hereto as Exhibit A. The Assessment Roll shows the exact amount of the total estimated cost of -the proposed improvement acquisition and incidental cost that is assessed upon each of the lots and parcels within AD 94-2 in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received from those improvements. The assessment numbers that appear on the Assessment Roll correspond to the diagram numbers shown on the AD 94-2 Assessment Diagram. 29177FER.I I-4 11/21/94 C. Maximum Annual Parcel Assessment for Recovery of Assessment District Administration Costs and Expenses: Section III of this Engineer's Report includes a statement of the proposed maximum annual assessment upon each of the parcels in AD 94-2. The purpose of this separate annual assessment is to pay the costs incurred by the City of Bakersfield, and not otherwise reimbursed, which result from the administration and collection of assessments or registration of any associated bonds and reserve or other related funds. This maximum annual assessment is proposed to be levied pursuant to Subdivision (f) of Section 10204 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the "Streets and Highways Code"). 6. ASSESSMENT SPREAD METHOD: A description of the assessment spread method used to apportion the total estimated cost proposed to be fmanced for the acquisition of improvements and incidental costs to each parcel in AD 94-2, in direct proportion to the estimated benefits received by each parcel, respectively, from those improvements is attached hereto as Exhibit D and incorporated herein by reference. DESCRIPTION OF ENGINEER'S REPORT EXHIBITS A. B. AND C Exhibits A, B, and C that are attached to this Engineer's Report include a total of 6 tables of AD 94-2 parcel assessments, cost estimates and/or assessment spread cost allocations. A brief description of each of the three report exhibits and of the separate tables contained in each exhibit is presented below. Engineer's Report Exhibits A through C have been designed for the purpose of presenting astep- by-step breakdown of how the AD 94-2 total assessment has been spread to the individual lots and parcels that are proposed to be assessed. The exhibits and their tables begin with: 1. A listing in Exhibit A, Assessment Roll, of the exact amount proposed to be assessed to every existing parcel or lot in AD 94-2; then, 2. The Exhibit B tables present the major items of total system costs and incidental expenses for all of AD 94-2 (Table B-I), the breakdown of those major items to show their cost share details for the Ten TR 5678 off-site improvements (Table B-II-A) and for the Ten TR 5679 off-site improvements (Table B-II-B) that are proposed to be acquired. All item costs in Table B-II-B are zero, pursuant to the Castle & Cooke request to remove Ten TR 5679 acquisitions from the scope of AD 94-2 financing. Table B-III-B presents a separate itemized statement of the total cost, as calculated by the City Finance Office, to pay off existing AD 82-1 Assessment 3083. That assessment payoff cost is proposed to be fmanced by AD 94-2. Table B-III-A showed the pay-off calculations for existing AD 82-1 Assessment 2166. That assessment pay-off cost has also been removed 29177FER.I I-5 11/21/94 from AD 94-2 at the request of Castle & Cooke. Accordingly, Table B-III-A is not included in this final form of the Engineer's Report; and 3. Exhibit C shows how every item of AD 94-2 improvement system acquisition cost, fees, and incidental expense shown in the Exhibit B Tables has been spread among the existing AD 94- 2 parcels and lots. Since all of the AD 94-2 parcels are involved in the process of subdivision and development into R-1 lots, it is the intent of this Engineer's Report that the Exhibit C table shows how the existing parcel assessments will be segregated and apportioned to the planned new R-1 lots that will be created as the existing parcels are subdivided. The detailed spread calculations shown in Exhibit C are based on the number of lots planned by Castle & Cooke for development within each proposed phase of Ten TR 5678, according to the maps and information available at the time this Engineer's Report was prepared. For the purpose of future apportionments, Exhibit C provides data on the total original assessment share to be apportioned to each individual lot in Ten TR 5678. Exhibit C shows a $0.00 amount as the Ten TR 5679 "Final Assessment Per Lot," in accordance with the deletion from AD 94-2 of the improvement acquisitions for that future subdivision. A description of the assessment segregation and apportionment process for the future R-1 lots to be subdivided from the existing AD 94-2 assessed parcel configurations is presented in Engineer's Report Exhibit D. The tables in Exhibits A, B, and C have been structured in hierarchical levels of cost and assessment spread data, with Exhibit A showing the final parcel assessment totals and Exhibit C the parcel assessment details. The concept of this structure is that a property owner in AD 94-2 can look through the Engineer's Report data tables to find his property's total assessment amount shown in Exhibit A and then continue on a step-by-step progression in the Exhibits B and C tables to find the assessment spread details for that parcel and all other parcels in AD 94-2. 29177FER.I I-6 11/21/94 ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-2 (GOSFORD/WHITE) SECTION II GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK AND ACQUISITIONS PROJECT DESCRIPTION The separate improvement systems to be acquired and their related incidental work and costs eligible for financing pursuant to the AD 94-2 proceedings (hereinafter the "Improvements") aze described below. The descriptions of the Improvements and the termini of the proposed work do not necessarily extend for the full length of their description. The plans and profiles of the Improvements shall be controlling as to their correct and detailed description. The general scope of the Improvements includes the acquisition of public infrastructure improvements that will be owned, operated, and maintained by the City, the payment of certain regulated public utility improvement costs, financing of the cost to pay off existing AD 82-1 Assessment 3083, and the payment of certain improvement, assessment proceeding and bond issuance incidental costs and expenses related to the AD 94-2 Improvement acquisitions. ^ The AD 94-2 Proposed Subdivisions All of the AD 94-2 Improvement acquisitions and private utility construction costs involve work and expense that are either required or expected by Castle & Cooke to be required as conditions of final map approval for the tentative subdivision map overlaying the AD 94-2 parcels southwest of the Arvin-Edison Canal. They are described as follows: A. Ten TR 5678 overlays all of the benefited AD 94-2 property located southwest of the Arvin- Edison Canal. The subdivision was approved by the City Planning Commission on April 21, 1994, for the development of 289 R-1 lots in five phases (Phases A through E). However, the proposed final form maps for TR .5678 Phases A through E show a combined total of 290 R-1 lots. The revised subdivision design will meet the Ciry requirement that 80% of the lots in a small subdivision be smaller in area than the 6,000 square foot minimum that applies to a standazd subdivision. The AD 94-2 Assessment spread is based on the planned development of 290 R-1 lots in Ten TR 5678. Engineer's Report Exhibit C, "Engineer's Summary of Individual Assessments," attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, lists the total number of R-1 lots shown on each of the five (5) subdivision phase maps for Ten TR 5678. The parcel covering Ten TR 5678 Phases A, C, D, and E is shown on the AD 94-2 Assessment Diagram and on the AD 94-2 Assessment Roll as Assessment 5. Tract No. 29177FER.II II-1 11/21/94 5678-Phase B (TR 5678-B) is planned for approval by the City Council on December 14, 1994, and will be recorded prior to recordation of the AD 94-2 Assessment. Assessment Nos. 6 through 141- are assigned to the TR 5678-B lots shown on the fmal unrecorded TR . 5678-B map provided by the subdivision engineer. The boundaries of the five phases within Ten TR 5678 are shown on Exhibit E ("Sketch Map of Proposed Tract No. 5679 and of Proposed Tract No. 5678 Phases A Through E (Showing Total Number of Residential Lots Per Tract or Tract Phase)"). All of Ten TR 5678 is subject to an existing special assessment lien for AD 82-1 (Assessment 3083), and AD 94-2 will finance the cost to pay off the remaining principal amount of that existing assessment. B. Proposed Ten TR 5679 overlays all of the AD 94-2 benefited property located northeast of the Arvin-Edison Canal. However, as stated in Section I of this Engineer's Report, after the Engineer's Report for AD 94-2 was "Preliminarily Approved" by City Council Resolution No. 164-94 on October 12, 1994, Castle & Cooke decided to eliminate the Ten TR 5679 off-site improvements from the AD 94-2 fmancing. The Ten TR 5679 parcel is shown on the AD 94-2 Assessment Diagram and Assessment Roll as Assessments 1 through 4. Since those assessments will not benefit from the improvements funded by AD 94-2, they are apportioned a zero assessment amount, as shown on Exhibit A, Assessment Roll. ^ Acquisition Agreement: AD 94-2 Improvements As stated in Section I, the AD 94-2 Improvements are proposed to be acquired by the City in accordance with the terms and conditions of the proposed Castle & Cooke Acquisition Agreement. That agreement will define the specific scope of Improvements that are to be constructed and installed by Castle & Cooke and, upon their completion, be acquired by the City using funds provided through the AD 94-2 proceedings. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS. INCIDENTAL WORK AND ANNUAL ASSESSMENT Separate general descriptions are presented below of the proposed improvement acquisitions, of any incidental work and expense to be financed by AD 94-2 that is related to the improvement system acquisitions or to the AD 94-2 proceedings, and of the proposed annual assessment to be levied by AD 94-2 for the recovery of certain costs that may be incurred by the City in future years from the administration of the AD 94-2 bonds and reserve fund. ^ General Description of AD 94-2 Improvement Acquisitions The AD 94-2 Improvements proposed to be acquired include the construction and installation as separate improvement systems of the public improvements and private utility company facilities, City facilities capacity charges or fees, and incidental work described below. The Improvements are to be constructed in accordance with plans and specifications prepared by the AD 94-2 29177FER.II II-2 11/21/94 Subdivision Engineer and as approved by the City Engineer. As stated above in Section II, the plans and specifications for all of the Improvements had not been completed and/or fmally approved by the City Engineer at the time this Engineer's Report was prepared. Accordingly, the following description of-work is based on schematic, preliminary, and/or approved plans, quantities, and estimates that have been reviewed and confirmed by the AD 94-2 Subdivision Engineer. The separate improvement systems to be acquired pursuant to the AD 94-2 proceedings are as follows: A. Tentative Tract No. 5678 Off-site Improvements to Be Acquired: 1. Sewer System Improvements a. In Ficus Drive at the intersection with Gosford Road, install approximately 70 feet of 8-inch diameter sewer line, including a standard manhole at the connection with an existing sewer line in Gosford Road; and b. In Salix Court, Persimmon Drive, and Dove Tree Way at the intersections with Pin Oak Park Boulevard, install a total of approximately 230 feet of 6-inch diameter sewer line, including one standard manhole and two vertically bored, inside drop manholes at the connections with the existing sewer line in Pin Oak Park Boulevard. 2. Water System Improvements: a. In Ficus Drive at the intersection with Gosford Road, install approximately 46 feet of 10-inch diameter water line, together with a 10-inch gate valve and a hot tap, and abandon the existing stub out; b. In Umbrella Pine Way at the intersection with White Lane, install approximately 29 feet of 10-inch diameter water line, together with a 10-inch gate valve and a hot tap, and abandon the existing stub out; and c. In Salix Court, Persimmon Drive, and Dove Tree Way at the intersections with Pin Oak Park Boulevard, install approximately 240 feet of 8-inch diameter water line, including three 8-inch gate valves and connection to an existing line in Pin Oak Park Boulevard. 3. Storm Drain System Improvements: In Pin Oak Park Boulevard at the locations indicated on the schematic plans, install approximately 577 feet of 18-inch diameter. storm drain pipeline and three catch basins. 29177FER.II II3 11!21/94 4. Street System Improvements: a. In Gosford Road from the Arvin-Edison Canal south to White Lane along the east frontage of Ten TR 5678, install full and operational sidewalk, including curb returns and handicap ramps at the intersection with Ficus Drive, street signs, traffic signs, street lights including the street light conduit with pull boxes, and signal conduit; b. Also in Gosford Road at the intersection with Ficus Drive, install the right turn lane pocket, with full and operational curb and gutter, A.C. paving and aggregate base, and paint stripe. This work requires removal of previously installed curb returns and curb and gutter, together with sawcutting and removal of A.C. paving at those locations; c. Also in Gosford Road at the intersection with~Ficus Drive install the left turn lane pocket within the existing median, including median curb, _ A.C. paving and aggregate base and paint stripe. This work requires removal of previously installed median curb together with sawcutting and removal of A.C. paving at those locations; d. In White Lane between Gosford Road and Pin Oak Park Boulevard along the southern frontage of Ten TR 5678, install full and operational sidewalk, ,including curb returns and handicap ramps at the intersection with Umbrella .Pine Way, street signs, traffic signs, street lights complete with street light conduit with pull boxes, and signal conduit; e. Also in White Lane at the intersection with Umbrella Pine Way, install the right turn lane pocket, with full and operational curb and .gutter, A.C. paving and aggregate base, and. paint stripe. This work requires removal of previously installed curb and gutter, together with sawcutting and removal of A.C. paving at those locations; f. In Pin Oak Park Boulevard between White Lane and the northerly boundary of Ten TR 5678 Phase E along the western frontage of Ten TR 5678, install full and operational sidewalk, including curb returns and handicap ramps at the intersections with Salix Court, Persimmon Drive and Dove Tree Way, street signs, and street lights complete with street light conduit with pull boxes; and g. In Persimmon Drive through the PG&E tower easement within Ten TR 5678, construct a new street, including A.C. paving and aggregate base, curb and gutter. 29177FER.II II-4 11/21/94 5. Miscellaneous Improvements: a. Along the west right-of--way for Gosford Road between the Arvin Edison Canal and White Lane along the eastern Ten TR 5678 frontage, install an 8-foot high block wall and landscaping with appurtenances within a 10-foot wide landscape strip, except at a location where a "view" wall will be constructed. The view wall is not a part of the AD 94-2 financing; b. Along the north right-of--way for White Lane between Gosford Road and Pin Oak Park Boulevard along the southern Ten TR 5678 frontage, install an 8-foot high block wall and landscaping with appurtenances within a 10-foot wide landscape strip; ~ c. Along the east right-of--way for Pin Oak Park Boulevard between White Lane and the northerly boundary of Ten TR 5678 Phase E and along the west boundary of j Ten TR 5678, install an 8-foot high block wall and landscaping with appurtenances with a 10-foot wide landscape strip; d. In persimmon Drive through the PG&E tower easement within Ten TR 5678, install a 6-foot 8-inch high block wall and landscaping with appurtenances within a 5-foot wide landscape strip; and e. Along the northern boundary of Ten TR 5678 where it abuts the existing City- owned Garden Park, landscape the park access from Ten TR 5678. B. Tentative Tract No. 5679 Off-site Improvements to Be Acquired As described above, the Ten TR 5679 off-site improvements have been deleted from the scope of improvement acquisitions to be financed pursuant to the AD 94-2 proceedings. ^ General Description of AD 94-2 Improvement and Assessment Proceeding Incidental Work and Expense The total cost proposed to be financed by AD 94-2 includes work to be performed and fees to be paid that are incidental to the construction of the separate improvement system acquisitions. In addition, the cost and expense related to the conducting by the City of the AD 94-2 proceedings and to the issuance and sale of bonds to finance the total assessed cost not paid by the property owners and/or not paid by public agency contributions are also proposed to be financed by AD 94-2: A. The incidental costs and expenses proposed to be funded by AD 94-2 are described as follows: The acquisition of all rights-of--way, easements, franchises, licenses, and permits, and the construction of all auxiliary work, and the payment of all incidental expenses necessary and/or convenient to the accomplishment of the foregoing and for the conduct of 29177FER.II II-5 11/21/94 special assessment proceedings and the issuance of special assessment bonds, as may be approved by the Ciry, for the financing of all or a portion of the foregoing, including, but not limited to, the incidental expense to cover the estimated cost of preparing, printing, registering, servicing, -and collecting the improvement bonds proposed to be issued to represent the assessments, with all of the foregoing improvement acquisitions, incidental work and expense to be made and done pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code and the 1913 Act; B. The payment and/or reimbursement to the Ciry and to AD 94-2 property owners of all eligible sums under the Streets and Highways Code, advanced by the Ciry and/or by Castle and Cooke, including all associated district formation and administration costs and expenses; and C. The funding of not to exceed one (1) year's capitalized interest on any bonds issued in the amount of the unpaid assessments, where said bonds are to be issued pursuant to the Municipal Code and Improvement Bond Act of 1915, Division 10 of the Streets and Highways Code ("the 1915 Act"). ^ General Description of Proposed Annual Assessment Section III of this Engineer's Report also includes a "Statement of Maximum Annual Parcel Assessment for Recovery of Assessment District Administration Cost and Expenses." The purpose of the proposed annual assessment is to pay costs incurred by the Ciry from the administration of and collection of assessments or from the administration or registration of any associated bonds and reserve or other related funds, pursuant to Subdivision (f) of Section 10204 of the Streets and Highways Code. 29177FER.II II-6 11/21/94 ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-2 - (GOSFORD/WHITE) SECTION III PROPOSED ASSESSMENT OF ESTIMATED IMPROVEMENT ACQUISITION COSTS AND EXPENSES REPORT REQUIREMENTS WHEREAS, on September 7, 1994, the City Council, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code and of the 1913 Act, adopted its Resolution of Intention No. 1123 and did declare its intention to levy a maximum annual assessment pursuant to Subdivision (f) of Section 10204 of the Streets and Highways Code to provide for an annual assessment upon each of the parcels of land in AD 94-2 to recover costs incurred from the administration and collection of assessments and from the administration or registration of any associated reserve or other related funds, in an assessment district known and designated as CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-2 (GOSFORD/WHITE) (herein "AD 94-2"); and, WHEREAS, said Resolution of Intention No. 1123 directed the appointed engineer of work for AD 94-2 to make and file a report presenting a general description of any works and appliances already installed and of any other property necessary or convenient for the operation of the improvements, plans and specifications for the proposed acquisition of improvements, an estimate of costs, maps and descriptions of lands and easements to be acquired, and a diagram and assessment of and upon the subdivisions of land within the assessment district, to which Resolution of Intention No. 1123 and the description of the proposed improvements to be acquired as therein contained, reference is hereby made for further particulars. PROPOSED ASSESSMENT OF ESTIMATED IMPROVEMENT ACQUISITION COSTS AND EXPENSES NOW, THEREFORE, I, Raul M. Rojas, the duly appointed Engineer of Work for AD 94-2, by virtue of the power vested in me under the Municipal Code and under the 1913 Act and the order of the City Council, hereby make the following assessment to cover the portion of the 29177FER.III III-1 11/21/94 estimated cost of the acquisition of improvements and the costs and expenses incidental thereto to be paid by AD 94-2. 1. The amount to be paid for the acquisition of improvements, and the expenses incidental thereto is generally as shown in the following Statement of Total Assessment: STATEMENT OF TOTAL ASSESSMENT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 942 (GOSFORD/WHITE) As Preliminarily Approved A. Cost of Improvements to be Acquired: 1. Tract No. 5678 Off-site Improvements: $ 541,297.40 2. Tract No. 5679 Off-site Improvements: $ 204.206.95 3. Total Cost of Improvements to be Acquired: $ 745,504.35 B. Improvement Incidentals: 1. Tract No. 5678 Off-site Improvements: 2. Tract No. 5679 Off-site Improvements: 3. Total Improvement Incidentals: C. Improvement Contingency: 1. Tract No. 5678 Off-site Improvements: 2. Tract No. 5679 Off-site Improvements: 3. Total Improvement Contingency: D. Total Cost of Improvements, Incidentals, and Contingency: 1. Tract No. 5678 Off-site Improvements: 2. Tract No. 5679 Off-site Improvements: 3. Total Cost of Improvements, Incidentals, and Contingency: E. Additional Cost/Fees: 1. Tract No. 5678: 2. Tract No. 5679: 3. Total Additional Cost/Fees: F. Total Cost of Improvements, Incidentals, Contingency, and Additional Cost/Fees: 1. Tract No. 5678: 2. Tract No. 5679: 3. Total Cost of Improvements, Incidentals, Contingency, and Additional Cost/Fees: $ 132,687.02 $ 49.769.46 $ 182,456.48 $ 53,918.75 $ 20.318.11 $ 74,236.86 $ 727,903.17 $ 274.294.52 $ 1,002,197.69 $ 34,791.89 $ 7.817.34 $ 42,609.23 $ 762,695.06 $ 282.111.86 $ 1,044,806.92 Confirmed Assessment Amount $ 538,882.95 $ 0.00 $ 538,882.95 $ 136,243.02- $ 0.00 $ 136,243.02 $ 54,010.08 $ 0.00 $ 54,010.08 $ 729,136.05 $ 0.00 $ 729,136.05 $ 34,791.89 $ 0.00 $ 34,791.89 $ 763,927.94 $ 0.00 $ 763,927.94 29177FER.III III-2 12/01/94 G. Estimated Assessment Proceeding Cost: 1. Tract No. 5678: $ 83,897.18 $ 92,620.43 2. Tract No. 5679: $ 31,032.57 $ 0.00 3. Total Estimated Assessment Proceeding Cost: $ 114,929.75 $ 92,620.43 H. Deduct Contributions and Cash Collections: 1. Tract No. 5678: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 2. Tract No. 5679: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 3. Total Contributions: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 I. Subtotal Cost to Assessment After Contributions and Cash Collections: 1. Tract No. 5678: $ 846,592.24 $ 856,548.37 2. Tract No. 5679: $ 313.144.43 $ 0.00 3. Subtotal Cost to Assessment After Contributions and Cash Collections: $ 1,159,736.67 $ 856,548.37 J. 19 15 Act Bond Issuance Cost and Reserve: 1. Tract No. 5678: $ 175,389.01 $ 177,451.63 2. Tract No. 5679: $ 64.874.32 $ 0.00 3. Total 1915 Act Bond Issuance Cost and Reserve $ 240,263.33 $ 177,451.63 K. Total Estimated Assessment Amount: 1. Tract No. 5678: $ 1,021,981.25 $ 1,034,000.00 2. Tract No. 5679: $ 378.018.75 $ 0.00 3. Total Estimated Assessment Amount: $ 1,400,000.00 $ 1,034,000.00 A detailed breakdown of the itemized costs of the acquisition of hnprovements and expenses incidental thereto is presented in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 2. Pursuant to the provisions of law and of Resolution of Intention No. 1123, I have assessed the total amount of the cost and expenses of the acquisition of improvements and expenses incidental thereto upon the several parcels of land liable therefor and benefited thereby and hereinafter numbered to correspond with the numbers upon the attached AD 94-2 Assessment Diagram, upon each in direct proportion and relation to the estimated benefits to be received by such parcels, respectively, from the acquisition of improvements, all as is more particularly set forth in the Assessment Roll, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. The numbers on the Assessment Roll correspond with the numbers assigned to each respective parcel and shown on the AD 94-2 Assessment Diagram. Each subdivision of land assessed is described within the Assessment Roll by reference to its parcel number as shown on the Assessor's Maps of the County of Kern for the fiscal year 1994/ 1995 or by reference to maps and deeds of record on file in the office of the County Recorder of said County. 29177FER.III III-3 12/01/94 For a more particular description of the manner in which -the Estimated Total Improvement Acquisition Cost and Incidental Expenses have been assessed upon the several parcels of land in AD 94-2, reference is made to the Description of Assessment Spread Method, attached hereto as Exhibit D and incorporated herein by reference. 3. As required by the 1913 Act, the assessment diagram entitled "ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM OF CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-2 (GOSFORD/WHITE), COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA", consisting of three (3) sheets, is on file in the office of the City Clerk. The AD 94-2 Assessment Diagram being too bulky to be bound with this Engineer's Report, a reduced and not to scale copy is attached hereto as Appendix B and incorporated herein by reference. For a more particular description of the AD 94-2 exterior boundaries reference is made to the AD 94-2 Boundary Map on file in the office of the City Clerk, attached hereto in reduced and not to scale form as Appendix A and incorporated herein by reference. STATEMENT OF MAXIMUM ANNUAL PARCEL ASSESSMENT FOR RECOVERY OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION COSTS AND EXPENSES Pursuant to Subdivision (f) of Section 10204 of the Streets and Highways Code, I present the following statement of a proposed maximum annual assessment upon each parcel and subdivision of land in AD 94-2, in the amount of $50.00. Said annual assessment shall be levied by the City Council to pay various costs and expenses incurred from time to time by the City and not otherwise reimbursed, which result from the administration and collection of assessment installments or from the administration or registration of the improvement bonds and the various funds and accounts pertaining thereto. The City Council shall determine, by resolution, the amount of the annual assessment for this purpose, which shall not exceed the maximum assessment stated above and shall not exceed a reasonable estimate of costs actually incurred. The above stated maximum annual assessment amount shall be separate from and in addition to any fee charged to property owners in AD 94-2 by the City, pursuant to Sections 8682 and 8682.1 of the Streets and Highways Code. 29177FER.III III-4 11/21/94 BOND DECLARATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that serial and/or term bonds representing the unpaid assessments,. and bearing interest at a rate not to exceed twelve percent (12%) per annum, will be issued in the manner provided by the 1915 Act, and the last installment of the bonds shall mature not to exceed twenty-four (24) years from the second day of September next succeeding twelve (12) months from their date. The provisions of Part 11.1 of the 1915 Act, providing a procedure for the collection of assessments and advance retirement of bonds shall apply. The total amount assessed pursuant to the AD 94-2 proceedings includes an incidental expense to cover the estimated cost of preparing, printing, registering, servicing and collecting the improvement bonds proposed to be issued pursuant to the 1915 .Act to represent any unpaid assessments. This Engineer's Report for AD 94-2 was filed in the office of the City Clerk on the 30th day of September, 1994 for preliminary approval by the City Council on October 12, 1994, and filed in the office of the City Clerk on the 2nd day of December, 1994, for final approval and assessment confnmation by the City Council by: ~~..». ..~. ~~ ~».,, s »......,~........, ..+..vvwa asaaa Engineer of Work, City of Bakersfield, Assessment District No. 94-2 (Gosford/White) 29177FER.III III-5 11/21/94 ~1 v ~,~~ ds.w ~ s a_ ki. 1S EXHIBIT A ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0.94-2 (GOSFORDNVHITE) ASSESSMENT ROLL ASMT APN/ PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED NO. PARCEL DESCRIPTION OWNER'S NAME ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 389-010-14-00-8 389-0.10-15-00-1 389-010-16-00-4 389-010-17-00-7 REMAINDER OF 391-010-34-00-3 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACL NO.5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 - PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 1 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 2 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 3 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 4 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 5 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 6 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 7 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 8 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 9 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC: 10 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 11 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 12 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 13 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 14 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 15 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 16 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 17 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 18 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 19 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 20 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 21 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 22 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 23 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 24 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 25 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 26 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 27 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 28 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 29 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 30 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 31 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 32 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 33 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 34 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 35 CASTLE & GOOKS HOMES, INC. 36 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 37 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 38 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 39 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 40 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 41 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 42 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 43 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 44 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 45 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 46 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 47 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 48 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 49 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 50 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. 51 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $378,018.75 $1,021,981.25 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $60'1,-863.24 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298:75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 29177EXA A-1 11/30/94 EXHIBIT A ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0.94-2 (GOSFORDNVHITE) ASSESSMENT ROLL ASMT APNI PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED NO. PARCEL DESCRIPTION OWNER'S NAME ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT 57 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 52 58 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 53 59 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 54 60 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 55 61 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 56 62 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 57 63 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 58 64 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 59 65 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 60 66 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 61 67 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 62 68 TRACT N0.5678 -PHASE B: LOT 63 69 TRACT NO.5678 -PHASE B: LOT 64 70 TRACT N0.5678 -PHASE B: LOT 65 71 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 66 72 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 67 73 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 68 74 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 69 75 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 70 76 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 71 77 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 72 78 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 73 79 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 74 80 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 75 81 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 76 82 TRACT NO.5678 -PHASE B: LOT 77 83 TRACT NO.5678 -PHASE B: LOT 78 84 TRACT N0.5678 -PHASE B: LOT 79 85 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 80 86 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 81 87 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 82 88 TRACT NO.5678 -PHASE B: LOT 83 89 TRACT NO.5678 -PHASE B: LOT 84 90 TRACT NO.5678 -PHASE B: LOT 85 91 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 86 92 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 87 93 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 88 94 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 89 95 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 90 96 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 91 97 TRACT NO. 5678 --PHASE B: LOT 92 98 TRACT N0.5678 -PHASE B: LOT 93 99 TRACT N0.5678 -PHASE B: LOT 94 100 TRACT N0.5678 -PHASE B: LOT 95 101 TRACT N0.5678 -PHASE B: LOT 96 102 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 97 103 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 98 104 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 99 105 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 100 106 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 101 107 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 102 108 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 103 109 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 104 110 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 105 111 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 106 112 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 107 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see-note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 see note 2 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75 .$3,298.75 $3,298.75 $3,298.75, $3,298.75 $3,298.75 29177EXA A-2 11 /30/94 EXHIBIT A ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0.94-2 (GOSFORDNVHITE) ASSESSMENT ROLL ASMT APN/ PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED NO. PARCEL DESCRIPTION OWNER'S NAME ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT 113 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 108 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. see note 2 $3,298.75 114 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 109 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. see note 2 $3,298.75 115 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 110 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. see note 2 $3,298.75 116 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 111 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. see note 2 $3,298.75 117 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 112 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. see note 2 $3,298.75 118 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 113 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. see note 2 $3,298.75 119 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 114 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. see note 2 $3,298.75 120 TRACT N0.5678 -PHASE B: LOT 115 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. see note 2 $3,298.75 121 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 116 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. see note 2 $3,298.75 122 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 117 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. see note 2 $3,298.75 123 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 118 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. see note 2 $3,298.75 124 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 119 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. see note 2 $3,298.75 125 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 120 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. see note 2 $3,298.75 126 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 121 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. see note 2 $3,298.75 127 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 122 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. see note 2 $3,298.75 128 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 123 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. see note 2 $3,298.75 129 TRACT NO.5678 -PHASE B: LOT 124 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. see note 2 $3,298.75 130 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT - 125 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. see note 2 $3,298.75 131 TRACT N0.5678 -PHASE B: LOT 126 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. see note 2 $3,298.75 132 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 127 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. see note 2 $3,298.75 133 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 128 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. see note 2 $3,298.75 134 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT 129 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. see note 2 $3,298.75 135 TRACT N0.5678 -PHASE B: LOT 130 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. see note 2 $3,298.75 136 TRACT N0.5678 -PHASE B: LOT 131 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. see note 2 $3,299.26 137 TRACT N0.5678 -PHASE B: PARK LOT CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. see note 2 $0.00 138 TRACT NO. 5678 -PHASE B: LOT A CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. see note 2 $0.00 139 TRACT N0.5678 -PHASE B: LOT B CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. see note 2 $0.00 140 TRACT N0.5678 -PHASE B: LOT C CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. see note 2 $0.00 141 TRACT NO.5678 -PHASE B: LOT D CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. see note 2 $0.00 SUBTOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED TO ASSESSMENTS 1 THROUGH 5: $1,400,000.00 5601,883.24 SUBTOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED TO ASSESSMENTS 6 THROUGH 141: 50.00 5432,136.76 (TRACT NO.5678 -PHASE B) TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: 51,400,000.00 51,034,000.00 NOTES: 1. FOR A DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE LINES, DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS OF ASSESSMENTS 6 THROUGH 141 REFERENCE THE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR TRACT NO. 5678-PHASE B, RECORDED 199_, IN BOOK OF MAPS, PAGES THROUGH , IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF KERN. 2. AT THE TIME THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-2 ("AD 94-2") ENGINEER'S REPORT WAS PRELIMINARILY APPROVED, ASSESSMENT 5 INCLUDED ALL 5 PHASES (A TO E) OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 5678 AND ASSESSMENTS 6 THROUGH 141 ON TRACT NO. 5678-PHASE B WERE NOT PART OF THE ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM AND ROLL. TRACT NO. 5678-PHASE B WAS RECORDED PRIOR TO RECORDING THE AD 94-2 ASSESSMENT AND, ACCORDINGLY, EACH LOT IN TRACT NO. 5678-PHASE B HAS BEEN ASSIGNED A SEPARATE ASSESSMENT NUMBER ON THE FINAL ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM AND EACH LOTS ASSESSMENT NUMBER AND CONFIRMED ASSESSMENT AMOUNT IS SHOWN ON THIS ASSESSMENT ROLL. PREPARED BY: WILSON AND ASfS~OCIATES APPROVED: ~ ~. V~ DATE: ~ 2 EDWARD J. WILSON, R.C.E. 23269 (EXPIRES 12-31-97) fJIP.~231~t1 29177EXA A-3 ~4~`i::: ~ CA ~~ . ~~ f , /~'.'l ~ ~`` ~~ ~a'~tl'~~S M~ &.!. `: ~`A. 'b`~ ~~ ~~'e ~~ Aq~' ~`~p ,~ `a '£~~'!~1 Fr P h„~4 p3. `~ _ _ ~,bew. `:,~~ "° ~~~~.f~ ~~~1~~ ~y~ ~~ ~~.~'~ ~.~J. ~~ ~"~~i ~ ~:U ~ 4 ~ ~~ a ~: ~ y tyR ~1~y qpr~ ,(~ jp~7, p A~,~ ~ ~ / ` , ~ y ~~~~ F.'i°`I. ~'~JSL'd .4i1.®.~e~~.,~i~ ~:!.~"V~~f~ ~,9~! p! F.'a, ~n:r Y-,r.!~;i F'.9.'+c~~~~ T.~~'5.~.~;1.,~~.~ a'C~r~<:~i~~t.,Pf'~+ 'm~`^~' ~t~.A a ~E~i~ ~.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ela ~ ~ .F.'.e~`w•. 5~.~~~'..~~i~i.~~~~ h ~ ~ ~ ~ 4s ~ ~1 ~` y q~ s~g. ~~qp/ry~-qy~'~~ 7~ ~{ ®y ~~ pe ~g ~g a~vp p~. ~[~ { ~ ~ ~¢ ~ J ! ~.47 `9 98!'.s'dN FA:R l :.!A ' 7.R\ ~~.r `H,N4~~.~~' ~-' i e~~~~~ ~i i` V `X. s~e ~7@,~~i ~ (( ~~ yy A IIyy ~~aa K~ py yy~ j y , :f~VL~p~n5 ~~~~.:3.12.~~~~ 3;a~~~v Sl, ~~d l~~`V~~~' P~~~„3' ~~.C~wi ~4'Ne... ~~~'~~~'° `.~,A YrJ~~/1v...i n•+i6..3.Iw.w~f_ YS `~i'~'2 ~.,s1 W,,;J F ~ 6 j t'.9 ~ ~~ .Ll)•~d7~1 ~'.~5~ `~T ta.,5r .4t',~i3~ .~~~~V~,:' ~6 b~l..l V~..~~ / F ^~ b y ~ q~ ~ , y~ y~ ,('~ , g , ~ ~ ,~g ~ ~ I~~~F~S .:"S .~~ .f~t;Wa"~:3~~~~r~.~~ 1$.s5~1;;~?~ ~~~ ":..5` ~3d3.~.~~ ~v.~ ~.~~,f,`g a ~ ~,9 yp pp ~~ ~~ ~~jj pg~~ '~ `{ ~J ~ d.'+S t~'H~ ~~~~"`~F~~~r~~_~y ~A4 A~@,£~1H` f~~~,~~~d ~~ ~`~'>,r~dNkl~ ~'~ ~ ,i ~ ~j ~~~ ~i .f1F~~.~ ,~~ ~d+e ~~!F°"~m', 1'Ys A ~6,1 1 .X ~ ~i' ~ d ~~ 1TR ~~ g ~ x g ~ p y ~ r ~ ,y ~ ~.E~°~.~~,~'~S~'dl~~i3,1.~k1'~d ~~i,~ `~~.fpa:~~».~~~ ~'~_°~~~®~ ~ .~~~`~ ~ ~.~~~.~~ `~.P . ..~~~~` .sl ' "~ ~"~~~.~ ~ .~. .~~~:~~{ ~. ~ a ~ ~ ~ : 4 p~ ~ ry ~ ~~y ~v-tq e~ 7g g& 3g yp (g ~ry ~~gq~ yy7 @,/ / , ( q ~ ~ a_~a.P~~ ~F_"}5.~~~ .~P,~.f2. ~F64 ,. ~..IRr.SI. ~~a @.I~d`°.~. h,~'~~9: +J~~v'Y.ft:lJ~~ ~~l ~nf~ 4411 ~ ~21,a l.~t ~ ~i± .L~,~s ~g'a~ ~~~a~'~~$~ti`~F,"3r~n~ l ~~S~f~,.~d~'~ 1a!u4>~1`<7th.F~'e~~ ~~, ~F~4 f ~~ pp gg t, ~ i { EXHIBIT B TABLE B-I ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0.94-2 (GOSFORD/WHITE) ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE OF TOTAL COST 8< ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT (Note: See Tables B-II for.improvement system cost details) 1. SEWER IMPROVEMENTS A. TRACT NO. 5678 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS $10,485.00 $25,533.00 B. TRACT NO. 5679 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS $0.00 $0.00 C. TOTAL SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ~ $10,485.00 M $25,533.00 (, 1 2. WATER IMPROVEMENTS A. TRACT NO. 5678 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS B. TRACT NO. 5679 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS C. TOTAL WATER IMPROVEMENTS 3. STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS A. TRACT NO. 5678 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS B. TRACT NO. 5679 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS C. TOTAL STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS 4.STREETIMPROVEMENTS A. TRACT NO. 5678 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS B. TRACT NO. 5679 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS C. TOTAL STREET IMPROVEMENTS 5. MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS A. TRACT NO. 5678 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS B. TRACT NO. 5679 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS C. TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS 6. PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS SUBTOTAL A. TRACT NO. 5678 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS B. TRACT NO. 5679 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS C. PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS SUBTOTAL (1. C+2. C+3. C+4. C+S. C+6. C) 7. PROJECT IMPROVEMENT INCIDENTAL COST A. TRACT NO. 5678 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS B. TRACT NO. 5679 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS C. TOTAL PROJECT IMPROV. INCIDENTAL COST $23,775.00 $23,775.00 $0.00 $0.00 $23,775.00 ________ $23,775.00 $13,155.00 $13,_155.00 $11,300.00 $0.00 $24,455.00 $13,155.00 $117,321.90 $117,321.90 $40,105.35 $0.00 $157,427.25 $117,321.90 $376,560.50 $359,098.05 $152,801.60 $0.00 $529,362.10 $359,098.05 $541,297.40 $538,882.95 $204,206.95 $0.00 $745,504.35 $538,882.95 $132,687.02 $136,243.02 $49,769.46 $0.00 $182,456.48 $136,243.02 2917781 B-I-1 11/30/94 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-1 ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0.94-2 (GOSFORD/WHITE) ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE OF TOTAL COST 8 ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT (Note: See Tables B-II for improvement system cost details) 8. PROJECT IMPROVEMENT AND INCIDENTAL COST A. TRACT NO. 5678 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS $673,984.42 $675,125.97 B. TRACT NO. 5679 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS $253,976.41 $0.00 C. TOTAL IMPROVEMENT AND INCIDENTAL COST $927,960.83 $675,125.97 9.IMPROVEMENT CONTINGENCY A. TRACT NO. 5678 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS $53,918.75 $54,010.08 B. TRACT N0.5679 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS $20,318.11 $0.00 C. TOTAL IMPROVEMENT CONTINGENCY $74,236.86 _ M $54,010.08 10. TOTAL COST OF IMPROVEMENTS, INCIDENTALS AND CONTINGENCY A. TRACT N0.5678 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS $727_,903.17 $729,136.05 B. TRACT NO. 5679 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS $274,294.52 $0.00 C. TOTAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS, INCIDENTALS $1,002,197.69 $729,136.05 AND CONTINGENCY 11. ADDITIONAL COST/FEES A. TRACT NO. 5678 (Payoff AD 82-1 asmnt. on APN 391-010-34) $34,791.89 $34,791.89 B. TRACT NO. 5679 (Payoff AD 82-1 asmnt. on APN 389-010-17)----_-N$7,817.34 ---------- $0.00 C. TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST/FEES $42,609.23 $34,791.89 12. TOTAL COST OF IMPROVEMENTS, INCIDENTALS, CONTINGENCY AND ADDITIONAL COSTIFEES A. TRACT N0.5678 $762,695.06 $763,927.94 B. TRACT NO. 5679 $282,111.86 $0.00 C. TOTAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS, INCIDENTALS, $1,044,806.92 $763,927.94 CONTINGENCY AND ADDITIONAL COST/FEES i 2917761 B-I-2 11 /30/94 EXHIBIT 6 TABLE B-I i f ENGINEER'S REPORT l CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0.94-2 (GOSFORD/IIVHITE) ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE OF TOTAL COST 8 ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED j ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT (Note: See Tables B-II for improvement system cost details) 13. ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT PROCEEDING INCIDENTAL COST AND EXPENSE A. ASSESSMENT ENGINEER $25,000.00 $25,000.00 B. BOND COUNSEL f 1. Legal services per Agreement No. 94-152 $24,000.00 $10,340.00 2. Additional legal services $0.00 $0.00 3. Expenses $5,000.00 $5,000.00 4. TOTAL BOND COUNSEL $29,000.00 $15,340.00 C. APPRAISER $10,000.00 $10,000.00 D. BOND ISSUANCE EXPENSES 1. Bond and other printing $10,000.00 $10,000.00 2. Bond administration & registration $5,000.00 $5,000.00 ' 3. Legal publications, notices, recording and mailing $3,000.00 $3,000.00 4. Auditor's record $1,500.00 $1,500.00 5. CDAC, MSRB, PSA fees $238.00 $175.78 ! 6. Disclosure counsel $22,000.00 $12,500.00 E. ENVIRONMENTAL APPROVAL PROCESSING $0.00 ~ $0.00 F. MISCELLANEOUS ASSESSMENT PROCEEDING EXPENSES $9,191.75 $10,104.65 G. TOTAL ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT PROCEEDING $114,929.75 $92,620.43 INCIDENTAL COST AND EXPENSE I G.1. TRACT NO. 5678 SHARE: $83,897.18 $92,620.43 G.2. TRACT NO. 5679 SHARE: $31,032.57 $0.00 14. SUBTOTAL COST TO ASSESSMENT A. TRACT NO. 5678 $846,592.24 $856,548.37 B. TRACT NO. 5679 - $313,144.43 $0.00 C. SUBTOTAL COST TO ASSESSMENT $1,159,738.87 $856,548.37 15. DEDUCT CONTRIBUTIONS AND CASH COLLECTIONS A. TRACT N0.5678 $0.00 $0.00 B. TRACT NO. 5679 $0.00 $0.00 C. TOTAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND CASH COLLECTIONS $0.00 $0.00 16. TOTAL COST TO 1915 ACT BOND ISSUANCE AFTER CONTRIBUTIONS AND CASH COLLECTIONS A. TRACT NO. 5678 $846,592.24 $856,548.37 B. TRACT NO. 5679 $313,144.43 $0.00 C. TOTAL COST TO 1915 ACT BOND ISSUANCE $1,159,738.67 $856,548.37 AFTER CONTRIBUTIONS AND CASH COLLECTIONS 2917781 B-I-3 11/30/94 j EXHIBIT. B TABLE B-I ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0.94-2 (GOSFORD/WHITE) ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE OF TOTAL COST 8< ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT (Note: See Tables B-I I for improvement system cost details) 17.1915 ACT BOND ISSUANCE COST AND RESERVE A. BOND DISCOUNT B. CAPITALIZED INTEREST C. BOND RESERVE FUND D. TOTAL BOND ISSUANCE COST AND RESERVE D.1. TRACT NO. 5678 SHARE: $175,389.01 D.2. TRACT N0.5679 SHARE: $64,874.32 18. TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED TO BONDS TRACT N0.5678 SHARE: $1,021,981.25 TRACT NO. 5679 SHARE: $378,018.75 2917781 B-I-4 $20,930.00 $79,333.33 $140,000.00 $240,263.33 $177,451.63 $0.00 $1,400,000.00 $1,034,000.00 $0.00 CONFIRMED ASSESSMENT $15,458.30 $58,593.33 $103,400.00 $177,451.63 $1,034,000.00 11 /30/94 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-A ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0.94-2 (GOSFORD/WHITE) ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT COST TRACT N0.5678 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED ITEM ESTIMATED ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL COST A. SEWER IMPROVEMENTS 1. 8" SEWER LINE -Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 70.00 LF 13.50 $945.00 2. 8" ROAD BORE - Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 70.00 LF 56.00 $3,920.00 3. STANDARD MANHOLE - Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 1.00 EA 1_,400.00 * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff--sites 1.00 EA 1,400.00 STANDARD MANHOLE SUBTOTAL: 2.00 EA 1,400.00 $2,800.00 4. VERTICALLY BORED INSIDE DROP MANHOLE * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 2.00 EA 3,000.00 $6,000.00 5. 6"SEWER LINE * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 230.00 LF 9.60 $2,208.00 6. 6" ROAD BORE * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 230.00 LF 42.00 $9,660.00 SUBTOTAL SEWER IMPROVEMENTS: ;25,533.00 B. WATER IMPROVEMENTS 1. 10" WATER LINE -Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 75.00 LF 14.00 $1,050.00 i 2. 10" GATE VALVE -Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 2.00 EA 650.00 $1,300.00 3. HOT TAP - Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 2.00 EA 1,500.00 $3,000.00 4. ABANDON EXISTING STUB OUT - Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 2.00 EA 175.00 $350.00 5. 8" WATER LINE * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 240.00 LF 14.00 $3,360.00 6. 8" GATE VALVE * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 3.00 EA 425.00 $1,275.00 7. 8" ROAD BORE * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 240.00 LF 56.00 $13,440.00 t SUBTOTAL WATER IMPROVEMENTS: ;23,775.00 C. STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS 1. 24" STORM DRAIN PIPE LINE * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 577.00 LF 15.00 $8,655.00 2. CATCH BASIN * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 3.00 EA 1,500.00 $4,500.00 SUBTOTAL STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS: ;13,155.00 29177B2A B-II-A-1 11/30/94 r ` EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-A ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-2 (GOSFORDNVHITE) ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT COST TRACT N0.5678 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED ITEM ESTIMATED ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL COST D. STREET IMPROVEMENTS 1. REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER. ' -Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 572.00 LF 1.00 * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff--sites 490.00 LF 1.00 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER SUBTOTAL: 1,062.00 LF 1.00 $1,062.00 2. REMOVE MEDIAN CURB - Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 244.00 LF 1.00 , * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 140.00 LF 1.00 REMOVE MEDIAN CURB SUBTOTAL: 384.00 LF 1.00 $384.00 3. REMOVE A. C. PAVING - Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 1,470.00 SF 0.30 * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 2,270.00 SF 0.30 1 REMOVE A. C. PAVING SUBTOTAL: 3,740.00 SF 0.30 $1,122.00 ' 4. SAWCUT A. C. PAVING -Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 600.00 LF 1.00 * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 600.00 LF 1.00 SAWCUT A. C. PAVING SUBTOTAL: 1,200.00 LF 1.00 $1,200.00 5. 6"CURB AND GUTTER r -Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 569.00 LF 5.25 [ -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 317.00 LF 5.25 f - in Persimmon Dr. (through PG&E easement) 412.00 LF 5.25 6" CURB AND GUTTER SUBTOTAL: 1,298.00 LF 5.25 $6,814.50 6. SIDEWALK -Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites '11,824.00 SF 1.30 * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 5,874.00 SF 1.30 - in Persimmon Dr. (through PG&E easement) 1,854.00 SF 1.30 j SIDEWALK SUBTOTAL: 19,552.00 SF 1.30 $25,417.60 7. HANDICAP RAMP - Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 1,534.00 SF 1.30 * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 2,400.00 SF 1.30 HANDICAP RAMPS SUBTOTAL: 3,934.00 SF 1.30 $5,114.20 8. A. C. PAVING -Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 492.00 TON 23.50 M1 -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 86.00 TON 23.50 E I - in Persimmon Dr. (through PG&E easement) 88.00 TON 23.50 A. C. PAVING SUBTOTAL: 666.00 TON 23.50 $15,651.00 9. AGGREGATE BASE -Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 514.00 CY 18.00 * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 72.00 CY 18.00 - in Persimmon Dr. (through PG&E easement) 90.00 CY 18.00 AGGREGATE BASE SUBTOTAL: 676.00 CY 18.00 $12,168.00 2917762A B-II-A-2 11/30/94 ` EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-A 9 ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTR ICT N0.94-2 (GOSFORD/WHITE) ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT COST TRACT N0.5678 OFF-SITE IMPROVEM ENTS TO BE ACQUIRED - ITEM ESTIMATED ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL COST D. STREET IMPROVEMENTS (Cont'd) 10. SUBGRADE PREPARATION -Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 1,509.00 SY 1.20 * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff--sites 310.00 SY 1.20 ~, - in Persimmon Dr. (through PG&E easement) 809.00 SY 1.20 SUBGRADE PREPARATION SUBTOTAL: 2,628.00 SY 1.20 $3,153.60 ' 11. PAINT STRIPE - CHANNELIZING, LANE - Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 200.00 LF 1.00 $200.00 12. MEDIAN CURB -Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 235.00 LF 5.00 * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 28.00 LF 5.00 MEDIAN CURB SUBTOTAL: 263.00 LF 5.00 $1,315.00 13. METRO STREET SIGN -Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 4.00 Fro 300.00 - * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 6.00 EA 300.00 ' METRO STREET SIGN SUBTOTAL: 10.00 FJ~ 300.00 $3,000.00 14. STREET SIGN i -Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 2.00 Fro 200.00 $400.00 15. RELOCATE TRAFFIC SIGN - -Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 6.00 Fro 90.00 $540.00 16. STOP SIGN * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 3.00 Fro 200.00 $600.00 17. STREET LIGHT -MAST ARM 9500 LUMEN -Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 7.00 Fro 1,900.00 * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 4.00 F~4 1,900.00 STREET LIGHTS -MAST ARM 9500 LUMEN SUBTOTAL: 11.00 EA 1,900.00 $20,900.00 j 18. STREET LIGHT CONDUIT b( -Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 2,010.00 LF 2.25 * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 1,382.00 LF 2.25 STREET LIGHT CONDUIT SUBTOTAL: 3,392.00 LF 2.25 $7,632.00 19. #3-1/2 PULL BOX -Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 7.00 EA 160.00 * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 7.00 Fro 160.00 #3-1/2 PULL BOX SUBTOTAL: 14.00 64 160.00 $2,240.00 20. #5 PULL BOX - Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 7.00 FA 160.00 $1,120.00 21. SIGNAL CONDUIT -Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 1,165.00 LF 2.00 $2,330.00 22. 3" LANDSCAPE CONDUIT -Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 161.00 LF 3.00 * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 240.00 LF 3.00 3" LANDSCAPE CONDUIT SUBTOTAL: 401.00 LF 3.00 $1,203.00 29177B2A B-I I-A-3 11 /30/94 i EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-A ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0.94-2 (GOSFORD/WHITE) ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT COST TRACT N0.51678 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED ITEM ESTIMATED ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL COST D. STREET IMPROVEMENTS (Cont'd) j 23. 6" LANDSCAPE CONDUIT -Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 161.00 LF 5.00 * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff--sites 240.00 LF 5.00 6" LANDSCAPE CONDUIT SUBTOTAL: 401.00 LF 5.00 $2,005.00 T 24. MONUMENT ENCASEMENT -Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 2.00 EA 250.00 * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 3.00 EA 250.00 - in Persimmon Dr. (through PG&E easement) 2.00 EA 250.00 s MONUMENT ENCASEMENT SUBTOTAL: 7.00 EA 250.00 $1,750.00 SUBTOTAL STREET IMPROVEMENTS: ;117,321.90 ' E. MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS - f 1. BLOCK WALL (8'0" height) -Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 12,263.00 SF 6.35 - in White Ln. along PG&E easement 1,821.00 SF 6.35 * t -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 12,100.00 SF 6.35 f BLOCK WALL (8'0" height) SUBTOTAL: 26,184.00 SF 6.35 $166,268.40 ~ 2. BLOCK WALL (6'8" height) - in Persimmon Dr. (through PG&E easement) 2,748.00 SF 6.35 $17,449.80 3. LANDSCAPING (10' STRIP) - Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 24,934.00 SF 3.13 ' - in White Ln. along PG&E easement 2,100.00 SF 3.13 * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 14,000.00 SF 3.13 LANDSCAPING (10' STRIP) SUBTOTAL: 41,034.00 SF 3.13 $128,436.42 4. LANDSCAPING (5' STRIP) - in Persimmon Dr. (through PG&E easement) 2,320.00 SF 3.13 $7,261.60 r 5. HARDSCAPING -Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites (Gosford median) 647.00 SF 5.50 $3,558.50 6. LANDSCAPING PARK ACCESS - Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 11,541.00 SF 3.13 $36,123.33 SUBTOTAL MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS: 5359,098.05 f. TOTAL ESTIMATED TRACT N0.5678 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENT COST $538,882.95 29177B2A B-II-A-4 11/30/94 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-A ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0.94-2 (GOSFORD/WHITE) ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT COST - TRACT N0.5678 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED ITEM ESTIMATED ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL COST G. IMPROVEMENT INCIDENTALS 1. DESIGN ENGINEERING AND LANDSCAPE DESIGN $45,568.00 2. IMPROVEMENT BONDS (4.45% of Item F) $23,980.29 3. CONSTRUCTION STAKING (4% of Item F) $21,555.32 4. SOIL AND MATERIALS TESTING (2% of Item F) $10,777.66 5. PLAN CHECK (1.2% of Item F) $6,466.60 6. SITE INSPECTION (4°k of Item F) $21,555.32 7. WATER INSPECTION FEE (4% of Item B) $951.00 8. CITY PROJECT ADMIN. COST (1% of Item F) $5,388.83 SUBTOTAL IMPROVEMENT INCIDENTALS: ;136,243.02 H. TOTAL IMPROVEMENTS AND INCIDENTALS ;875,125.87 I. IMPROVEMENT CONTINGENCY ;54,010.08 J. TOTAL IMPROVEMENTS, INCIDENTALS AND CONTINGENCY ;728,136.05 NOTES: (1) """ INDICATES IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE IMPROVEMENT PLANS AVAILABLE AT THE TIME THIS REPORT IS BEING PREPARED (2) THIS ITEMIZED COST ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT COST IS BASED ON "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT STUDY, TRACT 5678" PREPARED FOR CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. BY MARTIN-McINTOSH (DATED OCTOBER 27, 1994), AND THE COST ESTIMATE UPDATES SUBMITTED AFTER OCTOBER 27, 1994, ALSO BY MARTIN-McINTOSH. 29177B2A B-I I-A-5 11 /30/94 i a EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-B ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-2 (GOSFORD/WHITE) ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT COST TRACT NO. 5679 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED ITEM !~ ESTIMATED ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL COST A. SEWER IMPROVEMENTS $0.00 B. WATER IMPROVEMENTS $0.00 C. STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS 1. 24' STORM DRAIN PIPE LINE 2. MANHOLE SUBTOTAL STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS: D. STREET IMPROVEMENTS 1. REMOVE CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK 2. REMOVE MEDIAN CURB 3. REMOVE A. C. PAVING 4. SAWCUT A. C. PAVING 5. 6" CURB AND GUTTER 6. SIDEWALK 7. HANDICAP RAMP 8. A. C. PAVING 9. AGGREGATE BASE 10. SUBGRADE PREPARATION 11. PAINT STRIPE - CHANNELIZING 12. MEDIAN CURB 13. STREET SIGN 14. METRO STREET SIGN 15. #3-1/2 PULL BOX 16. STREET LIGHT -MAST ARM 9500 LUMEN 17. MONUMENT ENCASEMENT SUBTOTAL STREET IMPROVEMENTS: E. MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS 1. BLOCK WALL (8'0" height) 2. LANDSCAPING (10' STRIPI SUBTOTAL MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS: F. TOTAL ESTIMATED TRACT NO. 5679 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENT COST 29177626 B-I I-B-1 0.00 LF 22.00 $0.00 0.00 EA 1,400.00 $0.00 $o.oo 0.00 LF 1.00 $0.00 0.00 LF 1.00 $0.00 0.00 SF 0.30 $0.00 0.00 LF 1.00 $0.00 0.00 LF 5.25 $0.00 0.00 SF 1.30 $0.00 0.00 SF 1.30 $0.00 0.00 TON 23.50 $0.00 0.00 CY 18.00 $0.00 0.00 SY 1.20 $0.00_ 0.00 LF 1.00 $0.00 0.00 LF 5.00 $0.00 0.00 EA 200.00 $0.00 0.00 EA 300.00 $0.00 0.00 EA 160.00 $0.00 0.00 EA 1,900.00 $0.00 0.00 EA 250.00 $0.00 $o.oo 0.00 SF 6.35 $0.00 0.00 SF 2.80 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 11 /18/94 i ~ EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-B j ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-2 (GOSFORD/WHITE) ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT COST TRACT NO. 5679 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED ITEM ESTIMATED ! ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL COST j G. f IMPROVEMENT INCIDENTALS i 1. DESIGN ENGINEERING AND LANDSCAPE DESIGN $0.00 2. IMPROVEMENT BONDS (4.45% of Item F) $0.00 3. CONSTRUCTION STAKING (4% of Item F) $0.00 4. SOIL AND MATERIALS TESTING (2% of Item F) $0.00 5. PLAN CHECK (1.2% of Item F) $0.00 6. SITE INSPECTION (4% of Item F) $0.00 ~ 7. WATER INSPECTION FEES (4% of Item B) $0.00 8. CITY PROJECT ADMIN. COST (1 % of Item F) $0.00 SUBTOTAL IMPROVEMENT INCIDENTALS: 50.00 H. TOTAL IMPROVEMENTS AND INCIDENTALS 60.00 I. { IMPROVEMENT CONTINGENCY $0.00 J. TOTAL IMPROVEMENTS, INCIDENTALS AND CONTINGENCY $0.00 NOTE: PURSUANT TO CASTLE & COOKE DECISION, TRACT NO. 5679 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN DELETED FROM THE SCOPE OF WORK FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE FUNDED BY AD 94-2 PROCEEDINGS. 29177628 B-II-B-2 11/18/94 i f EXHIBIT B TABLE B-III-B ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0.94-2 - (GOSFORDIVUHITE) PAYOFF CALCULATION FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0.82-1 ASSESSMENT 3083 (APN: 391-010-34): PAYOFF COST ASSESSED TO ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 94-2 ASSESSMENTS 5 THROUGH 136 DESCRIPTION 1. REMAINING ASSESSMENT PRINCIPAL AMOUNT (EFF. 07/01/95): 2. AMOUNT CHARGED THROUGH CURRENT AUDITORS ROLL: 3. SUBTOTAL: ' 4. BOND CALL PREMIUM (5% OF SUBTOTAL ): 5. ESTIMATED ADMIN. COSTS FOR LIEN RELEASE: } CITY TIME (EMPLOYER'S WAGE x TIME WORKED ) 6. BOND CALL COSTS STANDARD FEE (500.00 x SUBTOTAL / 50,000 ): COST PER BOND (7.50 x SUBTOTAL / 5,000 ): LIEN RELEASE: 7. CREDIT TO RESERVE: (b) (7.0% x ORIGINAL ASMT LESS PREVIOUS CREDIT): 8. INTEREST TO CHARGE: (CONFIRMED ASMT/TOTAL BOND AMOUNT)x (NEXT INTEREST PAYMENT-07/02/95; NOTICE DUE 4/30/95) 9. INTEREST PAID ON CURRENT TAX ROLL: 10. FINAL PAYOFF AMOUNT: NOTES: (a) PAYOFF CALCULATION GOOD THROUGH 4/30/95 (b) RESERVE CREDIT BASED ON ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT : 88,060.29x .070 = (c) PAYOFF CALCULATION DATA PROVIDED BY CITY FINANCE DEPARTMENT (d) PAYOFF CALCULATION DATA IS BASED ON THE ASSUMPTION THAT BOTH INSTALLMENTS OF AD 82-1 PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST BILLED IN 1994/95 TAX YEAR WILL BE PAID BY 4/30/95 ASSESSMENT PAYOFF DETAILS 38,541.91 N/A 38,541.91 1,927.10 35.87 385.42 57.81 8.00 (6,164.22) 0.00 N/A $34,791.89 $6,164.22 29177836 B-III-B-1 11/18/94 t, z..r~~s .s rrr~Yfz rT~t - s~~r. .~ ~'`~~.` y~P> ~~~~~~E~~ ~~~~;~~~~~ ~~:.~~ ~~~~ ~ ~r ~~~~~ ~ ~~~ v~ ~ ~' ~ iii ,~r~v~ EXNIBITC ENGINIiER'9 REPORT :TTY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0.942 '(GDS?ORDIWNITE) ENGINEER'S SUMMARY OF INDINDUAL ASSESSMENTS AsSEasaab LMIYH TG9TNERMPOSE miuNRE ASYT W5.5H BRO6EN Wm OLLONx10 MEF v9N5E3 W CH OPOSEO iRSe)e RwbER OF SIDEMTYL MFA suREa BEROF )OTS PER ARFA (P9VSE) Wi1ex PROPOSED 9RE6NROYEYE SHYER - WATER OPP 04F95ExTS {WROYERE)x16 8~O~8 6: 6: M)fn5n.00 ~sx0))S.m TRM13n.155m 10. 19: T0.5e1P. 50.00 ~ !0.00 30.00 tOTAI t0TA3: 3x5 ] NTS TOBEeCOU S1PEEi 1WROYERFR iRH)L 311)3x5.50 1R Y» f0.m TOTAL REO SCFIWlE003 MPNOYEYFRIB 5011: TR 3]59.OWm ~~ R )9. W.m 1R ]0. 0 AL OT 351e uAwo•.~E3AEM iNOIOEMAtB se11: iN 31]:36aA3 SLIP SO.m TOn1 subionu OPROYEMExTb MO 6vG0EMAIH RHM10.115.9] 1P n.00 n9xa.T59Ex9r OONTNOENOY TR 56)9: 359A1Om TR 0: >Om s99eTDru 1xPROYE9ENi5, ALefi COHRNOE)xY l3: TR HS]n,9]6.05 TR50» n.m OTPL ns 9Mm Twrw cOST/FEES ryAYmFMfiin ASSESSMEMS c 1RHi359359.99 111561P. >Om TOTA4 f19191.e9 slSbTOru199PROV.. GOEM.,tOxfllro.. WMO AOMlOx91 TiFEEB 1 ~ 6 fT6l.nx99 TR 5619. 50.00 TO AuesxERr Rx00EEGxe ) Se E TR fOEAxR9l TR 1.1: SOm m 6ESSME 16 M Hf6Y,59631 RN>F. 50.00 AL oT fb0 9 cGRweu]uxs OGSE TIOxS iR%iS O 30.OD TR l9. k. ~~ Zom subloTxacosr MSE85xFRi 0 •PIER TWBUipN9 R56xe: i !6]9.59631 IP. H00 O Savo ISSUAxCE GIST M1e ~ SIn.OSS.N TR 10: 3000 AI: OTf9n 1 ToTu MWNT SESSED To80ND3 TR %i9: f1AH,00000 Rs91P 30.00 TOTAL Snd9O99m6 O96ma _ Om ~ Om O L01 FMN1AE80i N 51 WA 0.iWM9)x 13119 x.590!1 11nn x1.059n 9099 nA61M 99A59.11 91A153p 9x.550.11 nfifi 6x3N.11 9n,x93M 9.9nM 5.)nAa .919 6AH.A9 n.61).0 1NAn.3x ]9S M]6 953,)60.90 9 0>) Om 0 00 n3NJ6 1N.i60.90 x W)m .99131 n369.99 n310 91 93A6ap IHAXAI 1]33H 9> s 1LI0>9 - E ]x 9n)9l9 0.150H966 OHm 193afi.ro 9A9139 1x.050.00 Ssm ~ Ie.SM.H ix 619A9 Ma.31 v.. 1:.15x.03 Jmx3s n99 D9 9xs su 6A9695 a.n919 9 ousa nx.05 .1AI.N u9Ae5 ss ]6516 9u 1L s 151An.09 9NAn u . 0.00 . 9 eAn.w . S3n.M 9m3e9n . In,939.90 u5.uu9 ruMxr s: 9a os96x1sr o•sm9u 91Ax9A: sAUV a.9u.ao 9m a u~l aun ~exux 3v.9x ]wA] n1 )le~m . . . ~s.Tls.]a . a19369.n v,ra.u . niAru9 Am 551n9n n.n 1ae.n Saoa0oom fioo s9a lum 556 xn.oz urs9zs.9x Ss9 o9am _s>~nl.n s s1m 9m.fiofiu _ axoa9 MO V E. TxE DETMED mRPio w<unia59 u en6En ax EeNN9EROFlOT9YAlW9EAGI PROPOSEOPWSE OFiRAOTH0.5616 xD.Sen. AccobolxD 10119E 9ws MD 1xTOR9.uTax lE eT THE T W E TH9 REPORT IS BE15HI PREPMED. EMPOg110HYFM oN0E3 MOOxi ASSE To EASx IIAMN SWALIOTMTM0T4 RWSE THxTMOT On PEA PREUWNARY ASSEfSYEM u e84E49MPM PE ta x]6 U.N3N n3a6.1a 9]396.13 U.N1.T9 U3nM Sets 5) 3aA6x.H UM1n 31.x96.)55 U39u5 N.IN.W H SH.u fs.]1639 291Tx5P EXHIBIT D - ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-2 (GOSFORD/WHITE) DESCRIPTION OF ASSESSMENT SPREAD METHOD INTRODUCTION The 1913 Act requires that a specific procedure or formula be developed for the purpose of apportioning the total cost of the assessment district improvements. The 1913 Act further requires that the cost of the assessment be apportioned to the individual parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit that each parcel can be expected to receive from the work and improvements covered by the assessment. The City Council appointed the Director of Public Works as the Engineer of Work for AD 94-2 by adoption of Resolution of Intention No. 1123 on September 7, 1994. On August 10, 1994, the City Council adopted its Resolution No. 130-94 approving Agreement No. 94-153 with Edward J. Wilson, a Registered Civil Engineer, appointing him as the Assessment Engineer for AD 94-2. The Assessment Engineer has been retained by the City to prepare an Engineer's Report on the proposed assessment that will include, in part, an analysis of the facts in AD 94-2 and the development of a method of apportioning the total amount of the costs and expenses of the proposed improvements to the several subdivisions of land located within AD 94-2, in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such subdivision, respectively, from the improvements. AD 94-2 has been formed pursuant to a property owner petition, requesting the City Council to waive further proceedings under Division 4 of the Streets and Highways Code and to undertake proceedings pursuant to the 1913 Act. The petition is on file with the City Clerk. On August 10, 1994, the City Council adopted its Resolution No. 128-94, "Accepting Petition and Determining to Undertake Special Assessment Proceedings. " ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PURPOSE AD 94-2 has been formed for the purpose of financing the private property beneficial cost share for the acquisition of certain public improvements within AD 94-2. A description of AD 94-2 is presented in Section I of the "Engineer's Report, City of Bakersfield Assessment District No. 94-2 (Gosford/White)," hereinafter referred to as the "AD 94-2 Engineer's Report." A detailed description of those improvement acquisitions is presented in AD 94-2 Engineer's Report Section II. The AD 94-2 proceedings will confnm an assessment for the estimated total cost of the improvements to be acquired pursuant to the 1913 Act and the Municipal Code. The City 29177FER.EXD D-1 11/21/94 proposes to issue bonds under the 1915 Act, secured by the unpaid assessments, to pay the cost to acquire the improvements and pay all incidental costs and expenses related thereto and authorized for funding by the 1913 Act. NON-BENEFITED AND NON-ASSESSED PARCELS There are nine (9) non-benefited and non-assessed parcels in AD 94-2, described as follows: Assessments 1, 2, and 3 (identified as parcels 2, 3, and 4 of Parcel Map No. 7333) are landscape easement parcels owned by Castle & Cooke Homes, Inc. They are located within Ten TR 5679 along Gosford Road and South Laurelglen Boulevard. In the AD 94-2 Financing Proposal prepared July 19, 1994, the referenced parcels are shown as being combined with Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No. 7333 (Assessment 4) and resubdivided by Ten TR 5679 into landscape easement lots A, B, and C. Pursuant to the Castle & Cooke decision to eliminate all Ten TR 5679 off-site improvements from the district, none of the assessments covered by Ten TR 5679 (Assessments 1 through 4) are benefitted by the improvements described in AD 94-2 Engineer's Report Section II and are, accordingly, not apportioned a share of the AD 94-2 assessment. Assessments 137 through 141 in Tract No. 5678-Phase B (TR 5678-B) are all non-residential, non-buildable parcels that are classified herein as non-benefited by the AD 94-2 improvements and are, accordingly, not assessed a share of the AD 94-2 total cost and are described as follows: a. Assessment 137: A park lot that will provide all Ten TR 5678 parcels access to the existing City owned Garden Park; b. Assessments 138 & 139 Landscape lots, provided for construction of block wall and landscaping along the west right-of--way for Gosford Road along the eastern Ten TR 5678 frontage; c. Assessment 140: Non-buildable easement lot within existing PG&E power easement. d. Assessment 141: Non-buildable lot between TR 5678-B residential lots and existing Arvin-Edison Canal; and ASSESSMENT SPREAD METHOD A description of the methodology used to apportion the costs of the AD 94-2 acquisitions and of the incidental work, cost, and expenses of the AD 94-2 assessment proceedings is presented below. 29177FER.EXD D-2 12/01/94 Description of AD 94-2 Benefits It is the Assessment Engineer's responsibility to identify the benefits that the AD 94-2 parcels will receive from the Improvements proposed to be acquired. The benefits to the lots -and parcels in AD 94-2 are described as follows: Pursuant to the proposed Castle & Cooke Acquisition Agreement referenced in Section I of the AD 94-2 Engineer's Report, AD 94-2 will finance the acquisition of certain improvements and the payment of City improvement fees and costs required as conditions of final subdivision map approvals related to the approved Ten TR 5678 subdivision map that overlays the AD 94-2 parcels located to the southwest of the Arvin-Edison Canal. Improvements proposed to be financed pursuant to the AD 94-2 proceedings are to provide direct benefit to the area proposed to be developed by-Ten TR 5678. The improvements to be acquired are either already required or are expected by Castle & Cooke to be required to be installed as conditions of fmal map approval for Ten TR 5678. ^ The primary categories of direct bene,~t provided by the separate systems of Ten TR 5678 off-site improvements proposed to be acquired, as they are described in detail in Section II of this AD 94-2 Engineer's Report, are as follows: 1. Sewer System Improvements Those improvements will provide the Ten TR 5678 parcel with connections to sewer mains in Gosford Road and Pin Oak Park Boulevard, as a partial fulfillment of the subdivision approval requirements to provide the tract with connections to the existing sewer mains. The improvements in Gosford Road will benefit only Phases A through D of Ten TR 5678, and the improvements in Pin Oak Park Boulevard will benefit only Phase E of Ten TR 5678. 2. Water System Improvements: Those improvements will provide the Ten TR 5678 parcel with connections to water mains in Gosford Road, White Lane, and Pin Oak Park Boulevard, as a partial fulfillment of the subdivision approval requirements to provide the tract with connections to the existing water mains. Two connections in Pin Oak Park Boulevard (at Salix Court and ,Dove Tree Way) will benefit only Ten TR 5678 Phase E, while the remaining Water System Improvements will benefit the entire Ten TR 5678. 3. Storm Drain System Improvements: The proposed storm drain system acquisitions will provide both off-site frontage street drainage along Pin Oak Park Boulevard and in-tract street drainage only for Phase E of Ten TR 5678. The Phases A through D areas and the Gosford Road/White Lane Ten. TR 5678 frontages will not receive street drainage benefits from these improvements. 29177FER.EXD D-3 11/21/94 4. Street System Improvements: The improvements planned to be installed as Ten TR 5678 off-site street improvements include sidewalk, curb returns, handicap ramps, street lights with conduits and street signs along the tract frontages along Gosford Road, White Lane, and Pin Oak Park Boulevard, and are more particulazly described in Section II of the AD 94-2 Engineer's Report. As a part of the Street System Improvement benefit category, left and right turn lanes will be installed in Gosford Road at Ficus Drive, and a right turn lane in White Lane at Umbrella Pine Way. Those improvements will provide. for patial mitigation of traffic impacts related to the buildout of the lots in Ten TR 5678 and as partial fulfillment of the subdivision approval requirements to complete the tract frontage streets to their full master- planned configuration. 5. Miscellaneous Improvements Improvements classified as "Miscellaneous Improvements" by the AD 94-2 Subdivision Engineer include the block wall and landscaping strip along the outer perimeter of TR 5678 in Gosford Road, White Lane, and Pin Oak Park Boulevard, and also along Persimmon Drive within the Ten TR 5678 power line easement held by Pacific Gas & Electric Company ("PG&E"). A "view" wall will be constructed instead of a portion of the block wall in Gosford Road, and this "view" wall is not a part of the AD 94-2 financing. Miscellaneous Improvements also include the landscaping of the Garden Park access along the northwesterly boundary of Ten TR 5678 and aze, collectively, also improvements being installed as partial fulfillment of the subdivision approval requirements to complete the tract frontage streets. ^ As described in Sections I through III of the AD 94-2 Engineer's Report, pursuant to Castle & Cooke's request, all of the Ten TR 5679 off-site improvements have been removed from the AD 94-2 Scope of Work. Spread of AD 94-2 Costs to Benefited Parcels In accordance with the 1913 Act and subpazagraph (e) of Section 10204 as contained therein, the total cost and expense of the improvements to be financed aze required to be spread among the properties in the district in proportion to the estimated benefits each pazcel will receive from the improvements. All of the existing AD 94-2 pazcels except the lots in Tract No. 5678-Phase B ("TR 5678-B") are unsubdivided, existing APN's that are, in effect, interim pazcel configurations for properties that are currently involved in the land development process. The basis for this statement is that all of the AD 94-2 parcels have been approved or are planned for submittal to be approved for subdivision into single-family dwelling lots by two tentative tract maps as follows: 29177FER.EXD D-4 11/21/94 1. Tentative Tract 5678 overlays the entire AD 94-2 area southwest of the Arvin-Edison Canal. As stated in Section II of the AD 94-2 Engineer's Report, Ten TR 5678 is planned for development of 290 R-1 lots. A total of 131 residential lots have been approved in TR 5678-B (Assessments 6 through 136), and 159 residential lots are planned for development in phases A, C, D, and E, as shown on the AD 94-2 Engineer's Report Exhibit E. 2. Tentative Tract 5679 overlays all of AD 94-2 Assessments 1, 2, 3, and 4. As described earlier in this Exhibit D, Assessments 1, 2, and 3 are landscape easement parcels. Ten TR 5679 is planned for development of 83 R-1 lots. As also described earlier in this Report, all of the Ten TR 5679 Assessments (1 through 4) are assessed a zero assessment since no off-site improvements for that tract will be funded by AD 94-2. O Basis for AD 94-2 Assessment Spread As stated earlier in this Exhibit D, all of the improvements to be acquired and financed by the AD 94-2 proceedings are required or are expected by Castle & Cooke to be required to be installed as conditions of fmal map approval for Ten TR 5678. Accordingly, the tentative tract approval conditions are referenced as the basis for spreading the AD 94-2 improvement system acquisition costs. Therefore, the total cost of Ten TR 5678 off- site improvements and incidentals is assessed to Assessments 5 through 141. The Engineer's Itemized Estimates of that cost is presented in Exhibit B, Table B-II-A. O Spread of Assessed Tentative Tract Total Costs to Tract Phases and Individual Lots As the Ten TR 5678 Phases A, C, D, and E maps are recorded to subdivide AD 94-2 Assessment 5 into R-1 lots, the total system acquisition cost share assessed to this tentative tract parcel in accordance with the spread methodology described above will need to be segregated and apportioned to the new subdivision lots. The method of apportioning each tentative tract's total assessed cost share to its internal tract phases and then of spreading the tract phase costs to the future lots that will be developed within each phase is described below for each of the two tentative tracts. In this assessment spread method, a tentative tract's total cost share has been spread to that tract based on its existing and/or expected final map approval improvement requirements. The method used for spreading each tentative tract's total cost share among its phases and, fmally to the future lots that will be recorded within the tentative tract phases is based on each tract's estimated total number of R-1 lots as follows: a. The total Ten TR 5678 share, with the exception of its Storm Drain System Improvements and portions of Sanitary Sewer and Water System Improvements cost shares, is spread to its phases (A through E) in direct proportion to the proposed number of R-1 lots within each phase. The Ten TR 5678 Storm Drain System benefits only the Phase E portion of Ten TR 5678, and the total cost of those improvements, accordingly, is apportioned to the 29177FER.EXD D-5 11/21/94 Phase E area. The Sanitary Sewer System in Gosford Road benefits only Phases A through D, and the Sanitary Sewer System in Pin Oak Park Boulevard benefits only the Phase E portion of Ten TR 5678. Those improvements are spread separately to Phases A through D and Phase E, respectively. The Water System Improvements in Salix Court and Dove Tree Way will provide benefits only to Phase E of Ten TR 5678, and the total cost of those improvements, accordingly, is apportioned to the Phase E area. All other Water System Improvements (in Gosford Road at Ficus Drive, in White Lane at Umbrella Pine Way, and in Pin Oak Park Boulevard at Persimmon Drive) will benefit the entire Ten TR 5678, providing for the future, looped, in-tract water system. This portion of the Water System Improvements is spread to all Ten TR 5678 phases in direct proportion to the proposed number of lots within each phase. When each individual phase (A, C, D, and E) is recorded, its assessment share will be apportioned to each new lot within a phase on an equal-per-lot basis, since each individual lot will receive the same level of benefit from the tract off-site improvements to be fmanced by AD 94-2. The Phase B share of the Ten TR 5678 total assessment has already been apportioned to 131 residential lots (Assessments 6 through 136), since this phase of TR 5678 is planned to be recorded prior to the recordation of the AD 94-2 Assessment. b. As described above, all of Ten TR 5679 off-site improvements preliminarily planned to be acquired have been deleted from AD 94-2. Therefore, there is no assessment apportioned to Ten TR 5679 Assessments 1 through 4. Exhibit E of the AD 94-2 Engineer's Report, "Sketch Map of Proposed Tract No. 5679 and of Proposed Tract No. 5678 Phases A Through E (Showing Total Number of Residential Lots Per Tract or Tract Phase)" shows the boundaries of the planned five tract phases in Ten TR 5678, and also lists the proposed number of R-1 lots within each phase and in Ten TR 5679. Exhibit C the of AD 94-2 Engineer's Report ("Engineer's Summary of Individual Assessments") provides a detailed break down of how the tentative tract shares have been apportioned to the planned tract phases. O Spread of Cost to Refinance Existing AD 82-1 Assessments The cost to refmance the one existing AD 82-1 Assessments is spread as follows: 1. The total cost to pay off the existing fixed special assessment lien of record for AD 82-1 Assessment 3083, encumbering the parcel described as Kern County APN 391-010-34 (AD 94-2 Assessments 5 through 141), is financed as part of the total AD 94-2 assessment. The amount of remaining principal balance for Assessment 3083, effective July 1, 1995, assuming that both 1994/ 1995 debt service installments for Assessment 3083 billed on the 1994/1995 Kern County Property Tax Bill for the parcel will be paid by April 30, 1995, plus the total amount of all the estimated charges and credits associated with the payoff and release of lien for Assessment 3083 are itemized and shown on Table B-III-B, Payoff Calculation for Assessment District No. 82-1 Assessment 3083 in AD 94-2 Engineer's Report Exhibit B ("Table B-III-B"). 29177FER.EXD D-6 11!21/94 AD 94-2 Assessment Diagram sheets 2 of 3 and 3 of 3, attached as AD 94-2 Engineer's Report Appendix B, show that AD 82-1 Assessment 3083 covers all of AD 94-2 Assessments 5 through 141. APN 391-010-34 is also the same property area referred to in this Assessment Spread Method as Ten TR 5678. Therefore, the total AD 82-1 Assessment 3083 payoff cost is assessed to AD 94-2 Assessments 5 through 136 as an equal share per existing or per planned R-1 lot, since Assessments 137 through 141 are non-benefited parcels. The Assessment 5 share will be segregated and apportioned on anequal-per-lot basis to the future Ten TR 5678 Phases A, C, D, and E R-1 lots. 2. Pursuant to Castle & Cooke's decision, the total cost to pay off the existing fixed special assessment lien of record for AD 82-1 Assessment 2166, encumbering the parcel described as Kern County APN 389-010-17 (AD 94-2 Assessment 4), is not financed as part of the total AD 94-2 assessment. O Spread of AD 94-2 Assessment Proceeding Costs, Contributions and Bond Issuance Costs The method used to spread the AD 94-2 incidental costs and expenses related to the assessment proceedings is described below, along with a description of how any AD 94-2 contributions have been credited to the benefited parcels. 1. Spread of AD 94-2 Assessment Proceeding Incidental Cost and Expense The total amount of all of the Ten TR 5678 and Ten TR 5679 Improvement, Incidental, Contingency, and Additional Cost/Fees to be financed by AD 94-2 is stated in line 12.C of Table B-I, and the total cost shares for the Ten TR 5678 and Ten TR 5679 are itemized in lines 12.A and 12.B of Table B-I. An itemized list of "Estimated Assessment Proceeding Incidental Cost and Expense" for AD 94-2 is presented in lines 13. A through 13. G of Table B-I. All of the costs stated in Table B-I, lines 12.A and 12.B have been spread in proportion to parcel benefit from the improvements and costs proposed to be financed by AD 94-2. The AD 94-2 Assessment Proceeding Costs are to be incurred to make special assessment financing available for the improvements and costs to be funded. Therefore, it is the fording of this Assessment Spread Method that the AD 94-2 parcels are benefited by the Assessment Proceeding Costs in proportion to the total improvement and other costs assessed to each parcel. In accordance with this fording, the Table B-I line 13. G, Total Estimated Assessment Proceeding Incidental Cost and Expense, is spread to Ten TR 5678 and Ten TR 5679 in proportion to their total improvement and other costs assessed, as shown in lines 12.A and 12.B of Table B-I. The apportioned assessment proceeding cost share for each Assessment in Ten TR 5678 and Ten TR 5679 is shown in Exhibit C. 29177FER.EXD D-7 11/21/94 2. Spread of AD 94-2 Contributions Table B-I line 14 states the total amount proposed to be assessed to finance the estimated cost of Improvements, Additional Fees, and Assessment District Expenses and line 15 separately states the amounts of any "Contributions and Cash Collections" to reduce the cost to assessment for Ten TR 5678 and Ten TR 5679. The- Contribution amounts are deducted from the Ten TR 5678 or Ten TR 5679 line 14 total cost amounts and the net amount shown on line 16 is the total cost to 1915 Act Bond Financing. The separate contribution and cash collection amounts are credited to the parcel for which the cash payment or contribution was made, to reduce that parcel's share of the total cost to bond issuance. The apportioned contribution share for each Assessment in Ten TR 5678 and Ten TR 5679 is shown in Exhibit C. 3. Spread of AD 94-2 Bond Issuance Costs The AD 94-2 estimated Bond Issuance Costs are shown in line 17 of Table B-I. These costs are based on the actual cost of improvements and incidental expense to be financed and, accordingly, they are spread to each Assessment in proportion to the parcel's net total improvement and incidental cost share remaining after deducting any contribution. Each Assessment's Bond Issuance Cost share is shown in Exhibit C under the Bond Issuance_ Cost column. O Calculation of AD 94-2 Parcel Total Assessments The total cost shares spread to each parcel for nnprovements, incidental expenses, fees, assessment proceeding, and bond issuance costs to be financed are added and the contribution amounts subtracted, to calculate each parcel's total assessment. Parcel total assessment amounts are shown in Exhibit C and in Engineer's Report Exhibit A, Assessment Roll for AD 94-2. 29177FER.EXD D-8 1 I/21/94 ASSESSMENT ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION OF THE ASSESSMENT SPREAD METHOD This Engineer's Report has been prepared to present the following: 1. An estimate of the total cost of the improvements to be acquired, and incidental costs proposed to be funded pursuant to this assessment proceeding; and 2. An. analysis of the benefits of those improvements and a description of the methodology developed to spread the estimated improvement acquisition costs and incidental expenses to the AD 94-2 properties in proportion to the estimated benefits that those properties will receive from the improvements. However, this Engineer's Report makes no recommendation as to the economic feasibility for the assessment of the estimated cost of the proposed improvements on the benefited properties, nor on the financial feasibility of the issuance of 1915 Act Bonds to represent any unpaid amount of the AD 94-2 Assessment. The AD 94-2 Assessment may exceed the amount for which bonds can be issued pursuant to recommendation of the City's fmancial advisor, as to the minunum acceptable property value to assessment lien ratio for bonds issued and secured by AD 94-2 unpaid assessments. Additional property value in excess of the estimated current value of the assessed property with the improvements completed and installed may need to be confirmed by MAI appraisal, before the City can issue 1915 Act Bonds in the full amount of the AD 94-2 Assessment. In conclusion, it is my opinion that the Estimated Total Cost of the proposed improvement acquisitions, including all incidental costs, has been spread in direct proportion to the estimated benefits that each separate lot, piece, parcel or subdivision of lands within AD 94-2 will receive from the improvements. Submitted on the 30th day of September, 1994, to the Engineer of Work for filing with the City Clerk for preliminary approval by the City Council, and Submitted on the 2nd day of December, 1994, to the Engineer of Work for filing with the City Clerk for final approval and assessment confirmation by the City Council, by: o~FESSIpN~IF ~~ ~c Q~~~o , w~~sgs~~, Edward J. Wilson '" NO 2326,9 ~ R.C.E. 23269 (Expires 12/31/97) EkP ~2 ~~~, ~ Assessment Engineer ~ r~~L \Q City of Bakersfield Assessment District No. 94-2 ~~ CA~~F~ 29177FER.EXD D-9 12/01/94 W } WO I U 1 m U V= ~ W Ka N ~ KO 2 O~ VI fA~ ( w//]Jl (~ ~ z<W° o o~ = IGnG W ~J p f~Q~ a Z W .U W m 7"Z W Wr 1~/1 i N z 5 n n ~0. ~" o Y m i N° w m v vii v (V/~I W W O U m ~ O Z ~~ ~ aQ QZ2 IN/IZ NW ~ Q ~ ~O z ¢ o a_ az_ N J W OV a °OZ a O ~'- m A- OZ O O r Q Z v 1 ? ~~ ~~ ~ ao Z ~ In~ `d ° ~ ~'i~ m° aom l ] °z~m iv' i~ w „°~~ O = a W ~ m m m d, 2 ~ q 2 23 N 3 3 Z N~j WWN W W Z SQ O O VI Q W u,+a ~~ H ~ N ~Z ~ ~~ Q m 0. O 4 O«7 m v~ vl~ ° ~~ ~ rc rcz ~i vii 2Z~ SO SO w Nw ~ oz 00 r ~ o O ~ O a w o m ~ u ~ ~ W ZJ a 7 3NJ 3U 3U N W l p N I W ~ m U WQ O ° O K W 2 J 2 Z ~ ~ w ~ Z 0 W w ~ I o ~ma ~m ~°m ~ Z W Z z rcF ~ w ~ rc o W ~ J h-- t~~h t ~ av ~j (/I ZZv ?2 ?Z p 4 ~VI K3 Y O C U K IWA N i° ~ ' I I n w O ~ • I V N 1 ._ ( I D 9 ~ I ~ ^ ~ ~ O N Y ~ ~ O O Qil ~h ~~ • I U O n w z R ~ F~ E I i 2 w~ 0 ao O W~ N ~ ~Y1~ UO I W n CO z~ ~ r- ~ 1 -T OJ ~ O !W/1~ ~ &~ ~o ~ G~~y 5p$ ,~i ~,9~ a "' P4~y ~o W~ ~ Q°z I a n n a 2 ti U ~ O ~iryU ~2~ a~a h ro o "" w oz~~ ~ ~ a av~~ ~ o J ~ W ~ U O Z N v4+i~° ~2~~ a a a3 ~ F. .. _ h ~ W ~ 9gxa W '~~ ^i /~ O a 7 o~ / u~ / ~d °z ~ z / ~ a m o yhm~ az~ ac~ia~ 2 1N3W3SV3 3N17N3M01 '3 ~P 's'd w K U 1 /1 y U A ~ pQ a 7 ~ K 7 N U~ Y r K U V1 2 d K 7 ~ W a Y N 3 ti O d U K ~ ¢ ~ N U ~ W F m ¢ a a ~ ~ d o 0 a z v N o a o u o ~ v vi c~ u v i a w n v o ~d a a~ a a z .. -- a vl 3 ~ r o z~' ~ n Y o s o a o a ~ vi ° w w w ^ "~ ;~ o m n m a 7°~ ~ ° m Z' Y 2 O O Y Y Y ° ° ° x a° w a z o o o °m n o m m v m n ~o~a m U ~~ ~ m m ~ z m ? o Z Q aQQ 3 3 p O ~ ~ O Z ~ _ ~ n N ~ H m m g N N q ~ Z O _ ~ j~ ~ ~ K rv W W .- N N m v~ y ~ n 3 ' o } ~ m n m rn° w w a ~ i n In In c n a n wwz ~ > r w z N ~+ ' z ~ o ' n m z z _ d=~ VQ NI aZ W W W W W J W ~ W Z S -~ ~' a 2 W ~ , p< ~ 3~~ V U U U yU~ U a S p` K K ~ K K w 7 7 I-- I W wdy~j ~ y ~ (/ ~ (/ ~ ( /~ ` S ~ < ` ~ N N ° F° O a aooz= + 3 3 3 3 3 ~ ~ o n n O ~ F I~ 4 N <~< O ZO ° z z 1 ' ~ ~ w ~ ^ C/ n G ~ C o C m C 3; Ny~ VtII~ U ~ K 2 < Z ~ w U O]L Y O V pp ppU I~ 0 Z Z ][ 2 ]C Y K W u W Y a ~ n W Z ~ q ~ Q Z p 2 N _ S + ~ m p m ~w arc w ' 3 4 ~ + j S a ~ O +c~ Ua U~ ~~ o~ U~ ~ z Z ~ ~ '¢¢- ~aaaa J~ t~ Z ~ aS 3 i z i c ~ < ~Q ~ Q ~< ~Q ~ ~ Y Y 30 Y 9 ~ O ~ • 0. Z a ~i ~~~yy ~ C W .V-i n O ~' o E" °z WW~'..Gd fx z~ ~~ W 3 o ~ GadN ~ ; a~ ~~ I"•"1 W Q G ~W ao ~ Wz von ~) ~ h ~ z GT-I W~ ~~ ~ ~~ 0. 0 p N I ~w ~^ I ~ tia II ~ ~ ~ ~~ 3 :~ ~a ~~ a ~o wW W ~ ~ Z ( NN U K a ~ + `^ ~ °n wr Q~~~ Q~Q.!l.S~.7 .-~ w N I I ~ I v I Y I l'M Y I UWF r~ ~ ~ I Wa I OFW I ( ~ I O 2 OS O I W ~ ld O~ O I Z~~ I ~ i~o~ I S `~cr • i, O z ~ I O VY I O IVNV11~V i rc 7 • LI O I S O I S I<OW I KO _~ T ~ [~ 0 ~ ~: I Urc .oo urc ooo.=- I rc~ - ~~ F ~ ~ U 7 /'l .7-~ m I o `" ~~ o w ~. I W~ S 9k F 9 3 W P" •E-I .ro ° i i"~ oUFWI I ~ ~ =~iw I ixW ''~' 4 I.-. W A U y W c~ ~. y SYW mW ~ ~YW FOUW ~ WALL -y..l~ Q E O w '/rte. FI-I O ~ 3~- w=o0 3wLL ¢ I UO ~_II' /'1 ,~ W v=i . I~1 ~ ."~ I I OUW O~U I DyUyW < I~F I WZZ P'i'I fZI G7 ryC~+.~~ (~] (~ O I gYY OOZ YI <t } 00 ` ~ ~ s ro nl I--I ~ ~ m c7O~ ~o~ m UV~ ?~ IO< m cT1 clo ° ~: V] +~ W I OUF IV-W C W~ E-I ~ O LL i ovU~ i=W~ y Qa Cam!] ~ I rc o C. J x I> I I€rc v -c en b p d O o ~m~o C/~ A .«~ uo =~>= I ro I .o r8 ici. W W '~-~ v=i IN~~ s c O ~ o O W ~ ~ ~ '='~a°o I~ ~ Y ~I~ o ~~''yy'~~ t/1 Q I s~g~ i~oLL ~'o fx ~ ~ o ~ r~i Wi ~v~Wlir.I= OI i<N I ~ ~ ~ ~ ..~ o c ~ ^~ ~ U ~-I ~ o ~OOiF i ~ ~I ~~ p ~ ~~T»io ez w A w ~ =u uc~~o io?'W`d i 6 3 E ~tl~ ~W~ ~ m ~ ~ VI 7 p W p N ~ 20 ~VOWC p2.,ZS ~ W Z ~3eC W If. ~ay~ `III' a U O ~ W~ =<<rY W=I~o~ O pl ~ .. N '1 ~31i <gyll~y~lll !~ ~ O I U ~w~a~ la~~a ~~yy o ~~Wsn ~~~ W U ~~ ~g n r~ ~~ ~~ rv ~~~ ~;~ G ~a~ N ~ y. o~ ' (.~ z ~ U v " m A ~ y ~ ~ < a r earn s s d' ~ 01 AYAgi117 yy0 ~ ~~ Q I~-I as axrl~al ~ E., ~ ~ t py ~ F, z~ ~ ~ ~ ~ oA ~ ~ ~ ~ d E" ~. ~ a m W v z j W ~ ~ O „~. s ~ ~~ - W z_ rn d U ~ r ~r L~ ¢ ~ ^l ~ ZQF yai~ ci I `I 1;~ W ¢ ~ ~ 1 ~ ¢ Y O O ZZ N 4i Y ~ ~y r~ ~< ~ ~K ~ ~ r W W V a ~ ~ ~ ~ a O O O ~+ •M W -U _ W z ~ =~z ~ ~c = ~ ~ ~ o ° ~ "<$ c ~ ~ n a Nan (/] U w M~~ lNJ O ((..~~ W W O ~ W Y¢• p = ri!` ~ Y O Y pO O ~1 F W N N m 7 Z W W Y n • ~ p q V] U /H P+ ~ W~ ~bg^' ~~ ~] i ~ ~Z ~ I ~ ~ 5¢ ~ m ~ QY~ ~ Y $ Y Y Y ~ Q O ~_ AE-' $ ~~ ~~~~~~ ~ S ~ ~lvi ~ i d~ n ~ ~png~a`~ Z y~~~ v=i A P Om ~Om ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~W ~ ~ W ~ppR W W A z o 22p $ _ ~ Z Fi lO h ~\ p p ~~ 7 ~ R7Z O ~ ~ Zt ~ N O •j P m P N N ~~~ /O~ yH E i Z Z ~ y~~ ~ ~ y~~ ~ y~~ 3 y~~ ZQ ~ < O ~ LLLylll ~GSGSGS 4¢ rii V ~ Z • W p ¢ p ~ O O O (T] Q ~ O . W F{ FBI ~, Y 2~~ 2r S~ !!R ~ F~ ~~ U N ~ <W yZj p ~ ~ Z o pp ~ 1>p~J `h W ~ o rp'- N N~ ~ ~ A I.+~nY ~ , F O ~ W `y<S;• W f Z,) ¢ UO Z~ O ¢ U y=~ O ~ KKO ~ Q O, 9 1(p`l ~ Z t <~ Z 7p O i R m Z Z O d W V, A ~~ ~ ~~ ~ W~~ ~ JZ O ~ WV Zug ~ c C cC~~ ~ ? = FjJ 1 W ~jY r( ~~ 8 8 Wp {S~ pW j ~ G W ~ vw = AO ,~,n^ O VW y~ ~~ ZW ~pp~ ~Y{Qp ~yQt+pp ~ W m ~Zp[ WK~ W~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ [.l ~ L~Y7 ~~ G ¢ K [~¢p~1 ~ Z ~ ~ O ~ O N V/ ~ JI ` `~ N EZ~ 42 b2 ~ ~ d m CN ~7 ~ O ¢ ~ 2 ~ N ~ ~ P tW.t ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ nl ~„~ M~ G" I D - D o N ¢ ci t ~ ~ ~ ~ I$4 N YS ZY ~'t ~Y ~Y ~Y ~ ~ ~~ ~ R ~j g~ ~~ g~ yy ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ W ~ ~ z ~~ ~ ~! 3 a< a< a< a< ac ~ ~ Y Y 0 C ~~ ~' ~~ a ~ ~0 ~~ ~ ~~ a(_ = W OO - ,Z.1 O W „N ( W ~ ~ ~ C ~"I ~~ ~p RI ~ i >R ~~ Wt ~Qa ~WJ~ :- • ~ d ~~ gq ~i 2 .. © N ~A ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ d o o s 4 © N n ~ O`fi v ^ O ~2 ~ ~ °~ o a ~o ~o O ~ ~I a z I ... ^ v .ter _ I o ° ''~ z - I ~ ~~ ~ n • =' ~ c O ^ / n ~Z 2 / a N I d' W Lta C ~ O z '~ E, c. (n U w W ~.~ ...y ~ U w (~ M N H Q = AW~~,~ z ~~~n 0~9~~0 ~~~~~ A~~a~~ W w ., N (/~ ~, o ~ G1. °" *' !E O ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ p~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~_ Q^' ~* ~ ~~R ~ ~ n ~~]y~jZ~~~ ~~~ tar II-~~ `i CfQ~OC O~~ W~ /1~ ~OY~ ~oOp S~K~p ~~~L~~j (~ ~ O F-1'~ ~ ~W ~ , ~a~ 8~ ~ H~ S~3 W ~ O ~ •~Z~ ~ ~~~ $ i i ;~JZn ;~ W~ Wg ~<W ~ Wd~j~ ;~~ ~ N Rbm ~O ~~~p l~C) e~ ~ ~ ~ a~~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~„~W~ ~~~~ b~~~~ ~~~~'~ ~~ ~~~~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ n y~ ~j ~y 5~ y $ ~ !'~1 (%~ ~ o~F~i >s+ '~d'~~1 `G~d' > ~~oamo ~~~~ ~~F~ Jlz~$N €~ ~`i' ~ ~~ 5~ q ,•~ 2<~O~ ~~~Y OO= O~ ~WO<~O N~~ Z~~~~ ~~_~ COIg g~' Tn W v b;~~n0 ~JO~ o~OF ~~ tff.~llvoG Z~~~2~ ..~~~ ..~ H~ v~p ~~~ .^~p_~ ~O~ !~ V 1 ~ C-' r'q ~W n~ W~i `.Y 1~ ~.. ~~ ~'.~ O O' W .~ QWa~ ~O .-W v~ a~R~~ C~n~j y~~<y~~ ^y~~~~p` ~?,!~y~~1~_ ~F~~p<°~ ~a~o~^ ~ n~~'~ ~;I.~•A ° ;F~~t333C~~17=f ZO~W~ ~^R^~< pU~2`f ~y~C~F~ ~'~~<=~ y~j~~il~~~ ~~y~~1r ~e VN• ~ Y'~030<.~i /1 t~ ~ iF~1~C~~y~ gu166~ ~ ~~~~ 1~`~~ ~~ R~ G, 2a I"~ v~y~ ~ ~.. ~UO~p2 WZ~(I1 .~~ ;~n80 ~' ~I~~W ~gd `~WW~ ~(f 0'"00 ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ U~ ~~~~W«~ ~~~~ ~~~ff ~~ dad ~ ~~~a~ ~~~ ~g ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~ae~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~a~~~~ W Q O O ° z U . N 9 ~ FN_I ~ W ~ ~ - ~,/^~ W OQi ~1i-.U o' L WL C"` F ~ ~ U Q ~ ~~ o ^^ ' V l A ~ ~ rw x ~n VI ~ '~ UO O d a~i ~ '1F. 11,~ ' 1 V W W ,. O W w 0 { ~' ~, U~ a ~ o~ W ~ ~ WW X g Z W ~ ~ ~~ ~ a ~ y~-.1 U 00 = ov°o7 0 c E.. i~~oo~ v E'3EV11 o~Ef§s a~ o=s~ ~ ~~ :~~~~ ag~~ ~$ . ~~ 4 ~ k Y s ~: ~I~` $ n WJ g W1 ~I ~$~E$ •~ a3 2 O ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~a W ~ I ~ ~ W J ~ 30 ~W ~~ t 001 ~ yNl~y <WO ~`WY`( ~~m ; U ~ ~ NCO QQ''jj' 1 ~j > ' m VUm )) 1 O m ~IOiIU Z z W a N W O ~> o~ W ~9 ~~ ~~ ~° s ~n ~N t ~~ 3N a N n ~`~ W ~ O N ty p W OG7 WW1F ~~~~--ZJ N~ ZOJ VWUV~1 07Oj ~~OW~U OVIWWy< 1/~~sfp W=~ )) ~N~0 r`j`P~2~=C`~ CS I<OO CY~ ~W W01WW UC OOy~jL m yCpO~ F~ 1'V)O` W W .VIZ FOO pppO KU }C}CUO ~ O W ~~ ~ ~ WY J W ~ K W~ ~~ yOj~ ;Jl~il <O~O ~~ JUO: UW O ]W<<[ ' ti ) y ~ LL VI U O W m ~ U m W W W y O~ W LL W N Z ~0= m O O N iV OW U3~ ~~o~ I~~< ~ W =_t ~ O W ~O I WOUW 4' ~O W S~ 00 IK O` ZW ~~~y~I~W&~~ ~~~ ~sWyW~W~Z~~N ~jdHO J~O1~~~0>F~1/~ ~ ` O~ ~4~o~~1VS~~ O I^~ ;~7~°~~o I < l ~Va ~~~~= N~~G1 OZ Y ~s~~~~~~~ ~I~~ ~ i _~ a ~ gm $$ _. n 6 Lsl ~~ _. s ~O 04 O~ U 4~~ ~YY 2~W WUO N ~~ ~~ U ~~ O "F¢ ~~O ~~~~ ~Uj< O yU~il O r O Z 9a~Y Orr K IZ-WO ~M N~ j iCll yNI m yOy 1OI--`U CWO€ U ~ N r W :~o r ~~gi~ ,. . ~~~~ ~ ~~ & b~~= R1 4 C w O O ~= z fyJ O V ~~ ~~Y W U yrrOy ~~ j i rn fs, z _~ ~ F, c U ,,,,, ~~ ~_ U W A w CSz^o~ N W ~ A can ;° " W ~ ~ O zd~~-~ ~~ ~ ~/~ W ~// W O N ~T 1 W ~ +~' ~ ~ ~ U ~Y ~0 U ~w R~ ~ ~~ o~~'~ a v ~~ a ~~~~ ~ ~ 6a~a Sg~ A q U a o~ ' 0 Sa G~ q O ~! w~ oz U U ~E H z~ oA H ~z o~ W Qi a n x~ ~o~ 24~ ~ h _ !(~ y < xi ~ " I ~O ( n 7 Z NNtp~~ ~~ H ~ y ~~ ~ ~ <`~ <ZZ ~= OW ~ W = O j 2 ,^ ///~~~~~yjj111 ~ ` ~ W S~f ~ p G o ~ N W~ d i<j ~ p5 ~ N ~ U V ` Q~ U < K yl-~1 a om ~~m ?tn ?c~ m m ~ ~ °n7 ~ c~x YO FyIN ~W FW Z Z W ~ O` O p~ O W ,~//~~ 1(~y Q tYyJj1 F W 1K~ ,y~/am~ ~ ~Z WIgZ W(j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ W ~ $ p VI r, R ~pF WZ ~/ 1n = Y C~ ~~ Og ~ U N ~ W O W FY k~.I W ~~~y ~~ ~ YI ~ oQ ~I.~m ~ YI Z G37 7 ny yWla II/y~N ~ ~ Z J~ ~_ U" U~ ~ W u W ~ ~~ 2Zj ~Ca yrQ~ ~p0 d3Y ~pP ~pp W W ~ J 0 W W` _ ~ ~ m C {qp~ ~(Tj JI ~ ~~ VI =2~ ~2 ~Z ~ ~ ~ Y~1 ~ ~ ~~ ~Y~ ~Y Y Z ~ Y o d I ~ o~ ~ W • I I n 7 O ~ ~ y Y ° S ~ I i ~ R ~~ A z~ ~~ ~~ w i ~ 1 I~ a yp~ ` ~ ~ ]L U ~ Jam, 1~ W y' W 7 ~yp1~ ~ ~ 7 ~ 33 ~ ~ O O ~ Fti I„~ YI o Wo ~ ~ N W R W U I~ o a `~ ~ ~ W N W W ~ g a a O ~I ~+ w m r~ W ~ o r ~ ~ ~ n Y ~ x g ^n ~ g ~ ui C < < ~ n °n n ~ ~.~' 41 ~ V] U xa w ~ _ _ 2 Q Z z~7. f/1 C. W Z Y Z Qo ~ ~ n Y Y oQ ~Op[ 'f ~ m 0 I I• E^ ~ ( i ~ V _ YI W ~ h W p 2 t~ = ~. m p O' a Q n 33 a yS Y? 2 1 ~ z ~ yp+ r ~ n I i W ~ ~ C 1 o N p a o Z O N VI °- ~~ \ V~ V~ F l a o pO =p ~ ppp 2 y~ ~ Z r ~ 7 ~ 7 ~ ~ i W j y~ ~ Irpj W W K~~ 1 J -/~ (n [Oyu 1'W~Y d~~ FF ~ 8 X01 3 O p a ~ ~ R ~ Z 1 p Zy ~ ~~ v~ W VI y ~ 7 G 1~ ~ ~ O ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 Z ~[~ ~ ~ ~~.~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ i ~ c ~ ~ U y y~ W b h o p 5~~ ~ - ~~~ r AS ~ ~ r t3 ~) ~ ~ I .J ~l ~ ~w ~~ w ~ S ~o ~ ~ ~ ~:, ~~~~ x ~~;~ ~~ I 'W ~~ U W yr ~ ~ ~r ~p ~n _ ~ml, Z I ~~ c ~~• 4 v K~ Wf SRI ca ~ 'R ~ .. a ~~~ yyM//I d ~ 1 ~ Y q ~ O .w wa~ Z~~ ~ ~ b~ a .~~ c~' ~~ ~Z o~ ~ ~ a ~`5 a ~ bay ~ o o ~ ~~ ~~ ~_~ ~~ ~ i~~ ~~~ W O ~ O V U F~~C gg ~~ ° _~~ V~~~ 3e x yr~~~ a1gy~ O V (~ ~ p(V/N~I~ S(yn~~ Z fy<~` ~`W y NO ' ~ r W y~ W n. Q N {`Q~• M O O S ri IasO~ 0 '.. n ~O 914~~n N+~ ~ W O ~ ~ W Z ]f ~ 4 Y ^ W U ~n~.l ~aS~o z Y W ^ < W ~ A ~ < O) ~ C ~ ~4 •i ~~~ pn W = O rn h C "~'~ u- ~&aw & Y ~~ 2 C pJ ~ p N V WOO O ~ 2Z U / Wm mo~}Fj2 ZOp~z ~~ ~K~O i-C OU 0 ~ i ~ ~ ~ C ~ G4 z '"a r~//~~W St ~V P O ~2 F U N <ZFV ( O 4, y~~ > ~YKI y~ a ~==W ~ F U 5 y`W~ O ~, _ ~n~O m U ~. 1~-1~^ ~ ~eU ~ N~ ~ ~ ~ W C mm S~ 2 ~W ~ YI~m-~~ _ ~ (%~ V Flw ~ ~~ ,~=o ~~ `~~ ? N ~ ~ a 3 n ~ ~ on ~ mim~2`y =' ~ E'" ~ x ~~//~~ pQ yN~rcF C y~ yI Z` a t = ~ Z Nn w VI~ ~ ~k W~~ ~Z C ` ` G ~Q- y~`~ O Z ~ O ; ~VI ; `r=`~ I ~ W ~~j N I I~ O W ~ p K m ~ (~ W C ~~'f yW~ xa j m ~~ ~~j ^I lA~ O Om ~~~ ~~ ~V m m ~ Ra ~ C ~ S ~ ~ 2t < ~jm30 ~ ~/] ~~ V JJ = y1 11/% _ _~ ~~~ ~~ m~ 2 2 ~~ O p = ~C- ~ ~ ~a ~ MI~~W 7~ ~ ~ ,C.II r~O ~ y~rry~~N ~Wy ¢~~ ~~ ~ ~ U ~`V'gWyJ' ~ ~ ~ s W 1~~ ~ ?~ p ~N`~~Z f~Y ~ ~u~ ~'1 W f~l D O~ ~~~ W= ~a W ~ o p J ~ ~ a ~ ~ o F ~ j ~ ~~~~y W ~ ~ ~W ~i1f WJ (~ y~ U ~ m O ~~/~ W [~ D I I •I JJ yzW1 z ~ o J< a ~ ~ N r1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U Z~ W< ~O~ ~O ~f W W C W~ Z U~ 2~ m OW ~W b ~I ~ j~ i% ~~~ ~~ ~$ d ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ~~ a~ ~ S~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ w ~ A~ ' I D~ D~~ ff r Y o g n i ~~ ~~ R i I F W~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~E~ ~ ~< ' ~x ~ ~ ~ : ~w ~z ~~ W~ ~~~ ~s ~~ ~ ~ s~' aro~r axafso~ -~.~z<< . -mar ~ 3 i 6fD0N I o ~ I ~ N N N r4f h h h M h rf jI~ m ~ ~ WI N ®®®8®®®®®®®.~.~ ~® ~~ -^~- N ~~ ~ M f f n n n F~'_ N ,;: a ~~ ~ n ~ _ n / $ f ~ ~~~ n a ~ ~Q d ~ , ~Q~~ n ~\ i ~ m y-" n m o n ~ n n m c ~ n ,,~ n i fo ao h N n n a / h _ n ~ N ~ pp Ol O ~ ~ n ~ a0 ~ o ~ IA 1~ 10 a ~ 7` LJ ° o c~ '9~ n ~~ o 0 o~~~Q° °® ~~ ~ ~ ~°~~ ~^o =®~ ~® n iv ~ n o ~f~ N 1~1 ~ ~ ® N ® U ~ ® N pnj s ° n °n v~ o ~ a ® ~ ~ ~ _ y~ 0 t! 0 8B8 Jd BOSS 7l9 dYd J,AC>Df9SY3i ~® 3X17tl7IlOd '3 ~Y '0'd .If0 rTM7 ~LSY3 0 SSESSMENT NUMBER APPENDIX C ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-2 (GOSFORD/WHITE) LIST OF NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF PROPERTY OWNERS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL OWNER'S NUMBER/ NAME AND ADDRESS PARCEL DESCRIPTION 1 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. 389-010-14-00-8 P. O. BOX 11165 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 2 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. 389-010-15-00-1 P. O. BOX 11165 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 3 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. 389-010-16-00-4 P. O. BOX 11165 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 4 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. 389-010-17-00-7 P. O. BOX 11165 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 5 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. REMAINDER OF P. O. BOX 11165 391-010-34-00-3 " BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 6 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 1 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 7 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 2 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 8 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 3 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 i, 9 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 4 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 10 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT N0.5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 5 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 11 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 f' P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 6 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 c 12 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 7 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 ~ 13 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 8 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 I 29177APC 1 11 /21 /94 APPENDIX C ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-2 (GOSFORD/WHITE) LIST OF NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF PROPERTY OWNERS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL ASSESSMENT OWNER'S NUMBER/ NUMBER NAME AND ADDRESS PARCEL DESCRIPTION 14 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 9 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 15 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. P. O. BOX 11165 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 16 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. P. O. BOX 11165 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 17 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. P. O. BOX 11165 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 18 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. P. O. BOX 11165 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 19 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. P. O. BOX 11165 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 20 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. P. O. BOX 11165 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 21 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. P. O. BOX 11165 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 22 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. P. O, BOX 11165 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 23 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. P. O. BOX 11165 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 24 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. P. O. BOX 11165 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 25 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. P. O. BOX 11165 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 26 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. P. O. BOX 11165 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 ' 29177APC 2 TRACT NO. 5678 PHASE B -LOT 10 TRACT NO. 5678 PHASE B -LOT 11 TRACT NO. 5678 PHASE B -LOT 12 TRACT NO. 5678 PHASE B -LOT 13 TRACT NO. 5678 PHASE B -LOT 14 TRACT NO. 5678 PHASE B -LOT 15 TRACT N0.5678 PHASE B - .LOT 16 TRACT NO. 5678 PHASE B -LOT 17 TRACT NO. 5678 PHASE B -LOT 18 TRACT NO. 5678 PHASE B -LOT 19 TRACT NO. 5678 PHASE B -LOT 20 TRACT NO. 5678 PHASE B -LOT 21 11 /21!94 SSESSMENT NUMBER APPENDIX C ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0.94-2 (GOSFORD/WHITE) LIST OF NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF PROPERTY OWNERS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL OWNER'S NUMBER/ NAME AND ADDRESS PARCEL DESCRIPTION 27 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 22 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 28 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 23 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 29 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 24 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 30 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT N0.5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 25 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 31 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 26 • BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 32 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 27 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 33 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 28 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 34 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT N0. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 29 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 35 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 30 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 36 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 31 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 37 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT N0.5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 32 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 38 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 33 • BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 39 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 34 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 29177APC 3 11 /21 /94 ASSESSMENT NUMBER APPENDIX C ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-2 (GOSFORD/WHITE) LIST OF NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF PROPERTY OWNERS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL OWNER'S NUMBER/ NAME AND ADDRESS PARCEL DESCRIPTION 40 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 35 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 41 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT N0.5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 36 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 42 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 37 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 43 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 - P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 38 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 44 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT N0. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 39 - BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 45 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 40 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 46 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 41 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 47 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 42 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 48 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 43 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 49 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 44 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 50 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO.5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 45 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 51 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 - PHASE B -LOT 46 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 52 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT N0.5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 47 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 29177APC 4 11 /21 /94 ! ' SSESSMENT NUMBER APPENDIX C ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-2 (GOSFORDIWHITE) LIST OF NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF PROPERTY OWNERS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL OWNER'S NUMBER/ NAME AND ADDRESS PARCEL DESCRIPTION 53 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 48 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 54 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 49 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 55 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 50 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 56 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 ' P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 51 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 57 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT N0.5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 52 " BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 ''; 58 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT N0.5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 53 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 59 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT N0.5678 " P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 54 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 60 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT N0.5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 55 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 ~~ 61 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 I' P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 56 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 4 62 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO.5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 57 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 63 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT N0.5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 58 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 i I 64 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT N0.5678 ~ P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 59 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 65 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 f P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 60 ~f I BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 29177APC 5 11 /21 /94 APPENDIX C ENGINEER'S REPORT SSESSMENT NUMBER CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0.94-2 (GOSFORDIWHITE) LIST OF NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF PROPERTY OWNERS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL OWNER'S NUMBER/ NAME AND ADDRESS PARCEL DESCRIPTION 66 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 61 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 67 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT N0.5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 62 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 68 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 63 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 69 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 64 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 70 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 65 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 71 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT N0.5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 66 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 72 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 67 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 73 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT N0.5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 68 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 74 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 69 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 75 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 70 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 76 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 71 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 77 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 72 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 78 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 73 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 29177APC 6 11 /21 /94 i APPENDIX C ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTR ICT NO. 94-2 (GOSFORDIWHITE) LIST OF NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF PROPERTY OWNERS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL ASSESSMENT OWNER'S NUMBER/ NUMBER NAME AND ADDRESS PARCEL DESCRIPTION 79 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT N0.5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 74 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 j 80 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES,- INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 75 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 81 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT N0.5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 76 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 82 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT N0.5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 77 J BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 83 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 ~ P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 78 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 ! 84 ~ CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 ' P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 79 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 85 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 '- P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 80 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 86 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 ~ P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 81 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 87 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 82 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 r 88 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 83 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 89 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 84 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 90 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT N0.5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 85 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 j 91 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO.5678 '. P. 0. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 86 I BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 1 29177APC 7 11 /2 1 /94 i' 1 ' SSESSMENT NUMBER APPENDIX C ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-2 (GOSFORDIWHITE) LIST OF NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF PROPERTY OWNERS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL OWNER'S NUMBER/ NAME AND ADDRESS PARCEL DESCRIPTION 92 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 87 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 93 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 ' P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 88 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 ~' 94 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. TRACT N0.5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 89 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 95 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 90 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 96 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 91 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 97 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 92 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 ~ 98 I CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. TRACT N0.5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 93 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 99 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. TRACT N0.5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 94 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 100 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 95 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 101 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. TRACT N0.5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 96 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 1 102 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. TRACT N0.5678 f P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 97 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 j 103 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. TRACT NO.5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 98 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 f 104 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 99 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 29177APC 8 11 /21 /94 SSESSMENT NUMBER APPENDIX C ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0.94-2 (GOSFORD/WHITE) LIST OF NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF PROPERTY OWNERS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL OWNER'S NUMBER/ NAME AND ADDRESS PARCEL DESCRIPTION 105 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 100 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 106 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 101 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 107 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT N0.5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 102 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 108 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 103 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 109 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 104 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 110 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT N0.5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 105 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 111 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 106 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 112 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 107 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 113 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 108 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 114 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT N0.5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 109 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 115 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 110 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 116 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 111 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 117 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT N0.5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 112 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 29177APC 9 11 /21 /94 SSESSMENT NUMBER APPENDIX C ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-2 (GOSFORD/WHITE) LIST OF NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF PROPERTY OWNERS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL OWNER'S NUMBER/ NAME AND ADDRESS PARCEL DESCRIPTION 118 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 113 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 119 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 114 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 120 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 115 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 121 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 116 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 122 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 117 - BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 123 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 118 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 124 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 119 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 125 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 120 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 126 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 121 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 127 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 122 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 128 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 123 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 129 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 124 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 130 CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 125 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 29177APC 10 ~ 11 /21 /94 APPENDIX C ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0.94-2 (GOSFORDIWHITE) LIST OF NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF PROPERTY OWNERS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL ASSESSMENT OWNER'S NUMBER/ NUMBER NAME AND ADDRESS PARCEL DESCRIPTION 131 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. TRACT NO. 5678 P. O. BOX 11165 PHASE B -LOT 126 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 132 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. P. O, BOX 11165 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 133 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. P. O. BOX 11165 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 134 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. P. O. BOX 11165 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 135 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. P. O. BOX 11165 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 136 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. P. O. BOX 11165 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 137 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. P. O. BOX 11165 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 138 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. P. O. BOX 11165 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 139 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. P. O. BOX 11165 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 140 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. P. O. BOX 11165 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 141 CASTLE & COOKS HOMES, INC. P. O. BOX 11165 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 TRACT NO. 5678 PHASE B -LOT 127 TRACT NO. 5678 PHASE B -LOT 128 TRACT N0.5678 PHASE B -LOT 129 TRACT NO. 5678 PHASE B -LOT 130 TRACT NO. 5678 PHASE B -LOT 131 TRACT N0.5678 PHASE B -PARK LOT TRACT NO. 5678 PHASE B -LOT A TRACT NO. 5678 PHASE B -LOT B TRACT NO. 5678 PHASE B -LOT C TRACT NO. 5678 PHASE B -LOT D 29177APC 11 11 /21 /94 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-A ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-2 (GOSFORDIWHITE) ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT COST TRACT NO. 5678 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED ITEM ESTIMATED ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL COST A. SEWER IMPROVEMENTS 1. 8" SEWER LINE - Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 70.00 LF 13.50 $945.00 2. 8" ROAD BORE -Tract No. 5678. Phases A through 0 off-sites 70.00 LF 56.00 $3,920.00 3. STANDARD MANHOLE - Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 1.00 EA 1,400.00 * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff--sites 1.00 EA 1,400.00 STANDARD MANHOLE SUBTOTAL: 2.00 EA 1,400.00 $2,800.00 4. 6" SEWER LINE * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 75.00 LF 9.60 $720.00 5. 6" ROAD BORE * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 50.00 LF 42.00 $2,100.00 SUBTOTAL SEWER IMPROVEMENTS: $10,485.00 B. WATER IMPROVEMENTS 1. 10" WATERLINE -Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 75.00 LF 14.00 $1,050.00 2. 10" GATE VALVE -Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 2.00 EA 650.00 $1,300.00 3. HOT TAP - Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 2.00 EA 1,500.00 $3,000.00 4. ABANDON EXISTING STUB OUT - Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 2.00 EA 175.00 $350.00 5. 8" WATER LINE * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 240.00 LF 14.00 $3,360.00 6. 8" GATE VALVE * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 3.00 EA 425.00 $1,275.00 7. 8" ROAD BORE * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 240.00 LF 56.00 $13,440.00 i SUBTOTAL WATER IMPROVEMENTS: $23,775.00 C. k i STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS 1. 24" STORM DRAIN PIPE LINE * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 577.00 LF 15.00 $8,655.00 ' 2. CATCH BASIN * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 3.00 EA 1,500.00 $4,500.00 ~. I SUBTOTAL STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS: $13,155.00 t 29177B2A B-II-A-1 09/29/94 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-A ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0.94-2 (GOSFORDIWHITE) ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT COST TRACT N0.5678 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED ITEM ESTIMATED ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL COST D. STREET IMPROVEMENTS 1. REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER -Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 572.00 LF 1.00 * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff--sites 490.00 LF 1.00 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER SUBTOTAL: 1,062.00 LF 1.00 $1,062.00 2. REMOVE MEDIAN CURB - Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 244.00 LF 1.00 * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 140.00 LF 1.00 REMOVE MEDIAN CURB SUBTOTAL: 384.00 LF 1.00 $384.00 3. REMOVE A. C. PAVING -Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 1,470.00 SF 0.30 * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 2,270.00 SF 0.30 REMOVE A. C. PAVING SUBTOTAL: 3,740.00 SF 0.30 $1,122.00 4. SAWCUT A. C. PAVING - Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 600.00 LF 1.00 * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 600.00 LF 1.00 SAWCUT A. C. PAVING SUBTOTAL: 1,200.00 LF 1.00 $1,200.00 5. 6"CURB AND GUTTER -Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 569.00 LF 5.25 * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 317.00 LF 5.25 - in Persimmon Dr. (through PG8~E easement) 41.2.00 LF 5.25 6" CURB AND GUTTER SUBTOTAL: 1,298.00 LF 5.25 $6,814.50 6. SIDEWALK -Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 11,824.00 SF 1.30 * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 5,874.00 SF 1.30 - in Persimmon Dr. (through PGBE easement) 1,854.00 SF 1.30 SIDEWALK SUBTOTAL: 19,552.00 SF 1.30 $25,417.60 7. HANDICAP RAMP -Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 1,534.00 SF 1.30 * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 2,400.00 SF 1.30 HANDICAP RAMPS SUBTOTAL: 3,934.00 SF 1.30 $5,114.20 8. A. C. PAVING -Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 492.00 TON 23.50 * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 86.00 TON 23.50 - in Persimmon Dr. (through PG&E easement) 88.00 TON 23.50 A. C. PAVING SUBTOTAL: 666.00 TON 23.50 $15,651.00 9. AGGREGATE BASE - Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 514.00 CY 18.00 * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 72.00 CY 18.00 - in Persimmon Dr. (through PG&E easement) 90.00 CY 18.00 AGGREGATE BASE SUBTOTAL: 676.00 CY 18.00 $12,168.00 2917762A B-II-A-2 09/29/94 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-A ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0.94-2 (GOSFORDIWHITE) ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT COST TRACT N0.5678 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED ITEM ESTIMATED ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL COST D. STREET IMPROVEMENTS (Cont'd) 10. SUBGRADE PREPARATION -Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 1,509.00 SY 1.20 * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff--sites 310.00 SY 1.20 - in Persimmon Dr. (through PG&E easement) 809.00 SY 1.20 SUBGRADE PREPARATION SUBTOTAL: 2,628.00 SY 1.20 $3,153.60 11. PAINT STRIPE - CHANNELIZING, LANE -Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 200.00 LF 1.00 $200.00 12. MEDIAN CURB -Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 235.00 LF 5.00 * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 28.00 LF 5.00 MEDIAN CURB SUBTOTAL: 263.00 LF 5.00 $1,315.00 13. METRO STREET SIGN - Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 4.00 EA 300.00 * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 6.00 EA 300.00 METRO STREET SIGN SUBTOTAL: 10.00 EA 300.00 $3,000.00 14. STREET SIGN -Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 2.00 EA 200.00 $400.00 15. RELOCATE TRAFFIC SIGN -Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 6.00 EA 90.00 $540.00 16. STOP SIGN * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 3.00 EA 200.00 $600.00 17. STREET LIGHT -MAST ARM 9500 LUMEN -Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 7.00 EA 1,900.00 * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 4.00 EA 1,900.00 STREET LIGHTS -MAST ARM 9500 LUMEN SUBTOTAL: 11.00 EA 1,900.00 $20,900.00 18. STREET LIGHT CONDUIT - Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 2,010.00 LF 2.25 * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 1,382.00 LF 2.25 STREET LIGHT CONDUIT SUBTOTAL: 3,392.00 LF 2.25 $7,632.00 19. #3-1/2 PULL BOX -Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 7.00 EA 160.00 * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 7.00 EA 160.00 #3-1/2 PULL BOX SUBTOTAL: 14.00 EA 160.00 $2,240.00 20. #5 PULL BOX -Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 7.00 EA 160.00 $1,120.00 21. SIGNAL CONDUIT -Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 1,165.00 LF 2.00 $2,330.00 22. 3" LANDSCAPE CONDUIT -Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 161.00 LF 3.00 * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 240.00 LF 3.00 3" LANDSCAPE CONDUIT SUBTOTAL: 401.00 LF 3.00 $1,203.00 29177B2A B-I I-A-3 09/29/94 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-A ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0.94-2 (GOSFORDIWHITE) ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT COST TRACT N0.5678 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED ITEM ESTIMATED ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL COST D. STREET IMPROVEMENTS (Cont'd) 23. 6" LANDSCAPE CONDUIT -Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 161.00 LF 5.00 * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff--sites 240.00 LF 5.00 6" LANDSCAPE CONDUIT SUBTOTAL: 401.00 LF 5.00 $2,005.00 24. MONUMENT ENCASEMENT -Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 2.00 EA 250.00 * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 3.00 EA 250.00 - in Persimmon Dr. (through PG&E easement) 2.00 EA 250.00 MONUMENT ENCASEMENT SUBTOTAL: 7.00 EA 250.00 $1,750.00 SUBTOTAL STREET IMPROVEMENTS: E. MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS 5117,321.90 1. BLOCK WALL (8'0" height) -Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 17,596.00 SF 6.40 - in White Ln. along PG&E easement 1,821.00 SF 6.40 -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 12,100.00 SF 6.40 BLOCK WALL (8'0" height) SUBTOTAL: 31,517.00 SF 6.40 $201,708.80 2. BLOCK WALL (6'8" height) - in Persimmon Dr. (through PGr£E easement) 2,748.00 SF 6.40 $17,587.20 3. LANDSCAPING (10' STRIP) - Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 24,934.00 SF 2.80 - in White Ln. along PG8~E easement 2,100.00 SF 2.80 * -Tract No. 5678 Phase Eoff-sites 14,000.00 SF 2.80 LANDSCAPING (10' STRIP) SUBTOTAL: 41,034.00 SF 2.80 $114,895.20 4. LANDSCAPING (5' STRIP) - in Persimmon Dr. (through PG&E easement) 2,320.00 SF 2.80 $6,496.00 5. HARDSCAPING -Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites (Gosford median) 647.00 SF 5.50 $3,558.50 6. LANDSCAPING PARK ACCESS -Tract No. 5678 Phases Athrough Doff-sites 11,541.00 SF 2.80 $32,314.80 SUBTOTAL MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS: F. TOTAL ESTIMATED TRACT N0.5878 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENT COST $376,560.50 $541,297.40 29177B2A B-II-A-4 09/29/94 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-A ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-2 (GOSFORDIWHITE) ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT COST TRACT N0.5678 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED i ITEM ESTIMATED ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL COST G. IMPROVEMENT INCIDENTALS 1. DESIGN ENGINEERING AND LANDSCAPE DESIGN $41,610.00 2. IMPROVEMENT BONDS (4.45% of Item F) $24,087.73 3. CONSTRUCTION STAKING (4% of Item F) $21,651.90 4. SOIL AND MATERIALS TESTING (2% of Item F) $10,825.95 5. PLAN CHECK (1.2% of Item F) $6,495.57 6. SITE INSPECTION (4% of Item F) $21,651.90 7. WATER INSPECTION FEE (4% of Item B) $951.00 8. CITY PROJECT ADMIN. COST (1 % of Item F) $5,412.97 SUBTOTAL IMPROVEMENT INCIDENTALS: $132,687.02 H. TOTAL IMPROVEMENTS AND INCIDENTALS $673,984.42 I. IMPROVEMENT CONTINGENCY 553,918.75 J. TOTAL IMPROVEMENTS, INCIDENTALS AND CONTINGENCY $727,903.17 NOTES: (1) "*" INDICATES IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE IMPROVEMENT PLANS AVAILABLE AT THE TIME THIS REPORT IS BEING PREPARED (2) THIS ITEMIZED COST ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT COST IS BASED ON "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT STUDY, TRACT 5678 AND 5679" PREPARED FOR CASTLE & COOKE HOMES, INC. BY MARTIN-McINTOSH (DATED JULY 19, 1994), AND THE COST ESTIMATE MODIFIED AND UPDATED SEPTEMBER 26, 1994 ALSO BY MARTIN-McINTOSH. l 2917762A B-II-A-5 09/29/94 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-B ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-2 (GOSFORD/WHITE) ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT COST TRACT NO. 5679 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED ITEM ESTIMATED ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL COST A. SEWER IMPROVEMENTS $0.00 B. WATER IMPROVEMENTS $0.00 C. STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS 1. 24' STORM DRAIN PIPE LINE 450.00 LF 22.00 $9,900.00 2. MANHOLE 1.00 EA 1,400.00 $1,400.00 SUBTOTAL STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS: 571,300.00 D. STREET IMPROVEMENTS 1. REMOVE CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK 377.00 LF 1.00 $377.00 2. REMOVE MEDIAN CURB 244.00 LF 1.00 $244.00 3. REMOVE A. C. PAVING 735.00 SF 0.30 $220.50 4. SAWCUT A. C. PAVING 345.00 LF 1.00 $345.00 5. 6"CURB AND GUTTER 375.00 LF 5.25 $1,968.75 6. SIDEWALK 9,845.00 SF 1.30 $12;798.50 7. HANDICAP RAMP 2,767.00 SF 1.30 $3,597.10 8. A. C. PAVING 305.00 TON 23.50 $7,167.50 9. AGGREGATE BASE 265.00 CY 18.00 $4,770.00 10. SUBGRADE PREPARATION 935.00 SY 1.20 $1,122.00 11. PAINT STRIPE - CHANNELIZING 100.00 LF 1.00 $100.00 12. MEDIAN CURB 235.00 LF 5.00 $1,175.00 13. STREET SIGN 2.00 EA 200.00 $400.00 14. METRO STREET SIGN 4.00 EA 300.00 $1,200.00 15. #3-1/2 PULL BOX 2.00 EA 160.00 $320.00 16. STREET LIGHT -MAST ARM 9500 LUMEN 2.00 EA 1,900.00 $3,800.00 17. MONUMENT ENCASEMENT 2.00 EA 250.00 $500.00 SUBTOTAL STREET IMPROVEMENTS: $40,105.35 E. MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS 1. BLOCK WALL (S'0" height) 15,519.00 SF 6.40 $99,321.60 2. LANDSCAPING (10' STRIP) 19,100.00 SF 2.80 $53,480.00 SUBTOTAL MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS: $152,801.60 F. TOTAL ESTIMATED TRACT N0.5579 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENT COST $204,206.95 29177826 B-II-B-1 09/29/94 I EXHIBIT B TABLE B-II-B ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-2 (GOSFORDIWHITE) ENGINEER'S ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT COST TRACT NO. 5679 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED ITEM ESTIMATED ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL COST G. IMPROVEMENT INCIDENTALS 1. DESIGN ENGINEERING AND LANDSCAPE DESIGN $15,769.00 2. IMPROVEMENT BONDS (4.45% of Item F) $9,087.21 3. CONSTRUCTION STAKING (4% of Item F) $8,168.28 4. SOIL AND MATERIALS TESTING (2% of Item F) $4,084.14 5. PLAN CHECK (1.2% of Item F) $2,450.48 6. SITE INSPECTION (4% of Item F) $8,168.28 7. WATER INSPECTION FEES (4% of Item B) $0.00 8. CITY PROJECT ADMIN. COST (1 % of Item F) $2,042.07 SUBTOTAL IMPROVEMENT INCIDENTALS: :49,769.46 H. TOTAL IMPROVEMENTS AND INCIDENTALS 5253,976.41 I. IMPROVEMENT CONTINGENCY $20,318.11 J. TOTAL IMPROVEMENTS, INCIDENTALS AND CONTINGENCY $274,294.52 NOTE: i THIS ITEMIZED COST ESTIMATE OF IMPROVEMENT COST IS BASED ON "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT STUDY, TRACT 5678 AND 5679" PREPARED FOR CASTLE 8~ COOKE HOMES, INC. BY MARTIN-McINTOSH (DATED JULY 19, 1994), AND THE COST ESTIMATE MODIFIED AND UPDATED SEPTEMBER 26, 1994 ALSO BY MARTIN-McINTOSH. AS OF THE FILING DATE FOR THIS ENGINEER'S REPORT, THERE ARE NO CITY APPROVED IMPROVEMENT PLANS AVAILABLE FOR THIS PART OF THE PROPOSED ACQUISITIONS. 1 29177628 B-I I-B-2 09/29/94 EXHIBIT B j TABLE B-III-A ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0.94-2 (GOSFORD/11VHITE) PAYOFF CALCULATION FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0.82-1 ASSESSMENT 2166 (APN: 389-010-17): PAYOFF COST ASSESSED TO ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 94-2 ASSESSMENT 4 ASSESSMENT PAYOFF DESCRIPTION DETAILS 1. REMAINING ASSESSMENT PRINCIPAL AMOUNT (EFF. 07101/95): 2. AMOUNT CHARGED THROUGH CURRENT AUDITORS ROLL: 3. SUBTOTAL: 4. BOND CALL PREMIUM (5% OF SUBTOTAL ): 5. ESTIMATED ADMIN. COSTS FOR LIEN RELEASE: CITY TIME (EMPLOYER'S WAGE x TIME WORKED ) 6. BOND CALL COSTS STANDARD FEE (500.00 x SUBTOTAL / 50,000 ): COST PER BOND (7.50 x SUBTOTAL / 5,000 ): LIEN RELEASE: 7. CREDIT TO RESERVE: (b) (7.0% x ORIGINAL ASMT LESS PREVIOUS CREDIT): 8.INTERESTTO CHARGE: (CONFIRMED ASMT/TOTAL BOND AMOUNT)x (NEXT INTEREST PAYMENT-07/02/95; NOTICE DUE 4/30/95) 9. INTEREST PAID ON CURRENT TAX ROLL:- 10.FINAL PAYOFF AMOUNT: 8,622.30 N/A 8,622.30 431.12 35.87 86.22 12.93 8.00 (1,379.10) 0.00 N/A $7,817.34 NOTES: (a) PAYOFF CALCULATION GOOD THROUGH 4/30/95 (b) RESERVE CREDIT BASED ON ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT : 19,701.49 x .070 = $1,379.10 (c) PAYOFF CALCULATION DATA PROVIDED BY CITY FINANCE DEPARTMENT ~ (d) PAYOFF CALCULATION DATA IS BASED ON THE ASSUMPTION THAT BOTH ~ INSTALLMENTS OF AD 82-1 PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST BILLED IN 1994/95 TAX YEAR WILL BE PAID BY 4/30/95 2917763A B-III-A-1 09/29/94 EXHIBIT B TABLE B-III-B ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0.94-2 (GOSFORD/WHITE) PAYOFF CALCULATION FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0.82-1 ASSESSMENT 3083 (APN: 391-010-34): PAYOFF COST ASSESSED TO ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 94-2 ASSESSMENT 5 DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT PAYOFF DETAILS 1. REMAINING ASSESSMENT PRINCIPAL AMOUNT (EFF. 07/01/95): 2.AMOUNT CHARGED THROUGH CURRENT AUDITORS ROLL: 3. SUBTOTAL: 4. BOND CALL PREMIUM (5% OF SUBTOTAL ): 5. ESTIMATED ADMIN. COSTS FOR LIEN RELEASE: CITY TIME (EMPLOYER'S WAGE x TIME WORKED ) 6. BOND CALL COSTS STANDARD FEE (500.00 x SUBTOTAL / 50,000 ): COST PER BOND (7.50 x SUBTOTAL / 5,000 ): LIEN RELEASE: 7. CREDIT TO RESERVE: (b) (7.0% x ORIGINAL ASMT LESS PREVIOUS CREDIT): 8. INTEREST TO CHARGE: (CONFIRMED ASMT/TOTAL BOND AMOUNT)x (NEXT INTEREST PAYMENT-07/02/95; NOTICE DUE 4/30/95) 9. INTEREST PAID ON CURRENT TAX ROLL: 10. FINAL PAYOFF AMOUNT: 38,541.91 N/A 38,541.91 1,927.10 35.87 385.42 57.81 8.00 (6,164.22) 0.00 N/A $34,791.89 NOTES: (a) PAYOFF CALCULATION GOOD THROUGH 4/30/95 (b) RESERVE CREDIT BASED ON ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT : 88,060.29x .070 = (c) PAYOFF CALCULATION DATA PROVIDED BY CITY FINANCE DEPARTMENT (d) PAYOFF CALCULATION DATA IS BASED ON THE ASSUMPTION THAT BOTH INSTALLMENTS OF AD 82-1 PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST BILLED IN 1994/95 TAX YEAR WILL BE PAID BY 4/30!95 $6,164.22 29177836 B-III-B-1 09/29/94 ASMT NUMBER ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER FOR THE PURPOSE OF FUTURE NUMBER OF SHARE OF NUMBER OF SMENT ~EDING SUBTOTAL COST TO CONTRIBUTIONS AND SUBTOTAL COST TO ASSESSMENT BOND ISSUANCE TOTAL AMOUNT APPORTIONMENTS ASMT NO 515 RESIDENTIAL LOTS LOTS PER AREA S IMPRO ASSESSMENT CASH COLLECTIONS AFTER CONTRIBUTIONS COST ASSESSED TO BONDS . BROKEN INTO THE FOLLOWING AREAS, TO MATCH PHASES IN PROPOSED TR 5678 SEE EXHIBIT E PER PARCEU AREA (PHASE) WITHIN PROPOSED TR 5678 TR 5878 TR 5679 TOTAL: ~ 3,897.18 ~ 1,032.57 4 929.75 TR 5678: 5846,592.24 TR 5679: 5313,144.43 TOTAL: 51 159 736.67 TR 5678: 50.00 TR 5679: 50.00 TOTAL: 50.00 TR 5678: 5846,592.24 TR 5679: 5313,144.43 TOTAL: S1 159 736.67 TR 5678: 5175,389.01 TR 5679: 564,874.32 TOTAL: 5240 263.33 TR 5678: 51,021,981.25 TR 5679: 5378,018.75 TOTAL: S1 400 000.00 1 389.010-14-00-8 NIA 0 N/A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 389-010-15-00-1 N/A 0 N/A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 389-010.16-00-4 WA 0 N/A -0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4 389-010.17-00-7 N/A ~ 83 N/A 1,032.57 313,144.43 0.00 313,144.43 64,874.32 378,018.75 A 29 0.10000000 8,195.13 82,695.64 0.00 82,695.64 17,132.10 99,827.74 B 131 0.45172414 7,019.36 373,556.10 0.00 373,556.10 77,389.84 450,945.94 C 57 0.19655172 5,107.66 162,539.68 0.00 162,539.68 33,673.44 196,213.12 5 391-010-34-00.3 D 41 0.14137931 1,586.21 116,914.50 0.00 116,914.50 24,221.25 141,135.75 E 32 0.11034483 0,988.82 110,886.32 0.00 110,886.32 22,972.38 133,858.70 SUBTOTAL ASMT S: 290 1.00000000 3,897.18 846,592.24 0.00 846,592.24 175,389.01 1,021,981.25 TOTALS: 373 N/A 5 4 929.75 St 159,736.67 50.00 S1 159 736.67 5240 263.33 S1 400 000.00 S SHOWN ABOVE, THE DETAILED SPREAD CALCULATION IS BASED ON E NUMBER OF LOTS WITHIN EACH PROPOSED PHASE OF TRACT NO. 5678 D THE WHOLE TRACT N0.5679, ACCORDING TO THE MAPS AND INFORMATION VAILABLE AT THE TIME THIS REPORT IS BEING PREPARED. OR THE PURPOSE OF FUTURE APPORTIONMENTS, THE LIST BELOW PROVIDES ATA ON THE TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED TO EACH INDIVIDUAL LOT IN TRACTS 78 AND 5679. PRELIMINARY FINAL PHASE NUMBER OF ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT TRACT WITHIN TRACT OTS PER PHASE PER LOT PER LOT A 29 53,442.34 B 131 33,442.34 5678 C 57 53,442.34 D 41 53,442.34 E 32 54,183.08 5679 WA 83 S4 554.44 29177SP ~ 09/29/94 EXHIBIT D ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-2 (GOSFORD/WHITE) DESCRIPTION OF ASSESSMENT SPREAD METHOD INTRODUCTION The 1913 Act requires that a specific procedure or formula be developed for the purpose of apportioning the total cost of the assessment district improvements. The 1913 Act further requires that the cost of the assessment be apportioned to the individual parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit that each parcel can be expected to receive from the work and improvements covered by the assessment. The City Council appointed the Director of Public Works as the Engineer of Work for AD 94-2 by adoption of Resolution of Intention No. 1123 on September 7, 1994. On August 10, 1994, the City Council adopted its Resolution No. 130-94 approving Agreement No. 94-153 with Edward J. Wilson, a Registered Civil Engineer, appointing him as the Assessment Engineer for AD 94-2. The Assessment Engineer -has been retained by the Ciry to prepare an Engineer's Report on the proposed assessment that will include, in part, an analysis of the facts in AD 94-2 and the development of a method of apportioning the total amount of the costs and expenses of the proposed improvements to the several subdivisions of land located within AD 94-2, in. proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such subdivision, respectively, from the improvements. AD 94-2 has been formed pursuant to a property owner petition, requesting the City Council to waive further proceedings under Division 4 of the Streets and Highways Code and to undertake proceedings pursuant to the 1913 Act. The petition is on file with the Ciry Clerk. On August 10, 1994, the Ciry Council adopted its Resolution No. 128-94, "Accepting Petition and Determining to Undertake Special Assessment Proceedings. " ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PURPOSE AD 94-2 has been formed for the purpose of financing the private property beneficial cost share for the acquisition of certain public improvements within AD 94-2. A description of AD 94-2 is presented in Section I of the "Engineer's Report, City of Bakersfield Assessment District No. 94-2 (Gosford/White)," hereinafter referred to as the "AD 94-2 Engineer's Report." A detailed description of those improvement acquisitions is presented in AD 94-2 Engineer's Report Section II. The AD 94-2 proceedings will confnm an assessment for the estimated total cost of the improvements to be acquired pursuant to the 1913 Act and the Municipal Code. The City 29177PER.EXD D-1 09/29/94 proposes to issue bonds under the 1915 Act, secured by the unpaid assessments, to pay the cost to acquire the improvements and pay all incidental costs and expenses related thereto and authorized for funding by the 1913 Act. NON-BENEFITED AND NON-ASSESSED PARCELS There are three (3) non-benefited and non-assessed parcels in AD 94-2, described as follows: Assessments 1, 2, and 3 (identified as parcels 2, 3, and 4 of. Parcel Map No. 7333) are landscape easement parcels owned by Castle & Cooke Homes, Inc. They are located within Ten TR 5679 along Gosford Road and South Laurelglen Boulevard. In the AD 94-2 Financing Proposal prepared July 19, 1994, the referenced parcels are shown as being combined with Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No. 7333 (Assessment 4) and resubdivided by Ten TR 5679 into landscape easement lots A, B, and C. As existing and planned landscape easement lots, those parcels are not benefited by the improvements described in the AD 94-2 Engineer's Report Section II and are, accordingly, not apportioned a share of the AD 94-2 Assessment. ASSESSMENT SPREAD METHOD A description of the methodology used to apportion the costs of the AD 94-2 acquisitions and of the incidental work, cost, and expenses of the AD 94-2 assessment proceedings is presented below. Description of AD 94-2 Benefits It is the Assessment Engineer's responsibility to identify the benefits that the AD 94-2 parcels will receive from the Improvements proposed to be acquired. The benefits to the lots and parcels in AD 94-2 are described as follows: Pursuant to the proposed Castle & Cooke Acquisition Agreement referenced in Section I of the AD 94-2 Engineer's Report, AD 94-2 will finance the acquisition of certain improvements and the payment of City improvement fees and costs required as conditions of final subdivision map approvals related to the approved Ten TR 5678 and proposed Ten TR 5679 subdivision maps that overlay the AD 94-2 parcels. Improvements proposed to be fmanced pursuant to the AD 94-2 proceedings are divided into two groups, with each group providing separate direct bene,~t to the two non-overlapping areas proposed to be developed by Ten TR 5678 and Ten TR 5679. The improvements to be acquired are either already required or are expected by Castle & Cooke to be required to be installed as conditions of final map approval for Ten TR 5678 and for Ten TR 5679. ^ The primary categories of direct bene,~t provided by the separate systems of Ten TR 5678 off-site improvements proposed to be acquired, as they are described in detail in Section II of this AD 94-2 Engineer's Report, are as follows: 29177PER.EXD D-2 09/29/94 Sewer System Improvements Those improvements will provide the Ten TR 5678 parcel with connections to sewer mains in Gosford Road and Pin Oak Park Boulevard, as a partial fulfillment of the subdivision approval requirements to provide the tract with connections to the existing sewer mains. 2. Water System Improvements: Those improvements will provide the Ten TR 5678 parcel with connections to water mains in Gosford Road, White Lane, and Pin Oak Park Boulevard, as a partial fulfillment of the subdivision approval requirements to provide the tract with connections to the existing water mains. 3. Storm Drain System Improvements: The proposed storm drain system acquisitions will provide both off-site frontage street drainage along Pin Oak Park Boulevard and in-tract street drainage only for Phase E of Ten TR 5678. The Phases A through D areas and the Gosford Road/White Lane Ten. TR 5678 frontages will not receive street drainage benefits from these improvements. 4. Street System. Improvements: The improvements planned to be installed as Ten TR 5678 off-site street improvements include sidewalk, curb returns, handicap ramps, street lights with conduits and street signs along the tract frontages along Gosford Road, White Lane, and Pin Oak Park Boulevard, and are more particularly described in Section II of the AD 94-2 Engineer's Report. As a. part of the Street System Improvement benefit group, left and right turn lanes will be installed in Gosford Road at Ficus Drive, and a right turn lane in White Lane at Umbrella Pine Way. Those improvements will provide for partial mitigation of traffic impacts related to the buildout of the lots in Ten TR 5678 and as partial fulfillment of the subdivision approval requirements to complete the tract frontage streets to their full master- planned configuration. 5. Miscellaneous Improvements Improvements classified as "Miscellaneous Improvements" by the AD 94-2 Subdivision Engineer include the block wall and landscaping strip along the outer perimeter of TR 5678 in Gosford Road, White Lane, and Pin Oak Park Boulevard, and also along Persimmon Drive within the Ten TR 5678 PG&E tower easement. Those improvements also include the landscaping of the Garden Park access along the northwesterly boundary of Ten TR 5678. Those improvements are also a partial fulfillment of the subdivision approval requirements to complete the tract frontage streets. 29177PER.EXD D-3 09/29/94 ^ The primary categories of direct benefit provided by the separate systems of Ten TR 5679 off-site improvements proposed to be acquired, as they are described in detail in Section II of the AD 94-2 Engineer's Report, are as follows: 1. Storm Drain System Improvements Those improvements will provide off-site street drainage for Ten TR 5679 parcels and connection to storm drain mains in Gosford Road/South Laurelglen Boulevard as a partial fulfillment of the expected subdivision approval requirements. 2. Street System Improvements: The improvements planned to be .installed as Ten TR 5679 off-site street improvements include sidewalk, curb returns, handicap ramps, street lights with conduits and street signs along the tract frontage in Gosford Road and South Laurelglen Boulevard, and are more particularly described in Section II of the AD 94-2 Engineer's Report. As a part of the Street System Improvements benefit group, left and right turn lanes will be installed in Gosford Road at Roswell Lane. Those improvements will provide for partial mitigation of traffic impacts related to the buildout of the lots in proposed Ten TR 5679 and as partial fulfillment of the expected subdivision approval requirements to complete the tract frontage streets to their full master-planned configuration. 3. Miscellaneous Improvements: Improvements classified as "Miscellaneous Improvements" by the AD 94-2 Subdivision Engineer include the block wall and landscaping strip along the outer perimeter of Ten TR 5679 in Gosford Road and South Laurelglen Boulevard. Those improvements are also a partial fulfillment of the expected subdivision approval requirements to complete the tract frontage streets. Spread of AD 94-2 Costs to Benefited Parcels In accordance with the 1913 Act and subparagraph (e) of Section 10204 as contained therein, the total cost and expense of the improvements to be financed are required to be spread among the properties in the district in proportion to the estimated benefits each parcel will receive from the improvements. All of the existing AD 94-2 parcels (the unsubdivided, existing APN's) are, in effect, interim parcel configurations for properties that are currently involved in the land development process. The basis for this statement is that all of the AD 94-2 parcels have been approved or are planned for submittal to be approved for subdivision into single-family dwelling lots by two tentative tract maps as follows: 29177PER.EXD D-4 09/29/94 1. Tentative Tract 5678 overlays the entire AD 94-2 Assessment No. 5. As stated in Section II of the AD 94-2 Engineer's Report, Ten TR 5678 is planned for development of 290 R-1 lots. 2. Tentative Tract 5679 overlays all of AD 94-2 Assessments 1, 2, 3, and 4. As described earlier in this Exhibit D, Assessments 1, 2, and 3 are landscape easement parcels and are classified as non-benefited for the purpose of this Assessment Spread Method. Ten TR 5679 is planned for development of 83 R-1 lots. O Basis for AD 94-2 Assessment Spread As stated earlier in this Exhibit D, all of the improvements to be acquired and financed by the AD 94-2 proceedings are required or are expected by Castle & Cooke to be required to be installed as conditions of final map approval separately for Ten TR 5678 and for Ten TR 5679. Accordingly, the tentative tract approval conditions are referenced as the basis for spreading the AD 94-2 unprovement system acquisition costs. Therefore, the total cost of Ten TR 5678 off- site improvements and incidentals is assessed to Assessment 5, and the total cost of Ten TR 5679 off-site improvements and incidentals is assessed to Assessment 4. The Engineer's Itemized Estimates of those costs are presented in Exhibit B, Tables B-II-A and B-II-B, respectively. O Spread of Assessed Tentative Tract Total Costs to Tract Phases and Individual Lots As the Ten TR 5678 and Ten TR 5679 maps are recorded to subdivide AD 94-2 Assessments 4 and 5 into R-1 lots, the total system acquisition cost share assessed to each tentative tract parcel in accordance with the spread methodology described above will need to be segregated and apportioned to the new subdivision lots. The method of apportioning each tentative tract's total assessed cost share to its internal tract phases and then of spreading the tract phase costs to the future lots that will be developed within each phase is described below for each of the two tentative tracts. In this assessment spread method, a tentative tract's total cost share has been spread to that tract based on its existing and/or expected final map approval improvement requirements. The method used for spreading each tentative tract's total cost share among its phases and, finally to the future lots that will be recorded within the tentative tract phases is based on each tract's estimated total number of R-1 lots as follows: a. The total Ten TR 5678 share, with the exception of its Storm Drain System Improvements cost share, is spread to its phases (A through E) in direct proportion to the proposed number of R-1 lots within each phase. The Ten TR 5678 Storm Drain System benefits only the Phase E portion of Ten TR 5678, and the total cost of those improvements, accordingly, is apportioned to the Phase E area. When each individual phase is recorded, its assessment share will be apportioned to each new lot within a phase on an equal-per-lot 29177PER.EXD D-5 09/29/94 basis, since each individual lot will receive the same level of benefit from the tract off-site improvements to be financed by AD 94-2. b. There was no confnmation available on the possible phasing of Ten TR 5679 at the time this report was prepared. Therefore, as described above, the total cost of Ten TR 5679 off-site improvements to be acquired is assessed to Assessment 4. When TR 5679 is recorded, its assessment share will be apportioned to the new lots on an equal-per-lot basis, since each individual lot will receive the same level of benefits from tract off-site improvements to be financed by AD 94-2. Exhibit E of AD 94-2 Engineer's Report, "Sketch Map of Proposed Tract No. 5679 and of Proposed Tract No. 5678 Phases A Through E (Showing Total Number of Residential Lots Per Tract or Tract Phase)" shows the boundaries of the planned five tract phases in Ten TR 5678, and also lists the proposed number of R-1 lots within each phase and in Ten TR 5679. Exhibit C of AD 94-2 Engineer's Report ("Engineer's Summary of Individual Assessments") provides a detailed break down of how the tentative tract shares have been apportioned to the planned tract phases. O Spread of Cost to Refinance Existing AD 82-1 Assessments The cost to refinance the -two existing AD 82-1 Assessments is spread as follows: 1. The total cost to pay off the existing fixed special assessment lien of record for AD 82-1 Assessment 2166, encumbering the parcel described as Kern County APN 389-010-17 (AD 94-2 Assessment 4), is financed as part of the total AD 94-2 assessment. The amount of remaining principal balance for Assessment 2166, effective July 1, 1995, assuming that. both 1994/ 1995 debt service installments for Assessment 2166 billed on the 1994/ 1995 Kern County Property Tax Bill for the parcel will be paid by Apri130, 1995, plus the total amount of all the estimated charges and credits associated with the payoff and release of lien for Assessment 2166 are itemized and shown on Table B-III-A, Payoff Calculation for Assessment District No. 82-1 Assessment 2166 in AD 94-2 Engineer's Report Exhibit B ("Table B-III-A"). Reference to AD 94-2 Assessment Diagram sheet 2 of 2, attached as AD 94-2 Engineer's Report Appendix B, shows that AD 82-1 Assessment 2166 covers all of AD 94-2 Assessment 4. APN 389-010-17 is also the same property area referred to in this Assessment Spread Method as Ten TR 5679. Therefore, the total AD 82-1 Assessment 2166 payoff cost is assessed to AD 94-2 Assessment 4. This cost would also be included in the total amount apportioned to the future Ten TR 5679 R-1 lots on anequal-per-lot basis. 2. The total cost to pay off the existing fixed special assessment lien of record for AD 82-1 Assessment 3083, encumbering the parcel described as Kern County APN 391-010-34 (AD 94-2 Assessment 5), is financed as part of the total AD 94-2 assessment. The amount of 29177PER.EXD D-6 09!29/94 remaining principal balance for Assessment 3083, effective July 1, 1995, assuming that both 1994/1995 debt service installments for Assessment 3083 billed on the 1994/1995 Kern County Property Tax Bill for the parcel will be paid by April 30, 1995, plus the total amount of all the estimated charges and credits associated with the payoff and release of lien for Assessment 3083 are itemized and shown on Table B-III-B, Payoff Calculation for Assessment District No. 82-1 Assessment 3083 in AD 94-2 Engineer's Report Exhibit B ("Table B-III-B"). Reference to AD 94-2 Assessment Diagram sheet 2 of 2, attached as AD 94-2 Engineer's Report Appendix B, shows that AD 82-1 Assessment 3083 covers all of AD 94-2 Assessment 5. APN 391-010-34 is also the same property area referred to in this Assessment Spread Method as Ten TR 5678. Therefore, the total AD 82-1 Assessment 3083 payoff cost is assessed to AD 94-2 Assessment 5 and will be segregated and apportioned on an equal-per-lot basis to the Ten TR 5678 R-1 lots. O Spread of AD 94-2 Assessment Proceeding Costs, Contributions and Bond Issuance Costs The method used to spread the AD 94-2 incidental costs and expenses related to the assessment proceedings is described below, along with a description of how any AD 94-2 contributions have been credited to the benefited parcels. 1. Spread of AD 94-2 Assessment Proceeding Incidental Cost and Expense The total amount of all of the Ten TR 5678 and Ten TR 5679 Improvement, Incidental, Contingency, and Additional Cost/Fees to be financed by AD 94-2 is stated in line 12.C of Table B-I, and the total cost shares for the Ten TR 5678 and Ten TR 5679 are itemized in lines 12.A and 12.B of Table B-I. An itemized list of "Estimated Assessment Proceeding Incidental Cost and Expense" for AD 94-2 is presented in lines 13. A through 13. G of Table B-I. All of the costs stated in Table B-I, lines 12.A and 12.B have been spread in proportion to parcel benefit from the improvements and costs proposed to be financed by AD 94-2. The AD 94-2 Assessment Proceeding Costs are to be incurred to make special assessment financing available for the improvements and costs to be funded. Therefore, it is the fording of this Assessment Spread Method that the AD 94-2 parcels are benefited by the Assessment Proceeding Costs in proportion to the total improvement and other costs assessed to each parcel. In accordance with this fording, the Table B-I line 13.G, Total Estimated Assessment Proceeding Incidental Cost and Expense, is spread to Ten TR 5678 and Ten TR 5679 in proportion to their total improvement and other costs assessed, as shown in lines 12.A and 12.B of Table B-I. The apportioned assessment proceeding cost share for each APN in Ten TR 5678 and Ten TR 5679 is shown in Exhibit C. 29177PER.EXD D-7 09/29/94 2. Spread of AD 94-2 Contributions Table B-I line 14 states the total amount proposed to be assessed to finance the estimated cost of Improvements, Additional Fees, and Assessment District Expenses and line 15 separately states the amounts of any "Contributions and Cash Collections" to reduce the cost to assessment for Ten TR 5678 and Ten TR 5679. The Contribution amounts are deducted from the Ten TR 5678 or Ten TR 5679 line 14 total cost amounts and the net amount shown on line 16 is the total cost to 1915 Act Bond Financing. The separate contribution and cash collection amounts are credited to the parcel for which the cash payment or contribution was made, to reduce that parcel's share of the total cost to bond issuance. The apportioned contribution share for each APN in Ten TR 5678 and Ten TR 5679 is shown in Exhibit C. 3. Spread of AD 94-2 Bond Issuance Costs The AD 94-2 estimated Bond Issuance Costs are shown in line 17 of Table B-I. These costs are based on the actual cost of improvements and incidental expense to be financed and, accordingly, they are spread to each APN in proportion to the parcel's net total improvement and incidental cost share remaining after deducting any contribution. Each APN's Bond Issuance Cost share is shown in Exhibit C under the Bond Issuance Cost column. O Calculation of AD 94-2 Parcel Total Assessments The total cost shares spread to each .parcel for improvements, incidental expenses, fees,. assessment proceeding, and bond issuance costs to be financed are added and the contribution amounts subtracted, to calculate each parcel's total assessment. Parcel total assessment amounts are shown in Exhibit C and in Engineer's Report Exhibit A, Assessment Roll for AD 94-2. 29177PER.EXD D-8 09/29/94 ASSESSMENT ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION OF THE ASSESSMENT SPREAD METHOD This Engineer's Report has been prepared to present the following: An estimate of the total cost of the improvements to be acquired, and incidental costs proposed to be funded pursuant to this assessment proceeding; and 2. An analysis of the benefits of those improvements and a description of the methodology developed to spread the estimated improvement acquisition costs and incidental expenses to the AD 94-2 properties in proportion to the estimated benefits that those properties will receive from the improvements. However, this Engineer's Report makes no recommendation as to the economic feasibility for the assessment of the estimated cost of the proposed improvements on the benefited properties, nor on the financial feasibility of the issuance of 1915 Act Bonds to represent any unpaid amount of the AD 94-2 Assessment. The AD 94-2 Assessment may exceed the amount for which bonds can be issued pursuant to recommendation of the City's financial advisor, as to the minimum acceptable property value to assessment lien ratio for bonds issued and secured by AD 94-2 unpaid assessments. Additional property value in excess of the estimated current -value of the assessed property with the improvements completed and installed may need to be confirmed by MAI appraisal, before the City can issue 1915 Act Bonds in the full amount of the AD 94-2 Assessment. In conclusion, it is my opinion that the Estimated Total Cost of the proposed improvement acquisitions, including all incidental costs, has been spread in direct proportion to the estimated benefits that each separate lot, piece, parcel or subdivision of lands within AD 94-2 will receive from the improvements. Submitted on the 30th day of September, 1994, to the Engineer of Work for filing with the City Clerk for preliminary approval by the City Council, by rw. zsass c-a~~. ~~~`~ ~' of cavF~. ~_ t ~' , ~~ ~,i~e Edward J. Wilson '~ R.C.E. 23269 (Expires 12/31/97) -y Assessment Engineer City of Bakersfield Assessment District No. 94-2 29177PER.EXD D-9 09/29/94 7 1rr1TT • V O 0 z E .N ~ 9 U ~,I ~ ' ~ W rL^ ~ 1N . p y` Hy ~ A V 4 . o ~ W ~ ° >) C Wx ~ (/~' ~1 w a ~ ~ U I K C/] v o y d ~3 O ~~x W v W OI r ,,.., r W O O N ~//~, N~y V ` W ~ ~~,y.I Fi ~ HS _ ~ w ~ O W ~ UUU< U O H U o oe o7 ~c° '~s~;;~ ao"e3~ ~ °u~ o~ ~O:'r~E o:i„Z o(~` t ~ °JEa°S~U Y ~fi~'~~€~ ~£~ ~ ~~~ -~<o ~~5~b ~~ E ° ~- ~~~ O zs U~ rLL7Z NVU ORo J C ¢`QU y`~ U U m -d'- m `j :I, c~ r 10 ~ N J ~. N U. 3 '" K = << ~` Ns ~ ~. °w2 ilv yOc a3~ h U ~ O O O N F ~~ UOO O Y~~ O=JW a? 0 j owWrc W 0 /C 2 O))1Z Q2V O mK OW UWUK ON p=E~ <; < r ^ z ~ NO i ~ (~ W Sr r0~ K 9 p =W IN ~ Z~ U ~ O V U W ~ p ~= 0 W K yZjW•K~ W ti P W O ~2 U K I< pLL CO O O W ~ °~ ~ ~ H O~ O ~OJR~ U 7< W ~ OIL 2 W ai F W 1 9 OW 1~ IN pJ~ W G W~' N 2 SO 1- ~ tt KN~U J gg O o ~ 2 °N pN V ° I WU K Z ~ ~_ Q N w a O A N i~ < W° W Z ~ I.~ ~~ W O W N ~~ = °° NW ~° ~ i3w"' W 4.~ ~ F O 4 4p1rc 4 K Y Z W r°Z J P~ Y W oIrc N K Y W ~ w Ci F O 2 ~ ~„ ~s~ N _ F~- ~~_ ~KO 7 O~ N~ O~sj /J < 3w~ U =0 ~ IUW I w~0 NZZ Ni~0 ~~Z wU0 i NZ~ ~ W F ~ ~ ~ NI N p Wd> rm ~vJiU ' r< 'O ~ WOF G I~ O >}W CY` ~ ~Om 1 O w fK JI m WJJ uUU ~ ~N2 a ~ JO m ~UU ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O Z 7 €a ~~Z~ loW~ o ~ ~o~ ~ z~ a~ ti o p U O Z<W2 =vi WNGN,O = W S W O ~,N ~ ~ W ~ ) ) OO°K~ CN I W ° ° ~00 0 y ~ ~`1O~ ~/~ ~V//~ W_ W u2i G O NO IO z ~ IK4 2 H~ W r ~=K m yOI ^~ I V• *+ ~ 21 a WSW ~~ ~~ ~ ° - ~ ~ } ~ R (~ a ~, ~ ~ W (/~ >~ ~~z~ F-- F ° N p ~ ~ ~ W O U o j U 0 O W~` ~g~~g~~ ~ ° ~ ~ HH Y1 X10 ~~3° ` 0 Z ~ OW W ~ 9 0= N U F s y N~~~ C 1 ~~ NWWNyI LL O ~ Nm~ _ 1- Z ~ Z u1 1 6 U ¢ CW ~ yN(..~ ( n W NJ<W°FI=A ZZaWZ W W°T.~ ~ F= Q O3~ Y J N i W r~8Y2 K <~`U~~il /~i3 t ~ ~ IUO p O U 2 OmmF p I~ ~un I ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~, ~~ a~g ~ s ~~~~g ~ _ s"-"- ~ `C'~ ~ ~ ~ S .s N j 9 T+ a ~ ~ . , S ~ ~~ o a E ~ ~ x~ ~ y ~ ~i h o ^I ~I 9 h U G r r w~ oz E U H z~ oA ~z O W~3 W U ~ Z ~t U U~ w v1< ~ ~ V O N N K = O W ~ O T yWj . y ~~j' Z<p O O~ U a ~~_ ~ W 2 K j N ~ U ~ 2 ~ ~`n I.1 N Y.7 r 1~ yN0 7 WOU m = _ IVI ~ 4~~ ~ ~ v W W F+Y~ O JO ~ 1~ 1~ C G G 4 (/WW~ Z ~ w m ~ ~ y~ ` < O a O ~ _ ~ pp $3j 2 2 ~ = ~ ~~~ ~ a 7 N n ~ 1 N ~ /~~ / `yW V^ y j y ~ ~ ~N ~~ F~ ~ W<~ WZS W~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y ~ 31N ~ ~m WU Z O ~~ A OF WZO~ W3 W~ N W =< =a = W W 2 VIN VIN NN N ~ w ~ Y N W N ~ ~ W Z K ~ ~ 2 0 OZ OQ J F U~ U 7 O U Q r.-~ Z ~ 1 6 • v3f N~ ZO WWfUyU <W<Q ~w W W C F Uwp U ~ U W U V 2 W m= Y U W o W W~ U W~ W ~r//~~ `~- J N ~ <~ N Z=~ ?_ 2Z ~ ~ ~ U U' pp ~ a m p CIA K7 ~ O I W ~ O I ^ W n n n gyZ W ~ f x ; ~ W W O tt~~ = a OS 99a~ 2 ~ I~j a m O Z W 7 ~ U Z W F w p m ~yyri~~{ F 2 U R IWII I I n 1 .- W~ ~ ~~~aa~ ~~ ~~~~~,,~~ TA ~ w K y1 Y O O V• I ~ t/~ I "~) U O 4 V I~ ~ I F/1 U] Q,' W g 7Y 3 U Y ¢ ~ N p U O ~ 4~1 N ~ U U ~ ~Y ~ V ~ ~ W N ~ ~ O O ~ Y' ~ O ~ VI Q iJ Q O U ~ U O ~ V W < N< b ~ ~ ~ a n n o < < ~ ~ ~j3 W p r ~ H W ypQ O n 8Y + l ~ p n n ~ Ot v Z t`n d' 2 WZ t W VI ~ p m m Z 8Y Y m m = p Om h O Y Y8 Y "~ ~ m m 0 3 r 3 m W C R W i ,~ m q Q = m = p p 2 <. 2~ < y y 3333 ~ n m •i a m a N W N W y ~i ~ ~ ~ N Omi m „ N ~ ~ ~ = a m N ,~+ vi Z 2 yi 0 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ T ~ 3 U 2 0 ~ W Omi rj y, v~ UI < ; o m rf y7 ~ O OC K ~ K ? O ry ~ W W W W ~- ~ ~ ~~ a e~ C K K K K ~~ O R V H ~~ ~ ~ N N < ~ ~ O ~ n • w ~ ~ g o pF ~ Z ~ V F ~/l y j N _Wa ~ a w ~ O Y O Y O U p V p _ _ :Y 3Y zY r _ w r ~ O ~ 9j S W H I J II JJ yZWI ~^ ~ ~ y ~ a~ p O S < < V YOf 7 7 C N ~ yN ~ ~W ~ J~ ~ z ~ ~ !`} yyU'' ~ ¢U a 7 V y U' ~ 7 U ~ ~ ~ ~} 2 l 2y J f ~ < ~ < ` ~ N h r ~ ~ < ~ < ~ < ~ < ~ < a W ~ F Y Y W W VI n N O~ U $ ~ 0 1. O ~" x~ ~ W W N VI 4' O V1~ Unl O ~o W ~ Z O \R W f Q~ r Q H ~ U ~ .~I U A ,,.,, ~..q 0 W z Gc7 E ~ NI A N ~ ~ "~ ~ ~ o W A~ '~~/~ ~--I `'i ~ w ~///J~ W 0 N VJ d ~ ~ 0 U I I ~~~ s ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~q W^ O U ~2 U ~ ~ W ~U5`~ ~ W 1~ 1QO1 N m d ~ ~ Z ~ O ~ I ~ O ~ m V K V U O d ~~g ~~~ {.I p U W U _ ly ` ~ W ~ 3 ? r 1r~-~ ~~33~ ~~~ ~°~ 9a~ N~ NNaS W (AO i ~ p 3 n S N W FUpFw-~ 91~ 2~4 Wy` ~~ N ~ NON 7 2 m pp a~ ~~tiW >$=C F~ )T=V1 <F U=O~ U p~ N ~ h r C _ aq2 q a`Oa Y < Y ~ p 0 VJ ~~ `2~0 ON V 2 I"' J U - ~ ~~ ~~~~'g<Y 2 O O W W N Q~ C ~~ mo~~ ~ozz I O I I ~